Warren National University

Established: 2007
Accreditation: None
For-Profit: Yes
Country: USA

Programs:

Read all 72 reviews...

Write a Warren National University Review

(72 reviews)

Warren National University Reviews:

Missed Opportunity
October 31, 2009
I couldn't finish my degree but I must say that I worked hard for it, if not harder, since it all depended on my personal commitment. When comparing with any other traditional universities, I did not find a relevant difference on the level of education that was possible at WNU. ...

My University shut down by state
October 27, 2009
The facts: University shut down by state of Wyoming in 2009. Nothing left of them but a lingering class action lawsuit by former students. Did I learn anything? Absolutely! I learned a ton. It was mostly self-motivated, self-structured learning with WNU providing the outline. Very economical as to cost. Is ...

A fair Comparison
October 21, 2009
If you do your homework and know what to expect, WNU is/was a good investment in time and dollars. I attended two traditional universities before enrolling at WNU. I knew it wasn't comparable to an accredited university, but it was everything it said it was. I didn't expect substantial instructor ...


Read all 72 Warren National University reviews...




Comments:

Joyce February 7, 2007 at 6:24 p.m.

Good to see that Kennedy Western has changed their name to try and bury their past while still offering meaningless degrees for cash.

What a horrible institution

Kevin February 10, 2007 at 1:09 a.m.

I'm disappointed that this site would carry such a deplorable "college".

Texas April 11, 2007 at 11:39 a.m.

The State of Texas calls Warren National "University" a:

Fraudulent or Substandard Institution with No Known Texas Connection

Fraudulent or substandard degree" means a degree conferred in Texas in violation of the Texas Education Code

http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/AAR/Private......

Javier April 23, 2007 at 11:49 p.m.

Try some of the classes before you knock the school

Kevin April 24, 2007 at 4:42 a.m.

No need to try the courses. My employer, the school I would like to get an MBA from, and the Department of Education have all already told me that it won't be considered for promotions / won't be accepted in transfer / is unaccredited.

Even the much maligned University of Phoenix and the completely unknown Fort Hayes State are much better options.

Prospective Student May 2, 2007 at 4:31 a.m.

I read on the Kennedy Western page that a student

"With just 16 hours of study, I had completed 40 percent of the course requirements for a master's degree."

Is this program still offered through Warren National? Anyone have a link?

To prospective Student May 4, 2007 at 4:59 a.m.

As far as I know, Warren National is offering the same programs as Kennedy Western, so it should be available. I think all that changed was the name.

Good luck!
You are 40 hours away from a Warren MBA!

John May 25, 2007 at 7:47 p.m.

Actually you all are wrong.

Warren is the old KW, but their courses have changed DRAMATICALLY! Why? Because they are now a candidate for accreditation.

The name was changed to rid themselves of the "stigma" they aquired by a few Intellectual pinheads out there that smeared their name.

Now they are working on being an accredited online college.

Lawson May 25, 2007 at 9:53 p.m.

John,

This school has no chance of gaining regional accredidation. Do not waste your time/Money on any program they have to offer.

To John: June 1, 2007 at 7:26 p.m.

Nobody smeared them, the fact is that they were investigated by the Senate, testimony proved the degrees were worthless and easy to obtain and many people lost their jobs for claiming a degree from this diploma mill. All factual.

"Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense."

www.gao.gov/new.items/d04771t.pdf

Although they are technically a candidate for accreditation (due to Wyoming state law changes designed to remove diploma mills like Kennedy Western / Warren National), they have been claiming that for 20+ years.

Just print one June 18, 2007 at 8:38 p.m.

Don't waste your money on this school. If you must go this route, print one off yourself, it has the same value as a WNU degree and will hold up to any scrutiny just as well, without paying the $$$$.

RAFA June 25, 2007 at 10:11 p.m.

Thank's for the all the comments, however i am interested in joining a ligitimat instituation, got G.E.D and many certificates. Was alwasy told they be of use (from the local colleges) however seems like not true. Where can i bring em in use? Please help, Tbank's

F Y I June 29, 2007 at 7:34 p.m.

I busted my hump EARNING my PhD from KW. My family and I sacrificed heavily in time, hard work, and finances to EARN this degree. The knowledge and experience gained far outweigh the cost.

Interesting to note; of the distinguished "investigators" that prepared the GAO report, none have an advanced degree.

Rolo July 3, 2007 at 1:18 p.m.

Well I applied to KW and they agreed to WAIVE over half of my PHD requirements based on my CLAIM of life experience. I never had to prove anything and got a "degree plan" in less than a week. Then I checked into it closer.

Yes, they will run you through some busy-work to get your buy-in, which differentiates them from the less sophisticated diploma mills. In the end you still have an expensive, unaccredited so-called "doctorate" which will not allow you to teach anywhere in higher ed and is unacceptable for any type of licensing (fact) or employment (in a company with a competent HR department).

Rolo July 3, 2007 at 1:19 p.m.

"Interesting to note; of the distinguished "investigators" that prepared the GAO report, none have an advanced degree."

And neither do you if you attended Kennedy Western / Warren National

M. July 7, 2007 at 3:45 a.m.

Thanks to everyone that posted their comments. I was just taken in by these people today. I guess I will be out $50 dollars they suckered me into today. I thought it felt wrong.

Thanks again.

To M: July 9, 2007 at 5:45 p.m.

Sorry to hear you got scammed. Can you protest it on your credit card or through your better business bureau?

Robbie July 11, 2007 at 11:39 p.m.

Many employers accept KW degree. Mine did, and they are international. My degree is just as valid as any other degree, based on the work and study I did. I think the whole accredited bull**** is just that. I work with a lot of people with degrees from "accredited" schools and they are as dumb as a box of rocks, and can't figure a way out of a paper bag. It's all politics if you ask me. I know I learned a lot and put forth a lot of effort. That is what is important!!!

To Robbie: July 12, 2007 at 9:30 p.m.

"Many employers accept KW degree"

I would rephrase that as "some employers do not verify educational credentials properly"

See:
George O'Leary (Notre Dame football coach)
Sandra Baldwin (US Olympic committee)
The 463 government employees holding KWU and other unaccredited "degrees" who were terminated or disciplined in the Senate investigation.

etc
etc

Jason July 20, 2007 at 2:56 a.m.

I've attended traditional college classroom courses as well as online courses through Kaplan College and Warren National. The fact is, I don't need a professor to tell me to go home and read 4 chapters and be ready for the test on Friday. Most learning and comprehension is done on your own by studying the text material. I actually wish that some of the "traditional" courses I took would have allowed me to miss class everyday because the professors were lousy. "Accredited" is a word used by the education system of this country to justify the exorbitant and outrageous costs of a college education.

To Jason: July 20, 2007 at 3:49 a.m.

"Accredited" is a word used by the education system of this country to justify the exorbitant and outrageous costs of a college education."

Funny thing is that Warren National costs on average or more than a real, accredited school, so I don't get your point. Did all those Senate Hearings and lawsuits raise the price?

This is a stupid arguement July 20, 2007 at 8:23 a.m.

A "degree" that does not have regional accredidation is a worthless piece of paper. Any one that argues otherwise is mis-informed, a complete idiot, or has alterior motives (i.e. has their livlihood attached to the school offering unaccreditied degrees)

Jason July 22, 2007 at 4:13 p.m.

"Funny thing is that Warren National costs on average or more than a real, accredited school, so I don't get your point. Did all those Senate Hearings and lawsuits raise the price?"

You obviously have no idea about education costs in this country. Kaplan was more than Warren National and my traditional "brick and mortar" classroom courses dwarfed the per-credit hour price of Kaplan And Warren National. At $350/hr (which is generously low) and 62 hours required for an associates, this would work out to $21,700 just for tuition. Kaplan and Warren are nowhere near this cost. I understand math is not everyone's strong suit. An apology is not necessary on your part.

Bryan July 23, 2007 at 12:35 p.m.

Hello to everyone in this post!
I will try to strike a more positive tone.
Education comes in many forms throughout ones life. In some cases their are smart folks out there who have for what ever reason the need to learn more.
Some are born to a family who had the means to send their children to a traditional university and get a great educational experience.
Their are some who have work along side folks with advanced degrees and were inspired to further themselves.
Their are some who work along side folks with advanced degrees did the same and in some cases better work who felt left out the game only because of the paper.
One should walk in these folks shoes before casting a stone, I have!
I understand clearlythe verbal battle here.
Those that have the accredited degree not wanting their degree to be lessoned by the ”degree mills". I say to you you are the only one who can lesson the value of your degree.
Universities not wanting to loose the potential revenue stream.
The folks, including me, who have an unaccredited degree that worked hard to obtain wanting their educational experience to be validated in some form or fashion.
My experience was positive; I guess I am one of the lucky ones. It has brought me around the world, open doors I could have never imagined and justified my original goal, to better myself.
Isn't that what education is suppose to be about?
Please smart folks on both side of the issue, accredited and non accredited. Don't cast the first stone!
Learn more about your subject, research deeper then validate your work.
Let you action speak for you! After all it is the knowledge that will shine at the end of the day not the method of obtaining it.

Best Regards,
Bryan

WNU Student July 24, 2007 at 3:05 a.m.

To Lawson:

Why doesn't WNU have a chance for accredidation?

To Bryan: July 24, 2007 at 1:51 p.m.

"The folks, including me, who have an unaccredited degree that worked hard to obtain wanting their educational experience to be validated in some form or fashion. "

I'm glad you learned something and I agree with the life-long learning sentiment. However, you have a "degree" from a business that accepts 100% of students, graduates 100% of students, and from the Senate testimony, requires very little effort and is unaccredited. What does that say to a potential employer? Two things:

1) Your "degree" was easy to obtain and whether you learned anything is unverifiable, since nobody knows what the curriculum is, if there actually is one.

2) You didn't take 10 minutes on Google to investigate a shady school and paid the same or more money that a legitimate schoold would cost.

Bryan July 25, 2007 at 7:31 a.m.

Thanks for you observations and comments!
Sorry I have to ask.

"I'm glad you learned something and I agree with the life-long learning sentiment. However, you have a "degree" from a business that accepts 100% of students, graduates 100% of students, and from the Senate testimony, requires very little effort and is unaccredited. What does that say to a potential employer? "

Are you basing your observation solely on what’s in the government article? http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04771t.pdf...
The purpose of this probe was to identify accounting fraud in the Federal Goverment, during the investigation it also uncovered that their are programs, or should I say and procedures for obtaining a degree other than accredited intuitions.
You make several assumption in your summary and in point 1 & 2.

I assume that you are a graduate of an accreditated instuition!

How do you validate your education to a potential employer?
I assume again, GPA, transcripts, education verification from the instution.
If I am correct; So far we go about it the same way!

By easy to obtain if you are referring to working a full time job 8~12 hours a day, coming home passing pleasantries’ with my family then hitting the books for 3 to 4 hours, including 4~7 hours Sat&Sun for 3 years.
Then yes it was easy!
Prior to the start of this program an investigation was undertaken via the internet, Department of Education and also the state which provided the school its license to issue degrees.
It was clear that this program was not accredited!
Further I learned that accreditation is a "voluntary" association not mandated by the Federal Government or
by all States but rather pressure is applied by the target market and intuitions issuing degrees to meet the same standards.
It appears that business (Universities) and the Federal Government are attempting and to equate non accreditation status as degree mills.

I agree one should not be allowed to buy a piece of paper, earning it is a total different issue.

I wish you well in your travels.

Best Regards,
Bryan

Me July 25, 2007 at 1:53 p.m.

"How do you validate your education to a potential employer? I assume again, GPA, transcripts, education verification from the instution. If I am correct; So far we go about it the same way!"

Way wrong: The potential employer goes to the National Student Clearinghouse, a verification service that only accepts real, accredited universities that have been reviewed and approved by the Dept. of Education / CHEA. That approval process covers qualified faculty, structured curriculum and rigor.

The Clearinghouse will then validate back to the employer that the applicant has a legitimate degree.

Me 2 July 25, 2007 at 2:09 p.m.

My point is that you have to go to an independent 3rd party to verify the usefullness of any certification / license / degree. Those independent 3rd parties are accreditors, state licensure boards, national student clearing house, faculty accreditation requirements etc.

Having a non independent degree or transcript from Warren National is meaningless, since nobody will vouch that it has any academic meaning.

For example, you can get a degree and a transcript from Rochville University (unaccredited like Warren National / Kennedy Western) at: http://www.affordabledegrees.com/

No Studies
No Attendance No Waiting
No Examinations
No Hefty Fee
On the basis of what you already know, you can now qualify for an accredited degree that is accepted and recognized worldwide for as little as $199. Order now and receive your degree in just 5 days!

Wrong - O July 26, 2007 at 1:30 a.m.

"Are you basing your observation solely on what’s in the government article? http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04771t.pdf......
The purpose of this probe was to identify accounting fraud in the Federal Goverment, during the investigation it also uncovered"

Look at the title again:
"Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense."

So it's about academic / credentials fraud, and the government happened to pay for some of them unknowingly.

If you read the report, it focuses on employees defrauding the government by using fake and unaccredited academic credentials to secure raises and promotions falsely. Those Kennedy Western and other "degree holders" were terminated or disciplined. The end result was that they tightened up their screening process to make sure those didn't sneak through any more.

Bryan July 26, 2007 at 7:58 a.m.

Thanks again for you comments;
I would ask that you read the first chapter and more from the Dept of Education concerning Degree Mill's!
Also note in the article the use of the term "recognized"!

http://www.ed.gov/students/prep/college/...

"What is a diploma mill? The dictionary defines a diploma mill as:

An institution of higher education operating without supervision of a state or professional agency and granting diplomas which are either fraudulent or because of the lack of proper standards worthless. - Webster's Third New International Dictionary "
source:
http://www.ed.gov/students/prep/college/...

Further:

"Accreditation in the United States is a voluntary, non-governmental process, in which an institution and its programs are evaluated against standards for measuring quality".
source:
http://www.ed.gov/students/prep/college/...

Also while attempting to make my way thru the govermental info I looked up the accreditiation "corporation" that WNU has made an application.

" What is the Higher Learning Commission?
The Higher Learning Commission (HLC) is an independent corporation and one of two Commission members of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools (NCA), which was founded in 1895 as one of six regional institutional accreditors in the United States. The Higher Learning Commission accredits, and thereby grants membership in the Commission and in the North Central Association, to degree-granting educational institutions in the North Central region: Arkansas, Arizona, Colorado, Iowa, Illinois, Indiana, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, North Dakota, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, New Mexico, South Dakota, Wisconsin, West Virginia, and Wyoming.

HLC is recognized by the US Department of Education and the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA)."

source:
http://www.ncahlc.org/index.php

Wrong O comments:
One of several purposes listed on the Dept of Edu for assoication in an accreditation "corporation", federal funding!
Which if you re-read the article/ Federal Investigation listed eariler in the post, objectively, one might make the connection.
Re-read:
Summary & Back ground, please!
Adherence to New Homeland Security laws governing Federal Government reimbursement for degrees or courses from non accredited institutions.
Yes, the government investigators posing as a prospective student uncovered the practices use by listed Universities, business or corporations, however you choose to label a degree mill, to defraud the Fed.
I have not located the action taken by the Fed for those who hold a non-accredited degree.
Please provide your source.

I look forward to everyones reply!

Caveat Emptor July 26, 2007 at 6:41 p.m.

Thanks for the reference, Kennedy Western has been proven to meet the criteria you cite. "because of the lack of proper standards worthless."

"WNU has made an application." - That's swell, but they've hidden in "applicant status" on and off over the last 23 years as they've been forced to move from Idaho to Hawaii to California to Wyoming. I've applied for the NBA draft, but haven't had any luck for 23 years either.

Your arguments don't hold any weight, still waiting for some link to an independent third party site validating that Warren National University / Kennedy Western University is a real school.

So far, I can point to these sources as verifying that Kennedy Western / Warren National is invalid / worthless / illegal and has been since it started printing degrees.

1. Government Accounting Office - Federal investigation
2. Sworn estimony of former employees and undercover agents
3. State of Texas laws and I believe 8 other states (Maine, Michigan, Oregon come to mind for starters).
4. State Licensing boards
5. Accrediting bodies.

You've cited:

1. Personal opinion
2. "Applicant status" maybe the 24th year is the lucky one!

Point out some verifiable facts instead of arguing that when they were prominently featured in a Senate Hearing on diploma mills, that it was kind of an accounting thing.

Caveat Emptor 2 July 26, 2007 at 6:43 p.m.

Here is the link you requested showing where the government put a stop to the use of Kennedy Western degrees.

OPM ends diploma mill acceptance
Federal Computer Week May 14, 2004: "The Office of Personnel Management pulled the plug Thursday on using credentials from so-called diploma mills to qualify for a federal job and cut off tuition reimbursements to federal workers who take courses from those unaccredited institutions. In a strongly worded memo to federal managers, OPM Director Kay Coles James established a clear policy against using credentials from unaccredited institutions to get a job, a raise or reimbursement from the federal government for taking courses. 'There is no place in federal employment for degrees or credentials from diploma mills,' James wrote. 'They may not be used to qualify for federal jobs or salaries. You may not send employees to diploma mills for degree training or any other form of education. You may not reimburse employees for tuition associated with these schools. You may not use your authority to repay student loans if the degree is from a diploma mill.'"
¶ 5/14/2004 01:02:00 PM
Thursday, May 13, 2004
U.S. Officials Sport Fake Degrees
Wired News, May 13, 2004: "At least 28 high-ranking government officials, including three managers responsible for emergency operations at nuclear facilities, have fake degrees from so-called diploma mills, according to a government report issued Tuesday. The General Accounting Office, Congress' investigative arm, told a Senate committee Wednesday that it found 463 government employees who received degrees from three unaccredited schools: Kennedy-Western University, California Coast University and Pacific Western University."

Bryan July 27, 2007 at 7:04 a.m.

Sorry I don't understand this comment: 1. Personal opinion
While I agree during some of our eariler post I added some personal opinion the last post provided quotes, and link sources. Thats the best that I can do from my location.

On the other hand you provide a list without a source:

"So far, I can point to these sources as verifying that Kennedy Western / Warren National is invalid / worthless / illegal and has been since it started printing degrees"

1. Government Accounting Office - Federal investigation
2. Sworn estimony of former employees and undercover agents
3. State of Texas laws and I believe 8 other states (Maine, Michigan, Oregon come to mind for starters).
4. State Licensing boards
5. Accrediting bodies

1,2,3 & 5
1&2 I assume the source to be the goverment investigation title:
Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense

Personal comments:
I've attempted to illustrate the initial purpose of the goverment investigation however; I understand we see this from two different perspectives with differing opinions.
3. I again assume the source, the internet, I have also run across this blog somewhere on the WWW.
5. Of course Accrediting bodies, they KW /WNU have to the best of my knowledge never advertised or list their program / business as holding accreditation. State licensed, yes, by Wyoming.
I assume and hope that you are the source for previous comments using different alias in each post;
If so you state:
"Those Kennedy Western and other "degree holders" were terminated or disciplinedlude to dismissal and other"
I cannot find any information on the web or in your last statments.

OK, enought of this at least from me!

On a positive note!
I contacted the Higher Learning accreditation agency, Link: http://www.ncahlc.org/index.php?option=c...
which KW / WNU have applied mandated by Wyoming's State board of Edu and received the following:
I received a prompt reply which indicates they are being reviewed by the org and if the standards are sufficent for a site visit the org will visit. The reply further explained that the responce did not indicate a positive or negative acceptance.
I would attach a copy however I am at the office and the email is on my home PC, also am leaving from my office to head out for a well needed holiday / vacation to an island in the Med, Mallorca.

So I will not be able to reply for a few weeks.

Bryan

States where it is illegal with link July 27, 2007 at 3:54 p.m.

Here are the 7 seven states where it is outright illegal (10 total with various restrictions) to use an unaccredited Kennedy Western / Warren National "degree".

"Is Oregon the only state that disallows use of unaccredited degrees?

No. It is also illegal in North Dakota, New Jersey, Texas, Nevada, Washington and Maine to use unaccredited degrees. It is illegal in Indiana to use an unaccredited doctorate and Michigan law limits the legal options of users. Illinois limits the use of unaccredited degrees to those licensed by other states.

See those states’ laws

http://www.osac.state.or.us/oda/unaccred...

for details. Many other states are considering similar laws in order to prevent fraud."

LOL July 29, 2007 at 7:10 a.m.

"also am leaving from my office to head out for a well needed holiday / vacation to an island in the Med, Mallorca. "

Had a good laugh at this one. If you have a Warren National / Kennedy Western "degree", it is more likely that McDonalds gave you the weekend off.

WNU Student July 31, 2007 at 5:47 a.m.

Can someone explain to me why Warren National University does not have a chance for accredidation? They have a similar On-Line Program to a lot of other universities/colleges. How long does the accredidation process take?

To WNU Student: July 31, 2007 at 2:14 p.m.

Because of their shady past, everyone assumes it is just another dodge.

They have moved from state to state to state to avoid regulation and/or accreditation. (Hawaii, California, Wyoming, Idaho... might be missing one)

They have "applied" for accreditation in the past, just so they could be an "applicant" for accreditation, so they had something their agressive telemarketers could sell. If you read the testimony of a former employee, their "admissions" (telemarketing) people were paid on commission for each applicant they could lure in.

I don't know how long the accreditation process is, but they haven't made it in 24 years of trying so far.

There are many, many, real accredited online programs out there that won't stain your resume.

WNU Student July 31, 2007 at 10:01 p.m.

Thanks for the Information. I don't understand or someone explain to me how a Unaccredidated Institution would tranish one's resume? When one applies for a Job in the Corporate/Private Sector, they don't ask whether it was from accredited or unaccredited institution? Rather, they want to verify that you have a degree, gpa, major. No?

If you put KW'S Behind and look at WNU as a New Institution, don't you think they have a chance for getting accredidation?

To WNU: August 1, 2007 at 4:18 p.m.

"look at WNU as a New Institution, don't you think they have a chance for getting accredidation?"

No.

It's the same organization, same leadership, same location, that couldn't get accreditation for 24 years. The name change is just to rid themselves of the stigma of the Kennedy Western name.

WNU Student August 2, 2007 at 4:42 a.m.

Would one be able to explain to me how studying at WNU would tarnish one's resume? When one applies for a Job, they are not asked whether you attended Unacreedited or Accredited Institution in corporate sector. Rather, do you have a degree or not.

To WNU August 4, 2007 at 2:52 a.m.

"When one applies for a Job, they are not asked whether you attended Unacreedited or Accredited Institution in corporate sector."

WOW! I feel truly sorry for the clueless individual that told you that. I work in HR in a large corp, and the vast majority of colleagues I talk to accept only Regionally Accredited degrees. It's a big discussion right now whether nationally (a lesser accreditation) accredited degrees should be accepted with other compensating experience. Unaccredited degrees are not even degrees in my mind.

Please PLEASE talk to any advisor at a local community college, an HR director in a large corp, or even a high school guidance counselor to set you straight.

WNU Student August 4, 2007 at 4:20 a.m.

Thanks for the information and guidance in clarifying the issue on/around acceptance of Unaccredited degree within corporate sector. Since you work for a major corporation adn within their HR Department, I was wondering, if additional details would be provided.

Do you know if similar policies are in place within Financial Sector, Investment Banks, Regional Banks, Etc?

Someone with over 6+ Years of a major Investment Bank Experience and WNU BS - Business Administration Degree on their Resume would be any issues? If one was trying to for other positions, would HR within those organizations have any issues?

Your assistance would be truly appreciated.

Fraud Fighter August 4, 2007 at 1:29 p.m.

"Someone with over 6+ Years of a major Investment Bank Experience and WNU BS - Business Administration Degree"

Not possible, with a KWU / WNU "degree". Post a link please

Really? August 4, 2007 at 3:26 p.m.

If somehow, you really got into a good company despite your unaccredited degree, my advise is to keep that job until you retire, keep your mouth about how you obtained your "degree", and don't apply internally or externally for anything that might trigger a background check and put your existing job in jeopardy.

Potential WNU Student August 4, 2007 at 7:12 p.m.

It has been very interesting to read the comments on the University.

Without having Bias, someone explain to me, why the New School will be turned out for the accredidation? On the Wyoming State Website, it's shown that their license is extended till 2008 and have applied for accredidation?

Compared to this school, there are many others that have questionably programs also, but accredited by US Department of Education's standards. No?

To Potential Student: August 5, 2007 at 2:52 a.m.

Umm, read this entire thread or spend 3 minutes on Google and you'll see why you'd be throwing your money away.

If you still believe that WNU is the absolute best possible option for you, by all means apply. You're probably a few weeks away from getting a "degree".

Don't let the fact that there are hundreds of real, online, accredited universities out there offering that same major in the same format without the terms "Senate Hearing", "Type B Misdemeanor", "Illegal in some states", "Fraudulent or Substandard Institution with No Known Texas Connection", discourage you.

Shinigami August 5, 2007 at 3:04 a.m.

The biased comment that "you can earn %40 of the credit at Kennedy-Western (Now Warren National) in 16) is not true. If some one did do that than they are either cheating or found some sneaky way to crack the code.

Warren National is the same University as Kennedy-Western except that it has several programs such as Engineering.

I would speculate that the reason that there is so much elitist prejudice against this instution may be because tradional programs are jelous of their place in the academic community. If someone creates a better and more efficient way to educate which makes quality education more available its fought tooth and nail.

It should be remembered that at one time adult education programs and those which used non-traditional approaches (such as night school, community colleges and so on) were once viewed suspiciously.

Now we have a new type of distance learning program which is internet based and a lot of people are bent out of shape.

Wasabi August 9, 2007 at 3:36 a.m.

"The biased comment that "you can earn %40 of the credit at Kennedy-Western (Now Warren National) in 16) is not true"

Yes it is true. It is a part of Senate testimony that a government employee did just that. See above link.

"Now we have a new type of distance learning program which is internet based and a lot of people are bent out of shape."

There are hundreds of real, accredited distance learning programs out there. Kennedy / Warren is not one of them. I can't say it any more plainly.

Wasabi 2 August 9, 2007 at 7:31 p.m.

The other thing also to keep in mind that there are institutions online that do give Life and Work Experience Credits up to 30 Credits. Remember these are US Accredited Educational Instuitutions. Do your research and you will come to know.

The question is really, if these are able to get accredited, than I don't see why WNU can not succeed in this venue.

To: States where it is illegal with link August 14, 2007 at 4:59 a.m.

You forgot to add that Kennedy Western / Warren National is banned from offering / advertising degrees in California, Oregon and ?? any other states??

James August 15, 2007 at 5:10 a.m.

"On the Wyoming State Website, it's shown that their license is extended till 2008 and have applied for accredidation?"

True and true. But... they have talked about accreditation so many times before that it's hard to tell what their odds are. Until that time, if it comes, all degrees issued prior to that date will still be unaccredited.

Look elsewhere.

Jackie August 16, 2007 at 1:58 p.m.

Why was my response not posted?

Shinigami August 17, 2007 at 2 a.m.

To Wasabi:

"Yes it is true. It is a part of Senate testimony that a government employee did just that. See above link."

I do not believe that what was said is true. The Senate committee heard testimony from a biased source who was not subject to cross examination.

If indeed this witness did do this amount of credit in such a ridiculously short time than I fail to understand how, short of cheating.

I can tell you that I did attend Warren National and graduated. It took me about two years (and I transferred in with a bachelors from another university). The classes were NOT easy.

I only wish that the committee which investigated the University would have been less biased.

Incidently, I did attend an accredited four year University (Illinois State University) and I knew a number of students who cheated. Many of them took classes that they never attended (usually simple courses where there were large numbers of students enrolled) and passed around the answers during the exams. Cheating is pretty universal in fact.

I myself never cheated because 1) its unethical and 2) I was genuinly interested in learning.

Now there are such places as diploma mills where you pay money and voila' your degree arrives in the mail. Some will even give you phoney transcripts and references. But Warren National is not one of them. This is a legitimate distance learning school.

To Shingami August 17, 2007 at 3:46 a.m.

Shingami - Would you be able to provide details around what type of work you do and whether your employer accepted WNU Degree? How do you tackle cocnerns when one doess education verification adn they come to know that WNU is in process of being accredited?

To Shingami: August 17, 2007 at 1:23 p.m.

"If indeed this witness did do this amount of credit in such a ridiculously short time than I fail to understand how, short of cheating"

You should read the testimony instead of speculating. WNU waived a bunch of graduate level courses based on claims of life experience, but no documentation was required.

The student then took 2 open book exams to get credit for 2 graduate classes. Read it, it's public record and there is a link above. No cheating involved.

Shinigami August 17, 2007 at 11:36 p.m.

Details? I am a Network Administrator for Matsushi-ta (deliberately mispelled to bypass the swear filter) Electronics Corporation. I have talked to my employers openly about my education and classwork. In fact, my company has approved my education even before I enrolled. For the most part, the issue of accredidation has never come up. In my line of work its really what you know that is important. I do believe that the education I received enabled me to become a better administrator. I still keep my textbooks and refer to them often.

I did read the testimony. What I know is that the investigator was an officer in the Coast Guard (if I remember correctly). She claims to have taken, what was it four exams and got 40% of her classes completed. And it was in two days.

I do not know how it was done. There was no explaination of what method was used. If there were it was not part of the record.

All I can tell you is that the least amount of time I spent taking a class from beginning to end was about 7 weeks and that was taking only one course at a time and concentrating only on that one course.

I am not saying that what this witness said is not true. Just that I do not know how it was done. If she did find a shortcut than I do not know what it was. Maybe the Univesity needs to be made aware of this.

LOL August 19, 2007 at 5:43 a.m.

I just wandered across this website, but let me give you the book on Warren National "so called" University.

They are unaccredited,

There degrees are easy to get,

No reputable employer will even consider this a degree of any sort.

What a joke!

Ganju Shiba August 19, 2007 at 8:25 p.m.

To LOL:

You gave a brief review, if you would call it that about the University (and it is a real University and not "so called").

My only question is, did YOU attend this school? If not than you are not qualified to make that statement.

Here are the facts:

WNU operates legally. The school is licensed by the State of Wyoming.

WNU is an applicant for accreditation.

The degrees are NOT easy to get. You do not merely send money and get some bogus diploma in the mail. You need to earn it.

No reputable employer you say? I think if you were to ask any graduate if their employer accepted a Warren National degree they would give you a different answer.

And the only joke is that someone like you would make these statements knowing nothing about what you are talking about.

I suggest you research your topic a bit more before making statements like this.

? about illegal use of unaccredited "degrees" August 19, 2007 at 10:10 p.m.

"You forgot to add that Kennedy Western / Warren National is banned from offering / advertising degrees in California, Oregon and ?? any other states??"

My question is on California. It's not listed as one of the states it's illegal in, but Warren National cannot sell degrees there? Anyone have more details than that? Just seems odd that they are located in California, but can't advertise in California, but no illegal either.

Wyoming - haven for unaccredited "universities" August 19, 2007 at 10:17 p.m.

"Wyoming * Weak law and poor enforcement allowed state to fill with unaccredited suppliers. Political interference exacerbated this problem. The 2006 Wyoming legislature passed a new law requiring eventual accreditation, which should solve the problem in a couple of years."

http://www.osac.state.or.us/oda/unaccred...

Quick Question August 23, 2007 at 11:45 p.m.

Has any student been able to get their credits transferred to another institution or continue for another degree program with either WNU or KW Degree? If so, please advise on instiution where you continued or that accepted your coursework.

Quick Answer August 24, 2007 at 5:10 a.m.

No. Only other unaccredited universities will even consider it.

Chris August 24, 2007 at 11:18 p.m.

Ok so this is the second attempt to post this. I went to WNU / KWU and I think that a lot of you who have not even gone should not comment. The school serves a purpose. I went there. It is for mid career professionals who do not have time under any circumstances sit in a classroom. They have homework, readings, tests, etc. All schools have had their bumps in the road. With the federal hearing, that was one student who did not even go to WNU / KWU who bought their degree online from Hamilton College and was upset that she decided to take all the universities in Wyoming to court. Since WNU / KWU is the largest online university they had to go to court too. Yes, they have disgruntled employees but so does everyone. That guy that was on the stand was employed for two weeks. So you guys really should not knock a school, they have been in existance since 1984. A lot of schools are not accredited ie Havard. I could find articles that are not great about everything. But why would I? I say understand that they are helping society as they helped me. I am the CEO of a major coroporation and it is because of WNU / KWU. Education is education. I am sorry but it is legitimate. Why not pick on something else that matters like the war and why innocent people are dying versues a school? What has America come too? :( We are a horrible example to other countries.

Chris is funny... August 25, 2007 at 1:45 a.m.

"mid career professionals who do not have time under any circumstances sit in a classroom."

Those busy people can spend the same amount of time and money and get a regionally accredited degree, there are hundreds of options.

"A lot of schools are not accredited"

Complete lie. Most people can name hundreds of real, accredited universities. Only a few (those in higher ed and HR) can name a few unaccredited timebombs they've run across.

"I am the CEO of a major coroporation"

No, you are not. Entry level jobs are checked for accredited education credentials. CEO's of major corps are run through the ringer.

Ganju Shiba August 27, 2007 at 8:59 p.m.

To "Chris is funny",

How would you know who Chris is or what Chris does?

Are you clairvoyant?

Since you have this ability than maybe you can tell me some hot stock tips? Maybe you can let me know who will win the next World Cup?

Robert Fuller, PhD August 28, 2007 at 4:21 a.m.

Robert Fuller, PhD June 15, 2007 at 3:51 p.m.

The debate over accredited versus non-accredited came up all the time when I worked for the U.S. Department of Education. Because the academic world sees the nature of degrees versus experiences from a different perspective than does the workforce, neither is willing to budge much on their stance. And here's why: Statistics show that 60% of those who attend college, whether they be traditional universities, online universities, unaccredited or accredited, never actually use what they learned or were supposed to have been taught after they graduate from college. They use the degree to get in the door, end up doing something totally different or unrelated to their educational background, and actually do quite well. Statistics also show that 43% of new hirees are retrained to do their jobs using concepts vastly differently from what they learned in college. The shocking statistic was the number of employers who actually verify educational credentials when hiring someone. Only about 25% of employers actually check the educational credentials of new employees. The other 75% base their hiring practices on experience and word-of-mouth referrals (opinions) of your references or previous supervisors. But of course, they don't tell potential employees that.

A friend of mine who sat on regional and national accrediting bodies for probably 15 years told me "accredited or nonaccredited, it's all about money and poeple keeping their jobs these days; school officials will promise or say anything to the accrediting bodies these days to keep their doors open." I'm inclined to believe him at this point because I've seen some accredited institutions that should never have been opened!

Just some thoughts...

Robert

Ho Hum August 28, 2007 at 6:44 a.m.

Of course, 98.3216% of statistics with no credible source cited are just plain B.S.

I had the best laugh at this one:

"Only about 25% of employers actually check the educational credentials of new employees. The other 75% base their hiring practices on experience and word-of-mouth referrals."

Of course, again, no source cited. Any competent corporation, and all universities verify credentials. The ones that don't must be sole proprietors, small partnerships, or fast food restaurants that do not have the savvy or the means to protect themselves.

To Ho Hum August 28, 2007 at 6:11 p.m.

It seems that you have an expertise on/around the verificaiton process in the HR Department. What is your take on corporations veryifying degrees with institutions such as Warren National University? Do they Hire Candidates? If Candidates have 5+ Years of Experience, MBA from this University, will they be given a job?

Ho Hum August 29, 2007 at 7:11 a.m.

To be hired in a large corporation for any professional position, it requires a regionally accredited bachelors degree and relevant work experience. Therefore, an unaccredited so called "degree" does not meet the minimum requirements for such a job.

Since a corporation will get dozens of qualifed applicants meeting the criteria, they would have no need to review "unaccredited degree" holding applicants.

JR August 29, 2007 at 6:58 p.m.

All of those here bashing KWU/WNU are nothing more than ignorant blithering idiots. You have no FACTS to base your statements. Government inquiry? PLEASE, all smoke and mirrors.

1. Being Accredited is voluntary and NOT subject to US law.

2. To be accredited means that you pay a ton of money to some commission and become part of the 'Good ol boys club". These commissions have been around for a long long time and are getting "pissy" when something newer and better comes along and don't want to play in the commissions sandbox. It is the same as the record labels and the online music downloads out there. WAAA!

Who was the idiot that said they work in HR at a large corporation? oh, yes, To WNU (what an original name) I know of many companies that accept a degree from this institution. In fact a friend of mine is the CIO of a large, multi-state eye care practice. He attended KW, and was promoted to CIO AFTER getting his degree.

The bottom line is like Robert Fuller above stated, it all comes down to money. Paying BIG bucks to be part of the "Good ol boys club" PERIOD.

JR August 29, 2007 at 7:01 p.m.

Just read Ho Hum's posts.

What an idiot.

JR August 29, 2007 at 7:22 p.m.

One further thing.

Oregon was sued by KWU/WNU and the two settled out of court.

They agreed that KWU/WNU will not be classified as a "diploma mill", State of Oregon employees may not use KWU/WNU(as is the right of ANY employer), residents MAY use KWU/WNU on their resumes.

You can read it all here: http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0...

All of you bashers are just that, bashers.

Bashers=People who make incorrect statements based on ignorance and/or feeling. Complete lack of logic. Loosers. Whiners. Blithering idiots.

JR August 29, 2007 at 7:26 p.m.

Good reading:

http://www.discussanything.com/forums/ar...

To JR August 29, 2007 at 9:28 p.m.

You sound like someone of virtue and make decision based on facts. I would like to hear factually from someone how education is verified within the HR Organizations? When they verify, do they make a big stiff, if school is accredited or unaccredited?

Illegal in Oregon without this disclaimer August 30, 2007 at 4:56 a.m.

In addition, an individual using an unaccredited degree, even if the employer allows use of such degrees, must disclose on resumes, letterheads, business cards, announcements and advertisements that "(Name of school) does not have accreditation recognized by the United States Department of Education and has not been approved by the Office of Degree Authorization." ORS 348.609(2)(a). The only exception is for schools approved by ODA. See ORS 348.609(d) and OAR 583-050-0014.

It is a Class B Misdemeanor under the Oregon Criminal Code to use a degree in violation of ORS 348.609.

http://www.osac.state.or.us/oda/unaccred...

Correcting JR with verifiable source August 30, 2007 at 4:59 a.m.

"1. Being Accredited is voluntary and NOT subject to US law."

Here are the 7 seven states where it is outright illegal (10 total with various restrictions) to use an unaccredited Kennedy Western / Warren National "degree".

"Is Oregon the only state that disallows use of unaccredited degrees?

No. It is also illegal in North Dakota, New Jersey, Texas, Nevada, Washington and Maine to use unaccredited degrees. It is illegal in Indiana to use an unaccredited doctorate and Michigan law limits the legal options of users. Illinois limits the use of unaccredited degrees to those licensed by other states.

See those states’ laws

http://www.osac.state.or.us/oda/unaccred......

for details. Many other states are considering similar laws in order to prevent fraud."

How competent HR departments background check August 30, 2007 at 5:37 a.m.

"I would like to hear factually from someone how education is verified within the HR Organizations? When they verify, do they make a big stiff, if school is accredited or unaccredited?"

Most mid to large companies have gone to the National Student Clearinghouse for degree verification. It's a win-win. The individual Universities can offload alot of the verification work to the Clearinghouse, and HR departments can verify all valid degrees in one stop and print/save a verification for the file.

Nice and simple, if an applicant claims a degree, it's checked there.

Companies vary in what they validate:
*All degrees are accredited
*Highest degree is accredited
*Required accredited degrees per the job description

http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/
http://www.chea.org/search/

Small and naive companies, the controls can be very weak. Some don't check credentials, references, anything.

The HR professionals organization has good resources on protecting your organization in this regard.
http://www.shrm.org/

JR August 30, 2007 at 4:21 p.m.

To: Correcting JR with verifiable source.

No need for correction, except for your post.

I stated US law, not STATE law.

Accreditation is VOLUNTARY.

States are free to pass laws as they wish.

It all comes back to an institution willing to pay the ridiculously amount of money so as to join the "Good Ol Boy" club.

Re: How competent HR departments background check August 30, 2007 at 4:32 p.m.

I didn't see the University of Oxford on the National Student Clearinghouse.

Hmmm, Oxford must be a "diploma mill"

I guess my great grandfather would never get a job today like he did with Standard Oil.

How competent HR departments background check August 30, 2007 at 6:50 p.m.

The National Student Clearinghouse does not even have all the accredited universities on that list. I had attend a institution that has bene accredited by Middle States Association, Association of Collegiate Business Schools and Program and International Assembly for Collegiate Business Education.

In this circumstance, if candidate has presented the institution to HR and not on this clearinghouse. Than, how would the degree get validated? Would they not offer the candidate the position?

C2 August 31, 2007 at 6 a.m.

Good point, the Clearinghouse is not at 100% of US schools yet, only 91%. In those cases, HR can simply make sure the school is accredited on the Department of Education website and request verification directly from the school. Foreign schools are a little more work, but basically the same process. Both the Oxford and Middle States accredited examples above would obviously both pass this easily.

"More than 3,000 colleges, enrolling 91% of US college students, and hundreds of high school districts nationwide participate in the Clearinghouse

DegreeVerify: ...Commercial verifiers can instantly confirm degrees online, providing them with an easy, fast, and inexpensive way to validate educational records and combat credentials fraud."

http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/abou...

Glad to clear up all the confusion!

To JR: August 31, 2007 at 6:14 a.m.

I do agree with JR's point, that it's a shame that there isn't a single national law to deal with this issue.

Instead individual states and their consumer protection departments are left to fend for themselves. So until all 50 states have something in place, it's pretty easy to relocate to the states with the weakest education regulations.

JR August 31, 2007 at 3:35 p.m.

I have not stated nor do I promote the idea of a national law.

Each state has the right to do as they see fit, as long as they do not violate an individuals rights, as Oregon tried to do.

Therefore, the individual needs to take responsibility and due their due diligence when selecting a college/university to attend.

I see no problem with WNU's program. They require you to take, and pass, classes that are the core of the field in which one chooses to study. I have yet to see the purpose in spending tons of money for classes that are irrelevant to one's field of study. Does one REALLY care about what happened in the 17th century when they are studying Engineering or Technology? No they don't.

Interesting Article on Kennedy Western August 31, 2007 at 7:47 p.m.

"It May Take Hours, But You Too Can Earn a University Degree"

http://www.oregonlive.com/news/oregonian...

The Oregonian Newspaper 7/4/04

TO JR & C2 August 31, 2007 at 8:44 p.m.

The question I ask at end of the day is whether Corporate Institutions will embrace/accept degree from WNU?

If Corporate HR Department does ask, how does one answer to them regarding this degree?

I don't think there is anything wrong with the WNU Institution at all. I think they are more open than others in their programs and they get grunt of it. As people saying they can get degrees from this school in hours, show me how?

The other question is do you think Higher Learning Commission will give WNU Accredidation?

C2 September 1, 2007 at 6:50 p.m.

I agree with JR

"Therefore, the individual needs to take responsibility and due their due diligence when selecting a college/university to attend."

Completely agree. If you truly perform due diligence, and are okay with the severe limitations, senate investigation, unaccredited status, inability to gain licensure, and in a growing number states where it is legal to use a WNU degree, plus the existence of hundreds of comparable, real accredited programs out there, go ahead and buy a WNU degree.

To poster above, post your major, and I'm sure someone can recommend a dozen good programs for you to attain your degree completely online, with accreditation.

To C2 September 3, 2007 at 9:48 p.m.

With that, do you think HR in Fortune 500 Corporations would terminate an employee for completing their degree at WNU?

Do you think this institution will ever receive accredidation?

Dr J. Bear September 4, 2007 at 1:35 a.m.

Inside scoop is that they will be accredited before 2009. Likely Fall/winter 2008.

RobertK September 4, 2007 at 2:40 a.m.

I love all this dialogue!
I've taken courses at the #2 public university in the nation - graduate level 18 credits thus far and I've done the same at KWU for undergraduate and actually the UVA one's were extremely similar.
What I liked about KWU is their asynchronus model, which is very nice and I can't wait for that to be so widespread.
Bricks and mortar schools have their place especially when heading straight into them from high school.
KWU is for the mid-level professional who has to keep a job down and a family together and still move ahead and keep up with what is going around.
I'm thankful to KWU - it has helped me finish up my undergraduate - took me almost two years.
I'm also thankful for those faculty from accredited higher education who saw a need and were willing to fill that need and provide their expertise even if the university is unaccredited.
It's been said truth generally goes this way:
1. It is first ridiculed by the establishment
2. It is then violently opposed by the establishment
3. It then becomes commonplace
Higher education is changing and it's places like KWU (now WNU) who venture out and seize the day!
Bricks and mortar institutions are changing, but they wouldn't change as quickly if it were not for front line efforts by places such as KWU/WNU.
Just ask our founding fathers what it cost to birth this country!

Why September 4, 2007 at 4:07 a.m.

were there no accredited Universities before 1951? How did our nation survive? Oh how?

Oh that is right, ALL UNIVERSITIES were substandard prior to alcohol binge drinking, sex, drugs etc.
Accreditation, which happened curiously around the same time as LSD introduction, and communist teaching on campus does beg the question----Is it possible WNU standards will have to be lowered to get accreditation? You bet. That and a little grease money into the pockets of politicians.

< 2% September 4, 2007 at 6:05 a.m.

I keep seeing on this site that WNU is illegal in 3 soetimes 4 and sometimes 7 different states. This is just not true. I called the office of degree authorization in all 7 states and below is the general description for all. (Remember, civil service jobs pay about half of what private sector pays and only make up about 2% of the jobs in any given state).

"There are Colleges and universities which are not currently accredited by an accrediting body of the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (www.chea.org). Degrees from these institutions will not be accepted by the Civil Service Commission as satisfying any educational requirements indicated on job specifications."

The lady in Texas even said that it is only a misdemenor to use an outright diploma mill diploma and Texas has yet to prosecute anyone for fear of not being able to get a prosecution.
Also her supervisor told me they are not allowed under federal law to call WNU a diploma mill.

To: <2% September 4, 2007 at 1:14 p.m.

I doubt you have a link for anything above. It directly contradicts what those seven states have passed into their laws. That kind of misrepresentation is very easy to disprove in 15 seconds of Googling. For example in Texas:

Institutions Whose Degrees are Illegal to Use in Texas

"Fraudulent or substandard degree" means a degree conferred in Texas in violation of the Texas Education Code; conferred in another state in violation of that state's laws; conferred in another state by an institution that was not accredited by an accreditor recognized by the Coordinating Board... (Texas Educational Code, Chapter 61, Section 61.302)

The Texas Penal Code (Section 32.52) prohibits the use of fraudulent or substandard degrees "in a written or oral advertisement or other promotion of a business; or with the intent to: obtain employment; obtain a license or certificate to practice a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain a promotion, a compensation or other benefit, or an increase in compensation or other benefit, in employment or in the practice of a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain admission to an educational program in this state; or gain a position in government with authority over another person, regardless of whether the actor receives compensation for the position." Violation of this law is a Class B misdemeanor.

http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/AAR/Private...

Recap: September 4, 2007 at 1:26 p.m.

So in Texas, it is illegal to use a KWU / WNU degree to:

*obtain employment
*obtain a promotion
*obtain admission to an educational program

No grey area there.

TO 2% & Recap September 4, 2007 at 6:40 p.m.

Do you know what the limitations are in the state of New Jersey?

Even with the Texas law, how come they allow private institutions to exist within their states?

99.98% You Mislead Well September 4, 2007 at 6:43 p.m.

Illegal only if
(1) uses or claims to hold a postsecondary degree that the person knows:
(A) is a fraudulent or substandard degree;
(B) is fictitious or has otherwise not been granted....

Keywords for those of you who graduated accredited schools is "That the person knows".
This is why Oregon lost the KW lawsuit. The WNU students and faculty believe their credentials to be authentic.
Note:WNU is not required by any law to inform students of any Texas Laws. Therefore how would any student know of the Texas definition.
Oh, I suppose you have memorized the entire legal code in your state. You will try to say, Ignorance is no excuse under the law, but time and again under prescident law you are proven wrong.
How about this- Name one person convicted under the Tx. law.
Texas can not and will not touch this. It is a "Hot Potato." Texas knows the first attempt at a conviction will end up in some WNU student owning the state of Texas.
Also left out is that the Employer must press charges, at which time the states AG will advise them otherwise. Even if all is successful in getting a conviction it is just a misdemeanor, more likely just a warning.

love it homer September 5, 2007 at 3:15 a.m.

Loved the website.
I hate Texas.
The website is an insight into the back-woods hick arrogant cow-boy types that live there. I do feel bad for 99.98%. Maybe you picked a bad example for a state. Does Michigan have something you can quote against WNU? Better come up with something or you will become 50.001%.
Sorry ):. Next time spend a few minutes researching.

99.8% September 5, 2007 at 4:35 a.m.

Sorry to keep correcting you, but, KWU / WNU is specifically listed under the very clear heading:

"Institutions Whose Degrees are Illegal to Use in Texas"

That means... they are illegal to use in Texas.

The whole "the student must know" is another unsupported claim. Post a link and we'll discuss!

Texas example, per you request September 5, 2007 at 4:59 a.m.

Another verifiable Kennedy Western success story

"When Elected Officials Aren't What They Seem

Texas officials and Pennsylvania cats tout misleading credentials"

Excerpted:

"Identity deception can take many forms. A diploma mill degree, for example, may cause employers and taxpayers to assume a candidates credentials are genuine. Unless the deception is discovered, diploma mill customers adorn their identities with unearned titles before and after their name. Last year, Dallas based Trinity Southern University awarded a Masters degree to a Pennsylvania cat."

"News for Public Officials has learned that one well-known Texas County Clerk serving on the Supreme Court’s "Judicial Committee on Information Technology" Task Force claims a Ph.D. from a Wyoming school the United States General Accounting Office defines as a diploma mill.

Before she obtained her degree from Kennedy-Western and began calling herself Dr. Dianne Wilson, PhD, a Grand Jury indicted the Fort Bend County Clerk on charges she used taxpayer money to partially finance a Bachelor Degree from St. Edwards University and Certificates from the National Center for State Courts’ Institute for Court Management. (St. Edwards and the NCSC are accredited)

Kennedy-Western apparently accepted Wilson’s Certificates from the NCSC: Institute for Court Management as the equivalent of a Master’s Degree. The NCSC does not offer Master's degrees.

Wilson is not the only government official to claim advanced degrees from diploma mills or to put the title “Dr.” in front of their name after buying a degree from an unaccredited school."

http://www.davickservices.com/Some%20Off...

To Texas example, per you request September 5, 2007 at 7:17 a.m.

This article is so old and outdated information. The perspective that students are not allowed to use their creditentials in educational or govt sector is clearly known. With that the actions of Dr. Wilson is a crime.

The question that is puzzling to me is why is this the only school that is in limelight? There are hundreds of other schools that have post secondary licenses and operate in every state. Why are they not target? Are those fraudlent also?

To all KWU/WNU bashers September 5, 2007 at 2:02 p.m.

I would like to see where any official government website SPECIFICALLY states that KWU/WNU is a "diploma mill".

A "diploma mill" is where one pays money and gets a piece of paper in the mail saying "Diploma".

I do not see any information on the US DoE site.

I do see a link to National Association of State Administrators and Supervisors of Private Schools (http://www.nasasps.com), which shows members and links to state licensing agencies, and lo and behold! there is Wyoming! and guess what? Wyoming has granted a license to WNU, and even to the University of Wyoming! WOW!

Basically all of you bashers are nothing more that the ignorant lapdogs for, as JR above put it, the "Good ol Boy" institutions.

WNU has top notch professors from universities across the nation and requires the students to do work and take tests.

The FTC even admits it! September 5, 2007 at 2:27 p.m.

From the FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION:

There are a few legitimate institutions that have not pursued accreditation.

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer...

Could WNU be one of these? NAH, of course not, that would make all of the "Big dogs" at State agencies, CHEA, GAO and others look like the fools they are for including WNU as a diploma mill when they are not.

BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Caveat Emptor September 5, 2007 at 6:19 p.m.

"There are a few legitimate institutions that have not pursued accreditation."

But there are thousands that have, and offer the exact same online programs as Warren National "University"

Caveat Emptor September 5, 2007 at 6:24 p.m.

"I would like to see where any official government website SPECIFICALLY states that KWU/WNU is a "diploma mill"."

Scroll up the thread, there are already several posted, with links.

I did like your link to the FTC's article called:

"Diploma Mills: Degrees of Deception"
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer...

To: Caveat Emptor September 5, 2007 at 6:28 p.m.

If there are thousands that are accredited and offer "the exact same online programs" as WNU, then what is the difference?

ONE thing: Refusal to pay the rediculous amount of money to the "good ol Boy" club. Since they have refused to pay, they have been attacked by every means available to the pompous Academia and Educrats to knock them down.

To: Caveat Emptor September 5, 2007 at 7 p.m.

Scroll up to see WHAT?

The GAO report? BAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

It does not call KW?WN a diploma mill, it just states that government agencies paid money to them against regulations. The other schools are shams, and I have investigated.

If you are going off that ONE BIASED report, then you are surely a sucker!

FOLLOW THE MONEY. IT"S ALL ABOUT THE MONEY and the "Good ol Boy" club.

Caveat Emptor September 6, 2007 at 4:35 a.m.

"If there are thousands that are accredited and offer "the exact same online programs" as WNU, then what is the difference?"

Directly from the Federal Trade Commission Article you posted, answers your question:

"Colleges and universities accredited by legitimate organizations undergo a rigorous review of the quality of their educational programs."

"Diploma Mills: Degrees of Deception"
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/pubs/consumer......

Also from the Federal Trade Commission September 6, 2007 at 4:51 a.m.

"Avoid Fake-Degree Burns By Researching Academic Credentials"

"Ask the applicant for proof of the degree and the school’s accreditation. If you don’t get satisfactory answers from the school itself and the accreditation sites on the Web, ask the applicant for proof of the degree, including a certified transcipt, and the school’s accreditation. Ultimately, it’s up to the applicant to show that he earned his credentials from a legitimate institution. "

http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/busp...

Basic Background checking 101, from the Federal Consumer Protection arm.

To: Caveat Emptor September 6, 2007 at 12:14 p.m.

You have still not answered the question, if they are EXACTLY the same, then there is NO difference in the programs, except for accreditation.

Since accreditation is nothing more than joining the "Good ol Boys" club for a rediculous amount of money that provides absolutely NO real service in return, again I ask, what is the difference?

THERE IS NONE!

NOt until the middle of the last century was there any "accreditation" of schools. My My, what did we do before then? I guess all the great Leaders, business men/women, inventors, etc had substandard, worthless degrees because the schools they attended, Harvard, Yale, Stanford and others were not accredited.

Those that sit here and waste their breath how a school is not accredited is using flawed logic and have no argument.

WNU offeres the same courses as other "accredited" institutions using professors part-time from other "accredited" institutions. They are a quality institution that has unfortunately been lumped in with all of the diploma scams that are out there.

Until someone can provide some logical, factual data to back up their argument instead of "because I said so" then keep your traps shut.

First Amendment September 6, 2007 at 8:06 p.m.

The trend over the last 35 years for higher education to increasing be delivered by "for profit" entities, the fact that state laws vary greatly, and the tremendous growth of the Internet as a delivery technology for higher education account for the heated, related debates surrounding diploma mills, unaccredited institutions, and regional vs national accreditation. Each side of the issues is entrenched with its views because the stakes are indeed high. Higher education costs have skyrocketed over the last 50 years in the US, just about the same time accreditation bodies appeared. The regional and nation accreditation processes are not free, in fact are quite costly and time consuming. This is during a time when a larger percentage of the US population sought degrees, employers desired degrees, and the federal government greatly expanded the availability of education. The greater educational requirements of employers for degrees for career advancement and the surging cost and the time-demands of mid-level professional, two-parent income families led to a demand for alternative ways to obtain bachelor and advanced degrees. In the 1970s there arose many of these so-called diploma mills. Even some of the experts that call them "diploma mills" today, were expounding their merits as viable alternatives to gain higher education. As these alternative education providers grew and expenditures by the American public grew, this started a significant erosion of the revenue of traditional higher education providers, and indirectly to the regional and national associations that accredit them. At that point, these alternative institutions offered a viable alternative that saved time and great expense to individuals seeking degrees. Yes, some of these institutions were fraudulent; however, many did offer serious and significant, high-quality education. The alternative institutions focused on the objectives of education rather than merely counting up how many courses, papers, and grades, etc. as do the more traditional accredited schools. At this same time the Internet was being developed. The traditional accredited schools realized the potential to gain back some "market share" by leveraging this new technology and offering their degrees via the Internet, just like the alternative schools. The fact is that many of the unique aspects of the alternative, unaccredited schools have been absorbed by traditional schools--excepting, of course, the lower cost. However, I think it would better serve the interests of both sides to debate a even-handed, fair way to integrate these unaccredited institutions into our American educational system by constructive dialogue as how to determine the valid unaccredited institutions from those that truly are fraudulent. And mere opinion about these institutions being diploma mills will not suffice. If that is allowed, then opinion is allowed to become a de facto "accreditation entity."

The End September 6, 2007 at 11:55 p.m.

“You have still not answered the question, if they are EXACTLY the same, then there is NO difference in the programs, except for accreditation.”

You finally got it! It's the accreditation that separates them.

So, by FTC guidelines, "Colleges and universities accredited by legitimate organizations undergo a rigorous review of the quality of their educational programs."

Unaccredited “universities” have no such 3rd party quality review, no accountability, no oversight, no way to verify how much or how little students do to earn a “degree”. Take a look at what unaccredited universities have done recently:

Unaccredited Trinity Southern University issues a degree to a cat. (3.5 GPA!)
http://www.nbc10.com/money/3975070/detai...

Unaccredited Concordia College and University issues a degree to a dog.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17398521/

Unaccredited Rochville University can deliver your degree in 3-5 business days

Unaccredited Almeda University will grant you a degree for life experience

Unaccredited Kennedy Western University had a student who earned 40% of her Master’s degree in 16 hours of study (Senate Hearing)

Unaccredited Hamilton University conferred a doctorate, based primarily on a 4 page paper, to a gal in Homeland Security!

And those are only a few of the cases that made the paper. Who knows what multiple of that were discovered and handled quietly to avoid public embarrassment, and those waiting to be discovered.

To The End September 7, 2007 at 2:30 a.m.

You do make a point around Concord College and University, Rochville University, Almeda University & Hamilton University being diploma mills. We all agree that, they are true definition of diploma mills. Those schools just issue certificates without ever having to do any coursework, taking exams, writing thesis or in candidate status for accredidation.

It clearly shows the stupidity of the American Culture as being shallow minded, narrow minded and plain stupid.

Whether one wants to accept the form of online learning, Warren National University does have legitimate professors, legitimate Blackboard Systems and also candidate for the accredidation. They are also licesned by the department of Wyoming with notion that they have applied for the entry to the Boys Club.

I think what Frist Amendment wrote is correct, that as a nation, we need to have a debate/particular system on figuring out how we are going to tackle this issue. Not all Unaccredited schools are Fraud and WNU is one example of that.

If they were fradulent, why would they be applying for accreditation? I have heard that when they are doing that, they had to put down substantial deposit with State of Wyoming and Pay Hefty Application Fee for Accredidation Process. If someone knows the details, lay the open facts, as this is an open book and issues that we need to tackle as a country.

To: The End September 7, 2007 at 2:36 a.m.

So then what was the quality of education from these Colleges and Universities before the 1950's when the accreditation bodies came to be?

By your statement then, Harvard, Yale, MIT, Stanford, UCLA, Duke, Notre Dame, and the plethora of other institutions were nothing more than diploma mills, for there was no 3d party to regulate them.

Once again, accreditation entities are nothing more than "Good ol Boy" clubs that rape the educational institutions by extorting huge amounts of money so as to "verify" their educational programs.

Wyoming State Law September 7, 2007 at 2:50 a.m.

REGISTERED PRIVATE DEGREE GRANTING POST-SECONDARY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONS

Effective July 1, 2006, the Wyoming Department of Education now requires annual registration of private degree granting post-secondary education institutions. One of the major criteria of becoming registered is that the school must either be accredited or be in the process of becoming accredited by an accrediting organization recognized by the United States Department of Education. See W.S. § 21-4-401 et seq. and the Wyoming Department of Education Emergency Rules and Regulations, Chapter 30 for a full discussion of the requirements.

Directly from CHEA September 7, 2007 at 2:56 a.m.

11. Q. What if an institution or program is not accredited? Does that mean
it’s bad?

A. Not necessarily, but it does mean one should review as much information
as possible about the institution before enrollment. An institution or program
may be new and may not have met minimum standards to even be
considered eligible for accreditation. If an institution or program is not
accredited, it should have some other means of quality review.

Q. Shouldn’t there be a separate standard in the law to review distance
learning?

A. Right now, institutional and programmatic accrediting organizations are
effectively reviewing distance learning within the framework of the agreement
reached with USDE and the Congress during the 1998 reauthorization:
distance learning is considered part of the scope of accrediting
organizations if they had been reviewing distance learning prior to 1998.
At this time, there does not appear to be a need for a separate standard.
However, as new types of education offerings—e.g., online non-degree
options from providers that are not affiliated with any accredited entity—
become more and more available, accrediting organizations may need to
consider whether they should be examining the quality of these offerings
as well. And, this may involve consideration of a separate standard.

http://www.chea.org/pdf/fund_accred_20qu...

Potential Student September 7, 2007 at 3 a.m.

I have over 5+ Years of work experience and have reviewed the WNU MBA Program. Looking at the faculty, program and cost perspective, I have found the program to be a good match. With that, I know there are cricitcs in this forum on the university, even though they have gone for accredidation.

Would you suggest that I enroll in the University or wait till they become accredidated?

To Potential Student: September 7, 2007 at 3:08 a.m.

Don't waste your time, money or career there. This very site has dozens of good, accredited, online options.

If you can afford it, one of the best is Penn State - World University.

For a value, try Fort Hayes State or Peru State (Nebraska)

To Wyoming State Law September 7, 2007 at 3:12 a.m.

When Wyoming became known as a haven for unaccredited schools due to there weak laws, many groups were lobbying for the law change:

"The University of Wyoming Student Senate plans to lobby lawmakers to crack down on unaccredited private colleges in the state, saying those schools drag down the reputations of other Wyoming institutions."

http://www.uwyo.edu/news/webclips/showre...

To Wyoming State Law September 7, 2007 at 4:49 a.m.

The question I have is than why did the president of WNU (Mr. Saltman) testify at the hearings in support of the Accredidation.

Why has the university taken step for the accredidation? From Accredidation perspective, explain to me, why this school wouldn't receive accredidation?

?? September 7, 2007 at 5:27 a.m.

Who knows, we can all speculate:

I would guess that when it became a requirement in Wyoming, it was apply for accreditation or shuffle off to another weak-lawed state, which would be it's 5th state.

AFAIK, this business is run out of California, but the Wyoming laws are much more favorable.

There is a chance that they may some day receive accreditation, which would be great, but past history that I read from all the articles here don't inspire much confidence.

To Potential Student September 7, 2007 at 8:20 p.m.

There are so many good, accredited online MBA programs out there, it is almost overwhelming to compare them all. Here are a few to look at to get you started, but keep in mind there are dozens and dozens more to choose from.

Franklin University
Davenport University Online
Baker College
Kaplan University
University of Phoenix (too expensive in my mind)
Peru State (one of the cheaper options mentioned above)
Fort Hays State (low cost)
DeVry University
Penn State World (Penn State name, and online too!)
University of Maryland – UC
Nova Southeastern
Central Michigan
Boise State

So, it really depends on which of the big three factors you are looking to maximize (Name recognition, cost, accreditation)

*The name recognition ones such as Penn State can be a great find.

*The no-name low cost ones are no frills, but great when the next promotion / offer requires an Accredited master’s.

*Most of these are only regionally accredited, which will guarantee universal acceptance, but recently some of the top companies like HP have required AACSB (business school accreditation) on top of that to be eligible for tuition reimbursement. These are the toughest, most rigourous accreditation / programs out there.

*I personally would avoid anything that is only nationally accredited, such as DETC accredited schools. Although it is a real accreditation, and your employer can verify it as being accredited during routine background checks, you can run into some problems using this degree. I say that as an Accountant, as it won’t allow you to become a CPA in most states.

Congrats on looking to further your education and taking the time to ensure you select a quality, accredited program.

Accredidation September 9, 2007 at 4:34 a.m.

I wanted to throw this out there, as I was speaking to someone earlier tonight who attends the prestine princeton university. One of their departments (Computer Science) didn't get/lost its accredidation. Does this mean, this is a Diploma Mill that Princeton University is Running?

SuperStudent September 12, 2007 at 4:34 a.m.

has anyone gotten a real job using a wnu degree? if you can actually get a job using this degree, then i could understand why ppl still apply. If not then it seems utterly useless and a complete waste of time and money.

Depends... September 12, 2007 at 2:53 p.m.

I think the ”Peter Principle” applies. As long as nobody checks into it, you could probably get an entry level job in some places. But as you look to rise through the ranks, the background checking is more consistent, and an unaccredited degree should be discovered. Look at the Notre Dame coach guy, he was fine when he was a nobody, but when he got the Notre Dame job, it took about 1 day for everyone to pick apart the education in his bio.

I’ve never seen any evidence of “graduates” becoming professors, executives, CPA’s, or anything newsworthy.

I truly hope that WNU eventually passes it’s quality review, so that those graduating after 2012? don’t have to worry about these things.

Re Super Student September 13, 2007 at 3:43 a.m.

My WNU Degree did help me get a promotion within my company. My employer recommended this University in fact.

Re Re Super Student September 13, 2007 at 4:15 a.m.

Would you able to verify whether your employer is a major fortune 500 corporation or small firm? Potentially the industry of the firm also?

Regarding the above" September 19, 2007 at 5:44 a.m.

I am at Matsush ita, the world's largest electronic corporation. We are best know for Panasonic but we also have other divisions.

Confused? September 20, 2007 at 1:31 p.m.

I just received the Warren National catalog and on Page 72, under the heading "Licenses and Credentials", it says:

"The University is oriented to those individuals NOT seeking licenses or credentials."

I am confused by that statement. I want my degree to be a credential, but it won't be?

Re: Confused September 21, 2007 at 3:36 a.m.

When the University gets Accredidation in 2008, you will not have any issues around credentials. If you are looking for a degree for purpose of credentials, why not try out one of the Diploma Mills such as Almeda University? No Education, No Studying, Just Pay Flat Fee and Great Certificate to Hang on your wall. What do you say?

Confused? September 21, 2007 at 3:46 a.m.

Anyone got a serious answer? Would I be able to use this as a credential on a job app or not? I won't need a license of any sort, so I am fine if it won't work for that.

Re: Confused? September 21, 2007 at 4:57 a.m.

You would be able to use this as a credential on the resume. Honestly speaking, you will not have any issues.

To Confused: September 21, 2007 at 4:43 p.m.

IF it is legal in your state.
IF you don't need to be licensed.
IF your potential employer doesn't check for accredited degrees.
IF your internet connection doesn't connect to any accredited universities that offer your major

Then it might be okay for you!

J. Bovin September 22, 2007 at 2:55 a.m.

Wow,

A whole bunch of ugly and upset folks here,,,, seeming to have some real issues with WNU/KWU. If it was as bad as what most everyone says it is,,,,, why don't our wonderfull goverment shut it down???

Well, here is my thoughts. When wanting to get into a safety engineering program the only one that came up was KWU/WNU. After phoning them and getting some references in the state that I live, I was impressed. Some of the ones given were:

Three Area Hospitals
Pulp & Paper Mills

and a few others.

After calling them, everyone seemed very pleased with the experence.

So I decided to send in my $50.00 and filled out the necessary paperwork & got moving forward.

One of the first things required was that I had to take a GERE. Being out of school for 30 years, I didn't fair so well. Around five days latter, I recieved a phone call that my $50.00 was being returned and and was told I did have what it took inregards to the math that was required in the area of study that I wanted.

After speaking with them, they required that I take a math course and pass with an acceptable grade and retake the GERE,,, I retook the test and passed with acceptable marks.

After going through the entire KWU/WNU program, I couldn't believe what I had learned, which improved my knowledge and
self-confidence and increased my earnings incredibly.

People can say what they want about "Accredidation". I graduated for an "Accredited" school, my High School to be exact, and there were people getting the same diploma that I got that couldn't:

* Read
* Write
* Do simple math

In a matter of fact, I worked with a fellow that got his high school diploma from another local high school that when signing his paycheck, he had to lay his drivers license down next to the line on the check and copy his name. OOOPs another "Accredited" institution.

Say what you want, I am proud of my degree. I worked for 17 months and three weeks to obtain it, and here is the good thing, I use the knowledge in my work everyday. It is
working for me & my family.

So while you people a beating up Warren Nation University I'm sitting back laughing. You may be like the bulk of the people in our wonderfull society with your "Accredited" degree, not even using it because you can't find a job in the field you studied in.

I went to a unaccredited university and am making $84,000.00
per year, and using my degree!!

Have a great life,,,,,,,,, I am.

To: J. Bovin September 22, 2007 at 2:49 p.m.

"why don't our wonderfull goverment shut it down???"

Nice grammar. It is regulated by states, so schools can move from state to state to avoid serious regulation. WN"U" is on it's 4th or 5th state. Wyoming finally cracked down and required "universities" in it's state to become accredited.

So old KW"U" dumped it's hokey programs such as engineering and changed it's name. No word on another state move yet.

Correcting JBovin September 23, 2007 at 2:17 p.m.

"GERE. Being out of school for 30 years, I didn't fair so well. Around five days latter, I recieved a phone call that my $50.00 was being returned and and was told I did have what it took inregards to the math that was required in the area of study that I wanted.

After speaking with them, they required that I take a math course and pass with an acceptable grade and retake the GERE,,, I retook the test and passed with acceptable marks."

Just to set the record straight, my experience was much different.

A) I was accepted without any exam scores. WNU does not require them, period. Look at their catalog.
B) They waived a healthy chunk of my requirements (> 40%) based on my work experience. I still have my degree plan that shows this.
C) It's the GRE exam, not a GERE, at least know the name of the exam you supposedly took.

Re:To: J. Bovin September 23, 2007 at 7:19 p.m.

The Engineering programs offered at KWU, which is now WNU were actually very challanging. Maybe you just read the negative hype and are willing to believe all of it.

I believe that dropping the programs was necessary for WNU to become accredited.

Hopefully, once WNU is accredited it will silence everyone here who spends so much of their time and energy bashing something they know nothing about.

reply: To: J. Bovin September 25, 2007 at 6:08 p.m.

Why did they move?

Simple.

The Liberal Academia Educrats felt threatened. Anytime an educational institution with a better way to provide an education comes along, they (Academia) will start screaming anything and everything until something sticks, like "Diploma Mill"

"Accredidation" has been around for a short time in this country, created by the liberal Academia buffoons, with help from the idiots in the media to spread the word.

Bridge Collapse September 26, 2007 at 5:51 a.m.

"I believe that dropping the programs was necessary for WNU to become accredited."

Seems to be a contradiction. If the "engineering" "degrees" were so good, why would they cut them loose to score points towards accreditation?

"Voluntary" accreditation arguments debunked September 26, 2007 at 5:56 a.m.

From US Gov

Frequently Asked Questions about diploma mills, fraudulent degrees, and accreditation. Among other things:

Accreditation is “voluntary,” so doesn't that mean it is optional and not necessary?

Accreditation is voluntary in that the process of accreditation requires the full cooperation with and complete participation in the process of accreditation by the college or university seeking accreditation. At the heart of the accreditation process is a self-study prepared by the college or university demonstrating its commitment to the standards of accreditation.

Since accreditation is the PRIMARY means of determining the legitimacy and quality of colleges and universities in the United States, to describe the process as "voluntary" is not to describe it as "optional" or "unnecessary."

Accreditation September 28, 2007 at 2:18 a.m.

Since the University has applied for accreditation, would someone familiar with the field be able to advise, if they will be accredited or not before 2008?

No September 28, 2007 at 12:27 p.m.

Nobody is certain if they are serious about accreditation. They haven't made the cut in 24 years.

They have applied for it because they state they are located in forced them to.

If they are indeed serious, and they make massive changes to their large "life experience" awards, 1 day open book exam grad courses, cut all their substandard programs, etc, still probably 2010 at the absolute soonest.

Re: NO September 28, 2007 at 5:41 p.m.

Their Policy is that they transfer up to 60 Undergraduate Educational Credits and Give up to 30 Credits for Work Experience. Many Many Universities do this. Why is this an unfair practice? You mention 2010, but their Wyoming License expries in 2008 and dont have to put up substantial deposit on this, so wont this loose it, if they dont get accredited by 2008?

No September 28, 2007 at 5:56 p.m.

"Give up to 30 Credits for Work Experience. Many Many Universities do this"

Name one legitimate school that will give a year of college credit for nothing. WNU will give you one year for "work experience", other unaccredited schools like Rochville will give you 3 or 4 years.

"but their Wyoming License expries in 2008"

I'm not positive, but I thought I read they just had to APPLY by 2007, so I think they won't be forced out of state again, as long as they are still an applicant.

Updated list September 28, 2007 at 6:04 p.m.

The use of unaccredited WNU degree titles may be legally restricted or illegal in some jurisdictions.[14]

Jurisdictions that have restricted the use of credentials from unaccredited schools or that specifically restrict WNU credentials include Oregon [15][5], Michigan[16], Maine[17], North Dakota[5], New Jersey[5], Washington[15][18], Nevada[15], Illinois[15], Indiana[15], and Texas.[19].

WNU is also restricted from accepting students from Oregon[5][20], California[7][20] or Utah[20].

Re: NO September 28, 2007 at 9:04 p.m.

As for the 30 Credits Trasnferred from Accredited University, I have listed one below.

Strayer University

www.strayer.edu - Gives Credit for Life Experience

Work/Life Experience
Undergraduate students may be able to receive credit for their work or life experience; more information on this process is available through your Admissions Officer or Academic Advisor.

Ashworth University

www.ashworthuniversity.edu

Bachelor’s Degree
You may receive credit for up to 75% of your degree program as a combination of transfer credits from other institutions and life/work experience. Life/work experience credit is limited to 30 credits: 15 credits for general education courses and 15 credits for core and/or concentration courses. Credits must be no more than ten years old and be from an accredited institution.

Ashworth University is an Accredited Member of the Distance Education and Training Council, The Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (SACS), The Commission on International and Trans-Regional Accreditation (CITA). Also, Ashworth University meets the requirements of the Georgia Nonpublic Postsecondary Education Commission to offer instruction in career programs, associate, bachelor's and master's degree programs.

------------------------------------------------------------
American Sentinel University
http://www.americansentinel.edu

American Sentinel University recognizes that many students have already established and achieved substantial professional goals. We acknowledge students' life and work experience by awarding up to 30 credits toward the completion of the general education curriculum requirements.

Students may receive a total of up to 90 hours credit through a combination of credits transferred from other universities, for specific professional certifications, and credit awarded for life and work experience.

American Sentinel University is accredited by the Distance Education and Training Council. The Accrediting Commission of the Distance Education and Training Council is listed by the U.S. Department of Education as a nationally recognized accrediting agency and is a recognized member of the Council for Higher Education Accreditation.

------------------------------------------------------------

With all this said and being an accredited US Institution, are they also a Diploma Mill? Looking at them, Warren National Makes their policies upfront, rather than being sneaky. Whats the big deal?

Based on this, don't you think WNU should be accredited also? They are following the same requirements as these universities. There are plenty of more out there.

Just a Guy September 28, 2007 at 10:43 p.m.

"Distance Education and Training Council" is supposedly a national accediting body. If the school in question does not have regional accredidation, They may was well be called a degree mill.

Question September 29, 2007 at 4:01 a.m.

What's the difference between unaccredited and diploma mill? Aren't they the same thing, but one is just more polite?

Difference in Work Experience September 29, 2007 at 12:22 p.m.

You point to Strayer and some other schools, but you forget the most important point. They offer experience credits if you are able to validate that experience and pass Equivelancy exams, such as CLEP (College Level Exam Program) and DANTES.

Good old KW"U" usually waived 40% of entire degrees based on the CLAIM of some kind of training as a marketing tool to lure in those that wanted a quick "degree".

Re: Difference in Work Experience September 29, 2007 at 6:42 p.m.

As for WNU, they give 30 Credits with similar models as American Sentinel and Ashworth University. With Strayer also, its iffy, as they still give 30 credits for work experience.

With all this, than why shoudlnt WNU be accredidted?

Read above September 30, 2007 at 4:17 p.m.

Read the post above on why there is a difference.

There are many reasons why they have never passed accreditation, this is just one of them.

Go to a real school.

Wasim Javid October 1, 2007 at 4:02 a.m.

I like the MBA course selections offered by Warren National University. I have been in business for over a decade. The course offered from Business Communication through electives on Leadership, Marketing and Interntaional Business are very practical, helps with our daily business challenges and make sound decision.

Their online school is good with e-Library, Virtual Student Union, Chat Room, Faculty assistance. I don't regret not going to a regular full time University. I am studying at my own shedule. I recommend this University. Much better than other online universities

John October 1, 2007 at 4:11 a.m.

Accreditation is important and at the same time it depends on what you do with the accreditation. If you are a fresh graduate student and look to further your studies in master program and planning to go to other universities, you probably want to verify which universities will accept Warren degree. If you are working individual looking to develop a career, Warren National University gives you the best courses and career path. The degree from WNU is definitely received and accepted by international organizations like any other traditional universities.

Tony October 1, 2007 at 11:08 a.m.

I agree with Wasim's response. I have the same positive experience with WNU. They have a structured curriculum and helps you to accelerate your degree program in fast pace....

Rakhib October 1, 2007 at 11:13 a.m.

I would agree with John. This is the whole point - how you see it is very important? I have spoken to quite a few KWU/WNU students - both from Masters and Doctorate programs. They love the program structure and the flexibility. I recommend WNU for my fellas who want to speed up their career goals in short time.

Alex October 1, 2007 at 11:22 a.m.

Guys...WNU is the fastest growing university. If accreditation is your concern, the news is they have filed for accreditation and they are expected to get one soon. I also spoke to one of the key program designer who designed cuurriculum, course programs, trained faculties for WNU, University of Phoenix and other recognized online universities. The design, metrics used for the curriculum is the same for other online Universities. I am not saying all on-line universities are good. I am referring to WNU only. I have done enough research on WNU and this school is one of the very few that not only offers best curriculum structure for Bachelors, Masters and Business program, they also give you credit for your work experiene and allow you to complete the program in 12-18 months.

List October 1, 2007 at 2:03 p.m.

"look to further your studies in master program and planning to go to other universities, you probably want to verify which universities will accept Warren degree"

Here is the list of schools that will accept the degree.

NONE

To Alex: October 1, 2007 at 2:19 p.m.

If it is one of the best, why is it illegal in so many states? I can understand if you were naive enough to buy one of these degrees, but don't try to sell it to others who may be making a career decision.

I have never seen an employer that says "we gladly accept unaccredited degrees"

Whatever your major is, there is at least a dozen other schools that offer the same program, online, with accreditation, without all the Senate hearings and State blacklists.

Anyone who has Google and 5 minutes of time will come to the same conclusion.

If you still have your heart set on an unaccredited, cheap, easy degree, and want much of your degree magically waived, try other unaccredited universities like Belford or Almeda. At least it's more cost effective.

Lawmaker October 1, 2007 at 9:08 p.m.

Stop wasting your energy worrying about accreditation. For thousands of years there was none.
No one, and I mean NO ONE cares or checks on accreditation unless it is a government job requiring licensure (<2% of jobs are govt require licensure).
And one more note.
Do not believe all of the internet (state website postings) where the poster pre-empts the url with scarry sounding "illegal degree hot air" read the state code in detail, not just the title of the post. The code will assure you that you can legally use your WNU degree anywhere. Again, go to the state law code and read the details.
Remember-Government large enough to control everything in your life is powerful enough to take away every thing you have. Lets keep our marxist like government out of our education and our pockets.

Re: To Alex October 1, 2007 at 9:18 p.m.

Obviously you are another idiot that has drank the Accreditation Kool-aid!

Accreditation is nothing more than a bogus way for Acedemia Elitists to EXTORT money from colleges and Universities.

WHY has Accreditation only been around for 50-60 years? Answer THAT.

I guess Harvard, Princeton, Yale, etc are all diploma mills since they were not accredited until this whole B.S. sceme came around.

Accreditation? Nothing more than B.S.!!!!!!!!

HR John October 1, 2007 at 9:51 p.m.

"No one, and I mean NO ONE cares or checks on accreditation unless it is a government job requiring licensure "

Total BS, it is checked where I work on initial application and again on any internal move / promotion. It is checked by every competent HR department in good companies. They don't want to end up being the one that hires a guy with an unaccredited degree that a cat also got.

Please post any company saying "We gladly accept unaccredited degrees". Anyone, Anyone?

BigD October 2, 2007 at 3:12 a.m.

Great school, licensed in 1984. I'm a graduate of two accredited colleges and attended one other accredited university and Warren's program is the toughest I've found. I was on a college academic development board also, Warren has responded over the years to student's/ faculty recommendations, as well. Check out their alumni, you'll find some very successful people in both Government and private industry. I would rate this progam highly against any in the nation. Free trade laws guarentee (successfully defended by Warren) that your degree will not be descriminated against.

