Warren National University
Established: 2007
Accreditation: Applied - Pending
For-Profit: Yes
Country: USA
Programs:
|
Average Ratings (28 reviews)
|
Recent Warren National University Reviews:
An Accepted Degree In WA State
June 21, 2008
I am a graduate from KWU and I do work for the Government in Washington State. When all of this controversy over accreditation became of focus, my education was closely reviewed and it was determined that KWU aka Warren National did meet the Washington State requirements and I could continue ...
Very Disappointing
April 30, 2008
I just finished reading over the other commits and some of them made me sick. The commits praising WNU were very obvious to me that they were made up by someone from the university. I just became aware that the degree that I was seeking from Warren National University valid ...
Warren National is a scam
March 31, 2008
I had to postpone working toward my degree because my daughter was diagnosed with Autism and we could not afford her therapy and school at the same time. They would not refund my tuition. I have saved every item of correspondence from Warren National/Kennedy Western and am looking to file ...
Comments:
Kevin February 10, 2007 at 1:09 a.m.
I'm disappointed that this site would carry such a deplorable "college".
Texas April 11, 2007 at 11:39 a.m.
The State of Texas calls Warren National "University" a:
Fraudulent or Substandard Institution with No Known Texas Connection
Fraudulent or substandard degree" means a degree conferred in Texas in violation of the Texas Education Code
Javier April 23, 2007 at 11:49 p.m.
Try some of the classes before you knock the school
Kevin April 24, 2007 at 4:42 a.m.
No need to try the courses. My employer, the school I would like to get an MBA from, and the Department of Education have all already told me that it won't be considered for promotions / won't be accepted in transfer / is unaccredited.
Even the much maligned University of Phoenix and the completely unknown Fort Hayes State are much better options.
Prospective Student May 2, 2007 at 4:31 a.m.
I read on the Kennedy Western page that a student
"With just 16 hours of study, I had completed 40 percent of the course requirements for a master's degree."
Is this program still offered through Warren National? Anyone have a link?
To prospective Student May 4, 2007 at 4:59 a.m.
As far as I know, Warren National is offering the same programs as Kennedy Western, so it should be available. I think all that changed was the name.
Good luck!
You are 40 hours away from a Warren MBA!
John May 25, 2007 at 7:47 p.m.
Actually you all are wrong.
Warren is the old KW, but their courses have changed DRAMATICALLY! Why? Because they are now a candidate for accreditation.
The name was changed to rid themselves of the "stigma" they aquired by a few Intellectual pinheads out there that smeared their name.
Now they are working on being an accredited online college.
Lawson May 25, 2007 at 9:53 p.m.
John,
This school has no chance of gaining regional accredidation. Do not waste your time/Money on any program they have to offer.
To John: June 1, 2007 at 7:26 p.m.
Nobody smeared them, the fact is that they were investigated by the Senate, testimony proved the degrees were worthless and easy to obtain and many people lost their jobs for claiming a degree from this diploma mill. All factual.
"Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense."
www.gao.gov/new.items/d04771t.pdf
Although they are technically a candidate for accreditation (due to Wyoming state law changes designed to remove diploma mills like Kennedy Western / Warren National), they have been claiming that for 20+ years.
Just print one June 18, 2007 at 8:38 p.m.
Don't waste your money on this school. If you must go this route, print one off yourself, it has the same value as a WNU degree and will hold up to any scrutiny just as well, without paying the $$$$.
RAFA June 25, 2007 at 10:11 p.m.
Thank's for the all the comments, however i am interested in joining a ligitimat instituation, got G.E.D and many certificates. Was alwasy told they be of use (from the local colleges) however seems like not true. Where can i bring em in use? Please help, Tbank's
F Y I June 29, 2007 at 7:34 p.m.
I busted my hump EARNING my PhD from KW. My family and I sacrificed heavily in time, hard work, and finances to EARN this degree. The knowledge and experience gained far outweigh the cost.
Interesting to note; of the distinguished "investigators" that prepared the GAO report, none have an advanced degree.
Rolo July 3, 2007 at 1:18 p.m.
Well I applied to KW and they agreed to WAIVE over half of my PHD requirements based on my CLAIM of life experience. I never had to prove anything and got a "degree plan" in less than a week. Then I checked into it closer.
Yes, they will run you through some busy-work to get your buy-in, which differentiates them from the less sophisticated diploma mills. In the end you still have an expensive, unaccredited so-called "doctorate" which will not allow you to teach anywhere in higher ed and is unacceptable for any type of licensing (fact) or employment (in a company with a competent HR department).
Rolo July 3, 2007 at 1:19 p.m.
"Interesting to note; of the distinguished "investigators" that prepared the GAO report, none have an advanced degree."
And neither do you if you attended Kennedy Western / Warren National
M. July 7, 2007 at 3:45 a.m.
Thanks to everyone that posted their comments. I was just taken in by these people today. I guess I will be out $50 dollars they suckered me into today. I thought it felt wrong.
Thanks again.
To M: July 9, 2007 at 5:45 p.m.
Sorry to hear you got scammed. Can you protest it on your credit card or through your better business bureau?
Robbie July 11, 2007 at 11:39 p.m.
Many employers accept KW degree. Mine did, and they are international. My degree is just as valid as any other degree, based on the work and study I did. I think the whole accredited bull**** is just that. I work with a lot of people with degrees from "accredited" schools and they are as dumb as a box of rocks, and can't figure a way out of a paper bag. It's all politics if you ask me. I know I learned a lot and put forth a lot of effort. That is what is important!!!
To Robbie: July 12, 2007 at 9:30 p.m.
"Many employers accept KW degree"
I would rephrase that as "some employers do not verify educational credentials properly"
See:
George O'Leary (Notre Dame football coach)
Sandra Baldwin (US Olympic committee)
The 463 government employees holding KWU and other unaccredited "degrees" who were terminated or disciplined in the Senate investigation.
etc
etc
Jason July 20, 2007 at 2:56 a.m.
I've attended traditional college classroom courses as well as online courses through Kaplan College and Warren National. The fact is, I don't need a professor to tell me to go home and read 4 chapters and be ready for the test on Friday. Most learning and comprehension is done on your own by studying the text material. I actually wish that some of the "traditional" courses I took would have allowed me to miss class everyday because the professors were lousy. "Accredited" is a word used by the education system of this country to justify the exorbitant and outrageous costs of a college education.
To Jason: July 20, 2007 at 3:49 a.m.
"Accredited" is a word used by the education system of this country to justify the exorbitant and outrageous costs of a college education."
Funny thing is that Warren National costs on average or more than a real, accredited school, so I don't get your point. Did all those Senate Hearings and lawsuits raise the price?
This is a stupid arguement July 20, 2007 at 8:23 a.m.
A "degree" that does not have regional accredidation is a worthless piece of paper. Any one that argues otherwise is mis-informed, a complete idiot, or has alterior motives (i.e. has their livlihood attached to the school offering unaccreditied degrees)
Jason July 22, 2007 at 4:13 p.m.
"Funny thing is that Warren National costs on average or more than a real, accredited school, so I don't get your point. Did all those Senate Hearings and lawsuits raise the price?"
You obviously have no idea about education costs in this country. Kaplan was more than Warren National and my traditional "brick and mortar" classroom courses dwarfed the per-credit hour price of Kaplan And Warren National. At $350/hr (which is generously low) and 62 hours required for an associates, this would work out to $21,700 just for tuition. Kaplan and Warren are nowhere near this cost. I understand math is not everyone's strong suit. An apology is not necessary on your part.
Bryan July 23, 2007 at 12:35 p.m.
Hello to everyone in this post!
I will try to strike a more positive tone.
Education comes in many forms throughout ones life. In some cases their are smart folks out there who have for what ever reason the need to learn more.
Some are born to a family who had the means to send their children to a traditional university and get a great educational experience.
Their are some who have work along side folks with advanced degrees and were inspired to further themselves.
Their are some who work along side folks with advanced degrees did the same and in some cases better work who felt left out the game only because of the paper.
One should walk in these folks shoes before casting a stone, I have!
I understand clearlythe verbal battle here.
Those that have the accredited degree not wanting their degree to be lessoned by the ”degree mills". I say to you you are the only one who can lesson the value of your degree.
Universities not wanting to loose the potential revenue stream.
The folks, including me, who have an unaccredited degree that worked hard to obtain wanting their educational experience to be validated in some form or fashion.
My experience was positive; I guess I am one of the lucky ones. It has brought me around the world, open doors I could have never imagined and justified my original goal, to better myself.
Isn't that what education is suppose to be about?
Please smart folks on both side of the issue, accredited and non accredited. Don't cast the first stone!
Learn more about your subject, research deeper then validate your work.
Let you action speak for you! After all it is the knowledge that will shine at the end of the day not the method of obtaining it.
Best Regards,
Bryan
WNU Student July 24, 2007 at 3:05 a.m.
To Lawson:
Why doesn't WNU have a chance for accredidation?
To Bryan: July 24, 2007 at 1:51 p.m.
"The folks, including me, who have an unaccredited degree that worked hard to obtain wanting their educational experience to be validated in some form or fashion. "
I'm glad you learned something and I agree with the life-long learning sentiment. However, you have a "degree" from a business that accepts 100% of students, graduates 100% of students, and from the Senate testimony, requires very little effort and is unaccredited. What does that say to a potential employer? Two things:
1) Your "degree" was easy to obtain and whether you learned anything is unverifiable, since nobody knows what the curriculum is, if there actually is one.
2) You didn't take 10 minutes on Google to investigate a shady school and paid the same or more money that a legitimate schoold would cost.
Bryan July 25, 2007 at 7:31 a.m.
