Warren National University
Established: 2007
Accreditation: None
For-Profit: Yes
Country: USA
Programs:
|
Average Ratings (60 reviews)
|
Recent Warren National University Reviews:
Severely deficient, shut down, unaccredited
June 26, 2009
Saddened by forced closure and subsequent lawsuit. I completed the PhD in Health Administration in 2008 and have been unable to gain acceptance for this 'degree". The work was self study and much lighter that a masters, but still some useful learning to be had.
PhD Health Administration
June 24, 2009
I completed the PHD program in 2009. For the first time, including including my traditional Master's, I had to read the entire book. The dissertation was a very difficult part of the program. I had previously written a very complicated thesis in Biology. I do not feel cheated in the ...
California Pacific University -- DBA
June 14, 2009
I completed the California Pacific University Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) degree. It's an excellent value and extremely well-designed.
Comments:
Kevin February 10, 2007 at 1:09 a.m.
I'm disappointed that this site would carry such a deplorable "college".
Texas April 11, 2007 at 11:39 a.m.
The State of Texas calls Warren National "University" a:
Fraudulent or Substandard Institution with No Known Texas Connection
Fraudulent or substandard degree" means a degree conferred in Texas in violation of the Texas Education Code
Javier April 23, 2007 at 11:49 p.m.
Try some of the classes before you knock the school
Kevin April 24, 2007 at 4:42 a.m.
No need to try the courses. My employer, the school I would like to get an MBA from, and the Department of Education have all already told me that it won't be considered for promotions / won't be accepted in transfer / is unaccredited.
Even the much maligned University of Phoenix and the completely unknown Fort Hayes State are much better options.
Prospective Student May 2, 2007 at 4:31 a.m.
I read on the Kennedy Western page that a student
"With just 16 hours of study, I had completed 40 percent of the course requirements for a master's degree."
Is this program still offered through Warren National? Anyone have a link?
To prospective Student May 4, 2007 at 4:59 a.m.
As far as I know, Warren National is offering the same programs as Kennedy Western, so it should be available. I think all that changed was the name.
Good luck!
You are 40 hours away from a Warren MBA!
John May 25, 2007 at 7:47 p.m.
Actually you all are wrong.
Warren is the old KW, but their courses have changed DRAMATICALLY! Why? Because they are now a candidate for accreditation.
The name was changed to rid themselves of the "stigma" they aquired by a few Intellectual pinheads out there that smeared their name.
Now they are working on being an accredited online college.
Lawson May 25, 2007 at 9:53 p.m.
John,
This school has no chance of gaining regional accredidation. Do not waste your time/Money on any program they have to offer.
To John: June 1, 2007 at 7:26 p.m.
Nobody smeared them, the fact is that they were investigated by the Senate, testimony proved the degrees were worthless and easy to obtain and many people lost their jobs for claiming a degree from this diploma mill. All factual.
"Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense."
www.gao.gov/new.items/d04771t.pdf
Although they are technically a candidate for accreditation (due to Wyoming state law changes designed to remove diploma mills like Kennedy Western / Warren National), they have been claiming that for 20+ years.
Just print one June 18, 2007 at 8:38 p.m.
Don't waste your money on this school. If you must go this route, print one off yourself, it has the same value as a WNU degree and will hold up to any scrutiny just as well, without paying the $$$$.
RAFA June 25, 2007 at 10:11 p.m.
Thank's for the all the comments, however i am interested in joining a ligitimat instituation, got G.E.D and many certificates. Was alwasy told they be of use (from the local colleges) however seems like not true. Where can i bring em in use? Please help, Tbank's
F Y I June 29, 2007 at 7:34 p.m.
I busted my hump EARNING my PhD from KW. My family and I sacrificed heavily in time, hard work, and finances to EARN this degree. The knowledge and experience gained far outweigh the cost.
Interesting to note; of the distinguished "investigators" that prepared the GAO report, none have an advanced degree.
Rolo July 3, 2007 at 1:18 p.m.
Well I applied to KW and they agreed to WAIVE over half of my PHD requirements based on my CLAIM of life experience. I never had to prove anything and got a "degree plan" in less than a week. Then I checked into it closer.
Yes, they will run you through some busy-work to get your buy-in, which differentiates them from the less sophisticated diploma mills. In the end you still have an expensive, unaccredited so-called "doctorate" which will not allow you to teach anywhere in higher ed and is unacceptable for any type of licensing (fact) or employment (in a company with a competent HR department).
Rolo July 3, 2007 at 1:19 p.m.
"Interesting to note; of the distinguished "investigators" that prepared the GAO report, none have an advanced degree."
And neither do you if you attended Kennedy Western / Warren National
M. July 7, 2007 at 3:45 a.m.
Thanks to everyone that posted their comments. I was just taken in by these people today. I guess I will be out $50 dollars they suckered me into today. I thought it felt wrong.
Thanks again.
To M: July 9, 2007 at 5:45 p.m.
Sorry to hear you got scammed. Can you protest it on your credit card or through your better business bureau?
Robbie July 11, 2007 at 11:39 p.m.
Many employers accept KW degree. Mine did, and they are international. My degree is just as valid as any other degree, based on the work and study I did. I think the whole accredited bull**** is just that. I work with a lot of people with degrees from "accredited" schools and they are as dumb as a box of rocks, and can't figure a way out of a paper bag. It's all politics if you ask me. I know I learned a lot and put forth a lot of effort. That is what is important!!!
To Robbie: July 12, 2007 at 9:30 p.m.
"Many employers accept KW degree"
I would rephrase that as "some employers do not verify educational credentials properly"
See:
George O'Leary (Notre Dame football coach)
Sandra Baldwin (US Olympic committee)
The 463 government employees holding KWU and other unaccredited "degrees" who were terminated or disciplined in the Senate investigation.
etc
etc
Jason July 20, 2007 at 2:56 a.m.
I've attended traditional college classroom courses as well as online courses through Kaplan College and Warren National. The fact is, I don't need a professor to tell me to go home and read 4 chapters and be ready for the test on Friday. Most learning and comprehension is done on your own by studying the text material. I actually wish that some of the "traditional" courses I took would have allowed me to miss class everyday because the professors were lousy. "Accredited" is a word used by the education system of this country to justify the exorbitant and outrageous costs of a college education.
To Jason: July 20, 2007 at 3:49 a.m.
"Accredited" is a word used by the education system of this country to justify the exorbitant and outrageous costs of a college education."
Funny thing is that Warren National costs on average or more than a real, accredited school, so I don't get your point. Did all those Senate Hearings and lawsuits raise the price?
This is a stupid arguement July 20, 2007 at 8:23 a.m.
A "degree" that does not have regional accredidation is a worthless piece of paper. Any one that argues otherwise is mis-informed, a complete idiot, or has alterior motives (i.e. has their livlihood attached to the school offering unaccreditied degrees)
Jason July 22, 2007 at 4:13 p.m.
"Funny thing is that Warren National costs on average or more than a real, accredited school, so I don't get your point. Did all those Senate Hearings and lawsuits raise the price?"
You obviously have no idea about education costs in this country. Kaplan was more than Warren National and my traditional "brick and mortar" classroom courses dwarfed the per-credit hour price of Kaplan And Warren National. At $350/hr (which is generously low) and 62 hours required for an associates, this would work out to $21,700 just for tuition. Kaplan and Warren are nowhere near this cost. I understand math is not everyone's strong suit. An apology is not necessary on your part.
Bryan July 23, 2007 at 12:35 p.m.
Hello to everyone in this post!
I will try to strike a more positive tone.
Education comes in many forms throughout ones life. In some cases their are smart folks out there who have for what ever reason the need to learn more.
Some are born to a family who had the means to send their children to a traditional university and get a great educational experience.
Their are some who have work along side folks with advanced degrees and were inspired to further themselves.
Their are some who work along side folks with advanced degrees did the same and in some cases better work who felt left out the game only because of the paper.
One should walk in these folks shoes before casting a stone, I have!
I understand clearlythe verbal battle here.
Those that have the accredited degree not wanting their degree to be lessoned by the ”degree mills". I say to you you are the only one who can lesson the value of your degree.
Universities not wanting to loose the potential revenue stream.
The folks, including me, who have an unaccredited degree that worked hard to obtain wanting their educational experience to be validated in some form or fashion.
My experience was positive; I guess I am one of the lucky ones. It has brought me around the world, open doors I could have never imagined and justified my original goal, to better myself.
Isn't that what education is suppose to be about?
Please smart folks on both side of the issue, accredited and non accredited. Don't cast the first stone!
Learn more about your subject, research deeper then validate your work.
Let you action speak for you! After all it is the knowledge that will shine at the end of the day not the method of obtaining it.
Best Regards,
Bryan
WNU Student July 24, 2007 at 3:05 a.m.
To Lawson:
Why doesn't WNU have a chance for accredidation?
To Bryan: July 24, 2007 at 1:51 p.m.
"The folks, including me, who have an unaccredited degree that worked hard to obtain wanting their educational experience to be validated in some form or fashion. "
I'm glad you learned something and I agree with the life-long learning sentiment. However, you have a "degree" from a business that accepts 100% of students, graduates 100% of students, and from the Senate testimony, requires very little effort and is unaccredited. What does that say to a potential employer? Two things:
1) Your "degree" was easy to obtain and whether you learned anything is unverifiable, since nobody knows what the curriculum is, if there actually is one.
2) You didn't take 10 minutes on Google to investigate a shady school and paid the same or more money that a legitimate schoold would cost.
Bryan July 25, 2007 at 7:31 a.m.
Thanks for you observations and comments!
Sorry I have to ask.
"I'm glad you learned something and I agree with the life-long learning sentiment. However, you have a "degree" from a business that accepts 100% of students, graduates 100% of students, and from the Senate testimony, requires very little effort and is unaccredited. What does that say to a potential employer? "
Are you basing your observation solely on what’s in the government article? http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04771t.pdf...
The purpose of this probe was to identify accounting fraud in the Federal Goverment, during the investigation it also uncovered that their are programs, or should I say and procedures for obtaining a degree other than accredited intuitions.
You make several assumption in your summary and in point 1 & 2.
I assume that you are a graduate of an accreditated instuition!
How do you validate your education to a potential employer?
I assume again, GPA, transcripts, education verification from the instution.
If I am correct; So far we go about it the same way!
By easy to obtain if you are referring to working a full time job 8~12 hours a day, coming home passing pleasantries’ with my family then hitting the books for 3 to 4 hours, including 4~7 hours Sat&Sun for 3 years.
Then yes it was easy!
Prior to the start of this program an investigation was undertaken via the internet, Department of Education and also the state which provided the school its license to issue degrees.
It was clear that this program was not accredited!
Further I learned that accreditation is a "voluntary" association not mandated by the Federal Government or
by all States but rather pressure is applied by the target market and intuitions issuing degrees to meet the same standards.
It appears that business (Universities) and the Federal Government are attempting and to equate non accreditation status as degree mills.
I agree one should not be allowed to buy a piece of paper, earning it is a total different issue.
I wish you well in your travels.
Best Regards,
Bryan
Me July 25, 2007 at 1:53 p.m.
"How do you validate your education to a potential employer? I assume again, GPA, transcripts, education verification from the instution. If I am correct; So far we go about it the same way!"
Way wrong: The potential employer goes to the National Student Clearinghouse, a verification service that only accepts real, accredited universities that have been reviewed and approved by the Dept. of Education / CHEA. That approval process covers qualified faculty, structured curriculum and rigor.
The Clearinghouse will then validate back to the employer that the applicant has a legitimate degree.
Me 2 July 25, 2007 at 2:09 p.m.
My point is that you have to go to an independent 3rd party to verify the usefullness of any certification / license / degree. Those independent 3rd parties are accreditors, state licensure boards, national student clearing house, faculty accreditation requirements etc.
Having a non independent degree or transcript from Warren National is meaningless, since nobody will vouch that it has any academic meaning.
For example, you can get a degree and a transcript from Rochville University (unaccredited like Warren National / Kennedy Western) at: http://www.affordabledegrees.com/
No Studies
No Attendance No Waiting
No Examinations
No Hefty Fee
On the basis of what you already know, you can now qualify for an accredited degree that is accepted and recognized worldwide for as little as $199. Order now and receive your degree in just 5 days!
Wrong - O July 26, 2007 at 1:30 a.m.
"Are you basing your observation solely on what’s in the government article? http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04771t.pdf......
The purpose of this probe was to identify accounting fraud in the Federal Goverment, during the investigation it also uncovered"
Look at the title again:
"Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense."
So it's about academic / credentials fraud, and the government happened to pay for some of them unknowingly.
If you read the report, it focuses on employees defrauding the government by using fake and unaccredited academic credentials to secure raises and promotions falsely. Those Kennedy Western and other "degree holders" were terminated or disciplined. The end result was that they tightened up their screening process to make sure those didn't sneak through any more.
Bryan July 26, 2007 at 7:58 a.m.
Thanks again for you comments;
I would ask that you read the first chapter and more from the Dept of Education concerning Degree Mill's!
Also note in the article the use of the term "recognized"!
http://www.ed.gov/students/prep/college/...
"What is a diploma mill? The dictionary defines a diploma mill as:
An institution of higher education operating without supervision of a state or professional agency and granting diplomas which are either fraudulent or because of the lack of proper standards worthless. - Webster's Third New International Dictionary "
source:
http://www.ed.gov/students/prep/college/...
Further:
"Accreditation in the United States is a voluntary, non-governmental process, in which an institution and its programs are evaluated against standards for measuring quality".
source:
http://www.ed.gov/students/prep/college/...
Also while attempting to make my way thru the govermental info I looked up the accreditiation "corporation" that WNU has made an application.
" What is the Higher Learning Commission?
The Higher Learning Commission (HLC) is an independent corporation and one of two Commission members of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools (NCA), which was founded in 1895 as one of six regional institutional accreditors in the United States. The Higher Learning Commission accredits, and thereby grants membership in the Commission and in the North Central Association, to degree-granting educational institutions in the North Central region: Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, New Mexico, South Dakota, Wisconsin, West Virginia, and Wyoming.
HLC is recognized by the US Department of Education and the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA)."
source:
http://www.ncahlc.org/index.php
Wrong O comments:
One of several purposes listed on the Dept of Edu for assoication in an accreditation "corporation", federal funding!
Which if you re-read the article/ Federal Investigation listed eariler in the post, objectively, one might make the connection.
Re-read:
Summary & Back ground, please!
Adherence to New Homeland Security laws governing Federal Government reimbursement for degrees or courses from non accredited institutions.
Yes, the government investigators posing as a prospective student uncovered the practices use by listed Universities, business or corporations, however you choose to label a degree mill, to defraud the Fed.
I have not located the action taken by the Fed for those who hold a non-accredited degree.
Please provide your source.
I look forward to everyones reply!
Caveat Emptor July 26, 2007 at 6:41 p.m.
Thanks for the reference, Kennedy Western has been proven to meet the criteria you cite. "because of the lack of proper standards worthless."
"WNU has made an application." - That's swell, but they've hidden in "applicant status" on and off over the last 23 years as they've been forced to move from Idaho to Hawaii to California to Wyoming. I've applied for the NBA draft, but haven't had any luck for 23 years either.
Your arguments don't hold any weight, still waiting for some link to an independent third party site validating that Warren National University / Kennedy Western University is a real school.
So far, I can point to these sources as verifying that Kennedy Western / Warren National is invalid / worthless / illegal and has been since it started printing degrees.
1. Government Accounting Office - Federal investigation
2. Sworn estimony of former employees and undercover agents
3. State of Texas laws and I believe 8 other states (Maine, Michigan, Oregon come to mind for starters).
4. State Licensing boards
5. Accrediting bodies.
You've cited:
1. Personal opinion
2. "Applicant status" maybe the 24th year is the lucky one!
Point out some verifiable facts instead of arguing that when they were prominently featured in a Senate Hearing on diploma mills, that it was kind of an accounting thing.
Caveat Emptor 2 July 26, 2007 at 6:43 p.m.
Here is the link you requested showing where the government put a stop to the use of Kennedy Western degrees.
OPM ends diploma mill acceptance
Federal Computer Week May 14, 2004: "The Office of Personnel Management pulled the plug Thursday on using credentials from so-called diploma mills to qualify for a federal job and cut off tuition reimbursements to federal workers who take courses from those unaccredited institutions. In a strongly worded memo to federal managers, OPM Director Kay Coles James established a clear policy against using credentials from unaccredited institutions to get a job, a raise or reimbursement from the federal government for taking courses. 'There is no place in federal employment for degrees or credentials from diploma mills,' James wrote. 'They may not be used to qualify for federal jobs or salaries. You may not send employees to diploma mills for degree training or any other form of education. You may not reimburse employees for tuition associated with these schools. You may not use your authority to repay student loans if the degree is from a diploma mill.'"
¶ 5/14/2004 01:02:00 PM
Thursday, May 13, 2004
U.S. Officials Sport Fake Degrees
Wired News, May 13, 2004: "At least 28 high-ranking government officials, including three managers responsible for emergency operations at nuclear facilities, have fake degrees from so-called diploma mills, according to a government report issued Tuesday. The General Accounting Office, Congress' investigative arm, told a Senate committee Wednesday that it found 463 government employees who received degrees from three unaccredited schools: Kennedy-Western University, California Coast University and Pacific Western University."
Bryan July 27, 2007 at 7:04 a.m.
Sorry I don't understand this comment: 1. Personal opinion
While I agree during some of our eariler post I added some personal opinion the last post provided quotes, and link sources. Thats the best that I can do from my location.
On the other hand you provide a list without a source:
"So far, I can point to these sources as verifying that Kennedy Western / Warren National is invalid / worthless / illegal and has been since it started printing degrees"
1. Government Accounting Office - Federal investigation
2. Sworn estimony of former employees and undercover agents
3. State of Texas laws and I believe 8 other states (Maine, Michigan, Oregon come to mind for starters).
4. State Licensing boards
5. Accrediting bodies
1,2,3 & 5
1&2 I assume the source to be the goverment investigation title:
Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense
Personal comments:
I've attempted to illustrate the initial purpose of the goverment investigation however; I understand we see this from two different perspectives with differing opinions.
3. I again assume the source, the internet, I have also run across this blog somewhere on the WWW.
5. Of course Accrediting bodies, they KW /WNU have to the best of my knowledge never advertised or list their program / business as holding accreditation. State licensed, yes, by Wyoming.
I assume and hope that you are the source for previous comments using different alias in each post;
If so you state:
"Those Kennedy Western and other "degree holders" were terminated or disciplinedlude to dismissal and other"
I cannot find any information on the web or in your last statments.
OK, enought of this at least from me!
On a positive note!
I contacted the Higher Learning accreditation agency, Link: http://www.ncahlc.org/index.php?option=c...
which KW / WNU have applied mandated by Wyoming's State board of Edu and received the following:
I received a prompt reply which indicates they are being reviewed by the org and if the standards are sufficent for a site visit the org will visit. The reply further explained that the responce did not indicate a positive or negative acceptance.
I would attach a copy however I am at the office and the email is on my home PC, also am leaving from my office to head out for a well needed holiday / vacation to an island in the Med, Mallorca.
So I will not be able to reply for a few weeks.
Bryan
States where it is illegal with link July 27, 2007 at 3:54 p.m.
Here are the 7 seven states where it is outright illegal (10 total with various restrictions) to use an unaccredited Kennedy Western / Warren National "degree".
"Is Oregon the only state that disallows use of unaccredited degrees?
No. It is also illegal in North Dakota, New Jersey, Texas, Nevada, Washington and Maine to use unaccredited degrees. It is illegal in Indiana to use an unaccredited doctorate and Michigan law limits the legal options of users. Illinois limits the use of unaccredited degrees to those licensed by other states.
See those states’ laws
http://www.osac.state.or.us/oda/unaccred...
for details. Many other states are considering similar laws in order to prevent fraud."
LOL July 29, 2007 at 7:10 a.m.
"also am leaving from my office to head out for a well needed holiday / vacation to an island in the Med, Mallorca. "
Had a good laugh at this one. If you have a Warren National / Kennedy Western "degree", it is more likely that McDonalds gave you the weekend off.
WNU Student July 31, 2007 at 5:47 a.m.
Can someone explain to me why Warren National University does not have a chance for accredidation? They have a similar On-Line Program to a lot of other universities/colleges. How long does the accredidation process take?
To WNU Student: July 31, 2007 at 2:14 p.m.
Because of their shady past, everyone assumes it is just another dodge.
They have moved from state to state to state to avoid regulation and/or accreditation. (Hawaii, California, Wyoming, Idaho... might be missing one)
They have "applied" for accreditation in the past, just so they could be an "applicant" for accreditation, so they had something their agressive telemarketers could sell. If you read the testimony of a former employee, their "admissions" (telemarketing) people were paid on commission for each applicant they could lure in.
I don't know how long the accreditation process is, but they haven't made it in 24 years of trying so far.
There are many, many, real accredited online programs out there that won't stain your resume.
WNU Student July 31, 2007 at 10:01 p.m.
Thanks for the Information. I don't understand or someone explain to me how a Unaccredidated Institution would tranish one's resume? When one applies for a Job in the Corporate/Private Sector, they don't ask whether it was from accredited or unaccredited institution? Rather, they want to verify that you have a degree, gpa, major. No?
If you put KW'S Behind and look at WNU as a New Institution, don't you think they have a chance for getting accredidation?
To WNU: August 1, 2007 at 4:18 p.m.
"look at WNU as a New Institution, don't you think they have a chance for getting accredidation?"
No.
It's the same organization, same leadership, same location, that couldn't get accreditation for 24 years. The name change is just to rid themselves of the stigma of the Kennedy Western name.
WNU Student August 2, 2007 at 4:42 a.m.
Would one be able to explain to me how studying at WNU would tarnish one's resume? When one applies for a Job, they are not asked whether you attended Unacreedited or Accredited Institution in corporate sector. Rather, do you have a degree or not.
To WNU August 4, 2007 at 2:52 a.m.
"When one applies for a Job, they are not asked whether you attended Unacreedited or Accredited Institution in corporate sector."
WOW! I feel truly sorry for the clueless individual that told you that. I work in HR in a large corp, and the vast majority of colleagues I talk to accept only Regionally Accredited degrees. It's a big discussion right now whether nationally (a lesser accreditation) accredited degrees should be accepted with other compensating experience. Unaccredited degrees are not even degrees in my mind.
Please PLEASE talk to any advisor at a local community college, an HR director in a large corp, or even a high school guidance counselor to set you straight.
WNU Student August 4, 2007 at 4:20 a.m.
Thanks for the information and guidance in clarifying the issue on/around acceptance of Unaccredited degree within corporate sector. Since you work for a major corporation adn within their HR Department, I was wondering, if additional details would be provided.
Do you know if similar policies are in place within Financial Sector, Investment Banks, Regional Banks, Etc?
Someone with over 6+ Years of a major Investment Bank Experience and WNU BS - Business Administration Degree on their Resume would be any issues? If one was trying to for other positions, would HR within those organizations have any issues?
Your assistance would be truly appreciated.
Fraud Fighter August 4, 2007 at 1:29 p.m.
"Someone with over 6+ Years of a major Investment Bank Experience and WNU BS - Business Administration Degree"
Not possible, with a KWU / WNU "degree". Post a link please
Really? August 4, 2007 at 3:26 p.m.
If somehow, you really got into a good company despite your unaccredited degree, my advise is to keep that job until you retire, keep your mouth about how you obtained your "degree", and don't apply internally or externally for anything that might trigger a background check and put your existing job in jeopardy.
Potential WNU Student August 4, 2007 at 7:12 p.m.
It has been very interesting to read the comments on the University.
Without having Bias, someone explain to me, why the New School will be turned out for the accredidation? On the Wyoming State Website, it's shown that their license is extended till 2008 and have applied for accredidation?
Compared to this school, there are many others that have questionably programs also, but accredited by US Department of Education's standards. No?
To Potential Student: August 5, 2007 at 2:52 a.m.
Umm, read this entire thread or spend 3 minutes on Google and you'll see why you'd be throwing your money away.
If you still believe that WNU is the absolute best possible option for you, by all means apply. You're probably a few weeks away from getting a "degree".
Don't let the fact that there are hundreds of real, online, accredited universities out there offering that same major in the same format without the terms "Senate Hearing", "Type B Misdemeanor", "Illegal in some states", "Fraudulent or Substandard Institution with No Known Texas Connection", discourage you.
Shinigami August 5, 2007 at 3:04 a.m.
The biased comment that "you can earn %40 of the credit at Kennedy-Western (Now Warren National) in 16) is not true. If some one did do that than they are either cheating or found some sneaky way to crack the code.
Warren National is the same University as Kennedy-Western except that it has several programs such as Engineering.
I would speculate that the reason that there is so much elitist prejudice against this instution may be because tradional programs are jelous of their place in the academic community. If someone creates a better and more efficient way to educate which makes quality education more available its fought tooth and nail.
It should be remembered that at one time adult education programs and those which used non-traditional approaches (such as night school, community colleges and so on) were once viewed suspiciously.
Now we have a new type of distance learning program which is internet based and a lot of people are bent out of shape.
Wasabi August 9, 2007 at 3:36 a.m.
"The biased comment that "you can earn %40 of the credit at Kennedy-Western (Now Warren National) in 16) is not true"
Yes it is true. It is a part of Senate testimony that a government employee did just that. See above link.
"Now we have a new type of distance learning program which is internet based and a lot of people are bent out of shape."
There are hundreds of real, accredited distance learning programs out there. Kennedy / Warren is not one of them. I can't say it any more plainly.
Wasabi 2 August 9, 2007 at 7:31 p.m.
The other thing also to keep in mind that there are institutions online that do give Life and Work Experience Credits up to 30 Credits. Remember these are US Accredited Educational Instuitutions. Do your research and you will come to know.
The question is really, if these are able to get accredited, than I don't see why WNU can not succeed in this venue.
To: States where it is illegal with link August 14, 2007 at 4:59 a.m.
You forgot to add that Kennedy Western / Warren National is banned from offering / advertising degrees in California, Oregon and ?? any other states??
James August 15, 2007 at 5:10 a.m.
"On the Wyoming State Website, it's shown that their license is extended till 2008 and have applied for accredidation?"
True and true. But... they have talked about accreditation so many times before that it's hard to tell what their odds are. Until that time, if it comes, all degrees issued prior to that date will still be unaccredited.
Look elsewhere.
Jackie August 16, 2007 at 1:58 p.m.
Why was my response not posted?
Shinigami August 17, 2007 at 2 a.m.
To Wasabi:
"Yes it is true. It is a part of Senate testimony that a government employee did just that. See above link."
I do not believe that what was said is true. The Senate committee heard testimony from a biased source who was not subject to cross examination.
If indeed this witness did do this amount of credit in such a ridiculously short time than I fail to understand how, short of cheating.
I can tell you that I did attend Warren National and graduated. It took me about two years (and I transferred in with a bachelors from another university). The classes were NOT easy.
I only wish that the committee which investigated the University would have been less biased.
Incidently, I did attend an accredited four year University (Illinois State University) and I knew a number of students who cheated. Many of them took classes that they never attended (usually simple courses where there were large numbers of students enrolled) and passed around the answers during the exams. Cheating is pretty universal in fact.
I myself never cheated because 1) its unethical and 2) I was genuinly interested in learning.
Now there are such places as diploma mills where you pay money and voila' your degree arrives in the mail. Some will even give you phoney transcripts and references. But Warren National is not one of them. This is a legitimate distance learning school.
To Shingami August 17, 2007 at 3:46 a.m.
Shingami - Would you be able to provide details around what type of work you do and whether your employer accepted WNU Degree? How do you tackle cocnerns when one doess education verification adn they come to know that WNU is in process of being accredited?
To Shingami: August 17, 2007 at 1:23 p.m.
"If indeed this witness did do this amount of credit in such a ridiculously short time than I fail to understand how, short of cheating"
You should read the testimony instead of speculating. WNU waived a bunch of graduate level courses based on claims of life experience, but no documentation was required.
The student then took 2 open book exams to get credit for 2 graduate classes. Read it, it's public record and there is a link above. No cheating involved.
Shinigami August 17, 2007 at 11:36 p.m.
Details? I am a Network Administrator for Matsushi-ta (deliberately mispelled to bypass the swear filter) Electronics Corporation. I have talked to my employers openly about my education and classwork. In fact, my company has approved my education even before I enrolled. For the most part, the issue of accredidation has never come up. In my line of work its really what you know that is important. I do believe that the education I received enabled me to become a better administrator. I still keep my textbooks and refer to them often.
I did read the testimony. What I know is that the investigator was an officer in the Coast Guard (if I remember correctly). She claims to have taken, what was it four exams and got 40% of her classes completed. And it was in two days.
I do not know how it was done. There was no explaination of what method was used. If there were it was not part of the record.
All I can tell you is that the least amount of time I spent taking a class from beginning to end was about 7 weeks and that was taking only one course at a time and concentrating only on that one course.
I am not saying that what this witness said is not true. Just that I do not know how it was done. If she did find a shortcut than I do not know what it was. Maybe the Univesity needs to be made aware of this.
LOL August 19, 2007 at 5:43 a.m.
I just wandered across this website, but let me give you the book on Warren National "so called" University.
They are unaccredited,
There degrees are easy to get,
No reputable employer will even consider this a degree of any sort.
What a joke!
Ganju Shiba August 19, 2007 at 8:25 p.m.
To LOL:
You gave a brief review, if you would call it that about the University (and it is a real University and not "so called").
My only question is, did YOU attend this school? If not than you are not qualified to make that statement.
Here are the facts:
WNU operates legally. The school is licensed by the State of Wyoming.
WNU is an applicant for accreditation.
The degrees are NOT easy to get. You do not merely send money and get some bogus diploma in the mail. You need to earn it.
No reputable employer you say? I think if you were to ask any graduate if their employer accepted a Warren National degree they would give you a different answer.
And the only joke is that someone like you would make these statements knowing nothing about what you are talking about.
I suggest you research your topic a bit more before making statements like this.
? about illegal use of unaccredited "degrees" August 19, 2007 at 10:10 p.m.
"You forgot to add that Kennedy Western / Warren National is banned from offering / advertising degrees in California, Oregon and ?? any other states??"
My question is on California. It's not listed as one of the states it's illegal in, but Warren National cannot sell degrees there? Anyone have more details than that? Just seems odd that they are located in California, but can't advertise in California, but no illegal either.
Wyoming - haven for unaccredited "universities" August 19, 2007 at 10:17 p.m.
"Wyoming * Weak law and poor enforcement allowed state to fill with unaccredited suppliers. Political interference exacerbated this problem. The 2006 Wyoming legislature passed a new law requiring eventual accreditation, which should solve the problem in a couple of years."
Quick Question August 23, 2007 at 11:45 p.m.
Has any student been able to get their credits transferred to another institution or continue for another degree program with either WNU or KW Degree? If so, please advise on instiution where you continued or that accepted your coursework.
Quick Answer August 24, 2007 at 5:10 a.m.
No. Only other unaccredited universities will even consider it.
Chris August 24, 2007 at 11:18 p.m.
Ok so this is the second attempt to post this. I went to WNU / KWU and I think that a lot of you who have not even gone should not comment. The school serves a purpose. I went there. It is for mid career professionals who do not have time under any circumstances sit in a classroom. They have homework, readings, tests, etc. All schools have had their bumps in the road. With the federal hearing, that was one student who did not even go to WNU / KWU who bought their degree online from Hamilton College and was upset that she decided to take all the universities in Wyoming to court. Since WNU / KWU is the largest online university they had to go to court too. Yes, they have disgruntled employees but so does everyone. That guy that was on the stand was employed for two weeks. So you guys really should not knock a school, they have been in existance since 1984. A lot of schools are not accredited ie Havard. I could find articles that are not great about everything. But why would I? I say understand that they are helping society as they helped me. I am the CEO of a major coroporation and it is because of WNU / KWU. Education is education. I am sorry but it is legitimate. Why not pick on something else that matters like the war and why innocent people are dying versues a school? What has America come too? :( We are a horrible example to other countries.
Chris is funny... August 25, 2007 at 1:45 a.m.
"mid career professionals who do not have time under any circumstances sit in a classroom."
Those busy people can spend the same amount of time and money and get a regionally accredited degree, there are hundreds of options.
"A lot of schools are not accredited"
Complete lie. Most people can name hundreds of real, accredited universities. Only a few (those in higher ed and HR) can name a few unaccredited timebombs they've run across.
"I am the CEO of a major coroporation"
No, you are not. Entry level jobs are checked for accredited education credentials. CEO's of major corps are run through the ringer.
Ganju Shiba August 27, 2007 at 8:59 p.m.
To "Chris is funny",
How would you know who Chris is or what Chris does?
Are you clairvoyant?
Since you have this ability than maybe you can tell me some hot stock tips? Maybe you can let me know who will win the next World Cup?
Robert Fuller, PhD August 28, 2007 at 4:21 a.m.
Robert Fuller, PhD June 15, 2007 at 3:51 p.m.
The debate over accredited versus non-accredited came up all the time when I worked for the U.S. Department of Education. Because the academic world sees the nature of degrees versus experiences from a different perspective than does the workforce, neither is willing to budge much on their stance. And here's why: Statistics show that 60% of those who attend college, whether they be traditional universities, online universities, unaccredited or accredited, never actually use what they learned or were supposed to have been taught after they graduate from college. They use the degree to get in the door, end up doing something totally different or unrelated to their educational background, and actually do quite well. Statistics also show that 43% of new hirees are retrained to do their jobs using concepts vastly differently from what they learned in college. The shocking statistic was the number of employers who actually verify educational credentials when hiring someone. Only about 25% of employers actually check the educational credentials of new employees. The other 75% base their hiring practices on experience and word-of-mouth referrals (opinions) of your references or previous supervisors. But of course, they don't tell potential employees that.
A friend of mine who sat on regional and national accrediting bodies for probably 15 years told me "accredited or nonaccredited, it's all about money and poeple keeping their jobs these days; school officials will promise or say anything to the accrediting bodies these days to keep their doors open." I'm inclined to believe him at this point because I've seen some accredited institutions that should never have been opened!
Just some thoughts...
Robert
Ho Hum August 28, 2007 at 6:44 a.m.
Of course, 98.3216% of statistics with no credible source cited are just plain B.S.
I had the best laugh at this one:
"Only about 25% of employers actually check the educational credentials of new employees. The other 75% base their hiring practices on experience and word-of-mouth referrals."
Of course, again, no source cited. Any competent corporation, and all universities verify credentials. The ones that don't must be sole proprietors, small partnerships, or fast food restaurants that do not have the savvy or the means to protect themselves.
To Ho Hum August 28, 2007 at 6:11 p.m.
It seems that you have an expertise on/around the verificaiton process in the HR Department. What is your take on corporations veryifying degrees with institutions such as Warren National University? Do they Hire Candidates? If Candidates have 5+ Years of Experience, MBA from this University, will they be given a job?
Ho Hum August 29, 2007 at 7:11 a.m.
To be hired in a large corporation for any professional position, it requires a regionally accredited bachelors degree and relevant work experience. Therefore, an unaccredited so called "degree" does not meet the minimum requirements for such a job.
Since a corporation will get dozens of qualifed applicants meeting the criteria, they would have no need to review "unaccredited degree" holding applicants.
JR August 29, 2007 at 6:58 p.m.
All of those here bashing KWU/WNU are nothing more than ignorant blithering idiots. You have no FACTS to base your statements. Government inquiry? PLEASE, all smoke and mirrors.
1. Being Accredited is voluntary and NOT subject to US law.
2. To be accredited means that you pay a ton of money to some commission and become part of the 'Good ol boys club". These commissions have been around for a long long time and are getting "pissy" when something newer and better comes along and don't want to play in the commissions sandbox. It is the same as the record labels and the online music downloads out there. WAAA!
Who was the idiot that said they work in HR at a large corporation? oh, yes, To WNU (what an original name) I know of many companies that accept a degree from this institution. In fact a friend of mine is the CIO of a large, multi-state eye care practice. He attended KW, and was promoted to CIO AFTER getting his degree.
The bottom line is like Robert Fuller above stated, it all comes down to money. Paying BIG bucks to be part of the "Good ol boys club" PERIOD.
JR August 29, 2007 at 7:01 p.m.
Just read Ho Hum's posts.
What an idiot.
JR August 29, 2007 at 7:22 p.m.
One further thing.
Oregon was sued by KWU/WNU and the two settled out of court.
They agreed that KWU/WNU will not be classified as a "diploma mill", State of Oregon employees may not use KWU/WNU(as is the right of ANY employer), residents MAY use KWU/WNU on their resumes.
You can read it all here: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0...
All of you bashers are just that, bashers.
Bashers=People who make incorrect statements based on ignorance and/or feeling. Complete lack of logic. Loosers. Whiners. Blithering idiots.
To JR August 29, 2007 at 9:28 p.m.
You sound like someone of virtue and make decision based on facts. I would like to hear factually from someone how education is verified within the HR Organizations? When they verify, do they make a big stiff, if school is accredited or unaccredited?
Illegal in Oregon without this disclaimer August 30, 2007 at 4:56 a.m.
In addition, an individual using an unaccredited degree, even if the employer allows use of such degrees, must disclose on resumes, letterheads, business cards, announcements and advertisements that "(Name of school) does not have accreditation recognized by the United States Department of Education and has not been approved by the Office of Degree Authorization." ORS 348.609(2)(a). The only exception is for schools approved by ODA. See ORS 348.609(d) and OAR 583-050-0014.
It is a Class B Misdemeanor under the Oregon Criminal Code to use a degree in violation of ORS 348.609.
Correcting JR with verifiable source August 30, 2007 at 4:59 a.m.
"1. Being Accredited is voluntary and NOT subject to US law."
Here are the 7 seven states where it is outright illegal (10 total with various restrictions) to use an unaccredited Kennedy Western / Warren National "degree".
"Is Oregon the only state that disallows use of unaccredited degrees?
No. It is also illegal in North Dakota, New Jersey, Texas, Nevada, Washington and Maine to use unaccredited degrees. It is illegal in Indiana to use an unaccredited doctorate and Michigan law limits the legal options of users. Illinois limits the use of unaccredited degrees to those licensed by other states.
See those states’ laws
http://www.osac.state.or.us/oda/unaccred......
for details. Many other states are considering similar laws in order to prevent fraud."
How competent HR departments background check August 30, 2007 at 5:37 a.m.
"I would like to hear factually from someone how education is verified within the HR Organizations? When they verify, do they make a big stiff, if school is accredited or unaccredited?"
Most mid to large companies have gone to the National Student Clearinghouse for degree verification. It's a win-win. The individual Universities can offload alot of the verification work to the Clearinghouse, and HR departments can verify all valid degrees in one stop and print/save a verification for the file.
Nice and simple, if an applicant claims a degree, it's checked there.
Companies vary in what they validate:
*All degrees are accredited
*Highest degree is accredited
*Required accredited degrees per the job description
http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/
http://www.chea.org/search/
Small and naive companies, the controls can be very weak. Some don't check credentials, references, anything.
The HR professionals organization has good resources on protecting your organization in this regard.
http://www.shrm.org/
JR August 30, 2007 at 4:21 p.m.
To: Correcting JR with verifiable source.
No need for correction, except for your post.
I stated US law, not STATE law.
Accreditation is VOLUNTARY.
States are free to pass laws as they wish.
It all comes back to an institution willing to pay the ridiculously amount of money so as to join the "Good Ol Boy" club.
Re: How competent HR departments background check August 30, 2007 at 4:32 p.m.
I didn't see the University of Oxford on the National Student Clearinghouse.
Hmmm, Oxford must be a "diploma mill"
I guess my great grandfather would never get a job today like he did with Standard Oil.