Ali October 2, 2007 at 3:14 a.m.

I am a graduate from Kennedy-Western University, and I recently graduated with my MBA from a very reputable regionally accredited university which, by the way, accepted KWUs credits. This is a fact and no one's opinion. Top that!

To Ali: October 2, 2007 at 12:28 p.m.

"I am a graduate from Kennedy-Western University, and I recently graduated with my MBA from a very reputable regionally accredited university which, by the way, accepted KWUs credits. This is a fact and no one's opinion. Top that!"

It's simply not true. Please post a link to the schools graduate policy that says they accept unaccredited degrees. You can post these claims all you want, but there is not one shread of evidence on this thread yet that anyone accepts this sub-standard "degree".

Please post any company saying "We gladly accept unaccredited degrees". Anyone, Anyone?

I didn't think so.

Faculty? October 2, 2007 at 12:30 p.m.

"Warren has responded over the years to student's/ faculty recommendations"

They have faculty? What do they do? Do they grade the one open book exam required for a graduate course? That must be some easy $$$$.

RNMBA October 3, 2007 at 9:09 p.m.

I have two graduate degrees from accredited, well known universities. What I didn't realize is the dismal state of the KWU/WNU degree. I first heard about it on NBC Nightly News several years ago. That was after I worked very hard and completed all the courses for the PhD program. Silly me. I dropped out and never finished the dissertation. Why bother. I feel scammed out for sure.

smg October 5, 2007 at 4:22 p.m.

what's wrong with an online degree ? life is short, make a difference. if your life experiences are legit, go for it. make money for your family. some idiots out there who just finished college are so ignorant.

To: RNMBA October 5, 2007 at 5:43 p.m.

So sorry to hear that. There are alot of good online doctorate programs out there, but the unaccredited ones can be very deceptive and sound legitimate.

Were you able to recover any of the lost tuition or take any other action against them?

YSF October 9, 2007 at 1 a.m.

Anyone that believes being accredited makes a difference is a FOOL.

I have met many, many, many, many people with college degrees from "accredited" universities and they are some of the dumbest, most ignorant people I have ever met.

Being accredited does NOT mean you are getting a better education! It means that the school has the rubber stamp of approval to accept government money, i.e grants or VA. All they have been given is a license to steal Americans hard earned money through taxation.

I don't even have a degree, but I'll match brains against most of you "accredited" college grads ANY DAY! Me? I'm a Network Manager with several IT certifications making $100k+.

Any takers? "Anyone? Anyone? I didn't think so."

Warren National "faculty"? October 9, 2007 at 3:32 a.m.

From Senate Hearing 108-353 "Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations, Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"

Page 51 - A Senator asks an undercover agent who enrolled, about Kennedy Western faculty.

Senator Lieberman: "I wanted to ask you whether there was any way in which the so-called professors at Kennedy-Western made themselves available to you over the Internet. For instance, was there ever a way give to you that you could contact anybody that seemed to be a professor if you had a question about a course?"

Lieutenant Commander Gelzer: "You were supposed to be able to contact your professor for what they called tutorial advice. You weren't allowed to contact your professor directly. You had to make a request to your student advisor and then they would forward it on to the professor, and the only time I reached out to a professor, I never got a response."

re: Warren National "faculty"? October 9, 2007 at 9:17 p.m.

Ooooooooh!

One WHOLE time! Of course the prof isn't human! He's supposed to be readily available 24/7.

I requested contact with each professor in every class and received a response and talked with them, via phone, everytime. Some several times. Plus they now have a discussion board that the prof's answer questions and make comments frequently.

WNU is NOT a diploma mill, contrary to what the LIBTARDS in Congress and the Elitist Educrats at the Universities say.

Low budget faculty / unknown ownership October 9, 2007 at 11:32 p.m.

According to an article in the Chronicle of Higher Education

Most faculty are "recruited by Kennedy-Western through mass mailings and fliers. They earn from a few hundred to several thousand dollars a year, receiving $25 to grade a paper, a couple of hundred dollars to develop a course, and $40 an hour to answer students' questions."

"This information is not confirmed by Warren National University. According to the Chronicle, the university refused to disclose the number of faculty, the method of compensation, the proportion of faculty that is full-time or the ownership of the institution."

RNMBA October 10, 2007 at 6:20 p.m.

Accreditation is key. Not a single credit hour from KWU/WNU could be transferred because of the non-accredited status. On-line or not is not the issue. The "real" doctoral programs I am applying for are from real universities, and offer "on-line" programs. I have not attempted to recoup any funds; I think there would be loopholes...like..."we're licensed but not accredited".

File a complaint! October 11, 2007 at 1:06 a.m.

Personally, I would.

A) Send them a certified letter requesting a full refund for the reasons you cite.

B) If they don't at least make some restitution, go online and file a complaint with the Better Business Bureau they are in.

http://www.mountainstates.bbb.org/WWWRoo...

According to the Better Business site, Warren National University has received 14 formal complaints in the last few years, some in each of these BBB categories:

1. Advertising Issues - Claims alleging print or electronic media advertised claims or practices misrepresent the service or product offer.

2. Billing or Collection Issues - Claim alleging billing errors, unauthorized charges, or questionable collection practices.

3. Sales Practice Issues - Claims of alleged sales presentations made in person or by telephone that contain misrepresentations of the product or service, high pressure sales practices, failure to disclose key conditions of the offer, and verbal representations not consistent with written contractual terms or agreements.

4. Product Issues - Claim alleging a product does not meet the expectations of the complainant, including defective merchandise.

5. Refund or Exchange Issues - Claim of alleged failure to honor company policy or verbal commitment to provide refunds, exchanges, or credit for products or services.

In 1962 October 13, 2007 at 3:17 a.m.

No colleges worldwide were accredited. Zilch, Nada, Zip, Nein, zero.
Not one single NASA Engineer that put a man on the moon came from an accredited University.

Funny October 13, 2007 at 8:24 a.m.

Anyone want to read an entertaining news story?

It looks as the elite academics are getting what they asked for- government interference in education and lots of it. And they do not like it at all!!! It was OK as long as Uncle Sam let them keep their little good ole boy accreditation club going. Ah yes, live by the government sword and die by the government sword.
Football players getting BSEE degrees with SAT scores of 250 may no longer be allowed. Politics out and testing in. One standard for all accreditation agencies. What a beautiful day in America

http://insidehighered.com/news/2007/05/2...

WTF October 15, 2007 at 8:15 a.m.

Ref: Anyone want to read an entertaining news story?

The same winers who want the government to crack down on unaccredited universities are upset that the government wants to regulate the accreditors. I thought they were oh so concerned about quality education in universities. Follow the money. Its all about the dough.

http://insidehighered.com/news/2007/05/2...

MYOWNLAW October 15, 2007 at 8:30 a.m.

I hereby urge our esteemed Senators and the GAO to have a full investigation of all of the DOE recognized Accreditation Agencies for being substandard.

http://insidehighered.com/news/2007/05/2...

Let ask employees what they think October 16, 2007 at 5:26 a.m.

Testimony of Andrew Coulombe, Former Employee Kennedy Western University:

..."After graduating from college, I was looking to work in the field of higher education and I saw a listing on the employment website Monster.com for a position as an admission counselor at Kennedy Western University. I had not heard of Kennedy Western, but was eager to work in academia and to advise students. Therefore I applied for the job.

Shortly after being hired, I started training at Kennedy Western. I soon discovered this was like no other school I had ever seen. I saw immediately that I had been mislead by Kennedy Westerns recruiter. I was not going to be counseling anyone. I had been hired to be a telemarketer, using a script to sell Kennedy Western just like any other product.

As an admission counselor, I was required to call between 120 and 125 perspective students per day, trying to convince them that they should apply to Kennedy Western.

...The problem is, much of our sales pitch was not true. There is no admissions board. Applications were reviewed by one person. Of course, the applicant had excellent chances of getting in. In fact, I had never heard of an applicant being rejected.

We were also instructed to tell applicants applicants that they would be taking the same classes that students took at real schools, like Harvard or Princeton. I went to a real school, Kennedy Western is not a real school."

Thats the best you can do? October 16, 2007 at 10:26 a.m.

REF:Testimony of Andrew Coulombe, Former Employee Kennedy Western University:

This repetitive cut and paste of this one person who had an axe to grind because he did not get a pay raise.

cap October 16, 2007 at 10:28 a.m.

Ok, so I earned a WNU BS in Safety Engineering, then I could not believe it. Just days after I put the credential on my resume men in black suits showed up at my door. They placed me under arrest and read me my Miranda. They blindfolded me and took me to a secret place where I found out is used only for interrogating WNU students. They torture you first by waterboarding you. Then they play this recording over and over, something about senate GAO, senate GAO over and over again.
There was another WNU student in the room with me. She finally screams out "What do you want from me?". The recording stopped. A voice said "Compliance. We want you to fall in line with the way it has always been done. We distort and you comply." She asked in horror, "Who are you?" The voice replied "Big Brother".

Hank Park October 16, 2007 at 10:42 a.m.

I found the BSME program at WNU both challenging and valuable. The diversity of instructors from different locations across the country provided a very intriguing learning environment. I also took three Nuclear Engineering related classes at Georgia Tech while attending WNU online. I gained just as much, if not more, from the WNU courses online. I would strongly recommend this program to anyone interested in online learning.

Tanya Larson October 16, 2007 at 11:09 a.m.

I accomplished my Doctorates at Warren National University. It was a good experience. I feel like I learned a lot to help me improve my teaching ability. A large emphasis was placed on curriculum design which has helped me better understand how to adapt my curriculum to better meet this ever changing hi tech world.

Becka October 16, 2007 at 11:16 a.m.

I'm beginning my third Class (out of 6). The Liberal Arts programs have signicant writing requirements, and weekely participation requirements. You will find yourself challenged and wanting to put in the effort. WNUs teachers seem to be tuned in to online learning and so far have been helpful. You will interact with them a great deal in discussions and by email. They call you at the beginning of each class to say hello and get to know you. Frankly, although the school makes them do this, it is a nice touch to have the professor's actually show an interest in getting to know their students.

This is a structured program, and there are no real electives as each course is provided to you in full. The long paper that we've had for each of the first two seminars has been student's choice, and I expect that to continue.

This isn't just about battles and leaders. It is a broader course discussing the use of history, the study of history, and critical thought.

The support people at the school have been very responsive and friendly.

HiLo October 16, 2007 at 11:32 a.m.

Warren National is a respected university that does online education very well. Great instructors with reasonable tuition expenses. Having completed my MS degree, I would recommend it to anyone who has an interest in business or management. Also, they offer several other graduate degrees (including a MBA) that can be completed totally online, with no campus visits. (Though it is a nice place to visit since it is Beautiful Wyoming). Also, with this particuar degree, the MS in Management, there are a few areas to specialize in, or you can go the general track route.

Miscellaneous, overly obvious corrections October 16, 2007 at 2:05 p.m.

"I found the BSME program at WNU both challenging and valuable" - 1 open book exam per course can be challenging.

"I accomplished my Doctorates at Warren National University." That's great, just don't call yourself "Doctor" and don't make any plans to work in academia.

"WNUs teachers seem to be tuned in to online learning " Wow! like Bigfoot, nobody was sure they existed.

"Warren National is a respected university" - By who exactly?

*Not the federal government, who investigated them.
*Not a dozen different states, which have made these "degrees" illegal.
*Not by employees, who described it as a telemarketing sweatshop.
*Not by real schools, who will not accept unaccredited credits in transfer.
*Not by any professional licensing board, which do not recognize them.
*Not by any competent HR department that can spend $6 per employee for verification.

"Though it is a nice place to visit since it is Beautiful Wyoming" Mmmm, sorry, they are based in California, but maintain an address in Wyoming, (after Idaho and Hawaii booted them),

re: Miscellaneous, overly obvious corrections October 16, 2007 at 6:18 p.m.

I have attended "accredited" classes that had one open book exam as well. The whole semester wasted my time listening to an idiot ramble on everyday and then have me read chapters x-x.

Anyone that calls themself a "Doctor" and doesn't practice medicine is snobbish.

WNU/KWU was not investigated by the government.
Less than a dozen states have "outlawed" these degrees, in direct violation of an individuals rights.
1 disgruntled ex-employee
Schools and boards read the list of members of the "Good 'ol Boy Club"
HR spends $6 to verify because they are typical lazy and will "go with the flow" of the good ol boy acedemia.

Ca has admin offices, corporate is in Wy. Typical of "for profit businesses" thanks to Capitalism.

Correction - Investigation titles October 17, 2007 at 12:28 a.m.

Previous Poster says: "WNU/KWU was not investigated by the government."

There are many links posted to the Kennedy Western University a/k/a Warren National University Senate Hearing. You must have missed them, here are the titles:

***"Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense."

***"Diploma Mills are Easily Created and Some Have Issued Bogus Degrees to Federal Employees at Government Expense."

***"Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations: Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"

Other reading items on Kennedy Western University a/k/a Warren National University from various other exposes and news articles.

***"It May Take Hours, But You Too Can Earn a University Degree"

***"When Elected Officials Aren't What They Seem
Texas officials and Pennsylvania cats tout misleading credentials"

SOMEBODY October 17, 2007 at 7:49 a.m.

Is in love with Big Government :)

Some Day October 17, 2007 at 8:03 a.m.

I would like to meet, and buy a cup of coffee, the other one person (besides myself) who keeps changing their identity and making up stories and posting to this blog. I am 90% sure that there is only one or two other posters to this site besides me. There may be a third person, but I doubt it. I have had a lot of fun antagonizing both sides by changing my opinion 180 degrees and taking different stances here and there.

I'd be a disgruntled employee too October 17, 2007 at 12:20 p.m.

Testimony of Andrew Coulombe, Former Employee, Kennedy-Western University

“Admission counselors work in a boiler room atmosphere, where were under significant pressure to meet lofty sales goals. We were paid a low base salary and made over half of our pay in commissions. We were paid a commission of $15 per head on every application we brought in. If a student actually enrolled, we would get roughly $100 per student”

“Admissions counselors’ names were also listed on a large white board in our sales room, indicating how many sales we had made and whether or not we had met our sales goals. There was enormous turnover in Kennedy-Western’s sales force. Many counselors quit once they discovered they were going to be telemarketers, not admissions counselors. Others could not meet the sales goals set by Kennedy-Western. Others simply could not stomach what they were being asked to do.”

re: I'd be a disgruntled employee too October 17, 2007 at 6:22 p.m.

KWU/WNU is a FOR PROFIT institution, just like Univ of Pheonix!

Sales and commissions are a hard, intense position.

Maybe we should investigate car salesmen, as they are under the same pressure as Andrew was.

61 to 1 Telemarketer to Faculty Ratio October 18, 2007 at 1:26 a.m.

Kennedy Western University a/k/a Warren National University should be making boatloads of money!

Look at their employee list. (From Exhibit #31 - Committee on Governmental Affair). As provided by Kennedy-Western University, they list 119 employees. 61 Admissions Counelors (Telemarketers) and ONE FACULTY MEMBER!

Do the math October 18, 2007 at 1:38 a.m.

If you run the numbers

Say $6,000 in tuition - $100 to the telemarketer that landed a "student" - minimum wage to the "examination processor" = mucho profit to cover the 1 faculty member and some admin costs.

Marcus Boggs October 19, 2007 at 8:45 a.m.

I found this site surfing the net, and never knew there was such a thing as unaccredited universities anymore.

I am a collector of rare coins, and never was able to use my degree discipline.
I earned my BSEE degree at Georgia Southern in 1985 just after they got accredited. My degree in electrical engineering helped me get a job at the GA. Fish and game dept in the then eggs/hatchery biology division. Basically I made 5 dollars an hour squeezing egs and sperm out of fish and mixing them then counting the resulting hatched fry weeks later.
There were two of us there with degrees. There was a cute girl I tried to date with(but had no success)who had a degree in Psychology. Our boss who called the hiring shots (who had no degree) used to say "I will not hire an actual Biologist or someone with a degree in biology cause they might bring in their friends and take our jobs".
R E A L I T Y!!
Learning this at a young age was important.
I got lucky and my coin collecting hobby became the source of my ample income. And I enjoy coins. No degrees for this hobby though.
At my 20 year class reunion I was surprised to find that none of the 40 (or so )people that had degrees were working in their degree discipline. Not one! Around 10 or so were selling some multi-level marketing scheme that had to do with some tropical berry juice. The guy who owned the berry juice company was a guy named Bruce Cole who dropped out of high school in 11th grade. He was the most successful of all!!
Why does anybody care if someone else wants to plop down hard their earned moolah on a Kennedy National University degree, or any degree for that matter? Who are they hurting?
The outrage and contempt I see on this site for unaccreditation is unbelievable. What are you afraid of?

It is Fear October 19, 2007 at 9:32 a.m.

Afraid WNU students might get their jobs maybe?

Chickens judging Eagles.

WNU-PHD October 19, 2007 at 12:55 p.m.

The program was a good balance between structure and flexibilty, in that it was focused, but allowed me to study what I wanted within the area. I had easy contact with my profesors, who gave me constructive, useful feedback on my papers, and all but two of them responded to questions very quickly. The books I had to buy were almost all very good; in fact, I kept most of them. I wrote a lot, and believe that I developed as a writer because of it, even to the extent of having two papers published in a medical journal. As for technology, I experienced no real problems -- the online classroom environment was intuitive and never unavailable; registration was easy; and the school's support staff was easy to contact and gave prompt, useful answers.

It's not even a university October 19, 2007 at 1:04 p.m.

Look at their employee list. (From Exhibit #31 - Committee on Governmental Affair). As provided by Kennedy-Western University, they list 119 employees. 61 Admissions Counelors (Telemarketers) and ONE FACULTY MEMBER!

It's a telemarketing operation that supplies degrees.

Phillip Walter October 19, 2007 at 1:04 p.m.

The admissions process was much smoother than what I experienced at other institutions, and I was given a fair evaluation of previous coursework. Unlike other colleges, the focus was on providing education, not on making the most money. However, WNU is one of the most expensive colleges in Wyoming.

Several of my coworkers are either currently enrolled in the program or are looking into it. With increased competition, a degree can make a real difference. While many colleges offer online degrees, I wanted the acceptance that comes with a degree from Warren, which is more readily recognized than most brick and mortar colleges.

This degree has given me the background to continue my education in my chosen field, and I have been accepted into a master's program as a result.

To: Phillip Walter October 19, 2007 at 1:18 p.m.

Good for you! Which master's program did you get into? I have yet to find any university that accepts a Warren National University degree. Let me know the name and I will check into the one you found!

BSEE October 19, 2007 at 1:18 p.m.

I am from Canada. As a class taker at Warren National, allow me to offer this review to any potential student thinking about attending this fine college.
The course was very interesting, the instructor was always in contact with the student, and the material was top notch.
However, the quality of the online access was sometimes bottlenecked from multiple student usage.

From the beginning to the end WNU was a tough challenge and was number one, and far superior to any Canadian university!

The Engineering department at WNEL is also top notch and they handle all All ABET issues with respect and speed.

Overall a very nice experience

Verification October 19, 2007 at 1:27 p.m.

B.S. stories are nice, but can anyone point to anything verifiable? Cite a source other than buyer's remorse / personal opinion? Newspaper article? Anything?

The score is currently 83 verifiable negative points to a Warren National "university" "degree" to 0 verifiable positive points.

Nuclear Engineer October 19, 2007 at 1:28 p.m.

The BS in Nuclear Engineering Online program prepares tomorrow’s technology leaders today. Built on solid Physics, students are given opportunities to research, design, develop and evaluate a wide variety of Nuclear Prototypes. It is very challenging! You will feel the Neutron burn. But it is so worth the hard work.

Hey Dumbo October 19, 2007 at 1:32 p.m.

This site is for Student Reviews! Are you a WNU student?

A big no on that I am sure.

So get the hell off this site.

Earn Credit at an Unaccredited "University" October 19, 2007 at 1:39 p.m.

From the Investigation of Kennedy Western University and 2 other schools:

Committee on Government Affairs - Exhibit #16 (Again a verifiable, independent source), lists these activities that were granted academic credit for "life experience" at an unaccredited "college":

*Playing Tennis
*Buying a Persian Carpet
*Watching Public Television
*Eating in Exotic Restaurants
*Being Dungeon master
*Pressing flowers
*Keeping tropical fish

Just Like October 20, 2007 at 1:48 a.m.

Every other university!

Fancy T. Cowlbakers October 20, 2007 at 6:51 a.m.

There is no better value in today's education marketplace than prestigious WNU. The WNU degree is much more extensive than accredited schools and for a little more cost, it is worth it. For about $7000, its worth the education in any field. WNU has been a great experience.

Bob E Lee October 20, 2007 at 7:03 a.m.

My favorite WNU programming uses a traditional "correspondence school" format, where assignments are literally mailed to the student and exams are completed and returned by mail.

This format tends to make the quality of the lessons highly dependent on the quality of the course text books. Unfortunately many book companies these days place more emphasis on color and graphics than they do on content and clarity of presentation. There are no lectures or supplemental materials to help make up for the text shortcomings.

However, that one flaw aside, the overall program is very thoughfully designed and fairly straightforward even for someone with a limited background in the subject matter.

Personally I liked the self-directed nature of the study, but if you are one who needs a lot of interaction with others this may not be for you. For me, the lack of the currently fashionable and utterly boring "discussion" with people who know even less than you do was an absolute blessing, and made the program go much faster and pleasantly.

The later courses in the series include practicums, which give you a good feel for the real life application of your earlier courses. There also is a required 150-hour Lab, which can be a problem if you aren't currently involved in the field, but they do give you quite a bit of latitude in finding an appropriate activity. The blend of theory and application seemed well thought out and "real world" oriented.

Although I took this program just for personal interest, this is a very economical way to obtain a legitimate credential as a health care practitioner.

Do not believe all the pure crap you hear about not being able to use your WNU degree for licensure. Also the "Illegal WNU Degree Myth" is comical! I work at a hospital in Savannah GA., and if you want a promotion you call 1800-WARRENNATIONAL. Case closed.

Accreditation October 20, 2007 at 7:06 a.m.

Is soon to be a thing of the past.

Ref Cato Institute Website October 20, 2007 at 7:11 a.m.

The Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, "We find fault with the accreditation process itself and favor a free market or state solution.
Mr. Salisbury had no kind words for the accreditation process, which he described as a noncompetitive cartel of hidebound, quasi-governmental agencies that effectively suppresses innovations in higher education

US Govt DOJ Investigates Harvard October 20, 2007 at 11:13 a.m.

http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/dail...

Yale under US govt investigation October 20, 2007 at 11:18 a.m.

http://www.yalealumnimagazine.com/issues...

KW October 20, 2007 at 11:45 a.m.

Unlike Harvard and Yale, WNU never was investigated by any government agency.
They were a subject to an investigation. KW commited no violation and never was accused of any violation. It was the government agencies and govt employees that reimbursed government students at then unaccredited KW University that were being investigated for a crime. They had their government Kangaroo Court and never even allowed KW to attend.
US law and all 50 states require the accused to be able to face their accuser in any real indictment or investigation. Therefore this was a knock-off (fake) investigation.

Tina Kinneavy October 20, 2007 at 12:09 p.m.

I initially enrolled with Warren National in Feb. of 2006. I was able to transfer in with 30 credits from my local community college, which was great. Also, I LOVED the fact that I was easily able to take a 2 month leave of absence when I gave birth to my son in Sept. of 2006.

I am currently just a few months away from obtaining my BS in Business. As soon as I get my BS, I am then going to continue my education with WNU and pursue my BA in Accounting. So far, just about everything has been great. My enrollment advisor has been awesome! Even though his obligations to me ended after he got me signed up and enrolled in my first classes, he has continued to email me or give me a phone call every once in awhile just to see how I am doing and to give me encouragement. My academic advisor is also amazing. I have bugged him SO many times with numerous questions, and he has always been great about responding to me right away. The one negative thing that I have experienced with WNU is their financial aid people. They have switched my financial person on me several times...and each one that I have gotten has been awful. They never answer my questions, or if they do, it is usually the wrong answer that I am given.

All in all, the teachers have all been great, I have been learning ALOT in my classes, and I really enjoy the fact that I can work on my assignments when it is convenient for me and my hectic schedule. Also, I just noticed that they were listed as "America's Most Popular Higher Learning Facility" by National Review Magazine, which I thought was awesome. As for any person here who did not have a good expereince, what were the names of the teachers/advisors who weren't doing their job correctly? Because as I said, so far I have had great experiences with everyone except the financial aid people. I love this school and I cannot wait to fly out to Wyoming to receive my degrees.

YUK October 20, 2007 at 12:23 p.m.

I am ashamed of KW for giving in to the power elite in academia. Oh well.

Mr. Saltman, Kennedy-Western Chief Executive Officer and President, spoke in support of accreditation. Mr. Saltman explained that candidacy status for WNU is the first big step in accreditation and accreditation would ensure the integrity of the education being provided by post secondary education institutions in Wyoming.

It's not even a University October 20, 2007 at 1:56 p.m.

Look at their employee list. (From Exhibit #31 - Committee on Governmental Affairs). As provided by Kennedy-Western University, they list 119 employees. 61 Admissions Counelors (Telemarketers) and ONE FACULTY MEMBER!

It's a telemarketing operation that supplies degrees to the naive.

The TRUTH - on Kennedy Western Tuition Reimb October 20, 2007 at 2:06 p.m.

From the Committee on Governmental Affairs, Exhibit #28 from the Senate Hearing on Diploma Mills that included Kennedy Western University.

"Kennedy-Western Student on Tuition Reimbursement"

"I have been attempting in vain to get my company to approve this program and pay for the tuition. The Vice-President of engineering at my company... is convinced that a degree at Kennedy-Western isn't worth the paper it is printed on. In fact, he told me that any engineering course that is not accredited and does not include practical lab time is a complete waste of time and money and shouldn't be recognized by anyone in the industry..."

Dr J October 21, 2007 at 7:14 a.m.

REF: "It's a telemarketing operation that supplies degrees to the naive."

And no I did not get mine from KW.

Who is Naive?

Two industrial real-estate brokers go into a sales attempt. All things being equal, one broker has a genuine Seiko watch (price $370.00) and the other has a fake Rolex watch (Price $75.00). Who makes the Sale? In most cases, the broker with the fake Rolex gets the deal.
Now chances are real good I am older than you (unless you are a grandparent). I have seen it all. Appearances mean more than reality, much more.
An AS from KW looks better than just a high school diploma. A BS from KW looks better than an AS from a community college.
In todays fast pace world (where people on average keep jobs for a few years and move on and where so few truly qualified HR people monitor such)this degree stuff falls through the cracks. The KW degree is inexpensive and obtained with marginal effort. But it is legal in most states and countries. It is the "Fake Rolex" that lands the million dollar deal.
In the end, it is who has the most Jack in the bank. In life, get in, make your money hit and get out. Advice to live by my young friend. :)

HR John October 21, 2007 at 4:07 p.m.

"In todays fast pace world (where people on average keep jobs for a few years and move on and where so few truly qualified HR people monitor such)"

Background checks and credentials verification are all automated now and can be delivered electronically to your desktop within a day from the National Student Clearinghouse and other services.

According to SHRM (the HR professional group) 96% of companies do such checks and it is standard operating procedure that is taught in every HR course and training program. If you want to work at McDonalds, WalMart greeter, or one of the other bottom 4% of jobs, a Warren National University or Rochville University degree might get you there.

There are some exceptions that may sneak through the verification process to be found out later and quietly dealt with internally.

HR John October 21, 2007 at 7:11 p.m.

"A BS from KW looks better than an AS from a community college."

Incorrect. An AS from a community college is a valid credential that can and will be verified. A BS from KW is not. Pretty simple.

Dr J October 21, 2007 at 11:54 p.m.

Ref: HR John

Pretty simple is that you are not really an HR rep at all. You are an idealistic web imposter. Nice try though. :)

Throwing the BS flag October 22, 2007 at 3:44 a.m.

National Student Clearinghouse requires universities to participate and agree to monitoring. By my count they represent only about one third of the existing DOE sanctioned accredited universities. Regents Excelsior (ABET)accredited Engineering University, for example is not there for example. Check out the link below where Tulane is just now becoming a member. There are at least thousands on non members.

http://www.tulane.edu/~registra/nsch.sht...

Again October 22, 2007 at 9:44 a.m.

Ref: Anyone want to read an entertaining news story?
The same winers who want the government to crack down on unaccredited universities are upset that the government wants to regulate the accreditors. I thought they were oh so concerned about quality education in universities. Follow the money. Its all about the dough.

http://insidehighered.com/news/2007/05/2......

wow October 22, 2007 at 9:48 a.m.

http://insidehighered.com/news/2007/05/2...

You are right! The accreditors are against being audited. Talk about HIPOCRITOMAXIMUS!

Mental Floss October 22, 2007 at 12:09 p.m.

Sir Templeton once said "In any task, listen very carefully to what the experts say, then make damn sure you do exactly the opposite. That is the secret of all real success."

My, my, there are sure a lot of experts on this site boasting about how important accreditation is!!

Correcting on National Student Clearinghouse October 22, 2007 at 3:04 p.m.

1/3 of schools are in the clearing house? You must have had your math class waived for "life experience".

"More than 3,000 colleges, enrolling 91% of US college students, and hundreds of high school districts nationwide participate in the Clearinghouse"

DegreeVerify: ...Commercial verifiers can instantly confirm degrees online, providing them with an easy, fast, and inexpensive way to validate educational records and combat credentials fraud."

http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/abou......

Glad to clear up all the confusion!
And the other 9%, are still verified to weed out fakes, it is just a little slower. More colleges join every day.

re: Correcting on National Student Clearinghouse October 23, 2007 at 12:31 a.m.

I guess since Princeton's Computer Science school lost it's accreditation, you won't be hiring any CompSci grads from there.

Clowns to the left of me, jokers to the right October 23, 2007 at 3:41 a.m.

I am sorry did I say 33%. Guess I was wrong as it is only 20%.

The National Student Clearinghouse
provides immediate
online access to degree and enrollment data from colleges and universities throughout the United States. Degree verifications are available from more than 285 post-secondary institutions representing over 20% of all degrees granted, while enrollment verifications are available on 91% of the nation's students from more than 2,700 post-secondary institutions.

http://investor.talx.com/phoenix.zhtml?c...

So much October 23, 2007 at 3:44 a.m.

For the "Clearinghouse".

More Truth - Kennedy Western Students October 23, 2007 at 5:32 a.m.

From the Committee on Governmental Affairs, Exhibit #26 from the Senate Hearing on Diploma Mills that included Kennedy Western University.

"Kennedy-Western Student on the Program"

"I'm used to brick and mortar and this is really hard. I'm finding it difficult without any feedback. How do you actually get to talk to a professor? I can't understand why we don't write papers. With all the changes in healthcare, you would think they would want us to do more than memorize a book. I am thinking that maybe I made a mistake"

The Equalizer October 23, 2007 at 6:35 a.m.

REF: "1/3 of schools are in the clearing house? You must have had your math class waived for "life experience".

I am sorry did I say 33%. Guess I was wrong as it is only 20%. In engineering, that is called being conservative. You see, you were set up you bafoon.

The National Student Clearinghouse
provides immediate online access to degree and enrollment data from colleges and universities throughout the United States. Degree verifications are available from more than 285 post-secondary institutions representing over 20% of all degrees granted, while enrollment verifications are available on 91% of the nation's students from more than 2,700 post-secondary institutions.

http://investor.talx.com/phoenix.zhtml?c......

Sigh, another correction October 23, 2007 at 12:24 p.m.

Your ad on the clearinghouse is 5 years old (2007 - 2002 = 5). They currently list 1,899 schools as of today for Degree Verify not 285.

It's a great tool for simple background screening, $5 a pop, delivered to your desktop electronically. Some SHRM articles put the rate of academic fraud in some form (GPA, Major, Degree, Year, School, Diploma Mills) at 20% of applicants, that's why it is standard operating procedure.

WRONG! October 23, 2007 at 2:46 p.m.

http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/secu...

The website only lists that many schools. Does not say degree verify for all anywhere.

Also many Universities are listed over and over again, ie Kent about ten times. Also MIT, nor Duke nor Yale nor Harvard are even listed. Real good company right?

Also, they only have 700 clients (mostly government, military, and hospitals). There are about 700,000 private held companies and 10,000 Public held companies in CONUS alone!

Our HR rep (at Crane Nuclear) never even heard of them.

! October 23, 2007 at 2:50 p.m.

http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/secu...

Yea- It just says Degree and enrollment data combined. You have to pay to find out they only verify for 312 of the companies.

E-mail October 23, 2007 at 2:53 p.m.

http://www.studentclearinghouse.org/secu...

Email to "contact us" and an hour wait will get you the list of about 300 schools (and a hard sell about their 715 clients) that they verify.

WaWaWa October 23, 2007 at 3:40 p.m.

Furthermore, Just call 703-742-4200 (National Student Clearinghouse)and ask for Ann. Ann tells me that they will list any state licensed University. Accreditation is not a must. She even gave me the phone number of Don Gwinn (in Wyoming) 847-491-1335 and said they would love to work with WNU. She said all they do is the work the school do to verify the enrollment and degree (this is a service). They would tell any checkers that the school was unaccredited (just like WNU would do). In fact, they already have several unaccredited universities using the service.
You see, all they do is verify enrollment and that the person achieved what degree.

Makes Sense October 23, 2007 at 4:12 p.m.

The "Clearinghouse" is "National" and therefore since unaccredited schools are not illegal and are protected under the constitution, they have to let unaccredited schools list also.
Example-Even Oregon lists 10 or 15 unaccredited schools they approve of.
Simply put, the website "Clearinghouse" advocate is hereby discredited.

haberge October 23, 2007 at 4:53 p.m.

We are AREVA-
The large international French company that will get 27 of the next 30 Nuclear Dockets for new Nuclear plants in the US. We do not recognize Any US accreditation. Our HR people speak French and despise anything the US Govt sanctions. We are here for the money and look at WNU University as being as good as MIT. As the arrogant US population becomes more and more out of touch with world realisms and their so called accreditation, they will fall behind in Tech.

Cato October 23, 2007 at 4:57 p.m.

The Cato Institute, a libertarian think tank, "We find fault with the accreditation process itself and favor a free market or state solution.
Mr. Salisbury had no kind words for the accreditation process, which he described as a noncompetitive cartel of hidebound, quasi-governmental agencies that effectively suppresses innovations in higher education

WNU Students October 23, 2007 at 5:12 p.m.

WNU students.
Ask yourselves this question--Why is the other side so upset at us WNU students? Put yourself in their shoes. Think about it. You got it? There can only be one reason. Come on. The answer is easy!

YOU ARE TAKING THEIR JOBS!!! Nuf sed.

So October 23, 2007 at 5:13 p.m.

If we stop taking their jobs they will like us?

No October 23, 2007 at 5:14 p.m.

They will not like you, they will just hate you less.

I did not October 23, 2007 at 5:17 p.m.

Take anyones job. I went to WNU while I was employed. I do not "Take peoples jobs."

Caveat Emptor October 23, 2007 at 6:40 p.m.

"Ask yourselves this question--Why is the other side so upset at us WNU students?"

I don't think anyone is upset at the students, they are the victims. It's this Telemarketing business (61 telemarketers out of 119 employees by their own count) that continues to pump out substandard products that caused the Senate Investigation and the various states to boot them out. (they are on State #4).

"since unaccredited schools are not illegal"
Yes, they are illegal in many states, you must have missed the list, you can find it above.

"and the author of A Classroom of One"
If it's about Kennedy Western University, it could be called "A Faculty of One"

Students, look elsewhere, there are dozens of legitimate online schools who won't stain your resume.

To: Tinna Kinevay October 23, 2007 at 7:31 p.m.

"I am then going to continue my education with WNU and pursue my BA in Accounting. "

Please contact the CPA board in your state before you make this mistake, if you buy a Warren National University degree, you cannot sit for the CPA exam.

"The one negative thing that I have experienced with WNU is their financial aid people."

That's because Warren National Unviersity does not meet the minimum standards for federal financial aid, and likely your only option is a personal bank loan of some sort.

Tina October 24, 2007 at 7:48 a.m.

I have an associates from Kennesaw College (accredited)and an associates with experience was all that was required of me in Delaware to get the CPA.

http://www.beacpa.org/how/index.php#1

To Tina: October 24, 2007 at 2:15 p.m.

Whew, congrats on your associates from Kennesaw! I was afraid you were incorrectly relying solely on the purchase of a Warren National University "degree" to sit for the exam, but you can qualify due to the Kennesaw associates degree. Good luck, it's tough!

I live in a 150-hour requirement state and am so glad I passed it before they upped the requirements.

New rules for WNU October 24, 2007 at 2:19 p.m.

New rules for using your WNU Degree.

First of all, 45 of the states have no laws against unaccredited degrees for non-Civil or licensure jobs.

By calling the office of degree authorization in "THE ILLEGAL" states and asking for a waver based on WNUs seeking accreditation, you will likely get it. If they give you a hard time about it there are several civil litigation lawyers standing by to take your case pro-bono.

The states do not, and I repeat -DO NOT- want to test this illegal law in court. Notice their fear of prosecution of anyone. No one has or ever will be prosecuted for putting a WNU credential on a resume. Federal judges are waiting to "take out at the knees" the first states AG that tests this unconstitutional law.

Robert October 24, 2007 at 3:26 p.m.

I stumbled across this site with key words "Warren Commision".
I have been an HR manager at Verizon and before that AT&T. Total of 25 years. Today I find out there are unaccredited universities. I thought that was illegal?

Dont feel bad October 24, 2007 at 3:45 p.m.

I got scammed bad by Almeda.
3K for a fake PHD in dentistry. They even made me pay the 15 dollars for Fedx overnighting it. I think someone spilled coffee on it before they mailed it.
Anyways, I then spent about $500.00 for a business license and get this, Almeda scammed me another 50 bucks for verification to the state licensing board!!! I practiced dentistry for 9 years (and made about 3.5 million dollars) before I got caught. My 326 loyal customers were shocked when Oregon sent me to one of those white collar jails for 6 months. I think I will practice law when I get out, that is if Almeda is still in business.

Thomas Q Bayter III October 25, 2007 at 6:52 a.m.

I am doing an investigative report on this website. Expect a news story to break mid to late Dec, with one of the big "conservative" networks. In a week or so, I will post an email address for wnu students through which I can verify you are a student with your permission.

There are several problematic issues with this site that will be reported on.
1. Most posters on this site are not students, they are imposters who change their names over and over and re-post mostly defamatory lies.
2. Of the 13 "Reviews to date, we can verify that only a few are actually WNU students. The rest are fakes. The multiple legitimate WNU students attempt at posting reviews (in our test sample) were never considered.
3. A consortium of experts (lawyers, professors and private contributers) are reviewing this entire website.
4. It is too late for this site to "clean up its act". We will not accept any appeal to not go forward with the story.

Difference October 25, 2007 at 10:34 p.m.

How does one differentiate between unaccredited and a diploma mill?

All the cited laws and Senate testimony frequently interchange the two terms?

Oregon Agreed October 26, 2007 at 1:59 a.m.

WNU no at DM.

Truth Hurts October 26, 2007 at 4:20 a.m.

Senate Investigations and State Laws are tough to downplay.

Story updates - Channel 11 October 26, 2007 at 12:27 p.m.

Real officials, bogus degrees
Fake degrees a growing Texas problem
Tuesday, October 23, 2007

http://www.khou.com/topstories/stories/k...

Here is an update to the stories of various Texas officials holding unaccredited degrees. Alot of rehash of the Texas clerk (KWU) and the Senate hearing, but a new blurb on a professor at Texas Souther University with a KWU doctorate.

tilly girl October 26, 2007 at 1:37 p.m.

"Here is an update to the stories...."
Can you repost that, all I keep getting is a Cadillac Commercial.

WNU has October 26, 2007 at 1:45 p.m.

always conceded that for Government and educational/licensure (<2% of jobs are related to Govt, Ed, and licensure) the degree is no good. Even says it on WNUs website. Private jobs make up 98% of the economy.
I am waiting for someone to have tha balls to go after private individuals in the free enterprise domain in Texas. Never happen.

QUAGMIREOFLAWS October 26, 2007 at 1:55 p.m.

"I am waiting for someone to have tha balls to go after private individuals in the free enterprise domain in Texas. Never happen."

A federal judje will use what is known as prescident (vs) law citing the Oregon case (under federal law Oregon officials can go to jail and/or pay huge fines for refering to WNU as a diploma mill or for not letting WNU students use the degree) and Texas will get into the same debacle as Oregon got into.

45 of the states have no laws against unaccredited degrees for non-Civil or licensure jobs.

By calling the office of degree authorization in "THE ILLEGAL" states and asking for a waver based on WNUs seeking accreditation, you will likely get it. If they give you a hard time about it there are several civil litigation lawyers standing by to take your case pro-bono.

The states do not, and I repeat -DO NOT- want to test this illegal law in court. Notice their fear of prosecution of anyone. No one has or ever will be prosecuted for putting a WNU credential on a private sector resume. Federal judges are waiting to "take out at the knees" the first states AG that tests this unconstitutional law.

Steve Rawlinson (website owner/admin) October 26, 2007 at 2:20 p.m.

Dear Thomas Q Bayter III,

I'd be happy to talk with you about your concerns for this site or be interviewed for your story. You can use the Contact link at the bottom of every page to reach me.

In response to the specific issues that you identify:

"1. Most posters on this site are not students, they are imposters who change their names over and over and re-post mostly defamatory lies."

This is a difficult issue that all online degree forums face. Online degrees are relatively new and by the very nature of this site most people visiting are interested in learning more about a particular online college and have not yet completed a degree.

The comment system used here is not ideal for the type of discussions that are currently taken place. To be honest, I never expected that it would be used in this way for the type of lengthy discussions people are having. New software is probably the best solution for making it more useable and improving the quality of posts.

As for the fact that people can change their names and post “defamatory lies” my view is that can happen in any Internet forum and is not unique to this site. One of my philosophies for this site is to allow many different views to be included so that people can make up their own minds. I trust that people are intelligent and can judge for themselves. Also note that there is a clear difference between the posted comments and the reviews. Anyone can post a comment, but the reviews are rigorously screened. I think having these two methods for people to contribute to the site allows everyone to participate and has created a value resource.

Creating a online degree resource is what this site is about. Before this site was created there was virtually no information available to potential students. It’s my belief that any information is better than none, even if people have to sort through some “defamatory lies” to get it. No information is far more dangerous because people assume that means everything is fine. There is a lot of controversy about online degrees because they are still relatively new and this fact is reflected in the discussions on this site.

(continued below)

Steve Rawlinson (website owner/admin) October 26, 2007 at 2:22 p.m.

“2. Of the 13 "Reviews to date, we can verify that only a few are actually WNU students. The rest are fakes. The multiple legitimate WNU students attempt at posting reviews (in our test sample) were never considered. “

Talk about “defamatory lies” :) I don’t really see how you can be in a position to verify if reviews are fake or that legitimate reviews were “never considered.” I personally check ever review that is submitted. Note that last week no new reviews were approved as I was away on vacation.

I will admit that the review verification process can not be 100% accurate in detecting fake reviews. However, I stand by the process I use and I consider it to be very good.

“3. A consortium of experts (lawyers, professors and private contributers) are reviewing this entire website.”

If these “experts” have any questions or need information please feel free to have them contact me directly.

4. It is too late for this site to "clean up its act". We will not accept any appeal to not go forward with the story.

Great! I’m really looking forward to seeing your story and I encourage you to go forward with it. If there is anything I can do to help or information that I can provide please contact me. My hope it that your story is fair and accurately reflects the site and the valuable contribution that it is making.

Best Regards,

Steve Rawlinson

To: Tilly Girl October 26, 2007 at 3:17 p.m.

I'm getting the same ad, but if hit "close" on it, it will take you to the article.

RE: Story updates - Channel 11 October 26, 2007 at 6:51 p.m.

Good article. I like the Texas "cease and desist" approach to enforcement, on the unaccredited degree problem. So the individuals are pulling the Kennedy Western "Phd" from their websites, bios, stationary, marketing material etc. to come into compliance with state law.

I think the Texas Southern University lost alot of face in the process.

“They've degraded that entire institution, not just themselves, not just their department but that entire institution,” Lust said. Texas Southern University tells us it will soon remove any mention of Professor Lin’s Ph.D. from the University website.

Comprehensive Exam October 27, 2007 at 8:54 a.m.

Accreditted agencies and accredited universities are screaming bloody murder over Bush administration wanting to replace the failed accreditation system with Final Comprehensive Exams for determining the "Quality of the Degree", and for that matter "if You even get to keep the credential upon test failure."
You would have to defend the degree on a regular basis by passing tests out into the future.

Why are they so upset? They want standard degrees dont they?

Their biggest fear is that students from unaccredited universities like WNU will outscore them on the comprehensive tests. No wonder they are terrified!

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/09/educat...

Accreditation October 27, 2007 at 12:08 p.m.

I don't think that accreditation is the end all, be all for universities. But for the specific "university" in question, it has been individually proven to be so substandard that it is laughable.

Telemarketers cold calling people down on their luck, waiving the bulk of a so-called degree for just about any reason, then requiring 1 open book exam for the small amount of remaining "work" for each course. All well documented.

! October 27, 2007 at 2:56 p.m.

Accreditation is the end all, be all for universities!!!

But for the specific "university" in question, it has been individually proven to be so aboveboard that it has changed education as we know it.

The Basketball Players at brick and mortar schools given degrees with SAT scores of 10 , then accredited universities waiving the bulk of a so-called degree for just about any reason sports or minority related, then requiring no open book exams for zero amount of "work" for each course.

All more than well documented.

Joyce October 27, 2007 at 2:59 p.m.

Good to see that Kennedy Western has changed their name to try and bury their past while still offering meaningless degrees for cash.

What a horrible institution

Kevin October 27, 2007 at 3 p.m.

I'm disappointed that this site would carry such a deplorable "college".

Steve Rawlinson (website owner/admin) October 27, 2007 at 3:17 p.m.

Kevin,

There is a very good reason every college is listed on this site, so that people know what type of college it is and can get the information to make an informed decision. Imagine if this college wasn't listed, then people would have no information other than what the college tells them! My expectation is that the reviews and comments here will give people information that they wouldn't otherwise have. The fact that the college is listed here should not be interpreted as an endorsement of any type.

Good analogy you make October 29, 2007 at 12:11 a.m.

"The Basketball Players at brick and mortar schools given degrees with SAT scores of 10 , then accredited universities waiving the bulk of a so-called degree for just about any reason sports or minority related, then requiring no open book exams for zero amount of "work" for each course."

Great analogy! From all published reports, every Kennedy Western University student does about the same "work" as those athletes who get caught breaking the academic rules and kicked out of school.

(Of course, no SAT or any other type of admissions criteria required to get into Kennedy Western University / Warren National University and have half of your degree magicly waived)

To Steve: October 29, 2007 at 12:13 a.m.

Can't argue with site owner, but I think listing this school among the legitimate schools can be misleading to the unwary.

Would it be possible to list them under their own heading of "Unaccredited Schools", along with Rushmore?

WRONG October 29, 2007 at 8:04 a.m.

REF:Would it be possible to list them under their own heading of "Unaccredited Schools", along with Rushmore?

Rushmore is accredited.

The Snare of College Accreditation October 29, 2007 at 9:20 a.m.

Have you ever noticed that the first question people ask about a college is "Are they accredited?" By implication, the questioner is asking if the school is accredited by an organization recognized by the United States Department of Education, or otherwise recognized by state government as a degree-granting institution. They assume that the accreditation process ensures quality in education, and that employers will only hire employees with accredited degrees.
It will be shown here that accreditation does not equate to quality, that employers really are more interested in ability than pedigree, and that accreditation inherently has strings attached which undermines.......

http://www2.whidbey.net/jmboyes/snare.ht...

Anything specific? October 29, 2007 at 1:42 p.m.

Nice, broad articles about the evils of accreditation are nice, but can you post anything (other than personal opinion or marketing materials) that refutes the points about Kennedy Western University / Warren National University being a telemarketing organization that has 100% acceptance, 100% graduation, and requires perfunctory work to complete the unwaived half of a so-called "degree"?

Rushmore October 29, 2007 at 1:57 p.m.

Rushmore has no recognized accreditation. It is listed as a diploma mill on the dozen states that have laws against unaccredited degrees.

Kennedy Western University tried this trick for a while too, listing a bogus "accreditating agency". I can't recall the name of the "agency" right now. Was is the Board of Online Universities Accreditation (BOUA)?

Mental Floss October 29, 2007 at 2:55 p.m.

REF:Anything specific?

Where are your references for your claims? Find me anything legit that shows WNU has 100% graduation. Find anything that says they have 100% acceptance.
Tip: You should not reference your mind numbed robot like buddies on this blog.

And talk about broad articles on the evils of accreditation, how about the broad articles on the evils of unaccredited schools. Ref: The re-posting over and over and over again about the Senete testimony thing 4 years ago.
Real, thinking people are not into "Senator Worship". We worship God. You might think that by your brown nosing corrupt senators that you will get a piece of the corruption pie (and you might). Never too late to repent my friend.

Mental Floss October 29, 2007 at 3:08 p.m.

We at WNU understand that club members of academia and other occupations are quite lacking in the qualities that, ideally, defines their domain. We have seen how researchers employ reverse scientific method, how philosophers are unwise, how psychologists are not perceptive, how historians lack perspective, not to mention how physicians are not healers, attorneys hate justice, psychiatrists are lunatics and musicians only know the "F" and "N" word. Ah yes accrediataion.

PT Barnum says... October 29, 2007 at 5 p.m.

"Find anything that says they have 100% acceptance."
Former employee that worked in admissions, NEVER saw an "applicant" get turned down.

"has 100% graduation"
Most universities publish this statistic, but not WN"U", so let's go with "near 100% graduation" until someone can provide the actual statistics.

Considering a KW"U" "course" has been defined as finding terms in the glossary for one multiple choice open book exam, with the option to retake, I can't imagine the fail rate is much more than 0.

Never October 29, 2007 at 6:07 p.m.

Ref:
Former employee that worked in admissions, NEVER saw an "applicant" get turned down.

So a former employee who was fired for smoking marijuana in the office has a gripe with KW and says "I never" saw.

Well, I never saw Abraham Lincoln in person.

Here are some more.

I never saw bacteria.

I never saw an atom or molecule for that matter.

I never saw anyone killed in cold blood.

I never saw a Negro Slave.

I never saw a NAZI persecuted Jew.

I never saw the lines of gravitational force.

AND

I never saw such ignorance as you!

Who is October 29, 2007 at 6:23 p.m.

PT Barnum?

PT Barnum October 29, 2007 at 7 p.m.

PT Barnum, of Ringling Brothers and Barnum & Bailey Circus, a/k/a "The Greatest Show on Earth".

He is often credited with saying, "there's a sucker born every minute"

Accreditation sucks October 29, 2007 at 10:31 p.m.

I have attended "Accredited" schools and found them no harder than WNU. In fact, the accredited school was much easier.

One class had a whopping TWO tests, a mid-term and a final, both of which were open book, multiple guess tests. Another had no work, lots of required reading from the text and other sources, and a term paper due at the end, which the class discussed.

The only real reason for accreditation is money. Accreditation gives a school access to government money (grants, VA, etc) and in turn the school gives away their right/ability of free reign over their institution. Kinda like Marxism.

So all you Pro-Accreditation pundits out there are showing your true colors, that you are anti-american, government-loving Marxist's.

It is unfortunate that WNU has bowed to the pressures of Liberals in government and has started down the accreditation process. They (Libtards) are experts in smearing good names.

But PT Barnum October 30, 2007 at 1:50 a.m.

Never said "There is a sucker born every minute." The phrase was coined after his death.

People thinking he did say it is due to another rewriting of history by the same marxist elitists that dreamed up accreditation.

Scammed October 30, 2007 at 3:14 a.m.

Kennedy Western University AKA Warren National University is definitely going to get you a top notch education. IN LIFE EXPERIENCE!

When you graduate from KW you will have learned that for slightly more effort you could have gotten an accredited university degree. You will have learned that your money was wasted. It is an unaccredited school. As someone who spent thousands there and took all the classes (yes you have to actually take classes and pass tests.) They don't just hand you a piece of paper for "Life Experience". In fact the professor who taught my Chemistry course at KW was also a full time professor teaching Chemistry at SUNY in Albany NY.

Kennedy Western University is a scam.

I didn't find out until I tried to upgrade one of my professional engineering certifications and was turned down, that I myself had been scammed. When I enrolled at Kennedy Western University they had a statement on their web site claiming accreditation for their state license. They even had a picture of it. It was MY FAULT for not properly investigating the project that I put MY money into.

I am currently enrolled in a REAL brick and mortar university

At Kennedy Western University I wrote one paper as a final project for my so called degree.

If you are going to waste your time and effort on an education, don't do it at Warren National or any other online ONLY school. There are plenty of real physical state and private schools who offer quality online degrees and a quality education.

Take your tests (CLEP SAT's), find out what your prerequisite classes sho uld be and just start getting them out of the way. In short, just do it right the first time. Then you won't be playing catch up with your future later. As a side note if you read Warren Nationals new web site THEY will NOT accept any transfer credits unless they are from a fully accredited university. SO THEY WILL NOT EVEN ACCEPT THEIR OWN GRADUATE STUDENTS INTO THEIR NEW SCHOOL.

if they are associated with Kennedy Western and your future employer makes the connection, (or checks on Wikipedia) you are not getting hired. Take it from a KW alumni.

Paul October 30, 2007 at 3:40 a.m.

REF If they are associated with Kennedy Western and your future employer makes the connection, (or checks on Wikipedia) you are not getting hired. Take it from a KW alumni.

Yes, But if you already have a Job then get the Degree no one will fire you from that job. Many employers are looking for any reason at all to promote people and just need to check the "Does he/she have a degree box"

WNU Was up front with me. They said from the beginning that WNU BSME could not be used for obtaining a PE. But I already earned my Georgia PE 8 years ago without any University. Many states still allow a PE with no degree whatsoever. My schtik is that people will not question the BSME because they see the PE. And yes I chose WNU because it is fast. I needed to earn the BSME in less than a year and I will.

Life Exp. October 30, 2007 at 9:14 a.m.

Giving educational credits for past job experience makes little sense.

However,

Giving people jobs for past educational experiences makes less sense.

I am a Westpoint Cadet October 30, 2007 at 9:22 a.m.

I am laughing at this blog.
Any non Military University is substandard by every measure possible when compared to Westpoint.
Civilian Universities are fermented garbage. This WNU place is just slightly more fermented garbage.
What a joke.
Join the military and go fight for your country you little girls.

puncturewound October 30, 2007 at 12:10 p.m.

Humorous is that people operate in their paradigm. Someone who dedicates their whole life to cell structure of the aids virus thinks everybody knows what virto-cyto-plasmatic biased fatigue incline is. There are perhaps billions of terms familiar to billions of people, but only a few hundred thousand shared terms that allow us to communicate.

Rest assured, if you questioned a thousand people about WNU, there would perhaps be a few (<10 for sure) that ever heard the words. Assume 10, then 5 would likely say they heard the name, when in fact they heard something familiar (perhaps WNU, World Nuclear University) but not WNU the university in Wyoming. The other 5 might say “Isn’t that the school I keep seeing on yahoo?” and of those 5, 1 might say “I heard they were a Diploma something.”

The one I like is the HR (imposter) poster to this site, perhaps more than one of these frauds, who tells stories of throwing many KW/WNU resumes in the trash can and informing the individual how they will not be hired today because they have a diploma mill diploma.
It is laughable. Lets do some math. There have roughly been 30,000 KW graduates since 1984. For arguments sake, let us assume they are all alive still even though more than 10% have probably died. 180,000,000 adults in US. So roughly 30K/180mil = 1 in 6,000 resumes will have WNU on them! Now we have about 250 workdays a year. 6000/250 = Reading 24 resumes a day, five days a week to find 1 KW resume in a year.
What company is this? Primerica and Walmart and McDonalds and coca-cola combined with one HR super-man?

What ever happened to the “Clearinghouse Poster”, another discredited crown jewel of government borne ignorance. She must be on vacation.

Char October 30, 2007 at 12:33 p.m.

"Yes, But if you already have a Job then get the Degree no one will fire you from that job. Many employers are looking for any reason at all to promote people and just need to check the "Does he/she have a degree box"

Depends...
We're a large company and I was given a background and academic check on each promotion or transfer within the company. So, if you had a legitimate degree that got you the job initially, buying an additional unaccredited degree to try and get a promotion wouldn't work.

Caveat Emptor October 30, 2007 at 1:29 p.m.

"Rest assured, if you questioned a thousand people about WNU, there would perhaps be a few (<10 for sure) that ever heard the words"

Great point about the obscurity of these no-name degree suppliers, it would be impossible to keep track of them all.

Kennedy-Western University / Warren National University alone is on it’s 2nd name and 4th state.

Then think about all of their unaccredited sister colleges such as Hamilton University, Rochville University, Almeda University, Belford University, St. Regis University, Harrington University, Trinity Southern University, University of Northern Washington, etc, etc. There are hundreds of them, and many of them operate only online and can change their name / website easily. So, I would guess that any given business probably only sees a few Warren National University or Rochville University degrees at a time, but between all of them, it might be somewhat common.

You don’t have to know anything specific about any of these so-called “colleges”, our HR guys just check them against the Dept. of Education website to see if they are valid.

smg October 30, 2007 at 2:54 p.m.

i have an unaccredited degree from a diploma mill, and making 70k plus a year. i love america. also i'm highly educated, but don't have time to play school. so to all those haters about diploma mills, keep hating while i'm still living a comfortable life. wow!!!!!!

ANOTHER MYTH, more lies October 31, 2007 at 1:45 p.m.

REF:
"You don’t have to know anything specific about any of these so-called “colleges”, our HR guys just check them against the Dept. of Education website to see if they are valid."

US GOVT IS FORBIDDEN FROM SUCH BY THE US CONSTITUTION. US GOVT FOUND IN FAVOR OF KW/WNU AND DISCIPLINED OREGON STATE EDUCATION OFFICIALS FOR CALLING KW A DIPLOMA MILL...

Franstaunchenzant! October 31, 2007 at 2:06 p.m.

The future of higher education in America, its role in our country's democracy, and its contribution to world affairs is at stake. Join WNU in defending academic freedom! These things are at stake--and academic freedom does need to be defended. But with its polarizing language and "noli me tangere" defensiveness, the Ad Hoc Committee is doing more to deepen the problem than to address it.

PT Barnum says... November 1, 2007 at 12:47 a.m.

"US GOVT IS FORBIDDEN FROM SUCH BY THE US CONSTITUTION"
Still clueless I see, it's individual states that have made these degrees illegal, with more to follow. Individual employers can screen untrained and unqualified applicants out with a simple check.

Correction, again, on KWU/Oregon
They settled out of court, still have to use this embarrassing disclaimer on your KWU "degree"

In addition, an individual using an unaccredited degree, even if the employer allows use of such degrees, must disclose on resumes, letterheads, business cards, announcements and advertisements that "(Name of school) does not have accreditation recognized by the United States Department of Education and has not been approved by the Office of Degree Authorization." ORS 348.609(2)(a). The only exception is for schools approved by ODA. See ORS 348.609(d) and OAR 583-050-0014.

It is a Class B Misdemeanor under the Oregon Criminal Code to use a degree in violation of ORS 348.609

"Congress rightly wants to make sure that federal student aid funds don’t go to “fly by night” operations"

Is Warren National University eligible for federal student funds? Of course not.

This is the truth November 1, 2007 at 9:40 a.m.

I am a contractor. I have a resume albeit I am not sure why. I have been in the workplace for 30 years. And as God is my witness, I have never gotten a gig with my resume. The client asks for my services and allows me to pick which site vendors I work for. In otherwords, I pick my employer and not the other way around. All my contracts are secured through word of mouth.
Delivering a high quality product is all I have ever done. Never kissed the systems ass for a degree, never had to, never will. Anyone wanting real success in life will not do it with a government handout. Accreditation is little more it seems than a government "we give you money for votes" scheme. Welfare systems such as accreditation cartels are hurting our country. No one has any pride or decency anymore. There was a reason our founding fathers wanted small government. All government tends to grow and grow until no more freedom exists and this chokes off free enterprise. You free loaders on this site know who you are, and I pray for your salvation. You might have no shame because you have no soul. Your lives will be miserable as long as you associate government-taxpayer funded educations with success. Sure, you might earn 300K/year and think you are getting ahead but in the end, they (the govt)will steal from me to support the likes of you in your old age. Your punishment will not be of this earth.
I assure you my yearly income exceeds anyone posting to this blog. No one ever handed me government freebies. My parents were too proud to take a handout even though my mom never graduated HS and my dad never made more than minimum wage. They passed on a pride to me that made me (along with help from above) successful. This was not the false pride that black and minority comunities have where government handouts are "entitlements".

blooprents November 1, 2007 at 9:59 a.m.

Ther are no real HR posters to this site. Just peolple angry because they spent a lot of time and money on their degree and now they see it is doing nothing for them. They missed the boat.

Hint:Your lack of success is your character. Dont be mad at or judge other people who are more successful than you. Their success probably has little to do with this Waren National college or Kennedy school or whatever. They probably got lucky somewhere or inherited a lot of money somewhere or something. These Waren people are not going to let you see their poker hand or give you the secrets to their career success.
Take your mind off what you can get from Uncle Sam and focus on helping people.
The degree thing is nice and I have actually met people that applied the degree, although rare.

Its just frustrating though November 1, 2007 at 10:19 a.m.

When you see many of these people with a fake degree get promoted past you and then go to your boss and ask her about it and find out she has a fake degree too (then your life is a living hell until you finally quit). I interupted their little good ole(girls) club and became an outsider.
Well, I did quit and went to work work with a company that has real people with real degrees only to find out we are being bought out by guess who, yea the place I used to work for. I have considered quitting again but I used up all of my savings and racked up 50,000 in credit card debt on my first quit.
I hate these non-accredited fake degree telemarketers.
Its like a club now, no a cult. They are poping up everywhere.
Like the illegal immigrant thing, no laws are being enforced. When is government going to enforce some of these damn laws.

RH November 1, 2007 at 10:32 a.m.

Great point about the obscurity of these no-name degree suppliers, it would be impossible to keep track of them all.

No one checks!! HR people are too lazy and ignorant to check. The HR people are part of the Diploma Mill scam and playing it for lots of money.

Report them to your state government. November 1, 2007 at 12:32 p.m.

"I hate these non-accredited fake degree telemarketers."

Call your office of degree authorization in your state. Hire a lawyer or something.

Frustrated in Brownsville November 1, 2007 at 12:43 p.m.

{Call your office of degree authorization in your state. Hire a lawyer or something.}

I am afraid to. Have you ever heard of B&R? They tell my State Government what to do, not the other way around. Furthermore, the company management are the ones that have to bring charges and they are in on it. I would have to leave Texas for Mexico if I reported them.

Sounds to me like November 1, 2007 at 12:47 p.m.

You belong in Mexico you Government framunda cheese eating hump.

LOL November 1, 2007 at 2:55 p.m.

"No one checks!! HR people are too lazy and ignorant to check."

True, there are lazy and ignorant companies that you could theoretically sneak an unaccredited degree into.

?? November 1, 2007 at 3:16 p.m.

Will Warren National University provide me a list of the various states that I can't use my degree in? I don't like the sound of the various disclaimers I'll need to use when applying for a job, is there a check list or template or something?

Seems like the placement office should be helping in this area.

Use it in any state November 2, 2007 at 3:40 a.m.

As long as it is not a licensing requirement or G job, there. Even Texas AG admits the law is n/a for private companies. Or put another way, the company that hires you has to press charges. As long as you tell them up front you are OK. There are thousands of people with unaccredited degrees gainfully employed in everyone of the "Illegal States" It does not hurt to put "unaccredited" front and center on your resume. Pivate companies are in revolt against burdensome government requirements and will hire you to spite the government that works against their best interest.
Ask your self this question. Why have there been no prosecutions for private non governmental use of an unaccredited degree? The answer is simple. A federal district judge has sided with KW against the "Great state of Oregon". Some will say rightly it was settled out of court, but that still sets "Prescident". The reason Oregon settled out of court was simple (fear of what would happen).
In private chambers Oregon smartly made the correct choice not to persue this issue.
If you do not think WNU is standing by to defend you in the event you are challenged by any state government, then you have not been following the big picture. FEDERAL PRESCIDENT HAS SETTLED THIS ISSUE PEOPLE. Just because these states are too chicken to challenge the Feds and look dumb is the only reason they have the illegal laws in their code. First challenge and they will strike the laws.

Pissed off in Maine. November 2, 2007 at 3:46 a.m.

I too am sick and tired of all of these degree mill pushing companies hiring all of these people with their fake degrees. It is rampant up here. When the top management in your company has these dubious credentials and your company has a thousands times the money (as Maine does) to hire lawyers, it is a no win.
Maine passes these stupid laws but never enforces them. It sucks. I am moving to Canada.

To: Use in Any state November 2, 2007 at 5:54 a.m.

There are so many funny things in your post, I don't know where to start.

"It does not hurt to put "unaccredited" front and center on your resume"

That would be great. Companies could skip the 5 minutes and the $6 verification fee and put it directly in the dumpster.

"Why have there been no prosecutions for private non governmental use of an unaccredited degree?"

I'm assuming most people, like the Texas article, when they get the initial "cease and desist" order for illegal use, just run their KW"U" degree through the shredder when they are discovered.

"A federal district judge has sided with KW"
Umm, hate to break it to you, but an out of court settlement doesn't have a winner / loser. Still illegal in Oregon, and still have to use the embarrassing disclaimer on so-called degrees.

"FEDERAL PRESCIDENT"
Okay, if you are going to use a fancy word 8 times, please spell it correctly. Say it with me, Precedent.

Accepted November 2, 2007 at 3:31 p.m.

"Okay, if you are going to use a fancy word 8 times, please spell it correctly. Say it with me, Precedent."

So I spelled Precedent wrong. Forgive my english, I am originally from Montreal Canada and earned my citizenship to the US, and served in the US Navy. I speak French. English is my second language.

But the people in the "Texas Article" that you obviously did not read were government employees. Lets say that again THE TEXAS CASE INVOLVED GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES. A Court clerk and a Judge. Doubt you can or will admit you are wrong like I did since you have the markings of a rat. Where is this 5$ fee spent, are you the discredited "Clearinghouse poster"?
You are wrong. Oregon was disciplined and even given defamation training. They were forewarned by a Federal judge what would happen if they did not settle out of court.

By the way, one-upmanship on spelling is a bygone occupation since spell-check.
Anyone can cut and paste their writing into WORD and do a spell-check. Forgive any future mis-spelled words as that seems to offend you more than the lies you propogate.

himarks November 2, 2007 at 3:35 p.m.

"Like the illegal immigrant thing, no laws are being enforced. When is government going to enforce some of these damn laws."

Dont hold your breath.

himarks November 2, 2007 at 3:38 p.m.

"When you see many of these people with a fake degree get promoted past you and then go to your boss and ask her about it and find out she has a fake degree too (then your life is a living hell until you finally quit). I interupted their little good ole(girls) club and became an outsider."

Get used to it.

Texas, again November 2, 2007 at 8:18 p.m.

I'm not sure why you keep saying that Kennedy Western University / Warren National University "degrees" are ONLY illegal for government positions in Texas. (Although 2 government officials did recently throw their Kennedy-Western University "degrees" in the trash for that reason)

Here is the code: I've bolded the one part related to use in government, but it is also illegal for advertising, employment, licensing, and everything else.

http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/AAR/Private...

"The Texas Penal Code (Section 32.52) prohibits the use of fraudulent or substandard degrees "in a written or oral advertisement or other promotion of a business; or with the intent to: obtain employment; obtain a license or certificate to practice a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain a promotion, a compensation or other benefit, or an increase in compensation or other benefit, in employment or in the practice of a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain admission to an educational program in this state; OR GAIN A POSITION IN GOVERNMENT WITH AUTHORITY OVER ANOTHER PERSON, regardless of whether the actor receives compensation for the position." Violation of this law is a Class B misdemeanor."

Unenforced Laws November 3, 2007 at 2:22 a.m.

I see you left out that the individual has to "knowingly" use a substandard degree (guess you "accidently" overlooked that). If in the individuals opinion the degree is not substandard and since WNU has no responsibility to make any students aware of obscure Texas laws then that is a defense that can not be lost in court. You I am sure have heard of the phrase "Ignorance is no excuse under the law", but the exception is when "knowingly" is placed in front of the clause. That one word means two things.
1. States AG will not enforce this law since intent is so hard to prove and no one is expected to study and memorize all laws or even find some bogus list on a Texas website.
2. "Knowingly" is an escape clause that believe it or not is wanted more by enforcement(executive) than judicial to give freedom of movement.

I do not know what state you are in, but trust me you are violating written laws in your state every day. You just do not know it. Some of these laws exist so that they can be used selectively to get bad guys and hold them long enough to investigate them.

An unsuccessful attempt was made in Ga. to enforce the sodomy laws when the DEA busted into the wrong address. Lets just say the married couple at the address were having a specific type of non-missionary sex. The DEA was embarrased and looking at big trouble so they decided to bust the couple for sodomy. They were unsuccessful since the jury saw the snake in the grass.

Like I said before, find me a conviction in any state. A cease order on two GOVERNMENT employees in Texas does not count.

In law circles, untested laws do not exist as law. Look at it this way. If Texas (legislative branch)passed a law making it illegal to breath air in the state of Texas they (judicial branch) likely would not endorse it. AGs (executive brance) have considerable freedom in enforcement and would not enforce it. There are many untested laws. Look at the sodomy laws in Ga, they have been there for 200 years and never endorsed or enforced. Unendorsed and unenforced laws are not laws yet.

I have been holding off on this but the reason Private non-govt, enterprise can not be prosecuted has to do with interstate law. What if my services are based in South Carolina but I am doing calculations for a nuclear plant in Texas. Now my resume has WNU on it and a company from the Philipines is getting the contract to do the work and I am a subcontractor to that Phillipino company.
Add in the fact that I am a national from Canada, but my home is in Sweden.
Who broke the law? How does Texas enforce it? How do they even find out? Life is complicated. Get used to it!

Just Do It! November 3, 2007 at 1:55 p.m.

How do you found a university?

First, raise a lot of money. Without a pile of cash on hand, you won't be able to pay faculty and staff, or buy land, buildings, and textbooks. Many universities—Vanderbilt, Stanford, Carnegie Mellon—were started by moguls rich enough to pay the bills themselves. Others relied on foundations to jumpstart their endowment: Olin College in Massachusetts, for example, draws its funding from the Olin Foundation. In most cases, the endowment is overseen by a board of trustees. The majority of colleges are not-for-profit institutions, with all the usual exemptions from income and property taxes. Donors can also write off contributions. In exchange, schools have to reinvest earnings and follow prohibitions against political activism. But recent decades have seen a surge in for-profit colleges like University of Phoenix and DeVry University. Instead of donors, these colleges have investors.
Before a college can start accepting students, it needs a degree-granting license. Each state has its own process, but usually you need to submit your university's curriculum to a committee for review. Some of the most relaxed states—Oregon, Alabama, and Texas require only a site visit. In tough-as-nails Maine, inspectors visit your campus, all other university presidents must be notified of your application, and a state legislator must introduce a bill to grant your school a license. Without a license, you're not allowed to advertise your school as a degree-granting institution.

Jay November 4, 2007 at 3:14 a.m.

"What if my services are based in South Carolina but I am doing calculations for a nuclear plant in Texas. Now my resume has WNU on it and a company from the Philipines is getting the contract to do the work and I am a subcontractor to that Phillipino company."

Actually a great example! Where does the violation actually occur? Since the State of Texas specifically lists Warren National "University" as a "Fraudulent or Substandard Institution with No Known Texas Connection", it is just a matter of pinpointing it.

There are many people dropping the ball here. If you were hired in South Carolina, HR there did not do a background check to verify that you had valid academic credentials.

The nucleur power plant did not perform proper due diligence on it's subcontractor qualifications before signing the contract.

I would guess the violation occurs under the section where Texas has made it illegal to use a Warren National University degree "in employment or in the practice of a trade, profession, or occupation;"

Great, scary example of some half-trained yahoo working on a nucleur power plant project.

This is the Global Economy. November 4, 2007 at 6:17 a.m.

"Great, scary example of some half-trained yahoo working on a nucleur power plant project."

Do you ever fly Delta or US air? A huge amount of critical aviation engineering is done in places like India. You will not find most of their degrees validated or validatable in Texas yet Delta flys in and out of DFW hundreds of times a week. Oh no Mr. Bill! People in India with substandard degrees are working on Jets in Dallas.

Lets look at a complicated part designed in Atlanta Georgia, Pattented in New York, various sub-parts built in Miami Florida and China, Assembled in Thailand, QA tested in Alabama and marketed in Canada. By your argument if that part ends up in a car in Texas, then "Oh no Mr. Bill, how do we check the hundreds of degrees that were involved in the history of this part!"
Who do you prosecute? How do you prosecute? Why do you prosecute?

? November 4, 2007 at 3:08 p.m.

"There are many people dropping the ball here. If you were hired in South Carolina, HR there did not do a background check to verify that you had valid academic credentials."

But the WNU degree is perfectly legal in South Carolina. No?

?? November 4, 2007 at 3:15 p.m.

"The nucleur power plant did not perform proper due diligence on it's subcontractor qualifications before signing the contract."

The nuclear plant violates no laws accepting the resume. Texas law does not penalize an employer for accepting a degree. What motivates the person to turn the lady in? The laws have to do with using the resume. He is using it in SC (technically in the Phillipines).
Also most people doing calculations at nuclear plants are ex navy enlisted anyways(no degree).

??? November 4, 2007 at 3:31 p.m.

"I would guess the violation occurs under the section where Texas has made it illegal to use a Warren National University degree "in employment or in the practice of a trade, profession, or occupation;"

Lets get this straight.
So we are going to internationally extradite to the US, then do an interstate extradition from NY to Tx a Swedish National on a Class B Misdemeanor for submitting his resume to a company in the Phillipines that wins a 30 million dollar bid on a contract in Matagorda Texas?

After spending $200,000 on international extradition, then $25,000 on interstate extradition, we can promptly give her a first offender warning. The second time she does it a $500.00 fine. GET REAL!

I have November 4, 2007 at 3:40 p.m.

a confidentiality agreement applicable to my resume and HR at Shaw-Stone and Webster.
That is, if someone at Shaw shows my resume to anyone, including the State of Tx, they will violate the agreement.

Anna November 5, 2007 at 4:10 a.m.

My girlfriend says WNU is a Diploma Million. What does that mean?
She said you can get an associates degrees in less than two years there. True?

Elliott November 5, 2007 at 7:18 a.m.

To Anna-
They are a diploma mill, not million. Basically you just send them $10.00 and they send you a degree in a day or two. I stopped by their office in Wy. and used a credit card to get a Phd in about 5 minutes. I now work as a brain surgeon in Brooklyn. Messed a few brains up, but my brother in law who got the $800.00 law degree is my lawyer, and a good one at that!! He gets me out of trouble and I write him free pain killer scrips for his help. Oh and my mom is my scrub nurse. You guessed it, she got the $250.00 BS in Nursing speed-course from them.
I think some of the accredited university doctors here may be catching on. Never thought I would last 15 years here at the Mount. S. I guess if they lay me off I will go do the pilots course at WNU and try working for Delta - yea that sounds like fun!

Anna November 5, 2007 at 7:19 a.m.

I want to be a secret agent spy or a movie star. Can I buy one for that?

Good News November 5, 2007 at 8:33 a.m.

If WNU becomes accredited after I earn my degree, does the accreditation carry over. According to Dr. J. Bear, the authority on such matters-Yes it does. Enjoy!

http://books.google.com/books?id=k67XC_7...

SkyLark November 6, 2007 at 11:23 a.m.

Significantly, there is not a single case of someone with a WNU Resume not getting hired (or being fired because of WNU) in Corporate America (among the tens of thousands of resumes submitted).
The basis for hiring in America has never been linked with any specific "Accreditation" factor.
These Facist pinheads and their claims to link "Accreditation" with higher quality education largely amounts to post-facto guesswork abetted by statistical hijinks and imagination run amok.

WNU has no published ratings November 6, 2007 at 9:27 p.m.

WNU Listed alongside Belford, Canyon College, and other unaccredited universities. Where is sister college Rochville?!

"there is not a single case of someone with a WNU Resume not getting hired"

LOL. That's because I assume it quietly goes in the dumpster and isn't even considered, it's not a real newsworthy event to get unqualified applicants who don't meet minimum requirements.

Good News November 6, 2007 at 9:47 p.m.

"If WNU becomes accredited after I earn my degree, does the accreditation carry over. According to Dr. J. Bear, the authority on such matters-Yes it does. Enjoy!"

http://books.google.com/books?id=k67XC_7......

Excellent find! A cited reference from an actual expert on the subject!

So, Kennedy-Western degrees will always be junk, but there is hope for Warren National.

Dr J November 7, 2007 at 5:12 a.m.

All Startups in Universities require that they go at least 5-7 years before they finally get accredited.
During this time they must have actual students going there.
The initially unaccredited students (startup through final accreditation) have always been grand-fathered in to accreditation status, to my knowledge.
If someone knows otherwise and can reference the contrary please post.

To Dr J: November 7, 2007 at 7:30 p.m.

True, I think..., So 1/1/2007 is the official start date of a new university, Warren National University. If they are truly seeking accreditation, my understanding is that the Warren National students beginning after 1/1/07 would be grandfathered in.

Posters to this site have said that WNU will gain regional accreditation in 2008, so we'll know soon.

Dr. J - Accreditation November 8, 2007 at 6:14 a.m.

Where did you see those posters? I do believe in the University and feel they will get Accredited, but wanted to see those posters.

If you can post the link, it would be appreciated!!!

Skeptic November 8, 2007 at 6:38 p.m.

Warren National does not have a prayer in getting accredited and I doubt if they really want to do that. It is too easy making money from the rubes the way things are. And the idea of previous graduates being "grandfathered in" is ludicrous.

A business that can issue paper that costs maybe 25 cents and sell it for several thousand is a high profit business. Now they do have a few legitimate professors as window dressing and perhaps these legitimate professors do wave their hand over an exam or two, but essentially the business model is to
sell a sheet of paper for several thousand dollars. Even though they do get criticized a good deal, you can see how a business model like that would be attractive. Sort of like printing 100 dollar bills.

re: Skeptic November 9, 2007 at 6:04 a.m.

And "accredited" universities are not a "high profit business"?

Let's see ... hmmmmm .... they issue a sheet of paper that costs 25 cents, and charge the student $40k, $50k, $100k? plus let's not forget room and board , lab fees, and books.

PLUS they get to STEAL taxpayers money via grants, VA, etc.

All because they joined the "secret society" of accreditation.

No wonder WNU wants to get accredited! They see where the REAL money is!

To Skeptic: November 9, 2007 at 2:09 p.m.

My thoughts exactly. They (whoever owns it) have a cash cow, why go legit now?

Personally, I would load up the moving truck (again) and move the 6 employees in Wyoming to another state. Keep everyone else in California.

JOO November 9, 2007 at 5:06 p.m.

Accredited universities are all for profit. They do not steal for free.

Skeptic November 10, 2007 at 5:28 a.m.

Degrees from diploma mills are a great national problem but one that is partly hidden becuase all too often the people who get them are not found out. Suppose you lived a few miles from a nuclear power plant, and the night shift supervisor has a degree from podunk university, a diploma mill, and the degree is in nuclear engineering. But naturally, being from a diploma mill, the "engineer" learned only about 5 percent of the information from the diploma mill that he would have learned from a legitimate university. Could you sleep well at night, knowing that the supervisor has a bogus degree?

HUH? November 10, 2007 at 12:34 p.m.

REF:
"Degrees from diploma mills are a great national problem but one that is partly hidden becuase all too often the people who get them are not found out. Suppose you lived a few miles from a nuclear power plant, and the night shift supervisor has a degree from podunk university, a diploma mill, and the degree is in nuclear engineering. But naturally, being from a diploma mill, the "engineer" learned only about 5 percent of the information from the diploma mill that he would have learned from a legitimate university. Could you sleep well at night, knowing that the supervisor has a bogus degree?"

Most nuclear plant operators are X-Navy, enlisted. Few or no degrees in the control rooms.

On WNU November 10, 2007 at 1:10 p.m.

At the age of 22 I asked my college mentor whether or not my choice to attend KW/WNU for a graduate degree would lead me to actual work in my industry. And her response was, “Well, that’s really up to you.” I naively had assumed that a degree from a good school would guarantee industry employment. Isn’t that the purpose of obtaining a degree? Well, thousands of dollars and many years later, I now know better. “That’s really up to you” is another way of saying “No, a degree does not necessarily get you a job.” A degree is just a degree. A degree (specifically an MFA) will teach you how to do a skill, trade, or discipline better, faster, and more efficiently. But that hard-earned degree will absolutely not guarantee you a job. Not in today’s world of overpopulation, overcrowding, competition, diminishing resources, reduction of the middle-class, and post-dot-com-bust. No, a degree will get you, well, just a degree.

WNU#1 November 10, 2007 at 1:35 p.m.

