Grantham University
Established: 1951
Accreditation: Distance Education and Training Council
For-Profit: Unknown
Country: USA
Programs:
|
Review Averages (110
reviews)
|
Grantham University Reviews:
Promoted
November 19, 2009
Promoted! Thanks Grantham! 20 yrs of experience is worth about as much as a degree from Grantham. How do I figure that. With just a degree I would need almost 20 yrs experience to get the job I had without a degree. To get the promotion I need both. Having ...
Don't waste your time
November 17, 2009
This school is closer to a Diploma Mill than a Regionally Acc college. At 750 per course is not a good deal! you can get that same price from other regionally acc colleges...UOP, Excelsior, GWU, Penn State online, Central Texas..etc...etc..and these schools are well known. Don't be fooled by those ...
Above Average...
November 7, 2009
I've read several reviews from a few of the other colleges; Devry, University of Phoenix, and Colorado Technical University to name a few. I don't think there is a single school out there that fully pleases all of its students. I am in my second year of Computer Science and ...
Read all 110 Grantham University reviews...
Comments:
John Maxwell September 25, 2006 at 2:14 a.m.
I have had the same problem with Grantham. They refuse to return my calls, and I am having a hard time finding another school that will accept my credits there. They were quick to get me to sign up with all kinds of pie in the sky used car sales techniques, but after I enrolled and payed my money, I can not get anyone on the phone and even if I leave a message, they will not call me back. The customer service is poor to say the least and criminal to say the worst. This looks to be a basic bate and switch technique. They tell you anything to get you to enroll and then leave you to figure out everything on your own. What a crock.
Student #060723 October 19, 2006 at 1:18 p.m.
Huh? I have never had a problem getting through to faculty and staff. Problems have been solve quickly. As far as non-transferable credits, do your homework. There is a laundry list of schools that will accept credits from Grantham. You will be amazed at some of the schools on the list. Why does one go to school in the first place? Hopefully it's for self edification. Just my 2 cents.
student 357357357 October 31, 2006 at 2:08 a.m.
I have had both experiences that I hear above. I have had one professor that emailed right back on a sat afternoon...and some of them it takes a couple of days. They are accredited and you can transfer credits.
Student November 2, 2006 at 7:36 p.m.
No, actually you cant transfer your credits. Most legitimate schools will not accept credits from Grantham. Call your local school if you dont believe it.
Masuss November 4, 2006 at 3:36 a.m.
Go here--> http://www.chea.org/heta/default.asp This is the Higher Education Transfer Alliance.
All the schools have signed an alliance that says they will accept credits regardless of where it came from as long as it complies with CHEA.
Wrong Masuss November 5, 2006 at 4:48 p.m.
You are dead wrong. Call around. Tell the school that you have credits from Grantham. They will tell you that they do not accept them. CHEA aggreement or not, they will not accept credits from Grantham.
Read what is said:
If an Institution is in HETA, What Does This Tell Me?
An institution's membership in HETA tells you that its transfer decisions are not made solely on the basis of the accredited status of a sending institution and that the institution has agreed at least to consider transfer requests from other institutions. Each HETA member institution has an interest in cooperative efforts to assure and enhance student mobility.
What if an Institution is not in HETA?
The institution has determined, as of this time, not to become part of the transfer alliance. If an accredited institution does decide to join HETA, it will be added to the directory.
What Does HETA NOT Do?
HETA does not assure that transfer requests from one HETA institution will be accepted by another HETA institution. It does not, as of this date, include all institutions that might accept your transfer credit. HETA is voluntary and, for example, an institution may not yet have chosen to join HETA. HETA does not make judgments about the academic quality of individual institutions.
It does not say that they WILL accept credits, only that they will CONSIDER it, and most WILL NOT accept Granthams.
rip off November 7, 2006 at 2:47 a.m.
This ripoff report shines a light on Grantham.
serious student December 3, 2006 at 6 p.m.
This is too funny. Grantham keeps getting proven wrong no matter how they want to spin it.
James December 14, 2006 at 1:13 a.m.
I would just like to add a few comments from an outsider looking in. The mission of most online universities is to provide working adults the education and tools needed to advance in there current career field. Grantham, AIU, Phoenix online, all target working adults IE military wishing to advance in there career. Anyone interested in attending an online university with the goal in mind of transferring to a traditional college first and foremost, check the school's accreditation. Nationally Accredited schools will take most if not all your credits from a Regionally accredited school, but Regionally Accredited schools rarely except credits froma Nationally accredited University. Does this your credits are worthless? The answer is no. Alls it means is a Regionally Accredited University is considered a higher quality education compared to a Nationally accredited university. Second, do your homework. Use a search engine and run the name of the school with keyword opinion. You are guaranteed to find loads of info on the college including first hand opinions from students much like yourselves. Finally the only stupid question is the one not asked. Get yourself a point of contact and ask away.
John December 14, 2006 at 4:15 p.m.
James is the voice of reason. It's Nationally (DETC) accredited, and most Regionals won't take the credits.
Since this is a review site, I encourage all Grantham students to fill out a review if that want to be heard.
Robert December 16, 2006 at 7:35 a.m.
I went to Grantham University and their service was sub-standard. I could not get return phone calls or return e-mails. All of the exams were open book and super simple, but when I tried to get in touch with my instructors to have questions answered, it took forever to get anything resolved. I truly felt like I was on my own and that the school did not care. When it was time to re-enroll for the next semester, it was easy to get in touch with them, because they would call me every other day, bugging me to re-enroll. I wish they would have put that much effort into helping me with my studies. I now go to Fort Hayes State University online, and they are great. Regionally Accredited also, so no worries about transfers (although they would not accept my Grantham credits).
Scott December 17, 2006 at 5:50 p.m.
Write reviews! So others know!
student #1 December 30, 2006 at 6:27 p.m.
Review written and submitted.
seen a lot of blogs... January 8, 2007 at 4:22 p.m.
Happy New Year! I am not an advocate or a critic for DETC Accredited places of learning. I am just a 55 year-old guy, with a family, that has been working since he was 16, suffered through several company closings (anyone remember Singer Business Machines, or International Teleprinter Corporation (ITC), or how about RCA Tube Division) and never had the opportunity (read that as money) to attend a "brick & morter" college. I have personally talked to many employers, including my current one which by the way is providing tuition assitance for my studies at Grantham, and while not the best choice, Grantham University is at least respected and recognized. Maybe I can't transfer my credits to another college, but a BS from Grantham is still a BS on my resume. And let me tell you, in this day and age, "Job Security" is defined as how fast you can find another job. I know my degree from Grantham at the very least puts me in the running for that next job. The critics all have a good point, when your young set your sights high, plan to move and advance your degree(s). You are going to need to, competition is fearce, and its more international than ever. Grantham is not for everyone. But I can honestly say, I have learned a great deal, I believe I can present myself professionally during an interview and I can "talk the talk" in the field of data communications and networking. For those in Grantham, decide where you want to be, what are your goals? And then do it. Learning is what you make it. Grantham can be a fine resource. Here is an interesting site... http://distancelearn.about.com/od/accred...
Robert January 21, 2007 at 4:57 a.m.
Grantham is a joke. A waste of money and time. Everything is open book, so getting decent grades is easy. The hard part is finding someone that will take your degree seriously AFTER you graduate.
Summer January 23, 2007 at 7:32 a.m.
Grantham's credits will NOT transfer, so you people that don't believe it then go right ahead and earn a degree with Grantham, and watch your world crumble!! Most students find a friend that goes to Grantham and cheat on all tests including Proctor exam...its a total joke!!!
Understand that a diploma means much more when recieved with pride from a prominent and reputable university!!
Grantham should be SHUT DOWN!!!
Uneducated Consumers February 2, 2007 at 2:52 p.m.
I have nothing to do with this issue; I'm simply an outsider that has read your comments. However, I do work for a University that is Regionally accredited, but have worked for a University that was Nationally accredited. Those who have stated that it is up to the accepting institution to accept credits are completely correct. Actually, it is the larger regionally accredited universities that are the bad guy, due to the fact that they snobbishly refuse to accept credits. Most not-for-profit universities even shy away from other regionally accredited transfer credits from a for-profit institution simply because THEY CAN. The fact still remains that if you complete your degree through a Nationally Accredited institution - you have a degree that is just as good as one from a regionally accredited institution.
You had the opportunity to educate yourself prior to enrolling. Remember the age old phrase "buyer beware"? It was your right to educate yourselves on the transferability of the credits from Grantham. I guess this is why you need to get the degree in the first place, so that you can learn how to do research prior to making a decision. Good luck to you all.
True, except for one point February 3, 2007 at 3:24 a.m.
I live in Louisiana. If you want a state job, a nationally accredited degree will simply not work. It actually states right on the job description that a degree from a recognized REGIONALLY ACCREDITED school is required. This is the same in many other states as well. Grantham will not tell you that when you are getting ready to enroll. Do your homework guys.
Easy to cheat at Grantham February 6, 2007 at 4:11 a.m.
A guy in my unit goes to Grantham. Grantham sent out a proctor form for his Proctor to fill out and return. The proctor (his LT.) signed the form, but my buddy substituted his own e-mail address instead of the proctors. Now, the final exams get e-mailed directly to him, and he can cheat all he wants. He told me that a lot of his friends that go to Grantham do the same thing. What a joke. Grantham did not even call the proctor to make sure that he was actually the one who gave the student the exam. They just accepted the fax, graded it, and gave the cheating student an "A" for the exam. Nice follow up Grantham. I can tell you really care about the quality of the "education" that you provide.
Mary February 7, 2007 at 2:07 a.m.
I hope most of ou tht read these posts are takinig advantage of the inside information placed upon you.
come and earn your Bachelors of Crap February 7, 2007 at 5:25 a.m.
What a complete waste of my time. I learned nothing except how to read a text book, open a booklet and take an open book test. I thought I was going to be challenged, but I was wrong. I'm dropping out as soon as I complete this last class. Maybe, just maybe, I can transfer my credits to another school, although I have had no luck finding one that will take Grantham credits.
joey February 7, 2007 at 5:52 p.m.
YES it is a complete waste of time...and your credits wont go anywhere....sorry for your loss. All the staff there are generic and money hungry.......please seek other educational universities!!
No service February 9, 2007 at 2:46 a.m.
Tried five times today to get my grade reports. No contact and no one called back.....this place is a ripoff. Does anyone know where we can file a complaint or can we start a class action lawsuit against this school to shut it down. I am going to the TA office and legal to file a complaint and to see if i can get the military aware of this. I am also writing my congressman to see if we can get something pushed up the hill. This is obviously a fleecing of america so i am also writing NBC to see if we can a story on this school. I ask everyone to join me so more military members do not get ripped off by this school. If we all unit besides placing comments, (though the message is getting out this way), then we can protect others.
Please join me and let's shut this place down.
RIPOFF February 9, 2007 at 7:11 a.m.
This goes out to the person "NO SERVICE"---You can file a complaint with RIP OFF REPORT (www.ripoffreport.com). This will get the word out, and file a report with the better business bureau immediately!! Lets do all we can to help our Military. Let's ban together to make a change!
To "ME" February 21, 2007 at 6:22 p.m.
Grantham is spending thousands of dollars to find out who wrote the ripoffreport. We can't even use the printer, because of the expensive costs of printer ink...I hate it here. Did you read the ripoffreport?
to ME~From ITS TRUE February 22, 2007 at 6:59 a.m.
Evidently you haven't read the ripoff reports, because if you have then your questions would be answered!!! So many people are gone and have gotten fired. Everyone is tense around here........
to IT'S TRUE February 22, 2007 at 3:34 p.m.
That was the way it was here in Slidell as well. Nothing has changed. Most people were cheating on the proctored exams and getting passing, if not perfect grades on them. The name of the game was money. Always has been, and always will be. We were always getting yelled at for one thing or another. The management was a joke and expected was too much for what little supervision and support we were getting. I'm so glad I'm done with that job.
to IT'S TRUE February 22, 2007 at 8:42 p.m.
Yep, sounds like business as usual, just a different location. I'm still having problems finding a single solitary school to accept my Grantham credits. Most just laugh when I tell them I have credits there, really, they laugh. I'm glad that I didnt come up. I'm making way more money now than I ever did at Grantham. Jobs are plentiful here now. Did you come up from Slidell or are you from KC?
So it's true... February 24, 2007 at 2:46 p.m.
I'm enrolled at Grantham now, and I have to say, it's very much a rip-off...it's next to impossible to get in touch with the instructors, and they let you extend past your enrollment date so much that you lose interest in the courses anyway...after I finish my last javascript course here I'm done...This school is such a joke; I'm surprised that the military does business with them...talk about throwing away good money...
TOO SO ITS TRUE February 26, 2007 at 4:49 a.m.
SORRY you have been taken for a fool by Grantham...it's a daily occurrence...Hope you go to a reputable college with top notch credentials!! Hope you read RIPOFFREPORT and pass the word along!!
Ripoffreport February 26, 2007 at 6:16 a.m.
More people need to post on the ripoffreport. That's the only way to get the work out about this sham school and the derelicts who manage it.
It's not just here February 26, 2007 at 6:21 a.m.
You can read a lot of good information here:
http://chronicle.com/forums/index.php/to...
and here:
http://chronicle.com/forums/index.php/to...
and here:
http://chronicle.com/forums/index.php/to...
and here:
http://confuzioncityscomments.blogspot.c...
and here:
http://blogkc.com/archives/2005/09/kc-lo...
As well as on many military/college chat boards. Grantham really is getting a name for itself.
Bishop February 26, 2007 at 7:01 p.m.
All the people who are commenting....HAVE you made a report at RIPOFFREPORT? If not you should....Get the word out immediately because I hear Grantham is being ivestigated by EEOC and the Army!!
Former Student February 27, 2007 at 5:55 a.m.
You know I have read the reports and have seen MANY of your names on them. I do believe that you are former employees and have probably been wronged. So get a new job and move on. I have had bosses that I did not like but don't sit around blogging about them.
About the school, yes it is a paper diploma, but it also sits nicely on my resume under my MBA from Pepperdine. My degree from Grantham did advance my education and work status. I received a BSEET at Grantham and was accepted to Graziadio School of Business at Pepperdine University. I completed my MBA and have worked the entire time. I suspect many of you who complain about your working conditions have not completed a degree and are unhappy with your minimum wage jobs. It is not the fault of the man who only gives you a few grains to eat. It is the fault of the man who does not learn to grow the grain himself!
TO : Former Student February 27, 2007 at 12:56 p.m.
Or should I say, current Grantham Employee. We have heard from the Grantham spin doctors trying to put out the flames on many boards across the internet. Pepperdine would not accept a Grantham degree, especially as a prerequisite for their Masters Degree, so that is a lie right there. Only Grantham would stoop so low as to insult the wage of the person posting against it, a wage I might add, that they control. For shame Grantham. Your true colors are shining through.
YOU AMUSE ME February 27, 2007 at 11:31 p.m.
Too Former Student I am sure you are with Grantham, and I agree that only Grantham would stoop so low as too TRY and insult former or current employees wages. Grantham University is a shameful University lacking the proper credentials to call itself a TRUE University for higher education. Grantham staff sickens me, so instead of you all surfing the internet to find numerous comments that are true about your diploma mill school-you should get regionally accredited...PLEASE spend your time getting proper acreditation then come back on this board and speak the truth!!
Yeah right March 1, 2007 at 8:25 p.m.
Pepperdine accepting a Grantham degree!?!?!?!? That has to be the funniest thing I have every heard in my life. I even had a COMMUNITY COLLEGE turn down my Grantham credits. Next, you will be telling us that Harvard will accept Grantham. Please.
Rate 'em! March 5, 2007 at 6:50 p.m.
Due to the power of modern technology, you can rate your professors at Grantham. Or
Former Student March 5, 2007 at 6:52 p.m.
Actually, everyone thought my Grantham degree was so incredible, I don't even bother listing my (imaginary) Pepperdine MBA.
2 Former student March 5, 2007 at 7:30 p.m.
Grantham Degree incredible...? YEAH RIGHT!! Did you just make that up? It's incredible how generic this school is...It's incredible that students don't research first b4 signing up with Grantham.
to Former Student March 6, 2007 at 1:50 a.m.
I could think of a lot of words to describe a Grantham degree, but incredible is not one of them. Good try through.
Former student again March 9, 2007 at 1 a.m.
First of all I don’t know any of the names you all have listed as working for Grantham. I can not say they are good, bad, or whatever. I can say that my degree, GMAT, and my work experience got me into Pepperdine. I never said that a Grantham degree was "Incredible". I personally think that my degree from Grantham was a more of a tool to get into a Masters program.
What cracks me up is that I keep seeing the same names pop up on these forums. Jason from San Diego... I know you, I was in the Navy with you. I also know that you told me that the BSEET course was too difficult for you and you were going to change to the BSEM. I guess that was too tough for you too so you take your frustration out on Grantham.
Again, I can not speak about the business portion of Grantham, from what you all have said, they must have problems with personnel issues, but as far as a B.S. degree it gets you in the door. I would not recommend a M.S. Degree from Grantham just because there are many other, more prestigious Universities that offer programs for working adults.
Jason March 9, 2007 at 12:53 p.m.
Hmmm, do I really know you? I highly doubt it because I never wanted a BSEM degree nor every told anyone that I was going to change degrees because it was too difficult. The fact is, I was getting a 3.5 GPA in my studies, so difficult, Grantham is not. What ship were you stationed on? What unit were you with? What was/is your rank and rate? I'd be curious, because I'd bet you dollars to donuts that you have no idea who I am and that you are just a Grantham Employee trying to discredit my post. The fact is, I'm following all these posts, I just have not posted in some time. I see that Grantham is going out in full force to discredit people to make itself look good. Fact: All of Grantham tests are OPEN BOOK. The degree itself is easy to pass, but it's also the degree itself that is worthless.
Please, Grantham Employee, don't say that you know me when you do not.
Out-side looking in March 11, 2007 at 3:38 p.m.
Lets take a few minutes to review the facts boys and girls.
Rip off report dated 1/22/2007 11:17 am
A message from an employee who states, “GU is no good”
Five days later at 2:52pm (1/27/2007) the message was modified- apparently it didn’t get the attention it was seeking
The second person joins in (ID “truth hurts”) on 1/27/2007 at 1:01pm. Decides that they want to join in on the bashing. They also decided to modify their message at 2:52pm (see the trend here). They sign their message with “truth hurts”
On 2/6/2007 at 5:03pm- it appears the first message wasn’t getting the job done. Decided to add some extras bashing. A couple of hours later (7:35pm) they decided to modify their message. This time they signed their name to the message
Same day- the second person joins in. Time of the message was 6:44pm. Decides to add a spin on things by adding some names to the main event. Get this, at 7:35pm they decided to modify their message (see the trend here) This time they decided to sign their name with TH (truth hurts, where have we seen this before? see above) and their name
I am no PI, but this sounds like two individuals who were fired and are very unhappy.
News Flash- Facts are that everyone hates management in one way or another. Get over it people, move on.
Now boys and girls, let’s review some other facts.
Whether a Nationally or Regionally accredited learning institution accepts each other’s credit that is up to the gaining learning institution. So get over it!
As for the other GU employees looking for new jobs. Get on with it. I am more then sure they are not holding you down with straps. Perhaps if you were doing your job, your university would be a better place to go to.
In closing boys and girl. If you don’t like how McDonalds makes your hamburgers, go to Burger King where everything is served your way. That is the American way
Hi Management March 11, 2007 at 4:20 p.m.
Wow, it looks like Grantham Management is trying the "kinder, gentler" way this time. If it's only two people, kindly tell me why there are rip off reports going back to 2005 from students. It's all over the web, and it's all true. Instead of trying to make the University better, you waste your time trying to debunk people who post the truth about you guys. What a shame.
Oh, and the condescending tone to your last post and your writing style gives you away G.C.
Outside looking in~Hi Management March 11, 2007 at 8:37 p.m.
Nice try. I don't know what G.C stands for. But, if you haven't noticed, GU management hasn't responded to a single statement on these sites- I don't blame them. Who has time to waste with people like you. Move on friend!
Rose March 11, 2007 at 10:08 p.m.
I am a 62 year women who has less then ten good years left to live. Everyone who took part in this thread should not waste any more time with this junk. Take it from me. Get a degree of your choice and find yourself a real job.
Management or not March 11, 2007 at 10:19 p.m.
The above piece was a good write up. It makes total sense. Rose who ever you are, you are awesome! The author of "Hi management" get a life.
It makes no sense March 12, 2007 at 12:20 a.m.
The above write up proves nothing at all. The fact remains that everything that was said earlier is true. It's hard to find any school to accept Grantham credits. That's a fact. Ask around to other schools if you don't believe it. It's not that hard to find out the truth.
To Rose March 12, 2007 at 12:34 a.m.
That is exactly what this thread is about. Getting on with your life. This is why the thread was started, so people don't waste their time getting a degree that will not work for them in the long run. I've done some research, and I have yet to find a school that will accept Grantham credits. I use to be a student, and I can't find a school that will touch them. I wasted two semesters and a lot of money and time to find this information out. Now, I'm spreading the word so others can do their own research without blindly enrolling in a degree program. I have never told anyone NOT to become a Grantham student, I simply tell them what their Enrollment Advisor will not.
Simply said, DO YOUR HOMEWORK BEFORE YOU ENROLL. Don't expect a sales person to give you the straight skinny when it's simply a numbers game to them and their goal is to enroll as many people as they can each month.
Jason
TINA March 12, 2007 at 3:43 a.m.
I have read all the complaints about Grantham. There are many valid points about this companye! I urge all of you to contact the Better Business Bureau www.bbb.org
A line has to be drawn somewhere and this is the proper way to do it. Let's join forces~~~
Great site here March 13, 2007 at 2:29 a.m.
I just found this site and there is even more great information about Grantham. 8 pages of it going back about a year and a half.
Misc March 13, 2007 at 2:32 p.m.
Why bother with the better business bureau? These sound like serious accreditation issues.
To Peperdine graduate March 17, 2007 at 3:47 a.m.
To the Former Student that says they got into and graduated with a Masters Degree from Peperdine, I have to call the bullcrap flag on you my friend. This is the e-mail that I sent to Pepperdine University:
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 3:35 PM
To: GSBM Malibu Admissions <gsbmadm@pepperdine.edu>
Subject: Enrollment
Dear Sir or Ma'am,
I am just completing my BSEET degree from Grantham University, a DETC National accredited university. Would this meet your requirements for entrance into your MBA program? Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
****
(As you can see, I put down a BSEET degree, just like Mr. Former Student said he had.)
This is the reply that I received today:
Dear ****,
Thank you for your interest in the Graziadio School of Business and Management. We require completed undergraduate degrees from regionally accredited universities, so an undergraduate degree from a
nationally accredited school would not meet that requirement. I hope this helps and let me know if you have any further questions.
Take care,
Marc
Marc Endrigat
Graziadio School of Business and Management
Full-Time Programs
1-800-726-9283
So I say to you, Mr. Former Student, you are a LIAR and a DECEIVER. This is proof positive that a Grantham Degree will not get your into Pepperdine University. I left Mr. Endrigat's information so that anyone can verify this information if they so choose. Please do not post any more lies about Grantham being accepted by this university. It will not be.
OH MY GOSH March 17, 2007 at 4:49 a.m.
OH MY GOSH thank you so much for giving us the real scoop on GRantham and Pepperdine University...I keep trying to tell people that MAJORITY of Universities if not all WILL NOT accept a Grantham degree or finished courses...THANK YOU...Your proof was like a cool breeze on a summer day!!
Student March 17, 2007 at 7:53 p.m.
I have found all of these posts interesting in one way or the other. I have been spending a lot of my time researching Grantham to ensure I am receiving a degree that I can use in my life. I have fallen upon forums such as this in the past bashing Grantham, and I almost quit because of it. Good thing that I am not a sheep following the flock. I was at work (I am in the military and I work with civilian contractors) and I was speaking with a GS-15 about college. I told him my concerns about my school being a rip-off. He asked what school I went to and I told him "Grantham". He then said,"I have something interesting to show you in my office." I followed him to his large corner office to find a wall of degrees. This man had three masters degrees from University of Maryland, Texas A&M, and Colorado State. All of these Masters degrees were attached to the Bachelors Degree he also had on his wall. It was from Grantham University.
For those of you that are trying to dispell hope to those of us trying to balance family, work and an education...STOP!!! I am truly sorry that Grantham wasn't the right school for you, but it is for others. For those of you attending Grantham with concern, remember one thing. If you finish your Bachelors at Grantham, you won't have to worry about trying to transfer credits.
BS March 17, 2007 at 10:22 p.m.
Hi Student:
I am sorry, but your unverifiable, anecdotal (and likely BS) example does not hold water. It's akin to saying Bill Gates didn't graduate from college, so everyone that doesn't graduate from college can expect to get wealthy.
This exception(if it exists) does not prove a rule for usage of a Grantham degree.
What's honest and useful is the AVERAGE or LIKELY acceptability of the degree for every student looking to transfer those credits to a regionally accredited school.
I've taught college courses for 10+ years, advising students, and there is absolutely no way a bottom-tier DETC school like Grantham is welcomed with open arms by Tier 1 regional schools as you claim.
Even in the DETC's own, very biased FAQ, they acknowledge that at least 1 in 3 students will not be able to transfer credits / degrees.
http://www.detc.org/frequentlyQust.html
Then take into account a bottom tier DETC school, and project from there. I could never recommend my students to take courses from Grantham and then flip a coin to see if they were worth anything.
To Student March 18, 2007 at 12:15 a.m.
Are you going to make me send e-mails to those three schools as well to prove you a liar also? Oh well, I have some extra time, so I will. Thank you for the challenge and I'll report back when I have an answer.
E-mail from another school received March 18, 2007 at 5:34 a.m.
Well, I don't know about the other guys, but I sent this e-mail to Southeastern Louisiana University, a school located a few miles away from where Grantham use to be located. This is the answer I received.
To whom it may concern,
I am currently in the military and taking classes with Grantham University. Grantham is Accredited through the Distance Education and Training Council (DETC). I am looking at transferring to your school. Would you accept their transfer credits, and if so, how many credits do you require me to complete at your school to earn a bachelors degree with you. Thank you for your reply.
Very Respectfully,
****
Here is the answer I received:
From : Shannon Andre <Shannon.Andre@selu.edu>
Subject : Re: Transfer Credits
Hello,
I am not completely sure that we accept credit from Grantham University. I really don't think we do but it is worth a try! You can probably get some sort of credit for you military experience. A bachelor's degree is typically around 120 credit hours.
Thanks!
Shannon
PROOF March 19, 2007 at 3:01 a.m.
GOSH another school denying Grantham credits!! WOW A school right in the same state as Grantham was. This is so interesting and informative. I'm sure that was Grantham staff that lied....but anyway NEXT SCHOOL ON THE LIST TO DENY GRANTHAM CREDITS (drum roll please)
Found another e-mail - from ripoffreport.com March 20, 2007 at 11:10 p.m.
I sent an e-mail to Penn State Great Valley about transfer credits being accepted from Grantham University. Below is a copy of that e-mail.
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 10:14 AM
To: gvadmiss@psu.edu
Subject: transfer credits
I have been taking courses at Grantham University, A DETC Nationally
Accredited University. Generally speaking, do you accept credits from
DETC schools for transfer credits? Thank you for your asistance.
____________________________________
As you can see, the e-mail was sent after Mr. Jack posted his response. Below is the reply I received today:
______________________________________
Thank you for your interest in Penn State Great Valley.
Many accrediting organizations have been approved by the U.S. Department
of Education [USDE] and/or CHEA. The six regional accrediting
associations are the most academic in nature. Most universities in the
United States require regional accreditation before they will accept
another institution's courses and degrees.
Each higher education institution sets its own standards.
In order to be considered for admission to the Penn State Graduate
School, an applicant must have received from an accredited institution a
baccalaureate earned under residence and credit conditions substantially
equivalent to those required by The Pennsylvania State University.
Penn State accepts graduate applications from individuals who have
conferred degrees from institutions who have sought accreditation
through one of the 6 regional accrediting bodies identified below.
Middles States Assoc. of Colleges and Schools (PSU 's accreditation)
North Central Assoc. of Colleges and Schools New England Assoc. of
Schools and Colleges Northwest Assoc. of Schools and Colleges Southern
Assoc. Of Colleges and Schools Western Association of Schools and
Colleges
If Grantham does not have accreditation from one of the 6 regionals, you
would not be eligible to apply and the course work would not be
considered for transfer. In reviewing the Grantham web site, I could not
find a reference to this particular accreditation.
Kathleen G. Mingioni
Assistant Director of Admissions and Student Services
& Acting Registrar
Penn State Great Valley
School of Graduate Professional Studies
kgm2@psu.edu
610-648-3315
I think this speaks for itself.
To Matt who wrote a review above March 21, 2007 at 2:52 a.m.
So you put your name down? Big deal. I could put my name down as Freddie Mercury. That doesn't make it true. You can put down whatever name you want, that doesn't make you a verifiable student. For all we know, you could be another Grantham employee trying to put out the flames. You may feel what others are writing on this board are true, or false. That is up to the individual to decide. That facts are being presented by actual e-mails from actual Universities that are saying they WILL NOT accept Grantham credits for transfer or as prerequisites for a Master Degree. This can be verified by e-mailing the school in question and getting a response directly. We can not verify your information, nor do you present facts to back up your claim of transferring into a "prestigious school" where you earned said Masters Degree. What school did you attend that accepted your Grantham bachelors degree? I would like to be able to independently verify this information by contacting the school in question directly. Lack of a response will prove that you are lying.
If you read posts on ripoffreport.com, you can see that both current and former employees and students are posting there as well. The information is out there for anyone and everyone. We are not asking you to take this information at face value. We are presenting the well documented information and asking any potential students to be very cautious and research this school before enrolling.
To Student - Caught in a lie March 21, 2007 at 11:29 p.m.
This is the e-mail I sent to Colorado State University. A school I might add that "Student" said his "co-worker" received his Masters from using his Grantham degree as a prerequisite.
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Saturday, March 17, 2007 6:27 PM
To: Grad GSchool Email Stoll, Rachel <Rachel.Stoll@business.colostate.edu>
Subject: Graduate Enrollment
Dear Sir or Ma'am,
I am just completing my BSEET degree from Grantham University, a DETC
National accredited university. Would this meet your requirements for
entrance into your MBA program? Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
****
And.....(Drum roll please)......This is the reply today:
>From: "Stoll,Rachel" <Rachel.Stoll@business.colostate.edu>
>To: ****
>Subject: RE: Graduate Enrollment
>Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2007 08:35:00 -0600
>
>
>Unfortunately, the institution needs to be regionally accredited as
>well. You would not be eligible for admission to a graduate program at
>Colorado State University. Rachel
>
>
>
>Rachel Stoll
>Graduate Admissions
>College of Business
>164 Rockwell Hall
>1270 Campus Delivery
>Colorado State University
>Fort Collins, CO 80523-1270
>rachel.stoll@colostate.edu
>970-491-3704, (800)491-4622 x1
>Fax: 970-491-3481
Doesn't sound like a lot of room for leeway there, does it?
ANONYMOUS March 25, 2007 at 1:21 p.m.
Everyone has made some valid arguments and I am sure that the word about Grantham has spread. On a separate note, I just checked the Better Business Bureau website with a Grantham University search. There has only been one complaint filed against Grantham in three years and it was a contract dispute. The complaint was dismissed after investigation. Instead of using this website to post your concerns, why not go to the people who can take the proper action. Good luck.
ANONYMOUS April 2, 2007 at 4:45 p.m.
There is nothing wrong with a Grantham Degree or the school.
There are plenty of schools who accept DETC credits. I have received a promotion and also been accepted to NC State with this degree. Yes, their generic response was not to accept anything other than regional degrees but after getting the school, my employer involved, I was accepted.
Any posts about someone is sleeping with someone else and I did not get promoted are never credible and belong on Jerry Springer! You people continue to list just generic responses from schools. With some extra effort, you can be successful.
Ex-Employees of any company who lost there job. Have some dignity and get on with your life. From what I see from all the whining and crying, I think that Grantham and everybody else would be just in terminating your employment.
federal government April 2, 2007 at 5:06 p.m.
Several of my friends like to get drunk and surf ripoffs.com and reply to the posts with anything that comes to mind. It is a game to them. That is the trailer park of websites.
Any legitimate complaints need to go to BBB.
Do not even attempt to tell them that you are made because you were fired. Ex-employees love to make up things about why they could not cut it.
Department of Education Employee April 2, 2007 at 5:33 p.m.
Why do you people try to cut down on people who went to Grantham and who have made it good. What's wrong with the DETC? The Department of education says it is equal to the regionals!!
Why does anyone send e-mails to schools trying to get in?
Call or go to the school and ask for a review of your credentials. You will be reviewed differently. Trying to cut down others just to make up for your failures is a very bad habit.
If you were fired from a school and or job - Take it as a learning experience. You were in some fault for losing that job.
If you are trying to get into a school with a DETC degree - hold your head high and work hard at it. A lot of schools will accept the degree right out(and almost all employers)
For those who originally say no, provide extra material for them (G.M.A.T scores, resumes, etc.)
We get complaints from all schools from IVY League on down that they are rip-offs. If all these were credible, there would be no schools in existance.
observer April 2, 2007 at 5:50 p.m.
The customer service at Grantham has to be improving since
the former employees that are crying here have been let go!!
Grantham definitely made the right choice.
Graduate April 2, 2007 at 6:08 p.m.
I am a very happy graduate of Grantham. I had no problem transferring my degree.
To everyone who responded "today" April 2, 2007 at 10:16 p.m.
What school did you transfer your credits to? I doubt I will receive an answer because you Grantham employees know that I will send an e-mail to them and post the response.
Notice that all the responses were posted within an hour and a half of each other. The same Grantham employee I think? To all looking at enrolling, do your homework. Read the posts above and the responses from other Universities. The proof is right there, all you have to do is read it, and do a little research for yourself.
previous post April 3, 2007 at 1:32 a.m.
reply" to everyone who reponded today" I Transferred to USC.
Post all the replies that you want. This is where I am in my third and final semester for my M.B.A. My only reponse was the last one!
Also, why can you not get on with your life!! I have never been an employee of Grantham.
Sounds good April 3, 2007 at 1:53 a.m.
I'll let you know what USC tells me.
comment April 3, 2007 at 1:58 a.m.
I do not know about transferring credits but the degree will transfer to: Touro University International,Capella,Liberty University,Colorado Technical On-line etc. All good Regional Schools. I am sure there are many others. It is a good choice for working adults.
I am also most definitely not a present or former employee of Grantham.
To miserable April 3, 2007 at 2:08 a.m.
Go right ahead!! Want me to give my instructors name also with references. What a miserable individual you are!!
Former Student April 3, 2007 at 2:15 a.m.
I'm not an employee of Grantham but I can tell you that the credits that I received there would not transfer to any of the Regional schools that I have contacted, and I contacted over 20 online schools and 5 local Universities. I just cut my losses and started over. Live and learn.
GRANTHAM PLEASE April 3, 2007 at 4:55 a.m.
Obviously we have people from Grantham posting responses here. Like everyone is saying research for yourself about this school. Ex-Employees and current employees hate the day they ever landed at grantham for work im sure. It amazes me how people have so much to say BUT in defense to Grantham but haven't the slightest clue! It matters who's sleeping with who at Grantham because I don't want to go to a school that lacks morals and standards. If anything customer service has gotten worse at Grantham. Noone is there to answer the phone and I never get called until they want more money from me.Tons of schools will not accept Grantham credits and most of us "LIKE MINDED" individuals understand that from experience.
Employees please April 3, 2007 at 9:51 a.m.
Everyone, what we have on this forum is mostly angry ex-employees who can not get over getting fired. Lets all pray for them and hope that they receive help before their mental conditions worsen. There have been numerous happy and successful graduates of this school who have prospered This school is accrediated by the department of education. A good fit for some and not for others. Please ex-employees GET HELP with your Mental Condition before it is too late. It is much easier to transfer the entire degree from a national accrediated school then it is individual credits. Many of us have done so to regional schools and gotten promotions at work also. Multiple examples of transference have been given in this forum which these individuals have blattenly called liars. Please and for Heavens sake get some help with your mental conditions and anger. Also remember that God loves you!!
EX-STUDENT April 3, 2007 at 11:17 a.m.
My wife and I both are graduates of Grantham Univerity. I transferred my degree into Averett University which allowed me to recently achieve my MBA. My wife transferred into Capella University and received her Masters and now she is in the doctorial Program at Nova Southeastern University.
All in all it was a great fit for us.
Ripoffs.com is a joke April 3, 2007 at 11:40 a.m.
I was the one who stated earlier how my friends would get drunk and make posts about everything under the Sun. Also there can be lies,truths, whatever as nothing is ever checked out. If you have a legitimate grievence go to the Better Business Bureau. Beware that they will investigate the issue so have your act together. Emotions have no place there.
Proof has been posted April 3, 2007 at 11:49 a.m.
Anyone can SAY that they were able to transfer their Grantham degree to a Regional school and got their Masters. There is documented PROOF that, in most cases, that is simnply not true. Proof from actual universities with verifiable contact information has been posted saying that they WILL NOT accept a Grantham degree. I hardly think that my "mental state" has anything to do with me looking out for my fellow Military Service Members.
It all comes down to this: Do you want to spend the time and money on a degree that is not looked highly upon and not accepted when you want to further your education OR, do you want to spend the same time and money on a a degree that will be accepted at MOST other schools. Schools like Fort Hayes University, San Diego State online, Old Dominion online, etc. are Regionally Accredited and WILL be able to be transfered. Dollar for dollar, they are VERY competative. They WILL NOT charge you $250 a credit hour for a class that no other school will touch.
It's been said on here before and I'll say it again: I'm not telling anyone NOT to go to Grantham. That is up to you. I'm simply saying that any potential student needs to do a little research before dropping their entire GI Bill or TA into a school that may not fit into their plan. The Grantham employees that are posting here seem to be very passionate about attacking others. Be that as it may, do your homewoork on this school. You will find out a lot.
Proof has been posted April 3, 2007 at 1:28 p.m.
Everyone who has transferred there degree has been insulted by your calling them liars. These people have stated that they are or never have been employees of the school. Yes it is more challenging to get a Nationally accrediated degree into top schools but it is not impossible! I do agree that students should do their research before entering any school. As we have stated, it is a good fit for some but not for others. This can be said by all schools in existance. I would suggest that you get over your feelings that you were slighted as an employee. There is always two sides to every story. Go on with your life and I wish you the best. Just stop cutting down past graduates of Grantham who have made good.
ALL A DREAM April 3, 2007 at 5:45 p.m.
Focus on the facts instead of focusing on who are employee's or ex employees. This is maddness. Facts and research speak for themselves. Some people are making a mockery out of what is fact here. If you have done your research you will know that most allegations that have been made about Grantham are reality. Just call the school, look on other sites. Everyone can't have a vendetta against these people.... The only mental conditions I detect are the people on this board that are living in a dream in hopes that there degree will actually take them somewhere. most school that have been named for taking Grantham credits aren't any that people have ever heard of. When its time for an employer to hire u or a school to take your credits, they will ask the same question. "WHO IS GRANTHAM?"
To ALL a Dream April 3, 2007 at 6:38 p.m.
I have stated that people have been a success in this and other DETC schools. I have had success with degree transfer.
National and Regional schools are considered equal by the department of education. Yes all people can not have a vendetta against Grantham but you surely do. Their are over 2000 accrediated schools in the U.S. Why does someone have to go to one of the most well known (60 or so schools) to get a good education. Are you saying that because a school is not a household name that it is no good. I applaud Grantham for terminating the employment of this very negative and narrow minded person.
General Comment April 3, 2007 at 6:51 p.m.
Good enough for the Department of Education of The United States of America and CHEA means it is good enough for me.
To miserable ex-employee, How much experience do you have accrediating educational programs?
Response to ALL A DREAM April 3, 2007 at 7:18 p.m.
Actually I am an employee of Grantham and deal with the students on a daily basis. I can't speak for other schools but I can speak on what I know. They may be recognized by CHEA, but unless you are regionally accredited you have no leg to stand on. to all the other people who have transferred credits to other schools-good for you but there is only a handful of them. True, Grantham isn't known as other schools but I wonder why that is. Being they have been around since 1951.That should have been enough allotted time to get regionally accredited and gain Title 4 funding which we don't have.
National Accreditation April 3, 2007 at 10 p.m.
What is really funny is when I was hired, they explained National Accreditation to me. This is what they told me.
You know when you pick up a Star magazine or Readers Digest they have that art school in the back? The one where you draw either the pirate or the turtle and send it back in. They are Nationally Accredited.
What do you think would happen in you received a degree from that "online" art school and went to Disney or Marvel or even your local newspaper to get a job? They would laugh you out the door.
James April 3, 2007 at 11:11 p.m.
Its been a few months since I have returned to this sight and frankly I am appalled by some of the comments being posted. What was supposed to be a useful tool to assist a prospective student in choosing a school, has turned into a cheap tabloid magazine. Putting aside whose sleeping with who, employees getting screwed, misuse of government funds etc... lets get back to point of why this sight was formed in the first place!!!!!
Victor April 3, 2007 at 11:25 p.m.
Like any other product or service, there is nothing to please everybody at the same level. all the opinions are personal opinions and they do noit reflect the true reputation of the school as well as its educational parameters. In my case, I've completed 12 credits already with Grantham. in my initial contact with the educational advisors/sales people or any name you want to give them, they were professional and had all the patience in the world to answer all my questions and to clarify all my concerns. I did the same with other online universities before I start spending my money. Now, that several months have passed, I can honestly say than Grantham University meets the expectations I had, the courses and books are appropriate and the faculty is accesible. The books were compared with local university books, since i used their libraries to study; the indexes, chapters and lessons run parallel and similar topics are reviewed.
Also, it is important to have in mind that when people expresses their discomfort with a service or product-in this case with Grantham- in a very rude way, are people that are not interested with their education at all, their ignorance and lack of goals to succeed is revealed in their words. Grantham University is highly recommended for those who like challenge and are determined to accomplished all tasks-no half/ways- for a good recognition. In regards to credits accepted by other universities, it makes sense that other places won't take all the credits because they would not make any money by enrolling you in only a few credits. Yes, shopping around is the best, and you will find universities that give credit to 50%, 60%, 70%, and 80% of your credits. The rest has to be in accordance with their particular policies and curricula so you can adhere to a new student body, a new study house, and a new institution. I'm aware of that, and I'm already shopping around for those places that gives me the best. I have nothing bad or disappointed to say about Grantham University but the pleasure of better myself with a top notch courses that are already put in practice at my job, where lots of materials have contributed to several training meetings. Keep it up, enjoy Grantham or any other university; education is good!
BLAHBLAAAH BLAH April 4, 2007 at 12:33 a.m.
Its not unfair. The hurricane was a horrible event that caused catastrophe for current people still livng in Lousiana-Grantham hasn't helped Missouri no more than Missouri has helped Grantham. Bottom line before you pass judgement on Grantham employee's, ex employee's know what you are talking about-I will verbally battle you!!!
Former employee and student April 4, 2007 at 2:15 a.m.
You have no clue what you are talking about. Grantham flat out lied to it's Slidell employees, multiple times. You can believe all the lies that your employer is telling you, the truth is out there and has been out there. Forget that Grantham credits are worthless at MOST OTHER universities, the school treated it's Slidell employees like dirt. Fact: The school gave each employee only a few days to move to KC after the worst disaster to hit the United States....ever. If you were not willing to leave your home and family, you were fired. That is the fact. On their own website, they said that they would hold jobs for those not able to come up right away. The truth was, within a week, those who could not come were receiving termination letters. Then they said that Grantham would be returning to LA. Yep, another lie. The list goes on and on. Personally, I'm glad that I stayed because I am earning a nice living making quite a bit more than Grantham was every willing to pay it's employees.
I'm not bitter with Grantham, I understand how a business works. I understand how Grantham felt that their employees were just numbers, just like their students. Look at the way they run their departments. Students are just numbers to them. "We need X amount of TA's today". I remember hearing them say that. Don't make your goal for the week and catch hell from them. I use to work for admissions and I got sick and tired of the way we were treated and the way we were expected to deceive potential students just so we could make our goal. I transfered out of that department and actually took a paycut to do it. I was happy to make less money just to be done with it.
Former employee and student (Part 2) April 4, 2007 at 2:16 a.m.
I fell for the hype as well and became a student while employed. Since it was free and because I was going to receive a bonus at the end, I figured it was a good investment of my time. How wrong I was. After the storm, I wanted to go back to school and contacted multiple online universities as well as local schools. None of the schools I contacted would accept the credits that I received at Grantham. Not one credit would transfer, not even the basic English 101 or History 101. Multiple semesters worth of credits and not one school would even look at them. Am I a little upset? You bet I am. I was told by many people in Grantham management as well as the trainers that Grantham credits would be accepted at quite a few schools. I have yet to find even one. You can say what you want about former employees but I have read every response on this board as well as others and while some former employees have been rather harsh in their replies, none of the responses have been untrue. I'm sorry that you feel you are somehow being treated unfairly by former employees, but they are telling the truth. As someone else said on this board, the proof is being posted in black and white, while the venemous defenders of Grantham offer no proof, just the "What I say is true and you have to believe it because I said so". Hard to swallow, huh?
Appreciate last 2 posts April 4, 2007 at 2:35 a.m.
Choice is yours to make about Grantham. I can care less whether you take this free information that so many have offered for your well being. the choice is yours. Don't say you were not warned.
You can lead a horse to the water but you can't make him drink it!!
Grantham got caught spamming last year April 4, 2007 at 3:58 a.m.
Read about it here:
Outsider looking in April 4, 2007 at 4:49 a.m.
Some interesting information here to be sure.
What I find most interesting is that all of the individuals who are saying that Grantham credits will not be accepted by other schools are posting what look like real emails from other schools confirming that claim. The individuals who are posting that they had no problem transfering credits have posted nothing proving it, just expecting everyone to take their word for it. Come on guys! Out of all the people that claim that their credits transfered, is there not one of you who can come up with something, an email, a website, something from the school you transfered to that says that they will accept Grantham credits?
And to the supposed Department of Education employee that posted earlier, you said "Why does anyone send e-mails to schools trying to get in?". Are you a complete idiot? These are online schools we are talking about. This is the online degree review website. Grantham does not even have a campus. How else is someone suppose to get information from an online school? If this is who the Department of Education is hiring, we are all in trouble. Plus, no Department of Education employee would claim that any legitimate school will give you credits based on your resume. Please, you are only showing how ignorant you are.
General April 4, 2007 at 9:48 a.m.
Anyone who wonders onto this forum please be advised that Most of the negative comments are from Individuals you are employees of Grantham. They feel that they have been mistreated by having been provided a job with good benefits.While they should be helping students complete there education, they are posting comments all over the web.Please stay patient as Grantham weeds these individuals out.These employees have been passed over for promotion for activities such as these and believe they should be rewarded for doing nothing.Grantham has many fine outstanding employees who of course, these Individuals hate.
Please pray for these negative individuals.
To Victor April 4, 2007 at 11:27 a.m.
Finally a voice of wisdom on this forum.
What voice of reason? April 4, 2007 at 12:17 p.m.
You people sound like the Wizard of Oz. "Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain".
You keep saying, pay no attention to the people who are saying that Grantham credits wont transfer even though the proof is right in front of their eyes. You keep saying that, since you are Grantham employees, or "Claim" that you went to that school we should just beleive you on faith, with no proof. Truly pathetic.
To all you employees April 4, 2007 at 12:20 p.m.
If you truly believe in your school and the product you sell, why dont you post your names and extensions so potential students can contact you directly to ask their questions? Get off the breakroom computers and take a few of their phone calls.
Graduate April 4, 2007 at 1:54 p.m.
I graduated from Grantham in 2004. I must say that its was an excellent choice in every way. Transferred degree to Kaplan University(Regional) and now have my masters. I most say that I,as an alumni, am not happy with Grantham now. As we can see here, Employees fighting each other and posting on forums when they should be helping students. I was told that Customer service was getting worse and I can see why, some employees are not doing their job. In the end, I blame Senior management for not dealing with this situation. They should constantly be trying to improve the school. It was once and can be again, a great school!! It just may take a Senior management change and a employee shakeup!
2 "General" April 4, 2007 at 5:42 p.m.
Grantham doesn't have good benefits at all. We were told health insurance would be free when we first were hired, but once we were hired...Grantham pulled us in the conference room and told us that we would have to pay fully for it. What benefits do we have-half off ice cream and pretzels? We work hard everyday here, and these students only wish they knew exactly what actually goes on here. These students want so much not to believe there choice for higher education is stiffing them in every way. Hold on to your pipe dreams, because Grantham doesn't mind taking your money and using it to buy BMW's, F150 trucks, lavish homes in Virginia and 400,000 dollar homes in Kansas City!!
Telling ALL April 4, 2007 at 5:50 p.m.
Seems there was a lot of truth to those RIPOFF REPORTS...The person involved has been demoted and no longer Director.
General April 4, 2007 at 7:29 p.m.
Senior management overhaul is due! Pay and treat Employees well. Take these steps and watch Grantham flourish. It would be as good as it was in 2004.Maybe better!
Low pay is right April 4, 2007 at 9:52 p.m.
Most of the Grantham student support employees were making less than $10 an hour when I left, but the Admissions Reps (Read: Salesmen) were making about $14 and hour plus commission. The only thing was, the Admissions Reps were being fired left and right for not meeting an unrealistic goal that was set for them, or they were fired for "rocking the boat" (Read: complaining to each other on NON company time). Management even went so far as to tell people that they could not go to lunch with certain other people. Are we not adults?
Field Marshal April 8, 2007 at 3:06 a.m.
"Admissions Reps (Read: Salesmen) were making about $14 and hour plus commission"
Last I heard, Instructors (to use the term very loosely) are paid $15 per hour.
That's my point..... April 8, 2007 at 2:31 p.m.
Salesmen were getting paid almost twice what the support staff were paid, and sometimes more than the instructors. Tells you where Grantham priorities are, huh?
Robert April 10, 2007 at 4:06 a.m.
Wow, I'm sure they are able to get top tier college professors paying $15 an hour. That's who I want teaching me university level course work, someone who get's paid less than a waiter. Oh wait, they don't do any teaching. It's up to you to teach yourself, they just grade (if you want to call it that) your papers when they get around to it. What a pathetic excuse for a school this it.
Field Marshal April 11, 2007 at 11:37 a.m.
"Wow, I'm sure they are able to get top tier college professors paying $15 an hour."
EXACTLY
Recent Graduate April 12, 2007 at 10:52 p.m.
I just got my Computer Science B.S. from Grantham, and I'm surprised by all the comments I'm seeing here. I've been interviewing with prospective employers for more than a month now, and have three separate job offers on the table, all the way from $45k a year up to $65k. I've got almost no experience in the field, and so this is a great start for me. None of these folks hiring me has even raised an eyebrow at my degree. All they wanted to know was that the university was accredited, and once they knew that it was nationally accredited, they were fine with it and accepted the degree. Regional and national accreditation are basically the same thing; they don't indicate anything separate really.
To Recent Greaduate April 13, 2007 at 11:44 a.m.
Good for you and I wish you the best, just don't be surprised when you try to get your Masters at another school when they will not accept your Grantham degree.
To Recent Grad April 13, 2007 at 4:10 p.m.
Congrats to you!
Computer Science degrees of any type are in demand.
Some HR departments are not very savvy, as long as you have "A DEGREE" of any type.
General April 13, 2007 at 8:07 p.m.
Grantham Employees who are posting here!!
There is an easy way out of your situation....Quit!
Do they have a gun to your head holding you there!!!
You can walk out the door right now!!!!!
Blame yourself for your situation!! Go out and get another job!!!
In the future, try to mature beyond constantly complaining!!!
2 GENERAL April 14, 2007 at 7:38 p.m.
You know what........Not one single employee care's whether you get a worthless degree from Grantham period!! We as employees have the inside scoop and wanted to share it to current students and students who are looking to possibly enroll! It makes us no difference if a college won't except your degree, because it's not taking or putting any money in our pockets!
To General April 14, 2007 at 8:06 p.m.
Do what you want, we are just getting the information into the hands of the people who may need it. If you want to continue to either attend Grantham as a student or work there as an employee, that makes no difference to me. The point of this board is to get information out and that is what we are doing. As a former student, I can only tell you about my experience, and as such, I can tell you that other schools look down on Grantham and even some employers don't accept a Grantham diploma. If you want a degree that may or may not be accepted, that's up to you. Most people want a degree that will be looked highly upon, and a Grantham degree is not for them.
Inform everyone April 18, 2007 at 4:01 a.m.
Grantham is accredited through DETC. DETC has guidelines on how they process complaints.
From the DETC Web Page:
If you have a complaint about a DETC-accredited institution, please contact Adriene Crossland adriene@detc.org, Assistant to the Director of Accreditation.
202-234-5100 Ext. 105
*******************
Another Education Assocation to complain to is:
American Council on Education
One Dupont Circle NW
Washington, DC 20036-1193
(202) 939-9300
Their website is www.acenet.edu
********************
For Service Members & Veterans:
Those Servicemembers having problems with Grantham should also complain to these people.
Servicemembers Opportunity Colleges
1307 New York Avenue, NW
Fifth Floor
Washington, DC 20005-4701
soc.aascu.org/
800-368-5622
202-667-0079
FAX 202-667-0622
*******************
Don't forget to send your complaint to the VA if you used your GI Bill:
gibill.va.gov/contact/contact.htm
1-888-442-4551
*****************
Also, you might want to send your complaint to the U.S. Dept of Education - Inspector General Hotline:
ed.gov/about/offices/list/oig/misused/index.html
E-mail your Grantham Complaint to: oig.hotline@ed.gov
*****************
It is my opinion that complaining on Ripoff report and posting on internet forums might warn potential students; it does NOT force Grantham to act. Complaining to the RIGHT people (The Government and Military) will make them respond. Since the majority of Grantham Students are Military, it's important for them to seek help from their respective services if they're having problems. If enough complaints are processed, DETC COULD revoke their accreditation, which could cause a chain reaction: The military and the VA GI Bill won't pay for an unaccredited school, which would eventually force Grantham to change their ways for shut down.
GOOD LUCK!
Deployed Student April 19, 2007 at 12:06 p.m.
I have been disappointed with Grantham; the instructor is taking between 5-6 days to respond to my postings. He provides a grade and says "good work or excellent job" but, how do I learn from this minimal feedback. My "counselor" emails me every 3-4 weeks, but seems ignorant of previous conversations we've had ("I'm on my way to Iraq," "I'm in Iraq," "I dont' have email" etc....) I've come to Grantham as I felt in would fill my desire for continued learning, I'm disappointed, and will be applying to other schools at the end of this term.
An instructor April 19, 2007 at 6:43 p.m.
Just want to ask that former students stop generalizing. I work for Grantham as a part-time independent contractor (instructor). I answer my students' emails within 24 hours, and my tests are difficult to pass. Students have to correctly write essays. So, open book or not, means nothing. You are bashing an entire population with some hard-working people. We don't discriminate in this country by race or religion. Let's not generalize an entire group of professionals into the joke you've made of them... I came on this site after my google search of "Grantham benefits" (looking to see if they offer medical benefits if full-time employed) and this came up. How sad. Stop grouping people into clumps. My students email me all the time that I am helpful and courteous. I am kind, and respectful to my military students, especially...
I am disappointed to read all of this nonsense...anger is fine. Take it to the right places.
Let's show a little kindness in return.
2 Instructor April 19, 2007 at 9:18 p.m.
Hi I am a student at Grantham. You say you are an instructor so what happens to be your name?
I know for a fact that instructors that work for Grantham work other fulltime jobs and don't have time or just won't email us students back. It's shameful for instructors to use us as a tool to earn money and forget the whole reason we are attending school. I am throwing in the towel at Grantham because I can't take being called ONLY to renew my tuition and having instructors respond every blue moon!
WOW April 22, 2007 at 3:13 a.m.
I have heard that Grantham is moving back to Lousiana. Anyone have any news on this?
Franklin J. Bonner, MBA April 23, 2007 at 12:05 a.m.
I came across this site by accident and after reading all the Grantham bashes I decided to call the school and ask about classes. OH MY GOODNESS! I was on the phone with someone in "Admissions" and they treated me like I was buying a car - pressure pressure pressure - wanted my credit card number right away - why isn't this school federally funded like other Legit schools? I challenge one of the "top dogs" to answer this question. How about that Director of Admissions everyone keeps bashing.
Note to Instructor April 24, 2007 at 4:36 a.m.
Kudos to you for being professional in the face of this mess. Check out www.higheredjobs.com , you can adjunct for a regionally accredited school starting at a bare minimum of more than double your current salary. I understand if you needed to do it to get something on your CV, but I would upgrade to a better school.
"I work for Grantham as a part-time independent contractor (instructor). I answer my students' emails within 24 hours, and my tests are difficult to pass... I am kind, and respectful to my military students, especially..."
Screwed! April 28, 2007 at 4:55 p.m.
I'm in the military and Grantham just screwed me over. I signed up for a class but they never sent me all the materials, and never returned my phone calls. When I finally got through, all they did to solve my problem was to give me a 15 day extension on my course. Total BS and bad customer service! No im putting in a complaint through the military and doing everything I can do to warn others of this fake institution of learning.
this crap is funny April 29, 2007 at 6:59 p.m.
Any one who would waste their time money on a non-regionally accredited degree is a certified idiot.
I can't say it any simpler than that.
Any college that does not have regional accredidation that trys to pass it self off as a legitimate school should be shut down and its managers/founders imprisoned for fraud.
If you want a respected degree but must attend online, find a state supported college that also has a ground campus.
I agree with the above statement April 30, 2007 at 10:52 p.m.
Try Fort Hayes State University. It's Regionally Accredited and offers a 100% online degree. They do have a campus, but you do not have to attend any classes "in person". They blow Grantham out of the water in cost, and they treat you like a real student instead of just a mark on someones commision list.
Waste of money is right May 3, 2007 at 7:24 p.m.
Grantham is a huge waste of money and time, especially when you can get a degree from a reputable, Regionally accredited school for less cost and be treated better while doing it.
KC May 5, 2007 at 10:50 p.m.
About 99% of what I read is total garbage. The complainers are nothing more than students that don't do their work, at Grantham or anywhere else.
The word is getting out May 6, 2007 at 3:26 a.m.
http://forums.degreeinfo.com/showthread....
This is just too funny. More and more people are reading about this school and can make a judgement for themselves, not just what a sales guy at Grantham is telling them.
KC May 7, 2007 at 4:14 a.m.
http://www.ezripofflawsuit.com/?gclid=CO...
Only person that should go to jail is this guy in the link.
Now do your lessons no matter what school you go to. Grantham is a great school and will have Regional Accreditation shortly. It's accreditation now is good.
I assure you the posters are in the minority. I read this same junk about other schools as well.
Disgruntled employees etc. Students not doing work in a timely manner and complain when things go wrong. Truth hurts!
This is what I would do. Spend my energy on sometime you like better instead. This is my last post. I find this interesting never the less. Like the National Enquirer.
Just a Guy May 7, 2007 at 9:07 p.m.
KC,
Let me put it to you this way. I am an executive recruiter and have been for 15 years. I also teach HR at the collegiate level both online and traditionally.
If you sent me a resume with a Grantham degree on it, I would immediately toss it in the trash, as would every other recruiter I know.
If you apply for a masters program at a regionally accreditied school trying to use your Grantham degree they will not accept you.
For anyone considering higher education avoid schools that are not regionally accredited. Grantham has NO CHANCE of gaining regional accrediation. Save your Time/Money AVOID THIS SCHOOL!!!
Just a former student May 11, 2007 at 12:39 p.m.
KC, I can tell that you are an employee of Grantham, so I understand how you feel the need to stand up for them, but you really need to not buy into the hype that their training team is telling you. Students are doing the work, the work is just not being graded in a timely manner, and to those getting GI Bill, it means they are losing money. When wives of employees are grading proctor exams instead of instructors, there is a problem.
Correction on Accreditation May 16, 2007 at 2:56 p.m.
"Now do your lessons no matter what school you go to. Grantham is a great school and will have Regional Accreditation shortly. It's accreditation now is good"
Grantham is NOT a candidate for regional accreditation, they are not on the list, sorry.
They are also far from being a great school. They are nationally accredited, and a bottom tier DETC school at that.
Going Down Hill! May 17, 2007 at 12:22 a.m.
I started with Grantham when they were still located at Slidell. The Staff was great and my problems were handled quickly. Since they have moved to KC, everything has gone down hill. My emails were never received at Grantham University. Somehow all mail sent from a .Mil domain went straight into a "Junk Mail" folder. The same problem just happened again from a .Gov domain. The staff (especially in the electives/exam department) is incompetent. But what do you really expect from a Distance Learning School. I mean, who really enrolled at Grantham to actually learn anything? All I want is that degree. I'll depend on my military MOS training for the rest.
Regional NO!!! May 17, 2007 at 6:19 p.m.
Everyone knows you can't really get a higher learning type education out of Grantham...Most people are in the Military and just want to get something, some type of Degree! Problem is, they dont research b4 enrolling in this school....Grantham said last year that they would have Title 4 funding by June 2007...Well I must inform you....they don't!! Regional Accreditation...umm NO not going to happen besides it takes years to get this certification....and actually you have to have Title 4 funding in order to apply for Regional Accreditation!!!!!!!!
Please take your education elsewhere and STOP Enrolling with Grantham
the patriot May 26, 2007 at 1:48 a.m.
OK.. heres the deal. I'm former military, an OIF veteran, and currently working overseas. I must have spent the last hour and some change reading these posts. I understand the fraustration not being able to transfer credits to another school of your choice and I understand paying good money for a service, and not receiving timely responses from so called student advisors. This question is directed to veterans, has anyone, who is or has used their VA benefits had any problems receiving those benefits through Grantham? If the answer is no, then I would say there is no problem with Grantham. If you are a working adult who does not have the time to attend a traditional college, then I would think that a school such as this would benefit. If you are a veteran and have had problems receiving your benefits, I will need hard-core proof so that this info can be passed on to other organizations such as the FBI, DoD Office of Inspector General, and a few others; because when it comes to messing with government money.. "they don't play"!
I'm glad I took the time to read all of the comments, because believe it or not, all sides made good points. My concern however, are for the veterans. As a service member, you will never become rich, and we all make sacrafices in the name of our country. So it would definitely rub me the wrong way if veterans were getting screwed out of the benefits they earned with blood, sweat, and tears. So any feedback I get would be helpful. Someone in the forum made a good point, its all BS anyway; I know alot of people who went to nice big colleges and got their 4/6 yr degrees only to struggle as an Asst Manager at McDonalds barely clearing 35k per year. But we all do what we gotta do to survive. Now.. I don't care who is sleeping with who at Grantham, but if VA is honoring its word to me and Grantham is providing me the opportunity to have a shot in today's market.. Improvise, Adapt, and Overcome!!