How competent HR departments background check August 30, 2007 at 6:50 p.m.
The National Student Clearinghouse does not even have all the accredited universities on that list. I had attend a institution that has bene accredited by Middle States Association, Association of Collegiate Business Schools and Program and International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education.
In this circumstance, if candidate has presented the institution to HR and not on this clearinghouse. Than, how would the degree get validated? Would they not offer the candidate the position?
C2 August 31, 2007 at 6 a.m.
Good point, the Clearinghouse is not at 100% of US schools yet, only 91%. In those cases, HR can simply make sure the school is accredited on the Department of Education website and request verification directly from the school. Foreign schools are a little more work, but basically the same process. Both the Oxford and Middle States accredited examples above would obviously both pass this easily.
"More than 3,000 colleges, enrolling 91% of US college students, and hundreds of high school districts nationwide participate in the Clearinghouse
DegreeVerify: ...Commercial verifiers can instantly confirm degrees online, providing them with an easy, fast, and inexpensive way to validate educational records and combat credentials fraud."
http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/abou...
Glad to clear up all the confusion!
To JR: August 31, 2007 at 6:14 a.m.
I do agree with JR's point, that it's a shame that there isn't a single national law to deal with this issue.
Instead individual states and their consumer protection departments are left to fend for themselves. So until all 50 states have something in place, it's pretty easy to relocate to the states with the weakest education regulations.
JR August 31, 2007 at 3:35 p.m.
I have not stated nor do I promote the idea of a national law.
Each state has the right to do as they see fit, as long as they do not violate an individuals rights, as Oregon tried to do.
Therefore, the individual needs to take responsibility and due their due diligence when selecting a college/university to attend.
I see no problem with WNU's program. They require you to take, and pass, classes that are the core of the field in which one chooses to study. I have yet to see the purpose in spending tons of money for classes that are irrelevant to one's field of study. Does one REALLY care about what happened in the 17th century when they are studying Engineering or Technology? No they don't.
Interesting Article on Kennedy Western August 31, 2007 at 7:47 p.m.
"It May Take Hours, But You Too Can Earn a University Degree"
http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian...
The Oregonian Newspaper 7/4/04
TO JR & C2 August 31, 2007 at 8:44 p.m.
The question I ask at end of the day is whether Corporate Institutions will embrace/accept degree from WNU?
If Corporate HR Department does ask, how does one answer to them regarding this degree?
I don't think there is anything wrong with the WNU Institution at all. I think they are more open than others in their programs and they get grunt of it. As people saying they can get degrees from this school in hours, show me how?
The other question is do you think Higher Learning Commission will give WNU Accredidation?
C2 September 1, 2007 at 6:50 p.m.
I agree with JR
"Therefore, the individual needs to take responsibility and due their due diligence when selecting a college/university to attend."
Completely agree. If you truly perform due diligence, and are okay with the severe limitations, senate investigation, unaccredited status, inability to gain licensure, and in a growing number states where it is legal to use a WNU degree, plus the existence of hundreds of comparable, real accredited programs out there, go ahead and buy a WNU degree.
To poster above, post your major, and I'm sure someone can recommend a dozen good programs for you to attain your degree completely online, with accreditation.
To C2 September 3, 2007 at 9:48 p.m.
With that, do you think HR in Fortune 500 Corporations would terminate an employee for completing their degree at WNU?
Do you think this institution will ever receive accredidation?
Dr J. Bear September 4, 2007 at 1:35 a.m.
Inside scoop is that they will be accredited before 2009. Likely Fall/winter 2008.
RobertK September 4, 2007 at 2:40 a.m.
I love all this dialogue!
I've taken courses at the #2 public university in the nation - graduate level 18 credits thus far and I've done the same at KWU for undergraduate and actually the UVA one's were extremely similar.
What I liked about KWU is their asynchronus model, which is very nice and I can't wait for that to be so widespread.
Bricks and mortar schools have their place especially when heading straight into them from high school.
KWU is for the mid-level professional who has to keep a job down and a family together and still move ahead and keep up with what is going around.
I'm thankful to KWU - it has helped me finish up my undergraduate - took me almost two years.
I'm also thankful for those faculty from accredited higher education who saw a need and were willing to fill that need and provide their expertise even if the university is unaccredited.
It's been said truth generally goes this way:
1. It is first ridiculed by the establishment
2. It is then violently opposed by the establishment
3. It then becomes commonplace
Higher education is changing and it's places like KWU (now WNU) who venture out and seize the day!
Bricks and mortar institutions are changing, but they wouldn't change as quickly if it were not for front line efforts by places such as KWU/WNU.
Just ask our founding fathers what it cost to birth this country!
Why September 4, 2007 at 4:07 a.m.
were there no accredited Universities before 1951? How did our nation survive? Oh how?
Oh that is right, ALL UNIVERSITIES were substandard prior to alcohol binge drinking, sex, drugs etc.
Accreditation, which happened curiously around the same time as LSD introduction, and communist teaching on campus does beg the question----Is it possible WNU standards will have to be lowered to get accreditation? You bet. That and a little grease money into the pockets of politicians.
< 2% September 4, 2007 at 6:05 a.m.
I keep seeing on this site that WNU is illegal in 3 soetimes 4 and sometimes 7 different states. This is just not true. I called the office of degree authorization in all 7 states and below is the general description for all. (Remember, civil service jobs pay about half of what private sector pays and only make up about 2% of the jobs in any given state).
"There are Colleges and universities which are not currently accredited by an accrediting body of the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (www.chea.org). Degrees from these institutions will not be accepted by the Civil Service Commission as satisfying any educational requirements indicated on job specifications."
The lady in Texas even said that it is only a misdemenor to use an outright diploma mill diploma and Texas has yet to prosecute anyone for fear of not being able to get a prosecution.
Also her supervisor told me they are not allowed under federal law to call WNU a diploma mill.
To: <2% September 4, 2007 at 1:14 p.m.
I doubt you have a link for anything above. It directly contradicts what those seven states have passed into their laws. That kind of misrepresentation is very easy to disprove in 15 seconds of Googling. For example in Texas:
Institutions Whose Degrees are Illegal to Use in Texas
"Fraudulent or substandard degree" means a degree conferred in Texas in violation of the Texas Education Code; conferred in another state in violation of that state's laws; conferred in another state by an institution that was not accredited by an accreditor recognized by the Coordinating Board... (Texas Educational Code, Chapter 61, Section 61.302)
The Texas Penal Code (Section 32.52) prohibits the use of fraudulent or substandard degrees "in a written or oral advertisement or other promotion of a business; or with the intent to: obtain employment; obtain a license or certificate to practice a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain a promotion, a compensation or other benefit, or an increase in compensation or other benefit, in employment or in the practice of a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain admission to an educational program in this state; or gain a position in government with authority over another person, regardless of whether the actor receives compensation for the position." Violation of this law is a Class B misdemeanor.
Recap: September 4, 2007 at 1:26 p.m.
So in Texas, it is illegal to use a KWU / WNU degree to:
*obtain employment
*obtain a promotion
*obtain admission to an educational program
No grey area there.
TO 2% & Recap September 4, 2007 at 6:40 p.m.
Do you know what the limitations are in the state of New Jersey?
Even with the Texas law, how come they allow private institutions to exist within their states?
99.98% You Mislead Well September 4, 2007 at 6:43 p.m.
Illegal only if
(1) uses or claims to hold a postsecondary degree that the person knows:
(A) is a fraudulent or substandard degree;
(B) is fictitious or has otherwise not been granted....
Keywords for those of you who graduated accredited schools is "That the person knows".
This is why Oregon lost the KW lawsuit. The WNU students and faculty believe their credentials to be authentic.
Note:WNU is not required by any law to inform students of any Texas Laws. Therefore how would any student know of the Texas definition.
Oh, I suppose you have memorized the entire legal code in your state. You will try to say, Ignorance is no excuse under the law, but time and again under prescident law you are proven wrong.
How about this- Name one person convicted under the Tx. law.
Texas can not and will not touch this. It is a "Hot Potato." Texas knows the first attempt at a conviction will end up in some WNU student owning the state of Texas.
Also left out is that the Employer must press charges, at which time the states AG will advise them otherwise. Even if all is successful in getting a conviction it is just a misdemeanor, more likely just a warning.
love it homer September 5, 2007 at 3:15 a.m.
Loved the website.
I hate Texas.
The website is an insight into the back-woods hick arrogant cow-boy types that live there. I do feel bad for 99.98%. Maybe you picked a bad example for a state. Does Michigan have something you can quote against WNU? Better come up with something or you will become 50.001%.
Sorry ):. Next time spend a few minutes researching.
99.8% September 5, 2007 at 4:35 a.m.
Sorry to keep correcting you, but, KWU / WNU is specifically listed under the very clear heading:
"Institutions Whose Degrees are Illegal to Use in Texas"
That means... they are illegal to use in Texas.
The whole "the student must know" is another unsupported claim. Post a link and we'll discuss!
Texas example, per you request September 5, 2007 at 4:59 a.m.
Another verifiable Kennedy Western success story
"When Elected Officials Aren't What They Seem
Texas officials and Pennsylvania cats tout misleading credentials"
Excerpted:
"Identity deception can take many forms. A diploma mill degree, for example, may cause employers and taxpayers to assume a candidates credentials are genuine. Unless the deception is discovered, diploma mill customers adorn their identities with unearned titles before and after their name. Last year, Dallas based Trinity Southern University awarded a Masters degree to a Pennsylvania cat."
"News for Public Officials has learned that one well-known Texas County Clerk serving on the Supreme Court’s "Judicial Committee on Information Technology" Task Force claims a Ph.D. from a Wyoming school the United States General Accounting Office defines as a diploma mill.
Before she obtained her degree from Kennedy-Western and began calling herself Dr. Dianne Wilson, PhD, a Grand Jury indicted the Fort Bend County Clerk on charges she used taxpayer money to partially finance a Bachelor Degree from St. Edwards University and Certificates from the National Center for State Courts’ Institute for Court Management. (St. Edwards and the NCSC are accredited)
Kennedy-Western apparently accepted Wilson’s Certificates from the NCSC: Institute for Court Management as the equivalent of a Master’s Degree. The NCSC does not offer Master's degrees.
Wilson is not the only government official to claim advanced degrees from diploma mills or to put the title “Dr.” in front of their name after buying a degree from an unaccredited school."
To Texas example, per you request September 5, 2007 at 7:17 a.m.
This article is so old and outdated information. The perspective that students are not allowed to use their creditentials in educational or govt sector is clearly known. With that the actions of Dr. Wilson is a crime.
The question that is puzzling to me is why is this the only school that is in limelight? There are hundreds of other schools that have post secondary licenses and operate in every state. Why are they not target? Are those fraudlent also?
To all KWU/WNU bashers September 5, 2007 at 2:02 p.m.
I would like to see where any official government website SPECIFICALLY states that KWU/WNU is a "diploma mill".
A "diploma mill" is where one pays money and gets a piece of paper in the mail saying "Diploma".
I do not see any information on the US DoE site.
I do see a link to National Association of State Administrators and Supervisors of Private Schools (http://www.nasasps.com), which shows members and links to state licensing agencies, and lo and behold! there is Wyoming! and guess what? Wyoming has granted a license to WNU, and even to the University of Wyoming! WOW!
Basically all of you bashers are nothing more that the ignorant lapdogs for, as JR above put it, the "Good ol Boy" institutions.
WNU has top notch professors from universities across the nation and requires the students to do work and take tests.
The FTC even admits it! September 5, 2007 at 2:27 p.m.
From the FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION:
There are a few legitimate institutions that have not pursued accreditation.
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer...
Could WNU be one of these? NAH, of course not, that would make all of the "Big dogs" at State agencies, CHEA, GAO and others look like the fools they are for including WNU as a diploma mill when they are not.
BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Caveat Emptor September 5, 2007 at 6:19 p.m.
"There are a few legitimate institutions that have not pursued accreditation."
But there are thousands that have, and offer the exact same online programs as Warren National "University"
Caveat Emptor September 5, 2007 at 6:24 p.m.
"I would like to see where any official government website SPECIFICALLY states that KWU/WNU is a "diploma mill"."
Scroll up the thread, there are already several posted, with links.
I did like your link to the FTC's article called:
"Diploma Mills: Degrees of Deception"
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer...
To: Caveat Emptor September 5, 2007 at 6:28 p.m.
If there are thousands that are accredited and offer "the exact same online programs" as WNU, then what is the difference?
ONE thing: Refusal to pay the rediculous amount of money to the "good ol Boy" club. Since they have refused to pay, they have been attacked by every means available to the pompous Academia and Educrats to knock them down.
To: Caveat Emptor September 5, 2007 at 7 p.m.
Scroll up to see WHAT?
The GAO report? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.
It does not call KW?WN a diploma mill, it just states that government agencies paid money to them against regulations. The other schools are shams, and I have investigated.
If you are going off that ONE BIASED report, then you are surely a sucker!
FOLLOW THE MONEY. IT"S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY and the "Good ol Boy" club.
Caveat Emptor September 6, 2007 at 4:35 a.m.
"If there are thousands that are accredited and offer "the exact same online programs" as WNU, then what is the difference?"
Directly from the Federal Trade Commission Article you posted, answers your question:
"Colleges and universities accredited by legitimate organizations undergo a rigorous review of the quality of their educational programs."
"Diploma Mills: Degrees of Deception"
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer......
Also from the Federal Trade Commission September 6, 2007 at 4:51 a.m.
"Avoid Fake-Degree Burns By Researching Academic Credentials"
"Ask the applicant for proof of the degree and the school’s accreditation. If you don’t get satisfactory answers from the school itself and the accreditation sites on the Web, ask the applicant for proof of the degree, including a certified transcipt, and the school’s accreditation. Ultimately, it’s up to the applicant to show that he earned his credentials from a legitimate institution. "
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/busp...
Basic Background checking 101, from the Federal Consumer Protection arm.
To: Caveat Emptor September 6, 2007 at 12:14 p.m.
You have still not answered the question, if they are EXACTLY the same, then there is NO difference in the programs, except for accreditation.
Since accreditation is nothing more than joining the "Good ol Boys" club for a rediculous amount of money that provides absolutely NO real service in return, again I ask, what is the difference?
THERE IS NONE!
NOt until the middle of the last century was there any "accreditation" of schools. My My, what did we do before then? I guess all the great Leaders, business men/women, inventors, etc had substandard, worthless degrees because the schools they attended, Harvard, Yale, Stanford and others were not accredited.
Those that sit here and waste their breath how a school is not accredited is using flawed logic and have no argument.
WNU offeres the same courses as other "accredited" institutions using professors part-time from other "accredited" institutions. They are a quality institution that has unfortunately been lumped in with all of the diploma scams that are out there.
Until someone can provide some logical, factual data to back up their argument instead of "because I said so" then keep your traps shut.
First Amendment September 6, 2007 at 8:06 p.m.
The trend over the last 35 years for higher education to increasing be delivered by "for profit" entities, the fact that state laws vary greatly, and the tremendous growth of the Internet as a delivery technology for higher education account for the heated, related debates surrounding diploma mills, unaccredited institutions, and regional vs national accreditation. Each side of the issues is entrenched with its views because the stakes are indeed high. Higher education costs have skyrocketed over the last 50 years in the US, just about the same time accreditation bodies appeared. The regional and nation accreditation processes are not free, in fact are quite costly and time consuming. This is during a time when a larger percentage of the US population sought degrees, employers desired degrees, and the federal government greatly expanded the availability of education. The greater educational requirements of employers for degrees for career advancement and the surging cost and the time-demands of mid-level professional, two-parent income families led to a demand for alternative ways to obtain bachelor and advanced degrees. In the 1970s there arose many of these so-called diploma mills. Even some of the experts that call them "diploma mills" today, were expounding their merits as viable alternatives to gain higher education. As these alternative education providers grew and expenditures by the American public grew, this started a significant erosion of the revenue of traditional higher education providers, and indirectly to the regional and national associations that accredit them. At that point, these alternative institutions offered a viable alternative that saved time and great expense to individuals seeking degrees. Yes, some of these institutions were fraudulent; however, many did offer serious and significant, high-quality education. The alternative institutions focused on the objectives of education rather than merely counting up how many courses, papers, and grades, etc. as do the more traditional accredited schools. At this same time the Internet was being developed. The traditional accredited schools realized the potential to gain back some "market share" by leveraging this new technology and offering their degrees via the Internet, just like the alternative schools. The fact is that many of the unique aspects of the alternative, unaccredited schools have been absorbed by traditional schools--excepting, of course, the lower cost. However, I think it would better serve the interests of both sides to debate a even-handed, fair way to integrate these unaccredited institutions into our American educational system by constructive dialogue as how to determine the valid unaccredited institutions from those that truly are fraudulent. And mere opinion about these institutions being diploma mills will not suffice. If that is allowed, then opinion is allowed to become a de facto "accreditation entity."
The End September 6, 2007 at 11:55 p.m.
“You have still not answered the question, if they are EXACTLY the same, then there is NO difference in the programs, except for accreditation.”
You finally got it! It's the accreditation that separates them.
So, by FTC guidelines, "Colleges and universities accredited by legitimate organizations undergo a rigorous review of the quality of their educational programs."
Unaccredited “universities” have no such 3rd party quality review, no accountability, no oversight, no way to verify how much or how little students do to earn a “degree”. Take a look at what unaccredited universities have done recently:
Unaccredited Trinity Southern University issues a degree to a cat. (3.5 GPA!)
http://www.nbc10.com/money/3975070/detai...
Unaccredited Concordia College and University issues a degree to a dog.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17398521/
Unaccredited Rochville University can deliver your degree in 3-5 business days
Unaccredited Almeda University will grant you a degree for life experience
Unaccredited Kennedy Western University had a student who earned 40% of her Master’s degree in 16 hours of study (Senate Hearing)
Unaccredited Hamilton University conferred a doctorate, based primarily on a 4 page paper, to a gal in Homeland Security!
And those are only a few of the cases that made the paper. Who knows what multiple of that were discovered and handled quietly to avoid public embarrassment, and those waiting to be discovered.
To The End September 7, 2007 at 2:30 a.m.
You do make a point around Concord College and University, Rochville University, Almeda University & Hamilton University being diploma mills. We all agree that, they are true definition of diploma mills. Those schools just issue certificates without ever having to do any coursework, taking exams, writing thesis or in candidate status for accredidation.
It clearly shows the stupidity of the American Culture as being shallow minded, narrow minded and plain stupid.
Whether one wants to accept the form of online learning, Warren National University does have legitimate professors, legitimate Blackboard Systems and also candidate for the accredidation. They are also licesned by the department of Wyoming with notion that they have applied for the entry to the Boys Club.
I think what Frist Amendment wrote is correct, that as a nation, we need to have a debate/particular system on figuring out how we are going to tackle this issue. Not all Unaccredited schools are Fraud and WNU is one example of that.
If they were fradulent, why would they be applying for accreditation? I have heard that when they are doing that, they had to put down substantial deposit with State of Wyoming and Pay Hefty Application Fee for Accredidation Process. If someone knows the details, lay the open facts, as this is an open book and issues that we need to tackle as a country.
To: The End September 7, 2007 at 2:36 a.m.
So then what was the quality of education from these Colleges and Universities before the 1950's when the accreditation bodies came to be?
By your statement then, Harvard, Yale, MIT, Stanford, UCLA, Duke, Notre Dame, and the plethora of other institutions were nothing more than diploma mills, for there was no 3d party to regulate them.
Once again, accreditation entities are nothing more than "Good ol Boy" clubs that rape the educational institutions by extorting huge amounts of money so as to "verify" their educational programs.
Wyoming State Law September 7, 2007 at 2:50 a.m.
REGISTERED PRIVATE DEGREE GRANTING POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS
Effective July 1, 2006, the Wyoming Department of Education now requires annual registration of private degree granting post-secondary education institutions. One of the major criteria of becoming registered is that the school must either be accredited or be in the process of becoming accredited by an accrediting organization recognized by the United States Department of Education. See W.S. § 21-4-401 et seq. and the Wyoming Department of Education Emergency Rules and Regulations, Chapter 30 for a full discussion of the requirements.
Directly from CHEA September 7, 2007 at 2:56 a.m.
11. Q. What if an institution or program is not accredited? Does that mean
it’s bad?
A. Not necessarily, but it does mean one should review as much information
as possible about the institution before enrollment. An institution or program
may be new and may not have met minimum standards to even be
considered eligible for accreditation. If an institution or program is not
accredited, it should have some other means of quality review.
Q. Shouldn’t there be a separate standard in the law to review distance
learning?
A. Right now, institutional and programmatic accrediting organizations are
effectively reviewing distance learning within the framework of the agreement
reached with USDE and the Congress during the 1998 reauthorization:
distance learning is considered part of the scope of accrediting
organizations if they had been reviewing distance learning prior to 1998.
At this time, there does not appear to be a need for a separate standard.
However, as new types of education offerings—e.g., online non-degree
options from providers that are not affiliated with any accredited entity—
become more and more available, accrediting organizations may need to
consider whether they should be examining the quality of these offerings
as well. And, this may involve consideration of a separate standard.
Potential Student September 7, 2007 at 3 a.m.
I have over 5+ Years of work experience and have reviewed the WNU MBA Program. Looking at the faculty, program and cost perspective, I have found the program to be a good match. With that, I know there are cricitcs in this forum on the university, even though they have gone for accredidation.
Would you suggest that I enroll in the University or wait till they become accredidated?
To Potential Student: September 7, 2007 at 3:08 a.m.
Don't waste your time, money or career there. This very site has dozens of good, accredited, online options.
If you can afford it, one of the best is Penn State - World University.
For a value, try Fort Hayes State or Peru State (Nebraska)
To Wyoming State Law September 7, 2007 at 3:12 a.m.
When Wyoming became known as a haven for unaccredited schools due to there weak laws, many groups were lobbying for the law change:
"The University of Wyoming Student Senate plans to lobby lawmakers to crack down on unaccredited private colleges in the state, saying those schools drag down the reputations of other Wyoming institutions."
To Wyoming State Law September 7, 2007 at 4:49 a.m.
The question I have is than why did the president of WNU (Mr. Saltman) testify at the hearings in support of the Accredidation.
Why has the university taken step for the accredidation? From Accredidation perspective, explain to me, why this school wouldn't receive accredidation?
?? September 7, 2007 at 5:27 a.m.
Who knows, we can all speculate:
I would guess that when it became a requirement in Wyoming, it was apply for accreditation or shuffle off to another weak-lawed state, which would be it's 5th state.
AFAIK, this business is run out of California, but the Wyoming laws are much more favorable.
There is a chance that they may some day receive accreditation, which would be great, but past history that I read from all the articles here don't inspire much confidence.
To Potential Student September 7, 2007 at 8:20 p.m.
There are so many good, accredited online MBA programs out there, it is almost overwhelming to compare them all. Here are a few to look at to get you started, but keep in mind there are dozens and dozens more to choose from.
Franklin University
Davenport University Online
Baker College
Kaplan University
University of Phoenix (too expensive in my mind)
Peru State (one of the cheaper options mentioned above)
Fort Hays State (low cost)
DeVry University
Penn State World (Penn State name, and online too!)
University of Maryland – UC
Nova Southeastern
Central Michigan
Boise State
So, it really depends on which of the big three factors you are looking to maximize (Name recognition, cost, accreditation)
*The name recognition ones such as Penn State can be a great find.
*The no-name low cost ones are no frills, but great when the next promotion / offer requires an Accredited master’s.
*Most of these are only regionally accredited, which will guarantee universal acceptance, but recently some of the top companies like HP have required AACSB (business school accreditation) on top of that to be eligible for tuition reimbursement. These are the toughest, most rigourous accreditation / programs out there.
*I personally would avoid anything that is only nationally accredited, such as DETC accredited schools. Although it is a real accreditation, and your employer can verify it as being accredited during routine background checks, you can run into some problems using this degree. I say that as an Accountant, as it won’t allow you to become a CPA in most states.
Congrats on looking to further your education and taking the time to ensure you select a quality, accredited program.
Accredidation September 9, 2007 at 4:34 a.m.
I wanted to throw this out there, as I was speaking to someone earlier tonight who attends the prestine princeton university. One of their departments (Computer Science) didn't get/lost its accredidation. Does this mean, this is a Diploma Mill that Princeton University is Running?
SuperStudent September 12, 2007 at 4:34 a.m.
has anyone gotten a real job using a wnu degree? if you can actually get a job using this degree, then i could understand why ppl still apply. If not then it seems utterly useless and a complete waste of time and money.
Depends... September 12, 2007 at 2:53 p.m.
I think the ”Peter Principle” applies. As long as nobody checks into it, you could probably get an entry level job in some places. But as you look to rise through the ranks, the background checking is more consistent, and an unaccredited degree should be discovered. Look at the Notre Dame coach guy, he was fine when he was a nobody, but when he got the Notre Dame job, it took about 1 day for everyone to pick apart the education in his bio.
I’ve never seen any evidence of “graduates” becoming professors, executives, CPA’s, or anything newsworthy.
I truly hope that WNU eventually passes it’s quality review, so that those graduating after 2012? don’t have to worry about these things.
Re Super Student September 13, 2007 at 3:43 a.m.
My WNU Degree did help me get a promotion within my company. My employer recommended this University in fact.
Re Re Super Student September 13, 2007 at 4:15 a.m.
Would you able to verify whether your employer is a major fortune 500 corporation or small firm? Potentially the industry of the firm also?
Regarding the above" September 19, 2007 at 5:44 a.m.
I am at Matsush ita, the world's largest electronic corporation. We are best know for Panasonic but we also have other divisions.
Confused? September 20, 2007 at 1:31 p.m.
I just received the Warren National catalog and on Page 72, under the heading "Licenses and Credentials", it says:
"The University is oriented to those individuals NOT seeking licenses or credentials."
I am confused by that statement. I want my degree to be a credential, but it won't be?
Re: Confused September 21, 2007 at 3:36 a.m.
When the University gets Accredidation in 2008, you will not have any issues around credentials. If you are looking for a degree for purpose of credentials, why not try out one of the Diploma Mills such as Almeda University? No Education, No Studying, Just Pay Flat Fee and Great Certificate to Hang on your wall. What do you say?
Confused? September 21, 2007 at 3:46 a.m.
Anyone got a serious answer? Would I be able to use this as a credential on a job app or not? I won't need a license of any sort, so I am fine if it won't work for that.
Re: Confused? September 21, 2007 at 4:57 a.m.
You would be able to use this as a credential on the resume. Honestly speaking, you will not have any issues.
To Confused: September 21, 2007 at 4:43 p.m.
IF it is legal in your state.
IF you don't need to be licensed.
IF your potential employer doesn't check for accredited degrees.
IF your internet connection doesn't connect to any accredited universities that offer your major
Then it might be okay for you!
J. Bovin September 22, 2007 at 2:55 a.m.
Wow,
A whole bunch of ugly and upset folks here,,,, seeming to have some real issues with WNU/KWU. If it was as bad as what most everyone says it is,,,,, why don't our wonderfull goverment shut it down???
Well, here is my thoughts. When wanting to get into a safety engineering program the only one that came up was KWU/WNU. After phoning them and getting some references in the state that I live, I was impressed. Some of the ones given were:
Three Area Hospitals
Pulp & Paper Mills
and a few others.
After calling them, everyone seemed very pleased with the experence.
So I decided to send in my $50.00 and filled out the necessary paperwork & got moving forward.
One of the first things required was that I had to take a GERE. Being out of school for 30 years, I didn't fair so well. Around five days latter, I recieved a phone call that my $50.00 was being returned and and was told I did have what it took inregards to the math that was required in the area of study that I wanted.
After speaking with them, they required that I take a math course and pass with an acceptable grade and retake the GERE,,, I retook the test and passed with acceptable marks.
After going through the entire KWU/WNU program, I couldn't believe what I had learned, which improved my knowledge and
self-confidence and increased my earnings incredibly.
People can say what they want about "Accredidation". I graduated for an "Accredited" school, my High School to be exact, and there were people getting the same diploma that I got that couldn't:
* Read
* Write
* Do simple math
In a matter of fact, I worked with a fellow that got his high school diploma from another local high school that when signing his paycheck, he had to lay his drivers license down next to the line on the check and copy his name. OOOPs another "Accredited" institution.
Say what you want, I am proud of my degree. I worked for 17 months and three weeks to obtain it, and here is the good thing, I use the knowledge in my work everyday. It is
working for me & my family.
So while you people a beating up Warren Nation University I'm sitting back laughing. You may be like the bulk of the people in our wonderfull society with your "Accredited" degree, not even using it because you can't find a job in the field you studied in.
I went to a unaccredited university and am making $84,000.00
per year, and using my degree!!
Have a great life,,,,,,,,, I am.
To: J. Bovin September 22, 2007 at 2:49 p.m.
"why don't our wonderfull goverment shut it down???"
Nice grammar. It is regulated by states, so schools can move from state to state to avoid serious regulation. WN"U" is on it's 4th or 5th state. Wyoming finally cracked down and required "universities" in it's state to become accredited.
So old KW"U" dumped it's hokey programs such as engineering and changed it's name. No word on another state move yet.
Correcting JBovin September 23, 2007 at 2:17 p.m.
"GERE. Being out of school for 30 years, I didn't fair so well. Around five days latter, I recieved a phone call that my $50.00 was being returned and and was told I did have what it took inregards to the math that was required in the area of study that I wanted.
After speaking with them, they required that I take a math course and pass with an acceptable grade and retake the GERE,,, I retook the test and passed with acceptable marks."
Just to set the record straight, my experience was much different.
A) I was accepted without any exam scores. WNU does not require them, period. Look at their catalog.
B) They waived a healthy chunk of my requirements (> 40%) based on my work experience. I still have my degree plan that shows this.
C) It's the GRE exam, not a GERE, at least know the name of the exam you supposedly took.
Re:To: J. Bovin September 23, 2007 at 7:19 p.m.
The Engineering programs offered at KWU, which is now WNU were actually very challanging. Maybe you just read the negative hype and are willing to believe all of it.
I believe that dropping the programs was necessary for WNU to become accredited.
Hopefully, once WNU is accredited it will silence everyone here who spends so much of their time and energy bashing something they know nothing about.
reply: To: J. Bovin September 25, 2007 at 6:08 p.m.
Why did they move?
Simple.
The Liberal Academia Educrats felt threatened. Anytime an educational institution with a better way to provide an education comes along, they (Academia) will start screaming anything and everything until something sticks, like "Diploma Mill"
"Accredidation" has been around for a short time in this country, created by the liberal Academia buffoons, with help from the idiots in the media to spread the word.
Bridge Collapse September 26, 2007 at 5:51 a.m.
"I believe that dropping the programs was necessary for WNU to become accredited."
Seems to be a contradiction. If the "engineering" "degrees" were so good, why would they cut them loose to score points towards accreditation?
"Voluntary" accreditation arguments debunked September 26, 2007 at 5:56 a.m.
From US Gov
Frequently Asked Questions about diploma mills, fraudulent degrees, and accreditation. Among other things:
Accreditation is “voluntary,” so doesn't that mean it is optional and not necessary?
Accreditation is voluntary in that the process of accreditation requires the full cooperation with and complete participation in the process of accreditation by the college or university seeking accreditation. At the heart of the accreditation process is a self-study prepared by the college or university demonstrating its commitment to the standards of accreditation.
Since accreditation is the PRIMARY means of determining the legitimacy and quality of colleges and universities in the United States, to describe the process as "voluntary" is not to describe it as "optional" or "unnecessary."
Accreditation September 28, 2007 at 2:18 a.m.
Since the University has applied for accreditation, would someone familiar with the field be able to advise, if they will be accredited or not before 2008?
No September 28, 2007 at 12:27 p.m.
Nobody is certain if they are serious about accreditation. They haven't made the cut in 24 years.
They have applied for it because they state they are located in forced them to.
If they are indeed serious, and they make massive changes to their large "life experience" awards, 1 day open book exam grad courses, cut all their substandard programs, etc, still probably 2010 at the absolute soonest.
Re: NO September 28, 2007 at 5:41 p.m.
Their Policy is that they transfer up to 60 Undergraduate Educational Credits and Give up to 30 Credits for Work Experience. Many Many Universities do this. Why is this an unfair practice? You mention 2010, but their Wyoming License expries in 2008 and dont have to put up substantial deposit on this, so wont this loose it, if they dont get accredited by 2008?
No September 28, 2007 at 5:56 p.m.
"Give up to 30 Credits for Work Experience. Many Many Universities do this"
Name one legitimate school that will give a year of college credit for nothing. WNU will give you one year for "work experience", other unaccredited schools like Rochville will give you 3 or 4 years.
"but their Wyoming License expries in 2008"
I'm not positive, but I thought I read they just had to APPLY by 2007, so I think they won't be forced out of state again, as long as they are still an applicant.
Updated list September 28, 2007 at 6:04 p.m.
The use of unaccredited WNU degree titles may be legally restricted or illegal in some jurisdictions.[14]
Jurisdictions that have restricted the use of credentials from unaccredited schools or that specifically restrict WNU credentials include Oregon [15][5], Michigan[16], Maine[17], North Dakota[5], New Jersey[5], Washington[15][18], Nevada[15], Illinois[15], Indiana[15], and Texas.[19].
WNU is also restricted from accepting students from Oregon[5][20], California[7][20] or Utah[20].
Re: NO September 28, 2007 at 9:04 p.m.
As for the 30 Credits Trasnferred from Accredited University, I have listed one below.
Strayer University
www.strayer.edu - Gives Credit for Life Experience
Work/Life Experience
Undergraduate students may be able to receive credit for their work or life experience; more information on this process is available through your Admissions Officer or Academic Advisor.
Ashworth University
Bachelor’s Degree
You may receive credit for up to 75% of your degree program as a combination of transfer credits from other institutions and life/work experience. Life/work experience credit is limited to 30 credits: 15 credits for general education courses and 15 credits for core and/or concentration courses. Credits must be no more than ten years old and be from an accredited institution.
Ashworth University is an Accredited Member of the Distance Education and Training Council, The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), The Commission on International and Trans-Regional Accreditation (CITA). Also, Ashworth University meets the requirements of the Georgia Nonpublic Postsecondary Education Commission to offer instruction in career programs, associate, bachelor's and master's degree programs.
------------------------------------------------------------
American Sentinel University
http://www.americansentinel.edu
American Sentinel University recognizes that many students have already established and achieved substantial professional goals. We acknowledge students' life and work experience by awarding up to 30 credits toward the completion of the general education curriculum requirements.
Students may receive a total of up to 90 hours credit through a combination of credits transferred from other universities, for specific professional certifications, and credit awarded for life and work experience.
American Sentinel University is accredited by the Distance Education and Training Council. The Accrediting Commission of the Distance Education and Training Council is listed by the U.S. Department of Education as a nationally recognized accrediting agency and is a recognized member of the Council for Higher Education Accreditation.
------------------------------------------------------------
With all this said and being an accredited US Institution, are they also a Diploma Mill? Looking at them, Warren National Makes their policies upfront, rather than being sneaky. Whats the big deal?
Based on this, don't you think WNU should be accredited also? They are following the same requirements as these universities. There are plenty of more out there.
Just a Guy September 28, 2007 at 10:43 p.m.
"Distance Education and Training Council" is supposedly a national accediting body. If the school in question does not have regional accredidation, They may was well be called a degree mill.
Question September 29, 2007 at 4:01 a.m.
What's the difference between unaccredited and diploma mill? Aren't they the same thing, but one is just more polite?
Difference in Work Experience September 29, 2007 at 12:22 p.m.
You point to Strayer and some other schools, but you forget the most important point. They offer experience credits if you are able to validate that experience and pass Equivelancy exams, such as CLEP (College Level Exam Program) and DANTES.
Good old KW"U" usually waived 40% of entire degrees based on the CLAIM of some kind of training as a marketing tool to lure in those that wanted a quick "degree".
Re: Difference in Work Experience September 29, 2007 at 6:42 p.m.
As for WNU, they give 30 Credits with similar models as American Sentinel and Ashworth University. With Strayer also, its iffy, as they still give 30 credits for work experience.
With all this, than why shoudlnt WNU be accredidted?
Read above September 30, 2007 at 4:17 p.m.
Read the post above on why there is a difference.
There are many reasons why they have never passed accreditation, this is just one of them.
Go to a real school.
Wasim Javid October 1, 2007 at 4:02 a.m.
I like the MBA course selections offered by Warren National University. I have been in business for over a decade. The course offered from Business Communication through electives on Leadership, Marketing and Interntaional Business are very practical, helps with our daily business challenges and make sound decision.
Their online school is good with e-Library, Virtual Student Union, Chat Room, Faculty assistance. I don't regret not going to a regular full time University. I am studying at my own shedule. I recommend this University. Much better than other online universities
John October 1, 2007 at 4:11 a.m.
Accreditation is important and at the same time it depends on what you do with the accreditation. If you are a fresh graduate student and look to further your studies in master program and planning to go to other universities, you probably want to verify which universities will accept Warren degree. If you are working individual looking to develop a career, Warren National University gives you the best courses and career path. The degree from WNU is definitely received and accepted by international organizations like any other traditional universities.
Tony October 1, 2007 at 11:08 a.m.
I agree with Wasim's response. I have the same positive experience with WNU. They have a structured curriculum and helps you to accelerate your degree program in fast pace....
Rakhib October 1, 2007 at 11:13 a.m.
I would agree with John. This is the whole point - how you see it is very important? I have spoken to quite a few KWU/WNU students - both from Masters and Doctorate programs. They love the program structure and the flexibility. I recommend WNU for my fellas who want to speed up their career goals in short time.
Alex October 1, 2007 at 11:22 a.m.
Guys...WNU is the fastest growing university. If accreditation is your concern, the news is they have filed for accreditation and they are expected to get one soon. I also spoke to one of the key program designer who designed cuurriculum, course programs, trained faculties for WNU, University of Phoenix and other recognized online universities. The design, metrics used for the curriculum is the same for other online Universities. I am not saying all on-line universities are good. I am referring to WNU only. I have done enough research on WNU and this school is one of the very few that not only offers best curriculum structure for Bachelors, Masters and Business program, they also give you credit for your work experiene and allow you to complete the program in 12-18 months.
List October 1, 2007 at 2:03 p.m.
"look to further your studies in master program and planning to go to other universities, you probably want to verify which universities will accept Warren degree"
Here is the list of schools that will accept the degree.
NONE
To Alex: October 1, 2007 at 2:19 p.m.
If it is one of the best, why is it illegal in so many states? I can understand if you were naive enough to buy one of these degrees, but don't try to sell it to others who may be making a career decision.
I have never seen an employer that says "we gladly accept unaccredited degrees"
Whatever your major is, there is at least a dozen other schools that offer the same program, online, with accreditation, without all the Senate hearings and State blacklists.
Anyone who has Google and 5 minutes of time will come to the same conclusion.
If you still have your heart set on an unaccredited, cheap, easy degree, and want much of your degree magically waived, try other unaccredited universities like Belford or Almeda. At least it's more cost effective.
Lawmaker October 1, 2007 at 9:08 p.m.
Stop wasting your energy worrying about accreditation. For thousands of years there was none.
No one, and I mean NO ONE cares or checks on accreditation unless it is a government job requiring licensure (<2% of jobs are govt require licensure).
And one more note.
Do not believe all of the internet (state website postings) where the poster pre-empts the url with scarry sounding "illegal degree hot air" read the state code in detail, not just the title of the post. The code will assure you that you can legally use your WNU degree anywhere. Again, go to the state law code and read the details.
Remember-Government large enough to control everything in your life is powerful enough to take away every thing you have. Lets keep our marxist like government out of our education and our pockets.
Re: To Alex October 1, 2007 at 9:18 p.m.