There are many teachers who get past the interview stage and their fake degree goes undetected. This can lead to a fascinating array of scenarios further down the line. If the teacher turns out to be unprofessional, unreliable, and a thoroughly bad hire all round, then schools have been known to launch a witch-hunt, asking the teacher to supply them with an official letter of verification on university letter-headed paper. In some cases the school might chase after degree verification themselves. However, this isn’t always possible. Ask ten people whether an employer is legally entitled to do their own detective work, and you’ll get ten different answers. Some universities charge a fairly hefty fee for a verification service. Others are governed by privacy protection acts. Some colleges will only issue a letter if the student graduated within the last 25 years, and then there are some colleges that have closed down or burned to the ground.

To put things into perspective though, it’s worth remembering that there are also schools that find out an instructor’s degree is fake and yet continue to employ them. If a teacher is good at his job and popular with students, it sometimes makes sense for the school to turn a blind eye. Demand for teachers is currently outstripping supply in spectacular fashion. The last thing a school wants is to get involved in yet another interview and recruitment merry-go-round. There are even rumors of schools that make degrees themselves or at the very least, pat a new teacher on the head and point them in the right direction.

Seeking a legal opinion on all this, a lawyer from one of New York's oldest established law firms told us that working with fake documents is a very serious offence and there should be dire consequences if the teacher is caught. In the eyes of NY law, you are in effect, cheating the government, but there has yet to be a conviction. Too difficult.

Wrong November 10, 2007 at 4:09 p.m.

"Some universities charge a fairly hefty fee for a verification service" - Less than $10 usually. Background checks are a cost of doing business.

"there are also schools that find out an instructor’s degree is fake and yet continue to employ them." - LOL, it's okay to help a fraudster? I'm not sure what sleazy school this would refer to, but the adminsitration and/or school board would just get dragged down with them.

You don't have to look very long or very far to see all kinds of examples of people getting nailed with fake credentials.

The recent firefighter snafu, the hundreds of teachers in Florida, Dennis O'Leary (Notre Dame coach for a week), Laura Callahn, Sandra Baldwin (US Olympic committee), the hundreds identified in the Kennedy Western Senate hearing, the Texas officials recently, the Radio Shack guy, the list goes on and on.

Fined, terminated, reprimanded. And this is the very very small % that make it outside the companys walls, since they are obviously doing everything they can to damage control internally.

WHATTTTTT? November 10, 2007 at 5:24 p.m.

REF:
"The recent firefighter snafu, the hundreds of teachers in Florida, Dennis O'Leary (Notre Dame coach for a week), Laura Callahn, Sandra Baldwin (US Olympic committee), the hundreds identified in the Kennedy Western Senate hearing, the Texas officials recently, the Radio Shack guy, the list goes on and on."

I agree, but for everyone caught, hundreds go un-noticed. The same non-competitive system that creates accreditation and other government SNAFUS can not stop the fraud (due to the same morons in charge).

re: Wrong November 10, 2007 at 10:51 p.m.

You are a complete idiot.

There has NEVER been a "Kennedy Western Senate hearing"

There was a Senate hearing regarding unaccredited diplomas and diploma mills, which KW was identified due to the FIRST issue, unaccredited.

PLEASE show me all of these hundreds that were identified. I have read the entire hearing, and I just can seem to find them.

Again, you are nothing more than an ignorant, incompetent moron. You must have attended an Accredited University

wert November 11, 2007 at 9:46 a.m.

Diploma Mills are not listed on this website. Ref this website/blog.

Kennedy Western diploma mill hearing text November 12, 2007 at 5:38 a.m.

". the schools we investigated take pains to try to convince prospective students that they are legitimate and that student have to earn their degrees. That is why a healthy dose of credit for work and life experience becomes such a critical component of their business model. That is what permits these more sophisticated diploma mills to assume an air of legitimacy while minimizing the actual amount of work required."

Our investigation has revealed that there seem to be two kinds of diploma mills. One is simply a printing press.

Others, such as Columbia State University, Kennedy Western and some of the others we have looked at, are more sophisticated. They require a modicum of work, but nothing close to what should be required for a legitimate degree. Obviously, you shouldn't be able to earn a degree in 27 days, the example we discussed yesterday and Senator Lieberman cited."

Misc November 12, 2007 at 5:56 a.m.

"There has NEVER been a "Kennedy Western Senate hearing"

You must have missed it, here is a link. Kennedy Western former employees and investigators testified. The University even produced the list referenced here where they have ONE! so-called Faculty member and boatloads of telemarketers.

http://www.osac.state.or.us/oda/diploma_...

Nuke man November 13, 2007 at 3:05 a.m.

>>>>Most nuclear plant operators are X-Navy, enlisted. Few or no degrees in the control rooms.<<<<

I agree but the operation of a nuclear power plant involves far more people than just those in the control room. It is entirely possible that bogus degrees could adversely influence the safe operation of a nuclear plant. I know one fellow who got a diploma mill degree in Health Physics (a phony Ph.D.) and for a time occupied a high position related to the nuclear industry - until he was found out.

Nuke man November 13, 2007 at 3:08 a.m.

>>>>>You are a complete idiot.

There has NEVER been a "Kennedy Western Senate hearing"

There was a Senate hearing regarding unaccredited diplomas and diploma mills, which KW was identified due to the FIRST issue, unaccredited.<<<<

You err too much in favor of Kennedy Western. During the course of the hearings, Senator Susan Collins stated that Kennedy Western was not a legitimate university. You are correct in your implication that Kennedy Western was not the ONLY target of the investigation.

XNAVNUK November 13, 2007 at 3:41 a.m.

To NUKE-MAN
Shift supervisors in nuclear plants are in Operations Department and have to pass a tough licensing test every year. They can be found in the control room.
In my 30 years in the nuclear business, I have known few SS's to bother with a degree. Making 175K-200K/year, why waste the time.
The poster refered to a "Shift Supervisor".
Personally, I will trust an ex-navy nuclear power school graduate with a KW BSME degree over anyone else with an accredited BSME from, say,California Polytech or Georgia Tech. The discipline matters more than anything. Last I checked, universities are in the anti-discipline business.

Words have meanings November 13, 2007 at 3:53 a.m.

There is a difference between being the subject of an investigative hearing and being investigated. KW was the subject of a hearing.

Example-An eye-witness to a murder in a crime investigation is a "subject of an investigation" just like the guy who was murdered is a "subject of an investigation".
The object (objective) of the investigation is the accused.

KW was not on trial. Government employees and institutions were on trial. KW was never accused of breaking any laws. The matter involved unaccredited KW graduates being reimbursed tuition. Tuition reimbursement requires accreditation of the applicable university.

Dad November 13, 2007 at 7:10 a.m.

"There is a difference between being the subject of an investigative hearing and being investigated. KW was the subject of a hearing."

Oh, I feel much better now and am going to run out and sign my kids up.

Dad November 13, 2007 at 7:10 a.m.

They just graduated!

KW BSME November 13, 2007 at 7:52 a.m.

I had to cram all this stuff into my mind for the examinations, whether I liked it or not. This coercion had such a deterring effect on me that, after I had passed the final examination, I found the consideration of any scientific problems distasteful to me for an entire year."

MC^2 November 13, 2007 at 8 a.m.

Accreditation is a soft weapon of propaganda; hold it in your hands too long, and it will move about like a snake, and strike the other way.

Dr J November 13, 2007 at 8:15 a.m.

In punishing Warren National University for it's contempt of authority, fate made WNU an authority itself.

Dr J November 13, 2007 at 8:22 a.m.

The attempt to combine education and government has only rarely been successful and then only for a short while.

Shining the light on the "Accreditation Rats" November 13, 2007 at 8:38 a.m.

Academic freedom is the right to look for truth and to teach what one believes to be true. This right begs also a duty: one must not hide any part of what one has recognized to be the truth.

It is obvious that any government restriction on academic freedom (accreditation) acts in such a way as to hamper the dispersal of knowledge among the people and thereby impedes good national judgment and responsible action.

The texas law November 13, 2007 at 11:45 a.m.

The U.S. Code, which contains all federal statutes, occupies 56,009 single-spaced pages. Its 47 volumes take up nine feet of shelf space. An annotated version, which attempts to bring order out of chaos, is three feet long and has 230 hardcover volumes and 36 paperback supplements. Administrative lawmaking under statutes fill up the 207-volume Code of Federal Regulations, which spans 21 feet of shelf space and contains more than 134,488 pages of regulatory law... Federal law is further augmented by more than 2,756 volumes of judicial precedent, taking up 160 yards of law library shelving."

Hey all you framunda cheese eating government fecal nose accreditation advocates,
Can you be certain you're not breaking one of those laws?

Whew! November 13, 2007 at 1:19 p.m.

"I had to cram all this stuff into my mind for the examinations, whether I liked it or not"

Finding words in the glossary for 1 open book exam can be challenging.

PT Barnum November 13, 2007 at 3:24 p.m.

"Can you be certain you're not breaking one of those laws?"

No, but in less than 5 minutes, you can verify that your college is accepted/accredited and whether it was the subject of an investigative hearing. Things such as your education and career require due diligence.

I probably wouldn't spend that 5 minutes to determine if walking my dog on Thursdays is illegal on the left side of the street

Hey Dad! November 13, 2007 at 4:52 p.m.

REF:"Oh, I feel much better now and am going to run out and sign my kids up."

Hey dad, WNU will not take your kids. Look into their guidlines. Your kids do not qualify.

You are the crown jewel of ignorance.

Even if you are typical government scum parasite and you spent your whole adult life trying to get your 80 IQ kids ready for college by teaching them the SAT over and over and over again, they still can not get in. They have to actually hold a job. Chances are good that you never actually held a job either.

Dad November 13, 2007 at 5:02 p.m.

From the Senate Investigation of Kennedy Western University and 2 other schools:

Committee on Government Affairs - Exhibit #16, lists these activities that were granted academic credit for "life experience" at an unaccredited "college", that anyone can do.

*Playing Tennis
*Watching Public Television
*Keeping tropical fish

Word November 13, 2007 at 5:13 p.m.

"Finding words in the glossary for 1 open book exam can be challenging."

Look Pal,it is obvious you never attended the school. My KW experience was horrible and I would not do it again!

Physics, Calculus, Heat X-fer, Thermo, Mechatronics, Materials (to name a few) tests were all problem solving with barely enough time to finish the tests. Open book does you no good on these.

Now granted, subjects like English and Writing were like you say, unbelievable easy, almost a joke.

The truth is, the only difficult courses in any degree are the Math, Science and Engineering disciplines.

Touchy feely courses like Psychology, Sociology, Business, and Language degrees for example are a joke no matter where they are taught. And these courses are truly a scam, even at Harvard or Yale.
These liberal arts courses are only good for teaching you to teach them to someone else. Like a pyramid scheme.
These Liberal Arts type courses remind me of the old SNL spoof ....."Learn to be a standby operator today! Just dial 1-800-453-8532-Operators are standing by!"

Scammed November 13, 2007 at 6:37 p.m.

"My KW experience was horrible and I would not do it again!"

As was mine

diploma mill blues November 15, 2007 at 3:42 a.m.

In one of the old refernces on Wikipedia, there was some information about complaints to the Better Business Bureau about Kennedy Western. There were something like 14 complaints over a year or so. Imagine how many dissatisfied customers there must have been to generate 14 complaints as many would not go to the trouble of filing a complaint.

Not Today November 15, 2007 at 7:18 a.m.

There are fewer complaints about WNU toady at the BBB than there are at most accredited universities. Explain that!

BBB - look it up November 15, 2007 at 1:54 p.m.

http://www.mountainstates.bbb.org/WWWRoo......

According to the Better Business site, Warren National University has received 14 formal complaints in the last few years, some in each of these BBB categories:

1. Advertising Issues - Claims alleging print or electronic media advertised claims or practices misrepresent the service or product offer.

2. Billing or Collection Issues - Claim alleging billing errors, unauthorized charges, or questionable collection practices.

3. Sales Practice Issues - Claims of alleged sales presentations made in person or by telephone that contain misrepresentations of the product or service, high pressure sales practices, failure to disclose key conditions of the offer, and verbal representations not consistent with written contractual terms or agreements.

4. Product Issues - Claim alleging a product does not meet the expectations of the complainant, including defective merchandise.

5. Refund or Exchange Issues - Claim of alleged failure to honor company policy or verbal commitment to provide refunds, exchanges, or credit for products or services.

And AFAIK, this is a worthless statistic tho, because most claims are settled before it gets to this stage.

Not Today - Wrong November 15, 2007 at 4:24 p.m.

I looked up the University of Wisconsin, a HUGE university, and "The BBB processed a total of 0 complaints about this company in the last 36 months, our standard reporting period."

ML November 16, 2007 at 3:58 a.m.

I had the opportunity to take classes at WNU. The texts were first class, the instructors were Ph.D.s from Purdue, Kentucky and so on. I have completed graduate degrees at Boston University and Univ of Northern Colorado. The program at WNU is on par with the other "accredited" schools. Had the chance to review a number of dissertations from Pac 10 schools....the dissertation I was required to submit was better researched, more analytical and used twice the average number of references. I would challenge naysayers to take a course. In addition, most admissions teams have a staff of "telemarketers" in order to meet enrollment numbers. Plus I got credit for most of the below listed "life skills" that were dismissed as unwarranted at a well known Cal State University....only in my day they were taken for 3 credits hours toward a BA.

*Playing Tennis (PE in my day)
*Buying a Persian Carpet (Marketing class was great!)
*Watching Public Television (Think that was Multi-media 101)
*Eating in Exotic Restaurants (Culinary 201)
*Being Dungeon master (Software Development class - right on!)
*Pressing flowers (Home Economics 301)
*Keeping tropical fish (Ag 151)

Goes to show that naysayers have no perspective on life!

To ML: November 16, 2007 at 5:56 a.m.

So if you tell the telemarketer you were a "Dungeon Master", they'll automatically convert that to "Software Development" on your transcript at KWU when they are waiving half your doctorate? Sounds sweet.

BBB on WNU November 16, 2007 at 12:11 p.m.

A good rating. We would expect nothing less than a satisfactory business transaction.

Capella vs WNU November 16, 2007 at 12:20 p.m.

Last 36 mo.

Capella-accredited by NCA, 42 complaints.

WNU- 26 complaints.

Enough said!

WNU is accredited! November 16, 2007 at 12:23 p.m.

I noticed WNU was accredited by the BBB.

Tony November 16, 2007 at 12:34 p.m.

I have been a student of WNU for the past several months, and I have completed two courses. I must admit that I was skeptical at first, but I am pleasantly surprised by how much I am learning. The course structures are excellent, and the work is very challenging. If you are a critical thinker and are armed with a knack for reading and writing, then you ought to do just fine in the MBA Management program. I had completed some doctoral work at Georgia Tech, some of which transferred into my program. I also completed some graduate work at the University of Maryland and a few of those courses transferred into my program as well. I learn just as much at WNU as the other schools, except I have no ‘out of pocket’ costs. My employer covers the low tuition costs at WNU 100%. I have completed a master’s degree already from a regionally accredited college (Webster University). Since I already work professionally, I am more concerned with what I am able to learn over the brand name of the degree.

Q? November 16, 2007 at 12:46 p.m.

Does anyone have any idea what the differance there would be between MIT and WNU. I am currently enrolled in MIT's M.S. degree program and I am looking to transefer.

To Q? November 16, 2007 at 12:58 p.m.

You may find WNU a little more difficult.
I transfered in from Cal-Poly, BSEE, and thought it would be a breeze at WNU.
I guess I got used to Cal-Poly holding my hand and treating me like a child. WNU does not hold your hand. Self paced and you have to figure things out for yourself.
Without a doubt, some clown, who never attended WNU, will follow my advice with either 1)Something about accreditation,or 2)Something about senate hearings or 3)Something about accreditation or 4)something about senate hearings or 5) something about accreditation.
Do not let this lure you into thinking you can complete your degree any earlier and be on your way. It will likely take you longer and be more difficult

Scammed November 16, 2007 at 1:19 p.m.

Yes, I did attend. I found out the hard way that KWU is total garbage when tried to upgrade one of my professional engineering certifications and was turned down

Anyone that attends this university is naive or dishonest.

I was naive, which are you?

Shrent Hacoviac November 16, 2007 at 1:22 p.m.

I spent two years reviewing programs before I finally settled on WNU's program in chemistry. Amazing! The courses were challenging - the professors top notch - and my peers were some of the most amazing professionals I've ever met. I made great friends over the three years I spent working on my degree. I've seen my salary income go up by $280k a year, not counting another 35-50K per year giving lectures! (I attribute this to my MA). AND I published two books based on the research I did as part of my course work! If you can do it, I encourage you to enroll. You will never doubt your decision.

Ref: I was naive, which are you? November 16, 2007 at 1:34 p.m.

You were not naive, you were just dumber than dog poop.
KW/WNUs literature and websites have always stated that their degrees were not usable for G-jobs or professional licensing.
It scares me that someone as non-detail oriented as you were even able to get a PE. It took me three tries at the test to get that bad boy passed and I used to teach Engineering at Auburn.
You have not signed off on any bridges or structures near Birmingham lately, have you?

WNU doesn't even want it own "graduates" November 16, 2007 at 4:42 p.m.

Adjunct Faculty Qualifications:
• A PhD or Master's degree from a regionally-accredited university, in a field related to those offered by WNU.
o Graduates of KWU/WNU are not considered for Adjunct Faculty positions

http://www.wnuedu.com/academics-prospect...

English 101 November 16, 2007 at 5:36 p.m.

Thats WNU doesn't even want it's own "graduates."

WNU November 16, 2007 at 5:40 p.m.

Also will not take any Nationally Accredited graduates either. Just like MIT.

Y&Y November 16, 2007 at 6:05 p.m.

REF-"Graduates of KWU/WNU are not considered for Adjunct Faculty positions."

Nice snippet.

That is because teaching requires licensure. KW has never made a secret of this. The WNU degree is for people who want to make a ton of money. Last I checked, teaching paid less than Bussing Tables at Captain D's.
Someone already self employed who competes for private corporate contracts just needs an edge over the competition. They can spend 25K-50K and 3 years at an accredited online school or 8K and 18 months at WNU.
HR people at companies (who have an accreditation policy) are generally overwhelmed, too lazy to check and not too bright.
I do not know if many people are aware this or not, but private corporations HATE BIG GOVERNMENT. Many will hire WNU graduates to spite BIG GOVERNMENT. A ying and yang characteristic to the WNU snydrome has many people in academia baffled.
Another element that hates government is the mob, and you are a chump if you do not think they have massive power. They control the unions, the docks, shipping lines and probably your dad if you are from NJ or NY.
Make no mistake, accreditation has been taken over by the Feds. It's government against Corporate America. May the best entity win!

BART November 16, 2007 at 6:15 p.m.

Will be graduating from WNU in June, and after attending 2 different traditional colleges, I can say that WNU really works with you to get your credits transferred on a timely basis.
The work was challenging and the professors were readily available and answered emails within 24 hour turnaround. I completed most of my degree requirements while at Sea (I have since left the Navy), and found that I was able to complete my work after long shifts into the night and early morning hours. Highly recommend WNU as a good choice for active duty military, business people, stay at home parents, and any other adults with active, on the go lifestyles. Very flexible learning experience.

TACY POC November 16, 2007 at 6:28 p.m.

I could study anywhere. I have good B&M undergraduate & MBA degrees, a decent GMAT etc. I have a demanding job that I really enjoy. The cost of taking a leave of absence to study full-time at a great school would not make financial sense. I did extensive research, and find that the WNU curriculum in my field is the best thought-out and most aligned to my needs. I am including B&M schools in this analysis. I have designed curriculum for a top school, and I know good design when I see it. I am not trying to pass off my PhD as anything it isn't. I don't think my PhD will change my life, or my opportunities - my personal makeup will continue to drive my success. I don't want to be in a cohort - been there, done that. I love teams, but I have my hands full of them at work, and don't want to either "carry" or have to wait for other group members at school. The nature of my work is that there are busy times and slow times. Being able to speed up or slow down my progress through courses is a huge benefit. I am genuinely interested in my subject, and am doing this as a hobby as much as anything. I have "gotten ahead" plenty already, and am mostly looking to add a little brain food to the tail end of my career. I don't need my hand held. I am prepared to learn on my own and take a risk on my assignments (nobody will be looking at my 'marks'). I don't need someone to prescribe every little step of the way or tell me "exactly what they expect" from me, beyond the general marching orders. The bottom line is that I haven't chosen WNU out of lack of better options. I am genuinely impressed with their program and their delivery style. It isn't easy by any means, and is certainly not light-weight. I would say if your story is anything like mine, and you are favorably impressed with WNU's programs - go for it!

Wrong 1 November 16, 2007 at 6:36 p.m.

"That is because teaching requires licensure"

No, it doesn't, it only takes a legitimate degree, Master's level or above. Grade school teachers usually need a license, not college instructors. Irregardless, a Kennedy Western / Warren National "degree" is useless for both.

Wrong 2 November 16, 2007 at 6:37 p.m.

"Also will not take any Nationally Accredited graduates either. Just like MIT."

Does MIT put a disclaimer on their employment section that they won't even consider MIT graduates for employment because they consider their own university to be substandard?

Even other unaccredited schools like Rochville don't do that.

I promise you that November 17, 2007 at 1:36 p.m.

MIT will not consider your degree either.

<><><><>Diamonds<><><> November 17, 2007 at 1:39 p.m.

MIT has hired many more foreign professors (mostly european) than MIT graduates.

Luck? November 17, 2007 at 3:09 p.m.

I work for a large utility. Two weeks ago, my supervisor told me our department manager wanted to talk to me at 10 am. I asked him what she wanted to talk to me about and he only said that it was something IT found on my internet history.
I spent the next hour worried sick. I even threw up.
Like everyone in our group, I sometimes go on the internet for sports scores, financials, or click on a forbidden link in an e-mail etc.
Before the 10am meeting I resigned to possibly being fired. Even called a few friends to see if they were hiring.
I get there 10 minutes early and wait until she arrives at 10:20. That half hour lasted an eternity (and I just staired straight ahead at this winnie the pooh paperweight on her desk) and I must have been as pale as a ghost when she walked in.
She said nothing, but what she did was pull her KW degree from her desk drawer and show it to me. I exclaimed "I go there, well WNU anyways!"
She said I know, we saw the link to their courses on your history and I recognized the URL.
I asked her why she would not display the KW degree on her wall. She said at one time she did but then took it down because she was a little worried about making waves. I asked if she was embarrased of it and she said yes, a little. She also said it is not on her resume as she earned it while she was already there. I told her that if she did not mind, I would proudly display mine in my cubicle when I get it in a year or so. She smiled and said it would be OK.
Yesterday, she appeared as if out of thin air at my cubicle. We talked about this and that and the weather and Christmas shopping etc. Two hours went by! Again, she stopped by my cubicle at 15 minutes before quitting time. She asked if I would like Mr. Banes office and position and a raise! That is my bosses boss I thought to myself. I asked "What will Mr. Banes do?" She said "He wants to retire." I asked what about Ron (my boss) is not he in line for this position? She said no. I said yes, I will take it.
I got a promotion, and I have no degree yet. I will be supervising 8 people with degrees. Ha!

Comments from a chemist November 17, 2007 at 7:48 p.m.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>I spent two years reviewing programs before I finally settled on WNU's program in chemistry. Amazing! The courses were challenging - the professors top notch - and my peers were some of the most amazing professionals<<<<<

hmm...a legitimate degree in chemistry requires a very substantial amount of laboratory work. Since WNU has no laboratories, that seems to be a bit of a problem, doesn't it?

Bias Again November 18, 2007 at 7:28 a.m.

A good example of bias on this website is the follwing review put front and center by the administrator of this blog.

http://www.onlinedegreereviews.org/colle...

Some dumb#$% attends WNU and does not even read their base literature prior to enrolling where they say WNU is not for licensure or credentials.
He then tries to use the degree to upgrade his Professional License and gets turned down? How stupid is that? This guy is not a PE. No PE is that absent from mind! Absent from this world!
If this guy is this much of a moron, we do not need him signing off engineering documents anyways. He is a fraud and this site is a SHILL!!!!!!!!

Who do you trust? November 18, 2007 at 9:53 a.m.

Government or Christian Science Monitor-

WNU ,cutting edge, anti-cheating programs have accredited ie., "cheating" universities on the run. They are scared, quite scared.

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0427/p15s0...

Daily Dumpster November 19, 2007 at 2:22 a.m.

From the Diploma Mill News

http://www.diplomamillnews.blogspot.com/...

2 more Kennedy Western "degree" users exposed, "degrees" in the dumpster.

We know the drill...

"Will have all mention of the degree removed", "Personnel matters" being investigated, etc.

Can't fool all the people all the time...

So? November 19, 2007 at 3:37 a.m.

"Will have all mention of the degree removed", "Personnel matters" being investigated, etc."

Point to a conviction anywhere of a KW degree being used in the free-market (non-govt, non education). You can't. KW has always said that the degree was not for licensing, govt or higher ed teaching.
The jobs on your "non-biased diploma mill blog" that people got in trouble for are low paying teaching and government sector jobs. I believe they are supplementing their income with welfare to support their families.
Folks, the big money is in free enterprise, not poverty level G-jobs and teaching! Do not buy into the garbage on this site about accreditation. I have bid on and won many private contracts with my KW BSEE. I made 500K+ last year and about 350K this year (I took 4 months off this year for sailing my 80ft sailboat from Miami to Austrailia).
A free spirit and a belief in USA free-market is far more valuable than any degree. And yes, I got the KW degree because it is fast and easy. Why waste precious time on an education when the big money is in making deals.
Get the BSXX on your resume and stay away from G-jobs.

WORD

Mr. Roark November 19, 2007 at 3:55 a.m.

"KW has always said that the degree was not for licensing, govt or higher ed teaching."

Can you show me where on the website that it says this? Or do graduates get some type of mailing with all the limitations, and updates when it becomes invalid in a new state?

For the rest, "Welcome to fantasy island!"

They have some honesty I admit. November 19, 2007 at 5:24 a.m.

I have to admit that they do tell you this before signing up. In mailings and talking with their career counselors (telemarketers in disguise) they make this well known. The following is also on their Gen. Info web page. Easy to find, right out front.

Licenses and Credentials
The University is oriented to those individuals not seeking licenses or credentials. If a license or a credential is desired, a search should be conducted on state and federal association and credential requirements before applying. We are approved to receive the test results of the American College Testing Program (ACT) and Graduate Management Admission Council (GMAT).

WNU November 19, 2007 at 5:43 a.m.

Is under no requirement to make WNU students aware of unconstitutional or illegal and untested laws of other states.
Do you notice how Texas has yet to test the very law they passed?
Why will they never test it?
The cease and whatever orders can be used to scare state government employees because they get their pay-check from the state of Texas. If they are in education they are govt wonks also. All non profit universities are sucklings on the Big Government Teet.
The free-market is just waiting to strike at Texas on this issue.

Hmmm November 19, 2007 at 5:43 a.m.

That covers licenses, how about government employment or higher ed teaching?

Define University November 19, 2007 at 6:06 a.m.

Once a mechanism whereby smart people could raise themselves above humble beginnings and obtain a worthwhile qualification indicating a high probability of being employable. Now a complete con to get kids with high hopes into insurmountable amounts of debt before they even think about buying a house.. then they discover that the job they trained for was entirely fictitious, and they'll have to take any job they can get. At this point, they realise they should have saved their money and gone to Warren National University like all their "stupid" friends, who now have houses, cars and big screen TVs.

John always did well in his school classes, and did three A-Levels and got good grades. He went to uni for three years which put him about £30,000 in debt. When he finished his course he found that his degree counted for very little, since he had no experience and the other 400 job applicants also had degrees. He took a job as a sales rep with Coca-Cola, but got fired when he went to an interview for a better job. Meanwhile the cost of living rose exponentially, and by the age of 24, John's debts stood at around £45,000. This was before he even got a mortgage. A couple of years afterwards he divorced his wife on the grounds of infidelity, but she got custody of the kids, and now he doesn't even get to see them despite paying atrocious amounts of child support. Welcome to Blair's Britain.

Where? November 19, 2007 at 6:42 a.m.

"KW has always said that the degree was not for licensing, govt or higher ed teaching."

True on the license part. But completely false on the others. In fact, they are promoting government employment and higher ed employment with the testimonials in the KWU catalog.

Quote 1: "My original goal was to advance my career with the Department of Defense... I'm very proud to say that I have done just that"

Quote 2: From a Federal Aviation employee,

Quote 3: Employee of Life College

No mention of all the other restrictions, disclaimers, etc.

LIARS November 19, 2007 at 7:05 a.m.

The math teaching certification at WNU is much harder than any brick university. I don't know what degree the poster above acquired with WNU, but it is probably a liberal Arts Degree which is by defualt an easy degree at any university, not to mention totally useless.
Frankly, I recommend that anyone wishing to obtain a teaching certification either do it through a brick university or take the alternative certification if you already have a degree. WNU is many times more difficult because you are on your own. The mentors do not perform a 'mentoring' function but rather an administrative role. For example, they will recommend resources but not necessarily answer any of your questions. WNU is for mature and disciplined students whose main task is to prove that they have the competencies required in order to obtain a degree. WNU often does not care how or where you get previous training and knowledge provided you can demonstrate you have the ability. And no, you cannot guess your way through it, plus open book does you little good in complex Calculus - the exams are tough. I personally know of an MIT Professor and a space shuttle astronaut who failed rigorous modules a few times before finally giving up and losing credit for the course. WNU is not for everyone.

WTF November 19, 2007 at 10:40 a.m.

REF:" True on the license part. But completely false on the others. In fact, they are promoting government employment and higher ed employment with the testimonials in the KWU catalog."

What are you freakin blind! You boneheads always quote Wickipedia when it suits your bogus declarations but look the other way when it does not.

Did you attend KW Sir?

I doubt it.

Easy Button November 19, 2007 at 11:13 a.m.

REF:That covers licenses, how about government employment or higher ed teaching?

Lets see hmm, well there are many people in government jobs with no degree, in fact most government jobs require NO degree, Duh!

So I am assuming you want a higher level G-job. That is a "Credential" requirement, thus "If a license or a credential is desired, a search should be conducted on state and federal association and credential requirements before applying." SIMPLE.
Only government is compelled to pull the accreditation card because they usually end up paying the clown's tuition reimbursements (thanks to comunist organizations like "The American Negro College Fund".) If you pay Tyrones tuition, you have to pay Jerrel and LaWanda's tuition also.

By WNU saying they are unaccredited, automatically rules out teaching at accredited schools. DUH!
Higher ed unis that are accredited rule out any un-accredited degree for teaching only. T
here are some unaccredited universities that will hire you to teach.

Bottom line is that you can still work for government, just not with the degree being a stated requirement.

Soliciting advice November 19, 2007 at 11:35 a.m.

Does anyone have any idea what the differance there would be between Harvard and WNU. I am currently enrolled in Harvards PHD program and I am looking to transefer.

To: Soliciting Advice November 19, 2007 at 1:12 p.m.

Attend Rochville University, it is cheaper than WNU, but has the same accreditation.

No Student Support November 19, 2007 at 1:19 p.m.

In this week's round of KW"U" alumni being exposed, one was a career higher ed employee and one was a career government employee.

Apparently it didn't come up during intake that the degree would be unacceptable for them.

So, a vague, one sentence disclaimer in the marketing materials is the only warning they get, even though we talk to admission counselors and have our prior experience evaluated for mucho credits? And in the same marketing materials they are promoting higher ed and government employment?

Glad I got out when I did.

Bad WNU Experience November 19, 2007 at 4:54 p.m.

Ok, so I earned a WNU BS in Safety Engineering, then I could not believe it. Just days after I put the credential on my resume men in black suits showed up at my door. They placed me under arrest and read me my Miranda. They blindfolded me and took me to a secret place where I found out is used only for interrogating WNU students. They torture you first by waterboarding you. Then they play this recording over and over, something about senate GAO, senate GAO over and over again.
There was another WNU student in the room with me. She finally screams out "What do you want from me?". The recording stopped. A voice said "Compliance. We want you to fall in line with the way it has always been done. We distort and you comply." She asked in horror, "Who are you?" The voice replied "Big Brother".

Misc November 19, 2007 at 7:54 p.m.

"WNU often does not care how or where you get previous training and knowledge"

They don't care at all, and its been reported repeatedly that they don't even verify any of the "life experience".

I do miss the little calculator they used to have on their website that would estimate what % of your degree they would waive. You could get close to 60% if you put in the right numbers.

Still waiting .... November 20, 2007 at 2:55 a.m.

For one of these "pro accredited" pundits to tell me WHY accreditation is so worthwhile?

Is that to say that all of our great leaders, scientists and inventors attended sub-standard schools in the 1800's and early 1900's? Schools like Harvard, Yale, U of Va, U of Mass, William and Mary, etc etc etc etc.

Why we need accreditation November 20, 2007 at 9:29 a.m.

The indisputably most intelligent and famous single man that ever walked the earth had no degree. I hope everyone knows who that is.

Accreditation is a mostly misunderstood concept. The original intention was believe it or not a real good one. The path to hell is paved with good intentions right?

What started as a noble idea (of accrediting higher learning to make things better) only made things worse.

People used to study as to gain knowledge, and your net worth to society was measured in how well you conversed and conveyed what you knew to your peers in a given discipline. Even if you never went to a university, you could learn from books and if you were good enough even find yourself very well off (in the circles of the elite). The resume was not used.
The opposite is true today. How much you know does not matter at all. It matters how much you know for the test with a good brain dump after the test.
Those who purge their brains the best after a test are most ready for the next cram session. Those who take the longest to learn a concept also usually are not only the most creative but also take the longest to forget that concept. Thus the classroom system rewards those non creative individuals most likely to forget every thing they learn. GREAT!
Enter the resume, circa 1910. Now people can brag on paper about how well they binged (cram studied) and purged (brain dumped) 15 years ago. They usually remember very little about what they learned in their courses.
How odd it is that the way you advertise yourself on your resume has rules to follow in Texas. Even more odd is that your actual performance on the job matters very little in Texas government jobs (due in large part to affirmative action, no one wants to be the person, for example, who says something bad about a black female’s performance on the job).

So performance has no rules but resumes do?

Now the theory was that the more information someone crams into their head, the more information that will remain there 5 years from now. Not true, but let us assume it is.

Accreditation increases the quality and quantity of the information in the binge and purge. Yea, that’s it!

Accreditation requires no tests 2 or 3 or 5 years out of college to defend the degree (or lose it). This is because all university students would lose their degrees ten years after graduation.

The DOE was never supposed to accredit universities as this is a violation of the 10th amendment to the US constitution.

They grade the accreditors and the accreditors grade the Universities. That is until the University can no longer afford the extortion money for payola to the DOE. Then the university goes under. They (DOE) have begun using accreditation as tool to control what universities teach, mind control. Bad times are a coming.
Roll over Thomas Jefferson.

Badges? November 20, 2007 at 1:28 p.m.

Accreditation? We don't need no stinking accreditation.

Warren National rules, and anyone that says otherwise is dumb.

Bill Gates don't have no accredited degre

Anyone stupid enough to attend an accredited college shouldn't be allowed in the workforce, that's where all the stupid people go.

All the enlighted people go to unaccredited schools by choice after looking at the useless government schols

What is 98? November 20, 2007 at 11:46 p.m.

It is the average university graduates IQ in 2005.

Compare that to 132 back in 1959 when there was no accreditation.

What 168? November 21, 2007 at 2:53 a.m.

The average IQ of Kennedy Western graduates. All the accreditated universtiy people are to stupid to getin

Famous World Wide! November 21, 2007 at 3:45 a.m.

The Irish Times listed with commentary the following twelve education businesses in an article entitled,

"A dirty dozen - 12 famous diploma mills."
1. Columbia State University, Louisiana: Shut down by the Attorney-General of Louisiana.
2. La Salle University, Louisiana: Claims to be restructuring itself after its founder president was jailed and the premises were raided by the FBI.
3. Chadwick University, Alabama: claims accreditation from a bogus agency.
4. American State University, Hawaii: Recently offered an American reporter a bachelor's degree in journalism for $1,890 and a thesis of a mere 2,000 words.
5. American International University, Alabama.
6. Columbus University, Louisiana.
7. Monticello University, Kansas:
8. Frederick Taylor University, California.
9. Pacific Western University, Hawaii: offering to "match your position with a legal degree and transcripts."
10. City University of Los Angeles, California:
11. Kennedy Western University, Hawaii. (Name has changed to Warren National University.)
12. Trinity College and University; operates from Delaware, USA; Spain; and the United Kingdom. In February, 2007, several United Nations staff were fired from their jobs after it was discovered they had padded their resumes with Trinity "degrees".

"Irish Times November 22, 2007 at 12:03 p.m.

is less credible than the NY times, and the NY times the most discredited Paper on the planet"
No spin zone Jun 3, 2006.

A new, old low. November 22, 2007 at 12:04 p.m.

The Irish. Drunks and thievs. Thomas Jefferson 1792.

Accreditation November 22, 2007 at 12:19 p.m.

Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge (Dept. Of Education) is shipwrecked by the laughter of the Gods.

On "Illegal Degree" Laws November 22, 2007 at 12:29 p.m.

"Laws too gentle are seldom obeyed; too severe, seldom executed."

Answer: Accreditation November 22, 2007 at 12:35 p.m.

Question: What's a sundial in the shade?

Thanks-Giving message to WNU students. November 22, 2007 at 1:21 p.m.

We are now on the verge of vast change -changes so wondrously important and significant that we will upset the present (and need I say boring) trend of human thought and start it along completely new lines .

LOL November 22, 2007 at 3:45 p.m.

Not just a bad so-called "college", but even making international "worst" lists. Potential students, look elsewhere obviously.

PT Barnum November 22, 2007 at 4:34 p.m.

"WNU ,cutting edge, anti-cheating programs "

Who needs to cheat at KWU / WNU? If you have a pulse, you are halfway to a degree, then look through the glossary on a few multiple choice open book exams.

Corrections Officer, CSP November 22, 2007 at 4:56 p.m.

"Who needs to cheat at KWU / WNU? If you have a pulse, you are halfway to a degree, then look through the glossary on a few multiple choice open book exams."

Like a degree anywhere is something special?
Give me a break. I know of drugged out dumb as hell ghetto heroin dealers who attended U of Colorado (on the state's tab) as a form of reform and walk away with 4 year degrees.

The whole concept has been diluted by white trash and blacks with IQs < that of a frog.

You are so full of yourself.

DNA November 23, 2007 at 6:18 a.m.

Soon, your genetic DNA will determine your value in the work-place!
The national genome project is quickly linking genetics to longevity, health, motivational qualities, and intelligence.

Those of us that brought you university accreditation will also usher in a new era of genetic-qualification.

We will phase one program in as we phase the other out.

The two characteristics that determine university success are motivation and intelligence. As it turns out there are about 5 genes that determine these characteristics. The quick cheek swab and DNA testing can be done in about one week (vs. 4 years for a degree). After we get everyone in the countries DNA tests completed, we can begin taking degrees away from the sub-standard people, you know, the ones that slipped through the cracks and somehow got a degree where their genes did not warrant such an accomplishment. Perhaps our greatest fear is that WNU students might be DNA superior, but we will cross that road when we get there.
http://www.clt.astate.edu/aromero/popula...

Accreditation 101 November 24, 2007 at 8:06 a.m.

This link might help those who do not understand (the importance of higher learning accreditation) become more enlightened.

http://www.geocities.com/st_elias_semina...

Check the source on that November 25, 2007 at 1:25 a.m.

That handy article was written by a "Dr." Hoyer who was involved with the Kennedy Western University / Warren National University outfit

"Dr. Hoyer is the former Chair of the Environmental and Safety Engineering Department at Kennedy-Western University"

Of course the first article on this Kennedy Western cornerstone that pops up on Google is:

"Feds investigate diploma mills: Sites in West raided; records that name local man are sought" by Steve Orr, Rochester, New York Democrat and Chronicle, August 17, 2005.

"Federal authorities are conducting a criminal probe of suspected "diploma mills" that could involve bogus accreditation supplied by a Liberian government official — and a Rochester-area man appears to be at least tangentially involved in the case.

An affidavit filed in court by a Secret Service agent said the colleges sell degrees to "students" and require little or no coursework.

The affidavit said an agent obtained four bogus degrees from the online institutions while working undercover earlier this year.

Richard J. Hoyer, an Irondequoit resident with a history of involvement in online colleges, is identified in the affidavit as having been connected to St. Regis and the Liberian accreditation gambit in the past.

In stories published in 2003, the Democrat and Chronicle reported that Hoyer had drawn scrutiny from education regulators in at least three states. New York ordered him to cease operating an online homeland-security college in October 2003 because it had no state authorization.

The newspaper also reported that Hoyer was involved with an entity that was arranging accreditation in the name of the African nation of Liberia."

Patriot November 25, 2007 at 2 a.m.

By all accounts then, that would make Hoyer a true Patriot.
Remember, McCarthy has been vindicated by recent release of FBI documents.
Communists have infected our university system in the USA and opposition is expected.

Dr. Hoyer... November 25, 2007 at 4:59 a.m.

Is a fine example of Kennedy Western "faculty" and integrity.

So can someone explain? November 26, 2007 at 4:37 p.m.

Laypersons and professional alike have been brainwashed to think that to have a legitimate college or university degree, it must be accredited. The average person and most professionals have no idea what accreditation is, they believe or have been told through out the years, that accreditation equals a legitimate degree. This is not true! In fact it takes four years for a college to become accredited, making it technically impossible to disallow unaccredited schools. With this mindset, no new college or university could ever open.

This too? November 26, 2007 at 4:41 p.m.

All of the US public schools are accredited. Yet we are graduating 18 year olds who can’t make change without a calculator and can’t spell.

It's easy to explain! November 26, 2007 at 5:33 p.m.

"that accreditation equals a legitimate degree." - True

"In fact it takes four years for a college to become accredited" - Also true. And a legitimately new college looking to become accredited should be given the benefit of the doubt, but students should still avoid until they do become accredited, to avoid getting burned.

But the benefit of the doubt was gone a decade or more ago with Warren National University / Kennedy Western University. They have been in business 24 years, moved to 4 states, kicked out or non-renewed in a couple of those.

Fate November 28, 2007 at 2:18 p.m.

I never finished my KW degree. I dropped out after failing Heat transfer and thermo.

My "wealthy parented" friend who finished a 4 year degree at Emory (cost $85K) a year ago, and never did get a job, just filed bankruptcy in October, had a nervous breakdown and is in an asylum in Milledgevill somewhere.

A truly lucky spell landed me a job at Atlanta Airport working with my step-grandfather making 50K a year to start (learning to be an air-traffic controller).
Guess my step-grandfather credential was more important than her Emory degree. Glad I only lost two thousand dollars at KW.

So can someone explain? November 28, 2007 at 6 p.m.

WNU should sue Wikipedia for lies and defamation.

For example, WIKI lists WNU as illegal in North Dakota and they are not. Since they have applied for accreditation and are state licensed they are legal there. I have called all of the Offices of degree authorization of every state, and they all say that WNU degrees are allowed a waiver since they have applied for accreditation and they just need time to update their websites and legislation of new laws.

Grad Rate November 28, 2007 at 8:21 p.m.

"I never finished my KW degree. I dropped out after failing Heat transfer and thermo"

Wow, that drops the KWU / WNU graduation rate to 99.99999%

Wrong O November 28, 2007 at 8:40 p.m.

North Dakota:

"WIKI lists WNU as illegal in North Dakota" - True, but only if you believe what they specifically say, which is:

"In North Dakota, only credentials from legitimate institutions of higher education are acceptable for use in employment"

"Legitimate institutions are those that are accredited by organizations recognized by the US secretary of education or otherwise approved by the North Dakota State Board..."

So, WNU is not a "legitimate institution" under their definition.

Hiding in "applicant status" doesn't suddenly wipe away the past.

North Dakota November 28, 2007 at 8:45 p.m.

"it is illegal to use a false credential for employment, higher education admission, or in connection with a business or profession. Doing so carries a Class A misdemeanor..."

Pretty clear again. Better call them back!

OK November 29, 2007 at 6:35 p.m.

http://www.legis.nd.gov/cencode/T15C204....

WNU meets code just fine chump.

He is right November 29, 2007 at 6:38 p.m.

d. Does not operate in this state and is:
(1) Licensed by the appropriate state agency; and
(2) An active applicant for accreditation by an accrediting body recognized
by the United States secretary of education; or...

ND.gov November 29, 2007 at 6:48 p.m.

15-20.4-15. REFERENCE 4D, North Dakota, Like he said, all states read prteey much the same
4. As used in this section, "duly authorized institution of higher learning" means an
institution that:
a. Has accreditation recognized by the United States secretary of education or
has the foreign equivalent of such accreditation;
b. Has an authorization to operate under this chapter;
c. Operates in this state and is exempt from this chapter under section
15-20.4-02;
d. Does not operate in this state and is:
(1) Licensed by the appropriate state agency; and
(2) An active applicant for accreditation by an accrediting body recognized
by the United States secretary of education; or
e. Has been found by the state board for career and technical education to meet
standards of academic quality comparable to those of an institution located in
Page No. 6
the United States that has accreditation recognized by the United States
secretary of education to offer degrees of the type and level claimed.
15-20.4-16. Unlawful to use degree or certificate when coursework not completed -
Penalty.
1. An individual may not knowingly use a degree, certificate, diploma, transcript, or
other document purporting to indicate that the individual has completed an organized
program of study or completed courses when the individual has not completed the
organized program of study or the courses as indicated on the degree, certificate,
diploma, transcript, or document:
a. To obtain employment;
b. To obtain a promotion or higher compensation in employment;
c. To obtain admission to an institution of higher learning; or
d. In connection with any business, trade, profession, or occupation.
2. An individual who violates this section is guilty of a class A misdemeanor.
15-20.4-17. Consumer protection - False academic degrees. The state board for
career and technical education, in collaboration with the North Dakota university system, shall
provide via internet web sites, information to protect students, businesses, and others from
persons that issue, manufacture, or use false academic degrees.
Page No. 7

Thanks, good resources there November 29, 2007 at 8:15 p.m.

The North Dakota site does have some good resources. In their pamphlet titled “Is This a Real Degree, How to Avoid a Bogus Degree from a Diploma Mill”, you can research more about the shortcomings of Kennedy-Western / Warren National and other unaccredited institutions at:

The Oregon Office of Degree Authorization -
www.osac.state.or.us/oda/

Degree Info.com - www.degreeinfo.com

National Clearinghouse – www.degreeverify.com

Unconventional University Diplomas from Online Vendors Fraud, Corruption and Scandal: Buying a PhD: - www.hep.uiuc.edu/home/g-gollin/diploma_m...

I get it.... November 30, 2007 at 10:15 a.m.

Ifyou can not win the argument with the facts, throw out a bunch of dung and hope something sticks.

Just call 703-742-4200 (National Student Clearinghouse)and ask for Ann. Ann tells me that they will list any state licensed University. Accreditation is not a must. She even gave me the phone number of Don Gwinn (in Wyoming) 847-491-1335 and said they would love to work with WNU. She said all they do is the work the school do to verify the enrollment and degree (this is a service). They would tell any checkers that the school was unaccredited (just like WNU would do). In fact, they already have several unaccredited universities using the service.
You see, all they do is verify enrollment and that the person achieved what degree.

Oh and lets not forget, Oregons sweet little tail is still stinging from the spanking they got from a federal judge! REF:KW vs Ore. Oregon, the biggest complainer about unaccreditation is forced to accept KW degrees and disciplined for liable.

NUFF SAID.

So WNU is legal in ND? November 30, 2007 at 10:20 a.m.

But the below two clauses in the ND code does make WNU legal in North Dakota, right?

4. As used in this section, "duly authorized institution of higher learning"
d. Does not operate in this state and is:
(1) Licensed by the appropriate state agency; and
(2) An active applicant for accreditation by an accrediting body recognized
by the United States secretary of education; or

Dr. J November 30, 2007 at 10:23 a.m.

Granted, WNU is perfectly illegal in ND and every other state in the union including Tx.

But for how long? WNU has a history of walking away from accreditation at the last minute. Will be interesting to say the least.

Texas November 30, 2007 at 10:25 a.m.

Texas lists WNU specifically though.

Even Texas November 30, 2007 at 10:26 a.m.

Has to follow the constitution. Expect Texas to revise their website in the next few months.

Anyone Anyone? November 30, 2007 at 1:59 p.m.

Well, I can read the Senate investigation and approximately 15 articles from this blog alone that show that Kennedy Western / Warren National is decidely substandard if not borderline diploma mill in quality.

Can anyone post a positive article about either organization from an independent source?

Misc November 30, 2007 at 2:04 p.m.

Clearinghouse - "She said all they do is the work the school do to verify the enrollment and degree" That's interesting.

I wonder if the AMA would let me be listed as an unlicensed doctor, so that anyone checking could verify that I am not qualified.

Claim victory all you want, still illegal in Oregon.

I'll watch for Texas to make Kennedy Western and Warren National accepted schools within 3 months, thanks for the heads up.

Hey Dummy! November 30, 2007 at 4:17 p.m.

The average person and most professionals have no idea what accreditation is, they believe or have been told through out the years, that accreditation equals a legitimate degree. This is not true! In fact it takes four years for a college to become accredited, making it technically impossible to disallow unaccredited schools. With this mindset, no new college or university could ever open.

WNU November 30, 2007 at 4:27 p.m.

I evaluated a number of online degree programs and chose the WNU BA program for the following reasons. Flexibility and number of online of classes, experience and suitability of online instructors and WNU's proven track record in educating working adults. Each quarter I took 2 classes which was doable even with a family and business.

The support you get from the WNU staff is excellent. After completing the Previous Courses Evaluation (which maps out your entire learning plan) you will be assigned facility advisors and professional advisors who are available for questions and support through your WNU experience. The instructors are very good at distance learning and for the most part provide excellent feedback and are quite accessible.

You will be able to transfer most if not all of your previous college level classwork.
I would not hesitate to recommend WNU. The level of attention and support I received from the faculty, staff, and other students was fantastic. We have opportunities to participate in many of the same programs as on-campus students such as travel abroad, honor societies, and scholarships. The School has the highest GPA of any school going. Grades matter!

Yep November 30, 2007 at 4:34 p.m.

"The School has the highest GPA of any school going"

I suspect this is true. 100% acceptance, 100% graduation, 100% 4.0's

Can anyone post a positive article about either organization from an independent source to counter all the exposes and investigations?

Daily Dumpster, KWU in the News Again November 30, 2007 at 4:44 p.m.

Engineering Times:
Are Fraudulent Academic Degrees Making a Mark on Engineering?

http://www.nspe.org/etweb/10704diplomami...

The Tennessee State Board of Architectural and Engineering Examiners recently had a brush with candidates who listed diploma mill degrees on applications for licensure.

"The individual on contract with the board, who evaluates non-ABET accredited domestic engineering degrees, recognized the school in question because he had some prior knowledge of Kennedy-Western," says Barbara Bowling, executive director of the board.

The application of this person is still pending, but Bowling says it's doubtful the board would approve the application because the degree is not substantially equivalent to an engineering degree from an accredited university.

SS November 30, 2007 at 4:47 p.m.

The dirty little secret is?

I am sure everyone remembers the Coast Guard Lady who "Investigated KW". Investigation 101 says finish the job (in this case she should have obtained the degree in say 11 or 12 months to prove how easy the degree was-right?). Why did she not finish the coursework and make a real provable case?
Do forensic crime investigators find a suspect and quit investigating? WTF!
The answer to this is easy. The floor is open for anyone who thinks they know the answer.

Some Independent 3rd party articles on KWU / WNU November 30, 2007 at 8:55 p.m.

Rather than trying to decide exactly which state laws preclude you from mentioning you went to this school, let's focus on Independent 3rd party assessment of the value of Kennedy-Western University / Warren National University "degree" Here is a small sampling of articles that specfically discuss this degree supplier.

"It May Take Hours, But You Too Can Earn a University Degree"

"When Elected Officials Aren't What They Seem: Texas officials and Pennsylvania cats tout misleading credentials"

"Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations, Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"

"Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense."

"Diploma Mills are Easily Created and Some Have Issued Bogus Degrees to Federal Employees at Government Expense."

“Real officials, bogus degrees, Fake degrees a growing Texas problem”

"A dirty dozen - 12 famous diploma mills."

“Are Fraudulent Academic Degrees Making a Mark on Engineering?”

“Fighting Fakery - Diploma mills continue to churn out new "graduates" every day. What should legitimate colleges do about them? Is government action called for?”

“Two less doctors in the house - Hebert, Wilson back away from Ph.D.'s issued by 'diploma mills'”

“CBS 42 Investigates: Professors' questionable credentials”

Roland Gervais December 1, 2007 at 12:51 a.m.

Dear Friend and others,

I must say that the experience I had with WNU was fantastic.
After earning a BS in engineering, I decided to take an online degree course to see what it was like. After speaking with some friends, one of told me about WNU.

Wow, what a great experience! The course work was much more difficult than the course work at the local college that I went to.

Would I tell others to go, you bet!

Happy Holidays

Investigations out the yingyang. December 1, 2007 at 3:49 a.m.

But no convictions for wrongdoing. Harvard and Yale have actually been convicted of federal crimes and no one cares. Hmmm.

Govt. against Business December 2, 2007 at 5:09 a.m.

I think a lot of people are missing the boat big time. Corporations usually hate government and everything that goes with it. You can not be a successful business person unless you have some disdain for Big Government. Ever notice that almost all truly self made successful people are either Libertarians or Republicans?
Democrats like to suck up to big government because they can not survive in a competitive environment.
The best job I ever got was because of my pro second amendment stance. The guy who hired me liked guns and I liked guns.
Libertarians and true Republicans hate and I mean HATE the Dept. of Education.
We might hire the guy with the non DOE accredited credential just to spite state and federal governments.

TEXAS December 2, 2007 at 11:06 a.m.

http://www.radoil.com/engineers_01.html

Now here is a Proud Texan Not Afraid!

The Best December 2, 2007 at 12:13 p.m.

I’ve always been interested in improving the quality of life for others. That’s why I work in Structural Engineering. This KWU degree gives me tools I can take into the real world and implement.
I actually researched the best engineering schools for a good solid year. I researched every school there was—traditional schools as well as online colleges—and after a year of research where I put together all the different courses that you would need to take, I calculated how much it would cost, the amount of time it would take, and the different programs that were offered, it really boiled down to KWU as the very best choice. And that’s how I came to choose KWU.
What I really like about Warren National University is the vast diversity that it offers. I’ve met students from Germany and Africa, as well as all across the United States. What you get from that is a blending of cultures, different opinions, and different viewpoints, and a view of how Engineering is applied globally, not just within your region, state, or country.
When these pea-brains on this site condemn WNU, it is out of total ignorance.
Just wish I could have them see me boarding my Lear with my super-model wife and $80K platinum Rolex.
I would just love to see them turn green with envy.

George P. December 2, 2007 at 2:39 p.m.

"I am sure everyone remembers the Coast Guard Lady who "Investigated KW".

Because the G men would have had some splainin ta do when Mrs. Gelzer could not "just buy a degree" in a year or less.
If I remember correctly, she failed the first test she took

Right?

I agree - get that degree in a few weeks December 3, 2007 at 6:50 a.m.

I assume this question is from the Senate investigation of Kennedy-Western University titled "Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations: Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"

I took a quick look and it was where a Senator asked a Coast Guard member to enroll in Kennedy-Western University as part of the investigation. She applied to a Masters degree program in Engineering.

Kennedy-Western immediately waived 43% of the Engineering master's degree requirements, based on her JOURNALISM degree and some random seminars attended. She even notes that "they asked for no proof or documenation" and "As a note, I have no formal engineering training".

No matter, she was well on her way to a Master's degree in Engineering. Then of the remaining 5 classes left for a Master's degree, the student knocked off 2 of the 5 classes in a grand total of 16 hours and said that each "course" was an open-book exam where she had to pick terms out of the glossary.

I agree with the above poster, she should have sucked in up for a week or two and spent the 8 hours each for the 3 remaining courses and gotten her Master's Degree in Engineering.

www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate/pdf/1...

SS December 3, 2007 at 8:55 p.m.

REFERENCE: "I agree - get that degree in a few weeks"

Now that you agree she should have done it, might you speculate why she did not?

If she could have she would have right? Did the Senate run out of money because KW was so expensive? Did they fear for her life? Did she have PMS?

There is a real answer to this. They backed out for a real reason.

Why was she incapable of obtaining the degree? Anyone? Anyone?

Found it for you December 3, 2007 at 9:23 p.m.

Should have looked looked closer, she answers your question directly during the Senate investigation of Kennedy-Western University titled "Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations: Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"

"Not long after, I withdrew from the school, as by then we had a good sense of Kennedy-Western's academic program. With just 16 hours of study, I had completed 40 percent of the course requirements for my Master's degree"

(That's 2/5 open book exams after they waived 6 graduate engineering courses for her Journalism degree and some seminars)

You left out December 4, 2007 at 2:45 a.m.

The Final project or 4 more courses, her choice.

ss December 4, 2007 at 2:49 a.m.

That is what she said, but that is not the real reason. .............................Anyone else?

Coast Guard Lady December 4, 2007 at 2:52 a.m.

The real percentage is 2/9 = 22%

Assuming she went with the extra course option and not the project.

[2/(5+4)]x 100% = 22%.

Dr. Charles Mintz IV December 4, 2007 at 3:15 a.m.

Also, she was going for Environmental Engineering. This is faux engineering. Just like "Computer Engineering", "Hair Style Engineering" and "Safety Engineering" all fantasy engineering courses.

When I transfered from Emory to GA. Tech, I was given about 40% credits for the overlap courses going from BS in Nursing to BSEE. Is it so far off mark that she get 43% for her past experiences (including her BS)at KW?

HIPPOCRITUSMAXIMUS December 4, 2007 at 5:05 a.m.

REF:Who are these dirtbags?

They would be Senators who investigated KW!

Talk about foxes watching henhouses.

America, what a beautiful country.

James R. Otteson December 4, 2007 at 5:53 a.m.

I suggest that the case of government support for education is analogous to the case of government support for religion, and therefore the moral acceptability of the one is the same as that of the other. My suggestion hinges on the claim that both cases fall under the rubric of freedom of conscience, and hence both should be protected on the moral principle that everyones private conscience is inviolable and ought therefore to be safeguarded.

Accreditation 101 December 4, 2007 at 6:03 a.m.

"When you reach for the money is when they slip on the handcuffs." With taxpayer dollars comes taxpayer accountability (unless, of course, you are the government, which fails to account for billions of dollars in tax revenue every year). Accredited schools are de facto government schools, subject to all the political pressures that have made government-run schools the socially and academically "challenged" environments they are today. This will eventually pave the way to increasingly tighter regulation of all schools.

Clearing up the confusion December 4, 2007 at 4:56 p.m.

"When I transfered from Emory to GA. Tech, I was given about 40% credits for the overlap courses going from BS in Nursing to BSEE. Is it so far off mark that she get 43% for her past experiences (including her BS)at KW?"

Big difference, in your example, there are actual credits from taking actual courses at an actual university. They would cancel out some general requirements for another undergraduate degree, that makes sense. You should be granted 0% towards a graduate degree.

This Kennedy Western University student applied with zero graduate credits going in, and Kennedy Western University telemarketers magically waived a bunch of graduate level courses based on unverified claims of going to seminars.

The Senate Investigation of Kennedy Western says that:

“We were told that EVERY student in the Master’s program is awarded between 33 and 60 percent credit toward a degree for their experience. In fact, documents produced by Kennedy-Western indicated that nearly half of all students in the Master’s program have received more than 55 percent credit for their experience”.

I feel bad for those suckers that only got 1/3 of their degree free when a good negotiator could have gotten 60% and knocked days off getting that “degree”.

It's a great hook to get people signed up, but just one of many reasons why this school has been proven to be so substandard.

?? December 5, 2007 at 11:59 a.m.

But environmental engineering is NOT engineering. It is at best a misnomer. Real engineering disciplines have PE licenses associated with them. Have never heard of an Environmental engineering PE. What gives?

If you can get a job with education, December 5, 2007 at 12:01 p.m.

how come not vise versa.

?? December 5, 2007 at 4:37 p.m.

I agree. A Kennedy-Western University degree does not qualify you to be a PE in any state, so why offer these courses? An Engineering degree should qualify you to be an Engineer, but this "school" doesn't.

Some states you can get a PE with just a high school diploma and work experience.

So Cool December 5, 2007 at 4:59 p.m.

WNU is one of few major institutions that will allow you to transfer in 100% of your degree requirements. While they do offer considerable coursework of their own, they will very often accept credit from most RA colleges, CLEP/DANTES/ECE exams, ACE evaluated military experience... and, they're very generous by most transfer standards.

The BS degrees offer the most flexibility in program design and therefor in acceptability of transfer credit.

If you have a collection of credit already from the acceptable sources, WNU should be among the colleges you consider. It's fantastic for those people who didn't quite finish their younger college experience and for those who have attended a large number of colleges and need the credits earned placed on a single transcript toward a good, highly recognized and well respected, degree.

It's possible to wrap a bachelor's degree at WNU for right around $6500. I've spent just about $7000 on mine.

http://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb105-11.html December 5, 2007 at 8:26 p.m.

Abolish Dept of Education!

http://www.cato.org/pubs/handbook/hb105-...

Try the Big Three instead December 5, 2007 at 8:32 p.m.

"It's possible to wrap a bachelor's degree at WNU for right around $6500. I've spent just about $7000 on mine."

Sorry to hear that. You could have gotten a legitimate, regionally accredited degree through one of the Big Three (Thomas Edison, Excelsior, or Charter Oak) that will accept credits in transfer. You can read about them here:

http://distancelearn.about.com/od/online...

Warning, unlike Kennedy Western, you will actually have to have completed credits or show proficiency by exam, they will not give you half of a degree for simply applying.

Damien December 5, 2007 at 8:50 p.m.

A Yale professor told me back in August that a degree from Thomas Edison, Excelsior, or Charter Oak is just as worthless as a WNU degree as far as real schools go. "Do not to waste the extra effort and money at Thomas Edison, Excelsior, or Charter Oak, etc." He said. He also said that on a 1-100 scale the Ivy League schools are 100. Thomas Edison, Excelsior, or Charter Oak would rate a 1.5 and KW/WNU 1.49.

I have not signed up yet, but now I do not know who to believe.

True December 5, 2007 at 8:52 p.m.

Thomas Edison, Excelsior, or Charter Oak are a joke at Harvard. This site is a joke.

Fancy December 5, 2007 at 8:53 p.m.

There is no better value in today's education marketplace than prestigious WNU. The WNU degree is much more extensive than accredited schools and for a little more cost, it is worth it. For about $7000, its worth the education in any field. WNU has been a great experience.

How to get Graduate credit at KWU December 6, 2007 at 2:24 a.m.

"If I remember correctly, she failed the first test she took
Right?"

True, she had neither read nor reviewed the material before taking it, nor had she done any coursework prior taking the final exam. Students could order the final exam immediately on enrollment.

Luckily, she was "able to answer most of them by simply looking up a key word in the index" but after she failed she noticed that "a number of the questions had been graded incorrectly" and that "several questions had no possible correct answer provided in the choices"

She filed a grade challenge, and the school declared the test invalid, acknowledging "significant errors". Ms. Gelzer was sent a letter of apology and was allowed to retake the exam, which turned out to be the EXACT SAME ONE.

100 open book multiple choice questions = 1 graduate "course" granted within days of enrollment.

Was she scared to complete the degree? December 6, 2007 at 2:35 p.m.

?

Dr. Martin Shamblin December 6, 2007 at 2:44 p.m.

"I have not signed up yet, but now I do not know who to believe."

Go to a real school with a building.

It is true. All online university degrees including the accredited ones are useless. We just throw them in the trash. They are all Diploma Mills.
Any HR person who does their job will screen away these sham "degrees". Trust me, there is no such thing as an online degree that is respected.

Instead of getting an online degree just forge one yourself. Any color laser printer will produce a fine replica.

B. Mayona December 6, 2007 at 3:06 p.m.

"Go to a real school with a building."

Exactly!

I agree with an exception.
If they have been in the workplace in the applicable trade or discipline for 20 or more years.

The time spent in the "Art" will far outweigh any labs at any real school. Then at that point, we dont care what degree they put on their resume as long as we are not breaking any laws by hiring them.

Grissom December 6, 2007 at 3:24 p.m.

"Go to a real school with a building.

It is true. All online university degrees including the accredited ones are useless. We just throw them in the trash. They are all Diploma Mills."

Here Here!
Finally some sanity on this Blog.

We will even choose an unaccredited school degree that has an actual building and address over the so called "Accredited Online Universities." They are all a scam and should be closed down by the government.
Online + Degree = Oxymoron

Cynthia December 6, 2007 at 3:28 p.m.

All online schools will have what we call the "Thomas Edison" stigma. We stay away from them like we stay away from the flu virus.

Prof A December 6, 2007 at 9:37 p.m.

The Internet has been a boon and a bane for education, making it easier for unaccredited diploma mills to throw up a site, change their name, etc. At the same time, there dozens of absolutely wonderful opportunities out there for working adults.

Before you enroll, always check at the CHEA website to verify if they are regionally accredited.

For experienced working adults, I recommend three online avenues depending on the situation:

If you are looking for a respected name school, check out Penn State.
If you are looking for a low-cost, no-name option for a degree, check out Peru State (Nebraska).
If you have a collection of college courses from a variety of accredited schools, check out Excelsior. Many military folks end up in this situtation depending on their deployment.

If you feel more comfortable with an online program with a local presence, the options are endless. If you are in Ohio, check out Franklin University, if you are in Michigan, check out Davenport, Wisconsin-Lakeland College, Florida-Nova Southeastern, Minnesota-Capella, Idaho-Boise State online, etc etc.

More irrelevant dribble December 9, 2007 at 4:56 a.m.

Unfortunately, the question at hand is the incredibly substandard "degrees" that this college is pumping out

Can anyone point to a positive article about the quality of education from either KW"U" or WN"U" from an independent source to counter all the exposes and investigations?

chemist December 10, 2007 at 2:12 a.m.

In Nevada the state passed a new law in 2005, making it illegal to use a degree that can be considered false or misleading. The penalty is up to six months in jail and/or a $5,000 fine. Any degree not from an accredited university or if obtained with more than 10 percent credit for life experience, is considered false or misleading, whether or not the granting organization is in the state.

Chemist December 10, 2007 at 2:14 a.m.

I have confidence that most senators can tell the difference between legitimate degrees and diploma mills. I certainly do trust them on this issue.

chemist December 10, 2007 at 2:28 a.m.

Quite often, those will diploma mill degrees have other characteristics which disqualify them for employment. The text below was taken from the Washington Post:

"A D.C. elementary school principal who claimed a doctorate from a phony school has been removed from her position, according to District education officials.

Since 2002, Wilma Durham had headed Walker-Jones Elementary School, one of 15 "transformation schools" that were targeted for additional resources because of persistently low student performance. Parents and teachers had accused her of having an authoritarian and eccentric leadership style, saying she prohibited students and teachers from talking in the school cafeteria and made inappropriate remarks over the public address system."

FYI December 10, 2007 at 3:06 a.m.

"Can anyone point to a positive article about the quality of education from either KW"U" or WN"U" from an independent source to counter all the exposes and investigations?"

http://www.csmonitor.com/2005/0427/p15s0...

Hey you loving government punk December 10, 2007 at 3:08 a.m.

"I have confidence that most senators can tell the difference between legitimate degrees and diploma mills. I certainly do trust them on this issue."

Oh! I must have touched a nerve. Is your mommy a Senator?

Ward Churchill December 10, 2007 at 3:13 a.m.

Quite often, those with fully accredited DOE degrees have other characteristics which disqualify them for employment.

http://www.thefire.org/index.php/article...

Hey Punk December 10, 2007 at 3:15 a.m.

Last night the University of Colorado Board of Regents voted to fire professor Ward Churchill on the grounds of “serious, repeated, and deliberate research misconduct.” This vote came more than two years after the university investigated Churchill for making controversial public statements, including a reference to the victims of the World Trade Center attacks as “little Eichmanns.” FIRE released an analysis of the situation in 2005, determining that Churchill’s statements are protected and that the university’s initial investigation was unconstitutional. FIRE further cautioned that while the university’s investigation of Churchill’s research misconduct must not be swayed by anger over the content of his statements, Churchill was not immune to such scrutiny. FIRE wrote that Churchill freely injected himself into the public square, and that if “information that … legitimately places his job in jeopardy” came to light, “then that is simply the hazard of voluntarily participating in the marketplace of ideas.”

Hmmm, Irrelevant December 10, 2007 at 4:07 a.m.

Sorry, but the article doesn't mention anything about diploma mills or substandard degrees or Kennedy-Western University or Warren National University, so I'm not sure how it is relevant to the discussion.

The 2 Senators mentioned above weren't even quoted in the Senate investigation of Kennedy-Western University, so I don't even think they were present.

Susan Collins and Senator Lieberman are the ones that were the leads. Senator Collins even picked up an unaccredited "degree" or two in the deal.

All OL schools are Diploma Mills December 10, 2007 at 9:24 a.m.

There is no such thing as an accredited and legitimate online school. The purpose of All Online Schools is make money and illegally provide students with bogus degrees. These diploma mills allow students to cheat on tests using resource sharing.

Again, there is no such thing as a legitimate online/internet school.

These are schools you should avoid. If you are going to spend time and money on your education, you should take the time to persue a real degree from a real University with walls and doors and desks.

I can not think of one Company that will accept an online degree of any kind, not one.

All Online schools (for profit telemarketers) have purchased their accreditation.

Just like KW is getting ready to buy accreditation by wining and dining the agencies.

I wish these corrupt senators would do something.

KW Engineer December 10, 2007 at 9:32 a.m.

http://www.radoil.com/engineers_01.html

I thought KW degrees were illegal in TX, again-unenforced laws are not laws at all.

Online Schools are FRAUDS! December 10, 2007 at 9:48 a.m.

Proof that all Online Schools (Excelsior, Thomas Edison, Warren National) are FRAUDS.

Online school Rochville University can deliver your degree in 3-5 business days

Online Almeda University will grant you a degree for life experience

Online Hamilton University conferred a doctorate, based primarily on a 4 page paper, to a gal in Homeland Security!

There have even been online schools that gave degrees to Dogs, Cats, and Parakeets.

And those are only a few of the cases that made the paper. Who knows what multiple of that were discovered and handled quietly to avoid public embarrassment, and those waiting to be discovered.

Senate GAO Hearings December 10, 2007 at 9:54 a.m.

"Found KW guilty of no wrong doing."

Online Schools are FRAUDS! December 10, 2007 at 9:56 a.m.

Susan Collins and Senator Lieberman are the ones that were the leads while investigating online schools. Senator Collins even picked up an online "degree" or two in the deal.

Oline Schools December 10, 2007 at 9:59 a.m.

Quite often, those with online degrees have other characteristics which disqualify them for employment. The text below was taken from the Washington Post:

"A D.C. elementary school principal who claimed a doctorate from an online school has been removed from her position, according to District education officials.

Since 2002, Wilma Durham had headed Walker-Jones Elementary School, one of 15 "transformation schools" that were targeted for additional resources because of persistently low student performance. Parents and teachers had accused her of having an authoritarian and eccentric leadership style, saying she prohibited students and teachers from talking in the school cafeteria and made inappropriate remarks over the public address system."

Me too December 10, 2007 at 10 a.m.

I have confidence that most senators can tell the difference between legitimate degrees and online degrees. I certainly do trust them on this issue.

WNU Oficially Not a Diploma Mill December 10, 2007 at 10:15 a.m.

GAO investigators have no qualifications to label KW as a diploma mill. They are accountants not educators. Senators are not educators either.
Furthermore, a federal judge has set precedent in making it a defamation crime to call KW such.

Circles December 10, 2007 at 10:17 a.m.

KW/WNU debates always go nowhere, but in circles. No winners or losers, just circles.

Unenforced Laws in Texas December 10, 2007 at 6:55 p.m.

As another poster linked, graduates do just fine with unaccredited degrees, thank you very much.

BENTON F. BAUGH, Ph. D., P.E., PRINCIPAL

President of Radoil Tool Company, Inc.,

EDUCATION
BSME: University of Houston
One year in MBA program, University of Houston
MS: Kennedy-Western University (Non-resident)
Ph.D.: Kennedy-Western University (Non-resident)

EXPERT WITNESS ACTIVITIES

Served as an expert witness on 11 lawsuits including patents, trade secrets, product failures, and personal injuries. Benton has been deposed several times and qualified in court as an expert in mechanical engineering, risk analysis, and fluid dynamics.

Hey Moose Dung December 11, 2007 at 6:06 a.m.

In reference to the replica chemist that posted-

"In Nevada the state passed a new law in 2005, making it illegal to use a degree that can be considered false or misleading. The penalty is up to six months in jail and/or a $5,000 fine. Any degree not from an accredited university or if obtained with more than 10 percent credit for life experience, is considered false or misleading, whether or not the granting organization is in the state."

Read the code moose breath. Since most KW graduates like myself only had academic credit transfer we break the 10% requirement.
Also since a semicolon is an "AND" in the code then since KW is state licensed and has applied for accreditation the Nevada argument is oficially dead. Even if tou had job experience > 10%.

Here is what you found convenient to leave out.

4. For the purposes of this section, a degree or honorary degree is false or misleading or is used in a false or misleading manner if it:

(a) States or suggests that the person named in the degree or honorary degree has completed the requirements of an academic or professional program of study in a particular field of endeavor beyond the secondary school level and the person has not, in fact, completed the requirements of the program of study;

(b) Is offered as his own by a person other than the person who completed the requirements of the program of study; or

(c) Is awarded, bestowed, conferred, given, granted, conveyed or sold:

(1) Based upon more than 10 percent of the recipient’s documented life experience and not based upon actual completion of academic work;

(2) By a person or entity located in this State in violation of this chapter, as determined by the Commission; or

(3) By a person or entity located outside this State which would be a violation of this chapter if the person or entity were located in this State, as determined by the Commission.

Nevada Cleans up diploma mills, Bravo! December 11, 2007 at 6:42 a.m.

Kennedy Western "graduates" break that 10% even before the telemarketers, oops student services, get on the line.

The Senate Investigation of Kennedy-Western University says that:

“We were told that EVERY student in the Master’s program is awarded between 33 and 60 percent credit toward a degree for their experience. In fact, documents produced by Kennedy-Western indicated that nearly half of all students in the Master’s program have received more than 55 percent credit for their experience”.

EVERY, EVERY Student.
From documents PRODUCED BY Kennedy-Western.

The complete lack of any rigor or standards of Kennedy-Western is well-documented. I just hope that the name change is also a change towards legitimacy with Warren National. They've made money off their cash cow, let's clean it up now.

Nay Nay Moose Breath December 11, 2007 at 9:37 a.m.

“We were told that EVERY student in the Master’s program is awarded between 33 and 60 percent credit toward a degree for their experience. In fact, documents produced by Kennedy-Western indicated that nearly half of all students in the Master’s program have received more than 55 percent credit for their experience”.

That is past history, years old. They no longer do that.

Even so, you ignor the semi-colon between (2) and (3) negating everything you claim. Semi colon means "and" there. Ask a Lawyer.

Not to mention WNU only gave me credit towarsds a BSME based on ACE/SMART Navy College transcripts (accredited credits). No job experience credit here.

- December 11, 2007 at 9:40 a.m.

"Even so, you ignor the semi-colon between (2) and (3) negating everything you claim. Semi colon means "and" there. Ask a Lawyer."

Revision: That is between (1)and (3)

- December 11, 2007 at 10:01 a.m.

There are literally thousands of people using their WNU degrees in private industry in the so called "Illegal States"

Notice how these states only expose government workers. Yes Ed. is government also.

They will not go after people practicing in the free market.

Here is why.
The Dept of Ed. is an Unconstitutional mandate. It is illegal under the US constitution for the Dept of Ed. to even recognize certain accreditation agencies over others and set up a defacto "Ministry of Education".

The first states AG to enforce their illegal laws will be made an example of and may even end up abolishing the DOE altogther.

My Experience December 11, 2007 at 3:37 p.m.

"Kennedy-Western indicated that nearly half of all students in the Master’s program have received more than 55 percent credit for their experience”.

"That is past history, years old. They no longer do that."

Kennedy-Western University granted me more than half a DOCTORATE for continuing ed seminars and "life experience" in mid-2006, I have the "degree plan" to prove it.

Warren National is importing those empty credits, so nothing has really changed yet as far as I can see.

2007 December 12, 2007 at 3:01 a.m.

REF.KW University granted me more than half a DOCTORATE for continuing ed seminars and "life experience" in mid-2006, I have the "degree plan" to prove it.

The changes occured in 2007.

chemist December 13, 2007 at 7 a.m.

"They no longer do that". Is it possible for a diploma mill to change into a legitimate school? Possibly but not likely. It is much cheaper and more profitable to remain a diploma mill. All that it requires is a high tolerance for shady practices.

Prof A December 13, 2007 at 2:37 p.m.

Couldn't agree with you more, chemist.

Why change now, they have a great cash cow. Keep state-hopping. Even though California, Idaho, and Hawaii have kicked them out, and Wyoming finally cracked down, there are still plenty of other states to move the PO Box to.

I'd milk being an "applicant" for accreditation as long as possible, pack up the moving trucks again, and blame it on "the system".

anon December 14, 2007 at 6 p.m.

I am a prospective online special ed student. I have a family and have already sacrificed much time to obtain my college degrees in ed. Please let me know about the rigors of the online spec ed program, per course - difficulty, how many hours per week per course, length of papers, professor contact, terms papers, if any, format and difficulty of quizzes, essays, exams, online tutorial, etc. I am a high achiever, but do not want to sacrifice my children's years, any longer, and will reconsider an in-state program.

chemist December 15, 2007 at 3:14 a.m.

Answer to anon: If you want a decent education, stay away from online "schools". There may be a very few in the country that are of good quality but usually these are an extension of a legitimate school with an actual campus. It is easy to be fooled by an online diploma mill because they go to great lengths to simulate legitimate schools.

Physicist December 15, 2007 at 3:22 a.m.

>>>>Does anyone have any idea what the differance there would be between Harvard and WNU. I am currently enrolled in Harvards PHD program and I am looking to transefer.<<<<<<

I doubt that a Harvard student would ask such a stupid question, but in case you are legit, stick to Harvard.

Legal or illegal? December 15, 2007 at 3:26 a.m.

>>>>Granted, WNU is perfectly illegal in ND and every other state in the union including Tx<<<<

I think you meant legal but if you meant legal, you are mistaken. It is illegal in Nevada for instance.

To Anon December 15, 2007 at 4:24 p.m.

Even a special ed student could get a 4.0 at this so-called college, but you should look elsewhere if you actually want to use it for something

q December 19, 2007 at 9:43 p.m.

To whoever posted "Even a special ed student could get a 4.0 at this so-called college, but you should look elsewhere if you actually want to use it for something."

So you attended WNU?

Responding to Moose... December 25, 2007 at 4:17 a.m.

It is possible to get a fair idea of the educational level of those associated with WNU by their comments here. They often resort to name calling, do not do well in reading comprehension and often give false information.

response December 26, 2007 at 3:12 a.m.

Obtaining an accreditation is 'stamp' to verify that a particular business meets the standard it sets out to deliver. One of the purpose is to ensure trust and provide security for the public. An unaccreditated school does not necessarily mean that the school delivers quality or substandard education. The notion that accreditated school is the 'only' way of obtaining quality education is an assumption, which, without fact is a mere statement that is invalid.

From DOE December 26, 2007 at 7:22 p.m.

"Since accreditation is the PRIMARY means of determining the legitimacy and quality of colleges and universities in the United States, to describe the process as "voluntary" is not to describe it as "optional" or "unnecessary."

Plus KWU / WNU has been proved beyond a reasonable doubt that it provides decidely substandard "degrees"

Yet another Kennedy Western Expose December 26, 2007 at 7:29 p.m.

More Kennedy-Western University and sister college Almeda graduates exposed in the media. Tampa Bay area.

http://www.diplomamillnews.blogspot.com/......

P.S.: Your M.A. or Ph.D. may be B.S.
Some Floridians with top jobs hold degrees from questionable academic institutions.

By RON MATUS, Times Staff Writer
Published December 6, 2007

Dept. of Ed. Illegal in all 50 states! December 27, 2007 at 7:38 p.m.

When the Education Department was created in 1979, many critics warned that a secretary of education would turn into a national minister of education. Rep. John Erlenborn (R-Ill.), for instance, wrote, "There would be interference in textbook choices, curricula, staffing, audits, accreditation, salaries, the make-up of student bodies, building designs, and all other irritants that the government has invented to harass the population. These decisions which are now made in the local school or school district will slowly but surely be transferred to Washington.'' Dissenting from the committee report that recommended establishing the department, Erlenborn and seven other Republicans wrote, "The Department of Education will end up being the Nation's super schoolboard. That is something we can all do without.''

Such concerns were not limited to Republicans. Rep. Patricia Schroeder (D-Colo.) predicted, "No matter what anyone says, the Department of Education will not just write checks to local school boards. They will meddle in everything. I do not want that.'' David W. Breneman and Noel Epstein wrote in the Washington Post, "Establishing a cabinet-level department is a back-door way of creating a national education policy.'' And Richard W. Lyman, president of Stanford University, testified before Congress that "the two-hundred-year-old absence of a Department of Education is not the result of simple failure during all that time. On the contrary, it derives from the conviction that we do not want the kinds of educational systems that such arrangements produce.''

The Dept. of Ed, is also illegal under the US constitution!

LOL December 27, 2007 at 8:34 p.m.