Semper Fi
No need to improvise, adapt, and overcome..... May 27, 2007 at 7:58 p.m.
Just go to a good school that will appreciate what you did for your country.
Here is the deal. I'm a Veteran. I used GI Bill benefits at Grantham, and I got screwed, big time. The truth is, and they wont tell you this when you enroll, is that you will only be considered a "part time" student while enrolled at Grantham because of all the time they give you to complete your semester. This means that you will only recieve "Half time" pay for your work. IF (and that's a big IF) you complete your semester early, you MAY get your benefits retro. Here is the clincher, you have to depend on THEM to complete your semester, IE: you need to have papers graded, you need responses from instructors, you need your proctor exam sent to your Proctor, and then wait for it to be graded (and Grantham is slow with all of this). Long story short, I was never able to complete my semester early because of all the incompetence that Grantham is full of, so, I only got half time GI Bill benefits. That's about $500 a month. Now, I had to pay $250 a credit hour for five three/four credit hour courses in a semester. So, you pay over $4250 for a semester but only receive about $3000 in benefits because Grantham wont answer your questions in a timely manner or send your proctor exams out on time. Don't even get me started if you need an extention to complete your semester because of their foul ups. You end up OWING money back to the VA.
Look into Fort Hayes State University. It's all online, it's Regionaly Accredited, and you are considered a "Full Time Student" from day one with a traditional semester time frame. All that, and your degree will actually mean something when you are done.
To: No need to improvise, adapt, and overcome..... May 27, 2007 at 11:33 p.m.
TO: No need to improvise, adapt, and overcome.....As it appears, you haven't been doing your home work, again.
I am a veteran and currently receiving full time benefits. Give me a break, You really can't expect to get paid as a full time student if you are taking up to a year to complete your course work.
Website address below:
http://www.grantham.edu/admissions/schol...
Read for yourself "Veteran information packet for an update"
the patriot May 28, 2007 at 1:30 a.m.
I'm glad to get some feedback on the VA benefits matter. I decided to take it a step further. By sometime Monday, I'm expecting a response from the Missouri Education Dept, BBB, Dept of Education, etc to get any and all information they have on Grantham whether its complaints, investigations, reports of wrong doing, etc. Thanks for the feedback and I will look into FHSU as a backup.
Grantham CHEATERS Caught Red-Handed May 28, 2007 at 2:15 a.m.
The person that sent out the Proctor Exams and several other people working in Student records for Grantham University were "CAUGHT" cheating on tests to earn a degree for themselves. Yessss, this is all true!! I work for Grantham and everything came out in the wash a few days ago.
Figures May 28, 2007 at 3:32 a.m.
It figures that even Grantham staff are cheating on their exams. It also figures that Grantham did not fire them. Just goes to show you that they do not care about anything except making money.
This is how easy it is to cheat at Grantham May 28, 2007 at 3:41 a.m.
It's a piece of cake to cheat on Proctor exams. When Grantham sends you the proctor form, have your proctor fill out the information. Then, make up an alternate e-mail address from hotmail or yahoo or whatever. Before you fax the proctor form back to Grantham, you just white out the old e-mail address and put in your new one. Fax it back and there you go. All your proctor exams will be sent to your new address and you can take your time and get an "A". This is what a lot of Grantham students are doing. I saw it going on all the time. Grantham does not even check up with your proctor, they just e-mail the exam out and wait for it to return. They dont care about making students earn their degee. They are just in it for the proffit.
Question???? May 29, 2007 at 3:31 a.m.
are the 3 amigos's from slidell or kc? if they are from slidell are they going back home? from ripp off reports everytime a employee from slidell gets ready to leave they get in trouble. something always come up? now if we are talking about cheating how come they were not fired? HUMMMM managaement don't have proof. if they investigate them they will have to do it for all including managment. how can you cheat on the proctored exams the questions come from the course guide word for word. no cheating is needed just pay attention to the questions. any sane person can pass it.
Why do you think they are fazing student services out and on june 4 student progress will be sending out porctored exams?
I can agree with the above May 29, 2007 at 12:23 p.m.
When I was with Grantham, by proctor, a LT. in the Navy, never received a personal call or e-mail from Grantham. Just the proctor exam was e-mailed to him. When I was done, he would just scan it in and e-mail it back. No one ever checked up with him to see if I really took the exam or to see if he was even a real person. Like someone above said, I had two other people in my unit going to Grantham, and they made up a fake proctor and sent the information in. They did not even go through the trouble of having a real person sign the form and white anything out. They just made up Lt. So and So or Cmdr. Who's a Madoodle, signed the fake name and faxed it back. No one ever questioned it.
This is how easy it is to cheat at Grantham May 29, 2007 at 12:26 p.m.
If you are paying to cheat....go ahead
If you are serious about a good education ...then do the right thing by taking your exams honestly.
"Cheating" hummmm life presents itself with may opportunities to cheat. People do it all the time. The real question is why?
Again, if you are serious about a good education....then you won't have to cheat
I can agree with the above May 29, 2007 at 12:27 p.m.
Read the above....that is why a signature is required...on the form
a thought to think about May 29, 2007 at 2:49 p.m.
I work at Grantham and I know all who are being investigated and its hard for me to believe that the 3 Amigo's cheated. they took their exams at the school infront of the director himself or if not him some upper manager with authority. They all are in different degree programs. This is what i think happened. According to policy when you get your Associates Degree you get a 2% raise and $2000 after 90 days Bachalors 5% and $5000 in your upcoming check. Think about it. If they had completed their Associates them they are still waiting for their $2000 and if they complete their BA within the 90 days then that will be $5000 in their next check so that would be a total of $7000 managment would have to approve for each of then a whopping $21000. but what really pissed them off they are leaving and going back home in July. Not to mention the others they are investigating. when you start talking about money being given that is when they want to investigate why!!! See his real motives comes from an Employee who was awarded his BA and got all his money and Monday morning he quit. He got his degree an left and is probably making more money now and is at peace. So why not stop eveyone else from doing the same thing that he did. so they called them all cheaters. What better way to not pay someone for doing what everyone will need to have to work at grantham "A DEGREE"!!! Yes that is right. It will be a requirement. If you don't have a degree you will be let go. Just blow your mind!!! i know all of granthams dirty little secrets.
student May 31, 2007 at 7:23 p.m.
what about the ABET accreditation they were suppose to be seeking?
SUPPOSE to be seeking is the right term June 1, 2007 at 12:37 p.m.
Grantham is famous for big promises and little return. They have been seeking ABET and Regional Accreditation for YEARS. They will keep on seeking while their students suffer.
student June 12, 2007 at 12:47 p.m.
I was told it would never be possible for Grantham to receive Regional accreditation due to the fact there is no teaching faculty or students at a campus. If you look at on line schools that are Regionally accredited, you will find they lay out an aggregate of online courses that are offered from many different regionally accredited universities. The best Grantham could do would be to seek ABET accreditation. I thought they were seeking this and had published they had hired some hot shot woman to accomplish this. Turns out that woman is the owners wife.
UoP student June 16, 2007 at 1:58 p.m.
Just yesterday I received a message on my home phone and an email to my military email address from Grantham University. A little over a year ago I started looking around for schools that offer degrees online because I am in the military and work crazy schedules. I am an online student with University of Phoenix and have been taking classes with them for one year and plan to continue my education until I graduate. I honestly do not remember inquiring of Grantham University, but if I did, then why did it take them a little over a year to get back to me? If this is an indicator of their customer service, then I am not impressed.
WOW June 24, 2007 at 6:48 p.m.
The state of Oregon no longer accepts Tuition Assistance or GI Bill aid from Grantham......Woah!!! That says a lot....
Grantham brought "about" 20 people from all over the United States free of charge to come visit the Mall there in....Grantham paid for the hotels and air flights.....Grantham is in turmoil and need people to enroll becuz of all the cancellations....
People should keep cancelling becuz the authorities are VERY ALERT of what Grantham is doing.....Believe me Grantham's light isn't very bright and getting dimmer by the day!
. June 24, 2007 at 8:11 p.m.
Grantham was losing employees AND students at a rapid rate when I was still there. I can only imagine what is going on now. A lot of students were very upset with all the problems they were having before their move. From what I understand, they are having even more problems now.
former adjunct July 4, 2007 at 2:12 a.m.
I was an adjunct at Grantham for about a year. My students told me I was the best at answering their questions---and I thought that odd, given that I had to answer just one question per student per course. Made me wonder. Anyway, once I realized that my students were all completing my course in just two weeks, I tried to get the school to increase the course requirements. In grading the four tests---slowly, I might add---I still was able to spend only just over an hour with each student. Even after adding every-possible comment to their tests---which my students loved-----I was still just earning 18 dollars (gross) per student. Getting $20 and $30 paychecks every month---when you are checking e-mail every day of the month at least five times-----is less-than-fulfilling. I truly thought I could get the school to add material to the course so that the students would get more out of the course---with the side effect of my getting more than that $18 per student (when each student is paying several hundreds of dollars per course anyway). I also tried to re-write the test questions so that they would be more inline with the course objectives (as the course was written by folks outside the field who did not know what they were doing)---but was forbidden from making any changes. After advocating for a couple months for more course rigor and for freedom to modify/correct test questions, the school staff locked me out of my e-mail account. I was never fired or reprimanded----just locked out. The staff loved me as long as I didn't buck their little "scam" system---and threw me away once I jeopardized it. I recommend students steer clear of this "school"---and find somewhere with some rigor and some willingness to provide necessary feedback. I tried to make a difference, folks. So..if I got just $18 per student, where did the rest of the $ go ???
y July 4, 2007 at 4:47 a.m.
Former adjunct, good for you for trying. Good for you for not taking long to get a clue. Good luck, you are off to better things.
Another adjunct July 5, 2007 at 2:27 p.m.
I was paid $15 per hour gross as a self-employed person. So I had to pay both sides of the FICA, etc. Net result is about $9 per hour. Each class I taught earned the university about $32,000 - $45,000 in tuition.
former graduate July 6, 2007 at 10:22 p.m.
Overall: I couldn’t use my degree for progression in the Air Force. I know I will have problems in the civilian world.
Materials: “GOOD”.
Teachers: Need improvement. They need to be held accountable for not meeting student’s needs (i.e. responding to emails). I had an instructor tell me to hire a tutor. I struggled through math class on my own...no help! BTW...not all instructors were bad. Dr. Sutter was great and there have been other good ones. If you’re out there “thank you!”
Institution: Leadership needs to wake up and smell the coffee. You need to listen to its students, instructors, and staff for advice. It’s called process of improvement!
Support: I gave them a "6". I rated it not for the 3 bad instructors I had but for the majority of the instructors that pushed me, emailed me back to do better, or study harder. Thank you! I did learn a lot from them. Overall, the adjunct instructors I had were very knowledgeable and supporting. Grantham should listen to them and take some advice.
Value: It’s poor! I have not advanced in the Air Force with this degree. I have applied for State Jobs in IL...no luck there. It looks as if the only job I can get is the one I currently have. Wake up Grantham...you students need both Regional and ABET accreditation. I have been told by Grantham, We’re obtaining both since 2001. It isn't going to happen...bad on you for not keeping your word Grantham...shame on you!
Use of Technology: It could use improvement. I t does use very good technology for software via distance learning. I think using some hands-on circuit breadboards, multimeter, and a hand-held o-scope would be very beneficial. Also, use video for instructing students on-line.
My comments about cheating: I want to say I never cheated and for those that did...shame on you! You know Grantham’s "Code of Conduct" and its policy about cheating. It’s like any other school; if you’re caught you get in trouble. That should fall more on the person than Grantham because you can not get through life or your next job if you’re a cheater.
I would like to see from Grantham: Obtain Regional and ABET at the same time. Offer a Master's program for Engineering. Start an undergrad program for Electrical and Computer Engineering, Biomedical Engineering, and Biomedical Engineering Technology.
My final comments: Grantham if you can hear me...you know my thoughts since I constantly email about "what my expectations are from you" so wake up and smell the darn coffee. Also, for current Grantham students if you’re going to complain this is a good place, ripoffreport, and the Better Business Bureau. My advice to students is complaining to Grantham’s President, Dean and Provost and let them know just how you feel about the school. Also, let them know you’re unhappy and if things do not change for the better and soon you will take your money elsewhere. . Grantham…its time to act now before it’s too late!
Etienne July 9, 2007 at 2:52 a.m.
I was about ready to start an MBA from Grantham, but will now check elsewhere. I am an Air Force Vet, and have a real BS from A Real University, here in California> The price amd flexibility had attracted me, as it was less than half of other programs, I will look around now, instead!
Investigations July 11, 2007 at 4:39 p.m.
I have seen comments on here saying that Grantham is being investigated. It always is written " I heard that gratham is being investigated by...." Name your source. Where do you see this? I can not find a single document or anything saying Grantham is being investigated. That would be like me saying that I heard Grantham is joining MIT's engineering department. If you dont reference a real source then I have to assume your pulling it out of your chair warmer.
re:WOW July 11, 2007 at 5:35 p.m.
"The state of Oregon no longer accepts Tuition Assistance or GI Bill aid from Grantham......Woah!!! That says a lot...."
"People should keep cancelling becuz the authorities are VERY ALERT of what Grantham is doing.....Believe me Grantham's light isn't very bright and getting dimmer by the day!"
This guy is an idiot. First of all the state of Oregon has nothing to do with Tuition Assistance or the GI Bill. GI Bill is VA funded not State funded. Tuition Assistance could be state funded but tuition assistance is what it is funding provided to a student to pay for college. It could be Federal, State, company, college, or whoever wants to fund it.
To say that the State of Oregon does not accept tution assistance or GI Bill is not only worded completly backwards, (I think you meant to say that if you are a student from Oregan the state wont let you use Grantham for GI Bill or Tuition Assistance) but you are either unaware or just staight lying.
On your last commment about authorities being VERY AWARE about Grantham.
What authorities and what are they VERY AWARE of?? Again name a source for these allegations. I have to assume again you are just making this stuff up.
If you have real facts about investigations and can support with some real documentations not just a link to another blog, then that would be some good info, but to simply slander the college and lie about supposed investigations is pathetic.
Who cares? July 19, 2007 at 5:52 p.m.
Who cares if Grantham is being investigated. They stink, non the less. Investigation or not, people ARE dropping out and going to other school. Grantham enrollments are down and keep going down. Their service stinks, their accreditation stinks, their management stinks, their education stinks. A school where you teach yourself??? Yeah, right.
student July 20, 2007 at 12:26 p.m.
Ever heard of Dr. Percy Spencer? Self taught scientist that invented the microwave oven. What school have you ever attended that transplants the information from the books into your brain. You have to read and study the material to learn. When you teach yourself you know the material. Yeah, its harder and you have to spend more time but I would put my money on a self taught engineer as opposed to someone that does not have the ability to teach themself math or any other science for that matter.
Unhappy with GU July 20, 2007 at 6:25 p.m.
I know I am preaching to the choir here, but it does make me feel better. I began taking classes with GU in 2002 while still on active duty. No, I did not research them. Quite simply, I felt their program had the flexibility I needed to finish my degree.
I actually received an email through the Base from the Top 3 organization stating that several schools, including Grantham, were offering scholarships to the military to cover the cost of 25% that was not being paid by TA at the time.
I enrolled and 4 years later finished my BS in computer science. Soon after that I was looking for a new job and the fact that I had a degree, even from GU, was a major factor in getting the job. Did my employer care where the degree was from? I don't think so; he was hiring me for my experience. However, it is a requirement in this company to have at least a BA or BS degree.
I am currently enrolled in their MBA program and my BIGGEST complaint is the lack of customer service. Like MANY of the post I have read here, GU is only interested in the next semester and the next student AND the money...That’s it. It is nearly impossible to get someone on the phone. They rarely return calls or emails. It is simply terrible. SO after five years, once this semester is finished, so am I. I am looking at transferring (assuming they will accept the credits) to American Military University's MBA program. They are nationally and regionally accredited. My wife takes classes there and it is like night and day compared to Grantham.
That's Grantham for you July 20, 2007 at 7:48 p.m.
They are ONLY worried about the next check you are sending in. Need help now? You won't get it. It's the end of the semester and time to re-enroll? You can not get them to stop calling you. It's all about the money to Grantham. Customer service is not even in the top 10 of their priorities.
Needs Regional and ABET July 21, 2007 at 8:11 p.m.
Grantham used to call me every day about enrollment. I told them sure i would enroll if you are regionally and ABET accredited. There was silence on the phone. SIr, we are obtaining regional in 2008. My reply, I was told back in 2002 Grantham was seeking this and as of today--nothing!
I know they're accredited by the US Dept of Education but many people don't understand nationally accredited. Many believe it’s a lower standard of accreditation--its not!
I think Grantham needs to upgrade to regional and ABET and be done with it--stop milking the students and get the job done.
DETC Accred July 25, 2007 at 2:20 p.m.
SACS Guidelines on Accreditation require a regionally accredited degree.
Here is just a smattering of Google Finds on DETC accreditation.
http://distancelearn.about.com/od/accred......
The Good, the Bad and the Ugly about DETC. “I am happy to say that of the DETC graduates who try to transfer their credits, about 70% are successful today”
“Individuals whose qualifying degree is from a non-regionally accredited institution in the United States (U.S.) will be considered on case-by-case basis” – UTEP
http://admin.utep.edu/Default.aspx?tabid......
“It is expected that the institution will employ faculty members whose highest earned degree presented as the credential qualifying the faculty member to teach at the institution is from a regionally accredited institution” ODU –
http://www.odu.edu/ao/facultyhandbook/in......
Eastern Kentucky warns “You should also know that many educational institutions holding regional accreditation do not recognize credits or degrees earned at institutions that are nationally accredited. This is very important information if you plan on transferring from one college or university to another part way through a degree program, or if you plan to pursue additional degrees at different colleges or universities.”
http://safetymanagement.eku.edu/safety-d......
CPA Licensing requires a regionally accredited degree. This is just one state, but I believe you are able to become a CPA in 2 states with a DETC degree.
http://www.cscpa.org/Content/Students/Pl......
Again, I don't think DETC is bad, but:
*70% of the time your credits will transfer
*Or will have to be considered on a case by case
*Won't qualify you for professional licensing in most states.
That's alot of "maybe", "sort of", for the effort you put into it.
Regional accreditation doesn't have those problems.
Wright August 2, 2007 at 2:59 p.m.
I liked everyone's comments, bad ones and good ones! Grantham is not for everyone, and you can say the same for any school you go to. But, I have been enrolled in Grantham since 2005 and they have done a great job! 1 out of 10 they are a 8. My goal was just to have a degree that I did not have to pay for! And that is all I wanted! I been in the IT business for 20+ years and I have found several useful things that I have learned at Grantham. And, it reflects in my job (example: more pay, job satisfaction, just to name a few). Good luck for those who are still searching for an education!
YEAH WHATEVER August 3, 2007 at 2:25 a.m.
Students are still canceling left and right and Regional Accreditation is years away IF that! Don't be a fool people...and please stop wasting your time, money and efforts on a pipe dream that Grantham will offer a degree of higher learning because it won't!! With living expenses the way it is, you would think that most of you students would use your brains to research other schools beside's Grantham buy here/pay here car lot!
Military Targets of Theft August 3, 2007 at 2:38 a.m.
WOW if you students don't read what the ADJUNCT Instructor went through with Grantham then you have been brainwashed too....IF you students dont take the time and will to want and earn a reliable degree then you too should be taken for your money like all the rest
ok August 3, 2007 at 2:54 p.m.
mostly, everyone who bitches and complains just can't do the work. yes they need ABET accreditation. it would probably increase their business 10 fold.
??? August 4, 2007 at 2:30 a.m.
ok... your comment was idiotic. I hate grantham. I can easily do the work. I just choose to go somewhere were I actually learn something and not from little course guides.
ok August 6, 2007 at 1:16 p.m.
i doubt if you can do the work. if so, you would not be hanging around this website complaining about grantham. i am sure with your great intellect, you should be solving some the worlds greatest engineering problems.
the person above needs a clue or 3 August 7, 2007 at 4:24 p.m.
Is that why you hang around here? You couldn't hack it? To do the work at Grantham does not mean you have to have great intellect. Why would I solve engineering problems? I am not an engineer.
Capital letters are your friend. Is that your stellar GU education at work?
Which dept. do you head?
no more comments from me August 8, 2007 at 12:20 p.m.
no more replies from me. i have engineering work to do, have to earn my $100K+.
you are a liar August 9, 2007 at 2:08 p.m.
I am soooo convinced someone with your "skills" makes 100k. I am far from broke and obviously have a better education from a real university.
You know you are a GU clone, who really has nothing to say. That is why the above will be your supposed last comment.
not a liar August 9, 2007 at 2:32 p.m.
I said 100K+.
Obviously a liar August 9, 2007 at 3:28 p.m.
You stated no more replies too.
Admittedly I only make 60k, but at entry level, I am happy with that. I have only been at my job 4 months.
Congratulations on your salary obviously you need it to feel you are worthwhile.
Big hugs to you.
Old Vet August 9, 2007 at 3:44 p.m.
This is all very interesting. I read old employees that are obviously disgruntled (and quite possibly with good cause), and I read current employees (and very likely senior management) attempting to put out fires. You are both wrong for what you are doing on this board, and you are both guilty of spreading propaganda.
I foung this board because I wanted to know where I could go with the degree. I believe those that state that you can't transfer credits. I think we should be aware of that. But I have credits from bigger schools that wouldn't always transfer. I hear that the staff and faculty suck at returning emails/calls. Be aware of that too (to me that is quite disheartening and a turn off of the school). But here is my bottom line. I am in the food industry now. I spent my time in the Army and have gotten to where I am with my experience from the military, no degree. I need a degree so that other companies or possibly mine, can check off that box that says "Degreed" so that I can either be hired or promoted. I appreciate the information from the head hunter that posted that he would pitch a resume in the trash that stated Grantham as the school. I also appreciate the IT guy that has had success with his degree. We need more insightfull information here along those lines. We get it that some of you are disgruntled. We get it that there are current employees lying here. That is business anywhere you go. But now can we here from REAL alumni?
Real Alumni here August 9, 2007 at 11:33 p.m.
Hello Old Vet. I'm a relativly young vet myself. :) Only 33.
I can say with all honesty that my Grantham degree has gotten me no where that my military experience did not already put me. My boss flat out told me that he hired me because of my military background. He also told me flat out that had I applied and only had the Grantham degree listed with no military background, he would not have even called me back. I asked him why that was. He pretty much told me, "Why would I hire someone who only had to take open book tests to get their degree? I want someone who went to a real school.". It looks like he read up on Grantham.
Truth be told, I have been past up and past over by former employers because of this degree. I know I have lost job opportunities because of it, and I know that I have lost job promotions because of it. I even tried to transfer to another school half way though because of the negative feed back I was getting by potential employers, but no other school would accept any of the credits I earned from Grantham. Not just one or two courses, but every single course I took. None of them would transfer.
If I had to do it all over again, I would not go with Grantham. Take a look at Fort Hayes State or Old Dominion. They have great, totally online degrees that employers will take seriously. They are not self paced like Granthams are, but they are real courses, given by real instructors, earned from a real University.
Best of luck to you Old Vet, and thanks for your service.
student01 August 10, 2007 at 8:40 p.m.
I'm a grantham university student and I have to say that they are on the right path to becoming a great school providing great education to service members. I've seen them grow and I like the direction to where they are headed. Most individuals don't understand accreditation. the same accrediting bodies that give regional accreditation are the same accrediting bodies for the national accreditation. Regional universities don't like to transfer credits from a national accreditation just because they don't belong to the "fraternity". Again I'm happy with the education and service from grantham. I have to agree that 2004,2005 time frame their customer service was questionable,but know it has improved a lot.
Wrong August 12, 2007 at 5:01 a.m.
"Most individuals don't understand accreditation. the same accrediting bodies that give regional accreditation are the same accrediting bodies for the national accreditation."
Very misleading. Regional accreditation is a more stringent, more accepted level than national is by far. Trying to say they are virtually the same thing is misleading at best.
wow, what a suprise! August 15, 2007 at 6:22 p.m.
i have been a student at grantham for a minute but i didn't know about any of the things i have read. Very shocking! Are there any current grantham studens here that could help me out with some course work?
Tim August 23, 2007 at 4:28 p.m.
I have a question. Is it that Grantham is that bad of a school or is it the national accreditation that's the problem? Are there any national accredited schools with good reputations that students wouldn't have problems with when transferring credit?
To Tim August 24, 2007 at 2:54 p.m.
It's a little of both. First, Grantham is not a good school. You can read about all of the problems they have on various websites from poorly trained staff to bad business practices to everything in between. You just will not get a whole lot of support from them.
Second, National Accreditation is good for some things, but by and large, is not accepted by more employers than those schools would like to admit. It's not that they are bad schools because some are fine, it's just that not many other schools and employers take them seriously.
to tim is right August 24, 2007 at 5:29 p.m.
The answer is the most honest answer about the "university" here.
I was staff. I liked the sound of an unanswered phone. I did not have time to consistently answer it or return voice mails. So I didn't, part of that is because I had too much other work and didn't have time for students. Sounds strange, considering the University should be about students.
shani August 28, 2007 at 2:24 a.m.
If youre enrolled with Grantham--take the time to better your situation and CANCEL immediately!! Reading this site made me rethink my education route....I am proud to announce that I have CANCELED Grantham shed them like a snake sheds his skin....I'm done with these thieves.....and now enrolled in a accepted college that will take me to new heights!!
Curious August 30, 2007 at 2:16 a.m.
I have read all of these posts and I am curious why some say the degree is worthless. I e-mailed 3 employers and asked them if a Bachelor's degree in EET from Grantham was sufficient to apply for a job with them and they all said that it was. They all said that they only ensure that the degree is from an accredited organization, whether it be nationally or regionall accredited they didn't care.
Trisha August 30, 2007 at 11:20 p.m.
I'm really confused here. I was thinking of enrolling in Grantham and spoke with someone from admissions. They said Grantham is one of the most prestegious degrees on the market today, everybody respects Grantham.
When I inquired about transfer credits to another school, they said that would be no problem. They went on to advise many students went on to major universities such as University of Fl, University of Mass, etc. There was no problem with transferring credit from Grantham.
I come on this site and see all these post's and it's shocking! The Admissions advisor sounded so convincing.
Can someone help me with the truth?
To Trisha August 31, 2007 at 2:17 a.m.
If a used car salesman was trying to convice you that the baby poop green Pinto was the most prestigious car on the market today, would you believe him? Probably not, because you did your research on cars before you went shopping.
When the Grantham used car salesman tries to tell you that Grantham is one of the most prestegious degrees on the market today, he/she is trying to SELL you something. Do your research. Contact other schools. See what they say. You will be shocked by the answers you receive from them when you mention the name "Grantham".
Grantham Admission Advisors are nothing more than salesmen. The following is taken directly from the Admissions Advisor job posting on their website. These are two of the "skills" that they require:
Meeting and exceeding pre-established sales / enrollment objectives.
Advanced understanding of consultative selling, uncovering buying decisions and understanding customer needs.
In other words, they are salesmen, NOT advisors and NOT enrollment counselors. They need to meet goals, or they are fired. That's the long and short of it. You are just a number in order for them to keep their job. After you enroll, you will continue to be a number, just under Student Retention now. Aint life grand at Grantham.
Trisha August 31, 2007 at 2:41 p.m.
Thanks,
I will do my homework and continue to search for a good online school. Does anyone have a suggestion for a reputable online school?
To Trisha August 31, 2007 at 5:59 p.m.
Without a doubt, look into Fort Hayes State University. They have a campus in Fort Hayes KS. but you can get your degree 100% online. Regional Accreditation, great staff. It's not self paced, but the instructors actually instruct you. I have no affiliation with FHSU, but have a few friends that went there and they were VERY happy with the experience. Even better news, they are cheaper than Grantham on tuition.
Just a Guy September 2, 2007 at 9:02 a.m.
Curious,
They said you could "apply" they did not say they would hire you! You can "apply" without any degree at all.
another guy September 3, 2007 at 11:19 p.m.
I say for all you DRANTHAM students if you do leave do the right thing and let upper management know why you're leaving. I think Grantham needs to rethink its support for its students (e.g. Abet & regional accreditation). This should be its #1 goal before 2008.
Do YOU & the other students justics let them know why you're leavibg, going to a better school because that';s what will make them change.
Good luck!
To Trisha: September 7, 2007 at 2:52 a.m.
What is your intended major?
That will help us point you towards a reputable school.
Trisha September 8, 2007 at 3:13 a.m.
Psychology. Thanks for any help. A friend of mine mentioned American Military University and said it was a great school. I haven't heard of it. I looked at Argosy University but it was too expensive.
Shahaila "Shay" September 10, 2007 at 8:17 p.m.
There you go my name.
If you worked for Grantham before the hurricane or in KC in the beginning you know who I am. You probably know what happened and have read the letter I wrote when I left Grantham. After all this I cannot believe how bitter people still are about it. Move on.
I left Grantham and had a job with a company that paid more within weeks. My "sales" experience at Grantham got me the job. Then I decided to move back to California and have a job making 3 times the money I did at Grantham but my experience with Grantham helped me get this. I did not leave with a happy go lucky feeling. I left under bad circumstances. But Grantham was a stepping stone in the career path I am on today. It taught me a lot about business.
Grantham has it's purpose. Any smart person does their research before making any big life decision so why not someone looking to start school? Do your research. Grantham is not a horrible school for everyone. It is also not a great school for everyone. Do your research.
For all the still bitter employees, move on. There is so much more to life, look at it as an experience that has done something to make you a better person. Either it taught you a lesson or you had good memories. It did both for me.
Also, if you research ABET and Regional you will see that both take a great deal of time to achieve. I am not sure that Grantham will ever get there but not everything happens as soon as everyone wants it to.
If you have any questions go ahead and email me. Shahailab@aol.com.
grantham student September 12, 2007 at 12:33 a.m.
Shahaila "Shay"
I think 6 years is enough time to obtain both ABET and Regional. I started way back when it was said by the school every year they're working on both and NO RESULTS.
Its a great school and they can obtain both if they want too. I think its going to take a loss of students to make it happen so management can rethink its strategy.
I would recommend it however; for engineering w/o ABET and Regional your degree means very little to outside agencies that know about both accreditations and governement jobs trying to hiring you.
just my two cents.
Former student September 12, 2007 at 3:42 a.m.
Your degree will mean very little regardless. The school is a sham.
soon to be former grantham student September 15, 2007 at 9:35 p.m.
Former Student,
I agree my electrical engineering degree has no weight for obtaining an Air Force Comiision because it lacks both regional & Abet accreditation.
Unless the obtain these in 2008 I am leaving and going to a school that offers both.
Pareto's law states that 80% of your problems & students will leave unless you fix the 20% (e.g. regional & Abet accreditation).
Sorry GU...you need to "Man up" and fix those two things.
Ryan September 17, 2007 at 5:05 p.m.
Look I am in the military and very busy... Please stop posting negative things about grantham because your going to eventually ruin a good thing. My buddys and I are getting free diplomas through your tax dollars without doing anything, it the american dream!!! Please keep your comments to yourselves, I am enjoying the life... LOL
PS: Im Cheating my way through life, one days at a time!!!
So proud September 18, 2007 at 2:06 a.m.
So proud ryan that you represent our country.
You aren't funny and you are pathetic.
former student September 18, 2007 at 10:59 a.m.
You are full of crap. For all of you that complain about how easy the school is, pick up the engineering books for the EET final semester. Go through them and then tell us all how easy the school is and how easy it is to cheat. No way you can wing it.
prospective Employee September 19, 2007 at 12:30 a.m.
Of the employees that have posted here were any of you Student Progress Reps? I have been offered a job and would like to know what I would be possibly making an hour an to know if it is worth it. Or should I just walk away from any offer. Thanks
former employee September 19, 2007 at 2:08 a.m.
Prospective employee,
As a student progress rep, your job will be to call and bug students to re-enroll. You will not really be helping them with their progress at all. You will probably get about $10 an hour (if that). Oh, and if you dont make goal by getting so many TA's and re-enrollments, you will be fired.
run fast September 19, 2007 at 2:36 a.m.
I was a Student progress rep. At 10.00 an hour and the ridiculous management. You can do much better at McDonald's. I am sure you are qualified to work at a much better place.
I also say run September 19, 2007 at 11:30 p.m.
Not to mention that management will threaten to fire you at least 3 times a week. They love to hold that over your head. Not a nice place to work.
Grantham Student September 22, 2007 at 8:40 a.m.
I currently am attending Grantham University and will be completing my degree after next semester. I have read everything on here and most of the threads are things that I have been concerned with myself. However most of the posts on here are misinformed at best. First of all, transferring credits from school to school is never the approach you want to take in the first place. I started my degree when I was in the Marine Corps and until I started with Grantham I was taking classes at whatever school was where I was stationed at. Because of this I now have 5 schools that I have to get transcripts from whenever I need them. As far as transferring credits in the first place. Here in Arizona there are 3 major public schools. University of Arizona, Arizona State and Northern Arizona. University of Arizona will not accept transfer credits for degrees from the majority of classes at the other two schools. It is a matter of curriculum, and of course money. However with that said, I have spoken with multiple state Universities about Law School once I graduate from Grantham. All of them so far, while stressing that the demand for higher LSAT scores would be needed, would take a bachelors degree from ANY accredited university, National or regional. I have also spoken with my own employer and multiple Goverment agencies about employment, in specific the CIA and FBI. My own employer, Texas Instruments, stressed the quality of education that is demonstrated by distance education schools, regional or nationally accredited (Ie. University of Phoenix - regionally accredited). They see these schools as subpar compared to traditional schools. With that said I have been offered a promotion to management after I graduate. As far as the Goverment, while the FBI's website does state regionally accredited schools, the recruiter assured me that a nationally accredited school would suffice for the degree requirement as well, and would be seen just as any other degree.
The best advice that I can give is that if it is available to you go to a traditional school. Grantham's quality of education cannot touch these schools. However, if you are unable to do this, then Grantham is a fine school. What you put into it is what you get out of it. The classes that I took seriously I learned a lot from, the other classes I took the tests, took my A and moved on. If you are considering Grantham then I do recommend it with those cautions, it is an excellent way to complete a degree. The accredidation is there so you are safe knowing that you won't be fired from your job for having a fake degree. Finally once you start your degree with Grantham, finish it. In the end it will take me two years to complete my degree. Once I have my Bachelors the doors are open to me. I plan on continuing my education with possibly other Bachelors degrees, more probably advanced degrees.
jon September 23, 2007 at 3:21 p.m.
i don't go to grantham!! thank you to everyone who posted on this board.
rule #1 for college - go to a REGIONALLY ACCREDITED school!! don't waste your time with anything else.
Shay September 24, 2007 at 12:48 a.m.
6 years is not always enough time. They were in the process of moving to Kansas City to become regionally accredited because the accrediting agency in that part of the country is more linent with online schools then the one in Louisiana was. Which is why they were moving "part" of the campus up there before the hurricane. I am not saying that it is good or bad. I just know that for a lot of my students it was a good fit. They wanted it either for their Military promotions or to promote within the company they were at. The same company that paid for their education. I know that many many really good employers not only accept the degree but will also pay for it. I know this, not because Grantham told me this, but because I actually got the payment receipts from the employers. My point is that there is so much more out there for the people who worked for Grantham. It is a stepping stone. Use it to your advantage. I left on bad terms with them, but I would never say that students do not get something out of it. Because I believe that the ones who are going into it for the right reasons do get what they came for. I just want to know why anyone would "sell" something or work for something they do not believe in. Doesn't that make you a fraud too?
No Shay September 24, 2007 at 4:48 a.m.
Not a fraud, which is why we are no longer with GU.
BS September 24, 2007 at 7:24 p.m.
As I read through the posts, I'm curious..It was suggested back in February that all the people bashing Grantham should contact the Better Business Bureau with their "legitimate" complaints. If all of the negative things I have read about Grantham are true, how come there are no new complaints listed on the BBB site? Could it be that the vast majority of accusations against Grantham are untrue? (Please don't tell me to check some other "bashing website" for the "truth". When I read it on an established, respected website, I'll believe it.)
To BS September 25, 2007 at 12:20 a.m.
Go ahead and sign on Mr. BS. Get treated like someone who is buying a used car. Get lied to. Get ignored. Get laughed at by a potential employer. Then come back and tell us how great your Grantham experience was.
To BS September 25, 2007 at 10:55 a.m.
About 50% of the negative comments are from the one person that answered you.
Annoyed September 25, 2007 at 3:20 p.m.
Whats worse, it looks like this guy is a true to form griefer-flamer; no sense in arguing.
I am currently a student, due to finish in March of 2008. Once I finished my AS EET, I was hired on in California for a 20% increase on my old pay. My experience was the deciding factor, as well as my licensing; this degree allowed me to shed the nafarious label "or military equivalent" under education on my resume. My current employer has indicated they will not only pay for the program, but are offering a position for the day I graduate.
Communications between myself and instructors has been good and bad; some respond within a day or two, others up to a week.
Administration is hit-and-miss; so far they have lost my transcripts once, and I must have my proctor keep copies of the exams "just in case." I can confirm the badgering for re-enrollment, but my SPR has called & E-mailed periodically to check up on me.
Curriculum has been mixed; up to my AS it was a walk in the park, but only because I already had higher math and programming experience. I can honestly say the books offered have made excellent desktop references. The upper-division coursework is a surrealistic flippin nightmare, with Physics, Calculus, and Discrete Math leading the charge. I hear the last semester is even worse.
In order for me to complete my current semester (and previous for that matter), I have had to dedicate 3+ hours on weeknights, and 8+ hours on the weekends to meet the full time deadline. If you don't have a great deal of time to commit in your life, or the discipline to put a gun to your own head, I would not attempt a Grantham Degree.
I will write a course-by-course, book-by-book review once I have completed this program.
Hopefully this gives some insight to those looking to enroll, or those that are unsure and looking for piece of mind.
TO BS September 25, 2007 at 3:21 p.m.
If you think the BBB is respectable, a GU degree would be perfect for you.
BS September 25, 2007 at 7:04 p.m.
OK. So even if you don't think the BBB is respectable, why does Grantham continue to show up as an accredited institution on the DETC and CHEA databases? I would think if all the "problems" indicated in the above posts were real, their accredidation would have been long since revoked.
. September 25, 2007 at 11:35 p.m.
Uh, because they are accredited by the DETC?
Just a guy September 26, 2007 at 3:45 a.m.
Personally, I think all the pro-Grantham crowd here is Grantham employees trying to put out the flames. Notice that only a few of the anti-Grantham group is telling you not to go. Most are just saying to check it out carefully. Most of the Pro crowd is saying that everything is cool and you should sign up. Yep, just more Grantham car sales techniques.
to Just a guy September 26, 2007 at 2:37 p.m.
Here's a good example: www.cooks.edu
Accreditation not recognized, useless degree. Open-book coursework, no proctored exams. They have never changed the answer keys, so "students" just swap answers; they never actually have to read anything.
I watched a guy get promoted to Engineer, then ultimately Branch Manager with a degree from Cook's. I think he clears 90+K a year in that position. His friends are all engineers, all degrees from Cook's. The sad part is, once everyone found out Cook's was a complete sham (we call it the "Cookie-cutter" degree), the company was powerless to do anything about it.
not powerless September 28, 2007 at 2:11 p.m.
On two seperate occasions, I have seen people fired for fudging education requirements.
Mr. B September 30, 2007 at 9:16 p.m.
You cant tell me that someone gets a bogus degree and cant be fired. That's crap. If an employee of mine tells me he has a degree, first, I check up on it. Then, if by some weird ripple in time and space I hire him thinking he has a "real" degree and I find out otherwise, he's gone. Let him say otherwise.
Mr. E September 30, 2007 at 11:56 p.m.
I don't think it was a principle issue that kept them off of the chopping block so much as it was seniority, and the fact that the Cook's debacle was allowed to continue for enough time that it represented a large number of employees in certain areas.
Utilimately, once the jig was up on Cook's, the employees that benefitted were grand-fathered in, and the remaining workforce and newly hired no longer had the option of promotion w/ a Cookie-Cutter diploma.
outsider looking in... October 7, 2007 at 5:17 p.m.
To Mr B & Mr E,
FYI...
Grantham is accredited according to the US Dept of Education. Cooks EE program is not so you can not compare these two universities fairly. Grantham is DETC accredited and by law that is no different than a regional facility. Both are not Abet accredited but both do have all the requirements listed for students taking an abet accredited program. This is good!
Grantham does offer proctored exams, not all tests or quizes are open book as mentioned above, and the exams are online. Online tests, you can't swap the answers with other students; once you exit the exam you're test is done so Grantham makes those tests very difficult and hard to cheat on. Honestly, in my opinion, it doesn't matter what univeristy you attend if you're a student if you want it badly you can find ways to cheat to get ahead. Personaly, I believe sooner or later those people will get caught since you can't cheat your way through the job and promotions.
I think employers on here SHOULD give Grantham students a chance...you would be surprised at what they can DO. E.g. I have seen its students build complex ciruits using workbench and troubleshoot those circuits with simulated o-scopes, DMM, etc... Today's technology those simulated oscope made by tecktronix was the same model we use at work. I was so impressed at how realistic it was. Also, math Grantham students study Calc 1,2,and 3 or discrete math, etc (other include physics 1 & 2, C#,C+,C++ all of these with lab exercises). The labs include software such as Microsoft project, Motorola M68000 Microprocessor Developer System, Motorola ASM68K/EMU68K, Microsoft Visual Studio.NET (C++) and more.
My recommendation since I am in management is that you always do your reserach. Most important is accredited univeristies by US dept of Eduucation so if a college is not listed I think its a diploma mill. Abet is another I don't think a college should have the accreditation but its more important it follows Abets critera which Grantham has both of these characteristics.
My point is hire the best qualified candidate no matter where he or she hailed from college. Trye expereince I knew a gentleman hired that graduated from Clemsen Univeristy and was a citadel graduate but was not worth the price we were paying him. Actually my boss hired an online engineering techologist or applied enginner and he was able to get the job done. Bottom line for me is can you get the job done!
so I would interview and hire someone from grantham to give them a chance. It's an accredited university so I would hope you would do the same.
However; I agree a degree from cooks is not accredited so i would have a difficult time with hiring that employee.
Please do not take offense this is just my two cents...
Take care,
Mr. C
Mr. E October 8, 2007 at 7:06 a.m.
Why do you think I brought it up?
What better way to add legitamacy to an organization than to shed light on the imposters?
Perspective is everything.
Besides, I work with a USC graduate in MS EE that is not worth the air he displaces, let alone the tuition that his last company paid to send him (bad attitude, hides behind his credentials).
What do they call it... "University of Spoiled Children"
Mr C October 8, 2007 at 11:41 p.m.
My point is Grantham University is a legit and accredited college. I would have no problem hiring an individual that graduated from there...must have a positive attitude.
In your case; I see your point and what a waste. Attitude is everything!!!He might of graduated from USC but it means nothing to me if he can;t get the job done. Good lick with that!
BTW...in your case that guy who was an USC graduate really means University of Cook's instead of Carolina. lol!
Sorry for offense to all other USC graduates but this guy does sound like wasted space to me. I would be ashamed if it were me.
just my two humble cents.
Mr. C
Mr. f October 9, 2007 at 2:34 a.m.
It's good to see so many Grantham employees that are willing to come on here and state that they would hire Grantham graduates. Way to try to pump up those enrollments!
To anyone that plans on attending Grantham, do your homework first. Ask around to potential employers and see if they would hire someone with a Grantham degree. You would be surprised at how many would not, regardless of what the Grantham spin doctors and kool-aid drinkers will tell you. The point is, dont drink the kool-aid unless you know what flavor it is first.
Mr. E October 9, 2007 at 3:02 a.m.
Thanks for that, whatever that was.
Mr. f. October 9, 2007 at 11:40 p.m.
Mr. E,
It's called the truth. Something that Grantham has a hard time telling.
To Outsider from other Outsider October 10, 2007 at 12:55 a.m.
"My point is hire the best qualified candidate no matter where he or she hailed from college"
I absolutely agree with that statement. I always say that the degree gets you the interview, you and your experience get the job. I personally couldn't tell you where most of my peers graduated from.
That being said, we are one of many large employers that require degrees to be regionally accredited (a higher level than Grantham) as a quality control check.
Many of our positions require professional licensing. Grantham, because of their DETC accreditation, does not qualify in the vast majority of states to be licensed.
For the same money and same effort, you can find a quality distance program that is regionally accredited.
To outsider October 10, 2007 at 3:49 a.m.
Actually, for LESS money and same effort, you can find a quality distance program that is regionally accredited. A great school to look at is Fort Hayes State. Grantham charges $250 a credit hour. Fort Hayes State is under $200 a credit hour and is regionally accredited and well respected. You will have no problem with anyone turning you down because of your degree. Old Dominion University is another one. Great schools, both of them.
Matt Kimbrell October 10, 2007 at 6:13 a.m.
I think there is one or two people who get on here every day and write terrible things about Grantham to defame them for whatever reason. I don't know why you have such a bad feeling for them, but it is ugly. I am putting my real name and will tell you I am from San Diego and work at Camp Pendleton as an RF Engineer/Program Manager. I graduated from Grantham with a BSEET then from Pepperdine with a MBA.
I wish there was an IP monitor on this site so that you could see that the same discruntled man/woman has been making the majority of the comments. I personally believe it is the same "Jason" that wrote in the ripoff report and that same "Jason" that was on the Grantham online blog via the student/alumni portal saying they were DROPPING OUT of grantham. All I have to say about "Jason" is that you will never finish your degree if you continue to have that attitude.
Mr. E October 10, 2007 at 6:32 a.m.
Hear, hear.
I think we are witnessing first hand why an institution needs some kind of minimum requirement (or at least a psychological evaluation) to it's enrollees; this is a goal that literally anyone can attempt, but few follow through to completion (and there are ample reasons and justifications [read: challenges] to stop instead of putting out). And what better way to lash out at the "tormentor" than an anonymous site. Ultimately it provides a faceless way to push blame to an instituition, instead of looking inward to one's flaws. Not everyone can teach themselves, and not everyone has self-discipline. Everyone, however, is capable in finding fault in anything but themselves.
Also, Mr. Kimbrell, it is nice to see some fellow alumni join me in this fight.
-Derek
To all October 10, 2007 at 12:50 p.m.
I wish we did have an IP monitor here. That way you can see how many Grantham IP addresses are posting here. I would bet that over 75% of the "Grantham is great" posts are from employees and management of Grantham itself who monitor all these boards and try to do damage control.
CFO October 11, 2007 at 9:22 p.m.
I would like to know where these Grantham Grads are applying, and what companies have decided not to hire you bases on your Grantham Degree. I am a CFO of one of Ohio's largest manfacturing companies, employing over 5,000 men and women. When my HR Department does their resumes reviews, I assure you they do look up every college that every applicant has attended and do a review. If the did, I would fire them for wasting companies time. Futher more, most of them do not know what accreditations mean what. Look, a degree will get you am interview, and the bottom line is, you have to get the job, by presenting (selling yourself) to your employer. If having a degree from a "regionally accred." school will make you feel more confidant in interview room, GU is not for. If you just need to get to the interview room, and the rest is history, then by all means get the degree and go make some money.
Mr. C October 11, 2007 at 11:58 p.m.
Mr. F
I can assure you that I am not an employee of Grantham University. I simply wanted to give my advice from my management's point of view.
I know people working at TI that are not licensed engineers. Honestly, as long as the college is accredited you can still work as an engineer ut without the license you do not have the title.
just my two cents...
Good luck to everyone!
Mr. E October 12, 2007 at 12:33 a.m.
Mr. F,
I admit that I am a student of Grantham University, and my comments contributed are (naturally) biased.
But with a promotion in my future in sync with graduation in March, I can personally attest to the acknowledgment of the degree. Granted, if I were entry-level seeking to change careers, this degree would not do me a great deal of good without experience. Luckily, I have 10+ years in electronics, 5 of which have been system-design oriented. This only "checks the box" for my program manager so he can promote me without setting a precedent that others may interpret as unfair.
Also, as a student, I cannot sit back and idly allow a few disgruntled people to spread outright lies.
Truth about the VA:
The VA will pay for your Grantham education, tuition and some. At first, I was half-time, and I was ticked. But, as it turns out, since I completed the semester within 19 weeks (12 credit minimum with the VA), the full-time amount was back-dated and I received a lump sum payment. This payment plus what I had received totalled $5,250. Tuition at the time was $2,650. This pattern has continued to date, and I am now finishing my 7th semester. The overage was tax free, so I banked it for my kids. I would not have been able to financially swing this program if I hadn't had a credit card with a limit high enough to float 2 semester's worth of tuition. The VA just moves too slow to be relied upon to make timely payments on a loan.
A note on service: It sucks. That's fact. Student progress is getting better, but in the beginning I could not get action without going through concerns@grantham.edu. Now, my e-mails are answered in a day or two. I have never asked a question of an instructor, so I cannot comment on the turn around for course-content type of questions. Also, I could not meet the full-time deadline if I had to wait on every test to post before continuing. I submitted, pushed on, and figured I would let the chips fall where they may.
Cost: Contrary to what I have read here, Grantham did not raise my tuition costs to $250/CH like the money-hungry bastards that you would think they were by reading the posts here. They have charged me the same bulk rate since day 1. Maybe it is a grand-father thing.
Mr. E (cont) October 12, 2007 at 12:34 a.m.
Curriculum: Challenging, if not just cruel. The worst classes (time & energy-wise) were:
Precalculus
Calculus I (These 2 will make or break your adventure with Grantham)
Calculus II
Programming in C (labs were a nightmare)
Discrete Math
Programming in C++ (labs were a nightmare)
Physics I (open-book did not save me, I failed the final exam and had to retake)
Physics II
I will admit, I did not enroll in Grantham's EET program with good intentions; I did it to get promoted quickly in my current job. I figured with all of my transfer credit and electronics knowledge I would have the program stitched up in about 6 months. Not only was I wrong, but I thought there for a time I had bitten off more than I could chew. Making the full-time deadline is a challenge into itself, let alone getting past the administrative delays. Now I am in semester 7, 2 years total investment.
So, there it is. A bit of background, and maybe enough to convince you (as if I really care what your twisted, bitter, hateful mind thinks) that I do not work for Grantham.
To all October 12, 2007 at 4:16 a.m.
You say I use to work for Grantham, I say you still do. The truth is, who really cares. The people reading these posts sure don't. They are only looking for answers. I'm just one of many who post here, but I've never said, in any of my posts, NOT to go to Grantham. I've always said, call around but don't be surprised by what you hear. That has always been my advise to anyone looking into that school. Call employers and call other schools. Don't believe everything you read on the internet, good or bad. Find out for yourself.
To To all October 12, 2007 at 11:06 a.m.
O.K. let them find out. I work as an engineer for one of the largest defense contractors and they have always paid for Grantham courses. Yes, the ABET accredidation would certainly help the school and students. That way the graduates could test for professional licenses or apply for many Master Degree Engineering Programs. To those who say the degree is worthless, it hasn't been worthless to me.
Tameka October 15, 2007 at 10:23 p.m.
Hmmm Grantham said they would have TITLE 4 funding by June 2004...Hmmm, June/July has come and gone and NOTHING YET!! That whole Grantham crew are milking you idiots and you just won't see it! Basically I can care less because its your money/tuition assisatance/VA not mine! Anyone who believes in Grantham are suckers....you deserve to be taken advantage of! See Grantham is smart....they come along with huge promises and never fall through all along gettin rich off your dime.......Get it together folks! Grantham is like Peter Popoff or Jim Jones cult just drawing you people in and going in for the kill!!
Some of you have already drank the tainted KOOL AID....others don't be a victim!!!
Mr. E October 15, 2007 at 11:11 p.m.
LOL.... who are the bigger idiots? Those that use what's available to succeed in their given situations, or those that spend their time spreading lies, trying to rationalize washing out, or getting fired?
Honestly, move on. Go to UoP, maybe you will have better luck there (teaching, rep, student, whatever).
Does it matter October 17, 2007 at 1:43 a.m.
You can put all the BBB and CHEA stuff you want on there. What you have posted is all true, no one is disputing that.
For those that want to enroll, I say go for it. Just make sure you call other schools and potential employers before you invest time and money at Grantham. When you are ready to move on and get your Masters, you may be surprised at who will not accept a Grantham degree. When you are sick and tired of not getting support, you may be surprised that other schools do not think so highly of Grantham. Like I said, it's your money and time. Just inform yourself before you invest either.
. October 17, 2007 at 2:52 a.m.
Wow, the Grantham employees are out in force today.
Filler is right October 17, 2007 at 11:28 p.m.
All that Grantham stuff if just fluff that Grantham wrote and released. Good try though.
Blah October 18, 2007 at 3:29 a.m.
See? Even unbiased statistics tell us that you are a moron. Scientific proof that the insipid and unmotivated will fail no matter where they attend. Stop blaming GU, put on that paper hat, and play your role in this life. SOMEBODY has to take my order, it might as well be you.
"Would you like fries with that?"
Keep saying it to yourself, and you should make managment in no time.
To Blah October 18, 2007 at 12:48 p.m.
Wow, you are truly ignorant. "Statistics" and "Unbiased" do not belong in the same paragraph, let alone the same sentence. ALL statistics are biased in some form or another. The truth is, Grantham wrote most, if not all of the press releases that you posted a few days ago. I even know the guys that wrote them, so there goes your "unbiased" part.
In addition, your rambling incoherent posts say nothing about what a horrible school Grantham is. They say nothing about how you will not get support after your check is cashed. They say nothing about how you will be treated during, or after you graduate.
Anyone can surf the web and copy and paste so called "facts" and press releases. Anyone can post on here saying that they were able to go on and get their Masters with a Grantham degree. Where is the proof? Others have posted actual e-mail responses from other schools, complete with contact information, saying that they WILL NOT accept a degree from Grantham. They specifically sited Grantham. When others, such as yourself, have said that "such and such school accepted my Grantham degree" an e-mail was posted here, again, with complete contact information, that they indeed would not.
In closing, you can continue to post your "unbiased" Grantham press releases and "facts" that have nothing to do with Grantham directly. Most people will continue to see through your veil and the ones that dont will probably enroll anyway. That is the way of Grantham, always has been, always will. Thats the Grantham motto: "Why bother improving when we just put a spin on it and sell it anyways."
Keep on posting Grantham employee.
Ha! October 18, 2007 at 2:24 p.m.
Yes, I can only imagine the phone calls....
Hello, I am some guy wanting to attend your school/work for your company, but I won't be actually applying until I finish a 4 year degree. I just wanted to know.... will you hire me/accept me?
What a crock. I would laugh too.
Also, who attends ANY University with intention of transferring to another school? It's like dropping out is already part of the agenda. Make a plan, and stick to it. If the service sucks, bitch, but stay the course.
I too have felt the pangs of intransferrable credit, but it was from regional to regional. These problems you bring up have nothing to do with Grantham.
Tips October 18, 2007 at 11:54 p.m.
Questions You Need Answered
Is the institution accredited and by whom? Is the accrediting association recognized by the US Department of Education or CHEA (Council for Higher Education Accreditation)? (it is important to note that if the institution is not regionally accredited, you may have difficulty having the degree recognized by other universities and employers.)
If not regionally accredited, what transfer institutions or employers have accepted its credits and credentials?
Are there any residency requirements?
How long has this program been enrolling students?
What other institutions offer similar programs and do they grant the same credential for similar work?
What have graduates of this program done with their credentials?
How are course materials made available to students?
Where can the qualifications and current professional activity of the faculty be found in writing?
What academic, linguistic, and technical skills does the institution require for students enrolling in this program?
What equipment must I have access to and how will the institution help me in any problems that arise concerning the interface between my equipment and their offerings?
What non-classroom services are provided for distance education students?
Is there a student handbook for distance education students? If not where are these issues addressed?
What is the institution's refund policy if I should have to withdraw from this program?
How can I assure outsiders that the degree represents an assessment of my work rather than that of someone else?
What plan does the institution have for the continuation of this and other programs for the foreseeable future?
Where is there official written representations of the faculty's qualifications, the program's course sequence and requirements, the nature of student/faculty interaction and assumptions about technical skills?
References October 18, 2007 at 11:56 p.m.
Web Sites for Distance Education
Distance Education & Training Council
detc.org
The national accrediting commission for educational institutions that offer post-secondary distance learning and home study non-degree and degree courses through the master's degree level.
Adult Education and Distance Learner's Resource Center
geteducated.com
They offer the Virtual University Gazette, a free email monthly that describes new academic and corporate distance learning programs and features on distance education.
Distance Education Clearinghouse
uwex.edu/disted/home.html
Distance education news plus more links.
Peterson's Education Center
petersons.com/distancelearning/
Use on-line databases to search for your ideal distance learning course; read articles on various distance learning topics.
United States Distance Learning Association
usdla.org
To Ha. October 19, 2007 at 12:10 a.m.
No your trilobite, you dont call and say: "Hello, I am some guy wanting to attend your school/work for your company, but I won't be actually applying until I finish a 4 year degree. I just wanted to know.... will you hire me/accept me?"
What you do call and say is: "I am thinking about enrolling/am enrolled with Grantham University, a DETC nationally accredited school. Will you accept their degree as a prerequisite for your Masters Program/employment?
It's that simple. Say that and listen to their response. I already know what most have told me. I'll let you find out on your own.
Good luck Grantham employee.
Wierd October 19, 2007 at 1:31 a.m.
The above taken from
http://www.ftc.gov/bcp/conline/pubs/busp...
Now, I thought the Federal Trade Commission is a legitimate source of data, but of course, you will refute that as well.
Funny, they don't plug any of the hate blogs as credible resources.... I wonder why?
MAYBE BECAUSE ONLY DROP-OUTS HAVE ANYTHING TO SAY.
Those that finish, move on to get jobs. I seem to be the only graduate that has picked up 2 promotions because of this BSEET... I guess I am the lucky 1 guy that Grantham delivered it's promises to.
OH wait, thats right... I WORKED MY ASS OFF to finish, and solicit the right company to accept it.
You will have so many people around you tell you that something cannot be done; why join in?
This will be my last post here, as the narcissistic fountains of negativity that reside here will never admit the truth: THEY DROPPED OUT UNDER THEIR OWN ACTIONS.
Drop dead, get bent, and go push a mop.
To Weird October 19, 2007 at 1:41 a.m.
You said: "OH wait, thats right... I WORKED MY ASS OFF to finish, and solicit the right company to accept it."
You had to search for the "right company" to accept your Grantham degree? How sad is that. Personally, I dont want to NEED to do the extra work to find a company that that is willing to settle for a Grantham degree. Why bother. Just get a decent degree to begin with, then ANY company will accept it.
Thank you for proving my point.
John October 22, 2007 at midnight
Not that is some funny stuff. After all that chest beating he outright admits to having to search for a company to accept his Grantham degree. He would have had no problem if he got his degree from a reputable University.
It's funny October 26, 2007 at 3:38 a.m.
It's really funny that all of a sudden, Grantham is getting steller reviews each day for the last three days. Hmmm, I wonder which Grantham employee is posting reviews here. Funny how they keep talking about Grantham being the perfect school as long as you are motivated. Sounds like the same person posting each review. By the army slang, it sounds a lot like George Colon, the former Retention Director who was demoted for conduct unbecoming a director.
Another Grantham rejection October 26, 2007 at 6:27 p.m.
From: Sam
Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2007 10:43 PM
To: Wendy Stewart
Subject: Transfer Credits
Mrs Stewart,
I was planning on taking some online classes with Grantham University over the next two months. Specifically, the computer science track specializing in Information Technology. My plan was to transfer to Miramar College for the spring semester. After reviewing some forums online about Grantham I think its incumbent upon me to see if Miramar College will accept credits from Grantham University.
Is there anyway you could tell me if Miramar College will accept Grantham University credits? The following accreditation of Grantham is provided.
Accreditation - Grantham is accredited by the Accrediting Commission of the Distance Education and Training Council (DETC). The Accrediting Commission of the Distance Education and Training Council is listed by the U.S. Department of Education as a nationally recognized accrediting agency.
Grantham University
www.grantham.edu
Founded 1951
Street Address:
7200 NW 86th Street, Suite M
Kansas City, Missouri 64153
Again, I would very much like to enroll in the spring semester but would like to transfer a few credits from Grantham University. If this will not be possible you would save me a lot of time and eventual frustration.
Thank you for your time.
Samuel
..................and the answer is..................
Hi Sam,
I forwarded your email to our Evaluations department as they are the ones who review incoming coursework to Miramar and this is the response they gave:
We would not accept coursework from Grantham University. The reason being that although they are accredited by DETC, we only accept coursework from schools that are accredited by a regional accrediting bodies i.e. WASC (Western Association of Schools and Colleges), MS (Middle States Association of Schools and Colleges), etc.
If you have any additional questions, please let me know.
Wendy Stewart
San Diego Miramar College
Transfer Center Director
California October 26, 2007 at 8:51 p.m.
I ran into the same problem with all of the public schools for California. It seems only the private schools will take a DETC accredited degree without too much hassle.
I really wish someone would win this fight, one way or the other. Either distance ed goes strictly regional, and abolish "National Accreditation" of any type, or regional get held to the fire as economically-motivated eduactional elitists.
This stalemate must not continue, as it will ruin the workplace, and higher-education as a whole.
I half-wish the DETC had never been founded in the first place.
Drew October 30, 2007 at 9:16 p.m.
I've only done two courses through Grantham so far. The other day I decided to do a little bit of research so I typed "Grantham reviews" on google and all the sudden I see ripoffreport.com as one of the first entries. I'm glad I came to my senses before signing up for more courses. I've looked around and so far, it looks like American Military University, and Liberty University will accept these credits. They both cost the same as Grantham but are regionally acredited, and military friendly. Good luck to all.
anonymous employee November 19, 2007 at 8:06 p.m.