Obviously you are another idiot that has drank the Accreditation Kool-aid!
Accreditation is nothing more than a bogus way for Acedemia Elitists to EXTORT money from colleges and Universities.
WHY has Accreditation only been around for 50-60 years? Answer THAT.
I guess Harvard, Princeton, Yale, etc are all diploma mills since they were not accredited until this whole B.S. sceme came around.
Accreditation? Nothing more than B.S.!!!!!!!!
HR John October 1, 2007 at 9:51 p.m.
"No one, and I mean NO ONE cares or checks on accreditation unless it is a government job requiring licensure "
Total BS, it is checked where I work on initial application and again on any internal move / promotion. It is checked by every competent HR department in good companies. They don't want to end up being the one that hires a guy with an unaccredited degree that a cat also got.
Please post any company saying "We gladly accept unaccredited degrees". Anyone, Anyone?
BigD October 2, 2007 at 3:12 a.m.
Great school, licensed in 1984. I'm a graduate of two accredited colleges and attended one other accredited university and Warren's program is the toughest I've found. I was on a college academic development board also, Warren has responded over the years to student's/ faculty recommendations, as well. Check out their alumni, you'll find some very successful people in both Government and private industry. I would rate this progam highly against any in the nation. Free trade laws guarentee (successfully defended by Warren) that your degree will not be descriminated against.
Ali October 2, 2007 at 3:14 a.m.
I am a graduate from Kennedy-Western University, and I recently graduated with my MBA from a very reputable regionally accredited university which, by the way, accepted KWUs credits. This is a fact and no one's opinion. Top that!
To Ali: October 2, 2007 at 12:28 p.m.
"I am a graduate from Kennedy-Western University, and I recently graduated with my MBA from a very reputable regionally accredited university which, by the way, accepted KWUs credits. This is a fact and no one's opinion. Top that!"
It's simply not true. Please post a link to the schools graduate policy that says they accept unaccredited degrees. You can post these claims all you want, but there is not one shread of evidence on this thread yet that anyone accepts this sub-standard "degree".
Please post any company saying "We gladly accept unaccredited degrees". Anyone, Anyone?
I didn't think so.
Faculty? October 2, 2007 at 12:30 p.m.
"Warren has responded over the years to student's/ faculty recommendations"
They have faculty? What do they do? Do they grade the one open book exam required for a graduate course? That must be some easy $$$$.
RNMBA October 3, 2007 at 9:09 p.m.
I have two graduate degrees from accredited, well known universities. What I didn't realize is the dismal state of the KWU/WNU degree. I first heard about it on NBC Nightly News several years ago. That was after I worked very hard and completed all the courses for the PhD program. Silly me. I dropped out and never finished the dissertation. Why bother. I feel scammed out for sure.
smg October 5, 2007 at 4:22 p.m.
what's wrong with an online degree ? life is short, make a difference. if your life experiences are legit, go for it. make money for your family. some idiots out there who just finished college are so ignorant.
To: RNMBA October 5, 2007 at 5:43 p.m.
So sorry to hear that. There are alot of good online doctorate programs out there, but the unaccredited ones can be very deceptive and sound legitimate.
Were you able to recover any of the lost tuition or take any other action against them?
YSF October 9, 2007 at 1 a.m.
Anyone that believes being accredited makes a difference is a FOOL.
I have met many, many, many, many people with college degrees from "accredited" universities and they are some of the dumbest, most ignorant people I have ever met.
Being accredited does NOT mean you are getting a better education! It means that the school has the rubber stamp of approval to accept government money, i.e grants or VA. All they have been given is a license to steal Americans hard earned money through taxation.
I don't even have a degree, but I'll match brains against most of you "accredited" college grads ANY DAY! Me? I'm a Network Manager with several IT certifications making $100k+.
Any takers? "Anyone? Anyone? I didn't think so."
Warren National "faculty"? October 9, 2007 at 3:32 a.m.
From Senate Hearing 108-353 "Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations, Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"
Page 51 - A Senator asks an undercover agent who enrolled, about Kennedy Western faculty.
Senator Lieberman: "I wanted to ask you whether there was any way in which the so-called professors at Kennedy-Western made themselves available to you over the Internet. For instance, was there ever a way give to you that you could contact anybody that seemed to be a professor if you had a question about a course?"
Lieutenant Commander Gelzer: "You were supposed to be able to contact your professor for what they called tutorial advice. You weren't allowed to contact your professor directly. You had to make a request to your student advisor and then they would forward it on to the professor, and the only time I reached out to a professor, I never got a response."
re: Warren National "faculty"? October 9, 2007 at 9:17 p.m.
Ooooooooh!
One WHOLE time! Of course the prof isn't human! He's supposed to be readily available 24/7.
I requested contact with each professor in every class and received a response and talked with them, via phone, everytime. Some several times. Plus they now have a discussion board that the prof's answer questions and make comments frequently.
WNU is NOT a diploma mill, contrary to what the LIBTARDS in Congress and the Elitist Educrats at the Universities say.
Low budget faculty / unknown ownership October 9, 2007 at 11:32 p.m.
According to an article in the Chronicle of Higher Education
Most faculty are "recruited by Kennedy-Western through mass mailings and fliers. They earn from a few hundred to several thousand dollars a year, receiving $25 to grade a paper, a couple of hundred dollars to develop a course, and $40 an hour to answer students' questions."
"This information is not confirmed by Warren National University. According to the Chronicle, the university refused to disclose the number of faculty, the method of compensation, the proportion of faculty that is full-time or the ownership of the institution."
RNMBA October 10, 2007 at 6:20 p.m.
Accreditation is key. Not a single credit hour from KWU/WNU could be transferred because of the non-accredited status. On-line or not is not the issue. The "real" doctoral programs I am applying for are from real universities, and offer "on-line" programs. I have not attempted to recoup any funds; I think there would be loopholes...like..."we're licensed but not accredited".
File a complaint! October 11, 2007 at 1:06 a.m.
Personally, I would.
A) Send them a certified letter requesting a full refund for the reasons you cite.
B) If they don't at least make some restitution, go online and file a complaint with the Better Business Bureau they are in.
http://www.mountainstates.bbb.org/WWWRoo...
According to the Better Business site, Warren National University has received 14 formal complaints in the last few years, some in each of these BBB categories:
1. Advertising Issues - Claims alleging print or electronic media advertised claims or practices misrepresent the service or product offer.
2. Billing or Collection Issues - Claim alleging billing errors, unauthorized charges, or questionable collection practices.
3. Sales Practice Issues - Claims of alleged sales presentations made in person or by telephone that contain misrepresentations of the product or service, high pressure sales practices, failure to disclose key conditions of the offer, and verbal representations not consistent with written contractual terms or agreements.
4. Product Issues - Claim alleging a product does not meet the expectations of the complainant, including defective merchandise.
5. Refund or Exchange Issues - Claim of alleged failure to honor company policy or verbal commitment to provide refunds, exchanges, or credit for products or services.
In 1962 October 13, 2007 at 3:17 a.m.
No colleges worldwide were accredited. Zilch, Nada, Zip, Nein, zero.
Not one single NASA Engineer that put a man on the moon came from an accredited University.
Funny October 13, 2007 at 8:24 a.m.
Anyone want to read an entertaining news story?
It looks as the elite academics are getting what they asked for- government interference in education and lots of it. And they do not like it at all!!! It was OK as long as Uncle Sam let them keep their little good ole boy accreditation club going. Ah yes, live by the government sword and die by the government sword.
Football players getting BSEE degrees with SAT scores of 250 may no longer be allowed. Politics out and testing in. One standard for all accreditation agencies. What a beautiful day in America
WTF October 15, 2007 at 8:15 a.m.
Ref: Anyone want to read an entertaining news story?
The same winers who want the government to crack down on unaccredited universities are upset that the government wants to regulate the accreditors. I thought they were oh so concerned about quality education in universities. Follow the money. Its all about the dough.
MYOWNLAW October 15, 2007 at 8:30 a.m.
I hereby urge our esteemed Senators and the GAO to have a full investigation of all of the DOE recognized Accreditation Agencies for being substandard.
Let ask employees what they think October 16, 2007 at 5:26 a.m.
Testimony of Andrew Coulombe, Former Employee Kennedy Western University:
..."After graduating from college, I was looking to work in the field of higher education and I saw a listing on the employment website Monster.com for a position as an admission counselor at Kennedy Western University. I had not heard of Kennedy Western, but was eager to work in academia and to advise students. Therefore I applied for the job.
Shortly after being hired, I started training at Kennedy Western. I soon discovered this was like no other school I had ever seen. I saw immediately that I had been mislead by Kennedy Westerns recruiter. I was not going to be counseling anyone. I had been hired to be a telemarketer, using a script to sell Kennedy Western just like any other product.
As an admission counselor, I was required to call between 120 and 125 perspective students per day, trying to convince them that they should apply to Kennedy Western.
...The problem is, much of our sales pitch was not true. There is no admissions board. Applications were reviewed by one person. Of course, the applicant had excellent chances of getting in. In fact, I had never heard of an applicant being rejected.
We were also instructed to tell applicants applicants that they would be taking the same classes that students took at real schools, like Harvard or Princeton. I went to a real school, Kennedy Western is not a real school."
Thats the best you can do? October 16, 2007 at 10:26 a.m.
REF:Testimony of Andrew Coulombe, Former Employee Kennedy Western University:
This repetitive cut and paste of this one person who had an axe to grind because he did not get a pay raise.
cap October 16, 2007 at 10:28 a.m.
Ok, so I earned a WNU BS in Safety Engineering, then I could not believe it. Just days after I put the credential on my resume men in black suits showed up at my door. They placed me under arrest and read me my Miranda. They blindfolded me and took me to a secret place where I found out is used only for interrogating WNU students. They torture you first by waterboarding you. Then they play this recording over and over, something about senate GAO, senate GAO over and over again.
There was another WNU student in the room with me. She finally screams out "What do you want from me?". The recording stopped. A voice said "Compliance. We want you to fall in line with the way it has always been done. We distort and you comply." She asked in horror, "Who are you?" The voice replied "Big Brother".
Hank Park October 16, 2007 at 10:42 a.m.
I found the BSME program at WNU both challenging and valuable. The diversity of instructors from different locations across the country provided a very intriguing learning environment. I also took three Nuclear Engineering related classes at Georgia Tech while attending WNU online. I gained just as much, if not more, from the WNU courses online. I would strongly recommend this program to anyone interested in online learning.
Tanya Larson October 16, 2007 at 11:09 a.m.
I accomplished my Doctorates at Warren National University. It was a good experience. I feel like I learned a lot to help me improve my teaching ability. A large emphasis was placed on curriculum design which has helped me better understand how to adapt my curriculum to better meet this ever changing hi tech world.
Becka October 16, 2007 at 11:16 a.m.
I'm beginning my third Class (out of 6). The Liberal Arts programs have signicant writing requirements, and weekely participation requirements. You will find yourself challenged and wanting to put in the effort. WNUs teachers seem to be tuned in to online learning and so far have been helpful. You will interact with them a great deal in discussions and by email. They call you at the beginning of each class to say hello and get to know you. Frankly, although the school makes them do this, it is a nice touch to have the professor's actually show an interest in getting to know their students.
This is a structured program, and there are no real electives as each course is provided to you in full. The long paper that we've had for each of the first two seminars has been student's choice, and I expect that to continue.
This isn't just about battles and leaders. It is a broader course discussing the use of history, the study of history, and critical thought.
The support people at the school have been very responsive and friendly.
HiLo October 16, 2007 at 11:32 a.m.
Warren National is a respected university that does online education very well. Great instructors with reasonable tuition expenses. Having completed my MS degree, I would recommend it to anyone who has an interest in business or management. Also, they offer several other graduate degrees (including a MBA) that can be completed totally online, with no campus visits. (Though it is a nice place to visit since it is Beautiful Wyoming). Also, with this particuar degree, the MS in Management, there are a few areas to specialize in, or you can go the general track route.
Miscellaneous, overly obvious corrections October 16, 2007 at 2:05 p.m.
"I found the BSME program at WNU both challenging and valuable" - 1 open book exam per course can be challenging.
"I accomplished my Doctorates at Warren National University." That's great, just don't call yourself "Doctor" and don't make any plans to work in academia.
"WNUs teachers seem to be tuned in to online learning " Wow! like Bigfoot, nobody was sure they existed.
"Warren National is a respected university" - By who exactly?
*Not the federal government, who investigated them.
*Not a dozen different states, which have made these "degrees" illegal.
*Not by employees, who described it as a telemarketing sweatshop.
*Not by real schools, who will not accept unaccredited credits in transfer.
*Not by any professional licensing board, which do not recognize them.
*Not by any competent HR department that can spend $6 per employee for verification.
"Though it is a nice place to visit since it is Beautiful Wyoming" Mmmm, sorry, they are based in California, but maintain an address in Wyoming, (after Idaho and Hawaii booted them),
re: Miscellaneous, overly obvious corrections October 16, 2007 at 6:18 p.m.
I have attended "accredited" classes that had one open book exam as well. The whole semester wasted my time listening to an idiot ramble on everyday and then have me read chapters x-x.
Anyone that calls themself a "Doctor" and doesn't practice medicine is snobbish.
WNU/KWU was not investigated by the government.
Less than a dozen states have "outlawed" these degrees, in direct violation of an individuals rights.
1 disgruntled ex-employee
Schools and boards read the list of members of the "Good 'ol Boy Club"
HR spends $6 to verify because they are typical lazy and will "go with the flow" of the good ol boy acedemia.
Ca has admin offices, corporate is in Wy. Typical of "for profit businesses" thanks to Capitalism.
Correction - Investigation titles October 17, 2007 at 12:28 a.m.
Previous Poster says: "WNU/KWU was not investigated by the government."
There are many links posted to the Kennedy Western University a/k/a Warren National University Senate Hearing. You must have missed them, here are the titles:
***"Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense."
***"Diploma Mills are Easily Created and Some Have Issued Bogus Degrees to Federal Employees at Government Expense."
***"Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations: Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"
Other reading items on Kennedy Western University a/k/a Warren National University from various other exposes and news articles.
***"It May Take Hours, But You Too Can Earn a University Degree"
***"When Elected Officials Aren't What They Seem
Texas officials and Pennsylvania cats tout misleading credentials"
SOMEBODY October 17, 2007 at 7:49 a.m.
Is in love with Big Government :)
Some Day October 17, 2007 at 8:03 a.m.
I would like to meet, and buy a cup of coffee, the other one person (besides myself) who keeps changing their identity and making up stories and posting to this blog. I am 90% sure that there is only one or two other posters to this site besides me. There may be a third person, but I doubt it. I have had a lot of fun antagonizing both sides by changing my opinion 180 degrees and taking different stances here and there.
I'd be a disgruntled employee too October 17, 2007 at 12:20 p.m.
Testimony of Andrew Coulombe, Former Employee, Kennedy-Western University
“Admission counselors work in a boiler room atmosphere, where were under significant pressure to meet lofty sales goals. We were paid a low base salary and made over half of our pay in commissions. We were paid a commission of $15 per head on every application we brought in. If a student actually enrolled, we would get roughly $100 per student”
“Admissions counselors’ names were also listed on a large white board in our sales room, indicating how many sales we had made and whether or not we had met our sales goals. There was enormous turnover in Kennedy-Western’s sales force. Many counselors quit once they discovered they were going to be telemarketers, not admissions counselors. Others could not meet the sales goals set by Kennedy-Western. Others simply could not stomach what they were being asked to do.”
re: I'd be a disgruntled employee too October 17, 2007 at 6:22 p.m.
KWU/WNU is a FOR PROFIT institution, just like Univ of Pheonix!
Sales and commissions are a hard, intense position.
Maybe we should investigate car salesmen, as they are under the same pressure as Andrew was.
61 to 1 Telemarketer to Faculty Ratio October 18, 2007 at 1:26 a.m.
Kennedy Western University a/k/a Warren National University should be making boatloads of money!
Look at their employee list. (From Exhibit #31 - Committee on Governmental Affair). As provided by Kennedy-Western University, they list 119 employees. 61 Admissions Counelors (Telemarketers) and ONE FACULTY MEMBER!
Do the math October 18, 2007 at 1:38 a.m.
If you run the numbers
Say $6,000 in tuition - $100 to the telemarketer that landed a "student" - minimum wage to the "examination processor" = mucho profit to cover the 1 faculty member and some admin costs.
Marcus Boggs October 19, 2007 at 8:45 a.m.
I found this site surfing the net, and never knew there was such a thing as unaccredited universities anymore.
I am a collector of rare coins, and never was able to use my degree discipline.
I earned my BSEE degree at Georgia Southern in 1985 just after they got accredited. My degree in electrical engineering helped me get a job at the GA. Fish and game dept in the then eggs/hatchery biology division. Basically I made 5 dollars an hour squeezing egs and sperm out of fish and mixing them then counting the resulting hatched fry weeks later.
There were two of us there with degrees. There was a cute girl I tried to date with(but had no success)who had a degree in Psychology. Our boss who called the hiring shots (who had no degree) used to say "I will not hire an actual Biologist or someone with a degree in biology cause they might bring in their friends and take our jobs".
R E A L I T Y!!
Learning this at a young age was important.
I got lucky and my coin collecting hobby became the source of my ample income. And I enjoy coins. No degrees for this hobby though.
At my 20 year class reunion I was surprised to find that none of the 40 (or so )people that had degrees were working in their degree discipline. Not one! Around 10 or so were selling some multi-level marketing scheme that had to do with some tropical berry juice. The guy who owned the berry juice company was a guy named Bruce Cole who dropped out of high school in 11th grade. He was the most successful of all!!
Why does anybody care if someone else wants to plop down hard their earned moolah on a Kennedy National University degree, or any degree for that matter? Who are they hurting?
The outrage and contempt I see on this site for unaccreditation is unbelievable. What are you afraid of?
It is Fear October 19, 2007 at 9:32 a.m.
Afraid WNU students might get their jobs maybe?
Chickens judging Eagles.
WNU-PHD October 19, 2007 at 12:55 p.m.
The program was a good balance between structure and flexibilty, in that it was focused, but allowed me to study what I wanted within the area. I had easy contact with my profesors, who gave me constructive, useful feedback on my papers, and all but two of them responded to questions very quickly. The books I had to buy were almost all very good; in fact, I kept most of them. I wrote a lot, and believe that I developed as a writer because of it, even to the extent of having two papers published in a medical journal. As for technology, I experienced no real problems -- the online classroom environment was intuitive and never unavailable; registration was easy; and the school's support staff was easy to contact and gave prompt, useful answers.
It's not even a university October 19, 2007 at 1:04 p.m.
Look at their employee list. (From Exhibit #31 - Committee on Governmental Affair). As provided by Kennedy-Western University, they list 119 employees. 61 Admissions Counelors (Telemarketers) and ONE FACULTY MEMBER!
It's a telemarketing operation that supplies degrees.
Phillip Walter October 19, 2007 at 1:04 p.m.
The admissions process was much smoother than what I experienced at other institutions, and I was given a fair evaluation of previous coursework. Unlike other colleges, the focus was on providing education, not on making the most money. However, WNU is one of the most expensive colleges in Wyoming.
Several of my coworkers are either currently enrolled in the program or are looking into it. With increased competition, a degree can make a real difference. While many colleges offer online degrees, I wanted the acceptance that comes with a degree from Warren, which is more readily recognized than most brick and mortar colleges.
This degree has given me the background to continue my education in my chosen field, and I have been accepted into a master's program as a result.
To: Phillip Walter October 19, 2007 at 1:18 p.m.
Good for you! Which master's program did you get into? I have yet to find any university that accepts a Warren National University degree. Let me know the name and I will check into the one you found!
BSEE October 19, 2007 at 1:18 p.m.
I am from Canada. As a class taker at Warren National, allow me to offer this review to any potential student thinking about attending this fine college.
The course was very interesting, the instructor was always in contact with the student, and the material was top notch.
However, the quality of the online access was sometimes bottlenecked from multiple student usage.
From the beginning to the end WNU was a tough challenge and was number one, and far superior to any Canadian university!
The Engineering department at WNEL is also top notch and they handle all All ABET issues with respect and speed.
Overall a very nice experience
Verification October 19, 2007 at 1:27 p.m.
B.S. stories are nice, but can anyone point to anything verifiable? Cite a source other than buyer's remorse / personal opinion? Newspaper article? Anything?
The score is currently 83 verifiable negative points to a Warren National "university" "degree" to 0 verifiable positive points.
Nuclear Engineer October 19, 2007 at 1:28 p.m.
The BS in Nuclear Engineering Online program prepares tomorrow’s technology leaders today. Built on solid Physics, students are given opportunities to research, design, develop and evaluate a wide variety of Nuclear Prototypes. It is very challenging! You will feel the Neutron burn. But it is so worth the hard work.
Hey Dumbo October 19, 2007 at 1:32 p.m.
This site is for Student Reviews! Are you a WNU student?
A big no on that I am sure.
So get the hell off this site.
Earn Credit at an Unaccredited "University" October 19, 2007 at 1:39 p.m.
From the Investigation of Kennedy Western University and 2 other schools:
Committee on Government Affairs - Exhibit #16 (Again a verifiable, independent source), lists these activities that were granted academic credit for "life experience" at an unaccredited "college":
*Playing Tennis
*Buying a Persian Carpet
*Watching Public Television
*Eating in Exotic Restaurants
*Being Dungeon master
*Pressing flowers
*Keeping tropical fish
Just Like October 20, 2007 at 1:48 a.m.
Every other university!
Fancy T. Cowlbakers October 20, 2007 at 6:51 a.m.
There is no better value in today's education marketplace than prestigious WNU. The WNU degree is much more extensive than accredited schools and for a little more cost, it is worth it. For about $7000, its worth the education in any field. WNU has been a great experience.
Bob E Lee October 20, 2007 at 7:03 a.m.
My favorite WNU programming uses a traditional "correspondence school" format, where assignments are literally mailed to the student and exams are completed and returned by mail.
This format tends to make the quality of the lessons highly dependent on the quality of the course text books. Unfortunately many book companies these days place more emphasis on color and graphics than they do on content and clarity of presentation. There are no lectures or supplemental materials to help make up for the text shortcomings.
However, that one flaw aside, the overall program is very thoughfully designed and fairly straightforward even for someone with a limited background in the subject matter.
Personally I liked the self-directed nature of the study, but if you are one who needs a lot of interaction with others this may not be for you. For me, the lack of the currently fashionable and utterly boring "discussion" with people who know even less than you do was an absolute blessing, and made the program go much faster and pleasantly.
The later courses in the series include practicums, which give you a good feel for the real life application of your earlier courses. There also is a required 150-hour Lab, which can be a problem if you aren't currently involved in the field, but they do give you quite a bit of latitude in finding an appropriate activity. The blend of theory and application seemed well thought out and "real world" oriented.
Although I took this program just for personal interest, this is a very economical way to obtain a legitimate credential as a health care practitioner.
Do not believe all the pure crap you hear about not being able to use your WNU degree for licensure. Also the "Illegal WNU Degree Myth" is comical! I work at a hospital in Savannah GA., and if you want a promotion you call 1800-WARRENNATIONAL. Case closed.
Accreditation October 20, 2007 at 7:06 a.m.
Is soon to be a thing of the past.
Ref Cato Institute Website October 20, 2007 at 7:11 a.m.
The Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, "We find fault with the accreditation process itself and favor a free market or state solution.
Mr. Salisbury had no kind words for the accreditation process, which he described as a noncompetitive cartel of hidebound, quasi-governmental agencies that effectively suppresses innovations in higher education
US Govt DOJ Investigates Harvard October 20, 2007 at 11:13 a.m.
Yale under US govt investigation October 20, 2007 at 11:18 a.m.
KW October 20, 2007 at 11:45 a.m.
Unlike Harvard and Yale, WNU never was investigated by any government agency.
They were a subject to an investigation. KW commited no violation and never was accused of any violation. It was the government agencies and govt employees that reimbursed government students at then unaccredited KW University that were being investigated for a crime. They had their government Kangaroo Court and never even allowed KW to attend.
US law and all 50 states require the accused to be able to face their accuser in any real indictment or investigation. Therefore this was a knock-off (fake) investigation.
Tina Kinneavy October 20, 2007 at 12:09 p.m.
I initially enrolled with Warren National in Feb. of 2006. I was able to transfer in with 30 credits from my local community college, which was great. Also, I LOVED the fact that I was easily able to take a 2 month leave of absence when I gave birth to my son in Sept. of 2006.
I am currently just a few months away from obtaining my BS in Business. As soon as I get my BS, I am then going to continue my education with WNU and pursue my BA in Accounting. So far, just about everything has been great. My enrollment advisor has been awesome! Even though his obligations to me ended after he got me signed up and enrolled in my first classes, he has continued to email me or give me a phone call every once in awhile just to see how I am doing and to give me encouragement. My academic advisor is also amazing. I have bugged him SO many times with numerous questions, and he has always been great about responding to me right away. The one negative thing that I have experienced with WNU is their financial aid people. They have switched my financial person on me several times...and each one that I have gotten has been awful. They never answer my questions, or if they do, it is usually the wrong answer that I am given.
All in all, the teachers have all been great, I have been learning ALOT in my classes, and I really enjoy the fact that I can work on my assignments when it is convenient for me and my hectic schedule. Also, I just noticed that they were listed as "America's Most Popular Higher Learning Facility" by National Review Magazine, which I thought was awesome. As for any person here who did not have a good expereince, what were the names of the teachers/advisors who weren't doing their job correctly? Because as I said, so far I have had great experiences with everyone except the financial aid people. I love this school and I cannot wait to fly out to Wyoming to receive my degrees.
YUK October 20, 2007 at 12:23 p.m.
I am ashamed of KW for giving in to the power elite in academia. Oh well.
Mr. Saltman, Kennedy-Western Chief Executive Officer and President, spoke in support of accreditation. Mr. Saltman explained that candidacy status for WNU is the first big step in accreditation and accreditation would ensure the integrity of the education being provided by post secondary education institutions in Wyoming.
It's not even a University October 20, 2007 at 1:56 p.m.
Look at their employee list. (From Exhibit #31 - Committee on Governmental Affairs). As provided by Kennedy-Western University, they list 119 employees. 61 Admissions Counelors (Telemarketers) and ONE FACULTY MEMBER!
It's a telemarketing operation that supplies degrees to the naive.
The TRUTH - on Kennedy Western Tuition Reimb October 20, 2007 at 2:06 p.m.
From the Committee on Governmental Affairs, Exhibit #28 from the Senate Hearing on Diploma Mills that included Kennedy Western University.
"Kennedy-Western Student on Tuition Reimbursement"
"I have been attempting in vain to get my company to approve this program and pay for the tuition. The Vice-President of engineering at my company... is convinced that a degree at Kennedy-Western isn't worth the paper it is printed on. In fact, he told me that any engineering course that is not accredited and does not include practical lab time is a complete waste of time and money and shouldn't be recognized by anyone in the industry..."
Dr J October 21, 2007 at 7:14 a.m.
REF: "It's a telemarketing operation that supplies degrees to the naive."
And no I did not get mine from KW.
Who is Naive?
Two industrial real-estate brokers go into a sales attempt. All things being equal, one broker has a genuine Seiko watch (price $370.00) and the other has a fake Rolex watch (Price $75.00). Who makes the Sale? In most cases, the broker with the fake Rolex gets the deal.
Now chances are real good I am older than you (unless you are a grandparent). I have seen it all. Appearances mean more than reality, much more.
An AS from KW looks better than just a high school diploma. A BS from KW looks better than an AS from a community college.
In todays fast pace world (where people on average keep jobs for a few years and move on and where so few truly qualified HR people monitor such)this degree stuff falls through the cracks. The KW degree is inexpensive and obtained with marginal effort. But it is legal in most states and countries. It is the "Fake Rolex" that lands the million dollar deal.
In the end, it is who has the most Jack in the bank. In life, get in, make your money hit and get out. Advice to live by my young friend. :)
HR John October 21, 2007 at 4:07 p.m.
"In todays fast pace world (where people on average keep jobs for a few years and move on and where so few truly qualified HR people monitor such)"
Background checks and credentials verification are all automated now and can be delivered electronically to your desktop within a day from the National Student Clearinghouse and other services.
According to SHRM (the HR professional group) 96% of companies do such checks and it is standard operating procedure that is taught in every HR course and training program. If you want to work at McDonalds, WalMart greeter, or one of the other bottom 4% of jobs, a Warren National University or Rochville University degree might get you there.
There are some exceptions that may sneak through the verification process to be found out later and quietly dealt with internally.
HR John October 21, 2007 at 7:11 p.m.
"A BS from KW looks better than an AS from a community college."
Incorrect. An AS from a community college is a valid credential that can and will be verified. A BS from KW is not. Pretty simple.
Dr J October 21, 2007 at 11:54 p.m.
Ref: HR John
Pretty simple is that you are not really an HR rep at all. You are an idealistic web imposter. Nice try though. :)
Throwing the BS flag October 22, 2007 at 3:44 a.m.
National Student Clearinghouse requires universities to participate and agree to monitoring. By my count they represent only about one third of the existing DOE sanctioned accredited universities. Regents Excelsior (ABET)accredited Engineering University, for example is not there for example. Check out the link below where Tulane is just now becoming a member. There are at least thousands on non members.
Again October 22, 2007 at 9:44 a.m.
Ref: Anyone want to read an entertaining news story?
The same winers who want the government to crack down on unaccredited universities are upset that the government wants to regulate the accreditors. I thought they were oh so concerned about quality education in universities. Follow the money. Its all about the dough.
wow October 22, 2007 at 9:48 a.m.
http://insidehighered.com/news/2007/05/2...
You are right! The accreditors are against being audited. Talk about HIPOCRITOMAXIMUS!
Mental Floss October 22, 2007 at 12:09 p.m.
Sir Templeton once said "In any task, listen very carefully to what the experts say, then make damn sure you do exactly the opposite. That is the secret of all real success."
My, my, there are sure a lot of experts on this site boasting about how important accreditation is!!
Correcting on National Student Clearinghouse October 22, 2007 at 3:04 p.m.
1/3 of schools are in the clearing house? You must have had your math class waived for "life experience".
"More than 3,000 colleges, enrolling 91% of US college students, and hundreds of high school districts nationwide participate in the Clearinghouse"
DegreeVerify: ...Commercial verifiers can instantly confirm degrees online, providing them with an easy, fast, and inexpensive way to validate educational records and combat credentials fraud."
http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/abou......
Glad to clear up all the confusion!
And the other 9%, are still verified to weed out fakes, it is just a little slower. More colleges join every day.
re: Correcting on National Student Clearinghouse October 23, 2007 at 12:31 a.m.
I guess since Princeton's Computer Science school lost it's accreditation, you won't be hiring any CompSci grads from there.
Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right October 23, 2007 at 3:41 a.m.
I am sorry did I say 33%. Guess I was wrong as it is only 20%.
The National Student Clearinghouse
provides immediate
online access to degree and enrollment data from colleges and universities throughout the United States. Degree verifications are available from more than 285 post-secondary institutions representing over 20% of all degrees granted, while enrollment verifications are available on 91% of the nation's students from more than 2,700 post-secondary institutions.
So much October 23, 2007 at 3:44 a.m.
For the "Clearinghouse".
More Truth - Kennedy Western Students October 23, 2007 at 5:32 a.m.
From the Committee on Governmental Affairs, Exhibit #26 from the Senate Hearing on Diploma Mills that included Kennedy Western University.
"Kennedy-Western Student on the Program"
"I'm used to brick and mortar and this is really hard. I'm finding it difficult without any feedback. How do you actually get to talk to a professor? I can't understand why we don't write papers. With all the changes in healthcare, you would think they would want us to do more than memorize a book. I am thinking that maybe I made a mistake"
The Equalizer October 23, 2007 at 6:35 a.m.
REF: "1/3 of schools are in the clearing house? You must have had your math class waived for "life experience".
I am sorry did I say 33%. Guess I was wrong as it is only 20%. In engineering, that is called being conservative. You see, you were set up you bafoon.
The National Student Clearinghouse
provides immediate online access to degree and enrollment data from colleges and universities throughout the United States. Degree verifications are available from more than 285 post-secondary institutions representing over 20% of all degrees granted, while enrollment verifications are available on 91% of the nation's students from more than 2,700 post-secondary institutions.
Sigh, another correction October 23, 2007 at 12:24 p.m.
Your ad on the clearinghouse is 5 years old (2007 - 2002 = 5). They currently list 1,899 schools as of today for Degree Verify not 285.
It's a great tool for simple background screening, $5 a pop, delivered to your desktop electronically. Some SHRM articles put the rate of academic fraud in some form (GPA, Major, Degree, Year, School, Diploma Mills) at 20% of applicants, that's why it is standard operating procedure.
WRONG! October 23, 2007 at 2:46 p.m.
http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/secu...
The website only lists that many schools. Does not say degree verify for all anywhere.
Also many Universities are listed over and over again, ie Kent about ten times. Also MIT, nor Duke nor Yale nor Harvard are even listed. Real good company right?
Also, they only have 700 clients (mostly government, military, and hospitals). There are about 700,000 private held companies and 10,000 Public held companies in CONUS alone!
Our HR rep (at Crane Nuclear) never even heard of them.
! October 23, 2007 at 2:50 p.m.
http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/secu...
Yea- It just says Degree and enrollment data combined. You have to pay to find out they only verify for 312 of the companies.
E-mail October 23, 2007 at 2:53 p.m.
http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/secu...
Email to "contact us" and an hour wait will get you the list of about 300 schools (and a hard sell about their 715 clients) that they verify.
WaWaWa October 23, 2007 at 3:40 p.m.
Furthermore, Just call 703-742-4200 (National Student Clearinghouse)and ask for Ann. Ann tells me that they will list any state licensed University. Accreditation is not a must. She even gave me the phone number of Don Gwinn (in Wyoming) 847-491-1335 and said they would love to work with WNU. She said all they do is the work the school do to verify the enrollment and degree (this is a service). They would tell any checkers that the school was unaccredited (just like WNU would do). In fact, they already have several unaccredited universities using the service.
You see, all they do is verify enrollment and that the person achieved what degree.
Makes Sense October 23, 2007 at 4:12 p.m.
The "Clearinghouse" is "National" and therefore since unaccredited schools are not illegal and are protected under the constitution, they have to let unaccredited schools list also.
Example-Even Oregon lists 10 or 15 unaccredited schools they approve of.
Simply put, the website "Clearinghouse" advocate is hereby discredited.
haberge October 23, 2007 at 4:53 p.m.
We are AREVA-
The large international French company that will get 27 of the next 30 Nuclear Dockets for new Nuclear plants in the US. We do not recognize Any US accreditation. Our HR people speak French and despise anything the US Govt sanctions. We are here for the money and look at WNU University as being as good as MIT. As the arrogant US population becomes more and more out of touch with world realisms and their so called accreditation, they will fall behind in Tech.
Cato October 23, 2007 at 4:57 p.m.
The Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, "We find fault with the accreditation process itself and favor a free market or state solution.
Mr. Salisbury had no kind words for the accreditation process, which he described as a noncompetitive cartel of hidebound, quasi-governmental agencies that effectively suppresses innovations in higher education
WNU Students October 23, 2007 at 5:12 p.m.
WNU students.
Ask yourselves this question--Why is the other side so upset at us WNU students? Put yourself in their shoes. Think about it. You got it? There can only be one reason. Come on. The answer is easy!
YOU ARE TAKING THEIR JOBS!!! Nuf sed.
So October 23, 2007 at 5:13 p.m.
If we stop taking their jobs they will like us?
No October 23, 2007 at 5:14 p.m.
They will not like you, they will just hate you less.
I did not October 23, 2007 at 5:17 p.m.
Take anyones job. I went to WNU while I was employed. I do not "Take peoples jobs."
Caveat Emptor October 23, 2007 at 6:40 p.m.
"Ask yourselves this question--Why is the other side so upset at us WNU students?"
I don't think anyone is upset at the students, they are the victims. It's this Telemarketing business (61 telemarketers out of 119 employees by their own count) that continues to pump out substandard products that caused the Senate Investigation and the various states to boot them out. (they are on State #4).
"since unaccredited schools are not illegal"
Yes, they are illegal in many states, you must have missed the list, you can find it above.
"and the author of A Classroom of One"
If it's about Kennedy Western University, it could be called "A Faculty of One"
Students, look elsewhere, there are dozens of legitimate online schools who won't stain your resume.
To: Tinna Kinevay October 23, 2007 at 7:31 p.m.
"I am then going to continue my education with WNU and pursue my BA in Accounting. "
Please contact the CPA board in your state before you make this mistake, if you buy a Warren National University degree, you cannot sit for the CPA exam.
"The one negative thing that I have experienced with WNU is their financial aid people."
That's because Warren National Unviersity does not meet the minimum standards for federal financial aid, and likely your only option is a personal bank loan of some sort.
Tina October 24, 2007 at 7:48 a.m.
I have an associates from Kennesaw College (accredited)and an associates with experience was all that was required of me in Delaware to get the CPA.
To Tina: October 24, 2007 at 2:15 p.m.
Whew, congrats on your associates from Kennesaw! I was afraid you were incorrectly relying solely on the purchase of a Warren National University "degree" to sit for the exam, but you can qualify due to the Kennesaw associates degree. Good luck, it's tough!
I live in a 150-hour requirement state and am so glad I passed it before they upped the requirements.
New rules for WNU October 24, 2007 at 2:19 p.m.
New rules for using your WNU Degree.
First of all, 45 of the states have no laws against unaccredited degrees for non-Civil or licensure jobs.
By calling the office of degree authorization in "THE ILLEGAL" states and asking for a waver based on WNUs seeking accreditation, you will likely get it. If they give you a hard time about it there are several civil litigation lawyers standing by to take your case pro-bono.
The states do not, and I repeat -DO NOT- want to test this illegal law in court. Notice their fear of prosecution of anyone. No one has or ever will be prosecuted for putting a WNU credential on a resume. Federal judges are waiting to "take out at the knees" the first states AG that tests this unconstitutional law.
Robert October 24, 2007 at 3:26 p.m.
I stumbled across this site with key words "Warren Commision".
I have been an HR manager at Verizon and before that AT&T. Total of 25 years. Today I find out there are unaccredited universities. I thought that was illegal?
Dont feel bad October 24, 2007 at 3:45 p.m.
I got scammed bad by Almeda.
3K for a fake PHD in dentistry. They even made me pay the 15 dollars for Fedx overnighting it. I think someone spilled coffee on it before they mailed it.
Anyways, I then spent about $500.00 for a business license and get this, Almeda scammed me another 50 bucks for verification to the state licensing board!!! I practiced dentistry for 9 years (and made about 3.5 million dollars) before I got caught. My 326 loyal customers were shocked when Oregon sent me to one of those white collar jails for 6 months. I think I will practice law when I get out, that is if Almeda is still in business.
Thomas Q Bayter III October 25, 2007 at 6:52 a.m.
I am doing an investigative report on this website. Expect a news story to break mid to late Dec, with one of the big "conservative" networks. In a week or so, I will post an email address for wnu students through which I can verify you are a student with your permission.
There are several problematic issues with this site that will be reported on.
1. Most posters on this site are not students, they are imposters who change their names over and over and re-post mostly defamatory lies.
2. Of the 13 "Reviews to date, we can verify that only a few are actually WNU students. The rest are fakes. The multiple legitimate WNU students attempt at posting reviews (in our test sample) were never considered.
3. A consortium of experts (lawyers, professors and private contributers) are reviewing this entire website.
4. It is too late for this site to "clean up its act". We will not accept any appeal to not go forward with the story.
Difference October 25, 2007 at 10:34 p.m.
How does one differentiate between unaccredited and a diploma mill?