Thanks for the funny conspiracy story.

Warren National / Kennedy Western still not worth the paper its printed on.

Online Universities December 28, 2007 at 1:46 p.m.

REFERENCE: Thanks for the funny conspiracy story.

I agree, online universities such as Excelsior, Almeda, Thomas Edison and Kaplan truly are not worth the paper they are written on.

Dr. X December 31, 2007 at 8:05 p.m.

I have seen numerous people with "real" degrees talking about non-accredited institutions, and their reaction to them seems universally hostile. They all rave about how worthless those degrees are, that they're not worth the paper they're printed on, that anybody with any common sense would go to a "real" institution. One person actually sent an advertisement from a non-accredited institution to law enforcement authorities, although they did not explain exactly what they felt this institution could be charged with. Is it illegal to give people pieces of paper? The wrath expressed by these folks seems to stem from jealousy. They're just plain jealous that they had to spend years of time and thousands of dollars to get their paper education. I sympathize with people who've had to go through that ordeal, but to become hostile to someone else who's trying to find a better alternative is not fair. It's like the old-timers who get angry at kids because kids these days have computers, while in the old days they had to use chalk or something. Yes, it's a shame they had to do through that, but that's no reason to get angry at someone else who's evaded it. And for the record, I have yet to see anyone with a "real" degree give a valid reason for not going the unaccredited route. Most just say "it's not worth it" without saying why. The only semi-valid argument is that your employer may find out about it, but if you show them a piece of paper which looks real, and if you really go all-out and your institution has a number they can call to check, (or if you just supply them with a friend's phone number and have your friend pretend to be a university official who confirms your graduation), how would they know? As I said before, there are people who did not supply anything more than the *claim*, which was assumed to be true and was enough to get them a good job.

It speaks volumes that many people who hate "unaccrededit schools" hate them because they went to one themselves, not realizing that the institution was not accredited. They cite their "embarrassment" and "disgrace" because they were very proud of their achievements. I would advise these people to re-think their priorities. Going to university is not something to be proud of, because it is something you do for yourself, and things you do for you are not acts of pride; They are acts of necessity. If there is any justification in pride, it is for things you have done to make the world a better place for people other than yourself. However, pride is a worthless emotion in the first place, and it has no place in any human's psyche. If you are angry because your pride was wounded, I am sorry, but again, a degree is not gained for pride, but to improve your quality of life.
If they require you to have a degree, then you are not lying if you have a degree from a non-accredited institution and tell them you have a degree.

Ummm December 31, 2007 at 11:33 p.m.

"If they require you to have a degree, then you are not lying if you have a degree from a non-accredited institution and tell them you have a degree."

Lying by omission is still lying.

Dr. x January 1, 2008 at 10:17 p.m.

Since the Dept. of Ed. has no authority to recognize one accreditation agency over another, regional accreditation or otherwise has no real meaning at all.

?? January 1, 2008 at 11:29 p.m.

"Since the Dept. of Ed. has no authority to recognize one accreditation agency over another"

Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Do you live in an alternate universe or is it just pure denial?

my 2 cents January 1, 2008 at 11:32 p.m.

If you are going to follow Dr. X's advice and go the dishonesty route, Rochville or Belford or Almeda also offer unaccredited life experience degrees with cheaper rates and quicker studies that Kennedy-Western University.

Dr. X January 2, 2008 at 1:13 a.m.

Ref:Where do you guys come up with this stuff? Do you live in an alternate universe or is it just pure denial?

Q. Where, in the Constitution, is there mention of education?

A. There is none; education is a matter reserved for the states.

Sound Advice January 2, 2008 at 3:56 a.m.

"Ask about the school's credentials and the degrees the instructors hold. Many unaccredited online schools will eagerly grant you a degree, however these degrees from unaccredited schools are worthless. A diploma mill or unaccredited school should be avoided", (Military.com, 2007).

http://education.military.com/finding-a-...

Also from Military.com January 2, 2008 at 5:33 a.m.

"Are diploma mills legal?
No. Some states have lax standards that allow almost anyone to operate a “college,” but most have laws that provide penalties for people operating diploma mills."

Also covers Dr. X's statement about state regulation. 50 different systems make it easy for unaccredited "colleges" to gravitate to the weakest regulated states.

So even though Kennedy-Western has been booted from 3 states, cannot offer "degrees" in 4 states, and about a dozen other states have various restrictions / misdemeanors attached to their use, it's still technically legal in some spots.

You are a full blown Liar January 2, 2008 at 2:53 p.m.

REF:"So even though Kennedy-Western has been booted from 3 states, cannot offer "degrees" in 4 states, and about a dozen other states have various restrictions / misdemeanors attached to their use, it's still technically legal in some spots."

Above is not true. Just because you write it does not make it true. Most states (>90%) have no restrictions on using the degree for private non governmental licensure. Even Wiki (very hard on WNU to the point of being very misleading)reveals this.

Do yourself a favor and call the ODAs of the co called states. By their own laws they have to honor WNU degrees and will give a written waiver if you ask. This is in large part due to WNUs applied status and their state licensure.
A dozen = 3 states? WTF

Confused January 2, 2008 at 5:16 p.m.

Are we talking about Kennedy-Western University of California / Hawaii / Idaho / Wyoming or

Warren National University of California / Wyoming?

Kennedy-Western University degrees are a done deal, will never be recognized, they failed in their accreditation attempts.

Warren National students rolling the dice and enrolling after 1/1/2007 have a chance to receive an accredited degree at some point in the future, if Warren is successful.

Pure Franstanchenzant! January 2, 2008 at 11:19 p.m.

Ref:Warren National students rolling the dice and enrolling after 1/1/2007 have a chance to receive an accredited degree at some point in the future, if Warren is successful.

Wrong again chump:
I will have a degree with WNU and not KWU on it and I enrolled 8/06. And per Dr Bear, I will be pulled in based on graduation date. Besides, no one ever asks (was it accredited when you enrolled?) Ref: DR Bear.

Go fish!

Furthermore January 2, 2008 at 11:21 p.m.

They closed their California office and are only in Wyo. now.

Also January 2, 2008 at 11:28 p.m.

Once accredited, and for minimal coursework and a fee, WNU will offer old days KWU students the opportunity to convert their degree to WNU.

Checkmate!

??? January 2, 2008 at 11:50 p.m.

"for minimal coursework and a fee" - an apt descriptiobn for KW"U".

"WNU will offer old days KWU students the opportunity to convert their degree to WNU"

Hmm, so regardless of the hours spent on a KW "degree", it's going to magically turn into an accredited degree??

I can see the profit motive for WNU to issue more "coursework", but it seems very deceptive to call it the same thing.

That is true January 3, 2008 at 3:03 a.m.

It is what the university is named when you graduate that you get the diploma for. No school has ever told us the year they became accredited (not that we ever asked)

Pack up the moving trucks (again) January 3, 2008 at 6:31 a.m.

"They closed their California office and are only in Wyo. now."

Must have missed that. Hard to keep tabs on this "university" with all the states they move to, the name changes, and the various organizations they have claimed accreditation from in the past.

What does this mean for me? January 3, 2008 at 2:23 p.m.

I previously wrote "Kennedy-Western University granted me more than half a DOCTORATE for continuing ed seminars and "life experience" in mid-2006, I have the "degree plan" to prove it."

Can I now just transfer that over to Warren National?

Gin Ichimaru January 4, 2008 at 4:08 p.m.

Some facts to throw out to all...

First, the University has been based in Wyoming for a number of years now. Only its corporate offices were in California. Why would it matter where its office is located?

Second, Warren National and Kennedy-Western are the same thing so who cares what it was called before. So if someone graduates from the University under its old name why not use its new name.

Third, it seems that most people bashing this institution are people who never been there.

Finally, Warren National never claimed to be accredited. It never even used the phoney accreditation agencies that other unaccredited places (I cannot call all of them universities) have used. WNU has always sought to be a legitimate institution and never used fraudulant methods to promote its programs.

GWRD January 4, 2008 at 7:55 p.m.

"First, Why would it matter where its office is located?"

It's WHY they moved. California, Hawaii, Idaho, and Wyoming due to a rejection of their license renewal or to avoid being required to comply with quality standards.

"Second, Warren National and Kennedy-Western are the same thing so who cares what it was called before."

This is a big deal. KWU Senate Hearing showed they gave most of the degree for "life experience" with the rest being 1 open book exam per graduate course. No rigor whatsoever.

Warren National is going legit, but they are dragging forward all these free/easy credits/degrees from KWU. It really damages the credibility. If we make a clean cut from KWU, I think we would have smooth sailing.

"Finally, Warren National never claimed to be accredited."

Again, WNU gets tainted due to KWU. KWU did claim accreditation from one of those places.

I truly think that Warren National is going to turn out well, but grouping the Kennedy-Western people who did virtually nothing with current hard-working students is unfair.

Queer January 4, 2008 at 8:45 p.m.

I have been E-mailing and calling the help desk at WNU for 2 weeks now. No callbacks and vague indescript return emails. WTF?

Abolish ED January 6, 2008 at 6:31 p.m.

The federal government’s involvement in education represents everything that is wrong with so many of our government agencies: they are unconstitutional, wasteful, expensive, and out of touch. It is the duty of our congress to abolish not only the Department of Education, but the entire federal involvement in education. If Congress refuses to do its duty, the bureaucracy will continue to grow, and education will continue to decline. In 1979, Representative L.H. Fountain (D-NC) made an accurate prediction about the Department of Education which could be applied to the whole federal role in education. Fountain stated,

"I am opposed to this ill-advised and unnecessary legislation to establish a department which will grow and grow, cost the taxpayers of this nation unnecessary billions of dollars, and ultimately become an unmanageable monster bureaucracy."

Abolish ED January 6, 2008 at 6:51 p.m.

According to the United States Department of Education, "The United States has no Federal ministry of education or other centralized authority exercising single national control over postsecondary educational institutions in this country. The states assume varying degrees of control over education, but, in general, institutions of higher education are permitted to operate with considerable independence and autonomy...In order to insure a basic level of quality, the practice of accreditation arose in the United States as a means of conducting nongovernmental, peer evaluation of educational institutions and programs."

We see in this statement that the Department of Education claims that "accreditation arose in the United States as a means of conducting nongovernmental peer evaluation of educational institutions and programs." The Department of Education has divided the United States into regions. Each region in turn has a Regional Accreditor that accredits schools. These Regional Accreditors get their authorization from the Council on Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA) and/or the U.S. Department of Education's Eligibility and Agency Evaluation Staff (EAES). Now both of these organizations get their authority to "recognize" these accrediting agencies from the Department of Education itself. And as everyone knows, the Department of Education is a part of the United States government. So my question is this, if accreditation is "a means of conducting nongovernmental peer evaluation of educational institutions and programs," what is the Department of Education, a branch of the Federal Government, doing running the whole thing? This is obviously not nongovernment involvement in the accreditation system and proves that this part of the statement made by the Department of Education is not true.

ED non govt involvment scenario Reminds Me Of January 6, 2008 at 6:55 p.m.

When I was in Navy Boot Camp with an Admirals son in my company. The rest of us recruits were told "He would not get special treatment."

We watched as he did get special, albeit tacit treatment.

Yep January 7, 2008 at 1:07 a.m.

"I previously wrote "Kennedy-Western University granted me more than half a DOCTORATE for continuing ed seminars and "life experience" in mid-2006, I have the "degree plan" to prove it. Can I now just transfer that over to Warren National?"

Absolutely. Warren-National is taking all Kennedy-Western "credits", so not too much has changed.

Urban dictionary seems more credible than Wiki. January 7, 2008 at 3:06 p.m.

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.ph...

Accreditation Defined:

A total scam brought about by a good old boys club and federal government criminals to bilk dumb college brats out of their dads money, and thereby send them away with a so called education where they are more stupid when they leave than when they started.

Jackie January 7, 2008 at 10:14 p.m.

Can somebody please tell me something about the school?

Average ACTS / Placement / US News Ranking / Average Financial Aid Award / % that graduate in 4 / 6 years

Some concrete info would be helpful to me instead of random irrelevant rants.

To Jackie January 7, 2008 at 11:33 p.m.

Warren National, by the sound of your question is not for you.
Sounds like you want to "Play Ball". If you want to Play Ball, stay away from WNU.

Words like ACTS etc., indicate you are part of the establishment. You care more about "fitting in" than anything else.
WNU is for self made Mavericks like myself who have made a ton of money and now just want to learn things without sitting in front of Smelly Professors all day.
Do yourself a favor Jackie (If that is your real name)go the smelly professor route. It compliments your dress.

Cheers
Dr. JB

Jackie January 8, 2008 at 4:24 a.m.

Sounds like you want to "Play Ball".

I'm confused. I just am looking at online schools and want to evaluate this one. Can anyone else help.

Hi Jackie; January 8, 2008 at 1:17 p.m.

What's your major? I'm sure we can point you to a school. If you read this entire blog, there isn't one shred of evidence from a 3rd party that shows that this school is worth the time (which is why so much time is spent ranting about issues unrelated to the poor quality), but tons of proof that it is a:

"Sophisticated diploma mill" - GAO report
"Fraudalent or substandard" - Texas State Law lists it
A good way to get publicly embarrased when a newspaper catches you with one of these.

And to answer the question: January 8, 2008 at 1:22 p.m.

Average ACTS - No need, from all reports it's 100% acceptance. I assume it is a few points lower than any others.

Placement - Only in companies with incompetent HR departments or low-level positions that escape public scrutiny.

US News Ranking - Haha

Average Financial Aid Award - Doesn't meet the minimum quality qualifications to receive aid.

% that graduate in 4 / 6 years - The university said that they grant an average of 55% of a degree for life experience, then take 5-9 open book exams (1 exam = 1 graduate course) to finish. I don't see why you couldn't finish in a year.

Jackie January 8, 2008 at 9:26 p.m.

Wow! OK, I am looking for a BS in Healthcare Administration, then eventually a Masters. I have experience in the field and about 50 credits so far. Has to be online due to my work schedule.

If anyone can help out, would appreciate it! :-)

Jackie January 8, 2008 at 11:30 p.m.

Just go fit in somewhere. You will not rest until you do.

"The Maverick"

Another alumni featured on DIPLOMA MILL NEWS January 9, 2008 at 2:56 p.m.

http://diplomamillnews.blogspot.com/2008...

"Robert Blok received his master's of science in environmental engineering degree from Warren National University"

Bogus website: diplomamillnews.blogspot.com January 9, 2008 at 5:29 p.m.

"Robert Blok received his master's of science in environmental engineering degree from Warren National University"

The website you reference is so cheap!
With five dollars to buy a URL domain and 15 minutes my 10 year old could throw up a bogus website as such (and do a much better job I might add).
The "diploma mill news" is not a reliable or noteworthy reference. Nice try though.

WNU Does not meet definition of diploma mill January 9, 2008 at 5:36 p.m.

Warren National University is licensed by the Wyoming Department of Education, under W.S. 21-2-401 through 21-2-407. This licensure allows the university to legally conduct business.

So what January 9, 2008 at 7:58 p.m.

"This licensure allows the university to legally conduct business." - As everyone knows, this is academically meaningless in Wyoming.

Good article on the subject that covers the subject.

Alleged "diploma mills" flocking to Wyoming

http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/ed...

Some great quotes that are right on the mark:

"People start to giggle if you say 'Wyoming-licensed
school,'

"Because of loose state requirements, more online schools are popping up in Wyoming than anywhere else"

"Cheyenne alone is home to six distance-learning schools. A typical example is Paramount University of Technology, with a couple of basement offices in a downtown mall"

Abolish ED January 10, 2008 at 3:27 a.m.

According to Merriam Webster:

1st and dominant Definition of accreditation is:

-to give official authorization to or approval of-

Therefore the question, --What is state licensing if not accreditation?--

Duh! January 10, 2008 at 2:06 p.m.

I know this is complicated, but that is the generic definition, it has a very different and specific meaning in education. Look down a little further and you will see:

"to certify (a school, college, or the like) as meeting all formal official requirements of academic excellence, curriculum, facilities, etc."

Zing! January 10, 2008 at 6:53 p.m.

The Truth 37 - Kennedy Western 0

Yea January 11, 2008 at 12:36 a.m.

"to certify (a school, college, or the like) as meeting all formal official requirements of academic excellence, curriculum, facilities, etc."

Subjective, relative and up to opinion of who?

Ron Paul January 11, 2008 at 3:39 p.m.

Ron got it right in the republican debate last night when he said we need to abolish the Department Of Ed. Good for him!

Finis January 11, 2008 at 3:53 p.m.

So called "Educators" like it when they can hold the key to jobs with their lofty "Accredited Degrees". It is a power and control thing. That is why they hate WNU so much.

Now, Corporate America is taking control of education in a big way. They are thumbing their nose at you F-in eggheads and hiring people from private online (and yes, unaccredited)universities in droves. Why do you think WNU gets bigger and better (with stronger finances) every year while public and accredited universities are going bankrupt?
The U.S. government is in the last throws of survival. When the U.S. government is bankrupt, the first Dept. to be made obsolete will be ED. So-Long Government controlled Accreditation!

PT Barnum January 11, 2008 at 5:05 p.m.

"hiring people from ... online (and yes, unaccredited)universities in droves"

Can you verify that somehow? No, of course not, because it's not true. In my experience, a $6 background check will expose you as unqualified. Can you post some statistics on unaccredited placement?

"WNU gets bigger and better (with stronger finances"

LOL, true, it can only get better.

AFAIK, WNU is lining the pockets of 1 individual. I'm sure his finances are very strong, it's a great business model.

1. Pay the telemarketers for each mark they bring in.
2. Wave away half the degree for "life experience" to get them hooked.
3. Pay a test grader to score the 1 open book exam required for a course.
4. Pay a nominal amount to some professors with real degrees to appear in the marketing materials and maybe wave their hand over a paper now and then.

It has to be 90% profit, minimum.

KWU "Marks" January 11, 2008 at 5:09 p.m.

From the Senate Investigation of Kennedy-Western, one of their student counselors describes the people they targeted.

"Many of the people I called were down on their luck. Many lacked a college education and held dead-end jobs. We used used negative-sell tactics to convince them that they did not have many options in life and the Kennedy-Western was their best chance to improve their lot."

Proud WNU Grad January 11, 2008 at 8:47 p.m.

"Many of the people I called were down on their luck. Many lacked a college education and held dead-end jobs. We used used negative-sell tactics to convince them that they did not have many options in life and the Kennedy-Western was their best chance to improve their lot."

Perhaps I am down on my luck.
I put a WNU BSME on my resume and headhunters are going whacko offering me 150k per year jobs with 100/day perdiem left and right.

At first I felt guilty and asked about WNU being non-accredited. Whithout exception they all say that as long as they are state licensed no one cares.

These headhunters have the jobs (they are not bidding on them).

A certain headhunter wants to hire me in Texas. I told him not to bother because my degree was illegal there.
He said he would tell the employer over the phone it was WNU and then leave it off the resume if it makes me feel better (so we left it off the resume). I figured, yea right, never happen and the next day Walla! Job offer (and WNU is off resume).

Theres somethin happenin here, what it is aint exactly clear, theres a man over there.........

REF: WIKI January 11, 2008 at 9:31 p.m.

At the 2005 Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, Warren National University faculty members gave a presentation on the method used to deliver academic courses. Andree Swanson and Keren Meier-Emerich offered the following abstract for their presentation.

"This is an example of one course, out of 500 courses offered, which demonstrates the delivery model used by Kennedy-Western University. Courses are designed using a modular format, which includes multiple self-assessment opportunities. Offered as open-entry, a student may be the only one taking the course at a given time or may be one of many enrolled at the same time. The model allows for anytime, any pace, and any place learning."[33]

In the "Understanding New Media" book's section on virtual universities, author Kim Veltman mentions, "By leveraging the power of the internet, Kennedy-Western has refined the academic process and opened up countless opportunities to adult learners. And they used Jones e-Global Library." [34]

In a Chronicle of Higher Education article, Kennedy-Western faculty members stated students, "...often use the same textbooks and take exams as rigorous as those offered in professors' traditional classes."[9]

??? January 12, 2008 at 7:53 a.m.

"I put a WNU BSME on my resume"

Warren National dropped all their hokey engineering programs in the latest name change / moving van expedition. WNU has never had a BSME program.

"Walla! Job offer"

That's hilarious. Must have been granted "life experience" for those basic language credits.

"Andree Swanson and Keren Meier-Emerich offered the following abstract for their presentation."

Rarer than big-foot! I missed it, but much has been written about the laughing-stock these people made of themselves.

Ah yes, January 12, 2008 at 2:25 p.m.

But the BSME degree has WNU on it and not KW.

Booger-Bloggers January 12, 2008 at 2:35 p.m.

Note that-All bloggers on this site (and I do mean all) that say negative things about WNU are not even students or ex-students of KW/WNU. This blog title is "Online degree reviews written by students".
Therefore it can be assumed that these booger-bloggers are mainly telemarketers from other diploma mills like Almeda, Excelsior and Thomas Edison trying to push their so called "Universities".

Fact January 12, 2008 at 2:43 p.m.

In a landmark settlement, the Oregon State Office of Degree Authorization was punished for referring to Kennedy Western as a "diploma mill" and the state attorney general's office provided ODA personnel with training sessions on "Defamation Law" at the expense of the great State.

Yep January 12, 2008 at 5:22 p.m.

"But the BSME degree has WNU on it and not KW."

Lol, but you didn't get it there, in fact, it was never offered there. Just taking more liberties with the truth. Thank goodness for background checks.

"Almeda, Excelsior and Thomas Edison"

More confusion! Almeda is a diploma mill. Excelsior and Thomas Edison are regionally accredited.

Fact: KW"U" and WN"U" are still illegal to use in Oregon with out a lengthy disclaimer. In addition KWU / WNU cannot sell their diplomas in Oregon.

OK but January 12, 2008 at 5:27 p.m.

Oregon State Office of Degree Authorization was punished for referring to Kennedy Western as a "diploma mill.

What? January 12, 2008 at 5:30 p.m.

Reference "More confusion! Almeda is a diploma mill. Excelsior and Thomas Edison are regionally accredited."

OK, so Excelsior and Thomas Edison are accredited diploma mills. Lots of them (including Almeda) are accredited.

Cool! January 12, 2008 at 6:24 p.m.

The Warren National University(WNU) academic headquarters has been situated in Cheyenne since 1996.

WNU, established in 1984, has provided degree programs to more than 30,000 students nationwide. The university offers bachelors, masters and doctoral degree programs.

The degrees offered are business administration, engineering and health administration. The college has no teaching assistants, and 80 percent of the staff has attained their doctorates.

According to David Gering, director of corporate communications, special requirements must be met in order to be admitted into KWU. The school requires at least five years of work experience in the area of study for a bachelor’s degree.

In addition, the student must have completed 60 semester units from a university, an associate degree from a community college or pass an entrance examination. In 1998, WNU was the first interactive Internet-based learning platform.

Entrance requirements for a master’s degree are at least five years of work experience in the area of study as well as a bachelor’s degree from a four–year college. To be admitted into the doctoral degree program, the student must have at least five years of work experience in the area of study. Students must also have a master’s degree or at least 10 years of work experience, plus a bachelor’s degree.

WNU is primarily for mid-career students who wish to further their education and do not always have the time to invest in other four–year universities. With the KWU program, the average time for graduation is 2.4 years. The average student age is 42, with an average of eight years of work experience in the field in which they’re studying.

WNU, a private institution, is not an accredited university, but a candidate for accreditation. Students are made aware that while some schools will transfer credits from the college, many will not. However, Laramie County Community College students have the option to transfer their classes or associate degree to meet entrance requirements.

“Our students often comment that they have more contact with our online instructors than in a traditional university,” Gering said.

The easiest way for students to apply to WNU is online, but students must make sure they meet the prerequisites. The WNU academic headquarters in Cheyenne.

Attestation January 12, 2008 at 9:26 p.m.

WNU degrees are internationally attestable. What is that?

LOL January 12, 2008 at 11:44 p.m.

Thanks for posting the famously misleading KWU marketing materials, which got them investigated by the Senate in the first place.

James January 13, 2008 at 7:44 a.m.

"WNU degrees are internationally attestable. What is that?"

Not sure why they would be acceptable in a foreign country when they are not accepted in the States.

The only foreign articles I've seen on them is the Dirty Dozen Diploma Mills article.

Patrick January 13, 2008 at 2:29 p.m.

In regards to: "Thanks for posting the famously misleading KWU marketing materials, which got them investigated by the Senate in the first place."

Who is being misleading now?

KWU was not being investigated.
Government employees/employers were being investigated for paying the tuition for KW degrees, (a GAO procedure violation). The US government is not allowed to reimburse non chea accredited degrees-- also KW was a voluntary witness in those hearings.

KW was found to have done nothing illegal or unethical.

It was those cheating government employees/employers who were exclaiming how difficult the KW school was and therefore should be reimbursable for tuition.

That was when the GAO "senatorial scam" set up the bogus student "sting" and lied to the university about the students intentions. They could have defamed MIT the same way because they went in with the one express goal to hurt KW come hell or high-water.

Also, The GAO panel had no constitutional or legal authority to do what they did by lying to KW and enrolling a bogus student, (who never even finished a single program with KW). As far as the disgruntled employee testimony goes, I could go to any company in America and find disgruntled or laid off employees who bad talk their employer. Hell, I myself have been a laid off disgruntled PG&E employee and if the GAO asked me to testify, I too would have spun words to hurt them back then. Probably would today if given the chance.

Why do you think KW was still allowed to operate after the so called "Investigation"? The Senate knew they stepped over the line since our federal government has no jurisdiction over education. A simple answer is that KW did nothing wrong. Not to mention that some Senators who were on the panel have since actually been not just investigated, but convicted of various crimes. Hum?

You would do well to take a reading course.

KAKER-BEE January 13, 2008 at 4:05 p.m.

-----"Not sure why they would be acceptable in a foreign country when they are not accepted in the States."--------

Oh my! If they are not acceptable in the US, I need to tell my employer (Budweiser) to take back the 12K per year raise I just got for completing a degree there.

Thank You for informing me.

I will try to remember to do that on Monday.

Clearing up the Confusion January 13, 2008 at 4:28 p.m.

Yes, they were investigated, you can Google "Senate Hearing 108-353 "Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations, Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"

Here is why they were investigated:

"As part of the Committee's team investigating diploma mills, I enrolled an a non-accredited school and took classes. Our goal was to conduct a first-hand evaluation of the quality of education provided by an institution in this category"

"The reason, as you mentioned in your opening, Madam Chairman, the school BECAME A FOCUS OF OUR INVESTIGATION is because of the claims in its catalog..."

---They could have defamed MIT the same way because they went in with the one express goal to hurt KW come hell or high-water.---

I beg to differ. MIT would have never:
*Admitted this student to a masters program with no relevant background
*Waived most of a masters degree based on CLAIMS of training.
*Offered graduate courses that could be completed in a day.

---disgruntled employee testimony goes---
Much of it was corroborated by KW"U", such as the average of 55% life experience awards.

---Why do you think KW was still allowed to operate---
Great question. Since each State is on it's own to provide consumer protection. The individual states can only restrict the use of these degrees (about 10 do), prevent KW"U" from selling diplomas in their state (3 do), or boot them out (KW"U" is on State #4).

State-hoppers like KWU, online-onlys like Almeda, and Cayman-offshores like Rushmore just need to change a mailing address now and then.

? January 13, 2008 at 6:54 p.m.

The GAO found that 28 high-ranking officials at eight federal agencies hold diploma mill degrees and that a total of 463 students at three unaccredited schools work for the federal government. In addition, data from just two unaccredited schools—Kennedy-Western University and California Coast University—revealed nearly $170,000 in tuition payments from the federal government.

It clearly states KW as unaccredited and not a diploma mill.

http://www.senate.gov/~govt-aff/index.cf...

And if like you say January 13, 2008 at 7:01 p.m.

KW was being investigated, what were they found guilty of. Remember, if they were found guilty there would have been some fine or punishment. There was not.

Checkmate!

Ronald January 14, 2008 at 12:05 a.m.

The Federal government has no constitutional authority to be involved in school curricula or to control jobs in the market place. This is why we will abolish the Department of Education, end federal meddling in our schools, and promote family choice at all levels of learning.

Re-Read it January 14, 2008 at 7:12 a.m.

"It clearly states KW as unaccredited and not a diploma mill."

It clearly and specifically calls Kennedy-Western a "sophisticated diplomam mill"

Er... January 14, 2008 at 7:20 a.m.

"sophisticated diploma mill"

Where? January 15, 2008 at 4:32 p.m.

"Sophisticated Diploma Mill"

http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d04771t.pdf...

A Controlled-Find (word search) was conducted for the word "sophisticated" in the above URL/PDF Document. The word sophisticated is not there.

Please, I need the help to find it there!

V/r

Where? January 15, 2008 at 4:39 p.m.

A Controlled-Find (word search) was conducted for the word "sophisticated" in the below URL/PDF Document. The word sophisticated is not there.

Please, I need the help to find it here also!

V/r

http://www.senate.gov/~govt-aff/index.cf...

Link to Kennedy-Western Senate Investigation January 15, 2008 at 5:56 p.m.

I think the previous link is just the short version.

"Senate Hearing 108-353 "Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations, Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"

The testimony is almost 200 pages long. (Warning: Big File)

http://a257.g.akamaitech.net/7/257/2422/...

So then..... January 16, 2008 at 6:28 p.m.

Does this terminology make Yale an Ultra-Super-Duper-Megga-Sophisticated-Diploma Mill?

Answer January 16, 2008 at 9:12 p.m.

Glad you asked.

Yale is actually a legitimate, accredited school.

Pure Diploma Mills give 100% of degrees for "life experience" and you can get them in weeks.

From the Senate investigation of Kennedy-Western, sophisticated diploma mills:

"take pains to try to convince prospective students that they are legitimate and that student have to earn their degrees. That is why a healthy dose of credit for work and life experience becomes such a critical component of their business model. That is what permits these more sophisticated diploma mills to assume an air of legitimacy while minimizing the actual amount of work required."

LOGIC 101 January 17, 2008 at 2:15 p.m.

It is absurd to think that employment experience can be used to get credit towards a better education.

It is even more absurd to think that educational experience can be used to get credit towards better employment.

Both are happening. I suppose that is why educators are so upset.

Death Valley of the life of the mind January 18, 2008 at 1:10 p.m.

Accreditation is something like the Death Valley of the life of the mind. It is a dusty plain, leagues below the sea level of normal human cogitation, inhabited by scorpions and sidewinders. I could tell tales of college administrators stranded in this desperate landscape and languishing after mirage oases labeled "the assessment movement" and "teaching portfolios." But that's for another time. What I am concerned with now is the invasion of the dirt-bikers.

Accreditation at its best puts quacks out of business, but it is more typically a technique used by professional interests to feather their own nests. The most egregious example is the American Bar Association, which has a stranglehold on American legal education. Many of the ABA accreditation rules have only gossamer connections to the quality of legal education, but all of them have a laser-like focus on the perquisites of being a law professor -- down to specifying the number of square feet in each faculty member's office. You can get a fair picture of the world of specialized accreditation by imagining 250 or so would-be ABAs, each carping for a finer grade of ivory in its part of the tower.

When all is said and done, however, we university administrators have a certain grudging respect for the specialized accreditors. Some know their business, and at worst they are driven by old-fashioned greed. In any case, specialized accreditors do not come close to the other great branch of academic accreditation, the regional accreditation agencies, for exemplifying lassitude, incompetence, and day-to-day bewilderment, combined with a solemn sense of rectitude and, of course, a desire to augment their authority. I realize that that description could apply rather well to several government agencies, but the regional accreditation agencies are not -- or not quite -- part of government. They are part of that shadowy world of quasi-governmental agencies which enjoy governmental authority but are largely unaccountable.

Missing the point January 18, 2008 at 3:17 p.m.

It's not the lack of accreditation that makes most people regard KWU as a diploma mill. It's the documented lack of effort required to obtain a "degree", and the absence of any independent 3rd party oversight to dispel that viewpoint.

Not KWU January 19, 2008 at 5:58 p.m.

Regarding-"It's not the lack of accreditation that makes most people regard KWU as a diploma mill. It's the documented lack of effort required to obtain a "degree", and the absence of any independent 3rd party oversight to dispel that viewpoint."

But this is a WNU Blog, No? So go to the KWU Blog (on this website) to spew your hatred.

WNU = KWU January 19, 2008 at 8:23 p.m.

Sorry, no hatred, just facts.

Robert January 19, 2008 at 10:42 p.m.

Your best bet is to approach your company's HR department before you enroll, to make sure they will finance your tuition.
The company I work for did not have an issue with Kennedy-Western, and gave me financial assistance for completing my MBA through KWU. Since the school is now seeking accreditation as WNU, I assume they would have no problem accepting a WNU degree.
Robert
Kansas City

SCAMMED January 20, 2008 at 7:30 p.m.

To Robert:

Very poor advice. Just because an unsophisticated company pays for it, that totally disregards the damage it will do to your career down the road when somebody with a clue is background checking you.

Trust me, I know.

In my experience, about 5-10% of companies don't know enough to screen out a KWU / WNU degree.

KWU will always be unacceptable. WNU application for accreditation does not mean automatic acceptance. They haven't done anything yet and have claimed accreditation efforts several times in the past.

HUH? January 21, 2008 at 5:54 p.m.

In regard to "Very poor advice. Just because an unsophisticated company pays for it, that totally disregards the damage it will do to your career down the road when somebody with a clue is background checking you.
Trust me, I know.
In my experience, about 5-10% of companies don't know enough to screen out a KWU / WNU degree."

And your reference is "Trust me I know"? You must have a government accredited degree (with logic like that).

Furthermore, per Dr. John Bear (the recognized expert in this field), no HR representatives ever say "was the university accredited when you started your studies there?"
If a degreed person is over the age of 58, it is highly unlikely that the university they attended in 1966 was accredited since few (if any) universities were accredited back then.

Warren National is seeking accreditation from the U.S. Department of Education-recognized Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools, according to the Wyoming Department of Education.
Along with Warren National, Columbia Commonwealth University in Rock Springs is seeking accreditation from the Higher Learning Commission.

http://www.billingsgazette.net/articles/...

Facts Suck January 21, 2008 at 6:06 p.m.

REF:((If a degreed person is over the age of 58, it is highly unlikely that the university they attended in 1966 was accredited since few (if any) universities were accredited back then.))

Wow! The average age of a CEO in the US is about 56 (*). Oh no! This would mean many of our CEOs have unaccredited degrees! God save us!

* Ref below.
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-10594805...

The Moon January 21, 2008 at 6:08 p.m.

That is right, not a single scientist or engineer that did the original computations and research to put a man on the moon had a degree from an accredited university.

Why we need accreditation January 21, 2008 at 9:13 p.m.

1. Government school is the essential force for social cohesion. It cannot happen any other way. A bureaucratized public order is our best defense against chaos and anarchy.
2. The socialization of children in groups monitored by state agents is essential; without this, children cannot learn to get along with others in a pluralistic society.
3. Children from different backgrounds and from families with different beliefs must be mixed together. Robert Frost was wrong when he maintained "good fences make good neighbors."
4. The certifiable expertise of accredited educators is superior to that of lay people including parents. The protection of students from the uncertified is a compelling public concern.
5. Coercion in the name of liberty is a valid use of federal and state power. Compelling children to assemble in mandated groups for mandated intervals with mandated texts and overseers does not interfere with academic learning.
6. Students will inevitably grow apart from their morals and core beliefs as they grow older and this process must be supported and encouraged. The best way to do this is by diluting moral influence and discouraging the students attitudes that their own parents are sovereign in either mind or morality.
7. The world is full of crazy parents who will ruin their off-spring. An overriding concern of University is to protect students from bad parenting.
8. It is not appropriate for any family to unduly concern itself with it's own education, but it may expend unlimited money, resources, time and effort on behalf of the general education of everyone else(especially blacks and minorities).
9. The Federal and State government has the predominant responsibility for training, morals, and beliefs. Students schooled outside government scrutiny frequently become anti-social and poverty stricken murderers, psychopaths, rapists and perverts.

LoL January 21, 2008 at 10:50 p.m.

For WNU / KWU grads:

Dishonesty is the best policy.

Rationalization is key.

Chemist January 22, 2008 at 8:07 a.m.

>>>>>>>>If a degreed person is over the age of 58, it is highly unlikely that the university they attended in 1966 was accredited since few (if any) universities were accredited back then.<<<<<<<

Not so. I got my degree in 1967 and accreditation was in wide use back then and had been for some time.

Nay, Nay Moose Breath January 22, 2008 at 6:30 p.m.

Regarding [(Not so. I got my degree in 1967 and accreditation was in wide use back then and had been for some time.)]

It was 1965 when the Higher Education Act. was signed into law. This was when the Federal Government (Sec. of Ed) began recognizing accreditation organizations. There was at least a few years lag time for the audits to take place for the recognition.

Now then, you might make the argument that it was still accreditation even though not recognized by Dept. of Ed. ie Almeda.

Then you are in my web. I am the black widow!

Checkmate!

Tammy.gov January 22, 2008 at 6:52 p.m.

"It was 1965 when the Higher Education Act. was signed into law. This was when the Federal Government (Sec. of Ed) began recognizing accreditation organizations. There was at least a few years lag time for the audits to take place for the recognition."

Not that it matters a whole lot because only a small number of colleges were participants (< 1%)in the 1952 GI bill selected schools. The federal government would only reimburse war vets for tuition if they attended certain colleges. I worked for the VA back then, and there were about 7 colleges (out of several hundred) on the list. Also, it was not called accreditation back then. It was called VA recognized institutions of higher learning for purposes of government funded tuition assistance. The commisioner of education (my boss) kept the handwritten list in his desk drawer.

re: Why we need accreditation January 30, 2008 at 2:05 a.m.

All great points!

Especially if you are a firm believer of Communism and the Politburo! Or the Democratic party of today

All hail Mark and Stalin the murdurers!

W.O.W Player February 1, 2008 at 4:53 p.m.

Has anyone ever had their loan from Sallie Mae waved for attending WNU aka KWU since the school is (as some say)a "Diploma Mill"?

Just wondering :)

Help! February 1, 2008 at 6:47 p.m.

Do I take the $75/hour ST/OT job in North Carolina or the $65/hour+OT @ 1.5x job in South Carolina?

WNU Degree is paying off BIGTIME!

Help! February 4, 2008 at 1:01 p.m.

Do I take the McDonalds job (fries) or Taco Bell job (more hours) after I purchase a WNU degree?

VALID February 7, 2008 at 11:15 p.m.

I love to read comments where there is no investigation completed! Here are a couple to keep in mind: OLIN University started out as a FREE, yes FREE, no tuition required engineering school which graduated its first classes WITHOUT accredidation. It is now placed on a level equal to Harvard. Bob Jones University is another school respected nationally.....they are not accredited! It is all about ego on this thread. Maybe some of the complainers are simply jealous that they (or most likely MOM and DAD) paid too much for their education!

They Stole my Money! February 8, 2008 at 1:26 p.m.

Please please please do not enroll at Warren National University. I had terrible experience right from day one from the enrollment until I started the first course. I gave benefit of doubt when I had sour experience with their student counselor.

I decided to withdraw in the first four weeks and sent a request to reimburse 50% of the fee I paid. They said they will send response in 2 weeks. I made several follow ups and now it is almost 5 months and there is no response. I don't know how to get my money back.

Their admin, faculty, supervisor are not professional. I am very disappointed with their response. The reason I wanted to withdraw was that they had their previous university KWU information on student’s portal. Most of the information they had on the students section were outdated and not relevant to the course I selected. It did not motivate me to continue further.

It is not a professional setting. We are burning our money. There are quite a few other universities out there with high quality student service and curriculum structure at less price compared to Warren. Please do good homework before you sign up. Don't repent after the fact like me - I lost $3000.

I could care less about how good a school WNU is February 9, 2008 at 3:38 p.m.

I make a hell of a lot more money now. Have worked for the so called "Illegal States" (never been arrested).

As the unaccredited schools catch on, there will be more people running around with so called "sub-standard degrees" than the so called "accredited degrees". People are growing more unhappy with government run schools than ever before. The majority will rule, and due to entropy (and path of least resistance) people will gravitate to the easiest route. I admit, I took an easier route, and it is paying off!

LOL February 10, 2008 at 1:20 a.m.

LOL, a nameless individual working for a nameless company, with an unprovable "success story" with his "life-experience" degree. Even if it was true, defrauding your employer can only last so long as Gene Morrison learned this week...

Court expert 'was bogus scientist who bought PhD on internet'

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,...

WNU Rockz February 10, 2008 at 2:24 a.m.

Yo, I didn't learn nuthin during the 2 weeks I wuz in WNU, but now I'm makin phat loot.

LMAO February 13, 2008 at 5:36 p.m.

Yes, from the way you write I can see you learned nothing and I hardly believe you are making the loot you claim >.>

Valid February 15, 2008 at 6:19 a.m.

Is WNU degree valid to use in NC or SC?

MSBE grad February 15, 2008 at 6:20 a.m.

Yes they are not accreted… so long as you and your employer are ok whit that then have at. Let it be known I took 2 years and had to write a 110 page paper to get my un-accreted slip of paper. Yes there were 2 classes that I did not need to read the book, I took the practice test got a 98% and said why bother. Some classes took me days some took me many months to get through. I say to you so what, at the time it was the only way I could get a degree (un-accreted) as I was traveling around the world for Motorola as a field service engineer making ½ of what the others made that I worked with. I took first 2 years at UOP university of Phoenix but because I could not always log on at least 5 days a week (to read and post email…. As if that means I was learning) I had to stop attending UOP. After a two year brake I found Kennedy-Western University. I have completed school and yes some places tell me that it is a diploma mill and will not take the degree and some don’t ask and some don’t care. I work now as a SR Mechanical Engineer (and I am a fine one at that) for a small Co. I work there because the last 5 degreed BSME (accredited ones) sucked and cost tons of money. It has been 2 years now and I just got my 2nd 14% pay correction, I say correction as I had to start at a lower amount because of my non-accredited degree. When I see a please that states you must have a BS or BA but preferred a MS or MA well its all just BS to me and I know it’s some HR flunky having a thought (ok reading someone else’s thoughts and saying it’s so. So if you need an accredited degree then go get one. If you need a piece of paper that makes people think you are good to go then buy one, but if you just need to know what to read and someone to test you and help you understand something then Give it a try, but know that there are people that will bash you for it. If that bashing by other for some perception they have over something that truly don’t know will bug you then move on, oh and don’t live in the south as people may think you are a red neck, don’t live in LA as people will think you are vain, don’t live in the Midwest as people may think you are plane, well you smart people get my point. I will say am I as smart as someone out of MIT… no I am not but I don’t tell people that I am. Oh and you can take MIT class over the web for free (I have completed 12 and did very well) but that will not help me when some HR person sees that I do not have an accreted degree now will it even thou I have taken more school and much harder classes (sorry HR people DefEQ is harder than businesses law ((I know as I took both)).

sorry thats BSME February 15, 2008 at 6:22 a.m.

No chip on my shoulder or accreted degree on my wall. Now to express my other view. There should be a governmental agency that issues Lic for the right to provide education… it should not be decided by an organization paid by the people that it is grading… or am I the only one to see fault in this. Also please read the rules and standards for accreditation before you say it’s the end-all that you think it is.

WNU is 100% Valid February 15, 2008 at 12:23 p.m.

In all 50 states, as no prosecutor has fined or punished anyone yet in the three or four so called "illegal states". They will however try to intimidate state employees into removing credentials.

US Constitution February 15, 2008 at 12:47 p.m.

Allows advertising your WNU degree anywhere.
God help the first state prosecutor that is stupid enough to try to prosecute someone for free speach. The test will eventually come. The state will lose.

Diploma Mill News Features another KWU "grad" February 15, 2008 at 3:53 p.m.

http://www.diplomamillnews.blogspot.com/...

Educator: Deborah Schadler.

School: Gwynedd-Mercy College in Lower Gwynedd Township, where she is facilitator of the school of education's new Autism Institute

LOL February 15, 2008 at 3:56 p.m.

"prosecute someone for free speach."

Academic fraud is now free "speach"????

It depends. If I tell my cat that I am a Dr. based on my so-called PhD from KWU/WNU, no harm no foul.

But if I try to pass it off on an employer or someone else who relies on it? I don't think so.

AND February 15, 2008 at 9:04 p.m.

Diploma mill news is reputable?
Give me a break, My 8 year old could steal some Hyper Text Markup Language and start a bogus blog that looks better than that sham. WTF!

Again February 15, 2008 at 9:06 p.m.

Point to a prosecution.

There is an old Navy Fighter Pilots saying February 15, 2008 at 9:30 p.m.

You know you are right on target when you are catching flack.

WNU is catching plenty flack.

If you are jealous of WNU students making more money than you, just say so. It is ok to be jealous. I got 3 degrees for the price of one. My resume looks better than yours and no one cares about accreditation in the private sector.
Go hump yourself!

bb February 15, 2008 at 9:46 p.m.

Ok, so I earned a WNU BS in Safety Engineering, then I could not believe it. Just days after I put the credential on my resume men in black suits showed up at my door. They placed me under arrest and read me my Miranda. They blindfolded me and took me to a secret place where I found out is used only for interrogating WNU students. They torture you first by waterboarding you. Then they play this recording over and over, something about senate GAO, senate GAO over and over again.
There was another WNU student in the room with me. She finally screams out "What do you want from me?". The recording stopped. A voice said "Compliance. We want you to fall in line with the way it has always been done. We distort and you comply." She asked in horror, "Who are you?" The voice replied "Big Brother".

Another old saying February 15, 2008 at 11:40 p.m.

Q: What do you a call a person with a KWU bachelors, master's and doctorate?

A: A high school graduate.

Lol February 16, 2008 at 5:44 a.m.

"I got 3 degrees for the price of one"

When was the "Buy 1, Get 2 Free" Sale?

&%^$#@ February 16, 2008 at 1:38 p.m.

"No one cares about accedidation in the private sector"

Please tell me what company you are working for so I can sell their stock short...LOL

LOL - Piercetp February 18, 2008 at 4:31 a.m.

Some chump named Piercetp3840 is trying to pump up this dump by writing multiple reviews...

Warren National Is Pretty Good
By: Piercetp3840 (Graduate) on February 15, 2008

Warren National is a the real deal
By: Piercetp3840 (Graduate) on August 17, 2007

Robert February 21, 2008 at 2:15 a.m.

As an executive with over 100 employees working for me, i would never hire a KW/WNU grad.

I interviewed one once, and found him to be quite deceptive. Easy degrees draw people who are seeking the 'easy way out' which are just the people I don't want to hire.....

yea right February 22, 2008 at 6:47 p.m.

"Robert"
Looking at your hypertext unique protocol identifier, it is clear to see you are not an executive at all. Your name is not even Robert.

DQ February 23, 2008 at 8:26 p.m.

I am thinking about attending Virginia College Online does anyone know about this school. All of my research as been positive about the school. I want to get an associates degree in criminal justice and business administration and I cannot attend a on-site campus do to truck driving and being gone 3 weeks out of the month.

! February 24, 2008 at 1:50 p.m.

DQ
Save money, effort and time...... go to WNU.

WNU Graduated Student February 25, 2008 at 2:37 a.m.

This is all quite interesting - My experience at WNU was rather good. I completed the Doctoral Program in Computer Science and many of the courses were instructed by faculty from Univ of Penn, Georgia Tech, FSU, etc. No, WNU does not hold your hand but if you're looking to expand your knowledge base and add a post-graduate degree, it's a good way to go. Like all things in life, you get out what you put in.

WNU Graduated Student February 25, 2008 at 2:44 a.m.

One last piece to add for 'Robert', the executive. Your gross generalization based upon a single interview certainly proves you're a true modern day thinker. Is this the same policy your 100 employee wonder applies to women and minorities? Perhaps you can parlay you're awesome skill set to a worthy corporation like Worldcom, Adelphia or Tyco.

LOL - Piercetp February 27, 2008 at 4:28 a.m.

"Some chump named Piercetp3840 is trying to pump up this dump by writing multiple reviews...

Warren National Is Pretty Good
By: Piercetp3840 (Graduate) on February 15, 2008

Warren National is a the real deal
By: Piercetp3840 (Graduate) on August 17, 2007"

Is anyone really surprised that a KWU so-called "graduate" would do something misleading or unethical?

Wondering March 15, 2008 at 1:06 p.m.

With the latest Boston Globe report that 2/3 accredited university students are cheating, does it matter where they attend?

Potential Student March 17, 2008 at 12:50 a.m.

Does anyone know what accredidation they have applied for? Will they receive the accreditation by end of 2008?

Robbed Like Many Others March 18, 2008 at 5:45 p.m.

Presently there are THOUSANDS of WNU "students" out there who believe that they were misled by this outfit - A successful Class Action against WNU is inevitable and along with that will be the collapse of their attempt at becoming accredited followed by the collapse of their "business".

Jack March 20, 2008 at 6:52 a.m.

Kennedy-Western was a wonderful experience. I met great people that lead to good opportunities down the road. The faculty at KWU were helpful and thoughtful about student needs. If you couldn't get something in on time they let you have until the very last second to turn it in. They treat you like adults, not babysitting kids. You get what you put into it. Don't expect to be babied at KWU. The renamed WNU is undergoing NCA accreditation and will soon put all the naysayers to rest. I got a good IS management job and have 28 people under me and just broke a six figure income. Life is good and it's all thanks to KWU! Thanks Warren National.. I could do without the name changes though!

Look elsewhere March 20, 2008 at 12:24 p.m.

"Does anyone know what accredidation they have applied for? Will they receive the accreditation by end of 2008?"

They have claimed accreditation from a bogus accreditor in the past.

They have also publicly announced they were going to pursue accreditation and then retracted that statement and moved states.

This time, they actually filled out an application, but it's unknown what their real intention is.

What's your major? There are dozens of legitimate schools out there offering your major where you won't have to wonder if your degree will be accepted.

Jack March 20, 2008 at 1:09 p.m.

@Elsewhere

They have applied for NCA RA accreditation... that is REAL accreditation from CHEA!

I have the MIS and it has given me a great job making a ton of money and responsibility over dozens. I am quite happy with the acceptance of KWU in my career.

Hey March 20, 2008 at 2:31 p.m.

To ".Wwondering".
Hey jackass, it was the Boston Herald and not the Boston Globe. And the number was 64% not 2/3!

Easy Degrees March 20, 2008 at 3:07 p.m.

KWU will never be legitimate and never received any type of accreditation. Their 60% "life experience" credit waives and 1 open book exam = 1 "course" techniques are well documented. They are all just time bombs waiting to be discovered.

There is some hope for WNU students who graduate in about 2011 or later. WNU claims to be making an attempt at accreditation and I hope they succeed. Until then look elsewhere, it's not necessary to take the risk when other schools can offer qualified programs right now.

Links? March 20, 2008 at 3:11 p.m.

Please post a link to

A) The Boston article
B) Any company that says "we'll glady accept unaccredited degrees for management positions"

Thanks

victort March 20, 2008 at 10:18 p.m.

Actually, the number of cheating university students could be as high as 84%
http://www.millersville.edu/~jccomp/acad...

No, the Boston one March 20, 2008 at 11:21 p.m.

That study is from 1963 and 1993.

Jack March 21, 2008 at 6:03 a.m.

@Easy Degrees

Ashford is regionally accredited and they give 75 credit hours of Life Experience too. Looks like they will make accreditation after all. :)

Easy Degrees March 21, 2008 at 1:16 p.m.

LOL, really? Ashford gives every student 75 free credits on the spot with no required documentation like KWU? Please post a link, I would love to read about that. But like all KWU claims, I suspect it is not true.

Here is what KWU had to say about themselves:

“We were told that EVERY student in the Master’s program is awarded between 33 and 60 percent credit toward a degree for their experience. In fact, documents produced by Kennedy-Western indicated that nearly half of all students in the Master’s program have received more than 55 percent credit for their experience”.

victort March 21, 2008 at 1:30 p.m.

To: No, the Boston one
I did not place the Boston correction.

Hey dipstick, if it progressivly got worse from 1963 thru 1993 a simple extrapolation would demonstrate that today students at accredited universities cheat about 110% of the time!
There are more cheaters today than 15 years ago. More minorities, women, blacks and other "affirmative action" human debris are in the system now.

Easy Degrees March 21, 2008 at 2:14 p.m.

I like simple extraploations too!

From the Senate Hearing on Diploma mills:
"Kennedy-Western immediately waived 43% of the Engineering master's degree requirements, based on her JOURNALISM degree and some random seminars attended. She even notes that "they asked for no proof or documenation" and "As a note, I have no formal engineering training"."

"Then of the remaining 5 classes left for a Master's degree, the student knocked off 2 of the 5 classes in a grand total of 16 hours and said that each "course" was an open-book exam where she had to pick terms out of the glossary."

So, a Master's degree from Kennedy Western can be earned in a total of 40 hours of effort. Take a week off of work and get one now!

Anyone? March 22, 2008 at 1:36 p.m.

Please post a link to

A) The Boston Globe article
B) Any company that says "we'll glady accept unaccredited degrees for management positions"
C) Where Ashford University gives 75 free credits to all students without any verification, KWU-style.

Thanks

Jack March 23, 2008 at 4:43 p.m.

Warren requires documentation of PLA the same as Ashford. From WNU website...

"Non-collegiate learning may be considered for transfer IF such work is documented and submitted by means of the portfolio. By definition, the portfolio is a concise and explicit document that clearly identifies non-collegiate learning that merits academic credit.

Ashford awards PLA by handing in a PP accompanied by a letter on corporate stationary. If Ashford, with RA accreditation, can take it then WNU will get RA too.

Jack March 23, 2008 at 4:57 p.m.

Someone in the Ashford thread pointed it out here.

http://www.ashford.edu/online/forms/PLAG...

Write a letter on corporate stationary and include some bogus workshop agenda that you never went to and you can get credit. At Ashford you can get 75 credit hours from PLA and transfer up to 99. This school is RA, WNU is soon to follow!

Jack March 23, 2008 at 4:58 p.m.

There have been court cases specifically rejecting the notion you can't put unaccredited degrees on your resume. In Oregon, their law was overturned and it was found you can put it down.

http://www.bizjournals.com/portland/stor...

If the company you apply for values your experience they will take you. Experience and performance are ten times more important than where you received your degree. That is how I and most people get our management jobs. It must irk you how we KWU grads can get these jobs with our unaccredited degrees and you can't! LOL!!

Famous "alumni" March 23, 2008 at 11:04 p.m.

Any company that says "we'll glady accept unaccredited degrees for management positions" - There are none, that is why nobody can post one and keeps their supposed employers hidden. It's a 30-second background check to see if someone has a legitimate college degree.

If you manage to sneak into a company, congrats, you may shortly make the newspaper, like all of these recent articles on Kennedy-Western University and their degree purchasers.

***"Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense."

***"Diploma Mills are Easily Created and Some Have Issued Bogus Degrees to Federal Employees at Government Expense."

***"Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations: Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"

***"It May Take Hours, But You Too Can Earn a University Degree"

***"When Elected Officials Aren't What They Seem
Texas officials and Pennsylvania cats tout misleading credentials"

***“Real officials, bogus degrees, Fake degrees a growing Texas problem”

***"A dirty dozen - 12 famous diploma mills."

***“Are Fraudulent Academic Degrees Making a Mark on Engineering?”

***“Fighting Fakery - Diploma mills continue to churn out new "graduates" every day. What should legitimate colleges do about them? Is government action called for?”

***“Two less doctors in the house - Hebert, Wilson back away from Ph.D.'s issued by 'diploma mills'”

***“CBS 42 Investigates: Professors' questionable credentials”

***"PS Your PhD may be BS"

Jack March 23, 2008 at 11:49 p.m.

Read the settlement article...

"Oregon officials are also obligated under the settlement agreement to refrain from characterizing KWU as a "diploma mill."

... it is against the law to call it a diploma mill.

Illegal in Oregon without this... March 23, 2008 at 11:52 p.m.

Make sure to have your "my degree is crap" disclaimer on your resume...

"In addition, an individual using an unaccredited degree, even if the employer allows use of such degrees, must disclose on resumes, letterheads, business cards, announcements and advertisements that "(Name of school) does not have accreditation recognized by the United States Department of Education and has not been approved by the Office of Degree Authorization." ORS 348.609(2)(a). The only exception is for schools approved by ODA. See ORS 348.609(d) and OAR 583-050-0014."

It is a Class B Misdemeanor under the Oregon Criminal Code to use a degree in violation of ORS 348.609.

http://www.osac.state.or.us/oda/unaccred......

Jack March 24, 2008 at 9:30 a.m.

Your link is dead... they must have taken it down. Awwwhh

Thanks, they moved their diploma mill page March 24, 2008 at 12:29 p.m.

It's only a misdemeanor, but I am sure Kennedy-Western sends out frequent notifications regarding the restrictions and dangers of using these "degrees".

http://www.osac.state.or.us/oda/unaccred...

your welcome March 24, 2008 at 4:11 p.m.

They don't because they don't have to. No one has ever enforced it, another blue law that will soon be forgotten in backwater USA. It is against the law for Oregon officials to call WNU a diploma mill so that is not the page. It is the unaccredited page... not the diploma mill page. You don't even know the difference. LOL!

How do you tell? March 24, 2008 at 8:27 p.m.

Unaccredited / Diploma Mill, what's the difference?

Rochville, Belford, Warren National are all unaccredited. Why not go the cheaper route with Rochville?

Jack March 25, 2008 at 12:59 a.m.

Warren is accredited by the Wyoming DOE. Diploma mills are not.

Rochville same as Warren March 25, 2008 at 3:15 a.m.

"Rochville University is a fully accredited University recognized by Board of Online Universities Accreditation (BOUA)"

http://www.rochvilleuniversity.org/

LOL, Warren National is not accredited, it has a state business license, similar to the ones issued to beauty shops and tattoo parlors. It has no academic meaning, but their telemarketers will make a big deal about it to the naive.

Jack March 25, 2008 at 6:50 a.m.

Your argument is so lame! You can't compare the Wyoming DOE with a bogus accrediting agency. They don't pass out school liscences like beauty shops. LOL!

Scammed March 25, 2008 at 12:12 p.m.

I found out the hard way that KWU is total garbage when tried to upgrade one of my professional engineering certifications and was turned down

Anyone that attends this university is naive or dishonest.

I was naive, which are you?

Jack March 25, 2008 at 11:25 p.m.

Then your just going to have to work longer before your experience will apply. All degrees without professional accreditation are at the discretion of the certificate agency. You should have checked with them earlier... you can't blame anyone for your laziness but you.

Again March 26, 2008 at 12:05 a.m.

Show me a conviction for using an unaccredited degree. You can not! It has never happened and never will.

Go fish!

Prof A March 26, 2008 at 12:06 a.m.

"Warren is accredited by the Wyoming DOE"

I am speechless...

I deduct 20 Life Experience credits and order you to read up on accreditation. States are not accreditors in the slightest.

Jack March 26, 2008 at 12:48 a.m.

Wyoming recognizes WNU and her degrees meaning they accredit it.

accredit

• verb (accredited, accrediting) 1 (accredit to) attribute (something) to (someone). 2 give authorization to

Perhaps you should read a dictionary.

Prof A March 26, 2008 at 2:05 a.m.

Unfortunately, there is a complicated thing called context.

In US higher ed, it specifically means an accrediting agency recognized by the US Dept. of Education.

State licenses are that, a license to operate in the state. In Wyoming, I think the only 2 requiremenst are a cash deposit and that listed faculty must have accredited (Non-KWU / WNU) degrees.

Wyoming recently tightened up their laws, like the last 3 states to boot KWU (California, Hawaii, Oregon).

Since you are struggling for terminology, WNU is probably best described as an Unaccredited, Wyoming-licensed business.

Jack March 26, 2008 at 2:28 a.m.

I said it was "licensed"... read the thread before you make inane comments.

Doesn't know Jack March 26, 2008 at 2:58 a.m.

Jack March 26, 2008 at 12:48 a.m.

Wyoming recognizes WNU and her degrees meaning they accredit it.

Doesn't know Jack March 26, 2008 at 2:59 a.m.

"Jack March 25, 2008 at 12:59 a.m.

Warren is accredited by the Wyoming DOE. Diploma mills are not."

Jack March 26, 2008 at 4:23 a.m.

Jack March 25, 2008 at 6:50 a.m

"They don't pass out school liscences like beauty shops."

I told you to read the thread... apparently you have an omission problem.

Scammed March 26, 2008 at 12:16 p.m.

Well Jack, you are right in their target demographic with your repeated insistence that Wyoming DOE = Accreditation. Put that right on your resumer.

Good luck trying to use it though.

Scammed March 26, 2008 at 12:28 p.m.

Well Jack, in your defense, they do sell their state license aggressively, so you're not the only one to think that.

"Jack March 25, 2008 at 12:59 a.m.

Warren is accredited by the Wyoming DOE. Diploma mills are not."

Jack March 26, 2008 at 4:20 p.m.

I'm sorry it didn't work out for you. No degree is guaranteed to give someone their desired job. It all comes down to what you do with it that makes it valuable. Since I am a go getter mine has taken me to my goals and beyond. Those that didn't take the effort to gain experience first are the ones who are suffering. It is the same for grads from traditional schools as well.

Congrats Jack March 27, 2008 at 2:48 a.m.

It is still possible to get a decent job without a formal education.

curious March 27, 2008 at 3:41 a.m.

Question:

Why do individuals who never attended KWU/WNU bash the school so much?

If they never attended, and did not fall for the so-called "scam", and the actual degrees are in fact completely worthless, then what more is there to say really?

For those who did not attend a dubious school and did not graduate with an unaccredited degree, but rather attended a "normal school" with a legitimate qualification, then this should be none of their concern.

If all the negative remarks being said, been said about KWU/WNU were to hold merit, then I would imagine all those graduates of KW/WNU would be dismissed from their jobs for having a "Fake" degree, whenever applying for promotions or different positions within their organizations, or simply when they apply for jobs with different companies altogether. In theory, would they not all get turned down?

People who completed their KWU degrees and applied internally for a higher position, after the education verification and background checks, would get terminated for lying on the new resumes would they not?

I could understand an alumni getting concerned about all the talk, and getting afraid that maybe the "herd" is right, the university is just trying once "again" to dodge the accreditation issue by moving states, making an application to the Higher Learning Commision, in order to buy time, etc, etc.

Imagine the one who went on to a "real" MBA program after having completed their KWU degree, how must that person feel while wondering that the school might get wiped off the face of the map?

Do the posters on these types of blogs understand that some very prestigious MBA programs will accept applicants who have extensive experience, certifications, and skills, despite a lack of an undergraduate degree? That basically means, having a degree from unaccredited institution such as WNU will not necessarily keep an aspiring student out of a regionally accredited graduate program, or any world-renowned university‘s graduate degree program. (read on for specific examples)

Continued

Curious March 27, 2008 at 3:43 a.m.

Continued:

The KWU and WNU degree programs were intended for mature adults who had years of experience in their jobs. A Degree completion program was its true purpose. The bachelor degrees from WNU/WNU are not out of the ordinary:

If we examine, say American Intercontinental University (online school) - regionally accredited without any tarnishes on their reputation, we can easily take note, that they are a degree completion school.

If one browses through the AIU website, it seems clear that the school does not offer much, if at all, any general education offerings of any sort. Just core courses, meaning that the student is expected to have earned 45 credits at a previous institution when applying for the associate degree program, and 90 credits earned elsewhere when applying for the bachelors degree programs.

KWU used to require, and WNU still requires one to have at least 60 credits from previous institutions, and/or have an experiential portfolio submitted, in order to determine the applicability of professional certifications, training, experience, etc to determine eligibility toward the required 60 credits.

Should the student have less than 60 general education credits earned elsewhere, they were ALL required to take two separate general education exams in addition to all previous coursework towards admission. What exactly is wrong with having a standard, which requires a student to PROVE their competency in a subject?

Western Governors University is triple accredited, regional, DETC, + and has the accreditation required of teachers and aspiring educators. WGU does not offer a SINGLE course, at least not in the traditional sense.

It is COMPETENCY based, meaning, there are subjects to enroll in, and they come with suggested readings. Then the student must show competency before a live proctor in writing, demonstrate their knowledge of the subject.

George W. Bush himself served on the board of governors of WGU, while he was the governor of Texas. 19 US governors promote that (WGU) particular school. Yet this school is widely accepted by academia, despite not having any traditional course offerings whatsoever. So why would WNU not have a chance at regional accreditation?

In fact should WNU abandon its DBA offering, then the DETC accreditation would be very easily obtained.

Almost all regionally accredited and respected universities, such as NYU give credit for professional licensing and certifications (very little, but some).

Continued

Curious March 27, 2008 at 3:45 a.m.

Certain DETC accredited schools give up to 25% credit towards general education requirements for life experience credit and limits the percentage of credit that can be waived toward core courses. This is an accepted practice among accredited institutions.

The ACE recommends college credit for non-collegiate activities, and also reviews college programs for applicability of courses for transfer credits - for use by college admissions staff when evaluating transcripts from other schools. To my recollection, the ACE used to publish a kind of "resale value book" for college courses. Like a used car's book value.

As for having to take ONE, open-book final exam - almost all accredited distance/online education programs operate in this manner.

Has anyone, in all of their lives in learning, ever taken an open-book, grand-final exam? In say finance, or something advanced? "Open-book" will not always help you get the answers, at least not fast enough to complete an exam in the allotted time.

In addition, usually the questions require an understanding of the learning concept in the actual textbook to formulate a correct answer to a question in an open-book exam. That is why open-book exams exist in the first place. Do you recall that the hardest subjects you ever took in school; usually were open-book exams? If you do not recollect such instances, then perhaps you were never enrolled in advanced subjects.

Just because a formula is in the book, does not mean that the student will: a. know what the formula means, b. know how to apply it towards a required answer on an exam.

Ever hear of CLEP exams? College students study the CLEP books and take the CLEP exams to get waivers on college courses to speed up the graduation process, or to save money on tuition. All regionally accredited universities accept this form of course completion. Therefore attempting to point negativity on WNU for its course-completion via-grand-final-examination process deserves little merit, if any at all.

Curious March 27, 2008 at 3:47 a.m.

Continued:

Another example:

Thunderbird, Garvin School of business openly states in their publication that their admissions board may consider a highly skilled, experienced applicant who may not have obtained a bachelors degree, for admission into their MBA program. Their #1 ranked international business MBA program! (High GMAT scores are expected at this particular graduate school, since it is top ranked)

There are respected universities in the U.K. who do not opt for "3rd party accreditation". Just start an internet search for some of the most famous universities in the world, and one will find that most of the undergraduate programs do not have a standard accreditation system or governing body.

Only when we get into graduate degrees, then there are AMBA, Equis, AACSB, ACBSP, etc type of internationally recognized accreditations.

The UK's Quality Assurance system overseas every university in the UK,(Oxford U anyone?) and it is NOT "Accreditation" in the sense of the US Regional system.

If a graduate of Oxford University's undergraduate degree program put that degree on the resume, and applied for job in the U.S., now days due to all this misnomers and confusion, and public misconception, a background verifier for a hiring client company might mistake this as UNACREDITED. Fact of the matter is, technically that would not be far from the truth.

The US accrediting regional bodies themselves are companies and not government agencies. In the U.S., CHEA and DOE are government agencies who choose to recognize certain accrediting bodies (companies), and have no authority over any of them.

Continued

Curious March 27, 2008 at 3:50 a.m.

Continued:

Key points:

Negative views of WNU/KWU which I attempted to de-bunk:

1. Curriculum and degrees earned by examination are sub-standard*

*Rebuttal: We examined the idea that just about all degrees in regionally accredited colleges and universities are earned by examination. How else would a student pass a class?

2. Accepting credits for non-college coursework is unacceptable practice*

*Rebuttal: CLEP exams and ACE are used by ALL regionally accepted schools.

3. KWU/WNU degrees will not be accepted by any employer*

*Rebuttal: I personally worked for one of the worlds oldest and recently in the news as being one of the most prominent financial institutions, and they accepted this degree. I moved on to a competitor, and the new hiring company conducted an extensive background check - criminal records investigation, credential verification and degree verification, I had no issues.

4. Graduates of KWU/WNU will never be able to transfer credits to any regionally accredited university.

(Somewhat true, yet misleading) Since it is not uncommon for a graduates of KWU/WNU have associates degrees and extensive undergraduate credits from regionally accredited institutions, as well as a min. 5 years of professional experience in the field of the major, to have been ADMITTED into the KW/WNU program to begin with, one can imagine that not all regionally accredited graduate schools will not all frown on this. Plenty of schools will take students who are just shy of certain requirements, provided that there are certain stipulations which need to be addressed.

Curious March 27, 2008 at 3:50 a.m.

Continued:

For example: Story of a student pursuing a Ph.D in business, without first having completed a DBA. A respected university, should they wish to admit such a person, may require that the student take a few DBA courses prior to taking courses in the university's PhD level program, etc, etc.

Based on this, from personal experience, and from reading plenty of entries by posters, I would like to believe that many of KWU graduates have gone on to regionally accredited master's programs. I will admit, that most likely not many of us would like to boast about being an alumni (due to all of the negativity). Few might have wanted to disclose where they attend now, or where we work now. Unless it is Harvard we are currently attending, it could potentialy make our current school appear "substandard" in message forums.

If you are a former student, and did not enjoy the experience, feel free to express them. One the other hand,
If you have never attended the school and do not plan on ever attending, then do not bother knocking it, since you should have NO compelling reason to criticize something which:

1. Has nothing to do with you/does not affect you in any way
2. Is so flawed anyways (WNU?), that it is bound to fail.

If WNU is bound to fail, time will surely tell. Until then, just simply go on with your own life, enjoy your very own regionally accredited degree, and high-profile job, and maybe try pursuing a higher degree or advanced qualification.

Best regards,

A KWU graduate

Jack March 27, 2008 at 4:19 a.m.

@congrats... you need a degree for just about everything these days.

@curious... I agree with you but learn some brevity man!

Former Student Disagrees March 27, 2008 at 4:56 a.m.

Thanks for your opinions, they are much appreciated. From my experiences, I disagree.

1. Curriculum and degrees earned by examination are sub-standard*

"How else would a student pass a class?" KWU was shown in the diploma mill hearings to have 1 open book exam as the ENTIRE COURSE CONTENT, not as a course-end capstone to evaluate compentency after course readings, writings, and discussions.

2. Accepting credits for non-college coursework is unacceptable practice*

"CLEP exams and ACE are used by ALL regionally accepted schools." Depends. True, CLEP exams show proficiency in entry level courses that are specifically mapped to course content. Passing the exam is taken as proficiency in the related course. Reasonable, controlled, and standardized.

This is entirely different than what KWU testified to. No proficiency was required, no exam was taken to show proficiency, no documentation of any type was required to gain "life experience", on average of 50% of a Master's degree.

3. KWU/WNU degrees will not be accepted by any employer*

I have never seen any employer who openly states they will accept them, can you name one? On the other hand, there are routinely articles about people from KWU / Almeda, etc who are in hot water over these "degrees". I think there are unsophisticated companies (very large and small) that just have antiquated screening procedures.

4. Graduates of KWU/WNU will never be able to transfer credits to any regionally accredited university.

The regionally accredited credits and 5 years of work experience that you cite are helpful to any student in transfer. Unaccredited credits aren't.

All my comments refer to Kennedy Western. I'm optimistic that WNU will turn out o, but Warren National has KWU as it's baggage until it is able to set itself apart.

Curious March 27, 2008 at 5:49 a.m.

I appreciate your comments as well, as they are very well thought out.

I would like to elaborate on your points,

1. Curriculum and degrees earned by examination:

The University of London, the world's very first distance education provider, and a collective of some of the world's finest and highest ranked universities (LSE, Imperial College Tanaka school of business, etc) has an external programme, which tests students once per year: ONE written exam per course, for the ENITRE COURSE CONTENT.

This(University of London) is one of the highest recognized degrees Programs in the world, with alumni which includes numerous heads of state and Nobel prize winners. The 100 year old distance format consists of one extensive final exam for each course. (Not to imply that the heads of state and Nobel prize winners were students of the external program)

2. On showing proficiency, KWU administered the General Education Requirement Exam for Math and English, and are evident on student transcripts. That is a proficiency exam. As well as requiring an Information Literacy Capstone course which tests the student reading ability. Further, as part of a student's acceptance into KWU, one had to submit a PECA - Portfolio of Experiential Credit Assessment, and it had a certification page which required that students attest they had provided true evidence of prior credentials on the paperwork listing all coursework completed and transcripts if any were provided. However, as the U.S. Senate Hearing Testimony would indicate, the women who enrolled for the course din not feel that she was asked to provide evidence of her credentials, however by signing the PECA, she swore to KWU that she told them the truth about her academic credentials - in her own handwriting. AND SHE LIED! She already had a degree in the subject matter. She took two tests and felt that the class was too easy. 2nd year high school seniors report that it is easier the second time around, even if they had failed the first time. We had an instance of the person who did not fail the first time, she already had a degree and was "repeating" the same course at KWU. In her testimony, she effectively swore before the senate, that she in fact lied to KWU.

Curious March 27, 2008 at 5:49 a.m.

Brevity, here I come:

3. Acceptance of degree - I have never seen any employer who states they will specifically not accept it. KWU/WNU has an attestation service for the degree certificates, intended for international students presenting their degrees abroad, however the US Department of Education will place their Stamp+Seal,that the degree is valid. For all legal purposes, under the Wyoming Private SCHOOLS Licensing act - this is a legally valid degree from a valid degree-granting institution. Not a "beauty shop". It does not say "Beauty shop licensing act" in the Wyoming Legislature.

I do not think that my former and current employers could ever be classified as "unsophisticated" - being that they are both a key part of U.S/World History and finance development. If that were the case, then the entire finance industry would be considered unsophisticated as well.

However I agree that there are, as you say unsophisticated companies both large and small.

4. Transfer credits - This is at the sole discretion of the school, that the student is applying to. Harvard does not have to accept coursework from Boston University or Yale, and vice versa. Regionally accredited school can either accept or reject any coursework from any other school as they see fit. Certain schools as agreements to have a seamless transfer of credits, should this type of agreement not exist between schools, then there is no guarantee of acceptance of credit, no matter where from, and where to.

All my comments also refer to KW as well, and I am also optimistic about WNU. WNU does have to set itself apart, and accreditation is the only answer.

Curious March 27, 2008 at 6:27 a.m.

Also in regards to the government employee who testified that KWU did not require proof of credentials, we have to note that she was specifically recruited to find flaws with KWU. A person who signed an attestation to KWU, which specifically states that she would assume the responsibility of submitting all true attested copies of transcripts, and swore to have submitted a true resume/CV, and yet had clearly, and deliberately lied, should not be taken as 100% credible.

Former Student March 27, 2008 at 5:30 p.m.

Great comments. Don't be brief, it's not an issue that lends itself to brevity. Be back soon.

Former Student March 27, 2008 at 7:28 p.m.

1. Curriculum and degrees earned by examination:
“This(University of London) is one of the highest recognized degrees Programs in the world... The 100 year old distance format consists of one extensive final exam for each course.”

I’m a big fan of competency testing. Proving competency is a much better indicator of skill than keeping your butt in a seat. But, by all accounts, there is 100% admittance into KWU programs, and the exams can be passed by picking terms from the glossary, so there is no competency being proven, just tuition being collected. There is no standardization, rigor, oversight, or transparency. Contrast that with London U, the Bar Exam, CPA exam, CLEP exam, where it has a known content and rigor to it.

2. “She already had a degree in the subject matter”

On the diploma mill hearing witness. I believe she had a degree in Journalism, but some minor training in engineering and applied for an engineering master’s.

I agree that motivation has to be taken into account here. But, her testimony does corroborate the facts that KWU self-reported, that ALL candidates get at least 1/3 of their degrees waived for undocumented life experience, and most get more than ½.

3. Acceptance of degree – The majority of businesses I have dealt with define the word “degree” as one that is “properly accredited” or “regionally accredited”.

When I say unsophisticated, I am referring specifically to HR screening techniques. The company may have cured cancer, but their HR department just wants a copy of the transcript directly from the school, and then are shocked to learn the value of an Almeda degree. Wharton, Radio Shack, Notre Dame, Cessna, the US Govt all have egg on their face due to poor applicant screening.

Former Student March 27, 2008 at 7:28 p.m.

3A. “For all legal purposes, under the Wyoming Private SCHOOLS Licensing act - this is a legally valid degree from a valid degree-granting institution.”

I think this is the single central point of all debates surrounding KWU. What does a state license mean? It simply means that KWU complies with Wyoming state law for private schools. Nothing more, nothing less. It makes no assurances to quality or usability.

If you look at the content of Wyoming private school law, there are virtually no standards. You need a cash performance bond and must have accredited faculty listed. The Wyoming DOE doesn’t do quality assessments or site visits, nor does it set any type of minimum academic standards or rules. Remaining licensed is just paying the fee each year.

Keep in mind that Hamilton University (ran out of a Motel 6, and with famous alumni Dr. Laura Callahan) was also a Wyoming-licensed school.

If you look at the current schools that are Wyoming-licensed, you will literally find one run out of a guy’s basement. Unfortunately, with 50 states to choose from, “Basement University” can just hop to the next state if required to comply with any type of oversight.

“For all legal purposes” is an overly broad assertion. Several states have gone out of their way to specifically list unaccredited degrees as invalid. The National DOE views itself as the real determinant of validity.

4. Transfer credits – “This is at the sole discretion of the school, that the student is applying to.” True, but not all transfer credits are created equal. if you look at the studies and talk to enough schools, you’ll see how it works. If you put them in hierarchial order, (Regional, National, Unaccredited), transferring to the same level of school is not a problem. Neither is transferring down (Regional to National). The real problems come into play when trying to transfer up (Unaccredited to Regional). Every school will state some type of exception policy, but actual acceptance is extremely low.

tic tac March 28, 2008 at 3:43 a.m.

This school is a diploma mill according to the federal government. The site admin should take this school down and only post DOE accredited schools.

Curious March 28, 2008 at 10:20 a.m.

That previous comment is untrue, completely off the subject, outright defamation, and be should be removed by the administrator of this site.

There is no such thing as a DOE accredited school, the DOE does not ACCREDIT, since it is not an ACCREDITING BODY.

Moreover, Warren National is NOT a mill, "according to the federal government"

Go take some classes somewhere else then, and learn how to read complete sentences, and complete articles.

Or at least take some kind of remedial class, in ANYTHING. It will be an improvement over your current level of comprehension.

Do not post on this site again, ever.

Thank you.

Jack March 28, 2008 at 2:17 p.m.

The DOE doesn't accredit schools you tard! One would think your big fancy smancy degree would teach you that!! The DOE lets the CHEA pass out accreditation to various agencies... DUH!

I was quite surprised March 28, 2008 at 5:46 p.m.

To see my that my KWU BSME Diploma said "Warren National" for the school name.
What is so cool is that if WNU gets accredited, the accreditation pulls in to my record (Ref. Dr. Bear). This mostly because of past practices and the fact that no employer ever says "Was ..... accredited when you went there?" They just check for the time being. Wish me luck.

Bravo Zulu WNU!

Dr. Franstaun March 28, 2008 at 6:17 p.m.

What is amazing to me is the movement in the christian community to avoid hiring people from accredited universities.
Having both of my degrees from accredited universities and being a christian in the south, I observe this firsthand and it scares me. The practice is readily employed out in the open in South and North Carolina. Georgia, Alabama, Tenn. and Miss. also.
I may do my next paper on this subject.

Prof A. March 28, 2008 at 7:36 p.m.

“Moreover, Warren National is NOT a mill, "according to the federal government”

During the Kennedy-Western diploma mill hearings, the government did refer to KWU as a “sophisticated diploma mill”, but I think “unaccredited, state-licensed business” is more proper and less offensive description of KWU / WNU.

Prof A. March 28, 2008 at 7:36 p.m.

“The DOE doesn't accredit schools you tard! One would think your big fancy smancy degree would teach you that!! The DOE lets the CHEA pass out accreditation to various agencies... DUH!”

LOL and WOW! Here is the short version to help you understand how it works. The U.S. Department of Education (DOE) does not accredit institutions; rather, it determines which accrediting agencies receive recognition by the Department. CHEA is an entirely separate entity, whose accreditation is often redundant with a DOE-recognized accreditor. For simplicity, stick with the DOE list.

Prof A. March 28, 2008 at 7:37 p.m.

“To see my that my KWU BSME Diploma said "Warren National" for the school name. What is so cool is that if WNU gets accredited, the accreditation pulls in to my record”.

As resume lies go, that may be harder to detect than most if you just alter the name of the granting school. Then again, WNU has never had a BSME program, so that should be a red flag. Curious to see how that plays out. For the good of WNU students who actually complete an approved course of study, I would hope they segregate those records from the KWU “life experience” students.

Furthermore, March 28, 2008 at 7:49 p.m.

It is E.D. not DOE. DOE is ....Energy.

The E.D., by the way, has at least as many foes as friends, so it's recognition hurts ones reputation as much as it helps. A wash for accreditation purposes.
Their recent attempts at strong-arm tactics is making them un-popular, Reference- "Every child takes it in the behind program" a total and absolute failure.

Half of the U.S. are republicans/conservatives who would like to abolish the E.D. in place.

It is an outdated institution that has run it's course.

ACE Credits March 28, 2008 at 7:59 p.m.