I work at Grantham. I bought into the idea that we are "changing lives" by providing quality accessible education. Education in my opinion should be about education, not sales.. but when you contact your prospective student to answer their questions, they have already had anywhere from 3 to 23 colleges calling them in order to win over their enrollment. Like any corporation they have to meet their bottom line, and like many of us out there who have their personal bottom line to meet (pay their mortgage, food and their own student loan debt)and we chose to stay hoping the situation improves. I have a constant concern that if I don't make my monthly sales goal, I will be out. I have seen mass firing and over-hiring to be followed by more firing. It keeps you from trusting your company, your co workers and eventually yourself. Grantham is an at will company and a call center. Regional institutions of higher learning have admissions reps that don't have "goals". It breaks my heart when I have gotten to know someone that enrolls then drops out or goes on deployment because I am a person who wants to be accountable and responsible. I am very conflicted about working there since I have seen these post and other over the past few months and I don't want to stick my head in the sand and pretend that it will all go away and that Grantham will have some level of integrity. Grantham isn't for everyone, and I tell my prospective students up front that unless they are self disciplined and are not going to transfer to another school to finish, that they need to go elsewhere. Student progress is very tapped out, they have way too much put on them to be proficient. They are micromanaged by at least 5 managers and when they ask for assistance, suddenly most of them dissapear leaving the progress rep to deal with the student and can't give them any answers. Burnout and turnout is the name of the game. Promotion seems to be given on looks and not talent. I am very disapointed for myself and for those I am in contact with everyday. I wish I could do something, but I doubt I would be listened to and I would either be fired for asking questions (I have seen this with a former co-worker)or worse drawn into court for some bogus slander. I want to have a clean conscious and I am looking for another job.
ex-employee November 20, 2007 at 4:49 a.m.
Sounds like nothing has changed and I started there years ago. It will not get better until management is changed.
ex-student - military November 20, 2007 at 7:47 a.m.
This school has lack of reputation and no regional accreditation, no ABET cert, and no decent employer will hire someone with a "floater" degree. Do your research. I did after I became a student and luckily I only completed a few courses. Admissions reps are like talking to used car salesman and are not really concerned about your education. Good luck to all!
soom to be ex-employee November 21, 2007 at 12:04 a.m.
Not all of the Admissions Reps are like "used car salesmen" I happen to care very much about my students.The reps that are like that unfortunately are the ones with the highest numbers because they got their enrollments by desperate means, they lose their payraise if they don't meet goal so some of them stoop to low levels so they don't get a paycut. Depends on if your one of the favorites to be handed leads and go to bases.There is no way to honest way to move up in the company.
Fine for moi December 1, 2007 at 7:23 a.m.
I've been attending Gratham since July and I have not experienced any serious problems. My student Rep. was always available for me and the person who enrolled me in the school keeps in touch with me. I like the school.
d3c0y December 19, 2007 at 4:14 a.m.
I just read through all the postings... I still see now hard evidence for either side here. Not one person provided irrefutable proof (ie scanned documents or uploaded files) for or against this school. I put no faith in sites like this, for all we know the yeas and nays could all be 2 separate people in some sort of exuberant show, although highly unlikely but I see this did occur to some extent. The fact is I believe successful graduates wouldn't bother researching a topic like this or happen upon "forums" this these. Therefore they would not come across this highly questionable site. I honestly feel like I'm wasting my time reading this and now replying. Unfortunately this slander and these rebuttals will delay my enrollment to Grantham but will not rule them out. I guess you could say that all this junk here will ultimately make me a more informed individual.
to: d3c0y December 19, 2007 at 1:49 p.m.
Actually, there is hard evidence posted here. There are numerous e-mails that were sent to numerous schools asking about transfer of credits, acceptability of credentials, etc. In 100% of these cases, the other, reputable school, had stated that they would not accept Grantham in any way, shape, or form. There is no way to scan documents onto this forum, but full contact information was left for anyone who cares to verify the content of the e-mails with the actual school, and even the actual person at that school.
On the other hand, none of the Grantham grandstanders have offered any proof that there credits were worth anything.
Something to think about before wasting your time.
I love this site! December 19, 2007 at 6:40 p.m.
This site is great. It gives me a say-whatever-I-want-and-get-away-with-it card. Whenever I am frustrated with my studies at CSUN, I can come here and bash this school, it's staff, and online education as a whole and suffer no reprocussions of any kind. 90% of the negative stuff I post is absolute garbage, and I can get the Jerry-Springer crowd to join in. I love it!
Hell, I don't even go to Grantham, but I just love getting you guys good and worked up. Keep on keeping me entertained!
To: the jerk-off Grantham employee above December 19, 2007 at 7:44 p.m.
You can say whatever you want. That's fine. The people who say negative things about Grantham have posted proof positive that other schools do not accept, or respect Grantham.
Since I'm sure you work for Grantham, because this is exactly what they do, skirt the issue and throw up smoke screens, why dont you come up with some positive proof that Grantham is a well respected school that will get people jobs. Just coming on here and saying "Well, I'm a student and I love it." or "I'm a graduate and I got a $2 million dollar a year job with a Grantham degree" doesnt fly. We all know that Grantham staff monitors this board and tries to "come to the rescue" by posting ficticious "student" posts. Good try though, but the truth is the truth.
Tired December 20, 2007 at 2:15 p.m.
Get the G_Damn ABET accredidation Grantham!! You have been lying about it for too long. So it takes some work and money, you are a business so improve your business.
oh the memories..... December 29, 2007 at 5:44 p.m.
Did the credit card clear? Did the credit card clear?
Minyan December 31, 2007 at 4:14 a.m.
Why do you base the value of a school on the acceptance of its credits? I went to school to work, not the pipe dream of 5 years from now.
To minyan December 31, 2007 at 1:54 p.m.
The value of a school is not just the degree that it offers, but the acceptance of said degree, not only by other schools, but by potential employers as well. Grantham is known for not being accepted by either with any regularity.
Even if I could find an employer now that would accept Grantham, I would think twice. In todays market, where you work now is not necessarily where you will work tomorrow. What if you find another employer that wants to offer you an increase in pay and better benefits, but will not accept that Grantham degree? It would be a shame to invest the time and effort into earning a degree only to find that it's near worthless 5 years from now. Why not invest the same time and money into earning a degree from a reputable school that offers online courses such as Old Dominion University or Fort Hayes State University? Both are Regional and will be accepted by most everyone.
Your second statement is why Grantham is still in business. Most people just don't think about the future.
Anonymous December 31, 2007 at 8:26 p.m.
Or, the lies you keep attempting to spread have no validity, and your efforts to shame this university are in vain. All this lip service, and still no new complaints with the DETC, or the BBB.
Find another crusade, Jason.
former employee December 31, 2007 at 9:48 p.m.
Hey anonymous - Are you "bewildered and confused?"
Or "dumbfounded and bemused"?
Did the credit card clear?
What's the problem? December 31, 2007 at 10:01 p.m.
I ran across this article from military.com:
http://education.military.com/finding-a-...
Grantham meets the requirements they list (DANTES, DETC, SOC), so whats the big deal?
If you are in a position to go brick and mortar, do so. If not, go to an accredited school. A degree is a degree. The only thing my employers have ever asked is "is your degree accredited?"
If you have a beef, lawyer up, or go to the DETC, CHEA, or BBB and file a formal complaint. How hard is that?
With enough complaints, an accreditor will investigate, or pull. If you want to fight a battle, you really should use the right ammunition. This site has accomplished no more than wasting a lot of people's time.
Current Employee December 31, 2007 at 10:31 p.m.
I don't get this; I am making a killing off of duping the military. If you are not making money at GU, then you are not putting forth the effort.
These military morons are so easy to push into a sale, I am surprised this is legal. I am gonna ride this gravy train until it derails!
God save the troops! I have 2 kids to put through college, and those idiots are paying for every credit! There is no way I would let them go to grantham, though.
Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!
Marty January 1, 2008 at 10:49 p.m.
I've never had a company ask me if my degree was accredited. They would simply ask me where I got my degree.
Don't worry though, I'm sure they would put your resume listing a Grantham degree in the same pile as someone else with a degree from a well known, reputable university. I mean, why would they not, right?
Experience matters most January 2, 2008 at 10:44 p.m.
If one candidate had experience to stack on top of either degree, I would hire experience over educational background any day.
"An education is what you have after you have forgotten everything you learned in school" -Albert Einstein
Experience January 3, 2008 at 12:51 a.m.
Yep, experience......one more thing you don't get at Grantham University.
Grantham University.....where the only thing "hands on" is the keyboard while you are taking open book tests.
Thanks for proving my point.
Bottom line January 4, 2008 at 3:14 p.m.
The bottom line on Grantham is:
They have a real, but less desirable DETC accreditation.
They are one of the lowest quality DETC schools out there.
For the same money, you can get an online, regionally accredited degree or a better DETC degree.
There are many better options out there.
the new guy January 4, 2008 at 11:48 p.m.
I just heard about Grantham today. As someone planning on getting out of the military, and continuing my education... I was very excited to hear what they had to say. So, what I need is... to hear from someone who actually took/takes classes through Grantham (Preferrably someone from the Air Force) who can honestly tell me what they think. All I need to know is, can this degree really help me get a good job so I can support my family, and can I really use my CCAF degree towards a Bachelor's degree? Thanks!!
to "the new guy" January 5, 2008 at 1:36 a.m.
My military experience (USMC, Avionics) landed me a job as a Electronics Maintenance Technician, starting at $21.09/hour. I was promoted once, and left at an hourly rate of $27.65/hour.
I finished my ASEET w/ Grantham 4 years later, and landed a job as a Senior Engineering Technician, starting at $31.25/hour.
I finished my BS EET w/ Grantham 1.5 years later, and was promoted to Engineer I at $34.68/hour.
I don't see what all the complaining is about, as I have benefitted from the curriculum, and the credential. Had I not gotten it, I still would be working as an Electronics Maintenance Technician. By far, the 2.5 years it took to finish (I transferred in 1 year from other colleges) was absolute hell, but it paid off.
I didn't have a whole lot of options available to me for Electronics Engineering Technology, so Grantham seemed to be one of only a few options. It also helped as my company at the first job payed out 100% tuition assistance for Grantham, and came highly recommended by my supervisor, an ASBA Grantham grad that transferred to UOP for his BS.
If you seek a Computer Science, Business Administration, or Criminal Justice Degree, I would not recommend Grantham University. There are plenty of regionally accredited options available to you: American Intercontinental (AIU), American Military (AMU), Liberty(LU), Fort Hayes State (FHS), Penn Foster.
If you seek Electronics Engineering Technology, I would highly recommend GU. The support offered by the alumni in this program via student forums was second to none. The technology was current, and I walked out with excellent references and software (Visio, MATLAB, Visual Studio 2005). Keep in mind you will have a fight on your hands if you want to pursue a MS, as the regionals are still not accepting DETC degrees without protest.
I hope I helped to answer your question.
the new guy again January 5, 2008 at 9:02 p.m.
Thank you very much for taking the time to leave a response for me. As I said before, I just heard about Grantham yesterday, so I'm still exploring my options. But I feel extremely encouraged at how inexpensive and convienient this program seems at the moment. For the time being, I can't forsee any reason to go farther than a Bachelor's degree, and I can always utilize GU again if/when I do decide to go a step farther, so transferring credits isn't very high on the priority list. Honestly, I don't see a downside. So thanks again for your honest opinion. I will definitely keep your opinion in mind when I do decide how to get a degree.
To: The New Guy January 5, 2008 at 9:55 p.m.
Look carefully. Ask around. Most state jobs will not accept a DETC degree or any other Nationaly Accredited degree. A lot of jobs require Regional Accreditation.
Look at it this way. Why go to Grantham and get a degree that "may" be accepted by future employers or schools when you can go to a Regional school for the same amount of money and have a degree that you will have no problems with.
Look into Fort Hayes University or Old Dominion University. There are lots of other schools, but off the top of my head, those two will give you a respectable degree that will help you for the rest of your life.
Why? January 5, 2008 at 10:16 p.m.
Why does the top-rated online university on this site:
http://www.onlinedegreereviews.org/colle...
Share the exact same accreditation as Grantham, but not nearly the bad press that is found here?
The more I read on this blog, the more it really does sound like 2 or 3 "Hater's of the Year" posting over and over again. Can we please hear the opinion of someone else?
To: Why? January 5, 2008 at 10:30 p.m.
Here is some of the problem.
From that page:
"The professors and support staff are second to none when it comes to helping you out."
"I have always had good interaction with the staff, they are very quick to assist in any way"
"The Student Center staff are also very supportive."
You'll never get that from Grantham, but the accreditation still sucks. May work for some, but why limit yourself?
OK, please explain January 5, 2008 at 10:51 p.m.
Ok, now that we have established that your individual experience was negative, can you please provide more detail?
What was your degree of choice? How many classes did you take with grantham? What were they, or which specific instructors did not provide assistance? What led you to stop going? Did you try getting help from the student forums? Where are you now, since deciding to persue other options?
Thank you!
Ok, I'll bite January 5, 2008 at 11:11 p.m.
My degree of choice was Business Admin. I took 8 courses (two semesters) with Grantham. It would be easier to tell you which instructor actually took the time to help. I dont remember her name, but it was the writing instructor. Very informative. All the rest either ingored my e-mails or took over a week to get back to me. That, in my opinion, is poor cutomer service. I did try to get help from the forums and from calling my advisor directly. None were any help. My advisor was "away from her desk" 9 out of 10 calls to her and did not return my voice mails. The few times that I got ahold of her, she did not know the answer and said that she would get back to me. She never would and I would have to try to call her again. That is the main reason that I disenrolled.
Where am I now? Well, after trying in vain to find a school that would accept any Grantham credits and finding no school that would even consider it, I ended up enrolling in another, Regional school and started from scratch. I now have my degree and am happy that I went the Regional route. The job that I have now even stated on it's website that it required a degree from a Regional school, so this great job I have now would never have happened with a Grantham degree. I am also looking at getting my Masters and just out of curiosity, asked about Grantham and Regional accreditation. None of the schools I have spoken with would accept a Regional degree as a pre-req for their Masters program.
So, as you can see, I have gone the Grantham route and have been left wanting. Since I am former military, I would not want to see any of my Brothers In Arms falling into the Grantham "trap" without the knowledge that the "admision reps" fail to tell you before lunging for your credit card.
Can a Grantham degree be helpful? I'm sure it can in certain situations, but for a general "I need to get a degree" circumstance, it will fail you in many, many ways.
Thanks! January 6, 2008 at 12:56 a.m.
Thank you for the background, you have been very helpful.
I don't necessarily agree with everything you have stated, however.
"None of the schools I have spoken with would accept a Regional degree as a pre-req for their Masters program"
-I sincerely hope you meant National.
Your timeline places your enrollment with GU around 2003, am I correct? When did you graduate from your current school? Which school did you wind up settling in after getting "burned" at GU?
Also, I completely agree with you about the BSBA and ASBA programs at GU, UOP, and the like. GU started out as Grantham College of Engineering, and they have seriously forgotten where they came from in the persuit of the almighty dollar. I am sick and tired of every University cashing in on the cheap BSBA program; it has to be one of the easiest programs to get accredited by distance education, and the lowest overhead versus tuition revenue. I hope that any future readers seeking a BSBA or ASBA stick to regional programs (The same for BSCS, and BSCJ), as the whole field seems to be a massive money-grab. I personally would like to see the GU Business College get shut down, so they can focus their attention and staff back to the engineering students.
Again, thank you very much for the background. These posts, I believe, provide people the means to make a more informed decision, versus the "GU SUCKS!" or "GO GU" posts we see littered throughout. The only means for which people have to sort truth from fiction in an anonymous site is through ample detail.
One last detail.... January 6, 2008 at 2:04 a.m.
Out of sheer curiousity, what was your handle on the student forums?
not a grantham employee January 8, 2008 at 11:24 p.m.
PART I:
There are many regional to regional colleges that don't accept transfer credits today. As for the transfer of credits, this has become an old chestnut ("Are you still beating my dog?") of mine. The sine qua non of an institutions quality is not its credit transfer, hence your comments to DETC being a "lower level accreditation"--absurd. Seriously, no one is talking about Grantham but the majority of posts have been about its accreditation.
The real issue has nothing to do with academic quality and more to do with anti-competitive business practices of the receiving institutions (usually regional schools).
In the world of distance learning, it’s a fair statement to say that DETC accreditation is far more stringent and far more thorough than any other accrediting agency for evaluating a distance learning institution. Those CEOs whose online universities which enjoy both DETC and regional accreditation have repeatedly testified that DETC accreditation is the more stringent review.
Having said this, does it mean DETC accredited School Grantham is superior to MIT or Harvard or Penn State? Of course not!
CHEA has the HETA transfer agreement, whereas institutions, these members, don’t discriminate and will consider credits from nationally accredited schools. The list of schools increased to more than 300 and growing. DETC recently did a survey and found that graduates that attempted to transfer credits and degrees, 70% were very successful.
As to the real question "Is regional better than national?" I find to be the wrong question. Nothing makes them better. "Better" is a term that makes a judgment comparing one agency against another, and such a comparison really is impossible. Further, many people feel that the regional agencies accredit many as a house-hold name, famous institutions like Duke and Stanford, it automatically follows that this means the accreditation of these prestigious agencies is somehow "better" than the newcomer nationals.
not a grantham employee January 8, 2008 at 11:25 p.m.
PART II:
This is a real non sequitor to me. It is one thing to bask in the reflected glow of the famous colleges you happen to accredit by virtue of an historic accident. It is quite another to do a great job of accrediting, having a solid track record of improving the various institutions in your sector, and taking these institutions to new heights of excellence by virtue of a rigorous accreditation process.
The criteria by which an accrediting body should be judged is not how many famous schools does it accredit, but what has it done to improve the schools in its scope of activity. I would assume that Harvard and Yale would still be Harvard and Yale without regional accreditation, but I won't assert it as gospel.
I believe that DETC "holds the coat" versus any other accreditor when it comes to distance learning accreditation. DETC has the most relevant and stringent standards for online learning today. They’re the only accrediting agency to have adopted standards "the Principles of Good Practice for Distance Learning Institutions."
I say to you Grantham graduates...trust in yourself and in what you have learned, and you will do great wherever you go. Fight for acceptance of your DETC degree. Let your knowledge do the talking. And do not let anyone tell you regional accreditation is ipso facto better than DETC, the two accreditations are merely different and serve different purposes--that's it!
best of luck!
??? January 9, 2008 at 3:01 a.m.
"DETC recently did a survey and found that graduates that attempted to transfer credits and degrees, 70% were very successful."
So for the same money, same program, same degree, go to a Regionally Accredited institution and get 100% acceptance.
Not true January 9, 2008 at 4:30 a.m.
Regional to regional transfers are a pain as well. I had to scrap a year at Hawaii Pacific University because University Nevada Las Vegas wouldn't touch them.
I haven't been able to transfer even the basic classes over. This also included credits from Clark County Community College, which has an articulation agreement with UNLV, and even still the credits wouldn't transfer.
Doubtful January 9, 2008 at 2:53 p.m.
I find that very hard to believe.
I agree January 10, 2008 at 2:50 a.m.
I find your claim that you had to dump a year of studies because of a transfer highly suspect as well. A few classes, sure, but not an entire year, unless you changed majors.
When I transfered from a Regional to another Regional, I only lost a few credits. When I tried to transfer my Grantham credits over, I lost all of them.
%%% January 10, 2008 at 5:13 p.m.
"DETC recently did a survey and found that graduates that attempted to transfer credits and degrees, 70% were very successful."
So for the same money, same program, same degree, go to a Regionally Accredited institution and get 100% acceptance."
There is no such thingg as 100%! This is not true, many regional to regional credits don't transfer. I have not seen hard concrete proof that states all regional to regional coleges transfer 100% credits. How would they make money?
Sorry, that fish doesn't bite!
HATE THAT SCHOOL January 12, 2008 at 6:12 p.m.
I worked at grantham for a few months - just want to say that the first week i was there i was told "do you think you could get your old job back?"
Any person looking for an online school ....look somewhere else -
AND UPPER MANAGEMENT IS WELL AWARE OF ALL THAT WAS GOING ON.......EVEN CONTRIBUTED/ ENCOURAGED.
True January 18, 2008 at 3:21 p.m.
"This is not true, many regional to regional credits don't transfer. I have not seen hard concrete proof that states all regional to regional coleges transfer 100% credits."
The ones that do not transfer are 1 of 2 reasons.
a) The credits don't match the curriculum of the new school, and can be applied to gen eds instead.
b) If you have too many credits to transfer in, you may have problems. Most will require 30+ credits in residence to graduate.
Maybe a better way to say it is that all Regional credits will be considered, but may not match up. Some National credits will be entirely discounted.
A shame it is January 20, 2008 at 2:15 p.m.
"Quick, go charge that call before the Registrar closes out for the day!"
It's all about the money at Grantham. The student comes in way down the list.
What a moron January 20, 2008 at 2:20 p.m.
In one of the reviews above, someone said:
"I've read comments about cheating. Cheating is going to and does happen at any college you attend. Is is easy at Grantham-No! The tests are taken online and Granthams policy is you're not allowed to use text, notes, etc."
Yep, because the Grantham police watch you when you are online.....and they KNOW when you are cheating. Please, they allow cheating by not checking up to make sure proctors are even real people. Anyone can make up an e-mail address and sign a name and Grantham will sent the test right over. As was said above, it's all about the money there. They could case less about your education.
Some employers know this already. The rest are learning....slowly.
Thats a fact January 23, 2008 at 9:07 p.m.
My employer is learning first hand; I have saved him hundreds of thousands in recurring maintenance costs, have been developing new programs to automate current infrastructure using the programming I learned at GU, and also training the junior technicians in the trade.
They have a high opinion of GU, as a result of having a high opinion of ME.
Thankfully, they have been just as kind in (drastically) boosting my salary to more reflect the work I do.
Just my two cents.
reply: moron January 23, 2008 at 10:57 p.m.
This is in response to the individual that posted comments "what a moron"
I like researching and this is what I found in the student handbook. See excerpt below.
"Acceptable proctors include schoolteachers and
principals, librarians, clergy members, education officers in the military, or an education or human resources officer at the student’s workplace."
It doesn't mention anything about sending it to yourself or another email. That sounds absurd! Sorry, I must agree with the moron because I don't see any of the proctors listed above as person's that condone cheating.
My opinion is at any college you attend cheating is going to happen. However; what I have seen Grantham is taking steps to prevent it. taht deserves kudos! It appears the college is doing everything it can to prevent this type of student behavior.
Sorry, your post has no strong facts to prove your point..
this is my two cents!
Harvard February 3, 2008 at 4:55 a.m.
I love this school.. I am lazy, dont like to do much, and love easy grade, the way I see it, If I am not studying to be a doctor, I just need a piece of paper, what better way to do it then Grantham. Amen.
dRummer February 6, 2008 at 5:21 p.m.
Gents, I have never had an issue with the school every time I need something I get a call back or e-mail info sent to me right away..grades and any assistance with the logistics are a breeze, I even had to call in the emergency support one night and got a call right away with the assistance I needed, please be honest and legit about your experiences with the school, if you have gotten fired for any reason please move on...the fact that you say you got fired sets up expectations about how you really feel and we know 90% of your comments are of pain and anger, please move on...
mickie February 8, 2008 at 8:05 p.m.
I'm always having trouble getting what I need from this school. They sure enough call when they want your money though. Do a lot of checking around before enrolling.
Graduate of Grantham February 18, 2008 at 7:19 p.m.
I have a BSCET and MSIT from Grantham, both of which my company(AT&T) paid for. As a result of having these credentials, I have been afforded various opportunities for advancement, not to mention increases in salary of over $45K. I am currently contemplating a MBA or PH.D. with other universities and I have not experienced any bias towards my Grantham degrees.
For me, Grantham offered programs of interest and the flexibility that I needed to complete the requirements to fulfill my educational goals. I've taken many courses with a lot of colleges (online and classroom) and I can say that I have a great deal of respect for someone that is able to earn a degree online. It requires a level of discipline, effort, and motivation (not to mention intellect) that may not be as critical for a traditional classroom student to succeed. Moreover, those attributes (disciplined, motivated, etc) are crucial to your success in life after school.
At Grantham, your experience and success are in your hands. There are no personal experiences and lectures from professors or differing classroom perspectives, questions, and ideas to learn from, which are huge benefits of being in a classroom environment. Like a few have said, you'll get as much as you put in to the Grantham University programs or any other college/university programs.
Anyone reading these posts, I offer this advice.
- Do your research. Comparison shop just as you would for a new car. Do they offer the programs that fit your interest? Do they offer the format of your liking? Not all online programs are created equal (group projects/study vs independent study, accelerated courses vs 16 week courses, etc.)
- Accreditation is important. Make sure that the school is accredited. A great test, if your company offers tuition assistance and will pay for the program.
- Don't pay attention to all the rhetoric. There will be pros and cons to everything you do. You make it work for you. Contrary to one posters' belief, you cannot be lazy and do well in these programs. You have deadlines that must be met and if not, any school would love to take more of your money for an extension or better yet, make you retake the class. And cheating, if it wasn't an issue for every institution of higher learning, traditional and online, it would not be a part of their school bi-laws. Just don't prescribe to it.
Good luck in your educational pursuits!!
Another Grad February 18, 2008 at 7:44 p.m.
Greetings,
I am a AS EET Graduate from Grantham University, and I have 3 more assignments in 1 class to finish my BS EET. I am considering a second BS in Computer Science from Grantham as a result of my positive experiences.
I concur with the above post, and have nothing but a high opinion of anyone who completes a degree online.
I recently served as a guide and mentor to a collegue whom is considering a BS in CS via distance education. He asked of all the universities available, and if there was one program I would recommend. I told him of AIU, Fort Hayes, and all of the other programs available, and in the end he settled in on GU.
The worst offenders of high-pressure sales (from his recent experience) was Univerisity of Phoenix (5 calls per day) and American Intercontinental University (4 calls per day). At no one point did he say he felt pressured from the SPR at Grantham, and of all the universities he contacted, Grantham was the most informative as to what his options are and how to proceed, without signing up. I was especially surprised to hear this, as one of the primary complaints toward GU is their "used car salesmen" techniques.
On a side note, I am especially pleased to see the author of this site add an IP log to this blog. Good going, keep up the good work.
Ditto February 19, 2008 at 6:18 p.m.
"I concur with the above post, and have nothing but a high opinion of anyone who completes a degree online."
Couldn't agree more, kudos to all that complete a degree. However, Grantham is a poor choice compared to many, many Regionally Accredited universities with much better reputations.
They invented post-its March 9, 2008 at 4:35 a.m.
I used to work for this school. It was interesting to find that they were very interested in that military dough. As a matter of fact, most other students didn't even matter. There were people there who knew more about what money was avilable to military personnel than some of the military personnel did. I remember asking one of the "sales managers" if the students experience was the most important thing. He said no, it's their status so we know they can pay. I guess it is a business though. It's a shame people have to check up on education too just like everything else they purchase. What you are taught in school is supposed to help you feed your family. Not slam you. All the car salesmen terms flying around were a little strange. So many of these people had sold cars! Anyway, with all the turmoil, I wouldnt go to school there. Eventually I was asked to leave as I hadn't sold enough cars, I mean enrolled enough students. When I think of that place, I keep hearing the word rape. Also, I only witnessed sexual harassment once so I can't say that it's rampant.
For those who don't do his or her research. March 10, 2008 at 11:10 p.m.
Hello,
I found this pasage from the North Central Association
Commission on Accreditation and School Improvement (one of six regional accreditation standards/policies). Please see quote from the NCA policy letter.
"A school’s failure to submit a substantive change may result in changes to the school’s accreditation status.
Credits or Grade Placement. An NCA CASI postsecondary accredited school shall accept and classify transfer credits earned or grade placement from schools that are accredited by a recognized national, regional/trans-regional,1 or state accrediting agency without further validation based on the school’s policies and procedures governing such offerings. The school’s policies and procedures should be designed to ensure proper academic placement of the student."
Please read the fine print when telling others to goto a regional accredited school. Bottom line is regional is no better/worst than any of the other accredited bodies to include DETC.
attached is the website: http://www.googlesyndicatedsearch.com/u/...
thank you!
more research from another accredited body... March 10, 2008 at 11:31 p.m.
Here's another quote from research I found.
"Does accreditation guarantee that credits and degrees can be transferred to another institution?
No. Transferability of credits and degrees is a matter determined by the institution receiving the credits. Transferability depends on several factors. Among them are: the institution at which credits or degrees were earned, how well the credits offered for transfer mesh with the curriculum offered by the institution to which the student wishes to transfer, and how well the student did in the courses. Accreditation speaks only to the first of these factors and, therefore, cannot by itself guarantee transfer of credits; however, many institutions choose to accept transfer credits only from accredited institutions so that transfer of credits from an unaccredited institution may be excluded. Some institutions have specific agreements with other institutions guaranteeing transfer of credits. Anyone planning to transfer credits should, at the earliest opportunity, consult the receiving institution about the transfer before taking the courses for transfer, if possible. For additional information, see Commission Policy 2.5 Policy on Transfer and Award of Academic Credit.
...Accredited Institutions. Accreditation speaks primarily to the first of these considerations, serving as the basic indicator that an institution meets certain minimum standards. Users of accreditation are urged to give careful attention to the accreditation conferred by accrediting bodies recognized by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA). CHEA has a formal process of recognition which requires that any accrediting body so recognized must meet the same standards. Under these standards CHEA has recognized a number of accrediting bodies, including:
1. Regional accrediting institutions.
2. Certain national accrediting bodies that accredit various kinds of specialized institutions.
...
You can read all about it and more here:
http://www.nwccu.org/Search/search.htm?s...
As you can read, The Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities (NWCCU) will accept credits from a national accredited body along with the North Central Association
Commission on Accreditation and School Improvement (NCA).
That's two of the six that accepts transfer credits from national accredited colleges. Please do your research before you post ignorant comments that regional is better when it’s honestly a different form of accreditation based on a specific region. National is nationwide accreditation.
Again, please do your research before you postfiction on here.
Fiction? March 11, 2008 at 3:31 a.m.
I've read the e-mail answers that were sent to other, Regional schools rejecting Grantham credits. I hardly see that as fiction. Quite the contrary. You can post the Grantham propoganda that they gave you in your training class, but the truth is, MOST Regional schools will not accept Grantham credits or any other National.
Job March 13, 2008 at 10:14 a.m.
Grantham is a wonderful university. It is DECT accredited which is NATIONAL accreditation. That is better than anything out there. It is NATIONALLY accredited by the DOE. DUH! I didn't have any problem transferring my credits to an AACSB university. All of you are just a bunch a slackers who couldn't hack it. I really feel sorry for all you tards that apply for government jobs without checking the applications first. If you want a government job then get a regional degree. I didn't have any problems getting a job with a FORTUNE 500!! If you want a cutting edge business degree then go to GU!
To: Job March 13, 2008 at 11:54 p.m.
You think that National is better than Regional? You really need to do some research.
reply to fiction March 14, 2008 at 11:06 p.m.
Fiction?,
What I have stated is factual research. Its not propaganda but your pretty good at laying it on "thick". I have done the research and posted it for all to see the "TRUTH". You and others that bash Grantham are merely propagandists. you use your lies to bolster regional accreditation when it clearly states regional & national accreditation is two differeent types of accreditation. Show us where it states that regional is better than national--please prove your point instead of ignorantly posting fictional opinions.
FACTS are what matters not your opinions! The folks here must have the true facts in order to make the best judgement on his or her education choices.
Sorry fiction? but your facts have been BUSTED; it does not appear to me that Grantham is as bad a school as you made tried to make us all believe. Devil's advocate--I'm sure it has its good and bad points--that's every college! The TRUTH is what I've posted and you can read it for yourself.
Ready the e-mails March 15, 2008 at 2:41 a.m.
The proof is in the e-mails from the other schools. Those have been posted with full contact information provided so people can follow up. The proof is also in the hiring practices. A lot of jobs will not hire you with a national degree. That's also been proven. Nice try though. Anyone that wants to follow up can with the information that they were provided. The Government can say that accreditation is the same across the board, but the proof is in the pudding, and national pudding has been left wanting.
Don't Bother March 16, 2008 at 8:30 a.m.
"Ready the e-mails" along with numerous (if not most) posts will waste his, and more tragically, your time in debate. If you are currently in study, do not waste your time here. This is a pointless discussion, with fruitless results.
Job March 17, 2008 at 2:04 a.m.
DECT is real accreditation and it transfers!
Get the name right! March 18, 2008 at 12:39 a.m.
DETC
Distance
Education
Training
Council
Letter from Sec Ed March 18, 2008 at 3:20 a.m.
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/?qid=2...
All accreditors are created equally.
prospective student March 18, 2008 at 6:36 p.m.
Ive read nearly every post on this forum and it appears to me that for all the bashing of GU there have been no real alteratives offered. Its been said that if your looking forward to getting your masters then this may not be the school for you, so seek regionally accreditated school. For all my research online i've found hundreds of regionally credited school in computer science or business administration. But it seems that there is a real lack of any distance learning BSEE programs, nationally or regionally credited. It seems that the major you select has a real affect on whether your degree from GU is accepted by prospective employers. If your going for a BSIT or MBA there are much better alternatives than GU but for a BSEE there just are not many options online.
Btw any refrences to a regionally accreditied entirely online BSEE program would be appreciated.
Labs are the deciding factor March 18, 2008 at 7:47 p.m.
"Prospective student", your observations are correct. My opinion, based on a great deal of research, is that BSIS, BSCS, and BSBA programs are much easier to accredit due to the nature of the labwork involved.
A BSEE or BSEET requires hands-on via breadboards, scopes, and some simulation. It appears that the programs that are available for BSEET and BSEE online have substituted simulation for all of the hands-on; whether or not this is as effective as advertised has yet to be seen. For the most part, any military or prior experience student would not suffer for the lack of hands on by substituting experience and complimenting it with simulation.
I finished the BSEET this month, and the program was written up in 2004; there have been many changes to the curriculum since then to parallel an ABET-type program. I do not know if Grantham is seeking ABET, but they do seem like a leading contender.
I hate the idea of working within the confines of an ABET-worthy program, without the benefit of the namebrand. If I were looking to enroll again, I think I would be more inclined to wait and see how the ABET angle works out.
Funny, huh March 19, 2008 at 12:45 a.m.
I find it funny that someone will post a "grantham is great" post and then a few minutes later, someone else will post a "I agree with your statement" post. Same person? I think?
waiting for class to end. March 19, 2008 at 11:30 a.m.
Don't do it. Grantham is a waste of time. I made that horrible mistake; learn from mine! These were my grades:
BA101 A Introduction to Business 3 credits
Test Type Status Completed Date Attempted Grade
Manual Posting Completed 01/15/2008 1 98%
Online Test Completed 02/06/2008 1 98%
Manual Posting Completed 02/20/2008 1 96%
Manual Posting Completed 02/28/2008 1 95%
Manual Posting Completed 03/03/2008 1 98%
Online Test Completed 02/17/2008 1 88%
Manual Posting Completed 03/14/2008 1 98%
I simply changed the title of my first paper and submitted it for grading as my final work. I received a 98%. WOW.
Job March 20, 2008 at 6:08 a.m.
Go to Grantham! DETC is just a good as regional if not better. It is the accreditation for all future online programs which traditional schools are offering in boat loads. GU has been around almost 60 years and are leaders in higher education. You get out of it what you put into it. If you are too lazy then please do not garnish the e-halls of GU. We do not want you if you think you are going to get an easy ride. The support is excellent as they respond almost immediately with any queries you might have. The instructors leave great feedback which helps you better your work. This is not like a BS online program like UOP, these tests are proctored so you can't cheat. GU is the real deal!!
Wrong March 20, 2008 at 5:40 p.m.
"Go to Grantham! DETC is just a good as regional if not better"
Err, no it's not. There are many states that do not recognize DETC accreditation for professional licensing such as RN, CPA, etc.
Credit transfer will also me much more of a problem.
Fact check on isle 3 March 20, 2008 at 5:51 p.m.
"It is the accreditation for all future online programs which traditional schools are offering in boat loads."
It is the past accreditation for correspondence programs, mostly vocational. Regionals need to broaden their scope to cover more distance ed programs, given the feverish pace of technological development and the obvious need for distance delivery methods.
"The support is excellent as they respond almost immediately with any queries you might have. The instructors leave great feedback which helps you better your work."
Hit and miss at best. I have had good SPRs that hold true to your statement, but I have also had really bad ones that I had to fire. Instructor support is great, provided that you are dealing with Dr. Nancy Miller, Dexter Malley, Michael Cruz, or David Monahan. These instructors have apparently written the majority of the GU coursework, and are extremely competent and eager to help.
But then there are the bad ones; I will not name them here, but there are quite a few. Over 1 week to answer questions (I am being generous), with little to no resolution without higher staff intervention; retaliation grades (which is unprofessional, but occurs anywhere).
Overall, the asychronous model appears to be based on student participation and independent study (duh), with little to no intervention from the instructors. I am OK with the concept, but some topics (Signals & Systems, Calc II, Control Systems) just didn't click as fast as I think they could have with some additional lecture.
Job March 21, 2008 at 12:30 a.m.
DETC is hosting all the new strictly online program accreditations and they are rising above RA to provide access to all. Single mothers and housewives will be able to attend school to obtain their degrees and all that hidden talent can join the workforce. Grantham is a leader setting the standards that traditional schools are following. The standards for RA are the same for NA so quite hating on mothers getting their degrees. If you want to be a CPA or RN you don't go to Grantham. DUH!
That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard.
tic tac March 21, 2008 at 7:46 a.m.
Jack... you are wrong about DETC.
Read it and educate yourself.
tic tac March 21, 2008 at 7:46 a.m.
I meant Job...
Online EE (cont) March 21, 2008 at 6:47 p.m.
My apologies, the program above is not yet ABET accredited (but appears to be expected once the first graduating class cycles through).
http://le.suny.edu/bee/faqs.shtml
And, it is really expensive! 442/Credit hour. Ouch!
tic tac March 22, 2008 at 5:25 a.m.
Wrong thread EE... this is Grantham which is a far cry from SUNY.
See above March 22, 2008 at 5:40 a.m.
"prospective student" asked about a online EE, so there it is.
DETC is real, but sub-optimal March 22, 2008 at 1:40 p.m.
http://distancelearn.about.com/od/accred...
The Bad – Trouble Transferring
"The biggest problem with DETC accreditation is that regionally accredited schools don't view it as their equal. While credits from regionally accredited schools may transfer to other regionally accredited schools easily, credits from DETC accredited schools are often looked upon with suspicion. Even some schools with DETC accreditation view transcripts from regionally accredited schools as superior. "
DETC is only a matter of time... March 22, 2008 at 4:03 p.m.
I can recall many years ago when they same conversation came up about "omline" vs. brick and mortat schools. Years later, this is now the norm so its only a matter of time before DETC also becomes the norm.
piggy back off that March 22, 2008 at 4:09 p.m.
I saw on about.com how trye is this...
"Is online education as effective as classroom study?
60% of online students graduate and receive degrees. In tests of cognitive achievement, online students perform as well as or better than students enrolled in traditional classroom programs."
In todays society,I have attended oth B&M and online and I must agree with this statement.
Improvement in service March 22, 2008 at 6:30 p.m.
The last semester for me has been the smoothest to date. My lineup was:
Signals & Systems Theory (EE380)
Signals & Systems Theory Lab (EE381)
Control Systems (EE490)
Solid-State Circuit Analysis (EE220)
Solid-State Circuit Analysis Lab (EE221)
I took all classes, and proctored exams, inside of 17 weeks for the VA full-time deadline. I finished the proctored exam for EE490 on Saturday, March 15th, and my proctor snail-mailed in the answer sheet on Monday, March 17th. I received an e-mail from Grantham for receipt of the exam on Thursday, March 20, and then my grade posted and the class was closed for me on March 21st.
I cannot say if the drastic improvement in service has been a byproduct of this and many other blogs, but apparently Grantham has taken some of the information to heart.
My SPR has answered my e-mails within 24 hours, my instructors (save Mr. Sarwar) were posting grades within 3 business days (labs), and my proctored exams were executed smoothly.
If they keep it up, I cannot see a reason not to attend Grantham, provided they iron out their accreditation (if they even need to).
tic tac March 23, 2008 at 2:58 p.m.
@piggy back off that...
I found your article about onine education... read the very bottom mate.
http://phoenix.about.com/cs/education/a/...
"Information and answers to questions provided by University of Phoenix Online"
ROFLMAO!!!
tic tac March 23, 2008 at 3:04 p.m.
Looks like you pick rather biases sources... no wonder you didn't provide the direct link... shame on you!
Thats good! March 23, 2008 at 4:46 p.m.
UOP providing answers, that is hilarious!
Have you guys noticed the UOP logo and google ads that have appeared on this page? What gives? Is the owner taking UOP blood-money now?
Can the site remain unbiased when receiving ad monies from institutions that it swears to deliver information on, good or bad?
We shall see.
Dude, you are so busted! March 24, 2008 at 4:31 a.m.
tic tac March 22, 2008 at 5:53 a.m.
@CSU IT
I wasted a couple thousand dollars at CSU and I don't want people to make the same mistake. I think "yalls" love fest in here needs a stark dose of reality. CSU is actually among the best of DETC schools; only problem is, being at the top of the dung pile is not the same as being on the RA ladder. Maybe if some of the employees in here took this tidbit of info back to their higher-ups, the Deans might apply for RA accreditation.
Just show them this article and ask...why don't you apply for RA if the standards are so similar?!?
Taken from:
http://www.onlinedegreereviews.org/colle...
What do you do.... troll from forum to forum trying to pick a fight? That's lame, man!
tic tac March 26, 2008 at 11:29 a.m.
How am I busted? I'm not allowed to go to other forums? Yes sir you must be right! Hahaha
I went to CSU which also has DETC so I am uniquely qualified to comment on it.
busted? I think not March 26, 2008 at 12:39 p.m.
Tic tac, thank you for your insight. The Grantham bandwagon tries harder to drown people out the more people speak up. Thank you for speaking a little louder.
To everyone reading.....The way I see it, if you want to go to Grantham, then go. You have all the information available here as well as other boards across the internet. It's easy to get good grades at Grantham. It's east to attend because you can do your work at 2 in the morning if you want. Everything about it is pretty easy. If that is what you are looking for, then Grantham would be perfect for you. If you are looking for a degree that will be accepted by a majority of other schools, and, more importantly, most jobs, then Grantham is not the school for you. You have the information, so if you decide to go anyway, dont complain when it gets you no where.
Griffith Letter March 27, 2008 at 1:32 a.m.
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
OFFICE OF POSTSECONDARY EDUCATION
August 30,2007
To Whom It May Concern:
I have been asked by Mr. Michael P. Lambert, Executive Director of the Accrediting Commission of the Distance Education and Training Council (DETC), to write a letter
explaining the recognition the U.S. Secretary of Education has granted DETC.
DETC is currently listed by the U.S. Secretary of Education as a nationally recognized accrediting agency. DETC has held that status continuously since 1959, just seven
years after the then U.S. Commissioner of Education began to fulfill a statutory requirement to periodically publish a list of nationally recognized accrediting agencies
that the Commissioner/Secretary determines to be reliable authorities regarding the quality of the education or training provided by the institutions and/or programs they
accredit. The current scope of the Secretary's recognition of DETC is the accreditation of postsecondary institutions in the United States that offer degree programs
primarily by the distance education method up to and including the professional doctoral degree.
In order to be recognized by the Secretary, an accrediting agency must demonstrate to the Secretary's satisfaction that it meets the Criteria for Recognition, which are stated in Federal regulation. The Criteria do not differentiate between types of accrediting agencies, so the recognition granted to all types of accrediting agencies-regional, institutional, specialized, and programmatic-is identical. Only the specific scope of
recognition varies according to the type of agency recognized.
If you wish further information about the scope of DETC's recognition by the Secretary, the accrediting agency recognition process, or the Secretary's Criteria for Recognition please feel free to contact me.
Carol A. Griffiths
Accrediting Agency Evaluation Unit
Accreditation and State Liaison
1990 K STREET, N.W., WASHINGTON, D.C. 20006
www.ed.gov
Who cares? March 27, 2008 at 1:55 a.m.
Who cares about the letter. It is what it is. You can say all day that they are looked at the same by the .gov. That may be true in theory. In reality, DETC and National Accreditation is looked down upon. That is fact. Most jobs will not accept the degree and most other schools will not either. Why limit yourself to a degree from a school that less than 50% of the jobs will accept when, for the same time, money and effort, get a degree from a Regional school that EVERYONE will accept.
LOL, hopeless March 27, 2008 at 3:22 a.m.
Whatever. Your word, or the Secretary of Education... hmmm. That's a tough one!
I am starting to think the DETC is only looked down upon by you, and the other haters here. My employer has no problem with it. The VA has no problem with it. The Sec Ed has no problem with it. Therefore, I have no problem with it.
tic tac March 27, 2008 at 3:38 a.m.
RA schools have a problem with it... DETC schools admit they are inferior to RA schools, State/Federal applications require REGIONALLY accredited degrees, not national. Employers have problems with it... why would you buy a degree that comes with so many problems when there are RAs out there offering the same thing?
Why? I already got my promotion March 27, 2008 at 4:06 a.m.
Why the hell would I waste time and money on a RA degree (when I don't have either) when I can take a NA degree and get promoted for less cost, and relatively less time (no commute, that is a HUGE consideration). I can hang with what I have learned (classes, experience), and once I put 5 or so years experience under my belt the paper will receive little weight when applying for a new job.
Your educational snobbery just doesn't apply to the average guy. They have families. They cannot work, commute, live, and go to a remote campus.
The DETC has provided a legit accreditation for working people to advance in their careers. What else have we got if not this?
If you do not have a family, a job, or a life, then by all means.... GO TO A REGIONAL SCHOOL AND STOP THE BLOGGING!!!
tic tac March 27, 2008 at 5:15 a.m.
@Why?
I don't have a problem with the DETC; the school I work for has RA, so that is what I use to sell it on these forums.
I make my money in enrollments, you get a RA degree you probably aren't interested in, but feel confident about.
I have bills to pay, too.
tic tac March 27, 2008 at 9:28 a.m.
It looks like I have an admirer/imposter... you wish you could be me apparently. lol
Just A Witness March 27, 2008 at 5:55 p.m.
Is college that big of a deal that people have to sit here and attack each other? There are not a great percentage of people in America with master's degree. Therefore, if a NA, RA, or ACICS degree will work for you then fine. I believe everyone has made some valid points in this forum. However, let us give people the choice where they want to attend. I am not a CSU student and I graduated from a RA school. Here is a link concerning the population in American with degrees.
http://factfinder.census.gov/servlet/STT...
I believe a person has to do what they need to provide for their family. We can talk about CSU and other DETC schools all day long. However, the fact remains that their student body numbers are increasing. The University of Phoenix, Walden and Capella have sites that talk about how bad they are as well. That does not stop UOP from having there numbers increase as well. I mean the Superbowl was held at their stadium and they do not even have a football team. The student has to pick a university or college that fits there educational goal as well as the financial situation. There is no need to tell someone who has debt and a family to take out student loan just to attend a RA school. Many adults not kids out of high school attend DETC schools because of there affordability. In addition, numerous colleges will accept a NA degree for their masters program. Then again, most people stop after obtaining their bachelors degree. I suggest you read this months Forbes magazine that talks about education. There are a great number of people who are very rich in America without a college education.
Therefore, you can continue to argue with each other back and forth. Nevertheless, the fact still remains you are not going to prevent students from attending these colleges. There are too many state, ABHE, TRACS, and DETC schools to try to prevent. I suggest we just get back to our normal lives. If you really have a problem then I suggest you take it up with the U. S. Dept. of Education where you can make an impact.
James March 27, 2008 at 6:48 p.m.
Good link to some useful information concerning accreditation.
Mikel March 28, 2008 at 3:30 p.m.
I have tried many of times to contact Granthem through the internet, but they do not want to answer my questions nor send me any information.
I would not consider any university as serious if they do not even take the time to answer to their prospective students. I would also try to stay away from "DETC" institutions, because this type of accreditation is not really sought after if you do not plan to work in a government or federal institution after you get such degree.
I found T.U.I. to be a very nice alternative to Grantham and they answered all my questions per internet in less then 12 hours. T.U.I. is also regional accredited.
Your education is an investment, choose it wisely.
Best of luck to all
Catching Liars in the Act March 29, 2008 at 6:16 p.m.
To the person posting as Student: March 17, 2007 at 7:53 p.m.
You are LYING. You stated that you are in the military and work with civilian contractors and you spoke to a GS-15 about Grantham University. A GS-15 is not a civilian contractor. Any GS employee is a federal employee that works for the federal goverenment and they are not contractors. I know this because I am a federal government GS employee. So stop lying and putting government employees in the middle of your bogus Grantham degree. Here is what I will tell all of you. I am a government employee that works as a tech rep along side military personnel. There is one military individual that works in my division that is taking classes at Grantham. Almost daily this individual tells me how many problems that he has had with this school. I have even seen some of the course material that he has from Grantham and I must admit that it is bogus. Their course cirriculum will never meet Regional Accreditation status. He showed me a report that he had written that he recieved a grade of an A on. I was shocked. Grantham had the format prepaired for him and all he had to do was type. Totally bogus! When I was in college I remember writing 10 to 15 page papers and reports that had to be formated using APA or MLA formatting. The sad thing is that even though he knows that this school is bogus, he trys to encourage other military members to enroll. Im not disgrediting online education because I completed my degree online with a REGIONALLY ACCREDDITED university. Grantham University is Nationally Accredited and believe me, Regional Accreditation is a higher standard. I have seen the cirriculum from Grantham and believe me, the National Accreditation shows very clearly. If you are going to get your degree online or through distance education at least go to a Regionally Accredited university, which Grantham is not.
tic tac March 29, 2008 at 8:21 p.m.
Sorry everyone but I have not taken my medicine lately and I have too much time in my hands, I suffer from personality disorder and I have several personalities that takes over when I am not taking my medicine. Sorry for all the stupidity and other things.
@Liars March 30, 2008 at 12:29 a.m.
Sir,
I think that is what he meant by it. I too work w/ a GS9 and I too attend Grantham. I can testify we are required to use APA style in writing papers. Yes, in my masters program that all we did was write pages of papers and I had teachers that were easy and many that were tough.
My wife goes to a B&M, RA, and is not an online person. She doesn't want to comprehend the materiel, in my opinion, she likes to be spoon feed as many B&Ms do to students. Its all about experience and a college degree helps get you foot in the door. I have been checking out USAJOBS.com and the government will take either RA or National accredited degrees to include Grantham.
My boss went to a B&M school and consistently I am showing him up as the subject mater expert. It’s a shame as he claims to be an engineer but knows nothing about today’s technological advancements. I'll put my Grantham degree up against anyone who thinks they know computers/electronics...I can run with the heavy hitters--even with my degree from Grantham.
I bet your coworker has not even tried to contact Grantham about his problems. You see many like to complain especially on the Grantham forums but do nothing to try to resolve complaints. Myself, I am very outspoken and I had no problems while attending the university. I am checking into taking the CCE exam for engineers this fall.
Honestly, RA and national are not too different based on my research. RA is based on regions and national is across the US. I can provide it too. I challenge anyone from a RA university to take all 90 of my RA credits from a RA college in IL. If RA is so much better and accepts credits from other RA schools with ease please take me on--prove me wrong!
I bet I get no-one from a RA school that will accept all 90 credits for an EE or EET degree. Why? Colleges have to make money too. I am sorry but RA is not better.
Catching Liars in the Act March 30, 2008 at 7:25 a.m.
Let me layout the facts,
It doesnt matter how much you know about computers and electronics. If the job requires you to have a degree from a Regionally Accredited university and your resume reflects that your degree is from Grantham, which is Nationally Accredited, then you are SOL! Regional Accreditation is a higher standard and that is the bottom line. Please dont babel on about federal government employment and USA JOBS because I a have been a federal employee now for nearly 9 years. Go ahead and apply to USAJobs.gov with your Grantham degree and see if your resume even makes it throught the automated system. You can have all the knowledge you want but if your resume doesn't make it through the system then knowledge doesn't matter. Who cares if you work with a GS-09. As a GS-11, I tell GS-09s what to do all day. For my job series and most other federal job series your degree must be from a Regionally Accredited university which Grantham is not. Stop wasting your money. I have seen Grantham's course material and it is junk. It clearly shows why they only hold National Accreditation. Case closed!
Unbelievable March 30, 2008 at 11:17 a.m.
Most GS employees are idiots. I work with them too. Why do you think they have to hire the Lockheeds, the Raytheons and Boeings to get any decent engineers or projects done. If you want to push paper and pretend your hot sh__t then work for the government. Last time I checked the pay is low and the pensions from back in the old days are gone. I know for a fact the big 3 D-contractors are still promoting Grantham grads. You guys make me laugh.
USAF Doesn't Share Your View March 30, 2008 at 4:38 p.m.
Taken directly from the OTS website:
"To apply for OTS, you are required to be either a graduate of a regionally or nationally accredited college or university or a college senior who is available to depart for training within 365 days."
Taken from:
http://www.afoats.af.mil/OTS/BOT/botappl...
Governmental turds are not worth the air they displace. Whatsamatter? Couldn't cut it in the real world?
Catching Liars in the Act March 30, 2008 at 5:50 p.m.
Catching Liars in the Act,
Bottom Line, Grantham is not Regionally Accreditted. As far as contractors go. Lockheed,Raytheaon, Boeing, L3 Vertex, require engineering degrees from Regionally Accreditterd Universities that are accredited by (ABET),which Grantham lacks. As far as government pay, your an idiot if you think that we are poorly paid, As far as retirement; good pension, and TSP that is matched. Bottom line is Grantham is a scam. I don't know why you Granthamers don't want to concieve to the fact that the degree is not what you thought. The university I have my degree from does not have one complaint on Websites such as this. That is because they are a traditional(REAL) university. Why would you sign up with a school like Grantham when you can go to many of the traditional universities that offer distance education? I will tell you why, because traditional universities will not just take anybody and Grantham will. How do you think that I found this Website? It was the poor Granthamers that work under me that showed it to me. Their is a reason that people on this site are complaining about Grantham. As for the guy a couple of post up challenging anyone on his knowledge of computers, I have seen plenty of people who think they know computers but when you start talking to them about software engineering or computer engineering,or the mathematics used behind Cryptograhic algorithms such as Quadratic Sieve Factoring or Gaussian Elimination equations, you know, the typical mathematics and science behind computers; things they dont teach at Grantham, then you find they know zilch. Speaking of Math, I have personally seen Grantham goers taking pre-calculus exams and sitting their using software programs to factor the equations for them. That is a total joke. This kind of crap would not happen at a traditional university even if you are taking an online program because the proctoring is monitored. Since you mentioned contractors, I happen to know a few site managers for some Raytheon, L3Vertex Aerospace, and Lockheed contracts. I am going to give them a call to see just how many Granthamers are employed with them. In the mean time, you should consider going to a traditional university that is Regionally Accredited and has ABET Accreditation for their engineering programs. Their are plenty of them that offer distance education that will be respected and valued. Enough said!
Grantham is easy....that's why March 30, 2008 at 7:42 p.m.
You don't have to take an exam to be admitted to Grantham. You don't have to take an SAT or ACT exam either. You don't have to have good grades in high school. All you need is a check book. How many people who went to Grantham actually failed a class? None, that's how many because it's impossible to fail a class there. Everything is open book and if you do fail, they give you another chance to take the exam. How many "real" schools will give you a second chance on a final exam. None that I know of. Grantham is a joke.
Grantham SAT requirements March 30, 2008 at 8:25 p.m.
Folks,
I did some research and found that Grantham does have SAT requirements. see below:
A home school student who wishes to enroll at Grantham University may apply for admission as a non-degree seeking student and may enroll in no more than four (4) credit hours (undergraduate coursework) per enrollment period. Exceptions may be granted by the Provost for students wishing to enroll in more than four (4) credit hours. The prospective student must also have demonstrated one of the following:
ACT with a minimum average selection index of 18
SAT with a minimum average selection index of 440 Math and 440 English
PSAT with a minimum average selection index of 147
Demonstration of successful completion (grade "C" or higher) of college coursework in which college credit was earned
Provide state verification of minimum 11th grade level competency
Any applicant who is beyond the age of compulsory school attendance and has not completed secondary school through home schooling must meet one of the above criteria to establish eligibility to benefit from instruction at Grantham University. No student below the compulsory age of attendance (17) will be permitted to enroll until it is determined that enrollment won't be detrimental to the student's success. For persons not meeting the requirements for enrollment, a record will be made showing the reasons for acceptance. All exceptions to the above guidelines will be based on review and approval of the record by the University Provost. Students must attain high school diploma or equivalent before being allowed to enroll into a degree program.
I wish folks would do research before they make claims that Grantham doesn't do this or does do that...present only true facts people.
@cathing liars March 30, 2008 at 8:38 p.m.
LMFAO,
your kidding right...
from your quote
"I have seen plenty of people who think they know computers but when you start talking to them about software engineering or computer engineering,or the mathematics used behind Cryptograhic algorithms such as Quadratic Sieve Factoring or Gaussian Elimination equations, you know, the typical mathematics and science behind computers
Computers are far more complicated than that mt friend. These devices only run programs. I'm sorry but not all of what you're saying is true! As a computer programmer, you must have knowledge with C/C++, javascripting, Unix/Linux, SQL, etc. Math is important however; creativity and the ability to code is something learned through practice.
I've done some research and Grantham appears to teach C/C++ and a couple other programming skills that good. I didn't see anything out of the ordinary about this college other than a bunch of people with nothing better to do than put it and its students down. Hey you can either program or you cant. just my two cents.
@Grantham is easy....that's why March 30, 2008 at 8:47 p.m.
Bull s**t. Half of the griping around here is from "students" who couldn't do the work.
I personally have failed exams, and I went on bashing crusades as well. Then I realized I just didn't study and prepare enough, and I managed to pass.
Grantham has a 30% retention and graduation rate, period. If it were even close to the case you present, it would be much higher, and there would be no griping here. There have been no lawsuits, complaints with the BBB or DETC, or Federal Investigations. University of Pheonix cannot claim this, and they have the largest online student base in the nation.
If the author of this site were to include anonymous reviews for the brick and mortar schools, you would find the same Jerry-Springer garbage that is littered across EVERY online review.
Also, the "regionally accredited" nugget on the job postings is supervisor specific. I have found listings that specifically list ABET, I am not challenging that fact. However, had I the time to attend a B&M, that is RA and ABET, I would have (and, I may still, after my kids grow up). Between 40+ hours a week, raising 2 kids, and acting as a sole-breadwinner, I just couldn't give up more time in commuting or classwork (lectures). Grantham provided a means to learn, and try to get more competitive in my current title. Even with 6 years of systems engineering experience, I could not hold the title without some form of Bachelors of Science. Now I can.
And, for the record, I have met MORE than my fair share of airheads with RA degrees from great schools. They come in with a chip on both shoulders, and ultimately accomplish nothing. Most of them hold out for that cherry Government job to open up, and park until retirement. In my opinion, more power to them. In the meantime, work still has to get done, and the rest of us have to pick up the slack.
Catching Liars in the Act March 30, 2008 at 8:47 p.m.
USAF Doesn't Share Your View:
More power to you to become an Airforce Officer. I have a family member who is a commissioned Air Force Officer stationed at Tinker. Fortunately for him, he obtained his degree from a Regionally Accredited university so that if he decides to leave the service, he will not have any problems if he plans on working for an employer that requires you to have a degree from a Regionally Accredited university, as many of them do.Besides, This is about civilian employment. I know people who have gotten a commission with no degree because they are outstanding military members who meet the criteria to get accepted into special programs to get commissioned witout a degree. Obviousely, you are a Granthamer who had to participate in a ridiculouse Grantham degree program to get what you wanted. Whatsamatter? Couldn't cut it in the real university? You said it. I found this Website because military members that are Grantham students and work under me showed me this Website. I will tell you just as I tell them, with all of the traditional universities that are offering distance education, find one and enroll so that you stop getting ripped off. These guys are service members and deserve better. How many complaints do you see on this Website about traditional(Real)universities? Thought so. Grantham is joke and that is the bottom line. Stop trying to protect this degree mill and just go enroll into a real school. By the way, do even think of trying to transfer your credits because as you have read from the earlier postings from others, your credits will not transfer. Why is this? Because Regionally Accredited universities don't take credits from Grantham, which is Nationally Accredited Trust me, the course curriculum they give to their students shows why they are Nationally Accredited Must I say anymore.
LOL, strike a nerve? March 30, 2008 at 8:58 p.m.
Aww.... did poor little Govt Doosh get his feelings hurt? I am sorry.
I sincerely hope the next administration thins the turds a bit in your ranks. Let us see if your retirement follows the pink-slip.
Catching Liars in the Act March 30, 2008 at 9:12 p.m.
LMFAO,
Your Quote "I've done some research and Grantham appears to teach C/C++ and a couple other programming skills that good"
You are a Grantham student, not someone who has just done some research on Grantham. Besides, I know what computer programming languages are all about. Would you like me to define the difference between a software engineer and a computer programmer. There is a difference you know. Let me know and I will do that. In the mean time enroll into a real university that does not have complaints the way Grantham University does. You will be better off.
Spell check on isle 4 March 30, 2008 at 9:12 p.m.
@Catching
prepaired
formated
disgrediting
ACCREDDITED
babel
accreditterd
concieve
their (wrong form)
obviousely
Where did you go to school?
UOP March 30, 2008 at 9:26 p.m.
http://www.ripoffreport.com/searchresult...
More complaints, federal settlements. 16% retention rate, allegations of Title IV abuse. This is the very definition of a scam. But, at least it is RA.
Grantham has some blogs and misc. anonymous posts, but nothing REAL. You have an axe to grind, then go to the DETC, BBB, or FTC. If not, shut up and color.
Catching Liars in the Act March 30, 2008 at 9:29 p.m.
To LOL, strike a nerve?
Well I guess we will just sit back and see what happens when the next administration comes in. Thinning out highly unlikely. But in the event of such actions, I will have no problem finding a high level job with my degree from a Regionally Accredited, traditional(Real) university. The only person who's nerve was struck was yours when you read all of this information on your worthless degree from Grantham. What you need to do is stop wasting your time reading this because the word is out that this school is worthless. Spend more time trying to find a Regionally Accredited university to enroll in. Or are you affraid that a real university will be too hard for you to get into. Let me know if you want to know more. For that matter, all of what you have read on this site about your university being a paper mill should be enough.
Catching Liars in the Act March 30, 2008 at 9:45 p.m.
Thanks Spell check on isle 4 for the correction on my spelling. It is always nice to have a Granthamer correct typing errors for us folks who graduated from traditional(Real)Regionally Accredited non degree mill universities. Thanks for your attention to detail.
30% retention/graduation rate March 30, 2008 at 10:19 p.m.
That's pretty freaking sad if you ask me. That just goes to show that people are either:
A: learning that Grantham is a waste of time or,
B: are sick of getting the Grantham run-a-round and are leaving.
It does not say that Grantham is a tough school.
Oh, and I use to work for Grantham several years ago and while they may SAY that they have enrollment requirements, in reality, the only requirement is payment. Thank you, but try again.
Nope March 30, 2008 at 10:25 p.m.
Your comments, and others, have no bearing on what I will, or can do. At this point I am down to sheer entertainment value.