All the cited laws and Senate testimony frequently interchange the two terms?
Oregon Agreed October 26, 2007 at 1:59 a.m.
WNU no at DM.
Truth Hurts October 26, 2007 at 4:20 a.m.
Senate Investigations and State Laws are tough to downplay.
Story updates - Channel 11 October 26, 2007 at 12:27 p.m.
Real officials, bogus degrees
Fake degrees a growing Texas problem
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
http://www.khou.com/topstories/stories/k...
Here is an update to the stories of various Texas officials holding unaccredited degrees. Alot of rehash of the Texas clerk (KWU) and the Senate hearing, but a new blurb on a professor at Texas Souther University with a KWU doctorate.
tilly girl October 26, 2007 at 1:37 p.m.
"Here is an update to the stories...."
Can you repost that, all I keep getting is a Cadillac Commercial.
WNU has October 26, 2007 at 1:45 p.m.
always conceded that for Government and educational/licensure (<2% of jobs are related to Govt, Ed, and licensure) the degree is no good. Even says it on WNUs website. Private jobs make up 98% of the economy.
I am waiting for someone to have tha balls to go after private individuals in the free enterprise domain in Texas. Never happen.
QUAGMIREOFLAWS October 26, 2007 at 1:55 p.m.
"I am waiting for someone to have tha balls to go after private individuals in the free enterprise domain in Texas. Never happen."
A federal judje will use what is known as prescident (vs) law citing the Oregon case (under federal law Oregon officials can go to jail and/or pay huge fines for refering to WNU as a diploma mill or for not letting WNU students use the degree) and Texas will get into the same debacle as Oregon got into.
45 of the states have no laws against unaccredited degrees for non-Civil or licensure jobs.
By calling the office of degree authorization in "THE ILLEGAL" states and asking for a waver based on WNUs seeking accreditation, you will likely get it. If they give you a hard time about it there are several civil litigation lawyers standing by to take your case pro-bono.
The states do not, and I repeat -DO NOT- want to test this illegal law in court. Notice their fear of prosecution of anyone. No one has or ever will be prosecuted for putting a WNU credential on a private sector resume. Federal judges are waiting to "take out at the knees" the first states AG that tests this unconstitutional law.
Steve Rawlinson (website owner/admin) October 26, 2007 at 2:20 p.m.
Dear Thomas Q Bayter III,
I'd be happy to talk with you about your concerns for this site or be interviewed for your story. You can use the Contact link at the bottom of every page to reach me.
In response to the specific issues that you identify:
"1. Most posters on this site are not students, they are imposters who change their names over and over and re-post mostly defamatory lies."
This is a difficult issue that all online degree forums face. Online degrees are relatively new and by the very nature of this site most people visiting are interested in learning more about a particular online college and have not yet completed a degree.
The comment system used here is not ideal for the type of discussions that are currently taken place. To be honest, I never expected that it would be used in this way for the type of lengthy discussions people are having. New software is probably the best solution for making it more useable and improving the quality of posts.
As for the fact that people can change their names and post “defamatory lies” my view is that can happen in any Internet forum and is not unique to this site. One of my philosophies for this site is to allow many different views to be included so that people can make up their own minds. I trust that people are intelligent and can judge for themselves. Also note that there is a clear difference between the posted comments and the reviews. Anyone can post a comment, but the reviews are rigorously screened. I think having these two methods for people to contribute to the site allows everyone to participate and has created a value resource.
Creating a online degree resource is what this site is about. Before this site was created there was virtually no information available to potential students. It’s my belief that any information is better than none, even if people have to sort through some “defamatory lies” to get it. No information is far more dangerous because people assume that means everything is fine. There is a lot of controversy about online degrees because they are still relatively new and this fact is reflected in the discussions on this site.
(continued below)
Steve Rawlinson (website owner/admin) October 26, 2007 at 2:22 p.m.
“2. Of the 13 "Reviews to date, we can verify that only a few are actually WNU students. The rest are fakes. The multiple legitimate WNU students attempt at posting reviews (in our test sample) were never considered. “
Talk about “defamatory lies” :) I don’t really see how you can be in a position to verify if reviews are fake or that legitimate reviews were “never considered.” I personally check ever review that is submitted. Note that last week no new reviews were approved as I was away on vacation.
I will admit that the review verification process can not be 100% accurate in detecting fake reviews. However, I stand by the process I use and I consider it to be very good.
“3. A consortium of experts (lawyers, professors and private contributers) are reviewing this entire website.”
If these “experts” have any questions or need information please feel free to have them contact me directly.
4. It is too late for this site to "clean up its act". We will not accept any appeal to not go forward with the story.
Great! I’m really looking forward to seeing your story and I encourage you to go forward with it. If there is anything I can do to help or information that I can provide please contact me. My hope it that your story is fair and accurately reflects the site and the valuable contribution that it is making.
Best Regards,
Steve Rawlinson
To: Tilly Girl October 26, 2007 at 3:17 p.m.
I'm getting the same ad, but if hit "close" on it, it will take you to the article.
RE: Story updates - Channel 11 October 26, 2007 at 6:51 p.m.
Good article. I like the Texas "cease and desist" approach to enforcement, on the unaccredited degree problem. So the individuals are pulling the Kennedy Western "Phd" from their websites, bios, stationary, marketing material etc. to come into compliance with state law.
I think the Texas Southern University lost alot of face in the process.
“They've degraded that entire institution, not just themselves, not just their department but that entire institution,” Lust said. Texas Southern University tells us it will soon remove any mention of Professor Lin’s Ph.D. from the University website.
Comprehensive Exam October 27, 2007 at 8:54 a.m.
Accreditted agencies and accredited universities are screaming bloody murder over Bush administration wanting to replace the failed accreditation system with Final Comprehensive Exams for determining the "Quality of the Degree", and for that matter "if You even get to keep the credential upon test failure."
You would have to defend the degree on a regular basis by passing tests out into the future.
Why are they so upset? They want standard degrees dont they?
Their biggest fear is that students from unaccredited universities like WNU will outscore them on the comprehensive tests. No wonder they are terrified!
Accreditation October 27, 2007 at 12:08 p.m.
I don't think that accreditation is the end all, be all for universities. But for the specific "university" in question, it has been individually proven to be so substandard that it is laughable.
Telemarketers cold calling people down on their luck, waiving the bulk of a so-called degree for just about any reason, then requiring 1 open book exam for the small amount of remaining "work" for each course. All well documented.
! October 27, 2007 at 2:56 p.m.
Accreditation is the end all, be all for universities!!!
But for the specific "university" in question, it has been individually proven to be so aboveboard that it has changed education as we know it.
The Basketball Players at brick and mortar schools given degrees with SAT scores of 10 , then accredited universities waiving the bulk of a so-called degree for just about any reason sports or minority related, then requiring no open book exams for zero amount of "work" for each course.
All more than well documented.
Joyce October 27, 2007 at 2:59 p.m.
Good to see that Kennedy Western has changed their name to try and bury their past while still offering meaningless degrees for cash.
What a horrible institution
Kevin October 27, 2007 at 3 p.m.
I'm disappointed that this site would carry such a deplorable "college".
Steve Rawlinson (website owner/admin) October 27, 2007 at 3:17 p.m.
Kevin,
There is a very good reason every college is listed on this site, so that people know what type of college it is and can get the information to make an informed decision. Imagine if this college wasn't listed, then people would have no information other than what the college tells them! My expectation is that the reviews and comments here will give people information that they wouldn't otherwise have. The fact that the college is listed here should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any type.
Good analogy you make October 29, 2007 at 12:11 a.m.
"The Basketball Players at brick and mortar schools given degrees with SAT scores of 10 , then accredited universities waiving the bulk of a so-called degree for just about any reason sports or minority related, then requiring no open book exams for zero amount of "work" for each course."
Great analogy! From all published reports, every Kennedy Western University student does about the same "work" as those athletes who get caught breaking the academic rules and kicked out of school.
(Of course, no SAT or any other type of admissions criteria required to get into Kennedy Western University / Warren National University and have half of your degree magicly waived)
To Steve: October 29, 2007 at 12:13 a.m.
Can't argue with site owner, but I think listing this school among the legitimate schools can be misleading to the unwary.
Would it be possible to list them under their own heading of "Unaccredited Schools", along with Rushmore?
WRONG October 29, 2007 at 8:04 a.m.
REF:Would it be possible to list them under their own heading of "Unaccredited Schools", along with Rushmore?
Rushmore is accredited.
The Snare of College Accreditation October 29, 2007 at 9:20 a.m.
Have you ever noticed that the first question people ask about a college is "Are they accredited?" By implication, the questioner is asking if the school is accredited by an organization recognized by the United States Department of Education, or otherwise recognized by state government as a degree-granting institution. They assume that the accreditation process ensures quality in education, and that employers will only hire employees with accredited degrees.
It will be shown here that accreditation does not equate to quality, that employers really are more interested in ability than pedigree, and that accreditation inherently has strings attached which undermines.......
Anything specific? October 29, 2007 at 1:42 p.m.
Nice, broad articles about the evils of accreditation are nice, but can you post anything (other than personal opinion or marketing materials) that refutes the points about Kennedy Western University / Warren National University being a telemarketing organization that has 100% acceptance, 100% graduation, and requires perfunctory work to complete the unwaived half of a so-called "degree"?
Rushmore October 29, 2007 at 1:57 p.m.
Rushmore has no recognized accreditation. It is listed as a diploma mill on the dozen states that have laws against unaccredited degrees.
Kennedy Western University tried this trick for a while too, listing a bogus "accreditating agency". I can't recall the name of the "agency" right now. Was is the Board of Online Universities Accreditation (BOUA)?
Mental Floss October 29, 2007 at 2:55 p.m.
REF:Anything specific?
Where are your references for your claims? Find me anything legit that shows WNU has 100% graduation. Find anything that says they have 100% acceptance.
Tip: You should not reference your mind numbed robot like buddies on this blog.
And talk about broad articles on the evils of accreditation, how about the broad articles on the evils of unaccredited schools. Ref: The re-posting over and over and over again about the Senete testimony thing 4 years ago.
Real, thinking people are not into "Senator Worship". We worship God. You might think that by your brown nosing corrupt senators that you will get a piece of the corruption pie (and you might). Never too late to repent my friend.
Mental Floss October 29, 2007 at 3:08 p.m.
We at WNU understand that club members of academia and other occupations are quite lacking in the qualities that, ideally, defines their domain. We have seen how researchers employ reverse scientific method, how philosophers are unwise, how psychologists are not perceptive, how historians lack perspective, not to mention how physicians are not healers, attorneys hate justice, psychiatrists are lunatics and musicians only know the "F" and "N" word. Ah yes accrediataion.
PT Barnum says... October 29, 2007 at 5 p.m.
"Find anything that says they have 100% acceptance."
Former employee that worked in admissions, NEVER saw an "applicant" get turned down.
"has 100% graduation"
Most universities publish this statistic, but not WN"U", so let's go with "near 100% graduation" until someone can provide the actual statistics.
Considering a KW"U" "course" has been defined as finding terms in the glossary for one multiple choice open book exam, with the option to retake, I can't imagine the fail rate is much more than 0.
Never October 29, 2007 at 6:07 p.m.
Ref:
Former employee that worked in admissions, NEVER saw an "applicant" get turned down.
So a former employee who was fired for smoking marijuana in the office has a gripe with KW and says "I never" saw.
Well, I never saw Abraham Lincoln in person.
Here are some more.
I never saw bacteria.
I never saw an atom or molecule for that matter.
I never saw anyone killed in cold blood.
I never saw a Negro Slave.
I never saw a NAZI persecuted Jew.
I never saw the lines of gravitational force.
AND
I never saw such ignorance as you!
Who is October 29, 2007 at 6:23 p.m.
PT Barnum?
PT Barnum October 29, 2007 at 7 p.m.
PT Barnum, of Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Circus, a/k/a "The Greatest Show on Earth".
He is often credited with saying, "there's a sucker born every minute"
Accreditation sucks October 29, 2007 at 10:31 p.m.
I have attended "Accredited" schools and found them no harder than WNU. In fact, the accredited school was much easier.
One class had a whopping TWO tests, a mid-term and a final, both of which were open book, multiple guess tests. Another had no work, lots of required reading from the text and other sources, and a term paper due at the end, which the class discussed.
The only real reason for accreditation is money. Accreditation gives a school access to government money (grants, VA, etc) and in turn the school gives away their right/ability of free reign over their institution. Kinda like Marxism.
So all you Pro-Accreditation pundits out there are showing your true colors, that you are anti-american, government-loving Marxist's.
It is unfortunate that WNU has bowed to the pressures of Liberals in government and has started down the accreditation process. They (Libtards) are experts in smearing good names.
But PT Barnum October 30, 2007 at 1:50 a.m.
Never said "There is a sucker born every minute." The phrase was coined after his death.
People thinking he did say it is due to another rewriting of history by the same marxist elitists that dreamed up accreditation.
Scammed October 30, 2007 at 3:14 a.m.
Kennedy Western University AKA Warren National University is definitely going to get you a top notch education. IN LIFE EXPERIENCE!
When you graduate from KW you will have learned that for slightly more effort you could have gotten an accredited university degree. You will have learned that your money was wasted. It is an unaccredited school. As someone who spent thousands there and took all the classes (yes you have to actually take classes and pass tests.) They don't just hand you a piece of paper for "Life Experience". In fact the professor who taught my Chemistry course at KW was also a full time professor teaching Chemistry at SUNY in Albany NY.
Kennedy Western University is a scam.
I didn't find out until I tried to upgrade one of my professional engineering certifications and was turned down, that I myself had been scammed. When I enrolled at Kennedy Western University they had a statement on their web site claiming accreditation for their state license. They even had a picture of it. It was MY FAULT for not properly investigating the project that I put MY money into.
I am currently enrolled in a REAL brick and mortar university
At Kennedy Western University I wrote one paper as a final project for my so called degree.
If you are going to waste your time and effort on an education, don't do it at Warren National or any other online ONLY school. There are plenty of real physical state and private schools who offer quality online degrees and a quality education.
Take your tests (CLEP SAT's), find out what your prerequisite classes sho uld be and just start getting them out of the way. In short, just do it right the first time. Then you won't be playing catch up with your future later. As a side note if you read Warren Nationals new web site THEY will NOT accept any transfer credits unless they are from a fully accredited university. SO THEY WILL NOT EVEN ACCEPT THEIR OWN GRADUATE STUDENTS INTO THEIR NEW SCHOOL.
if they are associated with Kennedy Western and your future employer makes the connection, (or checks on Wikipedia) you are not getting hired. Take it from a KW alumni.
Paul October 30, 2007 at 3:40 a.m.
REF If they are associated with Kennedy Western and your future employer makes the connection, (or checks on Wikipedia) you are not getting hired. Take it from a KW alumni.
Yes, But if you already have a Job then get the Degree no one will fire you from that job. Many employers are looking for any reason at all to promote people and just need to check the "Does he/she have a degree box"
WNU Was up front with me. They said from the beginning that WNU BSME could not be used for obtaining a PE. But I already earned my Georgia PE 8 years ago without any University. Many states still allow a PE with no degree whatsoever. My schtik is that people will not question the BSME because they see the PE. And yes I chose WNU because it is fast. I needed to earn the BSME in less than a year and I will.
Life Exp. October 30, 2007 at 9:14 a.m.
Giving educational credits for past job experience makes little sense.
However,
Giving people jobs for past educational experiences makes less sense.
I am a Westpoint Cadet October 30, 2007 at 9:22 a.m.
I am laughing at this blog.
Any non Military University is substandard by every measure possible when compared to Westpoint.
Civilian Universities are fermented garbage. This WNU place is just slightly more fermented garbage.
What a joke.
Join the military and go fight for your country you little girls.
puncturewound October 30, 2007 at 12:10 p.m.
Humorous is that people operate in their paradigm. Someone who dedicates their whole life to cell structure of the aids virus thinks everybody knows what virto-cyto-plasmatic biased fatigue incline is. There are perhaps billions of terms familiar to billions of people, but only a few hundred thousand shared terms that allow us to communicate.
Rest assured, if you questioned a thousand people about WNU, there would perhaps be a few (<10 for sure) that ever heard the words. Assume 10, then 5 would likely say they heard the name, when in fact they heard something familiar (perhaps WNU, World Nuclear University) but not WNU the university in Wyoming. The other 5 might say “Isn’t that the school I keep seeing on yahoo?” and of those 5, 1 might say “I heard they were a Diploma something.”
The one I like is the HR (imposter) poster to this site, perhaps more than one of these frauds, who tells stories of throwing many KW/WNU resumes in the trash can and informing the individual how they will not be hired today because they have a diploma mill diploma.
It is laughable. Lets do some math. There have roughly been 30,000 KW graduates since 1984. For arguments sake, let us assume they are all alive still even though more than 10% have probably died. 180,000,000 adults in US. So roughly 30K/180mil = 1 in 6,000 resumes will have WNU on them! Now we have about 250 workdays a year. 6000/250 = Reading 24 resumes a day, five days a week to find 1 KW resume in a year.
What company is this? Primerica and Walmart and McDonalds and coca-cola combined with one HR super-man?
What ever happened to the “Clearinghouse Poster”, another discredited crown jewel of government borne ignorance. She must be on vacation.
Char October 30, 2007 at 12:33 p.m.
"Yes, But if you already have a Job then get the Degree no one will fire you from that job. Many employers are looking for any reason at all to promote people and just need to check the "Does he/she have a degree box"
Depends...
We're a large company and I was given a background and academic check on each promotion or transfer within the company. So, if you had a legitimate degree that got you the job initially, buying an additional unaccredited degree to try and get a promotion wouldn't work.
Caveat Emptor October 30, 2007 at 1:29 p.m.
"Rest assured, if you questioned a thousand people about WNU, there would perhaps be a few (<10 for sure) that ever heard the words"
Great point about the obscurity of these no-name degree suppliers, it would be impossible to keep track of them all.
Kennedy-Western University / Warren National University alone is on it’s 2nd name and 4th state.
Then think about all of their unaccredited sister colleges such as Hamilton University, Rochville University, Almeda University, Belford University, St. Regis University, Harrington University, Trinity Southern University, University of Northern Washington, etc, etc. There are hundreds of them, and many of them operate only online and can change their name / website easily. So, I would guess that any given business probably only sees a few Warren National University or Rochville University degrees at a time, but between all of them, it might be somewhat common.
You don’t have to know anything specific about any of these so-called “colleges”, our HR guys just check them against the Dept. of Education website to see if they are valid.
smg October 30, 2007 at 2:54 p.m.
i have an unaccredited degree from a diploma mill, and making 70k plus a year. i love america. also i'm highly educated, but don't have time to play school. so to all those haters about diploma mills, keep hating while i'm still living a comfortable life. wow!!!!!!
ANOTHER MYTH, more lies October 31, 2007 at 1:45 p.m.
REF:
"You don’t have to know anything specific about any of these so-called “colleges”, our HR guys just check them against the Dept. of Education website to see if they are valid."
US GOVT IS FORBIDDEN FROM SUCH BY THE US CONSTITUTION. US GOVT FOUND IN FAVOR OF KW/WNU AND DISCIPLINED OREGON STATE EDUCATION OFFICIALS FOR CALLING KW A DIPLOMA MILL...
Franstaunchenzant! October 31, 2007 at 2:06 p.m.
The future of higher education in America, its role in our country's democracy, and its contribution to world affairs is at stake. Join WNU in defending academic freedom! These things are at stake--and academic freedom does need to be defended. But with its polarizing language and "noli me tangere" defensiveness, the Ad Hoc Committee is doing more to deepen the problem than to address it.
PT Barnum says... November 1, 2007 at 12:47 a.m.
"US GOVT IS FORBIDDEN FROM SUCH BY THE US CONSTITUTION"
Still clueless I see, it's individual states that have made these degrees illegal, with more to follow. Individual employers can screen untrained and unqualified applicants out with a simple check.
Correction, again, on KWU/Oregon
They settled out of court, still have to use this embarrassing disclaimer on your KWU "degree"
In addition, an individual using an unaccredited degree, even if the employer allows use of such degrees, must disclose on resumes, letterheads, business cards, announcements and advertisements that "(Name of school) does not have accreditation recognized by the United States Department of Education and has not been approved by the Office of Degree Authorization." ORS 348.609(2)(a). The only exception is for schools approved by ODA. See ORS 348.609(d) and OAR 583-050-0014.
It is a Class B Misdemeanor under the Oregon Criminal Code to use a degree in violation of ORS 348.609
"Congress rightly wants to make sure that federal student aid funds don’t go to “fly by night” operations"
Is Warren National University eligible for federal student funds? Of course not.
This is the truth November 1, 2007 at 9:40 a.m.
I am a contractor. I have a resume albeit I am not sure why. I have been in the workplace for 30 years. And as God is my witness, I have never gotten a gig with my resume. The client asks for my services and allows me to pick which site vendors I work for. In otherwords, I pick my employer and not the other way around. All my contracts are secured through word of mouth.
Delivering a high quality product is all I have ever done. Never kissed the systems ass for a degree, never had to, never will. Anyone wanting real success in life will not do it with a government handout. Accreditation is little more it seems than a government "we give you money for votes" scheme. Welfare systems such as accreditation cartels are hurting our country. No one has any pride or decency anymore. There was a reason our founding fathers wanted small government. All government tends to grow and grow until no more freedom exists and this chokes off free enterprise. You free loaders on this site know who you are, and I pray for your salvation. You might have no shame because you have no soul. Your lives will be miserable as long as you associate government-taxpayer funded educations with success. Sure, you might earn 300K/year and think you are getting ahead but in the end, they (the govt)will steal from me to support the likes of you in your old age. Your punishment will not be of this earth.
I assure you my yearly income exceeds anyone posting to this blog. No one ever handed me government freebies. My parents were too proud to take a handout even though my mom never graduated HS and my dad never made more than minimum wage. They passed on a pride to me that made me (along with help from above) successful. This was not the false pride that black and minority comunities have where government handouts are "entitlements".
blooprents November 1, 2007 at 9:59 a.m.
Ther are no real HR posters to this site. Just peolple angry because they spent a lot of time and money on their degree and now they see it is doing nothing for them. They missed the boat.
Hint:Your lack of success is your character. Dont be mad at or judge other people who are more successful than you. Their success probably has little to do with this Waren National college or Kennedy school or whatever. They probably got lucky somewhere or inherited a lot of money somewhere or something. These Waren people are not going to let you see their poker hand or give you the secrets to their career success.
Take your mind off what you can get from Uncle Sam and focus on helping people.
The degree thing is nice and I have actually met people that applied the degree, although rare.
Its just frustrating though November 1, 2007 at 10:19 a.m.
When you see many of these people with a fake degree get promoted past you and then go to your boss and ask her about it and find out she has a fake degree too (then your life is a living hell until you finally quit). I interupted their little good ole(girls) club and became an outsider.
Well, I did quit and went to work work with a company that has real people with real degrees only to find out we are being bought out by guess who, yea the place I used to work for. I have considered quitting again but I used up all of my savings and racked up 50,000 in credit card debt on my first quit.
I hate these non-accredited fake degree telemarketers.
Its like a club now, no a cult. They are poping up everywhere.
Like the illegal immigrant thing, no laws are being enforced. When is government going to enforce some of these damn laws.
RH November 1, 2007 at 10:32 a.m.
Great point about the obscurity of these no-name degree suppliers, it would be impossible to keep track of them all.
No one checks!! HR people are too lazy and ignorant to check. The HR people are part of the Diploma Mill scam and playing it for lots of money.
Report them to your state government. November 1, 2007 at 12:32 p.m.
"I hate these non-accredited fake degree telemarketers."
Call your office of degree authorization in your state. Hire a lawyer or something.
Frustrated in Brownsville November 1, 2007 at 12:43 p.m.
{Call your office of degree authorization in your state. Hire a lawyer or something.}
I am afraid to. Have you ever heard of B&R? They tell my State Government what to do, not the other way around. Furthermore, the company management are the ones that have to bring charges and they are in on it. I would have to leave Texas for Mexico if I reported them.
Sounds to me like November 1, 2007 at 12:47 p.m.
You belong in Mexico you Government framunda cheese eating hump.
LOL November 1, 2007 at 2:55 p.m.
"No one checks!! HR people are too lazy and ignorant to check."
True, there are lazy and ignorant companies that you could theoretically sneak an unaccredited degree into.
?? November 1, 2007 at 3:16 p.m.
Will Warren National University provide me a list of the various states that I can't use my degree in? I don't like the sound of the various disclaimers I'll need to use when applying for a job, is there a check list or template or something?
Seems like the placement office should be helping in this area.
Use it in any state November 2, 2007 at 3:40 a.m.
As long as it is not a licensing requirement or G job, there. Even Texas AG admits the law is n/a for private companies. Or put another way, the company that hires you has to press charges. As long as you tell them up front you are OK. There are thousands of people with unaccredited degrees gainfully employed in everyone of the "Illegal States" It does not hurt to put "unaccredited" front and center on your resume. Pivate companies are in revolt against burdensome government requirements and will hire you to spite the government that works against their best interest.
Ask your self this question. Why have there been no prosecutions for private non governmental use of an unaccredited degree? The answer is simple. A federal district judge has sided with KW against the "Great state of Oregon". Some will say rightly it was settled out of court, but that still sets "Prescident". The reason Oregon settled out of court was simple (fear of what would happen).
In private chambers Oregon smartly made the correct choice not to persue this issue.
If you do not think WNU is standing by to defend you in the event you are challenged by any state government, then you have not been following the big picture. FEDERAL PRESCIDENT HAS SETTLED THIS ISSUE PEOPLE. Just because these states are too chicken to challenge the Feds and look dumb is the only reason they have the illegal laws in their code. First challenge and they will strike the laws.
Pissed off in Maine. November 2, 2007 at 3:46 a.m.
I too am sick and tired of all of these degree mill pushing companies hiring all of these people with their fake degrees. It is rampant up here. When the top management in your company has these dubious credentials and your company has a thousands times the money (as Maine does) to hire lawyers, it is a no win.
Maine passes these stupid laws but never enforces them. It sucks. I am moving to Canada.
To: Use in Any state November 2, 2007 at 5:54 a.m.
There are so many funny things in your post, I don't know where to start.
"It does not hurt to put "unaccredited" front and center on your resume"
That would be great. Companies could skip the 5 minutes and the $6 verification fee and put it directly in the dumpster.
"Why have there been no prosecutions for private non governmental use of an unaccredited degree?"
I'm assuming most people, like the Texas article, when they get the initial "cease and desist" order for illegal use, just run their KW"U" degree through the shredder when they are discovered.
"A federal district judge has sided with KW"
Umm, hate to break it to you, but an out of court settlement doesn't have a winner / loser. Still illegal in Oregon, and still have to use the embarrassing disclaimer on so-called degrees.
"FEDERAL PRESCIDENT"
Okay, if you are going to use a fancy word 8 times, please spell it correctly. Say it with me, Precedent.
Accepted November 2, 2007 at 3:31 p.m.
"Okay, if you are going to use a fancy word 8 times, please spell it correctly. Say it with me, Precedent."
So I spelled Precedent wrong. Forgive my english, I am originally from Montreal Canada and earned my citizenship to the US, and served in the US Navy. I speak French. English is my second language.
But the people in the "Texas Article" that you obviously did not read were government employees. Lets say that again THE TEXAS CASE INVOLVED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES. A Court clerk and a Judge. Doubt you can or will admit you are wrong like I did since you have the markings of a rat. Where is this 5$ fee spent, are you the discredited "Clearinghouse poster"?
You are wrong. Oregon was disciplined and even given defamation training. They were forewarned by a Federal judge what would happen if they did not settle out of court.
By the way, one-upmanship on spelling is a bygone occupation since spell-check.
Anyone can cut and paste their writing into WORD and do a spell-check. Forgive any future mis-spelled words as that seems to offend you more than the lies you propogate.
himarks November 2, 2007 at 3:35 p.m.
"Like the illegal immigrant thing, no laws are being enforced. When is government going to enforce some of these damn laws."
Dont hold your breath.
himarks November 2, 2007 at 3:38 p.m.
"When you see many of these people with a fake degree get promoted past you and then go to your boss and ask her about it and find out she has a fake degree too (then your life is a living hell until you finally quit). I interupted their little good ole(girls) club and became an outsider."
Get used to it.
Texas, again November 2, 2007 at 8:18 p.m.
I'm not sure why you keep saying that Kennedy Western University / Warren National University "degrees" are ONLY illegal for government positions in Texas. (Although 2 government officials did recently throw their Kennedy-Western University "degrees" in the trash for that reason)
Here is the code: I've bolded the one part related to use in government, but it is also illegal for advertising, employment, licensing, and everything else.
http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/AAR/Private...
"The Texas Penal Code (Section 32.52) prohibits the use of fraudulent or substandard degrees "in a written or oral advertisement or other promotion of a business; or with the intent to: obtain employment; obtain a license or certificate to practice a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain a promotion, a compensation or other benefit, or an increase in compensation or other benefit, in employment or in the practice of a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain admission to an educational program in this state; OR GAIN A POSITION IN GOVERNMENT WITH AUTHORITY OVER ANOTHER PERSON, regardless of whether the actor receives compensation for the position." Violation of this law is a Class B misdemeanor."
Unenforced Laws November 3, 2007 at 2:22 a.m.
I see you left out that the individual has to "knowingly" use a substandard degree (guess you "accidently" overlooked that). If in the individuals opinion the degree is not substandard and since WNU has no responsibility to make any students aware of obscure Texas laws then that is a defense that can not be lost in court. You I am sure have heard of the phrase "Ignorance is no excuse under the law", but the exception is when "knowingly" is placed in front of the clause. That one word means two things.
1. States AG will not enforce this law since intent is so hard to prove and no one is expected to study and memorize all laws or even find some bogus list on a Texas website.
2. "Knowingly" is an escape clause that believe it or not is wanted more by enforcement(executive) than judicial to give freedom of movement.
I do not know what state you are in, but trust me you are violating written laws in your state every day. You just do not know it. Some of these laws exist so that they can be used selectively to get bad guys and hold them long enough to investigate them.
An unsuccessful attempt was made in Ga. to enforce the sodomy laws when the DEA busted into the wrong address. Lets just say the married couple at the address were having a specific type of non-missionary sex. The DEA was embarrased and looking at big trouble so they decided to bust the couple for sodomy. They were unsuccessful since the jury saw the snake in the grass.
Like I said before, find me a conviction in any state. A cease order on two GOVERNMENT employees in Texas does not count.
In law circles, untested laws do not exist as law. Look at it this way. If Texas (legislative branch)passed a law making it illegal to breath air in the state of Texas they (judicial branch) likely would not endorse it. AGs (executive brance) have considerable freedom in enforcement and would not enforce it. There are many untested laws. Look at the sodomy laws in Ga, they have been there for 200 years and never endorsed or enforced. Unendorsed and unenforced laws are not laws yet.
I have been holding off on this but the reason Private non-govt, enterprise can not be prosecuted has to do with interstate law. What if my services are based in South Carolina but I am doing calculations for a nuclear plant in Texas. Now my resume has WNU on it and a company from the Philipines is getting the contract to do the work and I am a subcontractor to that Phillipino company.
Add in the fact that I am a national from Canada, but my home is in Sweden.
Who broke the law? How does Texas enforce it? How do they even find out? Life is complicated. Get used to it!
Just Do It! November 3, 2007 at 1:55 p.m.
How do you found a university?
First, raise a lot of money. Without a pile of cash on hand, you won't be able to pay faculty and staff, or buy land, buildings, and textbooks. Many universities—Vanderbilt, Stanford, Carnegie Mellon—were started by moguls rich enough to pay the bills themselves. Others relied on foundations to jumpstart their endowment: Olin College in Massachusetts, for example, draws its funding from the Olin Foundation. In most cases, the endowment is overseen by a board of trustees. The majority of colleges are not-for-profit institutions, with all the usual exemptions from income and property taxes. Donors can also write off contributions. In exchange, schools have to reinvest earnings and follow prohibitions against political activism. But recent decades have seen a surge in for-profit colleges like University of Phoenix and DeVry University. Instead of donors, these colleges have investors.
Before a college can start accepting students, it needs a degree-granting license. Each state has its own process, but usually you need to submit your university's curriculum to a committee for review. Some of the most relaxed states—Oregon, Alabama, and Texas require only a site visit. In tough-as-nails Maine, inspectors visit your campus, all other university presidents must be notified of your application, and a state legislator must introduce a bill to grant your school a license. Without a license, you're not allowed to advertise your school as a degree-granting institution.
Jay November 4, 2007 at 3:14 a.m.
"What if my services are based in South Carolina but I am doing calculations for a nuclear plant in Texas. Now my resume has WNU on it and a company from the Philipines is getting the contract to do the work and I am a subcontractor to that Phillipino company."
Actually a great example! Where does the violation actually occur? Since the State of Texas specifically lists Warren National "University" as a "Fraudulent or Substandard Institution with No Known Texas Connection", it is just a matter of pinpointing it.
There are many people dropping the ball here. If you were hired in South Carolina, HR there did not do a background check to verify that you had valid academic credentials.
The nucleur power plant did not perform proper due diligence on it's subcontractor qualifications before signing the contract.
I would guess the violation occurs under the section where Texas has made it illegal to use a Warren National University degree "in employment or in the practice of a trade, profession, or occupation;"
Great, scary example of some half-trained yahoo working on a nucleur power plant project.
This is the Global Economy. November 4, 2007 at 6:17 a.m.
"Great, scary example of some half-trained yahoo working on a nucleur power plant project."
Do you ever fly Delta or US air? A huge amount of critical aviation engineering is done in places like India. You will not find most of their degrees validated or validatable in Texas yet Delta flys in and out of DFW hundreds of times a week. Oh no Mr. Bill! People in India with substandard degrees are working on Jets in Dallas.
Lets look at a complicated part designed in Atlanta Georgia, Pattented in New York, various sub-parts built in Miami Florida and China, Assembled in Thailand, QA tested in Alabama and marketed in Canada. By your argument if that part ends up in a car in Texas, then "Oh no Mr. Bill, how do we check the hundreds of degrees that were involved in the history of this part!"
Who do you prosecute? How do you prosecute? Why do you prosecute?
? November 4, 2007 at 3:08 p.m.
"There are many people dropping the ball here. If you were hired in South Carolina, HR there did not do a background check to verify that you had valid academic credentials."
But the WNU degree is perfectly legal in South Carolina. No?
?? November 4, 2007 at 3:15 p.m.
"The nucleur power plant did not perform proper due diligence on it's subcontractor qualifications before signing the contract."
The nuclear plant violates no laws accepting the resume. Texas law does not penalize an employer for accepting a degree. What motivates the person to turn the lady in? The laws have to do with using the resume. He is using it in SC (technically in the Phillipines).
Also most people doing calculations at nuclear plants are ex navy enlisted anyways(no degree).
??? November 4, 2007 at 3:31 p.m.
"I would guess the violation occurs under the section where Texas has made it illegal to use a Warren National University degree "in employment or in the practice of a trade, profession, or occupation;"
Lets get this straight.
So we are going to internationally extradite to the US, then do an interstate extradition from NY to Tx a Swedish National on a Class B Misdemeanor for submitting his resume to a company in the Phillipines that wins a 30 million dollar bid on a contract in Matagorda Texas?
After spending $200,000 on international extradition, then $25,000 on interstate extradition, we can promptly give her a first offender warning. The second time she does it a $500.00 fine. GET REAL!
I have November 4, 2007 at 3:40 p.m.
a confidentiality agreement applicable to my resume and HR at Shaw-Stone and Webster.
That is, if someone at Shaw shows my resume to anyone, including the State of Tx, they will violate the agreement.
Anna November 5, 2007 at 4:10 a.m.
My girlfriend says WNU is a Diploma Million. What does that mean?
She said you can get an associates degrees in less than two years there. True?
Elliott November 5, 2007 at 7:18 a.m.
To Anna-
They are a diploma mill, not million. Basically you just send them $10.00 and they send you a degree in a day or two. I stopped by their office in Wy. and used a credit card to get a Phd in about 5 minutes. I now work as a brain surgeon in Brooklyn. Messed a few brains up, but my brother in law who got the $800.00 law degree is my lawyer, and a good one at that!! He gets me out of trouble and I write him free pain killer scrips for his help. Oh and my mom is my scrub nurse. You guessed it, she got the $250.00 BS in Nursing speed-course from them.
I think some of the accredited university doctors here may be catching on. Never thought I would last 15 years here at the Mount. S. I guess if they lay me off I will go do the pilots course at WNU and try working for Delta - yea that sounds like fun!
Anna November 5, 2007 at 7:19 a.m.
I want to be a secret agent spy or a movie star. Can I buy one for that?
Good News November 5, 2007 at 8:33 a.m.
If WNU becomes accredited after I earn my degree, does the accreditation carry over. According to Dr. J. Bear, the authority on such matters-Yes it does. Enjoy!
SkyLark November 6, 2007 at 11:23 a.m.
Significantly, there is not a single case of someone with a WNU Resume not getting hired (or being fired because of WNU) in Corporate America (among the tens of thousands of resumes submitted).
The basis for hiring in America has never been linked with any specific "Accreditation" factor.
These Facist pinheads and their claims to link "Accreditation" with higher quality education largely amounts to post-facto guesswork abetted by statistical hijinks and imagination run amok.
WNU has no published ratings November 6, 2007 at 9:27 p.m.
WNU Listed alongside Belford, Canyon College, and other unaccredited universities. Where is sister college Rochville?!
"there is not a single case of someone with a WNU Resume not getting hired"
LOL. That's because I assume it quietly goes in the dumpster and isn't even considered, it's not a real newsworthy event to get unqualified applicants who don't meet minimum requirements.
Good News November 6, 2007 at 9:47 p.m.
"If WNU becomes accredited after I earn my degree, does the accreditation carry over. According to Dr. J. Bear, the authority on such matters-Yes it does. Enjoy!"
http://books.google.com/books?id=k67XC_7......
Excellent find! A cited reference from an actual expert on the subject!
So, Kennedy-Western degrees will always be junk, but there is hope for Warren National.
Dr J November 7, 2007 at 5:12 a.m.
All Startups in Universities require that they go at least 5-7 years before they finally get accredited.
During this time they must have actual students going there.
The initially unaccredited students (startup through final accreditation) have always been grand-fathered in to accreditation status, to my knowledge.
If someone knows otherwise and can reference the contrary please post.
To Dr J: November 7, 2007 at 7:30 p.m.
True, I think..., So 1/1/2007 is the official start date of a new university, Warren National University. If they are truly seeking accreditation, my understanding is that the Warren National students beginning after 1/1/07 would be grandfathered in.
Posters to this site have said that WNU will gain regional accreditation in 2008, so we'll know soon.
Dr. J - Accreditation November 8, 2007 at 6:14 a.m.
Where did you see those posters? I do believe in the University and feel they will get Accredited, but wanted to see those posters.
If you can post the link, it would be appreciated!!!
Skeptic November 8, 2007 at 6:38 p.m.
Warren National does not have a prayer in getting accredited and I doubt if they really want to do that. It is too easy making money from the rubes the way things are. And the idea of previous graduates being "grandfathered in" is ludicrous.
A business that can issue paper that costs maybe 25 cents and sell it for several thousand is a high profit business. Now they do have a few legitimate professors as window dressing and perhaps these legitimate professors do wave their hand over an exam or two, but essentially the business model is to
sell a sheet of paper for several thousand dollars. Even though they do get criticized a good deal, you can see how a business model like that would be attractive. Sort of like printing 100 dollar bills.
re: Skeptic November 9, 2007 at 6:04 a.m.
And "accredited" universities are not a "high profit business"?