"As resume lies go, that may be harder to detect than most if you just alter the name of the granting school. Then again, WNU has never had a BSME program, so that should be a red flag. Curious to see how that plays out. For the good of WNU students who actually complete an approved course of study, I would hope they segregate those records from the KWU “life experience” students."

No life experience in my WNU degree. Nada, Zip, Zilch. All US Military ACE (Navy College Center) Transcripts.

You assumed "Ass Of U And NOT Me."

Which makes me believe you are really not a Prof.

Forp March 28, 2008 at 8:04 p.m.

"During the Kennedy-Western diploma mill hearings, the government did refer to KWU as a “sophisticated diploma mill”, but I think “unaccredited, state-licensed business” is more proper and less offensive description of KWU / WNU."

So then Yale is a super-cali-Megga-Uber-Sophisticated diploma mill?

DSAO March 28, 2008 at 8:38 p.m.

I have been attending WNU since May. I have experience attending both brick and mortar schools and other programs, and I found that WNU compares well. It is different than brick and mortar schools because you have to be an independant learner with self discipline. A professor will not feed you the information and constantly keep you on task. You must do a lot of this yourself. Your counselor will keep in touch with you on a regular basis by phone, though, to check your progress and this helps.

The tasks are not necessarily difficult, but many of them did make me think about the subject and that's the important thing. Transferring in was easy and with the exception of a critical thinking and a science course, I had already completed all of my engineering related requirements.

My counselor calls me regularly and responds to my e-mail in a timely manner, and if he doesn't know the answer he always directs me to the person that does. WNU also provides a lot of answers to common questions through their online students handbook, etc.

The learning materials are varied and provide a good range of views. They seem to try to avoid the bias that exists in many traditional courses due to professors who only present views that match their own.
I have already learned a lot, including very practical information such as a engineers legal rights in the workplace. I don't know about other people's experiences but the graders have been very consistent with me and the syntax is a lifesaver in terms of knowing ahead of time what is required and how the assignment will be graded. I also enjoy not being subject to a professor's odd requirements. At a previous university I once got an F on an essay for not having enough sentences in my paragraphs! At WNU I revise if the comments make sense and if they don't I explain my position and it is usually respected or the reasoning of the comments clarified.

As to cost, it's hard for me to beat WNU. At my brick and mortar university I had to commute an hour each way and the cost of gas is astronomical, not to mention the fact that the commute cost me valuable time and slowed down my progress.

Prof A. March 28, 2008 at 9:20 p.m.

Bottom Line:

For any major WNU offers, there is a better online program, with dedicated faculty, at the same price, without the KWU baggage and uncertainty of WNU's possible accreditation efforts.

Name a major that WNU offers and I'll be glad to direct you to a much better school.

Curious March 28, 2008 at 9:40 p.m.

Prof A.

What exactly is the definition of "life experience". More importantly, what is your own definition of life experience?

My view is that the "life-experience" description as frequently cited by web posters, is for non-professional experience; experience that is unrelated to the degree major.

I believe that five years of professional experience in finance(at time of enrollment) was not just "life-experience".

During the span of the five years Prior to starting the KNU/WNU program, I had accomplished: Four finance professional exams leading to four individual securities registrations, two academic diplomas (finance & taxation) from a DETC accredited university, a professional certification (finance/investments) from a non-collegiate institution, and two courses in a DETC accredited degree program.

I then had to pass two KNU/WNU General Education Requirement Exams to gain admittance (there is no such thing as an "open-book" exam for showing aptitude in English and Mathematics, either one has the aptitude or one does not).

At the end of the degree program, there was also a required capstone information literacy course.

It isn't as if the school awarded me credit for "breathing air", or "dining at an ethnic restaurant and watching foreign films".

This is just a short list of Some (not all) of the reasons why, after graduating, I was able to be admitted to a world famous school(accredited)for their MBA program.

Continued

Curious March 28, 2008 at 9:41 p.m.

I will state clearly, that it wasn't easy to get to the next level. The graduate school initially would not accept the KNU/WNU degree.

I had some explaining to do, before the admissions board of the school that I was applying to. It was not difficult, given my qualifications. The most compelling reasons (besides having a letter of recommendation from the supervisor, was the availability of verifiable and valid information on WNU/WNU.

I described the asynchronous curriculum delivery, education levels of the faculty professors, the application for candidacy towards accreditation, and by showing the proper licensing from the State of Wyoming - which required all degree granting institutions to become accredited, or be in the process of being accredited. So no, a school can no longer "operate out of a motel 6" in the state of Wyoming.

Wyoming has toughened up their private schools licensing, and by requiring all private schools in that state to gain accreditation or apply for accreditation, they have effectively "weeded" out schools that did not stand a chance at accreditation. Wyoming has seemingly exterminated their diploma mills. The list of schools operating out of Wyoming has since changed for the better. (Schools applied for accreditation to the HLC, DETC, etc, or failed to meet licensing requirements and ceased operations)

Funnily, I had also called up a local online/campus graduate school(regionally accredited by the Higher Learning Commission), and inquired about their admissions policy in regards to one having a bachelors degree from an institution that has applied for candidacy to the HLC.

The admissions counselor stated that he would ask the registrar and call me back. Two weeks passed by and I had not heard from anyone. I then applied online at their website. Soon afterwards, I received a letter from the school which granted me online access to enroll for courses. There was no mention of formal acceptance, and it also stated that I had to forward transcripts by the end of the first course.

I had applied to two graduate programs, and had been accepted to one, and received a vague form of access to another. 2 out of 2 “aint” bad.

How many "life experience" students can go on to an accredited MBA program? Prof A, please reexamine your own interpretation of "life-experience".

Prof A March 28, 2008 at 11:13 p.m.

"What exactly is the definition of "life experience"."

In the context of Kennedy Western, it is the part of their business model, where (by their own admission) they would waive >50% of a "degree" for every student, regardless of whether any prior experience actually existed. No verification or attempt at verification of prior experience was done.

"I was able to be admitted to a world famous school(accredited)for their MBA program."

Really, which one? The items you list are commendable, but even if could be proven true, your anecdotal story does not represent the 99.9999% of cases where its not true.

"So no, a school can no longer "operate out of a motel 6" in the state of Wyoming."

Actually, they can. The Wyoming change requires them to apply for accreditation. That same Wyoming-licensed school in a Motel 6 can fill out the application and buy time without doing anything substantial

Prof A March 28, 2008 at 11:19 p.m.

"The most compelling reasons (besides having a letter of recommendation from the supervisor, was the availability of verifiable and valid information on WNU/WNU."

By verifiable and valid info, I assume you are talking about Acceptance rates, average GMAT/SAT scores of students, pass rates, % graduate, etc., all the common stuff available on all universities.

I'm glad they are moving towards transparency, I'd love to see it, please post a link.

Curious March 29, 2008 at 4:22 a.m.

"Really, which one? The items you list are commendable, but even if could be proven true, your anecdotal story does not represent the 99.9999% of cases where its not true".

So I must be the .00001% exception. Thank God for that.

Which university are you employed as a professor?
What you say at times seems agreeable, but YOUR own anecdotal statistic does not represent anything, since it not based on anything, or a "link" that you are so fond of.

When you disclose which university you work out of, I will be more than happy to disclose where I am attending.

"That same Wyoming-licensed school in a Motel 6 can fill out the application and buy time without doing anything substantial"

I certainly hope this is not the case. If it is so, then why has the list of Wyoming schools diminished?

"By verifiable and valid info, I assume you are talking about Acceptance rates, average GMAT/SAT scores of students, pass rates, % graduate, etc., all the common stuff available on all universities".

Is this information available from all other distance education and online universities? Could you please post a link?

"I'm glad they are moving towards transparency, I'd love to see it, please post a link".

What transparency are you speaking of? You are asking me to "post a link" on a topic I never introduced. Apparently, this transparency that you speak of, is of importance to you. Please post a link for yourself and others then, since it is not of any importance to me.

I never stated nor did I imply that the school was moving towards anything of the sort.

I simply stated the facts; what I used as mitigating reasons why the degree should not be dismissed in consideration for admissions at that particular graduate school.

"For any major WNU offers, there is a better online program, with dedicated faculty, at the same price, without the KWU baggage and uncertainty of WNU's possible accreditation efforts"

Agreed-for the most part.

For any major that WNU offers, there is another online program without the baggage and uncertainty of WNU's possible accreditation efforts.

Better, in terms of faculty, while being the same price are broad assertions.

moreover March 29, 2008 at 6:11 a.m.

Prof A.,

The original question was on you very own definition of "life experience".

Prof A March 29, 2008 at 6:35 p.m.

"When you disclose which university you work out of, I will be more than happy to disclose where I am attending."

The topic of this board is to discuss certain universities, and their usefullnes. Your advocating that a KWU degree will get you into a world famous graduate program. If that's true it should be public knowledge what their standards are and no reason to hide it, since they took the student knowingly. My employment is irrelevant to the utility of a KWU degree. Feel free to assume I am really a Walmart greeter, the question is still valid.

"I certainly hope this is not the case. If it is so, then why has the list of Wyoming schools diminished?"

Some schools have skipped the state, but of the remaining 6 or 7, their application for accreditation means they can remain there for up to 5 years (or longer). Since previous Wyoming state licenses were so meaningless, there is no way to tell which ones are legitimately making an effort. Keep in mind that WNU is on State #4 after each preceding state attempted to regulate them.

Prof A March 29, 2008 at 6:42 p.m.

"The most compelling reasons (besides having a letter of recommendation from the supervisor, was the availability of verifiable and valid information on WNU/WNU."

I'm asking what "verifiable and valid information on WNU" is avalilable that was so compelling to a top tier grad program.

Yes, there is verifiable and valid information on other online and distance universities (student counts, demographics, acceptance rates, etc.). Here is a link, but the print version is handier.

http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreview...

Curious March 29, 2008 at 8:46 p.m.

"I'm asking what "verifiable and valid information on WNU" is available that was so compelling to a top tier grad program".

Prof A., you seem to be forgetting that it was I, as the student who was the one applying for admission, not KWU/WNU. I was the one on “trial”, not the school.

As posted previously:

I described the asynchronous curriculum delivery, education levels of the faculty professors, the application for candidacy towards accreditation, and by showing the proper licensing from the State of Wyoming - which required all degree-granting institutions to become accredited, or be in the process of being accredited.

In addition, I even posted a link, since you seem to believe that posting a "link" validates an assertion as being true.

Warren National University receives its registration
through the Wyoming State Department of Education,
under W.S. 21-2-401 through 21-2-407. Such oversight
requires the University to meet the standards as
indicated within Article 4: Private School Licensing
(http://www.k12.wy.us/F/psl/degree.html).

Please also note that the Bachelors degree was not the only component of my application being considered for admission. Professional examinations leading to professional qualification marks, certifications, letter of recommendation, and relevant professional experience were all considered.

Continued

Curious March 29, 2008 at 8:47 p.m.

"The topic of this board is to discuss certain universities, and their usefulness. Your advocating that a KWU degree will get you into a world famous graduate program. If that's true it should be public knowledge what their standards are and no reason to hide it, since they took the student knowingly. My employment is irrelevant to the utility of a KWU degree. Feel free to assume I am really a Walmart greeter, the question is still valid".

I would love to disclose to alumni, but here is why I do not want to: You, your questionable motives, and actions.

In my posting during the past week, I can given very detailed examples of how a student can further their education. I never stated anywhere that I was accepted to a top-tier MBA program. A top-tier MBA program would have to be at least in the top 50 in the world, and the institution would have to specifically be classified as a business school.

Prof A., is it really your intention to help the students discuss the usefulness of a degree, or is it just your purpose to discredit WNU/KWU?

You seem to tell prospective students that you will recommend a better program, and you spend most of your time making posts with “links” - the same old ones for years to discredit all previous graduates.

Is it out of your genuine concern, that students will be "duped" by WNU, and that their degrees would become worthless? If it is truly your concern for the benefit of the student, then someone as yourself should welcome an “anecdotal” story like mine. Since despite being "Duped" by KWU into completing a useless degree, one was able to advance.

Curious March 29, 2008 at 8:47 p.m.

Continued:

In addition, asking me to disclose complete details of me, when someone like yourself might go to the ends of the earth to further discredit my new school, sure, I should just tell you. Right.

You have not been the slightest bit forthcoming about your own credentials. You are presenting yourself as an educator and a professor, without showing any "valid and verifiable" information. I am glad that you are moving towards transparency.

It is my opinion that your true intention is to discredit all KWU graduates, and to advocate the notion that all of the work put in by them was completely worthless.

The idea that someone, or many people may have acquired advanced degrees, and actually received exemptions for professional qualification, professional training, and the like - must really strike a nerve with you.

I can certainly understand why you would feel that way, and I am not saying that it is wrong for you to think this.

This is a public forum, and I have shared my private experiences and insight. It took a lot of courage on my part to share my experience with KWU, when I have observed people such as you constantly making condescending remarks towards the school, its students and alumni.

Everyone is entitled to his or her own opinion, and that is fine.

To make a concession to you, Prof A., if I had to do it all over again, yes, I would choose a different school. Not because the school was poor, but because of people like you who will always try to discredit it.

Curious March 29, 2008 at 8:54 p.m.

To those graduates of KWU/WNU, who have found themselves unable to advance:

Please also note that the Bachelors degree was not the only component of my application being considered for admission. Professional examinations leading to professional qualification marks, certifications, letter of recommendation, and relevant professional experience were all considered.

That was the key clue from the past few days.

And as a back-up, just in case, one must provide the validity of the school license:

Warren National University receives its registration
through the Wyoming State Department of Education,
under W.S. 21-2-401 through 21-2-407. Such oversight
requires the University to meet the standards as
indicated within Article 4: Private School Licensing
http://www.k12.wy.us/F/psl/degree.html

Good day to all, and as a person said to me the other day:

"See you at the top of the world".

LoL. Prof A., please have fun with this one.

Take care everyone

ok. March 29, 2008 at 10:20 p.m.

"Yes, there is verifiable and valid information on other online and distance universities (student counts, demographics, acceptance rates, etc.). Here is a link, but the print version is handier".

Prof A., thank you for the link, however no where on this link, is there any mention that the report includes distance/online schools, if any. In fact it makes no mention of them whatsoever.

http://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreview...

Besides, this is only YOUR definition of "Verifiable and Valid" information. (acceptance rates, SAT/GMAT scores, etc)

Prof A March 30, 2008 at 4:10 a.m.

"I never stated anywhere that I was accepted to a top-tier MBA program."

You said "I was able to be admitted to a world famous school(accredited)for their MBA program."

"Since despite being "Duped" by KWU into completing a useless degree, one was able to advance"

And I was just asking for some evidence of that. I'd think that KWU would have had a press release on that, it would make a compelling case. My podunk college has them every time when an undergrad is accepted to an Ivy.

"is there any mention that the report includes distance/online schools, if any. In fact it makes no mention of them whatsoever."

Err, you have to type in the name of the school, University of Phoenix for example. It's just one of many published guides with detailed info on schools. For KWU, nobody even knew how many students they had.

"Prof A., is it really your intention to help the students discuss the usefulness of a degree, or is it just your purpose to discredit WNU/KWU?"

KWU has generated enought bad press itself, publicly and repeatedly, no need to pile on. All my questions revolve around claims about it's utility which are often said, never supported, and contradict published reports.

Again, draw the line between KWU and WNU.

Bottom line is that I hope WNU receives accreditation, I'll be the first to write a congrats. They seem to be heading in that direction, they dumped their hokey engineering degrees, I saw an ad for some academic admin positions, etc.

Until then, I don't see how anyone in good faith can recommend this school, given their propensity to hop states when faced with regulation, and the availability of dozens of accredited programs in the same major.

Curious March 30, 2008 at 4:47 a.m.

Prof A., Thank you for your response. For clarification, I did not want to be misleading about the graduate program that I am currently attending.

There is a distinction between, a top-tier MBA program, and world famous school(accredited)for their MBA program.

A top-tier MBA program would include the likes of Oxford - Said School, and The Chicago GSB. All business schools.

The program that I am currently attending is not a business school in the sense. It is a world-famous university ranked in the top 200, according to the latest times table rankings. Which happens to offer a MBA program. This is hardly grounds for a news-breaking ivy league enrollment article.

My intent here was not to promote the enrollment at WNU, but for the sake of its alumni who may have actually worked hard for their degrees - those who have legitimate transfer credits and exemption qualification and can document evidence. It should not be the fault of the student, that an institution may have failed to verify, what was true information.

I also hope that WNU receives accreditation, and I will be the first to come forward with where I went on for the MBA.

Not only did they drop the engineering degrees, all the Ph.D programs were discontinued as well. I think these were all steps towards right path.

Closing remarks March 30, 2008 at 7:54 a.m.

The Department of Health, Education and Welfare,
Office of Education, Bureau of Higher and Continuing
Education, Division of Eligibility and Agency Evaluation
state:

“The United States has no Federal ministry of education
or other centralized authority exercising single national
control over educational institutions in this country. The
States assume varying degrees of control over
education, but, in general, institutions of post secondary
education are permitted to operate with considerable
independence and autonomy. As a consequence,
American educational institutions can vary widely in the
character and quality of their programs.

“Degrees granted or issued in conformance with cited
statutes…are all equally legal under the law.
Judgements of value and applicability of a certain
degree are not made by the law or by the State. The
appropriateness of a degree or the applicability of a
degree to a job or the transfer of education credit is
decided by those who must render such evaluations for
those specific purposes.” (United States Department of
Education)

Parsing Context April 1, 2008 at 5:05 a.m.

If you are going to quote the accreditation page from the Dept. of Ed, include the primary message of the pages, such as:

Some Functions of Accreditation

1. Verifying that an institution or program meets established standards;
2. Assisting prospective students in identifying acceptable institutions;
3. Assisting institutions in determining the acceptability of transfer credits;

Also,
Accreditation is “voluntary,” so doesn't that mean it is optional and not necessary?

Accreditation is voluntary in that the process of accreditation requires the full cooperation with and complete participation in the process of accreditation by the college or university seeking accreditation. At the heart of the accreditation process is a self-study prepared by the college or university demonstrating its commitment to the standards of accreditation.

Since accreditation is the PRIMARY means of determining the legitimacy and quality of colleges and universities in the United States, to describe the process as "voluntary" is not to describe it as "optional" or "unnecessary."

Also Robbed by WNU April 4, 2008 at 3:42 a.m.

WNU is a little more than a money-making cash cow for a few clever people - it's a ".com" not a ".edu" for good reason. Also, this "curious" fellow (see his prolific comments from March 27-30) is obviously not objective about WNU. I strongly suspect that he's not just a "student" but someone who has lots to gain from attempting to offer believable rebuttals to the many legitimate criticisms of this outfit.

VP Exit Corp. April 4, 2008 at 2:39 p.m.

What upsets the arrogant (and elite) community of academics is that for years they have been able to offer their time consuming education credits ("memorize and regurgitate learning") so called credentials in return for jobs.

Now corporations and working people have figured out how to trade work experience for education credits. If education equals jobs, then surely jobs equal education. No?

Adjunct Prof April 4, 2008 at 8:03 p.m.

It is not true that a Ph.D. from WNU will prevent you from teaching at accredited schools. I was accepted as an anjunct professor at an accredited school.

Help! April 6, 2008 at 5:18 a.m.

"It is not true that a Ph.D. from WNU will prevent you from teaching at accredited schools. I was accepted as an anjunct professor at an accredited school."

What schools accepts them? Every single school I have ever been in contact with does not accept them. You will be doing a great service to all KWU / WNU alumni but letting us know where they are accepted.

Tom April 6, 2008 at 7:01 p.m.

You teach at an accredited school with an unaccredited degree. Sounds like Walden's faculty...

SK April 6, 2008 at 8:49 p.m.

I graduated with a Business degree a couple of years ago from WNU and increased my salary instantly by 18%. When interviewing with this company (A large medical device manufacturer) I let it be known about my degree, where it was from, etc... they did an extensive background check on me including education and had no problems. I have been considered a top performer and have not been handed a project I couldn't handle. I do know other engineers from "Accredited" universities that could do anything with a spreadsheet but could not apply common sense to the simplest problems, "engineers" that couldn't even turn a screwdriver or change oil in their own car.
Interesting that prior to accepting this position, I interviewed with a different large medical device company, my answer was different there. I was offered a position there (senior level technician) but my degree would not count for any future promotions, etc... (this decision was made by the hiring manager, not a corporate policy) after discussing this with the HR Recruiter, I turned the position down. She then proceeded to inform me that her boss, yes an HR Manager was persuing his MBA through Warren National. funny...

Point is, you can't judge what someone can do based on a piece of paper.
Bush graduated from Yale didn't he? I don't think he can find his a$$ with both hands.

In my situation, I was going to accredited schools. I was about a year shy when life happens and kids came. I was working 50 hrs/week and spending 3 - 4 nights a week in class. It was no longer working for us, my wife (who ironically is an HR recruiter) said I needed to look at something different because she needed me home more. Long story short, I transferred all my "accredited" credits to WNU and finished up.
Does this make me not as smart as you?

Prof A April 6, 2008 at 10:09 p.m.

"I also hope that WNU receives accreditation, and I will be the first to come forward with where I went on for the MBA.

Not only did they drop the engineering degrees, all the Ph.D programs were discontinued as well. I think these were all steps towards right path."

Agreed. These were the 2 areas they were most out of line with and would never have passed the slighest outside scrutiny during accreditation. Engineering "degrees" that did not allow you to become a Professional Engineer (some states allow you to gain the PE with a high school diploma) and PhD's that do not qualify you to teach for any accredited university due to their accreditation requirements.

The other point of contention with KWU "PhD's" is that the "dissertations" were never cataloged or published. Basically a minor term paper that didn't add to the body of knowledge and wouldn't hold up to any external review either.

Prof A April 6, 2008 at 10:35 p.m.

"Point is, you can't judge what someone can do based on a piece of paper."

Statistically speaking, you can. Strong high school performance is an excellent predictor of Strong college performance. Strong college performance is an excellent predictor of career success in both salary and demand for graduates of a particular school.

A typical Stanford freshman finished in the top 10% of their class (89% did), had a 3.9 GPA, SAT of 720, and only 12% of applicants were accepted. Even a generic state University has already limited its students to the top 50% of applicants.

There may be the anonymous miracle cases I read about here, but an unaccredited school with 100% acceptance that waives 50% of an unknown curriculum for osmosis...

Rochville Grad April 7, 2008 at 1:48 a.m.

"Now corporations and working people have figured out how to trade work experience for education credits. If education equals jobs, then surely jobs equal education. No?"

I had great life experience and got my experience validated with a degree from Rochville University, and got a 19% raise right off the bat. Don't be hatin'

SK April 7, 2008 at 11:17 p.m.

"Statistically speaking, you can."

true...

Statistics can be spun too.

How many people can afford a Stanford education? You've already stated what Stanford will accept academically. So what. This is some peoples only option, so its up to people like you to somehow minimize others education because the school is not accredited? What you are telling me is that the Accredited vs. Non Accredited education is an accurate measure as to how intelligent one is?

I know a lot of... we'll call them "Accredited" educated individuals that brag up how they cheated their way through college.

Tell me the difference between some other Online Universities? Ie: Phoenix for example... Is a Phoenix online education acceptable to you? I would like the know the real difference between Phoenix and WNU. I really don't know but welcome feeback... preferrably from a Stanford Grad.
I would love to hear the opinion of other WNU grads but we all know I can't value you're opinion since your degree in not "Accredited" ;)

Prof A April 8, 2008 at 12:10 a.m.

"Tell me the difference between some other Online Universities? Ie: Phoenix for example... Is a Phoenix online education acceptable to you? I would like the know the real difference between Phoenix and WNU."

Excellent question, I am a big supporter of online education and glad to help out. UOP is a regionally accredited institution. Their curriculum is known and they don't routinely waive the majority of degrees for "life experience" Their dissertations are cataloged and published. So is it real and recognized and valid for employment and licensing? Absolutely.

The other factor is perceived quality of the programs and it's graduates. Unfortunately they are a 100% acceptance school and routinely take a beating for their cost, faculty, and recruiting practices.

So they are a real, regionally accredited school, but definitely lower tier.

Prof A April 8, 2008 at 12:25 a.m.

"How many people can afford a Stanford education?"

That was just an example, but since you asked, the answer is "most anyone can afford a Stanford education" through financial aid. The 2007 college guide says that "Among students who received need-based aid, 100% of that need was covered. Also, the average amount of debt of borrowers graduating in 2005 was only $15,172.

If you are talented enough to get accepted, you can get most or all of it paid for.

SK April 8, 2008 at 12:53 a.m.

since I had taken a significant amount of my education in an accredited setting, I guess I picked the wrong online option... maybe I should have went to Phoenix?

Frankly it doesn't matter... some employers look at it, some don't. I know what I am capable of and am comfortable in my own skin. If I could do it all over again, I would have gone to a State or Private University through graduation. Instead, I spent time in the military (which in my domain is what recruiters are looking for).
And to think the Military schools wouldn't get me anywhere...

Honestly, I didn't have problems getting into State Universities or Private Universities, don't know how successful I would have been trying Stanford.

How do you figure Bush got into Yale? I wonder if he had to take advantage of the financial aid package? Good thing he was exceptionally smart!

You know where I see the trend going is that some employers are doing the "try before they buy" (Contract to hire)route where they weed out the non performers before the get on the payroll... accredited or non accredited. So at the end of the day, it depends on what you deliver, not how good you interview or where you went to school.

Prof A April 8, 2008 at 1:05 a.m.

You make some good points SK.

"You know where I see the trend going is that some employers are doing the "try before they buy" (Contract to hire)route where they weed out the non performers"

I couldn't agree more. I wish there were more competency based exams/benchmarks in both higher ed and employment. The problem is that you can't hire everyone, so you need proxy indicators of success, which is where I was going with my Stanford example. There is a definite level of predictibility of grads.

A Stanford grad has already finished in the Top 10% in several areas, and will complete a top notch program while competing against tough competition.

A State U grade has finished in the Top 50% in several areas...

UOP, 100% acceptance, but a standardized, recognized program.

Nationally accredited schools...

Then down from there.

SK April 8, 2008 at 2:04 a.m.

I understand what you are saying... I understand that some Universities are held in higher regard than others. (Stanford being one of them), Ivy leaguers, Notre Dame to name a few. It seems to be relative. Those that went to Ivy league schools for example probably feel their education is several notches above those that went to State Universities, and so on. I try not to get too caught up in all of this. When my life slows down I may someday go back and get "accredited" so to speak but right now it doesn't fit into my life plans.

My mom is 58 years old and is graduating with her MBA in business next month... oh did I mention from an accredited university? It's never too late

To SK April 8, 2008 at 11:59 p.m.

I know in one of the posts, you mention that your wife is an HR Recruiter. With that said, how do you approach the WNU degree on your resume? If one asks about its accredidation, what do you state? From HR Perspective, do corporate employers have the issue with WNU degree? If anyone has insight on how they have approached towards financial/banks, it would be appreciated.

Prof A April 9, 2008 at 2:31 a.m.

"From HR Perspective, do corporate employers have the issue with WNU degree?"

The last company I worked with had the following policy. They were very supportive of online programs and degrees, since they had a very tenured workforce and were not located near a major university. 9,000+ employees.

Bachelor's and Above required regional accreditation, regardless of delivery method.

Associates and below (1 year certificates), national accreditation (such as DETC) would be considered.

Unaccredited WNU - still two camps last time I talked to them. Camp 1 said just ignore the degree and look at what's left. This was difficult, because the academic screen came after the manager interviewed them. Camp 2 said disregard the candidate altogether.

SK April 9, 2008 at 2:39 a.m.

If anyone asks (which was once) I tell them its not accredited.
I simply have it on my resume as a bachelors degree in business from WNU. If anyone were to ask I would be honest and tell them of course. If a potential employer was to have issues with it, I probably wouldn't be talking to them to begin with. The reality is if it gets that far to a phone or personal inverview, chances are the employer already knows. Like I said in a previous post, some employers make a big deal out of it (you know, the employers with "sophicated" HR departments like someone mentioned in an earlier post) some don't (the employers with not so sophisticated HR departments). I think that reference is funny because there apparently is some fortune 500 companies out there with "unsophisticated" HR departments. In my case, my employer help to pay for it. I don't worry about what other people say, there are plenty of employers out there that don't make a big deal out of it. If I can't be employed in Texas because of it, trust me when I say my feelings aren't hurt... I never looked good in cowboy boots anyways.

You will even see it on job postings from those employers with sophisticated HR departments. They will specifically ask for the degree to be from an accredited university. if the job posting requires it then don't post. If they don't specify I would have no problems applying.

Scammed April 9, 2008 at 12:19 p.m.

I learned the hard way. In my experience, about 5-10% of companies don't know enough to screen out a KWU / WNU degree.

I didn't find out until I tried to upgrade one of my professional engineering certifications and was turned down, that I myself had been scammed. When I enrolled at Kennedy Western University they had a statement on their web site claiming accreditation for their state license. They even had a picture of it. It was MY FAULT for not properly investigating the project that I put MY money into.

I am currently enrolled in a REAL brick and mortar university

PT Barnum April 9, 2008 at 5:01 p.m.

"This was difficult, because the academic screen came after the manager interviewed them." - That's weird for such a large company. Our company screens them out prior to interview, so unaccredited applicants get a generic rejection letter.

"I think that reference is funny because there apparently is some fortune 500 companies out there with "unsophisticated" HR departments"

Personally I don't think its funny to the company or to the HR department that dropped the ball, but just from reading the USA TODAY, I have seen these companies publicly embarrased by academic fraud: Radio Shack, University of Notre Dame, the Federal Government, US Olympic Committee, Baylor University, Wharton!, and school districts and police departments by the handful. I'm sure Google has tons more that I haven't read. I suspcect that most companies can deal internally with these items and a small % make it to press.

Also, Texas is only 1 of the 12-13 states that restrict use of unaccredited degrees.

sk April 10, 2008 at 1:59 a.m.

"Also, Texas is only 1 of 12-13 states that restrict the use of unaccredited degrees"

yep, you're right! Maine is too, and lets not forget North Dakota:)

12-13 states out of 50.

how can you say all of these successful companies dropped the ball? How do you know they didn't KNOW what they were investing in? I would agree that in some cases, yes maybe someone slipped through the cracks. I can tell you there are some that are fully aware of what they are getting.

Embarassed how? By having someone on their payroll with an unaccredited degree or by someone with an unaccredited degree embarassing them publically by incompetence? Show me one example of a person with an unaccredited degree making a mistake that big and I'll show you 20 examples where people with accredited degrees make the same mistakes or worse.

Joe April 10, 2008 at 2:18 a.m.

You want examples of people with unaccredited degrees screwing up... look at the people fired from FEMA. It was loaded with degrees from diploma mills just like this one.

sk April 10, 2008 at 12:47 p.m.

don't forget to mention those within FEMA that had accredited degrees... and don't say there were none.

Joe April 12, 2008 at 11:41 a.m.

Those with accredited degrees weren't fired except for Mr. Brown who graduated from an obscure unranked law school. Our Secretary of Commerce is a college drop out. The #2 person in charge of Justice hiring had never practiced law with a tier 4 degree from Regent University online. The Secretary of Transportation got her degree from University of Phoenix online. It is people with no degree or online degrees that are screwing up this country.

PT Barnum April 12, 2008 at 12:43 p.m.

"how can you say all of these successful companies dropped the ball? How do you know they didn't KNOW what they were investing in?"

Very simple, because within days of being exposed to the press, the people involved were either investigated, terminated, or resigned based soley on their academic claims (not performed related).

So for them to know what they were investing in, what you are saying is:

*They gladly accepted unaccredited degrees.
*Did a thorough background check
*Released national press releases (Notre Dames was classic)
*Then terminated the person within a week.

Sounds like good business all around.

sk April 12, 2008 at 7:17 p.m.

google medical malpractice...

how many surgeons or RN's, etc have degrees from accredited medical schools? I'll guess it is at 100%, just recently a surgeon removed the wrong kidney from a cancer patient in Mn. He (or someone else with an accredited degree) just made a mistake right?

interesting when someone with an accredited degree messes someones life up or costs them their life just "made a mistake" but someone with an unaccredited degree making a mistake is ""screwing up this country" HILARIOUS! thanks for the laugh...

don't even get me started on the incompetence of our fearless leader who graduated from an Ivy league school who should take responsibility of the current state of the US economy. Or wait... maybe there is someone with an unaccredited degree somewhere that we can blame THAT on.

pathetic

you want more examples? can you do better than just FEMA? Didn't Bush put Mr. Brown in that position? could be wrong but I thought thats how he got there.

ps Phoenix is accredited

Joe April 12, 2008 at 10:17 p.m.

I know Phoenix is accredited which is why Mary Peters still has a job. Some years ago nearly 500 people in upper government positions were fired for putting unaccredited degrees on their resumes and many came from FEMA. That was all I was refering so don't waste your time barking up the wrong tree.

P.S. Most of the doctors who are being sued for malpractice hold degrees from Latin American countries.

True Dat April 13, 2008 at 5:40 a.m.

"how many surgeons or RN's, etc have degrees from accredited medical schools? I'll guess it is at 100%,"

Exactly. Since unaccredited "degree" (lol), holders are busy greeting me at WalMart and making sure I have "Fries with that", they have a 0% chance of screwing up anything important.

sk April 14, 2008 at 5:56 p.m.

"walmart greeter" funny...

My employer knew exactly what they were getting in me, they know where my degree is from and my military experience. I am a mid level Engineer for a major medical device manufacturer... (giggling as I type)

want to know what I make? probably not.

do you want fries with that?

I would love to see the statistics on the doctors from Latin America vs US educated doctors that are/have been sued.

I would bet that it is 70% or better that are educated in the US...

Joe April 15, 2008 at 1:10 a.m.

Those 500 federal employees fired for having unaccredited degrees are either Walmart greeters or asking "do you want fries with that." No one else will take liars!

PT Barnum April 15, 2008 at 5:41 a.m.

"I am a mid level Engineer for a major medical device manufacturer"

Risk managers at major medical device manufacturers are much smarter than that. Can you imagine if a device went bad and it had been worked on by someone with an "engineering" "degree" for 50% "life experience" and a couple hours of open book exams?

OUCH!

"want to know what I make?" I'll have to look up the average wage of high-school graduates and get back to you.

Rochville Grad April 15, 2008 at 12:21 p.m.

I'm a high level engineer for a MAJOR company that gladly welcomes me and I got my degree from Rochville. I work with a guy from Kennedy Western and 8 guys from Harvard. Me and the KWU guy are the only ones that have a clue.

Don't be hatin' on unaccredited degrees just because we're smarter and make more money.

sk April 15, 2008 at 4:28 p.m.

let em hate...

their opinions mean nothing :( who cares what they publish on some board burried somewhere on the internet?

PT..

I was not taken on for 50% life experience, I finished with WNU with a significant amount of "accredited" coursework.

do you know of any recent high school grads that make $85K?

want fries with that?

Joe...

Soooo what you are saying with your statement is that anyone with an unaccredited degree is a "liar"??? I didn't lie... Again, like I have mentioned a couple of different times, my employer knew where my degree is from, I even told them it was unaccredited in the phone interview.

Joe April 17, 2008 at 7:15 a.m.

What I'm saying is that 463 federal employees placed unacredited degrees on their resumes when the form says it must be accredited. Almost 200 of those were from Kennedy Western and they worked in the DoD. Those are the liars I refer to.

The Laws April 19, 2008 at 4:11 p.m.

Laws restricting the use of E.D sanctioned unaccredited university degrees are illegal and not enforcable and also untested.
Name me one person in any state in the US in the private sector convicted of using an unaccredited degree. Even the govt can not and will not prosecute for this. Worst case is getting laid off and there are thousands of unemployed Yale graduates out there right now.

Hey, numnuts, all universities start out as unaccredited.

Accredidation April 20, 2008 at 11:35 p.m.

Just wanted to know what the latest is on/around the WNU'S Accredidation process? Will they be accredited December 2008?

Another unaccredited expose April 22, 2008 at 2:39 a.m.

Let's ignore the 463 government employees who were terminated or disciplined with unaccredited degrees, but here is a recent case of a city manager with an unaccredited master's and Ph'D, going to trial

"Tramel was serving as the Sneads city manager when he was terminated from that position on the last day of February 2007 amid questions concerning the academic credentials he had claimed on his job application. "

According to Sneads attorney Guy Green at the time the resulting information was presented to the town council, it appears that the degrees listed on his job application allegedly came from a “diploma mill” rather than a legitimate school of higher learning. Tramel said Tuesday he could not comment on anything related to his education, citing the advice of counsel."

http://www.jcfloridan.com/jcf/news/local...

And other articles on KWU April 22, 2008 at 2:43 a.m.

These all discuss KWU "degrees"

"It May Take Hours, But You Too Can Earn a University Degree"

"When Elected Officials Aren't What They Seem: Texas officials and Pennsylvania cats tout misleading credentials"

"Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations, Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"

"Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense."

"Diploma Mills are Easily Created and Some Have Issued Bogus Degrees to Federal Employees at Government Expense."

“Real officials, bogus degrees, Fake degrees a growing Texas problem”

"A dirty dozen - 12 famous diploma mills."

“Are Fraudulent Academic Degrees Making a Mark on Engineering?”

“Fighting Fakery - Diploma mills continue to churn out new "graduates" every day. What should legitimate colleges do about them? Is government action called for?”

“Two less doctors in the house - Hebert, Wilson back away from Ph.D.'s issued by 'diploma mills'”

“CBS 42 Investigates: Professors' questionable credentials”

Joe April 23, 2008 at 10:39 p.m.

Kennedy Western/Warren is on the Texas Diploma Mill list.

http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/AAR/Private...

Jim April 26, 2008 at 12:44 a.m.

Please visit the Wyoming Department of Education website for more information:

http://www.k12.wy.us/F/psl/degree.html

7 Sorry April 26, 2008 at 4:14 a.m.

Wyoming was one of the "Seven Sorry Sisters" with virtually no oversight of colleges, which caused unaccredited universities (like Hamilton University of Laura Callahan fame) to flock into Wyoming.

Wyoming finally tightened up their laws, so it remains to be seen if KWU / WNU will simply move again to another state to avoid meaningful regulation.

http://www.insidehighered.com/news/2006/...

Texas? April 27, 2008 at 2:28 p.m.

http://www.pushhamburger.com/subvert.htm...

Referencing Texas for a standard of education is just plain stupid. See the link above on how corrupt and backwards Texas is when it comes to education. Worst than Wy by far.

Joe April 28, 2008 at 9:13 a.m.

If Texas is so dumb and stupid and they think WNU is substandard... then you know it REALLY sucks.

Even a cat can get an unaccredited degree April 28, 2008 at 8:40 p.m.

More credibility for the "life-experience" unaccredited "colleges"

http://www.nbc10.com/money/3975070/detai...

"Cat gets MBA"

The information on the student application claimed Colby completed three courses at a community college and worked at two different retailers as a manager. Colby's previous work experience included food prep at a fast-food restaurant, babysitting and a paper route, said the application.

Joe April 28, 2008 at 11:36 p.m.

Looks like Texas called that spade a spade. Trinity is clearly on their diploma mill list... just like Warren National.

Chuck April 29, 2008 at 7 p.m.

I just became aware that the degree that I was seeking from Warren National University (formally Kennedy-Western University) located in Cheyenne,
Wyoming is not valid in Texas and if I try to use their degree in Texas I would be breaking the law. No one at this university ever told me that I could not use their
degree in Texas. I found out about the Texas website from another student: http://www.thecb.state.tx.us/AAR/Private....
I sent this information to their CEO (Bob Patterson) and Martha Pollock (Resolution Committee Coordinator) to ask for a full refund.
I have sent several emails (no replies) and called several times (all calls go to voice mail) but they have not responded to either. I paid $6,100.00 dollars
to this university that I thought would receive a degree from them, but it looks like now that I was deceived by them. The university knew from the start that I
lived in Texas."

I also just found out that as of March 26 the BBB has revoked this universities accreditation due to not responding to complaints within the Bureau's required timeframe, so it looks like the BBB will not be able to help me with my problem.

To Chuck May 2, 2008 at 7:17 p.m.

There are thousands of people in Texas using their un-accredited degree in the private sector and no prosecutions to date.
Texas government can not legally intervene in free enterprise.
They can not enforce this illegal law.
Take a law class and see that unchallenged laws are not laws at all.
Worst case (if you become the first person in US history to be prosecuted for a KW/WNU degree, it is only a three hundred dollar fine).
Texas will loose though. Just like Oregon did. Use it there. I do. :)

Chuck to Unknown Post May 2, 2008 at 8:37 p.m.

You are wrong about several statements. Maybe it is OK to use a fraudulent degree in Oregon, but not in Texas. For one the fine is not $300. Quote from the State of Texas website; "An individual adjudged guilty of a Class B misdemeanor shall be punished by:
(1) a fine not to exceed $2,000;
(2) confinement in jail for a term not to exceed 180 days; or
(3) both such fine and confinement.
Second this in NOT an illegal law in Texas. I did my research and people have been prosecuted trying to use an illegal degree in Texas.

You are missing the point of my post entirely. WNU at NO time ever told me that Texas did not recognize a degree from their university. Texas prohibits “the use of fraudulent or substandard degrees in a written or oral advertisement or other promotion of a business; or with the intent to: obtain employment; obtain a license or certificate to practice a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain a promotion, a compensation or other benefit, or an increase in compensation or other benefit, in employment or in the practice of a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain admission to an educational program in this state; or gain a position in government with authority over another person, regardless of whether the actor receives compensation for the position."

WNU should have told me up front about the problems in Texas and let me make up my own mind.

Finally from the tone of your post it sounds like you are employed by WNU and don’t care if someone gets in trouble with the law or looses their job. All WNU cares about is collecting your money.

Still Illegal in Oregon May 3, 2008 at 4:43 a.m.

In addition, an individual using an unaccredited degree, even if the employer allows use of such degrees, must disclose on resumes, letterheads, business cards, announcements and advertisements that "(Name of school) does not have accreditation recognized by the United States Department of Education and has not been approved by the Office of Degree Authorization." ORS 348.609(2)(a). The only exception is for schools approved by ODA. See ORS 348.609(d) and OAR 583-050-0014.

It is a Class B Misdemeanor under the Oregon Criminal Code to use a degree in violation of ORS 348.609.

LOL, good luck getting a job (other than McDonalds) with that albatross...

NAMES PLEASE! May 3, 2008 at 1:23 p.m.

Hey jerkweed. How about some names of people prosecuted in TX along with case numbers and disposition.

Misdemeanor DUIs with serious injuries have resulted in only 500.00 fines in TX.
No judge will ever fine more than 300.00 for a degree.

MEOW! May 3, 2008 at 7:21 p.m.

Hi I'm a cat named Colby Nolan, I have an unaccredited MBA and nobody ever fined me!!

Chuck to NAMES PLEASE! May 6, 2008 at 12:45 a.m.

Your reply just proves my point that you are most likely an employee (you didn't deny it in you last post) of WNU and trying to do the old "Texas Two Step". If you want names of people prosecuted you look them up like I did. Resorting to calling people names also proves to me that you probably received a degree from WNU. This shows another good reason to stay away from WNU.

MEOW! - Cat with MBA May 6, 2008 at 12:24 p.m.

Meow, first of all, most people are going to get caught during the hiring process, so most are not going to be employed in the first place.

Second, the ones that are discovered internally will be handled quietly.

If somehow they make it past that point and their so-called "degree" is made public, they have the chance to throw their KWU "degree" in the dumpster and disavow it, like the people in these articles. (These are all KW"U" degree holders that threw away degrees, including "doctorates" when asked about them.)

"When Elected Officials Aren't What They Seem: Texas officials and Pennsylvania cats tout misleading credentials"

“Real officials, bogus degrees, Fake degrees a growing Texas problem”

“Two less doctors in the house - Hebert, Wilson back away from Ph.D.'s issued by 'diploma mills'”

“CBS 42 Investigates: Professors' questionable credentials”

So the easiest way to avoid the fine is to throw it in the dumpster, which means the number of prosecutions is going to be low, but here is one just for fun.

http://www.jcfloridan.com/jcf/news/local...

Meow

Use common sense May 11, 2008 at 3:19 a.m.

Search Google for Kennedy-Western + faculty + (any school name)

I was pleased to find faculty members at many fully accredited schools with Kennedy-Western University (now WNU) degrees. Even teaching at West Point! If it's good enough for regional schools to hire KWU Ph.D.s, then it sounds like a good deal (financially and professionally) to me.

Cat with an Unaccredited MBA May 11, 2008 at 4:51 a.m.

Meow, I just searched and found no KWU so-called "Phd's" working anywhere in higher ed except for the ones exposed in this article:

“CBS 42 Investigates: Professors' questionable credentials” and of course those PhD's are no longer listed in their bio's, lol.

Also, KWU / WNU expressly prohibit their own PHD "graduates" from working at KWU / WNU, Meow.

WNU Degree Use in New Jersey May 11, 2008 at 6:38 a.m.

I wanted to know what the limitations are of using WNU degree in NJ within Corporate Sector? Is it an issue or what?

If someone can advise, greatly appreciated!!!!!

New Jersey May 11, 2008 at 1:35 p.m.

Only the company that hires you can press charges or fire you and then only if they can prove you knew the law there.
The law is untested everywhere in the US and there are hoards of federal constitutional lawyers and judges waiting to "take to task" the first state that attempts enforcement (remember Oregon?).
The states know this law is unenforcable, but they pass these bogus slogans with the hopes that the sheople will obey.

James May 11, 2008 at 1:54 p.m.

"WNU Degree Use in New Jersey May 11, 2008 at 6:38 a.m.

I wanted to know what the limitations are of using WNU degree in NJ within Corporate Sector? Is it an issue or what?"

I wouldn't encourage resume fudging like that but I don't think it is specifically outlawed in NJ like the 12-15 other states where it is a misdemeanor. Remember, it's "employment at will", so be wary if you are discovered.

A typical state like Oregon outlaws it like this:

"In addition, an individual using an unaccredited degree, even if the employer allows use of such degrees, must disclose on resumes, letterheads, business cards, announcements and advertisements that "(Name of school) does not have accreditation recognized by the United States Department of Education and has not been approved by the Office of Degree Authorization." ORS 348.609(2)(a). The only exception is for schools approved by ODA. See ORS 348.609(d) and OAR 583-050-0014.

It is a Class B Misdemeanor under the Oregon Criminal Code to use a degree in violation of ORS 348.609."

Prof A May 11, 2008 at 3:49 p.m.

"I was pleased to find faculty members at many fully accredited schools with Kennedy-Western University (now WNU) degrees"

A very misleading and untrue statement. It is a fact that to teach at a regionally accredited university, you need a Masters degree from a regionally accredited u, usually with 18 graduate credits in the subject matter. If you did in fact spot a KWU "PhD" on a university website, they are teaching based on their accredited Master's degree, and the KWU "PhD" is an oversight that hasn't been noticed yet.

Recently there was a Baylor prof with a KWU "PhD", which was exposed in a news story, all reference to that "degree" was immediately removed, but the person has a recognized masters.

One instance doesn't = universal acceptance or any acceptance at all, especially in higher ed.

Use common sense May 11, 2008 at 5:06 p.m.

Reply to Prof A
"One instance doesn't = universal acceptance or any acceptance at all, especially in higher ed."

I'm not talking one instance. I started making a list of KWU graduates teaching at accredited schools (with URLs, names, degrees, schools) and gave up after a half hour. I have three pages (single space) of notes.

I also found one professor with a KWU masters degree as his only terminal degree teaching at a state university. I won't assist the self-appointed degree police by listing which university.

Prof A May 11, 2008 at 8:52 p.m.

"I started making a list of KWU graduates teaching at accredited schools (with URLs, names, degrees, schools"

Great, post them and prove your point that counters the overwhelming evidence that says otherwise. I've only been able to Google 3 in the last 15 minutes, and 2 of them were quickly renounced, such as the Baylor one. The other one has a real MBA.

If they do exist, then they must be as widely accepted as you claim.

Cat with an unaccredited MBA May 12, 2008 at 2:44 p.m.

"I started making a list of KWU graduates teaching at accredited schools"

Meow! So I can be a college prof too with my unaccredited degree? Awesome! Thanks for doing the legwork, I will start applying tomorrow, since I shouldn't have any problems at all. Purr, meow.

"Cat gets MBA"
www.nbc10.com/money/3975070/detail.html

No to Prof A May 12, 2008 at 4:14 p.m.

You find them. It isn't hard. I won't help you hound honest teachers. You seem the type who would contact their employers and cause trouble.

Prof A May 12, 2008 at 5:41 p.m.

I personally have no interest in "outing" somebody teaching with unaccredited degrees, it has been done many, many times already by Law enforcement, Newspapers, TV, and the US Senate, in great detail.

I'm just responding to an obviously bogus claim.

But for discussion purposes about these phantom KWU profs,

1) Accreditation rules strictly forbid it.
2) KWU won't even take their own grads
3) Even the flimsy state of Wyoming statues require regionally accredited profs
4) There are documented reports of these people throwing their "PhDs" away when confronted, at least 3 KW"U"
5) From your comments, you and they are both aware that their credentials won't stand up to any type of review, which is understandable.

Use Common Sense May 13, 2008 at 4:33 p.m.

Prof A, it is not a bogus claim. Just try a little harder and you will get the same results I have.

For discussion purposes:
item 2. I think it is wonderful that KWU doesn't allow its graduates to teach there. KWU tries to find the best in their field to teach their courses - that means hiring professors with experience and established reputations in their fields (not newly minted graduates).
Don't you find it odd that so many established professors at accredited universities are willing to teach at WNU?

Prof A May 13, 2008 at 5:57 p.m.

So your complete argument is if someone can find a couple KWU alums teaching somewhere despite the accreditation standards on Google, they must be legit?

"item 2. I think it is wonderful that KWU doesn't allow its graduates to teach there... not newly minted graduates)."

Nice try, but they are banned from teaching at KWU at all, not just "newly minted graduates", by WNU policy and by Wyoming state statutes. (And if they were accredited, by those standards also)

Although you've offered zero evidence or even a coherent argument, I plugged "Kennedy Western Phd" into a search engine and got the first page of:

5 ads and these flattering articles

"State: P.S.: Your M.A. or Ph.D. may be B.S."

"State questions wellness expert’s degree - January 20, 2006"

"CBS 42 Investigates: Professors' questionable credentials"

"When Elected Officials Aren't What They Seem"

One higher ed hit, but that's the Baylor one where she got caught and removed any mention of KWU.

Page 2, all ads plus

"The Old New Thing : Poking at diploma mills: Kennedy-Western"

"Senate Hearing GAO-04-771T, Diploma Mills: Federal Employees Have Obtained ..."

Page 3, mostly the Kennedy Western diploma mill hearing before the Senate, etc

Prof A May 13, 2008 at 5:58 p.m.

Can you at least point to a single university employment page that accepts unaccredited degree profs? None exist, but no names needed that way.

Get Real May 16, 2008 at 12:41 p.m.

Prof A (if you really are a professor)
1. No university is going to advertise that they are seeking (or even accept) anything but the best. All advertisements for job openings always are a wish list requirements for the "ideal candidate".
2. It is enough proof of what I say to look at the number of KWU/WNU (and other unaccredited school) graduates who are employed as professor, adjuncts, instructors, administrators, etc. at accredited schools.
3. The syntax of you Google search is flawed. Please review my original instructions and try again. You got what you asked for from Google. But, perhaps you tried my syntax and the results didn't support your personal view. Tell us the name you teach at and we'll see if there are any unaccredited degree holders working there.

Prof A. May 16, 2008 at 3:48 p.m.

So if we ignore common sense, the accrediting guidelines for faculty, every universities employment requirements, the state laws where it is regulated, WNU’s own disdain for it’s “grads” then wade through numerous pages of exposes and Senate diploma mill hearings, we’ll eventually find a few KWU “PhD’s” who are able to teach because of their accredited Master’s degree? Wow, that is a ringing endorsement.

I think everyone does agree with you that their names and employers should be kept hidden, along with any Rochville, Belford, St. Regis PhD’s.

For your next round of “I found it on the Internet, so it must be legit”, try searching for “Flat Earth Society”. I had no idea!

Uncle Janko May 17, 2008 at 3:43 p.m.

Hey Jake, leave this site for posters who have real experience with KWU/WNU (students who attended the schools and professors who taught at the schools). Your opinions based on junk you read on the Internet are worthless.

Cat with an Unaccredited MBA May 20, 2008 at 4:39 a.m.

MEOW! Yeah! unless you or your cat graduated from this unaccredited place, keep your facts to yourself, MEOW!

Colby Nolan, M.B.A., Trinity Southern University

"Cat gets MBA"
www.nbc10.com/money/3975070/detail.html

The Moon May 24, 2008 at 6:50 p.m.

Not one Engineer that did the calculations and engineered the equipment that put a man on the moon graduated from an accredited university. Not one.

LOL May 28, 2008 at 4:45 a.m.

"The Moon May 24, 2008 at 6:50 p.m.

Not one Engineer that did the calculations and engineered the equipment that put a man on the moon graduated from an accredited university. Not one."

What a stupid idiot. It's like saying Orville and Wilbur Wright didn't have a pilot's license. During the moon launch, there weren't a bunch of hokey pseudo-colleges out there and accreditation wasn't need to separate the real colleges from the sellers of useless diplomas.

The people that put the men on the moon were brilliant grads from great colleges like Yale and Harvard, and obviously not Kennedy Western / Warren National of Hawaii / Utah / California / Woming / Idaho / Whatever state they are moving to next.

Janko Shave May 28, 2008 at 4:54 p.m.

LOL,
Were you there? Or it this your opinion.

Cat with an Unaccredited MBA May 29, 2008 at 2:58 a.m.

Meow! My Alma Mater of Trinity Southern University offered a Master of Science in Applied Science and Technology (MSAST) as well as a Doctorate of Philosophy in Mathematics. All this talk about the space program makes me wish I had gotten those degrees instead of my unaccredited MBA. I'm sure my life experience degree would have qualified me for a job at NASA Meow!

The Moon June 1, 2008 at 5:17 p.m.

Reference "The people that put the men on the moon were brilliant grads from great colleges like Yale and Harvard, and obviously not Kennedy Western / Warren National of Hawaii / Utah / California / Woming / Idaho / Whatever state they are moving to next".

Sorry, none had Engineering Degrees from Yale or Harvard. Most had degrees from the Military and all civilians had their degrees from State Licensed Colleges like U of Oklahoma and U of Kansas, MIT and U of Scranton. Perhaps you should do some research before calling others stupid idiots.

Here are the names. Look them up yourself Einstein.

Neil A. Armstrong, Michael Collins Edwin E. Aldrin, Jr.
James A. Lovell, Jr William A. Anders, Fred W. Haise, Jr, Charles Moss Duke, JrRonald Evans, Owen K. Garriott, Don L. Lind, Ken Mattingly,Bruce McCandless II,
Harrison Schmitt, Bill Pogue,Jack Swigert
Cliff Charlesworth, Glynn Lunney, Gene Kranz.

LAWMAKER June 1, 2008 at 5:30 p.m.

Laypersons and professional alike have been brainwashed to think that to have a legitimate college or university degree, it must be accredited. The average person and most professionals have no idea what accreditation is, they believe or have been told through out the years, that accreditation equals a legitimate degree. This is not true! In fact it takes four years for a college to become accredited, making it technically impossible to disallow unaccredited schools. With this mindset, no new college or university could ever open. Another falsehood is where people believe a degree must be recognized by the US Department of Education. The US Department of Education does not, and has never had a responsibility to recognize college or university degrees. There are Regional, National and Professional accrediting agencies, which are non-governmental, non-profit, peer review, third party organizations that the US Department of Education recognizes for the purpose of federal tuition loans. This has nothing to do with making the college or university legitimate.
Here is one that falsehood that is actually funny, that a degree earned outside of the United States are not as good, or not as legitimate as a regionally, national or professional “accredited” US degree. Not true! Most foreign countries require that all colleges and universities be licensed, registered and/or accredited by the Ministry of Education (a government agency), which in most cases, is much more stringent that our non-governmental accrediting process. Foreign university administrators laugh at our regional accreditation process.
Many colleges and universities throughout the US receive state license or authority to grant degrees. Some are schools are exempt from licensing based on offering only religious degrees. Others decide that the regional, national or professional accreditation (peer review from a non-governmental, non-profit, peer review agency) is not needed. Each state has their own requirements for degree granting institutes.
Educational evaluation firms or agencies are private companies. The opinion that they provide in a written report is just that, an opinion. These firms or agencies are not the US Department of Education and are not a governmental agency. You could send your degree to three or four of these agencies and get two to three different opinion reports. There is also an educational evaluation membership organization that several of these private companies join to (pay membership dues). They attempt to give the impression that only their members are qualified to conduct educational evaluations.

What is 101 June 1, 2008 at 5:38 p.m.

It is the average university graduates IQ in 2007.

Compare that to 132 back in 1959 when there was no accreditation.

PT Barnum June 1, 2008 at 8:38 p.m.

Rationalize all you want about this hokey pseudo-"college", but the fact remains:

"From US Gov

Frequently Asked Questions about diploma mills, fraudulent degrees, and accreditation. Among other things:

Accreditation is “voluntary,” so doesn't that mean it is optional and not necessary?

Accreditation is voluntary in that the process of accreditation requires the full cooperation with and complete participation in the process of accreditation by the college or university seeking accreditation. At the heart of the accreditation process is a self-study prepared by the college or university demonstrating its commitment to the standards of accreditation.

Since accreditation is the PRIMARY means of determining the legitimacy and quality of colleges and universities in the United States, to describe the process as "voluntary" is not to describe it as "optional" or "unnecessary."

PT Barnum June 1, 2008 at 8:45 p.m.

"Each state has their own requirements for degree granting institutes."

And you can just follow the KWU moving vans to figure out which states had little or no requirements, lol.

Joe June 2, 2008 at 12:57 a.m.

Government sanctioned accreditation doesn't really mean a whole lot of beans these days. You have to look at the bigger picture... professional accreditations, US News rankings, Peterson's guide to enrollments, faculty credentials etc.

Cat with an Unaccredited MBA June 2, 2008 at 1:46 a.m.

MEOW, The space program? The average IQ in 1959? Religious degrees? Foreign degrees?

How do these things relate in any way or make KWU / WNU / Rochville / Belford degrees legitimate?

I'm confused, but then again, I am just a cat with an unaccredited MBA. Meow.

@cat June 2, 2008 at 5:36 a.m.

The cat routine is getting old bro.

Cat with an Unaccredited MBA June 2, 2008 at 12:21 p.m.

Unfortunately, it contains more fact (a cat managed to get an unaccredited degree) than any of the BS posted in the last week.

PT Barnum June 2, 2008 at 4:27 p.m.

Joe June 2, 2008 at 12:57 a.m.
"You have to look at the bigger picture... professional accreditations, US News rankings, Peterson's guide to enrollments, faculty credentials etc."

True.

Professional accreditations - KWU / WNU have none, and "degrees" won't qualify you for any professional exams. They can't even stay in the Better Business Bureau. (Sidenote: You can become a professional engineer with a high school diploma.)

US News - LOL, won't even list them.

Petersons guide - Not familiar with this one, but I assume they are unlisted.

Faculty credentials - They are using faculty now? At the Senate diploma mill hearing, KWU self-reported that they had 1 faculty member. None listed on WNU site now, but their employment page specifically states that they won't accept KWU / WNU graduates.

Harry June 3, 2008 at 2:41 p.m.

The Higher Learning Commission review team is making a site visit to Warren National University on October 13, 2008. This review is to determine the schools qualification for initial candidacy.

Armored Saint June 3, 2008 at 4:27 p.m.

To Harry,

Wow. Is this public news? Is this posted anywhere? Thanks.

Dr. Elrond June 3, 2008 at 10:01 p.m.

The comments about Dr. Yellen are typical of the type of people who wander degree related web sites bashing every school because of imagined wrongs. I doubt many of these negative posters even finished a degree program at any school.

See the website for the Higher Learning Commission for information regarding WNU and initial candidacy for accreditation.
The Online Degree Reviews website will not allow the posting of URLs.

@Dr. Elrond June 3, 2008 at 10:20 p.m.

www.google.com

I don't seem to have any problem posting URLs.

??? June 4, 2008 at 4:02 a.m.

"See the website for the Higher Learning Commission for information regarding WNU and initial candidacy for accreditation."

Will there be a public comment period where people can write to the accreditation board and express their opinion on this worthless institution?

Joe June 4, 2008 at 6:59 a.m.

For those not technical enough to post links...

www.ncahlc.org/index.php?option=com_cont...

candidacy = Preaccreditation status, which does not carry membership in the Commission.

Joe June 4, 2008 at 7:09 a.m.

I want everyone to watch this video...

www.khou.com/sharedcontent/video/makeASX...

Then I want you to fill out this form about what you think about this diploma mill's accreditation and submit it to the HLC.

www.ncahlc.org/index.php?option=com_cont...

Dan June 4, 2008 at 1:20 p.m.

Thank you for the link! I filled the form out and expressed my opinion.
That is that WNU was tougher than Navy Nuclear Power School and they deserve accreditation.

To WNU Haters June 4, 2008 at 1:29 p.m.

Go to the following link.
www.onlinedegreereviews.org/college/page...

WNU beat out three other accredited universities in student ratings. Do you really think those same students who rated WNU as such will turn on WNU and say bad things to CHEA.

Think before you post if your intent is to liable hurt WNU.

Harry June 4, 2008 at 4:42 p.m.

To Armored Saint:

The WNU October review announcement by the HLC has already been discussed since my post, but I will supply a little more detail on accessing it.

Go to the Higher Learning Commission home page. On the left side you will see a menu. Click on Affilited Institutions, and then click on Upcoming Visits; the list is alphabetical.

Another award June 4, 2008 at 7:15 p.m.

"To WNU Haters June 4, 2008 at 1:29 p.m.
Go to the following link." leads me to:

"Top 5 Worst - Academic Probation Awards
Five colleges have consistently received poor reviews from students on OnlineDegreeReviews.org and have qualified for the Online Degree Reviews Academic Probation Awards"

Another proud moment in KWU/WNU history.

Another Award June 4, 2008 at 8:04 p.m.

Hey Numnuts-

My point being that the other four universities on the list are fully CHEA accredited!!
WNU ranked superior to 3 of the other four accredited universities.
One of the four WNU beat out is Western Governors University. The most accredited university in the world is Western Governors(accredited by all CHEA/ED recognized agencies).

More proof accreditation is not worth a damn.

Checkmate

Award Winning June 4, 2008 at 8:37 p.m.

WNU makes the "Top 5 Worst - Academic Probation Awards
Five colleges have consistently received poor reviews from students on OnlineDegreeReviews.org and have qualified for the Online Degree Reviews Academic Probation Awards"

So now we can call WN"U" an "award-winning" "university"?

tic tac June 4, 2008 at 8:51 p.m.

Thanks for the link Joe... I filled it out telling how much damage it would to do the HCL much less poor unsuspecting victims.

tic tac June 4, 2008 at 8:53 p.m.

... HLC

How can you clowns argue about being at the top of the worst 5? You want to be king of the crap pile?

Dr. Elrond June 4, 2008 at 10:08 p.m.

How can you clowns argue about how bad WNU is, based on how bad you think KWU was? How many of you attended WNU? Do you even know someone who attended and graduated from WNU?
I haven't commented to the Higher Learning Commission regarding WNU, because I graduated from KWU. I have no experience with the staff or faculty of WNU. DO YOU?

Cat with an Unaccredited MBA June 5, 2008 at 12:36 a.m.

"I graduated from KWU." - Be careful if you're using "Dr." in front of your name based soley on a KW"U" in the following areas:

Jurisdictions that have restricted or made illegal the use of credentials from unaccredited schools include Oregon,[21] [22] Michigan,[23] Maine,[24] North Dakota,[22] New Jersey,[22] Washington,[21] [25] Nevada,[21][26] Illinois,[21] Indiana,[21] Texas,[27][28] and Korea.[29] WNU is also restricted from accepting students from Oregon,[22] [30] California,[9] [30] or Utah.[30]

Cat with an Unaccredited MBA June 5, 2008 at 1:30 a.m.

Oh, and Meow.

Joe June 5, 2008 at 3:36 a.m.

KWU is the same as WNU... they just changed the name to escape the bad publicity they faced. They are still the same old diploma mill they always were. Rather than meeting the standards of the previous state they were in they moved to Wyoming so they could get away with their milled degrees.

Mistake June 5, 2008 at 12:16 p.m.

I think it is a mistake for WNU to seek accreditation. From what I've read they seem to have a very profitable business serving down on their luck people who are unable to get into an accredited school.

? June 5, 2008 at 3:03 p.m.

What does Texas do when WNU gets accreditation?

No Action Required June 5, 2008 at 3:29 p.m.

What does Texas do when WNU gets accreditation?

Since Texas has taken no prosecutorial action on this issue with WNU being "outlawed" and unaccredited then it would make sense that Texas has no action to take when WNU does get accredited.

Problems With This Site June 5, 2008 at 3:52 p.m.

1. Based out of Canada.
This should be enough to make any posters suspect of this fraudulent website. Canada survives at the will of the U.S. Their National Defense could not even defend them from any one of the large US inner city gangs, much less a country like Brazil.
2. It is titled "Online Degree Reviews, but you do not have to warrant actually being a student. This is why the same 5 or 6 people keep posting by changing their names and telling unprovable lies.
3. Everyone posts bogus websites as proof of this or that. No one posts journals or anything verifiable. The root of all postings comes from Wiki references. Real good source.
4. Elitist Morons (REF-The Cat Poster)are not challenged by the site admin with their indirect argument being at best the clean end of a turd.

Wulf the Dog June 5, 2008 at 4:25 p.m.

As Slim Pickens would say: Only two things ...."

PT Barnum June 5, 2008 at 7:05 p.m.

"Everyone posts bogus websites as proof of this or that."

Please see the list of expose articles on Kennedy Western under the post "And other articles on KWU April 22, 2008 at 2:43 a.m."

Every single one of them is from a newspaper report, TV News reports (ABC, NBC) or Senate hearing with sworn testimony that discuss KWU. Which of these sources do you consider bogus?

And yes, a cat did get an unaccredited MBA, as reported and validated by NBC.

Joe June 5, 2008 at 8:41 p.m.

I haven't seen anyone posting bogus websites. GAO report is bogus? Major news outlets are bogus?

Hey Tard June 5, 2008 at 8:57 p.m.

REF. "And yes, a cat did get an unaccredited MBA, as reported and validated by NBC".

First of all, institutions are "unaccredited" not Degrees.

Second- Was the institution that gave a cat a degree WNU?

Here is your logic path.

Manson is a murderer.

Manson is a human.

Eric Clapton is a human.

Eric Clapton is therefore a murderer and Manson is a musician.

PT Barnum June 5, 2008 at 9:17 p.m.

Bad analogy, because for it to be true, there would have to be some evidence that KWU is any different than CatU, Rochville, or any of its' unaccredited brethren.

Also, what sourced reports do you consider bogus? Newspapers, Senators, State law?

Wulf June 5, 2008 at 9:56 p.m.

Hey PTB,
What knowledge do you have regarding WNU? I don't mean old news you found regarding KWU. I mean what hard information do you have regarding WNU. Do you know what it takes to become accredited? Do you know WNU hasn't spent a lot of resources preparing for accreditation?
You don't know what you are talking about. And your cat friend can climb a tree.

Ex-WNU Student June 6, 2008 at 1:57 a.m.

I learned a few months ago that the degree that I was seeking from Warren National University (WNU) located in Cheyenne, Wyoming is not valid in Texas and if I try to use it in Texas it is against the law to use and I could be fined or jailed if I try to use it. No one at this university ever told me that I could not use their degree in Texas. When I went to the State of Texas website and found that WNU was on the list I sent this information to the WNU and asked for a full refund. I have sent several emails and called several times (all calls go to voice mail) but they have not responded to either. I paid over $6,000.00 dollars to this university that I thought would receive a degree from them, but it looks like now that I was deceived by them. They knew from the start that I lived in Texas.

When I never received any replies from WNU I filed a complaint with the Wyoming Better Business Bureau. WNU never replied to the complaint and because of this they lost their accreditation with the BBB. I also filed a complaint with the Wyoming Department of Education, but WNU never replied to them either.

This "university" only cares about cheating people out of their money and should be closed down and prosecuted for their illegal business practices.

You either deserve the Darwin Award or ..... June 6, 2008 at 2:54 p.m.

"I learned a few months ago that the degree that I was seeking from Warren National University (WNU) located in Cheyenne, Wyoming is not valid in Texas..............."

Well then, you need to forget about a higher education altogether. You have no business getting a degree when you can not do the basic research on such a well published issue.

Morons with 90 point IQs know WNU is not accredited (especially those living in the great state of Texas).

Actually, I do not think you are that stupid. No one is that stupid. I do believe you to be one of the many liars to frequent this website. You made this story up.

Tommy Boy June 6, 2008 at 3:03 p.m.

My partner learned a few years ago that the degree that he was seeking from Warren National University (WNU) located in Cheyenne, Wyoming is not valid in Texas and if he tries to use it in Texas since it is against the law to use and he could be fined or jailed (that might be fun for him though:)) if he tries to use it. No one at this university ever told him that he could not use their degree in Texas. When I went to the State of Texas website and found that WNU was on the list I sent this information to the WNU and asked for a full refund for Bruce. I have sent several emails and called several times (all calls go to voice mail) but they have not responded to either. We paid over $6,000.00 dollars to this university that I thought he would receive a degree from them, but it looks like now that Bruce was deceived by them. They knew from the start that I lived in Texas (Steers and ...???).

When he never received any replies from WNU I filed a complaint with the Wyoming Better Business Bureau. WNU never replied to the complaint and because of this they lost their accreditation with the BBB. We also filed a complaint with the Wyoming Department of Education, but WNU never replied to them either.

This "university" only cares about cheating people out of their money and should be closed down and prosecuted for their business practices.

Tommy Boy's Toy June 6, 2008 at 4:19 p.m.

And then we send letters and emails to Oprah. She never replied to us either. We send an email to Jerry Springer, but he said he could't pay us the whole six thousand, but he'd pay for tickets to be on his show. I think we might just do that. That will teach Wyoming to mess around with us Texans!

PT Barnum June 6, 2008 at 6:41 p.m.

"Ex-WNU Student June 6, 2008 at 1:57 a.m."

I think your experience is pretty common, looking at the number of complaints that KWU wasn't able to settle internally before being booted by the BBB.

Having state by state diploma mill laws is messy. Use of a KWU/WNU degree is illegal or restricted in 10 states, but there are only 3 states where KWU/WNU can't OFFER to sell a degree.

What did their enrollment department say when you initially enrolled? Anything?

PT Barnum June 6, 2008 at 7:04 p.m.

"Ex-WNU Student June 6, 2008 at 1:57 a.m."

Unfortunately, your situation is all too common and completely consistent with many independent, verified (and KWU-reported) sources.

Make sure to send a copy to the accreditation board, I am sure their box is full of similar accounts.

www.ncahlc.org/index.php?option=com_cont...

"Morons with 90 point IQs know WNU is not accredited" So obviously all KWU/WNU enrollees have an IQ less than 90 or they would go somewhere else. That sounds right.

Ex-WNU Student June 6, 2008 at 8:47 p.m.

"What did their enrollment department say when you initially enrolled?"

Their enrollment department NEVER mentioned that their degrees were against the law to use in Texas. The main thing that they were worried about was how I wanted to pay for the courses...

Ex-WNU Student June 6, 2008 at 8:51 p.m.

I have already gone to the website you suggested and sent them a copy of my posting. I also went into further detail about my dealings with WNU.

EX-WNU Student June 7, 2008 at 5:25 a.m.

Folks neeed to remember and accept Change!!!!!!! Remember, Organizations, Individuals, Corporations makes mistakes, but essentially trying to better one's self is what makes them more succesffully.

Presently, WNU does not have the same concepts as previously and dramtically improved their operations, learning experience and Format.

With that, they have fair chance of getting what they want in this process, which is to be Accredited.

Rest of Critics, can keep their mouth shut and be Happy!!!! Don't be jealous of Online Education at Low Prices with High Quality Education.

Ex-WNU Student June 7, 2008 at 4:02 p.m.

"Folks need to remember and accept Change!!!!!!!"

Your commits make me sick. It is very obvious that you work for WNU. WNU is neither low price nor high quality education (I paid out over $6,000 and . It doesn't make any difference what they offer; their degree is against the law to use in Texas and many other states. A degree from WNU is a waist of time and money. You could loose your job, pay a fine and/or go to jail if you try to use a degree from WNU. Why would anyone want to go through all this foolish and unnecessary trouble to get a degree that is worthless?

RU Nutz June 7, 2008 at 4:27 p.m.

$6000 is peanuts. It costs that much for one semester at some cheap public universities. WNU is a bargain compared to the University of Phoenix.
You blew it bozo. Once WNU is accredited expect them to charge market rates. You could have been a WNU graduate. Then when they become accredited and removed from the Texas list (which is not based on quality of the school, but solely on whether or not it is accredited, a lazy man's way of doing evaluations for quality) you could be bragging about the shrewd move you made to get their degree before the price tripled.

Cat with an Unaccredited MBA June 7, 2008 at 5 p.m.

Meow! So if my unaccredited university (Trinity Southern) become accredited, my degree I earned in 3 days magically becomes accredited also? Purrrr...

Cat with an Unaccredited MBA June 7, 2008 at 5:03 p.m.

"Don't be jealous of Online Education at Low Prices with High Quality Education."

Meow, KWU has been shown over and over to be low quality and low value. You can find that same degree, online, cheaper, and legitimate. If your only concern is cheap and an unaccredited degree, I recommend my alma mater, Trinity Southern. Same usefullness, much cheaper. Meow.

Ex-WNU Student June 7, 2008 at 5:50 p.m.

RU Nutz fits you perfect. You’re the bozo. You just don't get it do you. You sound just like a WNU employee trying to make WNU sound like a good investment. What a Joke! How can you say WNU is a bargain when the degree is Worthless?

I wish that there was some way to block all the WNU employees off this site.

I agree June 7, 2008 at 6:34 p.m.

Block all postings from employees of the associated university and also block it from people who have no real experience with the school they are commenting on. Only students of the school should be allowed to comment.

I agree also June 7, 2008 at 6:52 p.m.

except for one caveat. The Ex-WNU Student is exagerating when he/she says the WNU is worthless. You didn't graduate so you never put it to the test. I'm sure there are graduates outside of Texas who have found personal, professional and/or economic benefits from their degrees at WNU.

Ex-WNU Student June 7, 2008 at 7:15 p.m.

"except for one caveat"
Here we go again with another WNU employee trying to make WNU sound like a great place to get a degree. I am not exageration when I say the their degrees are worthless. They only mention Texas, but there are many other states that their degrees are worthless too. They also don't mention that WNU doesn't tell people that their degrees are worthless in these states because that only what your money.

The reason that I am an ex-WNU student is because that when I found out about the degree being worthless for me to use in Texas I knew that it was senseless to continue with their degree program. Only someone working for WNU would make a statement like the one above.

Like I said before WNU employees should not be able to make posting on this site.

@ RU Nutz June 7, 2008 at 11:56 p.m.

A KWU/WNU degree confered before any accreditation is still unaccredited and against the law in many states to use.

Lawmaker June 8, 2008 at 7:35 p.m.

"A KWU/WNU degree confered before any accreditation is still unaccredited and against the law in many states to use."
FALSE

Degrees are not accredited, universities are. It is highly unlikely anyone will ever say "What year did you graduate and was the school accredited when you started there?" WNU, once accredited, looses the substandard status and yes, the accreditation pulls in.

Remember, not one engineer who put a man on the moon had previously graduated from an unaccredited university.

More likely they will just look at the list of accredited universities posted at the Dept. of Ed website. :)

Ex-WNU Student June 8, 2008 at 9 p.m.

Lawmaker (if you are one) you are still missing the point. WNU is still unaccredited and is selling there degree programs to people that live in states that the degrees are against the law to use. I have worked for several Human Resource Directors/Managers over the years and I know for a fact that they check potential and current employee’s degrees to see if they are legal to use in the state that the company is located. If the degree is not legal to use they will not offer a potential employee a job and the current employee is fired if they try and pass off the degree as accredited.

If you think that employers don't check degrees then you are living in a dream world.

I've seen the "man on the moon" quote before and it was from a WNU employee.

And one other thing, KWU/WNU has been trying to gain accreditation for many years now and they haven't got it yet. Even changing their name and moving to a different state didn’t help.

PT Barnum June 9, 2008 at 3:07 a.m.

"I'm sure there are graduates outside of Texas who have found personal, professional and/or economic benefits from their degrees at WNU."

If they do exist, they are harder to find than Bigfoot. They are always unnamed people in unnamed companies. But the ones who get caught with these "degrees" are named, along with their company very publicly, lol.

PT Barnum June 9, 2008 at 3:09 a.m.

It is highly unlikely anyone will ever say "What year did you graduate and was the school accredited when you started there?"

Admitting that you would have to lie by omission to gloss over the notoriously substandard past of KW"U" is pretty telling.

There was almost no accreditation prior to 1965 June 9, 2008 at 4:02 p.m.

Even by 1978, less than half of (some now very famous) universities were accredited.
There are many 55+ year olds who graduated from universities that were not accredited then, but are now (with most getting their accreditation in the last 20 years).

90% of CEOs in this country are over 50! Employees aged 50-65 are also by far the highest paid and most valuable employees.

Lighten Up Fransis June 9, 2008 at 4:29 p.m.

PT Barnum,
Let it go. You lost your money because you didn't do your research before picked an out of state school. Stop blaming others for your mistake.

PT Barnum June 10, 2008 at 12:20 a.m.

"There was almost no accreditation prior to 1965" (Obvious answer: because there wasn't a proliferation of cheap and easy unrecognized "degrees" available by mail, and eventually Internet)

Let me try: There were almost no driver licenses prior to 1920! And some of those people are still driving and one became president, and once drove through California, which is one of the 5 states KWU has been in, so it's gotta be good!

It's like playing to 6 degrees of separation to figure out how this has any relationship to substandard KWU degrees or somehow makes them useful. LOL.

PT Barnum and a still open question. June 10, 2008 at 12:27 a.m.

Rather than pointing to irrelavancies, I was hoping one of the KWU scholars could answer me on which sources of KWU exposes are bogus and why?

"Please see the list of expose articles on Kennedy Western under the post "And other articles on KWU April 22, 2008 at 2:43 a.m."

Every single one of them is from a newspaper report, TV News reports (ABC, NBC) or Senate hearing with sworn testimony that discuss KWU. Which of these sources do you consider bogus?"

@ ignorant lawmaker June 10, 2008 at 11:39 a.m.

Institutions confer degrees and they are either accredited or not. That much is obvious. Under Texas Education code...

(11) "Fraudulent or substandard degree" means:
(A) a degree conferred by a private postsecondary educational institution or other person that, at the time the degree was conferred, was operating in this state in violation of this subchapter;

Public degrees without accreditation many years ago do not fall under the stipulation. Unaccredited degrees that are conferred by diploma mills that ever fell on the list will not be legal even after they are taken off the list. Only those with degrees conferred after the date they are taken off the list will be recognized. You will find this type of language in several state codes.

As far as what employers do that is up to them. Are you willing to face arrest and lose your job just to use a fraudulent degree?

Frank June 12, 2008 at 1:11 a.m.

Warren National University is fully accredited by the US Department of Education. Fully accredited to land you in jail and unemployed. Degrees from Warren National University are accepted at all state and federal prisons. Programs include license plate development, culinary administration, and shower bending. Apply Now!

To Frank June 13, 2008 at 12:33 a.m.

Hey, that means those individuals who are presently implementing the economic policies of the USA are professionals to be either federal prisoners or license plate developers, chefs or useless individuals making salaries over $100K?

With that said, the PhD Economist from IVY League School can't figure a way out to get the Markets back on track?

Ding Ding Ding, you are absoultely right that, this is all thanks to US Department of Education Fully Accredited Universities that presently have developed scholars into so-called leaders.

Frank - It seems you have experience in Shower Bending Experience. Maybe, writing a Dummies Guide/Crash Guide/101 Tips of Suriving Federal & State Prisons/Shower Bending might be New York Times # 1 Top Seller.

Go for it!!!!!!!!!

Accredidation June 13, 2008 at 12:37 a.m.

Congratulations to WNU for achiving this milestone and turning the organization around. They are a quality institute that does provide education with emphasis on Cost. I am sorry, they don't charge $800 Credit Hour for Text Book Knolwedge/Interview Skills.

Irrespective of degree, American system is based on On the Job Training. Whether one is Engineer or Chef, the quirks/tools/systems/job knowledge/expertise is only achieved on the job. Years of dedication and one's willigness to learn makes this successful and person grow through the ladders of their organization.

With that said, Congratulations to WNU for making it possible for students to Achieve their American Dream!!!!!!

@ Accredidation June 13, 2008 at 6:03 a.m.

WNU hasn't achieved anything as of yet. If you want to get good job experience you need a good degree to open the door for you. If you get an unaccredited degree like WNU the only jobs you are elligable for are the same as if you had never gone at all. You used to be able to get government jobs with this degree but no longer.

It is "accreditation" BTW.

PT Barnum June 13, 2008 at 4:19 p.m.

"I am sorry, they don't charge $800 Credit Hour for Text Book Knolwedge/Interview Skills."