FACT: The DOE recognizes Grantham as a legitimate nationally accredited institution of higher learning. The CHEA recognizes Grantham. Gratham is a member of the SOC, and is approved for DANTES and GI Bill.
FACT: There has been 1 legitimate BBB complaint against GU, which was resolved. That is impressive since they have been in operation since 1951.
FACT: GU has never come under any federal investigation, of any kind. Considering it was established in 1951, that is impressive.
FACT: The armed services recognize GU as a legimate source of talent for commissions.
FACT: The only source of doubt seen since 1951 has been in the last few years, since Hurricane Katrina. They pulled some nasty business moves trying to recover, and they are paying for it in public relations. That was pretty dumb firing the low-level employees like they did.
FACT: This degree has taught me a great deal about the underlying principles for my occupation that I could not operate in an engineering position without.
FACT: Degree mills, accrediation mills, and other money grabs have no staying power. It has been 57 years since the school's inception, I think someone would have started asking the right questions long before now.
FACT: This degree has gotten me promoted twice, and my past and present employers have no problems with the accreditation. The only source of impropriety comes from anonymous online blogs.
With all of the above, I cannot see a reason why someone would not attend an online school. This NA phenomena is not going away, and the sooner the traditionalists get used the idea that their degrees no longer guarantee them job security, the better. Jobs depend on what you have done, what your are capable of doing, and the attitude you present while doing it; not the diploma you hide behind when times get tough. Step up, or get put out. That's the way engineering should be.
-And that's all I have to say about that.
@nope March 31, 2008 at 11:39 a.m.
I couldn't have said it better myself.
And that too is all I'm going to say
more facts March 31, 2008 at 12:29 p.m.
Try getting real school to accept your grantham credits. The fact is, less than 10% will accept any credits at all. Good luck though. Spend your money with grantham. You could have spent your time and money better, but you know everything there is to know about higher education.
Job March 31, 2008 at 11:42 p.m.
That's a lie... DETC transfers two thirds of the time according to their own study. It might not transfer to Harvard but it will into 3rd tier schools.
info April 1, 2008 at 1:25 a.m.
Yeh right Job! Name one legitimate university that is regionally accredited that will take credits from Grantham. Please let me know so that I can email them and post their response of denial here on this website for all to see. Why is it that Grantham students are always here trying to convince people that their school is legitimate instead of studying? I know why, because they just cheat on their poorly proctored open book test that a highschooler could easily pass. Thats why!
proof was already posted April 1, 2008 at 3:26 a.m.
Anytime that anyone has posted on this board that "so and so will accept Grantham credits", an e-mail has been sent to that school and without fail, every one has said that they WILL NOT accept Grantham credits. That is a far cry from 2/3. Oh, and Job....."DETC transfers two thirds of the time according to their own study"? According to THEIR OWN STUDY!?!?!? Yeah, I'm sure that's not biased. Jeez.
Proof? April 1, 2008 at 4:12 a.m.
I called the listed contacts, and they could not recall denying transfer of credit based soley on NA criterion alone. Your "proof" is nothing more than an outlook-generated forgery. You should be ashamed.
USMC OCS April 1, 2008 at 4:28 a.m.
http://officer.marines.com/page/Officer-...
"Does it matter what college I attended?
The program is available to students or graduates from any accredited four-year college or university. "
Called them up, Grantham is a go.
Listen April 1, 2008 at 5:04 a.m.
Ok Proof, Your quote "I called the listed contacts, and they could not recall denying transfer of credit based soley on NA criterion alone" I beleive you Proof. It was not just because of their National Accreditation. It is because those legitimate institutions know that Grantham is bogus. Don't for one minute think that real universities dont know the Grantham scam. Those instituions that were emailed are very aware of the bogus course material that Grantham uses. Come on! open book testing and cheating and so forth. Lets be real here. Stop fooling yourself because legitimate schools are not buying it. Maybe if they were not so bogus then just maybe real institutions would look past the NA criterian. In reality everyone who is up on education knows that Grantham is a joke.
Go elsewhere April 1, 2008 at 5:07 a.m.
Whatever your major is, there is an online program from a regionally accredited school, for the same price or lower, without the myriad of problems that Grantham has.
Proof? (Cont) April 1, 2008 at 5:26 a.m.
The only thing that was common to all was a request for list of curricula; I mentioned Grantham and the overwhelming response seemed to be "who?" I received the same response when I had mentioned Columbia Southern University (the best rated on this site), and Fort Hayes State. All parties I have spoken to seemed to be more than willing to accomodate, provided I give course descriptions and details for scope. I do not believe that is unreasonable, given the depth of most of the subject matter at hand.
Perhaps the infamy that you speak of is not as clear as you have been led to believe.
I could detail each course for them, but why bother. I have already wasted theirs, and my time verifying the libel contained here.
To Proof April 1, 2008 at 8:33 a.m.
You sir, are a liar. That is why the names of the contact people at that school were left in the e-mail, so anyone could call or e-mail and get the same information. I stand by what was posted because I am the one who e-mailed every single school that was quoted as taking Grantham credits and each one verified that they would not.
So, what position do you hold at Grantham?
Yet another one April 1, 2008 at 8:45 a.m.
Hi Sam,
I forwarded your email to our Evaluations department as they are the ones who review incoming coursework to Miramar and this is the response they gave:
We would not accept coursework from Grantham University. The reason being that although they are accredited by DETC, we only accept coursework from schools that are accredited by a regional accrediting bodies i.e. WASC (Western Association of Schools and Colleges), MS (Middle States Association of Schools and Colleges), etc.
If you have any additional questions, please let me know.
Wendy Stewart
San Diego Miramar College
Transfer Center Director
(619) 388-7476
List of successful transfer schools April 1, 2008 at 2:23 p.m.
Here is the short list of schools Grantham students have successfully transferred to, mostly for acceptance into master's programs:
Kaplan
University of Southern California
Fontbonne
California Polytechnic
Harvard (Special circumstance, high GMAT and career got him in)
William Howard Taft University
Nova Southeast University of Phoenix
American Intercontinental Online
Touro College
Capella University
Argosy University
Strayer University
Jones International
Colorado Technical University
Western Governor's University (is NA and RA)
MIT (Sloan school of management, SDM)
Louisiana Tech
Kansas State
Southeastern Louisiana U
Cleveland State U
City University (Wash.)
Liberty University (Va.)
Bellevue University (Neb.)
Salve Regina University (RI)
I am sure there are many, many more; these are the schools my fellow alumni have had success with. The long list can be found here:
http://www.geocities.com/elsupremo1two3/...
Many thanks to "Virus" for researching these.
I looked into moving on to CSUN, but California public schools will not accept a NA degree, but the private schools will.
If you have a school in mind, these are the men to speak with:
Michael P. Lambert, Executive Director
1601 Eighteenth Street NW
Washington, DC 20009-2529
Phone: 202-234-5100
Fax: 202-332-1386
Email: detc@detc.org
Web: www.detc.org
Gary R. Sutter, Ph.D.
Provost
Grantham University
e-mail: sutterg@grantham.edu
(w) 800-955-2527 Ext. 252
Mr. Lambert has been instrumental, along with Dr. Sutter, in getting students accepted into many institutions. Before you enroll, make absolutely sure the school you intend on transferring to will accept the credits.
And, for the last time (psycho), I do not work for Grantham. I am an alumni, and satisfied customer.
You really have to come up with some new ammunition.
isn't Miramar College a 2 yr college? April 1, 2008 at 4:27 p.m.
Why would you want to transfer to a 2 year college? I doubt, they would accept my credits from a regional college in NC. no regional college accepts all your credits. How else would they make money?
at it again April 1, 2008 at 11:46 p.m.
Boy Oh Boy! The Grantham spin doctors are at it again. Just take a look at that list of schools. You have got to be kidding me. I guess the emails that were sent to the reputable schools just did not cut it. First off, why should you have to go thruogh the trouble of getting someone from detc.org to represent on your behalf just to get a reputable institution to accept your Grantham credits? How rediculous! That really says alot about Grantham University.
Anecdotal April 1, 2008 at 11:56 p.m.
The above schools have been reported from actual Grantham students who persued their masters, or bachelors elsewhere. I have spoken to many of them via student forums, and I am absolutely certain they are not "grantham spin doctors."
The online degree programs are still in their infancy (when compared to the ivies, and the overseas), of course a mediator gets involved. For that matter, regional to regional offices touch base (registrars) when working out transfers as well. Why would Grantham be any different?
I understand your contempt for Grantham, and in certain phases of the program I would have been right there with you. I don't, however, understand your reserve in this matter. I have a feeling we will be at this for a long, long time. I just wish you would come up with some new material from time to time. I am bored.
Sam April 1, 2008 at 11:56 p.m.
I feel I've been fortunant to have found Grantham University. I've never been to college (except for USMC "university", but that's another story), so I can't compare GU to a "brick & mortar".
I will be completed with Semester 4 in about the next couple months. The BSEET degree has guaranteed a promotion to me at my job.
I'm 43 years old with 3 daughters and a wife and a 40+ hour a week job and no way could I go to a B&M school. Even if I had the time for a B&M school, I appreciate more the ability to go at my own pace with GU.
Maybe I have been luckier than most, but the SAs and Instructors (except for a couple) assigned to me, have been superior.
I am no way trying to diminish the importance of other's troubles that have been posted on the board, but I feel GU has been the best way to obtain a home-study degree. Furthermore, I have learned a lot more in mathematics, electronics, chemistry and the other courses offered in my curriculum.
I've had to get some issues resolved and each time it was resolved to my satisfaction. I just think the way it's "gone about it" determines the end result. I always say, "You get more flies with honey than with c.rap."
As far as accredidation; it fits fine with my life's situation. I would highly recommend Grantham University to another.
Correction April 2, 2008 at 12:05 a.m.
Above, I cited the Grantham graduation rate at 30%. Please accept my most sincere apologies, the graduation rate is 41%.
Here is my reference:
http://oedb.org/rankings/graduation-rate...
If anyone knows of my current ratings or standings, please post them here?
at it again April 2, 2008 at 12:10 a.m.
The last two post are evidence that the spinsters at Grantham are watching and instantly try to post a rebutall. I wonder how much pay the average Grams spinster makes hanging around eyeballing this site.
at it again April 2, 2008 at 12:13 a.m.
Just check out the two post above Correction. Proof! Proof! Proof!
The spin Dr.s April 2, 2008 at 12:34 a.m.
Grantham actually has computers in it's break room for employees to post rebuttals to places like this and ropoffreport.com and others. They check it all the time. It's funny to watch. Most employees don't believe the hype, they just need the numbers or DeAnn will fire them.
-yawn- April 2, 2008 at 2:21 a.m.
More of the same..... surely you can come up with something better than that.
A vet April 2, 2008 at 5:36 p.m.
@ Spin Dr.
Sir,
Don’t you have better things to do then post ridiculous gossip? You still have no concrete proof other than you own words...others on here HAVE NOT proven any points that regional is better than national. I hope you’re not referring to the 2 year college that posted they don’t accept regional—it is posted on the website. My question is this… Why would you want to transfer to a 2 year community college for?
Also, I’m sorry but regional to regional don’t always transfer credits either. I’ll bet you my paycheck that if emailed they wouldn’t accept my 49 credits from Florida State (its regional). I wish you folks would either prove your point or move on; you wasting up bandwidth here on your childish nonsense.
Also, when you post fiction here it degrades the primary use intended for this website and you’re degrading out military members who attend the university. I will stop you here when I say I am NO way an employee of Grantham or “spinster” as you’ve pointed out others in here.
What do you think you're doing? You should stop and think that Grantham has to be a good school or why else is it supported at the DoD and dept of Ed levels.
You should be supporting our troops and the fact that they decided to go back to college (yes, grantham too) if not you're degrading them and its very unpatriotic of you, sir.
Thank you.
the truth April 3, 2008 at 12:14 a.m.
Vet,
You need to read the earlier post of people that were trying to say that Grantham credits or actual degree had been accepted by legitimate regional universities. An email was sent to those school asking if Grantham credits or degrees would transfer and a response email was sent back saying they would not accept Grantham credits. The email responses were posted on this site to show positive proof that Grantham is a joke AKA degree mill= worthless. Grantham must be jacked up because legitimate traditional universities that are regionally accredited do not have the same garbage posted about them. Even the traditional schools that offer online programs don't have complaints. Grantham seems to be a ripoff. Never attend a university that does not have an athletic program. I checked Grantham's Website and they don't have squat for athletics nor do they have regional accreditation. Also, I highly doubt that you are a student at FSU.
to a vet.....from a vet April 3, 2008 at 12:17 a.m.
First, it is not fiction. MANY e-mails have been posted here by various schools saying that they will not accept Grantham credits. That is nothing new. I do not think that Grantham is a good school.
Being a former employee and a former student I can tell you first hand what they really think of active military. They are a meal card, nothing more. Get as many active military to send in TA as you can. Oh, and ignore the Vets because the VA will only pay half time and most will not enroll when they find that out. Vets are more trouble that active students with TA.
Being a former student I can tell you that EVERY SINGLE school that I have approached asking about my Grantham credits have denied EVERY SINGLE credit I had earned there. I had some community college (RA) courses that I had taken over 15 years ago that they did accept. What does that tell you?
Being a Vet myself, I would like to see other Vets and active duty guys get the most out of their HARD EARNED TA and GI Bill benefits. There are a lot of good RA schools out there that will treat you with the respect and honor that you deserve. Grantham is not one of those schools.
False April 3, 2008 at 1:07 a.m.
QUOTE: "Oh, and ignore the Vets because the VA will only pay half time and most will not enroll when they find that out. Vets are more trouble that active students with TA."
I have received full time benefits since semester 1 was complete. I had 1/2 time going in, and once I completed my semester, all monies were back-dated.
As long as you complete 12+ credits within 16-19 weeks with Grantham, you will receive the full time rate.
GI BILL payed all of tuition, and the overage was almost equal. I actually banked $16,000 or so tax-free along with earning my degree.
If any of the readers have questions about the GI Bill, I will be more than happy to answer them. I completed the BSEET and received full-time benefits (save 1 semester that I had to retake an exam and finished 2 months late) for 6 semesters.
As for the e-mails, go to hell. A few forged text-based postings (considering the success I have seen with my fellow alumni) do not count as any "proof".
I am a vet, and I approve of this message.
And another thing.... April 3, 2008 at 1:11 a.m.
QUOTE: "regionally accredited do not have the same garbage posted about them"
The blogosphere is still young, give it time. I have found sites for my old college (HPU) with some of the same garbage.
Check out any university on this site and you will find the same niche posting negativity here.
This is why no one hands a megaphone to the retard in the crowd. The legitimate claims get drowned out in the static. What a shame!
"I dropped out of college... YAY"
Typical Grantham retort April 3, 2008 at 1:25 a.m.
That is typical of Grantham employees. When the lies don't work, go right to name calling. You must work directly under DeAnn.
know you April 3, 2008 at 1:29 a.m.
@ A vet
Your quote "I wish you folks would either prove your point or move on; you wasting up bandwidth here on your childish nonsense".
Don't worry about bandwith because networks are engineered by real network engineers that graduated from regionally accredited universities which teach the proper mathematics to figure bandwith and latency solutions for networks. If you were really affiliated with FSU as you claim you would know that. Your either a Grantham student or graduate.
Blah April 3, 2008 at 1:33 a.m.
"Typical Grantham retort"
Again with the "Grantham Spinster" defense.
Why don't you spawn some more forged e-mails? How about an acreditation rumor?
Can you give DeAnn the clap? That could be fun.
The Challenge April 3, 2008 at 1:53 a.m.
Please post one legitimate regional university that will accept Grantham's credits or Bachelors. I will gladly send that institution an email and see what the response is. Why do I get the feeling that the answer will be no. I know why! because it has been done before and the rejection emails have already been posted as proof that real universities know the Grantham scam.
See above April 3, 2008 at 3:14 a.m.
So you can spawn more forgeries to "support" your claim?
You word, reputation, and credibility mean absolutely nothing here. You have done nothing more than tell little lies in hopes supporting a pointless crusade against an institution that has delivered success to so many, but unfortunately, not you.
The proof is in the defense of this institution. Myself, and many other alumni have stepped in to add at least a doubt to your moronic arguments. This forum is for graduates, and dropouts alike.
If it were as bad as you have presented it (over the last couple of years, I might add), then absolutely no one would come in its' defense.
"The Grantham Spin Doctors" as you so boringly like to use, are the Alumni, and satisfied customers of Grantham intervening (the ying to your idiotic yang) to make sure there is balance.
So, in conclusion, keep marching on with your megaphone. There will always be (myself included) alumni to stand against the lies, deceit, and doubt that you so carelessly post here.
Network water-head April 3, 2008 at 4:23 a.m.
"teach the proper mathematics to figure bandwith and latency solutions for networks"
Idiot. This is why blogs are so easy to set up. Only space is a factor, not bandwidth, or any of the buzzwords you threw out there to try and sound smart.
So far we have occupied only 453,120 bytes of this guy's web server. That is a drop in the bucket for 18 months of (very) active blogging. Ah, the wonder of cheap storage.
know you April 3, 2008 at 5:03 a.m.
@ water
The point of the matter is that Grantham is a non respected university and that is the bottom line. If they would put as much time in trying to get regional accreditation as they do spin doctoring they would be ahead of the game. Bottom line is they can't get regional accreditation because their curriculum is that of paper mill standard = toilet paper. The school takes anyone so that should say it all.
In reality April 3, 2008 at 5:18 a.m.
The 50/50 rule expired a short time ago. You will see many online universities applying, and gaining RA. "Non Respected" by you, sure (I think you have made that clear), but respect is defined by the individual presenting themselves. If you know your stuff, and kill them at the interview, the education is only validation of that fact.
If you are entry-level, do not go to Grantham. I cannot stress that enough. Let me repeat it: IF YOU ARE ENTRY LEVEL, DO NOT GO TO GRANTHAM!
If you have experience in the field, be it in field engineering, or are a technician looking to move up, Grantham is a perfect opportunity to do so. I can only speak of the BSEET, but the courses offered were genuine, challenging (if not just cruel), and completely relevant in every way to electronics and computer programming. I would not able to do the things that I do at work if I didn't have the Grantham foundation to build on. These principles took me out of electronics maintenance, put me in field engineering (AAS), and carved a spot for me in engineering (BSEET).
But, then again, I read a lot of other books too. I will concede the point that the Grantham curriculum only accounts for about 1/2 of the crap I have packed in my head. I am continually learning through whatever means available, and that comes out in the interview as well.
The Technical Director for our organization himself stated:
"A undergrad is a undergrad. All it shows is an ability for problem-solving. It is up to the person to move from there."
If you want a degree that will set you up for life, fire off that application to Yale, Harvard, or wherever. I think if you had the scores to get in, you would not be wasting your time here.
50/50 Reference April 3, 2008 at 5:30 a.m.
If you do not know what the 50/50 rule is, here is the reference:
know you April 3, 2008 at 6:02 a.m.
@ In reality
Actually I'm just sitting in my dorm room here in College Station. My parents took my American Express away so that I could not have any spring break fun so I thought it would be cool to blog a little. Your school still sucks though according to what I have been reading. Hopefully when I graduate I will have Grantham grads as competition when interviewing for jobs. Why are you onliners so frustrated with us real university goers? Oh well, see ya next year.
so many alumni? April 3, 2008 at 12:42 p.m.
What, all one of you and all the other Grantham empoyees? Funny.
You know, I thought it was insulting when I was being trained as a salesman....um, I mean, Student Advisor. I was told by the people that trained me (the Director of Admissions) that "military people like to be told what to do. That is how they operate. Tell them to go get their TA, don't ask them to."
Pretty insulting huh? Pretty crappy way to treat the people that you SAY you are trying to help and are out their risking their life. If you want to put money in their pockets, go right ahead, just expect to be trated like that every step of the way.
Patriot card is lame April 3, 2008 at 4:57 p.m.
"Pretty insulting huh? Pretty crappy way to treat the people that you SAY you are trying to help and are out their risking their life. If you want to put money in their pockets, go right ahead, just expect to be trated like that every step of the way."
Nice try. I have overseen the research, and enrollment of a coworker into GU's Computer Science program. I pleaded with him to explore all of the alternative schools listed here, and explained the shortfalls of the DETC acreditation to him in great detail. After all was said and done, he enrolled at GU anyway. Perhaps it is merely because he witnessed my promotion as a result of the GU BSEET, it is a known quantity to him.
At no one point was he made uncomfortable, or felt any pressure to enroll. He was pressured, however, by AIU and UOP on a daily basis.
I have been keeping a close eye on his studeies, mainly to get a feel for any confirmation of the tactics mentioned here. So far he has no complaints, and his SPR and intructors have been very helpful.
The emotional appeal you have presented is lame, and downright pathetic. I don't think a RA can set up shop in Baghdad or Basra, bub.
@know you April 3, 2008 at 5:02 p.m.
"Hopefully when I graduate I will have Grantham grads as competition when interviewing for jobs."
Hopefully Grantham grads will be interviewing you when you look for a job. Bring it, it will be me. You better study, and you better retain something useful.
From what I have seen about your rant on bandwidth, you are nothing more than a parrot for buzzwords. I really hate those.
Good luck in your studies at College Station, sorry to hear mommy and daddy took away your allowance. I, in the meantime, have a family to feed. I am daddy.
@ Patriot card is lame April 4, 2008 at 12:56 a.m.
Funny that you pleaded with him to explore other schools after you went there yourself. That says a lot.
Of Course April 4, 2008 at 1:10 a.m.
I used his (my colleague) case as an unbiased example for independent selection of program, and venue. He wants to persue a Computer Science degree, and I have already stated above that RA's have CS degrees coming out of their ears. If he were to select a school (namely Grantham), I wanted him to see every pitfall that he may run into along the way. I showed him this site, the ripoff reports, and also the chronicle. Even with all of that, he settled in on Grantham.
The last thing I want for him is to make real progress in his studies, and run across a blog that would make him doubt his decision. I feel that with all of the information provided, and the fact he spent a month shopping, and researching, he could feel good about the choice he has made.
That is the worst part about this site, and the ripoff report. That doubt factor is very hard to overcome (thanks to you, you lying turds) when times get tough (unexpected delays, seemingly impossible assignments). If someone goes in already knowing about it, and makes up their own mind, they are a more determined student for it.
More name calling April 4, 2008 at 2:08 a.m.
Yep, more name calling from Grantham employees.
I find it funny that you, and people like you, are quick to say that the e-mails posted are "fakes". I figured you would, that is why the contact information was posted with them for all to see. I really do not care if you believe them or not. They were not posted for you, they were posted for others that were looking into this sham of a school. I'm sure that many potential students have read them and, hopefully, most contacted the other schools to verify the information. See, unlike you, I don't expect people to blindly follow the information that I post. I actually WANT them to follow up and find out for themselves. I encourage them to contact the other schools and ask the questions. I want them to contact potential employers and see what they think of this school. The more potential students that read these posts, the more potential students will be able to make informed decisions about their education. So, you can lead the chearleading section if you want. I'm glad that you do because it makes more people wonder why you feel to need to put down and call names at the people who do not feel like you do. Keep up the good work.
Are you dense? April 4, 2008 at 3:03 a.m.
"Yep, more name calling from Grantham employees."
You're kidding, right? You really got it bad, man.
Also, I would also encourage the readers to check the list of schools that have been posted by Alumni as successful transfer schools. I am sure there are many, many more, but those have been specifically plugged by Alumni that have furthered their studies elswhere (traitors).
The DETC reports 70% success, and there are a TON of schools in the US. Find one that you can work with, and run with it.
As far as employers go, I can only speak for the contractor side of the Department of Defense. They pay tuition, promote after completion... what other validation does a guy need?
Also, I didn't call your e-mails "fakes"; I called them forgeries. Your experience, references, and education couldn't get you in. I get that. It is not their fault they don't want to bet on a dropout.
and even more name calling April 4, 2008 at 3:08 a.m.
Keep up the name calling, it just goes to proove my point. Thanks. Calling people who figure out that Grantham is a bad deal and want to transfer out are "traitors"? You really have issues.
70% transfer rate? You need to check your numbers.
Call them fakes or forgeries all you want. They are there for anyone to follow up with. Again, keep up the good work.....rah rah rah Grantham.
It was meant to be a joke April 4, 2008 at 3:15 a.m.
"Thanks. Calling people who figure out that Grantham is a bad deal and want to transfer out are "traitors"? You really have issues."
"Traitors" was supposed to be a joke.
I hate to keep plugging this site, but here it is again:
http://distancelearn.about.com/od/accred...
I know it is a biased source, but the DETC is backed by the DOE, and you are merely backed by opinions. I still value the word of the Secretary of Education, and Mr. Lambert, over yours anyday.
Good for you April 4, 2008 at 3:17 a.m.
I'm glad you do. Keep following it. As for me, I believe what other schools and employers think about a school, and Grantham is very low on their list. The DOE can say that everything is equal, but they are not the ones doing the hireing or transfering credits, so until they do, you are out of luck.
interesting observation April 4, 2008 at 3:20 a.m.
I think it's interesting to note that several reviews with near perfect scores have been posted in just a few days. Hmmmm, someone at Grantham trying to bump up with 5.1 score they are receiving. No fair padding the numbers DeAnn and George. That's not playing fair.
The word is out, there are more to come April 4, 2008 at 3:24 a.m.
"No fair padding the numbers DeAnn and George"
Nope. The alumni have caught on to what you have been up to, Jason, and are doing something about it.
Yin and Yang....
Also, out of luck?
I am an engineer now. I win. Woot!!
One more thing.. April 4, 2008 at 3:29 a.m.
"they are not the ones doing the hireing or transfering credits, so until they do, you are out of luck."
Alas, they are the ones paying for the education. What better way of showing approval for a university than paying an employee to attend?
General Motors is in: http://www.grantham.edu/other/gm_courses...
Raytheon, Boeing, JT3, Sandia Labs, EG&G are in. Here are more:
Alcoa Mill Products
Allied Signal Aerospace
American Home Security
AMTS Data Systems
Analytical Systems, Inc
Applied Systems Inc
Automotive Systems Laboratory
Bailey Controls
Baker Hughes Inteq
Bell Canada
BellSouth Telecommunications
Benton County Information Systems
Bryan Memorial Hospital
Caterpillar Inc
CECOM-LSSO, Eric Stream
Cell Star LTD
Coastal Engineering
Comdial Telecommunications
Computer Science Corporation
Con Agra Foods
Corning Cable Systems
Daimler Chrysler
Eagan, McAllister Associates, Inc.
GM- Metal Fabrication
Green Mountain Power
GTech Corporation
HAI Finance Corp
Harley Davidson
HB Media Group
Hiawatha Community Hospital
Hibernia National Bank
Hitachi High-Tech Electronics Engineering Co Ltd
Hutchinson Technologies
Kelly Services
Kimberly-Clark Corporation
Lear Corporation
Liquid Container
Lowes Home Improvement
ManTech
May Department Stores Co.
MeadWestvaco Corp
Meridian Imaging Solutions
Meridian One Corporation
Miller Brewing Co
MN Star Technologies
Morgan Gin Company
NASA
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Nunkin & Bush
Pacific Sunwear
Picker International
Praxis Inc.
Qwest
Communications International
Raytheon
RCG Information Technology
ROCKWELL COLLINS
Sandia National Laboratories
Skyworks Solutions Inc
South Carolina Electric and Power
St Microelectronics
Stanley Technologies Inc
Teal Electronics
Technion Communications Corp
Tessenderlo-Kerley
The Boeing Company
The Raymond Corporation
Thomson Consumer Electronics
Thomson Multimedia Inc
Union Pacific Railroad
US Steel Gary Works
US West Pathways
Verizon Communications
Visteon Systems
Xylan Corp
York International Corporation
So what you are selling here is the fact that this list of tuition paying employers will shell out the cash for Grantham, but won't hire them?
I dunno 'bout that mang.
Good job George April 4, 2008 at 3:33 a.m.
Tell him like it is George. How's that new baby of yours?
Your only weapon is doubt April 4, 2008 at 3:38 a.m.
You have only come back with doubt and deception, and that really is sad. You have presented forged e-mails, told outright lies, impersonated people, and that is the best you can do?
I AM NOT A FRICKEN GU EMPLOYEE!
Come back when you have some new ammunition, Jason.
OK George April 4, 2008 at 3:42 a.m.
Keep up the good work. This guy is a lieing turd and should be ran out on a rail.
You are still mad? April 4, 2008 at 3:53 a.m.
You are still mad that I called you out on your bogus Peperdine claim? Geez, get on with you life and talk to DeAnn about that raise.
Jason April 4, 2008 at 4:26 a.m.
Look, I give up. I have tried everything to warn you idiots of Grantham, these are all of my posts:
navy student September 19, 2006 at 3:01 p.m.
John Maxwell September 25, 2006 at 2:14 a.m.
Student November 2, 2006 at 7:36 p.m.
Wrong Masuss November 5, 2006 at 4:48 p.m.
rip off November 7, 2006 at 2:47 a.m.
Robert December 16, 2006 at 7:35 a.m.
Robert January 21, 2007 at 4:57 a.m.
Summer January 23, 2007 at 7:32 a.m.
Easy to cheat at Grantham February 6, 2007 at 4:11 a.m.
RIPOFF February 9, 2007 at 7:11 a.m.
TO : Former Student February 27, 2007 at 12:56 p.m
Yeah right March 1, 2007 at 8:25 p.m.
2 Former student March 5, 2007 at 7:30 p.m.
to Former Student March 6, 2007 at 1:50 a.m.
Jason March 9, 2007 at 12:53 p.m.
Hi Management March 11, 2007 at 4:20 p.m.
It makes no sense March 12, 2007 at 12:20 a.m.
To Rose March 12, 2007 at 12:34 a.m.
To Peperdine graduate March 17, 2007 at 3:47 a.m.
BS March 17, 2007 at 10:22 p.m.
To Student March 18, 2007 at 12:15 a.m.
E-mail from another school received March 18, 2007 at 5:34 a.m.
PROOF March 19, 2007 at 3:01 a.m.
Found another e-mail - from ripoffreport.com March 20, 2007 at 11:10 p.m.
To Matt who wrote a review above March 21, 2007 at 2:52 a.m.
To Student - Caught in a lie March 21, 2007 at 11:29 p.m.
To everyone who responded "today" April 2, 2007 at 10:16 p.m.
Sounds good April 3, 2007 at 1:53 a.m.
GRANTHAM PLEASE April 3, 2007 at 4:55 a.m.
Jason (again) April 4, 2008 at 4:27 a.m.
Proof has been posted April 3, 2007 at 11:49 a.m.
What voice of reason? April 4, 2007 at 12:17 p.m.
To all you employees April 4, 2007 at 12:20 p.m.
Robert April 10, 2007 at 4:06 a.m.
Waste of money is right May 3, 2007 at 7:24 p.m.
The word is getting out May 6, 2007 at 3:26 a.m.
Just a former student May 11, 2007 at 12:39 p.m.
I can agree with the above May 29, 2007 at 12:23 p.m.
y July 4, 2007 at 4:47 a.m.
That's Grantham for you July 20, 2007 at 7:48 p.m.
??? August 4, 2007 at 2:30 a.m.
the person above needs a clue or 3 August 7, 2007 at 4:24 p.m.
you are a liar August 9, 2007 at 2:08 p.m.
To Tim August 24, 2007 at 2:54 p.m.
Former student September 12, 2007 at 3:42 a.m.
TO BS September 25, 2007 at 3:21 p.m.
Just a guy September 26, 2007 at 3:45 a.m.
Mr. f October 9, 2007 at 2:34 a.m.
Mr. f. October 9, 2007 at 11:40 p.m.
To outsider October 10, 2007 at 3:49 a.m.
To all October 10, 2007 at 12:50 p.m.
. October 17, 2007 at 2:52 a.m.
Filler is right October 17, 2007 at 11:28 p.m.
To Ha. October 19, 2007 at 12:10 a.m.
To Weird October 19, 2007 at 1:41 a.m.
It's funny October 26, 2007 at 3:38 a.m.
Another Grantham rejection October 26, 2007 at 6:27 p.m.
ex-student - military November 20, 2007 at 7:47 a.m.
to: d3c0y December 19, 2007 at 1:49 p.m.
To: the jerk-off Grantham employee above December 19, 2007 at 7:44 p.m.
Experience January 3, 2008 at 12:51 a.m.
To: The New Guy January 5, 2008 at 9:55 p.m
Ok, I'll bite January 5, 2008 at 11:11 p.m.
Ditto February 19, 2008 at 6:18 p.m.
Ready the e-mails March 15, 2008 at 2:41 a.m.
Funny, huh March 19, 2008 at 12:45 a.m.
Who cares? March 27, 2008 at 1:55 a.m.
more facts March 31, 2008 at 12:29 p.m.
proof was already posted April 1, 2008 at 3:26 a.m.
To Proof April 1, 2008 at 8:33 a.m.
Yet another one April 1, 2008 at 8:45 a.m.
at it again April 1, 2008 at 11:46 p.m.
at it again April 2, 2008 at 12:10 a.m.
at it again April 2, 2008 at 12:13 a.m.
The spin Dr.s April 2, 2008 at 12:34 a.m.
the truth April 3, 2008 at 12:14 a.m.
to a vet.....from a vet April 3, 2008 at 12:17 a.m.
Typical Grantham retort April 3, 2008 at 1:25 a.m.
The Challenge April 3, 2008 at 1:53 a.m.
More name calling April 4, 2008 at 2:08 a.m.
and even more name calling April 4, 2008 at 3:08 a.m.
Good for you April 4, 2008 at 3:17 a.m.
interesting observation April 4, 2008 at 3:20 a.m.
Good job George April 4, 2008 at 3:33 a.m.
OK George April 4, 2008 at 3:42 a.m.
You are still mad? April 4, 2008 at 3:53 a.m.
Jason April 4, 2008 at 4:30 a.m.
I tried starting this on RIPOFFREPORT.com, and the chronicles, and even brought it to the student forum. My handle was Jsn_Dwyn. My Yahoo Instant Message acct is jsn_dwyn, please feel free to contact me.
I am sick and tired of people defending this sham of a school. Get real people!!
Wow, you have a lot of time on your hands April 4, 2008 at 4:45 a.m.
I find it really hard to believe that you are a student of Grantham and have that much time to copy and paste all of that. Wow. First, I've only posted a few times, mostly in the last few months. Second, I'm not "jason". Third, you are pretending to be "jason" to try to discredit his opinion, that is just sad.
Face reality, you are a sad Grantham employee that is trying to defend his school. Nothing wrong with that, just come clean. I've already said that I was a student AND I use to work for them. I do have an agenda. I've admitted that. My adgenda is to warn others about this school so they do not fall for the hype that I fell for. Three semesters of waisted time and no other school will touch the Grantham credits. I've been honest with my history and my experience with Grantham, both as a student and an employee. I have never said, in any of my posts, for people NOT to go to Grantham. I've only said that, in my opinion as well as other schools and employer, that Grantham is quite a bit shady. I've also encouraged others to follow up with what I have posted, because it is the truth. You, on the other hand, have followed the typical Grantham protocol and spread incorrect info, which I have rebuffed, then, when things were not going your way, you went on the attack. That is typical of my experience with Grantham management, so you are no different.
I will continue to spread the word. I will continue to speak with military personnel everytime I am at the Ed Office. I will continue to inform anyone that will listen. You can call all the names you want, that will not deter me. It will only make my resolve stronger. Thank you again.
know you April 4, 2008 at 4:57 a.m.
@know you
Your quote "Hopefully Grantham grads will be interviewing you when you look for a job. Bring it, it will be me. You better study, and you better retain something useful.
From what I have seen about your rant on bandwidth, you are nothing more than a parrot for buzzwords. I really hate those.
Good luck in your studies at College Station" You have got to be kidding me right. First off I noticed you said studies at College Station. FYI College Station is the city and Texas A&M is the university. Do you think that your worthless booger paper degree from Grantham is going to stand a chance against a Texas A&M University degree.That has got to be the funniest thing I have heard all semester. Stop fooling yourself. As far as my rant on Bandwith, If you want me to, I can change my major from Computer Engineering to Chemical Engineering. Grantham doesn't even have a school of engineering. You can bring it, as you stated you would to a job interview if you want. Your Grantham degree will just be used to wipe the boogers from your nose from all of the crying you will be doing when you are laughed out the front door. As far as mommy and daddy taking away my allowance, daddy just agreed to upgrade my platinum American Express to the American Express Plum Card. Just face it, your school and degree are worthless. So just get over it. Your school doesn't have any entrance requirements. They simply take anyone. What a joke. national accreditation+no entrance requirement+no ABET = paper mill^2*toilet paper/booger paper
Really? April 4, 2008 at 5:05 a.m.
"I do have an agenda. I've admitted that"
I never would have guessed!
A&M is awesome! April 4, 2008 at 5:09 a.m.
"FYI College Station is the city and Texas A&M is the university"
Duh, I didn't want A&M to pop up on a search for Grantham.... but now that the damage is done...
"As far as mommy and daddy taking away my allowance, daddy just agreed to upgrade my platinum American Express to the American Express Plum Card."
Plum is business..
And, I would not be interviewing against you... I would be interviewing YOU. I like A&M, don't screw that up.
Interviewing ME April 4, 2008 at 5:11 a.m.
That is too funny. A Grantham graduate interviewing an A&M graduate. In your dreams.
Boredq April 4, 2008 at 5:14 a.m.
"I find it really hard to believe that you are a student of Grantham and have that much time to copy and paste all of that"
I just graduated, and I am having a hard time adjusting to a no-homework lifestyle. I committed 3 hours a night, plus 16 hours on the weekends for 2.5 years to finish this.
I figured while I am in transition, I might as well troll here.
@Interviewing ME April 4, 2008 at 5:15 a.m.
Truth sucks, doesn't it? I dare you to post your name here sir; If you seek DoD R&D, I will see it.
GU S O E April 4, 2008 at 5:19 a.m.
http://www.grantham.edu/academics/colleg...
Grantham started out as Grantham College of Engineering.
to the last poster April 4, 2008 at 5:29 a.m.
I highly doubt that any Grantham graduate has any final say in a DoD R&D Department. Nice try.
Bring that chip April 4, 2008 at 5:31 a.m.
Come on out to Edwards. We shall see what you are capable of.
I have nothing but respect for A&M, what the hell are you doing on a 2-bit tabloid site?
same to you April 4, 2008 at 5:35 a.m.
The same can be said about you hanging out here.
I dunno April 4, 2008 at 5:42 a.m.
refer boredq above.
USN O-6 (ret) April 4, 2008 at 7:54 a.m.
This thread has degenerated into the most juvenille of this board and I'm sorry to say it is caused by those defending traditional education. Grantham is DETC, that means they can take federal loans and are not considered a diploma mill. The DOD not only recognizes DETC for College route OCS but they have Grantham on the Servicemembers Opportunity Colleges (SOC) Consortium list. Members of the military have risen through the ranks with DETC accredited degrees and many are in high positions. I know several personally. These individuals can be in positions of oversight for R&D projects and some are. There is no reason a Grantham grad couldn't be heading one of those departments.
my two cents April 4, 2008 at 11:58 a.m.
Sir,
The generation these days just don’t do his/her homework. I never said whether or not I was currently enrolled at FSU; I only stated I took classes there. I took your advice an emailed some universities which I will post on here.
This one came from University of Dallas Texas. I also emailed a few others.
Dear Sir or Ma'am,
I am in the military and I am just completing my BSEET degree from Grantham University, a nationally accredited university by DETC. I am thinking of applying for admissions into your university and would like to know what my requirements would be for entrance into one of your graduate programs (e.g. MBA or MS)? Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
Dear ****,
Thank you for your interest in a graduate program here at UTD. I’ve outlined our admission requirements below:
You can apply online here:
Can't post website, not allowed
Admission information for degree seeking
* An official GMAT score report ( Graduate Management Admissions Test) or GRE, no more than seven years old by date of application is required of all applicants who do not possess a Doctoral degree. Currently, our competitive GMAT score is a 580 and for GRE a 1240 (verbal and quantitative only).
* Official transcripts from all colleges or universities attended, certified, signed or stamped by the Registrar and sent directly to the UTD Registrar are required of all candidates for admission. The transcript from the degree granting institution must show conferral of degree. Two copies of each transcript are required from all applicants. For admission consideration, the undergraduate grade point average will be calculated based on the last 60 hours of undergraduate academic course work (on official transcripts). Transcripts must also be submitted from any graduate programs in which the prospective student was enrolled. A resume detailing the applicant’s employment history since high school is required of all applicants.
* Letters of references from 3 people (employers, community leaders, teachers, etc), are required of all applicants.
* An official TOEFL score report (Test of English as a Foreign Language) completed no more than two years prior to application to UTD School of Management is required of all international students. Our required TOEFL score(s) are: 213 computer based; 550 paper based or internet-based 80.
* One page essay outlining the applicant’s academic interests and goals is required.
Please let me know if you have further questions.
Thanks,
Nikki/SOM
Phone 972-883-2750 Fax 972-883-6425
The University and Advising Office now requires that ALL REGISTRATION REQUESTS be transmitted from the student's UTD email account.
that transfer myth is busted April 4, 2008 at 12:13 p.m.
Hello,
I am an GU alumni and I can attest I have had positive experiences with Grantham Univeristy. I think the negative poster is wrong in his assumptions...here is what I found for Kaplan as its transfer requirements into its graduate program.
"Kaplan requirements:
Online Graduate Program Requirements†
To apply for one of our many master's degree programs, you will need to have a bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university and a GPA of 2.5."
Doesn't say anything about not accepting Grantham or national credits therefore myth about GU credits not transfer to any school is busted.
@my two cents also agrees.
in reality on april 3rd April 4, 2008 at 12:45 p.m.
You are correct in your comments. There is only a couple of reasons to attend this university. Number 1 is the reason you have stated. The other is if you cannot attend a traditional university because on your life situation. Family or out of the country. I work for one of the Big 3 D-contractors and they have reimbursed me for every Grantham credit I have taken. It has made a difference in my ability to perform my job as an engineer. I really can't see how anyone can't cheat. If you do find a way, it will be discovered at your first design review. It would be nice if Grantham would get the ABET accreditation. It is possible for them to achieve this.
correction April 4, 2008 at 1:57 p.m.
No one every said that no one will accept Grantham credits, just the majority of the schools out there.
in reality on april 3rd April 4, 2008 at 2:06 p.m.
O.K. slip of the the keyboard. I meant to say can cheat not can't cheat. Have your fun but I am well rewarded every two weeks and with job satisfaction.
Steve April 5, 2008 at 7:40 p.m.
In 2006, I registered myself with Grantham University, as the major selling point was:
Stated:
Take as much time as you need to finish (catered to Military and Government), with no penalties.
Remarks:
This has since changed. Grantham NOW states that 'You are allowed to finish at your own pace. However, there is a maximum of 8 weeks to complete each course. If you need more time to finish, you can apply for an extension.'
Stated:
Grantham is a fully acreddited university, recognized by the DETC, and all credits are transferrable.
Remarks:
Grantham NOW states: 'Grantham University's degree programs are self-paced. Students are allotted 8 weeks to complete each course; however, you can accelerate your course completion based on your study habits and time devoted to the material. Some students have completed their bachelor's degree in as little as 18 months depending on the number of transfer credits accepted, diligence in studies, type of degree program, number of electives, etc.'
I was contacted by Grantham, and told that I had just one week to complete 4 courses and take the proctored exams for, these courses of which I had not even received books for yet. I was told that if I did NOT take the proctored exams for these courses (regardless of the fact that I did not receive the books), that they would go into a 'Failed' status.
I withdrew from Grantham, and was told that that due to a failure to withdraw within 5 business days of the start date, I was not eligible for a refund. They claim that I still owe them tuition for courses not even started.
I have also discovered that many of their credits are NOT transferrable to other schools, as they are NOT accredited.
Steve
Dover, New Hampshire
U.S.A.
More Details please April 5, 2008 at 8:19 p.m.
I saw this post on ripoff, I am curious of what the circumstances really are.
Grantham has reformatted their completion timelines, that is a fact. You can do any number of classes, sure, but you only have 8 weeks in which to complete the classes.
I have heard this restructuring is a reflection of their efforts to gain Title IV approval (which was approved 2 months ago by the DETC)
Refer: Title IV above, and do a search for Grantham in the document
I highly doubt they would restructure without a legitimate goal in mind (duh), we shall see what they are plotting.
I really don't think 8 weeks is enough time for the majority of the GU BSEET curriculum; I managed to do it, but I have no life.
Clinton April 6, 2008 at 6:58 p.m.
I completed my BS in Engineering Managment, and I a proud of my degree. I worked hard for it. I work for the State of Alaska which would not have been possible without my degree. My military career made it almost impossible to attend a brick and morter school, Not to mention the local university didn't even accept its own credits from campus to campus. From my experience, every school tries to make it difficult for students to transfer credits, becuase of their financial interests. Each student should evaluate thier education goals and find the school that best serves their needs. Grantham served mine, whether you knock GU or not, I still draw a pay check and I am a better person having attended GU.
@clinton April 6, 2008 at 9:16 p.m.
I agree w/ you 100%
Grantham is a real good university for both working, transfer, & freshmen students. I graduated from GU and have had nothing but positive remarks due to my new degree in BSEET.
Thank you GU and I too am a better person having attended this college.
@ Truth, Good for you April 7, 2008 at 4:18 p.m.
Sir,
Here is another University that admits Grantham’s degree’s into its graduate programs. See what Univ South Florida (USF) admissions had to say about admissions for all its incoming/transfer students including Grantham University. I told you they would accept these folks credits!!!
Subject: RE:'FSUEmail=849-789' Questions about transfer credits
Dear ****,
Thank you for contacting our office. I can only speak to graduate programs at FSU. If you wish to pursue your Bachelors here I can transfer your information to an undergraduate officer.
As for the graduate program, you can only transfer 6 hours of course work. You will need to fill out the application, pay the fee, and send us your transcripts. We also require GRE scores.
If you have further questions please let me know.
Sincerely,
Rae S.
Office of Admissions & Records
Florida State University
PO Box 3062400
Tallahassee FL 32306-2400
Phone: 850-644-6200
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: Questions about transfer credits
Mrs. Rae,
Thank you for taking the time to email me. I am not sure I quite understand; so you will accept my bachelor's degree plus 6 hours of course work for transfer? Or FSU only accepts 6 credits from my BSEET? I am confused.
I guess I really need to know do I qualify to be accepted in FSUs graduate programs. If so please let me know...
Thank you
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear ****,
Thank you for contacting our office. Sorry for the confusion. If you have already completed some graduate course work we can transfer up to 6 hours towards your graduate degree program.
If you have further questions please let me know.
Sincerely,
Rae S.
Office of Admissions & Records
Florida State University
PO Box 3062400
Tallahassee FL 32306-2400
Phone: 850-644-6200
How many more schools do I have to email to prove the point that Grantham credits, a nationally accredited university by DETC is accepted by many regional accredited universities.
I think I've proven my point so far and if i wanted i could enroll into FSUs graduate programs with a Grantham University degree.
Nicely done! April 7, 2008 at 7:48 p.m.
Outstanding work sir!
that's funny April 7, 2008 at 11:50 p.m.
Not one mention of Grantham or a National Accreditation in that entire string of e-mails. The school does not mention Grantham at all. The other e-mails posted above that have rejected tranfers specifically mention that they will not take Grantham credits. I call bull.
Puzzled April 8, 2008 at 1:33 a.m.
I don't understand why people care if others cheat on the proctored exams. They don't count towards your grade anyway. They are to gage if you have learned the course work or can look up the answers, as it would be in the real world. Doesn't affect your grade, so cheat away!!! I personally want to learn the information, so I don't cheat. Ya get what you put into it.
Spin on April 8, 2008 at 1:59 a.m.
You noticed that the email did not mention Grantham University as the institution that the credits were transferring from. I dare you to send that email and put Grantham as the institution the credits are coming from. No, how about this, I will send that school an email and specifically mention Grantham University and wait for the rejection email and I will post it here. Grantham backers and Grantham spin doctors are on full alert again. Cheating or no cheating Grantham is a degree mill and it is no secret.
@Spin on April 8, 2008 at 2:12 a.m.
Whatever nutjob! You have admitted to being a fired employee, failed student, and to having an agenda. No matter what is posted here, we can expect you to retort with utter negativity, armed with only doubt. We get it already, you hate this school.
An extension to: Improvement in service
I got my transcript today, which is the only thing my employer needs to promote me. I sent in the request on 3/25/08, and received it today in the mail (4/7/08). Not a bad turnaround at all. I will post when I receive my diploma.
Are any Grads here going to attend the commencement ceremony in June?
Activity April 8, 2008 at 2:20 a.m.
Ahhh, Proof that spinster activity is definatley brewing at Grantham from the posting above that starts with "Whatever nutjob!"
retort with the truth April 8, 2008 at 2:29 a.m.
"...............we can expect you to retort with utter negativity, armed with only doubt."
You forgot to add "....and the truth."
ROFLMAO April 8, 2008 at 3:11 a.m.
Yeah right!
I can see it already...
"And here with us tonight on CNN, the anonymous blogger and representative of Majority of Schools. Additionally, he holds the office of speaker for Majority of Employers."
This is the last time I will respond directly to one of your posts. Your tone in the posts is easy enough to identify, so I will simply ignore you. You are dead to me.
Your "truth" is no more than a perception, of which had been biased to an extreme due to termination of employment, and tandem termination of study.
Begone with you!
@ Spin , @ funny...your bull is called! April 8, 2008 at 11:30 a.m.
Sirs,
Here is the entire email message excluding my personal info. Go ahead and email them, waste your time, Grantham is a legitimate school that FSU accepts as transfer credits for its graduate programs.
Thank you for contacting our office. Sorry for the confusion. If you have already completed some graduate course work we can transfer up to 6 hours towards your graduate degree program.
If you have further questions please let me know.
Sincerely,
Rae S.
Office of Admissions & Records
Florida State University
PO Box 3062400
Tallahassee FL 32306-2400
Phone: 850-644-6200
Website:
-----Original Message-----
From: John.doe@hotmail.com Date:
Monday, April 07, 2008 10:52 AM
To: FSU Graduate Admissions (graduateadmissions@admin.fsu.edu)
Subject: RE: Questions about transfer credits
Mrs. Rae,
Thank you for taking the time to email me. I am not sure I quite understand; so you will accept my bachelor's degree plus 6 hours of course work for transfer? Or FSU only accepts 6 credits from my BSEET? I am confused.
I guess I really need to know do I qualify to be accepted in FSUs graduate programs. If so please let me know...
Thank you
V/R
John Doe
-----Original Message-----
From: FSU Graduate Admissions
Sent: Monday, April 07, 2008 10:37 AM
To: John Doe
Subject: RE:'FSUEmail=849-789' Questions about transfer credits
Thank you for contacting our office. I can only speak to graduate programs at FSU. If you wish to pursue your Bachelors here I can transfer your information to an undergraduate officer.
As for the graduate program, you can only transfer 6 hours of course work. You will need to fill out the application, pay the fee, and send us your transcripts. We also require GRE scores.
If you have further questions please let me know.
Sincerely,
Rae S.
Office of Admissions & Records
Florida State University
PO Box 3062400
Tallahassee FL 32306-2400
Phone: 850-644-6200
Website:
-----Original Message-----
From: John.doe@hotmail.com
Date: Thursday, April 03, 2008 11:00 AM
To: gradadms@admin.fsu.edu (gradadms@admin.fsu.edu);
admissions@admin.fsu.edu (admissions@admin.fsu.edu)
Subject: Questions about transfer credits
Dear Sir or Ma'am,
I am in the military and I am just completing my BSEET degree from Grantham University, a nationally accredited university by DETC. I am thinking of applying for admissions into your university and would like to know what my requirements would be for entrance into one of your graduate programs (e.g. MBA or MS)? How many credits transfer or what is the max amount FSU will take if I want to finish my BS with you? Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
V/R
John Doe
nice "forged" e-mail April 8, 2008 at 12:10 p.m.
I like how you forged that last part. Good touch.
@ nice April 8, 2008 at 3:59 p.m.
Do you honestly believe I would give the whole world my name and email. That's dumb...ever heard of id theft.
The email is not forged...email them yourself...waste your own time.
I wanted to prove my point and I did. You sir...still haven't!
thanks,
JD
Caught in the act April 8, 2008 at 9:32 p.m.
This Here is what Florida State has to say about admissions for Graduate Study at FSU. Here is proof that your worthless Grantham degree is nothing more than straight doo doo paper. So you are lying about FSU accepting a worthless Grantham degree or credits. Here is the Link.
http://www.fsu.edu/students/prospective/...
University-Wide Admission Standards
Admission to graduate study at Florida State University is within the jurisdiction of the University, subject to minimum standards adopted by the Board of Governors of the State University System of Florida. In order to meet these minimum standards, applicants must have, or be a candidate for, a bachelor's degree or equivalent from a regionally accredited institution and meet at least one of the following criteria:
Earned a minimum 3.0 grade point average in all work attempted while registered as an upper-division student working toward a bachelor's degree, or
Earned a minimum score of 1000 on the combined verbal and quantitative portions of the GRE or a minimum score of 470 on the GMAT (College of Business applicants only), or
Earned a graduate degree from a regionally accredited institution.
526K and counting April 8, 2008 at 10:10 p.m.
Over half a Meg, and still no "hard" evidence out there. At least UOPsucks.com can site specific job postings that exempt UOP grads from applying.
This e-mail nonsense gets nothing accomplished; there are too many other factors that would get someone denied for admission. There are too many schools and employers out there for either side to say "majority" or "few"; how do you accurately sample a pool of data that deep without committing a lifetime (or fortune) doing it?
The real way to fight is by complaining to the DETC, BBB, or CHEA if you really have a legit complaint. If you can get a school's acreditation pulled, then you have killed the school. Look what happened to www.cooks.edu
@ caught April 8, 2008 at 11:46 p.m.
Sir,
As I've said to you...based on my research it’s up to the discretion of the school. I wish you would understand that! The school has final authority to make its own rules no matter what type of accreditation it is. I wasn’t going to mention this statement but I am glad you mentioned it—this only proves my point even more. I too read that what it said on the website--that’s why I chose FSU--I wanted to know regardless of what type of accreditation it is FSU posted on its site; I wanted YOU to see FSU still accepts Grantham’s credits.
I am glad to see your doing your research now. However, I DID email FSU and that email is NO scam. FSU did say, they would accept Grantham’s credits! Sir, why didn't you just email them and verify what I have posted. No, I ask all of you to email FSU; you have my permission to use my same introductory email if you want for verification. FSU has said in an email they accept these credits. Grantham your credits are good!
Sir, you still have not proved your point any point other than you need to email FSU first before you start calling anyone a liar. So far, YOU have been the only one lying on this thread.
JD
Looks Like Proof April 9, 2008 at 12:02 a.m.
The Caught in the act posting above is sure proof based on what I have been reading. All of the emails that were sent to real universities and the returned rejections from those schools plus the information above that came from Florida State's Website. It clearly states that you have to have a Bachelors from a regionally accredited institution in order for it to be used as a credential to get into graduate studies at FSU. Grantham is nationally accredited so what everyone is saying about there credits or degree has simply been proven. Stop kidding yourselves into believing that a Grantham degree is worth the hardwork or must I say easy work if the claims of cheating and junk curriculum are true as many have claimed here. If you persist on distance education why not go to a traditional school that offers online education. To me it just seems more logical. Stop getting scammed by Grantham because it seems as if the degree won't be accepted so why waste the money.
Oh wow April 9, 2008 at 12:50 a.m.
I can't believe that Grantham has been caught in ANOTHER lie. That came right from FSU's website. That is prrof positive. Thank's for checking up on that for us. Yep, there are a few more reading this that will not consider Grantham.
fact April 9, 2008 at 3:04 a.m.
@ caught
You can say what you want but the discretion is pretty much layed out in front of you by them saying the following:
subject to minimum standards adopted by the Board of Governors of the State University System of Florida. In order to meet these minimum standards, applicants must have, or be a candidate for, a bachelor's degree or equivalent from a regionally accredited institution and meet at least one of the following criteria:
Do you honestly think that those standards are going to be altered. If that is the minimum standards required then a Grantham degree does not meet those requirements because they do not have regional accreditation. Those rules are what they go by and I highly doubt that they will bend them for Grantham so get over it. The degree will not transfer to a legit institution!
@ fact,wow, proof April 9, 2008 at 11:22 a.m.
"Do you honestly think that those standards are going to be altered." My answer is yes! Like I said, that email is real FSU does accpet Granthams credits...email them your self and see. I bet you won't because your stuck on trying to prove otherwise--you still have not proven anything.
You proved JD point very well!
"Those rules are what they go by and I highly doubt that they will bend them for Grantham so get over it."
Of course they will, they got to make money too--you're dumb for thinking otherwise.
JD emailed you with an actual admissions officer saying she would accept those credits--get over yourself. Grantham is legit by DoD, dept of Ed, and yes...FSU will accept Granthams credits.
JD here April 9, 2008 at 11:24 a.m.
All I am going to say to you naysayers is email FSU yourself and you'll get the same email as I did--if your honest.
I've proved my point.
@looks like proof April 9, 2008 at 11:36 a.m.
I'm sorry but after reading your previous posts. You not credible to me anymore...you are the one that has posted fiction. Its not until now that someone else has finally called you out on it.
I'm sorry but if it comes down to belieing YOU or an email sent from an admissions offier from FSU then I go with the admissions officer.
A Grantham alumni April 9, 2008 at 12:05 p.m.
I must say my experiences with Grantham were above any other college I’ve attended. I give them a 9 rating out of 10! I did my research before I entered the school and found it is accredited. As a military member, the DoD or jobs I’ve looked at in the private sector doesn’t care if my degree is regional/national accredited but only that its accredited. Is one better than the other—my opinion is NO!
I had no problems with instructors, the materials, or had the opportunity to cheat. I made some good study buddies on the forum. My proctored exams were scheduled at the base education center--I couldn’t cheat. I have in the past attended a B&M school and honestly, any student who has attended a B&M knows you can cheat if you wanted to.
Sooner or later no matter what college it is if you cheat you will get caught—even at Texas A&M. Could I easily cheat while attending Grantham-NO! The tests were not open book and randomly generated. My tests were graded by computer and grades were posted.
The subjects are not easy (physics 1,2 and calc 1,2, etc)...B&Ms teach from power points/lectures. Online, your lectures come from the book and instructors. I felt I got my money worth.
It’s ridiculous how dumb those posts have become. The guy here is posting all kinds of crap about Grantham. You should be ashamed, dude!
Grantham is legitimate and I’m proud to call myself an alumni. Folks don't listen to all the negative hype this guy has posted on here--he's ignorant!
A quote from comedian Ron White about sums him up, "You can't fix stupid!"
Semper fi!
FSU and all other April 9, 2008 at 12:39 p.m.
FSU clearly posts it's requirements on it's website and so do others. National is not accepted by most schools. That has already been proven.
its proven... April 9, 2008 at 2:55 p.m.
dude!
FSU clearly emailed JD and accepted Granthams credits. national is accepted by most schools...its been proven!
doctored e-mail April 10, 2008 at 12:28 a.m.
I'm not going to believe a doctored e-mail over the schools ACTUAL WEBSITE!!!! Nice try, but you loose.
to: it's proven April 10, 2008 at 1:27 a.m.
Funny how you accept "JD's" single e-mail without a question but refute the MANY e-mails that were posted saying that Grantham credits would not be accepted.
You employees need to try better than that.
that's right April 10, 2008 at 3:51 a.m.
The Grantham Spin doctors are not only good at trying doctor their sick school, but they also specialize in doctoring emails. The Website clearly states that FSU has jurisdiction of accepting credits but they are subject to minimum standards that are adopted by the Board of Governors of the State University System of Florida, which states clearly that regional accreditation is required. FSU and all of the other respected regionals are not going to accept a Bachelors from Grantham as credit to enter Graduate studies.
that's right again April 10, 2008 at 3:58 a.m.
Oh, and one more thing!
Grantham spin doctors, please utilize the spell check tool option on your workstations. You folks are giving away too many clues when you try to refute wrecklessly.
To:right (the same guy) April 10, 2008 at 11:47 a.m.
I believe JD simply because he has an email sent from FSU stating they would accept Granthams credits. I did read your link and FSU does state that on its website. However, JD, did his research and an FSU admissions officer said they'll accept them. Why don't you email them using his same format and see what FSU says.
Also, UoD Texas accepted Grantham too. I guess to you all schools that accept Grantham credits are bad--everyone's posts I've read so far are right--you're a very disgruntled employee/ex-student that will say anything to get folks to believe you.
Lastly, I am not a spinster or employee from Grantham. I hope my spelling is ok for you--you'll probably complain about that too.
@ all active duty and retired military April 11, 2008 at 11:11 a.m.
Please read page 6 of the link provided below. This may or may not help any active or retired military members attending a university accredited by the DETC. Thank you.
@ Page 6 April 11, 2008 at 12:32 p.m.
Sounds like a fancy way of saying, "we know DETC will not transfer into most schools, but give it a try anyway."
Pathetic.
Most? April 11, 2008 at 1:56 p.m.
How is 30% "Most"?!!!!
Plan Ahead April 11, 2008 at 2:08 p.m.
Good Wiki "reference": http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/School_accr...
The key phrase is: "The student who is planning to transfer to a regionally accredited school after studying at a nationally accredited one should ensure that they will be able to transfer the credits before attending the nationally accredited school."
Now if you fail out of said national school, all bets are off. Chances are you probably need to reconsider your major, or your study habits. But then again, sometimes life just gets in the way.
Either way, make a plan, research, adjust plan as a result of research, and commit 100% once the plan is established. Call local schools you would potentially want to attend and MAKE SURE they will accept Grantham coursework. If there are no schools in your area (or area you plan to move to) either finish at Grantham, or pick another school.
Fail to plan, plan to fail.
Gotcha! April 12, 2008 at 6:07 a.m.
Hello Lin, former employee and failed student. I have finally tracked you down (it was pepperdine that gave you away)
Here is Lin's e-mail:
BWAHAHAHAHA
Reference April 12, 2008 at 6:24 a.m.
Lin,
This is what gave you away:
to:Gotcha! April 12, 2008 at 12:43 p.m.
Wow, you really are a detective on par with Holmes. What gave that person away? Was is the fact that she PUT her name down or the fact that she PUT her e-mail address down?
You employees are really reaching now. The lady put all that information in the report. Do you think you are some great clue finder because you were able to read it AT THE TOP OF THE REPORT????
Besides, everything that she wrote was true, including the e-mail from Pepperdine that she posted.
You really are a retard.
here is the e-mail ref above April 12, 2008 at 12:45 p.m.