Thanks for you observations and comments!
Sorry I have to ask.
"I'm glad you learned something and I agree with the life-long learning sentiment. However, you have a "degree" from a business that accepts 100% of students, graduates 100% of students, and from the Senate testimony, requires very little effort and is unaccredited. What does that say to a potential employer? "
Are you basing your observation solely on what’s in the government article? http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04771t.pdf...
The purpose of this probe was to identify accounting fraud in the Federal Goverment, during the investigation it also uncovered that their are programs, or should I say and procedures for obtaining a degree other than accredited intuitions.
You make several assumption in your summary and in point 1 & 2.
I assume that you are a graduate of an accreditated instuition!
How do you validate your education to a potential employer?
I assume again, GPA, transcripts, education verification from the instution.
If I am correct; So far we go about it the same way!
By easy to obtain if you are referring to working a full time job 8~12 hours a day, coming home passing pleasantries’ with my family then hitting the books for 3 to 4 hours, including 4~7 hours Sat&Sun for 3 years.
Then yes it was easy!
Prior to the start of this program an investigation was undertaken via the internet, Department of Education and also the state which provided the school its license to issue degrees.
It was clear that this program was not accredited!
Further I learned that accreditation is a "voluntary" association not mandated by the Federal Government or
by all States but rather pressure is applied by the target market and intuitions issuing degrees to meet the same standards.
It appears that business (Universities) and the Federal Government are attempting and to equate non accreditation status as degree mills.
I agree one should not be allowed to buy a piece of paper, earning it is a total different issue.
I wish you well in your travels.
Best Regards,
Bryan
Me July 25, 2007 at 1:53 p.m.
"How do you validate your education to a potential employer? I assume again, GPA, transcripts, education verification from the instution. If I am correct; So far we go about it the same way!"
Way wrong: The potential employer goes to the National Student Clearinghouse, a verification service that only accepts real, accredited universities that have been reviewed and approved by the Dept. of Education / CHEA. That approval process covers qualified faculty, structured curriculum and rigor.
The Clearinghouse will then validate back to the employer that the applicant has a legitimate degree.
Me 2 July 25, 2007 at 2:09 p.m.
My point is that you have to go to an independent 3rd party to verify the usefullness of any certification / license / degree. Those independent 3rd parties are accreditors, state licensure boards, national student clearing house, faculty accreditation requirements etc.
Having a non independent degree or transcript from Warren National is meaningless, since nobody will vouch that it has any academic meaning.
For example, you can get a degree and a transcript from Rochville University (unaccredited like Warren National / Kennedy Western) at: http://www.affordabledegrees.com/
No Studies
No Attendance No Waiting
No Examinations
No Hefty Fee
On the basis of what you already know, you can now qualify for an accredited degree that is accepted and recognized worldwide for as little as $199. Order now and receive your degree in just 5 days!
Wrong - O July 26, 2007 at 1:30 a.m.
"Are you basing your observation solely on what’s in the government article? http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04771t.pdf......
The purpose of this probe was to identify accounting fraud in the Federal Goverment, during the investigation it also uncovered"
Look at the title again:
"Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense."
So it's about academic / credentials fraud, and the government happened to pay for some of them unknowingly.
If you read the report, it focuses on employees defrauding the government by using fake and unaccredited academic credentials to secure raises and promotions falsely. Those Kennedy Western and other "degree holders" were terminated or disciplined. The end result was that they tightened up their screening process to make sure those didn't sneak through any more.
Bryan July 26, 2007 at 7:58 a.m.
Thanks again for you comments;
I would ask that you read the first chapter and more from the Dept of Education concerning Degree Mill's!
Also note in the article the use of the term "recognized"!
http://www.ed.gov/students/prep/college/...
"What is a diploma mill? The dictionary defines a diploma mill as:
An institution of higher education operating without supervision of a state or professional agency and granting diplomas which are either fraudulent or because of the lack of proper standards worthless. - Webster's Third New International Dictionary "
source:
http://www.ed.gov/students/prep/college/...
Further:
"Accreditation in the United States is a voluntary, non-governmental process, in which an institution and its programs are evaluated against standards for measuring quality".
source:
http://www.ed.gov/students/prep/college/...
Also while attempting to make my way thru the govermental info I looked up the accreditiation "corporation" that WNU has made an application.
" What is the Higher Learning Commission?
The Higher Learning Commission (HLC) is an independent corporation and one of two Commission members of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools (NCA), which was founded in 1895 as one of six regional institutional accreditors in the United States. The Higher Learning Commission accredits, and thereby grants membership in the Commission and in the North Central Association, to degree-granting educational institutions in the North Central region: Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, New Mexico, South Dakota, Wisconsin, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
HLC is recognized by the US Department of Education and the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA)."
source:
http://www.ncahlc.org/index.php
Wrong O comments:
One of several purposes listed on the Dept of Edu for assoication in an accreditation "corporation", federal funding!
Which if you re-read the article/ Federal Investigation listed eariler in the post, objectively, one might make the connection.
Re-read:
Summary & Back ground, please!
Adherence to New Homeland Security laws governing Federal Government reimbursement for degrees or courses from non accredited institutions.
Yes, the government investigators posing as a prospective student uncovered the practices use by listed Universities, business or corporations, however you choose to label a degree mill, to defraud the Fed.
I have not located the action taken by the Fed for those who hold a non-accredited degree.
Please provide your source.
I look forward to everyones reply!
Caveat Emptor July 26, 2007 at 6:41 p.m.
Thanks for the reference, Kennedy Western has been proven to meet the criteria you cite. "because of the lack of proper standards worthless."
"WNU has made an application." - That's swell, but they've hidden in "applicant status" on and off over the last 23 years as they've been forced to move from Idaho to Hawaii to California to Wyoming. I've applied for the NBA draft, but haven't had any luck for 23 years either.
Your arguments don't hold any weight, still waiting for some link to an independent third party site validating that Warren National University / Kennedy Western University is a real school.
So far, I can point to these sources as verifying that Kennedy Western / Warren National is invalid / worthless / illegal and has been since it started printing degrees.
1. Government Accounting Office - Federal investigation
2. Sworn estimony of former employees and undercover agents
3. State of Texas laws and I believe 8 other states (Maine, Michigan, Oregon come to mind for starters).
4. State Licensing boards
5. Accrediting bodies.
You've cited:
1. Personal opinion
2. "Applicant status" maybe the 24th year is the lucky one!
Point out some verifiable facts instead of arguing that when they were prominently featured in a Senate Hearing on diploma mills, that it was kind of an accounting thing.
Caveat Emptor 2 July 26, 2007 at 6:43 p.m.
Here is the link you requested showing where the government put a stop to the use of Kennedy Western degrees.
OPM ends diploma mill acceptance
Federal Computer Week May 14, 2004: "The Office of Personnel Management pulled the plug Thursday on using credentials from so-called diploma mills to qualify for a federal job and cut off tuition reimbursements to federal workers who take courses from those unaccredited institutions. In a strongly worded memo to federal managers, OPM Director Kay Coles James established a clear policy against using credentials from unaccredited institutions to get a job, a raise or reimbursement from the federal government for taking courses. 'There is no place in federal employment for degrees or credentials from diploma mills,' James wrote. 'They may not be used to qualify for federal jobs or salaries. You may not send employees to diploma mills for degree training or any other form of education. You may not reimburse employees for tuition associated with these schools. You may not use your authority to repay student loans if the degree is from a diploma mill.'"
¶ 5/14/2004 01:02:00 PM
Thursday, May 13, 2004
U.S. Officials Sport Fake Degrees
Wired News, May 13, 2004: "At least 28 high-ranking government officials, including three managers responsible for emergency operations at nuclear facilities, have fake degrees from so-called diploma mills, according to a government report issued Tuesday. The General Accounting Office, Congress' investigative arm, told a Senate committee Wednesday that it found 463 government employees who received degrees from three unaccredited schools: Kennedy-Western University, California Coast University and Pacific Western University."
Bryan July 27, 2007 at 7:04 a.m.
Sorry I don't understand this comment: 1. Personal opinion
While I agree during some of our eariler post I added some personal opinion the last post provided quotes, and link sources. Thats the best that I can do from my location.
On the other hand you provide a list without a source:
"So far, I can point to these sources as verifying that Kennedy Western / Warren National is invalid / worthless / illegal and has been since it started printing degrees"
1. Government Accounting Office - Federal investigation
2. Sworn estimony of former employees and undercover agents
3. State of Texas laws and I believe 8 other states (Maine, Michigan, Oregon come to mind for starters).
4. State Licensing boards
5. Accrediting bodies
1,2,3 & 5
1&2 I assume the source to be the goverment investigation title:
Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense
Personal comments:
I've attempted to illustrate the initial purpose of the goverment investigation however; I understand we see this from two different perspectives with differing opinions.
3. I again assume the source, the internet, I have also run across this blog somewhere on the WWW.
5. Of course Accrediting bodies, they KW /WNU have to the best of my knowledge never advertised or list their program / business as holding accreditation. State licensed, yes, by Wyoming.
I assume and hope that you are the source for previous comments using different alias in each post;
If so you state:
"Those Kennedy Western and other "degree holders" were terminated or disciplinedlude to dismissal and other"
I cannot find any information on the web or in your last statments.
OK, enought of this at least from me!
On a positive note!
I contacted the Higher Learning accreditation agency, Link: http://www.ncahlc.org/index.php?option=c...
which KW / WNU have applied mandated by Wyoming's State board of Edu and received the following:
I received a prompt reply which indicates they are being reviewed by the org and if the standards are sufficent for a site visit the org will visit. The reply further explained that the responce did not indicate a positive or negative acceptance.