If your only goal is to get an unrecognized "degree" with limited utility as cheaply as possible, I would recommend Rochville University over KWU, it's only $299, and has faster turnaround.

PT Barnum June 13, 2008 at 8:02 p.m.

Hello, I am the PT Barnum poster.
I keep posting these stupid statements on this blog because I am upset that no one has ever gotten in any real trouble for using a WNU degree. I keep seeing my friends get better jobs than me and they do not walk around all disgruntled. I hates WNU. Hatem, hatem, hatem.

I am we Tod it.
I am sofa king we Tod it.

PT Barnum June 14, 2008 at 6:11 p.m.

No, I am the real PT Barnum.
I have found a cheeper way to success. I got my accredided degree from Almeda. Take that Warren!
PT Barnum, D.Ed., MBA, Project Management

PT Barnum June 16, 2008 at 1:46 p.m.

Almeda = KWU = Rochville. All unaccredited, all of limited utility.

"no one has ever gotten in any real trouble for using a WNU degree"

Please see the list of expose articles on Kennedy Western under the post "And other articles on KWU April 22, 2008 at 2:43 a.m."

Every single one of them is from a newspaper report, TV News reports (ABC, NBC) or Senate hearing with sworn testimony that discuss KWU. Which of these sources do you consider bogus?

PT Barnum June 16, 2008 at 5:13 p.m.

Harvard=Yale= Floyd's Barber College = KIm's Karate Kollege.
All accredited
"no man is an island"
Please see Playboy and other publications found in the men's room.

PT Barnum June 16, 2008 at 7:08 p.m.

I rest my case at

Facts 126 (all from valid sources that KW"u" scholars couldn't even attempt to refute)

KW"u" - 0.

Reality Check June 17, 2008 at 4:38 a.m.

I can't believe people would even argue over this. For the same money or less, you can get a real degree from a real university taught by real instructors (not rent-an-instructor-that-teaches-for-a-real-university-so-we-can-put-them-in-our-catalog).

Semi-Cheap, easy, and not recoginzed is not the way to go for an education.

Warning - Don't Use in the State of Washington June 25, 2008 at 5:33 a.m.

RCW 28A.415.024
Credit on salary schedule — Accredited institutions — Verification — Penalty for submitting credits from unaccredited institutions.

(b) Certificated staff who submit degrees received from an unaccredited educational institution for the purposes of receiving a salary increase shall be fined three hundred dollars. The fine shall be paid to the office of the superintendent of public instruction and used for costs of administering this section.

c) In addition to the fine in (b) of this subsection, certificated staff who receive salary increases based upon degrees earned from educational institutions that have been verified to be unaccredited must reimburse the district for any compensation received based on these degrees.

PT Barnum June 27, 2008 at 2:32 p.m.

No, I am the real PT Barnum

I am we Tod it.
I am sofa king we Tod it.

LtCdr Boggs June 27, 2008 at 2:47 p.m.

There is an old fighter pilot slogan.
You know you are right on target when you start to receive lots of flack.

WNU is right on target. Go WNU!

WWII Fighter Pilot and KWU Grad. Retired
LtCdr Marc Boggs

Another official creatively lying about KW"u" June 27, 2008 at 4:17 p.m.

weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/news/politics/broward/blog/2008/05/supervisor_of_elections_race_c.html

Question: Why is the campaign using "Dr."?

Gaskill: "Adriane holds a PhD and sometimes uses it, sometimes not…. At first Adriane thought the title would be offputting, but it describes her educational background. FYI, Brenda Snipes uses 'Dr. Snipes' as her title."

Question: What is the academic credential (name of university, area of study, degree received and date degree received) that gets the qualification Dr.?

Gaskill: "PhD in Business Administration 2007, Kennedy-Western University - Wyoming.
“FYI: Kennedy-Western was unaccredited last year to do administrative issues; as a result Adriane has enrolled in Northcentral University in Arizona;

Classic lie June 27, 2008 at 7:05 p.m.

“FYI: Kennedy-Western was unaccredited last year due to administrative issues; as a result Adriane has enrolled in Northcentral University in Arizona;"

That's alot of comedy crammed into one sentence.

"was unaccredited last year due to administrative issues" -

Only last year?? due to a technicality of some sort?? not the last 25 years for failing to provide a recognized program?

"as a result Adriane has enrolled in Northcentral University in Arizona"

Why would someone get a 2nd PhD in the exact same thing from a different university, if the first one was legitimate?

USN O-6 (ret) June 29, 2008 at 9:12 p.m.

I am pro-online education all the way, but this school is a diploma mill.

USA O-6 July 1, 2008 at 4:40 p.m.

WNU is a fine school. Graduation has served me well.

Misc July 1, 2008 at 8:11 p.m.

"Why would someone get a 2nd PhD in the exact same thing from a different university, if the first one was legitimate?"

Because a KW"u" "degree" is just fine until someone asks about it or checks up on it.

diplomamillnews July 3, 2008 at 12:23 a.m.

YSF writes "Anyone that believes being accredited makes a difference is a FOOL."

Anyone caught attempting to gain employment or a promotion in any one of the states with 'diploma mill' laws by flashing a 'degree mill' on their resume will face jail time and/or hefty fines.

U.S. Department of Education
Diploma Mills and Accreditation

"Remember: In some states, it can be illegal to use a degree from an institution that is not accredited by a nationally recognized accrediting agency, unless approved by the state licensing agency."

Ref the TX engineer with the KWU degree July 3, 2008 at 12:53 a.m.

He has a legit degree from University of Houston. As long as his KW degree doesn't show up on his resume for a job/promotion, he's good to go.

Name calling can be slander July 4, 2008 at 12:49 p.m.

Be careful with the slander.

Just because this site is in Canada, does not mean that your computers unique identifier in USA is not obtainable(for any one that knows how to get it:)).

Federal courts have ruled it illegal to call WNU a Diploma Mill.

If WNU is in a legal state (that you also live in) and you defame them, you can be sued (you will not win the suit) in your state in a civil action. If you live in a state like Texas though, you are probably ok since the Fed will likely not take up the suit. ;>)

Freedom of speech only goes so far.

Texas Jim July 4, 2008 at 7:39 p.m.

"Federal courts have ruled it illegal to call WNU a Diploma Mill." - Really? Please cite the case. Are you referring to the out of court settlement with the State of Oregon, where it is still illegal to use a KWU/WNU degree without the lengthy disclaimer? Not a federal ruling and the university was still KWU, not WNU.

I agree that there is no need to call any school a "diploma mill". Call it by it's factual name and point to published regulatory descriptions of it. Rochville, Kennedy Western can simply be called "unaccredited universities" (Fact), and if they are blacklisted by a state, you can point to the States published description, such as Texas, where the Dept of Ed lists it as a "Fraudulent or Substandard Institution with No Known Texas Connection" "Fraudulent or substandard degree" means a degree conferred in Texas in violation of the Texas Education Code".(Fact)

No need to interject personal opinion, WNU can take it up with the state of Texas if the description is improper.

Just A Guy July 6, 2008 at 3 a.m.

WNU= DIPLOMA MILL Go Ahead and Sue Me!!! LOL

Just A Guy July 6, 2008 at 3:03 a.m.

LtCdr Boggs,

You analogy is rediculous!!

Just A guy July 6, 2008 at 3:06 a.m.

By the way this entire site is just OPINION.

I can say that I think that HARVARD has become a diploma Mill and there isn't a damn thing they can do about it.

No court in that land would hear the suit, Idiot!!

Accreditation July 6, 2008 at 5:04 a.m.

Would someone explain to me that a student graduates in April 2008 after the University has been given Initial Accreditation. With that said, is their degree valid or what?

@Accreditation July 7, 2008 at 1:27 a.m.

Initial accreditation doesn't exist. They are a candidate for accreditation which doesn't carry the status. If they do become accredited by the end of the year then anyone who graduates after that date will have an accredited diploma... not before.

accredited diploma? July 13, 2008 at 3:02 p.m.

Diplomas are not accredited dumbo, schools are. WTF.

Yea July 13, 2008 at 3:03 p.m.

Show me one diploma that has "accredited" stamped on it.

The state laws July 13, 2008 at 3:10 p.m.

The state laws are untested and unenforcable in the private sector. The states will not test these laws. They have already lost this argument several times in district federal courts.

Again-Find me a private sector conviction anywhere in CONUS, Hi. or Alaska.

You will not find a conviction. There are lots of illegal laws.

I have posted this challenge multiple times on this site and no takers, ever.

Checkmate Chumps!

Nuff Said

Lawmaker July 13, 2008 at 3:14 p.m.

"The state laws are untested and unenforcable in the private sector. The states will not test these laws. They have already lost this argument several times in district federal courts."

You are correct sir!

Expect fecal matter replys to your facts.

Expect that maggot "Meow" poster or the human debris "PT Barnum" poster to say Meow or whatever.

Tru Dat July 14, 2008 at 12:10 p.m.

"The states will not test these laws. They have already lost this argument several times in district federal courts."

Really, where?

Tru Dat - Articles About Kennedy-Western July 14, 2008 at 12:16 p.m.

Here is a couple articles to start looking at. I'm not sure how to find case law, but I do know all the states still clearly list their laws, and more and more are adding to the list. Here is a sampling of articles.

***"Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense."

***"Diploma Mills are Easily Created and Some Have Issued Bogus Degrees to Federal Employees at Government Expense."

***"Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations: Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"

***"It May Take Hours, But You Too Can Earn a University Degree"

***"When Elected Officials Aren't What They Seem
Texas officials and Pennsylvania cats tout misleading credentials"

***“Real officials, bogus degrees, Fake degrees a growing Texas problem”

***"A dirty dozen - 12 famous diploma mills."

***“Are Fraudulent Academic Degrees Making a Mark on Engineering?”

***“Fighting Fakery - Diploma mills continue to churn out new "graduates" every day. What should legitimate colleges do about them? Is government action called for?”

***“Two less doctors in the house - Hebert, Wilson back away from Ph.D.'s issued by 'diploma mills'”

***“CBS 42 Investigates: Professors' questionable credentials”

***"PS Your PhD may be BS"

***"Texas officials and Pennsylvania cats tout misleading credentials"" MEOW!

***Supervisor of Elections race: Candidate denounces opponent for spreading 'scurrilous rumors.' Oops. What if there were no rumors, scurrilous or otherwise?***

Mistake July 15, 2008 at 4:27 a.m.

If you are absolutely unable to get into a recognized school, I guess you might be able to find someone to accept a Kennedy Western degree. Don't hold me to that, because I haven't seen any businesses that accept them.

Mistake is Mistaken July 15, 2008 at 5:09 p.m.

Do a Google search for University + Faculty + Kennedy Western + Ph.D.
You will find many (more than 50) faculty members at accredited schools who have Ph.D.s from Kennedy Western University. Do a similar search for resumes and you will find many KWU Ph.D.s accepted in the private sector.

WNU finally comes clean July 15, 2008 at 6:42 p.m.

From their own FAQ:

"I live in a state that identifies unaccredited degrees as "illegal". Will Warren National University's process of accreditation impact my ability to list my degree on my résumé without repercussions?"

"If a state's law requires that only degrees from accredited institutions be listed on a résumé, it is unlikely that Warren National University (WNU) degrees would only be "legal" until (and if) WNU is accredited. When (and if) WNU is accredited, chances are you will have to be admitted to a program following accreditation and graduate, before declaring your degree as being from an accredited institution. WNU recommends that students contact the legal authority in their state because the requirements under each law may differ between states and may be complicated. "

www.wnuedu.com/PublicAccreditationNotice...

WNU verifies that KWU degrees are worthless July 15, 2008 at 6:48 p.m.

Frequently Asked Questions About Accreditation For Current Students And Alumni Of Warren National University:

"If Warren National University is accredited before I graduate, will I receive a degree from an accredited university?"

"Warren National University (WNU) students that are admitted after the University is accredited will earn a degree from an accredited university. Unfortunately, it is the policy of the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) not to allow institutions to grandfather students who matriculate while the institution holds unaccredited status."

Thanks WNU for taking the high ground and settling this argument.

WNU jettisons KWU trash July 16, 2008 at 4:30 a.m.

I'm glad to see that Warren National is on the path to legitimacy, and distancing themselves from KWU will go a long way to that end.

HLC Evaluation July 16, 2008 at 5:26 p.m.

I'm an HLC avaluator. We go on rotation so I don't know if I will review WNU on-sight or not but I did review their self-study. They made alot of high claims in it compared to the GOA report that was published about them. If they do recieve accreditation it will be the biggest 180 I have ever seen.

evaluator... July 16, 2008 at 5:27 p.m.

mispelled

GAO July 16, 2008 at 5:28 p.m.

mispelled... can't spell today! arghhh!

KWU grad July 16, 2008 at 5:37 p.m.

You're not from the HLC... quit lying!! Kennedy Western is a great school and always has been. They just need the HLC to approve them and when they do they will be the best online RA school ever! WNU has offered to allow me to rematriculate and get an accredited degree after they get it. All I have to do is take one class and I have an accredited degree. Thanks WNU, you're the best!!!

Errr, no... July 16, 2008 at 7:25 p.m.

"Unfortunately, it is the policy of the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) not to allow institutions to grandfather students who matriculate while the institution holds unaccredited status."

KWU grad July 16, 2008 at 9:17 p.m.

I already asked them about that. They said if I take a class then I won't be grandfathered. They will issue me an accredited degree frmom Warren National and treat my KWU credits as a transfer from a different school. They said they owed it to me as a respected honor student. Thanks Warren National, you're the best!!

KWU Grad2 July 17, 2008 at 4:06 a.m.

Really? Who did you talk to? I want in on that deal.

2 KWU Grad July 17, 2008 at 10:13 p.m.

You're full of it. WNU will say anything, do anything and promise you the MOON to get your money. Don't believe a word they say. Either you are to stupid to understand this or you are saying this garbage because you work for WNU. Don't give them any more money.

Just A Guy July 18, 2008 at 2:03 a.m.

WNU is cut from the same mould as UOP, ITT and all the rest of these online schools. Go to a real school if you want to get anywhere.

No July 18, 2008 at 6:53 p.m.

"WNU is cut from the same mould as UOP, ITT and all the rest of these online schools. Go to a real school if you want to get anywhere."

WNU is an unrecognized, unrespected school. With good effort, it may someday be an recognized, unrespected school like UOP.

Pure Franstanchenzant! July 19, 2008 at 12:25 p.m.

"WNU is cut from the same mould as UOP, ITT and all the rest of these online schools. Go to a real school if you want to get anywhere."

I agree. An education any less than Yale or Harvard is a total waste of time.

Unk Janko July 19, 2008 at 5:27 p.m.

"WNU is cut from the same mould as UOP, ITT and all the rest of these online schools. Go to a real school if you want to get anywhere."

I agree. If the school doesn't have a good basketball team, they aren't worth a pinch.

Cat with an Unaccredited MBA July 19, 2008 at 10:55 p.m.

Meow! I guess it will be me and the abandoned KW"u" grads going forward with the same quality of degree. Congrats to those WNU grads after 2012 who will get a good education! Meow!

Another KW"u" "grad" exposed July 25, 2008 at 8:55 p.m.

"NewsChannel 5 Investigates:
Taxpayers Foot Bill for Questionable Degrees"

www.newschannel5.com/global/story.asp?s=......

Ex WNU Student July 26, 2008 at 2:59 p.m.

The above link doesn't work, this is the right one...

www.newschannel5.com
/Global/story.asp?s=8681750

TEXAS LAWS July 26, 2008 at 3:25 p.m.

When laws are passed that cannot or will not be enforced, people quickly come to understand that the law is unenforcable.

This is why, if you actually happen to drive at the 55 mph speed limit in Houston, you seriously run the risk of getting rear-ended by the flood of vehicles that are whizzing by 20 or even 25 miles per hour faster.

Please, someone show me a conviction for use of an unaccredited degree in any state. Anyone? Anyone?

Exhausted July 27, 2008 at 3:03 p.m.

Your challenge of "Please, someone show me a conviction for use of an unaccredited degree in any state. Anyone? Anyone?"

Pissed me off so much that I did set out yesterday to find that single conviction and worked surfing the internet for 10 hours before giving up.

I am quite angry to find you are correct.

There has not even been a conviction in the government sectors.

I am writing my state congressman.

Problem is, I am afraid, that they are too wrapped up in the 30 million illegal alliens issue.

A few hundred thousand unaccredited degree users probably will matter little to them.

Good Quote July 27, 2008 at 5:01 p.m.

In fact, Cunningham said NES's handing of the Kennedy-Western situation shows a degree of foolishness.

"NewsChannel 5 Investigates:
Taxpayers Foot Bill for Questionable Degrees"

"Once you understand that this is a bad degree, that it is a worthless meaningless degree, then take action, go to that person say, look we've made a mistake in your case," Cunningham added.

What really got the tax activist was NewsChannel 5's discovery that professors at some state colleges actually get bonuses for Ph.D.s from unaccredited, fly-by-night schools."

Another conviction - unaccredited degree business July 27, 2008 at 5:08 p.m.

"7/9/08
SPOKANE, Wash. - U.S. Attorney James A. McDevitt announced Thursday 58-year old Dixie Ellen Randock, 41-year old Heidi Kae Lorhan and 40-year old Roberta Markishtum, all of Spokane, were sentenced Wednesday for their roles in conducting an international diploma mill.

Dixie Ellen Randock was sentenced to 36 months followed by 3 years of court supervision. Her daughter Heidi Kae Lorhan was sentenced to 12 months and one day imprisonment, followed by two years of court supervision. Roberta Markishtum was sentenced to 4 months, followed by 1 year of court supervision.

Steven Karl Randock, Sr., Blake Allan Carlson, Kenneth Wade Pearson, Richard John Novak, and Amy Leann Hensley will be sentenced at a later date."

Nice Try Clown! July 27, 2008 at 7:28 p.m.

Moron above can not read SWE.
1. Unaccredited is not a degree mill.
2. Still no unaccredited degree USERS convicted.

Checkmate!

Federal defamation law says.. July 27, 2008 at 7:29 p.m.

It is illegal to refer to WNU as a diploma mill.

A fine is just piling on July 28, 2008 at 12:51 a.m.

I think it should be sufficient to lose your job, not get an education, or not be considered for employment for buying an unaccredited degree as dozens of reports have documented.

States tacking on fines on top that is just mean-spirited. That is really kicking someone when they are down.

Exhausted July 28, 2008 at 12:32 p.m.

I searched the internet for 15 hours trying to find someone convicted for jaywalking, but could not find any, so WNU is a good degree.

Correction July 31, 2008 at 3:03 p.m.

"... he's an idiot. The state of Oregan does not equal a federal defamation law."

Even that was settled out of court, and KWu and WNu degrees are still illegal there.

Finally, a web page gets it right! August 2, 2008 at 12:06 p.m.

www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=...

State - unaccredited degree to employee list August 3, 2008 at 2:58 p.m.

www.spokesmanreview.com/breaking/story.a...

Agencies looking for diploma buyers among employees
Jim Camden
Staff writer
August 1, 2008

Washington state agencies are reviewing the list of customers of a Spokane-based diploma mill, trying to determine whether any are state employees who used fraudulent degrees to get a job, promotion or raise."

When the Human Resources Division finds a name that matches an employee’s name, they will check whether that employee listed the degree on his or her application to get the job, had it added to the personnel file or used it to get a raise or a promotion, Spears said."

You are the phony August 8, 2008 at 6:55 p.m.

The article regarding the Washington State agencies has no place on this page. It is in regard to phony degrees, not Warren National University. You imply the WNU degrees are phony and your posting should be removed and your IP address blocked from future postings.

Errr August 9, 2008 at 1:43 a.m.

I think the article is a great example of:

A) A state enforcing its law against unaccredited degrees, which many here state doesn't happen.

B) More proof (although there already was plenty), that unaccredited degrees are not generally accepted by employers.

Perhaps the most important posting on this site August 9, 2008 at 5:13 p.m.

www.tampatrib.com/FloridaMetro/MGAV6GTVD...

Lawmaker August 9, 2008 at 5:18 p.m.

We are on the right on verge of beheading the Accreditation Cartel.

Florida was our test case.

Texas, you are next. Then Washington, then New Jersey.

Enough is enough.

Lawmaker August 9, 2008 at 5:24 p.m.

www.lewrockwell.com/north/north8.html

Lawmaker August 9, 2008 at 5:28 p.m.

Some rich entrepreneur is going to assemble a bunch of famous professors, record their videos, get their reading lists, and hire an army of Ph.D-holding teaching assistants at $15 per hour. He can hire retired big-name professors, pay them huge salaries, and play the big-name professor game better than the Ivy League.

He will own the finest university on earth, charge $7,000 a year, and make another fortune for himself. Will it get its accreditation? If it does, the precedent is set: 100% distance learning. If not, then the accrediting system will be seen as a cartel-operated sham. Besides, what student will care if it is accredited? Harvard University is not accredited and never has been. This Web-based university will have bigger names than Harvard.

Once someone does this, the precedent will have been set: no accreditation needed. The dominoes will begin to fall. The price of a college education will fall with it.

If the government blocks this inside the U.S., the entrepreneur has 180 (this week) other nations to choose from. Get accreditation there, if it is needed for marketing. If not, forget about it. Use the same faculty, the same textbooks, the same CD-ROM's, the same e-mail addresses. This is distance learning.

When you think of "distance learning," think of an Olympics limited to 45-year-old athletes ("Skilled! Experienced!"), who one day must face 19-year-olds. The distance between the cartel's runners and the newcomers will be measurable in yards, meters, and seconds. The cartel's members will learn at a very great distance.

This is where higher education is headed. The monopoly over higher education is going to be broken up, all over the world.

Most important posting on this site Part 2 August 10, 2008 at 2:26 a.m.

www.tampatrib.com/FloridaMetro/MGAV6GTVD...

Thanks for the link, but just another routine story of an unaccredited degree holder. The degree buyer is discredited and the degree seller is in jail.

"He never received the bonus pay because clerks at the sheriff's office could not get the school to verify his graduation.

Retired federal agent Allen Ezell, who ran the FBI's Operation Diploma Scam from 1980 to 1991, says there's a good reason Columbia State University never confirmed Bordonaro's college work.

``They did not offer courses, period. It's that simple. They weren't set up to do that,'' Ezell said.

In April, a federal grand jury in Los Angeles indicted Pellar on nine counts of mail fraud in connection with his operation of Columbia State University.

Federal agents had no trouble finding Pellar because he was in federal prison for an unrelated fraud scheme."

What really matters August 14, 2008 at 9:04 p.m.

I have attened State (UNF) Schools and on-line schools (Kennedy Western.) Both on-line and in class. I found the self study on-line classes to be harder as I had no dialogue with an instructor burned in memory, no class mates to discuss lectures with, and difficult due to the well written (humor here folks) text books. A friend laughed at my choice of KWU and called it a "fake" school. Months later he did an on-line program with some workmates at University of North Florida where...*gasp* they had the exact same text book. Further *gasp* they took the tests together at night and were able to, er...assist, one another on the questions. I have difficulty accepting that my class has any less value then his.

This is my main issue with the schools system in general. How does one define the merit of a class or degree outside of accreddidation. The Boards are not monitored themselves but are able to pass the accredidation out to those they decide are worthwhile. Who watches the watchers? (Frank Miller fans anyone?)

I consider myself fairly intelligent but do not feel the need to tell someone else their degree is worthless. Different degrees certainly have merit. For instance, a degree from Harvard would be of a higher status then one from University of Florida, a two year degree from University of Florida would have higher stature then from a local community college. IF the argument is the respectability of the degree, I am in agreement. But to disallow it completly rings false.

A degree that is simply paid for should be the truest defining litmus test for a diploma mill. Not the name of the school.

Well August 15, 2008 at 2:43 p.m.

"A friend laughed at my choice of KWU and called it a "fake" school." - Unaccredited, unaccepted, sub-standard, but not fake.

"had the exact same text book."
"I have difficulty accepting that my class has any less value then his." Did you learn the same amount? Maybe. But the key is proving to an external party that you took valid coursework, and that is where KWU fails.

"A degree that is simply paid for should be the truest defining litmus test for a diploma mill." There are varying shades. The GAO called KWU a "sophisticated diploma mill", and the other school simply a "diploma mill".

"How does one define the merit of a class or degree outside of accreddidation."

In the US, US GOV says "accreditation is the PRIMARY means of determining the legitimacy and quality of colleges and universities in the United States"

hansel August 15, 2008 at 9 p.m.

Detective Cleared In Fake Diploma Case.

www.tampatrib.com/FloridaMetro/MGAV6GTVD...

Government Corruption All Around. August 15, 2008 at 9:06 p.m.

Higher education in the United States is a cartel. It is rarely discussed in these terms, but that is what it has been throughout most of the 20th century.

A cartel is an association of producers that jointly establishes certain output criteria for membership. The goal of the cartel is for all of its members to obtain net revenues above what would be possible if there were open competition, especially price competition. Members restrict output in order to gain high revenues per unit sold. The cartel's members raise their prices.

A cartel faces competition from members who cheat and from non-members who enter the market. This is why cartels that do not obtain protection from the State in restricting entry into a market eventually break down. Without State intervention, newcomers attract consumers by offering lower prices. Also, some cartel members cheat by secretly increasing their output, lowering prices, or both. The cartels' other members must then cut prices to retain customers. The cartel breaks down.

Whenever you find a cartel that has existed for several decades, begin a search for State intervention: civil sanctions placed on non-members who seek to enter the market through price competition. In the field of higher education, look for laws against the unaccredited use of certain words: college, university, B.A., M.A., Ph.D.

Accreditation
I have yet to see a history of the collegiate academic accreditation system in the United States. It would make a great Ph.D. dissertation topic for some free market economist. (Perhaps it has been written, and I have missed it.)

There is a Web site that lists the various collegiate accrediting associations: the Council for Higher Education Accreditation. The site also has a revealing page on Government Relations. The organization favors "voluntary enforcement," meaning self-policing by existing members, without additional regulations imposed by the U.S. Department of Education.

Economists might say that "voluntary enforcement" really means "government enforcement of existing regulations, especially against non-member interlopers, but with no new rules imposed on existing cartel members." (Except when analyzing the Federal Reserve System, economists say things like this.)

Recall that the chief goal of a cartel is to keep out price-competitive interlopers. In a document titled, HEA 98 – Summary of Accreditation Provisions,

4 things that discredit this site. August 16, 2008 at 11:11 p.m.

1. Based out of Canada.
This should be enough to make any posters suspect of this fraudulent website. Canada survives at the will of the U.S. Their National Defense could not even defend them from any one of the large US inner city gangs, much less a country like Brazil.
2. It is titled "Online Degree Reviews, but you do not have to warrant actually being a student. This is why the same 5 or 6 people keep posting by changing their names and telling unprovable lies.
3. Everyone posts bogus websites as proof of this or that. No one posts journals or anything verifiable. The root of all postings comes from Wiki references. Real good source.
4. Elitist Morons (REF-The Cat Poster)are not challenged by the site admin with their indirect argument being at best the clean end of a turd.

Ok I get it, this is WNU. Cool! August 16, 2008 at 11:18 p.m.

Some rich entrepreneur is going to assemble a bunch of famous professors, record their videos, get their reading lists, and hire an army of Ph.D-holding teaching assistants at $15 per hour. He can hire retired big-name professors, pay them huge salaries, and play the big-name professor game better than the Ivy League.

He will own the finest university on earth, charge $7,000 a year, and make another fortune for himself. Will it get its accreditation? If it does, the precedent is set: 100% distance learning. If not, then the accrediting system will be seen as a cartel-operated sham. Besides, what student will care if it is accredited? Harvard University is not accredited and never has been. This Web-based university will have bigger names than Harvard.

Once someone does this, the precedent will have been set: no accreditation needed. The dominoes will begin to fall. The price of a college education will fall with it.

If the government blocks this inside the U.S., the entrepreneur has 180 (this week) other nations to choose from. Get accreditation there, if it is needed for marketing. If not, forget about it. Use the same faculty, the same textbooks, the same CD-ROM's, the same e-mail addresses. This is distance learning.

When you think of "distance learning," think of an Olympics limited to 45-year-old athletes ("Skilled! Experienced!"), who one day must face 19-year-olds. The distance between the cartel's runners and the newcomers will be measurable in yards, meters, and seconds. The cartel's members will learn at a very great distance.

This is where higher education is headed. The monopoly over higher education is going to be broken up, all over the world.

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$ August 16, 2008 at 11:24 p.m.

I was able to complete my political science degree here in just over a 2 years. The professors were very professional and helpful; most had had real-world experience as well as concern and care for the students. I can truthfully say that a few became friends of mine, with whom I remain in contact. The degree included some interesting sidelines like UN certification in peacekeeping operations, and I was able to take a good slate of classes in the field of economics in addition to the political science/international relations courses required for the degree. Doing online education of this sort requires a person to be a self-starter, but for those who have the drive, this is a great place.

WNU-ILU August 16, 2008 at 11:29 p.m.

I tried a traditional school for my bachelor's degree but it was seriously lacking. The few courses that WNU offers are right in line with my career goals. The instructors are been-there-done-that folks who haven't spend their entire lives on a campus somewhere, but have been out there putting it on the line for their country. They are now in a position to share the wealth and I consider myself fortunate to be there.

LOL August 17, 2008 at 5:17 a.m.

"The few courses that WNU offers are right in line with my career goals."

What are your career goals? Wasting money on an unrecognized college program that nobody will accept?

Practice this phrase: "Would you like fries with that?"

Here are some links: August 17, 2008 at 5:22 a.m.

"Everyone posts bogus websites as proof of this or that. No one posts journals or anything verifiable"

You must have missed the trainload of independent, 3rd party, verifiable articles on KWU / WNU, so here they are again. Senate testimony, state law, newspaper articles, etc. Keep in mind, that EVERY ONE OF THESE ARTICLES IS ABOUT KWU "STUDENTS"

***"Federal Employees Have Obtained Degrees from Diploma Mills and Other Unaccredited Schools, Some at Government Expense."

***"Diploma Mills are Easily Created and Some Have Issued Bogus Degrees to Federal Employees at Government Expense."

***"Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations: Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"

***"It May Take Hours, But You Too Can Earn a University Degree"

***"When Elected Officials Aren't What They Seem
Texas officials and Pennsylvania cats tout misleading credentials"

***“Real officials, bogus degrees, Fake degrees a growing Texas problem”

***"A dirty dozen - 12 famous diploma mills."

***“Are Fraudulent Academic Degrees Making a Mark on Engineering?”

***“Fighting Fakery - Diploma mills continue to churn out new "graduates" every day. What should legitimate colleges do about them? Is government action called for?”

***“Two less doctors in the house - Hebert, Wilson back away from Ph.D.'s issued by 'diploma mills'”

***“CBS 42 Investigates: Professors' questionable credentials”

***"PS Your PhD may be BS"

***"Texas officials and Pennsylvania cats tout misleading credentials"

***Supervisor of Elections race: Candidate denounces opponent for spreading 'scurrilous rumors.' Oops. What if there were no rumors, scurrilous or otherwise?

HUH? August 17, 2008 at 12:36 p.m.

REF: "You must have missed the trainload of independent, 3rd party, verifiable articles on KWU / WNU, so here they are again. Senate testimony, state law, newspaper articles, etc. Keep in mind, that EVERY ONE OF THESE ARTICLES IS ABOUT KWU "STUDENTS""

All above is opinion based. Diploma mill is a made up word that is defined poorly, and therefore opinion based. And for you to say KWU gave a degree to a cat is a lie.

Just because something is on internet does not make it valid. Show me something in a law journal.

Furthermore, a WNU degree is not illegal in Texas for private use. Call the Tx ODA and they will tell you that the list needs revision to remove WNU. Quote- "We are trying to get WNU removed from the list, but the web is controlled by a contractor who revises it in October and April only."
Other states such as New Jersey say they will definately remove WNU from list in Oct. when WNU becomes candidate.

Cat Turds August 17, 2008 at 12:40 p.m.

"Elitist Morons (REF-The Cat Poster)are not challenged by the site admin with their indirect argument being at best the clean end of a turd."

Well said!

CBS are F$%@ ups August 17, 2008 at 12:43 p.m.

"CBS 42 Investigates: Professors' questionable credentials”"

CBS lost their moral authority to investigate a long time ago.

C Bull Shi August 17, 2008 at 4:12 p.m.

"CBS lost their moral authority to investigate a long time ago."

Reference the Dan Rather Scandle.

These reporters are not to be trusted. They are in bed with the lawyers and our corrupt congress.

Oh no Mr. Bill! August 17, 2008 at 4:19 p.m.

REF:((If a degreed person is over the age of 58, it is highly unlikely that the university they attended in 1966 was accredited since few (if any) universities were accredited back then.))

Wow! The average age of a CEO in the US is about 56 (*). Oh no! This would mean many of our CEOs have unaccredited degrees! God save us!

* Ref below.
www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-10594805...

No sense. August 17, 2008 at 4:54 p.m.

Of my many professional friends, few if any are in a profession where they use their degree for its named purpose.

Yes I am older than most posters on this site.

One of my friends has a Masters in ME from MIT. He sells Buicks.

Another graduated Navy Nuclear Power School (2 year tech school, no college at all)and he holds a high level position at the Dept. of Energy.
Are you saying that if he now goes ahead and earns a degree from WNU that the DOE will have to fire him?

Get a clue.

sssss August 22, 2008 at 11:18 a.m.

www.aaup.org/AAUP/newsroom/prarchives/20...

This might explain why Susan Collins is in love with accreditation.

Congrats! August 24, 2008 at 4:41 a.m.

"Elitist Morons (REF-The Cat Poster)are not challenged by the site admin with their indirect argument being at best the clean end of a turd."

Well said!"

That is literary genius for a KWu "grad". I award you a KWU PhD in Literature for life experience.

Another one bites the dust August 24, 2008 at 5:17 a.m.

"NewsChannel 5 Investigates:
Taxpayers Foot Bill for Questionable Degrees
July 15, 2008"

NewsChannel 5's chief investigative reporter Phil Williams noted a real education at a real school can cost a lot of money. It turns out a not-so-real education can cost just as much money - just ask the spokesperson for Nashville Electric Service.

"He didn't realize it wasn't a legitimate institution," Teresa Corlew said about NES Vice President Eddie Andrews, whose resume boasts an impressive-sounding Masters of Business Administration.

Andrews has an official-looking diploma from Kennedy-Western University.

Another one bites the dust August 24, 2008 at 1:48 p.m.

I am so sorry. :(

When I first posted the above story I forgot to post the link.

Going back in, I had a chance to read the whole thing and realized it was an opinionated editorial and not a real news story.

The bottom line? They will let these guys go and give them increased job compensation, albeit not paying for their education.

I thought you could not use a KWU for state employment.

Not only are they not firing these guys, they are also getting pay raises.
Here is the post. Next time I will try not to forget to post the link. Also I am sorry for not copy/pasting the whole story.

www.newschannel5.com/Global/story.asp?S=...

Thank You for being responsible August 24, 2008 at 2:10 p.m.

To: Another one bites the dust, Thank You for being responsible.

You did the right thing going back in and admitting you got overly anxious to persecute KWU. Good for you!

Today, we see so much editorializing and opinionozing of the news. These two-bit "I Team" investigations are always one sided and try to make something a fact just by saying it.

Anyone can investigate anyone without any accountability nowadays.

The GAO- (Unqualified to investigate a private school) did not even let KWU testify. Also KWU was found "not guilty" of any wrong-doing. The GAO cherry picked the people they wanted to testify.

KWU is PERFECTLY LEGAL in Tn. for private sector use.
A KWU degree is also ok for State employment in Tn.

Legally the state can not pay for KWU degrees, but the degrees are perfectly legal and legit there.

More quotes about KWU Investigation from News 5 August 25, 2008 at 7:26 p.m.

"In fact, Cunningham said NES's handing of the Kennedy-Western situation shows a degree of foolishness.

"Once you understand that this is a bad degree, that it is a worthless meaningless degree, then take action, go to that person say, look we've made a mistake in your case," Cunningham added."

NES said it stopped paying for those unaccredited courses long ago, but the state Board of Regents just now said it's reviewing the policies that let those professors collect bonuses on their questionable degrees.

State personnel officials said they are also reviewing their policies to make sure that no one gets hired in the future with bogus degrees, but we don't know how many may have already slipped through."

More of the same from WNU August 27, 2008 at 1:43 p.m.

From the Chronicle of Higher Education:

August 25, 2008
A Mysterious Silence Emanates From Warren National U.

Warren National University appears to be in trouble.

A note on its Web site says the institution has “suspended, until further notice, the admission or reactivation of students into our degree programs.” What this means for current students is unclear.

Warren National, which is unaccredited, has an interesting history. Previously known as Kennedy-Western University, it has moved from Idaho to California to its current home, Wyoming. It received some unwelcome publicity in 2004, when it and several other unaccredited institutions were the subjects of an investigation by the General Accounting Office. It later changed its name to Warren National.

For the past few days, the university’s Web site has been down. The note blames the decision on “economic uncertainty.” Multiple calls to the university today went to employees’ voice-mail. Even the campus operator failed to answer. —Thomas Bartlett

Accreditation August 29, 2008 at 12:07 p.m.

www.goacta.org/publications/downloads/Ac...

John F Kennedy August 29, 2008 at 2:42 p.m.

chronicle.com/news/article/5058/a-mysterious-silence-emanates-from-warren-national-u

"""From the Chronicle of Higher Education:
August 25, 2008
A Mysterious Silence Emanates From Warren National U."""

The only thing "Mysterious" is the poster, again not leaving a link for other readers of this site. This read comes from a BLOG. If you know what blogs are, they are generally places (like this degree review site) where you do not even have to leave your real name. A new low for the internet.
I urge you to go to WNUs website and see that every thing is fine.
By the way, an attempt at updating Wiki with the story and reference resulted in rejection "Unreliable, unverifiable, assumptive source"
Also try calling CHEA. They said they are unaware of any problems with WNU.

Break the accreditor monopoly August 29, 2008 at 2:53 p.m.

Break the accreditor monopoly.
The traditional division of the country into regions that are the sole province of one accrediting
association makes no sense today, if it ever did. The Department of Education and state governments should require colleges and universities to solicit bids for accrediting services, just as they do for other services. It is of course possible that only the historic, regional accreditor would submit a bid. But competition is a powerful force and even nonprofit institutions
like to grow. The prospect of getting contracts may overcome traditional boundaries and perhaps draw new accreditors into the fi eld. An objection to required bidding might be that universities would be able to seek out accreditors with low costs and low standards. But accreditation standards have already fallen to the lowest common denominator. Instead of causing a “race to the bottom,” competition in accreditation would likely do the opposite. Schools that wanted to diff erentiate themselves by virtue of their high standards, serious teaching, sound curriculum and so forth might seek out selective accreditors whose certifi cation would be a mark of distinction. Competition in this fi eld can only lead to improvement. The states could also seek federal waivers of the law requiring accreditation by a federally recognized accrediting agency (as was done with regard to welfare reform), then devise their own mechanisms for ensuring the educational quality of their institutions.

Make accreditors prove their worth August 29, 2008 at 4:17 p.m.

If the federal government repealed the restriction against using student aid money at nonaccredited colleges and universities, the accreditation system would no longer be guaranteed a market for its services. Accreditors would have to pass the test of the market—i.e., earn enough in voluntary payments to cover all of their operating costs.

Former Boston University president Jon Westling summed up the benefits of opening up a free market in accreditation:
"Accreditation agencies should be, in effect, accredited by their customers. If they have anything worthwhile to offer colleges and universities, colleges and universities will pay them for it. Generally, colleges and universities will pay to be reviewed by the agency which has the strictest standards that the institution thinks it can pass. A free market in accreditation agencies will quickly stratify, with the toughest agencies attracting the best colleges and universities. The public will benefit from a genuine ranking system. Accreditation associations should start acting in a manner more akin to business consultants than monopolies".

MUST READ August 29, 2008 at 4:25 p.m.

www.goacta.org/publications/downloads/Ac...

Foreword
This paper is intended as a primer for policymakers on lessons learned from decades of experience with the federal system of higher education accreditation. It streamlines, updates
and expands ACTA’s 2002 investigation, Can College Accreditation Live Up to Its Promise? At that time we found that accreditation did not ensure quality, was not protecting the curriculum
from serious degradation, and was giving students, parents, and public decision-makers
almost no useful information about institutions of higher education.
Our new investigation fi nds that things have only become worse. Recent stories abound—
illustrated in “Stories from the Front Lines”—about the ills visited upon schools by accreditors,
and about lapses in academic programs that accreditation has failed to prevent. Accreditation
is giving students and parents a false sense of confi dence that certifi ed schools have
passed a meaningful test when they have not.
Today, accreditation is bad education policy that undermines the autonomy of our educational
institutions while doing nothing to ensure academic quality. Congress rightly wants to
ensure that federal student aid funds do not go to “fly by night” operations. But there are other
and better ways to achieve that result—at less cost and with less damage to higher education.
In the following pages, we outline “Why Accreditation Doesn’t Work” and “What Policymakers
Can Do” to fi x the accreditation system now.

Anne D. Neal

Link August 29, 2008 at 6:28 p.m.

For those of you not savvy enough to find an article via google, here is a link to the Chronicle of Higher Education Article

chronicle.com/news/article/5058/a-mysterious-silence-emanates-from-warren-national-u

Also August 29, 2008 at 6:34 p.m.

www.montanasnewsstation.com/Global/story...

Also circulating through the AP and various other papers.

WN "u" August 29, 2008 at 6:38 p.m.

www.wnuedu.com/ says:

"Notice of temporary suspension of admissions to Warren National University

The most important responsibility for Warren National University is to the success of our current students. Warren National University remains committed to our mission of providing the adult learner with a flexible and affordable education that evidences the emerging best practices of online learning in higher education. This is a time of both significant change and of economic uncertainty. In response, the University must focus our resources on meeting our current commitments. For this reason we have suspended, until further notice, the admission or reactivation of students into our degree programs.

We look forward with great anticipation to the day when this moratorium can be responsibly lifted. We recognize that each student provides the University with a unique opportunity to realize our mission as an institution of higher learning."

Thanks for the laughs. August 29, 2008 at 6:46 p.m.

"This read comes from a BLOG. If you know what blogs are, they are generally places (like this degree review site) where you do not even have to leave your real name."

It was written by Tom Bartlett of the Chronicle of Higher Education, which is one of the most respected journals in higher ed.

"I urge you to go to WNUs website and see that every thing is fine."

Read the above from their website, and wildly speculate what wonderful, feel-good reason a 5-state, 2-name "university" would shut down admissions 5 weeks before an accreditation site visit.

"By the way, an attempt at updating Wiki with the story and reference resulted in rejection "Unreliable, unverifiable, assumptive source"

HAHAHAHAHA, so an article published at the Chronicle of Higher Education is dubious, but your anonymous attempts to Wiki something are legitimate?! too funny

"Also try calling CHEA. They said they are unaware of any problems with WNU"

What would CHEA know about WN "u"? I'm sure they are unaware of problems at Rochville University also.

Let's speculate August 29, 2008 at 7:01 p.m.

So, the big question is why are they shutting down?

Best case: They need to completely cut off and separate KW "u" students that are in progress or graduated under the 60% life experience / an-open-book-multiple-choice-exam-for-1-class format from the WNU students who will be taking a recognized course of study.

If so, this is a good indication that they are serious, but distancing themselves from all previous alumni is going to be painful, especially after promises to morph KW "u" into a WNU degree

Worst Case: They need major modifications to the curriculum to pass a review, so they have the above issues with KW "u" "alumni" and the 1/1/07 thru current WNU coursework completed will have to be figured out.

DR. Tihsllub August 29, 2008 at 7:27 p.m.

In my 30 years of working experience, I have never been asked "Were those universities accredited when you went to them?"

In fact, I do not even date my degrees on my resume.

And when did the accredited degree come along?

I thought the schools were what was accredited.

Agreed August 30, 2008 at 12:51 a.m.

"They need to completely cut off and separate KW "u" students that are in progress or graduated under the 60% life experience / an-open-book-multiple-choice-exam-for-1-class format from the WNU students who will be taking a recognized course of study."

I think that is where this is going. KWU are what they were, largely "life-experience" "degrees", with some perfunctory work. WNU degrees will be recognized and legitimate, hence the need to not comingle the two. There will be a definite cutoff between the previous "graduates" of KWU, and all the new curricula graduates of WNU. by not allowing KWU grads to rename their "academic work" as being WNU.

But...... August 30, 2008 at 12:20 p.m.

All diplomas issued since Jan. 07 are labled Warren National Diplomas.

Well August 30, 2008 at 5 p.m.

"But...... August 30, 2008 at 12:20 p.m.

All diplomas issued since Jan. 07 are labled Warren National Diplomas."

True, but I have no idea what it means.

Prior to 2006 labeled KWU - Unrecognized
After accreditation - labeled WNU and recognized
1/1/07 - the shut down this week. - No Idea. I'm afraid these may have been determined to be lacking, and revisions are being made.

Educators are in large part Marxist Lapdogs. September 12, 2008 at 5:54 p.m.

People of the Marxist mindset really do believe the following irrational relationship.

Education equals Job

But......

Job does not equal Education

This is a violation of first principles and is an indication of their elitist and power hungry objectives.

Let us get back to the constitution. Do what you can behind the scenes. Together we can stop Obama-Speek and other elitist drivel.

Cat with an Unaccredited MBA September 12, 2008 at 6:29 p.m.

Don't fear KWU alums! This board is a constant reassurance that our forever unaccredited degrees are worthwhile, even though the elitists don't think so!

GAO SCUM September 22, 2008 at 12:16 a.m.

Guess the GAO is now exposed for the frauds they are. With the collapse of the world financial markets, the GAO and Mrs Gelzer have been exposed.

Hmmm. The same GAO that "Investigated" KWU?

Correct! September 22, 2008 at 2:39 a.m.

You are correct, Kennedy Western University was investigated as a part of Senate Hearing 108-353 "Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations, Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?" where KWU admitted that over 50% of degrees were given for unverified "life experience" and a "course" was one open book exam from the glossary.

Have they published another report on diploma mills that contradicts their initial report?

The state of the financial markets is obviously irrelevant to this discussion, but please let me know if they have updated their diploma mill work.

Thanks,

Bill September 26, 2008 at 7:47 a.m.

Accepted to Grad School; I don't think so.

One does not explain their way into graduate school. Try the hard sell somewhere else, these people need REAL information about REAL schools.

Final word: NO

Rick September 27, 2008 at 5:28 p.m.

All of the teachers at my school have legitimate, accreditted college degrees. Recently, our school board required them to take a general knowledge test, based on a liberal arts core curriculum. Fifteen out of the 26 failed. Guess it's like grandpa always said, a diploma means you were able to pay someone for a piece of paper, doesn't mean you learned anything.

Best so far September 28, 2008 at 1:12 a.m.

"Education equals Job

But......

Job does not equal Education"

Couldn't agree more. Don't bother with a recognized degree or formal training. If you want to be a lawyer, just get out and do some lawyering. If you want to be a businessman, just get out businessing, don't bother with formal training or any credentials that will actually qualify you to do it.

Phd Marketing October 4, 2008 at 4:38 a.m.

What a great slogan:

Here at Kennedy Western: "a diploma means you were able to pay someone for a piece of paper, doesn't mean you learned anything."

I award you a PhD in Marketing for life experience.

Why is Warren National still shut down? October 4, 2008 at 3:26 p.m.

From their website? " until further notice, the admission or reactivation of students into our degree programs.

We look forward with great anticipation to the day when this moratorium can be responsibly lifted. We recognize that each student provides the University with a unique opportunity to realize our mission as an institution of higher learning."

LazyJAE October 7, 2008 at 4:01 p.m.

You have to love the cry babies on this blog site, accredited, unaccredited, accredited unaccredited, Illegal, legal. If KWU/WNU is an illegal diploma mill as the basher’s and Lieberman claim they are, then there has been a crime committed and they are subject to arrest under either a state law or a federal CFR laws, period. Remember the word is “ILLEGAL”.

Imagine Senator’s investigating colleges and universities. They can’t control the budget, balance a check book, are found to be corrupt, accepting bribes from lobbyists, corrupt corporations and illegal campaign moneys from foreign nationals and they are investigating institutions of higher learning. That is like the Mafia setting on the Supreme Court.

LazyJAE October 7, 2008 at 4:03 p.m.

I have taken numerous courses over the web from both the military and through FEMA, Federal Emergency Management Agency. All open book or web based reading, then take the test on line, question and answer or true and false, open book. Nearly every course upon successful completion was good for at least one college semester hour, some up to three depending on the length of the course.

All I had to do was have a copy of the transcripts from either one of those institutes forwarded, to certify course completion, to the schools admission office at the school of my choice, pay the schools required semester hour rate to have a transcript made up showing the course completion on that schools transcript letter head.

Now I can say that I attended Joe Blow College and have the transcripts to prove it. Any accredited college or university. All because the federal government says that they have to accept the course work or loose federal subsidies, Pell Grants, Stafford Loans, GI Bill, Etc. Another words, federal black mail.

Some have said that giving life experience credit is bogus. Well if you read most schools admissions policies, upon submitting a portfolio, they will review it and can or may give you up to 25% of the schools required course work credit for the life experience, seminars, conferences and other course work related to the career field you are studding in. No school can give more than 50% credit and you must complete at least 25% of the school curriculum in order to receive a degree from that institution. This varies some state by state.

Diploma Mill October 7, 2008 at 4:24 p.m.

"Some have said that giving life experience credit is bogus. Well if you read most schools admissions policies, upon submitting a portfolio, they will review it and can or may give you up to 25%"

There is just a little bit of truth in this statement. Prior learning assessment (PLA) is available at some schools, but you completely misrepresent the quantity of credits that can be granted and make it appear as if every student at every college qualifies for these credits. Below is a good source that shows an average award of 14.4 credits for PLA, which is realistic for military personnel. The report also shows that very few universities award and very few student receive PLA credit.

"AN INVESTIGATION OF PRIOR LEARNING ASSESSMENT PROCESSES IN
TEXAS PUBLIC UNIVERSITIES OFFERING NONTRADITIONAL
BACCALAUREATE DEGREES" Rusty Freed - North Texas Disseratation.

"For those institutions that responded that credit was awarded solely through experience, the mean number of credit hours awarded through work experience was 14.4"

Contrast this to Kennedy Western, who during a Senate investigation of Diploma Mills, admitted they granted an AVERAGE of 55% of the degree based on claims of life experience, no portfolio required. 55% of a BS degree would be around 70 / 128 credits.

LazyJAE October 8, 2008 at 2:40 p.m.

You’re obviously trying to read more into it than there is. The key words are CAN or MAY, doesn't say a thing that they WILL or DID. You just pointed out that the mean number was 14.4 credits, so we know for a fact that schools do award such credits.

As for KWU/WNU they do require a portfolio and they do require that you have any transcripts from what ever school that you previously attended forwarded to their school directly. I know this for a fact because I made the inquiry not only there but at a number of other distant learning schools. We are obviously talking about two different time frames here too.

Another thing, how come you don't address the corrupt government officials who conducted this half XXX senate hearing. Why were my tax dollars wasted on a senate hearing over distant learning schools and diploma mills? Why do we have federal law enforcement agencies? To enforce criminal laws, hum. So if there is a criminal act here selling bogus diplomas then the Senate investigations should have been turned over to law enforcement or federal prosecutor’s or both.

So why are you such a basher of THIS school? Flunk out, disgruntled employee, work for some other school, you just like to stir the pot. If there is any one at fault here then it should be the State of Wyoming, Board of Regents for allowing KWU/WNU to issue a post secondary degree. It doesn’t matter that this school is accredited or unaccredited. When you do the research of the accreditation groups there is a whole list of schools that have gained accreditation, then turned around and lost it for what ever reason, then become re-accredited. How about the accredited schools that are closing down all over the country because of corruption and greed, over paid staff, professors and CEO or Chancellors? Very interesting isn’t it. Get a life, get a job and be something besides a cry baby. An education is an education no matter where you achieve it from. Combine it with some experience and you can go far, be all that you can be. Oh by the way. Is your JOB accredited? If not, your probably doing or performing sub-par work too.

Diploma Mill October 9, 2008 at 5:05 a.m.

"You just pointed out that the mean number was 14.4 credits, so we know for a fact that schools do award such credits"

Yes, in rare instances in limited amounts, again you are misrepresenting how uncommon it is, the most seen in that entire study was 30 credits, which is not the 55% of entire degrees that KWU copped to for EVERY STUDENT.

"As for KWU/WNU they do require a portfolio"

Not when I applied.

"Another thing, how come you don't address the corrupt government officials who conducted this half XXX senate hearing"

Irrelevant to the substandardness of KWU as proven in the Diploma Mill hearing.

"then the Senate investigations should have been turned over to law enforcement or federal prosecutor’s or both"

Agree, but I do believe 486 people lost their jobs or where disciplined, Google "Laura Callahan"

"So why are you such a basher of THIS school? "

Just citing well-documented facts like many of the other posters here.

"When you do the research of the accreditation groups there is a whole list of schools that have gained accreditation, then turned around and lost it for what ever reason, then become re-accredited."

Then cite your research, would like to read about all of them.

LazyJAE October 9, 2008 at 8:33 p.m.

So you are a disgruntled former student. 486 people loosing jobs does not constitute criminal prosecution of the school and its officials. All it shows is that the federal government dismissed or disciplined a number of employees because their degrees were not from accredited schools which are questionable at best. They never mentioned how many of those people were appointed and not covered by union contracts. We can beat that one all day long because if you go and look at most of your senior employees who have 30 or more years service, their degrees will not be accredited either. Accreditation just came about in the last 25 or 30 years, and it does not guarantee a quality education. It only guarantees the school qualifies for federal financial aid, more of our welfare system at work.

My research: go to the North Central Council on Accreditation and read their web site. You know how to search the other accreditation agencies.

If you do not like the school that you go to, change, go some where else, but don’t say how crummy it is because it didn’t meet your expectations. There isn’t a school out there that will turn down your money if at all possible. As for a small percentage of schools that will give credit for job experience. I have had at least four tell me they would; Ohio State University was willing to award me a quarter just for my military service alone for general subjects and another quarter for my prior education. Columbus State Community College an entire year because of my prior education and job experience along with Grantham University and California Coast University all accredited schools.

WNU appears to be turning its self around. They have stopped accepting any further students until becoming accredited. Good for any new students because their degrees will be accredited. They are meeting the State of Wyoming, Board of Regents accreditation requirements. By the way each state is very different. California says that they will not accept any schools degrees that are not accredited, yet they still have a number of post-secondary schools still unaccredited. Double standard here isn’t it? We don’t need more government control; we need more self control and self policing, after all isn’t that what a free society is all about, the opportunity to choose?

Diploma Mill October 9, 2008 at 9:36 p.m.

"look at most of your senior employees who have 30 or more years service, their degrees will not be accredited either"

So a Harvard degree from 1970 is invalid? Really?

"As for a small percentage of schools that will give credit for job experience. I have had at least four tell me they would" "Ohio State University was willing to award me a quarter"

Congrats, you are one of the very small group the PLA was intended for, and your credit award exceeds anything discovered in detailed disseration research on PLA.

"WNU appears to be turning its self around." - Agreed, I hope they become accredited and start providing students a useful credential.

"have stopped accepting any further students until becoming accredited"

Debateable, true, they have been shut down since August, but no reason given why. There are many angry students who were in progress that were dumped without refunds and little explanation.

"Accreditation ... only guarantees the school qualifies for federal financial aid, more of our welfare system at work."

Wrong, From US Dept. of Ed

"... accreditation is the PRIMARY means of determining the legitimacy and quality of colleges and universities in the United States"

Cat with an Unaccredited MBA October 10, 2008 at 1:09 a.m.

My degree from Trinity Southern, degrees from Kennedy Western all good, stop hatin.

TuitionPaid October 10, 2008 at 3:15 a.m.

My employer, a major bank, reimbursed me for all of my WNU tuition.

Clueless Employer October 10, 2008 at 4:56 a.m.

"My employer, a major bank, reimbursed me for all of my WNU tuition."

Really? Which bank? My bank laughed in my face.

WNU advises on illegality of its degrees October 10, 2008 at 6:48 p.m.

WN "u" FAQ from their site

"I live in a state that identifies unaccredited degrees as "illegal". Will Warren National University's process of accreditation impact my ability to list my degree on my résumé without repercussions?"

If a state's law requires that only degrees from accredited institutions be listed on a résumé, it is likely that Warren National University (WNU) degrees would only be "legal" when(and if) WNU is accredited. When (and if) WNU is accredited, chances are you will have to be admitted to a program following accreditation and graduate, before declaring your degree as being from an accredited institution. WNU recommends that students contact the legal authority in their state because the requirements under each law may differ between states and may be complicated.

WNU Grad. October 15, 2008 at 3 a.m.

Folks, there seems to be much speculation and certainly many complaints coming from various places concerning WNU. As a recent graduate of WNU, I can say this. Earning a degree from WNU does take a lot of work and dedication. It took me two years to complete my BS degree. For those who make it sound so easy, students' that have really attended WNU, will tell you that if you do not have at least 60-credits, you cannot be admitted without passing their GERE comprehensive exams covering mathematics and English. This is required before you can even take one class. Most students are then required to take eight courses and complete a major final project in APA format. The final project is not just a few pages of mumbo-jumbo. My final project was 100-pages of well researched data covering a topic related to my degree major, which was business.

WNU Grad. October 15, 2008 at 3:01 a.m.

The final paper proposal alone took eight weeks to prepare, sighting the references in the annotated bibliography. After dialoging back and fourth of my professor, I was able to get the approval to begin work on the final project. The final project is so intensive that the University now offers students the option to complete several additional courses, in lieu of the final project. Why? The final project is, and always has been a big challenge for any student. If you have not attended WN university or been through the course work, or worked with the faculty, then you have no credible opinion about the level of difficulty concerning Warren’s degree programs. Everyone’s a critic.

WNU Grad. October 15, 2008 at 3:01 a.m.

Now all that said, Warren’s programs are sound. Now, I also want to offer some credible information concerning Warren’s suspended admissions status and accreditation standing. This is based on the student news letter that we students receive monthly. I just received this month’s new letter today.

My best estimation is that they school is ramping up for accreditation. This is their primary focus. The news letter announced many new staff additions, which does not suggest that the university is planning to close. I mean, come on, the school has been in business for over two decades. It is prudent to make the required changes to remain operating. Keep in mind that Accreditation for WU fosters in Title IV funding NCA/HCL means that WNU will have greater access to funding for their students.

This will surely help WNU grow, so accreditation is a huge benefit for WNU; any way you look at it. That said, they are making the changes they need to satisfy NCA/HLC and meet the statements made in their self study. You might be thinking, this guy seems to be making sense. I do know what I am talking about, because I went through the NCA accreditation process with my current employer. I work for an education company.

WNU Grad. October 15, 2008 at 3:01 a.m.

Despite any negative past, if you meet the HLC requirements, you will be accredited, period! NCA/HLC cannot and will not discriminate against any school. You either meet the benchmark, or you do not. HLC is there to help schools become accredited; not to find ways to keep schools out. HCL accreditation is not a good old boys club. It is black and white. Knowing what I do about the process, as I recently went through an onsite full accreditation review; any school can become accredited, as long as they are committed to doing so.

I will also say to you skeptics, give WNU some credit. They are making changes to meet a standard. Once they meet the standard, WNU is no different than any other accredited university. I am sure the critics will be silenced in time.

I also want to note that the new Dean of students recently sent every WNU student a letter outlining the university’s new policy changes. The letter explained to every student that they need to be engaged in their degree program and be dedicated to completion, or be at risk being dropped.

No doubt, WNU wants every student in their current program to complete, so they can transition into the HLC required changes. In the two years of enrollment at WNU, there were many changes made.

Finally, I will say a few things in closing. I’ve probably made more money per annum than most of you reading this; double six figures and I have W2’s to prove it. It’s about brains, as well as the sheepskin. My time spent at WNU was tough and I did learn a lot. I read through every text book, from cover to cover. My project research was very deep. I have been accepted into a graduate school with my WNU degree. I will be attending a private, religious based university; pursuing an accredited degree in Christian Counseling. What ever was of WNU’s past, they seem to be absolute toward gaining NCA/HLC accreditation, which is good for all past and future WNU graduates.

Long live Warren National University!

Helpful October 15, 2008 at 6:21 a.m.

I'm glad WNU is being upfront about the utility of their degrees. I have been accepted, but will take a wait and see approach for a year to see how their attempt at accreditation goes.

"it is likely that Warren National University (WNU) degrees would only be "legal" when(and if) WNU is accredited. When (and if) WNU is accredited, chances are you will have to be admitted to a program following accreditation and graduate,"

Funny WNU Grad October 15, 2008 at 1:38 p.m.

So you're making "double six figures" without a college degree, at an education company that recently went through a full accrediation process?

What possible job exists for a high school graduate to make that kind of $$ in higher ed???

WNU Grad. October 15, 2008 at 5:22 p.m.

It's called having partial ownership in a private school smart guy. I have not and do not provide instruction, but I am the head of marketing and a majority share holder of a private school. We leave the academics and instruction to the PhDs. That's what they are good at; but they could not run a for profit business to save their lives. As an owner, not involved with the educational administration; I'm not required to have any degree. Yes, my job does exist and the degree was not important, since I am a shareholder. Ownership has its advantages.

John J. October 15, 2008 at 8:52 p.m.

You can Rah Rah all you want, but I don't know why these WN "u" "graduates" keep posting this BS, when every factual account contradicts it. The newspaper in my area reported on KWU - "It May Take Hours, But You Too Can Earn a University Degree"

"Once they meet the standard, WNU is no different than any other accredited university."

LOL, when Charles Manson gets out jail, he will be no different than any other USA citizen...

LazyJAE October 15, 2008 at 9:10 p.m.

Funny

You must live in a box without light, sound or intellect. I personally know a man who is a high school grad who made over 1 million dollars last year as a farmer. I know another who owns a multi-million dollar motorcycle franchise, and I know two brothers who own an entire factory with world wide contracts making so much money they own their own jet and airport facility to land it on.

A degree guarantees nothing other than you have spent another 2, 3 or 4 or more years studding in a particular subject, then it is good luck Charlie. WNU Grad may have received an inheritance some where down the line and was able to purchase a majority of the shares in a private for profit school. Probably wouldn't be the first time.

No one but a disgruntled former student who couldn’t cut the mustard, so to speak, would still be crying about WNU not being accredited. Get on with life, go to a school that meets your needs and quit harping on the school because it isn’t accredited. It is a matter of freedom of choice, buyer be ware, but be careful how you keep bashing the school publicly because you could face a defamation law suit some day.

The school is legitimate or the State of Wyoming wouldn’t allow it to continue operating because doing so would be theft by deception. Another thing, accreditation is voluntary, not mandatory, again not a crime. There are thousands of schools out there public and private, a lot accredited, a lot who are not and some, some where in between.

I have attended both and have seen very little difference in either other than that word “Accredited” My office has a sign on it “Accredited by BBB”. It doesn’t make me operate any differently other than I now have this fancy sticker for my door.

WNU just went through the review process yesterday and today for acceptance so give them a break and move on, they appear to be.

WNU Grad. October 16, 2008 at 12:24 a.m.

So there are a few WNU students that could not make it through the program and complain because they do not qualify for a refund. Every school has a refund policy, which gives students a certain amount of time to decide if the school is a good fit. The fact of the matter is that WNU has graduated thousands of students with very few complaints, respectively. It will be nice to see when they announce their candidacy for accreditation; which will happen if they match their self study outline. Plain and simple...

Agreed October 16, 2008 at 2:27 a.m.

"It will be nice to see when they announce their candidacy for accreditation"

I agree, but I have pity for all the KWu "grads" out there that got snookered. In a few years, the first WNU grad will be getting something for their hard-earned money. That will be a good day.

Good article October 16, 2008 at 2:05 p.m.

Wyoming's plethora of 'diploma mills' not getting much credit
BY MEAD GRUVER
Associated Press

CHEYENNE, Wyo. - The campus of American Capital University has no tree-shaded quadrangle, no stately old buildings or libraries, no classrooms, no fraternity houses -- not even a student curled up with a book in a quiet corner.

There's just a middle-age man who sits at a computer in a tiny, undecorated, windowless office in the basement of a downtown building.

But in a sense, this fellow -- Bill Allen, American Capital University's chief academic officer -- has lots of company: Wyoming licenses 10 other online schools that are not accredited by any mainstream organization and maintain only a token physical presence in the state.

LAUGHING MATTER

'People start to giggle if you say `Wyoming-licensed school,' if you know about accreditation,'' said George Gollin, a University of Illinois physics professor and crusader against diploma mills, schools that offer degrees for little or no academic work.

Because of loose state requirements, more online schools are popping up in Wyoming than anywhere else, according to Steven Crow, executive director of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools, the regional school accreditation agency.

''Most other states have enough rigor in how they determine who can operate as a college and grant degrees that it's not as easy for places to get started,'' he said.

Cheyenne alone is home to six distance-learning schools, five within a few blocks of one another. A typical example is Paramount University of Technology, with a couple of offices in the basement of a sleepy downtown mall. At the end of the street, American City University occupies a couple of rooms in an ornate, Victorian-era building that once housed a brothel.

MULTIPLE CHOICE

Another school, Kennedy-Western University, was the focus of a U.S. Senate Governmental Affairs Committee investigation last year. At the school, only an open-book, multiple-choice test with 100 questions was required in a course on hazardous waste management; the same with environmental law and regulatory compliance.

''With just 16 hours of study, I had completed 40 percent of the course requirements for a master's degree,'' said Claudia Gelzer, a committee staff member.

LazyJAE October 16, 2008 at 7:16 p.m.

So why didn't Lieutenant Commander Claudia Gelzer finish the program then if it was so easy? It looks to me that it would have given her more credibility to complain about the program. Then again, she is representing a U.S. Senator who wasted our tax money in search of what? The school is still operational; they are still issuing diplomas or degrees. I wonder what school she graduated from. I also wonder why a United States Navy sailor is working for a U.S. Senator any way. Some more waste of my hard earned tax money being squandered. If she is a real Lieutenant Commander then she should have been out in the fleet performing the job in which the Navy hired her to do. She found the answers in the back of the book. Hello, ever take a test where the answers were not some where in the book. How about the local college professor who puts the answers on the board, take notes and you can pass my tests. My granddaughter attended a state university who allowed open book tests. I some times wonder who these complainers really are. Have they ever really attended a local college and university? There isn't much difference. How about the cheating scandals in the three military academies’. Our future military officers. Remember only about 10% of the cheaters really get caught, so maybe we should shut down the military academy’s on ethic violations or better yet take their accreditation away from them. I don't believe she did 16 hours of study for 40 credit hours either. Maybe to complete 40 percent of one course. Then maybe again she is a speed reader with a photographic memory, very few people can do that.

Just the facts - documented testimony October 16, 2008 at 8:02 p.m.

I enjoy your unsupported anecdotes and tangents, but unfortunately KWU practices are well documented. This gal was just like every other KWU student, getting the first half of her degree waived for no reason, then spending a couple of hours per graduate class to finish up.

I disagree that "there isn't much difference" between the KWU method and a typical college. Keep in mind, this gal was a journalism major taking grad-level environmental engineering courses, LOL.

Senate Hearing 108-553
BOGUS DEGREES AND UNMET EXPECTATIONS: ARE TAXPAYER DOLLARS SUBSIDIZING DIPLOMA MILLS?

I chose two classes, ‘‘Hazardous Waste Management’’ and ‘‘Environmental Law and Regulatory Compliance.’’. The course guidelines arrived by E-mail and contained no
actual syllabus. No papers, homework assignments, online discussions, or interaction with the professor was required.

Once enrolled in my classes, I was assigned a student advisor. There was no time restriction, she said. If I felt prepared to take the tests the day after tomorrow. I ordered the Hazardous Waste Management test first. I had neither read nor reviewed the textbook. My objective was to determine whether the test was, in fact, legitimate. I had 3 hours to complete 100 questions, and I was able to answer most of them by simply looking up a key word in the index, turning to that section of the text, and finding the answer.

Not long after, I withdrew from the school, as by then we had a good sense of Kennedy-Western’s academic program. With just 16 hours of study, I had completed 40 percent of the course requirements for my Master’s degree."

WNU Grad. October 17, 2008 at 12:32 p.m.

Whatever the Lieutenant Commander did back then at KW, was not the same program I completed through WNU. I spent countless hours, over the course of two years reading every page of the tests; along with over 6-months of research on my final project. There is no way in the world the Lieutenant Commander would have completed the final project in less than 4-6 months. WNU also uses Blackboard, the same LMS used by most online universities; i.e. Capella and U of Phoenix. If you haven’t completed a program with WNU recently, then you have no idea what you are taking about. Oh, and I did have a good deal of interaction between my cohorts and professors. Don’t believe the hype; the way WNU operates today matches up with other mainstream universities.

LazyJAE October 17, 2008 at 1:01 p.m.

Well let’s start dropping school names then. Marion Technical College in Marion, Ohio. I was teaching a class there on public safety in a criminal justice course. I hadn't even set up my material when 4 or 5 of the students just got up and walked out of the class. The Professor said nothing. I asked him if this was normal or permissible. His answer, "I don't care as long as they show for their exam". Shawnee State University in Portsmouth, Ohio, chemistry class students were allowed to have an open book test as well as ask the instructor what page to find the answers on. Should I go on? Ohio State University, they could care less if you ever show for class as long as you can pass the exam and quizzes. All accredited schools. Hum, I wonder if there are any ethic issues here.

My facts are correct and accurate including KWU. This journalism major as you call her was nothing more than a congressional hack doing a follow up for some quack Senator who had a boner on because some disgruntled student complained to him. Colleges and Universities are cutting class times and every thing else to push people through degree programs. Show me Claudia Gelzer’s resume, educational background and the university that she graduated from, facts, only the facts. She dropped out of KWU, whose money did she spend, because it is my understanding that you have to pay the full tuition up front before you can start the academic program. My tax money probably. So she wasted how many thousands of our tax payer’s dollars just to say this school was a diploma mill, of which she never completed, so she can not say that with accurately because she never completed the courses required to get her degree?

Once again if the school is doing some thing illegal then go after them through the court system and shut them down. The same with any other school any where in the country doing the same whether accredited or not. I can show you doctors who have graduated from some of the top universities in the country that do not have the brains to come in out of the rain, but no one ever questions their degrees or how they got them. Only that they have one. The name on the sheep skin doesn’t guarantee a quality education no matter what school you attended. You bloggers in here never address the problem only cry about system and how the school is a so easy and didn’t meet your expectations or some one else’s. Get a life, get a job, and move on because it is apparent that this school isn’t going away any time soon.

Good point about shady KWU billing practices October 17, 2008 at 1:12 p.m.

"whose money did she spend, because it is my understanding that you have to pay the full tuition up front before you can start the academic program. My tax money probably"

From the Senate Diploma Mill Investigation of Kennedy Western

"First, our investigation showed that some diploma mills and
other unaccredited schools modified billing practices so students can obtain payments for degrees by the Federal Government."

Gelzer: That amount was $6,525, payable all at once or in installments, but with no less than 25 percent down
to start. I asked why the school charged for its degrees in a lump sum.

As you know, the Federal Government can only reimburse students or employees for courses, not for a degree. So I told my counselor the Coast Guard would only reimburse me by the class. She said not to worry. Kennedy-Western could make it look like they were charging me per class by drawing up a bill reflecting a course-bycourse breakdown.

But... October 17, 2008 at 1:19 p.m.

"WN "u" also uses Blackboard, the same LMS used by most online universities; i.e. Capella and U of Phoenix. If you haven’t completed a program with WNU recently, then you have no idea what you are taking about. "

Let's assume that after they correct whatever major issues that caused them to shut down in August, the courses are exactly the same as a Capella.

So as a student, you are looking at both that have the exact same course. But from WNU you are not getting an accredited degree and you have all the baggage of 5 state moves, Senate hearing, press coverage, etc.

Why would an informed person choose WNU over Capella or any other of the dozens of same programs out there?

LazyJAE October 17, 2008 at 2:29 p.m.

This blogg site amazes me. The response must be computer generated because no one ever responds to the questions in an appropriate manner, such as Good Points response.

Geizer spent $6,525.00 but never says whether it was out of her own pocket or the Senators budget. Why would any one spend their own money for a senate investigation? Hum amazing isn't it.

Then the additional response goes on to talk about the Coast Guard would only reimburse me by the class. Most agencies reimburse by the quarter or upon successful completion of a program. So who cares how the billing is broke down? That isn't generally an issue with most employers. The school does charge by the semester hour for each course.

Then it goes on to talk about choosing WNU versus Capella or some other program. No one knows for sure how a program is going to be until you actually enroll and get started. I have never read an advertisement yet from any school, company or organization that represents its self in a negative manner. That is called "negative marketing", it just isn't done.

Many legitimate choices out there October 17, 2008 at 7:47 p.m.

"Geizer spent $6,525.00" - I do believe this came out of the Coast Guard reimbursement program. One of the Diploma Mill exhibits shows how KWU doctored up a bill for $812 for one course to facilitate reimbursement, so I am guessing it was $1,624 for the two grad classes she finished that weekend. A pretty cheap investigation that saved $100,000's of taxpayer money by ending improper payments.

"No one knows for sure how a program is going to be until you actually enroll and get started."

So nobody ever does research on a school before enrolling? They just pick one out of a hat, enroll, and hope for the best?

Actually, students research schools through resources such as the Princeton Review that evaluate the school based on reputation, average student academics, location, enrollment size, etc. There is a ton of info out there.

Please tell me what part of WNU's reputation, accreditation, cost, or program quality would be a good selling point to a student looking?

Reputation - spend 30 seconds on Google, and it's a no-go. (Even if you ignore the notorious KWU years and focus on WNU, they are still tied)

Accreditation - possibly 2 years from now

Cost - actually not too bad, some small CC's or state schools are cheaper though.

Program - changing, like you said, unknown at this point, with a best-case goal of being the "same" as other programs. No differentiator.

Just a visitor from Europe October 18, 2008 at 4:16 a.m.

I went to school in Europe (University of Frankfurt in Germany; public university). This website has been very interesting for me to read. I also read the comments under Ashworth University as well and posted a comment there. Being relatively new to this educational system, I would like to know why any person would even consider schools that are not accredited. I understand that there are various accreditations as well such as DETC and Regional Accreditation. From what I gather, DETC is national accreditation and is not as highly recognized as RA in the academic community as well as in the "real world". There are many, many colleges and universities in this country. Surely there are programs in various academic areas for working adults that also have RA. I just find it hard to understand why people don't insist on RA (or at the very least DETC accreditation) in order to have a degree that will be "completely valid" in everyone's eyes.

Right on October 18, 2008 at 2:05 p.m.

"Being relatively new to this educational system, I would like to know why any person would even consider schools that are not accredited"

You are absolutely correct. However, some people that do not qualify for a regular school or do not want to do the work needed buy a degree from places like this and try to pass it off on employers and rationalize it as being "different" or "deserved" based on life experience.

There are hundreds of legitimate schools out there that offer real programs.

WNU grad. October 18, 2008 at 2:45 p.m.

You are all too far hung up on the sheepskin. I have a Bachelor of Science degree from WNU. I have had many people reporting to me with Bachelors, Masters and PhD degrees from accredited universities. Yes, I am their boss, because I have a greater skill set. I have owned a successful soft ware development firm, a private education company and also own a restaurant chain. I enjoy being an entrepreneur. Education is very important for the sake of learning. There are many people with an accredited degree that have learned nothing in college. Conversely, there are many people with zero post secondary experience who are brilliant and successful. College does not make the man.

My experience and drive are what makes me successful and not the sheepskin. The only reason I pursued a bachelor degree was to get into a bible graduate college, where I could earn a masters degree in Christian Counseling. This will allow me to help people; not for money, but because people need good advice in this crazy world. A bachelor’s degree was a prerequisite for this program, or I never would have pursued additional formal schooling. My accredited graduate school accepted my degree from WNU. I’ve made a good deal of money without a degree, based on the intelligence that God gave to me at birth. Like many people, I am a life learner and I don’t need to spend time listening to some PhD talk about business theory, when I have already been able to achieve real success.

I suspect that most people pursue a degree from WNU because it will work for their needs. It worked for my needs. And by the way, I am sure I could easily secure a job making 6-figures with my degree from WNU. Not because of my degree, but because of my proven track record in business. Anyone that makes a hiring decision solely based upon a degree is an idiot. It’s the candidate and not the degree, stupid. Any smart business person understands this.

I’ve met way too many educated people that have zero real world experience; and couldn’t negotiate their way out of a paper bag. For those of you who remain that a WNU degree is substandard, you are sadly mistaken. None of you naysayers have ever taken a course at WNU or completed a degree program. As soon as you do, you will have a right to a say. Until then, stop your whining and get a job. : -)

Screwed over a vet October 18, 2008 at 6:10 p.m.

As a veteran, I researched the school Kennedy Western. I got all my financial aid and yes it was a paced program. My problem is I never checked into class because I called the advisor at that time to inform them that I was going over seas and when I returned I would start my FIRST class. When I returned the university changed its name to Warren University and dropped my degree program. They also said they would no longer take my military schools because the program no longer existed. I am still paying for classes that I have never attended and for ones that do not exist. How can some take money when the student is not even completely in a class. Someone help me.

To:Right On & WNU Grad October 18, 2008 at 6:39 p.m.

Thank you "Right On" for explaining that to me. So...some schools give so-called "life-experience" meaning that they give college credit for their work experience? Is that common? It also seems like (and I am probably very wrong here) employeers would just do an educational background check and discover that the individual in question doesn't have an accredited degree or one from a degree mill. Therefore, they don't get the job. I would imagine that it must be very difficult for them to get a good job that requires an educational/academic training. Is that true?

To: WNU Grad
You have obviously found a situation that is comfortable for you through your hard work. I am happy for you and you should feel good about your accomplishments. However, it seems to me, based on the comments I have read here and in the reviews on WNU, that you are in a rather small minority. The school's rating based on the reviews is about 4.45 out of 10. That indicates a deep and wide spread dis-
satisfaction with the school, don't you agree? People seem to be very upset and disappointed with their experience. I have read a number of the reviews on other schools and, for the most part, they are mild compared to what I am reading here. Now, I do understand that it worked out for you, but unless I don't understand English well, it seems that the vast majority of the people disagree with you.

More KWU "grads" ordered to cease and desist - PhD October 27, 2008 at 8:13 p.m.

10/24/08 - Just another report from New Jersey Newspaper and NJ Higher ed ordering KWU grads to stop identifying themselves as PhD's and throw them in the trash. Once caught, they complied immediately.

"According to the commission's letters released Thursday, two others received degrees from another apparent diploma mill, Kennedy Western University in Cheyenne, Wyo., now Warren National University.

Wilhelmina P. D'Dumo, an instructor of psychiatry at the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey's school of osteopathic medicine, Cherry Hill, and Edward J. Moskal of Kinnelon, an assistant professor of computer science at St. Peter's College, the Jesuit College of New Jersey based in Jersey City, were both ordered to drop their doctoral titles."

"they found D'Dumo and Moskal in violation of state statutes that govern academic titles"

"responded to the commission's request, writing that they had complied with the order"

www.app.com/article/20081024/NEWS/810240...

WNU / VET DOING JUST FINE November 1, 2008 at 12:20 p.m.

As a contractor in the nuclear industry, My WNU BSME has not helped my pay-grade so much as I had hoped (I was making about 125K/yr+ pdm prior to my degree -with just Navy Nuclear Engineering School and nuclear operations experience- and now I make about 132K/yr+ pdm).
What has increased almost exponentially is the number of job offers I get.
I think people understand that Navy Nuclear School is more difficult than any college degree and that the degree is a mere formality.
I am the real thing, as God is my witness.

Another WNU / Vet November 2, 2008 at 5:14 a.m.

I have to agree with the above. I'm doing fine with my career, but regret wasting $$ on an easy degree that I can't even put on my resume out of fear of being exposed.

WNU grad. November 2, 2008 at 6:38 p.m.

Most people, in most states, can list their WNU degree on their résumé with no concern whatsoever. Furthermore, if WNU does get their HLC accreditation, none of us graduates will have anything to worry about. We will have a degree from a regionally accredited university. I realize the degree itself will not become accredited, without the possibility of further course work, but no one is going to take their time to research specifics; unless of course, you are applying for a job with the FBI. Of the tens of thousands of WNU gradates’, there would be many more complaints, if alumni were really having any major problems. Only time will tell. It seems to make sense that WNU will be making a public accreditation update soon, since their onsite candidacy visit has been completed.

Advuce for KWU grads - lie and rationalize November 3, 2008 at 6:30 a.m.

LOL, this is the classic KWU mindset, lying by omission and rationalization. Will KWU put in it their "alumni" newsletter on how to fool potential employers and avoid detection?

I disagree that the KWU "Phd's" that are being thrown in the trash in every state are going to suddenly become legitimate.

"none of us graduates will have anything to worry about. I realize the degree itself will not become accredited, without the possibility of further course work, but no one is going to take their time to research specifics"

WNU grad. November 3, 2008 at 1:14 p.m.

There is a difference between a KW and WNU degree. You will all realize this over time. And once their accreditation is finalized, I will be the fist one to congratulate WNU for their well deserved accolade. For all of you haters, keep on whining. As a WNU grad. I have a great job making a good salary. I am sure if I were looking for a new job, I know my employment chances would be better listing my WNU then no degree at all. That said, keeping working hard, so you can stay caught up on your negative am. mortgage. LOL

Incorrect November 3, 2008 at 4:26 p.m.