Here is the e-mail from Pepperdine. Yet another school that regects not only Grantham, but all Nationally Accredited schools.........
"Dear ****,
Thank you for your interest in the Graziadio School of Business and Management. We require completed undergraduate degrees from regionally accredited universities, so an undergraduate degree from a nationally accredited school would not meet that requirement. I hope this helps and let me know if you have any further questions.
Take care,
Marc
Marc Endrigat
Graziadio School of Business and Management
Full-Time Programs
1-800-726-9283"
To Lin April 12, 2008 at 3:23 p.m.
"You really are a retard."
It all makes sense now. No one would take hate blogging this far except a woman scorned.
This is why I don't hire women in general, NA or RA. They screw up, get fired, and take on some damn fool crusade to try and get "even".
Find something better to do with your time, Lin.
no in a nice way April 12, 2008 at 6:33 p.m.
I emailed FSU to see what the response would be. Check it out. DRUM ROLL PLEASE!
Thank you for contacting our office. How many years did you study to earn your Bachelors degree? It is hard for me to give you a definite yes without looking at your transcripts. If you are interested in FSU I encourage you to apply.
If you have further questions please let me know.
Sincerely,
Rae S.
Office of Admissions & Records
Florida State University
PO Box 3062400
Tallahassee FL 32306-2400
Phone: 850-644-6200
Website: http://admissions.fsu.edu/
-----Original Message-----
From: ******************
Date: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 02:37 PM
To: gradadms@admin.fsu.edu (gradadms@admin.fsu.edu)
Subject: Admission requirements for Graduate studies
To whom it may concern,
I am interested in Graduate studies at Florida State University and I wanted to get some information about enrollment. I have a BSEET from Grantham University which is holds National Accreditation. I wanted to see if my degree would be considered for entry to Graduate studies at FSU. I noticed on your Website that FSU only accepts Bachelors degrees from regionally accredited institutions for consideration for Graduate studies at FSU. Could you please clarify if my Grantham University degree will meet the requirements since they are Nationally accredited. Thanks
*****
Sounds to me like they are saying no in nice way. This is totally different from the response that the PERSON ABOVE-AKA JD, got when they emailed Florida State. This email states that they have to look at the transcripts before a definite YES can be given. The answer will be a definite NO when they see the national accreditaiton standard transcript that actually reflects the curriculum from Grantham.
Grammar April 12, 2008 at 7:17 p.m.
"which is holds National Accreditation"
That didn't help.
Also April 12, 2008 at 7:22 p.m.
You didn't specify which National Accreditor, and your e-mail was cold, and seemingly uninterested. I would definately approach YOU with caution as well.
1 more thing (sorry) April 12, 2008 at 7:24 p.m.
JD's e-mail seemed genuine, and assumed nothing. THAT is the way to approach a registrar. The only way he could have really peaked her attention was to include a copy of his resume, and transcript.
oh please April 12, 2008 at 7:35 p.m.
No university wants a copy of your resume. They could care less where you work.
That last e-mail was the cold hard truth. JD's e-mail was a fake. National is not looked highly upon at FSU either.
no difference April 12, 2008 at 9:28 p.m.
Since the Grantham degree holders and Grantham employees think that grammer played a part in the type of response that was recieved, why don't we send them another email. There was nothing cold about the way the question was asked. It was straight forward. The sender wants to know if a Grantham degree will get them into a Masters program at FSU. As far as specifying which national accreditor, that doesn't matter. National is national no matter what accrediting body it is. The obvious thing here is that Grantham credits and degrees are hard or nearly impossible to transfer to legitimate regional schools.It has been proven in all of the emails that have been posted.
Sabotage doesn't count April 12, 2008 at 9:42 p.m.
"why don't we send them another email"
Go ahead. Waste more of your, and more tragically, their time.
Resume: Believe or not, career history plays a BIG role in Graduate study admissions. If you can show experience in the area of study, it sets your far ahead of the noobs fresh out of school.
Keep blogging, you are only destroying your own chances to succeed. NA is a good thing!
Logical errors April 12, 2008 at 11:57 p.m.
QUOTE: "The obvious thing here is that Grantham credits and degrees are hard or nearly impossible to transfer to legitimate regional schools. It has been proven in all of the emails that have been posted."
Your sample pool of data is nowhere near deep enough to make that claim or draw that conclusion. The DETC has sampled the data, successes and failures alike, for a result of 70%. They have published the findings, and the DOE concurs.
Your claim is biased, as the successes are omitted to support your claim. Additionally, this site is biased as Graduates will not waste the time to blog about a school they are happy with.
Logical fallacy: Hasty Generalization
Reference: http://www.fallacyfiles.org/hastygen.htm...
@faker April 13, 2008 at 12:19 a.m.
“No in a nice way…please…your email states national accreditation to FSU. If you can read FSU didn’t say no…she said submit to apply…doesn’t sound like “NO” to me.
Folks, I can prove his/her email is fake because in emails to FSU admission there are confirmation numbers for submitting (e.g. in mine the subjects reads: Subject: RE:'FSUEmail=849-789' Questions about transfer credits.)
You’re busted and a liar sir. FSU did not reject your credits…you’re an idiot too. In your letter to FSU you stated Grantham was national and in your remarks you stated “The answer will be a definite NO when they see the national accreditaiton standard transcript that actually reflects the curriculum from Grantham.´Sir, FSU would have known if you really emailed them.
You’re a faker!!!
Mine on the otherhand is REAL!
JD OUT!
JD move on April 13, 2008 at 4:10 a.m.
You can say what you want and do all of the name calling you want, but the fact of the matter is the last email to FSU is REAL. Legitimate regionals are not buying the Gram Scam. So move on JD. Since your Bachelors will not transfer to a legitimate regional, maybe you should consider graduate studies at Grantham.
Shaft April 13, 2008 at 4:29 a.m.
I hope that JD is getting paid overtime for doctoring. Any way, what was meant by Quote:“The answer will be a definite NO when they see the national accreditaiton standard transcript that actually reflects the curriculum from Grantham" is the fact that once FSU sees a Grantham transcript the national standard will really show because regional schools have a higher curriculum standard. What does it matter anyway, Grantham can't even get regionally accredited. All of the REJECTION emails from regional schools including the one from FSU shows that Grantham credits will not transfer.
Thats strange April 13, 2008 at 5:32 a.m.
There is no such creature as a "standard national accreditation transcript". Each school is free to offer whatever classes it chooses, it is the delivery method, bookeeping, and curriculum that is judged.
A BSEET from GU parallels all that I have seen from other schools offering the same degree (ITT, DeVry, UOP).
Also, it is apparent, and had been for some time now, the e-mails you so boringly like to quote are nothing more than 2-bit forgeries laid out in Outlook format. An e-mail is no more credible on a blog than my claim as President of the United States.
Furthermore, why the hell do you focus on the DETC as much as you do? That horse has been beat over, and over, and over again throughout every school on this forum. The DETC has backed Military-friendly schools for a very long time now (to include Marine Corps Institute, a factor in promotion in every enlisted rank). You are not attacking Grantham, the employer that fired you and the school that kicked your retarded butt out (deee dee deee), but every DETC school out there.
But, keep marching on with that megaphone of yours.
"I got fired and kicked out of college, YAY!!!"
I got in, Woot! April 13, 2008 at 5:56 a.m.
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Monday, April 11, 2008 8:35 AM
To: GSBM Malibu Admissions <gsbmadm@pepperdine.edu>
Subject: MBA Program Inquiry
Greetings,
I am just completing my Bachelor of Science in Electronics Engineering Technology degree from Grantham University. I am seeking additional insight if I would qualify for entrance into Pepperdine's MBA program, and what exactly the entrance requirements are. I have been in this career field for 20 years now, a great deal of that time spent in project management. Attached are my resume, Grantham transcript, awards, honors, and other classes I have attended. Any information and guidance you could provide would be greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
xxxx
Dear xxxx,
Thank you for your interest in the Graziadio School of Business and Management. I look forward to speaking with you in this matter, and would appreciate if you could call me at your earliest convenience.
Take care,
Marc
Marc Endrigat
Graziadio School of Business and Management
Full-Time Programs
1-800-726-9283
saxinthecity April 13, 2008 at 12:12 p.m.
It appears that anyone associated with Grantham are negative liars.
I would advise all military to run far away from these second-rate, money-grubbing so-called schools and save their money for actual college. It is a waste of time and money to "pretend" you are going to college, when, in fact, you are only throwing your money away. [Don't be fooled by the those who think they are getting a head start on their education. They would be better off using their tuition to play the lottery. Truly!]
Military folks should concentrate on doing their military service NOW, and put off their education until they are out of the military when they can give full time to their studies. You will have a much better experience if you plan on getting your degree from a State University. Many colleges now expect students to get their first two years out of the way at their local Community College, and then transfer the credits over to a State University for your final degree, but your degrees (AA or AS from the Community College and BA or BS from your State University) will be GOLD. There is no problem transferring credits IF you check with both schools as you go along. Use the student services officer at the University to make sure your CC credits are transferable. It only takes a 5-minute meeting to make sure you are on track. From then on, you can do it on the phone.
Understand that almost all core curriculum (English, history, algebra, psychology, sociology) is transferable, however if you take a class in under-water marble-stacking, it may not be transferable for a computer science degree. Many folks who "gripe" about having credits that are not transferable have changed their major, and neglect to realize that certain classes are not associated with all degrees. Yes, English applies to ALL degrees, but square-dance class does not transfer to Economics. Sorry, but you have to be responsible and reasonable. Don't act squirrelly and then complain to try to get sympathy. You usually won't have to choose a major until your second year, but once you pick it, understand that if you change it, it might cost you in time and money, if some of the classes are not transferable. [I had no problem transferring over every single class, but then I made sure they were all transferable BEFORE I took them, and I stayed with the same major. I had no desire to make a career out of school. I took 15 to 18 hours, and went summers and was out in two and a half years (with honors).]
Forget this Grantham business, and Apollo, and ITT, and University of Phoenix. All they do is advertise and take your money. GO TO A STATE UNIVERSITY
Guys! Think of your favorite SPORTS STARS and check where they went! Then, check out the schools where they went. [Try for the best and forget these "matchbook cover" outfits. Stick with the real thing, and keep trying until you make it. You will most probably "fit" the school that accepts you.]
Thank you April 13, 2008 at 3:52 p.m.
@ Saxinthecity
You are exactly right. That is what I am trying to get accross here. I just don't understand why someone would want to go to these type of junk universities(companies). There is no better feeling than obtaining your degree from a real university with a real campus that is really respected. The bottom line is take this person's advice above because the truth is being laid out. Go to A REAL SCHOOL so you get a REAL valuable edcaution that will take you places and on top of it all you will have a chance to walk with your graduating class at their REAL CAMPUS, and not some RENTED AUDITORIUM. If distance education is the only option for you, be advised that there are many traditional universities that offer online education. Just do your research. There are plenty of taditional brick and mortar schools that offer a quality online education that will be respected in the real world. Because the bottom line is Granthams National Accreditation will hold you down. Leave these Private FOR PROFIT schools alone. Dont be fooled because you are wasting your time and money with them. Go to a real school that has regional accreditation. Just remember this, go to traditional school on campus if you can. If that is not an option, go to a traditional school that has online education and your problems of junk education will go away.
Traditionalist Propaganda April 13, 2008 at 10:18 p.m.
And the two above posts illustrate the battle between traditionalists and onliners.
Education is at a turning point, a gold-rush in my mind. SUNY was given a heap of money to produce a 100% online, ABET and RA BSEE program. It is supposed to receive said accreditation once the first graduating class cycles through in 18 months.
Once that program is online, I intend on enrolling (transfer acceptance or no). Until then, there are no options available for the electronics career fields (face it, State-ran universities have a hard-on for the EE and will not specialize). This is why the for-profits are so appealing. That damn "or military equivalent" nugget is such a hard point to get across due to the varying depth of the military technical fields, but everyone understands a BSEET coupled with military experience.
Like it or not, the B&M's are going down. With campus rapes, robberies, and shootings, who the hell would want to deal with that crap?
Traditionalists, as I like to call them, can be expected to resist change. That is what you are here for, and that is absolutely fine. Conservation is also a good thing, but I have to believe that a delivery method that doesn't require a commute, parking fees, and navigation to a classroom so some jerkoff can read off of power-point slides while stupid people keep asking stupid questions.
In either case, I wish anyone pursuing a degree the very best, either B&M or Online. I don't understand (aside from the anti-competitive angle) why anyone would be so hell-bent on stopping a guy (or girl) from picking up a book and learning something new.
to above April 13, 2008 at 11:32 p.m.
No one is trying to stop people from bettering themselves. In fact, we are trying to make sure they do it the best way that they can. There is nothing wrong with online schools. There IS something wrong with a scam school. A few great schools that offer 100% online enrollment are Fort Hayes and ODU. There are dozens of others, and they are good, solid, Regional schools that will get you somewhere. Why pay $250 a credit hour for a Grantham degree that will hold you down? You can pay, last I checked, about $175 a credit hour at Fort Hayes and get a degree that will not get the "raised eyebrow" look from anyone. Fort Hayes is also a traditional B&M school, and your degree does not say "Online school". Everyone knows that Grantham is an online school and worse, a 3rd teir school at best.
Take your chances and roll the dice, but I would always bet on Regional to get you where you need to go.
Real April 14, 2008 at 3:05 a.m.
@ Traditionalist Propaganda
Nobody is saying that online education is not the way to go. Like the "Thank You" post said, if you are going to consider distance education, enroll into one of the many traditional schools that offer online education. Some of the top universities in the nation offer 100% online degree programs. Why get scammed and pay all that money to Grantham for something that will have no value. As the person above stated, "Take your chances and roll the dice" if you want but it will be a very expensive gamble. Even if you using TA from the military to pay for it, still its your time invested as well.
Traditionalist Propaganda April 14, 2008 at 3:20 p.m.
Again, there is no RA that offers a 100% online EE or EET. For computer sciences, business, criminal Justice, I completely agree with you 100%. These programs are too easy to accredit and offer online not to go exclusively RA.
So far this BSEET degree has paid off; I am an engineer (applied) now, and I got here with the degree from GU. Before this, I was a tech. Had I not gone to GU, I would be making 40% less than I do now (had I just cooled my heels). That "or military equivalent" was a hard option to find when I was initially looking for a job, and even harder to prove. If I had to do it all over again, I wish I would have known about Grantham before I finished with the Marines; I could have been here now without the delay in getting my degree.
So, as far as investment is concerned, the GU degree will pay for itself by the end of this next year, and I get to keep the $16K overage I received from the VA tax free. My company pays tuition 100%, so I plan to use that when SUNY BSEE comes online.
As soon as SUNY gets ABET accredited, I plan to enroll there. I really don't want to get into theoretical engineering as my promary occupation, but it will be nice to discover the statistical analysis of systems, as it was not covered in the BSEET (anywhere).
Aaron April 15, 2008 at 8:24 p.m.
Just as an FYI... I had gone to a regionally accredited brick and mortar school, when I tried to transfer to a local school who is regionally accredited by the same organization, they would only accept 30 of my 90 credits. Another regionally accredited school accepted 60. It all depends on the school.
When they transfer credit, they lose money. Really the only time you need to worry about Regional Accreditation is if you don't plan on finishing your degree at that school. If you go to grad school, some may accept it, some may not, I haven't really looked into it. For the EE program, regional doesn't really matter as much as ABET, just as ABA for law school.
ABET sucks! April 15, 2008 at 8:33 p.m.
ABET currently only accredits RA schools, that is such a drag!
Hopefully SUNY will set the online standard!
Grantham just started it's ABET-clone BSEET last year (notice the addition of the capstone requirement, and ethics courses). Unfortunatley, GU can't even apply for ABET until the first graduating class cycles through (refer ABET website, SUNY website), so it will be at least another 3 years before they can even apply. Dammit!
The worst of it is the fact that the current class set to graduate in 2011 (or sooner) for the ABET candidate program won't have the namebrand, but will have gone through the work anyway. I wonder how GU will handle that aspect.
Grantham Sucks April 16, 2008 at 2:52 a.m.
Please folks,
Grantham is a low tier Nationally accredited business, not a university. That is why I know that half of you Grantham grads here blogging claiming to be engineers are liars. Just like the Propaganda person a few post up. He is the one who posted ABET sucks! He is the one that keeps giving all of the lip service about SUNY. What you should have done is gone to regionally accredited school that has ABET accreditation to begin with. Im so glad that my agency only hires engineers that graduated from regionally accredited schools. That is a great way to filter out the Grantham riff raff. You Grantham students and grads need not sit around and hold your breath for ABET accreditation because it wont happen. If it were it would have happened a long time ago. Grantham is a scam and everyone knows this.
The Honest Truth April 16, 2008 at 2:18 p.m.
Yes, I wrote the posts:
Traditionalist Propaganda
ABET Sucks!
I don't know how to show my career history without giving up my identity to the world, but I assure you I do not tell lies on this subject. I started out in the USMC as an intermediate-level technician, and got out after 5 years. I went to work for the largest DoD contractor in the US, and then bailed to a sub after 4 or so years. I went from tech to junior field engineer in that move, as a result of my AS EET and work experience. I just got promoted to Applied Engineer as a result of my BSEET, and again work experience.
Don't be surprised when you hear of a success story; not everyone fails with this degree. If you have had a hard go of it with your credentials, perhaps a self-assessment in the area of ethics and attitude are in order?
Also, Grantham has a program that is aligned with the 2007-2008 ABET requirements. Why the hell would they go through all of the trouble to reformat if they were indeed not intending to apply?
If they do get ABET or RA, does that negate all of the negative press that the haters-of-the-year have been posting?
GU: http://www.grantham.edu/academics/curric...
ABET: www.abet.org/forms.shtml
The ABET site is also a great place to seek out a program in your area, check it out!
The Honest Truth April 16, 2008 at 2:22 p.m.
Also,
The reason I keep plugging SUNY is because in 1.5 years, it will mark the first, and only, 100% online BS Electrical Engineering degree program that is RA and ABET accredited. That is the program I am holding my breath for, as they have a great deal of financial backing and attention. I can't wait!
Grantham Sucks April 16, 2008 at 7:09 p.m.
@ Honest Truth,
Sorry to inform you but I'm light years ahead of you. I obtained my DEGREE from the start from a university that is regionally accredited and has ABET accreditation. So please dont worry about my credentials because the Aerospace engineering industry is treating me real well these days. Your school still sucks though. No ABET = No value.
? April 16, 2008 at 11:39 p.m.
So why troll here if you have no online experience to speak of? This is a Grantham review page, and you have no background on the matter; have you simply come to bash those that follow an alternate delivery method by principle alone?
Great! April 17, 2008 at 12:28 a.m.
"I obtained my DEGREE from the start from a university that is regionally accredited and has ABET accreditation."
I am glad to hear you are doing well for yourself on your chosen path. I, however, decided to serve in the Armed Forces (patriotism and all that).
In retrospect, I think you had the right idea. I would have less scars, would not have had to bury some of my friends, and could have a RA ABET engineering degree. Then again, I didn't know I had an aptitude for programming and electronics (I learned that working on helicopters in the Marines), so I probably would have majored in Underwater Basket Weaving instead.
But, then again, I have a great job as an Applied Engineer, and make 77K a year. It is hard to feel bad about that, considering I started with nothing.
sup April 17, 2008 at 1:55 a.m.
What kind of programing is required for helos?
Hmmm April 17, 2008 at 5:08 a.m.
@ Great
"programming and electronics (I learned that working on helicopters in the Marines)"
You have got to be kidding me.
In my 20 years of I-level Avionics experience and 13 years of that is specifically with SH-60 Avionics I must say that it is time to raise the BULL FLAG. That is all I will say on that because I am going to let GREAT! continue to be a legend in his own mind.
Great! April 17, 2008 at 4:06 p.m.
I don't understand exactly what you are getting at....
I worked I-level on 53's, 46's, Cobras, & Hueys. We had the occasional CDU pop in from C-130, but my old unit was meant for rotary wing support, my MOS was specific to Comm/Nav (RADALT, IFF, TACAN, COMM, etc).
The Marines are still the only branch to do component-level troubleshooting on the older avionics (APX-72's, 100's, ARN-105's). I beleive it was a product of our budget; we just couldn't buy new equipment, so we fixed what we could and took the cast-off's from the Navy when they upgraded.
What Service/Unit were you with?
@sup (Great!) April 17, 2008 at 4:08 p.m.
None; it was the test equipment that brought about the programming; automated test, measurement, and analysis was a time-saver. Why press buttons and write down measurements from a Spec-A when I can have the computer do the work over GPIB?
ABET April 18, 2008 at 7:38 p.m.
ABET does not come easily.
Deadlines and Due Dates
The ABET accreditation cycle is approximately one-and-a-half years from beginning to end. The following is a brief outline of the activities and important dates that occur during this cycle. Contact us for more information.
January
Institution requests accreditation evaluation for program(s). Deadline to submit request for evaluation visit to take place in fall is January 31.
February - June
Institution prepares self-study. Self-study reports for evaluations visit to take place in fall must be received by ABET headquarters no later than July 1.
March - June
ABET commissions assign visit team chair(s) and visit team members. Visit date(s) is chosen.
July
Institution submits self-study. Deadline to submit self-study for evaluation visit to take place in fall is July 1.
September - December
Evaluation visit(s) takes place on institution's campus. ABET team presents factual findings orally on campus. Then, following a 7-day response period for the institution to report errors of fact or observation, the team finalizes and submits its preliminary findings and recommendations (called a "draft statement") to the leadership of the appropriate commission for editing.
December - February
Draft statements are edited and sent to the institution for response.
February - April
Institution responds to draft statement(s) within 30 days.
May - June
Final changes are made to draft statement(s) if necessary, based on institutional response. Statement(s) is finalized.
July
Annual Summer Commission Meeting held. Commissioners review final statement(s) and determine final accreditation action(s).
August
Institution is notified of final accreditation action(s).
ABET again April 18, 2008 at 7:46 p.m.
ABET IS a NATIONAL ACCREDITATION ORGANIZATION, so to say that it does not accredit NA schools is quite funny.
ABET is a national accreditation organization that oversees university programs in the subject areas of engineering, applied science, technology, and computing. As a respected accrediting association for the last 70 years, ABET has proven it can uphold strict educational standards. Today, there are over 2,700 programs in over 550 colleges and universities in the country that pass the quality standards of ABET.
Recognized as a national accrediting agency by the Council for Higher Education Accreditation, ABET is made up of 28 professional and technical societies. Beyond accrediting American universities, ABET also helps to lead international agreements such as the Washington Accord and offers education credentials to those students who have earned degrees abroad.
Within the mission of ABET is the leading goal of promoting quality education and innovating new standards. To accomplish these goals, the members of ABET travel the world to assist developing universities. In countries and regions where education is still a working process, ABET helps universities plan for excellence in the engineering and technology fields.
to ABET April 22, 2008 at 6:19 p.m.
ABET is a PROFESSIONAL ACCREDITING BODY... not national. Learn the difference before you sound like an idiot again.
Grantham is a joke April 22, 2008 at 9:19 p.m.
If DETC were "just as valid as regional accredidation" then schools such as New Mexico State University, Penn State University, etc... would seek national accredidation. DETC is, and always will be, concidered to be a complete joke by those who really know anything about higher education. Bottom line, if a school is not regionally accredited, avoid it at all costs because the "degrees" they "award" are nothing more than worthless pieces of paper.
Jack T.
Grantham is not a joke! April 22, 2008 at 10:44 p.m.
Hello all,
I’m a Grantham grad and currently serving our great military. I've been reading many posts here and I am disappointed at all the Grantham bashing going on here. I was just accepted to AT Sill University, school of health care management for the PhD program—its regional accredited! I had no problems with transfer credits—all were accepted. I’m actually pretty psyched about it and thinking of using my GI Bill to help finance my education.
I did it using a master’s degree from Grantham University and I had no problem applying or being accepted. I'm not here to knock down people, the school, or even accreditation—that’s not me. Actually, I want to give my honest assessment for other students on this site who are looking to apply here. I am proud to have graduated from a national accredited school. I would recommend Grantham to everyone; I had nothing but positive results.
just wanted to share that with you…
Take care all,
TJ
to TJ April 23, 2008 at 5:01 a.m.
AT Sill University, never heard of it. I ran that through google and came up with notta.
sorry April 23, 2008 at 4:43 p.m.
Sorry dude,
I mispelled it; try ATSU or AT Still University. It appreas to be a good school so I'll be trying that for a while and probably go onto teach somewhere--thats the plans!
Good luck!
TJ
to TJ April 23, 2008 at 11:36 p.m.
I don't see it listed in US News or Peterson's. I hope it works out for you as I have no idea the quality of that school.
tic tac April 24, 2008 at 7:10 a.m.
DETC isn't recognized in Texas, they call it "substandard."
To Abet questioner April 25, 2008 at 10:38 p.m.
This is pulled right off the ABET site.
"ABET is a national accreditation organization that oversees university programs in the subject areas of engineering, applied science, technology, and computing"
So actually read a posting before you call anyone an idiot.
to ABET retard April 26, 2008 at 5:28 a.m.
CHEA Specialized and Professional Accrediting
Organizations 2007-2008
Second on the list...
http://www.chea.org/Directories/special....
From the website...
"ABET accreditation is assurance that a college or university program meets the quality standards established by the PROFESSION for which it prepares its students... ABET accredits postsecondary degree-granting programs housed within regionally accredited institutions. ABET accredits programs only, not degrees, departments, colleges, or institutions."
It only accredits programs INSIDE regionally accredited schools. It won't touch nationally accredited schools because they are substandard.
For Jason April 26, 2008 at 3:28 p.m.
Jason.....you must be bored in life. You have made over 80 postings to this site. Shameful to say your list proves that you even made up names and topics with every intent to confuse individuals who are seeking a good quality education. If you are that bored, go play on a busy highway some where so that us serious folks can determine and research what is in our best interest. No need to respond to these comments, Jason. I don't have time for you or your posting.
To: For Jason April 27, 2008 at 1:51 a.m.
Wow, you guys at Grantham are getting really desperate. You mean to tell me that you are trying to convince people that every negative post on this site is the work of one person? You guys really do have a damage control team in place. If you don't have time for postings, why do you always seem to pop up after some truth has been told and all you do is name call and attack. Truly pathetic.
Anyway, Say hi to DeAnn, George and Tom.
Sorry April 27, 2008 at 2:42 a.m.
All of the negative post are proof that Grantham is a joke. Everything negative here is true about this school.This school is a ripoff and holds national accreditation, which in my opinion is a joke. Someone asked me the other day about online education and I told them to make sure they stay away from for profit schools that have national accreditation like Grantham. There are way too many real universities that offer online degrees and it only makes since to enroll into one of them instead of a business like Grantham. Grantham is a joke. They will take anyone who has money for the application fee. If they were such a great school they would have regional accreditation and ABET accreditation. I know people who attend Grantham and I have seen their curriculum and it is really pathetic. No wonder they have national accreditation instead of regional. The school is a joke people and that is a fact.
TO: Sorry, AKA Jason April 27, 2008 at 2:26 p.m.
Moron 1. a mentally retarded person with a mental age between 7 an 12 years or an intelligence quotient between 50 and 72. 2. A particularly stupid person.
Which one are you? Not all the statements posted are true, that is fact. Jason who is the Navy has compile his list of posting. It is very clear he is unhappy with this school.
For us people who are serious about education, you morons have cluttered this blog with useless information.
wow April 27, 2008 at 2:29 p.m.
You Grantham employees are really mean. Is that all you can do is name call? That's really sad.
Jason Who April 27, 2008 at 9:47 p.m.
Who is Jason and why is he being blamed for exposing this pathetic school's scam tactics. It makes no difference who Jason is because he is not the one that is responsible for all of the negative postings here. Please folks! You Grantahm students and grads are being scammed or have been scammed I should say. Grantham is a joke and that is the bottom line. The word is out so just face it, Your school is worthless and is not respected in society. National says it all. Believe me Im not Jason. How pathetic! Gratham = not respected in the real world. So get over it and move on
please, Jason who April 27, 2008 at 9:52 p.m.
Moron 1. a mentally retarded person with a mental age between 7 an 12 years or an intelligence quotient between 50 and 72. 2. A particularly stupid person. 3. Jason 4. Jason Who 5. Sorry
to: please April 27, 2008 at 10:16 p.m.
Yep, more typical "Grantham employee" BS. Is that all you people can do is name call?
Here is the typical Grantham response:
Grantham student: "I'm not happy with the way that Grantham is doing......XYZ."
Person above: "Yeah, well, you are a stupid head. Everyone else is happy with Grantham. You're a moron and are ugly and smell."
Grantham student: "Um, no, I'm not. I'm just not happy with the way I've been treated. I can't transfer my credits and no one at the school is helping me after I've paid all my money."
Person above: "You are the only one having problems. Everyone else is happy. Not only that, you're a poo head and can't even tie your own shoes. Oh, and you still live with your mom."
Geez man, get a life. People actually have a problem with your school and instead of having an intelligent discussion and trying to fix the problem, all you do is name call. If this is how you treat all of your problems, it's no wonder so many of your students are unhappy.
above posting April 27, 2008 at 11:07 p.m.
Moron 1. a mentally retarded person with a mental age between 7 an 12 years or an intelligence quotient between 50 and 72. 2. A particularly stupid person. 3. Jason 4. Jason Who 5. Sorry 6. and now you
to above April 27, 2008 at 11:42 p.m.
Yep, I'm convinced that Grantham is right for me now. Good job.
prospective student April 28, 2008 at 1 a.m.
I'm convinced Grantham is the wrong school for me since reading this thread. The list is long: impossible to transfer credits, used car salesman enrollment procedures, won't return phone calls or e-mails, outdated materials, open book test, no feedback on work. After almost 60 reviews this school only rates a 5 out of 10. The students think its a crap school too. No way am I going to waste money at this disaster.
You're one to talk! April 28, 2008 at 2:14 a.m.
"Geez man, get a life. People actually have a problem with your school and instead of having an intelligent discussion and trying to fix the problem, all you do is name call. If this is how you treat all of your problems, it's no wonder so many of your students are unhappy."
Every retort you have in your arsenal begins with "Yep, more grantham employees _______".
You have not provided any evidence to support your claim, and so many of us have profited from this degree program (BSEET). We get it, you had a bad experience working for them, and studying under them. I am sorry you were fired, and subsequently had to adjust your study goals.
I have never had a single problem with them, neither through professional advancement via my current employer, nor with the faculty and program. The course material was in no way outdated (Modern Control Systems and Signals & Systems Theory actually came with MATLAB 2007a, fully registered).
Abandon this foolish crusade, it is simply not working. You have exposed yourself as a fraud, and your attempts to discredit this business are in vain.
once again April 28, 2008 at 2:20 a.m.
"You have exposed yourself as a fraud"? Wow, OK. I'm one voice out of many, and I'm a fraud? OK, if you say so.
"and your attempts to discredit this business are in vain." No, not really. They discredit themselves. I'm just bringing it to the attention of others....and....I'm not the only one. The more you name call, the more others will see what kind of school you work for and the less will enroll. So......keep up the good work. By the way, you ARE right about one thing. They are a business, and you will be treated as such.
By the way, I've never worked for them. I was just a student who has had a very bad experience, as has others that I have served with. So, again, I will continue to spread the word. You know, free speach and all that.
above posting April 28, 2008 at 2:46 a.m.
You are more of a moron than the last guy. You are not only a moron, but are stupid too. I love Grantham as does all of my friends. We have had nothing but good results from our Grantham degrees. In fact, I receive a huge promotion and pay raise because of my degree. You are dumb. Please don't post your anti-Grantham hate here. Obviously, you failed out and are trying to get even. You are ignorant and ugly.
Me too April 28, 2008 at 3:27 a.m.
I received a promotion as well, due to my BSEET. I would not be where I am today without it, and I would not have any of the tricks of the trade at my disposal.
The "once again" poster is the same guy who is responsible for the majority of the posts here. Screw this guy; I know what I am, and I know what I can do.
Here we go again.... April 28, 2008 at 3:30 a.m.
Quote: "kind of school you work for"
again with the "Yep, more Grantham Employees _______"
Dude, I don't work for fricken Grantham. Any positive poster is immediately discredited with "grantham employee." This tactic reveals your intentions and bias; this is why you are a fraud.
Joe April 28, 2008 at 8:51 a.m.
My God... they offer engineering degrees 100% online (shocked). Now that's one degree you need to be in a classroom for and have access to simulation equipment. I have an ABET accredited electronics degree from The Citadel and decided to check out Grantham's curriculum. It is missing quite a few important things in the general core:
Applied Mathematics
Linear Systems
Electromechanical Energy Conversion
Digital Systems Engineering
Computer Applications for Electrical Engineers
and quite a bit in the Senior Year:
Thermodynamics
Advanced Digital Systems
Digital Signal Processing
Solid-State Devices
Grantham still focuses on analog systems while the rest of the world has turned to digital technology. It is an outdated degree program with little application in the real world. It will leave it's graduates ill prepared for current and future technology and the inability to have hands on instruction makes this degree utterly worthless.
Curriculum April 28, 2008 at 3:26 p.m.
You cited the following classes:
Applied Mathematics
Linear Systems
Electromechanical Energy Conversion
Digital Systems Engineering
Computer Applications for Electrical Engineers
Thermodynamics
Advanced Digital Systems
Digital Signal Processing
Solid-State Devices
And I can personally validate the following WERE included in my studies:
Solid-state devices (EE221, EE220)
Digital Signal Processing (EE380, EE381, MATLAB included)
Advanced Digital Systems (CE220, EE490)
Linear Systems (EE490)
Applied Mathematics (MA113, MA141, MA302, MA312, MA315)
The paranthetical references are the Grantham courses, here are the names:
EE221 - Solid-State Circuit Analysis Lab (Multisim)
EE220 - Solid-State Circuit Analysis
EE380 - Signals & Systems Theory (MATLAB, differential equations based)
EE381 - Signals & Systems Lab
EE490 - Control Systems (Linear Time Invariant Systems, differential equation based math, outch!)
MA113 - Mathmatics for Basic Circuit Analysis
MA141 - Precalculus
MA302 - Calculus I (Derivatives, Integrals, Limits, etc)
MA312 - Calculus II (Partial derivatives, multiple Integrals, vector calculus, various multivariable calc)
CE220 - Computer Technology (nasty low level, really detailed as to the inner workings of Modern PC's down to t-states)
MA315 - Discrete Mathematics (great intro for program complexity and logical reasoning)
Also, I was required to take:
CS263 - Programming in C (Visual Studio 2005, I wished they had used Borland Builder)
CS265 - Programming in C++
CE262 - Microprocessor Systems Engineering (chipset-based assembly languages, along with all of the low-level IO calls, and DOS interrupts)
CS216 - Computer Networks (7-layer OSI model, and basic networking techniques using star-wired, parallel, and parallel star-wired network topology).
I have ISBN's if you need them.
The only outdated (in my opinion) class I was unhappy with was EE136 (Antennas, Transmission Lines, Microwaves). This was a great intro to source to load impedance matching using Smith charts, waveguide, and the characteristics of RF as it applies to radiation and reception through free space. The manual for this class was a Grantham-based loose-leaf booklet (approximately 600 pages), but I have heard the new text has been updated (if anyone has the ISBN, please post it here).
The rest are missing, but this is a Technology degree, NOT an engineering degree.
BS Electrical Engineering = Theoretical Engineer
BS Electronics Engineering Technology = Applied Engineer
I really can't stress that last point enough to the people reading these posts. If you are a white-board kinda person with focus on theoretical engineering, DO NOT GO TO GRANTHAM.
The only beef I have with these folks is the ABET issue. My employer does not seem to care, but I know it will jam up the works later if I don't rack up at least 5 years of experience before my next move.
Joe April 28, 2008 at 7:11 p.m.
Making the subjects into a unit as part of a survey course does not qualify. These are semster long courses, many at the senior level. You can't water down such important subjects to give it a glance in a few weeks. You certianly didn't get any application in your labs. The best they could do is send you a circuit board and tell you how to soder it! Did you buy the diagnostic equipment you need? Did you get simulation software with it? ABET would never accredit something that doesn't have applied theory.
To Joe April 28, 2008 at 9:05 p.m.
If it were a Electrical Engineering curriculum, I would totally agree with you.
I have sait it numerous times, so what is once more. If you have no prior electronics experience, DO NOT GO TO GRANTHAM.
Simulations only (NI multisim, MATLAB, etc) reinforce experience. If you are just starting out, DO NOT GO TO GRANTHAM. GRANTHAM WILL GET YOU KILLED. They do not cover safety for neither you, or your equipment.
There is only one class of people that should take a curriculum like this on, and that is prior experience military (or civilian) that are trying to shake the military equivalent off of their resume. If you are changing careers, fresh out of high-school, or have no electronics experience DO NOT GO TO GRANTHAM. The curriculum assumes enough background that you will have a difficult (if not impossible) time succeeding in your studies.
"The best they could do is send you a circuit board and tell you how to soder it!"
-I think Cleveland Institute of Electronics uses this method. Breadboard & components, mail in the result.
To Joe (again) April 28, 2008 at 9:10 p.m.
"Joe April 26, 2008 at 10:29 a.m.
Well, I have an ABET undergrad in electrical engineering and an AACSB MBA, both from The Citadel. I know what AACSB entails but that doesn't automatically win me over. If I hire an accountant then I will definitely go with the AACSB. Most of the online accounting degrees don't even leave folks certified except in Arizona, definitely not in my state. If I'm hiring a lower level manager I might pick someone with a DL degree coming out of the military because they know how to lead and have hands on experience with our systems. I have hired several people with DL degrees for more technical positions."
So which is it? Do you have an Electrical, or a Electronics degree?
To Joe (Again, Again) April 28, 2008 at 9:12 p.m.
The above was taken from the CSU site, here is the link:
Joe April 28, 2008 at 9:24 p.m.
My concentration is electronics as it would be in any electrical engineering program.
To Joe April 28, 2008 at 10:03 p.m.
I think he means what area—power, controls, telecom, or signals. Electronics is sometimes referred to as electrical and electronic engineering. The distinction is that electrical engineers are usually concerned with using electricity to transmit high energy(power transformers), while electronic engineers are concerned with using electricity to transmit information (NIC).
Honestly, who are we to place limits on how universities use technology. I must agree that online simulation is the safest and best way to perform all labs. You will get all the time to put everything you leanred to practice once you get hired. Any idiot can solder and you don’t need a full semester soldering 101 to figure that out. I believe labs are important but how the method of delivery is achieved is not. The bottom line is did the information or lab do what it was intended to do.
The Army use simulation for weapons training and have had tremendous results so should we go back to the old ways of training since online simulations are substandard—I think not! Also, the Air Force ill be using digital 3D dental xrays to train doctors in dentristry. It only makes sesne—why expose patients and staff to low energy radiation in order to achieve training when an online simulation performs the same results.
Just my two cents…
Joe April 28, 2008 at 11:22 p.m.
I thought he would have been able to put two and two together... no matter. He says don't go to Grantham if you don't have experience. Then why bother unless you just want a piece of paper? If it isn't ABET and the engineering degree people are looking for then "DO NOT GO TO GRANTHAM... GRANTHAM WILL GET YOU KILLED." Hell, you can't even do DUT, CAD, or SPICE. Do you even know how to design a circuit and know that it works? How do you do that online?
WUP April 29, 2008 at 12:12 a.m.
@ above posting
You stated:"We have had nothing but good results from our Grantham degrees. In fact, I receive a huge promotion and pay raise because of my degree"
So what, now you run the milkshake machine instead of the fry cooker at your local Dairy Queen. BIG DEAL! Your really going places with your Grantham credentials.
to WUP April 29, 2008 at 12:43 a.m.
You are a stupid head. Grantham is great. You just don't like it because you failed out and got fired. You are ignorant and a moron, as is anyone that does not like Grantham.
Grantham Rocks! April 29, 2008 at 1:14 a.m.
I went from flipping burgers to soldering circuit boards with my Grantham degree!
Grow up April 29, 2008 at 1:50 a.m.
Grow the hell up, all of you.
There were were having a nice, civil conversation, and you had to go and act like that.
To Joe April 29, 2008 at 9:37 p.m.
Joe,
I'll answer your question...
"Hell, you can't even do DUT, CAD, or SPICE. Do you even know how to design a circuit and know that it works?" Yes, I can! You don't need a laboratory to do that; all you need to run SPICE and other CAD design programs is a your computer. Have you used those programs before? Yes!
"How do you do that online?" Grantham uses a newer program, SPICE is an old program used to design electronic circuits. It's called Electronics Workbench Multisim. I've used both programs and I prefer Electronics Workbench Multisim because it has more components to choose from, #D breadboards, oscopes, function generators, and more. It has everything you would use at work or in a electronics laboratory,
check it out!
WUP May 2, 2008 at 6:35 p.m.
@ You are a stupid head
Sorry but I graduated from a regional university that is not interested in ripping people off, but instead carrying on the tradition of a real university,which would be having real professors, athletics, real exams- no open book test, a real campus, real graduations on campus and so on. I could not have possibly failed out or got fired from Grantham because Im smart enough to know that Grantham is a ripoff and I would never enroll with them because the school is a joke. So I suggest that you stop wasting your time and money with a business and enroll into a real university that has entrance requirements which serves a tool to screen out the ones that do not belong there. Face it, Grantham takes anybody because their screening tool is your checkbook-50.00 and your in. To top it all off,they are a flat out scam with worthless credits because they have National accreditation. So my friend,I would recommend that you find a tradtional school to enroll into and take classes with them even if it is online because a traditioal school's online degree will still be valued the same as attending on campus. Everybody knows that Grantham is a joke so stop wasting your time in cyberspace with them thinking that it is going to get you somewhere because it wont.Go to a REAL university. Even if online education is your choice, go to a REAL university that offers online degree programs. Grantham credits and degrees are nothing more than Ass Crack paper that you can hang next to the toilet in the bathroom. That is the bottom line.It is too easy these days to find a tradtitional school to take classes online with so why settle for a bogus school like Grantham.
OK, list a few for us! May 2, 2008 at 8:14 p.m.
@WUP
Since you are an authority on the worth of a school and the degrees it offers, can you please suggest a few for the following areas of study (ABET and RA only, please, since national is a joke):
Computer Science
Electrical Engineering
Mathematics
Physics
Please note that only 100% online formats will work, and the RA applies to all, whereas the ABET applies to the 1st 2.
Thanks!
Bottom Line May 20, 2008 at 12:21 a.m.
I don't care what discipline you are talking about...If it isn't RA it isn't worth a sh-t...
So True May 21, 2008 at 3:25 a.m.
So true it is. Sorry, your National Degree does not hold the same weight at an RA degree. Fact.
BL and ST May 21, 2008 at 3:44 a.m.
Two plus weeks and that is the best answer we can get from the RA folks!
The Answer May 21, 2008 at 6:17 a.m.
@ list a few for us!
You cant get those degrees 100% from a RA or ABET affiliate, which leads to the fact that because Grantham attempts to offer some sort of engineering degree online makes them a total joke. This is the fact that remains to be seen over and over here and that is all there is to it. Grantham is a total waste of time!
Lame (List a few for us) May 21, 2008 at 8:57 p.m.
2 Weeks without follow-up, and all I get is a usual RA vs. NA and Grantham sucks comment. I will look elsewhere for direction, for a second there I though at least some of the RA bubbas would offer an alternative.
It is so easy to shed light on problems, and apparently so difficult to offer solutions. How lame.
RA Bubba May 21, 2008 at 11:32 p.m.
Grantham is a worthless National Accredited school that offers credits that will not transfer to a respected Regional Accredited university. Regional Accreditation is a higer standard so Grantham degrees are a waste of time and money. There you have it. The truth is out. From what I have been reading from these postings it seems that the Grantham scam has been exposed for quite some time now. Please! Grantham employees and distressed students stop defending this scamster school.
Another RA Bubba May 23, 2008 at 8:03 p.m.
I figure, if these people want to waste their time and money, let them. It will make it easier for the people with RA degrees to get jobs. Picture this, applicant "A" walks in with an online Grantham degree and applicant "B" walks in with any RA degree. All things being equal, who do you think will get the job? If you are honest with yourself, you know the answer.
Old Tune May 24, 2008 at 4:53 p.m.
You have been playing that angle for so long.
-GU students/Grads already have jobs, and are looking for promotions. I got mine.
-Fresh off the street/straight out of college recruits are anybody's guess. I have met too many worthless EE's straight out of school for that argument to hold any weight. It is interview performance and background that win me over, not name-brand.
A more realistic scenario:
Applicant A, with no experience and a RA degree walks in for a job you just opened.
Applicant B, whom has a good track record, experience in your organization, and newly graduated from GU applies for the same job.
"All things being equal, who do you think will get the job? If you are honest with yourself, you know the answer."
Employers will bet on a known quantity vs. an unknown anyday. Get over yourself.
And I think the point has been made, time and time again; If you are fresh out of high school, or have no experience in the trade, do not go to grantham.
This kind of school, along with all of the NA's, are career builders, not career starters. If you want a new career, then definately go to a RA school.
@ RA folks May 24, 2008 at 8:12 p.m.
In my opinion...
i don't hink its really matters if your an 'ol timer or someone out of high school. NA is no better or worse than an RA school. You RA folks need to really do some researh before sounding so stupid on this forum.
A seriously real scenario:
Applicant A, with 2-3 years experience and a RA degree walks in for a job being advertised.
Applicant B, 3 or more years of experience in and graduated from GU with a B.S. degree and applies for the same job.
"All things being equal, who do you think will get the job?
If you are honest with yourself, managed or hired new employees before I think we know the answer."
I'm going with "experience" I don't give a hoot whether you graduated from MIT or Grantham. Bottom line is can you and how long have you been doing the job and got any certifications to add.
You RA folks need to stop posting nonsense and go get some real facts to support your claims otherwise your points are worthless.
sorry but thats the truth!
yeah right May 25, 2008 at 2:47 p.m.
"I don't give a hoot whether you graduated from MIT or Grantham."
Then you would be the first guy I fired in my company. That is just too funny. You would pick a Grantham grad over an MIT grad? You sir, are grasping at straws now. That is funniest statement I have heard on this board up till now.
You are wrong May 28, 2008 at 4:52 a.m.
"i don't hink its really matters if your an 'ol timer or someone out of high school. NA is no better or worse than an RA school"
Unfortunately where I work, you need to be professionally licensed, and a NA degree will not allow to even attempt the professional exams such as CPA, RN, etc.
Don't make a mistake and go to Grantham. For the same money, there are many regionally accredited programs without the less useful accreditation and terrible reputation of Grantham.
Errr, No May 28, 2008 at 5 a.m.
"Applicant A, with no experience and a RA degree walks in for a job you just opened.
Applicant B, whom has a good track record, experience in your organization, and newly graduated from GU applies for the same job."
Unfortunately, the real choice is usually between two candidates of similar experience, but only one holds a recognized degree (not Grantham)
Joe May 29, 2008 at 7:39 a.m.
MIT vs Grantham... ROFLMAO! Thanks for the laugh!!
As a hiring manager for a major defence firm I will take an MIT, Purdue, or Citadel grad with zero experience over anyone with a Grantham degree and a couple years on the job. These schools are nationally ranked ABET programs. They focus on theory, simulation, and creation... these are the people that create the devices of tommorow today. Grantham grads with some apprentice experience know the basics and can make sound technicians but these people will not be leading design teams.
Gun HOOOO! May 29, 2008 at 11:13 a.m.
Grantham Univeristy.... didn't George Bush graduated from there???
Bush May 29, 2008 at 2:39 p.m.
George W. graduated from Yale.
Agreed May 29, 2008 at 4:01 p.m.
@Joe
" Grantham grads with some apprentice experience know the basics and can make sound technicians but these people will not be leading design teams."
Absolutely, nor should they. A BSEET is not the same as a BSEE. BSEET grads should focus on application, not design & theory. If you want to design, go BSEE. If you want to execute design, go BSEET.
Why does everyone keep lumping these unrelated programs together and comparing them? Grantham is a glorified trade school, not a theoretical engineering state-funded university. We really are stuck on comparing apples and oranges in the name of defaming a good tech school.
SNIFF SNIFF....A SCAM May 29, 2008 at 7:25 p.m.
Uh, After all of Granthams big promises and claims of being in the buisness for years and still no proof of accrediation and nothing has come yet! I work there and It's almost June 2008 and Grantham still hasn't been approved for regional accrediation.....Hmmm, I smell a New York Sewer Rat...dont you?
Title IV May 29, 2008 at 7:38 p.m.
They just got Title IV, we shall see.
WTF? May 29, 2008 at 7:46 p.m.
Of all the lip service, why are they not on the list for the student clearinghouse?
no Title 4 May 30, 2008 at 12:27 a.m.
Title for my AZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ....u keep living in a dream world if you wanna. Grantham continues to have loyal dummies right by their side...u foolish rats...wow! so gullable...please do your homework
Joe May 30, 2008 at 1:13 a.m.
"We really are stuck on comparing apples and oranges in the name of defaming a good tech school."
Because vocational schools shouldn't be handing out engineering bachelor degrees... especially online. If it was an associates or certification I wouldn't give it a second thought.
Joe May 30, 2008 at 2:51 a.m.
@no title 4
If the school is accredited by a DOE recognized agency (DETC) they should be eligible for Title IV IIRC.
Title IV Reference May 30, 2008 at 4:03 p.m.
www.detc.org/downloads/ACReport08.pdf
Scroll down a bit to Grantham, or search the page.
-Keep in mind, this is not a GU publication, but the newsletter issued by the accreditor.
Joe May 30, 2008 at 7:35 p.m.
It looks like I was right.
@ Joe June 1, 2008 at 11:47 p.m.
I VP friend of mine is a senior design team engineer for a systems engineering company. He's also a CCE (Certified Clinical Engineer) so he knows about designing. I have learned the process at I can tell you engineers and EETs must work together and stop thinkng one program is better or worse than another.
Bottom line is we all learn electronics, right. Some EET programs if you can believe it like grantham offer higher standards of math according to Abet. I believe most EETs require only trig and GU offers Calc 1 & 2.
In my experience, math is math and has not changed in the last 50 years and Calc 1/2 is hardno matter what method is being taught.
So Joe, I have to disagree with you about your hiring practices. I would hire experience aboove anything else.
think about it...
I'm a GU grad June 1, 2008 at 11:57 p.m.
Let me say that I am military and have graduated from GU. In my opinion GU is a great school. Its no MIT, Yale, or Harvard but its still a great school.
I tell my kids not to complain about anything unless you;ve trued it. I suggest many of you that say the program is bad then take a few classes an see for youself.
I am in the process of applying for my PhD and will be taking the FE exam in NC soon. A lot of us military as you can see on TV don't have the time to take tradional classes. GU has been around supporting the military since WWII and in my opinion supporting us vet's I saluate you.
I ask you folks to please stop the nonsense. Grantham IS accredited and not a rip off; its a great school and I've used what I have learned on the job in the military and have been recognized for my educational benefits. Again, I am a recent grad and I can tell you this is a great school.
I'm proud to say I graduated from Grantham University!
take care,
Bill
Joe June 2, 2008 at 5:33 a.m.
Most of the EET programs I know of and the one I attended at The Citadel required Analytic Geometry III, Calculus III along with applied Mathmatics II. So you can see good ABET programs have to take quite a bit more than an online program.
CCE's are the kind of people you would hire as team leaders as they have moved too far away from design and more towards oversight and maintenance. Working in the defence sector requires my staff to be on the cutting edge and push ideas to the limits. I want people who think outside the box and have the proper background to do so. That is what ranked ABET programs provide. This online curriculum spends too much time on analog systems... that would be fine if you wanted to work in the Iranian defence sector.
ABET provides more and better applied mathmatics as you have to apply the Calculus and Trig with your Physics in the labs. At Grantham you just take a math course... at The Citadel you apply it to application and theory in state of the art facilties.
So math isn't just math if you don't apply it properly. Experience as an apprentice technician isn't nearly as valuable as an ABET education.
Analog? June 2, 2008 at 1:58 p.m.
@Joe
I don't know where you get the idea that the BSEET is comprised of mostly analog theory, but you are incorrect.
If anything, Digital systems were emphasized throughout, with computer programming to boot.
The only Analog theory I recall was in Control Systems, with the study of Linear Time-Invariant systems.
Also, I hate to kick your soap box out from beneath you, but you have not taken a single course with Grantham, nor Columbia Southern University. Why do you insist on commenting on curriculums that you know nothing about?
Also, you keep citing Citadel; I hate to burst that bubble, but Citadel has spawned the worst engineers I have ever encountered. Perhaps it is the additional conditioning offered by the USAF OTS, but I have not met a single grad that was worth more than moving heavy objects from point A to point B.
Analog? (Cont) June 2, 2008 at 2:36 p.m.
Now that I think about it:
As an experienced Tech, Field Engineer, and now Entry-Level Engineer, the only complaint I have with the Grantham curriculum is the utter lack of RF content. For RADAR, RF, and ELINT, this course of study is essential. Luckily, GU taught me how to pick up a book, not only read it but take good notes, and apply it so I can get spun up on my own. I don't need no stinking school anymore!
Honest Review From First Hand Experience June 2, 2008 at 6:58 p.m.
This is directed to anyone interested in an honest review of Grantham University. First off, I want to make it clear that I am not a Grantham employee. I am sure not a field engineer. I am a First Class Petty Officer in the United States Navy. A Legalman for any fellow Sailors posting on this site. My first two years in the Navy I attended Vincennes University (Regionally Accredited) and graduated. My next two years in the Navy I attended Grantham University and graduated. Therefore, I feel because I have attended both a Regionally and Nationally Accredited University, I can provide some honest insight.
Reading Assignments - I found no difference between the amount of required reading for either schools.
Homework - I found both school's homework assignments equally difficult.
Exams - I will state for the record that Grantham University's open book exam policy needs to be looked at.
In closing, if anyone is honestly using this site to decide if Grantham is right for them, remember this. If you have any future goals to transfer to another university after Grantham then simply DON'T ATTEND GRANTHAM. Everyone posting on this site has provided adequate evidence your credits WON'T Transfer. On the otherhand, those of you and this is directed to active duty military member's who need degrees to advance in their CURRENT field, by all means enroll in Grantham, finish your degree, advance to the next higher paygrade, and be proud of your accomplishments. If anyone has any intelligent responses to my post, please address to James. Out of respect for myself and the other active and retired members posting on this site who protect the freedoms you all enjoy, please limit your bashing of my post.
Joe June 2, 2008 at 9:50 p.m.
"I hate to kick your soap box out from beneath you, but you have not taken a single course with Grantham, nor Columbia Southern University. Why do you insist on commenting on curriculums that you know nothing about?"
It is part of my job to know. I don't recall actually commenting on the CSU curriculum. The gist of what I was saying there was NA/RA debate doesn't matter, what to expect from the hiring managers end, and do your research before you commit to a school.
"I hate to burst that bubble, but Citadel has spawned the worst engineers I have ever encountered."
Overall ranked 38th in the nation whose electrical/electronics ranks on par with Purdue. No partner, I seriously doubt if the worst engineers you have ever encountered came from The Citadel. Me thinks you just say it to get a rise out of this vet.
@ James June 3, 2008 at 3:57 p.m.
James,
I am not sure how long ago you graduated from GU but they have revised its policy a few years back about no "open book". The exams are taken randomly online.
Also, GU credits DO transfer. I have a Masters degree with them and ATSU or FSU (An RA) is willing to accept my credits if I transfer into a PhD or Masters program.
I'm not bashing you but I thought perhaps you didn't know that GU credits will transfer and no onger open book. Also, please keep in mind that if you graduated from the Citadel and tried to transfer credits someplace else you could have just as hard a time--the univeristy has the final authority to accept/deny credits.
Mr. Citadel Guy (sorry no disrespect I don't know your name) Grantham does offer advanced math e.g. trig, Calc I,II, differiential equations, fourier analyisis, etc.
I have to also disagree with you math is math and PI ahas always been PI since roman times. I do agree that application is very important and like many colleges GU has an instructors to help you with the math and software called MatLab. This is similiar to what many univeristy students who are studying higher level math use today.
Also, I noticed on Citadels cirrculum they use analog theory too. Solid state electronics e.g. op amps are they not used for analog and digital circuits too?
just my honest points...
GU is a good school and I encourage anyone who wants to attend--Attend!
Mr. Citadel Guy June 3, 2008 at 10:05 p.m.
Basic Calc I/II is only the first step in an ABET accredited math core. You also have to take Physics with applied Calculus + lab... this is specifically for electrical/electronic engineers. It deals with kinematics, dynamics, electricity and magnetism, fluid statics and dynamics, thermodynamics and optics. You won't get that in a base Physics or Calculus course. This is a prereq to prepare you for upper level courses. Without it you wouldn't have a clue what to do. This is why math isn't just math or science isn't just science. It is applied math and science for electronic engineering. Grantham doesn't offer this so you know their upper levels are watered down. You would flunk out of any serious ABET program without proper preparation, especially if your watered-down courses are only 6 weeks long.
Joe June 3, 2008 at 11:44 p.m.
I'm sorry... 3 week watered down courses.
Please! June 4, 2008 at 5:03 p.m.
If it takes you more than 3 hours to complete a Grantham course, you are an idiot.
A Degree from Grantham should take no longer than 4 months to finish. The only reason it takes that long is the utter lack of support from the "school" in getting some assignments graded.
They are all one person! June 4, 2008 at 6:48 p.m.
All of the students reps, "instructors", and staff all lead to the same mail server inbox. Beware!
@ Joe, Mr Citadel Guy, everyone else... June 5, 2008 at 12:25 a.m.
I say take the challage, enroll in Granthams upper math courses and decide for yourself.
None of you are the subject matter experts for Abet. Abet has two distinct programs, actually more than two (i.e. computing and IT) but I will talk only about TAC-for EET and EAC-engineering.
As what @Joes says is very much true. Grantham's cirriculum is inline with Abets TAC program...I've done my homework. Now, I must agree with Joe & Mr. C that if grantham wants EAC then all they need to do to meet the critera is change its algebra based physics to calculus based. Its exactly on target with Abet for TAC so I don't understand what all the complaints are about.
Joe and Mr C your trying to place a TAC program in with an EAC program. Two different engineering programs, ok! Could Grantham do this and succeed. Yes, I strongly feel they could. Honestly, I don't know of any math programs out there that are "watered down" as you speak of. Calculus is hard and meant to break you and make you quit the engineering program. Don't give up; you can do it!!!
As a biomedical engineer; I find asking myself why did I have to take all that math in college. I hardly ever use it and when I do the formula is already there for me. I just plug in the numbers and go. O' thats if I feel like doing it the "ol fashioned way; today we have anaylzers and calculators that will do those functions for me. Come on Joe and Mr. C!
I agree with @Joe that upper level math in any college can't be easy or watered down. Sorry guys and I say this with a smile from the guy that commented about the Roamns but he is right "math is math, Calculus is Calculus, and PI will always be 3.3.14159265 to infinity.
Mr. C you'll figure all this out once you graduate and find yourself asking those same questions as I do know.
I've always hated this debate about EE vs EET when really we're both two different kinds of engineers. I chuckle when I see that EE are theorist eng and EET are applied eng. When I see this I think of the great minds i.e. Nikola Tesla, Volta, Edison, etc...what would they say today about this discrimination. They would say that we ARE electronically inclined to make a difference in the world so work together for the common good.
In the long debate I have seen here I've read how people HAVE been able to transfer credits, most of these folks are military (vast amount of high tech experience there), and the Grantham students are loyal. I like that and I hire folks that meet those requirements--attitude is everything.
Terry's Part 2 June 5, 2008 at 12:26 a.m.
So why don't you guys stop messing with these folks. This site is for online degree reviews and clearly neither of you two or the disgruntled employees never attended this school before--your opinions are not factual and degrading to other students.
BTW, I'm not a student or employee of Grantham either just a simple engineer that like to fight for the underdogs--Grantham students keep you chins held high and don't ever believe your degree is worthless or "watered down"
good luck!
Terry
Joe June 5, 2008 at 3:29 a.m.
I am the Citadel Guy if you hadn't figured it out.
I have an EE with a specialization in EET along with an MBA that I use as department head of a major defence firm. It is the same degree except ABET EEs with EET core have a much better theory and design background. I will reiterate the position that I will hire Grantham grads as technicians but more because the fact they come from the military like me and I know they have the competency to do the work. Grantham grads without military experience will probably get themselves killed on the job. This is because the program doesn't provide a firm background for its students. This fact has already been coroberated by Grantham grads.
Applied math and science in an ABET program is not just figuring out pie or running equations you will never use again. They are taylored for electrical/electronic engineering so you will have in-depth knowledge for design and application. I'm not talking about the plain Calc that is in the Grantham cirruculum. You have to take more applied sceince and math on top of all that. I am sorry you have not had this program or you would know that.
A Grantham grad just stated the courses are so watered down they should be able to do one in under three hours. This might be an exaggeration but the point is still taken. They allow you to complete upper level degree classes in as little as three weeks... this is wrong.
Electronics Engineer June 6, 2008 at 2:52 p.m.
Citadel Guy, I am a supporter of what Grantham is doing, and I support your last post. I am a Grantham alumnus in BSEET. I had served in the Navy for 8 years. I was able to get a government electronic engineering,(YD-02 on the NSPS program equiv. to GS-13 step 5.) position with the Department of the Navy; USMC, because of my balance of degree and experience. This position is a degreed engineer required position. Because I did not go to an ABET school, I fell under the "or" catagory when hired. That means that you must have a degree and experience.
Here is the link
www.opm.gov/qualifications/SEC-IV/A/GS-P...
Hey it would be great if I would have had been able to drop everything and attend classes at a regular lecture based school, but I worked hard and completed a challenging course load, as mentioned above, with no instructor to "teach" me. I had to break open the books and learn this stuff on my own.
I would agree that Grantham is not for someone who is coming out of high school, or trying to make a carreer change, but with prior expereince and the degree check mark in the box, Grantham was and is great for me.
I think the argument about transfering schools is superfluous. If you made the decision to complete your degree and choose Grantham, why would you need to transfer? I am sure they are some extraordinary circumstances, but in general it is always best to just stay at the college you are at to finish your degree, because transfering classes from school to school at any school will cause some class transfer problems. Why keep beating that transfer drum?
Now applying for Masters programs is another situation. I was able to get into a Master of Science in Systems Engineering at NPS (Naval Postgraduate School), but I did not look anywhere else; The Navy is paying for it.
Also, why would a "Citidel" guy even be trolling on the online degree review site for Grantham University. It would be interesting to know because I work with alot of Citidel guys on my "compound", both USMC and USMC retired. My boss is a Citidel guy and he never had a problem with my Grantham degree.
outsider June 7, 2008 at 4:04 a.m.
Electronics Engineer...