I would attach a copy however I am at the office and the email is on my home PC, also am leaving from my office to head out for a well needed holiday / vacation to an island in the Med, Mallorca.
So I will not be able to reply for a few weeks.
Bryan
States where it is illegal with link July 27, 2007 at 3:54 p.m.
Here are the 7 seven states where it is outright illegal (10 total with various restrictions) to use an unaccredited Kennedy Western / Warren National "degree".
"Is Oregon the only state that disallows use of unaccredited degrees?
No. It is also illegal in North Dakota, New Jersey, Texas, Nevada, Washington and Maine to use unaccredited degrees. It is illegal in Indiana to use an unaccredited doctorate and Michigan law limits the legal options of users. Illinois limits the use of unaccredited degrees to those licensed by other states.
See those states’ laws
http://www.osac.state.or.us/oda/unaccred...
for details. Many other states are considering similar laws in order to prevent fraud."
LOL July 29, 2007 at 7:10 a.m.
"also am leaving from my office to head out for a well needed holiday / vacation to an island in the Med, Mallorca. "
Had a good laugh at this one. If you have a Warren National / Kennedy Western "degree", it is more likely that McDonalds gave you the weekend off.
WNU Student July 31, 2007 at 5:47 a.m.
Can someone explain to me why Warren National University does not have a chance for accredidation? They have a similar On-Line Program to a lot of other universities/colleges. How long does the accredidation process take?
To WNU Student: July 31, 2007 at 2:14 p.m.
Because of their shady past, everyone assumes it is just another dodge.
They have moved from state to state to state to avoid regulation and/or accreditation. (Hawaii, California, Wyoming, Idaho... might be missing one)
They have "applied" for accreditation in the past, just so they could be an "applicant" for accreditation, so they had something their agressive telemarketers could sell. If you read the testimony of a former employee, their "admissions" (telemarketing) people were paid on commission for each applicant they could lure in.
I don't know how long the accreditation process is, but they haven't made it in 24 years of trying so far.
There are many, many, real accredited online programs out there that won't stain your resume.
WNU Student July 31, 2007 at 10:01 p.m.
Thanks for the Information. I don't understand or someone explain to me how a Unaccredidated Institution would tranish one's resume? When one applies for a Job in the Corporate/Private Sector, they don't ask whether it was from accredited or unaccredited institution? Rather, they want to verify that you have a degree, gpa, major. No?
If you put KW'S Behind and look at WNU as a New Institution, don't you think they have a chance for getting accredidation?
To WNU: August 1, 2007 at 4:18 p.m.
"look at WNU as a New Institution, don't you think they have a chance for getting accredidation?"
No.
It's the same organization, same leadership, same location, that couldn't get accreditation for 24 years. The name change is just to rid themselves of the stigma of the Kennedy Western name.
WNU Student August 2, 2007 at 4:42 a.m.
Would one be able to explain to me how studying at WNU would tarnish one's resume? When one applies for a Job, they are not asked whether you attended Unacreedited or Accredited Institution in corporate sector. Rather, do you have a degree or not.
To WNU August 4, 2007 at 2:52 a.m.
"When one applies for a Job, they are not asked whether you attended Unacreedited or Accredited Institution in corporate sector."
WOW! I feel truly sorry for the clueless individual that told you that. I work in HR in a large corp, and the vast majority of colleagues I talk to accept only Regionally Accredited degrees. It's a big discussion right now whether nationally (a lesser accreditation) accredited degrees should be accepted with other compensating experience. Unaccredited degrees are not even degrees in my mind.
Please PLEASE talk to any advisor at a local community college, an HR director in a large corp, or even a high school guidance counselor to set you straight.
WNU Student August 4, 2007 at 4:20 a.m.
Thanks for the information and guidance in clarifying the issue on/around acceptance of Unaccredited degree within corporate sector. Since you work for a major corporation adn within their HR Department, I was wondering, if additional details would be provided.
Do you know if similar policies are in place within Financial Sector, Investment Banks, Regional Banks, Etc?
Someone with over 6+ Years of a major Investment Bank Experience and WNU BS - Business Administration Degree on their Resume would be any issues? If one was trying to for other positions, would HR within those organizations have any issues?
Your assistance would be truly appreciated.
Fraud Fighter August 4, 2007 at 1:29 p.m.
"Someone with over 6+ Years of a major Investment Bank Experience and WNU BS - Business Administration Degree"
Not possible, with a KWU / WNU "degree". Post a link please
Really? August 4, 2007 at 3:26 p.m.
If somehow, you really got into a good company despite your unaccredited degree, my advise is to keep that job until you retire, keep your mouth about how you obtained your "degree", and don't apply internally or externally for anything that might trigger a background check and put your existing job in jeopardy.
Potential WNU Student August 4, 2007 at 7:12 p.m.
It has been very interesting to read the comments on the University.
Without having Bias, someone explain to me, why the New School will be turned out for the accredidation? On the Wyoming State Website, it's shown that their license is extended till 2008 and have applied for accredidation?
Compared to this school, there are many others that have questionably programs also, but accredited by US Department of Education's standards. No?
To Potential Student: August 5, 2007 at 2:52 a.m.
Umm, read this entire thread or spend 3 minutes on Google and you'll see why you'd be throwing your money away.
If you still believe that WNU is the absolute best possible option for you, by all means apply. You're probably a few weeks away from getting a "degree".
Don't let the fact that there are hundreds of real, online, accredited universities out there offering that same major in the same format without the terms "Senate Hearing", "Type B Misdemeanor", "Illegal in some states", "Fraudulent or Substandard Institution with No Known Texas Connection", discourage you.
Shinigami August 5, 2007 at 3:04 a.m.
The biased comment that "you can earn %40 of the credit at Kennedy-Western (Now Warren National) in 16) is not true. If some one did do that than they are either cheating or found some sneaky way to crack the code.
Warren National is the same University as Kennedy-Western except that it has several programs such as Engineering.
I would speculate that the reason that there is so much elitist prejudice against this instution may be because tradional programs are jelous of their place in the academic community. If someone creates a better and more efficient way to educate which makes quality education more available its fought tooth and nail.
It should be remembered that at one time adult education programs and those which used non-traditional approaches (such as night school, community colleges and so on) were once viewed suspiciously.
Now we have a new type of distance learning program which is internet based and a lot of people are bent out of shape.
Wasabi August 9, 2007 at 3:36 a.m.
"The biased comment that "you can earn %40 of the credit at Kennedy-Western (Now Warren National) in 16) is not true"
Yes it is true. It is a part of Senate testimony that a government employee did just that. See above link.
"Now we have a new type of distance learning program which is internet based and a lot of people are bent out of shape."
There are hundreds of real, accredited distance learning programs out there. Kennedy / Warren is not one of them. I can't say it any more plainly.
Wasabi 2 August 9, 2007 at 7:31 p.m.
The other thing also to keep in mind that there are institutions online that do give Life and Work Experience Credits up to 30 Credits. Remember these are US Accredited Educational Instuitutions. Do your research and you will come to know.
The question is really, if these are able to get accredited, than I don't see why WNU can not succeed in this venue.
To: States where it is illegal with link August 14, 2007 at 4:59 a.m.
You forgot to add that Kennedy Western / Warren National is banned from offering / advertising degrees in California, Oregon and ?? any other states??
James August 15, 2007 at 5:10 a.m.
"On the Wyoming State Website, it's shown that their license is extended till 2008 and have applied for accredidation?"
True and true. But... they have talked about accreditation so many times before that it's hard to tell what their odds are. Until that time, if it comes, all degrees issued prior to that date will still be unaccredited.
Look elsewhere.
Jackie August 16, 2007 at 1:58 p.m.
Why was my response not posted?
Shinigami August 17, 2007 at 2 a.m.
To Wasabi:
"Yes it is true. It is a part of Senate testimony that a government employee did just that. See above link."
I do not believe that what was said is true. The Senate committee heard testimony from a biased source who was not subject to cross examination.
If indeed this witness did do this amount of credit in such a ridiculously short time than I fail to understand how, short of cheating.
I can tell you that I did attend Warren National and graduated. It took me about two years (and I transferred in with a bachelors from another university). The classes were NOT easy.
I only wish that the committee which investigated the University would have been less biased.
Incidently, I did attend an accredited four year University (Illinois State University) and I knew a number of students who cheated. Many of them took classes that they never attended (usually simple courses where there were large numbers of students enrolled) and passed around the answers during the exams. Cheating is pretty universal in fact.
I myself never cheated because 1) its unethical and 2) I was genuinly interested in learning.
Now there are such places as diploma mills where you pay money and voila' your degree arrives in the mail. Some will even give you phoney transcripts and references. But Warren National is not one of them. This is a legitimate distance learning school.
To Shingami August 17, 2007 at 3:46 a.m.
Shingami - Would you be able to provide details around what type of work you do and whether your employer accepted WNU Degree? How do you tackle cocnerns when one doess education verification adn they come to know that WNU is in process of being accredited?
To Shingami: August 17, 2007 at 1:23 p.m.
"If indeed this witness did do this amount of credit in such a ridiculously short time than I fail to understand how, short of cheating"
You should read the testimony instead of speculating. WNU waived a bunch of graduate level courses based on claims of life experience, but no documentation was required.
The student then took 2 open book exams to get credit for 2 graduate classes. Read it, it's public record and there is a link above. No cheating involved.
Shinigami August 17, 2007 at 11:36 p.m.