Let's see ... hmmmmm .... they issue a sheet of paper that costs 25 cents, and charge the student $40k, $50k, $100k? plus let's not forget room and board , lab fees, and books.
PLUS they get to STEAL taxpayers money via grants, VA, etc.
All because they joined the "secret society" of accreditation.
No wonder WNU wants to get accredited! They see where the REAL money is!
To Skeptic: November 9, 2007 at 2:09 p.m.
My thoughts exactly. They (whoever owns it) have a cash cow, why go legit now?
Personally, I would load up the moving truck (again) and move the 6 employees in Wyoming to another state. Keep everyone else in California.
JOO November 9, 2007 at 5:06 p.m.
Accredited universities are all for profit. They do not steal for free.
Skeptic November 10, 2007 at 5:28 a.m.
Degrees from diploma mills are a great national problem but one that is partly hidden becuase all too often the people who get them are not found out. Suppose you lived a few miles from a nuclear power plant, and the night shift supervisor has a degree from podunk university, a diploma mill, and the degree is in nuclear engineering. But naturally, being from a diploma mill, the "engineer" learned only about 5 percent of the information from the diploma mill that he would have learned from a legitimate university. Could you sleep well at night, knowing that the supervisor has a bogus degree?
HUH? November 10, 2007 at 12:34 p.m.
REF:
"Degrees from diploma mills are a great national problem but one that is partly hidden becuase all too often the people who get them are not found out. Suppose you lived a few miles from a nuclear power plant, and the night shift supervisor has a degree from podunk university, a diploma mill, and the degree is in nuclear engineering. But naturally, being from a diploma mill, the "engineer" learned only about 5 percent of the information from the diploma mill that he would have learned from a legitimate university. Could you sleep well at night, knowing that the supervisor has a bogus degree?"
Most nuclear plant operators are X-Navy, enlisted. Few or no degrees in the control rooms.
On WNU November 10, 2007 at 1:10 p.m.
At the age of 22 I asked my college mentor whether or not my choice to attend KW/WNU for a graduate degree would lead me to actual work in my industry. And her response was, “Well, that’s really up to you.” I naively had assumed that a degree from a good school would guarantee industry employment. Isn’t that the purpose of obtaining a degree? Well, thousands of dollars and many years later, I now know better. “That’s really up to you” is another way of saying “No, a degree does not necessarily get you a job.” A degree is just a degree. A degree (specifically an MFA) will teach you how to do a skill, trade, or discipline better, faster, and more efficiently. But that hard-earned degree will absolutely not guarantee you a job. Not in today’s world of overpopulation, overcrowding, competition, diminishing resources, reduction of the middle-class, and post-dot-com-bust. No, a degree will get you, well, just a degree.
WNU#1 November 10, 2007 at 1:35 p.m.
There are many teachers who get past the interview stage and their fake degree goes undetected. This can lead to a fascinating array of scenarios further down the line. If the teacher turns out to be unprofessional, unreliable, and a thoroughly bad hire all round, then schools have been known to launch a witch-hunt, asking the teacher to supply them with an official letter of verification on university letter-headed paper. In some cases the school might chase after degree verification themselves. However, this isn’t always possible. Ask ten people whether an employer is legally entitled to do their own detective work, and you’ll get ten different answers. Some universities charge a fairly hefty fee for a verification service. Others are governed by privacy protection acts. Some colleges will only issue a letter if the student graduated within the last 25 years, and then there are some colleges that have closed down or burned to the ground.
To put things into perspective though, it’s worth remembering that there are also schools that find out an instructor’s degree is fake and yet continue to employ them. If a teacher is good at his job and popular with students, it sometimes makes sense for the school to turn a blind eye. Demand for teachers is currently outstripping supply in spectacular fashion. The last thing a school wants is to get involved in yet another interview and recruitment merry-go-round. There are even rumors of schools that make degrees themselves or at the very least, pat a new teacher on the head and point them in the right direction.
Seeking a legal opinion on all this, a lawyer from one of New York's oldest established law firms told us that working with fake documents is a very serious offence and there should be dire consequences if the teacher is caught. In the eyes of NY law, you are in effect, cheating the government, but there has yet to be a conviction. Too difficult.
Wrong November 10, 2007 at 4:09 p.m.
"Some universities charge a fairly hefty fee for a verification service" - Less than $10 usually. Background checks are a cost of doing business.
"there are also schools that find out an instructor’s degree is fake and yet continue to employ them." - LOL, it's okay to help a fraudster? I'm not sure what sleazy school this would refer to, but the adminsitration and/or school board would just get dragged down with them.
You don't have to look very long or very far to see all kinds of examples of people getting nailed with fake credentials.
The recent firefighter snafu, the hundreds of teachers in Florida, Dennis O'Leary (Notre Dame coach for a week), Laura Callahn, Sandra Baldwin (US Olympic committee), the hundreds identified in the Kennedy Western Senate hearing, the Texas officials recently, the Radio Shack guy, the list goes on and on.
Fined, terminated, reprimanded. And this is the very very small % that make it outside the companys walls, since they are obviously doing everything they can to damage control internally.
WHATTTTTT? November 10, 2007 at 5:24 p.m.
REF:
"The recent firefighter snafu, the hundreds of teachers in Florida, Dennis O'Leary (Notre Dame coach for a week), Laura Callahn, Sandra Baldwin (US Olympic committee), the hundreds identified in the Kennedy Western Senate hearing, the Texas officials recently, the Radio Shack guy, the list goes on and on."
I agree, but for everyone caught, hundreds go un-noticed. The same non-competitive system that creates accreditation and other government SNAFUS can not stop the fraud (due to the same morons in charge).
re: Wrong November 10, 2007 at 10:51 p.m.
You are a complete idiot.
There has NEVER been a "Kennedy Western Senate hearing"
There was a Senate hearing regarding unaccredited diplomas and diploma mills, which KW was identified due to the FIRST issue, unaccredited.
PLEASE show me all of these hundreds that were identified. I have read the entire hearing, and I just can seem to find them.
Again, you are nothing more than an ignorant, incompetent moron. You must have attended an Accredited University
wert November 11, 2007 at 9:46 a.m.
Diploma Mills are not listed on this website. Ref this website/blog.
Kennedy Western diploma mill hearing text November 12, 2007 at 5:38 a.m.
". the schools we investigated take pains to try to convince prospective students that they are legitimate and that student have to earn their degrees. That is why a healthy dose of credit for work and life experience becomes such a critical component of their business model. That is what permits these more sophisticated diploma mills to assume an air of legitimacy while minimizing the actual amount of work required."
Our investigation has revealed that there seem to be two kinds of diploma mills. One is simply a printing press.
Others, such as Columbia State University, Kennedy Western and some of the others we have looked at, are more sophisticated. They require a modicum of work, but nothing close to what should be required for a legitimate degree. Obviously, you shouldn't be able to earn a degree in 27 days, the example we discussed yesterday and Senator Lieberman cited."
Misc November 12, 2007 at 5:56 a.m.
"There has NEVER been a "Kennedy Western Senate hearing"
You must have missed it, here is a link. Kennedy Western former employees and investigators testified. The University even produced the list referenced here where they have ONE! so-called Faculty member and boatloads of telemarketers.
Nuke man November 13, 2007 at 3:05 a.m.
>>>>Most nuclear plant operators are X-Navy, enlisted. Few or no degrees in the control rooms.<<<<
I agree but the operation of a nuclear power plant involves far more people than just those in the control room. It is entirely possible that bogus degrees could adversely influence the safe operation of a nuclear plant. I know one fellow who got a diploma mill degree in Health Physics (a phony Ph.D.) and for a time occupied a high position related to the nuclear industry - until he was found out.
Nuke man November 13, 2007 at 3:08 a.m.
>>>>>You are a complete idiot.
There has NEVER been a "Kennedy Western Senate hearing"
There was a Senate hearing regarding unaccredited diplomas and diploma mills, which KW was identified due to the FIRST issue, unaccredited.<<<<
You err too much in favor of Kennedy Western. During the course of the hearings, Senator Susan Collins stated that Kennedy Western was not a legitimate university. You are correct in your implication that Kennedy Western was not the ONLY target of the investigation.
XNAVNUK November 13, 2007 at 3:41 a.m.
To NUKE-MAN
Shift supervisors in nuclear plants are in Operations Department and have to pass a tough licensing test every year. They can be found in the control room.
In my 30 years in the nuclear business, I have known few SS's to bother with a degree. Making 175K-200K/year, why waste the time.
The poster refered to a "Shift Supervisor".
Personally, I will trust an ex-navy nuclear power school graduate with a KW BSME degree over anyone else with an accredited BSME from, say,California Polytech or Georgia Tech. The discipline matters more than anything. Last I checked, universities are in the anti-discipline business.
Words have meanings November 13, 2007 at 3:53 a.m.
There is a difference between being the subject of an investigative hearing and being investigated. KW was the subject of a hearing.
Example-An eye-witness to a murder in a crime investigation is a "subject of an investigation" just like the guy who was murdered is a "subject of an investigation".
The object (objective) of the investigation is the accused.
KW was not on trial. Government employees and institutions were on trial. KW was never accused of breaking any laws. The matter involved unaccredited KW graduates being reimbursed tuition. Tuition reimbursement requires accreditation of the applicable university.
Dad November 13, 2007 at 7:10 a.m.
"There is a difference between being the subject of an investigative hearing and being investigated. KW was the subject of a hearing."
Oh, I feel much better now and am going to run out and sign my kids up.
Dad November 13, 2007 at 7:10 a.m.
They just graduated!
KW BSME November 13, 2007 at 7:52 a.m.
I had to cram all this stuff into my mind for the examinations, whether I liked it or not. This coercion had such a deterring effect on me that, after I had passed the final examination, I found the consideration of any scientific problems distasteful to me for an entire year."
MC^2 November 13, 2007 at 8 a.m.
Accreditation is a soft weapon of propaganda; hold it in your hands too long, and it will move about like a snake, and strike the other way.
Dr J November 13, 2007 at 8:15 a.m.
In punishing Warren National University for it's contempt of authority, fate made WNU an authority itself.
Dr J November 13, 2007 at 8:22 a.m.
The attempt to combine education and government has only rarely been successful and then only for a short while.
Shining the light on the "Accreditation Rats" November 13, 2007 at 8:38 a.m.
Academic freedom is the right to look for truth and to teach what one believes to be true. This right begs also a duty: one must not hide any part of what one has recognized to be the truth.
It is obvious that any government restriction on academic freedom (accreditation) acts in such a way as to hamper the dispersal of knowledge among the people and thereby impedes good national judgment and responsible action.
The texas law November 13, 2007 at 11:45 a.m.
The U.S. Code, which contains all federal statutes, occupies 56,009 single-spaced pages. Its 47 volumes take up nine feet of shelf space. An annotated version, which attempts to bring order out of chaos, is three feet long and has 230 hardcover volumes and 36 paperback supplements. Administrative lawmaking under statutes fill up the 207-volume Code of Federal Regulations, which spans 21 feet of shelf space and contains more than 134,488 pages of regulatory law... Federal law is further augmented by more than 2,756 volumes of judicial precedent, taking up 160 yards of law library shelving."
Hey all you framunda cheese eating government fecal nose accreditation advocates,
Can you be certain you're not breaking one of those laws?
Whew! November 13, 2007 at 1:19 p.m.
"I had to cram all this stuff into my mind for the examinations, whether I liked it or not"
Finding words in the glossary for 1 open book exam can be challenging.
PT Barnum November 13, 2007 at 3:24 p.m.
"Can you be certain you're not breaking one of those laws?"
No, but in less than 5 minutes, you can verify that your college is accepted/accredited and whether it was the subject of an investigative hearing. Things such as your education and career require due diligence.
I probably wouldn't spend that 5 minutes to determine if walking my dog on Thursdays is illegal on the left side of the street
Hey Dad! November 13, 2007 at 4:52 p.m.
REF:"Oh, I feel much better now and am going to run out and sign my kids up."
Hey dad, WNU will not take your kids. Look into their guidlines. Your kids do not qualify.
You are the crown jewel of ignorance.
Even if you are typical government scum parasite and you spent your whole adult life trying to get your 80 IQ kids ready for college by teaching them the SAT over and over and over again, they still can not get in. They have to actually hold a job. Chances are good that you never actually held a job either.
Dad November 13, 2007 at 5:02 p.m.
From the Senate Investigation of Kennedy Western University and 2 other schools:
Committee on Government Affairs - Exhibit #16, lists these activities that were granted academic credit for "life experience" at an unaccredited "college", that anyone can do.
*Playing Tennis
*Watching Public Television
*Keeping tropical fish
Word November 13, 2007 at 5:13 p.m.
"Finding words in the glossary for 1 open book exam can be challenging."
Look Pal,it is obvious you never attended the school. My KW experience was horrible and I would not do it again!
Physics, Calculus, Heat X-fer, Thermo, Mechatronics, Materials (to name a few) tests were all problem solving with barely enough time to finish the tests. Open book does you no good on these.
Now granted, subjects like English and Writing were like you say, unbelievable easy, almost a joke.
The truth is, the only difficult courses in any degree are the Math, Science and Engineering disciplines.
Touchy feely courses like Psychology, Sociology, Business, and Language degrees for example are a joke no matter where they are taught. And these courses are truly a scam, even at Harvard or Yale.
These liberal arts courses are only good for teaching you to teach them to someone else. Like a pyramid scheme.
These Liberal Arts type courses remind me of the old SNL spoof ....."Learn to be a standby operator today! Just dial 1-800-453-8532-Operators are standing by!"
Scammed November 13, 2007 at 6:37 p.m.
"My KW experience was horrible and I would not do it again!"
As was mine
diploma mill blues November 15, 2007 at 3:42 a.m.
In one of the old refernces on Wikipedia, there was some information about complaints to the Better Business Bureau about Kennedy Western. There were something like 14 complaints over a year or so. Imagine how many dissatisfied customers there must have been to generate 14 complaints as many would not go to the trouble of filing a complaint.
Not Today November 15, 2007 at 7:18 a.m.
There are fewer complaints about WNU toady at the BBB than there are at most accredited universities. Explain that!
BBB - look it up November 15, 2007 at 1:54 p.m.
http://www.mountainstates.bbb.org/WWWRoo......
According to the Better Business site, Warren National University has received 14 formal complaints in the last few years, some in each of these BBB categories:
1. Advertising Issues - Claims alleging print or electronic media advertised claims or practices misrepresent the service or product offer.
2. Billing or Collection Issues - Claim alleging billing errors, unauthorized charges, or questionable collection practices.
3. Sales Practice Issues - Claims of alleged sales presentations made in person or by telephone that contain misrepresentations of the product or service, high pressure sales practices, failure to disclose key conditions of the offer, and verbal representations not consistent with written contractual terms or agreements.
4. Product Issues - Claim alleging a product does not meet the expectations of the complainant, including defective merchandise.
5. Refund or Exchange Issues - Claim of alleged failure to honor company policy or verbal commitment to provide refunds, exchanges, or credit for products or services.
And AFAIK, this is a worthless statistic tho, because most claims are settled before it gets to this stage.
Not Today - Wrong November 15, 2007 at 4:24 p.m.
I looked up the University of Wisconsin, a HUGE university, and "The BBB processed a total of 0 complaints about this company in the last 36 months, our standard reporting period."
ML November 16, 2007 at 3:58 a.m.
I had the opportunity to take classes at WNU. The texts were first class, the instructors were Ph.D.s from Purdue, Kentucky and so on. I have completed graduate degrees at Boston University and Univ of Northern Colorado. The program at WNU is on par with the other "accredited" schools. Had the chance to review a number of dissertations from Pac 10 schools....the dissertation I was required to submit was better researched, more analytical and used twice the average number of references. I would challenge naysayers to take a course. In addition, most admissions teams have a staff of "telemarketers" in order to meet enrollment numbers. Plus I got credit for most of the below listed "life skills" that were dismissed as unwarranted at a well known Cal State University....only in my day they were taken for 3 credits hours toward a BA.
*Playing Tennis (PE in my day)
*Buying a Persian Carpet (Marketing class was great!)
*Watching Public Television (Think that was Multi-media 101)
*Eating in Exotic Restaurants (Culinary 201)
*Being Dungeon master (Software Development class - right on!)
*Pressing flowers (Home Economics 301)
*Keeping tropical fish (Ag 151)
Goes to show that naysayers have no perspective on life!
To ML: November 16, 2007 at 5:56 a.m.
So if you tell the telemarketer you were a "Dungeon Master", they'll automatically convert that to "Software Development" on your transcript at KWU when they are waiving half your doctorate? Sounds sweet.
BBB on WNU November 16, 2007 at 12:11 p.m.
A good rating. We would expect nothing less than a satisfactory business transaction.
Capella vs WNU November 16, 2007 at 12:20 p.m.
Last 36 mo.
Capella-accredited by NCA, 42 complaints.
WNU- 26 complaints.
Enough said!
WNU is accredited! November 16, 2007 at 12:23 p.m.
I noticed WNU was accredited by the BBB.
Tony November 16, 2007 at 12:34 p.m.
I have been a student of WNU for the past several months, and I have completed two courses. I must admit that I was skeptical at first, but I am pleasantly surprised by how much I am learning. The course structures are excellent, and the work is very challenging. If you are a critical thinker and are armed with a knack for reading and writing, then you ought to do just fine in the MBA Management program. I had completed some doctoral work at Georgia Tech, some of which transferred into my program. I also completed some graduate work at the University of Maryland and a few of those courses transferred into my program as well. I learn just as much at WNU as the other schools, except I have no ‘out of pocket’ costs. My employer covers the low tuition costs at WNU 100%. I have completed a master’s degree already from a regionally accredited college (Webster University). Since I already work professionally, I am more concerned with what I am able to learn over the brand name of the degree.
Q? November 16, 2007 at 12:46 p.m.
Does anyone have any idea what the differance there would be between MIT and WNU. I am currently enrolled in MIT's M.S. degree program and I am looking to transefer.
To Q? November 16, 2007 at 12:58 p.m.
You may find WNU a little more difficult.
I transfered in from Cal-Poly, BSEE, and thought it would be a breeze at WNU.
I guess I got used to Cal-Poly holding my hand and treating me like a child. WNU does not hold your hand. Self paced and you have to figure things out for yourself.
Without a doubt, some clown, who never attended WNU, will follow my advice with either 1)Something about accreditation,or 2)Something about senate hearings or 3)Something about accreditation or 4)something about senate hearings or 5) something about accreditation.
Do not let this lure you into thinking you can complete your degree any earlier and be on your way. It will likely take you longer and be more difficult
Scammed November 16, 2007 at 1:19 p.m.
Yes, I did attend. I found out the hard way that KWU is total garbage when tried to upgrade one of my professional engineering certifications and was turned down
Anyone that attends this university is naive or dishonest.
I was naive, which are you?
Shrent Hacoviac November 16, 2007 at 1:22 p.m.
I spent two years reviewing programs before I finally settled on WNU's program in chemistry. Amazing! The courses were challenging - the professors top notch - and my peers were some of the most amazing professionals I've ever met. I made great friends over the three years I spent working on my degree. I've seen my salary income go up by $280k a year, not counting another 35-50K per year giving lectures! (I attribute this to my MA). AND I published two books based on the research I did as part of my course work! If you can do it, I encourage you to enroll. You will never doubt your decision.
Ref: I was naive, which are you? November 16, 2007 at 1:34 p.m.
You were not naive, you were just dumber than dog poop.
KW/WNUs literature and websites have always stated that their degrees were not usable for G-jobs or professional licensing.
It scares me that someone as non-detail oriented as you were even able to get a PE. It took me three tries at the test to get that bad boy passed and I used to teach Engineering at Auburn.
You have not signed off on any bridges or structures near Birmingham lately, have you?
WNU doesn't even want it own "graduates" November 16, 2007 at 4:42 p.m.
Adjunct Faculty Qualifications:
• A PhD or Master's degree from a regionally-accredited university, in a field related to those offered by WNU.
o Graduates of KWU/WNU are not considered for Adjunct Faculty positions
English 101 November 16, 2007 at 5:36 p.m.
Thats WNU doesn't even want it's own "graduates."
WNU November 16, 2007 at 5:40 p.m.
Also will not take any Nationally Accredited graduates either. Just like MIT.
Y&Y November 16, 2007 at 6:05 p.m.
REF-"Graduates of KWU/WNU are not considered for Adjunct Faculty positions."
Nice snippet.
That is because teaching requires licensure. KW has never made a secret of this. The WNU degree is for people who want to make a ton of money. Last I checked, teaching paid less than Bussing Tables at Captain D's.
Someone already self employed who competes for private corporate contracts just needs an edge over the competition. They can spend 25K-50K and 3 years at an accredited online school or 8K and 18 months at WNU.
HR people at companies (who have an accreditation policy) are generally overwhelmed, too lazy to check and not too bright.
I do not know if many people are aware this or not, but private corporations HATE BIG GOVERNMENT. Many will hire WNU graduates to spite BIG GOVERNMENT. A ying and yang characteristic to the WNU snydrome has many people in academia baffled.
Another element that hates government is the mob, and you are a chump if you do not think they have massive power. They control the unions, the docks, shipping lines and probably your dad if you are from NJ or NY.
Make no mistake, accreditation has been taken over by the Feds. It's government against Corporate America. May the best entity win!
BART November 16, 2007 at 6:15 p.m.
Will be graduating from WNU in June, and after attending 2 different traditional colleges, I can say that WNU really works with you to get your credits transferred on a timely basis.
The work was challenging and the professors were readily available and answered emails within 24 hour turnaround. I completed most of my degree requirements while at Sea (I have since left the Navy), and found that I was able to complete my work after long shifts into the night and early morning hours. Highly recommend WNU as a good choice for active duty military, business people, stay at home parents, and any other adults with active, on the go lifestyles. Very flexible learning experience.
TACY POC November 16, 2007 at 6:28 p.m.
I could study anywhere. I have good B&M undergraduate & MBA degrees, a decent GMAT etc. I have a demanding job that I really enjoy. The cost of taking a leave of absence to study full-time at a great school would not make financial sense. I did extensive research, and find that the WNU curriculum in my field is the best thought-out and most aligned to my needs. I am including B&M schools in this analysis. I have designed curriculum for a top school, and I know good design when I see it. I am not trying to pass off my PhD as anything it isn't. I don't think my PhD will change my life, or my opportunities - my personal makeup will continue to drive my success. I don't want to be in a cohort - been there, done that. I love teams, but I have my hands full of them at work, and don't want to either "carry" or have to wait for other group members at school. The nature of my work is that there are busy times and slow times. Being able to speed up or slow down my progress through courses is a huge benefit. I am genuinely interested in my subject, and am doing this as a hobby as much as anything. I have "gotten ahead" plenty already, and am mostly looking to add a little brain food to the tail end of my career. I don't need my hand held. I am prepared to learn on my own and take a risk on my assignments (nobody will be looking at my 'marks'). I don't need someone to prescribe every little step of the way or tell me "exactly what they expect" from me, beyond the general marching orders. The bottom line is that I haven't chosen WNU out of lack of better options. I am genuinely impressed with their program and their delivery style. It isn't easy by any means, and is certainly not light-weight. I would say if your story is anything like mine, and you are favorably impressed with WNU's programs - go for it!
Wrong 1 November 16, 2007 at 6:36 p.m.
"That is because teaching requires licensure"
No, it doesn't, it only takes a legitimate degree, Master's level or above. Grade school teachers usually need a license, not college instructors. Irregardless, a Kennedy Western / Warren National "degree" is useless for both.
Wrong 2 November 16, 2007 at 6:37 p.m.
"Also will not take any Nationally Accredited graduates either. Just like MIT."
Does MIT put a disclaimer on their employment section that they won't even consider MIT graduates for employment because they consider their own university to be substandard?
Even other unaccredited schools like Rochville don't do that.
I promise you that November 17, 2007 at 1:36 p.m.
MIT will not consider your degree either.
<><><><>Diamonds<><><> November 17, 2007 at 1:39 p.m.
MIT has hired many more foreign professors (mostly european) than MIT graduates.
Luck? November 17, 2007 at 3:09 p.m.
I work for a large utility. Two weeks ago, my supervisor told me our department manager wanted to talk to me at 10 am. I asked him what she wanted to talk to me about and he only said that it was something IT found on my internet history.
I spent the next hour worried sick. I even threw up.
Like everyone in our group, I sometimes go on the internet for sports scores, financials, or click on a forbidden link in an e-mail etc.
Before the 10am meeting I resigned to possibly being fired. Even called a few friends to see if they were hiring.
I get there 10 minutes early and wait until she arrives at 10:20. That half hour lasted an eternity (and I just staired straight ahead at this winnie the pooh paperweight on her desk) and I must have been as pale as a ghost when she walked in.
She said nothing, but what she did was pull her KW degree from her desk drawer and show it to me. I exclaimed "I go there, well WNU anyways!"
She said I know, we saw the link to their courses on your history and I recognized the URL.
I asked her why she would not display the KW degree on her wall. She said at one time she did but then took it down because she was a little worried about making waves. I asked if she was embarrased of it and she said yes, a little. She also said it is not on her resume as she earned it while she was already there. I told her that if she did not mind, I would proudly display mine in my cubicle when I get it in a year or so. She smiled and said it would be OK.
Yesterday, she appeared as if out of thin air at my cubicle. We talked about this and that and the weather and Christmas shopping etc. Two hours went by! Again, she stopped by my cubicle at 15 minutes before quitting time. She asked if I would like Mr. Banes office and position and a raise! That is my bosses boss I thought to myself. I asked "What will Mr. Banes do?" She said "He wants to retire." I asked what about Ron (my boss) is not he in line for this position? She said no. I said yes, I will take it.
I got a promotion, and I have no degree yet. I will be supervising 8 people with degrees. Ha!
Comments from a chemist November 17, 2007 at 7:48 p.m.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>I spent two years reviewing programs before I finally settled on WNU's program in chemistry. Amazing! The courses were challenging - the professors top notch - and my peers were some of the most amazing professionals<<<<<
hmm...a legitimate degree in chemistry requires a very substantial amount of laboratory work. Since WNU has no laboratories, that seems to be a bit of a problem, doesn't it?
Bias Again November 18, 2007 at 7:28 a.m.
A good example of bias on this website is the follwing review put front and center by the administrator of this blog.
http://www.onlinedegreereviews.org/colle...
Some dumb#$% attends WNU and does not even read their base literature prior to enrolling where they say WNU is not for licensure or credentials.
He then tries to use the degree to upgrade his Professional License and gets turned down? How stupid is that? This guy is not a PE. No PE is that absent from mind! Absent from this world!
If this guy is this much of a moron, we do not need him signing off engineering documents anyways. He is a fraud and this site is a SHILL!!!!!!!!
Who do you trust? November 18, 2007 at 9:53 a.m.
Government or Christian Science Monitor-
WNU ,cutting edge, anti-cheating programs have accredited ie., "cheating" universities on the run. They are scared, quite scared.
Daily Dumpster November 19, 2007 at 2:22 a.m.
From the Diploma Mill News
http://www.diplomamillnews.blogspot.com/...
2 more Kennedy Western "degree" users exposed, "degrees" in the dumpster.
We know the drill...
"Will have all mention of the degree removed", "Personnel matters" being investigated, etc.
Can't fool all the people all the time...
So? November 19, 2007 at 3:37 a.m.
"Will have all mention of the degree removed", "Personnel matters" being investigated, etc."
Point to a conviction anywhere of a KW degree being used in the free-market (non-govt, non education). You can't. KW has always said that the degree was not for licensing, govt or higher ed teaching.
The jobs on your "non-biased diploma mill blog" that people got in trouble for are low paying teaching and government sector jobs. I believe they are supplementing their income with welfare to support their families.
Folks, the big money is in free enterprise, not poverty level G-jobs and teaching! Do not buy into the garbage on this site about accreditation. I have bid on and won many private contracts with my KW BSEE. I made 500K+ last year and about 350K this year (I took 4 months off this year for sailing my 80ft sailboat from Miami to Austrailia).
A free spirit and a belief in USA free-market is far more valuable than any degree. And yes, I got the KW degree because it is fast and easy. Why waste precious time on an education when the big money is in making deals.
Get the BSXX on your resume and stay away from G-jobs.
WORD
Mr. Roark November 19, 2007 at 3:55 a.m.
"KW has always said that the degree was not for licensing, govt or higher ed teaching."
Can you show me where on the website that it says this? Or do graduates get some type of mailing with all the limitations, and updates when it becomes invalid in a new state?
For the rest, "Welcome to fantasy island!"
They have some honesty I admit. November 19, 2007 at 5:24 a.m.
I have to admit that they do tell you this before signing up. In mailings and talking with their career counselors (telemarketers in disguise) they make this well known. The following is also on their Gen. Info web page. Easy to find, right out front.
Licenses and Credentials
The University is oriented to those individuals not seeking licenses or credentials. If a license or a credential is desired, a search should be conducted on state and federal association and credential requirements before applying. We are approved to receive the test results of the American College Testing Program (ACT) and Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAT).
WNU November 19, 2007 at 5:43 a.m.
Is under no requirement to make WNU students aware of unconstitutional or illegal and untested laws of other states.
Do you notice how Texas has yet to test the very law they passed?
Why will they never test it?
The cease and whatever orders can be used to scare state government employees because they get their pay-check from the state of Texas. If they are in education they are govt wonks also. All non profit universities are sucklings on the Big Government Teet.
The free-market is just waiting to strike at Texas on this issue.
Hmmm November 19, 2007 at 5:43 a.m.
That covers licenses, how about government employment or higher ed teaching?
Define University November 19, 2007 at 6:06 a.m.
Once a mechanism whereby smart people could raise themselves above humble beginnings and obtain a worthwhile qualification indicating a high probability of being employable. Now a complete con to get kids with high hopes into insurmountable amounts of debt before they even think about buying a house.. then they discover that the job they trained for was entirely fictitious, and they'll have to take any job they can get. At this point, they realise they should have saved their money and gone to Warren National University like all their "stupid" friends, who now have houses, cars and big screen TVs.
John always did well in his school classes, and did three A-Levels and got good grades. He went to uni for three years which put him about £30,000 in debt. When he finished his course he found that his degree counted for very little, since he had no experience and the other 400 job applicants also had degrees. He took a job as a sales rep with Coca-Cola, but got fired when he went to an interview for a better job. Meanwhile the cost of living rose exponentially, and by the age of 24, John's debts stood at around £45,000. This was before he even got a mortgage. A couple of years afterwards he divorced his wife on the grounds of infidelity, but she got custody of the kids, and now he doesn't even get to see them despite paying atrocious amounts of child support. Welcome to Blair's Britain.
Where? November 19, 2007 at 6:42 a.m.
"KW has always said that the degree was not for licensing, govt or higher ed teaching."
True on the license part. But completely false on the others. In fact, they are promoting government employment and higher ed employment with the testimonials in the KWU catalog.
Quote 1: "My original goal was to advance my career with the Department of Defense... I'm very proud to say that I have done just that"
Quote 2: From a Federal Aviation employee,
Quote 3: Employee of Life College
No mention of all the other restrictions, disclaimers, etc.
LIARS November 19, 2007 at 7:05 a.m.
The math teaching certification at WNU is much harder than any brick university. I don't know what degree the poster above acquired with WNU, but it is probably a liberal Arts Degree which is by defualt an easy degree at any university, not to mention totally useless.
Frankly, I recommend that anyone wishing to obtain a teaching certification either do it through a brick university or take the alternative certification if you already have a degree. WNU is many times more difficult because you are on your own. The mentors do not perform a 'mentoring' function but rather an administrative role. For example, they will recommend resources but not necessarily answer any of your questions. WNU is for mature and disciplined students whose main task is to prove that they have the competencies required in order to obtain a degree. WNU often does not care how or where you get previous training and knowledge provided you can demonstrate you have the ability. And no, you cannot guess your way through it, plus open book does you little good in complex Calculus - the exams are tough. I personally know of an MIT Professor and a space shuttle astronaut who failed rigorous modules a few times before finally giving up and losing credit for the course. WNU is not for everyone.
WTF November 19, 2007 at 10:40 a.m.
REF:" True on the license part. But completely false on the others. In fact, they are promoting government employment and higher ed employment with the testimonials in the KWU catalog."
What are you freakin blind! You boneheads always quote Wickipedia when it suits your bogus declarations but look the other way when it does not.
Did you attend KW Sir?
I doubt it.
Easy Button November 19, 2007 at 11:13 a.m.
REF:That covers licenses, how about government employment or higher ed teaching?
Lets see hmm, well there are many people in government jobs with no degree, in fact most government jobs require NO degree, Duh!
So I am assuming you want a higher level G-job. That is a "Credential" requirement, thus "If a license or a credential is desired, a search should be conducted on state and federal association and credential requirements before applying." SIMPLE.
Only government is compelled to pull the accreditation card because they usually end up paying the clown's tuition reimbursements (thanks to comunist organizations like "The American Negro College Fund".) If you pay Tyrones tuition, you have to pay Jerrel and LaWanda's tuition also.
By WNU saying they are unaccredited, automatically rules out teaching at accredited schools. DUH!
Higher ed unis that are accredited rule out any un-accredited degree for teaching only. T
here are some unaccredited universities that will hire you to teach.
Bottom line is that you can still work for government, just not with the degree being a stated requirement.
Soliciting advice November 19, 2007 at 11:35 a.m.
Does anyone have any idea what the differance there would be between Harvard and WNU. I am currently enrolled in Harvards PHD program and I am looking to transefer.
To: Soliciting Advice November 19, 2007 at 1:12 p.m.
Attend Rochville University, it is cheaper than WNU, but has the same accreditation.
No Student Support November 19, 2007 at 1:19 p.m.
In this week's round of KW"U" alumni being exposed, one was a career higher ed employee and one was a career government employee.
Apparently it didn't come up during intake that the degree would be unacceptable for them.
So, a vague, one sentence disclaimer in the marketing materials is the only warning they get, even though we talk to admission counselors and have our prior experience evaluated for mucho credits? And in the same marketing materials they are promoting higher ed and government employment?
Glad I got out when I did.
Bad WNU Experience November 19, 2007 at 4:54 p.m.
Ok, so I earned a WNU BS in Safety Engineering, then I could not believe it. Just days after I put the credential on my resume men in black suits showed up at my door. They placed me under arrest and read me my Miranda. They blindfolded me and took me to a secret place where I found out is used only for interrogating WNU students. They torture you first by waterboarding you. Then they play this recording over and over, something about senate GAO, senate GAO over and over again.
There was another WNU student in the room with me. She finally screams out "What do you want from me?". The recording stopped. A voice said "Compliance. We want you to fall in line with the way it has always been done. We distort and you comply." She asked in horror, "Who are you?" The voice replied "Big Brother".
Misc November 19, 2007 at 7:54 p.m.
"WNU often does not care how or where you get previous training and knowledge"
They don't care at all, and its been reported repeatedly that they don't even verify any of the "life experience".
I do miss the little calculator they used to have on their website that would estimate what % of your degree they would waive. You could get close to 60% if you put in the right numbers.
Still waiting .... November 20, 2007 at 2:55 a.m.
For one of these "pro accredited" pundits to tell me WHY accreditation is so worthwhile?
Is that to say that all of our great leaders, scientists and inventors attended sub-standard schools in the 1800's and early 1900's? Schools like Harvard, Yale, U of Va, U of Mass, William and Mary, etc etc etc etc.
Why we need accreditation November 20, 2007 at 9:29 a.m.
The indisputably most intelligent and famous single man that ever walked the earth had no degree. I hope everyone knows who that is.
Accreditation is a mostly misunderstood concept. The original intention was believe it or not a real good one. The path to hell is paved with good intentions right?
What started as a noble idea (of accrediting higher learning to make things better) only made things worse.
People used to study as to gain knowledge, and your net worth to society was measured in how well you conversed and conveyed what you knew to your peers in a given discipline. Even if you never went to a university, you could learn from books and if you were good enough even find yourself very well off (in the circles of the elite). The resume was not used.
The opposite is true today. How much you know does not matter at all. It matters how much you know for the test with a good brain dump after the test.
Those who purge their brains the best after a test are most ready for the next cram session. Those who take the longest to learn a concept also usually are not only the most creative but also take the longest to forget that concept. Thus the classroom system rewards those non creative individuals most likely to forget every thing they learn. GREAT!
Enter the resume, circa 1910. Now people can brag on paper about how well they binged (cram studied) and purged (brain dumped) 15 years ago. They usually remember very little about what they learned in their courses.
How odd it is that the way you advertise yourself on your resume has rules to follow in Texas. Even more odd is that your actual performance on the job matters very little in Texas government jobs (due in large part to affirmative action, no one wants to be the person, for example, who says something bad about a black female’s performance on the job).
So performance has no rules but resumes do?
Now the theory was that the more information someone crams into their head, the more information that will remain there 5 years from now. Not true, but let us assume it is.
Accreditation increases the quality and quantity of the information in the binge and purge. Yea, that’s it!
Accreditation requires no tests 2 or 3 or 5 years out of college to defend the degree (or lose it). This is because all university students would lose their degrees ten years after graduation.
The DOE was never supposed to accredit universities as this is a violation of the 10th amendment to the US constitution.
They grade the accreditors and the accreditors grade the Universities. That is until the University can no longer afford the extortion money for payola to the DOE. Then the university goes under. They (DOE) have begun using accreditation as tool to control what universities teach, mind control. Bad times are a coming.
Roll over Thomas Jefferson.
Badges? November 20, 2007 at 1:28 p.m.
Accreditation? We don't need no stinking accreditation.
Warren National rules, and anyone that says otherwise is dumb.
Bill Gates don't have no accredited degre
Anyone stupid enough to attend an accredited college shouldn't be allowed in the workforce, that's where all the stupid people go.
All the enlighted people go to unaccredited schools by choice after looking at the useless government schols
What is 98? November 20, 2007 at 11:46 p.m.
It is the average university graduates IQ in 2005.
Compare that to 132 back in 1959 when there was no accreditation.
What 168? November 21, 2007 at 2:53 a.m.
The average IQ of Kennedy Western graduates. All the accreditated universtiy people are to stupid to getin
Famous World Wide! November 21, 2007 at 3:45 a.m.
The Irish Times listed with commentary the following twelve education businesses in an article entitled,
"A dirty dozen - 12 famous diploma mills."
1. Columbia State University, Louisiana: Shut down by the Attorney-General of Louisiana.
2. La Salle University, Louisiana: Claims to be restructuring itself after its founder president was jailed and the premises were raided by the FBI.
3. Chadwick University, Alabama: claims accreditation from a bogus agency.
4. American State University, Hawaii: Recently offered an American reporter a bachelor's degree in journalism for $1,890 and a thesis of a mere 2,000 words.
5. American International University, Alabama.
6. Columbus University, Louisiana.
7. Monticello University, Kansas:
8. Frederick Taylor University, California.
9. Pacific Western University, Hawaii: offering to "match your position with a legal degree and transcripts."
10. City University of Los Angeles, California:
11. Kennedy Western University, Hawaii. (Name has changed to Warren National University.)
12. Trinity College and University; operates from Delaware, USA; Spain; and the United Kingdom. In February, 2007, several United Nations staff were fired from their jobs after it was discovered they had padded their resumes with Trinity "degrees".
"Irish Times November 22, 2007 at 12:03 p.m.
is less credible than the NY times, and the NY times the most discredited Paper on the planet"
No spin zone Jun 3, 2006.
A new, old low. November 22, 2007 at 12:04 p.m.
The Irish. Drunks and thievs. Thomas Jefferson 1792.
Accreditation November 22, 2007 at 12:19 p.m.
Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge (Dept. Of Education) is shipwrecked by the laughter of the Gods.
On "Illegal Degree" Laws November 22, 2007 at 12:29 p.m.