You nailed everything right on the head, good for you.
Roto Rooter June 7, 2008 at 10:31 a.m.
I think the Citidel Guy "Joe" is full of the Crap that I have clean each day for living!!!
Joe June 7, 2008 at 6:01 p.m.
"Also, why would a "Citidel" guy even be trolling on the online degree review site for Grantham University."
I needed data for hiring a senior technician as the rest of my floor staff was too green. I saw a Grantham grad with a pretty good CV that I was considering moving up to the engineering staff (at a later date) so I hired him. I had to fire him because he screwed up his breadboards.
"It would be interesting to know because I work with alot of Citidel guys on my "compound", both USMC and USMC retired. My boss is a Citidel guy and he never had a problem with my Grantham degree."
I never had a problem with a Grantham degree until I realized how incompetent some of their graduates can be. That is not a remark about you... just my experience. I do have an entry techinician that I hired from Grantham on my line. The kid knows his stuff but he also is military. I won't be moving him up to my engineering staff until he prooves himself after my previous experience.
BTW... the rating of Grantham on this website is terrible. It seems like most people here are not happy with it. Those who feel the need to attack me should look at your own alumni.
to Joe June 7, 2008 at 7:03 p.m.
What do you expect from an untimed open-book tested university Joe? Of course people aren't going to learn anything when all they have to do is look it up. It's like using a calculator to pass a long division test.
@Joe I'm not picking on you... June 7, 2008 at 7:06 p.m.
Joe,
Why would a person with a 4 year degree in electronics/engineering work as a technician. That doesn't make any sense. A technician defined is someone with a 2 year degree not a 4 year degree. Of course, your hiring overqualified people and I must say if I didn't get a promotion because I had a degree from Grantham then I'd be glad you fired me too. Actually, if I were your boss I would have some questions about your style of supervision/management. All new employees require shop orientation it’s required and I find it hard to believe your story about a technician that didn't understand breadboards--that seems far-fetched.
Joe, here are my qualifications. I work for a DoD hospital with a degree in as a BEEE with specialization in biomedical and a MS Info Management Tech. Grantham has all the preq's for an EET student to take and pass the FE exam.
In my state of NC, both EE and EETs are allowed to sit in for the exam and become registered PEs. For those of you that don't know it’s a good requirement to posses the PE title for consulting, expert witness, etc.
"Applied math and science in an ABET program is not just figuring out pie or running equations you will never use again. They are tailored for electrical/electronic engineering so you will have in-depth knowledge for design and application. I'm not talking about the plain Calc that is in the Grantham curriculum. You have to take more applied science and math on top of all that. I am sorry you have not had this program or you would know that."
I do know as being a graduate from an Abet accredited school of engineering what the courses entails and I will say you’re still wrong. As an engineer I am responsible as a manager for technicians, FDA, NFPA rules and regulations as well as interpretations of the codes. Yes, let’s talk design now, ok. I modify medical equipment as required to benefit the cost of our organization. As you would have learned from your studies from a abet program that design entails several steps and rules along the way (ever heard of 510k?). Yes, calculations are required but I'm talking unless you design its pointless in my opinion. I hardly use advanced calculus on my job and I assist with calculations/acceptance testing for shielding of x-rays rooms/medical imaging devices.
Joe, you should reread some of the posts on here because it doesn't sound as bad as you make them out to be.
Why I am here before anyone asks that question is because I'm looking for a school online that offers an MBA. In my busy life I don't have time to go to a traditional boring classroom and listen to some old guy lecture for 45 minutes. If I can find something that I can do both at home and work would be great. I am looking at Grantham myself and a couple of other schools to keep my options open.
@Joe I'm not picking on you... Part2 June 7, 2008 at 7:07 p.m.
So Joe give these guys a break...you're making us EEs look stupid. They’ve stated the fact in several posts that they’re school is legit and accredited…really…what’s your problem?
Regards,
Terry
Joe June 7, 2008 at 8:06 p.m.
My Grantham grads are applying as technicians because they can't find jobs as engineers. They both told me so. I personally will not hire a Grantham grad as a straight hire to my engineering staff. I will move them up to the position if they prove themselves and have military experience. I do not have much respect for open book testing that is untimed as do many other people. You think I'm in the minority on that? The people I have consulted with give the program about as much weight as an ABET accredited AS which is why they are taking tech positions. If you're a CCE your most likely running a maintenance department. It is a little bit different than designing cutting edge weapon systems. I don't doubt with a Masters degree in IT Tech from an ABET school you can get that job. I would hire you too but I wouldn't hire an only-Grantham degree. The math isn't pointless in my department as we cover R&D. That might be where you are trying to make comparisons that shouldn't be made and I would have too if I was talking about other fields but I'm not.
I am not here to paint Grantham grads as stupid. If they were incompetent they never would have made it through the military. They make great technicians but that shows the value of the degree is that of an ABET accredited AS. I have experienced a Grantham grad screw up a breadboard which shows me open book testing has lead to some people slipping through the cracks. It certainly isn't representative of everyone but with open enrollment and untimed book tests anyone can get an engineering degree.
to Joe June 7, 2008 at 9:56 p.m.
You are right on. ANYONE can get into Grantham with no background, no testing, no SAT/ACT scores, etc. The only thing you need is a credit card. As a former student, I can tell you that e-mailing the final exam and letting me take it open book was pathetic. EVERYTHING was open book and most were untimed (IF you had a Proctor that did his job). Most guys in my shop that went to Grantham just had their buddies Proctor their exams and they gave them all the time they wanted. Pathetic. Grantham only cares about their money, not the education of their students. This was obvious by the way they only called when there was money to be paid and they did not follow up on questions in a timely manner. I would never hire a Grantham grad over someone who went to a real school, and by "real school", I'm not discounting online schools. Schools like Fort Hayes and such are real online schools. Grantham is not.
Joe June 8, 2008 at 3:31 a.m.
The open enrollment isn't a big problem for me accept that I have to review each online school carefully. If they don't test properly or hand out credit too easily I have to question the degree. If they have high entrance standards I usually don't have to dig much deeper because those schools generally have ABET's seal of approval. The procter issue really bothers me about Grantham. Like you said, everybody in your shop was scratching each others back. They could help anyone cheat. There is no quality control with this degree so I have to place them as technicians and see how they perform. I'm hoping the Grantham lad I have now will come through. I want to be progressive enough to say I am placing online degree holders on my engineering staff but I absolutely will not do it unless they prove they deserve it. I'm sorry to say but that's the way it is.
To Joe June 8, 2008 at 3:51 p.m.
Joe,
"I am not here to paint Grantham grads as stupid. If they were incompetent they never would have made it through the military. They make great technicians but that shows the value of the degree is that of an ABET accredited AS."
Yes, you are trying to paint the students here as stupid. If you would do your research on Abet you would see Grantham does meet its outcomes/requirements. see excerpt from Abet 2009 standards for EET.
"Objective
An accreditable program in Electrical/Electronic(s) Engineering Technology will prepare graduates with the technical and managerial skills necessary to enter careers in the design, application, installation, manufacturing, operation and/or maintenance of electrical/electronic(s) systems. Graduates of associate degree programs typically have strengths in the building, testing, operation, and maintenance of existing electrical systems, whereas baccalaureate degree graduates are well prepared for development and implementation of electrical/electronic(s) systems.
Outcomes
Graduates of associate degree programs must demonstrate knowledge and hands-on competence appropriate to the goals of the program in:
a.
the application of circuit analysis and design, computer programming, associated software, analog and digital electronics, and microcomputers to the building, testing, operation, and maintenance of electrical/electronic(s) systems.
b.
the applications of physics or chemistry to electrical/electronic(s) circuits in a rigorous mathematical environment at or above the level of algebra and trigonometry.
Given the breadth of technical expertise involved with electrical systems, and the unique objectives of individual programs, some baccalaureate programs may focus on preparing graduates with in-depth but narrow expertise, while other programs may choose to prepare graduates with expertise in a broad spectrum of the field. Therefore, the depth and breadth of expertise demonstrated by baccalaureate graduates must be appropriate to support the goals of the program. In addition to the outcomes expected of associate degree graduates, graduates of baccalaureate degree programs must demonstrate:
a.
the ability to analyze, design, and implement control systems, instrumentation systems, communications systems, computer systems, or power systems.
b.
the ability to apply project management techniques to electrical/electronic(s) systems.
c.
the ability to utilize statistics/probability, transform methods, discrete mathematics, or applied differential equations in support of electrical/electronic(s) systems."
I learned in my studies with granthm it takles more disciplin to study online than a traditional school. I am great at researching stuff. So I want to make sure your educated on what the REAL requirements are before you go telling me that my schools program is the same as an AAS--I think not!
take care,
JD
To Joe, June 8, 2008 at 3:58 p.m.
Grantham does have tests you must take prior to admissions. You and the other guy needs to do your homework before porting lies on here. GU requires new students to take an ACT/SAT (foriegn TOFEL).
Also, if you read up further there is a passage that another student posted stating from the handbook the only authorized proctoted testers. Its not you buddy from work or your wife, kids, whaterever--that's funny for anyone to suggest or think that--too funny!!!
just my two cents from another grantham student.
bye,
former proctor June 8, 2008 at 7:52 p.m.
I have been following up on this because one of my guys is a student at Grantham. I'm a LT in the the Navy and the Division Officer in my shop. I had one of my junior Petty Officers come to me and ask me to proctor one of his exams. Always happy to help out a sailor better himself, I agreed to do it. I filled out the form he gave me and faxed it back it. Shortly thereafter, I received an e-mail with the test. No one at the school contacted me for verification that I was who I said I was. I gave them my personal e-mail address and that is where they sent the exam. After I proctored the exam, I faxed it back to them, and again, no one from the school contacted me to verify that I had indeed proctored the exam and followed the rules. I can see how the student a few posts above could have cheated. If I was dishonest, I could have just handed the test to the sailor and told him to give it back to me when he was done. This really gave me a bad taste in my mouth.
To: To Joe (above) June 8, 2008 at 8:06 p.m.
Actually, it is you who need to do your homework. Grantham does NOT require new students to take an ACT/SAT unless you are fresh out of High School (which is NOT who they are marketing to anyway). Anyone else can just pay their way in. Pathetic.
Joe June 8, 2008 at 8:37 p.m.
@To Joe
GU is open enrollment which means no ACT/SAT is required. If you do take the ACT/SAT and meet a minimum score you can opt of two remedial classes but you don't have to take it and just opt for the two dummy classes. The TOFEL is for interntational students or illegal aliens that can't speak much English. Considering there is no minimum score required for entrance it is indeed open enrollment. The website says so.
The proctor is chosen by you and can be anyone of your buddies or coworkers... there is no quality control at this school.
Joe June 8, 2008 at 8:48 p.m.
@To Joe
Grantham does not meet ABET standards or they would be ABET accredited. After reviewing the standards I can see why they aren't. You learned at Grantham yet think you must pass an SAT/ACT or TOFEL score to get in? It sounds like you didn't even go to the school.
To Joe June 8, 2008 at 8:54 p.m.
What is funny is that the above post @ you was probably a Grantham employee. I have gotten more bad enrollment/student info from actual employees than on this board. Pretty sad that the advisors are that bad. What does that say about the rest of the school?
Joe June 8, 2008 at 9:13 p.m.
I started thinking it was an employee too when they said the age old line... "it takles more disciplin to study online than a traditional school."
Especially when you get untimed open-book tests... yeah, that takes far more discipline than closed-book timed tests. lol
To Joe June 8, 2008 at 9:20 p.m.
Yeah, I know. My wife just completed her Masters from a traditional school, but she did'nt have to have ANY discipline for that. Good thing she did not go to Grantham, right?
Not so June 8, 2008 at 11:51 p.m.
"Grantham does not meet ABET standards or they would be ABET accredited"
It would appear they are working on it. It is only AFTER the graduating class of said ABET program can even apply.
A good example of this is the SUNY BSEE.
To issue a blanket statement like that is a gross overgeneralization, and is misleading. If you are to post here, please stick to "citable" references.
Proctored Exams June 9, 2008 at 12:02 a.m.
TRUTH: There is NO oversight in the proctored exam process. I had to pick a proctor who was known for integrity, just to get my collegues to take me seriously.
The proctored exam process is most definately broken. I have had fellow students produce the current proctored exams in e-mail. If it were not for this, I would not have actually passed a few of my exams. I barely made it through the classes.
It sounds as if the time limit will be enforced via internet. I support this idea, but it just has too many holes. I do not understand why they even require Proctored exams anyway, almost all of the other NA's do not, and still have the open-book policy for testing. What a pain.
My point is, it is easy for those that need to cheat to pass a class to find a way. I used the same proctor for 6 semesters straight, and Grantham only contacted him by e-mail.
At the same time, most of the exams given were difficult enough that the open book, as well as a fudged time limit, will not save you. You really do have to know your stuff to pass these classes, and that is why I had to cheat on 2 of them. My proctor didn't know. Of the 26 classes I took, I will always wonder if those 2 I cheated on should have taken me out.
Sonya June 9, 2008 at 12:05 a.m.
Why waste time on this forum? If you're not happy with Grantham...move on and get a life. The only thing that matters on the resume is if you have a four year degree with some experience in order to get a good job.
To Sonya June 9, 2008 at 12:15 a.m.
First, the same can be said for you. If you are happy with your degree, why do you feel the need to defend it?
For me, I want others to get truthfull information before they enroll. I want them to know the pitfalls that the sneaky and pressured sales people at Grantham will not tell them before they enroll. DeeAnn has them so scared that they will loose their job that they will do anything to enroll someone. If Grantham is right for you after you have checked everything out, then for it. Just know what you are getting into.
Second, you are dead wrong. Having a degree is not the only thing that matters on a resume. Employers look at the school you graduated from. I know several that would never hire anyone from Grantham based on their reputation alone, let alone that they are a NA school. Other employers will not hire anyone with an NA degree no matter who its from.
Stop trying to convince people that Grantham is such a great place and it's for everyone. It's not, and only a Grantham employee looking to save their job would say that it is.
Joe June 9, 2008 at 4:22 a.m.
@Not so
"A good example of this is the SUNY BSEE."
How is comparing a state university system to OpenBook U. a good example?
"To issue a blanket statement like that is a gross overgeneralization, and is misleading. If you are to post here, please stick to "citable" references."
Cite this... When your school applies for TAC ABET accreditation they review your testing and admissions procedures. Open enrollment, untimed open-book, and lacky proctor guidelines will NEVER get you ABET. Unless Grantham does away with all of those things you can "forgetta-bout-it!"
Not So June 9, 2008 at 1:47 p.m.
The SUNY program has massive amounts of funding, and was designed around ABET requirements. That being said, it will be another year + minimum before they can apply for ABET accreditation (first graduating class must cycle through). After that happens, it will be a year or so as they go through the accreditation process.
Keep in mind, this is a non-profit state University, and it will still take 6 years from program design to actual ABET stamp.
I absolutely agree with you, however, about the open book testing and proctored exam process. There is complete lack of control here. The exams were pulled from the student guides (which was a good start), but the online tests were based on the old guides. All a guy has to do is ask around, and the old guides surface. I hear that some of the courses have been changed, and a 2-time login is in effect (1 view, 1 attempt), and proctored exams for a lot of the classes have been tossed out entirely. The only catch is that you have only 1 attempt at the final exam, and if unsuccessful, you must retake the class. I believe that is complete crap.
Overall, I believe the program and asynchronous model is worth it to the student. That "any time, any place" benefit is just too good to pass up. Yeah, you take a risk with the NA junk, but a guy even considering Grantham is not in the position to attend a B&M.
To Joe June 9, 2008 at 7:48 p.m.
Joe,
Did you read the questionanaire. Thanks for the link provided you proved yourself worng again.
"When your school applies for TAC ABET accreditation they review your testing and admissions procedures. Open enrollment, untimed open-book, and lacky proctor guidelines will NEVER get you ABET."
It does not mention anywhere in the questionaaire that it does not accept open enrollement, untimed book, etc. Its all open ended questions/definitions to help you school better the program. Grantham DOES meets the requirements...wy they have not applied is something you'll have to ask them. They do meet all those requirements for Abet. See excerpt below for some definitions.
ABET definition: Assessment is one or more processes that identify, collect, and prepare data to evaluate the achievement of program outcomes and program educational objectives.
ABET definition: Evaluation is one or more processes for interpreting the data and evidence accumulated through assessment practices. Evaluation determines the extent to which program outcomes or program educational objectives are being achieved, and results in decisions and actions to improve the program.
Here is more...
Attach course syllabi in Appendix A for each course used to satisfy the mathematics, science, and discipline-specific requirements required by Criterion 5 or any applicable Program Criteria. The syllabi formats should be consistent for each course, must not exceed two pages per course, and, at a minimum, contain the following information:
Department, number, and title of course
Designation as a Required or Elective course
Course (catalog) description
Prerequisites
Textbook(s) and/or other required material
Course learning outcomes / expected performance criteria
Topics covered
Class/laboratory schedule, i.e., number of session each week and duration of each session
Contribution of course to meeting the requirements of Criterion 5
Relationship of course to Program Outcomes
Person(s) who prepared this description and date of preparation}}
Where does it say it all has to be taught at a traditional vs. all online college. As long as your have a means to present the material and labs your golden. These folks on here are right...do your homework and cite plausible references to support your claims not hurt you.
man the more i read about Abet its no different than any other money making establishment. A bunch of engineers get togther to form a group of what they think is best for schools in America. Please!!!
Sorry Joe...I'm not stepping in what your laying on the ground.
that's my two cents...
Joe June 9, 2008 at 9:27 p.m.
The link I provided is the self assessment TAC candidates must provide to ABET for review to show where they are and what they are going to do to improve. Provided in the document they must reveal their admissions and testing procedure. When ABET reviews open book and open enrollment you can kiss ABET good-bye unless they are going to change it. No 100% online program has ABET and doubt if Grantham would ever qualify with traditional schools going online having a problem getting it.
@Joe June 10, 2008 at 2:55 a.m.
"When ABET reviews open book and open enrollment you can kiss ABET good-bye unless they are going to change it."
And you know this how?.......
Nice to see the speaker for ABET has decided to participate in this pointless blog.
Joe June 10, 2008 at 5:41 a.m.
I have an ABET evaluator on my hiring staff who I placed there to pick her brain over this very thing. I already consulted her opinion on Grantham and it is worse than mine. She DOES speak for them.
To @ Joe June 10, 2008 at 12:09 p.m.
Funny how this is a "Pointless blog" when others show real proof about the scam that is Grantham. When everyone was singing their praises, it was "a very informative blog". What a crock of Grantham crap. Typical of Grantham management and the Grantham spin Doctors.
@Joe June 10, 2008 at 7:20 p.m.
" have an ABET evaluator on my hiring staff who I placed there to pick her brain over this very thing. I already consulted her opinion on Grantham and it is worse than mine. She DOES speak for them"
Ok, now that's a stretch.
I am convinced that you are nothing more than another hater, who spent considerable effort to try to build credibility on this, and the CSU blog.
Be that as it may, I do agree with a great deal of what you have expressed. I really like the idea of anyone with sights on engineering spending time in the Technician ranks proving themselves, and witnessing the destruction an overly-elegant "I'm smart" design can cause. We practice that mentality here, and even try to weed out the interns.
This is not a pointless blog (I really hate to retract my statement, but there it is), as it serves as a 10%-30% accurate anecdotal account of individual experiences at with Grantham.
As a Graduate, and an Engineer, I have provided nothing but the truth as I know it; not "spin" as stated above. I have already been promoted twice because of this degree, and I already made my tuition monies spent from the GI Bill back with the increases in pay.
At this point, I am even. Color me up, I am out!
Joe June 10, 2008 at 7:42 p.m.
"I am convinced that you are nothing more than another hater, who spent considerable effort to try to build credibility on this, and the CSU blog."
Yeah... right. ROFL! I'm about the only one willing to stick to the same name on this blog which tells me I'm the only genuine one here.
@Joe June 10, 2008 at 11:04 p.m.
Joe,
please get your facts right. You said, you worked for a defese contractor designing missiles or waepons and such. Why would you need an Abet evaluator on your staff?
I think you and she are full of crap. Abet does not say anywhere about not accepting 100% online colleges. If that were true SUNY 's new 100% online program would be out the door. I think not!!!
Joe, please, please stop posting here. Your posting facts that do not support your claims--that's outright lying to people.
The fact is unless you have attended grantham folks you can't make any decisions about the school. In my opinion, its a great school and I recommend it to everyone.
bye
@ Joe June 10, 2008 at 11:11 p.m.
"I am convinced that you are nothing more than another hater, who spent considerable effort to try to build credibility on this, and the CSU blog."
I must agree 100% online with this statement. Check out the facts and nonsense Joe posts--no sense or supportted facts to back up his false claims.
I am starting to think Joe is NO engineer at all but a grantham flunk out that couldn't hack the challenges and studies at grantham. Joe, why not just say you hate Grantham because you bailed or are you another disgruntled employee.
Joe June 11, 2008 at 2:23 a.m.
I run a department of 224+ people. I have a select # of engineers on my hiring staff to help me make those decisions. One of them is a volunteer ABET evaluator who holds a low opinion of engineering programs from correspondence colleges. If you think that is a minority opinion at ABET you are only fooling yourself. I'm for real unlike the rest of this anonymous board.
"I am starting to think Joe is NO engineer at all but a grantham flunk out that couldn't hack the challenges and studies at grantham. Joe, why not just say you hate Grantham because you bailed or are you another disgruntled employee."
I hold a BSEE and an MBA from The Citadel. I still have my old email account if that will satisfy your whining. Shoot me a quote at craunj1@citadel.edu and I will repeat it here if you require verification.
Let it be War June 11, 2008 at 5 a.m.
Ok, fine. Traditional vs. online.
"And Caesar's ghost, roaming about in search of revenge, with hate at his side still hot from hell, will in these boundaries with a ruler's voice cry 'HAVOC' and let slip the dogs of war, so that this terrible action will smell above the earth, with rotting corpses, begging to be buried."
If it is war you want, it is a war you shall get.
Racial slur? June 11, 2008 at 5:02 a.m.
"who holds a low opinion of engineering programs from correspondence colleges"
What the hell is that supposed to mean?
ALL online colleges are bad now?
Joe June 11, 2008 at 5:20 a.m.
I doubt if she meant it to mean that. She is very scrutinizing of engineering programs though. It is her job to evaluate them and she takes it very seriously as most ABET volunteers do.
I don't think a traditional vs online war is appropriate here. Grantham does its testing by correspondence so it wouldn't be a fair comparison.
To Joe June 11, 2008 at 12:11 p.m.
Sorry you have to put with up with all this. You come here with your opinion and facts based on your experience and all you get is typical Grantham attack. This is the way it was working for them and this is the way it is when ANYONE has ANYTHING negative to say about them. First it's the "you are wrong" approach, then they go to the "this is war" and attack you personally and professionally. I'm surprised that they dont start calling your "Momma" names as well. As I said, this is typical of Grantham management. I know the truth as do others, My Grantham credits I earned 3 years ago have gotten me no where in furthering my degree. Credits that I earned 15 years ago at a community college are still transfering into real schools. What does that tell you?
Now wait just a minute... June 11, 2008 at 2:28 p.m.
"Sorry you have to put with up with all this. You come here with your opinion and facts based on your experience and all you get is typical Grantham attack. "
The exact opposite approach has been applied to anyone who has posted good experiences as well. I have offered up detailed experience, both student and career, and have been slapped with the "Grantham spin doctor" BS.
The only experience I cannot comment on is the transfer issue, but why would I need to transfer? I finished my degree.
The traditional vs. online crap IS the problem right now; this is strictly growing/development pains for a new avenue for your average working-class Joe to get a leg up. Most of the Military (and working stiffs) simply do not have the time to commute/park/navigate a campus. Does that mean they don't belong in class?
I really believe once the winners emerge from this whole online delivery mess we will see a surgence in Distance Learning grads in the workforce; you had best start getting used to the idea.
NARTE June 11, 2008 at 6:33 p.m.
-THE certification for EMI/EMC technician and engineers.
The testing for certification is open book, open note, and open computer, with a proctor.
This a highly valued certification in my field, and it follows the same format as GU.
to joe June 11, 2008 at 9:07 p.m.
I really believe once the winners emerge from this whole online delivery mess we will see a surgence in Distance Learning grads in the workforce; you had best start getting used to the idea.
I agree 100%.
You traditional folks are being left behind perhaps that is your problem. Online is the new wave and you had to find your cheese in the world Joe.
Joe find your cheese...
Also, the FE exam is open book that you can bring in the reference handbook and formulas to help you pass the exam. Is that bad too Joe? I'd hope not since you’re not even a licensed professional engineer. How can you even hold the title of "engineer" without one?
BTW...I am not as I have posted many times a Grantham student or employee. I only state the facts with supported material.
Joe you and your Abet co-worker are wrong about Grantham.
Do you homework first before you post your biased, unsupported OPINIONS.
Joe June 12, 2008 at 12:05 a.m.
I found my cheese partner...
The FE exam is not open book. The only reference material you can use during the exam is the NCEES handout and the test is timed. I don't have a problem with that kind of test. A Grantham student can't even sit for the EIT exam since their program isn't accredited by ABET.
If you are a PE then you know that doesn't have much to do with engineering in my field. It is a qualification I have little use for as well as most electronic engineers. If you want to do civil engineering, government HVAC/power systems, consult, or testify in court then be my guest. I am a manager of engineers now... I obtain the certifications I need to do my job the best it can be done. An MBA is far more valuable than an MS in my position.
You really should check your facts before you attempt to call people out.
PE June 12, 2008 at 3:32 a.m.
"If you are a PE then you know that doesn't have much to do with engineering in my field."
Agreed. I have met many who value this cert, but what is the point if civil or governmental is not in your path.
FE June 12, 2008 at 3:33 a.m.
Someone remind me, what is the FE and why should I care?
Joe June 12, 2008 at 4:43 a.m.
It is the first test you take before you become a P.E. It is a nice cert to have but only necessary in a few fields. Some states like mine won't even let you apply if you didn't graduate from an ABET accredited program.
The only reference material you are allowed to take into the FE exam is this document and the test is timed. It won't do you much good unless you know the material inside and out.
PE June 12, 2008 at 9:34 p.m.
Hi folks,
I agree 50% with Joe on this staement. "The FE exam is not open book. The only reference material you can use during the exam is the NCEES handout and the test is timed. I don't have a problem with that kind of test. A Grantham student can't even sit for the EIT exam since their program isn't accredited by ABET."
Joe is right that its not "Open Book"; its actually a pretty tough test. Actually, NC, SC, FL and other states do allow accredited EETs to sit in on the exam. You'll have to check the site for more details. I can tell you my home state of IL does not but EETs are becoming more recognized in be able to take the exam. Graduating from a school that teaches calc does help.
I too would not recommend taking it unless you know that doesn't have much to do with engineering in your field. It is a qualification I too have little use for as well as most electronic engineers. If you want to do civil engineering, government HVAC/power systems, consult, or testify in court then take the test. My employer does not offically recognize me as an engineer (it doesn't really matter to me since I get paid as one) without passing the PE, I personally think for either its overrated.
Joe June 13, 2008 at 4:38 a.m.
I got the ABET requirement for the EIT exam off the NCEES rules page. If you want reciprocity with the other states you need to live in a state that follows those minimum standards.
Many states are allowing technology folks to become PEs as well. There is a line seperating EAC and TAC programs with that being engineers take more math/science and trained in theory/design while technology is for application and maintenance.
LS June 13, 2008 at 6:07 p.m.
Grantham is fine. I agree that customer service has been bad in the past. They have recently hired better student advisors. Now they call me too much to see how I'm doing. As far as transfer credits go they will transfer to some schools. One major one is University of Phoenix.
My two cents June 13, 2008 at 6:34 p.m.
I agree that grantham does meet those requirements for Abets math portion. All they need to do is switch to physics based calculus and they have an engineering cirricula.
E.g. SIUC EET students take math as high as Trig and tech physics and they're Abet so Grantham looks pretty good from what i see. Only change I see is the Physics to calculus based and the students should be able to handle it since they're taking Calc 1 & 2 and Diff equations. All you could see on the PE.
I recommend that if your EET graduate the best time to take the exam is after you graduate. Who cares if your EE or EET...take the exam anyways.
just my thoughts...
James June 13, 2008 at 6:42 p.m.
I have to agree with JS here. As a current student customer service in the past especially after Katrina was bad but Grantham was the only school in Southern LA to keep its doors/students going to school.
They're very military minded and I have had great support from faculty/instructors in my math/electronics classes.
"Now they call me too much to see how I'm doing." I totally agree...they call me at home and at work.
As afr as transfering classes I've double checked with the universities that a previous student posted on here with FSU and ATSU and yes my credits will transfer into a MBA program. I'm excited because I am going to try to take the EIT exam as an EET then finish my MBA or perhaps my PhD.
Anyways...I am proud that i found Grantham because being in the military I couldn't afford the time or money to go to college plus take care of my family and pets. Grantham has treated me pretty good and I've had no complaints which is why i'm surprised at all the ones I'm hearing here--simply not true!
bye,
James
@James June 13, 2008 at 8:53 p.m.
Can you take the EIT in your state with just a Grantham degree? I thought someone said you had to graduate from an ABET program in most states.
answer @James June 13, 2008 at 9:16 p.m.
Yes, there are two ways to take the EIT:
1. Exam waiver: The Fundamentals exam may be waived for an engineer or surveyor who has earned an advanced academic degree and/or acquired many years of work experience. Guidelines vary greatly for each jurisdiction. Please check with your licensing board and/or review licensing requirements.
2. It depends on your state. What state do you live in?
let me kow and I'll tell you whether you qualify or not.
James
@James June 13, 2008 at 9:38 p.m.
I live in NY.
James answer June 13, 2008 at 10:07 p.m.
This was a tricky one at first but then I found it.
According to NYs PE Form 2 states "Note: If you attended or graduated from a program that’s NOT ABET accredited and/or if you attended a graduate program, ask your school to attach an official school transcript or marksheet to this form." So they'll accept nonAbet or Grantham college.
Part B. states that EETs CAN sit in for the EIT exam. see link: www.op.nysed.gov/pe2.pdf
i'm no expert since I'm not from NY but I'd say yes you can according to NYs FE rules/regs.
My recommendations for all are: 1. get an FE study guide and study your butt off. 2. Email: op4info@mail.nysed.gov and tell them your interested in taking the FE exam. Some states have prep courses for it although they always have disclaimers.
good luck!
@James June 14, 2008 at 1:36 a.m.
So it doesn't automatically qualify you for the exam here. I have to submit transcripts to see if they will meet their standards. Will it hurt me that I'm in a technology program rather than an engineering program? I heard technologists can't even be a PE in most states.
Sorry James June 14, 2008 at 6 a.m.
Sorry James.....look again....
University-Wide Admission Standards
Admission to graduate study at Florida State University is within the jurisdiction of the University, subject to minimum standards adopted by the Board of Governors of the State University System of Florida. In order to meet these minimum standards, applicants must have, or be a candidate for, a bachelor's degree or equivalent from a regionally accredited institution and meet at least one of the following criteria:
Earned a minimum 3.0 grade point average in all work attempted while registered as an upper-division student working toward a bachelor's degree, or
Earned a minimum score of 1000 on the combined verbal and quantitative portions of the GRE or a minimum score of 470 on the GMAT (College of Business applicants only), or
Earned a graduate degree from a regionally accredited institution.
...............notice that pesky little "regionally accredited institution only" line. Sorry.
Joe June 14, 2008 at 7:27 a.m.
James... can you spell B-U-S-T-E-D? I doubt if Grantham transfers to many more schools than listed on the website and even many of those schools only take a handful of classes. That has been one of the biggest complaints on this site. ABET programs won't touch their credits from the evaluator I've been talking to.
James answers June 14, 2008 at 4:42 p.m.
I am not B U S T E D, you must be very young and naive.
Did you read this before you actually posted the excerpt? Have you read the previous posts already where someone sent an email getting accepted to FSU? Please read the fine print. It says FSU admission is within its jurisdiction that means FSU makes the final decision. Honestly, you make me laugh do you think colleges are going to turn your money away--I think not! Next, in the passage it says “a bachelor OR equivalent from an RA”…. If FSU only accepted RA which it does not it would read “a bachelor AND equivalent from an RA”... My recommendation is that you Grantham students submit your application to an FSU admission officer and see. Also, the last line doesn’t make sense to me…why would you submit an RA graduate degree if you’re seeking an RA graduate degree.
Again, let’s breakdown this sentence further shall we.
“Bachelor’s degree or equivalent from a regionally accredited institution and meet at least one of the following criteria:
Earned a minimum 3.0 grade point average in all work attempted while registered as an upper-division student working toward a bachelor's degree, or
Earned a minimum score of 1000 on the combined verbal and quantitative portions of the GRE or a minimum score of 470 on the GMAT (College of Business applicants only), or
Earned a graduate degree from a regionally accredited institution.
...............notice that pesky little "regionally accredited institution only" line. Sorry.”
Now that you understand the definition of the meaning between “AND” (means both) and “OR” (exclusively one) we shall proceed. It states you must have “bachelor's degree OR equivalent from a regionally accredited institution AND meet at least one of those requirements. E.g1. If you have a BS from Grantham and a GPA 3.0 = you can apply/good. E.g2. If you have a BS from Grantham and a GRE score of 100 = you can apply/good. …notice that the little pesky statement line does not factor into the equation Joe.
In my experience, transfer credits are up to the college to decide the college has final authority jurisdiction.
Next, answer to @James. “So it doesn't automatically qualify you for the exam here. I have to submit transcripts to see if they will meet their standards. “It does not say you’re disqualified!
Answer James #2 June 14, 2008 at 4:43 p.m.
“Will it hurt me that I'm in a technology program rather than an engineering program?” No, I think it’s what you want to do. EETs can become PEs along with EEs. It’s a tough question to answer because I don’t know you or what your job aspirations are in life. If you want to be an engineer go take engineering classes and pass the PE exam. Or, if you want to be an engineer take EET classes and take the PE exam too. In our home state of NY they do NOT discriminate between the two professions which I must agree. You must understand, we all learn electronics and apply it differently in the fields we have chosen so its best not to put one class above or below another but as equals to achieve the same objective.
“I heard technologists can't even be a PE in most states.” Finally, yes in my home state of IL an EET can’t sit in on the exam but many states you can (e.g. NY, NC, SC, FL, etc.). The mindset it’s beginning to change because most employers know that a 4 year electronics degree whether EE or EET can get the job done. NY guy, you need to send them your transcripts anyways for evaluation if you want to take the exam whether Abet or not so GO for it.
This has become an interesting debate.
James
mentoring by James June 14, 2008 at 4:48 p.m.
All,
if you want to find out if you qualify as an EET to sit in for the exam go here.
www.ncees.org/licensure/licensing_boards...
This link is to your states licensing boards.
Never take "NO" or let someone else who is not the best qualified tell you can't do something. I agree with the person above anout doing your own research and homework. Ask the board your questions the worst they can say is "NO" but what if they say "YES". Its GMP (good management practice) especially if you want to become professional engineers that you will try, design, and fail just never give up.
Good luck and study hard.
James
,,, June 14, 2008 at 7:39 p.m.
Sorry, but I have to agree with James on this one.
The colleges can admit anyone they want. I too find it totally hilarious that a school would not accept someone with a bachelor's solely because they have one from an RA college.
that's funny!!!
Joe June 14, 2008 at 8:49 p.m.
Sorry James but you must have a problem with reading comprehension. It clearly says they must meet the minimum standard of having graduated from a regionally accredited college.
"In order to meet these minimum standards, applicants MUST have, or be a candidate for, a bachelor's degree or equivalent from a regionally accredited institution and meet at least one of the following criteria:
www.fsu.edu/students/prospective/admissi...
There are no if, and, or buts about it James. It says you MUST have a regionally accredited degree. That word is pretty final partner. Like I said... can you spell B-U-S-T-E-D?
@Joe June 15, 2008 at 1:55 a.m.
Joe,
why don't you just email them and ask like I did. You should get the same response from the admissions officer that you can be accepted with an RA degree/Grantham.
How's that for BUSTED...partner.
@Joe part 2 June 15, 2008 at 1:59 a.m.
Joe,
I think my so called BUSTED point has already been proven..what about YOU? Here is an email from the school that was posted sometime ago from another student wanting to apply to FSU--He was accepted.
"Here is another University that admits Grantham’s degree’s into its graduate programs. See what Univ South Florida (USF) admissions had to say about admissions for all its incoming/transfer students including Grantham University. I told you they would accept these folks credits!!!
Subject: RE:'FSUEmail=849-789' Questions about transfer credits
Dear ****,
Thank you for contacting our office. I can only speak to graduate programs at FSU. If you wish to pursue your Bachelors here I can transfer your information to an undergraduate officer.
As for the graduate program, you can only transfer 6 hours of course work. You will need to fill out the application, pay the fee, and send us your transcripts. We also require GRE scores.
If you have further questions please let me know.
Sincerely,
Rae S.
Office of Admissions & Records
Florida State University
PO Box 3062400
Tallahassee FL 32306-2400
Phone: 850-644-6200
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subject: RE: Questions about transfer credits
Mrs. Rae,
Thank you for taking the time to email me. I am not sure I quite understand; so you will accept my bachelor's degree plus 6 hours of course work for transfer? Or FSU only accepts 6 credits from my BSEET? I am confused.
I guess I really need to know do I qualify to be accepted in FSUs graduate programs. If so please let me know...
Thank you
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Dear ****,
Thank you for contacting our office. Sorry for the confusion. If you have already completed some graduate course work we can transfer up to 6 hours towards your graduate degree program.
If you have further questions please let me know.
Sincerely,
Rae S.
Office of Admissions & Records
Florida State University
PO Box 3062400
Tallahassee FL 32306-2400
Phone: 850-644-6200
How many more schools do I have to email to prove the point that Grantham credits, a nationally accredited university by DETC is accepted by many regional accredited universities."
I think I've proven my point so far and if i wanted i could enroll into FSUs graduate programs with a Grantham University degree...sorry Joe you LOSE this one!
James
Joe June 15, 2008 at 4:16 a.m.
You haven't proven a thing. First of all, second hand emails don't mean jack squat but I will give you the benefit of the doubt on this one. Given that, she makes no reference to accepting a Gratham undergrad. All she is saying is they only take 6 hours from any generic grad transfer. The woman is not the evaluator of your application but answering general info questions. She's probably never heard of Grantham and has no idea of it's accreditation. When it comes time for your application review it will get tossed in the trash because it doesn't meet the minimum standards of FSU grad admissions. The FSU website is quite clear... "MUST have a regionally accredited degree" is not a hard concept to grasp.
at it again June 15, 2008 at 5:12 p.m.
I have already sent an email to FSU and it clearly did not accept Granthams credits. It is posted up further in this thread. James, you are a Grantham employee or student not wanting to accept the fact that Grantham is a joke and a scam. Why is it that your doctored email is the only email that says the FSU will take Gratham credits? That is not the response that I got when I emailed them. James, stop spin doctering please! Grantham is a joke man. Why would someone want to go to Grantham when there are real schools that offer distance education and that are regionally accredited.
@Joe & at it again June 15, 2008 at 10:20 p.m.
Did wither of you read the email? Joe, I think your the one with reading comprehension problems. She implies in her email that she does accept Grantham’s credits the student identified he was from Grantham a RA school and she could have told him then that FSU will only accept RA credits. She did not, she said to pay the fee and have your enrollment application processed. You must think people are dumb when you can't even read the fine print.
Also, @at it again your email is the doctored one. After studying both emails it’s clearly shows you made a mistake falsifying your email, it has no real registration number as the previous students did. All you did was copy his and make up statements that FSU will not accept Grantham credits to prove your point. All you really did was discrediting yourself. I'm positive that any Grantham student that sent graduate admissions an email about transfer credits that they would tell you--they're credits ARE accepted.
You know what I think is a joke that you two spin doctors would discredit a school that you have no REAL proof to discredit. Your facts are unsupported and it makes you really sound like a couple of idiots. I mean no disrespect but you two really are young and naive to think schools that are accredited will loose money because they don't want to accept RA credits--you’re joking right? I'm sure some schools are but about 75-80% will not--those are some good odds.
Now, I know from your previous posts your argument is that if Grantham was RA then all credits are 100% accepted, right. No! Your wrong again, it does not matter if your RA or NA the college has jurisdiction authority to accept a number of credits if the want. E.g. Years ago I tried transferring from RA to RA and not all of my credits transferred. Why? I'll tell you why, colleges "younglings" are all for profit and out to make money not loose it.
I ma not an employee of Grantham but I can tell you both that your fighting a loosing battle. Online RA or NA schools are here to stay. Traditional vs. online is a battle and online is winning--it’s the wave of the future.
"Why would someone want to go to Grantham when there are real schools that offer distance education and that are regionally accredited?" I can only give my opinion but I believe it has to do with personal choice. What do you think? Don't try to make us all believe that RA is better than NA because they have yet to be proven both the both of you.
Again, make your point and provide supporting facts and not your personal opinions--that's not what this site is all about.
James
“Smell it, smell it and now take it”
--Don’t mess with the Zohan
The simple answer June 17, 2008 at 4:40 a.m.
For the same time and money, you can get a regionally accredited degree without the quality problems at Grantham.
umm umm June 17, 2008 at 7:49 a.m.
@Zohan or James. I hope that Grantham is paying you double time to put a spin on things over there. Anyway,it does not matter. Grantham is still a scam. The argument has been PROVEN that FSU or any other REAL university will not touch Grantham credits. Bottom Line! Why is that so hard for you to see that Grantham is a pathetic for profit school that really can not get any respect? As far as "Smell it" goes, when it comes to Grantham and your spinster tactics, I smell Scam! Scam! Scam! and so does everybody else including FSU.
Top of the morning to you Sir
Good day now
No, you really can't June 17, 2008 at 5:07 p.m.
"For the same time and money, you can get a regionally accredited degree without the quality problems at Grantham."
The challenge has been presented, a few times now, for someone to provide an ABET and RA accredited degree program that is 100% online for:
Computer Science
Electrical Engineering
Mathematics
Physics
And not 1 program has been offered. To date, the only one I know of that is close is SUNY, and it will apply for ABET come next year.
As for the next poster,
"Grantham and your spinster tactics, I smell Scam! Scam! Scam! and so does everybody else including FSU."
This qualifies as trolling, I believe.
@umm umm June 17, 2008 at 6:04 p.m.
Sir,
I am not a grantham employee/spinster.
"Why is that so hard for you to see that Grantham is a pathetic for profit school that really can not get any respect?" I could ask you that same question. I will concede that grantham is a for profit school that really can not get any respect if you can concede that for all schools too. The bottom line is ALL colleges are out to make money & they don't respect you or care. How simple is that! I can't be no more simple than that. Next, FSU does recognize Grantham as a legit accredited school & they stated they would accept its students as transfer into its Graduate programs. The only scam I see and that I am being accused of being a spinster for is calling your bluff, sir.
Again...I'll repeat myself...Don't try to make us all believe that RA/for=-profit is better than NA/for-profit because they have yet to be proven both the both of you. Please, make your point and provide supporting facts and not your personal opinions--that's not what this site is all about.
James
Joe June 18, 2008 at 10:26 p.m.
Jamie is full of it and I will put an end to this now. I emailed FSU Graduate Admissions myself...
Date: Sunday, June 15, 2008 07:19 PM
To: gradadms@admin.fsu.edu (gradadms@admin.fsu.edu)
Subject: Minimum requirements for acceptance
I was thinking about applying for FSU grad school but it says under the minimum requirements you MUST have a regionally accredited degree. I have a nationally accredited online degree from Grantham University under the DETC. Does this disqualify me from possible acceptance since it isn't a regionally accredited degree? It is accredited by a recognized agency of the USDOE.
Sincerly,
Concerned Applicant
--------------------------------------
Reply
Florida State University would not recognize your degree from Grantham University. I hope you are able to find an institution that has more flexible admissions criteria so you can continue your studies.
Sincerely,
Kay Hollis
Office of Admissions and Records
Florida State University
PO Box 3062400
Tallahassee, FL 32306-2400
----------------------------
So James... you can cut the BS because you have been B-U-S-T-E-D.
Joe June 18, 2008 at 10:44 p.m.
So FSU grad admissions just told me to take my crappy Grantham degree and go somewhere with more "flexible" admission standards. I can't even get into this publicly funded graduate program with a Grantham degree. Florida State just spit on me... it feels like crap even though I was pretending. It sort of lets me know how Grantham grads feel when they are turned down for so many of life's opportunities. You have my sympathies.
WTF? June 19, 2008 at 5:47 a.m.
"So FSU grad admissions just told me to take my crappy CSU degree and go somewhere with more "flexible" admission standards. I can't even get into this publicly funded graduate program with a CSU degree. Florida State just spit on me... it feels like crap even though I was pretending. It sort of lets me know how CSU grads feel when they are turned down for so many of life's opportunities. You have my sympathies."
Taken from the CSU blog. WTF game are you playing here, Joe? What EXACTLY is your stake in all of this?
Joe June 19, 2008 at 10:21 a.m.
I didn't write that. Someone is copy-catting.
@Joe June 19, 2008 at 4:40 p.m.
Sure we believe you since you've been so honest and forthcoming thus far. I was with you until now...you almost had had this skeptic convinced.
shame on you Joe.
JB
Joe June 19, 2008 at 7:36 p.m.
So you're the copy-cat... lame.
@Joe June 20, 2008 at 1:34 p.m.
I'm not the copy-cat...you are Joe!
Stop blaming me for your childish pranks and lies.
You the one that's a lamo, pal. Get a life!
JB
Troll June 20, 2008 at 4:16 p.m.
Don't feed the trolls!
Joe June 20, 2008 at 4:45 p.m.
Yeah... I copy-cat myself. That makes a whole lotta sense. I'm just trying to keep my words as my own. If you think I would sully my name by doing so then you don't know common sense. I have put myself out here using the same ID throughout and proved my alma matter. None of you have gone so far to be authentic. Cut the crap and get back to the issues. Everyone knows it doesn't make sense to do so under my name when all I have to do is write someone elses. I guess your illogical brain never bothered to think of that contingency... not surprising.
Your whining is rather annoying :yawn:
Proven? June 20, 2008 at 5:34 p.m.
"proved my alma matter. "
I sent you a quote, where is it?
Joe June 20, 2008 at 7:05 p.m.
You didn't send me jack squat dirt bag. Here's the proof.
img365.imageshack.us/my.php?image=cithg5.jpg
hahaha... take a hike loser.
Joe June 20, 2008 at 8:51 p.m.
Sticks and stones... you're attempts to assassinate my character failed. Get over it. Nobody likes a soar loser.
@Joe June 20, 2008 at 11:02 p.m.
Joe,
you need to get off that high horse your on. You failed yourself when you copycatted that message...your pathetic.
Please like JB said, "Get a life!"
Jason June 21, 2008 at 3:03 a.m.
You went to The Citadel. You're alright in my book Joe. Thank you for serving your country. It looks like you have a crazed fan club of stalkers. Anyone who stalks you on a forum must be the one who need to get a life.
Answer the fricken question June 21, 2008 at 4:48 a.m.
What EXACTLY is your stake in all of this?
Grantham=Diploma Mill June 21, 2008 at 7 a.m.
This blog is full of Grantham advisors attacking anyone who criticizes the school. BEWARE!!!
So True June 21, 2008 at 10:05 p.m.
Grantham employees attack anyone who says anything bad about the school. Personal attacks, which is pathetic.
Pack of lies June 22, 2008 at 4:35 a.m.
"Grantham employees attack anyone"
Employees.... NO.
Did you really think this idiot shaming crusade would go unchallenged? Grantham is a good, tough (if not unnecessarily so) school.
The sad part is, I am defending attacks from the same doggone players, over and over again. I should spend my time more constructively, like looking at p0rn. At least then there would be SOME kind of reward.
As long as Grantham has the DETC, CHEA, DOE, VA, and SOC on their side, they can do no wrong. If you want to bring this school down, go after their accreditation. Write letters, write congressman, hell, write the BBB. Until that happens, STFU. This is a waste of your, and more tragically, MY time.
I am a veteran. I am a Alumnus. I work in DOD R&D; I approve of this message.
... June 22, 2008 at 1:19 p.m.
i agree w/pack of lies.
i too am tired of unsupported lies...you need to get over it or do something about it. this is not the forum for it.
I too am a veteran. I am a Alumnus. I work for the DOD; I too approve of this message.
another vet June 22, 2008 at 9:51 p.m.
Unsupported lies? I think they have been supported. When you Grantham flag wavers have said that "such and such school accepts my credits" proof has been posted to the contrary. I hardly call that unsupported. As a veteran myself, I have to question a school that is so universally UNaccepted by other schools. I have seen time and time again so many schools and employers say that they will NOT accept a NA degree. That tells me a lot.
Have you considered... June 22, 2008 at 10:16 p.m.
"I have seen time and time again so many schools and employers say that they will NOT accept a NA degree. That tells me a lot."
Perhaps it may be you, or your approach? I have had nothing but success with this BSEET degree.
I think it may be time for you to look inward as to the source of your failures, Jason.
To Grantham employee above June 22, 2008 at 11:34 p.m.
I never completed by degree at Grantham because their customer service was so piss poor and no one was accepting their degree. I did, however, complete my degree at Fort Hayes with a 3.6 GPA and they were great. They did not accept any of my Grantham credits though, so what does that tell you?
Oh and.... June 22, 2008 at 11:37 p.m.
why do you think everyone that tells the truth about Grantham is "Jason". I have seen one or two posts from that guy on a few different boards and that is it. Is George or DeeAnn putting you up to the bashing?
@Oh and.... June 23, 2008 at 12:56 a.m.
Typical.
Also, who the hell cares about FHSU? They're a liberal arts college, with overspecialized curriculums. No wonder you couln't get anything to transfer.
I see why you completed your studies there; it must have been a breeze compared to the asynchronous model.
Reference June 23, 2008 at 1:08 a.m.
insidehighered.com/news/2007/02/26/transfer
help.yahoo.com/l/us/yahoo/education/courses/distancelearn-09.html
You probably should have read these before attending a NA college. I would suggest anyone who is considering it to do just that.
The simple answer June 23, 2008 at 1:30 a.m.
For the same time and money, you can get a regionally accredited degree without the quality or accreditation problems at Grantham.
Full Circle June 23, 2008 at 3:06 a.m.
"For the same time and money, you can get a regionally accredited degree without the quality problems at Grantham."
The challenge has been presented, a few times now, for someone to provide an ABET and RA accredited degree program that is 100% online for:
Computer Science
Electrical Engineering
Mathematics
Physics
And not 1 program has been offered. To date, the only one I know of that is close is SUNY, and it will apply for ABET come next year.
Joe June 23, 2008 at 8:47 a.m.
The SUNY program is a full fledged BSEE... it is a bit more than a BSEET and has been formed to follow EAC-ABET standards taught by the same professors who teach the approved ground programs.
typical is right June 23, 2008 at 6:26 p.m.
Oh, FHSU is a crap school. Grantham is so much better.
Typical Grantham employee jargon. Please, I have had no problems with my REGIONAL degree. The same can not be said for Granthams national.
@Joe June 23, 2008 at 7:35 p.m.
That is the program I am really holding my breath for; as soon as it gets an ABET stamp, I am in.
I wasn't trying to imply that the SUNY BSEE is the same as a BSEET, if that is the way it sounded, you have my aplogies.
Joe June 24, 2008 at 3:41 a.m.
I think you are making a wise decision. Good things come to those who wait.
Gran Scam June 24, 2008 at 5:20 a.m.
Grantahtm is pathetic. Staight up tird paper is what their degrees are all about. A Grantham degree is good for pet clean up and that is about it. No matter if its Online or on campus you should go to a real university. You are better off enrolling in a real university instead of dealing with Grantham and its problematic National Accreditation.
Joe June 24, 2008 at 5:36 a.m.
About the only schools that will take these credits are listed here. The list isn't very impressive.
my 2 pennies... June 25, 2008 at 11:56 p.m.
Guys/Girls,
I don't see Granham or SUNY ever becoming Abet accredited.
Here's why...
1. college must be regional accredited
2. must provide a facility for labs
The #2 according to Abet can't be achieved yet. Are they right or wrong?
I personally think Abet is overated; I can say that because I graduated from a school that was TAC so I have some experience. I think with new technology and the way its growing everything is now online simulations. You can and its being done to simulate physics, biological sciences, computers, and electronics labs.
Abet is out to make money while still in the old mindset that tradittional is better. I have had military training and while at tech school I spent 1 full year with hands-on which is more than any college will teach these days. I think folks that already have experience in engineering should have that experience credited towards lab experience...I amy be wrong but that's how I strongly feel and I am a realist. I knw by the time my grandkids goto college it will probably ALL be online- MD, nursing, engineering, etc. Its scray but eciting at the same time because I hope i get to see that new technology.
anyways...just my 2 pennies...
good luck!
Joe June 26, 2008 at 4:39 a.m.
SUNY is regionally accredited. It stands for the State University of New York. I don't think a program without adequate labs should get ABET because it lacks hands on application. They provide software and require students to get test kits which help overcome some of that but there are somethings that you just can't afford to buy that a university needs to have. When our personal computers can run super intensive simulations it will be more practical. That day is not too far off.
To Joe June 26, 2008 at 9:03 p.m.
Your above statement that reads:
"About the only schools that will take these credits are listed here. The list isn't very impressive.
www.chea.org/heta/search.asp#ser", is not a true statement for all the schools on that list. I'm not a troll here but three schools that I attended are on that list: Grantham, Troy, and American Public University System (American Military University) and neither Troy or APUS would accept my Grantham credits. Most of my undergrad work was from Troy and APUS. I finally completed my undergrad degree from APUS and I'll finish my grad degree in the Spring from the U of Georgia :)
To Joe June 26, 2008 at 11:11 p.m.
"When our personal computers can run super intensive simulations it will be more practical. That day is not too far off."
I must agree! I've see new technology including 3 D dental xrays used by dental physcians that blows your mind away. the 3D image is all online and teaches students about oral anatomy as well as diagnosis all through 3D imaging--very impressive.
"I don't think a program without adequate labs should get ABET because it lacks hands on application." This is debatable to me since I do agree with you. Again, I'd have to say that many labs like the online labs that teaches physics UNC State which simulates being in a physics lab. here is the website: www.laaplatform.com/laaphysics/beta/inde....
Its pretty cool so I agree that this technology is not too far away from reality and perhaps Grantham has the right idea. Grantham needs to obtain regional and Abet--bottom line.
Adjunct Pay June 28, 2008 at 1:47 a.m.
I read somewhere that they pay $15 an hour as an independent contractor for instructors, so minus 15.3% for both FICA's, 28% for Federal, and 5% State Tax, that is about $7.75 an hour, which gets you the quality of "instructors" that you could expect.
@adjucnt pay June 28, 2008 at 4:18 p.m.
All of the instructors have advanced degrees (MS,MBA, PhDs).
Actually, I had instructors in the past that adjuct for grantham that were from MIT, Cornell, Devry, Johns Hopkins, LSU, etc.
I can attest the quality of instructors are very,very good.
I have attended community colleges were instructors had only BS, BA degrees working on MS/Phd's.
I find that statement to be inaccurate.
Mike B. June 28, 2008 at 7:46 p.m.
"Your above statement that reads:
"About the only schools that will take these credits are listed here. The list isn't very impressive.
www.chea.org/heta/search.asp#ser", is not a true statement for all the schools on that list. I'm not a troll here but three schools that I attended are on that list: Grantham, Troy, and American Public University System (American Military University) and neither Troy or APUS would accept my Grantham credits. Most of my undergrad work was from Troy and APUS. I finally completed my undergrad degree from APUS and I'll finish my grad degree in the Spring from the U of Georgia :)"
Every bit of this is so true. Trust me, I learned the hard way!
Mr S June 29, 2008 at 12:23 a.m.
I think they should get rid of national and regional and make one universal accreditation body. Seriously, it has nothing to do with quality of the colleges and prestige--its about profit.
I have only attended regional and never heard of national until now but I can testify to this. I am in the military and I tried transferring credits from IL to LA and they did not accept all of my credits. Here is what I think is a joke since were on this topic...
1. All credits should transfer. I should not have to go to another college to learn the same damn thing over again. Its not fair!
2. I agree with the statement made eariler...math is math, science is science,etc. It's getting so bad now you have to have math and science classes that are NOT over 5 years old otherwise you have to retake them. Math has been around since ancient greek times and yes a few rules have been invented but those that know math understand this equation does not balance.
Again, I strongly feel they should get rid of national and regional and make one universal accreditation body. That way everyone wins and transfer standards are the same. I would agree that if a college i.e. Harvard wants to exceed those standards for enrollment is fine. Its a good way of weeding out folks but I should have the oportunity to transfer all my credits for courses I've already taken.
sorry...just venting but hearing Mike B's story I can relate from a regional-regional transfer and it pisses me off.
cheers
Grantham grad July 1, 2008 at 11:43 p.m.
I regret going to this school just about everyday. I decided to go after I got out of the AF and used my GI Bill. I wish I had saved it for something better. The BSEET program is a joke. With open book tests and unlimited time I breezed my way through it. When I hit the job market the only opportunities anyone was willing to offer were tech positions. The thing is I had that job before I started the program. No one respects this degree. Engineers chuckle at you while you get no leg up on the competition. I hate this school and the stigma it has placed on my potential. I didn't go to college to do the same thing I did before I went.
Cry me a river July 2, 2008 at 1:50 a.m.
Reference:hotjobs.yahoo.com/career-articles-technology_it_s_where_the_jobs_are-435
Get off of your a$$ and go get a Field Engineer or Applied Engineer job. Forget engineer, if you wanted that, you should not have gotten a TECHNOLOGY degree.
Your river is cried July 2, 2008 at 9:38 a.m.
I don't work in those kinds of fields. I want to be an eCAD engineer which is a TECHNOLOGY job.
Grantham grad July 2, 2008 at 9:40 a.m.
Thanx anyway!
Joe July 2, 2008 at 7:34 p.m.
That is the reality of the job market Grantham grad. I hire ECAD Design Engineers and require them to have at least a BSEE. I don't take BSEET degrees for that job. It is a designing job which a technology degree will not prepare you for. Most of the technology jobs out there are technician level. If you wanted an engineering position you should have gotten a BSEE. I suggest you go back to school for an MSEE as those are the people who are my ECAD Engineers. You also need to gain experience DESIGNING the circuits... not just servicing them. You might have a hard time moving up as an applied engineer as that requires BSEEs as well. Go back to school and then reapply. An MSEE will get you the job you want.
Get a clue July 2, 2008 at 7:45 p.m.
If you want to be an eCAD engineer, you need a BSEE, or perhaps a BSME. This sounds like a costly mistake, and you have my sympathies.
BSEET's are DO'ers, not designers. The Technologist/Field Engineer/Applied Engineer career path is profitable as hell, and you really do need a BSEET or better to get into the ranks (some companies will accept 15+ years of hands-on tech work in leu of the degree), but design is a hobby in this field, not the occupation.
An Engineer defines WHAT, and a Technologist defines HOW.
Grantham Grad July 3, 2008 at 5:02 a.m.
Grantham told me my degree would prepare me for eCAD engineering. They said it was a better degree than the BSEE and encompassed cutting edge strategies that would prepare me. My enrollment advisor said my programing in C and Java would compliment my experience with Cadence Allegro. Electronic Workbench was bunk but Cadence Allegro meets the industry standard for PCB design. I was lied to people... can't you get that? This school is a fraud.
Joe, where would you expect to find an online MSEE accredited by ABET? They don't exist.
Clueless, I know what an engineer is and a technologist. The engineer is the boss while the other is the lacky. I am tired of being the lacky.
Fvck you July 3, 2008 at 5:21 a.m.
"The engineer is the boss while the other is the lacky"
Eat shiot and fvcking die.
Grantham Grad July 3, 2008 at 5:28 a.m.
I guess the truth is too much for you. If you are happy making $15 an hour then keep cursing. I want to get salaried and run my own team. The only way to do that is to be promoted to engineer. I am tired of technician jobs and being bossed around by people who have the same level of education and less experience than me.
Joe July 3, 2008 at 6:22 a.m.
You would have to attend an on-ground campus. If you want it bad enough you will do it. If not you can stop complaining and keep doing what you are trained to do. Grantham does not offer the training to make you an engineer. You are a tech and will continue to be a tech until you change your attitude and finish your education. Grantham is a glorified AS degree and doesn't even carry TAC accreditation much less EAC. Your degree is less than a BSEE. I feel sorry for you that your Grantham advisor told you a bunch of lies but it is up to you to know what you need to get your dream job. From your attitude, I would say you are exactly what you admit... a lacky. If you ever expect anyone like me to hire you on staff you will have to have a better attitude. I don't take people who complain and don't do their homework.
@Grantham Grad July 3, 2008 at 3:35 p.m.
Did you ever voice your complaints to Grantham?
I only say this because I agree with Joe you complain too much and complaining to the wrong people will get you nothing. Heck if you feel that strongly about it, take legal action.
Now, I'll educate you about Abet. People with MSEE graduate degrees are not abet accredited...no grad degrees are by abet. I agree with the person above that Abet is overrated and getting a job is all about your attitude plus doing your homework. I'm sorry you feel you got shafted but the truth is your attitude is very poor and you have no confidence that you can do an EE job. Like go said, go back to school and get some more so you can qualify for eCAD or find another eCAD position that accepted EETs.
Next, I am not sure if I agree 1005 with Joe about his view of BSEET and BSEE. I have friends that are BSEETs (very knowledgeable too) and some are PEs. This really all goes back to the EEs not understanding what EETs can do.
I also disagree with the statement EETs are technicians. According to Occupational handbook (BLS.gov) a technician is someone with a 2 year degree not a 4 year. So, Joe our government does not discriminate between these two. If you have an EET that meets EE requirements then they can be hired too.
Folks, (EET or EE?) what's it matter as long as you can do the job, right. This has been a debate that EEs have had for years. My EE friends take field engineer jobs because they get paid more than doing EE work. Honestly, EEs feel go to school for one or two extra classes and get paid less. You both learn the same electronics both theory and applications but EEs might take an extra math class--it’s that simple!
part2 July 3, 2008 at 3:35 p.m.
BTW I have a BSEET and a MSEE degree and in my 15 year experience working for the DoD I can say this is all true. I can also say that I can do a EEs job because that's what I do. Designing is not as hard as people are making it out to seem. Here is what you need to know. 1. Design input, implementation (submitting FDA 510k for modifications), product validation, and off into production. Remember, ISO 9000 for GMP and quality techniques. High quality = less costs and this is very important before you hit the final stage of production. You work as a team and it’s collectively all EE/EETs involved in the design process. I encourage EETs that have a good background and engineering electronics experience too apply to those jobs anyways.