Details? I am a Network Administrator for Matsushi-ta (deliberately mispelled to bypass the swear filter) Electronics Corporation. I have talked to my employers openly about my education and classwork. In fact, my company has approved my education even before I enrolled. For the most part, the issue of accredidation has never come up. In my line of work its really what you know that is important. I do believe that the education I received enabled me to become a better administrator. I still keep my textbooks and refer to them often.
I did read the testimony. What I know is that the investigator was an officer in the Coast Guard (if I remember correctly). She claims to have taken, what was it four exams and got 40% of her classes completed. And it was in two days.
I do not know how it was done. There was no explaination of what method was used. If there were it was not part of the record.
All I can tell you is that the least amount of time I spent taking a class from beginning to end was about 7 weeks and that was taking only one course at a time and concentrating only on that one course.
I am not saying that what this witness said is not true. Just that I do not know how it was done. If she did find a shortcut than I do not know what it was. Maybe the Univesity needs to be made aware of this.
LOL August 19, 2007 at 5:43 a.m.
I just wandered across this website, but let me give you the book on Warren National "so called" University.
They are unaccredited,
There degrees are easy to get,
No reputable employer will even consider this a degree of any sort.
What a joke!
Ganju Shiba August 19, 2007 at 8:25 p.m.
To LOL:
You gave a brief review, if you would call it that about the University (and it is a real University and not "so called").
My only question is, did YOU attend this school? If not than you are not qualified to make that statement.
Here are the facts:
WNU operates legally. The school is licensed by the State of Wyoming.
WNU is an applicant for accreditation.
The degrees are NOT easy to get. You do not merely send money and get some bogus diploma in the mail. You need to earn it.
No reputable employer you say? I think if you were to ask any graduate if their employer accepted a Warren National degree they would give you a different answer.
And the only joke is that someone like you would make these statements knowing nothing about what you are talking about.
I suggest you research your topic a bit more before making statements like this.
? about illegal use of unaccredited "degrees" August 19, 2007 at 10:10 p.m.
"You forgot to add that Kennedy Western / Warren National is banned from offering / advertising degrees in California, Oregon and ?? any other states??"
My question is on California. It's not listed as one of the states it's illegal in, but Warren National cannot sell degrees there? Anyone have more details than that? Just seems odd that they are located in California, but can't advertise in California, but no illegal either.
Wyoming - haven for unaccredited "universities" August 19, 2007 at 10:17 p.m.
"Wyoming * Weak law and poor enforcement allowed state to fill with unaccredited suppliers. Political interference exacerbated this problem. The 2006 Wyoming legislature passed a new law requiring eventual accreditation, which should solve the problem in a couple of years."
Quick Question August 23, 2007 at 11:45 p.m.
Has any student been able to get their credits transferred to another institution or continue for another degree program with either WNU or KW Degree? If so, please advise on instiution where you continued or that accepted your coursework.
Quick Answer August 24, 2007 at 5:10 a.m.
No. Only other unaccredited universities will even consider it.
Chris August 24, 2007 at 11:18 p.m.
Ok so this is the second attempt to post this. I went to WNU / KWU and I think that a lot of you who have not even gone should not comment. The school serves a purpose. I went there. It is for mid career professionals who do not have time under any circumstances sit in a classroom. They have homework, readings, tests, etc. All schools have had their bumps in the road. With the federal hearing, that was one student who did not even go to WNU / KWU who bought their degree online from Hamilton College and was upset that she decided to take all the universities in Wyoming to court. Since WNU / KWU is the largest online university they had to go to court too. Yes, they have disgruntled employees but so does everyone. That guy that was on the stand was employed for two weeks. So you guys really should not knock a school, they have been in existance since 1984. A lot of schools are not accredited ie Havard. I could find articles that are not great about everything. But why would I? I say understand that they are helping society as they helped me. I am the CEO of a major coroporation and it is because of WNU / KWU. Education is education. I am sorry but it is legitimate. Why not pick on something else that matters like the war and why innocent people are dying versues a school? What has America come too? :( We are a horrible example to other countries.
Chris is funny... August 25, 2007 at 1:45 a.m.
"mid career professionals who do not have time under any circumstances sit in a classroom."
Those busy people can spend the same amount of time and money and get a regionally accredited degree, there are hundreds of options.
"A lot of schools are not accredited"
Complete lie. Most people can name hundreds of real, accredited universities. Only a few (those in higher ed and HR) can name a few unaccredited timebombs they've run across.
"I am the CEO of a major coroporation"
No, you are not. Entry level jobs are checked for accredited education credentials. CEO's of major corps are run through the ringer.
Ganju Shiba August 27, 2007 at 8:59 p.m.
To "Chris is funny",
How would you know who Chris is or what Chris does?
Are you clairvoyant?
Since you have this ability than maybe you can tell me some hot stock tips? Maybe you can let me know who will win the next World Cup?
Robert Fuller, PhD August 28, 2007 at 4:21 a.m.
Robert Fuller, PhD June 15, 2007 at 3:51 p.m.
The debate over accredited versus non-accredited came up all the time when I worked for the U.S. Department of Education. Because the academic world sees the nature of degrees versus experiences from a different perspective than does the workforce, neither is willing to budge much on their stance. And here's why: Statistics show that 60% of those who attend college, whether they be traditional universities, online universities, unaccredited or accredited, never actually use what they learned or were supposed to have been taught after they graduate from college. They use the degree to get in the door, end up doing something totally different or unrelated to their educational background, and actually do quite well. Statistics also show that 43% of new hirees are retrained to do their jobs using concepts vastly differently from what they learned in college. The shocking statistic was the number of employers who actually verify educational credentials when hiring someone. Only about 25% of employers actually check the educational credentials of new employees. The other 75% base their hiring practices on experience and word-of-mouth referrals (opinions) of your references or previous supervisors. But of course, they don't tell potential employees that.
A friend of mine who sat on regional and national accrediting bodies for probably 15 years told me "accredited or nonaccredited, it's all about money and poeple keeping their jobs these days; school officials will promise or say anything to the accrediting bodies these days to keep their doors open." I'm inclined to believe him at this point because I've seen some accredited institutions that should never have been opened!
Just some thoughts...
Robert
Ho Hum August 28, 2007 at 6:44 a.m.
Of course, 98.3216% of statistics with no credible source cited are just plain B.S.
I had the best laugh at this one:
"Only about 25% of employers actually check the educational credentials of new employees. The other 75% base their hiring practices on experience and word-of-mouth referrals."
Of course, again, no source cited. Any competent corporation, and all universities verify credentials. The ones that don't must be sole proprietors, small partnerships, or fast food restaurants that do not have the savvy or the means to protect themselves.
To Ho Hum August 28, 2007 at 6:11 p.m.
It seems that you have an expertise on/around the verificaiton process in the HR Department. What is your take on corporations veryifying degrees with institutions such as Warren National University? Do they Hire Candidates? If Candidates have 5+ Years of Experience, MBA from this University, will they be given a job?
Ho Hum August 29, 2007 at 7:11 a.m.
To be hired in a large corporation for any professional position, it requires a regionally accredited bachelors degree and relevant work experience. Therefore, an unaccredited so called "degree" does not meet the minimum requirements for such a job.
Since a corporation will get dozens of qualifed applicants meeting the criteria, they would have no need to review "unaccredited degree" holding applicants.
JR August 29, 2007 at 6:58 p.m.
All of those here bashing KWU/WNU are nothing more than ignorant blithering idiots. You have no FACTS to base your statements. Government inquiry? PLEASE, all smoke and mirrors.
1. Being Accredited is voluntary and NOT subject to US law.
2. To be accredited means that you pay a ton of money to some commission and become part of the 'Good ol boys club". These commissions have been around for a long long time and are getting "pissy" when something newer and better comes along and don't want to play in the commissions sandbox. It is the same as the record labels and the online music downloads out there. WAAA!
Who was the idiot that said they work in HR at a large corporation? oh, yes, To WNU (what an original name) I know of many companies that accept a degree from this institution. In fact a friend of mine is the CIO of a large, multi-state eye care practice. He attended KW, and was promoted to CIO AFTER getting his degree.
The bottom line is like Robert Fuller above stated, it all comes down to money. Paying BIG bucks to be part of the "Good ol boys club" PERIOD.
JR August 29, 2007 at 7:01 p.m.
Just read Ho Hum's posts.
What an idiot.
JR August 29, 2007 at 7:22 p.m.
One further thing.
Oregon was sued by KWU/WNU and the two settled out of court.
They agreed that KWU/WNU will not be classified as a "diploma mill", State of Oregon employees may not use KWU/WNU(as is the right of ANY employer), residents MAY use KWU/WNU on their resumes.
You can read it all here: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0...
All of you bashers are just that, bashers.
Bashers=People who make incorrect statements based on ignorance and/or feeling. Complete lack of logic. Loosers. Whiners. Blithering idiots.
To JR August 29, 2007 at 9:28 p.m.
You sound like someone of virtue and make decision based on facts. I would like to hear factually from someone how education is verified within the HR Organizations? When they verify, do they make a big stiff, if school is accredited or unaccredited?
Illegal in Oregon without this disclaimer August 30, 2007 at 4:56 a.m.
In addition, an individual using an unaccredited degree, even if the employer allows use of such degrees, must disclose on resumes, letterheads, business cards, announcements and advertisements that "(Name of school) does not have accreditation recognized by the United States Department of Education and has not been approved by the Office of Degree Authorization." ORS 348.609(2)(a). The only exception is for schools approved by ODA. See ORS 348.609(d) and OAR 583-050-0014.
It is a Class B Misdemeanor under the Oregon Criminal Code to use a degree in violation of ORS 348.609.
Correcting JR with verifiable source August 30, 2007 at 4:59 a.m.
"1. Being Accredited is voluntary and NOT subject to US law."