"Laws too gentle are seldom obeyed; too severe, seldom executed."
Answer: Accreditation November 22, 2007 at 12:35 p.m.
Question: What's a sundial in the shade?
Thanks-Giving message to WNU students. November 22, 2007 at 1:21 p.m.
We are now on the verge of vast change -changes so wondrously important and significant that we will upset the present (and need I say boring) trend of human thought and start it along completely new lines .
LOL November 22, 2007 at 3:45 p.m.
Not just a bad so-called "college", but even making international "worst" lists. Potential students, look elsewhere obviously.
PT Barnum November 22, 2007 at 4:34 p.m.
"WNU ,cutting edge, anti-cheating programs "
Who needs to cheat at KWU / WNU? If you have a pulse, you are halfway to a degree, then look through the glossary on a few multiple choice open book exams.
Corrections Officer, CSP November 22, 2007 at 4:56 p.m.
"Who needs to cheat at KWU / WNU? If you have a pulse, you are halfway to a degree, then look through the glossary on a few multiple choice open book exams."
Like a degree anywhere is something special?
Give me a break. I know of drugged out dumb as hell ghetto heroin dealers who attended U of Colorado (on the state's tab) as a form of reform and walk away with 4 year degrees.
The whole concept has been diluted by white trash and blacks with IQs < that of a frog.
You are so full of yourself.
DNA November 23, 2007 at 6:18 a.m.
Soon, your genetic DNA will determine your value in the work-place!
The national genome project is quickly linking genetics to longevity, health, motivational qualities, and intelligence.
Those of us that brought you university accreditation will also usher in a new era of genetic-qualification.
We will phase one program in as we phase the other out.
The two characteristics that determine university success are motivation and intelligence. As it turns out there are about 5 genes that determine these characteristics. The quick cheek swab and DNA testing can be done in about one week (vs. 4 years for a degree). After we get everyone in the countries DNA tests completed, we can begin taking degrees away from the sub-standard people, you know, the ones that slipped through the cracks and somehow got a degree where their genes did not warrant such an accomplishment. Perhaps our greatest fear is that WNU students might be DNA superior, but we will cross that road when we get there.
http://www.clt.astate.edu/aromero/popula...
Accreditation 101 November 24, 2007 at 8:06 a.m.
This link might help those who do not understand (the importance of higher learning accreditation) become more enlightened.
Check the source on that November 25, 2007 at 1:25 a.m.
That handy article was written by a "Dr." Hoyer who was involved with the Kennedy Western University / Warren National University outfit
"Dr. Hoyer is the former Chair of the Environmental and Safety Engineering Department at Kennedy-Western University"
Of course the first article on this Kennedy Western cornerstone that pops up on Google is:
"Feds investigate diploma mills: Sites in West raided; records that name local man are sought" by Steve Orr, Rochester, New York Democrat and Chronicle, August 17, 2005.
"Federal authorities are conducting a criminal probe of suspected "diploma mills" that could involve bogus accreditation supplied by a Liberian government official — and a Rochester-area man appears to be at least tangentially involved in the case.
An affidavit filed in court by a Secret Service agent said the colleges sell degrees to "students" and require little or no coursework.
The affidavit said an agent obtained four bogus degrees from the online institutions while working undercover earlier this year.
Richard J. Hoyer, an Irondequoit resident with a history of involvement in online colleges, is identified in the affidavit as having been connected to St. Regis and the Liberian accreditation gambit in the past.
In stories published in 2003, the Democrat and Chronicle reported that Hoyer had drawn scrutiny from education regulators in at least three states. New York ordered him to cease operating an online homeland-security college in October 2003 because it had no state authorization.
The newspaper also reported that Hoyer was involved with an entity that was arranging accreditation in the name of the African nation of Liberia."
Patriot November 25, 2007 at 2 a.m.
By all accounts then, that would make Hoyer a true Patriot.
Remember, McCarthy has been vindicated by recent release of FBI documents.
Communists have infected our university system in the USA and opposition is expected.
Dr. Hoyer... November 25, 2007 at 4:59 a.m.
Is a fine example of Kennedy Western "faculty" and integrity.
So can someone explain? November 26, 2007 at 4:37 p.m.
Laypersons and professional alike have been brainwashed to think that to have a legitimate college or university degree, it must be accredited. The average person and most professionals have no idea what accreditation is, they believe or have been told through out the years, that accreditation equals a legitimate degree. This is not true! In fact it takes four years for a college to become accredited, making it technically impossible to disallow unaccredited schools. With this mindset, no new college or university could ever open.
This too? November 26, 2007 at 4:41 p.m.
All of the US public schools are accredited. Yet we are graduating 18 year olds who can’t make change without a calculator and can’t spell.
It's easy to explain! November 26, 2007 at 5:33 p.m.
"that accreditation equals a legitimate degree." - True
"In fact it takes four years for a college to become accredited" - Also true. And a legitimately new college looking to become accredited should be given the benefit of the doubt, but students should still avoid until they do become accredited, to avoid getting burned.
But the benefit of the doubt was gone a decade or more ago with Warren National University / Kennedy Western University. They have been in business 24 years, moved to 4 states, kicked out or non-renewed in a couple of those.
Fate November 28, 2007 at 2:18 p.m.
I never finished my KW degree. I dropped out after failing Heat transfer and thermo.
My "wealthy parented" friend who finished a 4 year degree at Emory (cost $85K) a year ago, and never did get a job, just filed bankruptcy in October, had a nervous breakdown and is in an asylum in Milledgevill somewhere.
A truly lucky spell landed me a job at Atlanta Airport working with my step-grandfather making 50K a year to start (learning to be an air-traffic controller).
Guess my step-grandfather credential was more important than her Emory degree. Glad I only lost two thousand dollars at KW.
So can someone explain? November 28, 2007 at 6 p.m.
WNU should sue Wikipedia for lies and defamation.
For example, WIKI lists WNU as illegal in North Dakota and they are not. Since they have applied for accreditation and are state licensed they are legal there. I have called all of the Offices of degree authorization of every state, and they all say that WNU degrees are allowed a waiver since they have applied for accreditation and they just need time to update their websites and legislation of new laws.
Grad Rate November 28, 2007 at 8:21 p.m.
"I never finished my KW degree. I dropped out after failing Heat transfer and thermo"
Wow, that drops the KWU / WNU graduation rate to 99.99999%
Wrong O November 28, 2007 at 8:40 p.m.
North Dakota:
"WIKI lists WNU as illegal in North Dakota" - True, but only if you believe what they specifically say, which is:
"In North Dakota, only credentials from legitimate institutions of higher education are acceptable for use in employment"
"Legitimate institutions are those that are accredited by organizations recognized by the US secretary of education or otherwise approved by the North Dakota State Board..."
So, WNU is not a "legitimate institution" under their definition.
Hiding in "applicant status" doesn't suddenly wipe away the past.
North Dakota November 28, 2007 at 8:45 p.m.
"it is illegal to use a false credential for employment, higher education admission, or in connection with a business or profession. Doing so carries a Class A misdemeanor..."
Pretty clear again. Better call them back!
OK November 29, 2007 at 6:35 p.m.
http://www.legis.nd.gov/cencode/T15C204....
WNU meets code just fine chump.
He is right November 29, 2007 at 6:38 p.m.
d. Does not operate in this state and is:
(1) Licensed by the appropriate state agency; and
(2) An active applicant for accreditation by an accrediting body recognized
by the United States secretary of education; or...
ND.gov November 29, 2007 at 6:48 p.m.
15-20.4-15. REFERENCE 4D, North Dakota, Like he said, all states read prteey much the same
4. As used in this section, "duly authorized institution of higher learning" means an
institution that:
a. Has accreditation recognized by the United States secretary of education or
has the foreign equivalent of such accreditation;
b. Has an authorization to operate under this chapter;
c. Operates in this state and is exempt from this chapter under section
15-20.4-02;
d. Does not operate in this state and is:
(1) Licensed by the appropriate state agency; and
(2) An active applicant for accreditation by an accrediting body recognized
by the United States secretary of education; or
e. Has been found by the state board for career and technical education to meet
standards of academic quality comparable to those of an institution located in
Page No. 6
the United States that has accreditation recognized by the United States
secretary of education to offer degrees of the type and level claimed.
15-20.4-16. Unlawful to use degree or certificate when coursework not completed -
Penalty.
1. An individual may not knowingly use a degree, certificate, diploma, transcript, or
other document purporting to indicate that the individual has completed an organized
program of study or completed courses when the individual has not completed the
organized program of study or the courses as indicated on the degree, certificate,
diploma, transcript, or document:
a. To obtain employment;
b. To obtain a promotion or higher compensation in employment;
c. To obtain admission to an institution of higher learning; or
d. In connection with any business, trade, profession, or occupation.
2. An individual who violates this section is guilty of a class A misdemeanor.
15-20.4-17. Consumer protection - False academic degrees. The state board for
career and technical education, in collaboration with the North Dakota university system, shall
provide via internet web sites, information to protect students, businesses, and others from
persons that issue, manufacture, or use false academic degrees.
Page No. 7
Thanks, good resources there November 29, 2007 at 8:15 p.m.
The North Dakota site does have some good resources. In their pamphlet titled “Is This a Real Degree, How to Avoid a Bogus Degree from a Diploma Mill”, you can research more about the shortcomings of Kennedy-Western / Warren National and other unaccredited institutions at:
The Oregon Office of Degree Authorization -
www.osac.state.or.us/oda/
Degree Info.com - www.degreeinfo.com
National Clearinghouse – www.degreeverify.com
Unconventional University Diplomas from Online Vendors Fraud, Corruption and Scandal: Buying a PhD: - www.hep.uiuc.edu/home/g-gollin/diploma_m...
I get it.... November 30, 2007 at 10:15 a.m.
Ifyou can not win the argument with the facts, throw out a bunch of dung and hope something sticks.
Just call 703-742-4200 (National Student Clearinghouse)and ask for Ann. Ann tells me that they will list any state licensed University. Accreditation is not a must. She even gave me the phone number of Don Gwinn (in Wyoming) 847-491-1335 and said they would love to work with WNU. She said all they do is the work the school do to verify the enrollment and degree (this is a service). They would tell any checkers that the school was unaccredited (just like WNU would do). In fact, they already have several unaccredited universities using the service.
You see, all they do is verify enrollment and that the person achieved what degree.
Oh and lets not forget, Oregons sweet little tail is still stinging from the spanking they got from a federal judge! REF:KW vs Ore. Oregon, the biggest complainer about unaccreditation is forced to accept KW degrees and disciplined for liable.
NUFF SAID.
So WNU is legal in ND? November 30, 2007 at 10:20 a.m.
But the below two clauses in the ND code does make WNU legal in North Dakota, right?
4. As used in this section, "duly authorized institution of higher learning"
d. Does not operate in this state and is:
(1) Licensed by the appropriate state agency; and
(2) An active applicant for accreditation by an accrediting body recognized
by the United States secretary of education; or
Dr. J November 30, 2007 at 10:23 a.m.
Granted, WNU is perfectly illegal in ND and every other state in the union including Tx.
But for how long? WNU has a history of walking away from accreditation at the last minute. Will be interesting to say the least.
Texas November 30, 2007 at 10:25 a.m.
Texas lists WNU specifically though.
Even Texas November 30, 2007 at 10:26 a.m.
Has to follow the constitution. Expect Texas to revise their website in the next few months.
Anyone Anyone? November 30, 2007 at 1:59 p.m.
Well, I can read the Senate investigation and approximately 15 articles from this blog alone that show that Kennedy Western / Warren National is decidely substandard if not borderline diploma mill in quality.
Can anyone post a positive article about either organization from an independent source?
Misc November 30, 2007 at 2:04 p.m.
Clearinghouse - "She said all they do is the work the school do to verify the enrollment and degree" That's interesting.
I wonder if the AMA would let me be listed as an unlicensed doctor, so that anyone checking could verify that I am not qualified.
Claim victory all you want, still illegal in Oregon.
I'll watch for Texas to make Kennedy Western and Warren National accepted schools within 3 months, thanks for the heads up.
Hey Dummy! November 30, 2007 at 4:17 p.m.
The average person and most professionals have no idea what accreditation is, they believe or have been told through out the years, that accreditation equals a legitimate degree. This is not true! In fact it takes four years for a college to become accredited, making it technically impossible to disallow unaccredited schools. With this mindset, no new college or university could ever open.
WNU November 30, 2007 at 4:27 p.m.
I evaluated a number of online degree programs and chose the WNU BA program for the following reasons. Flexibility and number of online of classes, experience and suitability of online instructors and WNU's proven track record in educating working adults. Each quarter I took 2 classes which was doable even with a family and business.
The support you get from the WNU staff is excellent. After completing the Previous Courses Evaluation (which maps out your entire learning plan) you will be assigned facility advisors and professional advisors who are available for questions and support through your WNU experience. The instructors are very good at distance learning and for the most part provide excellent feedback and are quite accessible.
You will be able to transfer most if not all of your previous college level classwork.
I would not hesitate to recommend WNU. The level of attention and support I received from the faculty, staff, and other students was fantastic. We have opportunities to participate in many of the same programs as on-campus students such as travel abroad, honor societies, and scholarships. The School has the highest GPA of any school going. Grades matter!
Yep November 30, 2007 at 4:34 p.m.
"The School has the highest GPA of any school going"
I suspect this is true. 100% acceptance, 100% graduation, 100% 4.0's
Can anyone post a positive article about either organization from an independent source to counter all the exposes and investigations?
Daily Dumpster, KWU in the News Again November 30, 2007 at 4:44 p.m.
Engineering Times:
Are Fraudulent Academic Degrees Making a Mark on Engineering?
http://www.nspe.org/etweb/10704diplomami...
The Tennessee State Board of Architectural and Engineering Examiners recently had a brush with candidates who listed diploma mill degrees on applications for licensure.
"The individual on contract with the board, who evaluates non-ABET accredited domestic engineering degrees, recognized the school in question because he had some prior knowledge of Kennedy-Western," says Barbara Bowling, executive director of the board.
The application of this person is still pending, but Bowling says it's doubtful the board would approve the application because the degree is not substantially equivalent to an engineering degree from an accredited university.
SS November 30, 2007 at 4:47 p.m.
The dirty little secret is?
I am sure everyone remembers the Coast Guard Lady who "Investigated KW". Investigation 101 says finish the job (in this case she should have obtained the degree in say 11 or 12 months to prove how easy the degree was-right?). Why did she not finish the coursework and make a real provable case?
Do forensic crime investigators find a suspect and quit investigating? WTF!
The answer to this is easy. The floor is open for anyone who thinks they know the answer.
Some Independent 3rd party articles on KWU / WNU November 30, 2007 at 8:55 p.m.
Rather than trying to decide exactly which state laws preclude you from mentioning you went to this school, let's focus on Independent 3rd party assessment of the value of Kennedy-Western University / Warren National University "degree" Here is a small sampling of articles that specfically discuss this degree supplier.
"It May Take Hours, But You Too Can Earn a University Degree"
"When Elected Officials Aren't What They Seem: Texas officials and Pennsylvania cats tout misleading credentials"
"Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations, Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"
"Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense."
"Diploma Mills are Easily Created and Some Have Issued Bogus Degrees to Federal Employees at Government Expense."
“Real officials, bogus degrees, Fake degrees a growing Texas problem”
"A dirty dozen - 12 famous diploma mills."
“Are Fraudulent Academic Degrees Making a Mark on Engineering?”
“Fighting Fakery - Diploma mills continue to churn out new "graduates" every day. What should legitimate colleges do about them? Is government action called for?”
“Two less doctors in the house - Hebert, Wilson back away from Ph.D.'s issued by 'diploma mills'”
“CBS 42 Investigates: Professors' questionable credentials”
Roland Gervais December 1, 2007 at 12:51 a.m.
Dear Friend and others,
I must say that the experience I had with WNU was fantastic.
After earning a BS in engineering, I decided to take an online degree course to see what it was like. After speaking with some friends, one of told me about WNU.
Wow, what a great experience! The course work was much more difficult than the course work at the local college that I went to.
Would I tell others to go, you bet!
Happy Holidays
Investigations out the yingyang. December 1, 2007 at 3:49 a.m.
But no convictions for wrongdoing. Harvard and Yale have actually been convicted of federal crimes and no one cares. Hmmm.
Govt. against Business December 2, 2007 at 5:09 a.m.
I think a lot of people are missing the boat big time. Corporations usually hate government and everything that goes with it. You can not be a successful business person unless you have some disdain for Big Government. Ever notice that almost all truly self made successful people are either Libertarians or Republicans?
Democrats like to suck up to big government because they can not survive in a competitive environment.
The best job I ever got was because of my pro second amendment stance. The guy who hired me liked guns and I liked guns.
Libertarians and true Republicans hate and I mean HATE the Dept. of Education.
We might hire the guy with the non DOE accredited credential just to spite state and federal governments.
TEXAS December 2, 2007 at 11:06 a.m.
http://www.radoil.com/engineers_01.html
Now here is a Proud Texan Not Afraid!
The Best December 2, 2007 at 12:13 p.m.
I’ve always been interested in improving the quality of life for others. That’s why I work in Structural Engineering. This KWU degree gives me tools I can take into the real world and implement.
I actually researched the best engineering schools for a good solid year. I researched every school there was—traditional schools as well as online colleges—and after a year of research where I put together all the different courses that you would need to take, I calculated how much it would cost, the amount of time it would take, and the different programs that were offered, it really boiled down to KWU as the very best choice. And that’s how I came to choose KWU.
What I really like about Warren National University is the vast diversity that it offers. I’ve met students from Germany and Africa, as well as all across the United States. What you get from that is a blending of cultures, different opinions, and different viewpoints, and a view of how Engineering is applied globally, not just within your region, state, or country.
When these pea-brains on this site condemn WNU, it is out of total ignorance.
Just wish I could have them see me boarding my Lear with my super-model wife and $80K platinum Rolex.
I would just love to see them turn green with envy.
George P. December 2, 2007 at 2:39 p.m.
"I am sure everyone remembers the Coast Guard Lady who "Investigated KW".
Because the G men would have had some splainin ta do when Mrs. Gelzer could not "just buy a degree" in a year or less.
If I remember correctly, she failed the first test she took
Right?
I agree - get that degree in a few weeks December 3, 2007 at 6:50 a.m.
I assume this question is from the Senate investigation of Kennedy-Western University titled "Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations: Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"
I took a quick look and it was where a Senator asked a Coast Guard member to enroll in Kennedy-Western University as part of the investigation. She applied to a Masters degree program in Engineering.
Kennedy-Western immediately waived 43% of the Engineering master's degree requirements, based on her JOURNALISM degree and some random seminars attended. She even notes that "they asked for no proof or documenation" and "As a note, I have no formal engineering training".
No matter, she was well on her way to a Master's degree in Engineering. Then of the remaining 5 classes left for a Master's degree, the student knocked off 2 of the 5 classes in a grand total of 16 hours and said that each "course" was an open-book exam where she had to pick terms out of the glossary.
I agree with the above poster, she should have sucked in up for a week or two and spent the 8 hours each for the 3 remaining courses and gotten her Master's Degree in Engineering.
SS December 3, 2007 at 8:55 p.m.
REFERENCE: "I agree - get that degree in a few weeks"
Now that you agree she should have done it, might you speculate why she did not?
If she could have she would have right? Did the Senate run out of money because KW was so expensive? Did they fear for her life? Did she have PMS?
There is a real answer to this. They backed out for a real reason.
Why was she incapable of obtaining the degree? Anyone? Anyone?
Found it for you December 3, 2007 at 9:23 p.m.
Should have looked looked closer, she answers your question directly during the Senate investigation of Kennedy-Western University titled "Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations: Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"
"Not long after, I withdrew from the school, as by then we had a good sense of Kennedy-Western's academic program. With just 16 hours of study, I had completed 40 percent of the course requirements for my Master's degree"
(That's 2/5 open book exams after they waived 6 graduate engineering courses for her Journalism degree and some seminars)
You left out December 4, 2007 at 2:45 a.m.
The Final project or 4 more courses, her choice.
ss December 4, 2007 at 2:49 a.m.
That is what she said, but that is not the real reason. .............................Anyone else?
Coast Guard Lady December 4, 2007 at 2:52 a.m.
The real percentage is 2/9 = 22%
Assuming she went with the extra course option and not the project.
[2/(5+4)]x 100% = 22%.
Dr. Charles Mintz IV December 4, 2007 at 3:15 a.m.
Also, she was going for Environmental Engineering. This is faux engineering. Just like "Computer Engineering", "Hair Style Engineering" and "Safety Engineering" all fantasy engineering courses.
When I transfered from Emory to GA. Tech, I was given about 40% credits for the overlap courses going from BS in Nursing to BSEE. Is it so far off mark that she get 43% for her past experiences (including her BS)at KW?
HIPPOCRITUSMAXIMUS December 4, 2007 at 5:05 a.m.
REF:Who are these dirtbags?
They would be Senators who investigated KW!
Talk about foxes watching henhouses.
America, what a beautiful country.
James R. Otteson December 4, 2007 at 5:53 a.m.
I suggest that the case of government support for education is analogous to the case of government support for religion, and therefore the moral acceptability of the one is the same as that of the other. My suggestion hinges on the claim that both cases fall under the rubric of freedom of conscience, and hence both should be protected on the moral principle that everyones private conscience is inviolable and ought therefore to be safeguarded.
Accreditation 101 December 4, 2007 at 6:03 a.m.
"When you reach for the money is when they slip on the handcuffs." With taxpayer dollars comes taxpayer accountability (unless, of course, you are the government, which fails to account for billions of dollars in tax revenue every year). Accredited schools are de facto government schools, subject to all the political pressures that have made government-run schools the socially and academically "challenged" environments they are today. This will eventually pave the way to increasingly tighter regulation of all schools.
Clearing up the confusion December 4, 2007 at 4:56 p.m.
"When I transfered from Emory to GA. Tech, I was given about 40% credits for the overlap courses going from BS in Nursing to BSEE. Is it so far off mark that she get 43% for her past experiences (including her BS)at KW?"
Big difference, in your example, there are actual credits from taking actual courses at an actual university. They would cancel out some general requirements for another undergraduate degree, that makes sense. You should be granted 0% towards a graduate degree.
This Kennedy Western University student applied with zero graduate credits going in, and Kennedy Western University telemarketers magically waived a bunch of graduate level courses based on unverified claims of going to seminars.
The Senate Investigation of Kennedy Western says that:
“We were told that EVERY student in the Master’s program is awarded between 33 and 60 percent credit toward a degree for their experience. In fact, documents produced by Kennedy-Western indicated that nearly half of all students in the Master’s program have received more than 55 percent credit for their experience”.
I feel bad for those suckers that only got 1/3 of their degree free when a good negotiator could have gotten 60% and knocked days off getting that “degree”.
It's a great hook to get people signed up, but just one of many reasons why this school has been proven to be so substandard.
?? December 5, 2007 at 11:59 a.m.
But environmental engineering is NOT engineering. It is at best a misnomer. Real engineering disciplines have PE licenses associated with them. Have never heard of an Environmental engineering PE. What gives?
If you can get a job with education, December 5, 2007 at 12:01 p.m.
how come not vise versa.
?? December 5, 2007 at 4:37 p.m.
I agree. A Kennedy-Western University degree does not qualify you to be a PE in any state, so why offer these courses? An Engineering degree should qualify you to be an Engineer, but this "school" doesn't.
Some states you can get a PE with just a high school diploma and work experience.
So Cool December 5, 2007 at 4:59 p.m.
WNU is one of few major institutions that will allow you to transfer in 100% of your degree requirements. While they do offer considerable coursework of their own, they will very often accept credit from most RA colleges, CLEP/DANTES/ECE exams, ACE evaluated military experience... and, they're very generous by most transfer standards.
The BS degrees offer the most flexibility in program design and therefor in acceptability of transfer credit.
If you have a collection of credit already from the acceptable sources, WNU should be among the colleges you consider. It's fantastic for those people who didn't quite finish their younger college experience and for those who have attended a large number of colleges and need the credits earned placed on a single transcript toward a good, highly recognized and well respected, degree.
It's possible to wrap a bachelor's degree at WNU for right around $6500. I've spent just about $7000 on mine.
http://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb105-11.html December 5, 2007 at 8:26 p.m.
Abolish Dept of Education!
Try the Big Three instead December 5, 2007 at 8:32 p.m.
"It's possible to wrap a bachelor's degree at WNU for right around $6500. I've spent just about $7000 on mine."
Sorry to hear that. You could have gotten a legitimate, regionally accredited degree through one of the Big Three (Thomas Edison, Excelsior, or Charter Oak) that will accept credits in transfer. You can read about them here:
http://distancelearn.about.com/od/online...
Warning, unlike Kennedy Western, you will actually have to have completed credits or show proficiency by exam, they will not give you half of a degree for simply applying.
Damien December 5, 2007 at 8:50 p.m.
A Yale professor told me back in August that a degree from Thomas Edison, Excelsior, or Charter Oak is just as worthless as a WNU degree as far as real schools go. "Do not to waste the extra effort and money at Thomas Edison, Excelsior, or Charter Oak, etc." He said. He also said that on a 1-100 scale the Ivy League schools are 100. Thomas Edison, Excelsior, or Charter Oak would rate a 1.5 and KW/WNU 1.49.
I have not signed up yet, but now I do not know who to believe.
True December 5, 2007 at 8:52 p.m.
Thomas Edison, Excelsior, or Charter Oak are a joke at Harvard. This site is a joke.
Fancy December 5, 2007 at 8:53 p.m.
There is no better value in today's education marketplace than prestigious WNU. The WNU degree is much more extensive than accredited schools and for a little more cost, it is worth it. For about $7000, its worth the education in any field. WNU has been a great experience.
How to get Graduate credit at KWU December 6, 2007 at 2:24 a.m.
"If I remember correctly, she failed the first test she took
Right?"
True, she had neither read nor reviewed the material before taking it, nor had she done any coursework prior taking the final exam. Students could order the final exam immediately on enrollment.
Luckily, she was "able to answer most of them by simply looking up a key word in the index" but after she failed she noticed that "a number of the questions had been graded incorrectly" and that "several questions had no possible correct answer provided in the choices"
She filed a grade challenge, and the school declared the test invalid, acknowledging "significant errors". Ms. Gelzer was sent a letter of apology and was allowed to retake the exam, which turned out to be the EXACT SAME ONE.
100 open book multiple choice questions = 1 graduate "course" granted within days of enrollment.
Was she scared to complete the degree? December 6, 2007 at 2:35 p.m.
?
Dr. Martin Shamblin December 6, 2007 at 2:44 p.m.
"I have not signed up yet, but now I do not know who to believe."
Go to a real school with a building.
It is true. All online university degrees including the accredited ones are useless. We just throw them in the trash. They are all Diploma Mills.
Any HR person who does their job will screen away these sham "degrees". Trust me, there is no such thing as an online degree that is respected.
Instead of getting an online degree just forge one yourself. Any color laser printer will produce a fine replica.
B. Mayona December 6, 2007 at 3:06 p.m.
"Go to a real school with a building."
Exactly!
I agree with an exception.
If they have been in the workplace in the applicable trade or discipline for 20 or more years.
The time spent in the "Art" will far outweigh any labs at any real school. Then at that point, we dont care what degree they put on their resume as long as we are not breaking any laws by hiring them.
Grissom December 6, 2007 at 3:24 p.m.
"Go to a real school with a building.
It is true. All online university degrees including the accredited ones are useless. We just throw them in the trash. They are all Diploma Mills."
Here Here!
Finally some sanity on this Blog.
We will even choose an unaccredited school degree that has an actual building and address over the so called "Accredited Online Universities." They are all a scam and should be closed down by the government.
Online + Degree = Oxymoron
Cynthia December 6, 2007 at 3:28 p.m.
All online schools will have what we call the "Thomas Edison" stigma. We stay away from them like we stay away from the flu virus.
Prof A December 6, 2007 at 9:37 p.m.
The Internet has been a boon and a bane for education, making it easier for unaccredited diploma mills to throw up a site, change their name, etc. At the same time, there dozens of absolutely wonderful opportunities out there for working adults.
Before you enroll, always check at the CHEA website to verify if they are regionally accredited.
For experienced working adults, I recommend three online avenues depending on the situation:
If you are looking for a respected name school, check out Penn State.
If you are looking for a low-cost, no-name option for a degree, check out Peru State (Nebraska).
If you have a collection of college courses from a variety of accredited schools, check out Excelsior. Many military folks end up in this situtation depending on their deployment.
If you feel more comfortable with an online program with a local presence, the options are endless. If you are in Ohio, check out Franklin University, if you are in Michigan, check out Davenport, Wisconsin-Lakeland College, Florida-Nova Southeastern, Minnesota-Capella, Idaho-Boise State online, etc etc.
More irrelevant dribble December 9, 2007 at 4:56 a.m.
Unfortunately, the question at hand is the incredibly substandard "degrees" that this college is pumping out
Can anyone point to a positive article about the quality of education from either KW"U" or WN"U" from an independent source to counter all the exposes and investigations?
chemist December 10, 2007 at 2:12 a.m.
In Nevada the state passed a new law in 2005, making it illegal to use a degree that can be considered false or misleading. The penalty is up to six months in jail and/or a $5,000 fine. Any degree not from an accredited university or if obtained with more than 10 percent credit for life experience, is considered false or misleading, whether or not the granting organization is in the state.
Chemist December 10, 2007 at 2:14 a.m.
I have confidence that most senators can tell the difference between legitimate degrees and diploma mills. I certainly do trust them on this issue.
chemist December 10, 2007 at 2:28 a.m.
Quite often, those will diploma mill degrees have other characteristics which disqualify them for employment. The text below was taken from the Washington Post:
"A D.C. elementary school principal who claimed a doctorate from a phony school has been removed from her position, according to District education officials.
Since 2002, Wilma Durham had headed Walker-Jones Elementary School, one of 15 "transformation schools" that were targeted for additional resources because of persistently low student performance. Parents and teachers had accused her of having an authoritarian and eccentric leadership style, saying she prohibited students and teachers from talking in the school cafeteria and made inappropriate remarks over the public address system."
FYI December 10, 2007 at 3:06 a.m.
"Can anyone point to a positive article about the quality of education from either KW"U" or WN"U" from an independent source to counter all the exposes and investigations?"
Hey you loving government punk December 10, 2007 at 3:08 a.m.
"I have confidence that most senators can tell the difference between legitimate degrees and diploma mills. I certainly do trust them on this issue."
Oh! I must have touched a nerve. Is your mommy a Senator?
Ward Churchill December 10, 2007 at 3:13 a.m.
Quite often, those with fully accredited DOE degrees have other characteristics which disqualify them for employment.
Hey Punk December 10, 2007 at 3:15 a.m.
Last night the University of Colorado Board of Regents voted to fire professor Ward Churchill on the grounds of “serious, repeated, and deliberate research misconduct.” This vote came more than two years after the university investigated Churchill for making controversial public statements, including a reference to the victims of the World Trade Center attacks as “little Eichmanns.” FIRE released an analysis of the situation in 2005, determining that Churchill’s statements are protected and that the university’s initial investigation was unconstitutional. FIRE further cautioned that while the university’s investigation of Churchill’s research misconduct must not be swayed by anger over the content of his statements, Churchill was not immune to such scrutiny. FIRE wrote that Churchill freely injected himself into the public square, and that if “information that … legitimately places his job in jeopardy” came to light, “then that is simply the hazard of voluntarily participating in the marketplace of ideas.”
Hmmm, Irrelevant December 10, 2007 at 4:07 a.m.
Sorry, but the article doesn't mention anything about diploma mills or substandard degrees or Kennedy-Western University or Warren National University, so I'm not sure how it is relevant to the discussion.
The 2 Senators mentioned above weren't even quoted in the Senate investigation of Kennedy-Western University, so I don't even think they were present.
Susan Collins and Senator Lieberman are the ones that were the leads. Senator Collins even picked up an unaccredited "degree" or two in the deal.
All OL schools are Diploma Mills December 10, 2007 at 9:24 a.m.
There is no such thing as an accredited and legitimate online school. The purpose of All Online Schools is make money and illegally provide students with bogus degrees. These diploma mills allow students to cheat on tests using resource sharing.
Again, there is no such thing as a legitimate online/internet school.
These are schools you should avoid. If you are going to spend time and money on your education, you should take the time to persue a real degree from a real University with walls and doors and desks.
I can not think of one Company that will accept an online degree of any kind, not one.
All Online schools (for profit telemarketers) have purchased their accreditation.
Just like KW is getting ready to buy accreditation by wining and dining the agencies.
I wish these corrupt senators would do something.
KW Engineer December 10, 2007 at 9:32 a.m.
http://www.radoil.com/engineers_01.html
I thought KW degrees were illegal in TX, again-unenforced laws are not laws at all.
Online Schools are FRAUDS! December 10, 2007 at 9:48 a.m.
Proof that all Online Schools (Excelsior, Thomas Edison, Warren National) are FRAUDS.
Online school Rochville University can deliver your degree in 3-5 business days
Online Almeda University will grant you a degree for life experience
Online Hamilton University conferred a doctorate, based primarily on a 4 page paper, to a gal in Homeland Security!
There have even been online schools that gave degrees to Dogs, Cats, and Parakeets.
And those are only a few of the cases that made the paper. Who knows what multiple of that were discovered and handled quietly to avoid public embarrassment, and those waiting to be discovered.
Senate GAO Hearings December 10, 2007 at 9:54 a.m.
"Found KW guilty of no wrong doing."
Online Schools are FRAUDS! December 10, 2007 at 9:56 a.m.
Susan Collins and Senator Lieberman are the ones that were the leads while investigating online schools. Senator Collins even picked up an online "degree" or two in the deal.
Oline Schools December 10, 2007 at 9:59 a.m.
Quite often, those with online degrees have other characteristics which disqualify them for employment. The text below was taken from the Washington Post:
"A D.C. elementary school principal who claimed a doctorate from an online school has been removed from her position, according to District education officials.
Since 2002, Wilma Durham had headed Walker-Jones Elementary School, one of 15 "transformation schools" that were targeted for additional resources because of persistently low student performance. Parents and teachers had accused her of having an authoritarian and eccentric leadership style, saying she prohibited students and teachers from talking in the school cafeteria and made inappropriate remarks over the public address system."
Me too December 10, 2007 at 10 a.m.
I have confidence that most senators can tell the difference between legitimate degrees and online degrees. I certainly do trust them on this issue.
WNU Oficially Not a Diploma Mill December 10, 2007 at 10:15 a.m.
GAO investigators have no qualifications to label KW as a diploma mill. They are accountants not educators. Senators are not educators either.
Furthermore, a federal judge has set precedent in making it a defamation crime to call KW such.
Circles December 10, 2007 at 10:17 a.m.
KW/WNU debates always go nowhere, but in circles. No winners or losers, just circles.
Unenforced Laws in Texas December 10, 2007 at 6:55 p.m.
As another poster linked, graduates do just fine with unaccredited degrees, thank you very much.
BENTON F. BAUGH, Ph. D., P.E., PRINCIPAL
President of Radoil Tool Company, Inc.,
EDUCATION
BSME: University of Houston
One year in MBA program, University of Houston
MS: Kennedy-Western University (Non-resident)
Ph.D.: Kennedy-Western University (Non-resident)
EXPERT WITNESS ACTIVITIES
Served as an expert witness on 11 lawsuits including patents, trade secrets, product failures, and personal injuries. Benton has been deposed several times and qualified in court as an expert in mechanical engineering, risk analysis, and fluid dynamics.
Hey Moose Dung December 11, 2007 at 6:06 a.m.
In reference to the replica chemist that posted-
"In Nevada the state passed a new law in 2005, making it illegal to use a degree that can be considered false or misleading. The penalty is up to six months in jail and/or a $5,000 fine. Any degree not from an accredited university or if obtained with more than 10 percent credit for life experience, is considered false or misleading, whether or not the granting organization is in the state."
Read the code moose breath. Since most KW graduates like myself only had academic credit transfer we break the 10% requirement.
Also since a semicolon is an "AND" in the code then since KW is state licensed and has applied for accreditation the Nevada argument is oficially dead. Even if tou had job experience > 10%.
Here is what you found convenient to leave out.
4. For the purposes of this section, a degree or honorary degree is false or misleading or is used in a false or misleading manner if it:
(a) States or suggests that the person named in the degree or honorary degree has completed the requirements of an academic or professional program of study in a particular field of endeavor beyond the secondary school level and the person has not, in fact, completed the requirements of the program of study;
(b) Is offered as his own by a person other than the person who completed the requirements of the program of study; or
(c) Is awarded, bestowed, conferred, given, granted, conveyed or sold:
(1) Based upon more than 10 percent of the recipient’s documented life experience and not based upon actual completion of academic work;
(2) By a person or entity located in this State in violation of this chapter, as determined by the Commission; or
(3) By a person or entity located outside this State which would be a violation of this chapter if the person or entity were located in this State, as determined by the Commission.
Nevada Cleans up diploma mills, Bravo! December 11, 2007 at 6:42 a.m.
Kennedy Western "graduates" break that 10% even before the telemarketers, oops student services, get on the line.
The Senate Investigation of Kennedy-Western University says that:
“We were told that EVERY student in the Master’s program is awarded between 33 and 60 percent credit toward a degree for their experience. In fact, documents produced by Kennedy-Western indicated that nearly half of all students in the Master’s program have received more than 55 percent credit for their experience”.
EVERY, EVERY Student.
From documents PRODUCED BY Kennedy-Western.
The complete lack of any rigor or standards of Kennedy-Western is well-documented. I just hope that the name change is also a change towards legitimacy with Warren National. They've made money off their cash cow, let's clean it up now.
Nay Nay Moose Breath December 11, 2007 at 9:37 a.m.
“We were told that EVERY student in the Master’s program is awarded between 33 and 60 percent credit toward a degree for their experience. In fact, documents produced by Kennedy-Western indicated that nearly half of all students in the Master’s program have received more than 55 percent credit for their experience”.
That is past history, years old. They no longer do that.
Even so, you ignor the semi-colon between (2) and (3) negating everything you claim. Semi colon means "and" there. Ask a Lawyer.
Not to mention WNU only gave me credit towarsds a BSME based on ACE/SMART Navy College transcripts (accredited credits). No job experience credit here.
- December 11, 2007 at 9:40 a.m.
"Even so, you ignor the semi-colon between (2) and (3) negating everything you claim. Semi colon means "and" there. Ask a Lawyer."
Revision: That is between (1)and (3)
- December 11, 2007 at 10:01 a.m.
There are literally thousands of people using their WNU degrees in private industry in the so called "Illegal States"
Notice how these states only expose government workers. Yes Ed. is government also.
They will not go after people practicing in the free market.
Here is why.
The Dept of Ed. is an Unconstitutional mandate. It is illegal under the US constitution for the Dept of Ed. to even recognize certain accreditation agencies over others and set up a defacto "Ministry of Education".
The first states AG to enforce their illegal laws will be made an example of and may even end up abolishing the DOE altogther.
My Experience December 11, 2007 at 3:37 p.m.
"Kennedy-Western indicated that nearly half of all students in the Master’s program have received more than 55 percent credit for their experience”.
"That is past history, years old. They no longer do that."
Kennedy-Western University granted me more than half a DOCTORATE for continuing ed seminars and "life experience" in mid-2006, I have the "degree plan" to prove it.
Warren National is importing those empty credits, so nothing has really changed yet as far as I can see.
2007 December 12, 2007 at 3:01 a.m.
REF.KW University granted me more than half a DOCTORATE for continuing ed seminars and "life experience" in mid-2006, I have the "degree plan" to prove it.
The changes occured in 2007.
chemist December 13, 2007 at 7 a.m.