So, my recommendation is apply for another eCAD job because your degree in the DoD is valid or if that’s not what you want go back to school. School is always good thing.
Keep you heads up and have a positive attitude
Technologist July 3, 2008 at 3:46 p.m.
"If you are happy making $15 an hour then keep cursing"
As a Technologist, I make $37 an hour. I have only been out of the military for 6 or so years, so I am happy with that at the moment.
Grantham grad July 3, 2008 at 9:55 p.m.
"Now, I'll educate you about Abet. People with MSEE graduate degrees are not abet accredited...no grad degrees are by abet."
Then explain this... "An ABET-accredited master’s degree"
EE vs EET July 3, 2008 at 11:11 p.m.
Most states don't allow technologists to become PEs. Those that do require them to be ABET accredited. No one from Grantham will ever be a PE so that debate is moot. Engineering positions require BSEEs, not BSEETs. Even Field Engineers prefer EEs over EETs. Everyone takes EEs while only some take EETs. Some even offer the position to people with GEDs if they have a lot of experience so it isn't really an engineering job. EE is the superior degree in all situations.
@Grantham grad/EE vs EET July 4, 2008 at 1:53 a.m.
The website has made a "typo" and just plain wrong. If you goto Abet's website it clearly states that it does not accredit graduate degrees. Thats absurd...MSEE are managers and no longer workers so why accredit that--nonsense!
@ EE vs EET
I think your statement should read "few" states don't allow technologists to become PEs. I'm curious why you say NOONE from Grantham will never be a PE. Why not? Are you on the board for deciding who or what colleges are allowed to sit in for the exam--I doubt that. The truth is many states DO allow EETs to sit in on the EIT exam (e.g. my home state of NC does). It's in the Geneva Convention look it up!
The statement about field engineers prefer EEs...now you really shown me that you don't even know what your talking about. Your NO engineer; in the past I've worked as a field engineer and yes I have an EET degree. I chose something more stable because I hated being on the road and missed being with my family--its more for the single guys.
EE vs EET...your very funny and naive! Seriously, an EE is not superior to an EET. I will prove it to anyone that wishes to put his or her EE Abet skills against my EET Abet skills.
EE vs EET July 4, 2008 at 4:25 a.m.
I can prove it by showing Field Engineer job postings that require an EE, not an EET. Any job posting you find accepting EETs also take and prefer EEs. I didn't say you couldn't get a job as a field engineer without an EE so your point is moot. States that let technologists become PEs require their degrees to be ABET accredited. NCEES is the holy grail of PE rules... read it.
@EE vs EET July 4, 2008 at 2:10 p.m.
Read it! I have! lol!!!!!!
And your WRONG!
I'm betting I've been around in this field a lot longer than you have. Your statement "States that let technologists become PEs require their degrees to be ABET accredited. NCEES is the holy grail of PE rules... read it." is MOOT. If you did read the NCEES site data; NCEES is not the deciding factor but the individual states in which you live. Your statement is moot because it is too generalized by and your implying all states do not allow EETs to sit into the EIT unless they have Abet. You may not have said this but your are strongly imlying it and you do not have enough knowledge to support your claims. I'm sorry but that's wrong too.
Have any of you ever taken the exam?
EE vs EET July 4, 2008 at 2:53 p.m.
Name a state that will let a Grantham grad become an EIT if you are so confident.
EE vs EET July 5, 2008 at 5:04 p.m.
Yeah, that's what I thought.
try looking up NC July 5, 2008 at 6:04 p.m.
Once again, I have to do all the work for you. You'll fall under option 3, EET graduate (note: option 2 is for engineering degrees that are not abet)of NCs board.
A. Education and Experience
The experience required is dependent upon the educational attainment of the applicant. The greater the engineering educational level, the less engineering experience required for approval for seating for examinations and eventual licensure. The following levels of engineering education and the experience requirements for each are those required by North Carolina Statutes and the Board:
(1) College Graduate, ABET Accredited Engineering Curriculum.
Those applicants with a degree from an engineering curriculum of four or more years, and which has been approved by the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, may take the Engineering Fundamentals Examination (Exam I) at the time of graduation from their college or university.
After successful completion of the Fundamentals Examination, and upon completion of a minimum of four (4) years of progressive engineering experience, applicants are eligible to apply for the Engineering Principles and Practice Examination (Exam II).
(2) College Graduate, Non-ABET Accredited Engineering or Related Science Curriculum.
Those applicants with a degree from a Non-ABET approved engineering or related science curriculum of four (4) or more years may take the Fundamentals Examination (Exam I) upon completion of four (4) years of progressive engineering experience following graduation from the college or university awarding the degree.
After successful completion of the Fundamentals Examination, and upon completion of a minimum of eight (8) years of progressive engineering experience, applicants are eligible to apply for the Engineering Principles and Practice Examination (Exam II).
A curriculum not accredited by ABET, but which contains adequate course work in engineering and scientific principles, would be a curriculum of this nature. The Board will determine the acceptability of such curricula on a case-by-case basis.
(3) College Graduate, Engineering Technology.
Those applicants with a degree in engineering technology from a technology curriculum of four (4) or more years may take the Engineering Fundamentals Examination (Exam I) upon completion of four (4) years of progressive engineering experience following graduation from the college or university awarding the degree.
After successful completion of the Fundamentals Examination, and upon completion of a minimum of eight (8) years of progressive engineering experience, applicants are eligible to apply for the Engineering Principles and Practice Examination (Exam II).
So, I'll ask you again...have you ever taken the exam?
As a Grantham grad...you should apply and take it.
EE vs EET July 5, 2008 at 7:20 p.m.
Who needs to go to Grantham in NC? Who needs to go to college? They let HS grads sit for the exam.
(5) High School Graduate.
Those applicants with a high school diploma may
be approved to take the Engineering
Fundamentals Examination (Exam I) upon
adequate documentation indicating the completion
of eight (8) years of progressive engineering
experience following graduation from high school.
After successful completion of the Fundamentals
Examination, and upon completion of a minimum
of twelve (12) years of progressive engineering
experience, applicants are eligible to apply for the
Engineering Principles and Practice Examination
(Exam II).
Talk about slackers!
Felix July 5, 2008 at 9:26 p.m.
We have a fraud here and it is "Just a Guy" and the other names he seems to use.
I just looked at other college reviews on this website, and he has the same message on a few:
www.onlinedegreereviews.org/college/nort...
and
www.onlinedegreereviews.org/college/univ...
and
www.onlinedegreereviews.org/college/kenn...
and
www.onlinedegreereviews.org/college/gran...
It starts with:
"As the growth of online education continues I do not understand why anyone would even consider an online university that does not also have traditional on-campus programs."
On the UOP board he is an ex-employee of UOP, on another he claims to have been an executive recruiter for 15 years, and a professor. Same writing pattern, same anti-online university sentiment - same person. The pattern on the other forums is the same thing that occurs on this forum: he complains and other students defend their program, and he argues using different names.
This person apparently has an issue with online degrees.
It doesn't matter what you say to these "characters", they apparently have a hidden agenda, and it is to discredit online colleges that have no brick and mortar campus. It's very sick.
I will post this on the other boards as well.
I have contacted the webmaster of this forum.
Joe July 5, 2008 at 11:17 p.m.
Welcome to the world of anonymous blogging. It really isn't necessary to SPAM the other forums with this same message. If they guy switches characters everytime he posts you will never call him out. If you want to waste your time digging through the Java script of this blog you can catch his IP. I tried it and it took me forever. I won't be wasting my time with that again.
Joe July 5, 2008 at 11:18 p.m.
NC only requires a HS diploma to become a PE... WTF?!?
@ July 5, 2008 at 11:49 p.m.
Yes, NC allows HS diplomas as so does other states too. You would be very surprised. It’s mostly for the 'old timers or emeritus applicants. These folks are next to my generation and the young guys today are next to me. I'm sorry but it’s all about your experience and no Abet or Regional or whatever degree can beat-experience.
You must realize people; college has changed a lot since even my time or even our father's time. My kid is in the 8th grade and already had studied and passed Algebra/French I before she even hit HS in NC. Yes, she will get credit for it in HS and she has the opportunity take summer college.
I wish they had these programs when I went to HS. I can recall only needing Geometry to graduate now my daughter needs trig to graduate HS to be competitive in college. We've started her on the path and when she hopefully graduates HS she'll have Calc I completed.
So Joe, the PE has nothing to do with HS, Abet, or non-Abet because the folks that sit on the board are mostly emeritus engineers. NC has a really excellent schooling system and breads some of the best engineers from the country.
I hope this sheds some light on this matter. So again I'll put out the challenge with my Abet EET degree and MSEE degree to any BSEE that feels they have more experience and knowledge than this 'old timer.
So I say to you Grantham folks if PE is what you want apply in NC but make sure you study the exam because I’ve seen how difficult it is. My recommendation is take it when you’re finished with college so the information is still fresh in your young minds. Good luck to all of you!
@Joe July 6, 2008 at 12:05 a.m.
Joe,
I just wanted to clear up two things with you, sir. I'm impressed with your knowledge of computers and computer languages so I wanted to talk with you.
1. This site uses mostly HTML and not JavaScript. Yes, it does have some but it’s mostly HTML source code. You'll never get the IPs because every time you post you’re logged into a database that tracks your posts by ID numbers. (E.g. your last post ID = 8790). This identifies you so the administrator can cross reference your IP then looks it up using an ip tracer program. Honestly, most folks use proxy services or find anonymous/elite IP address to prevent crackers from learning their IP address.
2. BTW...I proud to say I graduated from Grantham's EET program. Do you have any engineer jobs available other than technician because I'm over qualified? Seriously, let me know! I can work on your computer/electrical design team.
It's good to network.
I agree with you felix July 6, 2008 at 12:09 a.m.
Felix,
Its about time someone turns this guy in. I too have noticed this "guy" complaining while other students defend their program, and he argues using different names.
This guy is sick and needs a life!
Not really July 6, 2008 at 1:57 a.m.
Its only a handful of states that let you get a PE without professional accreditation for your degree. Even NC says the board will still have to review your degree if it isn't ABET and they will never let Grantham grads become PEs. You can't name one person who graduated from Grantham that became a PE and never will. They will laugh your application straight to the trash can. The old-timers clause is exactly that. It is for professionals who have a lifetime of experience and pass the tests. Grantham grads are so incompetent they could never pass the exams so no need to worry. We won't have these incompetents ruining our profession. The test is way too hard for them unlike their open book, unlimited time tests.
Joe July 6, 2008 at 2:16 a.m.
When I referred to JavaScript I was talking about the trap link I posted in the blog. I installed code that recorded visitors IP so I could see if I was being stalked by the same person. Turned out I was right.
Just A Guy July 6, 2008 at 2:51 a.m.
OMG!! I've been tracked down and outed by the dynamic duo of Joe and Felix!!
Felix has turned me in to the online degree nazis!!
They're coming to take me away because I say "bad things" about online degrees!!
I'm SOOOO SCARED!! ROFL
Just A Guy July 6, 2008 at 2:54 a.m.
BTW Grantham is truly a COMPLETELY WORTHLESS DEGREE MILL
AVOID
Felix July 6, 2008 at 3:33 a.m.
You have been outed for being a moron and a very, very, lonely person.
You need mental help.
Grantham grad July 6, 2008 at 11:52 p.m.
That is a pretty simple Java script to run but then again you aren't specializing in programming. Pretty sneaky I must say to track us. I would be interested in working for a defense firm to. Does your company have an outfit near TN? I am ex-military if that makes a difference. Like my compatriot says, it is good to network!
Admissions to FSU July 7, 2008 at 7:12 p.m.
Greetings,
I was reading some of the blog material about Grantham and FSU acceptance. FSU is a school I would really like to attend after Grantham for my MBA. I was distraught at first from all the bad hype I've heard on here about Grantham and an email I received from FSU. However, an extra 5 minute email and a little bit of persistence paid off.
I want to “debunk” the notion that Grantham credits (DETC) can be approved for an exception at FSU! FSU even was so helpful they gave me a contact person which I am going to contact about enrollment as soon as possible. Honestly, Grantham is not a bad school as folks on this blog have made it out to be. It strongly appears many of the negative tones are based on ex-employees or students that had problems with Grantham. I like many; many other students have NOT had any problems with Grantham. I wanted to find out for myself if Joe was right and solve this myth of not being able to transfer my Grantham credits—I can. Folks please stop telling lies and start using supporting evidence to back up your claims. If you have had a bad experience and are a student with Grantham then you’re the best person to post a comment about the school. I’m a student and I have nothing but good things to say about Grantham. See my email message below…I spoke to the same lady as Joe did.
"Dear Jerry,
The department or college can approve you for an exception. You can contact Lisa Beverly (lbeverly@cob.fsu.edu) in the College of Business.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate contact us.
Jermaine Williams
Graduate Officer
Office of Admissions and Records
Florida State University
P.O. Box 3062400
Tallahassee, Fl 32306-2400
Phone (850)644-6200
Fax (850)644-0197
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry
Date: Monday, June 23, 2008 07:39 AM
Admissions to FSU 2 July 7, 2008 at 7:12 p.m.
To: FSU Graduate Admissions (graduateadmissions@admin.fsu.edu)
Subject: RE: Graduate Enrollment
Dear Jermaine,
Thank you for your email.
I am wondering if this statement "attended must be approve by the Regional Institutions Accrediting Bodies." is firm. I ask this because upon some research on the FSUs website I found this excerpt
"An applicant who has not graduated from a regionally-accredited institution may be considered for admission as a provisional graduate student. For information on provisional graduate status, see the subsection on 'Provisional Graduate Students' in this chapter."
Also, to let you know Grantham is accredited by the Dept of Ed., CHEA, and Service member’s Opportunity Colleges (SOC) associations.
I'm still confused because you're saying only regional accreditation and the website says it may consider provisional admission. Can you please check into this and confirm whether my degree can be accepted in lieu regional status. If you could please check and confirm that would be great. I can pass all other requirements for admission I just want to know for a fact does FSU make any exceptions.
I look forward to hearing from you
Thank you.
Jerry
-----Original Message-----
From: FSU Graduate Admissions [mailto:graduateadmissions@admin.fsu.edu]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2008 2:38 PM
To: Jerry
Subject: RE:'FSUEmail=894-XXX' Graduate Enrollment
Dear Jerry,
Thank you for contacting our office. Grantham University is not accredited by the Regional Institution Accrediting Bodies. Any school or institution attended must be approve by the Regional Institutions Accrediting Bodies.
If you have any questions please do not hesitate contact us.
Jermaine Williams
Graduate Officer
Office of Admissions and Records
Florida State University
P.O. Box 3062400
Tallahassee, Fl 32306-2400
Phone (850)644-6200
Fax (850)644-0197
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry
Date: Thursday, June 19, 2008 08:55 AM
To: gradadms@admin.fsu.edu (gradadms@admin.fsu.edu)
Subject: Graduate Enrollment
Dear Sir or Ma'am,
I'm in the military and I just completed my Bachelor's of Engineering Technology degree from Grantham University, a DETC Nationally accredited university. I am very interested in attending your school. Would this meet FSUs requirements for entrance into your MBA program? Your assistance is greatly appreciated.
Sincerely,
V/R
Jerry"
I wanted to thank Joe and Terry for emailing FSU. It pissed me off at first that FSU would not make an exception or take my credits but knowing what you want and not accepting “NO” for an answer is how we get things done. I agree with the statement about making one unified accredited body; its nonsense all the bickering between the two. The bottom line is I have a degree from Grantham; it’s accredited, and its degree is valued by most institutions.
Take care,
Jerry
Joe July 7, 2008 at 8:08 p.m.
Thanks for taking the time to reprove the point. Jamie is a staunch advocate of DETC to the point of sheer ignorance. He will lie openly on a blog just to make people believe his position. Since he was honored by and gives speeches for the DETC and works for a DETC affiliate it is no wonder he is so unobjective to the point of dishonesty. I think it is elitist of FSU to outright reject DETC degrees but all the University of (insert state here) reject them from what I have seen. If you're looking for an AACSB accredited online MBA you have a few options. Someone mentioned Missouri State while Drexel offers one as well... take a look at this list too. You might need to check if they require a regional degree or not. Stay away from the second half of the page starting at Walden... they are not AACSB.
www.allonlineschools.com/search/aacsb-ac...
George Washington is ranked 54th in the NATIONAL list and does not say it requires a regional degree. FSU is ranked 112 so you know GWU is a leap ahead. I would seriously check out their Global MBA because it is HIGHLY selective and respected. If you do go make sure you have high GMAT scores. They only take 100 out of 800 applicants
Joe July 7, 2008 at 8:17 p.m.
My bad... the Global MBA isn't online. Check out the other MBA and business degrees at GWU. If they are anything like what you are looking for you can't beat the quality of that online program.
@Joe July 7, 2008 at 8:44 p.m.
Joe, Did you read Jerry's email?
How did he reprove your point...actually he disproved it!
The lady clearly did not know anything or that FSU accepts national accredited degrees. Once she asked the question and found out otherwise did she point Jerry into the help he needed. She clearly states that FSU WOULD make an exception and this proves Jamie's point that Grantham's DETC credits can be accepted. I think its time you admit you were wrong and that you misread Jerry's email...
Go Jerry and thanks! I too am a grantham student and I think its great you did your homework...what degree program did you say you were in? Also, good luck in your studies and applying to FSU.
Also, Joe thanks for the link I didn't know about AASCB and how important that was for MBA. Just goes to show you can make an old dog learn new tricks!
take care,
Joe July 8, 2008 at 1:39 p.m.
No he didn't. They will not take nationally accredited credits. That is why they make you a PROVISIONAL student. duh
@Joe July 8, 2008 at 3:55 p.m.
Joe opinions vary and yes, he did prove you wrong!
Your claim was that FSU ONLY accepted regional and not national accreditation. At first, the lady said, FSU accepts only regional too but when challanged she told a different story, didn't she. Hey, make me a PROVISIONAL student the bottom line is FSU will let me apply and accept my national accredited credits so i can complete an MBA with FSU. Who's duh now!
FSU Student Wanna BE July 8, 2008 at 4:48 p.m.
If I perform well as a provisional student, do I still get the MBA or other Masters of my choice?
Joe July 8, 2008 at 6:11 p.m.
"Your claim was that FSU ONLY accepted regional and not national accreditation."
Yep... that's the claim and that's the truth. They don't accept national accredited graduate credits or undergraduate degrees. Being a provisional student is not acceptance to a degree program. Maybe you should take the time to learn the difference. They still have to reapply after taking 15 credit hours making nothing less than a B at any time. If they are able to meet that requirement then they can exempt the regional accredited degree and reapply to the program and hope they get accepted. Having your NA degree exempted does not mean they accept it. You are putting 15 credit hours of gradaute work in it's place. Seems like a big waste of money to take an extra 9 credits. Only 6 of the 15 will count towards the degree. That is even more out-of-state tuition they will have to pay. There are plenty of AACSB online MBAs that will take NA degrees right off the bat and not make them be provisional students. GWU is ranked 54 in US News, takes NA degrees, and offers a highly selective AACSB MBA.
FSU Wanna BE July 13, 2008 at 12:38 a.m.
Thanks for setting me straight Joe!
Poor service July 26, 2008 at 1:34 a.m.
Grantham has the WORST service of ANY online school !!!!!! STAY AWAY !!!
Grantham Grad August 26, 2008 at 12:28 a.m.
I have to disagree with the negative posters on this website. How can you say anything negative if you have never attended the school? Also, where is your support to back it up. I have had GREAT service from the staff. I do notice on the forums that many students are having troubles. Many other students have tried to mentor them and explain the process. The bottom line is if you feel Grantham has poor service then perhaps you have not followed its process for resolving complaints. People, it works both ways.
When I was a student I don't know how many times I had to tell my peers to read the handbook about resolving complaints. I always resolved mine via email so if something didn't get fixed in a timely manner then I could email management to get it resolved. I always got my problems answered which is why I am surprised by the negative posts.
Bottom line is Grantham is accredited and is 75% accepted by most school (that's some very good stats!). Anyways, I wanted to share my that I've had positive experiences at this school and recommend them to ANYONE. If you have any questions feel free to email me at elsupremo1two3@yahoo.com and I can answer some more questions you might have.
take care,
CJ
whatever August 27, 2008 at 5:22 a.m.
Grantham Grad is posting the typical Grantham spirit script that they are teaching their employees to come on here and post. Just face the fact that the school is a scam and that's the bottom line.
whatever August 29, 2008 at 11:24 a.m.
If it's such as scam then why don't YOU do something more about it. Do something more productive (e.g. file legal action, contact DETC, or BBB). The bottom line is Grantham has no complaints filed against them. Why? It's a good school that's why. Folks, don't let one or two bad students/employees postinh here sway your judgment. Find out for yourself. To "whatever"--you should DO more, if you feel that strongly against Grantham than post unsupported statements (i.e. it's a scam) that proves nothing--THAT'S THE BOTTOM LINE.
take care,
@whatever September 12, 2008 at 9:04 a.m.
"The bottom line is Grantham has no complaints filed against them."
Bull honkey... you didn't even bother to check liar.
Checked it out September 12, 2008 at 3:40 p.m.
Grantham has 5 complaints on file (up 4 from a year ago)
Here is the reference:
kansascity.app.bbb.org/report/99134289/?&language=1
Also, some perspective September 12, 2008 at 3:47 p.m.
Searching the local UOP and DeVry,
DeVry had 5 complaints, just in the KC area.
kansascity.app.bbb.org/report/31020002/?&language=1
UoP has 1.
kansascity.app.bbb.org/report/99120969/?&language=1
Given the fact that DeVry has so many locations (as does UoP), this will make it difficult to track down every complaint, across every zip code. Grantham has 1 location, so it is convenient to use this as a litimus test. If you start to see a great number of complaints filed against this school, that would add a lot a validity to the claims posted here. I guess only time will tell.
Duh September 19, 2008 at 3:08 p.m.
"Bottom line is Grantham is accredited and is 75% accepted by most school"
So, go to a regionally accredited school for the same price (probably cheaper) and get 100% accepted, without the stigma.
Ceremony September 23, 2008 at 1:16 a.m.
youtube.com/watch?v=c-valUBOcg8&feature=related
Avoid October 4, 2008 at 4:41 a.m.
Most classes are taught by Adjunct faculty for $15 per hour, pretax, with little training.
Other Schools October 4, 2008 at 6:40 a.m.
Does anyone know what other online universities pay their faculty? How much training is provided at the other schools?
Yep, they stink October 21, 2008 at 12:40 a.m.
Grantham service and the degree stink worse than a 5 day old fish. Worse service I have ever received and the degree is worthless if you actually want to do something with it.
@whatever October 25, 2008 at 9:07 p.m.
I guess I struck a sore spot. I'll tell you again. Posting on her does nothing but filing a ligit complaint will DO even more. I think that's what you should do if you have a legit complaint or let it go brother.
just my opinion
original whatever October 26, 2008 at 5:06 a.m.
To the last @whatever. Your opinion doesn't matter. What does matter is the fact that Grantham is a scam and there is plenty of facts to back it up. Their credits are worthless because they wont transfer to a reputable university, which has been proven many times here and the degree has no value. That is not just my opinion "brother". That is a fact! Now stop wasting your money with this worthless school and go to a traditional university that is regionally accredited. Stop wasting your time and money with these private for profit institutions.
@ original whatever October 26, 2008 at 3:34 p.m.
You're to ignorant to understand that I agree with you.
What I was saying and that you failed to comprehend was simply "do something about the school or shut you piehole".
Quit complaining on here it's wasting everyone's time.
BTW...I already graduated from a regional school, but I don't see a problem with either accredited body (i.e. regional or national). Onmy job, we hire graduates that have degrees that are simply accredited and not a diploma mill.
Gosh, I can't believe they let idiots like you post here. You ruined my whole day; I dislike stupid people.
original whatever October 27, 2008 at 3:49 a.m.
"Onmy job, we hire graduates that have degrees that are simply accredited and not a diploma mill."
I highly doubt that you are involved in any kind of hiring process because you are most likely a Grantham employee or student that has been scammed "brother"
Later!
Here we go again October 27, 2008 at 4:22 p.m.
Great, this little hemorrhoid has come back. Flame on!
There is no difference between the two acccred November 8, 2008 at 10:51 p.m.
Both are conducted by non-profit associations established by consent of a group of institutions. Both accreditations are based on the ...meets published standards of academic quality and institutional integrity.
DETC enjoys the precisely same national recognitions as the regional bodies do, and the same kind of accreditation standards e.g. curriculum quality, faculty qualifications, student services, and ethical and business practices. To term one more acceptable or better than another is not at all accurate. here is the website check it out. distancelearn.about.com/od/accreditationinfo/a/DETC_Interview
There is a difference November 10, 2008 at 1:10 a.m.
Ask any Regional school and they will tell you the difference. Most will not accept National. Most will giggle at you if you say you have Granthem credits.
Truth is here November 10, 2008 at 10:13 a.m.
All the Grantham grads,employees,and students can defend the school all day if you want. Grantham credits are still worthless and it has been proven over and over again. Reputable regional universities simply will not take them. Regional accreditation is a higher standard and that is all there is to it. Face it Grantham backers,the school is a scam! No ABET + No Regional = smells like a rotten egg = Grantham
Hooked on Grantham worked for me! November 10, 2008 at 6:42 p.m.
Ladies & Gents,
I have monitoring/participating in this blog for about a year now, and I must say, there is enough personal accounts to back both sides of the arguments.
-Grantham transfers have been rocky at best, but have proven successful with a little determination and diligence. Although I appreciate that not every institution is created equal when it comes to accepting credits, the fact that the basics (i.e. maths, physics, electronics, english) do not carry over is unacceptable.
-Grantham service is lacking, I think primarily due to the 100% adjunct staff. I witnessed first hand the utter neglect of the lesser staff, but then when I received attention from others (Cruz, Malley, Miller) it was a different school experience entirely. This, again, is unacceptable. To have one extreme or the other should not be the case; I would settle for mediocre across the board, so at the very least I knew what to expect from all.
-Grantham degree acceptance is hit and miss. I have been very fortunate in the fact that I work in a field that is more experience and aptitude based than acedemic. When I explain the Grantham experience, and delivery model to traditional engineers, I feel like I am constantly having to justify why I chose that route. Luckily, I now have a year of experience under my belt, and I can testify the background provided by Grantham's BSEET left me well-prepared for the challenges of my current position.
-Retention (for me anyway) is also hit and miss. The classes I cared about stuck like glue, and I can recall most of what I have learned. The classes I didn't, not so much. I constantly find myself having to review the subject matter (Calculus, Physics, Chemistry) to try to keep it fresh in my head.
All in all, I don't regret attending, and finishing my BSEET with Grantham. It was, by far, the hardest 2.5 years of my life, and I am glad that it is over. With this last year's increase in wages (I earned 95K this year, up from 70K before I graduated), I washed the tuition investment, so now I am in the money (thank god!). I have received numerous awards for my exploits since my promotion, but Grantham didn't do that; I did. I hate the idea of lending any credibility to this school, or it's staff. I would not reccomend it to anyone in the future. I appear to be more of the exception than the norm for this school, and that is simply unacceptable.
Take this as you will, I am sure the hemorrhoid will jump all over this.
There are some interesting differences November 11, 2008 at 12:34 a.m.
DETC is expert in distance learning technique and specializes in accrediting distance education instruction. DETC has over a half century of experience in doing this. DETC evaluates institutions completely every five years, while regional accreditation is conducted once every ten years. Between five-year reviews, DETC does a comprehensive subject specialist curriculum evaluation of every new program before students may enroll, while regional associations do not.
But at the core, the accreditations are very similar, and both are virtually identical in philosophy and scope of activity. So to hastily express one more acceptable or better than another is not entirely accurate. So, to "Ask any Regional school and they will tell you the difference. Most will not accept National." I gigle at this comment because you sound like a car dealership trying to con folks into buying an extended warranty.
Hooked on Grantham...
After reading your post in the end it was your Grantham degree that got you that promotion so be proud you have a degree...even if its from Grantham. Don't be fooled that one accreditation is better than the other.
... November 11, 2008 at 1:16 a.m.
The thoroughness and rigor of the DETC review is greater in terms of student protection, what the outcomes of student learning are and how they are determined, then the regional accreditation process. Yet, through monopolistic practices greater student protection is held in lower regard than lesser quality, larger oversight accreditation. Actually, this is a sad commentary on the state of higher education in America and illustrates the true political nature of the issue rather than a discussion on educational quality and outcomes.
Illustrative, I recall that day when little Japanese car companies where held in low regard in comparision to the large, “high quality", American car companies. Only those who could not afford a quality car purchased a Japanese car. Then, over the years the real facts emerged and Amercan car companies are still striving to catch up with the quality offered by the little, Japanese car companies. I love my Toyota!
what? November 11, 2008 at 1:53 p.m.
Compairing a car company to Grantham is only true on one front.......Grantham hires car salesmen.
The place is a joke. The staff is a joke. Management is a joke. The teachers are a joke.
If you have a job that is going to send you there, fine, but dont expect just any job to open it's arms to you if you go there thinking it will get you hired over someone with a Regional degree. That simply wont happen.
what are you saying November 11, 2008 at 3:32 p.m.
"If you have a job that is going to send you there, fine, but dont expect just any job to open it's arms to you if you go there thinking it will get you hired over someone with a Regional degree. That simply wont happen"
What world do you live in? Of course, people with a national accredited degrees will get hired too. It happens more than you think and your not going to change that. The only way that would happen is if HR specifically asks for a hiree with a regional accredited dgegree. I ask you how many interviews have you been to where someone asked you that--none!
Look November 11, 2008 at 9:27 p.m.
@ Hooked on Grantham worked for me
I am sorry to inform you that Grantham grads don't get jobs that make $70,000 to $95,000 a year. Who are you trying to fool? You are living in a fantasy. You even said yourself that the traditional engineers are always queastioning your education at Grantham and you were having to justify yourself to them. That should tell you something. The degree is worthless and the school is a joke. Your degree is not even an engineering degree so I highly doubt that you even collaborate with any engineers. Your posting has got to be the funniest fairy tale that I have ever read. Grantham has no ABET,and the National accreditation is second best. So please stop huffing the pixe dust Peter Pan because for profit schools like Grantham are not respected in the workforce. Why can't you just understand that?
to "what are you saying" November 12, 2008 at 12:46 a.m.
I've seen far to many "regional degree reguired" on job posting for it to be chance. You live in a dream world. If an employer has two resumes in front of them and one has a National degree and the other Regional, who do you really think they will hire?
@what are you saying November 12, 2008 at 11:45 p.m.
Answer: The best qualified and experienced candidate is who they'll hire.
dream world November 13, 2008 at 1:05 a.m.
Yep, you live in a dream world. The national will be thrown in the trash and the Regional will get the call.
@dream world November 13, 2008 at 12:20 p.m.
I think you're dreaming...
EETs November 14, 2008 at 3 a.m.
hi,
I've been reading many posts about a EET being a techncian. I'm an EET or applied engineer at we are not labeled simply "technicians". Tech's according to bls.gov are rated according to a 2 -year degree. See attached from bls.gov website, "Many 4-year colleges offer bachelor’s degrees in engineering technology, but graduates of these programs often are hired to work as technologists or applied engineers, not technicians."
in addition, this is what my Hr used when I was hired on my company as an engineer and not a technician. So, I want to make it clear that EETs are engineers and tech's.
Joe November 14, 2008 at 5:12 a.m.
As has been said on this thread before, an EET from Grantham is about as relavent as an Associates from an ABET accredited CC. In most cases you will end up being a technician. If you are fortunate enough to grab an applied engineer slot you are still just a glorified technician. They are the go-betweens for techs and developers and still run diagnostics. Depending on what field you work you may get to perform some solutions based problem solving but in no way are they actually on the engineer/development level. If you want to be a design engineer then get an ABET accredited BSEE. If you want to be a project manager then get an ABET accredited BSEET. If you want to be a technician then go to Grantham. If you ever want to progress with a Grantham degree then taking the PE is a must and in most states that will be impossible. Check your states requirements before signing on to a dead end degree.
Joe November 14, 2008 at 6:02 a.m.
Ahh, the DETC vs RA debate again. I have little faith in RA since they accredit junk schools as well as DETC. If one looks at some of the names on their list you can see some of the worst: UOP, Walden, Ashford, Capella... ect. RA is no gaurantee of quality but neither is DETC. DETC schools that were listed as diploma mills a few months before suddenly gain accreditation when they did little to change. If one is to judge which is better you can see who accepts what. DETC schools will take any RA credits submitted. RA schools will often not do so. If you apply to a DETC graduate program you will be accepted, there is no gaurantee in an RA school unless it is for-profit. If you try getting into FSU, ASU, UT, or any of the online graduate programs from the better state schools you will have a hard, if not impossible, time getting accepted.
When it comes down to it, there is only one accreditation that really matters... professional. In many professions you cannot even hold a job without out it. It is important in so many fields, engineering in particular. ABET is a hallmark of the profession as it tells employers that you have met the standards of the industry in your preparation. As an engineer, your career will progress much faster if you have ABET on your resume and in many states is the only way to advance. If you live in a state that does not require it you must have several years of experience to make up for it. I cannot think of a single DETC school that carries professional accreditated programs which is why many employers pass them over. In this time of economic hardship it will become even harder to find a position without it.
Do yourself a favor and look for the following program accreditations...
Engineering = ABET
Business = AACSB
Education = NCATE
Counseling = CACREP
Psychology = APA
Nursing = CCNE
Law = ABA
Look November 15, 2008 at 3:41 a.m.
@ Flare up AKA Hooked on Grantham sucks for me
Why can't you just admit that your school sucks and you have been scammed with a $40,000 degree that can't even get you a cashier job at wal mart. Stop trying to make us believe that Grantham University is a respected university because they are truly the bottom of the barrel. A complete ripoff is what they are. They are nationally accredited, have no ABET, no athletic program, no real campus = a total joke. Why waste your time when you can go to a tradional school that offers distance education. The only reason that you went their is because they take absolutely anyone with $50 to spare for the applicaiton fee. Real universities have an admissions process that weed out the ones that don't belong there. Grantham is for profit and has worthless credits and anyone can get in.You have been scammed so just get over it.
a few comments November 15, 2008 at 5:56 p.m.
Ok,
First, "accreditation that really matters... professional" that's only true if you plan taking the FE, PE, or any other certifications required by engineers. In addition, let's be totally honest here because all schools are "for=profit". If no schools were then you could attend school for free. I've always smiles whenever I hear that misnomer catch-phrase used by colleges to scam students to believe otherwise.
Secondly, any school that is RA or NA is considered by ACE a respected college. Additionally, regional colleges are prohibited by law and ACE from discrimination against those accreditors. I suggest that you do the research and compare the two types of accreditors to see which is really the "gold-standard". In essence, if national accreditation was so bad that means that there are many Ivy League schools that suck. Why? DETC is the gold standard and not regional for distance learning accreditation. Regional is more for students that attend onsite. If we remember some years ago the majority of Americans didn't think that distance learning would take off as great as it has had. I bet 20 years from now it will be even better, more affordable, safer, and efficient than traditional learning.
Lastly, I don't know too much about Grantham but to post that its credits are worthless and it’s a rip off is a bit naive on your part. I ask you, "How do you know this"?
Hooked on Grantham worked for me! November 15, 2008 at 5:57 p.m.
I, and I can't believe I am typing this, absolutely agree with you.
The "let anyone have a shot for fifty bucks" thing must stop. Some people genuinely don't belong in any form of distance education, and for the carrot to be hung so easily in the name of profit is simply unfair. Some people really should shut up and color.
I invested 16K of my GI bill into this, and cashed out 14K for myself (full time pace paid more than tuition at the time, and they never hiked up the price given consistent enrollment). I banked the 14K, and I picked up 25K this year on top with my promotion. Dollars and sense, I didn't get ripped off at all.
It is easy to see how this love/hate relationship has started. Those that make it through without incident love the school, and those that don't work out for whatever reason absolutely hate it. Since I finished up, 2 of my coworkers (against my recommendation) started at Grantham. The evolution from "I will not allow myself to fail" to "screw this school, I am out!" is disheartening. Both that entered dropped after the first semester, with 2 complaints:
1.) I am not learning anything.
2.) I can't get my grades back in time.
After seeing these 2 drop out, I am convinced current management is driving this school into the ground. I was actually considering going back for a Computer Science degree (just for fun), but I don't want the hassle. If they clean up their act, maybe I will go back.
Truth again November 15, 2008 at 7:16 p.m.
@ a few comments
First off, a few comments and Hoooked on Grantham worked for me are the same poster
Second, you have no clue because of your quote
"if national accreditation was so bad that means that there are many Ivy League schools that suck."
I want you to tell me what Ivy league school holds National accreditation. You have got to kidding right. Also all universities are not for profit because real traditional universities operate off of endowments that are recieved from different organizations for the school to perform scientific research and development. Several industry leaders and federal agencies funding these schools for research is how they make money. The money that these schools make from tuition and endowments are reinvested into the school and not dropped in the pockets of stockholders the way that Grantham University and other for profit shools do. A university can be private and still be non profit. Or a university can be private for pofit such as Grantham which is a total scam and a joke. Also, National accreditation is not Golden. Please stop kidding yourself. Grantham just does not have the respect that real universities have so accept it for what it is which is a scam at best.
Good day now!
Hooked on Grantham worked for me! November 15, 2008 at 7:36 p.m.
I am not responsible for "a few comments"....
Also, I was agreeing with the post "Look"
Hooked on Grantham worked for me! November 15, 2008 at 7:45 p.m.
Almost forgot,
"The only reason that you went their is because they take absolutely anyone with $50 to spare for the applicaiton fee. "
The real reason I went was for a shot at a promotion. My supervisor at the time recommended it (he has an associates from GU, and then transferred to UOP for his BSBA), and I when I started in '05, there weren't as many accredited programs available for EET. Things have changed quite a bit in the last few years!
@truth... November 15, 2008 at 8:02 p.m.
Hi,
I don't think they're the same poster. I too, can't believe but I do somewhat agree with you too. I can't think of but only one Ivy League school that offers both RA and DETC-Air University. Do you know who they are? Ans: our nation's military. Also, many people do not know that it is the largest college in the world with over 350,000 students enrolled.
Additionally, Western Governors University offers both and 'a few comments is right' about that. I see many schools will begin shifting towards RA and DETC since DETC has higher standards for distance learning--that is a fact!
So, I am curious to know as well "How do you know this school's credits are worthless"? I too believe your a college dropout from the school that is bitter about it. I say let it go and move on to another school. Also, quit hating on people here that have earned the degree apparently the school works for them.
@hooked on grantham. hey, be proud your a graduate and have risen up in the ranks. Bottom line is you got your degree and are getting paid for it so it doesn't sound like you got ripped off to me.
... November 15, 2008 at 8:20 p.m.
Hello,
First, I am not the same guy as ‘Hooked on Grantham’. Also, DETC ‘is’ the gold-standard for distance learning since it’s been around longer accrediting distance learning institutions while regional accreditation has recently jumped on board with it.
Secondly, there are some interesting differences here:
1. DETC 'is' expert in distance learning technique and specializes in accrediting distance education instruction.
2. DETC has over a half century of experience in doing this. That is more than anyone can say for regional accreditation.
3. DETC evaluates institutions completely every five years, while regional accreditation is conducted once every ten years. Between five-year reviews, DETC does a comprehensive subject specialist curriculum evaluation of every new program before students may enroll, while regional associations do not.
Lastly, I now can see why you didn’t graduate from Grantham. Please, use spell check because you misspelled many words, have a fragment, and no supporting sentences in your recent post. You really need to ‘stop’ scamming everyone in here.
Good day now.
Listen November 16, 2008 at 5:18 a.m.
@ Hi
There are only eight Ivy league schools and Air University is not one of them. You don't know what you are talking about. These eight schools are Brown, Cornell, Columbia, Dartsmouth, Yale, University of Pennsylvania, Princeton, and Harvard. Sorry but Air University is not included. Anyway,Grantham is a ripoff and a low tier for profit university that has no rankings among the best colleges. Just like it was stated above, Traditional universities operate off of funding that is issued from several organizations to continue technological advancement and scientific research. All of you Grantham employees need to stop being so defensive. Everyone knows that Grantham is a scam. Also I am sorry to inform you that National is a lower standard and than Regional. If National were so great all of the traditional universities would have it. All of the ones that are in defense of this miserable school are Granthma employees working overtime to put a spin on things. Face it, the school is a ripoff.
... November 17, 2008 at 12:56 a.m.
@listen...
First you're the one that doesn't know what you're talking about. You said, "Only eight Ivy League schools and Air University is not one of them". Thanks, I needed a good laugh…I guess MIT, Stanford, UoI-Champaign, etc. are not Ivy League schools, huh. Please stop using "Wikipedia" as your viable data source of data. Secondly, stop to referring me as a student or an employee; I’m not. I am a guy that posted his opinion and I am very knowledgeable about RA and NA. So, you’re trying to humiliate people on here I am not going to be one of them. Especially, from some young snotty nose kid that probably dropped out of this school and is so bitter that he is trying to find ways to attack the school. I think you’re going about it the wrong way. Basically, I find your comment’s very funny as well since you jump to conclusions without verifying any facts or have any knowledge about your statements. How do you know that RA is better? That’s because you don’t and there is no hard facts listed (facts that compare or contract the difference between the two) that says RA is better or a “gold-standard”. It’s all hearsay. Hey, I got a bridge in London to sell you…are you interested? What if I told you that this bridge is the “gold-standard” and I graduated from Harvard then would you buy it? Listen, I’m not picking on you but if you understand college rankings at all then you know that all “Ivy League” colleges are posted on “US News Report” (which is more than eight schools as you have posted) and AF Institute of Technology and AF Academy (#1 ranked Ivy League college in the West) which are subdivisions of what is called Air University are among them. I stand but what I said that RA is no better than DETC/NA. Also, many colleges are beginning to shift to DETC just wait and see. Lastly, no matter how colleges get there money there all out to make money. So, please stop kidding yourself, and scamming people here.
He ALWAYS does this! November 17, 2008 at 2:42 a.m.
If you have anything good to say about Grantham, you must be an employee. He has taken this stance since he first went on his shaming crusade some time ago.
I wish he would come up with some better material already!
Listen is right November 17, 2008 at 4:55 p.m.
@Ivy know it all.
You can say what you want but there are only 8 Ivy League colleges and MIT and Stanford are not original Ivies.Ivy Plus, which is a term used when referring to MIT and Stanford,does not count.Sorry, but Air Force Institute of Technology is not included either. Anyway, this does not change the fact that Grantham is a for profit ripoff with the lower standard National accreditation and and no ABET. They will take anyone that submits an application. If you want a respected degree then go to a traditional school that holds Regional accreditation from one of the 6 Regional accrediting bodies. Grantham is a joke, so just move on to new business.
tort tort November 17, 2008 at 7:11 p.m.
"(facts that compare or contract the difference between the two) that says RA is better or a “gold-standard”"
Is the @listen poster above an idiot or what? That is the typical Grantham grad for ya.
I didn't know that it was possible to compare and Contract two things. Oh! Maybe he meant compare and contrast.
... November 17, 2008 at 9:18 p.m.
I'm not a grantham grad or employee. Oh, did I hit a nerve because you must be a grantham dropout.
I got him to bite once November 18, 2008 at 12:10 a.m.
He has already admitted to dropping out, due to poor service. Supposedly he followed on with a RA, and has been on a rampage for some time now.
Search the page for "Ok, I'll bite ".
I can't say as if I really blame him, I would be pretty pissed if I had gotten ignored to the point of frustration as well.
Fortunately, I stuck with it, and finished out to get promoted at work (see "Hooked on Grantham worked for me").
what a story. November 18, 2008 at 12:33 a.m.
I agree with you (I got him to bite).
I'd be pretty pissed too if that happened to me as well (that's college for you). I think he's going about it the wrong way though. He is scamming people to believe something that aren’t entirely factual. I don't know about Grantham's business practices but don't tell me something you can't prove with hard core facts.
If "hooked on Grantham" story was a success then he should not give up and not take "no" for an answer. It's the same fundamentals as in the business world and all colleges will take your money--that's a fact!
I can't believe this but after reading his story I do feel bad that things didn’t work out for him. You know, that’s life, but keep moving forward because when one door closes another opens.
Glad to hear your story was a success and I wish both of you the best of luck.
ACT November 18, 2008 at 5:52 a.m.
@ what a story and got him to bite once = the same poster
"Boss Boss, the plane, the plane" "Welcome to Fantasy Island"
The only things that you are missing from your bogus story are the opening lines from Tatoo and Mr Rorke because you are definetly living on Fantasy Island. You Grantham employees are so funny. Grantham must be a really cool place to work. Maybe they should spend more time trying to get ABET and Regional accreditation so they can gain a small grain of respect.
Missing Link November 18, 2008 at 2:45 p.m.
@What a story
The only thing I can't put my finger on is if he used to work for GU. I read on the chronicles web site (so a search on "It's not just here "), and a similar story has been leaf-letted across the web.
2 Semesters, Employed by GU, and let go after Katrina. He pretty much swears a "blood oath" to bring down GU. This is the only way I can understand such persistence, and vile contempt, is if this hemorrhoid is that guy.
A normal drop-out would carry on, and forget the whole ordeal. Only someone whom felt so wronged would carry on this long.
... November 19, 2008 at 1:34 a.m.
I agree with you "missing link" this must be the same guy. Only someone that is that obsessed must have either washed out of Grantham or been fired. It makes sense now from his despicable contempt attempting to fool others to believe such insubstantial truths. Honestly, he needs to move on and stop scamming people or the school for his own failures. E.g. I have told him repeatedly that I’m no student or employee and his is so delusional that he still thinks I am affiliated with the school--something is not right there.
Lastly, you’re right a normal person would move on but I still think by scamming people to believe his lies are absurd. In fact, I do feel bad things didn’t work out for him but he must take responsibility for his own failures and keep moving forward.
Need Job November 19, 2008 at 4:46 a.m.
Is Grantham hiring right now? Maybe they need more spinsters to help out with the holiday rush!
Joe November 20, 2008 at 9:07 a.m.
a few comments said,
"First, "accreditation that really matters... professional" that's only true if you plan taking the FE, PE, or any other certifications required by engineers.
If you don't plan on taking the FE or any of the other certifications you are no engineer. As I am an employer of engineers I specifically look to see if applicants have passed the FE and certs at the very least. If they have not they do not have the most basic compentencies in the field. If they never even bothered to take it then they are not serious canidates for any position other than technician. Even so, all my senior techs have at least passed the FE. One of my senior techs is a Grantham grad, he isn't there because of Grantham, he is there because he passed the FE, certs, and has military experience. If he continues his education he may very well end up on my engineering staff, his taking the FE proves he is serious and competent which he most certainly is. The other Grantham hire I made turned out to be a total dud. He was hired for his military background, he must have been the slacker in his shop because he couldn't even diagram a working breadboard. He should have learned this and it was the day I became wary of Grantham degrees. If you come to me from Grantham you better have passed the FE or your CV ends up in the trash. If you are unable to take it due to accreditation problems you better have a kick arse work history.
Joe November 20, 2008 at 9:50 a.m.
"In addition, let's be totally honest here because all schools are "for=profit". If no schools were then you could attend school for free."
There is a big difference between the for-profit and non-profit models of education. For-profits only have one bottom line, shareholder profit margins. Non-profits only incentive to increase enrollment is to fund further betterment of their facilities and quality, thus increasing prestige. One would think a for-profit model would want a quality product that ranks up there with better non-profits but this costs too much money. If they tried to compete on quality they would go out of business. That is why they are reduced to spamming email, pop-ups, banner ads, and marketing ploy review sites. Even worse are open enrollment and pushy sales people. Non-profits don't do this because their reputations are good enough to attract quality candidates, so much so that they can weed through applications and pick the best, thus increasing their prestige further.
You might argue that sports is a marketing tool used by traditional schools, in this you would be right. Fortunately for us one's team ranking does not effect the school's ranking. Ivy League has not so good teams but offer some of the best educations. Heck, even my alma mater of The Citadel has crappy sports teams but that doesn't stop it from getting a good ranking. It has it because the academics and atmosphere are conducive to a good education.
The bottom line of a non-profit is about institutional betterment by quality of academics and student life. They gain their enrollments through prestige that is earned... not faked or coaxed by shifty sales or spam advertising. They do not owe anyone anything except a quality education and campus life to the students who attend because their future depends on it. For-profits are not worried about being top education providers because they know they won't, they can't afford to break the stigma and it will take a for-profit school with the vision to invest enough to compete with ranked non-profits before this will ever change. The first thing they can do is get rid of open enrollment, second they can hire more better and tenured faculty, third they can stop the ridiculous ad campaigns that give all online schools a bad name, fourth they can meet all professional accrediting standards like all good non-profits have, finally they can sacrifice a little short term loss to implement these changes. If just one of these schools ends up on the US News National Ranking, they will be the for-profit school everyone will flock to first.
Curious November 20, 2008 at 6:25 p.m.
Joe,
You wrote:
"If they have not they do not have the most basic compentencies in the field. If they never even bothered to take it then they are not serious canidates for any position other than technician. Even so, all my senior techs have at least passed the FE."
I was under the impression you had to be degreed to take that exam... can anyone sit down and take it?
Curious II November 20, 2008 at 6:28 p.m.
"The first thing they can do is get rid of open enrollment, second they can hire more better and tenured faculty, third they can stop the ridiculous ad campaigns that give all online schools a bad name, fourth they can meet all professional accrediting standards like all good non-profits have, finally they can sacrifice a little short term loss to implement these changes. If just one of these schools ends up on the US News National Ranking, they will be the for-profit school everyone will flock to first."
Come on SUNY!
Holly Crap November 21, 2008 at 4:38 a.m.
You guys really think that ONE PERSON is doing all of this? That is really pathetic. I, for one believe that it is multiple people, probably ex-students and ex-employees. Why do I think this? Because I am an ex-student myself and the service sucked, but I'm not the only one posting.
Joe November 21, 2008 at 8:35 a.m.
@Curious
In Michigan anyone can take the FE exam. In fact, many people go out-of-state there to sit for it as it looks good on the CV. In many other states experience can be substituted for a degree. There has been a drastic relaxation of criteria over the years for the path to PE as states want ETs to be on a level playing field if they prove themselves capable. I don't really have a problem with it if they can pass the exams. Getting a passing score in the FE means alot in the industry. If a Grantham grad wants to take the FE it is pretty easy in most states, if not they can hop on a train to MI and take it no questions asked.
"Come on SUNY!"
SUNY is a public university system but it might be the first online ABET accredited program... a model for-profits can follow.
California FE and PE November 21, 2008 at 3:41 p.m.
Joe,
Did some digging, and California will waive the EAC/TAC ABET requirement in leu of experience for attempting the FE and PE.
Here is the link:
ppi2pass.com/ppi/PPIInfo_pg_map-ca.html
2 More years, and I will sit down and take it. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction!
Lisa November 22, 2008 at 12:15 a.m.
My husband went to Grantham (against my advice) but it seems to have worked out okay for him. He was in the military for 20 years and wanted to get out of the technical side of his field and more into a management position. Often what he felt (and sometimes what he was told) held him back was that he didn't have a degree.
So, he went to Grantham and got his degree and is now in management. He feels that Grantham provided that "check in the box" that employers were looking for.
I still think he would have been much better off going somewhere else but it worked for him....but only in his specific circumstance. (Plenty of work experience in his field, just needing a college degree to get a managment job.)
Just for sake of comparison, I went to a Big East University (on-campus) for four years. I always laughed about the quality of my education, but compared to Grantham, my university was stellar!
So, I guess if you are a person whose employers just need a check in the box of "some degree, any degree" then Grantham will stand you in good stead. Otherwise, if you are in a field where they will actually LOOK at where you got your degree from, you are in trouble.
Joe November 23, 2008 at 4:52 a.m.
"2 More years, and I will sit down and take it. Thanks for pointing me in the right direction!"
No problem... I am happy to put future engineers on the right goal path to maximize your employment potential. I was there myself some years ago. I wanted to go PE but my administration duties kept me from it. I miss getting my hands dirty.
Hey Joe November 23, 2008 at 7 p.m.
Since I have some time, I was thinking of putting some interdisciplinary studies (Math/Physics) on my resume. I ran across Ellis University (ellis.edu/difference/accreditation.php).
Since they are covered by the NCAC and the DETC, would this be a safe bet?
I am going to see how much of my SMART stuff and Grantham BSEET will apply to the physics/math BS, I will post my findings here!
Joe November 24, 2008 at 7:05 a.m.
That will help big time. Instead of an ABET degree you can shove your advanced science degree in their face and show them you are twice as qualified as the average Joe.
Joe November 24, 2008 at 9:45 a.m.
@Lisa
What position and kind of company does your husband hold after Grantham and doing 20?
@Joe November 24, 2008 at 4:27 p.m.
That's kinda what I am thinking; more or less "hedging my bet". I already have a suite of licenses and certs (FCC, iNARTE, ISCET), but I want to focus my efforts on the study of Electromagnetics as it applies to EMI/EMC work. I figure a physics concentration will get me a little closer to the truth, rather than starting a formal EE program.
Again, thanks for the advice! I am relieved to actually have pulled something productive (direction) from this forum.
Becca November 24, 2008 at 7:51 p.m.
My husband has been in Grantham for a year, and I currently attend a traditional college. With a swing shift, my husband had no choice but to do an online college - or no college at all. He uses his Tuition Assistance (National Guard) and gets his GI Bill. I wish we had know about AMU before Grantham. I am not sure if the credits will transfer. AMU is a regionally accredited school. Does anybody out there know? Anyway, Grantham has worked for him so far. In the end, he will have a degree that has not cost him anything. In fact, he will have been paid to go to school. He is pursuing a business degree. I don't think this school is a good choice for a technical degree.
I attend a Regionally accredited school (Math Major). My school is a higher education than his, no doubt. For instance, I completed in English 101 what he did in English 102 (essays in MLA formatting and such), but overall there isn't that much difference. I definitely don't like their Proctored Exam policy. An entire course should not be put at risk for one test. Who hasn't bombed on a test at one time or another? So far, my husband has passed every test, but I get nervous each time he takes one.
Grantham has made a lot of changes in their policies in the past 6 months. Are they trying to get Regionally Accredited?
Also, my earlier question, does anybody know if American Military University accepts Grantham Credits?
@Becca November 24, 2008 at 8:50 p.m.
"does anybody know if American Military University accepts Grantham Credits?"
There are accounts on the student forums of the credits transferring to AMU, as well as one reference in the reviews here. I would give a shot, what would he have to lose by trying?
Joe November 24, 2008 at 11:13 p.m.
AMU will take all his credits as long as they apply to the course listings and do not exceed the transfer maximum. AMU is far better than Grantham as they have faculty with military experience that give degrees in military/security related fields for which they are excellent. If your husband is not getting a degree related to the military/security field AMU does not have a stellar reputation. There are plenty of traditional schools he can take his Top-Up money that are on the SOC list and are online. He does not have to limit himself to Grantham or AMU with all the quality degrees being offered these days.
Joe November 24, 2008 at 11:39 p.m.
@future engineer...
At my company, having an advanced science degree along with an engineering degree is the prefered educational combo and often end up being at the front of the line. It took me 5 years in the military and 3 years in the company before I got some of the positions these guys were getting with only 3 years experience and no military background. I was kicking myself for some time for not double majoring.
Campus rocks November 26, 2008 at 4:46 a.m.
What is all this Grantham lip service about? If you want to be and engineer then get yourself enrolled in a real school and get off your lazy behinds and get on over here on campus with the rest of us. You online wanna be engineers are crazy. Besides, the partys are great and spending mom and dads money is even better on campus. Sorry that your fake school is so bad though. I will let you guys know how many jobs I turn down when I graduate. Later dude
Miki November 28, 2008 at 1:04 a.m.
DETC degrees are fine, RA degrees are fine and the best combo is the RA, PA such as ABET for Engineering.
In general some schools that I like are WGU.
WGU is DETC NA and 4 RA accreditation.
They accept DETC and RA credit in their degree programs.
GU degrees are fully accepted in their RA degree programs etc.
When I hire employees I look for a complete package and degree is one of the many requirements.
I don't discriminate over accreditation.
Education + Training + Experience = Professional.
WGU warning November 28, 2008 at 4:56 a.m.
They are fine for finalizing a degree but don't try transfering. They won't.
exactly November 29, 2008 at 3:43 a.m.
WGU is a ripoff diploma mill just like Grantham. They both take anybody and are not respected. Stay away from these paper mill businesses and go to a real university that has an admissions process to weed out the riff raff.
Miki November 29, 2008 at 4:19 a.m.
I didn't invent the University tier system.
There are RA bottom feeders and there Hayward's and Yale there. When a person makes a decision about education he has to take in to account the cost, the residency etc.
My wife had 80% of her teaching credential completed at state university RA, the we had to relocate. She tried to transfer her credits to another university accredited by the same RA agency in the same state.
The University refused to accept more then 15% of her credits. The excuse was the classes didn't exactly matched.
The real reason is they want to sell as many classes as they can.
... November 29, 2008 at 3:15 p.m.
Mikki,
I had a similiar situation happen to me. I tried transferring my RA credits from IL to FL and FL didn't take all of them. I had to end up repeating the same classes. I laugh when these people boost about a real school (no such thing). All schools are out to make money whether your RA or NA; the schools have the right to accept whatever creadits they wish.
I wish the federal government would step in a do something about this discrimination. The RA schools are ripping people off. Honestly, Why wouldn't you accept my Algebra credits when math is math...it always has been for hundreds of years.
I agree with you that the real reason RA schools want to make as much mney as they can be telling people your classes will not transfer. Its justification is because it didn't match...that's a lie.
Miki November 29, 2008 at 3:54 p.m.
California Board of Psychology
The Distance Education and Training Council Accrediting Commission (DETC) is a National Career-related Accrediting Organization. The California Board of Psychology would accept a degree in psychology from an educational institution that is accredited by the DETC.
Sincerely,
Marsha Guzzi
Licensing Analyst
California Board of Psychology
2005 Evergreen Street, Suite 1400
Sacramento, CA 95815-3831
www.psychboard.ca.gov
Miki November 29, 2008 at 4:11 p.m.
DETC the National Accrediting agency of Grantham University is a younger accrediting agency then the 6 regional.
Between the 6 regional for example SACS still won't accredit 100% on line universities wile North Central is very experimental and more liberal in accrediting 100% on line universities such as NCU.
In General I'm impressed with DETC achievements so far. The underdog and climbing fighting the accreditation discrimination evolving from Home Study National Council accrediting vocational schools in the 50's to gradually accrediting colleges and trade schools for Associate degrees, them Bachelors and Masters degrees and now professional doctoral degrees.
As more and more DETC graduates are in hiring positions more and more DETC graduates will be hired.
Traditional B&M schools oposed on line and non traditional education but they lost and joined the bandwagon. The students and market eventually dictate.
I aploud long existing universites for their research history and academics, don't get me wrong.
But in the free society there is room for vocational and professional specialty oriented higher education.
Many States in US officially recognize DETC accredited degrees.
Texas is mooving this way to:
The Academic Excellence Review Committee of the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) unanimously voted June 11 2008 to recommend to the THECB that the Accrediting Commission of the DETC by formally recognized under the provisions of Texas Law.
California did that many years ego.
As I started DETC is relatively yang accrediting body and achived a lot.
Miki November 29, 2008 at 4:17 p.m.
One more post to show how DETC is evolvinng.
Onlu couple of years ego DETC accredited up to Masters degree only.
Now:
From the DETC website:
Policies, Procedures and Standards
The Commission voted to give final adoption to the following changes (these are effective June 7, 2008):
C.9. Policy on Degree Programs - definition of Professional Doctorate
List of Professional Doctoral Degrees Acceptable for DETC Accreditation
The DETC wishes to exercise its scope of activity in the area of professional doctoral degree accreditation in a responsible manner. It also believes that certain professional doctoral degrees are not within its scope of activity. It therefore reserves the right to limit its scope of activity in reviewing professional doctoral degrees to the kinds of institutions and the types of programs for which it feels adequate public acceptance exists, appropriate distance education standards have been developed, and which it believes it has the competence to evaluate properly.
The Accrediting Commission will accept applications for only the following professional doctoral degrees for DETC accreditation:
Doctor of Business Administration (DBA)
Doctor of Education (Ed.D.)
Doctor of Physical Therapy (DPT)
Doctor of Occupational Therapy (DOT)
Doctor of Arts (specified fields) (DA)
Doctor of Science (specified fields) (DSc)
Doctor of Ministry (D.Min.)
Doctor of Public Administration (DPA)
Don't hold your breath November 29, 2008 at 5:44 p.m.
>>As more and more DETC graduates are in hiring positions more and more DETC graduates will be hired.<<
I would not base my employment future on that little tidbit.
Miki November 29, 2008 at 8:33 p.m.
Hey its a free country, I provided info for these who hold DETC accredited degrees. I'm not GU graduate but one of my degrees is DETC accredited and I never ever had to defend it. I did my homework and from the beginning knew exactly what I'm getting.
Regionally Accredited degree with Professional Accreditation from name recognized university preferably B&M university or college will have the highest level of acceptance nationally and abroad.
Saying that I'm a hiring manager with foreign degree (RA equivalent) and DETC accredited degree.
Our HR organization has to verify if degree is from university with recognized accreditation. As far as me I look at the candidate and what he / she brings to the team.
Usually during the interview process our candidates see number of highly knowledge interviewers. If the job is in Engineering or Technology field then technical interview reveals a lot about the knowledge of the candidate.
HR also has all of prospective employees to take CBE.
We contact minimum 3 references preferably 2 former managers and 1 peer etc.
I hired people with degrees from ITT, Devry, UCLA, NYU, Grantham, Cleveland Institute of Electronics / WC, MIT, RIT, CU, CSU, CCU etc and foreign educated professionals as well.
Some hold valuble vendor certifications or PMP designations etc.
I will repeat some of the best of the best here are former US militry.
Professional = Education + Traning + Experience.
I hired people with degrees from ITT, Devry, UCLA, NYU, Grantham, Cleveland Institute of Electronics / WC, MIT, RIT, CU, CSU, CCU etc and foreign educated professionals as well.
Some hold valuable vendor certifications or PMP designations etc.
I will repeat some of the best of the best here are all former US military.
Professional = Education + Training + Experience.
I can see where DETC accredited professional Doctorate will not be AT THIS TIME welcomed at RA education providers. But there is incresing NA higher education providers etc.
Turf wars :-)
Joe November 30, 2008 at 12:16 a.m.
If you want to be an engineer in my defense company the required education goes...
"Required Education (including Major): Bachelor of Science degree in (fill in the blank) Engineering from an ABET accredited school as a minimum."