Here are the 7 seven states where it is outright illegal (10 total with various restrictions) to use an unaccredited Kennedy Western / Warren National "degree".
"Is Oregon the only state that disallows use of unaccredited degrees?
No. It is also illegal in North Dakota, New Jersey, Texas, Nevada, Washington and Maine to use unaccredited degrees. It is illegal in Indiana to use an unaccredited doctorate and Michigan law limits the legal options of users. Illinois limits the use of unaccredited degrees to those licensed by other states.
See those states’ laws
http://www.osac.state.or.us/oda/unaccred......
for details. Many other states are considering similar laws in order to prevent fraud."
How competent HR departments background check August 30, 2007 at 5:37 a.m.
"I would like to hear factually from someone how education is verified within the HR Organizations? When they verify, do they make a big stiff, if school is accredited or unaccredited?"
Most mid to large companies have gone to the National Student Clearinghouse for degree verification. It's a win-win. The individual Universities can offload alot of the verification work to the Clearinghouse, and HR departments can verify all valid degrees in one stop and print/save a verification for the file.
Nice and simple, if an applicant claims a degree, it's checked there.
Companies vary in what they validate:
*All degrees are accredited
*Highest degree is accredited
*Required accredited degrees per the job description
http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/
http://www.chea.org/search/
Small and naive companies, the controls can be very weak. Some don't check credentials, references, anything.
The HR professionals organization has good resources on protecting your organization in this regard.
http://www.shrm.org/
JR August 30, 2007 at 4:21 p.m.
To: Correcting JR with verifiable source.
No need for correction, except for your post.
I stated US law, not STATE law.
Accreditation is VOLUNTARY.
States are free to pass laws as they wish.
It all comes back to an institution willing to pay the ridiculously amount of money so as to join the "Good Ol Boy" club.
Re: How competent HR departments background check August 30, 2007 at 4:32 p.m.
I didn't see the University of Oxford on the National Student Clearinghouse.
Hmmm, Oxford must be a "diploma mill"
I guess my great grandfather would never get a job today like he did with Standard Oil.
How competent HR departments background check August 30, 2007 at 6:50 p.m.
The National Student Clearinghouse does not even have all the accredited universities on that list. I had attend a institution that has bene accredited by Middle States Association, Association of Collegiate Business Schools and Program and International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education.
In this circumstance, if candidate has presented the institution to HR and not on this clearinghouse. Than, how would the degree get validated? Would they not offer the candidate the position?
C2 August 31, 2007 at 6 a.m.
Good point, the Clearinghouse is not at 100% of US schools yet, only 91%. In those cases, HR can simply make sure the school is accredited on the Department of Education website and request verification directly from the school. Foreign schools are a little more work, but basically the same process. Both the Oxford and Middle States accredited examples above would obviously both pass this easily.
"More than 3,000 colleges, enrolling 91% of US college students, and hundreds of high school districts nationwide participate in the Clearinghouse
DegreeVerify: ...Commercial verifiers can instantly confirm degrees online, providing them with an easy, fast, and inexpensive way to validate educational records and combat credentials fraud."
http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/abou...
Glad to clear up all the confusion!
To JR: August 31, 2007 at 6:14 a.m.
I do agree with JR's point, that it's a shame that there isn't a single national law to deal with this issue.
Instead individual states and their consumer protection departments are left to fend for themselves. So until all 50 states have something in place, it's pretty easy to relocate to the states with the weakest education regulations.
JR August 31, 2007 at 3:35 p.m.
I have not stated nor do I promote the idea of a national law.
Each state has the right to do as they see fit, as long as they do not violate an individuals rights, as Oregon tried to do.
Therefore, the individual needs to take responsibility and due their due diligence when selecting a college/university to attend.
I see no problem with WNU's program. They require you to take, and pass, classes that are the core of the field in which one chooses to study. I have yet to see the purpose in spending tons of money for classes that are irrelevant to one's field of study. Does one REALLY care about what happened in the 17th century when they are studying Engineering or Technology? No they don't.
Interesting Article on Kennedy Western August 31, 2007 at 7:47 p.m.
"It May Take Hours, But You Too Can Earn a University Degree"
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian...
The Oregonian Newspaper 7/4/04
TO JR & C2 August 31, 2007 at 8:44 p.m.
The question I ask at end of the day is whether Corporate Institutions will embrace/accept degree from WNU?
If Corporate HR Department does ask, how does one answer to them regarding this degree?
I don't think there is anything wrong with the WNU Institution at all. I think they are more open than others in their programs and they get grunt of it. As people saying they can get degrees from this school in hours, show me how?
The other question is do you think Higher Learning Commission will give WNU Accredidation?
C2 September 1, 2007 at 6:50 p.m.
I agree with JR
"Therefore, the individual needs to take responsibility and due their due diligence when selecting a college/university to attend."
Completely agree. If you truly perform due diligence, and are okay with the severe limitations, senate investigation, unaccredited status, inability to gain licensure, and in a growing number states where it is legal to use a WNU degree, plus the existence of hundreds of comparable, real accredited programs out there, go ahead and buy a WNU degree.
To poster above, post your major, and I'm sure someone can recommend a dozen good programs for you to attain your degree completely online, with accreditation.
To C2 September 3, 2007 at 9:48 p.m.
With that, do you think HR in Fortune 500 Corporations would terminate an employee for completing their degree at WNU?
Do you think this institution will ever receive accredidation?
Dr J. Bear September 4, 2007 at 1:35 a.m.
Inside scoop is that they will be accredited before 2009. Likely Fall/winter 2008.
RobertK September 4, 2007 at 2:40 a.m.
I love all this dialogue!
I've taken courses at the #2 public university in the nation - graduate level 18 credits thus far and I've done the same at KWU for undergraduate and actually the UVA one's were extremely similar.
What I liked about KWU is their asynchronus model, which is very nice and I can't wait for that to be so widespread.
Bricks and mortar schools have their place especially when heading straight into them from high school.
KWU is for the mid-level professional who has to keep a job down and a family together and still move ahead and keep up with what is going around.
I'm thankful to KWU - it has helped me finish up my undergraduate - took me almost two years.
I'm also thankful for those faculty from accredited higher education who saw a need and were willing to fill that need and provide their expertise even if the university is unaccredited.
It's been said truth generally goes this way:
1. It is first ridiculed by the establishment
2. It is then violently opposed by the establishment
3. It then becomes commonplace
Higher education is changing and it's places like KWU (now WNU) who venture out and seize the day!
Bricks and mortar institutions are changing, but they wouldn't change as quickly if it were not for front line efforts by places such as KWU/WNU.
Just ask our founding fathers what it cost to birth this country!
Why September 4, 2007 at 4:07 a.m.
were there no accredited Universities before 1951? How did our nation survive? Oh how?
Oh that is right, ALL UNIVERSITIES were substandard prior to alcohol binge drinking, sex, drugs etc.
Accreditation, which happened curiously around the same time as LSD introduction, and communist teaching on campus does beg the question----Is it possible WNU standards will have to be lowered to get accreditation? You bet. That and a little grease money into the pockets of politicians.
< 2% September 4, 2007 at 6:05 a.m.
I keep seeing on this site that WNU is illegal in 3 soetimes 4 and sometimes 7 different states. This is just not true. I called the office of degree authorization in all 7 states and below is the general description for all. (Remember, civil service jobs pay about half of what private sector pays and only make up about 2% of the jobs in any given state).
"There are Colleges and universities which are not currently accredited by an accrediting body of the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (www.chea.org). Degrees from these institutions will not be accepted by the Civil Service Commission as satisfying any educational requirements indicated on job specifications."
The lady in Texas even said that it is only a misdemenor to use an outright diploma mill diploma and Texas has yet to prosecute anyone for fear of not being able to get a prosecution.
Also her supervisor told me they are not allowed under federal law to call WNU a diploma mill.
To: <2% September 4, 2007 at 1:14 p.m.
I doubt you have a link for anything above. It directly contradicts what those seven states have passed into their laws. That kind of misrepresentation is very easy to disprove in 15 seconds of Googling. For example in Texas:
Institutions Whose Degrees are Illegal to Use in Texas
"Fraudulent or substandard degree" means a degree conferred in Texas in violation of the Texas Education Code; conferred in another state in violation of that state's laws; conferred in another state by an institution that was not accredited by an accreditor recognized by the Coordinating Board... (Texas Educational Code, Chapter 61, Section 61.302)
The Texas Penal Code (Section 32.52) prohibits the use of fraudulent or substandard degrees "in a written or oral advertisement or other promotion of a business; or with the intent to: obtain employment; obtain a license or certificate to practice a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain a promotion, a compensation or other benefit, or an increase in compensation or other benefit, in employment or in the practice of a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain admission to an educational program in this state; or gain a position in government with authority over another person, regardless of whether the actor receives compensation for the position." Violation of this law is a Class B misdemeanor.
Recap: September 4, 2007 at 1:26 p.m.
So in Texas, it is illegal to use a KWU / WNU degree to:
*obtain employment
*obtain a promotion
*obtain admission to an educational program
No grey area there.
TO 2% & Recap September 4, 2007 at 6:40 p.m.
Do you know what the limitations are in the state of New Jersey?
Even with the Texas law, how come they allow private institutions to exist within their states?
99.98% You Mislead Well September 4, 2007 at 6:43 p.m.
Illegal only if
(1) uses or claims to hold a postsecondary degree that the person knows:
(A) is a fraudulent or substandard degree;
(B) is fictitious or has otherwise not been granted....
Keywords for those of you who graduated accredited schools is "That the person knows".
This is why Oregon lost the KW lawsuit. The WNU students and faculty believe their credentials to be authentic.