"They no longer do that". Is it possible for a diploma mill to change into a legitimate school? Possibly but not likely. It is much cheaper and more profitable to remain a diploma mill. All that it requires is a high tolerance for shady practices.
Prof A December 13, 2007 at 2:37 p.m.
Couldn't agree with you more, chemist.
Why change now, they have a great cash cow. Keep state-hopping. Even though California, Idaho, and Hawaii have kicked them out, and Wyoming finally cracked down, there are still plenty of other states to move the PO Box to.
I'd milk being an "applicant" for accreditation as long as possible, pack up the moving trucks again, and blame it on "the system".
anon December 14, 2007 at 6 p.m.
I am a prospective online special ed student. I have a family and have already sacrificed much time to obtain my college degrees in ed. Please let me know about the rigors of the online spec ed program, per course - difficulty, how many hours per week per course, length of papers, professor contact, terms papers, if any, format and difficulty of quizzes, essays, exams, online tutorial, etc. I am a high achiever, but do not want to sacrifice my children's years, any longer, and will reconsider an in-state program.
chemist December 15, 2007 at 3:14 a.m.
Answer to anon: If you want a decent education, stay away from online "schools". There may be a very few in the country that are of good quality but usually these are an extension of a legitimate school with an actual campus. It is easy to be fooled by an online diploma mill because they go to great lengths to simulate legitimate schools.
Physicist December 15, 2007 at 3:22 a.m.
>>>>Does anyone have any idea what the differance there would be between Harvard and WNU. I am currently enrolled in Harvards PHD program and I am looking to transefer.<<<<<<
I doubt that a Harvard student would ask such a stupid question, but in case you are legit, stick to Harvard.
Legal or illegal? December 15, 2007 at 3:26 a.m.
>>>>Granted, WNU is perfectly illegal in ND and every other state in the union including Tx<<<<
I think you meant legal but if you meant legal, you are mistaken. It is illegal in Nevada for instance.
To Anon December 15, 2007 at 4:24 p.m.
Even a special ed student could get a 4.0 at this so-called college, but you should look elsewhere if you actually want to use it for something
q December 19, 2007 at 9:43 p.m.
To whoever posted "Even a special ed student could get a 4.0 at this so-called college, but you should look elsewhere if you actually want to use it for something."
So you attended WNU?
Responding to Moose... December 25, 2007 at 4:17 a.m.
It is possible to get a fair idea of the educational level of those associated with WNU by their comments here. They often resort to name calling, do not do well in reading comprehension and often give false information.
response December 26, 2007 at 3:12 a.m.
Obtaining an accreditation is 'stamp' to verify that a particular business meets the standard it sets out to deliver. One of the purpose is to ensure trust and provide security for the public. An unaccreditated school does not necessarily mean that the school delivers quality or substandard education. The notion that accreditated school is the 'only' way of obtaining quality education is an assumption, which, without fact is a mere statement that is invalid.
From DOE December 26, 2007 at 7:22 p.m.
"Since accreditation is the PRIMARY means of determining the legitimacy and quality of colleges and universities in the United States, to describe the process as "voluntary" is not to describe it as "optional" or "unnecessary."
Plus KWU / WNU has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt that it provides decidely substandard "degrees"
Yet another Kennedy Western Expose December 26, 2007 at 7:29 p.m.
More Kennedy-Western University and sister college Almeda graduates exposed in the media. Tampa Bay area.
http://www.diplomamillnews.blogspot.com/......
P.S.: Your M.A. or Ph.D. may be B.S.
Some Floridians with top jobs hold degrees from questionable academic institutions.
By RON MATUS, Times Staff Writer
Published December 6, 2007
Dept. of Ed. Illegal in all 50 states! December 27, 2007 at 7:38 p.m.
When the Education Department was created in 1979, many critics warned that a secretary of education would turn into a national minister of education. Rep. John Erlenborn (R-Ill.), for instance, wrote, "There would be interference in textbook choices, curricula, staffing, audits, accreditation, salaries, the make-up of student bodies, building designs, and all other irritants that the government has invented to harass the population. These decisions which are now made in the local school or school district will slowly but surely be transferred to Washington.'' Dissenting from the committee report that recommended establishing the department, Erlenborn and seven other Republicans wrote, "The Department of Education will end up being the Nation's super schoolboard. That is something we can all do without.''
Such concerns were not limited to Republicans. Rep. Patricia Schroeder (D-Colo.) predicted, "No matter what anyone says, the Department of Education will not just write checks to local school boards. They will meddle in everything. I do not want that.'' David W. Breneman and Noel Epstein wrote in the Washington Post, "Establishing a cabinet-level department is a back-door way of creating a national education policy.'' And Richard W. Lyman, president of Stanford University, testified before Congress that "the two-hundred-year-old absence of a Department of Education is not the result of simple failure during all that time. On the contrary, it derives from the conviction that we do not want the kinds of educational systems that such arrangements produce.''
The Dept. of Ed, is also illegal under the US constitution!
LOL December 27, 2007 at 8:34 p.m.
Thanks for the funny conspiracy story.
Warren National / Kennedy Western still not worth the paper its printed on.
Online Universities December 28, 2007 at 1:46 p.m.
REFERENCE: Thanks for the funny conspiracy story.
I agree, online universities such as Excelsior, Almeda, Thomas Edison and Kaplan truly are not worth the paper they are written on.
Dr. X December 31, 2007 at 8:05 p.m.
I have seen numerous people with "real" degrees talking about non-accredited institutions, and their reaction to them seems universally hostile. They all rave about how worthless those degrees are, that they're not worth the paper they're printed on, that anybody with any common sense would go to a "real" institution. One person actually sent an advertisement from a non-accredited institution to law enforcement authorities, although they did not explain exactly what they felt this institution could be charged with. Is it illegal to give people pieces of paper? The wrath expressed by these folks seems to stem from jealousy. They're just plain jealous that they had to spend years of time and thousands of dollars to get their paper education. I sympathize with people who've had to go through that ordeal, but to become hostile to someone else who's trying to find a better alternative is not fair. It's like the old-timers who get angry at kids because kids these days have computers, while in the old days they had to use chalk or something. Yes, it's a shame they had to do through that, but that's no reason to get angry at someone else who's evaded it. And for the record, I have yet to see anyone with a "real" degree give a valid reason for not going the unaccredited route. Most just say "it's not worth it" without saying why. The only semi-valid argument is that your employer may find out about it, but if you show them a piece of paper which looks real, and if you really go all-out and your institution has a number they can call to check, (or if you just supply them with a friend's phone number and have your friend pretend to be a university official who confirms your graduation), how would they know? As I said before, there are people who did not supply anything more than the *claim*, which was assumed to be true and was enough to get them a good job.
It speaks volumes that many people who hate "unaccrededit schools" hate them because they went to one themselves, not realizing that the institution was not accredited. They cite their "embarrassment" and "disgrace" because they were very proud of their achievements. I would advise these people to re-think their priorities. Going to university is not something to be proud of, because it is something you do for yourself, and things you do for you are not acts of pride; They are acts of necessity. If there is any justification in pride, it is for things you have done to make the world a better place for people other than yourself. However, pride is a worthless emotion in the first place, and it has no place in any human's psyche. If you are angry because your pride was wounded, I am sorry, but again, a degree is not gained for pride, but to improve your quality of life.
If they require you to have a degree, then you are not lying if you have a degree from a non-accredited institution and tell them you have a degree.
Ummm December 31, 2007 at 11:33 p.m.
"If they require you to have a degree, then you are not lying if you have a degree from a non-accredited institution and tell them you have a degree."
Lying by omission is still lying.
Dr. x January 1, 2008 at 10:17 p.m.
Since the Dept. of Ed. has no authority to recognize one accreditation agency over another, regional accreditation or otherwise has no real meaning at all.
?? January 1, 2008 at 11:29 p.m.
"Since the Dept. of Ed. has no authority to recognize one accreditation agency over another"
Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Do you live in an alternate universe or is it just pure denial?
my 2 cents January 1, 2008 at 11:32 p.m.
If you are going to follow Dr. X's advice and go the dishonesty route, Rochville or Belford or Almeda also offer unaccredited life experience degrees with cheaper rates and quicker studies that Kennedy-Western University.
Dr. X January 2, 2008 at 1:13 a.m.
Ref:Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Do you live in an alternate universe or is it just pure denial?
Q. Where, in the Constitution, is there mention of education?
A. There is none; education is a matter reserved for the states.
Sound Advice January 2, 2008 at 3:56 a.m.
"Ask about the school's credentials and the degrees the instructors hold. Many unaccredited online schools will eagerly grant you a degree, however these degrees from unaccredited schools are worthless. A diploma mill or unaccredited school should be avoided", (Military.com, 2007).
Also from Military.com January 2, 2008 at 5:33 a.m.
"Are diploma mills legal?
No. Some states have lax standards that allow almost anyone to operate a “college,” but most have laws that provide penalties for people operating diploma mills."
Also covers Dr. X's statement about state regulation. 50 different systems make it easy for unaccredited "colleges" to gravitate to the weakest regulated states.
So even though Kennedy-Western has been booted from 3 states, cannot offer "degrees" in 4 states, and about a dozen other states have various restrictions / misdemeanors attached to their use, it's still technically legal in some spots.
You are a full blown Liar January 2, 2008 at 2:53 p.m.
REF:"So even though Kennedy-Western has been booted from 3 states, cannot offer "degrees" in 4 states, and about a dozen other states have various restrictions / misdemeanors attached to their use, it's still technically legal in some spots."
Above is not true. Just because you write it does not make it true. Most states (>90%) have no restrictions on using the degree for private non governmental licensure. Even Wiki (very hard on WNU to the point of being very misleading)reveals this.
Do yourself a favor and call the ODAs of the co called states. By their own laws they have to honor WNU degrees and will give a written waiver if you ask. This is in large part due to WNUs applied status and their state licensure.
A dozen = 3 states? WTF
Confused January 2, 2008 at 5:16 p.m.
Are we talking about Kennedy-Western University of California / Hawaii / Idaho / Wyoming or
Warren National University of California / Wyoming?
Kennedy-Western University degrees are a done deal, will never be recognized, they failed in their accreditation attempts.
Warren National students rolling the dice and enrolling after 1/1/2007 have a chance to receive an accredited degree at some point in the future, if Warren is successful.
Pure Franstanchenzant! January 2, 2008 at 11:19 p.m.
Ref:Warren National students rolling the dice and enrolling after 1/1/2007 have a chance to receive an accredited degree at some point in the future, if Warren is successful.
Wrong again chump:
I will have a degree with WNU and not KWU on it and I enrolled 8/06. And per Dr Bear, I will be pulled in based on graduation date. Besides, no one ever asks (was it accredited when you enrolled?) Ref: DR Bear.
Go fish!
Furthermore January 2, 2008 at 11:21 p.m.
They closed their California office and are only in Wyo. now.
Also January 2, 2008 at 11:28 p.m.
Once accredited, and for minimal coursework and a fee, WNU will offer old days KWU students the opportunity to convert their degree to WNU.
Checkmate!
??? January 2, 2008 at 11:50 p.m.
"for minimal coursework and a fee" - an apt descriptiobn for KW"U".
"WNU will offer old days KWU students the opportunity to convert their degree to WNU"
Hmm, so regardless of the hours spent on a KW "degree", it's going to magically turn into an accredited degree??
I can see the profit motive for WNU to issue more "coursework", but it seems very deceptive to call it the same thing.
That is true January 3, 2008 at 3:03 a.m.
It is what the university is named when you graduate that you get the diploma for. No school has ever told us the year they became accredited (not that we ever asked)
Pack up the moving trucks (again) January 3, 2008 at 6:31 a.m.
"They closed their California office and are only in Wyo. now."
Must have missed that. Hard to keep tabs on this "university" with all the states they move to, the name changes, and the various organizations they have claimed accreditation from in the past.
What does this mean for me? January 3, 2008 at 2:23 p.m.
I previously wrote "Kennedy-Western University granted me more than half a DOCTORATE for continuing ed seminars and "life experience" in mid-2006, I have the "degree plan" to prove it."
Can I now just transfer that over to Warren National?
Gin Ichimaru January 4, 2008 at 4:08 p.m.
Some facts to throw out to all...
First, the University has been based in Wyoming for a number of years now. Only its corporate offices were in California. Why would it matter where its office is located?
Second, Warren National and Kennedy-Western are the same thing so who cares what it was called before. So if someone graduates from the University under its old name why not use its new name.
Third, it seems that most people bashing this institution are people who never been there.
Finally, Warren National never claimed to be accredited. It never even used the phoney accreditation agencies that other unaccredited places (I cannot call all of them universities) have used. WNU has always sought to be a legitimate institution and never used fraudulant methods to promote its programs.
GWRD January 4, 2008 at 7:55 p.m.
"First, Why would it matter where its office is located?"
It's WHY they moved. California, Hawaii, Idaho, and Wyoming due to a rejection of their license renewal or to avoid being required to comply with quality standards.
"Second, Warren National and Kennedy-Western are the same thing so who cares what it was called before."
This is a big deal. KWU Senate Hearing showed they gave most of the degree for "life experience" with the rest being 1 open book exam per graduate course. No rigor whatsoever.
Warren National is going legit, but they are dragging forward all these free/easy credits/degrees from KWU. It really damages the credibility. If we make a clean cut from KWU, I think we would have smooth sailing.
"Finally, Warren National never claimed to be accredited."
Again, WNU gets tainted due to KWU. KWU did claim accreditation from one of those places.
I truly think that Warren National is going to turn out well, but grouping the Kennedy-Western people who did virtually nothing with current hard-working students is unfair.
Queer January 4, 2008 at 8:45 p.m.
I have been E-mailing and calling the help desk at WNU for 2 weeks now. No callbacks and vague indescript return emails. WTF?
Abolish ED January 6, 2008 at 6:31 p.m.
The federal government’s involvement in education represents everything that is wrong with so many of our government agencies: they are unconstitutional, wasteful, expensive, and out of touch. It is the duty of our congress to abolish not only the Department of Education, but the entire federal involvement in education. If Congress refuses to do its duty, the bureaucracy will continue to grow, and education will continue to decline. In 1979, Representative L.H. Fountain (D-NC) made an accurate prediction about the Department of Education which could be applied to the whole federal role in education. Fountain stated,
"I am opposed to this ill-advised and unnecessary legislation to establish a department which will grow and grow, cost the taxpayers of this nation unnecessary billions of dollars, and ultimately become an unmanageable monster bureaucracy."
Abolish ED January 6, 2008 at 6:51 p.m.
According to the United States Department of Education, "The United States has no Federal ministry of education or other centralized authority exercising single national control over postsecondary educational institutions in this country. The states assume varying degrees of control over education, but, in general, institutions of higher education are permitted to operate with considerable independence and autonomy...In order to insure a basic level of quality, the practice of accreditation arose in the United States as a means of conducting nongovernmental, peer evaluation of educational institutions and programs."
We see in this statement that the Department of Education claims that "accreditation arose in the United States as a means of conducting nongovernmental peer evaluation of educational institutions and programs." The Department of Education has divided the United States into regions. Each region in turn has a Regional Accreditor that accredits schools. These Regional Accreditors get their authorization from the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) and/or the U.S. Department of Education's Eligibility and Agency Evaluation Staff (EAES). Now both of these organizations get their authority to "recognize" these accrediting agencies from the Department of Education itself. And as everyone knows, the Department of Education is a part of the United States government. So my question is this, if accreditation is "a means of conducting nongovernmental peer evaluation of educational institutions and programs," what is the Department of Education, a branch of the Federal Government, doing running the whole thing? This is obviously not nongovernment involvement in the accreditation system and proves that this part of the statement made by the Department of Education is not true.
ED non govt involvment scenario Reminds Me Of January 6, 2008 at 6:55 p.m.
When I was in Navy Boot Camp with an Admirals son in my company. The rest of us recruits were told "He would not get special treatment."
We watched as he did get special, albeit tacit treatment.
Yep January 7, 2008 at 1:07 a.m.
"I previously wrote "Kennedy-Western University granted me more than half a DOCTORATE for continuing ed seminars and "life experience" in mid-2006, I have the "degree plan" to prove it. Can I now just transfer that over to Warren National?"
Absolutely. Warren-National is taking all Kennedy-Western "credits", so not too much has changed.
Urban dictionary seems more credible than Wiki. January 7, 2008 at 3:06 p.m.
http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.ph...
Accreditation Defined:
A total scam brought about by a good old boys club and federal government criminals to bilk dumb college brats out of their dads money, and thereby send them away with a so called education where they are more stupid when they leave than when they started.
Jackie January 7, 2008 at 10:14 p.m.
Can somebody please tell me something about the school?
Average ACTS / Placement / US News Ranking / Average Financial Aid Award / % that graduate in 4 / 6 years
Some concrete info would be helpful to me instead of random irrelevant rants.
To Jackie January 7, 2008 at 11:33 p.m.
Warren National, by the sound of your question is not for you.
Sounds like you want to "Play Ball". If you want to Play Ball, stay away from WNU.
Words like ACTS etc., indicate you are part of the establishment. You care more about "fitting in" than anything else.
WNU is for self made Mavericks like myself who have made a ton of money and now just want to learn things without sitting in front of Smelly Professors all day.
Do yourself a favor Jackie (If that is your real name)go the smelly professor route. It compliments your dress.
Cheers
Dr. JB
Jackie January 8, 2008 at 4:24 a.m.
Sounds like you want to "Play Ball".
I'm confused. I just am looking at online schools and want to evaluate this one. Can anyone else help.
Hi Jackie; January 8, 2008 at 1:17 p.m.
What's your major? I'm sure we can point you to a school. If you read this entire blog, there isn't one shred of evidence from a 3rd party that shows that this school is worth the time (which is why so much time is spent ranting about issues unrelated to the poor quality), but tons of proof that it is a:
"Sophisticated diploma mill" - GAO report
"Fraudalent or substandard" - Texas State Law lists it
A good way to get publicly embarrased when a newspaper catches you with one of these.
And to answer the question: January 8, 2008 at 1:22 p.m.
Average ACTS - No need, from all reports it's 100% acceptance. I assume it is a few points lower than any others.
Placement - Only in companies with incompetent HR departments or low-level positions that escape public scrutiny.
US News Ranking - Haha
Average Financial Aid Award - Doesn't meet the minimum quality qualifications to receive aid.
% that graduate in 4 / 6 years - The university said that they grant an average of 55% of a degree for life experience, then take 5-9 open book exams (1 exam = 1 graduate course) to finish. I don't see why you couldn't finish in a year.
Jackie January 8, 2008 at 9:26 p.m.
Wow! OK, I am looking for a BS in Healthcare Administration, then eventually a Masters. I have experience in the field and about 50 credits so far. Has to be online due to my work schedule.
If anyone can help out, would appreciate it! :-)
Jackie January 8, 2008 at 11:30 p.m.
Just go fit in somewhere. You will not rest until you do.
"The Maverick"
Another alumni featured on DIPLOMA MILL NEWS January 9, 2008 at 2:56 p.m.
http://diplomamillnews.blogspot.com/2008...
"Robert Blok received his master's of science in environmental engineering degree from Warren National University"
Bogus website: diplomamillnews.blogspot.com January 9, 2008 at 5:29 p.m.
"Robert Blok received his master's of science in environmental engineering degree from Warren National University"
The website you reference is so cheap!
With five dollars to buy a URL domain and 15 minutes my 10 year old could throw up a bogus website as such (and do a much better job I might add).
The "diploma mill news" is not a reliable or noteworthy reference. Nice try though.
WNU Does not meet definition of diploma mill January 9, 2008 at 5:36 p.m.
Warren National University is licensed by the Wyoming Department of Education, under W.S. 21-2-401 through 21-2-407. This licensure allows the university to legally conduct business.
So what January 9, 2008 at 7:58 p.m.
"This licensure allows the university to legally conduct business." - As everyone knows, this is academically meaningless in Wyoming.
Good article on the subject that covers the subject.
Alleged "diploma mills" flocking to Wyoming
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/ed...
Some great quotes that are right on the mark:
"People start to giggle if you say 'Wyoming-licensed
school,'
"Because of loose state requirements, more online schools are popping up in Wyoming than anywhere else"
"Cheyenne alone is home to six distance-learning schools. A typical example is Paramount University of Technology, with a couple of basement offices in a downtown mall"
Abolish ED January 10, 2008 at 3:27 a.m.
According to Merriam Webster:
1st and dominant Definition of accreditation is:
-to give official authorization to or approval of-
Therefore the question, --What is state licensing if not accreditation?--
Duh! January 10, 2008 at 2:06 p.m.
I know this is complicated, but that is the generic definition, it has a very different and specific meaning in education. Look down a little further and you will see:
"to certify (a school, college, or the like) as meeting all formal official requirements of academic excellence, curriculum, facilities, etc."
Zing! January 10, 2008 at 6:53 p.m.
The Truth 37 - Kennedy Western 0
Yea January 11, 2008 at 12:36 a.m.
"to certify (a school, college, or the like) as meeting all formal official requirements of academic excellence, curriculum, facilities, etc."
Subjective, relative and up to opinion of who?
Ron Paul January 11, 2008 at 3:39 p.m.
Ron got it right in the republican debate last night when he said we need to abolish the Department Of Ed. Good for him!
Finis January 11, 2008 at 3:53 p.m.
So called "Educators" like it when they can hold the key to jobs with their lofty "Accredited Degrees". It is a power and control thing. That is why they hate WNU so much.
Now, Corporate America is taking control of education in a big way. They are thumbing their nose at you F-in eggheads and hiring people from private online (and yes, unaccredited)universities in droves. Why do you think WNU gets bigger and better (with stronger finances) every year while public and accredited universities are going bankrupt?
The U.S. government is in the last throws of survival. When the U.S. government is bankrupt, the first Dept. to be made obsolete will be ED. So-Long Government controlled Accreditation!
PT Barnum January 11, 2008 at 5:05 p.m.
"hiring people from ... online (and yes, unaccredited)universities in droves"
Can you verify that somehow? No, of course not, because it's not true. In my experience, a $6 background check will expose you as unqualified. Can you post some statistics on unaccredited placement?
"WNU gets bigger and better (with stronger finances"
LOL, true, it can only get better.
AFAIK, WNU is lining the pockets of 1 individual. I'm sure his finances are very strong, it's a great business model.
1. Pay the telemarketers for each mark they bring in.
2. Wave away half the degree for "life experience" to get them hooked.
3. Pay a test grader to score the 1 open book exam required for a course.
4. Pay a nominal amount to some professors with real degrees to appear in the marketing materials and maybe wave their hand over a paper now and then.
It has to be 90% profit, minimum.
KWU "Marks" January 11, 2008 at 5:09 p.m.
From the Senate Investigation of Kennedy-Western, one of their student counselors describes the people they targeted.
"Many of the people I called were down on their luck. Many lacked a college education and held dead-end jobs. We used used negative-sell tactics to convince them that they did not have many options in life and the Kennedy-Western was their best chance to improve their lot."
Proud WNU Grad January 11, 2008 at 8:47 p.m.
"Many of the people I called were down on their luck. Many lacked a college education and held dead-end jobs. We used used negative-sell tactics to convince them that they did not have many options in life and the Kennedy-Western was their best chance to improve their lot."
Perhaps I am down on my luck.
I put a WNU BSME on my resume and headhunters are going whacko offering me 150k per year jobs with 100/day perdiem left and right.
At first I felt guilty and asked about WNU being non-accredited. Whithout exception they all say that as long as they are state licensed no one cares.
These headhunters have the jobs (they are not bidding on them).
A certain headhunter wants to hire me in Texas. I told him not to bother because my degree was illegal there.
He said he would tell the employer over the phone it was WNU and then leave it off the resume if it makes me feel better (so we left it off the resume). I figured, yea right, never happen and the next day Walla! Job offer (and WNU is off resume).
Theres somethin happenin here, what it is aint exactly clear, theres a man over there.........
REF: WIKI January 11, 2008 at 9:31 p.m.
At the 2005 Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Warren National University faculty members gave a presentation on the method used to deliver academic courses. Andree Swanson and Keren Meier-Emerich offered the following abstract for their presentation.
"This is an example of one course, out of 500 courses offered, which demonstrates the delivery model used by Kennedy-Western University. Courses are designed using a modular format, which includes multiple self-assessment opportunities. Offered as open-entry, a student may be the only one taking the course at a given time or may be one of many enrolled at the same time. The model allows for anytime, any pace, and any place learning."[33]
In the "Understanding New Media" book's section on virtual universities, author Kim Veltman mentions, "By leveraging the power of the internet, Kennedy-Western has refined the academic process and opened up countless opportunities to adult learners. And they used Jones e-Global Library." [34]
In a Chronicle of Higher Education article, Kennedy-Western faculty members stated students, "...often use the same textbooks and take exams as rigorous as those offered in professors' traditional classes."[9]
??? January 12, 2008 at 7:53 a.m.
"I put a WNU BSME on my resume"
Warren National dropped all their hokey engineering programs in the latest name change / moving van expedition. WNU has never had a BSME program.
"Walla! Job offer"
That's hilarious. Must have been granted "life experience" for those basic language credits.
"Andree Swanson and Keren Meier-Emerich offered the following abstract for their presentation."
Rarer than big-foot! I missed it, but much has been written about the laughing-stock these people made of themselves.
Ah yes, January 12, 2008 at 2:25 p.m.
But the BSME degree has WNU on it and not KW.
Booger-Bloggers January 12, 2008 at 2:35 p.m.
Note that-All bloggers on this site (and I do mean all) that say negative things about WNU are not even students or ex-students of KW/WNU. This blog title is "Online degree reviews written by students".
Therefore it can be assumed that these booger-bloggers are mainly telemarketers from other diploma mills like Almeda, Excelsior and Thomas Edison trying to push their so called "Universities".
Fact January 12, 2008 at 2:43 p.m.
In a landmark settlement, the Oregon State Office of Degree Authorization was punished for referring to Kennedy Western as a "diploma mill" and the state attorney general's office provided ODA personnel with training sessions on "Defamation Law" at the expense of the great State.
Yep January 12, 2008 at 5:22 p.m.
"But the BSME degree has WNU on it and not KW."
Lol, but you didn't get it there, in fact, it was never offered there. Just taking more liberties with the truth. Thank goodness for background checks.
"Almeda, Excelsior and Thomas Edison"
More confusion! Almeda is a diploma mill. Excelsior and Thomas Edison are regionally accredited.
Fact: KW"U" and WN"U" are still illegal to use in Oregon with out a lengthy disclaimer. In addition KWU / WNU cannot sell their diplomas in Oregon.
OK but January 12, 2008 at 5:27 p.m.
Oregon State Office of Degree Authorization was punished for referring to Kennedy Western as a "diploma mill.
What? January 12, 2008 at 5:30 p.m.
Reference "More confusion! Almeda is a diploma mill. Excelsior and Thomas Edison are regionally accredited."
OK, so Excelsior and Thomas Edison are accredited diploma mills. Lots of them (including Almeda) are accredited.
Cool! January 12, 2008 at 6:24 p.m.
The Warren National University(WNU) academic headquarters has been situated in Cheyenne since 1996.
WNU, established in 1984, has provided degree programs to more than 30,000 students nationwide. The university offers bachelors, masters and doctoral degree programs.
The degrees offered are business administration, engineering and health administration. The college has no teaching assistants, and 80 percent of the staff has attained their doctorates.
According to David Gering, director of corporate communications, special requirements must be met in order to be admitted into KWU. The school requires at least five years of work experience in the area of study for a bachelor’s degree.
In addition, the student must have completed 60 semester units from a university, an associate degree from a community college or pass an entrance examination. In 1998, WNU was the first interactive Internet-based learning platform.
Entrance requirements for a master’s degree are at least five years of work experience in the area of study as well as a bachelor’s degree from a four–year college. To be admitted into the doctoral degree program, the student must have at least five years of work experience in the area of study. Students must also have a master’s degree or at least 10 years of work experience, plus a bachelor’s degree.
WNU is primarily for mid-career students who wish to further their education and do not always have the time to invest in other four–year universities. With the KWU program, the average time for graduation is 2.4 years. The average student age is 42, with an average of eight years of work experience in the field in which they’re studying.
WNU, a private institution, is not an accredited university, but a candidate for accreditation. Students are made aware that while some schools will transfer credits from the college, many will not. However, Laramie County Community College students have the option to transfer their classes or associate degree to meet entrance requirements.
“Our students often comment that they have more contact with our online instructors than in a traditional university,” Gering said.
The easiest way for students to apply to WNU is online, but students must make sure they meet the prerequisites. The WNU academic headquarters in Cheyenne.
Attestation January 12, 2008 at 9:26 p.m.
WNU degrees are internationally attestable. What is that?
LOL January 12, 2008 at 11:44 p.m.
Thanks for posting the famously misleading KWU marketing materials, which got them investigated by the Senate in the first place.
James January 13, 2008 at 7:44 a.m.
"WNU degrees are internationally attestable. What is that?"
Not sure why they would be acceptable in a foreign country when they are not accepted in the States.
The only foreign articles I've seen on them is the Dirty Dozen Diploma Mills article.
Patrick January 13, 2008 at 2:29 p.m.
In regards to: "Thanks for posting the famously misleading KWU marketing materials, which got them investigated by the Senate in the first place."
Who is being misleading now?
KWU was not being investigated.
Government employees/employers were being investigated for paying the tuition for KW degrees, (a GAO procedure violation). The US government is not allowed to reimburse non chea accredited degrees-- also KW was a voluntary witness in those hearings.
KW was found to have done nothing illegal or unethical.
It was those cheating government employees/employers who were exclaiming how difficult the KW school was and therefore should be reimbursable for tuition.
That was when the GAO "senatorial scam" set up the bogus student "sting" and lied to the university about the students intentions. They could have defamed MIT the same way because they went in with the one express goal to hurt KW come hell or high-water.
Also, The GAO panel had no constitutional or legal authority to do what they did by lying to KW and enrolling a bogus student, (who never even finished a single program with KW). As far as the disgruntled employee testimony goes, I could go to any company in America and find disgruntled or laid off employees who bad talk their employer. Hell, I myself have been a laid off disgruntled PG&E employee and if the GAO asked me to testify, I too would have spun words to hurt them back then. Probably would today if given the chance.
Why do you think KW was still allowed to operate after the so called "Investigation"? The Senate knew they stepped over the line since our federal government has no jurisdiction over education. A simple answer is that KW did nothing wrong. Not to mention that some Senators who were on the panel have since actually been not just investigated, but convicted of various crimes. Hum?
You would do well to take a reading course.
KAKER-BEE January 13, 2008 at 4:05 p.m.
-----"Not sure why they would be acceptable in a foreign country when they are not accepted in the States."--------
Oh my! If they are not acceptable in the US, I need to tell my employer (Budweiser) to take back the 12K per year raise I just got for completing a degree there.
Thank You for informing me.
I will try to remember to do that on Monday.
Clearing up the Confusion January 13, 2008 at 4:28 p.m.
Yes, they were investigated, you can Google "Senate Hearing 108-353 "Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations, Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"
Here is why they were investigated:
"As part of the Committee's team investigating diploma mills, I enrolled an a non-accredited school and took classes. Our goal was to conduct a first-hand evaluation of the quality of education provided by an institution in this category"
"The reason, as you mentioned in your opening, Madam Chairman, the school BECAME A FOCUS OF OUR INVESTIGATION is because of the claims in its catalog..."
---They could have defamed MIT the same way because they went in with the one express goal to hurt KW come hell or high-water.---
I beg to differ. MIT would have never:
*Admitted this student to a masters program with no relevant background
*Waived most of a masters degree based on CLAIMS of training.
*Offered graduate courses that could be completed in a day.
---disgruntled employee testimony goes---
Much of it was corroborated by KW"U", such as the average of 55% life experience awards.
---Why do you think KW was still allowed to operate---
Great question. Since each State is on it's own to provide consumer protection. The individual states can only restrict the use of these degrees (about 10 do), prevent KW"U" from selling diplomas in their state (3 do), or boot them out (KW"U" is on State #4).
State-hoppers like KWU, online-onlys like Almeda, and Cayman-offshores like Rushmore just need to change a mailing address now and then.
? January 13, 2008 at 6:54 p.m.
The GAO found that 28 high-ranking officials at eight federal agencies hold diploma mill degrees and that a total of 463 students at three unaccredited schools work for the federal government. In addition, data from just two unaccredited schools—Kennedy-Western University and California Coast University—revealed nearly $170,000 in tuition payments from the federal government.
It clearly states KW as unaccredited and not a diploma mill.
And if like you say January 13, 2008 at 7:01 p.m.
KW was being investigated, what were they found guilty of. Remember, if they were found guilty there would have been some fine or punishment. There was not.
Checkmate!
Ronald January 14, 2008 at 12:05 a.m.
The Federal government has no constitutional authority to be involved in school curricula or to control jobs in the market place. This is why we will abolish the Department of Education, end federal meddling in our schools, and promote family choice at all levels of learning.
Re-Read it January 14, 2008 at 7:12 a.m.
"It clearly states KW as unaccredited and not a diploma mill."
It clearly and specifically calls Kennedy-Western a "sophisticated diplomam mill"
Er... January 14, 2008 at 7:20 a.m.
"sophisticated diploma mill"
Where? January 15, 2008 at 4:32 p.m.
"Sophisticated Diploma Mill"
http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04771t.pdf...
A Controlled-Find (word search) was conducted for the word "sophisticated" in the above URL/PDF Document. The word sophisticated is not there.
Please, I need the help to find it there!
V/r
Where? January 15, 2008 at 4:39 p.m.
A Controlled-Find (word search) was conducted for the word "sophisticated" in the below URL/PDF Document. The word sophisticated is not there.
Please, I need the help to find it here also!
V/r
Link to Kennedy-Western Senate Investigation January 15, 2008 at 5:56 p.m.
I think the previous link is just the short version.
"Senate Hearing 108-353 "Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations, Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"
The testimony is almost 200 pages long. (Warning: Big File)
So then..... January 16, 2008 at 6:28 p.m.
Does this terminology make Yale an Ultra-Super-Duper-Megga-Sophisticated-Diploma Mill?
Answer January 16, 2008 at 9:12 p.m.
Glad you asked.
Yale is actually a legitimate, accredited school.
Pure Diploma Mills give 100% of degrees for "life experience" and you can get them in weeks.
From the Senate investigation of Kennedy-Western, sophisticated diploma mills:
"take pains to try to convince prospective students that they are legitimate and that student have to earn their degrees. That is why a healthy dose of credit for work and life experience becomes such a critical component of their business model. That is what permits these more sophisticated diploma mills to assume an air of legitimacy while minimizing the actual amount of work required."
LOGIC 101 January 17, 2008 at 2:15 p.m.
It is absurd to think that employment experience can be used to get credit towards a better education.
It is even more absurd to think that educational experience can be used to get credit towards better employment.
Both are happening. I suppose that is why educators are so upset.
Death Valley of the life of the mind January 18, 2008 at 1:10 p.m.
Accreditation is something like the Death Valley of the life of the mind. It is a dusty plain, leagues below the sea level of normal human cogitation, inhabited by scorpions and sidewinders. I could tell tales of college administrators stranded in this desperate landscape and languishing after mirage oases labeled "the assessment movement" and "teaching portfolios." But that's for another time. What I am concerned with now is the invasion of the dirt-bikers.
Accreditation at its best puts quacks out of business, but it is more typically a technique used by professional interests to feather their own nests. The most egregious example is the American Bar Association, which has a stranglehold on American legal education. Many of the ABA accreditation rules have only gossamer connections to the quality of legal education, but all of them have a laser-like focus on the perquisites of being a law professor -- down to specifying the number of square feet in each faculty member's office. You can get a fair picture of the world of specialized accreditation by imagining 250 or so would-be ABAs, each carping for a finer grade of ivory in its part of the tower.
When all is said and done, however, we university administrators have a certain grudging respect for the specialized accreditors. Some know their business, and at worst they are driven by old-fashioned greed. In any case, specialized accreditors do not come close to the other great branch of academic accreditation, the regional accreditation agencies, for exemplifying lassitude, incompetence, and day-to-day bewilderment, combined with a solemn sense of rectitude and, of course, a desire to augment their authority. I realize that that description could apply rather well to several government agencies, but the regional accreditation agencies are not -- or not quite -- part of government. They are part of that shadowy world of quasi-governmental agencies which enjoy governmental authority but are largely unaccountable.
Missing the point January 18, 2008 at 3:17 p.m.
It's not the lack of accreditation that makes most people regard KWU as a diploma mill. It's the documented lack of effort required to obtain a "degree", and the absence of any independent 3rd party oversight to dispel that viewpoint.
Not KWU January 19, 2008 at 5:58 p.m.
Regarding-"It's not the lack of accreditation that makes most people regard KWU as a diploma mill. It's the documented lack of effort required to obtain a "degree", and the absence of any independent 3rd party oversight to dispel that viewpoint."
But this is a WNU Blog, No? So go to the KWU Blog (on this website) to spew your hatred.
WNU = KWU January 19, 2008 at 8:23 p.m.
Sorry, no hatred, just facts.
Robert January 19, 2008 at 10:42 p.m.
Your best bet is to approach your company's HR department before you enroll, to make sure they will finance your tuition.
The company I work for did not have an issue with Kennedy-Western, and gave me financial assistance for completing my MBA through KWU. Since the school is now seeking accreditation as WNU, I assume they would have no problem accepting a WNU degree.
Robert
Kansas City
SCAMMED January 20, 2008 at 7:30 p.m.
To Robert:
Very poor advice. Just because an unsophisticated company pays for it, that totally disregards the damage it will do to your career down the road when somebody with a clue is background checking you.
Trust me, I know.
In my experience, about 5-10% of companies don't know enough to screen out a KWU / WNU degree.
KWU will always be unacceptable. WNU application for accreditation does not mean automatic acceptance. They haven't done anything yet and have claimed accreditation efforts several times in the past.
HUH? January 21, 2008 at 5:54 p.m.
In regard to "Very poor advice. Just because an unsophisticated company pays for it, that totally disregards the damage it will do to your career down the road when somebody with a clue is background checking you.
Trust me, I know.
In my experience, about 5-10% of companies don't know enough to screen out a KWU / WNU degree."
And your reference is "Trust me I know"? You must have a government accredited degree (with logic like that).
Furthermore, per Dr. John Bear (the recognized expert in this field), no HR representatives ever say "was the university accredited when you started your studies there?"
If a degreed person is over the age of 58, it is highly unlikely that the university they attended in 1966 was accredited since few (if any) universities were accredited back then.
Warren National is seeking accreditation from the U.S. Department of Education-recognized Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools, according to the Wyoming Department of Education.
Along with Warren National, Columbia Commonwealth University in Rock Springs is seeking accreditation from the Higher Learning Commission.
Facts Suck January 21, 2008 at 6:06 p.m.
REF:((If a degreed person is over the age of 58, it is highly unlikely that the university they attended in 1966 was accredited since few (if any) universities were accredited back then.))
Wow! The average age of a CEO in the US is about 56 (*). Oh no! This would mean many of our CEOs have unaccredited degrees! God save us!
* Ref below.
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-10594805...
The Moon January 21, 2008 at 6:08 p.m.
That is right, not a single scientist or engineer that did the original computations and research to put a man on the moon had a degree from an accredited university.
Why we need accreditation January 21, 2008 at 9:13 p.m.
1. Government school is the essential force for social cohesion. It cannot happen any other way. A bureaucratized public order is our best defense against chaos and anarchy.
2. The socialization of children in groups monitored by state agents is essential; without this, children cannot learn to get along with others in a pluralistic society.
3. Children from different backgrounds and from families with different beliefs must be mixed together. Robert Frost was wrong when he maintained "good fences make good neighbors."