"There is a difference between a KW and WNU "degree"."

Unfortunately, they are exactly the same thing right now, unaccredited and unacceptable to anyone competent enough to run a background check. In about 2 years, we can draw a clear dividing line, and at that point a WNU degree (no quotations needed!) will be worthwhile for those beginning the program after that date, and should be congratulated.

Even given the well-documented ease of coursework, there are virtually no WNU grads at this point. WNU only opened 1/1/2007 until they were forced to shut down in August 2008. So the vast majority of so-called WNU "grads" are full or partial KW"u" "grads" desperately hoping the name change will obscure the association to KW"u".

WNU grad. November 7, 2008 at 3:34 a.m.

"WNU only opened 1/1/2007 until they were forced to shut down in August 2008."

WNU is still in operation and was not forced to shut down.

"So the vast majority of so-called WNU "grads" are full or partial KW"u" "grads" desperately hoping the name change will obscure the association to KW"u"."

I don't think any of us WNU graduates are feeling any sense of desperation.

Another WN"u" "grad" makes diploma mill news November 7, 2008 at 5:49 a.m.

What a typical week!! Cease and desist orders from the state of New Jersey, more "grads" caught by the diploma mill news, no wonder they have been shut down since August!!

Wayne Smith, Warren National University (aka Kennedy Western U)

www.diplomamillnews.blogspot.com/

Wayne E. Smith, Currently a so-called "MBA" candidate, Mr. Smith received his Bachelor's Degree in Healthcare Management from Warren National University in 2007.

Misnomer November 7, 2008 at 5:54 a.m.

"any of us WNU graduates"

Plase don't confuse the KW"u" grads with the eventual WNU grads who will start their programs in a year or so and earn a recognized degree.

All this positive for WNU you fool! November 7, 2008 at 3:23 p.m.

GILBERT, AZ, November 5, 2008 /Cambridge Who's Who/ -- Wayne E. Smith, Proprietor of Impact Virtual Training, LLC, has been recognized by Cambridge Who's Who for showing dedication, leadership and excellence in all aspects of athletic training.

Mr. Smith brings 20 years of professional experience to Impact Virtual Training, a retail shop and professional sports training center. An expert in training and rehabilitating professional athletes, he is in charge of managing operations, sales and marketing. Currently an MBA candidate, Mr. Smith received his Bachelor's Degree in Healthcare Management from Warren National University in 2007 and his Associate's Degree in Sports Medicine Technology from Denver Technical College in 1990. He has co-written numerous articles and manuals in his field, and was honored with several company service awards. He considers his networking skills to be the driving force behind his success. A sixth degree black belt in karate, Mr. Smith volunteers as a karate instructor for Central Christian Church. He also gives generously to the American Red Cross and to his local police department.

Virtual Training, LLC assists athletes in reaching optimum performance through simulated altitude training and patterned electrical neuromuscular stimulation. For more information, visit www.impactvirtual.com.

About Cambridge Who's Who
Cambridge Who's Who is an exclusive membership organization that recognizes and empowers executives, professionals and entrepreneurs throughout the world. From healthcare to law, engineering to finance, manufacturing to education, every major industry is represented by its 250,000 active members.

Cambridge Who's Who membership provides individuals with a valuable third party endorsement of their accomplishments and gives them the tools needed to brand themselves and their businesses effectively. In addition to publishing biographies in print and electronic form, Cambridge Who's Who offers an online networking platform where members can establish new business relationships and achieve career advancement within their company, industry or profession.

For more information, please see www.cambridgewhoswho.com.

Contact:
Ellen Campbell
Director of Media Relations
mediarelations@cambridgewhoswho.com

Cambridge Who's Who is the fastest-growing publisher of executive, professional and entrepreneur biographies in the world today. Our accomplished members and extensive online database make Cambridge Who's Who a premier resource for networking.

The Cambridge mission is to deliver its members the recognition and competitive edge needed to network and do business effectively. Inclusion in the registry is an honor limited to individuals who have demonstrated leadership and achievement in their industry and occupation. The registry is distributed exclusively to our members around the world, making it the ideal vehicle for you to use to position yourself and your company.

Sorry for your ignorance - KWU Diploma Mill News November 7, 2008 at 7:59 p.m.

These things are junk mailed out to everyone under the sun, I throw away 2-3 a month. Anyone with some $$$, can pay to write their own bio (with no standards, editorials, or fact checking) to get into Cambridge Who's Who.

From their site:
"To begin the application process, please enter the application code from the mailing you received in the space provided below."

Mr Flagg-Now go for it! November 8, 2008 at 6:27 p.m.

University of Hawaii at Manoa:_"Degrees from unaccredited institutions will be evaluated on a case by case basis."__

Phoenix Seminary:_"Graduates of Unaccredited institutions, when accepted, are placed on academic probation for their first year of study at Phoenix Seminary........etc." __

Ohio State University: "This classification is assigned for one or more of the following reasons. The applicant has:_"1-A baccalaureate or professional degree from an unaccredited college or university."__

Beacon University: "Graduates from unaccredited institutions may be accepted conditionally."__

University of Idaho:_"GRE general appitude scores if bachelor's degree is from an unaccredited institution."__

Seattle Pacific University:_"SPU will therefore, review credentials from unaccredited institutions at the students request."__

Liberty University:_"Applicants who hold a bachelor's degree from an unaccredited institution may be admitted to some master's degree programs on Academic Probation Status."__

Arkansas State University:_"Or whose baccalaureate degree is from an unaccredited institution, may be granted Conditional Admission Status after.....etc." __

Florida State University:_Unaccredited Undergraduate Degree:_"If you have your undergraduate degree from an unaccredited institution, but your GRE scores meet the "Minimum" requirement, we can consider your application." __

American Indian University:_"Transfer of credit from non-accredited colleges will be awarded under the following conditions....etc."__

University of Oregon:_"A student from an unaccredited institution, or one that offers the equivalent of bachelor's degree instruction but not the degree itself, may be consdiered for admission under special procedures."

Auburn University:_"Students transferring from an unaccredited institution may be granted provisional credit. When such credit is allowed, the final amount of credit will be determined upon completion by the student of one year of work at Auburn University....etc." __

Eastern Oregon University:_"Course work taken at a non-accredited institution will be evaluated but not applied until the completion pf 35 EOU credits." __

Troy State University, Dothan AL.:_"Students transferring from unaccredited institutions who have earned an overall grade point average of 2.0 (4.0 scale) or better may be granted provisional admission...etc." **Troy also said it will not accept DETC accredited degrees but would work with me on an unaccredited degree. (strange that) __

Some of the schools don't say no--but say send the transcripts and and xxxx number of dollars and we will let you know. So who really knows--9% -- 15%-- 20%-- no way to know. Union Institute and University said they would have to see the details first.

UPSETtooMUCH November 8, 2008 at 9:35 p.m.

Just goes to show that a number of regionally accredited schools are more willing to let people in who hold phony credentials, than let someone in with legitimate ones from their competitors. It makes me sick to my stomach.

This a must read! November 8, 2008 at 9:42 p.m.

For the next five to ten years though, WNU and other partially accredited universities using examination-based or project-based processes will make good profits. I think that UoP and Capella and a dozen other "major" schools will price themselves out of the market causing more and more people to reach for respectable graduate and post-graduate degrees based on cost. The fact that the population is just getting started understanding and respecting WNU creates a policy/purchasing lag leading to too many people attempting for too few seats creating an ivy-league effect in the WNU market.

Based on what I've heard though, schools like WNU will have a pretty good road ahead of them in the middle-run unless they don't manage their costs effectively. It's becoming a game of revenue streaming just like any business and other traditional online accredited schools and brick and mortars will fall behind because of high CHEA maintanance costs.

WTF! November 8, 2008 at 9:47 p.m.

Since most universities are only accepting 20% of their RA applicants, it really pisses me off that they consider these damn non-accredited schools.

Yea November 8, 2008 at 9:53 p.m.

I was told by GA. Tech that my RA accreditation I have from California is no better than if I went to WNU. So I am enrolling to WNU in Jan. 08 because it costs about 80% less to go and no one really cares in the workplace (not what you know, it is who you know). Our country is falling apart I tell ya. Hell, MIT = Auburn + Almeda anymore. Everyone is loosing their minds in the USA.

Ex-Student November 10, 2008 at 1:43 a.m.

This "University" only cares about taking your money. I drop out of their program when I found out that their "degrees" were illegal to use in Texas. Before I found out about this and was taking the classes NO ONE ever contacted me to offer any help, guidance or ask how I was doing. Don't be fooled by the "good" reviews. These "students" are employed by WNU and write these false "good" reviews to try and sucker in new students. Don't believe them!

Lot of rationalization from the fakers November 10, 2008 at 4:33 a.m.

"Some of the schools don't say no--but say send the transcripts and and xxxx number of dollars and we will let you know. So who really knows--9% -- 15%-- 20%-- no way to know. Union Institute and University said they would have to see the details first."

Ummm, yeah, I think every University has some clause to consider ANY potential student, even those without a high school diploma and an SAT score of 5. This somehow makes a KW "u" degree better or accepted?

Once they get the details that it is KW "u", they would say "we'll gladly accept you into the master's program when you complete these 128 credits of pre-requisites". lol

Pity for the naive November 10, 2008 at 3:30 p.m.

"I was told by GA. Tech that my RA accreditation I have from California is no better than if I went to WNU. So I am enrolling to WNU in Jan. 08 because it costs about 80% less to go and no one really cares in the workplace"

Wow, this is a wild mess in 2 short sentences.

1st - "RA accreditation from California" does not exist. Are you are talking about unaccredited, state-licensed schools? Schools of this type like Preston, Breyer State, Hamilton can briefly get a state license until the state cleans up their act and boots them.

2nd - "So I am enrolling to WNU in Jan. 08" - Do you mean '09? WNU has been shut down since August, no news if they will reopen. Best to wait until they receive accreditation.

3rd - "because it costs about 80% less" Yep, if it is like my program at KWU, 57% of my credits were magically waived and free. 80% less cost, 100% less learning.

4th - "no one really cares in the workplace" - Now sure where you work, but our employer requires college degrees.

exiter November 16, 2008 at 2:37 p.m.

Acreditatun is a proces by which colejes polise themselfs to ensure that they meat certun stadards of kwality.
Take advantaje of it and only go to an acredited skool.

SCAM November 26, 2008 at 11:18 p.m.

Educational accreditation is done in the U.S. by so called "private accreditors".
These are formed, funded, and operated by their members and obviously this keeps them from kicking out their many poorly performing members (who just so happen to be their source of ample revenue).
They are not government agencies (Yea Right!) although they have quasi-governmental powers to the extent that their god-like holy blessing will make a postsecondary school's students (however stupid) eligible for federal student aid. America, what a beautiful country.

Droopy November 29, 2008 at 3:03 p.m.

I live in Georgia and have a BSME Degree from WNU.

I had to jump through a couple of fire hoops to be able to sit for my PE exam, but finally was able to do that and passed.

Now admitted, the WNU unaccredited degree did turn some heads and rolled some eyes.

In Ga., no degree is needed at all to be a PE.

Now when people often tell me I can not be a real engineer because I did not go to an ABET accredited school, I point out that the law says they can not legally claim to be an engineer without a PE license. Sweet!

again November 29, 2008 at 9:17 p.m.

North Dakota November 28, 2007 at 8:45 p.m.

"it is illegal to use a false credential for employment, higher education admission, or in connection with a business or profession. Doing so carries a Class A misdemeanor..."

Pretty clear again. Better call them back!

OK November 29, 2007 at 6:35 p.m.
www.legis.nd.gov/cencode/T15C204....

WNU meets code just fine chump.

He is right November 29, 2007 at 6:38 p.m.

d. Does not operate in this state and is:
(1) Licensed by the appropriate state agency; and
(2) An active applicant for accreditation by an accrediting body recognized
by the United States secretary of education; or...

ND.gov November 29, 2007 at 6:48 p.m.

15-20.4-15. REFERENCE 4D, North Dakota, Like he said, all states read prteey much the same
4. As used in this section, "duly authorized institution of higher learning" means an
institution that:
a. Has accreditation recognized by the United States secretary of education or
has the foreign equivalent of such accreditation;
b. Has an authorization to operate under this chapter;
c. Operates in this state and is exempt from this chapter under section
15-20.4-02;
d. Does not operate in this state and is:
(1) Licensed by the appropriate state agency; and
(2) An active applicant for accreditation by an accrediting body recognized
by the United States secretary of education; or
e. Has been found by the state board for career and technical education to meet
standards of academic quality comparable to those of an institution located in
Page No. 6
the United States that has accreditation recognized by the United States
secretary of education to offer degrees of the type and level claimed.
15-20.4-16. Unlawful to use degree or certificate when coursework not completed -
Penalty.
1. An individual may not knowingly use a degree, certificate, diploma, transcript, or
other document purporting to indicate that the individual has completed an organized
program of study or completed courses when the individual has not completed the
organized program of study or the courses as indicated on the degree, certificate,
diploma, transcript, or document:
a. To obtain employment;
b. To obtain a promotion or higher compensation in employment;
c. To obtain admission to an institution of higher learning; or
d. In connection with any business, trade, profession, or occupation.
2. An individual who violates this section is guilty of a class A misdemeanor.
15-20.4-17. Consumer protection - False academic degrees. The state board for
career and technical education, in collaboration with the North Dakota university system, shall
provide via internet web sites, information to protect students, businesses, and others from
persons that issue, manufacture, or use false academic degrees.
Page No. 7

Joe December 1, 2008 at 1:49 a.m.

@Droopy

What 8 years of satisfactory experience did you have that GA accepted you to sit for the FE?

s December 1, 2008 at 1:10 p.m.

Giving educational credits for past job experience makes little sense.

However,

Giving people jobs for past educational experiences makes less sense.

Droopy December 1, 2008 at 1:15 p.m.

"What 8 years of satisfactory experience did you have that GA accepted you to sit for the FE?"

How about 14 years nuclear commercial engineering after I got out of the nuclear navy. Real Operations, Real Maintenance and Real Engineering experience.
Getting PEs to sign off on my ppwk was a breeze.

Joe December 2, 2008 at 11:06 a.m.

Kodos... I have alot of respect for the Navy's nuke schools. The people coming out of Charleston and Orlando are top notch. I have met many coming out of the Weapon's Station in Goose Creek and they know their stuff. KWU must have been a joke for you after that training.

Droopy December 2, 2008 at 10:34 p.m.

"KWU must have been a joke for you after that training."

Actually my diploma says Warren National and so do my transcripts. I got ZERO life experience credit.
WNU took the Navy College Center recommend NPS conversion (about 70 credits that would be good at any university as universal RA transfer)then I had to take 10 courses. Calculus, Mechatronics, Heat transfer, Heat Exchanger Science, Fluid Dynamics, Physics, Alternative Energy applications, Ethics (now ethics was a joke and the only test that open book helped at all)and some English/Lit lab thing (not a course)that was boring as hell.
Was not as tough as NPS, but still a good refresher. Trust me, the open book does not help at all when you are given a heat x-fer word problem that requires differential calculus integrated with a summation where there are multiple independent and dependent variables involved!

I admit I ran out of time on the physics test and guessed on the last two (1 per 6 chance on both) and got both right and an 82 on the test. If wrong, I would have failed.

When and if WNU gets RA, I will likely go back and convert/salvage what I can into an accredited something or other(Eng Mgt or the like)

I will say this though. The WNU BSME was more difficult than my accredited Psychology Degree from Ga. State U which made me NO money.

Joe December 3, 2008 at 2:14 p.m.

Why would a nuke engineer get a Psych degree?

Droopy December 3, 2008 at 5:39 p.m.

"Why would a nuke engineer get a Psych degree?"

Ask me why I have a life/health insurance license along with a series 6 and 63 securities license and am a CFP and make little money at it.

Ask me why I have so damn much real estate that makes me no money.

Ask me why a racoon ate two of my prize Koi last week.

?? December 3, 2008 at 8:57 p.m.

"Actually my diploma says Warren National and so do my transcripts."

You must be a very recent graduate? Warren National has only existed from 1/1/07 til it was shut down in August 2008 (and still is)

"I got ZERO life experience credit."

Then you got robbed, EVERYONE else did. EVERY SINGLE ONE.

From the Federal Investigation of Kennedy Western:

BOGUS DEGREES AND UNMET EXPECTATIONS:
ARE TAXPAYER DOLLARS SUBSIDIZING DIPLOMA MILLS?

"In response to a formal query from the Committee, Kennedy-
Wester… we were told that EVERY student in the
Master’s program is awarded between 33 and 60 percent credit toward a degree. In fact, documents produced by Kennedy-Western indicated that nearly half of all students in the Master’s programs have received more than 55 percent credit for their experience"

Droopy=ZERO December 6, 2008 at 12:02 a.m.

Droopy must be a complete failure in life. If you can't get WNU to give you life credit you have no business selling anything. He has enough experience to become a PE by exemption but can't get Warren to give him credits is BS.

lazyjae2 December 16, 2008 at 9:17 p.m.

??, I have a son currently enrolled at Central Michigan University in their business masters program. They gave him 50% work and educational experience towards his masters. They are an accredited school. So what's your point about WNU giving credit towards their masters, and he was allowed to test out of a statistics class.

Accreditation does not guarantee your school is any better than another nor that your education is superb. It is only guaranteeing that the federal government, who by the way can't run their own business with out nearly bankrupting the country, is medaling into another business business.

If they seriously want to stop the so called diploma mills then make it mandatory that all secondary educational institutions be licensed by the U.S. Dept. of Education.

Diploma Mill December 16, 2008 at 10:11 p.m.

"They gave him 50% work and educational experience towards his masters. They are an accredited school. So what's your point about WNU giving credit towards their masters"

Ahh, more undocumented, anecdotal hearsay, but let's go with it.

For work already completed, transfer credits for coursework already completed are legitimate of course, as are a limited and controlled amount of equivalency exams that can be used to show proficiency in a topic.

The difference is that Kennedy Western was investigated by the Senate and admitted they granted an AVERAGE of 55% of the degree based on claims of life experience (no coursework, no equivalency exams, not verified in any way) as a way to entice the naive.

Diploma Mill December 16, 2008 at 10:17 p.m.

"If they seriously want to stop the so called diploma mills then make it mandatory that all secondary educational institutions be licensed by the U.S. Dept. of Education."

Even though the Dept of Ed accredits the legitimate schools, I agree that enforcement against the scams is uneven.

The current state by state enforcement just allows the Kennedy Westerns (Hawaii, Idaho, Utah, California, Wyoming) and Breyer States (Alabama, Idaho, California, Liberia, etc) to bounce from state to state in search of weak state regulation.

Some facts here. (Part one) December 22, 2008 at 5:55 a.m.

First, not everyone who posts favorably about Warren National/Kennedy Western employee of that school.

But lets get the facts straight.

First Warren National is unaccredited. This we know. But to go further, is it a Diploma Mill?

A "Diploma Mill" or "Degree Mill" is totally in the eyes of the beholder. Even definitions are not precise. One source states that a Diploma mill is an institution which charges money for degrees which involve little or no work. All students I talked to tell me that the work involved is comparable to any other college or University.

My own experience was that it is actually harder than the four year accredited school where I earned my Bachelors.

Frequently the infamous GAO investigation is mentioned. I read some of the evidence from this. There was one investigator who claims that she earned 40% of her credit in 16 hours. I would say that I am highly suspicious. I do know that, at the time I attended this school a student was allowed to retake 40% of their class work. But to do this in 16 hours? I think this individual was cheating or had some sneaky way of manipulating the exams.

We also had a disgruntled former employee, whose job was to attract new students talk about how high pressure was put on recruiters. This may be true, but I heard similar complaints made against the University of Phoenix which is accredited. By bashing the University, and therefore the students that he recruited, I would say that not only was this recruiter's complaint a red hearing, but it actually demonstrates blatant hypocrisy.

The GAO "investigation" did not present any representatives from the University, no students nor alumni. It could be considered a witch hunt for this reason.

Anyway the GAO hearing was for the purpose of investigating uses of government money by public employees. In other words, it was an internal affair of the federal government and had little to do with the legitimacy of Kennedy-Western, now called Warren National.

Some facts here. (Part two) December 22, 2008 at 5:57 a.m.

Now lets also talk about "illegal" degrees. I will state this clearly, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN ILLEGAL DEGREE in the United States.

Some states have varying restrictions on how degrees can be used however. The paternalistic legislators of Oregon tried to make it a crime to cite a Kennedy-Western on one's resume. The University sued and the outcome was an out of court settlement.

It does seem odd of course, that citing any form of educational experience can be considered unlawful. After all, I have seen people put all kinds of ridiculous nonsense on their resumes. I have seen such things as memberships in pseudo-professional organizations (which require nothing more than membership dues to join) to Brain bench certifications. I even saw people put down the fact that they audited courses at MIT (Which anyone can do, just go to MIT's website and you can audit any course you want.)

What is implied on the long list of states restricting "use" of unaccredited colleges and universities can be vague. It may mean that some will not consider experience at such institutions suitable for Professional Examinations and Licenses. Others will not allow these schools to be considered for educational requirements in government jobs. It is, however difficult to enforce such restrictions in the private secotr.

The truth is that people lie and embellish the truth on their resumes and job applications. Its really up to the hiring managers to do their homework and investigate applicants. And this is how it should be. As long as there is freedom of speech why should people not state their experiences on resumes.
.

Some facts here. (Part three) December 22, 2008 at 5:58 a.m.

At this current time Warren National has applied for Accreditation, and there is a possibility that they may be a "Recognized Candidate" in April. The University has made great strides to become a legitimate and respected institution. This means that they have dropped such popular programs as Engineering (except for IT or Computer Engineering) and at this time stopped admitting new Students.

I finally want to say that many of those who bash the University, its students and graduates simply do not know what they are talking about. Maybe they do not know that many students of Warren National put considerable time and effort into pursuing their degrees. Its not merely a matter of paying some money and your diploma comes in the mail. On the contrary, it takes time and effort.

I suspect that part of the hostility towards KWU/WNU is due to the fact that it is a low cost alternative to traditional accredited institutions. Accredited Universities need money and need to attract students. If another institution comes forth delivering equal, if not better education at a lower cost these schools feel threatened. For this reason they feel it necessary to do everything possible to destroy the reputation of the school and even to punish the graduates of this school.

Academic elitism has a very long history. In the past, traditional 4 year brick-and-mortar colleges looked down at community colleges, adult learning and other innovations. When distance learning became more and more common, the same things were said about that. Now we see the squeeze put on unaccredited institutions.

Of course Warren National is currently seeking accreditation so a lot of these arguments may be rendered moot

RE:Droopy=ZERO December 22, 2008 at 6 a.m.

Warren National does not give life experience.

Diploma Mill December 22, 2008 at 5:07 p.m.

"There was one investigator who claims that she earned 40% of her credit in 16 hours. I would say that I am highly suspicious."

Unfortunately facts are facts, it is well documented during the Senate Investigation of Kennedy Western.

Senate Hearing 108-553
BOGUS DEGREES AND UNMET EXPECTATIONS: ARE TAXPAYER DOLLARS SUBSIDIZING DIPLOMA MILLS?

I chose two classes, ‘‘Hazardous Waste Management’’ and ‘‘Environmental Law and Regulatory Compliance.’’. The course guidelines arrived by E-mail and contained no
actual syllabus. No papers, homework assignments, online discussions, or interaction with the professor was required.

Once enrolled in my classes, I was assigned a student advisor. There was no time restriction, she said. If I felt prepared to take the tests the day after tomorrow. I ordered the Hazardous Waste Management test first. I had neither read nor reviewed the textbook. I had 3 hours to complete 100 questions, and I was able to answer most of them by simply looking up a key word in the index, turning to that section of the text, and finding the answer.

Not long after, I withdrew from the school, as by then we had a good sense of Kennedy-Western’s academic program. With just 16 hours of study, I had completed 40 percent of the course requirements for my Master’s degree."

Diploma Mill December 22, 2008 at 5:12 p.m.

"The GAO investigation did not present any representatives from the University,"

Kennedy-Western did provide information to the Senate Committee investigating them:

"In fact, documents produced by Kennedy-Western indicated that nearly half of all students in the Master’s programs have received more than 55 percent credit for their experience."

Perhaps you should read the facts before randomly speculating.

www.credentialwatch.org/reports/mills.pd...

Who cares December 23, 2008 at 5:42 a.m.

The GAO witchhunt was in, what was it? 2004?

And were the witnesses cross examined?

Just a big waste of tax money is all.

Droopy=ZERO December 25, 2008 at 8:35 a.m.

""Warren National does not give life experience""

Credit for Prior Learning
Warren National University is receptive to awarding academic credit for learning acquired through non-collegiate experiences. By definition, non-collegiate experiences will be considered as learning resulting from experiences when the individual was not enrolled in an educational institution for academic credit.

www.wnuedu.com/aboutwnu-general-informat...

Like I said, Droopy=ZERO!

Illegal Degree December 25, 2008 at 8:46 a.m.

"Now lets also talk about "illegal" degrees. I will state this clearly, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN ILLEGAL DEGREE in the United States."

If one uses a document to defraud a person or institution it is illegal. If you want to hold on to your fake degree then by all means do so. I can get one printed up at phoenydegrees.calm for pennies compared to what you payed for your worthless piece of paper.

Real PhD and JD Part 1 December 26, 2008 at 1:17 p.m.

This is a very interesting thread. I will make only a few comments:

1) Virtually every posting from a "graduate" of this "school" demonstrates poor writing skills; in many instances multiple incorrect spellings; and poor reasoning if any. As a retired VP HR successively of three major corporations, it would seem that none of these "graduates" could pass the required writing test that is part of our hiring process. In the larger context, that would seem to raise material validity issues about the quality of this program.

A legitimate degree program should produce products (people) who are at least literate. Granted, even accredited schools may have issues with this and I have no statistics on this point. Why no stats? Because we would in every instance have weeded out candidates claiming a degree from any school that was unaccredited.

The very fact of the controversies raised in this excellent thread is illuminating.

Real PhD and JD Part 2 December 26, 2008 at 1:28 p.m.

2) Several comments have been made about "cross examination" involving officials from this school. Such comments demonstrate ignorance of legal procedure. Cross examination occurs only in civil or criminal due process, pursuant to strict rules of procedure. Investigatory hearings are not civil or criminal due process of this sort; they gather information. Interested parties may present their factual allegations by invitation, subpoena, or even sometimes merely as friends of one position or another. Sometimes, such offerings become much more formal when given under oath and when ramped up to that level, those testifying should be represented by counsel. Even still, there is no "cross examination."

3) At present, it is not illegal to have a degree from this or any similar school. What appears to be illegal is to use such a degree to represent that the presenter has graduated from a school that has met certain professional educational standards. Inasmuch that this "university" clearly does not meet such standards, a presenter making such a claim would be engaging in fraud. The firms where I was employed never encountered this issue, because EACH AND EVERY APPLICANT was and is screened thoroughly.

4) There is some confusion about federal vs. state law. An infraction of the sort listed in #3 above could be prosecuted in any state, should a prosecutor desire to spend valuable time doing so. But if the U. S. mails, or any form of electronic communication were used, such an act could also be prosecuted under federal mail and/or wire fraud statutes.

5) I spoke with a buddy of mine who is a United States Attorney. He laughed that such minor infractions would be prosecuted at either state or federal levels. "We have more important concerns."

6) Employers serious about due diligence will always check their applicants once they pass the initial screening. But not all employers do this. I know of one major firm that hired a VP without doing any background other than phoning two references. But applicants these days should be aware that for about $35 - 75, background (including education) can be checked readily through many online services.

Real PhD and JD Part 3 December 26, 2008 at 1:29 p.m.

By the way, I am told by the Chancellor of the University of Maryland that there is "no such thing as a legitimate online doctoral level degree, either PhD, DBA or EdD." Part of legitimate doctoral programs is involvement in high level cognitive activities that includes direct interactions in seminars, inter-student communications, etc. This is not kid's stuff. Online simply cannot pass muster at this level.

From some of the postings, I muct conclude that schools like this are attractive to folks whose English has not developed to the point where they could participate meaningfully in in-class and other dialogue. I suggest that trying to short-cut the process of becoming educated in an country where English is dominant probably does not serve the student's best interests. It is admirable that you seek education; that education should include as prerequisite, English fluency, so that your chances of future success have some chance of being optimal.

R December 27, 2008 at 4:34 p.m.

So what about all degrees pouring into the United States from Universities around the world. Are they accredited here, what's the difference? I have bachelors degree in MIS from Warren National University and it was a challenge to obtain. So what if I didn't major in partying from an accredited university. I'll put my combination of work experince and WNU degree up against any college degree out there today and put them to shame. I am top in my industry today, and from the looks of the economic downfall we are about to face in this country (about to) let's see how that accredited piece of paper taste when you get hungry. I know plenty of people whose kids have accredited degrees and can't find a job anywhere better than Subway. Furthermore, my wife has a degree from an "accredited" university, we have been together for 15 years and I have always made 3 times the salary she makes in her job. So try a little salt and pepper on your accredited degree and keep this in mind, I hear George Busch has an "accredited" degree in economics, a lot of good that did US(A).

Sorry Pal December 29, 2008 at 2:08 a.m.

All those people with KWU degrees working in the government and defense are gone. Changing the name to WNU didn't stop them from finding them. You can put your work experience and degree up against anyone you want, that doesn't change the matter of you being the best burger flipper in your store. Keep it up and you may just become assistant manager. hahaha

Other Diploma mills December 29, 2008 at 4:55 p.m.

"So what about all degrees pouring into the United States from Universities around the world. Are they accredited here, what's the difference?"

Like the Kennedy Westerns and Rochvilles we have here, there are similiar diploma sellers in other countries too.

Our company uses a service that comes up with an equivalency to the US standard and points out the fakes for us so that we can avoid getting burned. We are in one of the states where these degrees are illegal.

Go to college instead of KWU December 29, 2008 at 5:11 p.m.

"Now lets also talk about "illegal" degrees. I will state this clearly, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS AN ILLEGAL DEGREE in the United States."

Then why do so many states say it is illegal, have it in their statutes, list Kennedy Western and specify what level of crime it is? For example:

"It is a Class B Misdemeanor under the Oregon Criminal Code to use a degree in violation of ORS 348.609."

"In Texas, Violation of this law is a Class B misdemeanor."

Suspecious December 29, 2008 at 8:58 p.m.

Reading these blogs in here is like watching the three Stooges and Laurel and Hardy all at the same time. I said, they said, we said, college does not make the person nor does it guarantee that you will be a rocket scientist when you graduate.

It is another tool to hopefully help you become a better more rounded individual who can qualify for a better paying position some where in the American work force.

Accredited versus un-accredited, it is my choice where I choose to go to school to get my education. I see these supposed college athletes who are attending the big name accredited colleges and universities who can’t speak a structured sentence, couldn’t write a research paper to save their sole, setting in class rooms asleep while their tooters copy the notes and attempt to help the poor athlete pass his basic reading 101 classes so he/she can play sports. Real impressive isn’t it America? Now PHD cone head deny it isn’t happening.

So your company screens every application and only hires the Rhodes Scholars. We had one of those idiots as a President and you see where our country is now. The biggest down fall of our economy since the great depression. Give every undeserving sucker out there a new house he can’t afford so we can all be equal and wear little Chinese looking suits.

Then there is the Harvard graduate who is looking out for his own interest too. The get richer oil scheme killing America. Oh, and I cleaned up the mess my daddy left before he left office.

How about all of the accredited colleges going out of business because of their over paid nutty professors and school Deans or Presidents. I wonder if accreditation is protecting them from financial disaster. I guess they forgot to build that into the review process, “financial soundness”.

You can’t work in a federal government job if you are from a non-accredited school, not because your education is any less or better than from an accredited school. It is because the federal government doesn’t have their mingling fingers in your schools business. Remember, all accredited schools now qualify for federal aid, financial assistance, you will have so many minorities, qualified or not, or you will not get your federal assistance. Remember Fanny Mae, the failing financial institution your hard earned tax dollars went too. Government control.

When it becomes mandatory that all post secondary schools have the same standards, across the board, not a half a dozen regional accreditation, privately owned, good ole boy companies, all with different standards making a buck off of the poor struggling smaller schools, then I will be a champion of accreditation.

Now with the economy faltering the way it is and my school can no longer afford to maintain accreditation, or looses it, does that nullify my degree that I am only a year away from completing?

After all the school that was, will no longer be.

Fallacy December 30, 2008 at 6:35 a.m.

After weeding through all the incoherent gibberish, I was able to find one line that was relevant to the discussion.

"Accredited versus un-accredited, it is my choice where I choose to go to school to get my education."

Unfortunately, an unaccredited degree is not an education.

The sweet smell December 30, 2008 at 7:54 p.m.

of revolution is in the air. Go WNU, Go!

The huge financial debacle December 30, 2008 at 8:01 p.m.

Will kill government controlled propoganda ministries otherwise known as accredited universities.

Let us hope for more unaccredited and freedom loving universities.

Government is not the solution, it is the problem!

Suspecious December 30, 2008 at 9:08 p.m.

Fallacy - Prove it! Webster’s definition of education - an act or process of education; instruction

Educate - impart knowledge and training to: develop mentally and morally by instruction. Provide schooling for. No mention of accreditation or non-accreditation.

Accreditation: Accept as true, believe, confer authority. So any one who graduated prior to the 70's their degrees are bogus and no good. In order to be accredited a school must be in existence for a minimum of two years with active students. So all of those poor saps are idiots in your eyes and their degrees a meaningless and worthless.

Is your place of employment accredited? Mine is and it doesn't function any better now than before, except it cost my employeer a bunch of wasted money just to have a sticker on the door window.

Blah Blah Blah December 31, 2008 at 5:12 a.m.

Thanks for being able to find the generic definition of education in the dictionary, award yourself 6 Kennedy Western credits. Now add context to it by including the DOE standards of quality for education in the US - accreditation.

Not sure why you would think that older degrees are bogus, but just like now, there were real and bogus universities. The increase in hokey degrees led to the implementation of quality standards.

We're not accredited, but similar to universities, we have to comply with the highest industry standards. And of course we screen for diploma mill buyers :-)

kcufttub January 1, 2009 at 3:21 p.m.

Actually, truth being said (rare on this site)KWU was a diploma mill that matured into a real university, WNU.

Current Student January 1, 2009 at 5:17 p.m.

The "University" changed my program, dropped my program then told me I have until Jan 31st, 2008 to complete a porgram they no longer have. The whole time I was trying to get my money back (still am). I took three classes with no support, no lecture, no real outline, and all the run around they could give me.

It was a read the book take the test with no practicle references to the real world.

If you are looking to get your money back contact your attorney general. If they do not give you money back for the classes you have not taken that is a theft of sevice. With enough state run lawsuits going, you may not get all of your money back but it will create a large financial burden to them and close them down.

Current Student January 1, 2009 at 5:26 p.m.

"Actually, truth being said (rare on this site)KWU was a diploma mill"

That is abundantly clear.

However, I was under the impression though that WNU would be different, and I haven't seen anything that is different.

Ex-Student January 1, 2009 at 8:11 p.m.

This "University" only cares about taking your money. I dropped out of their program when I found out that their "degrees" were illegal to use in my state. Before I found out about this and was taking the classes NO ONE ever contacted me to offer any help, guidance or ask how I was doing. Don't be fooled by the "good" reviews. These "students" are employed by WNU and write these false "good" reviews to try and sucker in new students. Don't believe them!

Misconception January 3, 2009 at 8:54 p.m.

WNU is not illegal to use in any state as long as it is a private company.
These laws are untested by the courts and therefore are invalid.
States like Texas have yet to challenge even one the hundreds of WNU degreed employees in private companies who have the degree posted for all to see in Texas.
Texas is afraid to challenge any unaccredited degree because the federal courts will clean their clocks. About one year ago, another poster challenged anyone to find a prosecution or confrontation of anyone in private industry (in any of the 50 states). To date various clowns have only posted GAO stuff and government workers stories (who have been harrased because of an unaccredited degree).

I will officially repost the challenge for all to see. Find me a prosecution. Just one. You can not. Interstate commerce laws and the constitution prohibit these bogus state laws

Check Mate

Current Student January 3, 2009 at 9:35 p.m.

"WNU is not illegal to use in any state as long as it is a private company."

No, they are specifically listed in my state as being illegal,although it is only a misd - Class A

In my state January 4, 2009 at 12:41 a.m.

Here in Texas, Kennedy-Western "university" is specifically listed as illegal for these uses, which is basically everything buy showing it to your cat:

The Texas Penal Code (Section 32.52) prohibits the use of fraudulent or substandard degrees "in a written or oral advertisement or other promotion of a business; or with the intent to: obtain employment; obtain a license or certificate to practice a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain a promotion, a compensation or other benefit, or an increase in compensation or other benefit, in employment or in the practice of a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain admission to an educational program in this state; or gain a position in government with authority over another person, regardless of whether the actor receives compensation for the position." Violation of this law is a Class B misdemeanor.

again January 5, 2009 at 4:04 p.m.

I will officially repost the challenge for all to see. Find me a prosecution. Just one. You can not. Interstate commerce laws and the constitution prohibit these bogus state laws

Texas laws that go unenforced January 5, 2009 at 4:18 p.m.

It is illegal to take more than three sips of beer at a time while standing.

A recently passed anticrime law requires criminals to give their victims 24 hours notice, either orally or in writing, and to explain the nature of the crime to be committed.

The entire Encyclopedia Britannica is banned in Texas because it contains a formula for making beer at home.

It is illegal to drive without windshield wipers. You don't need a windshield, but you must have the wipers.

You can be legally married by publically introducing a person as your husband or wife 3 times.

A city ordinance states that a person cannot go barefoot without first obtaining a special five-dollar permit.

It is illegal for one to shoot a buffalo from the second story of a hotel.

It is illegal to milk another person's cow.

Abilene
It is illegal to idle or loiter anyplace within the corporate limits of the city for the purpose of flirting or mashing.

Austin
Wire cutters can not be carried in your pocket.

Beaumont
Collegiate football is banned at Lamar University.

Borger
It is against the law to throw confetti, rubber balls, feather dusters, whips or quirts (riding crop), and explosive firecrackers of any kind.

Clarendon
It is illegal to dust any public building with a feather duster.

El Paso
Churches, hotels, halls of assembly, stores, markets, banking rooms, railroad depots, and saloons are required to provide spittoons "of a kind and number to efficiently contain expectorations into them."

Houston
Beer may not be purchased after midnight on a Sunday, but it may be purchased on Monday.

It is illegal to sell Limburger cheese on Sunday.

Galveston
It is illegal to drive a motor car down Broadway before noon on Sundays.

LeFors
It is illegal to take more than three swallows of beer while standing.

Lubbock County
It is illegal to drive within an arm's length of alcohol - including alcohol in someone else's blood stream.

Mesquite
It is illegal for children to have unusual haircuts.

Port Arthur
Obnoxious odors may not be emitted while in an elevator.

San Antonio
It is illegal to flirt or respond to flirtation using the eyes and/or hands.

It is illegal to urinate on the Alamo.

The Texas Penal Code (Section 32.52) prohibits the use of fraudulent or substandard degrees "in a written or oral advertisement or other promotion of a business; or with the intent to: obtain employment; obtain a license or certificate to practice a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain a promotion, a compensation or other benefit, or an increase in compensation or other benefit, in employment or in the practice of a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain admission to an educational program in this state; or gain a position in government with authority over another person, regardless of whether the actor receives compensation for the position." Violation of this law is a Class B misdemeanor.

Texas Ban On Free Speech? January 5, 2009 at 8:06 p.m.

I have my KW degree on my resume on monster. Does that mean I am breaking a Tx. law.

Supreme Court Says NO!

Any one want to own the Great State Of Texas?

Illegal degrees January 5, 2009 at 8:09 p.m.

Thanks for mixing in some 150 year old laughers with the state's recent stand against diploma mills.

Denial apparently isn't just a river in Egypt.

RWR From The Grave January 5, 2009 at 8:20 p.m.

Seriously. How does one start a new school? Issue illegal degrees for 3-5 years until accredited? Perhaps one could run a university for 3-5 years with just professors and no students? You university types are dumber than dog #@$^.

Government is not the solution. Government is the sole problem. Ban the Dept. Of Ed now!

WNU says it best January 5, 2009 at 8:32 p.m.

"I have my KW degree on my resume on monster."

That could be true. A recent article from SHRM (HR association) showed that 10-15% of applicants falsify or embellish their academic credentials.

"Does that mean I am breaking a Tx. law."

Since Kennedy Western is specifically identified as a "fraudualent or substandard university", you'll have to follow KWU's own FAQ notes on how to procede.

"I live in a state that identifies unaccredited degrees as illegal. Will Warren National University's process of accreditation impact my ability to list my degree on my résumé without repercussions?"

If a state's law requires that only degrees from accredited institutions be listed on a résumé, it is likely that Warren National University (WNU) degrees would only be illegal until (and if) WNU is accredited. When (and if) WNU is accredited, chances are you will have to be admitted to a program following accreditation and graduate, before declaring your degree as being from an accredited institution.

Great Questions RWR January 5, 2009 at 8:43 p.m.

"Seriously. How does one start a new school?"

Great Question. You would have to look on a case by case basis, but a new school would probably be given the benefit of the doubt until it shows reasons for you to be skeptical.

Unfortunately, KWU has been around for 25 years, claimed accreditation at various points, been booted from several states, and was the star of a Senate investigation of diploma mills where their fly-by-night operation was well documented.

Given such a poor track record, everyone will continue to be skeptical of KWU accreditation efforts.

:) January 5, 2009 at 9:09 p.m.

Ok then, if WNU degrees are illegal why do most all of the "illegal states" allow WNU to operate within their borders.

Lawmaker January 5, 2009 at 9:15 p.m.

"Great Question. You would have to look on a case by case basis, but a new school would probably be given the benefit of the doubt until it shows reasons for you to be skeptical."

Huh?

The "bogus laws" as written say nothing about "benefit of doubt for new schools".

The laws say unaccredited=illegal or so you say. Which is it Mr. Internet Lawyer?

match head January 5, 2009 at 9:18 p.m.

"Unfortunately, KWU has been around for 25 years, claimed accreditation at various points, been booted from several states, and was the star of a Senate investigation of diploma mills where their fly-by-night operation was well documented."

CITATION PLEASE FOR THIS (government calling KW a diploma mill)?

Monster January 5, 2009 at 9:33 p.m.

Texas can not tell someone in North Carolina what they can or can not do. Therefore it is not illegal to put it on Monster or any other internet website.

If someone in Texas looks at your resume on the internet, Texas can not extradite you to Tx.

Suspecious January 5, 2009 at 9:58 p.m.

Ok then, if WNU degrees are illegal why do most all of the "illegal states" allow WNU to operate within their borders? The best question that I have seen asked on here yet.

The FDOE does not set educational standards. Each state and their Board of Regents set the educational guidelines for their own particular state.

If the Federal DOE set the standards for educational requirements then it would be a national standard and mandatory. Accreditation is "VOLUNTARY", and even then the standards are not the same across each "privately" run region.

Substandard universities, there are probably hundreds of them both accredited and unaccredited. It's called "Buyer Beware" when looking for any thing. An education is and education is an education no matter where you obtain it from. It is all in what you are seeking in life or experience.

Keep in mind nearly 90% of the Colleges and Universities are privately owned and operated institutions and they are in business for the same reason, to make as much money as possible from any one willing to put down their hard earned dollars.

They will all tell you how concerned they are for your education and how they hope that you have a fullfilling and successful journey through life and enjoy the challenges of their institutions. Then turn around next week and announce a tuition increase so their Dean or Chancellor can have a multi million dollar pay raise.

See above January 5, 2009 at 10:24 p.m.

"CITATION PLEASE FOR THIS (government calling KW a diploma mill)?"

Senate Hearing 108-353 "Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations, Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"

Diploma Mill January 5, 2009 at 10:28 p.m.

"benefit of doubt for new schools". "The laws say unaccredited=illegal or so you say. Which is it Mr. Internet Lawyer?"

Reading in context is difficult, so I'll type slower.

In the Texas statutes, both would be unaccredited = illegal.

However, in public opinion and objective evaluation, a new and unproven school is much better than one like KW"u" with such a horrible track record of state-hopping and Senate investigation.

Clearing up your confusion January 5, 2009 at 10:31 p.m.

"Accreditation is "VOLUNTARY"

From US Gov

Frequently Asked Questions about diploma mills, fraudulent degrees, and accreditation. Among other things:

Accreditation is “voluntary,” so doesn't that mean it is optional and not necessary?

Accreditation is voluntary in that the process of accreditation requires the full cooperation with and complete participation in the process of accreditation by the college or university seeking accreditation. At the heart of the accreditation process is a self-study prepared by the college or university demonstrating its commitment to the standards of accreditation.

Since accreditation is the PRIMARY MEANS OF DETERMINING THE LEGITIMACY AND QUALITY of colleges and universities in the United States, to describe the process as "voluntary" is not to describe it as "optional" or "unnecessary."

Sparky January 6, 2009 at 4:56 p.m.

A private for profit agency reviewing any one does not make it legitimate or quality. It only says that you meet their standards. That is like saying that the Big 10 is of the same quality as the Atlantic Conference which we know is like comparing apples and oranges.

When the federal DOE mandates that all post secondary educational institutions meet the same educational standards across the board, in every state, then it will be a legitimate and quality proven program. As it stands now WNU/KWU meets the State Of Wyoming educational standards.

I don't say WNU is any better or any worse than any other school. You have students that will complain about every school in some way or another, after all over 50% of freshmen drop out of school in the first year.

As for the Senate investigating some one, they need to take a real hard look at themselves. After all most of them can't balance a check book, several have been arrested for various felonies and misdemeanors, litterly bankrupted business, run our countries national debt to astronomical proportions, run social security into a hole, been involved in organized crime and even committed murder, been proven to have drug habits that boggle the mind and sell national interests to our enemies. And you are willing to put your trust in the U.S. Senate to investigate some one else.

Diploma Mill January 6, 2009 at 7:19 p.m.

"A private for profit agency reviewing any one does not make it legitimate or quality."

My point was would you rather have an employee who is on their first job (An unaccredited new university) or one that has had 5 jobs in the last year and was investigated for its practices (KWU)

"As it stands now WNU/KWU meets the State Of Wyoming educational standards"

No it doesn't. KWU has been proven a hundred times over to be substandard and will never be an acceptable "degree". WNU is in the grace period right now, due to its claims of attempting accreditation. We'll see. The fact that they have been shut down since August 2008 can't bode well.

"As for the Senate investigating some one, they need to take a real hard look at themselves"

Projecting negative attributes on an broad group of Senators doesn't change that fact that KWU was purposely selected by the Senate to be investigated as a diploma mill.

In that investigation, KWU admitted to giving half a masters degree to everyone with a valid credit card (actually 55%), among 100% acceptance and other laughable practices.

lawmaker January 7, 2009 at 2:36 p.m.

"As for the Senate investigating some one, they need to take a real hard look at themselves. After all most of them can't balance a check book, several have been arrested for various felonies and misdemeanors, litterly bankrupted business, run our countries national debt to astronomical proportions, run social security into a hole, been involved in organized crime and even committed murder, been proven to have drug habits that boggle the mind and sell national interests to our enemies. And you are willing to put your trust in the U.S. Senate to investigate some one else."

Sparky-You are correct.
What we are watching happen to our government is a Marxist take-over with the senate as a willing advocate.
Accreditation is a racket where a powerful central government buys votes with taxpayer money. A university that does not take government money has a real difficult time staying afloat.

How do you explain:

GA. Tech graduates that can not do simple percentage calculations.

Ball players who can not read (and drool on them selves because they are stupid) graduate Texas universities every year.

The ASU 325 lb. chemical engineering graduate who was said to (be by a psychiatrist) "mentally retarded, but smart enough to catch a football and run it down a field"

Wrong January 7, 2009 at 2:41 p.m.

"Senate Hearing 108-353 "Bogus Degrees and Unmet Expectations, Are Taxpayer Dollars Subsidizing Diploma Mills?"

Faulty citation.

No where in here does the federal government call Warren National a diploma Mill.

Bogus Citations January 7, 2009 at 2:51 p.m.

Reference:
"Our investigation has revealed that there seem to be two kinds of diploma mills. One is simply a printing press.

Others, such as Columbia State University, Kennedy Western and some of the others we have looked at, are more sophisticated. They require a modicum of work, but nothing close to what should be required for a legitimate degree."

Notice that the word "Seem" is cleverly used.

It used to seem as though the earth was flat. By your logic, the earth is flat. Get a clue dumbass.

Government - KWU is a Sophisticated Diploma Mill January 7, 2009 at 5:20 p.m.

Ahhh, trying to parse one word in a 198 Senate diploma mill investigation suddenly makes KWU totally legitimate! KW "u" is repeatedly described as a "sophisticated diploma mill" throughout the hearing.

"In contrast, the schools that we investigated take pains to try to convince prospective students that they are legitimate and that students have to earn their degrees. That is why a healthy dose of credit for work and life experience becomes such a critical component of their business model. That is what permits these more sophisticated diploma mills to assume an air of legitimacy while minimizing the actual amount of work required."

Deduct 6 Kennedy Western reading comprehension credits until you actually read the report.

2004 "investigation" was a witch hunt! January 7, 2009 at 5:53 p.m.

All this rubbish abotu WNU/KWU being some kind of "Diploma Mill" is just that, rubbish.

I would ask anyone to tell me...

... How many witnesses testified on behalf of the Univeristy. (Note that I refuse to put the word University in quotations, I am fine with the word as it is.)

Did any students, other that the govenment paid stooge, testify on the University's behalf? How many Alumni gave testimony? Were any students there? Were any invited?

Want to know something else? Now this is really funny. That whole fiasco was led by none other than Joe Leiberman! Thats right, the same Joe Leiberman who ran for Vice President with Al Gore in 2000 and actually resigned on Al's behalf costing him the presidence and 8 years of Dubya. Leiberman turned out to be such a traitor to his own party that he was dumped.

At any rate, that was back in 2004 and this is 2009. A lot has changed in 5 years. The University has applied for accreditation and who knows what the future may bring. Personally I hope WNU gets its accreditation so all the nim rods here who waste so much time and energy will shut the hell up.

Hehe January 7, 2009 at 6:37 p.m.

"All this rubbish abotu WNU/KWU being some kind of "Diploma Mill"

Well the book on Kennedy Western "university" is written, sophisticated diploma or plain old diploma mill depending on your point of view from 1984 til the time it closed in 2006.

WNU from 2007 to present, still to be determined, hopefully students in a couple of years will get a useable degree. I am hoping that they are planning on going legit, but only time will tell.

Diploma Mill January 7, 2009 at 6:41 p.m.

"At any rate, that was back in 2004 and this is 2009. A lot has changed in 5 years"

The "university" hasn't been investigated for almost 5 years, congrats! (Although the Better Business Bureau dumped them recently)

So what have they done, other than fill out an application so that they can remain in Wyoming?

They've claimed accreditation in the past, they have claimed attempts at accreditation in the past, what evidence can you provide that would make anyone think it is different this time?

WNU Website FAQ January 8, 2009 at 1:25 a.m.

7. I live in a state that identifies unaccredited degrees as "illegal". Will Warren National University's process of accreditation impact my ability to list my degree on my résumé without repercussions?

If a state's law requires that only degrees from accredited institutions be listed on a résumé, it is unlikely that Warren National University (WNU) degrees would only be "legal" until (and if) WNU is accredited. When (and if) WNU is accredited, chances are you will have to be admitted to a program following accreditation and graduate, before declaring your degree as being from an accredited institution. WNU recommends that students contact the legal authority in their state because the requirements under each law may differ between states and may be complicated.

Sparky January 8, 2009 at 1:27 p.m.

You just have to love this site. Batman and Robin are chasing the Joker, the Joker is ribbing the Riddler, North hates the South, accredited VS non-accreditation, but only if it pertains to WNU of course. I have yet to read one thing about all of the schools that are currently open in California, Oregon, Texas and Michigan that are non-accredited. California having the largest listing of non-accredited schools; followed by Texas, then Oregon, and last Michigan.

All of these states have supposed laws against using the names of non-accredited schools on your resume, but it never fails to amaze me why they don't go after the root of the problem instead of making non enforceable laws. Solution, no school will operate, solicit, advertise, open or instruct at the post high school level unless they have been certified by a national or regional federally approved accreditation agency, mute issue then. Probably can't do that because there is too many political dollars floating around greasing too many palms for the law makers to look the other way. CHEA has over 300 voluntarily non-accredited universities listed, now they can't all be diploma mills can they?

? January 8, 2009 at 5:15 p.m.

"California having the largest listing of non-accredited schools; followed by Texas, then Oregon, and last Michigan."

You'll have to cite a source. Those states have lists of illegal to use degrees, but other than California, not operating in the state borders.

"Solution, no school will operate, solicit, advertise, open or instruct at the post high school level unless they have been certified by a national or regional federally approved accreditation agency, mute issue then."

I agree. Instead of letting diploma mills bounce from state to state in search of easy regs and naive people, implement it at the fed level.

The word is "moot" btw.

Riddle me this Batman! January 8, 2009 at 6:26 p.m.

"You just have to love this site. Batman and Robin are chasing the Joker"

Good analogy.

Do you know why I totally love this site?

Because people CAN debate here and express opinions freely without being banned. Try doing that on Distance Learning Discussion Forum.

Here is what I come away from this whole discussion here...

1) Warren National University, formerly Kennedy-Western has a dubious reputation among many in the acedemic community.
2) Its defenders claim that this is a legitimate school which happens not to be accredited because it cost less and they can operate more freely.
3) Its accusers believe that its nothing more than a money making scam which, at best robs people of money and "sells" easy-to-earn diplomas.

I do have a questions about this though,

First, if this was a genuine Diploma Mill run by a bunch of scam artists, than why don't they do what other mills have done and take their business to Mississippi or better yet, base their operations in Romania, Singapore or Switzerland (the last mentioned being a home for a lot of "less-than-wonderful" schools and scams).

Nefarious institutions would not even try to get accreditation. They would just pack up their business and head elsewhere. Kind of like the old days when a possee would run flim flam men out of town with buckets of tar and feathers.

I am not sure where I read this, probibly in the Wikipedia discussion or something, but I did hear that a number of unaccredited institutions, some of which were very disreputable did get addreditation. Maybe Warren National has a chance after all.

Should Warren National tighten up its standards? Of course. But maybe, just maybe they need the benifit of the doubt here.

Well January 8, 2009 at 8:39 p.m.

Thanks for the well thought out comments.

"First, if this was a genuine Diploma Mill run by a bunch of scam artists, than why don't they do what other mills have done and take their business to Mississippi "

The intent of such moves is to seek low-regulation or no-regulation areas. KW "u" has done exactly that, hopping each time an area started enforcement, to its 5th state in Wyoming, which at the time of the move had virtually no regulation.

"Nefarious institutions would not even try to get accreditation."

Jury is still out on this one for WNU. As KW "u", they had publicly announced accreditation efforts in the past, so we'll have to see. WNU is only an "applicant", which by itself means nothing. I suppose I could submit my application into the NFL draft...

"I did hear that a number of unaccredited institutions, some of which were very disreputable did get addreditation"

Interested to know some examples. But why take the chance, when there are hundreds of established, legitimate, online programs already?

Sparky January 8, 2009 at 10 p.m.

? read the last sentence rocket scientist, CHEA, or CHEA.org has the complete list of un-accredited schools. How much proof do you need or do you not know what the acronym stands for: Council for Higher Education and Accreditation.

If you have the money you can become accredited. Go to the North Central Council on Accreditation and see how many schools are no longer affiliated with the accreditation program for one reason or another. School went out of business, hum; imagine that an accredited school going out of business. I thought that was part of accreditation, a sound financial institution. Or they were not accredited and changed their name upon becoming accredited. With the economy being what it is there will probably be a lot more schools dropping out of accreditation because to be a member and continue to be accredited their is a yearly fee for membership.

Diploma Mills January 9, 2009 at 4:50 a.m.

"CHEA.org has the complete list of un-accredited schools"

There is no complete list, since diploma mills often change their name and state. Any list that is published is probably out of date the minute it goes live.

I'm too lazy to look, but I assume that CHEA has Kennedy Western "university" (chuckle) and Warren National "university" on the schools to avoid list.

Recent KW "u" article from hometown newspaper January 9, 2009 at 2:14 p.m.

Cheyenne Herald - Article titled "Former Wyoming State Superintendent of Public Instruction deeply involved with one of the nation’s major degree sellers!"

The unaccredited “institutions of higher learning” have a thousand names but all have the same purpose. That purpose is to sell virtually worthless pieces of paper to willing but naive buyers.

www.cheyenneherald.com/_pdf/November%202...

Sparky January 9, 2009 at 3:54 p.m.

DM, you hit the nail directly on the head. You said it: You are "Lazy". Run your gums but to lazy to follow up on what people are saying. CHEA does not say to avoid any school. It only lists those schools that are currently not accredited. The same with their list of accredited schools. That list is constantly changing too, schools changing their names when applying for accreditation, schools dropping out of the accreditation program for what ever reason.

An education is only worthless to some one like you who has nothing else in life to do but cut others down because they do not follow your ideas or beliefs.

If I choose to attend a non-accredited school or an accredited school, of which I have attended both, and for the most part have found very little, if any differences, that is my choice and I or whom ever should be commended for attempting to educate my self in what ever fashion that I so choose. The knowledge that I gain is mine and no one can take that away.

A college degree is nothing more than a sheet of paper that signifies that I spent my time and money at a certain institution of supposed higher learning, it guarantees nothing that I learned a single thing. I suppose I could have a degree from Ohio University and brag how I spent it drunk and parting all of the time, cheated on my exams because the nutty professor left the answers on his desk when he left. Or that I sat in a class of 300 others with a professor that couldn't speak English.

Does accreditation cover that, that one must be able to effectively communicate to those that he/she is teaching. I am sorry, instructing, teaching is the process of conveying ones thought to another in such a fashion that the receiving party can effectively understand and retain the information conveyed.

As for a student pursuing a distant learning school and not having access to his professor. Hello, it takes more discipline to do this kind of learning because you have to READ a lot more and comprehend the information you are reading. No mommy and daddy there to read it for you or hold your hand. That is probably why WNU does not want any one under 25 in their program. As for accreditation or non-accreditation, I am still not sold on it either way. It guarantees nothing when it comes to learning. Just like a hospital that holds Joint Accreditation it does not guarantee the doctor inside of your chest isn’t a half witted, poor performing quack who has bounced around from hospital to hospital.

KW "u" January 9, 2009 at 4:28 p.m.

"As for a student pursuing a distant learning school and not having access to his professor."

Are you referring to the Senate diploma investigation of KW "u", where the student got no response when they emailed a professor? It's not like that in other places. I've attended legitimate distance learning courses, and have had good access to a professor.

It's understandable that you have no access to a professor, in the Senate hearing, KW "u" presented an employee list that had 60+ marketing people and only ONE professor!

"Just like a hospital that holds Joint Accreditation it does not guarantee the doctor inside of your chest isn’t a half witted, poor performing quack who has bounced around from hospital to hospital."

Wow, I'm glad you choose to go to an unaccredited university and an unlicensed doctor, but I'll take the ones that have passed quality reviews in both instances.

Sparky January 9, 2009 at 7:33 p.m.

KW we can tell you have no real life experience in the real world. I never said that I attended a non-accredited university, your assuming that. Now your talking out of the lack of knowledge side of your face as it pertains to physicians. I have many years experience around physicians and health care facilities that are accredited and had first hand experience with half witted physicians that come from top notch universities and didn't or don't have enough sense to come in out of the rain and still some how manage to maintain a license to practice.

An employee, why didn't the Senate "Lieberman" real fine person, ultra liberal "may as well have invited Ted Kennedy to testify", bring in more than one person from the school to testify? Sounds kind of like having a kangaroo jury trial. We all know that you can get a jack rabbit indicted by a jury trial because you only hear one side of the story. A disgruntled employee or student makes for a hostile witness, another words they are not real good witnesses on a witness stand.

?? January 9, 2009 at 8:14 p.m.

First you said:

"If I choose to attend a non-accredited school or an accredited school, of which I have attended both"

Then:

"I never said that I attended a non-accredited university,"

Which is it?

"A disgruntled employee or student makes for a hostile witness, another words they are not real good witnesses on a witness stand."

So you have evidence that both the KW "u" employee and the KW "u" student who gave sworn testimony committed perjury?

And what about the facts that KW "u" submitted directly?

xxx January 9, 2009 at 9:13 p.m.

"In contrast, the schools that we investigated take pains to try to convince prospective students that they are legitimate and that students have to earn their degrees. That is why a healthy dose of credit for work and life experience becomes such a critical component of their business model. That is what permits these more sophisticated diploma mills to assume an air of legitimacy while minimizing the actual amount of work required."

Still do not see the phrase Diploma Mill in there either you double dumbass. Learn how to read

I hate WNU (ASME) January 9, 2009 at 9:21 p.m.

WNUs courses were more difficult than any accredited university I have ever attended (ASU in Savannah- ASEE and Shorter college in Atlanta - AA General Science) and I can not get a better job because my new degree is not recognized and stains my resume.

Sparky January 9, 2009 at 9:41 p.m.

Once again you have very poor interpretation skills. The key word is "school" were did you ready any thing that says "university"? I have attended both accredited and non accredited schools. There are other schools besides a university. Police Academy, Fire Academy, EMT schools, military schools some of which are accredited and some that are not, steno schools, nursing schools, apprentice schools, paralegal schools, etc. get the picture cave dweller?

Sworn testimony, you obviously have no court room experience either. People lie in the courts all of the time including clear up to the Presidency. Remember. Clinton and Nixon both perjured themselves before a Congressional Committee.

LOL January 11, 2009 at 1:17 a.m.

LOL at latest review:

"Warren made my dreams come true!"

Looks like Piercetp is at it again for his 4th? review. His dream was to be a faux-engineer that didn't graduate from college?

Repost for the guy that missed it January 11, 2009 at 1:24 a.m.

For the poster that missed it the first time. From the Senate diploma mill hearing on Kennedy-Western "university" a/k/a Warren National "university" of Idaho / Hawaii / California / Utah / Wyoming / next???

"the schools we investigated take pains to try to convince prospective students that they are legitimate and that student have to earn their degrees. That is why a healthy dose of credit for work and life experience becomes such a critical component of their business model. That is what permits these more sophisticated diploma mills to assume an air of legitimacy while minimizing the actual amount of work required."

"Others, such as Columbia State University, Kennedy Western and some of the others we have looked at, are more sophisticated. They require a modicum of work, but nothing close to what should be required for a legitimate degree. Obviously, you shouldn't be able to earn a degree in 27 days."

"People lie in the courts all of the time"

I missed the part where the KW "u" student and employee were convicted of perjury. Irregardless, I thought KW "u" information about themselves was the most laughable.

ONE Professor!
60 Marketing employees!
55% free Masters!

Call now with a valid credit card! LMAO

Batman and Robin January 12, 2009 at 1:32 p.m.

This is a job for Crime Busters, Who ya gonna call? Crime Busters. I attended one of the mid west conference schools, got credit for playing football, took a course in bat mitten, and got work credit for cutting the lawn in a student work program. Now I make commercials for Bob the Builder.

Did I mention the part about my professors who would curve the grades for us stupid people. Didn't want to look bad in the eyes of his reviewers when it came time for his evaluations for re-hire. He would even put the answers on the board for us or show them in red if he used a power point presentation.

The accreditation thing only means that the school has been evaluated by some profit making good ole boy system who the feds have rubber stamped as being a spokesman for them so that we tax payers can give our hard earned money to the schools THEY say are legitimate. So another words some more tax payer blackmail. Take the federal welfare dollars away from the schools who have been blackmailed by the feds and they would probably go out of business.

KWU Alumnist January 12, 2009 at 3:47 p.m.

I have a BS from an accredited school in the mountain west, but completed an MS program at KWU. Through KWU, I completed three MS-level courses and found them to be directly applicable to my chosen profession. I also completed a thesis, which involved over 200 hours of blood, sweat, and tears. The work involved in my thesis advanced my career significantly (I work for a very large engineering firm). In fact, I have received two career promotions since completing my MS program and owe it to the work I did at KWU, not the degree, but the knowledge gained from completing that program, most particularly my thesis research. BTW, my employer paid for the entire program.

I understand that I cannot teach with the degree and that certain other states may not recognize it; however, in retrospect, knowing what I know now, I still would have completed the program. Just my own 2 cents.

Hometown newspaper makes good point January 12, 2009 at 4:57 p.m.

From the Cheyenne Herald article:

"Former Wyoming State Superintendent of Public Instruction
deeply involved with one of the nation’s major degree sellers!"

"if Warren National receives accreditation, degrees sold by Kennedy-Western will still be unaccredited."

KW "u" needs to be distinctly separated from the 2010 and after WNU degrees.

Hometown newspaper makes good point January 12, 2009 at 4:59 p.m.

More from the Cheyenne Herald on an update since Diploma Mill law went into affect.

"None of the unaccredited diploma mills have become accredited since the legislation went into effect. But they were given far too long to milk the world’s vulnerable from a Wyoming address before achieving accreditation. All they had to do was “apply” and Kennedy-Western University (which insulted the state by changing its name to Warren National University, in honor of our own Francis E. Warren ) made an application - as did Newport Int’l and Wyoming Catholic College."

"Warren National will more than likely pack up and move on as they have in the past."

Batman and Robin January 13, 2009 at 7:45 p.m.

Cheyenne Herald, a left wing radical rag paper, it's surly not the Gothim City paper. Homie you need a better understanding of the accreditation process. It isn't completed or accomplished over night. Most schools that apply for and goes through accreditation change their name. DeVry for one, they were known before as DeVry Institute of Technology before they became accredited as DeVry University, Columbus State Technical College changed their name to Columbus State Community College when they became accredited. Go down through the NCAC affiliation list and you will see dozens of school with name changes after becoming accredited. It's the separation of names for accountability or accreditation purposes. Warren National stopped accepting students because they didn't want those currently in the program to conflict with any new students that would be graduating under the new program of accreditation. Does that make sense?

If you’re trying to improve your image and become accredited wouldn't it make sense to get people on board who knows the system and can get things moving a little quicker and in a professional logical manor. It's done all the time in business and currently in our Presidential transition.

Diploma Mill January 13, 2009 at 8:11 p.m.

"Cheyenne Herald, a left wing radical rag paper"

It's always good to attack the source, (rag newspaper, bad Senators, Good Ole Boys, etc etc), when you can't counter the fact.

"Most schools that apply for and goes through accreditation change their name."

Most? Really? Are you counting Devry to Devry and Columbus State to Columbus State? These are simply form changes, like all the Technical Institutes changing to Technical colleges. There is value in name recognition, so keeping it 99% the same is smart.

The Chronicle of Higher Ed concluded that KW"u" changed to WN"u" to obfuscate their history, since the only name recognition of KW"u" obviously wasn't the good kind.

It's all good January 13, 2009 at 8:13 p.m.

But I feel better now knowing that every university changes their name to something completely unrecognizable from the previous, gets bashed by their local newspapers, and shuts downs unexplicably for 6 months at a time, after moving to their 5th state.

All these moves should be taken as high indicators of quality and stability. I would be suspect of any university that doesn't do it this way.

Texas Spanked By Federal Judge January 14, 2009 at 6:15 p.m.

blogs.chron.com/fortbend/archives/2008/12/county_judges_d.html

More Texas Spankings On The Way January 14, 2009 at 6:21 p.m.

County Judge Bob Hebert took no time to send out a press release Wednesday after he received an e-mail from a Los Angeles-based attorney informing him that the controversy surrounding his doctoral title was put to rest by a federal judge in Austin.

Judge Sam Sparks on Dec. 2 ruled academic degrees received from.....

Batman and Robin January 14, 2009 at 8:06 p.m.

Got to love it. A FEDERAL Judge spanks Texas on its law to prosecute those with unaccredited degrees. Since a Federal Judge over ruled the Texas State law on the use of unaccredited degrees then it makes the Congressional investigation a mute issue. Warren National and California Coast can breathe a little easier now. Now if they just finish their accreditation process maybe it will shut up some of the cry babies in here.

Lawmaker January 14, 2009 at 10:22 p.m.

REF: "Got to love it. A FEDERAL Judge spanks Texas on its law to prosecute those with unaccredited degrees. Since a Federal Judge over ruled the Texas State law on the use of unaccredited degrees then it makes the Congressional investigation a mute issue. Warren National and California Coast can breathe a little easier now. Now if they just finish their accreditation process maybe it will shut up some of the cry babies in here."

What is fascinating is that the Dr. Degree is totally unaccredited in two distinct ways. DETC can not accredit Dr. degrees and he graduated about 1 year post DETC accreditation. Double unaccreditation!!
This will set finally into federal law that Tx is the real fraud.

Texas Spanked By Federal Judge January 15, 2009 at 6:53 a.m.

LOL, Unfortunately, the degree wasn't a diploma mill, but rather an accredited university, California Coast, which is accredited by the DETC. Sounds like somebody had a bad list at the Texas, and should get their butt chewed.

Good for the Judge, Cal. Coast is a decent school, and it was unfortunate they got dragged into the Senate Diploma MIll hearing with KW "u" and the other. But if you read the report, you don't take anything negative away about CCU.

"While having cleaned up California Coast's degree mill stigma, he also refused the plaintiffs' request for him to declare the state diploma mill statutes unconstitutional" -

Glad to see that it was ruled constitutional, a good test. I see the law still stands and KW "u" and WN "u" are still listed as illegal.

I do hold out hope for 2011+ graduates of WN "u" having useful degrees if the "university" opens again and follows through on their accreditation.

And the word is "MOOT", look it up.

Carolina Law January 15, 2009 at 9:02 a.m.

Unfortunately for the judge, his degree is still illegal. He finished his degree in 2004 and CCU did not gain accreditation until 2005. There is no grandfather clause under the Texas law, therefor making it a 'substandard degree' at the time of issue. DETC is also not allowed to offer Ph.Ds, which is the degree the judge hangs on his wall. They are only allowed to offer professions based doctorates or they will lose accreditation. If this judge continues to use this degree in violation of Texas statute, he will be eligable for prosecution.

?? January 15, 2009 at 1:19 p.m.

I'm a 2005 Grad of Kennedy Western. If they become accreddited, will I be abel to teach at a comunity college?

Full Story January 15, 2009 at 1:58 p.m.

County Judge Bob Hebert took no time to send out a press release Wednesday after he received an e-mail from a Los Angeles-based attorney informing him that the controversy surrounding his doctoral title was put to rest by a federal judge in Austin.

Judge Sam Sparks on Dec. 2 ruled academic degrees received from California Coast University valid and legal to use in Texas.

That means Hebert can call himself "doctor" again.

Hebert had referred to himself as a doctoral recipient on the county's official Web site and his personal Web site and had a degree certificate from the distance-learning university hung on his office wall - up until late September when he was told by a Channel 11 reporter that Texas doesn't recognize degrees from that institute.

The TV report described Hebert's doctoral degree in management from California Coast as "phony" and the university that awarded the recognition as a "degree mill."

A local newspaper also amplified the allegation in a report last year.

Hebert said he began distance learning in 1999 and received the degree in 2004.

"Diploma mill" was a term used in 2004 by the U.S. General Accounting Office to describe California Coast and Warren National, another distance-learning institute. The Texas Legislature in 2005 authorized the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board to create a list of "diploma mill" schools, including those two, which don't have accreditation recognized by the board.

Known as the "diploma mill" statutes, state penal code outlaws the "use of fraudulent or substandard degrees" in any manner for employment, business license, job promotion, compensation or other benefits. A violation is a Class B misdemeanor.

An outraged Hebert in January joined California Coast and five other former and current California Coast students from Texas to file a lawsuit against the state and the state agency in January, asking the court to strike down related state statutes that they claimed violated their rights protected by the First Amendment of the Constitution.

Hebert told me Wednesday afternoon that he was happy to feel vindicated. He had this to say:

I got hammered by Channel 11 and a local paper called me a disappointment and embarrassment to the county. I thought I'd better put a press release out to let people know if we are right or wrong.
Jeff Daar, the attorney for Hebert and the other plaintiffs, told me that a turning point of the trial came in July when the attorney representing the state told the judge that the state recognizes that it was legal in the state to use degrees from California Coast and asked the judge not to strike down the "diploma mill" statutes as in violation of the First Amendment.

Full story continued January 15, 2009 at 1:59 p.m.

That position became an essential basis for the judge to eventually determine the validity of California Coast's degrees in Texas, Daar said.

Also, the judge also found that Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board had recognized Distance Education and Training Council, a federal Department of Education-recognized accreditor that recognizes California Coast, Daar said.

That means the state board logically has no basis to not recognize California Coast.

I sought perspectives from the state board Wednesday afternoon. Lizette Montiel, a spokeswoman for the agency, regarded the ruling as in favor of her agency. However, she referred my questions to the agency's lawyer, who wasn't immediately available.

In reviewing copies of the plaintiffs' complaint and the judge's ruling I obtained, I found that both the plaintiffs and defendants got what they wanted to a degree.

While having cleaned up California Coast's "degree mill" stigma, he also refused the plaintiffs' request for him to declare the state "diploma mill" statutes unconstitutional. Sparks concluded:

There is simply no basis to find doctoral plaintiffs face a credible threat of prosecution under the diploma mill statutes. Accordingly, they have no standing to pursue this matter.

Lawmaker January 15, 2009 at 2:15 p.m.

REF:
"Judge Sam Sparks on Dec. 2 ruled academic degrees received from California Coast University valid and legal to use in Texas."

This does in fact (by prescedent) force not just Texas but all states to recognize the pre-accreditation degrees of WNU, should WNU become accredited.

Texas can keep their laws on the books, but they will have no teeth and be un-enforced. I have been saying for a long time that these laws are un-enforced and put there just to try and scare people.
There has never been and there will never be a prosecution under these bogus state laws as higher order federal laws trump Tx. law.

No Texas Prosecuter has the balls.

MY GUESS January 15, 2009 at 2:19 p.m.

Is that the old judge has a pre 1965 degree and knows that his degree is unaccredited also and this is payback to the elitist morons out there.

LAWMAKER January 15, 2009 at 2:23 p.m.

"I'm a 2005 Grad of Kennedy Western. If they become accreddited, will I be abel to teach at a comunity college?"

Looks that way. :)

Teaching January 15, 2009 at 3:17 p.m.

"I'm a 2005 Grad of Kennedy Western. If they become accreddited, will I be abel to teach at a comunity college?"

Unfortunately no. Even if WN "u" does reopen and gains accreditation, your degree won't qualify at all.

If you read the WNU FAQ about it, it's clear you won't be able to. However, there does seem to be a process that would involve going back to school at WNU to make up for all the missing components of a KW "u" degree. I'm not sure if it would be completing the 40% - 60% of coursework that was handed out as "life experience", there isn't enough detail.

If you are "situationally honest", you can always take the route of trying to misrepresent your "degree" as being issued by an accredited WNU (2010+), instead of KW "u" and hope that the background check is poor. A community college may not be sophisticated enough to detect it. :-)

Relevant section from WN "u" FAQ January 15, 2009 at 3:20 p.m.

Sorry no whitewashing of old "degrees".

"If Warren National University is accredited before I graduate, will I receive a degree from an accredited university?"

Warren National University (WNU) students that are admitted after the University is accredited will earn a degree from an accredited university. Unfortunately, it is the policy of the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) not to allow institutions to grandfather students who matriculate while the institution holds unaccredited status.

tihs esroH January 15, 2009 at 5:40 p.m.

REF:
"Warren National University (WNU) students that are admitted after the University is accredited will earn a degree from an accredited university. Unfortunately, it is the policy of the Higher Learning Commission (HLC) not to allow institutions to grandfather students who matriculate while the institution holds unaccredited status."

Correct, they still hold unaccredited degrees BUT pending the Texas decision being appealed and overturned by a Federal circuit judge, the prescedent has been set in stone. (Unaccredited degrees must now be recognized when the school later becomes accredited). The state laws have now been short curcuited by a superior constitutional mandate.

The ugly head of constitutional law rears its ugly head again and the Nazi elites are once more beside themselves with anger.

As stated January 15, 2009 at 5:54 p.m.

"In a ruling that led to the suit’s dismissal but also led to the removal of CCU from the diploma-mill list, U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks said there appears to be no basis to believe degrees issued by CCU before 2005 - as Hebert’s was - would be considered substandard or fraudulent under Texas’ “degree mill statutes.”

This is a defacto (by prescedent) overturning of Texas Law. FYI, Texas has about a year to re-write the law, and they will, lest they get their peepees slapped again.

Unenforced Texas Laws Are Commonplace January 15, 2009 at 6 p.m.

It is illegal to take more than three sips of beer at a time while standing.

A recently passed anticrime law requires criminals to give their victims 24 hours notice, either orally or in writing, and to explain the nature of the crime to be committed.

The entire Encyclopedia Britannica is banned in Texas because it contains a formula for making beer at home.

It is illegal to drive without windshield wipers. You don't need a windshield, but you must have the wipers.

You can be legally married by publically introducing a person as your husband or wife 3 times.

A city ordinance states that a person cannot go barefoot without first obtaining a special five-dollar permit.

It is illegal for one to shoot a buffalo from the second story of a hotel.

It is illegal to milk another person's cow.

Abilene
It is illegal to idle or loiter anyplace within the corporate limits of the city for the purpose of flirting or mashing.

Austin
Wire cutters can not be carried in your pocket.

Beaumont
Collegiate football is banned at Lamar University.

Borger
It is against the law to throw confetti, rubber balls, feather dusters, whips or quirts (riding crop), and explosive firecrackers of any kind.

Clarendon
It is illegal to dust any public building with a feather duster.

El Paso
Churches, hotels, halls of assembly, stores, markets, banking rooms, railroad depots, and saloons are required to provide spittoons "of a kind and number to efficiently contain expectorations into them."

Houston
Beer may not be purchased after midnight on a Sunday, but it may be purchased on Monday.

It is illegal to sell Limburger cheese on Sunday.

Galveston
It is illegal to drive a motor car down Broadway before noon on Sundays.

LeFors
It is illegal to take more than three swallows of beer while standing.

Lubbock County
It is illegal to drive within an arm's length of alcohol - including alcohol in someone else's blood stream.

Mesquite
It is illegal for children to have unusual haircuts.

Port Arthur
Obnoxious odors may not be emitted while in an elevator.

San Antonio
It is illegal to flirt or respond to flirtation using the eyes and/or hands.

It is illegal to urinate on the Alamo.

The Texas Penal Code (Section 32.52) prohibits the use of fraudulent or substandard degrees "in a written or oral advertisement or other promotion of a business; or with the intent to: obtain employment; obtain a license or certificate to practice a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain a promotion, a compensation or other benefit, or an increase in compensation or other benefit, in employment or in the practice of a trade, profession, or occupation; obtain admission to an educational program in this state; or gain a position in government with authority over another person, regardless of whether the actor receives compensation for the position." Violation of this law is a Class B misdemeanor.

LOL January 15, 2009 at 6:06 p.m.

"If you read the WNU FAQ about it, it's clear you won't be able to. However, there does seem to be a process that would involve going back to school at WNU to make up for all the missing components of a KW "u" degree. I'm not sure if it would be completing the 40% - 60% of coursework that was handed out as "life experience", there isn't enough detail.
If you are "situationally honest", you can always take the route of trying to misrepresent your "degree" as being issued by an accredited WNU (2010+), instead of KW "u" and hope that the background check is poor. A community college may not be sophisticated enough to detect it. :-)"

So now WNU is more credible than a federal judge who says the degrees are recognized. FUNNY!

Again as stated January 15, 2009 at 6:08 p.m.

"In a ruling that led to the suit’s dismissal but also led to the removal of CCU from the diploma-mill list, U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks said there appears to be no basis to believe degrees issued by CCU before 2005 - as Hebert’s was - would be considered substandard or fraudulent under Texas’ “degree mill statutes.”

This is a defacto (by prescedent) overturning of Texas Law. FYI, Texas has about a year to re-write the law, and they will, lest they get their peepees slapped again.

Fries with that? January 15, 2009 at 7:49 p.m.

"If you are "situationally honest", you can always take the route of trying to misrepresent your "degree" as being issued by an accredited WNU (2010+), instead of KW "u""

Heck, if your "degree" won't withstand any scrutiny, why not just say you went to Harvard instead?

"U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks said there appears to be no basis to believe degrees issued by CCU before 2005 - as Hebert’s was - would be considered substandard or fraudulent under Texas’ “degree mill statutes.”

I agree with that, CCU was never hokey in my opinion. But I'd be interestd to see how a Rochville or Kennedy Western would fair in such an evaluation when there are piles of documentation showing their substandard practices.

Misc January 15, 2009 at 7:50 p.m.

"So now WNU is more credible than a federal judge who says the degrees are recognized"

I agree that WNU has no credibility, but the judge said that CCU is not a diploma mill, which is correct. I don't see that the ruling is okaying all diploma mills on the list.

Batman and Robin January 15, 2009 at 7:56 p.m.

Texas Spanked By Federal Judge

MOOT: Debatable
MUTE: Silent, deadening, it's still a mute issue now that a Federal Judge trumped the state law. State law can not supersede federal law.
Only a Federal Appeals Court can over turn the Federal Judges decision.

LOL January 15, 2009 at 8:12 p.m.