Note:WNU is not required by any law to inform students of any Texas Laws. Therefore how would any student know of the Texas definition.
Oh, I suppose you have memorized the entire legal code in your state. You will try to say, Ignorance is no excuse under the law, but time and again under prescident law you are proven wrong.
How about this- Name one person convicted under the Tx. law.
Texas can not and will not touch this. It is a "Hot Potato." Texas knows the first attempt at a conviction will end up in some WNU student owning the state of Texas.
Also left out is that the Employer must press charges, at which time the states AG will advise them otherwise. Even if all is successful in getting a conviction it is just a misdemeanor, more likely just a warning.
love it homer September 5, 2007 at 3:15 a.m.
Loved the website.
I hate Texas.
The website is an insight into the back-woods hick arrogant cow-boy types that live there. I do feel bad for 99.98%. Maybe you picked a bad example for a state. Does Michigan have something you can quote against WNU? Better come up with something or you will become 50.001%.
Sorry ):. Next time spend a few minutes researching.
99.8% September 5, 2007 at 4:35 a.m.
Sorry to keep correcting you, but, KWU / WNU is specifically listed under the very clear heading:
"Institutions Whose Degrees are Illegal to Use in Texas"
That means... they are illegal to use in Texas.
The whole "the student must know" is another unsupported claim. Post a link and we'll discuss!
Texas example, per you request September 5, 2007 at 4:59 a.m.
Another verifiable Kennedy Western success story
"When Elected Officials Aren't What They Seem
Texas officials and Pennsylvania cats tout misleading credentials"
Excerpted:
"Identity deception can take many forms. A diploma mill degree, for example, may cause employers and taxpayers to assume a candidates credentials are genuine. Unless the deception is discovered, diploma mill customers adorn their identities with unearned titles before and after their name. Last year, Dallas based Trinity Southern University awarded a Masters degree to a Pennsylvania cat."
"News for Public Officials has learned that one well-known Texas County Clerk serving on the Supreme Court’s "Judicial Committee on Information Technology" Task Force claims a Ph.D. from a Wyoming school the United States General Accounting Office defines as a diploma mill.
Before she obtained her degree from Kennedy-Western and began calling herself Dr. Dianne Wilson, PhD, a Grand Jury indicted the Fort Bend County Clerk on charges she used taxpayer money to partially finance a Bachelor Degree from St. Edwards University and Certificates from the National Center for State Courts’ Institute for Court Management. (St. Edwards and the NCSC are accredited)
Kennedy-Western apparently accepted Wilson’s Certificates from the NCSC: Institute for Court Management as the equivalent of a Master’s Degree. The NCSC does not offer Master's degrees.
Wilson is not the only government official to claim advanced degrees from diploma mills or to put the title “Dr.” in front of their name after buying a degree from an unaccredited school."
To Texas example, per you request September 5, 2007 at 7:17 a.m.
This article is so old and outdated information. The perspective that students are not allowed to use their creditentials in educational or govt sector is clearly known. With that the actions of Dr. Wilson is a crime.
The question that is puzzling to me is why is this the only school that is in limelight? There are hundreds of other schools that have post secondary licenses and operate in every state. Why are they not target? Are those fraudlent also?
To all KWU/WNU bashers September 5, 2007 at 2:02 p.m.
I would like to see where any official government website SPECIFICALLY states that KWU/WNU is a "diploma mill".
A "diploma mill" is where one pays money and gets a piece of paper in the mail saying "Diploma".
I do not see any information on the US DoE site.
I do see a link to National Association of State Administrators and Supervisors of Private Schools (http://www.nasasps.com), which shows members and links to state licensing agencies, and lo and behold! there is Wyoming! and guess what? Wyoming has granted a license to WNU, and even to the University of Wyoming! WOW!
Basically all of you bashers are nothing more that the ignorant lapdogs for, as JR above put it, the "Good ol Boy" institutions.
WNU has top notch professors from universities across the nation and requires the students to do work and take tests.
The FTC even admits it! September 5, 2007 at 2:27 p.m.
From the FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION:
There are a few legitimate institutions that have not pursued accreditation.
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer...
Could WNU be one of these? NAH, of course not, that would make all of the "Big dogs" at State agencies, CHEA, GAO and others look like the fools they are for including WNU as a diploma mill when they are not.
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Caveat Emptor September 5, 2007 at 6:19 p.m.
"There are a few legitimate institutions that have not pursued accreditation."
But there are thousands that have, and offer the exact same online programs as Warren National "University"
Caveat Emptor September 5, 2007 at 6:24 p.m.
"I would like to see where any official government website SPECIFICALLY states that KWU/WNU is a "diploma mill"."
Scroll up the thread, there are already several posted, with links.
I did like your link to the FTC's article called:
"Diploma Mills: Degrees of Deception"
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer...
To: Caveat Emptor September 5, 2007 at 6:28 p.m.
If there are thousands that are accredited and offer "the exact same online programs" as WNU, then what is the difference?
ONE thing: Refusal to pay the rediculous amount of money to the "good ol Boy" club. Since they have refused to pay, they have been attacked by every means available to the pompous Academia and Educrats to knock them down.
To: Caveat Emptor September 5, 2007 at 7 p.m.
Scroll up to see WHAT?
The GAO report? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
It does not call KW?WN a diploma mill, it just states that government agencies paid money to them against regulations. The other schools are shams, and I have investigated.
If you are going off that ONE BIASED report, then you are surely a sucker!
FOLLOW THE MONEY. IT"S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY and the "Good ol Boy" club.
Caveat Emptor September 6, 2007 at 4:35 a.m.
"If there are thousands that are accredited and offer "the exact same online programs" as WNU, then what is the difference?"
Directly from the Federal Trade Commission Article you posted, answers your question:
"Colleges and universities accredited by legitimate organizations undergo a rigorous review of the quality of their educational programs."
"Diploma Mills: Degrees of Deception"
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer......
Also from the Federal Trade Commission September 6, 2007 at 4:51 a.m.
"Avoid Fake-Degree Burns By Researching Academic Credentials"
"Ask the applicant for proof of the degree and the school’s accreditation. If you don’t get satisfactory answers from the school itself and the accreditation sites on the Web, ask the applicant for proof of the degree, including a certified transcipt, and the school’s accreditation. Ultimately, it’s up to the applicant to show that he earned his credentials from a legitimate institution. "
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/busp...
Basic Background checking 101, from the Federal Consumer Protection arm.
To: Caveat Emptor September 6, 2007 at 12:14 p.m.
You have still not answered the question, if they are EXACTLY the same, then there is NO difference in the programs, except for accreditation.
Since accreditation is nothing more than joining the "Good ol Boys" club for a rediculous amount of money that provides absolutely NO real service in return, again I ask, what is the difference?
THERE IS NONE!
NOt until the middle of the last century was there any "accreditation" of schools. My My, what did we do before then? I guess all the great Leaders, business men/women, inventors, etc had substandard, worthless degrees because the schools they attended, Harvard, Yale, Stanford and others were not accredited.
Those that sit here and waste their breath how a school is not accredited is using flawed logic and have no argument.
WNU offeres the same courses as other "accredited" institutions using professors part-time from other "accredited" institutions. They are a quality institution that has unfortunately been lumped in with all of the diploma scams that are out there.
Until someone can provide some logical, factual data to back up their argument instead of "because I said so" then keep your traps shut.
First Amendment September 6, 2007 at 8:06 p.m.
The trend over the last 35 years for higher education to increasing be delivered by "for profit" entities, the fact that state laws vary greatly, and the tremendous growth of the Internet as a delivery technology for higher education account for the heated, related debates surrounding diploma mills, unaccredited institutions, and regional vs national accreditation. Each side of the issues is entrenched with its views because the stakes are indeed high. Higher education costs have skyrocketed over the last 50 years in the US, just about the same time accreditation bodies appeared. The regional and nation accreditation processes are not free, in fact are quite costly and time consuming. This is during a time when a larger percentage of the US population sought degrees, employers desired degrees, and the federal government greatly expanded the availability of education. The greater educational requirements of employers for degrees for career advancement and the surging cost and the time-demands of mid-level professional, two-parent income families led to a demand for alternative ways to obtain bachelor and advanced degrees. In the 1970s there arose many of these so-called diploma mills. Even some of the experts that call them "diploma mills" today, were expounding their merits as viable alternatives to gain higher education. As these alternative education providers grew and expenditures by the American public grew, this started a significant erosion of the revenue of traditional higher education providers, and indirectly to the regional and national associations that accredit them. At that point, these alternative institutions offered a viable alternative that saved time and great expense to individuals seeking degrees. Yes, some of these institutions were fraudulent; however, many did offer serious and significant, high-quality education. The alternative institutions focused on the objectives of education rather than merely counting up how many courses, papers, and grades, etc. as do the more traditional accredited schools. At this same time the Internet was being developed. The traditional accredited schools realized the potential to gain back some "market share" by leveraging this new technology and offering their degrees via the Internet, just like the alternative schools. The fact is that many of the unique aspects of the alternative, unaccredited schools have been absorbed by traditional schools--excepting, of course, the lower cost. However, I think it would better serve the interests of both sides to debate a even-handed, fair way to integrate these unaccredited institutions into our American educational system by constructive dialogue as how to determine the valid unaccredited institutions from those that truly are fraudulent. And mere opinion about these institutions being diploma mills will not suffice. If that is allowed, then opinion is allowed to become a de facto "accreditation entity."
The End September 6, 2007 at 11:55 p.m.
“You have still not answered the question, if they are EXACTLY the same, then there is NO difference in the programs, except for accreditation.”
You finally got it! It's the accreditation that separates them.