4. The certifiable expertise of accredited educators is superior to that of lay people including parents. The protection of students from the uncertified is a compelling public concern.
5. Coercion in the name of liberty is a valid use of federal and state power. Compelling children to assemble in mandated groups for mandated intervals with mandated texts and overseers does not interfere with academic learning.
6. Students will inevitably grow apart from their morals and core beliefs as they grow older and this process must be supported and encouraged. The best way to do this is by diluting moral influence and discouraging the students attitudes that their own parents are sovereign in either mind or morality.
7. The world is full of crazy parents who will ruin their off-spring. An overriding concern of University is to protect students from bad parenting.
8. It is not appropriate for any family to unduly concern itself with it's own education, but it may expend unlimited money, resources, time and effort on behalf of the general education of everyone else(especially blacks and minorities).
9. The Federal and State government has the predominant responsibility for training, morals, and beliefs. Students schooled outside government scrutiny frequently become anti-social and poverty stricken murderers, psychopaths, rapists and perverts.
LoL January 21, 2008 at 10:50 p.m.
For WNU / KWU grads:
Dishonesty is the best policy.
Rationalization is key.
Chemist January 22, 2008 at 8:07 a.m.
>>>>>>>>If a degreed person is over the age of 58, it is highly unlikely that the university they attended in 1966 was accredited since few (if any) universities were accredited back then.<<<<<<<
Not so. I got my degree in 1967 and accreditation was in wide use back then and had been for some time.
Nay, Nay Moose Breath January 22, 2008 at 6:30 p.m.
Regarding [(Not so. I got my degree in 1967 and accreditation was in wide use back then and had been for some time.)]
It was 1965 when the Higher Education Act. was signed into law. This was when the Federal Government (Sec. of Ed) began recognizing accreditation organizations. There was at least a few years lag time for the audits to take place for the recognition.
Now then, you might make the argument that it was still accreditation even though not recognized by Dept. of Ed. ie Almeda.
Then you are in my web. I am the black widow!
Checkmate!
Tammy.gov January 22, 2008 at 6:52 p.m.
"It was 1965 when the Higher Education Act. was signed into law. This was when the Federal Government (Sec. of Ed) began recognizing accreditation organizations. There was at least a few years lag time for the audits to take place for the recognition."
Not that it matters a whole lot because only a small number of colleges were participants (< 1%)in the 1952 GI bill selected schools. The federal government would only reimburse war vets for tuition if they attended certain colleges. I worked for the VA back then, and there were about 7 colleges (out of several hundred) on the list. Also, it was not called accreditation back then. It was called VA recognized institutions of higher learning for purposes of government funded tuition assistance. The commisioner of education (my boss) kept the handwritten list in his desk drawer.
re: Why we need accreditation January 30, 2008 at 2:05 a.m.
All great points!
Especially if you are a firm believer of Communism and the Politburo! Or the Democratic party of today
All hail Mark and Stalin the murdurers!
W.O.W Player February 1, 2008 at 4:53 p.m.
Has anyone ever had their loan from Sallie Mae waved for attending WNU aka KWU since the school is (as some say)a "Diploma Mill"?
Just wondering :)
Help! February 1, 2008 at 6:47 p.m.
Do I take the $75/hour ST/OT job in North Carolina or the $65/hour+OT @ 1.5x job in South Carolina?
WNU Degree is paying off BIGTIME!
Help! February 4, 2008 at 1:01 p.m.
Do I take the McDonalds job (fries) or Taco Bell job (more hours) after I purchase a WNU degree?
VALID February 7, 2008 at 11:15 p.m.
I love to read comments where there is no investigation completed! Here are a couple to keep in mind: OLIN University started out as a FREE, yes FREE, no tuition required engineering school which graduated its first classes WITHOUT accredidation. It is now placed on a level equal to Harvard. Bob Jones University is another school respected nationally.....they are not accredited! It is all about ego on this thread. Maybe some of the complainers are simply jealous that they (or most likely MOM and DAD) paid too much for their education!
They Stole my Money! February 8, 2008 at 1:26 p.m.
Please please please do not enroll at Warren National University. I had terrible experience right from day one from the enrollment until I started the first course. I gave benefit of doubt when I had sour experience with their student counselor.
I decided to withdraw in the first four weeks and sent a request to reimburse 50% of the fee I paid. They said they will send response in 2 weeks. I made several follow ups and now it is almost 5 months and there is no response. I don't know how to get my money back.
Their admin, faculty, supervisor are not professional. I am very disappointed with their response. The reason I wanted to withdraw was that they had their previous university KWU information on student’s portal. Most of the information they had on the students section were outdated and not relevant to the course I selected. It did not motivate me to continue further.
It is not a professional setting. We are burning our money. There are quite a few other universities out there with high quality student service and curriculum structure at less price compared to Warren. Please do good homework before you sign up. Don't repent after the fact like me - I lost $3000.
I could care less about how good a school WNU is February 9, 2008 at 3:38 p.m.
I make a hell of a lot more money now. Have worked for the so called "Illegal States" (never been arrested).
As the unaccredited schools catch on, there will be more people running around with so called "sub-standard degrees" than the so called "accredited degrees". People are growing more unhappy with government run schools than ever before. The majority will rule, and due to entropy (and path of least resistance) people will gravitate to the easiest route. I admit, I took an easier route, and it is paying off!
LOL February 10, 2008 at 1:20 a.m.
LOL, a nameless individual working for a nameless company, with an unprovable "success story" with his "life-experience" degree. Even if it was true, defrauding your employer can only last so long as Gene Morrison learned this week...
Court expert 'was bogus scientist who bought PhD on internet'
WNU Rockz February 10, 2008 at 2:24 a.m.
Yo, I didn't learn nuthin during the 2 weeks I wuz in WNU, but now I'm makin phat loot.
LMAO February 13, 2008 at 5:36 p.m.
Yes, from the way you write I can see you learned nothing and I hardly believe you are making the loot you claim >.>
Valid February 15, 2008 at 6:19 a.m.
Is WNU degree valid to use in NC or SC?
MSBE grad February 15, 2008 at 6:20 a.m.
Yes they are not accreted… so long as you and your employer are ok whit that then have at. Let it be known I took 2 years and had to write a 110 page paper to get my un-accreted slip of paper. Yes there were 2 classes that I did not need to read the book, I took the practice test got a 98% and said why bother. Some classes took me days some took me many months to get through. I say to you so what, at the time it was the only way I could get a degree (un-accreted) as I was traveling around the world for Motorola as a field service engineer making ½ of what the others made that I worked with. I took first 2 years at UOP university of Phoenix but because I could not always log on at least 5 days a week (to read and post email…. As if that means I was learning) I had to stop attending UOP. After a two year brake I found Kennedy-Western University. I have completed school and yes some places tell me that it is a diploma mill and will not take the degree and some don’t ask and some don’t care. I work now as a SR Mechanical Engineer (and I am a fine one at that) for a small Co. I work there because the last 5 degreed BSME (accredited ones) sucked and cost tons of money. It has been 2 years now and I just got my 2nd 14% pay correction, I say correction as I had to start at a lower amount because of my non-accredited degree. When I see a please that states you must have a BS or BA but preferred a MS or MA well its all just BS to me and I know it’s some HR flunky having a thought (ok reading someone else’s thoughts and saying it’s so. So if you need an accredited degree then go get one. If you need a piece of paper that makes people think you are good to go then buy one, but if you just need to know what to read and someone to test you and help you understand something then Give it a try, but know that there are people that will bash you for it. If that bashing by other for some perception they have over something that truly don’t know will bug you then move on, oh and don’t live in the south as people may think you are a red neck, don’t live in LA as people will think you are vain, don’t live in the Midwest as people may think you are plane, well you smart people get my point. I will say am I as smart as someone out of MIT… no I am not but I don’t tell people that I am. Oh and you can take MIT class over the web for free (I have completed 12 and did very well) but that will not help me when some HR person sees that I do not have an accreted degree now will it even thou I have taken more school and much harder classes (sorry HR people DefEQ is harder than businesses law ((I know as I took both)).
sorry thats BSME February 15, 2008 at 6:22 a.m.
No chip on my shoulder or accreted degree on my wall. Now to express my other view. There should be a governmental agency that issues Lic for the right to provide education… it should not be decided by an organization paid by the people that it is grading… or am I the only one to see fault in this. Also please read the rules and standards for accreditation before you say it’s the end-all that you think it is.
WNU is 100% Valid February 15, 2008 at 12:23 p.m.
In all 50 states, as no prosecutor has fined or punished anyone yet in the three or four so called "illegal states". They will however try to intimidate state employees into removing credentials.
US Constitution February 15, 2008 at 12:47 p.m.
Allows advertising your WNU degree anywhere.
God help the first state prosecutor that is stupid enough to try to prosecute someone for free speach. The test will eventually come. The state will lose.
Diploma Mill News Features another KWU "grad" February 15, 2008 at 3:53 p.m.
http://www.diplomamillnews.blogspot.com/...
Educator: Deborah Schadler.
School: Gwynedd-Mercy College in Lower Gwynedd Township, where she is facilitator of the school of education's new Autism Institute
LOL February 15, 2008 at 3:56 p.m.
"prosecute someone for free speach."
Academic fraud is now free "speach"????
It depends. If I tell my cat that I am a Dr. based on my so-called PhD from KWU/WNU, no harm no foul.
But if I try to pass it off on an employer or someone else who relies on it? I don't think so.
AND February 15, 2008 at 9:04 p.m.
Diploma mill news is reputable?
Give me a break, My 8 year old could steal some Hyper Text Markup Language and start a bogus blog that looks better than that sham. WTF!
Again February 15, 2008 at 9:06 p.m.
Point to a prosecution.
There is an old Navy Fighter Pilots saying February 15, 2008 at 9:30 p.m.
You know you are right on target when you are catching flack.
WNU is catching plenty flack.
If you are jealous of WNU students making more money than you, just say so. It is ok to be jealous. I got 3 degrees for the price of one. My resume looks better than yours and no one cares about accreditation in the private sector.
Go hump yourself!
bb February 15, 2008 at 9:46 p.m.
Ok, so I earned a WNU BS in Safety Engineering, then I could not believe it. Just days after I put the credential on my resume men in black suits showed up at my door. They placed me under arrest and read me my Miranda. They blindfolded me and took me to a secret place where I found out is used only for interrogating WNU students. They torture you first by waterboarding you. Then they play this recording over and over, something about senate GAO, senate GAO over and over again.
There was another WNU student in the room with me. She finally screams out "What do you want from me?". The recording stopped. A voice said "Compliance. We want you to fall in line with the way it has always been done. We distort and you comply." She asked in horror, "Who are you?" The voice replied "Big Brother".
Another old saying February 15, 2008 at 11:40 p.m.
Q: What do you a call a person with a KWU bachelors, master's and doctorate?
A: A high school graduate.
Lol February 16, 2008 at 5:44 a.m.
"I got 3 degrees for the price of one"
When was the "Buy 1, Get 2 Free" Sale?
&%^$#@ February 16, 2008 at 1:38 p.m.
"No one cares about accedidation in the private sector"
Please tell me what company you are working for so I can sell their stock short...LOL
LOL - Piercetp February 18, 2008 at 4:31 a.m.
Some chump named Piercetp3840 is trying to pump up this dump by writing multiple reviews...
Warren National Is Pretty Good
By: Piercetp3840 (Graduate) on February 15, 2008
Warren National is a the real deal
By: Piercetp3840 (Graduate) on August 17, 2007
Robert February 21, 2008 at 2:15 a.m.
As an executive with over 100 employees working for me, i would never hire a KW/WNU grad.
I interviewed one once, and found him to be quite deceptive. Easy degrees draw people who are seeking the 'easy way out' which are just the people I don't want to hire.....
yea right February 22, 2008 at 6:47 p.m.
"Robert"
Looking at your hypertext unique protocol identifier, it is clear to see you are not an executive at all. Your name is not even Robert.
DQ February 23, 2008 at 8:26 p.m.
I am thinking about attending Virginia College Online does anyone know about this school. All of my research as been positive about the school. I want to get an associates degree in criminal justice and business administration and I cannot attend a on-site campus do to truck driving and being gone 3 weeks out of the month.
! February 24, 2008 at 1:50 p.m.
DQ
Save money, effort and time...... go to WNU.
WNU Graduated Student February 25, 2008 at 2:37 a.m.
This is all quite interesting - My experience at WNU was rather good. I completed the Doctoral Program in Computer Science and many of the courses were instructed by faculty from Univ of Penn, Georgia Tech, FSU, etc. No, WNU does not hold your hand but if you're looking to expand your knowledge base and add a post-graduate degree, it's a good way to go. Like all things in life, you get out what you put in.
WNU Graduated Student February 25, 2008 at 2:44 a.m.
One last piece to add for 'Robert', the executive. Your gross generalization based upon a single interview certainly proves you're a true modern day thinker. Is this the same policy your 100 employee wonder applies to women and minorities? Perhaps you can parlay you're awesome skill set to a worthy corporation like Worldcom, Adelphia or Tyco.
LOL - Piercetp February 27, 2008 at 4:28 a.m.
"Some chump named Piercetp3840 is trying to pump up this dump by writing multiple reviews...
Warren National Is Pretty Good
By: Piercetp3840 (Graduate) on February 15, 2008
Warren National is a the real deal
By: Piercetp3840 (Graduate) on August 17, 2007"
Is anyone really surprised that a KWU so-called "graduate" would do something misleading or unethical?
Wondering March 15, 2008 at 1:06 p.m.
With the latest Boston Globe report that 2/3 accredited university students are cheating, does it matter where they attend?
Potential Student March 17, 2008 at 12:50 a.m.
Does anyone know what accredidation they have applied for? Will they receive the accreditation by end of 2008?
Robbed Like Many Others March 18, 2008 at 5:45 p.m.
Presently there are THOUSANDS of WNU "students" out there who believe that they were misled by this outfit - A successful Class Action against WNU is inevitable and along with that will be the collapse of their attempt at becoming accredited followed by the collapse of their "business".
Jack March 20, 2008 at 6:52 a.m.
Kennedy-Western was a wonderful experience. I met great people that lead to good opportunities down the road. The faculty at KWU were helpful and thoughtful about student needs. If you couldn't get something in on time they let you have until the very last second to turn it in. They treat you like adults, not babysitting kids. You get what you put into it. Don't expect to be babied at KWU. The renamed WNU is undergoing NCA accreditation and will soon put all the naysayers to rest. I got a good IS management job and have 28 people under me and just broke a six figure income. Life is good and it's all thanks to KWU! Thanks Warren National.. I could do without the name changes though!
Look elsewhere March 20, 2008 at 12:24 p.m.
"Does anyone know what accredidation they have applied for? Will they receive the accreditation by end of 2008?"
They have claimed accreditation from a bogus accreditor in the past.
They have also publicly announced they were going to pursue accreditation and then retracted that statement and moved states.
This time, they actually filled out an application, but it's unknown what their real intention is.
What's your major? There are dozens of legitimate schools out there offering your major where you won't have to wonder if your degree will be accepted.
Jack March 20, 2008 at 1:09 p.m.
@Elsewhere
They have applied for NCA RA accreditation... that is REAL accreditation from CHEA!
I have the MIS and it has given me a great job making a ton of money and responsibility over dozens. I am quite happy with the acceptance of KWU in my career.
Hey March 20, 2008 at 2:31 p.m.
To ".Wwondering".
Hey jackass, it was the Boston Herald and not the Boston Globe. And the number was 64% not 2/3!
Easy Degrees March 20, 2008 at 3:07 p.m.
KWU will never be legitimate and never received any type of accreditation. Their 60% "life experience" credit waives and 1 open book exam = 1 "course" techniques are well documented. They are all just time bombs waiting to be discovered.
There is some hope for WNU students who graduate in about 2011 or later. WNU claims to be making an attempt at accreditation and I hope they succeed. Until then look elsewhere, it's not necessary to take the risk when other schools can offer qualified programs right now.
Links? March 20, 2008 at 3:11 p.m.
Please post a link to
A) The Boston article
B) Any company that says "we'll glady accept unaccredited degrees for management positions"
Thanks
victort March 20, 2008 at 10:18 p.m.
Actually, the number of cheating university students could be as high as 84%
http://www.millersville.edu/~jccomp/acad...
No, the Boston one March 20, 2008 at 11:21 p.m.
That study is from 1963 and 1993.
Jack March 21, 2008 at 6:03 a.m.
@Easy Degrees
Ashford is regionally accredited and they give 75 credit hours of Life Experience too. Looks like they will make accreditation after all. :)
Easy Degrees March 21, 2008 at 1:16 p.m.
LOL, really? Ashford gives every student 75 free credits on the spot with no required documentation like KWU? Please post a link, I would love to read about that. But like all KWU claims, I suspect it is not true.
Here is what KWU had to say about themselves:
“We were told that EVERY student in the Master’s program is awarded between 33 and 60 percent credit toward a degree for their experience. In fact, documents produced by Kennedy-Western indicated that nearly half of all students in the Master’s program have received more than 55 percent credit for their experience”.
victort March 21, 2008 at 1:30 p.m.
To: No, the Boston one
I did not place the Boston correction.
Hey dipstick, if it progressivly got worse from 1963 thru 1993 a simple extrapolation would demonstrate that today students at accredited universities cheat about 110% of the time!
There are more cheaters today than 15 years ago. More minorities, women, blacks and other "affirmative action" human debris are in the system now.
Easy Degrees March 21, 2008 at 2:14 p.m.
I like simple extraploations too!
From the Senate Hearing on Diploma mills:
"Kennedy-Western immediately waived 43% of the Engineering master's degree requirements, based on her JOURNALISM degree and some random seminars attended. She even notes that "they asked for no proof or documenation" and "As a note, I have no formal engineering training"."
"Then of the remaining 5 classes left for a Master's degree, the student knocked off 2 of the 5 classes in a grand total of 16 hours and said that each "course" was an open-book exam where she had to pick terms out of the glossary."
So, a Master's degree from Kennedy Western can be earned in a total of 40 hours of effort. Take a week off of work and get one now!
Anyone? March 22, 2008 at 1:36 p.m.
Please post a link to
A) The Boston Globe article
B) Any company that says "we'll glady accept unaccredited degrees for management positions"
C) Where Ashford University gives 75 free credits to all students without any verification, KWU-style.
Thanks
Jack March 23, 2008 at 4:43 p.m.
Warren requires documentation of PLA the same as Ashford. From WNU website...
"Non-collegiate learning may be considered for transfer IF such work is documented and submitted by means of the portfolio. By definition, the portfolio is a concise and explicit document that clearly identifies non-collegiate learning that merits academic credit.
Ashford awards PLA by handing in a PP accompanied by a letter on corporate stationary. If Ashford, with RA accreditation, can take it then WNU will get RA too.
Jack March 23, 2008 at 4:57 p.m.
Someone in the Ashford thread pointed it out here.
http://www.ashford.edu/online/forms/PLAG...
Write a letter on corporate stationary and include some bogus workshop agenda that you never went to and you can get credit. At Ashford you can get 75 credit hours from PLA and transfer up to 99. This school is RA, WNU is soon to follow!
Jack March 23, 2008 at 4:58 p.m.
There have been court cases specifically rejecting the notion you can't put unaccredited degrees on your resume. In Oregon, their law was overturned and it was found you can put it down.
http://www.bizjournals.com/portland/stor...
If the company you apply for values your experience they will take you. Experience and performance are ten times more important than where you received your degree. That is how I and most people get our management jobs. It must irk you how we KWU grads can get these jobs with our unaccredited degrees and you can't! LOL!!
Famous "alumni" March 23, 2008 at 11:04 p.m.
Any company that says "we'll glady accept unaccredited degrees for management positions" - There are none, that is why nobody can post one and keeps their supposed employers hidden. It's a 30-second background check to see if someone has a legitimate college degree.
If you manage to sneak into a company, congrats, you may shortly make the newspaper, like all of these recent articles on Kennedy-Western University and their degree purchasers.
***"Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense."
***"Diploma Mills are Easily Created and Some Have Issued Bogus Degrees to Federal Employees at Government Expense."
***"Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations: Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"
***"It May Take Hours, But You Too Can Earn a University Degree"
***"When Elected Officials Aren't What They Seem
Texas officials and Pennsylvania cats tout misleading credentials"
***“Real officials, bogus degrees, Fake degrees a growing Texas problem”
***"A dirty dozen - 12 famous diploma mills."
***“Are Fraudulent Academic Degrees Making a Mark on Engineering?”
***“Fighting Fakery - Diploma mills continue to churn out new "graduates" every day. What should legitimate colleges do about them? Is government action called for?”
***“Two less doctors in the house - Hebert, Wilson back away from Ph.D.'s issued by 'diploma mills'”
***“CBS 42 Investigates: Professors' questionable credentials”
***"PS Your PhD may be BS"
Jack March 23, 2008 at 11:49 p.m.
Read the settlement article...
"Oregon officials are also obligated under the settlement agreement to refrain from characterizing KWU as a "diploma mill."
... it is against the law to call it a diploma mill.
Illegal in Oregon without this... March 23, 2008 at 11:52 p.m.
Make sure to have your "my degree is crap" disclaimer on your resume...
"In addition, an individual using an unaccredited degree, even if the employer allows use of such degrees, must disclose on resumes, letterheads, business cards, announcements and advertisements that "(Name of school) does not have accreditation recognized by the United States Department of Education and has not been approved by the Office of Degree Authorization." ORS 348.609(2)(a). The only exception is for schools approved by ODA. See ORS 348.609(d) and OAR 583-050-0014."
It is a Class B Misdemeanor under the Oregon Criminal Code to use a degree in violation of ORS 348.609.
Jack March 24, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.
Your link is dead... they must have taken it down. Awwwhh
Thanks, they moved their diploma mill page March 24, 2008 at 12:29 p.m.
It's only a misdemeanor, but I am sure Kennedy-Western sends out frequent notifications regarding the restrictions and dangers of using these "degrees".
your welcome March 24, 2008 at 4:11 p.m.
They don't because they don't have to. No one has ever enforced it, another blue law that will soon be forgotten in backwater USA. It is against the law for Oregon officials to call WNU a diploma mill so that is not the page. It is the unaccredited page... not the diploma mill page. You don't even know the difference. LOL!
How do you tell? March 24, 2008 at 8:27 p.m.
Unaccredited / Diploma Mill, what's the difference?
Rochville, Belford, Warren National are all unaccredited. Why not go the cheaper route with Rochville?
Jack March 25, 2008 at 12:59 a.m.
Warren is accredited by the Wyoming DOE. Diploma mills are not.
Rochville same as Warren March 25, 2008 at 3:15 a.m.
"Rochville University is a fully accredited University recognized by Board of Online Universities Accreditation (BOUA)"
http://www.rochvilleuniversity.org/
LOL, Warren National is not accredited, it has a state business license, similar to the ones issued to beauty shops and tattoo parlors. It has no academic meaning, but their telemarketers will make a big deal about it to the naive.
Jack March 25, 2008 at 6:50 a.m.
Your argument is so lame! You can't compare the Wyoming DOE with a bogus accrediting agency. They don't pass out school liscences like beauty shops. LOL!
Scammed March 25, 2008 at 12:12 p.m.
I found out the hard way that KWU is total garbage when tried to upgrade one of my professional engineering certifications and was turned down
Anyone that attends this university is naive or dishonest.
I was naive, which are you?
Jack March 25, 2008 at 11:25 p.m.
Then your just going to have to work longer before your experience will apply. All degrees without professional accreditation are at the discretion of the certificate agency. You should have checked with them earlier... you can't blame anyone for your laziness but you.
Again March 26, 2008 at 12:05 a.m.
Show me a conviction for using an unaccredited degree. You can not! It has never happened and never will.
Go fish!
Prof A March 26, 2008 at 12:06 a.m.
"Warren is accredited by the Wyoming DOE"
I am speechless...
I deduct 20 Life Experience credits and order you to read up on accreditation. States are not accreditors in the slightest.
Jack March 26, 2008 at 12:48 a.m.
Wyoming recognizes WNU and her degrees meaning they accredit it.
accredit
• verb (accredited, accrediting) 1 (accredit to) attribute (something) to (someone). 2 give authorization to
Perhaps you should read a dictionary.
Prof A March 26, 2008 at 2:05 a.m.
Unfortunately, there is a complicated thing called context.
In US higher ed, it specifically means an accrediting agency recognized by the US Dept. of Education.
State licenses are that, a license to operate in the state. In Wyoming, I think the only 2 requiremenst are a cash deposit and that listed faculty must have accredited (Non-KWU / WNU) degrees.
Wyoming recently tightened up their laws, like the last 3 states to boot KWU (California, Hawaii, Oregon).
Since you are struggling for terminology, WNU is probably best described as an Unaccredited, Wyoming-licensed business.
Jack March 26, 2008 at 2:28 a.m.
I said it was "licensed"... read the thread before you make inane comments.
Doesn't know Jack March 26, 2008 at 2:58 a.m.
Jack March 26, 2008 at 12:48 a.m.
Wyoming recognizes WNU and her degrees meaning they accredit it.
Doesn't know Jack March 26, 2008 at 2:59 a.m.
"Jack March 25, 2008 at 12:59 a.m.
Warren is accredited by the Wyoming DOE. Diploma mills are not."
Jack March 26, 2008 at 4:23 a.m.
Jack March 25, 2008 at 6:50 a.m
"They don't pass out school liscences like beauty shops."
I told you to read the thread... apparently you have an omission problem.
Scammed March 26, 2008 at 12:16 p.m.
Well Jack, you are right in their target demographic with your repeated insistence that Wyoming DOE = Accreditation. Put that right on your resumer.
Good luck trying to use it though.
Scammed March 26, 2008 at 12:28 p.m.
Well Jack, in your defense, they do sell their state license aggressively, so you're not the only one to think that.
"Jack March 25, 2008 at 12:59 a.m.
Warren is accredited by the Wyoming DOE. Diploma mills are not."
Jack March 26, 2008 at 4:20 p.m.
I'm sorry it didn't work out for you. No degree is guaranteed to give someone their desired job. It all comes down to what you do with it that makes it valuable. Since I am a go getter mine has taken me to my goals and beyond. Those that didn't take the effort to gain experience first are the ones who are suffering. It is the same for grads from traditional schools as well.
Congrats Jack March 27, 2008 at 2:48 a.m.
It is still possible to get a decent job without a formal education.
curious March 27, 2008 at 3:41 a.m.
Question:
Why do individuals who never attended KWU/WNU bash the school so much?
If they never attended, and did not fall for the so-called "scam", and the actual degrees are in fact completely worthless, then what more is there to say really?
For those who did not attend a dubious school and did not graduate with an unaccredited degree, but rather attended a "normal school" with a legitimate qualification, then this should be none of their concern.
If all the negative remarks being said, been said about KWU/WNU were to hold merit, then I would imagine all those graduates of KW/WNU would be dismissed from their jobs for having a "Fake" degree, whenever applying for promotions or different positions within their organizations, or simply when they apply for jobs with different companies altogether. In theory, would they not all get turned down?
People who completed their KWU degrees and applied internally for a higher position, after the education verification and background checks, would get terminated for lying on the new resumes would they not?
I could understand an alumni getting concerned about all the talk, and getting afraid that maybe the "herd" is right, the university is just trying once "again" to dodge the accreditation issue by moving states, making an application to the Higher Learning Commision, in order to buy time, etc, etc.
Imagine the one who went on to a "real" MBA program after having completed their KWU degree, how must that person feel while wondering that the school might get wiped off the face of the map?
Do the posters on these types of blogs understand that some very prestigious MBA programs will accept applicants who have extensive experience, certifications, and skills, despite a lack of an undergraduate degree? That basically means, having a degree from unaccredited institution such as WNU will not necessarily keep an aspiring student out of a regionally accredited graduate program, or any world-renowned university‘s graduate degree program. (read on for specific examples)
Continued
Curious March 27, 2008 at 3:43 a.m.
Continued:
The KWU and WNU degree programs were intended for mature adults who had years of experience in their jobs. A Degree completion program was its true purpose. The bachelor degrees from WNU/WNU are not out of the ordinary:
If we examine, say American Intercontinental University (online school) - regionally accredited without any tarnishes on their reputation, we can easily take note, that they are a degree completion school.
If one browses through the AIU website, it seems clear that the school does not offer much, if at all, any general education offerings of any sort. Just core courses, meaning that the student is expected to have earned 45 credits at a previous institution when applying for the associate degree program, and 90 credits earned elsewhere when applying for the bachelors degree programs.
KWU used to require, and WNU still requires one to have at least 60 credits from previous institutions, and/or have an experiential portfolio submitted, in order to determine the applicability of professional certifications, training, experience, etc to determine eligibility toward the required 60 credits.
Should the student have less than 60 general education credits earned elsewhere, they were ALL required to take two separate general education exams in addition to all previous coursework towards admission. What exactly is wrong with having a standard, which requires a student to PROVE their competency in a subject?
Western Governors University is triple accredited, regional, DETC, + and has the accreditation required of teachers and aspiring educators. WGU does not offer a SINGLE course, at least not in the traditional sense.
It is COMPETENCY based, meaning, there are subjects to enroll in, and they come with suggested readings. Then the student must show competency before a live proctor in writing, demonstrate their knowledge of the subject.
George W. Bush himself served on the board of governors of WGU, while he was the governor of Texas. 19 US governors promote that (WGU) particular school. Yet this school is widely accepted by academia, despite not having any traditional course offerings whatsoever. So why would WNU not have a chance at regional accreditation?
In fact should WNU abandon its DBA offering, then the DETC accreditation would be very easily obtained.
Almost all regionally accredited and respected universities, such as NYU give credit for professional licensing and certifications (very little, but some).
Continued
Curious March 27, 2008 at 3:45 a.m.
Certain DETC accredited schools give up to 25% credit towards general education requirements for life experience credit and limits the percentage of credit that can be waived toward core courses. This is an accepted practice among accredited institutions.
The ACE recommends college credit for non-collegiate activities, and also reviews college programs for applicability of courses for transfer credits - for use by college admissions staff when evaluating transcripts from other schools. To my recollection, the ACE used to publish a kind of "resale value book" for college courses. Like a used car's book value.
As for having to take ONE, open-book final exam - almost all accredited distance/online education programs operate in this manner.
Has anyone, in all of their lives in learning, ever taken an open-book, grand-final exam? In say finance, or something advanced? "Open-book" will not always help you get the answers, at least not fast enough to complete an exam in the allotted time.
In addition, usually the questions require an understanding of the learning concept in the actual textbook to formulate a correct answer to a question in an open-book exam. That is why open-book exams exist in the first place. Do you recall that the hardest subjects you ever took in school; usually were open-book exams? If you do not recollect such instances, then perhaps you were never enrolled in advanced subjects.
Just because a formula is in the book, does not mean that the student will: a. know what the formula means, b. know how to apply it towards a required answer on an exam.
Ever hear of CLEP exams? College students study the CLEP books and take the CLEP exams to get waivers on college courses to speed up the graduation process, or to save money on tuition. All regionally accredited universities accept this form of course completion. Therefore attempting to point negativity on WNU for its course-completion via-grand-final-examination process deserves little merit, if any at all.
Curious March 27, 2008 at 3:47 a.m.
Continued:
Another example:
Thunderbird, Garvin School of business openly states in their publication that their admissions board may consider a highly skilled, experienced applicant who may not have obtained a bachelors degree, for admission into their MBA program. Their #1 ranked international business MBA program! (High GMAT scores are expected at this particular graduate school, since it is top ranked)
There are respected universities in the U.K. who do not opt for "3rd party accreditation". Just start an internet search for some of the most famous universities in the world, and one will find that most of the undergraduate programs do not have a standard accreditation system or governing body.
Only when we get into graduate degrees, then there are AMBA, Equis, AACSB, ACBSP, etc type of internationally recognized accreditations.
The UK's Quality Assurance system overseas every university in the UK,(Oxford U anyone?) and it is NOT "Accreditation" in the sense of the US Regional system.
If a graduate of Oxford University's undergraduate degree program put that degree on the resume, and applied for job in the U.S., now days due to all this misnomers and confusion, and public misconception, a background verifier for a hiring client company might mistake this as UNACREDITED. Fact of the matter is, technically that would not be far from the truth.
The US accrediting regional bodies themselves are companies and not government agencies. In the U.S., CHEA and DOE are government agencies who choose to recognize certain accrediting bodies (companies), and have no authority over any of them.
Continued
Curious March 27, 2008 at 3:50 a.m.
Continued:
Key points:
Negative views of WNU/KWU which I attempted to de-bunk:
1. Curriculum and degrees earned by examination are sub-standard*
*Rebuttal: We examined the idea that just about all degrees in regionally accredited colleges and universities are earned by examination. How else would a student pass a class?
2. Accepting credits for non-college coursework is unacceptable practice*
*Rebuttal: CLEP exams and ACE are used by ALL regionally accepted schools.
3. KWU/WNU degrees will not be accepted by any employer*
*Rebuttal: I personally worked for one of the worlds oldest and recently in the news as being one of the most prominent financial institutions, and they accepted this degree. I moved on to a competitor, and the new hiring company conducted an extensive background check - criminal records investigation, credential verification and degree verification, I had no issues.
4. Graduates of KWU/WNU will never be able to transfer credits to any regionally accredited university.
(Somewhat true, yet misleading) Since it is not uncommon for a graduates of KWU/WNU have associates degrees and extensive undergraduate credits from regionally accredited institutions, as well as a min. 5 years of professional experience in the field of the major, to have been ADMITTED into the KW/WNU program to begin with, one can imagine that not all regionally accredited graduate schools will not all frown on this. Plenty of schools will take students who are just shy of certain requirements, provided that there are certain stipulations which need to be addressed.
Curious March 27, 2008 at 3:50 a.m.
Continued:
For example: Story of a student pursuing a Ph.D in business, without first having completed a DBA. A respected university, should they wish to admit such a person, may require that the student take a few DBA courses prior to taking courses in the university's PhD level program, etc, etc.
Based on this, from personal experience, and from reading plenty of entries by posters, I would like to believe that many of KWU graduates have gone on to regionally accredited master's programs. I will admit, that most likely not many of us would like to boast about being an alumni (due to all of the negativity). Few might have wanted to disclose where they attend now, or where we work now. Unless it is Harvard we are currently attending, it could potentialy make our current school appear "substandard" in message forums.
If you are a former student, and did not enjoy the experience, feel free to express them. One the other hand,
If you have never attended the school and do not plan on ever attending, then do not bother knocking it, since you should have NO compelling reason to criticize something which:
1. Has nothing to do with you/does not affect you in any way
2. Is so flawed anyways (WNU?), that it is bound to fail.
If WNU is bound to fail, time will surely tell. Until then, just simply go on with your own life, enjoy your very own regionally accredited degree, and high-profile job, and maybe try pursuing a higher degree or advanced qualification.
Best regards,
A KWU graduate
Jack March 27, 2008 at 4:19 a.m.
@congrats... you need a degree for just about everything these days.
@curious... I agree with you but learn some brevity man!
Former Student Disagrees March 27, 2008 at 4:56 a.m.
Thanks for your opinions, they are much appreciated. From my experiences, I disagree.
1. Curriculum and degrees earned by examination are sub-standard*
"How else would a student pass a class?" KWU was shown in the diploma mill hearings to have 1 open book exam as the ENTIRE COURSE CONTENT, not as a course-end capstone to evaluate compentency after course readings, writings, and discussions.
2. Accepting credits for non-college coursework is unacceptable practice*
"CLEP exams and ACE are used by ALL regionally accepted schools." Depends. True, CLEP exams show proficiency in entry level courses that are specifically mapped to course content. Passing the exam is taken as proficiency in the related course. Reasonable, controlled, and standardized.
This is entirely different than what KWU testified to. No proficiency was required, no exam was taken to show proficiency, no documentation of any type was required to gain "life experience", on average of 50% of a Master's degree.
3. KWU/WNU degrees will not be accepted by any employer*
I have never seen any employer who openly states they will accept them, can you name one? On the other hand, there are routinely articles about people from KWU / Almeda, etc who are in hot water over these "degrees". I think there are unsophisticated companies (very large and small) that just have antiquated screening procedures.
4. Graduates of KWU/WNU will never be able to transfer credits to any regionally accredited university.
The regionally accredited credits and 5 years of work experience that you cite are helpful to any student in transfer. Unaccredited credits aren't.
All my comments refer to Kennedy Western. I'm optimistic that WNU will turn out o, but Warren National has KWU as it's baggage until it is able to set itself apart.
Curious March 27, 2008 at 5:49 a.m.
I appreciate your comments as well, as they are very well thought out.
I would like to elaborate on your points,
1. Curriculum and degrees earned by examination:
The University of London, the world's very first distance education provider, and a collective of some of the world's finest and highest ranked universities (LSE, Imperial College Tanaka school of business, etc) has an external programme, which tests students once per year: ONE written exam per course, for the ENITRE COURSE CONTENT.
This(University of London) is one of the highest recognized degrees Programs in the world, with alumni which includes numerous heads of state and Nobel prize winners. The 100 year old distance format consists of one extensive final exam for each course. (Not to imply that the heads of state and Nobel prize winners were students of the external program)
2. On showing proficiency, KWU administered the General Education Requirement Exam for Math and English, and are evident on student transcripts. That is a proficiency exam. As well as requiring an Information Literacy Capstone course which tests the student reading ability. Further, as part of a student's acceptance into KWU, one had to submit a PECA - Portfolio of Experiential Credit Assessment, and it had a certification page which required that students attest they had provided true evidence of prior credentials on the paperwork listing all coursework completed and transcripts if any were provided. However, as the U.S. Senate Hearing Testimony would indicate, the women who enrolled for the course din not feel that she was asked to provide evidence of her credentials, however by signing the PECA, she swore to KWU that she told them the truth about her academic credentials - in her own handwriting. AND SHE LIED! She already had a degree in the subject matter. She took two tests and felt that the class was too easy. 2nd year high school seniors report that it is easier the second time around, even if they had failed the first time. We had an instance of the person who did not fail the first time, she already had a degree and was "repeating" the same course at KWU. In her testimony, she effectively swore before the senate, that she in fact lied to KWU.
Curious March 27, 2008 at 5:49 a.m.
Brevity, here I come:
3. Acceptance of degree - I have never seen any employer who states they will specifically not accept it. KWU/WNU has an attestation service for the degree certificates, intended for international students presenting their degrees abroad, however the US Department of Education will place their Stamp+Seal,that the degree is valid. For all legal purposes, under the Wyoming Private SCHOOLS Licensing act - this is a legally valid degree from a valid degree-granting institution. Not a "beauty shop". It does not say "Beauty shop licensing act" in the Wyoming Legislature.
I do not think that my former and current employers could ever be classified as "unsophisticated" - being that they are both a key part of U.S/World History and finance development. If that were the case, then the entire finance industry would be considered unsophisticated as well.
However I agree that there are, as you say unsophisticated companies both large and small.
4. Transfer credits - This is at the sole discretion of the school, that the student is applying to. Harvard does not have to accept coursework from Boston University or Yale, and vice versa. Regionally accredited school can either accept or reject any coursework from any other school as they see fit. Certain schools as agreements to have a seamless transfer of credits, should this type of agreement not exist between schools, then there is no guarantee of acceptance of credit, no matter where from, and where to.
All my comments also refer to KW as well, and I am also optimistic about WNU. WNU does have to set itself apart, and accreditation is the only answer.
Curious March 27, 2008 at 6:27 a.m.
Also in regards to the government employee who testified that KWU did not require proof of credentials, we have to note that she was specifically re


Joyce February 7, 2007 at 6:24 p.m.
Good to see that Kennedy Western has changed their name to try and bury their past while still offering meaningless degrees for cash.
What a horrible institution