The state law hasn't changed one bit.

*The court decided that CCU should not be on the illegal list, due to DETC accreditation.

Remember that CCU became accredited in 2005 by DETC, but Texas did not recognize it as acceptable in 2008, which it should have done immediately.

*The court specifically decided to leave the diploma mill law stand.

But how does this apply to clear cut cases still on the Texas (not to mention a dozen other states) illegal list like Kennedy Western, Rochville, Breyer State, etc?

Trying to assume that this decision on an accredited university somehow retroactively validates 25 years of substandard KW "u" degrees, is 4th hand transitive at best.

454 Casull January 15, 2009 at 10:21 p.m.

"I agree with that, CCU was never hokey in my opinion. But I'd be interestd to see how a Rochville or Kennedy Western would fair in such an evaluation when there are piles of documentation showing their substandard practices."

GAO brought both CCU and WNU before congress calling both degree mills.
Also WNU will have regional accreditation, superior to DETC by CHEA standards.

You can't have it both ways SFB.

George January 15, 2009 at 10:36 p.m.

"Constitutional law rears its ugly head again and the Nazi elites are once more beside themselves with anger.
Not atypical."

Atypical is not a word clueles.

Batman and Robin January 16, 2009 at 2:14 p.m.

Substandard: A level of quality.

I guess all of you graduates out there who do not have degrees from Harvard, Yale or Princeton, your degrees are worthless because we all know they are the supreme Ivy League schools of the U.S. and all others are substandard in comparison. You are all below an established standard.

California Coast is substandard too, because it is only accredited by DETC, which is a federally recognized accrediting agency, but is considered by the regional good ole boy accreditors to be substandard to their ideas. Amazing how convoluted things can get when one starts expressing ones opinion about some thing or some one else.

KWU or now WNU is probably substandard to a lot of schools, yes not accredited, but licensed "legally" by the "State of Wyoming", to which they reside in or are head quartered in, (just like all other colleges and universities across the country) to confer degrees upon those who successfully complete at least 25% of their curriculum, just like all other colleges and universities within the U.S., provided they have completed other instruction from other schools accepted or accredited and have a certain amount of work experience with in the career field they are currently studying and can provide certified transcripts from those other institutions, or from CLEP, or can test out of certain required classes and pay for the credits.

Now all of you substandard Al Bundys out there, get your selves re-enrolled in an Ivy League school, of which you probably can’t afford anyway, and get yourself a top notch high standard degree. A Ford is a Ford, a Chevy is a Chevy, and a Honda is a Honda, but they all do the same thing, roll down the highway, some just ride a little different than others.

Again, KW "u" and WN "u" January 16, 2009 at 2:59 p.m.

"they are the supreme Ivy League schools of the U.S. and all others are substandard in comparison. You are all below an established standard."

I disagree that all non-Ivies are useless. There are 2 standards to consider, Recognition and prestige. Recognition as a valid university is established by accreditation, the quality standard in the US. Prestige is a matter of opinion, but can be seen by looking at the University rankings that put them into tiers, based on student scores, ACT, GPA, acceptance, etc.

So...

KW "u" is unrecognized and not prestigious
University of Phoenix is Recognized but not prestigious
Harvard is Recognized and prestigious

KW "u" versus WN "u" January 16, 2009 at 3:02 p.m.

For those of you still grabbing at straws to think your KW "u" or current WN "u" degree will be whitewashed IF WN "u" gains accreditation, pay close attention to WN "u" FAQ, which clearly tells you that your degree will be forever unaccredited:

"If you are currently matriculating at Warren National University (WNU) or if you were admitted when WNU was unaccredited, the unaccredited status of your degree has not changed and will not change. WNU will only become accredited after a series of steps in "seeking accreditation," and this process may take several years. Only students who are admitted after WNU is fully accredited will earn an accredited degree. "

Geico January 16, 2009 at 5:37 p.m.

"For those of you still grabbing at straws to think your KW "u" or current WN "u" degree will be whitewashed IF WN "u" gains accreditation, pay close attention to WN "u" FAQ, which clearly tells you that your degree will be forever unaccredited:"

Hey Mr. thick skull cave dweller, that is not the point. You must be dumber than dog poopy or are just trying to muddy the waters.

One more time.

A FEDERAL JUDGE (BY PRESCEDENT LAW-otherwise known as VS law) SAYS THAT STATES MUST RECOGNIZE the unaccredited degree (when the University finally becomes accredited) as legal.

Yes this could be appealed. More likely it will not be appealed as the federal appeals court would overturn all like state laws in the USA regarding this issue. The liberal elites will not take this chance.

Simply put for you cave dwellers out there:
When and if WNU becomes accredited, WNU will be removed from not just the Tx. illegal university list, but all states will be subject to this higher standard.

Hint-Federal law trumps state law.

The days of clubbing a female over the head and bringing her back to your cave to have relations is over.

Lawmaker January 16, 2009 at 5:48 p.m.

HUH?
"Atypical is not a word clueles."

Actually atypical is a word, it means not typical. I think though that clueles is not a word.

Did you graduate from an accredited university? Admit it, you did. Figures.

again January 16, 2009 at 5:55 p.m.

In a ruling that led to the suit’s dismissal but also led to the removal of CCU from the diploma-mill list, U.S. District Judge Sam Sparks said there appears to be no basis to believe degrees issued by CCU before 2005 - as Hebert’s was - would be considered substandard or fraudulent under Texas’ “degree mill statutes.

Batman and Robin January 16, 2009 at 6:53 p.m.

This cave dweller is a disgruntled former KWU student who flunked out of the school, feels he was duped of his hard earned loan that he has to repay, because it was not a Pell or Stafford or low income government grant.

No matter what any one says, shows, or implies he will have some thing else to say to try and counter what ever any one else has to say.

The school chose to remain unaccredited because it did not want to be told who, what or how to do business by the federal government which is what happens when they have control over you, unless you are a lobbyist padding their pockets. The feds can reorganize certain accreditation agencies all they want; however, the key once again is that accreditation is still "voluntary", not mandatory.

What really interests me is why the congressional investigation never went after any of the so called diploma mills that will sell you a degree just by giving them your money. Never any mention of that.

Why then did the congressional investigation never pursue presenting a law to congress making it mandatory that all secondary colleges and universities become accredited? After all, congress makes the federal laws. Why didn't they pursue the so called diploma mills that sell degrees for a fee? Why wasn't a criminal investigation ever started by the FBI for consumer fraud? Even more interesting is why the federal government never went after any of these so called mills.

How come you never hear one word from Congress of the constant scandals out of the military Academy’s where test cheating is rampant, not only here but many, many of the other colleges and universities in the U.S. that are accredited. Let’s not just sweep up the dust, but clean up the mess.

How about Clinton's education program that flopped or the Bush no child left behind program. No mandatory accreditation of any of the pre or post educational institutions.

How about equal justice for ALL.

Diploma Mill January 16, 2009 at 7:26 p.m.

"a disgruntled former KWU student who flunked out of the school"

Huh? It's 100% acceptance, 100% graduation at KW "u", nobody has ever flunked out of KW "u".

"A FEDERAL JUDGE (BY PRESCEDENT LAW-otherwise known as VS law) SAYS THAT STATES MUST RECOGNIZE the unaccredited degree (when the University finally becomes accredited) as legal."

Wow, somebody better call WN "u" right away, because their own website completely contradicts your fantasy, and says that all past degrees are useless.

Well, if they ever reopen or begin answering their phones again, that is.

"accreditation is still voluntary, not mandatory."

Good point, quality standards are usually voluntary, and if you want to go to an unlicensed doctor or dentist or unaccredited University, your choice. But in the US, the governing body says:

"Since accreditation is the PRIMARY means of determining the legitimacy and quality of colleges and universities in the United States, to describe the process as "voluntary" is not to describe it as "optional" or "unnecessary."

Diploma mill January 16, 2009 at 7:35 p.m.

"What really interests me is why the congressional investigation never went after any of the so called diploma mills that will sell you a degree just by giving them your money. Never any mention of that."

They did this, you should actually read it if you are so intereted. Some facts would really help your argument.

Batman and Robin January 16, 2009 at 7:41 p.m.

You bone head, quit twisting the print. They are not saying that at all. They are only saying that any degree earned before accreditation will not be considered accredited after they become accredited unless you start and complete their program under accreditation.

Show me any thing any where that says a doctor or dentist has to be accredited. You are getting confused with hospital Joint Council on Accreditation which is a joke in its self. They have to have a license to practice and pass the medical boards. If they had to be accredited, as you say, then we can kick out two thirds of the physicians in this country because they are from foreign countries like India, Brazil, China, Taiwan, and god knows where else.

Mental Floss January 16, 2009 at 8:14 p.m.

"Wow, somebody better call WN "u" right away, because their own website completely contradicts your fantasy, and says that all past degrees are useless."

1. WNUs website is pre federal ruling so since this just happened they may take a few weeks to reflect this on the website.

2. WNU website and Federal ruling are two different subjects. WNU can not opine over a federal judges ruling (and why would they want to).

3. The two separate issues are Accreditation and Legality. You are confusing them.

WNU Stud January 16, 2009 at 8:37 p.m.

Accreditors and schools identified, in websites maintained by the U.S. Department of Education (USDE) or CHEA, as recognized or accredited, are highly likely to be legitimate. And some accreditors or schools not so identified are legitimate as well. For instance, legitimate schools like Warren National that are in process of becoming accredited are often not listed, and some religious schools choose not to be listed. Thus, some legitimate higher education accreditors, programs, and institutions are not accredited or recognized by CHEA, USDE, or both. Because often no simple “litmus test” is available to gauge whether an accreditor, school or program is legitimate, members of the public act prudently who consult resources such as those CHEA and government bodies cite, and who conduct further inquiries. In this area, not to “look before you leap” can be a costly, painful, and consequential mistake.

Batman and Robin January 16, 2009 at 9:10 p.m.

Great response stud. I have attended and completed many, many courses and schools in the military that were not accredited. Upon successful completion of those schools I was considered to be one of the most highly trained and qualified people in my career field in the free world.

US Navy's nuclear school is not accredited and those sailors are considered cream of the cream. US Army's EOD Course is not accredited and is used by all services and the private sector that have certain homeland security responsibilities. I have taken a number of other government courses and schools that are not accredited but are mandatory for my career field as a civilian. So I guess I am stupid in the eyes of some people in this blog site because some of the educational opportunities presented to me were not "accredited".

Pissed off in Maine January 17, 2009 at 3:38 p.m.

I too am sick and tired of all of these degree mill pushing companies hiring all of these people with their fake degrees. It is rampant up here. When the top management in your company has these dubious credentials and your company has a thousands times the money (as Maine does) to hire lawyers, it is a no win.
Maine passes these stupid laws but never enforces them. It sucks. I am moving to Canada.

LAWMAKER January 17, 2009 at 3:47 p.m.

Even Texas AG admits the law is n/a for private companies. Or put another way, the company that hires you has to press charges. As long as you tell them up front you are OK. There are thousands of people with unaccredited degrees gainfully employed in everyone of the "Illegal States" It does not hurt to put "unaccredited" front and center on your resume. Pivate companies are in revolt against burdensome government requirements and will hire you to spite the government that works against their best interest.
Ask your self this question. Why have there been no prosecutions for private non governmental use of an unaccredited degree? The answer is simple. Two federal district judges have sided with WNU against the "Great state of Oregon" and "The Great State Of Texas". Some will say rightly Oregon settled out of court, but that still sets "Prescedent". The reason Oregon settled out of court was simple (fear of what would happen).
In private chambers Oregon smartly made the correct choice not to persue this issue. They would have lost like Texas.
If you do not think WNU is standing by to defend you in the event you are challenged by any state government, then you have not been following the big picture. FEDERAL PRESCEDENT HAS SETTLED THIS ISSUE PEOPLE. Just because these states are too chicken to challenge the Feds and look dumb is the only reason they have the illegal laws in their code. The first time any state challenges the Fed., all state laws allowing degree discrimination will be struck.

Carolina Law January 18, 2009 at 6:07 a.m.

It is not the company that presses charges. They may bring it to the atttention of the DA's office, but it is up to them if they want to follow through with it. The company is more than welcomed to fire the faulty degree holder.

The State of Texas did not address issues of unacreditted degrees. In the case of Herbert et al vs the State of Texas was decided that DETC degrees were valid. The Education Board had already taken DETC schools off the diploma mill list so it was rather an exercise in futility. WNU is still on it and will be until it attains accreditation.

Two federal judges siding with you isn't enough to do much of anything if enough don't give you a majority opinion in your favor. According to Oregan law, WNU is still a degree that violates ORS 348.609(1). Federal "PRECEDENT" has not settled anything regarding WNU. For there to be PRECEDENT they have to make a ruling first.

Law of 8s January 18, 2009 at 3:22 p.m.

"Two federal judges siding with you isn't enough to do much of anything if enough don't give you a majority opinion in your favor. According to Oregan law, WNU is still a degree that violates ORS 348.609(1). Federal "PRECEDENT" has not settled anything regarding WNU. For there to be PRECEDENT they have to make a ruling first."

You are either a liar or stupid. I will not call you a liar.

Carolina Law January 18, 2009 at 10:19 p.m.

Smart of you not to. About the two judges, there was no actual ruling in a federal court. Oregan was settled out-of-court and Texas was on the state level. The Oregan case never had a ruling to set a precedent and the Texas case wasn't even about unaccredited degrees but DETC. There is and never was a federal ruling to set a precedent.

Oregan still has WNU on its diploma mill site under the list of schools that violate ORS 348.609(1). If you fail to list WNU or KWU as unaccredited on your application, you can be charged under the law. Whether they decide to prosecute is another story.

... January 19, 2009 at 3:54 a.m.

I mean Oregon.

Current Student January 19, 2009 at 3:47 p.m.

"WNUs website is pre federal ruling so since this just happened they may take a few weeks to reflect this on the website."

The ruling was 12/2/08. If it was such a landmark decision or at all relevant to WNU, I am sure they could have changed some text in the last 6 weeks.

But good luck having them do anything. They will not return calls or emails, and from what I have heard, they have laid off a good chunk of their staff.

Current Student January 19, 2009 at 10:12 p.m.

Any recommendations on how to contact them? Do they still have offices in California or is Cheyenne the whole thing? They are only renting out 2,000 sq. feet in on part of a floor at the listed location, so I can't believe that's all:

200 W. 17th Street Suite 30
Cheyenne, WY 820010000

WNU Contacts January 20, 2009 at 3:11 a.m.

Bob Patterson
Chief Operating Officer
Warren National University
bpatterson@wnuedu.com
(800) 635-2900 x353
(307) 638-6114 x353
(818) 707-9897 fax

Martha Pollock
mpollock@wnuedu.com
(800) 635-2900 ext. 284

Kamal Shahrabi
kshahrabi@wnuedu.com

Batman and Robin January 20, 2009 at 3:47 p.m.

First DETC was not the ruling in the case "Texas vs Hebert". The case involved the recognition of a Doctorial degree earned from California Coast “prior” to California Coast receiving accreditation from DETC.

DETC is only for schools that issue associate degrees. That is one of the reasons why WNU applied for regional accreditation, they award up to the doctorial level. The ruling against the state of Texas was by a U.S. District Court, Judge Sam Sparks, not a state court, so it does trump state law. There does not have to be a unanimous ruling in this case because it was heard on a regional basis, not by the Federal Supreme Courts. It now becomes "case law" and can now be referred to in any legal challenges

I think half of the people in here can't comprehend the English language to save their soles. Then again ignorance makes for good bloging.

Oregon and California both state they have laws against some one using unaccredited degrees on resumes, yet both states continue to allow a large number of unaccredited universities to flourish within their boarders. Why is that? Double standard? Political hands being greased? Money for the economy? Well we probably won't have to worry too much longer about either one of those two states any way, they both are on the verge of financial collapse from all of their social welfare programs and ultra-liberalism.

Well said Batman! January 20, 2009 at 5:27 p.m.

:)

English as a Second Language January 20, 2009 at 11:42 p.m.

"I think half of the people in here can't comprehend the English language to save their soles."

Do you mean souls? I'm glad you are the one half that has difficulty with it. I am here to balance that out for you.

"ignorance makes for good bloging"??

Do you mean blogging?

I grant you 18 KWU life experience credits in English as a Second Language!

Well said! January 20, 2009 at 11:42 p.m.

:-)

Carolina Law January 21, 2009 at 1:34 a.m.

Batman and Robin said "DETC is only for schools that issue associate degrees."

No it isn't. DETC schools offer up to professional doctorates. The case of Herbert et al vs Texas was about CCU and DETC granting institutions recognizing degrees. It just so happens Judge Herbert's degree is still illegal. DETC is not allowing CCU to confer his Ph.D.

Duh January 21, 2009 at 6:24 a.m.

"DETC is only for schools that issue associate degrees."

LMAO, this must be the ignorance that makes for good "bloging"

Batman and Robin January 21, 2009 at 2:26 p.m.

Duh, I stand corrected, DETC does allow some doctorate programs. This is a change from a number of years ago because DETC at one time did not accredit schools at the doctorate level.

So then why would WNU even want to be accredited by a regional accreditation agency? Why not DETC, it is easier, cost less, still can cover the basic degree programs, is still nationally recognized, but doesn't qualify for as much federal welfare money.

•Doctor of Business Administration (DBA)

•Doctor of Education (Ed.D.)

•Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT)

•Doctor of Occupational Therapy (DOT)

•Doctor of Arts (specified fields) (DA)

•Doctor of Science (specified fields) (DSc)

•Doctor of Ministry (D.Min.)

•Doctor of Public Administration (DPA)

12 steps to accreditation

1.have a clearly defined and stated mission, goals, and objectives;
2.state its educational objectives clearly, and offer sufficiently comprehensive, accurate, up-to-date, educationally sound instructional materials, and methods to meet its educational objectives;
3.provide adequate student services;
4.provide adequate examination services and attention to individual student differences;
5.have students who "express satisfaction" with the instruction and services received, and have an outcomes assessment plan; Can't have negativity here.
6.have a qualified faculty;
7.enroll "only students who can be expected to benefit from the instruction"; No equality education here.
8.be honest in its advertising and promotional practices;
9.show financial resources that are adequate to carry out all obligations to students;
10.use fair and equitable tuition and refund policies that meet the minimum tuition cancellation policies;
11.have adequate facilities, equipment, and record protection; Any warehouse will work.
12.conduct continuous research and self-improvement studies of accreditation.

If you go on to read the DETC requirements for accreditation a school must have been accepting students at least two years prior to accreditation and have at least 100 students enrolled. So all of you students who attended a DETC school two years prior to accreditation, YOUR SCREWED and your degrees are worthless.

Mental Floss January 21, 2009 at 8:46 p.m.

I think that there are a lot of young people on this site who think accreditation matters. This is fair since you have never seen how the real world works. Given time in the workplace, you will see that no one really cares. I have been in the workplace for 28 years. I have never heard someone ask "Is your University Accredited?
Do yourself a favor and concentrate on doing a good job in your first job. If doing a good job means you need more knowledge then buy a book on the subject and read it. If you need to be spoon fed, go to a Brick and Mortar University (accredited or not). Do not waste your time online with any school (accredited or not) unless you learn better that way.

Batman and Robin January 21, 2009 at 9:47 p.m.

Well said Mental Floss. I've been in the work force for over 40 years and have the same thoughts as you.

I've taken distant learning courses along with structured class room instruction through the military, private sector and in the university world and I have found nearly all of them challenging, and I have taught in the military, high school and university only to be disappointed with the quality of students at the high school and college level.
Watched students go to sleep during instruction, get up and leave the class room after signing in, talk with one another during instruction, amazing, and in accredited schools.

The accreditation thing was never a question or given much thought until the last few years because of the "ME" generations inability to take care of themselves, wanting spoon fed every thing. I've been told that I was over qualified a few times because of my education and experience, but I have never asked me if my education was from an accredited institution, probably because there are just too many schools out there that aren't accredited. But that alone does not make one any smarter, only that the school jumped through some hoops, met some standards on paper and plopped down their money for a title.

Most of the people on this site seem to have no significant experience in the real world. They or he/she failed at something, have a bad taste in their mouth and just want to bring down the system that they feel failed them, when in reality they failed them self.

Real World January 22, 2009 at 3:10 p.m.

"I think that there are a lot of young people on this site who think accreditation matters. This is fair since you have never seen how the real world works. Given time in the workplace, you will see that no one really cares. "

Unfortunately, here in the real world, all of our professional jobs (we have 7,000+ employees) require a real degree, and we verify each new hire.

Many of our professional jobs also require professional licensing, which obviously requires a real degree.

Good article on best practices January 22, 2009 at 3:22 p.m.

For those of you that suspect academic fraud in your organization, here is a good article to protect yourself.

“Elementary” Facts About Education Falsification

-Global Employment Screening Company Notes Research Findings and Expresses Concern Regarding the Explosion of Diploma Mills-

"Diploma mills operate to make a profit by distributing non-accredited academic degrees to individuals based on a level of payment and life experiences. People who obtain these degrees can then falsely claim them on their resumes."

“You see it in the news, diploma mill operations being closed by federal and state investigations. Diploma mills should be a concern to all employers. The ramifications associated with hiring an individual with a false degree can be very damaging to an organization resulting in a loss of trust, and depending on the job, harm to individuals"

“This is a serious problem being addressed aggressively by the employment screening industry and reemphasizes the importance of thorough, comprehensive screening processes,” said Morris. "

Mental Floss January 22, 2009 at 4:16 p.m.

You can not force an employer to hire a deadbeat over a producer just because the deadbeat has an accredited degree and the producer does not.

Now I can see that the government has engineered a take-over of free enterprise.

Since government workers produce Zero GDP, they do not care about competition or hard work or even doing a good job. This is why they think government endorsed education (US constitutional violation) is so important. This (accreditation) makes them (government employees)feel important. They get no satisfaction from their jobs and have low self esteems. Our founding fathers gave the US government no authority over education for a reason. Those with wisdom can understand why the framers wanted limited government. You government types in the lower ranks need to beware. The same socialist type government you worship will make YOU and/or YOUR CHILDREN the first casualty when and if we let them get too powerful. Study history. It is on the verge of repitition.

batman and robin January 22, 2009 at 8:48 p.m.

Real world, how many of those 7,000 employees are currently laid off or are they scattered all over the world in low paying third world countries? I hope their accredited degrees keep them employed. Socialism and too much government in private industry/education has collapsed every country that it has touched. Are we next?

"Diploma mills operate to make a profit by distributing non-accredited academic degrees to individuals based on a level of payment and life experiences. I can agree with part of this statement, however, I know of several universities that will give you some credit for life experience if it is in the career field in which you are studying, and give additional credit for schooling from tech schools, vocational schools, some high school studies, and academies such as police and fire.

"The only problem with government is government itself". Ronald Regan

It's a diploma mill stupid January 23, 2009 at 5:56 a.m.

"Real world, how many of those 7,000 employees are currently laid off or are they scattered all over the world in low paying third world countries?"

None

"You can not force an employer to hire a deadbeat"

True, that is why we have quality standards and minimum education requirements to narrow the selection process down to the 10 or 15 candidates that have excellent production and track record success.

"The only problem with government is government itself". Ronald Regan"

Do you mean Ronald Reagan? Hard to read your semi-literate
postings.

But I award you a KW "u" "doctorate" for "life experience", none the less.

Duh January 23, 2009 at 6:19 a.m.

"however, I know of several universities that will give you some credit for life experience if it is in the career field"

I'm glad you admitted ignorance in the realm of accreditation and it shows even more in this post. There are legitimate ways to test out of credits, but diploma mill laws such as Nevada's limit this to an absolute maximum of 10% when properly documented, vetted, and tested for comparability.

There is quite a difference between that and good ole' KW "u", who admitted they gave away 55% for "life experience" to anyone with a valid credit card without even verifying.

batman and robin January 23, 2009 at 3:58 p.m.

Duh, you’re off your rocker numb nuts. Nevada may only give 10% but no two states laws or schools regulations for that matter are the same. I know from experience what certain accredited and non accredited schools that will give more than 10% credit; however, because of the limitations of this web site certain forms of information are prohibited for what ever reason. More socialism of restricting freedom of speech I guess. Get a life, get a job, and for heavens sake get off you lazy lizard butt and get out in the real world instead of being a dead head and playing internet games all day.

Any one who has been in the armed forces of the US can transfer their military education and experience into nearly any university in the US and get college credit for course completion and life experience As a matter of fact the brick and mortar schools will even give credit for completion of basic training. Any one who has completed any form of FEMA courses can get semester hour credits at nearly any university in the US for successfully completing the on line course, open book at that, in certain career fields. Do some more research dead beat.

Mental Floss January 23, 2009 at 4:37 p.m.

I think that if the administrator of this site were sincere, there would have to be some certified proof that individuals were in fact actually students or alumni of the university being slandered.

After all, the website is titled "Online Degree Reviews"

How does a UOP graduate do a review on WNU????

I can assure any future readers of this site that I am one of the only real WNU graduate/student in this blog. The rest are:

1. People who work at CHEA.
2. US dept. of ED Employees.
3. Teachers/students at other universities.
4. Government Wonks.

After reading this, I am sure some Poser will come along and blog about how "I am a real WNU graduate and I had a bad experience....." or, fill in the blank________________.

Therefore I am posting this Poser alert.

BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR POSERS CLAIMING THEY ARE KW OR WNU GRADUATES/STUDENTS AND ALSO CLAIMING THEY HAD A BAD EXPERIENCE.

batman and robin January 23, 2009 at 6:27 p.m.

Mental Floss I have to think that you are correct there. Most of these blogers are from other institutions or say they are or DOE employees or CHEA punks knocking the system because they aren't making a buck off of the school. WNU could have chosen to have gone either DETC or with North Central Accreditation, so there once again it is or was their "CHOICE" to "VOLUNTARILY" go with North Central Council on Accreditation.

Does accreditation make ones school any better after accreditation. No, only says they are abiding by some private institutions standards, which if you read them aren't real difficult to achieve, just time consuming to put every thing on paper.

There is a big push on for law enforcement agencies to become accredited. My former law enforcement agency that I worked for I wrote the accreditation standards for them. Four hundred and fifty standards, the forms had to be made out a certain way to conform across the board for specific events or situations, evidence procedures had to be done a certain way, and vehicles all had to look like clones. The department look wise was already there except for the 450 standards. While writing the standards to conform to the departments needs I started noticing a pattern. The standards were not designed to help me the officer do a better job, they were designed to protect the company (agency) from me the working stiff. It allowed the company to use what ever standard they saw fit against me should I violate one of those 450 standards. Didn't make me a better employee, only sucked much needed money out of the city and made some private accreditation firm richer. After 10 years of being sucked dry of their money, some one finally woke up and asked why we were repeatedly paying out $5,000.00 bucks every year to be a member of accreditation and spending $10,000.00 every five years to have four university cone head police chiefs come in and recertify us.

batman and robin January 23, 2009 at 6:43 p.m.

Mental Floss the jest of this whole thing is that accreditation does nothing to assure the professors or associate professors are teaching the correct curriculum, or that they are fit to teach at all, only that they have their masters or doctorates degree or in some colleges at least 5 years work experience in the career field they are teaching. Nothing says that the professor has to be able to convey the English language so that we Americans can understand his conversation, or that the professor will not curve the grade averages so those slow learners can pass too, helps make the school numbers look better if they can say they have a higher graduation rate, doesn't assure the student who graduates can write a structured comprehensive sentence nor does it mandate that the student attend the class of instruction at least 80% of the time to get credit for attending. Show up the first day, come back the last day and take the exam, unless there are papers due which can be found any where on the internet from other students who have made a living out of writing research or term papers for other students. Some of the more serious classes do require lab time, medical fields, large number of sciences or engineering but those are the exception not the rule.

Plenty of Life Experience January 23, 2009 at 7:27 p.m.

I happen to know for a fact that several companies where I have been employed in the past (uh, BIG companies, I might add) where the body of your work experience far outweighs any degree you might hold. Take that to the bank, as well, folks. Most companies will only look at a degree "in the real world" as a personal achievement. A crowning achievement, if you will. In fact, I know a ton in my profession (software engineering) who hold no degree, but who have completed several accredited certifications (like myself). Again, all personal achievements.

My problem with WNU is not whether or not it is accredited, it's the fact that they display very poor customer service. For instance, I have tried to contact their Director of Student Adminssions for a month now, but this person has yet to return any of my phone calls nor have they responded to any of my email. I find this to be very apalling and very unacceptable. To think, I paid this institution money to obtain a degree, yet they seem to want to continually ignore me when I have a question about anything. My questions are in regards the Electrical Engineering program that not one of its staff members can seem to give me a straight answer about.... that is to say, if they decide to ever answer their phone. Again, unacceptable. If you are going accept money from an individual for whatever reason, you better damn well be prepared to answer questions... at times this may even mean answering "tough questions" as well (yet another concept that the great and mighty "cultured" Europeans cannot seem to grasp either... but I'll leave this for an entriely different discussion altogether).

Thank you to "WNU Contacts" for providing me with a list of folks from which to choose for contact purposes. But, I'm now left to wonder if Mr. Patterson will return my call or respond to my email.... ??

Plenty of Life Experience January 23, 2009 at 8:19 p.m.

Mr. Mental Floss....

In reference to your ALERT... "BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR POSERS CLAIMING THEY ARE KW OR WNU GRADUATES/STUDENTS AND ALSO CLAIMING THEY HAD A BAD EXPERIENCE."

So, let me get this straight... Because somebody has had a bad experience, that makes them less a student at an institution - in this case WNU? Why, I wasn't aware that you were the end-all, be-all, defacto of certifying whether or not I am a student at WNU... WHO HAS HAD A VERY BAD EXPERIENCE with this institution by the way. I'll even go as far as providing you my name and login credentials if you're up to the task of being proven wrong and wearing the proverbial egg on your face, since you wish to pound your chest so arrogantly to claim that I, and others like me, who have had a bad experience with your beloved institution are the frauds here. Perhaps the shoe should be on the other foot and I should be the one to call you out as the fraud. Are you a WNU investor? Is large money at stake for you?

Why don't you do myself, and others like me, a favor and can the rhetoric??

Just because I have a grievance with WNU does not make me less a student of WNU as you. In the future, please keep this in mind before beating your chest like one of our primate cousins.

Plenty of Life Experience January 23, 2009 at 8:44 p.m.

In response to BSME BS

"The "University" changed my program, dropped my program then told me I have until Jan 31st, 2008 to complete a porgram they no longer have. The whole time I was trying to get my money back (still am). I took three classes with no support, no lecture, no real outline, and all the run around they could give me.
It was a read the book take the test with no practicle references to the real world.
If you are looking to get your money back contact your attorney general. If they do not give you money back for the classes you have not taken that is a theft of sevice. With enough state run lawsuits going, you may not get all of your money back but it will create a large financial burden to them and close them down."

WOW, this has been my experience and pretty much what I've been told by ** Ms. Martha Pollock **... verbatim (I even saved the email from Ms. Pollock as proof, there Mr. Proud WNU Grad Mental Floss... nice Frank Zappa reference there by the way; you can't even be original). Yet the true FRAUDS here fail to pick up their phones, respond to email, or return phone calls. Isn't it nice how this phony institution can extend its hand to accept your money, but then leave you hanging high and dry, in the end? I sure wish you all of the success in the world with that WNU degree, Mr. Mental Floss.... again, I will provide any "proof" that you desire to prove that I am who I say that I am (though, I've nothing really to prove to you). All you have to do is provide me with valid contact information and we can talk... mano e mano. What do you say? What do you have to lose?

Kennedy-Western Made My Dreams Come true. January 23, 2009 at 9:33 p.m.

From the time I was young my father told me that I should become an Engineer like he was.

When I was young I tried doing that but found engineering school too difficult to master. I dropped out, or rather got a degree in something else.

Then I checked out Kennedy-Western.

I though, maybe this is worth a try. After all you work at home at your own pace. Whats not to like?

Well the work was not easy. In fact it was hard. But the faculty and staff were with me every step of the way.

Kennedy-Western Made My Dreams Come true January 23, 2009 at 9:35 p.m.

The above comment was cut short...sorry

From the time I was young my father told me that I should become an Engineer like he was.

When I was young I tried doing that but found engineering school too difficult to master. I dropped out, or rather got a degree in something else.

Then I checked out Kennedy-Western.

I though, maybe this is worth a try. After all you work at home at your own pace. Whats not to like?

Well the work was not easy. In fact it was hard. But the faculty and staff were with me every step of the way.

I learned the very difficult science of Electrical Engineering. It was hard. For over two years my life was on hold in fact.

But I made it through.

I can now call myself an Engineer.

Thank you Kennedy-Western.

Plenty of Life Experience January 23, 2009 at 10:04 p.m.

To Kennedy-Western Made My Dreams Come true...

Really? Well, I hate to burst your bubble, but would you please stop cutting and pasting positive comments into this blog? I read the "review" and gagged once already... so, once is enough for me. Least of all, me.

Here's the straight, sir... you are employed by WNU to post this garbage about a fraudulent EE program. I am enrolled in EE (Signal Processing) and have had a very bad experience with WNU and its "support". So can the rah rah BS already. There aren't many here who will believe yoursappy story.

Ex-Student January 24, 2009 at 3:44 p.m.

I agree with you 100%... I am sick and tired of these KW/WNU flunkies spreading their lies on this website. I have also asked these "flunkies" to stop but it doesn't stop them. After what I have gone through I know that everything this KW/WNU employee said the exact opposite from what they said. Don’t believe them! Stay away from KW/WNU and save your money and time.

KWU workz 4 me! January 25, 2009 at 1:21 a.m.

I have absolutely no problems with my KWU degree as my state doesn't say it is a diploma mill. It got me a job making $80k and I'm doing fine. For those that have strict laws on unaccredited degrees, don't go here yet. WNU is in the process of gaining RA accreditation and will soon be able to grant accredited degrees. They have told me that I only have to come back and take one class and they will reissue my diploma saying Warren National and will be fully accredited. Thanx WNU, you're the best!!

Ex-Student January 25, 2009 at 3:59 a.m.

What part of "say off this website" if you work for KW/WNU did you not understand workz 4 me. NO ONE believes you or your lies. KW/WNU has been trying to get accredidation for over 10 years now and they are no closer to getting it. There "degrees" are worthless!

KWU workz 4 me! January 25, 2009 at 6:33 a.m.

What part of 'stop being a cry baby' do you not understand? Your degree is worthless because you do not know how to market yourself. It is the same for all losers like you who don't bother to network. You can't sit on your butt complaining about KWU and get a job, you have to go out and grab the opportunities. If you are going to sit at your computer all day at least join a network site and converse with people. That is how I found my dream job and a fellow alumnist got me in the door.

Ex-Student January 25, 2009 at 7:14 p.m.

How can you live with yourself lying about how great KWU/WNU is? You are the worst loser there is trying to sucker people into sending money to a sham university. You also don't deny that you work for this university. It doesn't matter how much you network or market yourself (LIE), their degree is still worthless! You're the biggest cry baby because you don't want people like me telling the truth about this university.

Re: Ex Student and Plenty of Life Experience... January 26, 2009 at 2:14 a.m.

I do not work for Warren National nor ever did.

I can tell you that my degree from the University is not worthless. I used this degree to get a job doing what I love.

If you had a bad experience all I can say is sorry. But stop talking about stuff you know noting about. You do not know me and I do not know you. For all I know you may have never attended Warren National. Maybe you work for University of Phoenix (ha ha)

And please stop telling people not to post here. You do not own this site. Its here for everyone. There are lots of other places on the net for people to run around whining about Warren National University. I chose to post here because everyone can talk freely.

Granted some police states like Oregon or Texas to stated their experiences on their resume's. Of course its unconstitutional to restrict anyone's freedom of speech but I guess freedom is something that we all need to fight for.

Me? I am not afraid to tell anyone I attended Warren National. Why the hell not? I worked my arse off but it sure is satisfying to be able to interview for a job and know what you are talking about.

Correction: January 26, 2009 at 2:23 a.m.

Re:
"Granted some police states like Oregon or Texas to stated their experiences on their resume's. Of course its unconstitutional to restrict anyone's freedom of speech but I guess freedom is something that we all need to fight for."

I really meant to say that Oregon and Texas are trying to restrict grads from posting their WNU/KWU on their resumes.

But the point is this. Anything short of changing the first Amendment to the United States Constitution cannot stop anyone from stating their educational experience. At least this is true of the US and any other country where there is freedom of speech. This is why Oregon backed out of their ridiculous lawsuit a couple of years back.

MF January 26, 2009 at 4:11 p.m.

BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR POSERS CLAIMING THEY ARE KW OR WNU GRADUATES/STUDENTS AND ALSO CLAIMING THEY HAD A BAD EXPERIENCE.

Ex-Student too January 26, 2009 at 8:25 p.m.

I graduated from Kennedy Western University and I can honestly say that it was definitely challenging. I transferred in 30 semester credit hours from an accredited school, along with a large number of military certificates and schooling from the federal sector. Each school had to send a certified copy of my transcripts directly to the school, I had to send a portfolio asking for credit for life experience, if I had at least five years work experience in my career field and wanted consideration for it. The life experience had to be directly related to the career field in which I was studying and had to be verifiable. I wasn't given 50% experience for any life experiences like some in here have claimed, but I was given some. I was also told that I had to complete at minimum of 25% of my studies with the university in order to get certification or credit for my degree from that school, this was mandatory. I have since found this be be a requirement of nearly all universities and colleges. I also had to take a battery of written test in English, math, English composition and a general intelligent test to see what areas I may be weak in or if I was going to be capable of successfully functioning at the college level.

I was also required to complete a research paper in my field of study as my last project, it had to be researched in at least 8 different areas, that could be verified, all papers were screened for plagiarism, if you were caught plagiarizing some one else’s work you would be suspended from any further course work under their code of ethics, minimum of 75 pages written to the American writing standards. I had direct internet capability with the Library of Congress as well as another library if I need to do research on line. Research paper counted for one semester of credit upon successful completion. Paper had to be submitted with a cover page for review, a professor would be assigned to review the paper with an emphases placed on correct punctuation and grammar and following the correct standards of writing along with content. My paper had to be resubmitted 3 different times in order to meet the standards for review.

Ex-Student too January 26, 2009 at 8:25 p.m.

My exams had to be administered by a proctor from a university, librarian or public school official or a person from a reputable verifiable business such as a bank CEO, tests were open book, you had two hours to answer generally between 100 and 150 questions, some true and false, some were fill-in; some had to have a written essay or opinion. Several of my courses required writing papers and some research work.

I had a professor assigned to me of whom I had a name and phone number as well as an e-mail address for, and yes there was a little lag time in getting back to me if I had a question, but nothing that couldn't have waited a day or two. Once I made the initial contact from that time on there was no problem communicating.

The first exam I took I barely passed and I was wondering why I had taken this course. The test was not an easy one and I thought a final exam over the whole book was a bit too much considering you had very little time to do the test and try and look up an answer if you didn't know it, so memorization was a key to passing exams here.

My course books were bought from a university book store on line within my state, which was my choice as the school would give me the ISO number of the book required for what ever course I was taking, or I could order it from the school. So another word I could have or did at least once order my books from Noble Book Stores by ISO number because of availability.

Researching the Wyoming State law they said the school had to meet accreditation standards if they were not accredited in order to operate and be licensed by their Board of Regents. I too have not had any one question me whether or not the school was accredited or not accredited only that they could confirm my degree and GPA.

A True Ex Student January 27, 2009 at 1:29 a.m.

BE ON THE LOOKOUT FOR POSERS CLAIMING THEY ARE KW OR WNU GRADUATES/STUDENTS AND ALSO CLAIMING THEY HAD A GOOD EXPERIENCE.

Hey True Ex Students January 27, 2009 at 1:53 a.m.

So let me guess, you work for University of Phoenix, right? How much are they paying you to monitor this board and post garbage?

I know, its better than being homeless.

True Ex Student January 27, 2009 at 2:22 a.m.

So let me guess, you work for WNU and you make false statements that other people work for UofP? How much is WNU paying you? When an ex student tells the TRUTH about how bad this university is, you cut them down. The only garbage on this website are the lies you are posting.

My letter to the Cheyenne Herald January 27, 2009 at 3:04 a.m.

As a graduate of Warren National University, from when it was officially known as Kennedy-Western University, I must say that I was deeply offended by the biased article which appeared in the November 11th edition of the Cheyenne Herald. It is unfortunate that the article did not give its authorship so I could know exactly who wrote that garbage.

What I can tell you is that as a studented who graduated in 2005 with a Bachelor's in Electrical Engineering I do NOT consider my degree "worthless" in any way shape or form.

I did indeed work very hard for my degree. I transferred in with over 120 credit hours from a fully accredited brick-and-mortar school where I earned another degree. I can say that while working to earn my degree (I did not "buy" the degree, as you say but I EARNED it) I found the program extremely challenging. My progress took an extreme among of work and over two years of my life. It was a very hard two years indeed. My entire life was on hold in fact. Yet I did persevere.

OH.. you ask just what did I have to take while studying?

Well let us look at the Electrical Engineering program (no longer offered at Warren National but once a popular program):

Bachelor of Science, Electrical Engineering

Option A: Digital Communication/ Signal Processing
EE 100: Linear Circuits
EE 101: Electronic Circuits
EE 105: Introduction to Digital Logic
EE 115: Physics
EE 124: Engineering Math Part I
EE 125: Electronic Devices
EE 126: Engineering Math Part II
EE 130: Ethics and Engineering Decision-Making
EE 205: Power Electronics
EE 210: Power Systems
EE 220: Computer Applications for Engineers
EE 310: Field and Wave Electromagnetics
EE 405: Probability Theory and Applications for Electrical Engineering
EE 410: Microprocessors
EE 420: Transform Theory for Electrical Engineers
EE 430: Signals and Systems
EE 415: Introduction to Digital Signal Processing
EE 450: Elements of Communication Systems
EE 480: The Final Project Proposal
EE 490: The Final Project (9 Units)

to be continued

Continued... January 27, 2009 at 3:05 a.m.

Option B: Control Systems/ Computer Systems Performance
EE 100: Linear Circuits
EE 101: Electronic Circuits
EE 105: Introduction to Digital Logic
EE 115: Physics
EE 124: Engineering Math Part I
EE 125: Electronic Devices
EE 126: Engineering Math Part II
EE 130: Ethics and Engineering Decision-Making
EE 205: Power Electronics
EE 210: Power Systems
EE 220: Computer Applications for Engineers
EE 310: Field and Wave Electromagnetics
EE 405: Probability Theory and Applications for Electrical Engineering
EE 410: Microprocessors
EE 420: Transform Theory for Electrical Engineers
EE 430: Signals and Systems
EE 120: Numerical Methods and Software for Electrical Engineers
EE 300: Control Systems
EE 305: Control Systems Analysis Using MATLAB
EE 315: Basic Organization of Computer Systems
EE 470: Computer System Modeling Techniques
EE 480: The Final Project Proposal
EE 490: The Final Project (9 Units)

Hmmm... so you have to take all these courses? Does that seem like an easy program to you? It does not look to me like its a mere matter of paying off the school and wham bamm... there's your degree. Does it?

Well you get the idea.

Was my degree really "Worthless?" Well to me it was not. It helped me gain a promotion at work and made me more marketable on the job market. Even those who were sceptical of my educational pursuits were later impressed when they saw how well I did my job. My knowledge and experience has made me indefensible to my company.

I have been in contact with many others who report that their degrees helped them secure important jobs. Many report that their Warren National experience was the most important accomplishment in their lives.

Finally I want to stress, when you trash Warren National what you are really doing is trashing the honor and reputation of a lot o people who invested lots of time, energy and their own money in pursuing a degree. To call a Warren National education worthless is a slap in the face of thousands of us which is why I feel compelled to write this letter.

I think it should be an honor to the state of Wyoming that this University which enriched the lives of so many people would take the name of its first governor. Francis E. Warren would be proud.

One other thing.... January 27, 2009 at 3:06 a.m.

The Cheyenne Herald is a free publication. I guess its the only way people would bother reading that trash. I personally would not use it for toilet paper.

Re: True Ex Student.. January 27, 2009 at 3:12 a.m.

I am not a liar YOU are. Why don't you get a life and stop wasting time posting that kind of garbage.

If its therapy you need than call a professional. But do us all a favor and take this BS somewhere else.

LOL January 27, 2009 at 3:22 a.m.

"Well let us look at the Electrical Engineering program (no longer offered at Warren National but once a popular program):"

Actually, it was NEVER offered at WNU, only at KW"u" but it's a classic example of how KW "u" "grads" will work hard at snowing potential employers if/when WN "u" become accredited.

It was offered at KW "u", where they admitted to giving 55% of all degrees for unverified "life experience", regardless of what the catalog says (marketing material). Which classes did you actually take?

3rd grade writing level January 27, 2009 at 3:24 a.m.

"Even those who were sceptical of my educational pursuits were later impressed when they saw how well I did my job. My knowledge and experience has made me indefensible to my company."

Let me guess, they waived all the writing and language comprehension classes?

I am not "sceptical" that your academic credentials are "indefensible"

Re: LOL January 27, 2009 at 4:18 a.m.

I took the following from KWU (not KW"U" but KWU).

I did get some classes waved due to previous coursed I took elsewhere. I never, repeat NEVER got any classwork waved because of "life experience."

I took EE 100: Linear Circuits
EE 101: Electronic Circuits
EE 105: Introduction to Digital Logic
EE 115: Physics
EE 125: Electronic Devices
EE 205: Power Electronics
EE 210: Power Systems
EE 220: Computer Applications for Engineers
EE 310: Field and Wave Electromagnetics
EE 410: Microprocessors
EE 420: Transform Theory for Electrical Engineers
EE 430: Signals and Systems
EE 415: Introduction to Digital Signal Processing
EE 480: The Final Project Proposal

Did you ever attend this University? If so what coursed did YOU take?

Bill January 27, 2009 at 3 p.m.

HOT HOT:

-----Original Message-----
From: Lil Nakutis [mailto:lnakutis@hlcommission.org] On Behalf Of Higher Learning Commission
Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2009 8:58 AM
Subject: Re: Warren National University (UNCLASSIFIED)

Warren National University has withdrawn its application for candidacy with the Higher Learning Commission.

Lil Nakutis
Information Management Coordinator
The Higher Learning Commission of NCA
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 2400
Chicago, IL 60602
Voice: (312) 263-0456 x113 / Fax: (312) 263-7462
E-mail: lnakutis@hlcommission.org

batman and robin January 27, 2009 at 7:48 p.m.

Very I N T E R S T I N G! How did you confirm that? They are still posted on the NCA web site as an applicant.

Mental Floss January 28, 2009 at 3:07 a.m.

Rumor has it the name of the university will be changed to George Wallace University.

Next State? January 28, 2009 at 2:56 p.m.

If true, they expectedly milked their "applicant" status as long as possible. 2nd or 3rd time they did this?

So for state #6, which state doesn't have quality standards or regulation? I was reading that California regulation of diploma mills has all but imploded, Breyer State jumped there.

Seems like a logical choice.

"My letter to the Cheyenne Herald"

I sure hope it was unsigned!

Bill January 28, 2009 at 3:29 p.m.

Confirmed by the Associate Director for Accreditation
The Higher Learning Commission of NCA
30 N. LaSalle Street, Suite 2400, Chicago, IL 60602

"Warren National University has voluntarily withdrawn from the Higher Learning Commission's Eligibility Process. I believe that the institution plans on an announcement to students and its constituents very soon, which will likely include an indication of the institution's future plans."

batman and robin January 28, 2009 at 3:49 p.m.

Cloaked in secrecy and silence. I wonder if their review is one reason they withdrew or if there is another reason. You would think that a university of their purported size would just go ahead with the accreditation and move on especially since the federal government is all but black mailing unaccredited schools to get on board.

On the other hand the feds could make a federal educational standard law that all post secondary schools will become accredited to be licensed or go the back door route and hold each state at bay mandating that the states pass such laws or face the loss of federal educational dollars, and then the problem would be solved. After all they black mail us all in other ways.

Like the kids say: January 28, 2009 at 6:34 p.m.

EPIC FAIL!

batman and robin January 28, 2009 at 7:07 p.m.

Duh if you are still floating around out there. I knew I wasn't talking out of the dark side when I said DETC didn't accredit schools at the doctorate level. Read this:

The Chronicle of Higher Education stated in 2002, "Kennedy-Western University has a history of flirting with accreditation but failing to earn it." [7] In 2001 Warren National announced it was considering applying to the Distance Education and Training Council (DETC) for accreditation, a legitimate accreditor that is recognized for accrediting distance-learning institutions.[7] However, the DETC's approval from the U.S. Department of Education does not authorize it to accredit institutions that award doctorates, and WNU did not pursue DETC accreditation.[7].

Since that article was written DETC has since been given authorization by some one to accredit schools who issue doctorates. So now I wonder if Warren National may be re-thinking their accreditation process and leaning towards DETC. It is quicker and less time consuming to get their accreditation and probably less costly too. Then again is it the ole flip flop shell game again, playing a little game of dodge ball, or trying to snooker every one?

Hint January 28, 2009 at 8:05 p.m.

The US constitution strictly prohibits the federal government from participating or controlling education in any way. This power is left to the states. Using an indirect threat and implied QPQ, (and lots of time) the federal government has stepped over the line.

By just using the raw power of the federal government to recognize certain educational institutions over others and then to bully the states to comply, the federal government has usurped the constitution.

We are close to a challenge on this, just crossin the T's and dottin the I's.

batman and robin January 28, 2009 at 8:58 p.m.

If that is the case then, the feds have no business getting involved in the so called diploma mill issues. If a state licenses a school to issue degrees or a diploma, by what you are saying then it becomes a mute issue, wouldn't you agree? I would say only an unlicensed school would be in violation of the state laws or be considered a diploma mill because it would be operating outside of the law..

PUT ED TO BED NOW! January 28, 2009 at 9:47 p.m.

www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constit...

The federal Department of Education is unconstitutional. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution does not authorize Congress to legislate education within the independent, sovereign states who are themselves a "Republican form of government." There is only one solution to stopping the brainwashing of America's youth and that is for the states of the Union to completely sever any relationship with the federal Department of Education.

Re: Bill January 29, 2009 at 3:19 a.m.

You posted a statement without giving the source of the statement. Could you please provide us a direct link to this, or do we need to take it on faith. I did check the Warren National website and saw nothing stating this there.

Bill January 29, 2009 at 1:23 p.m.

Read it here first!
Hot off the press for distribution (in two parts because of limited space to post: TONIGHT:

Important Announcement from Warren National University January 2009
An open letter to the students of Warren National University

Warren National University receives its licensure through the Wyoming State Department of Education, under W.S. 21-2-401 through 21-2-407. Such oversight requires the University to meet the standards as indicated within Article 4: Private School Licensing. This is a time of economic challenge for organizations both large and small. Every industry faces change brought in by new and unprecedented economic factors. Organizations that provide services to consumers are experiencing the impact of this economic downturn more and more each day. Warren National University is proud of our long history as a Wyoming private postsecondary institution providing adult learners nationwide with affordable online degree programs.

Warren National initiated an application for accreditation through the Higher Learning Commission of the NCA in June 2005. In December, 2007 the University was granted eligibility status from the HLC which lead to the scheduling of an onsite visit. The HLC site visit was held in October, 2008. On December 15, 2008 WNU was informed that it did not receive the team's recommendation for candidacy.

Warren National's plans to achieve accreditation were adversely impacted by the limitations of a tightening credit market and made more difficult by the increased costs of daily operation. Wyoming law requires that all private post-secondary degree granting institutions either obtain accreditation or remain "a candidate for accreditation" or "otherwise in the process for accreditation" to retain its degree granting authority. Effective January 22, 2009, Warren National University is no longer an applicant for accreditation. Warren National University is therefore required by Wyoming law to cease operation.

Bill -- Part 2 January 29, 2009 at 1:27 p.m.

The University formally solicited the Wyoming Department of Education for the opportunity to support our students through an extended teach-out period. On January 15, 2009, WNU received a letter from the Wyoming Department of Education informing the University that "Wyoming law does not provide the Department with the necessary authority to grant the request for a 'teach-out' period". On January 27, 2009 the University received notice from the Wyoming Department of Education notifying that our registration was being revoked. Warren National University is initiating an appeal of this decision. The degree granting authority for WNU is preserved while the appeal is being heard by the Wyoming Department of Education. Without the degree granting authority of the State of Wyoming, WNU cannot provide educational services to our students.

We are saddened to announce that the last day of instruction for Warren National University will be March 31, 2009.

Bill part 3 January 29, 2009 at 1:29 p.m.

I can't post links/web pages on these postings and I'm limited to how many characters, but the whole message will be posted tonight on the WNU home page.

Here's what they are proposing future students do:

Active Warren National University students who do not feel that they will be able to complete their program requirements by March 31, 2009 have the opportunity to continue their education with Preston University. Students may transfer to Preston today or at anytime during or after the teach-out period.

Current Student January 29, 2009 at 5:58 p.m.

Well, that explains why they wouldn't answer my calls or emails for weeks.

I've never heard of this Preston University, and a first glance a wikipedia shows they are unaccredited, unlicensed, and faked faculty of 2 PhD's who had never heard of them. UGGGGGGGGGH. Are they in Wyoming or Alabama or New Mexico? I can't even tell.

Can someone please help me? I want to transfer my 3 years of KWU / WNU credits to an accredited university, who should I contact? DETC accreditation would be fine.

batman and robin January 29, 2009 at 6:35 p.m.

Your only choice is to contact some of the other distant on line schools and see what they tell you. You obviously know how to use the internet, try a Google search. Your going to hear a bunch of nay sayers saying they knew the school was going to shut down. There are accredited schools across the country shutting down too because of financial problems, a number who have lost their accreditation too, probably because of financial issues. The economy is killing every thing right now. Look at the below schools, but I would stear clear of Preston if at all possible.

Google preston university
california coast
grantham university

Remember January 29, 2009 at 6:35 p.m.

Things are always darkest just before the dawn.

Help on the way January 29, 2009 at 6:55 p.m.

REF:
"Can someone please help me? I want to transfer my 3 years of KWU / WNU credits to an accredited university, who should I contact? DETC accreditation would be fine."

Here is a list of just a few of the RA schools that accept WNU.

University of Hawaii at Manoa:_"Degrees from unaccredited institutions will be evaluated on a case by case basis."__

Phoenix Seminary:_"Graduates of Unaccredited institutions, when accepted, are placed on academic probation for their first year of study at Phoenix Seminary........etc." __

Ohio State University: "This classification is assigned for one or more of the following reasons. The applicant has:_"1-A baccalaureate or professional degree from an unaccredited college or university."__

Beacon University: "Graduates from unaccredited institutions may be accepted conditionally."__

University of Idaho:_"GRE general appitude scores if bachelor's degree is from an unaccredited institution."__

Seattle Pacific University:_"SPU will therefore, review credentials from unaccredited institutions at the students request."__

Liberty University:_"Applicants who hold a bachelor's degree from an unaccredited institution may be admitted to some master's degree programs on Academic Probation Status."__

Arkansas State University:_"Or whose baccalaureate degree is from an unaccredited institution, may be granted Conditional Admission Status after.....etc." __

Florida State University:_Unaccredited Undergraduate Degree:_"If you have your undergraduate degree from an unaccredited institution, but your GRE scores meet the "Minimum" requirement, we can consider your application." __

American Indian University:_"Transfer of credit from non-accredited colleges will be awarded under the following conditions....etc."__

University of Oregon:_"A student from an unaccredited institution, or one that offers the equivalent of bachelor's degree instruction but not the degree itself, may be consdiered for admission under special procedures."

Auburn University:_"Students transferring from an unaccredited institution may be granted provisional credit. When such credit is allowed, the final amount of credit will be determined upon completion by the student of one year of work at Auburn University....etc." __

Eastern Oregon University:_"Course work taken at a non-accredited institution will be evaluated but not applied until the completion pf 35 EOU credits." __

Troy State University, Dothan AL.:_"Students transferring from unaccredited institutions who have earned an overall grade point average of 2.0 (4.0 scale) or better may be granted provisional admission...etc." **Troy also said it will not accept DETC accredited degrees but would work with me on an unaccredited degree. (strange that) __

Current Student January 29, 2009 at 7:45 p.m.

I don't want a pie in the sky list full of if's and but's and conditionals, and provisionals and maybes, and 1 year of class before they decide (Auburn), and yes, I can use the internet.

I simply do not have the time nor $$ to shotgun my info to 30 universities that MIGHT consider my credits.

Let me be direct.

For fellow KWU / WNU students, what is the single best (most complete transfer) to an accredited university that you had success transferring your credits into? Be specific as to your major, which university, and what % transferred.

BE CLEAR PLEASE January 29, 2009 at 10:08 p.m.

"For fellow KWU / WNU students, what is the single best (most complete transfer) to an accredited university that you had success transferring your credits into? Be specific as to your major, which university, and what % transferred."

Privately accredited or government accredited?

Current Student January 29, 2009 at 10:28 p.m.

I don't know what privately accredited means, I am just looking for RECOGNIZED accredtiation, such as DETC.

One Of Many Ripped Off WNU Customers January 29, 2009 at 10:39 p.m.

The not-so-surprising news finally came out: The State Of Wyoming is forcing WNU to shut down. WNU says it will have no more "instruction days" after March 31/09. Actually, they never DID have any "instruction days" since it was all "read the book write the test". They've brought in MILLIONS of dollars and provided very little in return. As much as we dislike the "cartel" of the existing educational establishment, I believe that this is a good thing as it just may force some much needed standardization.

Same Song Second Verse January 30, 2009 at 1:16 a.m.

Institutions Whose Degrees are Illegal to Use in Texas

Preston University

Location - Alabama

No accreditation from a CB recognized accreditor. DBA, or connected with, University, Preston Russel Hobbes in the Netherlands. No degree-granting authority from The Netherlands. Name changed to Fairmont International University.

The End - Finally January 30, 2009 at 2:58 a.m.

Turn out the lights the party is over...

Surprised January 30, 2009 at 1:22 p.m.

Everyone expected them to milk their "applicant" status, fail miserably at meeting the quality standards, make excuses, and move to California.

But why shut down a cash cow that puts very little cost into their product? Move it to Cali or the Caymans.

batman and robin January 30, 2009 at 1:55 p.m.

Tha fat lady hasn't sang yet, than again a number of schools are closing because of the economy, Antioch University in Ohio which has brick and morter campuses in 6 states just shut its Ohio campus doors and its regionally accredited.

Final insult January 30, 2009 at 2:26 p.m.

So, after misleading and fleecing students for 25 years, they are now selling their sucker list, I mean current students to Preston University, which wouldn't even attempt accreditation when Wyoming passed the diploma mill law?

They don't even appear to be licensed, despite what is in the KW "u" student letter.

Current Student January 30, 2009 at 2:34 p.m.

I spoke to Grantham University this AM, and explained my situatoin, they are DETC accredited. The rep was nice, but I am not optimistic, he pointed me to this part of their transfer policy. When pressed, he admitted it was extremely unlikely I would recieve anywhere close to 50% for my 3 years of KWU credits, maybe 20%. Not sure if it is worth the time to follow up.

Any other suggestions?

"Generally, undergraduate college-level courses completed at accredited institutions as recognized by the Department of Education will transfer, provided that grades of at least "C" are earned and the course is similar in content and scope to work offered at Grantham University. Developmental or remedial courses will not be considered for transfer."

batman and robin January 30, 2009 at 3:54 p.m.

Current Student, I am afraid that you are probably going to have problems transferring in a lot of credits to any school. Doesn't matter if they are accredited or not, it is a money thing with all of these institutions. They all give you a song and dance speech how “THEIR” school is the greatest, most liberal in awarding credits, etc. When it gets right down to the nitty gritty they are all the same. Your work isn't going to compare to theirs. It’s the American way; English 101 isn't the same in all schools as you would think, especially of so called and acclaimed accredited schools who are supposed to be all playing on the same playing field. You would think that their courses would all be some what standardized. After all a mechanical engineer is a mechanical engineer, a business man a business man, you get the picture. Give us your money here are the courses WE offer.

Current Student January 30, 2009 at 4:18 p.m.

I disagree with your assessment. There are numerous students who have posted here and elsewhere that have great success transferring, I just need the specifics, so I can follow suit.

Grantham will take my 12 regionally accredited credits I picked up in the service on a 1 to 1 basis.

batman and robin January 30, 2009 at 4:41 p.m.

OK that is 12 from the service. I did the same thing. Have to remember and it is only my opinion here, that the federal government which to an extent dictates to the accredited schools, because they receive federal dollars you will accept our military course work. If you get a copy of the Army, Navy or Air Force Times, they have a listing of schools that accept military education towards degrees. This may be a better route for you since you may get more credit going this route. There too you can use your GI bill. I know of two people locally who had difficulty transferring credits from one university to another. The one school that is accredited even told the students that their school credits were not accepted readily at other schools and it is a state university.

So if you have a military background then you are entitled to the GI bill, why go to a school that does not accept federal grants, student loans or the GI bill? You could have had your education paid for by the government.

Current Student January 30, 2009 at 4:53 p.m.

I was in the service along time ago. While in the service, I took correspondence courses to gain 12 credits. GI Bill is no longer an optoin, and that is my fault.

I transferred those 12 credits in KWU, and have 3 years of KWU credits to boot.

Grantham will take my 12 credits on a 1 to 1 basis, and they would take almost all of them into a matching program if they were all accredited, but it sounds like the exchange rate for the KWU credits is coming in at about 20%.

So, again, what other Uni can a look to, that is DETC accredited or better?

Current Student January 30, 2009 at 4:55 p.m.

And I am much less than impressed with WNU's decision to partner with Preston, I think they could have done much much better.

WHO? January 30, 2009 at 5:01 p.m.

"I don't know what privately accredited means, I am just looking for RECOGNIZED accredtiation, such as DETC."

Recognized by who?

batman and robin January 30, 2009 at 5:17 p.m.

You have the in the U.S. private regional accreditation agencies and DETC which is privately owned too, that are recognized by the Fed DOE that accredits both private and state or federally sponsored schools.

Private accreditation: the accrediting agencies in the US are ALL privately owned companies that accredit educational institutions. Answer your question. So you want a school that is accredited by one of these 6 accediting agencies.

RE: Remember January 30, 2009 at 6:23 p.m.

It's also always the darkest right before it goes pitch black!

Current Student January 30, 2009 at 6:51 p.m.

I don't care, somebody just give me the names of a few good schools to check into that will take my KWU credits at near face value, even if it is the lowest level of accreditation, I don't know which of the 6 are lower or higher and don;t care.

Any other resources for KWU grads in my same situation appreciated also. Since they stopped returning calls and emails motnhs ago, there is absolutley no student support structure in place other than the massmailing we got.

USE YOUR BRAIN FOR ONCE IN YOUR LIFE, PLEASE! January 30, 2009 at 7:36 p.m.

"Private accreditation: the accrediting agencies in the US are ALL privately owned companies that accredit educational institutions. Answer your question. So you want a school that is accredited by one of these 6 accediting agencies."

What I am trying to get at is that they are all government owned. Like Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac they are pseudo government to the point that in fact they are government owned. There is a quid pro quo here at work and it needs to be busted up. Fannie and Freddie destroyed the economy and these "Private Companies" were 100% run by the government. People please use your frickin minds once in a while. The US government under Obama is the enemy of the free people of the US.

batman and robin January 30, 2009 at 7:46 p.m.

Great reply, I totally agree. The only thing wrong with government is government itself: Ronal Reagan. I do not think that I didn't say that they were not government controlled or manipulated, of which they are. Any time the government gets involved in any thing they become the controllers and will blackmail you into their way of doing things or cut off your funding, unless your a liberal then they will give you a bigger welfare check in the name of equality.

Current Student January 30, 2009 at 8:05 p.m.

Again, I don't care, somebody just give me the names of a few good schools to check into that will take my KWU credits at near face value

WN "u", a look back January 30, 2009 at 9:43 p.m.

Now that KW "u" / WN "u" has been officially shut down by the State of Wyoming, let's look back at the good ole' days.

J. Bovin September 22, 2007 at 2:55 a.m.

Wow,

A whole bunch of ugly and upset folks here,,,, seeming to have some real issues with WNU/KWU. If it was as bad as what most everyone says it is,,,,, why don't our wonderfull goverment shut it down???

TOUCHE!, Mr. Bovin

WNU Grad. January 31, 2009 at 1 a.m.

My two cents...Keep in mind that WNU chose to withdraw their application for accreditation with HLC after they discovered they were not being recommended for initial candidacy. Also, keep this in mind: The purpose of HCL and other regional agencies is to help a school improve and eventually become accredited.

Accreditation is all about quality and improvement. HLC sets forth standards that must be met. Any college or university could meet HLC standards IF they had enough operating capital. If HLC would not recommend candidacy at this time, they would stipulate why and give the college or university the opportunity to correct the recommendations made by the review team. I have been through this before personally.

WNU must not have enough capital to get through the accreditation process. Having accreditation gives WNU the opportunity to secure title IV funding, which is a cash cow in a good economy. Since the economy is in the tank, WNU would have to spend a great deal of capital on improvement, which it seems they are unwilling to do. WNU could easily move to Alabama, California or Mississippi, which does not even require a license or State approval at this time. WNU is clearly choosing to cease operations, so they are not willing to do what it takes.

My guess is that the majority shareholders of WNU made enough money and decided to retire. What a disservice to us students/alumni that worked hard to gain a degree. At least I was able to use my degree to get into graduate school/seminary; so I cannot say it was all bad.

Good luck to those in transition.

EPIC FAIL January 31, 2009 at 4:17 a.m.

"Warren National University is therefore required by Wyoming law to cease operation."

Unfortunately, as soon as one diploma mill such as Warren National is forcibly ordered to cease operations by one of the states, another pops up.

The Walk of Shame January 31, 2009 at 4:33 a.m.

Warren National "University" has finally posted the details of their failed accreditation attempt and license revocation on their website.

www.wnuedu.com

Current Student January 31, 2009 at 3:25 p.m.

"Good luck to those in transition."

If you mean: left twisting in the wind with no student services support, and 3 years of useless credits that no alumni can even hint at a decent university to transfer them into, well, ummm, thanks.

Bob Lindy January 31, 2009 at 7:23 p.m.

I finally got a full refund of my tuition! :-)

Current Student January 31, 2009 at 9:57 p.m.

How!?!?!?!

WNU Grad. February 1, 2009 at 2:31 a.m.

"If you mean: left twisting in the wind with no student services support, and 3 years of useless credits that no alumni can even hint at a decent university to transfer them into, well, ummm, thanks."

Why would anyone have spent 3-years in any WNU program? I finished mine in 13-months. No excuses for procrastination ;)

PT Barnum February 1, 2009 at 5:15 a.m.

13 months to get a WN "u" degree, lol. If the gal in the Senate diploma mill hearing about this dump knocked off 40% of a Master's in 16 hours, most people should be graduating in a month or less...

It's all elementary anyway. Senate hearing, 5 states, failed accreditation, shut down by the state, all in the history books now.

Rochville or someone similiar will pick up those "students"

WNU Grad. February 1, 2009 at 3:27 p.m.

PT Barnum: If you can create a well written and researched 150-page original, APA formatted thesis in 13-hours, I will personally give you a $ 1,000.00 cash. Nice try... ; )

Rochville never had nor will they ever have State authority to issue a college degree. What you fail to realize is that EVERY college and university in the US receives their degree granting authority from the State; and not from the accrediting body. That is why the State had the authority to revoke the authority from WNU. All past graduates still have a State approved college degree. You can debate the accreditation factor all you want. The facts regarding degree granting authority still holds true.

A degree mill has no legal authority to grant degrees. WNU had legal degree granting authority for many years. They chose not to change and comply with new laws. In no way does that affect past graduates.

PT Barnum February 1, 2009 at 5:31 p.m.

"PT Barnum: If you can create a well written and researched 150-page original, APA formatted thesis in 13-hours, I will personally give you a $ 1,000.00 cash. Nice try... ; )"

So WNU scholarly works are catalogued and archived just like all other universities? I should be able to find them all on academic research databases? I just did a search through the academic database - Proquest, no sign of any supposed thing.

The "university" itself gets a aa couple nice mentions if you put in "diploma mill" or "academic fraud" :-)

PT Barnum February 1, 2009 at 5:35 p.m.

"They chose not to change and comply with new laws. In no way does that affect past graduates."

True, WN "u"'s inability to meet quality standards, rejection for accreditation, and subsequent shut down by the State of Wyoming in no way affects the uselessness of past degrees.

So the best argument left after their utter failure is that at one time, it was probably technically not illegal for them to sell degrees. Awesome! Add "one-time" member of the Better Business Bureau too!

Great article on the end of WNU February 1, 2009 at 9:02 p.m.

www.examiner.com/x-2083-NY-Consumer-Affa...

One down... February 1, 2009 at 10:57 p.m.

... a hundred more major diploma mills to go!

James February 2, 2009 at 1:52 a.m.

Credit from WNU are worthless. You may find a university to accept them, but they are worthless. Those who find the degree acceptable don't know what they are doing. The degree, coursework, diploma are not worth the paper used to print it. If anyone looks into the degree, WNU or Preston
are worthless. I feel so badly that so many students were convenced that the degree was valuable and paid money for the degree. This is a good thing. The for profit universities should go away. They are not interested in quality. They are interested in profits. So sad.

Current Student February 2, 2009 at 6:03 a.m.

James, from calling around the last week, you aren't far off.

I can get maybe 15 cents on the dollar for my credits at any real university.

I'm just going to file my complaint with the state of Wyoming and hopefully there are enough of us to get state action on refunds.

Signing off...

Batman and Robin February 2, 2009 at 2:46 p.m.

Current student and James, Antioch University in Ohio, a private for profit North Central accredited school with campuses in 5 other states recently closed its doors because of financial problems. So what is your point about a school closing? It is happening all over the country.

Wells Fargo a failed bank that the feds just propped up and was bought out by another bank? Their whole mission in life is to suck as much blood or money out of you as they can. They give student loans to any one who has good credit to finance an education with a lot of schools; Chase Bank does the same thing, Sallie Mae Services too. They are the same banks running credit cards up to 30% interest on customers for being a day late on a payment. The banks could care less if you finish your education, or if the school is around next week. They only want their money back with interest. It is considered an unsecured loan. If you paid in full up front then that is your fault.

As for WNU issuing worthless degrees, they were licensed by the "State of Wyoming" who "authorized" them to issue degrees, so the degree is perfectly legal, the same as in all states, (The Board of Regents or its equivalent is the granting authority), the state, not the feds, not some private accreditating agency, the state is the granting authority.

Batman and Robin February 2, 2009 at 2:47 p.m.

Now was or is WNU a premier top of the line education institution, that is entirely in the eyes of the beholder, "buyer beware" you only get out of things what you put into it. Has the schools duped a lot of people out of money, maybe, probably so, who knows for sure there are only one or two cry babies in here complaining and we can't verify that. How many other companies out there has done the same thing and got away with it. However, WNU has protected them selves by giving current students an option of finishing their degrees through another school. They didn't say it was a quality place, only an option.

The Better Business Bureau, that in its self is a joke, they have no enforcement authority only a clearing house that keeps complaint information on certain business that becomes a member of their private organization. One listed complaint does not make for a bad business, if that was the case Sears would have been out of business a

PT Barnum February 2, 2009 at 5:08 p.m.

"Antioch University in Ohio, a private for profit North Central accredited school with campuses in 5 other states recently closed its doors because of financial problems"

They closed one of their campuses temporarily due to low enrollment, they did not fail accreditation nor were they ordered to cease operations. So this one site = colleges closing all over the country? Obviously not.

www.antiochla.edu/about-antioch/general-...

"As for WNU issuing worthless degrees, they were licensed by the State of Wyoming"

Ahhh, if you take this myopic view, and ignore the fact that they were subsequently booted by the 3rd state to find them dreadfully substandard, you'd come up with about 5% truth and 95% lying by omission. Hey that asbestos was Legal when I put it in the house, so don't bother me!

"WNU has protected them selves by giving current students an option of finishing their degrees through another school."

No protection referring them to another Wyoming refugee with no accreditation who doesn't even appear to meet the low standards of being licensed. The fact that they could not partner with any legitimate school says volumes.

"The Better Business Bureau, that in its self is a joke,"

Then why did KW "u" feature it so prominently in their marketing materials for so long?

PT Barnum February 2, 2009 at 5:18 p.m.

College Name City Expiration Date
Preston University Montgomery 12/01/2008

According to the State of Alabama Site, Preston "University" is not currently licensed.

Batman and Robin February 2, 2009 at 8:30 p.m.

Who cares about being booted? It wasn't because they were issuing illegal degrees, hello, they didn't meet the criteria for candidacy status, and that means by Wyoming law they have to cease operations until they meet the standard to keep their license. North Central still has them listed as “PEAQ Participant”, “No status” so they still have an opportunity to become eligible. That is a “Voluntary” program isn’t it? So they can still re-apply or continue to fix what ever problem there was or is. Then again maybe the good ole boy system will choose to deny them the opportunity to be part of their “Voluntary” accreditation system.

BBB advertisement, its called "marketing", why does any business post adds, or develop web sites, to make money, to attract business, people, we are the greatest school in the world, come here, we are a member of the Better Business Bureau, etc. I bet you’re an Obama fan too.

So Antioch is closed because of low enrollment, wrong answer again, there is a financial issue, check out their web site, they are soliciting funds from both private and former alumni in the hope of re-opening as a separate college away from the main organization. Low enrollment would create a cash flow though, wouldn't you think. Hum, no students, no money, no profits, can't stay open, imagine that. I wonder if it would have any thing to do with the economy? If you don’t have money you can’t pay those big CEO wages or those professors or maintenance personnel, and it goes on and on. So it is because of low enrollment? So then why are they soliciting “money” from private donors and alumni to re-open as a separate college?

RIP Warren National February 2, 2009 at 9:19 p.m.

In posted today in The Chronicle....

Warren National U., Formerly Known as Kennedy-Western U., to Shut Down

Warren National University will be no more at the end of March, seven months after it suspended new admissions.

In a lengthy, convoluted explanation on its Web site, the university blamed the decision to close its doors on a failed accreditation bid and the general economic downturn.

The institution, known as Kennedy-Western University before a 2007 name change, has been around since the 1980s. It was founded in California but ran afoul of the state’s licensing board. It later settled in Wyoming.

In 2004 the General Accounting Office investigated Kennedy-Western and a number of other degree-granting entities that it deemed questionable. The GAO was concerned because federal employees were getting reimbursed by the government for their tuition.

The university was notable for its slick marketing and for doling out credit for “life experience.” It often hired professors from accredited universities to teach classes on the side. Its founder, Paul Saltman, always resisted the diploma-mill label and, in a letter to The Chronicle in 2004, touted the university’s “academic rigor.” —Thomas Bartlett

LOL February 2, 2009 at 9:33 p.m.

"In a lengthy, convoluted explanation on its Web site, the university blamed the decision to close its doors on a failed accreditation bid and the general economic downturn."

I got a huge laugh out of this. Classic marketing, mixing the real reason (failed accreditation and utter incompetence) with an irrelevant distractor (economic downturn).

Such a short article. I'm sure the Wyoming papers will be much more detailed about ridding the state of such an embarrassment.

Batman and Robin February 3, 2009 at 1:04 p.m.

Charles W. Manning chancellor of the Tennessee Board of Regents, wants to stress online education, hire more adjuncts, and put full-time faculty members in an "oversight" role. Alfred Lutz, president of the Faculty Senate at Middle Tennessee State U., opposes that plan, saying it threatens academic freedom and tenure.

Threatens academic freedom. WNUs reluctance to become accredited in a voluntary program, is that exercising academic freedom?

Diploma Mill fails at legitimacy February 3, 2009 at 1:13 p.m.

Great article on the end of WNU February 1, 2009 at 9:02 p.m

"The institution was established in California in 1984 under the name Kennedy-Western University and adopted its new name in 2007. While it had reportedly been economically successful targeting mid-career professionals, it had a questionable reputation as a diploma mill. The school unsuccessfully flirted with accreditation several times. It announced it would close after its most recent attempt to achieve accreditation failed."

Interesting article. I was wondering why there was such an uptick in complaints. Everyone was forced to prepay their tuition, take private loans (since diploma mills do not qualify for federal loans), and now they are forcibly shut down by the state.

So, this student paid $8,000, got $1,800 in classes, and WN "u" won't repay his money, although the loans are now called due.

Batman and Robin February 3, 2009 at 1:16 p.m.

He is what allowing the government to be involved in the educational system gets you: California Budget Impasse Threatens Cal Grants, Again San Francisco — Community-college students in California may see their "student-aid grants" delayed because the state’s leaders have been unable to agree on a budget and the state is starting to run out of money.

In what is becoming a common occurrence in recent years, California will issue IOU’s for $13-million in payments to colleges for the Cal Grants program, forcing either campuses or students to come up with the money instead. The payment delays for Cal Grants and other programs, which started yesterday and will continue for at least a month, are designed to keep California afloat while lawmakers hash out a budget to meet the state’s estimated $15-billion deficit.

The budget impasse has left colleges in the state scrambling to ensure that students will not be hurt. The University of California and California State University systems have said they would use institutional funds or other means of covering the students’ costs until the grants are disbursed.

But many of the 86,000 community-college students who receive Cal Grants may not be covered, putting some of them in a financial bind. Erik Skinner, the community-college system’s vice chancellor for fiscal policy, said last month that campuses would deal with the situation on a case-by-case basis, but many of them would have a tough time coming up with the money. Socialism at its very best.

Memo to Clueless February 3, 2009 at 2:20 p.m.

This is a board about diploma mills and Warren National University. If you want to blabber about unrelated topics, go somewhere else, since you obviously have nothing to contribute to the topic at hand.

Wyoming newsies pick up Diploma Mill Closing February 3, 2009 at 3:29 p.m.

www.casperstartribune.net/articles/2009/...

Not a lot of new ground, diploma mill testimony, etc. Waiting to see the Cheyenne Herald piece.

"The Wyoming Department of Education revoked the Cheyenne-based school's state registration last month, according to Mary Kay Hill, the department's administrative director.

Hill said Warren National has appealed that decision, but apparently only to try to remain open for a little while longer -- not to stay in business indefinitely."

Batman and Robin February 3, 2009 at 3:45 p.m.

Go take a flying leap into a dung pile, idiot. It's reflecting on government sticking its nose into the educational system, which they are obviously flubbing up. They want to tell you what to do, but can't take care of their own problems. They are the reason that we have diploma mills in this county in the first place, because they refuse to make or pass any laws or legislation to prohibit or regulate such institutions. After all, all of you liberals out there want this country to be a socialist society anyway, now is your chance to have government hold your little hands and spoon feed you all of their corrupt crap.

Then again, no one can give you an exact definition of a diploma mill either. Is it a supposed school that sells you a piece of paper with no work involved and not authorized by any state to issue a degree; or is it an authorized school licensed by the state to issue degrees, who is in some peoples opinion sub-standard in their instructions; or are they an institution who is greasing some politicians palm to either stay in business or to get federal money to build bigger buildings and give themselves larger raises?

WN "u" front page of Diploma Mill News February 3, 2009 at 8:36 p.m.

www.diplomamillnews.blogspot.com/

Who is this... February 4, 2009 at 6:28 p.m.

...Batman and Robin fool? Are you some kind of SPAMBOT that does nothing but post irrelavency?

Batman and Robin February 4, 2009 at 8:21 p.m.

Of course, and you are? The Accreditation expert? Socialist want a be? Sad former misguided WNU student who washed out? Schools out, doors closed, WNU is now a mute issue, so shut up, go away or close down this site.

I still say the school was legally allowed to operate and award degrees under Wyoming state law by way of the authority of their Board of Regents.

Accreditation is "Voluntary", not mandatory, nor required or necessary as long as the states monitor them instead of the federal government.

If you want the federal government involved in your every day life, making decisions for you, telling you how to run your business for the good of all, where you can go to school (brainwashing you) then you should join the Neo-Nazi party.

Just remember, WNU just made a little mistake, and should be forgiven, for not becoming accredited, and placed under the federal governments watchful eye.

More diploma mill coverage February 4, 2009 at 9:10 p.m.

"A University Closes and we Rejoice -Good Bye and Good Riddance"

"Nobody should be surprised or saddened by the loss of Warren National University. In fact, we recognized it for what it was years ago, and refused to list it on our online college or online degree websites. "

From - Online Education Newsletter

Hardeeharhar February 4, 2009 at 9:12 p.m.

"WNU is now a mute issue"

This is so funny.

LMO February 4, 2009 at 9:44 p.m.

So who we pick on now?

John K. February 5, 2009 at 1:57 a.m.

WNU will soon likely be back in business under a new name, operating out of the Caymans or another small nation that is friendly to this type of organization. Maybe WNU students can continue with them when that happens. Most folks who are considering any proprietary college, accredited or not, would be wise to check out the offerings of their local junior college or trade school. The tuition is way cheaper and these schools are very student focused. Credits usually transfer 100% to other institutions.

PT Barnum February 5, 2009 at 1:30 p.m.

Well, going to a licensed doctor is technically "voluntary" too, and so is accreditation, but if you want anything good to come out of it:

From US Gov

Frequently Asked Questions about diploma mills, fraudulent degrees, and accreditation. Among other things:

Accreditation is “voluntary,” so doesn't that mean it is optional and not necessary?

Accreditation is voluntary in that the process of accreditation requires the full cooperation with and complete participation in the process of accreditation by the college or univ