So, by FTC guidelines, "Colleges and universities accredited by legitimate organizations undergo a rigorous review of the quality of their educational programs."
Unaccredited “universities” have no such 3rd party quality review, no accountability, no oversight, no way to verify how much or how little students do to earn a “degree”. Take a look at what unaccredited universities have done recently:
Unaccredited Trinity Southern University issues a degree to a cat. (3.5 GPA!)
http://www.nbc10.com/money/3975070/detai...
Unaccredited Concordia College and University issues a degree to a dog.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17398521/
Unaccredited Rochville University can deliver your degree in 3-5 business days
Unaccredited Almeda University will grant you a degree for life experience
Unaccredited Kennedy Western University had a student who earned 40% of her Master’s degree in 16 hours of study (Senate Hearing)
Unaccredited Hamilton University conferred a doctorate, based primarily on a 4 page paper, to a gal in Homeland Security!
And those are only a few of the cases that made the paper. Who knows what multiple of that were discovered and handled quietly to avoid public embarrassment, and those waiting to be discovered.
To The End September 7, 2007 at 2:30 a.m.
You do make a point around Concord College and University, Rochville University, Almeda University & Hamilton University being diploma mills. We all agree that, they are true definition of diploma mills. Those schools just issue certificates without ever having to do any coursework, taking exams, writing thesis or in candidate status for accredidation.
It clearly shows the stupidity of the American Culture as being shallow minded, narrow minded and plain stupid.
Whether one wants to accept the form of online learning, Warren National University does have legitimate professors, legitimate Blackboard Systems and also candidate for the accredidation. They are also licesned by the department of Wyoming with notion that they have applied for the entry to the Boys Club.
I think what Frist Amendment wrote is correct, that as a nation, we need to have a debate/particular system on figuring out how we are going to tackle this issue. Not all Unaccredited schools are Fraud and WNU is one example of that.
If they were fradulent, why would they be applying for accreditation? I have heard that when they are doing that, they had to put down substantial deposit with State of Wyoming and Pay Hefty Application Fee for Accredidation Process. If someone knows the details, lay the open facts, as this is an open book and issues that we need to tackle as a country.
To: The End September 7, 2007 at 2:36 a.m.
So then what was the quality of education from these Colleges and Universities before the 1950's when the accreditation bodies came to be?
By your statement then, Harvard, Yale, MIT, Stanford, UCLA, Duke, Notre Dame, and the plethora of other institutions were nothing more than diploma mills, for there was no 3d party to regulate them.
Once again, accreditation entities are nothing more than "Good ol Boy" clubs that rape the educational institutions by extorting huge amounts of money so as to "verify" their educational programs.
Wyoming State Law September 7, 2007 at 2:50 a.m.
REGISTERED PRIVATE DEGREE GRANTING POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
Effective July 1, 2006, the Wyoming Department of Education now requires annual registration of private degree granting post-secondary education institutions. One of the major criteria of becoming registered is that the school must either be accredited or be in the process of becoming accredited by an accrediting organization recognized by the United States Department of Education. See W.S. § 21-4-401 et seq. and the Wyoming Department of Education Emergency Rules and Regulations, Chapter 30 for a full discussion of the requirements.
Directly from CHEA September 7, 2007 at 2:56 a.m.
11. Q. What if an institution or program is not accredited? Does that mean
it’s bad?
A. Not necessarily, but it does mean one should review as much information
as possible about the institution before enrollment. An institution or program
may be new and may not have met minimum standards to even be
considered eligible for accreditation. If an institution or program is not
accredited, it should have some other means of quality review.
Q. Shouldn’t there be a separate standard in the law to review distance
learning?
A. Right now, institutional and programmatic accrediting organizations are
effectively reviewing distance learning within the framework of the agreement
reached with USDE and the Congress during the 1998 reauthorization:
distance learning is considered part of the scope of accrediting
organizations if they had been reviewing distance learning prior to 1998.
At this time, there does not appear to be a need for a separate standard.
However, as new types of education offerings—e.g., online non-degree
options from providers that are not affiliated with any accredited entity—
become more and more available, accrediting organizations may need to
consider whether they should be examining the quality of these offerings
as well. And, this may involve consideration of a separate standard.
Potential Student September 7, 2007 at 3 a.m.
I have over 5+ Years of work experience and have reviewed the WNU MBA Program. Looking at the faculty, program and cost perspective, I have found the program to be a good match. With that, I know there are cricitcs in this forum on the university, even though they have gone for accredidation.
Would you suggest that I enroll in the University or wait till they become accredidated?
To Potential Student: September 7, 2007 at 3:08 a.m.
Don't waste your time, money or career there. This very site has dozens of good, accredited, online options.
If you can afford it, one of the best is Penn State - World University.
For a value, try Fort Hayes State or Peru State (Nebraska)
To Wyoming State Law September 7, 2007 at 3:12 a.m.
When Wyoming became known as a haven for unaccredited schools due to there weak laws, many groups were lobbying for the law change:
"The University of Wyoming Student Senate plans to lobby lawmakers to crack down on unaccredited private colleges in the state, saying those schools drag down the reputations of other Wyoming institutions."
To Wyoming State Law September 7, 2007 at 4:49 a.m.
The question I have is than why did the president of WNU (Mr. Saltman) testify at the hearings in support of the Accredidation.
Why has the university taken step for the accredidation? From Accredidation perspective, explain to me, why this school wouldn't receive accredidation?
?? September 7, 2007 at 5:27 a.m.
Who knows, we can all speculate:
I would guess that when it became a requirement in Wyoming, it was apply for accreditation or shuffle off to another weak-lawed state, which would be it's 5th state.
AFAIK, this business is run out of California, but the Wyoming laws are much more favorable.
There is a chance that they may some day receive accreditation, which would be great, but past history that I read from all the articles here don't inspire much confidence.
To Potential Student September 7, 2007 at 8:20 p.m.
There are so many good, accredited online MBA programs out there, it is almost overwhelming to compare them all. Here are a few to look at to get you started, but keep in mind there are dozens and dozens more to choose from.
Franklin University
Davenport University Online
Baker College
Kaplan University
University of Phoenix (too expensive in my mind)
Peru State (one of the cheaper options mentioned above)
Fort Hays State (low cost)
DeVry University
Penn State World (Penn State name, and online too!)
University of Maryland – UC
Nova Southeastern
Central Michigan
Boise State
So, it really depends on which of the big three factors you are looking to maximize (Name recognition, cost, accreditation)
*The name recognition ones such as Penn State can be a great find.
*The no-name low cost ones are no frills, but great when the next promotion / offer requires an Accredited master’s.
*Most of these are only regionally accredited, which will guarantee universal acceptance, but recently some of the top companies like HP have required AACSB (business school accreditation) on top of that to be eligible for tuition reimbursement. These are the toughest, most rigourous accreditation / programs out there.
*I personally would avoid anything that is only nationally accredited, such as DETC accredited schools. Although it is a real accreditation, and your employer can verify it as being accredited during routine background checks, you can run into some problems using this degree. I say that as an Accountant, as it won’t allow you to become a CPA in most states.
Congrats on looking to further your education and taking the time to ensure you select a quality, accredited program.
Accredidation September 9, 2007 at 4:34 a.m.
I wanted to throw this out there, as I was speaking to someone earlier tonight who attends the prestine princeton university. One of their departments (Computer Science) didn't get/lost its accredidation. Does this mean, this is a Diploma Mill that Princeton University is Running?
SuperStudent September 12, 2007 at 4:34 a.m.
has anyone gotten a real job using a wnu degree? if you can actually get a job using this degree, then i could understand why ppl still apply. If not then it seems utterly useless and a complete waste of time and money.
Depends... September 12, 2007 at 2:53 p.m.
I think the ”Peter Principle” applies. As long as nobody checks into it, you could probably get an entry level job in some places. But as you look to rise through the ranks, the background checking is more consistent, and an unaccredited degree should be discovered. Look at the Notre Dame coach guy, he was fine when he was a nobody, but when he got the Notre Dame job, it took about 1 day for everyone to pick apart the education in his bio.
I’ve never seen any evidence of “graduates” becoming professors, executives, CPA’s, or anything newsworthy.
I truly hope that WNU eventually passes it’s quality review, so that those graduating after 2012? don’t have to worry about these things.
Re Super Student September 13, 2007 at 3:43 a.m.
My WNU Degree did help me get a promotion within my company. My employer recommended this University in fact.
Re Re Super Student September 13, 2007 at 4:15 a.m.
Would you able to verify whether your employer is a major fortune 500 corporation or small firm? Potentially the industry of the firm also?
Regarding the above" September 19, 2007 at 5:44 a.m.
I am at Matsush ita, the world's largest electronic corporation. We are best know for Panasonic but we also have other divisions.
Confused? September 20, 2007 at 1:31 p.m.
I just received the Warren National catalog and on Page 72, under the heading "Licenses and Credentials", it says:
"The University is oriented to those individuals NOT seeking licenses or credentials."
I am confused by that statement. I want my degree to be a credential, but it won't be?
Re: Confused September 21, 2007 at 3:36 a.m.
When the University gets Accredidation in 2008, you will not have any issues around credentials. If you are looking for a degree for purpose of credentials, why not try out one of the Diploma Mills such as Almeda University? No Education, No Studying, Just Pay Flat Fee and Great Certificate to Hang on your wall. What do you say?
Confused? September 21, 2007 at 3:46 a.m.
Anyone got a serious answer? Would I be able to use this as a credential on a job app or not? I won't need a license of any sort, so I am fine if it won't work for that.
Re: Confused? September 21, 2007 at 4:57 a.m.
You would be able to use this as a credential on the resume. Honestly speaking, you will not have any issues.
To Confused: September 21, 2007 at 4:43 p.m.
IF it is legal in your state.
IF you don't need to be licensed.
IF your potential employer doesn't check for accredited degrees.
IF your internet connection doesn't connect to any accredited universities that offer your major
Then it might be okay for you!
J. Bovin September 22, 2007 at 2:55 a.m.
Wow,
A whole bunch of ugly and upset folks here,,,, seeming to have some real issues with WNU/KWU. If it was as bad as what most everyone says it is,,,,, why don't our wonderfull goverment shut it down???
Well, here is my thoughts. When wanting to get into a safety engineering program the only one that came up was KWU/WNU. After phoning them and getting some references in the state that I live, I was impressed. Some of the ones given were:
Three Area Hospitals
Pulp & Paper Mills
and a few others.
After calling them, everyone seemed very pleased with the experence.
So I decided to send in my $50.00 and filled out the necessary paperwork & got moving forward.
One of the first things required was that I had to take a GERE. Being out of school for 30 years, I didn't fair so well. Around five days latter, I recieved a phone call that my $50.00 was being returned and and was told I did have what it took inregards to the math that was required in the area of study that I wanted.
After speaking with them, they required that I take a math course and pass with an acceptable grade and retake the GERE,,, I retook the test and passed with acceptable marks.
After going through the entire KWU/WNU program, I couldn't believe what I had learned, which improved my knowledge and
self-confidence and increased my earnings incredibly.
People can say what they want about "Accredidation". I graduated for an "Accredited" school, my High School to be exact, and there were people getting the same diploma that I got that couldn't:
* Read
* Write
* Do simple math
In a matter of fact, I worked with a fellow that got his high school diploma from another local high school that when signing his paycheck, he had to lay his drivers license down next to the line on the check and copy his name. OOOPs another "Accredited" institution.
Say what you want, I am proud of my degree. I worked for 17 months and three weeks to obtain it, and here is the good thing, I use the knowledge in my work everyday. It is
working for me & my family.
So while you people a beating up Warren Nation University I'm sitting back laughing. You may be like the bulk of the people in our wonderfull society with your "Accredited" degree, not even using it because you can't find a job in the field you studied in.
I went to a unaccredited university and am making $84,000.00
per year, and using my degree!!
Have a great life,,,,,,,,, I am.
To: J. Bovin September 22, 2007 at 2:49 p.m.
"why don't our wonderfull goverment shut it down???"
Nice grammar. It is regulated by states, so schools can move from state to state to avoid serious regulation. WN"U" is on it's 4th or 5th state. Wyoming finally cracked down and required "universities" in it's state to become accredited.
So old KW"U" dumped it's hokey programs such as engineering and changed it's name. No word on another state move yet.
Correcting JBovin September 23, 2007 at 2:17 p.m.
"GERE. Being out of school for 30 years, I didn't fair so well. Around five days latter, I recieved a phone call that my $50.00 was being returned and and was told I did have what it took inregards to the math that was required in the area of study that I wanted.
After speaking with them, they required that I take a math course and pass with an acceptable grade and retake the GERE,,, I retook the test and passed with acceptable marks."
Just to set the record straight, my experience was much different.
A) I was accepted without any exam scores. WNU does not require them, period. Look at their catalog.
B) They waived a healthy chunk of my requirements (> 40%) based on my work experience. I still have my degree plan that shows this.
C) It's the GRE exam, not a GERE, at least know the name of the exam you supposedly took.
Re:To: J. Bovin September 23, 2007 at 7:19 p.m.
The Engineering programs offered at KWU, which is now WNU were actually very challanging. Maybe you just read the negative hype and are willing to believe all of it.
I believe that dropping the programs was necessary for WNU to become accredited.
Hopefully, once WNU is accredited it will silence everyone here who spends so much of their time and energy bashing something they know nothing about.
reply: To: J. Bovin September 25, 2007 at 6:08 p.m.
Why did they move?
Simple.
The Liberal Academia Educrats felt threatened. Anytime an educational institution with a better way to provide an education comes along, they (Academia) will start screaming anything and everything until something sticks, like "Diploma Mill"
"Accredidation" has been around for a short time in this country, created by the liberal Academia buffoons, with help from the idiots in the media to spread the word.
Bridge Collapse September 26, 2007 at 5:51 a.m.
"I believe that dropping the programs was necessary for WNU to become accredited."
Seems to be a contradiction. If the "engineering" "degrees" were so good, why would they cut them loose to score points towards accreditation?
"Voluntary" accreditation arguments debunked September 26, 2007 at 5:56 a.m.
From US Gov
Frequently Asked Questions about diploma mills, fraudulent degrees, and accreditation. Among other things:
Accreditation is “voluntary,” so doesn't that mean it is optional and not necessary?
Accreditation is voluntary in that the process of accreditation requires the full cooperation with and complete participation in the process of accreditation by the college or university seeking accreditation. At the heart of the accreditation process is a self-study prepared by the college or university demonstrating its commitment to the standards of accreditation.
Since accreditation is the PRIMARY means of determining the legitimacy and quality of colleges and universities in the United States, to describe the process as "voluntary" is not to describe it as "optional" or "unnecessary."
Accreditation September 28, 2007 at 2:18 a.m.
Since the University has applied for accreditation, would someone familiar with the field be able to advise, if they will be accredited or not before 2008?
No September 28, 2007 at 12:27 p.m.
Nobody is certain if they are serious about accreditation. They haven't made the cut in 24 years.
They have applied for it because they state they are located in forced them to.
If they are indeed serious, and they make massive changes to their large "life experience" awards, 1 day open book exam grad courses, cut all their substandard programs, etc, still probably 2010 at the absolute soonest.
Re: NO September 28, 2007 at 5:41 p.m.
Their Policy is that they transfer up to 60 Undergraduate Educational Credits and Give up to 30 Credits for Work Experience. Many Many Universities do this. Why is this an unfair practice? You mention 2010, but their Wyoming License expries in 2008 and dont have to put up substantial deposit on this, so wont this loose it, if they dont get accredited by 2008?
No September 28, 2007 at 5:56 p.m.
"Give up to 30 Credits for Work Experience. Many Many Universities do this"
Name one legitimate school that will give a year of college credit for nothing. WNU will give you one year for "work experience", other unaccredited schools like Rochville will give you 3 or 4 years.
"but their Wyoming License expries in 2008"
I'm not positive, but I thought I read they just had to APPLY by 2007, so I think they won't be forced out of state again, as long as they are still an applicant.
Updated list September 28, 2007 at 6:04 p.m.
The use of unaccredited WNU degree titles may be legally restricted or illegal in some jurisdictions.[14]
Jurisdictions that have restricted the use of credentials from unaccredited schools or that specifically restrict WNU credentials include Oregon [15][5], Michigan[16], Maine[17], North Dakota[5], New Jersey[5], Washington[15][18], Nevada[15], Illinois[15], Indiana[15], and Texas.[19].
WNU is also restricted from accepting students from Oregon[5][20], California[7][20] or Utah[20].
Re: NO September 28, 2007 at 9:04 p.m.
As for the 30 Credits Trasnferred from Accredited University, I have listed one below.
Strayer University
www.strayer.edu - Gives Credit for Life Experience
Work/Life Experience
Undergraduate students may be able to receive credit for their work or life experience; more information on this process is available through your Admissions Officer or Academic Advisor.
Ashworth University
Bachelor’s Degree
You may receive credit for up to 75% of your degree program as a combination of transfer credits from other institutions and life/work experience. Life/work experience credit is limited to 30 credits: 15 credits for general education courses and 15 credits for core and/or concentration courses. Credits must be no more than ten years old and be from an accredited institution.
Ashworth University is an Accredited Member of the Distance Education and Training Council, The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), The Commission on International and Trans-Regional Accreditation (CITA). Also, Ashworth University meets the requirements of the Georgia Nonpublic Postsecondary Education Commission to offer instruction in career programs, associate, bachelor's and master's degree programs.
------------------------------------------------------------
American Sentinel University
http://www.americansentinel.edu
American Sentinel University recognizes that many students have already established and achieved substantial professional goals. We acknowledge students' life and work experience by awarding up to 30 credits toward the completion of the general education curriculum requirements.
Students may receive a total of up to 90 hours credit through a combination of credits transferred from other universities, for specific professional certifications, and credit awarded for life and work experience.
American Sentinel University is accredited by the Distance Education and Training Council. The Accrediting Commission of the Distance Education and Training Council is listed by the U.S. Department of Education as a nationally recognized accrediting agency and is a recognized member of the Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
------------------------------------------------------------
With all this said and being an accredited US Institution, are they also a Diploma Mill? Looking at them, Warren National Makes their policies upfront, rather than being sneaky. Whats the big deal?
Based on this, don't you think WNU should be accredited also? They are following the same requirements as these universities. There are plenty of more out there.
Just a Guy September 28, 2007 at 10:43 p.m.
"Distance Education and Training Council" is supposedly a national accediting body. If the school in question does not have regional accredidation, They may was well be called a degree mill.
Question September 29, 2007 at 4:01 a.m.
What's the difference between unaccredited and diploma mill? Aren't they the same thing, but one is just more polite?
Difference in Work Experience September 29, 2007 at 12:22 p.m.
You point to Strayer and some other schools, but you forget the most important point. They offer experience credits if you are able to validate that experience and pass Equivelancy exams, such as CLEP (Col

Joyce February 7, 2007 at 6:24 p.m.
Good to see that Kennedy Western has changed their name to try and bury their past while still offering meaningless degrees for cash.
What a horrible institution