Miki November 30, 2008 at 3:19 a.m.
Joe,
So a person with Engineering Technology degree from RA ABET accredited college like Excelsior can't get a job as an Engineer with your company as well.
So the person who wants to work at companies that require only ABET accredited Engineering Degree goes to University or Institute or college that offers ABET accredited Engineering program as simple as that.
ABET Engineering degrees require residency, ABET is not accrediting Distance Learning Engineering programs at Bachelors level.
I think ABET takes very serious the Lab requirements etc.
And they are beginning to flex so we may start seeing DL Bachelors of Science Engineering degrees.
There is a bachelor of science in electrical engineering offered by a distance from the University of North Dakota. It requires that you (or the company you work for) be a member of their consortium.
If you want to study medicine and get licensed then you study AMA accredited program.
The same if you want to be licensed as PE ABET accredited degree is required.
DETC accredited Engineering Technology degree today is not
the same as degree in XXXXXX Engineering. But what do you do if you are a consultant or a military who is deployed or simply can't attend traditional university?
So your degree is good for 90% of the companies but you get the opportunity to earn fully accredited and recognized degree.
Now go the Monster.com or DICE.com or IEEE.org and check how many employers required ABET accredited degree.
For persons who must have XXXXXX Engineering Technology degree ABET accredited by DL can try Excelsior College.
Miki November 30, 2008 at 3:27 a.m.
Last time I checked Grantham offered DETC accredited degrees in:
Computer Science
Engineering Management
Engineering Technology - Computer
Engineering Technology - Electrical/Electronics
Prospective students should check what is the difference between Engineering and Engineering Technology degrees.
Some Engineering Technology wile RA, ABET accredited will
not be accepted for Engineer jobs.
Beware, though, that no matter how 'compelling' your evidence might be, you have no way to persuade a particular school or employer into accepting DETC degrees...as a matter of facts, any degree.
Joe November 30, 2008 at 5:03 a.m.
I take BSEETs with ABET for design potential. They will never be senior engineers without further quals but they make it on the team. They go on to project management. We are not baised against technologists but they lack design fundamentals that you get with an EAC-ABET degree.
"The same if you want to be licensed as PE ABET accredited degree is required."
Not anymore... most states have exemptions. Unless you are a Civil Engineer or graduated from a Non-ABET school, a PE is not a necessity. For someone from Grantham, it is a must if they want to get into the higher end of engineering. I suggest they do it before 2015 because the NCEES is going to be making the standards tougher nation wide.
About the only thing you will find on monster or any of the other websites is an applied engineer, that isn't really an engineer, but a glorified tech who still has to run diagnostics.
Miki November 30, 2008 at 7 a.m.
Its good that we share the information, this way potential students or graduates of GU can be better informed.
By now the readers know the disadvantages and advantages.
Miki November 30, 2008 at 10:32 a.m.
Here is a job opening with one of our groups in OH.
We will consider experienced engineers with accredited bachelors degree masters degree preferred.
Job ID: W1529972
Location: , OH
Salary: $80000 - $110000
Date Re-Listed: 11/26/2008
Job Type: Full Time
Hourly: 45 - 55
Degree Required: Bachelor of Science or equivalent.
General Comments:
SR. MOTOR ELECTRONICS PROJECT ENGINEER BLDC MOTOR CONTROLS / DRIVES.
BSEE (min) plus 3 years of experience (min) designing Motor Controls for BLDC, SR and PM machines. H1B sponsorship not considered. Position is now available due to promotion. IDEAL CREDENTIALS: The successful candidate should possess . . . . . >> either a BSEE (or higher) or a similar engineering technology oriented degree >> a minimum of three (3) years of experience engaged in the design and development of Motor Controllers including both the HW and related programming >> calls for knowledge and/or experience with micro-controllers and DSP devices, power circuit design and related electro-magnetics >> must possess solid written and verbal communication skills >> regulatory agency knowledge for line powered drives You will be part of a talented engineering group designing and developing custom electronic controls for Brushless Motors, Blowers and Fans for such high-end applications CAT Scan Machines, Semiconductor Processing, Business Machines, Environmental Air and Fuel Cell Systems to name a few. COMPANY PROFILE:: Our client is a well-recognized leader in the design and manufacturing of Blower, Motor, and Pump products for a wide variety of applications. They continue to be a leading global supplier of Brush and Brushless DC Motors, Pumps, Controllers, Brushless Blower Systems, and Regenerative Blowers. Their design expertise, exceptional customer service, and state-of-the-art ISO 9001/9002 manufacturing enable them to provide high quality custom design products in cost effective packages. REASONS WHY THE RIGHT CANDIDATE WILL LOVE THIS JOB:
Economically strong company with increasing sales and growing profits.
Custom design offers varied and challenging work in a fast-paced environment.
Talented Engineering Group with experienced management and good visibility
Stable environment with low turnover and a history of internal promotion
Located in a picturesque mid-western river community offering low COL, a major university and lower than average crime statistics.
Competitive compensation and good benefits. Please send your current word.doc formatted resume for consideration. Complete confidentiality will of course be observed. We will contact all viable candidates for an initial telephone interview within 48 working hours of receipt. We also have other positions that may interest you. Don’t hesitate to forward you information for a confidential review and evaluation.
@Joe November 30, 2008 at 3:48 p.m.
Do you work for DoD or the governement (What is the Defense COntractor's website/name)?
NCEES has set a target date of 2015 November 30, 2008 at 3:57 p.m.
It's a difficult thing to tabulate precisely, because every state has different laws and regulations, and they are subject to constant change. However, I think you will find that while all states currently prefer ABET-accredited engineering BS degrees for licensure, only a few states strictly require them. Most states have loopholes of varying size, particularly for those who get engineering MS degrees without an engineering BS degree (note that ABET does not normally accredit MS degrees). Again, this is not a particularly common route to PE licensure, but it does exist.
Furthermore, NCEES (the national council of engineering boards) has formally recommended that the MS degree, rather than the BS degree, should become the standard for engineering licensure in the future. The new NCEES licensure model explicitly allows people with non-engineering BS degrees to become PEs, if they subsequently obtain an approved engineering MS. This model would be more like that used in fields like law or medicine. NCEES has set a target date of 2015 for adoption of the new model by state boards nationwide.
... November 30, 2008 at 4:09 p.m.
Mikki,
Having a P.E. license is like having an insurance policy and may affect your career. In fact, your graduate degree has more weight.
If you ever want or need to become a consulting engineer, then you must be licensed as a P.E. However, the job you posted or what Joe does doesn't actually require an applicant to be a P.E.--Joe you should know this.
blah blah I call bull November 30, 2008 at 4:56 p.m.
You Grantham backers can blah blah all you want. The school is total garbage and is not respected. Someone mentioned their Algebra from IL wound not transfer to FL. That is because the credits were probably over ten years old so you can stop the BS right now. Schools like Grantham get laughed at behind closed doors so just accept it. Grantham employees,grads, and students can come here and rip and roar all they want about RA credits will not transfer to other RA schools but nobody is buying it because it is a total lie. You guys sound like a damn car dealership trying to sell a car. Just get over it. If you want a real respected education then go to a real respected Regional university. People go to Grantham because they can't get accepted into a real university. I don't want to hear the "I work full time and online is the only way so thats why I chose Grantham" story because real universities offer online education. The thing is at a real university even in the online program you still have to be accepted. People go to Grantham because they take all applicants who apply. Now you come on here trying to sale the Grantham hoop la and it makes you sound like a car salesman. Grantham sounds like it is a business instead of a university just like all the other for-profit ripoffs. If Grantham was of any kind of quality, at least some of their credits would transfer. Guess what? None of their credits will transfer to a legitimate university so that should tell you something right there. Not respected and no value! Bottom line!
Miki November 30, 2008 at 5:07 p.m.
As a licensed member of NSPE I read about the new NCEES licensure model and seen number of presentations about it.
Also Engineer government jobs require PE license.
Some of my friends are Agricultural Engineers with PE license and Industrial Engineers with PE license etc.
In UK wile the Engineering profession is not protected some 5 years ego or more the Engineering Council( Main body regulating Engineering and Technology in UK - maintains register of Engineers) increased the education requirement to be registered as Chartered Engineer from accredited BEE to accredited MEE degree. There they have 3 tier system.
CEng, IEng, EngTech.
What we required of our PE in USA is on the level of Incorporated Engineer IEng in UK.
As far as ABET accredited Masters Degree in Engineering there are such programs via DL.
DL Bachelors degree ABET accredited are almost non existing.
Washington accord United States - Represented by Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Sydney accord - US provisional status United States - Represented by Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.
I do know cases when DETC accredited BEET allowed a person to be registered as IEng. NARIC UK evaluated the degree as equivalent to UK Honors degree in EET. ( viewed an not accredited by agency listed with ECUK - for this they have special serator provisions)
The Engineering Technologists have representation there.
In US its by NIET or some other societies.
Miki November 30, 2008 at 6:09 p.m.
blah blah or who ever you are.
You are wrong about DL degrees in Engineering. RA is not sufficient and most of them ABET accredited anyway and there almost no such a thing as DL BSEE degree ABET accredited.
I listed one and it has restrictions.
Now our military personnel or busy consultant who is traveling all the time have a fiew choices.
1. Go for EET instead EE, then there are EC, TESC and some others. You then can take classes from any RA university and EC will take the credits toward the degree.
Or study in DL DETC or other NA degree.
Go to the best school you can for your situation.
You can also post some links to DL ABET EE degrees that we don't know about.
Bushing and bad mouthing is easy, why not be constructive and post some valuable alternatives.
hi! November 30, 2008 at 7:40 p.m.
Mikki,
blah,blah is Joe is Jason...all the same person who discredits NA schools.
They never provide any concrete evidence to support thier false claims. Its a neveing debate with those jokers.
@blah blah I call bull November 30, 2008 at 9:51 p.m.
I'm the person that posted about my RA credits not transferring. It's not "bull" and no they're not over ten years old. I did have to end up repeating the same classes. In fact, all RA schools "are" out to make money (doesn't matter whether your RA or NA); the schools have the right to accept whatever credits they wish.
Stop BSing people and yourself...it's a lie.
Joe November 30, 2008 at 10:39 p.m.
Of course Joe knows a PE is required to offer engineering services. If you have a PE on staff you only need one to do so. A PE liscence is far more valuable than the undisignated MS a non-ABET degree will get you if you come from a school like Grantham. If you already have an ABET BSEE then go for the MSEE; for Grantham grads this is not possible as they will only get a generic MS.
ABET does not accredit MS programs to date except in a very few graduate schools. There has been talk of them accrediting both starting in 2010. If Grantham grads can get into these ABET accredited MS programs then they should. To date, this has not really been an option and the only way to credential themselves is to become a PE. An MS without the ABET (fill in the blank) EE designate isn't worth nearly as much as PE on your title. Since many states will allow non-ABET grads and ABET-TAC grads to become PEs... I say go for it.
"However, the job... Joe does doesn't actually require an applicant to be a P.E.--Joe you should know this."
I know what we hire at Raytheon, if you don't have an ABET degree you better arrive with something greater... like a PE. We don't take just the minimum qualifications for actual hire.
blah blah I call bull December 1, 2008 at 12:54 a.m.
@ Mikki + hi + Algebra B.S poster = on the Grantham payroll.
You can ramp and rave all you want but the evidence of Grantham not being respected has been delivered. Stop trying to get readers to buy into your b.s that National is just as good as Regional because it is not. Even if Grantham were to suddenly gain Regional, they would still be a for profit ripoff like the other for profit Regionals that have open addmissions and are in no way envolved with research and development and all they care about is making money. So they will take anybody that applies just as Grantham does. I don't need to mention the other for profit ripoffs because you are well aware of who they are. Preach on all you want but these days people want degrees from schools that are respected. That is one thing that Grantham is not. No respect and no value!
Miki December 1, 2008 at 3:01 a.m.
I really don't like the tone of your post.
I Think you are deliberately trying to discredit GU.
If you read my posts and understand what I stated there you will see that no one is claiming that RA degrees are as good as NA degrees etc.
Some RA schools are better then others and the same goes for NA schools, some are better then others.
Some schools have better Engineering department wile others have better Forensic science department.
Among RA schools there are leading universities with excellent history of research and scholarship and there are not so good universities.
Florida Community College at Jacksonville and most Florida public institutions won't hire instructors if they don't have a SACS-accredited degree.
I take it that my brothers University of Oklahoma degree isn't good enough to teach Poli Sci at a CC in Florida since OU is NCA accredited one of the 6 RA - North Central.
ACICS another National Accreditor now requires faculty teaching general education courses to have a masters degree, the degree requirements for other disciplines are, indeed lower than SACS.
Absurd in Florida- Florida Community College at Jacksonville and most Florida public institutions won't hire instructors if they don't have a REGIONALLY-accredited degree by SACS only.
I would dare say that someone with a graduate degree from University of Chicago or Northwestern (both RA NCA) would be qualified to teach that subject at a Florida Community College.
My Instructor shared with me the following:
He used to teach for an ACICS-accredited school, and quit after less than a year. The general preparation of the students was just atrocious, and he sometimes felt more like a grade school teacher than a college adjunct. He was making a small fortune, but he actually felt guilty cashing the checks, so he quit. He don't ever regret his decision.
He is teaching PT at DETC accredited university and very pleased with the standards there.
He is FT at RA university 100% online and constantly has to defend the school bad reputation wile he thinks the school is way above average.
__________________
Among NA universities the same thing.
I'm not on GU payroll, I'm Accreditation evaluator -volunteer for ABET. Sr. member IEEE and serve on couple of TACS and Licensed member NSPE among others.
... December 1, 2008 at 6:56 p.m.
Mikki,
The bottom line "is" RA is no better than NA or vice-versa. First, a school that offers engineering online and is accredited by DETC is a reputable engineering school. It’s been proven by graduates who have transferred credits and are now performing in the engineering field.
In fact, it’s silly for Joe and Mr. Blah Blah to post that RA is better than NA. Neither ne has hard-core facts to disprove it. They can not compare or contrast the two. Simply, Joe and Blah doesn't know or understand the real facts.
Additionally, Joe and Mr. Blah Blah (the same guy) are ex-Grantham university dropouts that are disgruntled about the school. They've been deliberately trying to discredit the school and anyone that shows them the facts they try to discredit—not me. I don't see any problems with NA schools that offer engineering classes online--it’s the way of developing technology. Next, I see schools like Grantham are at least embracing this technology and it scares many "traditionalists" that can not accept change-- engineering is all about change—those two need to get use to it.
Lastly, I agree with you that if a graduate of the University of Illinois (the Top Engineering School in the country) can't get a job down south as an instructor—that’s ridiculous. My opinion is that there should be no-more RA or NA combine them and have Abet accredit all (both RA and NA) accredited engineering degrees. Also, I’m not a Grantham employee, spinster, or whatever. Finally, Joe, what is your job position a Raytheon because I’m finding that your company really doesn’t care if the degrees are Abet/the persons a PE?
Correction on Accreditation December 1, 2008 at 7:03 p.m.
Are national college credits better than regional credits?
No! There is no fundamental difference between the two forms of accreditations. Both are conducted by non-profit associations established by consent of a group of institutions. Both accreditations are based on the principle of voluntary application by an institution, both are institution-wide in scope, and both use peer reviews to judge whether an institution meets published standards of academic quality and institutional integrity.
DETC enjoys the precisely same national recognitions as the regional bodies do, and DETC has the same kind of accreditation standards which address curriculum quality, faculty qualifications, student services, and ethical and business practices.
There are some interesting differences: DETC is expert in distance learning technique and specializes in accrediting distance education instruction. It has over a half century of experience in doing this. DETC evaluates institutions completely every five years, while regional accreditation is conducted once each decade. Between five-year reviews, DETC does a comprehensive subject specialist curriculum evaluation of every new program before students may enroll, while the regional associations do not.
But at the core, the accreditations are very similar, and both are virtually identical in philosophy and scope of activity. To term one more acceptable or better than another is not at all accurate.
Correction on Accreditation Part 2 December 1, 2008 at 7:06 p.m.
Will the credits a student receives from a DETC-accredited institution be accepted by a traditional college or university? What dictates this?
There is never any guarantee any accrediting association can offer that a student's credits will transfer to another institution. This is because each institution reserves the right to make its own decisions on which credits to accept and which to refuse.
The fact that some regionally accredited colleges refuse to accept credits from another school solely because it is not regionally accredited flies directly in the face of national policies advocated by American Council on Education (ACE), the American Association of Collegiate Registrars and Admissions Officers (AACRAO), Council for Higher Education Accreditation (CHEA), et al. The real issue here has less to do with the academic quality of the sending institution, and more to do with anti-competitive business practices of the receiving institution. Competition is heating up in higher education, and there are forces at work to control the inroads being made by "upstart" operators. Congress, the Department of Education, and the Department of Justice have been looking into this anti-competitive practice by higher education, and we suspect we will see significant activity in the coming months on this matter.
I know first-hand the quality and the rigor of the academic degree programs of the DETC institutions. Each DETC institution program is evaluated by several professors who teach at regionally accredited institutions. These professors are asked to respond to over 200 questions about the programs they are evaluating. There is no question that at the end of this process, the DETC program is comparable to the quality and rigor of a similar program offered by a RA college.
So, when you look at the reasons provided by a college for rejecting DETC credits, "That it is not offered by a regionally accredited institution," the reasons boil down to prejudice, ignorance or anti-competitiveness. Or better put, it is the result that the receiving institution person simply does not accept DETC accreditation as being legitimate, despite what the Secretary of Education or CHEA has decided.
The challenge DETC graduates face in transferring credits is to convince the receiving institution that their academic work is truly legitimate. I am happy to say that of the DETC graduates who try to transfer their credits, about 70 percent are successful today. This percentage will continue to increase as the hundreds of thousands of DETC institution alumni are able to convince skeptics that DETC accreditation is a "real" accreditation, and that people can place their faith in it.
Lastly, Congress doesn't even believe one is better than the other. See HEAAmendment2007 that congress passed prohibiting regional accredited schools from this form of discrimination.
LMFAO December 1, 2008 at 7:24 p.m.
Joe Said,
"A PE liscence is far more valuable than the undisignated MS a non-ABET degree will get you if you come from a school like Grantham."
Joe, stop writing you’re embarrassing me. How can you have a so called degree from the “Citadel” and have problems using spell check?
You make me laugh saying that a PE (a worker license) is valued more than a degree. So, you say that if someone has a MS degree then they will get paid less than a PE does...I’m now rolling on the floor, dying laughing. :0)
Joe you must work at Fantasyland?
Miki December 1, 2008 at 7:55 p.m.
The truth is that there is an accreditation discrimination.
Wile we know legalities and declarations that NA is as good as RA unfortunately in the field, practically the situation is not so.
Efforts are made to close the gap. but official standing is not the same as the one in reality.
NA degree holders face accreditation discrimination.
RA is older well regarded as Gold standard.
NA especially DETC are getting there.
In my humble opinion its just a meter of time.
ABET accredits Master of Science in Flight Test and Evaluation program at unaccredited California state approved National Flight Test Institute.
ABET may look in to accrediting Engineering residential programs AS and BS level at NA school.
This is political and standard related. Most DETC Engineering degrees are Distance Learning.
As far as ET then there will have to be changes made tot he content and curiculum of the programs.
There is more I'm sure but I don't know all the reasons and history.
Joe December 2, 2008 at 1:10 a.m.
It appears you're the one who lives in fantasy land.
"PEs earn an average of 20% more in salary than engineers with no professional license, according to findings from the National Society of Professional Engineers
(NSPE), Alexandria, Va. “The Engineering Income & Salary Survey,” conducted each year by NSPE, found that the median income for an engineer with no professional license is $69,000 while a licensed PE earns a median salary of $86,000."
0 percent financing available December 2, 2008 at 1:17 a.m.
@ Miki
Are there any factory rebates available with that Grantham degree because you sound like a car dealership commercial trying to make a sale. Who cares about your huff and puff because Grantham has neither ABET or Regional. So cut the b.s short because we all know the scoop about Grantham. Word travels fast about low tier universities and low quality education these days.
Joe December 2, 2008 at 1:37 a.m.
Raytheon cares about ABET and as I posted before a PE will increase your income and employment according to the NSPE.
jobs.myspace.com/a/ms-jobs/list/q-Raytheon+ABET
BTW... the only name I go under here is Joe. I am not the only one questioning these schools and it is high time you people realize that. I couldn't care less about RA/NA accreditation. If you had followed my posts you would know I think they only say you are not a diploma mill.
Joe December 2, 2008 at 1:42 a.m.
@Miki
Raytheon cares about ABET and as I posted before a PE will increase your income and employment according to the NSPE.
jobs.myspace.com/a/ms-jobs/list/q-Raytheon+ABET
BTW... the only name I go under here is Joe. I am not the only one questioning these schools. I couldn't care less about RA/NA accreditation. If you had followed my posts you would know I think they both only say you are not a diploma mill. If UoP can get regional accreditation then it isn't all it is cracked up to be.
Hear Hear December 2, 2008 at 2:36 a.m.
"If UoP can get regional accreditation then it isn't all it is cracked up to be."
Amen, brother.
Back at you December 2, 2008 at 3:46 a.m.
jobs.boeing.com/JobSeeker/JobView?reqcode=08-1026728
Apparently your competitors are beginning to see the light.
Who would want for a craptastic company like Raytheon, anyway?
More for you December 2, 2008 at 3:47 a.m.
jobs.myspace.com/a/ms-jobs/list/q-EMC+ABET
Really December 2, 2008 at 4:25 a.m.
@ Hear Hear
Even the UoP will turned down Grantham credits. So that says it all. One for profit rip off won't scratch the back of another for profit rip off.
Aaaaamen,brother
Damned Lie December 2, 2008 at 5:46 a.m.
UOP most definately takes Grantham credits. I have personally seen a ASBA transfer over for completion for a BSBA.
You, sir, are a damned liar.
So What December 2, 2008 at 7:20 a.m.
@ Lie
So what if they do take them. Both schools are for profit schools(businesses) with no rankings. So what if they exchange each others garbage. Big deal! I am sure that there are other for profit ripoffs that will take Grantham credits also but that is nothing to brag about. It is clear that all of the legitimate schools turn them away.
Joe December 2, 2008 at 8:39 a.m.
@Back at you...
"Apparently your competitors are beginning to see the light.
Who would want for a craptastic company like Raytheon, anyway?"
Your link is just the Boeing job portal. If you look at engineering positions you will see ABET is prefered. At Raytheon, it is required most of the time. If you think Raytheon is such a craptastic company just remember,
WE MAKE THE MISSILES AND RADAR THAT MAKE THE US MILITARY #1.
@Joe December 2, 2008 at 5:34 p.m.
Ya, I know. Fricken warmungering profiteers.
I work for a service contract to the same folks, and Raytheon is a teammate. No one I have talked to "enjoyed" working for Raytheon, mainly because of the "just another number" mentality when dealing with middle management. Lockheed Martin has the same bad press, but moreso than Raytheon.
When posting the Boeing example, I was trying to show that they are open (ABET preferred, not required) to the idea, and that is all I need to at least have a shot (if I so desired, I like my job right now) at being considered.
@Joe December 2, 2008 at 6:08 p.m.
Joe,
Your mixing apples and oranges here. Your previous post does discriminate between NA and RA you've said that and are wrong. If you did the research you would find out that Grantham is not a diploma mill so why even post here then...you discriminate against NA schools.
Next, your post says that a PE earns more than a MS (graduate degree) holder and that too is false. I do agree with you that a PE does earn more than someone that doesn't have a PE but a PE vs MS....no!no!no! I'm not buying that one.
Joe, not all "engineering jobs where you work say you "MUST" be Abet. Also, look at the buzzword, ok "preferred" and not "required". You sir, are an idiot!
Whatever December 2, 2008 at 6:37 p.m.
@ Back at you
These DOD contracters kick out very lucrative paychecks for quality educated people and the Grantham riff raff is weeded out by the required ABET. I crossed over to Federal Gov some years ago but I have worked for several of these companies- Sikorsky, L3, Raytheon etc. No matter how crappy you make think they are, when you are making $85000+ dollars a year you learn to live with it. Now, get out there and get yourself an ABET accredited degree and get a piece of the pie.
@Mikki December 2, 2008 at 6:39 p.m.
Hello Miki,
"...in the field, practically the situation is not so."
I'm not sure I agree with that but I respect your opinion. I would like to see the proof in that. Honestly, every college student that graduate’s falls on his/her butt which is why you get 60/90 days of on-the-job training. Simply, a college degree doesn’t replace experience it fills in that check in the box for promotions. In fact, many folks like me attend Grantham we’re active duty military and already have electronics/engineering experience (more than Joe anyway).
Essentially, Grantham offers a great degree program and for the military it’s the best choice to earn your engineering degree. Honestly, this active duty member could not have earned a degree without joining the military and Grantham so I am proud to be part of them both. Personally, I just don’t have time to attend a traditional school, take care of a family, and be across the world fighting the “War on Terror” for people like “Dirty” Joe here so he can express his opinions.
Also, I have attended in the past both RA and NA schools so I am qualified to say that I didn’t get a gold standard education from a traditional style college. Actually, I don’t believe that RA is the gold standard especially for online education. I believe that DETC is the gold standard for online education and it’s been around longer providing education via distance learning than RA has…it’s a fact!
Finally, I strongly believe that Abet should not discriminate and accredit NA schools. Abet was created by IEEE so there is some political bias there. IEEE should rethink and give those accredited NA schools a chance like the RA schools has; it’s the right thing to do. Lastly, I would agree that no school should have Abets stamp on it if it’s a "diploma mill" or unaccredited by the US dept of Ed and CHEA.
@whatever December 2, 2008 at 6:43 p.m.
You should get a degree from grantham, get a job working for DoD (USAJOBS), and get paid higher than $85,000.
Can you live with working for $95,000, 26 days vaction a year or more, and high job security. huh, can you live with that?
Back at you December 2, 2008 at 8:29 p.m.
"Now, get out there and get yourself an ABET accredited degree and get a piece of the pie."
Why? I already carved a 97K (this year, 80K base) piece with my BSEET from Grantham.
An ABET BSEE would be a bad investment for me at this point.
Miki December 2, 2008 at 9:48 p.m.
@Mikki hi,
Try to get a hold of Dr.J Bear research he did in 2000, surveying AACRAO members as to policies on accepting credits and degrees from RA, NA, and other schools.
2000 research, when he got survey results from more than 300 registrars of RA schools . . . showing that about 20% accepted NA all the time, and 20% some of the time (in other words, situationally, which is why a list of such schools would not be all that useful).
The data is 8 years old and as far as we know major improvement occurred since then.
Also ACE evaluated category was added.
Also Middle States Association Commission on Higher Education one of the 6 RA has informed all of their institutions that they cannot reject any nationally accredited credit in transfer strictly because it is coming from a non-regionally accredited institution.
Things are not as bleak as sometimes portrayed. I think DETC and its member schools have done a good job working on this issue and applaud their success.
NA December 2, 2008 at 9:51 p.m.
A new survey is on the way :
Here is an update:
The questions ask specifically about acceptability of RA, DETC, ACICS, ACE Military, ACE workplace, CHEA listed schools, and CLEP/DANTES exams.
Demographics capture school (not to be released), accreditation, and operating status (public, private, etc.)
I'm hoping for a high enough response level that we get a representative sample from which to generalize and if not will select another random sample from the remaining list.
I will, of course, post the results on this board for your consideration and opinions.
__________________
Carson Turner
I am still on it. I'd say about 85% done. It's been a lot more work than I thought it would be but very interesting. I have 10 days left on a survey deadline that's out now. I'll be sending a follow-up reminder to the no-response contacts after that. I'm up-to-date on my data entry and calculations.
I took a list of accredited senior colleges and universities in the US and queried every fourth school on the list. The result was 482 of 1928 colleges listed. Responses are slow - I attribute that to the time of year I started all of this and therefor am not rushing to close the survey yet.
What I'm wondering now is if some of the people I'm getting answers from really know the policy of their college or if they're guessing. I have one that "never" accepts credit from schools accredited by agencies listed by CHEA but will take almost everything else. :-)
I'm thinking maybe early-mid August now and I'll have the numbers complete and be ready to start writing the paper. I'll release the numbers well before the paper since I suspect most folks on this board are more interested in the data than my fine writing.
I was thinking it would be interesting, with some significant help, to take the list of colleges I surveyed and to look at their catalog online pulling the same questions as best the catalog addresses them for comparison. That may be a next step.
Carson Turner
Whatever December 2, 2008 at 9:55 p.m.
@ $95000,26 days vacation poster.
I guess you did not see the + sign after the $85000 I listed in my posting above. You should read the post better next time. Just to let you know I got on DOD(USAJOBS)years ago. Yes I do like getting 8 hrs of annual leave per pay period. Oh yeh. I forgot to mention that I pick up another step in 4 days$$$$$$$. I would tell you my pay grade but that would be bragging. I guess you didn't read where I said I crossed over to Federal Gov some years ago. That is a Grantham grad for you.
Joe December 3, 2008 at 1:32 a.m.
--Your mixing apples and oranges here. Your previous post does discriminate between NA and RA you've said that and are wrong.--
Really, check out one of my first posts on another blog.
--Joe April 26, 2008 at 11:40 p.m.
I couldn't care less about RA vs NA, the only difference is RA schools have more professional accreditations. I do care about those. Unless people are coming to me with a professionally accredited degree, any degree with military experience is just a tick on the resume --
--Ya, I know. Fricken warmungering profiteers. I work for a service contract to the same folks, and Raytheon is a teammate. No one I have talked to "enjoyed" working for Raytheon, --
That doesn't mean anything considering they are not here to vouch for themselves. I have worked in Raytheon for twenty years and like it enough to retire. We have 72,000 employees that like it enough to work for us. They are free to leave if they only feel like a number. I make sure my sections are treated as more than that as do my colleagues. If they think like you do (freakin warmungering profiteers) they do not need to work here. Your bais as to our mission has already nullified your statement.
--Next, your post says that a PE earns more than a MS (graduate degree) holder and that too is false. --
I think you are forgetting what I was originally discussing. I said it is better than an UNDESGINATED MS that someone without an ABET BS will get. That is most certainly true as a generic MS isn't worth near as much as a designated MS or a PE. You have to remember that ABET doesn't accredit any graduate degrees except a few select Grad-only schools. Without the ABET desginate earned from your BS, your MS is half the value giving a PE higher earning potential. I have already explained this but you calling me an "idiot" must mean you need clarification. That type of attack is uncalled for from a professional.
@Joe December 3, 2008 at 1:41 a.m.
"Your bais as to our mission has already nullified your statement"
You know, I meant that as a compliment. I am a war horse as well, just with a different DoD contractor. I have 6 years myself, plus 5 in the Marines placed upon the altar of freedom.
I don't know if I am comfortable enough to retire here; I would like to think I am still a technological mercenary at heart.
Joe December 3, 2008 at 3:22 a.m.
--Joe, not all "engineering jobs where you work say you "MUST" be Abet. Also, look at the buzzword, ok "preferred" and not "required". You sir, are an idiot!--
You are speaking from ignorance. If I show you dozens of job ads that say 'required' and then you read one with no mention of it, do you think a non-accredited program has a chance? The ones that are not saying it are open to all kinds of foreign hires like CEAB, EC-UK, ENAEE, CTI and many others. You are not just competing against Americans. If you read Boeing ads saying 'prefered' do you think you have a chance? Maybe better than Raytheon, but not really. If you want to apply, go for it. You can call me names all you want... it doesn't change the reality that competition is fierce.
--we’re active duty military and already have electronics/engineering experience (more than Joe anyway).. I just don’t have time to attend a traditional school, take care of a family and be across the world fighting the “War on Terror” for people like “Dirty” Joe here so he can express his opinions.--
Do you know my experience? Do you know my service record? You are not the only one who sacrificed for the country. My contribution is no less. You decided your path in life and now you have to live with your choice of Grantham. I hope you find success with your degree.
Wow December 3, 2008 at 6:20 a.m.
This got ugly quick.
Can't we all just get along?
Also,
Joe, you said:
"You decided your path in life and now you have to live with your choice of Grantham. I hope you find success with your degree."
I find this to be a slight contradiction to your stance displayed thus far; the fact that you have taken on such an aggressive crusade against distance education proves quite the contrary. If you wished the service well (and let's face it, it is mostly prior and current Armed Services using schools like Grantham to get ahead) wouldn't you simply keep your fvcking know it all mouth shut?
Joe December 3, 2008 at 1:22 p.m.
Lets get one thing straight... I don't have a problem with DL if and when it is done properly. I am taking HR certs through FSU online as I speak so your statement is bunk. The only issue I have with it is I don't get a video but it isn't a big deal because it is not something I need to visualize. The tests are proctored and timed at a testing center with no notes allowed. The school has entrance requirements, the people in my classes are all qualified to be there, and the faculty are tenured. The only thing I could want is interactive webcasting. If it was an engineering degree I would want residency labs that give you an ABET cred. At Grantham, you get none of that.
--wouldn't you simply keep your fvcking know it all mouth shut?--
No I won't... you are using my tax dollars to buy it. I want the best education my money can buy for you and all other service members. It is a travesty that the SOC list has schools with such low standards on it. I am ashamed that ranked programs haven't made themselves available to you wholesale but there are alot of options out there for everyone.
www.soc.aascu.org/pubfiles/socmisc/UNIV_...
If you were willing to make a few 5 day trips to North Dakota to run labs you could have an ABET accredited BSEE.
If overseas you could wait until you are stateside or hop on a transport and take leave to run them. It is your choice not to do so. The best things in life require a little sacrifice.
Miki December 3, 2008 at 2:39 p.m.
Joe has good point and his advise should be taken seriously.
A do agree that in the field of Engineering having ABET accredited degree or its international equivalent is desirable.
My opinion is that people in service work on more advanced equipment them many outdated Lab equipment in universities. Wile evaluator for ABET I do think that technology is there to allow people to have substitute for labs at their work places.
ACE - American Council of Education states its doesn't meter if you learned typing by taking typing 101 or at work as long as you can prove it ( exam ) you deserve credit.
As I mentioned earlier I had new Engineer grad from top RA ABET program burn a 2 million dollar equipment on their second day at work.
I served 5 years in signal corps of the Air Force as a specialist of telecommunication systems.
The lab equipment I worked with was state of the art latest most advanced lab equipment as it was required to maintain
the newest systems we had.
The same is for our development R&D environment facilities at my civilian job.
Our senior leadership started internal company training for every new engineer. This way after 30 days in training
status the new engineer will be allowed in to R&D lab etc to minimise the damage new sometimes very overconfident grads do no meter what university they graduated from.
Miki December 3, 2008 at 3:06 p.m.
When I studies in XXXXXX Institute of technology (ranked 50 in the world) we had open book exams. The same with my DETC accredited degree Joe.
The _InstTech open book exam, I wished it would be closed book. Because the exams where so difficult that open book won't help you at all and the closed book exams usually where easier.
As far as my DETC degree experience is that open book exams
made me learn better for the exam and during exam. SOmehow after the exam the material simply got recorded in my brain, the real issue was practicing and doing as much as possible and getting good advise correction from instructors before you take the exam. There was always large amount of questions that are not answered in your reading materials, manuals and books - in your open book proctored exam,in my case in a near by college and at time library exam location.
Many Online colleges have now web cam and special exam site that disable your right button on the mouse so you can't surf or copy paste during assignments and tests.
The technology makes it possible.
Saying this I rather people got to work in a good modern lab and not just simulators.
Joe = Self-Righteous Prick w/ Superiority Complex December 3, 2008 at 3:36 p.m.
"No I won't... you are using my tax dollars to buy it. I want the best education my money can buy for you and all other service members. It is a travesty that the SOC list has schools with such low standards on it. I am ashamed that ranked programs haven't made themselves available to you wholesale but there are alot of options out there for everyone.
www.soc.aascu.org/pubfiles/socmisc/UNIV_......
If you were willing to make a few 5 day trips to North Dakota to run labs you could have an ABET accredited BSEE.
If overseas you could wait until you are stateside or hop on a transport and take leave to run them. It is your choice not to do so. The best things in life require a little sacrifice."
Get over yourself. You have an opinion, and you are simply beating everyone (every DETC school listed on this site!!!!!) over the head with it. Find a new excuse for a social life.
Joe December 3, 2008 at 5:17 p.m.
Listen to yourself... "a$$hole,Self-Righteous Prick, fvucking idiot"
You must be some kind of juvenille because you certainly act like one. When you grow up and learn to converse like an adult you might be able to talk to me. Until such time, your opinion means nothing.
Joe December 3, 2008 at 5:23 p.m.
OK Miki, I am willing to converse since you have a cordial attitude and seem like a professional. What company and position is your current job? What degrees do you hold from where? What has your DETC degree done for you?
Miki December 3, 2008 at 6:53 p.m.
The ideas and opinions expressed here are verifyable.
They can provide guidance to go further and investigate things on the net or in other forms.
If the potential student didn't know what ABET is and now heard about it here then he can Google it.
And be better informed about the future decisions.
Jey no offence but there is a lot negativity in this discussion and I don't want to add my schools to this as it may tie them to negative treads on the Internet.
I will keep my current employer out of it.
My previous employers are Rockwell (Principal) before we sold out DoD plants to Boeing.
In 2000 I interviewed with Raytheon and didn't get hired :-).
A month later I joined Intel in Northern CA.
Fun Article December 3, 2008 at 7:49 p.m.
lvrj.com/news/35301229.html
UncleSam December 3, 2008 at 9:25 p.m.
try www.nytimes.com/2006/07/30/education/edl...
New Yor Times
Degrees of Acceptance.
Short extract
THE Central Intelligence Agency is a surprisingly progressive job recruiter. In its search for employees with “wide-ranging talents and diverse backgrounds,” the agency routinely comes across and employs applicants with online schooling from accredited colleges. It is familiar with most virtual institutions, and it continuously updates its list of approved colleges.
NY Times Article December 3, 2008 at 11 p.m.
>>In one recent survey, employers overwhelmingly preferred traditional bachelor’s degrees when hiring over credentials even partially completed online. In the study, published in the January issue of the quarterly Communication Education, two communications professors asked some 270 small and medium-size companies in eight cities about their attitudes toward online credentials. The companies primarily sought managers or entry-level employees in accounting, engineering, business and information technology.
Ninety-six percent said they would choose traditional candidates over those with virtual degrees. Graduates of hybrid programs (online and in classrooms) didn’t fare much better, with 75 percent choosing candidates with traditional degrees.<<
What the hell?!? I paid good money for this degree and these bigots choose them 96 percent of the time over me. 96!! That is just wrong.
Dates December 4, 2008 at 12:05 a.m.
"What the hell?!? I paid good money for this degree and these bigots choose them 96 percent of the time over me. 96!! That is just wrong."
This article was published in 2006. Hopefully someone will invest the time to do another poll.
Joe December 4, 2008 at 12:27 a.m.
@NY Times
I think you have to look at the companies being interviewed. Accounting, engineering, business, and IT are all very competitive industries. There is a place for online degrees but those aren't it apparently. 96%... wow. I would like to see a new study but 2 years isn't that long ago.
Well, I told you engineering was discriminatory. I don't think it is 96% tough industry wide, but it is tough to get in there.
@unclesam December 4, 2008 at 2:59 a.m.
The CIA, FBI, and other Dod agencies do not discriminate against degrees. All they care about is if its accredited and yes they will take your Grantham degree.
DoD want people with military experience. Basically, the degree is a checkbox for your application.
Joe December 4, 2008 at 4:38 a.m.
As I have said before "with military experience, it just a tick on the resume."
More Recent December 4, 2008 at 4:49 p.m.
jacksonville.com/tu-online/stories/111208/met_354963423.shtml
... December 4, 2008 at 7:52 p.m.
"As I have said before "with military experience, it just a tick on the resume."
In fact, that is a very important "tick" to have on your resume.
Joe December 5, 2008 at 3:25 a.m.
Actually, the person that lifted it from me left out the part where I said "if the degree was not accredited by ABET."
I know Joe December 5, 2008 at 9:45 a.m.
Citedal grad, yeah I know that Joe. He is pretty cool about casual Fridays but not much else. Works you overtime. Treats contracted help like crap. He plays favorites by rewarding his crony section managers but giving people on the floor jack. He got promoted because he knew the right people. More Citadel people that is! He does give promotions more than the average division but only to his favorites. He takes the company policy of courtesy way too far. Make sure you say "Hi" or lose your job. He is so concerned with making himself look good he works you to death. I should sue for all the gray hairs. You aren't going to work for Joe or anybody else at Raytheon without proper references... seriously. Don't join this company unless you are an engineer who is happy in dead end jobs. You have to be a complete idiot to get fired under Joe. He will give you a dozen chances before he lets your azz loose. It isn't so bad for the young bucks coming in for Joe as their pay is good, but when you get some time under your belt the lack of raises catches up to the industry. Most of the old guys won't quit because they are sitting out for their pensions. Don't bother trying to get a raise, he won't give it to you. You just have to be content with 3.5% annual. That hardly covers inflation. Check out his secretaries, whoa momma! You know there is something going on in that office. I am so glad I left Raytheon and Joe is a shining example of what is wrong with that entire company.
Thats the DoD December 5, 2008 at 3:24 p.m.
"You just have to be content with 3.5% annual."
That is the nature of the DoD contracting gig; promotions are like pulling teeth, and the "merit" raises barely cover inflation. I have been swallowing that crap for the last 6 years. It is give and take though; you just can't beat the job security (right now).
Raytheon has a bad rap in general for their middle-managers; I have seen a few transition to our company during the "great merger" in 2002, and they are all the same. They will literally nickel-and-dime you to the point of looking for another job. All in all, they are not as bad as Lockheed Martin, but they are definately a close second.
Joe December 5, 2008 at 10:20 p.m.
Of course I work you overtime. We have deadlines to meet. I give bonuses to my managers and engineers because they don't get paid hourly and work their arses off. I only give them to those who produce, yes they are my favorites. If you are lazy then Raytheon is not for you. Unlike other cheapskate divisions I don't make you pay for your coffee, now do I? I try not to fire people, is that a bad thing? Instead of laying off my old timers I gave them promotions to ride out their retirement. I have their loyalty so I can get more out of them. You like casual Fridays apparently. I spend alot on the Friday grab bags and catering. How many cancelled their Christmas parties... not me. The raise is part of the industry, it is not like you don't get other benefits. How about the tuition reimbursement program... it is very generous. Healthcare is high but so is everywhere. As mentioned by DoD, the raises and promotions are the industry standard. Don't even insinuate about my secretary. Read Bill Swanson's rules if you want to know how I operate. I passed it out to everyone.
@I know Joe December 5, 2008 at 10:52 p.m.
And does "Joe" have a last name?
I know Joe December 6, 2008 at 1:49 a.m.
Read Bill Swanson's rules my azz! Half those rulz are plaigerized and you know it. I use it for toilet paper!! You Citadel grads are all alike. Everyone that goes to The Citadel is automatically given promotion. If I read one more press release about Swanson giving The Citadel money I think I will puke. He gives more money to them than his own Cal Poly. There must be some secret memo he passed down showing favoritism for every graduate of that school. Diversity in education my AZZ!!
I said I liked your Fridays, that is the only day of the week I liked going to work. I didn't have your minions on my azz as they were too busy stuffing their faces. Like I had time to go to school. Raytheon premiums suck! Thanks for the free coffee you CHEAPSKATE! I hardly got a raise with the one promotion I had. Your Christmas parties are lame! Free alchohol is fine but a cash bar... what the hell! The year before that was potluck... thanks for the alchohol, I took it all home! You can't throw a traditional Christams party or what? I have to listen to Ray Gay and Elvis imposters during the holidays. Give me a bonus you CHEAPSKATE!
...And does "Joe" have a last name?...
Of course you have a last name you idiot. It is CHEAPSKATE! You aren't going to get me sued and blacklisted you vindictive SOB. I am too smart to fall for that one. Too bad I wasn't smart enough to quit right when you took over. You ruined Christmas!
@ Joe... December 6, 2008 at 3:42 a.m.
Joe,
I can tell you were a loser from your very first post I noticed you're negative connotations. Now, it’s confirmed you know absolutely nothing and I wouldn't be bragging about schools when it’s obviously don't work as an engineer--you’re a manager. Honestly, how can you talk about the subject when you’re not even a respected PE yourself...you talk a good game but that about it.
Also, what exactly have you done? What branch of service have you belonged to (honestly, did you ever). How dare you belittle our nations finest when you’re not even in the military (I think you’re lying about serving). You will not belittle me!!!!!
Joe, you’re a scumbag, you need to be more supportive of these folks instead of telling them to make sacrifices. They're making more of a sacrifice than you are right now. As prior military myself, I can tell you it’s not your choice to go to school. You should know that military duties come first, family second, then everything else. Being in the military and being able to go to any school is a big sacrifice for all military members. It’s a privilege not a right for these men and women and they sacrifice a lot.
I'd say offering degrees online no matter what type or accredited school “is” supporting our troops. A school like Grantham I commend for sacrificing it’s time to work with these men and women unlike most colleges that rip you off by taking less credits for the same courses. I'd be embarrassed if I were you for not supporting these folks...as the young man said “many can't go to the schools you want them to and they're sacrificing their lives for us while finding time to go to school.” Joe, I can't believe how much of a jerk you are and to say that to our military service members...I can't believe you said that. I’m trying to remain civil but I shoot from the hip when I say you're last name must be "idiot".
To the vets out there I wish you the best. We, Americans, are praying for your safety and a quick return home. God bless our wonderful troops. I support you!
military members comments December 6, 2008 at 3:59 a.m.
Joe said,
"WE MAKE THE MISSILES AND RADAR THAT MAKE THE US MILITARY #1."
I'm a military officer and I can tell you that it's not your hardware that makes us #1. Its the honor, sacrifices, and courage of our men and women that wear the uniform. Have a little bit more respect for us why don't you.
My comment about this school is that in the Air Force we accept this degree for comissioning new officers (it can't be crap otherwise we wouldn't accept it. In addition, our Education Office's recognize all nationally accredited schools (yes, even Grantham) for our Airmen's high quality education. So, despite the fact that the degree is from an online school our miltary members are more than qualified in electronics/engineering fields in the civilian industry.
Joe, you can be at ease that your, my and even others tax paying dollars are well spent for our Airmens college education (even for a school like Grantham).
thank you,
FDC
I know Joe December 6, 2008 at 5:54 a.m.
Whoa! Joe is getting reamed. Let me add kindling to the fire lmao! From what I know, he was an SWO-EOOW aboard the first Tico. He has a big poster of it in his office which he makes sure everyone sees. The rumor is, he wanted his own division but was past over for LTC and quit. He worked his way up in Raytheon, due to favoritism, as an engineer and finally followed the Peter Principle to his current uselessness. He should have stopped as a Senior Engineer II, that he was good at. That MBA he hangs on the wall only made him egotistic/maniacal.
Online degree at Raytheon---University of Phoenix MBAs are all over the place. You won't find online engineers there. Don't see them at my current company either accept as technicians. Engineers hate the word online except at Lockheed. I know of some Grantham University graduates there. If you want to work in this industry with an online degree, go to Lockheed, work for 2-3 years and quit. Then get yourself a real job. It is the best way to get your foot in the door.
---how can you talk about the subject when you’re not even a respected PE yourself.---
Who the hell needs a PE? It is a worthless cert for what they do there. They won't give you extra money. Only reason to do it is to bolster a weak resumé. If you are one of those, PE required to call yourself an engineer, then FU. I am an engineer without that title. It is in my job description so I am an ENGINEER!
Joe December 6, 2008 at 7:41 a.m.
@ Joe said... "I can tell you were a loser... you know absolutely nothing... when it’s obviously don't work as an engineer--you’re a manager."
I was an engineer before I became a manager.
"Honestly, how can you talk about the subject when you’re not even a respected PE yourself...you talk a good game but that about it."
Since I am responsible for hiring engineers you can figure it out. A PE is not required to talk about it.
"What branch of service have you belonged to (honestly, did you ever)."
5 years in the USN.
"The rumor is, he wanted his own division but was past over for LTC and quit."
Actually, I got out before I was eligible for LTC. Too much politics.
"You will not belittle me!!!!!"
I don't even know you.
"He should have stopped as a Senior Engineer II, that he was good at."
However, I do know you Stevo. You must have found this blog in your quest to belittle the company.
"Joe, you’re a scumbag"
Then so are 96% of engineers. Welcome to the real world.
"I'd say offering degrees online no matter what type or accredited school “is” supporting our troops"
Join the USO... then you are supporting our troops, not ripping them off.
"A school like Grantham I commend for sacrificing it’s time to work with these men and women"
You are hilarious... read the stories here about them ripping-off their GI Bill.
"I'm a military officer (USAF) and I can tell you that it's not your hardware that makes us #1. Its the honor, sacrifices, and courage of our men and women that wear the uniform. Have a little bit more respect for us why don't you."
What are USAF fighters without Raytheon products... a toothless tiger. You might as well take up an F-86. You dishonor the sacrifice and courage of the forces of other nations if you think US forces sacrifice and display more courage. It is our technology and the training in the use of it that makes us #1. Courage and sacrifice is not only synonomous with the United States. Show some respect for our allies or do you think Aussie Diggers are less capable than US infantry? That is what you are implying.
"My comment about this school is that in the Air Force we accept this degree for comissioning new officers (it can't be crap otherwise we wouldn't accept it."
The military accepts any CHEA recognized accredited school for OCS college credits. That doesn't mean you will make the cut. Your statement implies any accredited school is good enough. Do you really believe that?
"Joe, you can be at ease that your, my and even others tax paying dollars are well spent for our Airmens college education (even for a school like Grantham)."
I am not willing to base my faith on a loose accreditation system that does not check program quality but only does it by the numbers.
Miki December 6, 2008 at 4:33 p.m.
GU also offers degrees in Computing and in the world of IT things are very different the DoD Engineering.
In IT today the ABET accreditation is not a required as in Engineering. In IT the wining combination is the degree + vendor cert's.
In my company its not where you got the degree from but what and how you contribute to the productivity and success of your project teams. Our managers range from former PMP's who used the PM status to advance in to management or external hires.
Not to often I see Engineers become managers. Many engineers elect not to get in to management beyond Project Engineer in the company.
These who earned MBA or related degrees and wish to become managers are fiew. Some stay others find that its easier to switch jobs. We also hire VP's and directors from other firms.
The degree is one out of many other qualities we are looking for. And rarely a hiring decision made on persons degree. We don't accept unaccredited or accredited by unrecognized agency degrees.
Same December 6, 2008 at 6:57 p.m.
"In my company its not where you got the degree from but what and how you contribute to the productivity and success of your project teams. Our managers range from former PMP's who used the PM status to advance in to management or external hires."
I work for a small employee-owned company, and performance is valued over acedemic credentials hands-down. A degree doesn't get the job done, but it does show at leat 70% retention in a related field of study. It is up to the individual to take the initiative and stay current in the trade, and take on assignments that may or may not be in their job description.
I will give a Grantham/CIE/Devry grad a fair shake at Applied Engineer anyday. They show me some aptitude, positive attitude, and willingness to take on higher tasks, then I would not think twice about making them an engineer.
A FE or PE serves no utility in my particular field in the DOD, so it doesn't carry any weight in my eyes. From what I understand, civil engineers are best served with the state licensure.
So, Joe, I ask you this:
Between knowledge, experience, or attitude, which is most important to you, and why?
Joe December 7, 2008 at 4:41 a.m.
"In my company its not where you got the degree from but what and how you contribute to the productivity and success of your project teams."
They aren't going to know until after they hire you... there lies the problem.
"Not to often I see Engineers become managers. Many engineers elect not to get in to management beyond Project Engineer in the company. These who earned MBA or related degrees and wish to become managers are fiew."
Most of our management were/are engineers, especially in the associated divisions. It would make little to no sense to put someone in that position who doesn't have the foggiest idea what goes on beneath them. Most get an engineering management degree or an MBA if that isn't available.
"The degree is one out of many other qualities we are looking for. And rarely a hiring decision made on persons degree."
Depends on the experience. If they have a long time at a reputable company with good references the degree means little. If they only have a few years out of college it makes much more difference. If they have some experience at lower levels, then decide to get a degree to move up, it plays a role as well.
Joe December 7, 2008 at 4:56 a.m.
"I work for a small employee-owned company, and performance is valued over acedemic credentials hands-down. A degree doesn't get the job done"
Of course it doesn't. Unfortunately, we can't gauge performance unless you have references we can 100% rely on before hire. That is why it is good to know the right people when applying for a job.
"I will give a Grantham/CIE/Devry grad a fair shake at Applied Engineer anyday."
So would I, if we had them. Applied Engineers are most often glorified techs that run between them and the engineers. It is different in the medical field as they run their operation, but just about everywhere they are running diagnostics.
"Between knowledge, experience, or attitude, which is most important to you, and why?"
#1 -- Knowledge, you can't do the job if you don't know what you're doing.
#2 -- Attitude, if you aren't enthusiastic and forthcoming in your work, you are just another drone.
#3 -- Experience, it is only the past predictor of future actions.
Miki December 7, 2008 at 5:03 a.m.
Our company upper management think that Engineers don't make good managers. They support versatile engineers the kind that have good managerial skills but remain engineers
such as project engineers or team lead engineers.
They value continues education and development.
The path of Engineer is limited here even with MBA this is why these who wish to manage and desire upper managing positions leave. But our business is very different from the one Joe is in and I can understand why in his environment engineers can be promoted to management.
Our engineers know that they need to develop many skills and continue to develop their knowledge.
We have generous tuition reimbursement program and many take online classes and in company classes in leadership, management, IT etc.
I just approved number of PO's for IEEE classes and RIT classes.
Miki December 7, 2008 at 5:24 a.m.
We actually have technicians who became managers as well.
many managers are officers in US military.
Got the truth here December 7, 2008 at 5:37 a.m.
@ military members comments
Why are you talking garbage. If Grantham were so great then why is this Air Force SSgt talking about how worthless Grantham is. This is just more proof that Grantham is not respected. Read Below:
I took 3 semester's worth of classes at Grantham Universtiy. I am a SSgt in the United States Air Force. This is a school that just has a lot of money, and can pay off sites like military.com to do their advertising. If you don't believe that they ARE NOT regionally accredited, just look at their website: They talk about how important accreditation is. And they have a very professional looking website. Many people think that "nationally" accredited is what to look for, this is simply NOT true. They 'brag' about being accredited through DETC; which is a worthless Accrediting Commission. You want your school to be regionally accredited. PLEASE LISTEN TO ME, AND TAKE MY ADVICE!!! This school's credits are WORTHLESS! 100% WORTHLESS; I cannot get ANY OTHER School to accept my credits, the "CCAF (Community College of the Air Force) who paid for these classes won't even accept these credits (and I took Math Classes, English Classes, Physc, and a few criminal justice classes). I worked with 3 other people that went to this school, and completed all of their requirements for their CCAF, and when they went to go transfer their credits, CCAF wouldn't take any of them. None of the community colleges would take them. Rutger's wouldn't take them, no well known, respected university would touch them. All of these "positive" reviews HAVE to be from the school itself. I really wish military.com would stop take this school's advertising dollars, and stop putting them out as a "military friendly school". The course books are a JOKE. The course work is a joke, you just take mulitple choice tests, that are easy, and you are allowed to use the book. There is no time for the test either. Your not going to learn anything. And good luck trying to get in touch with anyone here. Tech support? Professors? Academic Deans? Advisors? NOTHING. The people you WILL here from are the admissions folks, you will get in touch with them in a heart beat. At first I thought I just had a bad teacher. Until I realized that this school barely exsists. I got a hold of no one. I have written the Dean countless times, his name is J. Patrick Cambell. I have still not heard back from any of my emails, phone calls, or letters I've sent him. Please please please, just take my advice, DO NOT TOUCH THIS SCHOOL! I wish, man I wish someone would have warned me. At McGuire AFB, I actually got the Wing CC to post an advisory about this school at the Ed. Center. I really wish that military would just go ahead and ban this school.
Joe December 7, 2008 at 5:42 a.m.
We value continuing education as well, in fact, it is required at some level or another. Employees can take academic courses, go through the Continuing Education Unit for non-academic recognition, or they can get skill training through Raytheon Learning Institute.
Joe December 7, 2008 at 7:54 a.m.
Miki said..."Our company upper management think that Engineers don't make good managers."
What company is this that berates engineers?
"Us Vs. Them" December 7, 2008 at 8:10 a.m.
If you would listen to your tone towards techs & technologists, you would see the answer.
"Glorified techs running diagnostics" sets up the classic "us vs. them" atmosphere. Unfortunately, managers have to look after all aspects of production, without bias towards any given element. There are some GREAT techs out there, and those great techs make great technologists. If they are up to it, some make great engineers. The best engineer I know has nothing more than a GED (and of course, 20 years of experience).
I pity any tech or engineer in your charge; you seem to have a very unrealistic view of the corporate world, and I can only imagine how frustrating it is for your subordinates to constantly try to gain your favor.
Joe December 7, 2008 at 9:07 a.m.
I don't have to worry about bais towards applied engineers and neither do any of my staff... we don't have them. The techs and engineers in my charge are what they are. They have titles that signify their positions to even the most outward observers. They do not need an ambigous title that placates their sense of self worth.
Joe December 7, 2008 at 9:47 a.m.
My sections are in design, there are plenty of technologists who gain engineering titles in other technical, maintenance, and prodcution divisions of the company. For my staff, the technologists I have are techs because they are the ones who run the tests, the engineers crunch the numbers. If a technologists can crunch the numbers, then they can be a design engineer. It has happened before.
Check it December 7, 2008 at 4:33 p.m.
@ Joe
You said "For my staff, the technologists I have are techs because they are the ones who run the tests, the engineers crunch the numbers. If a technologists can crunch the numbers, then they can be a design engineer. It has happened before."
Grantham grads can't crunch numbers because they spent their time cheating on all those bogus so called proctored open book exams for their Calculus classes. I guess they did not think that it would catch up with them in the end!
OK December 7, 2008 at 6:43 p.m.
"If a technologists can crunch the numbers, then they can be a design engineer. It has happened before."
Ok, so a guy can hire on as a technologist, and then work his way up to design engineer after all in your organization. Got it. I had gotten the impression from you that a tech/technologist could NEVER make it to engineer, simply because of the ABET (DL vs RA) arguement.
Thanks for the clarification!
Joe December 7, 2008 at 8:19 p.m.
ABET accredits technology programs... it is called TAC.
@check it December 7, 2008 at 8:33 p.m.
Why don't you and Joe stop the b.s. Neither of you can crunch numbers or perform calculus from Grantham. Check or SSgt guy your a drop out aren't you. you couldn't hack it.
Not the point December 7, 2008 at 8:52 p.m.
That wasn't my point. You gave me the impression that in your organization, a tech could never rise through the ranks without an ABET accredited RA degree. I have a particular distaste for this, as there are great techs out there capable of taking on Engineering tasks, and ultimately an Engineer job. I realize that an ABET RA BSEE guarantees exactly that without the work, but unfortunately we all must work the situations our lives will allow.
I myself have done exactly that; with a great deal of independent study, initiative, and dedication I have risen from a junior technician fresh out of the Avionics shop to an entry-level Engineer in just 6 years (while raising 2 small children, mind you). Albeit not with Raytheon, but another DoD contracting company similar.
After living this scenario, the message I would like to send to anyone reading this forum:
With so many people telling you cannot do something, why chime in? Anything is possible, and never take NO for an answer.
With that said, that does not take away the fact that Grantham is not TAC of ABET accredited, and that really is a deal-breaker to the average guy just getting started. If you are military with some electronics under your belt, it is possible to take a Grantham degree and work your way up to Engineer on the outside. If you are not military, or have no electronics experience, I would recommend taking a more traditional route and follow the TAC/EAC/CAC of ABET schools.
Check it again December 7, 2008 at 9:27 p.m.
To @ check it post above.
Do you seriously think that Grantham is so hard. You see, that is the typical Grantham retort that most of Grantham fan boys do when others know or say that the school is a joke. How can someone not pass or "hack it" as you stated when in fact, the test are open book. Please stop fooling yourself because "Hard" Grantham is not. I have seen Grantham students taking these open book Calculus test that have to be mailed off and I totally laughed my a$$ off thinking how can someone take this school serious. I wish I had it that easy when I was in college going to a traditional campus that administered real exams. How can you possibly have a final exam that is open book? Plus, Grantham takes anyone. What a joke!
Joe December 7, 2008 at 9:56 p.m.
"You gave me the impression that in your organization, a tech could never rise through the ranks without an ABET accredited RA degree."
Did I not just mention ABET-TAC? The techs that want to move up often get a mathematics or science degree of some kind to boot. That is more valauble to me than a plain ABET-EAC. If you are walking into Raytheon with an unaccredited technology degree with no math or science background... it ain't happening. Engineers have to be able to crunch the numbers in all divisions of this company.
Miki December 8, 2008 at 6:41 a.m.
Any one who wishes to upgrade their knowledge can go to MIT or any other respectful university and take come classes.
GOTO ://ocw.mit.edu/OcwWeb/Electrical-Engineering-and-Computer-Science/
Miki December 8, 2008 at 7:10 a.m.
I have an employee whit Engineering degree from CA National University (DETC).
He also earned Graduate Certificate In Nanotechnology Engineering I think from Washington State University
School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering.
Prospective student must have received a baccalaureate degree from a college or university accredited by a recognized accrediting association.
Another certificate to update engineers knowledge and enhance his resume is the ABET accredited UC Irvine Communications Systems Design Engineering Certificate Program.
There are ways to enhance and update forgotten or obsolete outdated knowledge.
Other avenue a class I took more then 10 years ego ro enhance my knowladge
IEEE Educational Videos on Wavelets
A series of IEEE Educational videos on wavelets is now available from
IEEE headquarters, featuring an easy graphical review of the relevant
mathematics behind wavelets, and an exciting array of applications
from image, audio and video compression, to speech coding and
recognition, to noise filtering. This video series is accessible to a
wide audience of researchers and students in mathematics, science and
especially in engineering disciplines. Prerequisites are kept to a
minimum: some calculus and linear algebra, and a working familiarity
with concepts in signal processing.
The pricing on this series has now been significantly reduced. For
more information or to order these videos, please contact:
Elizabeth Sivco
Video Producer, IEEE Educational Activities
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)
Miki December 8, 2008 at 7:40 a.m.
Stanford Engineering Everywhere is an online portal offering ten courses from Stanford’s School of Engineering— including the three-course introductory sequence in Computer Science— free of charge.
Introduction to Computer Science
Programming Methodology CS106A
Programming Abstractions CS106B
Programming Paradigms CS107
Artificial Intelligence
Introduction to Robotics CS223A
Natural Language Processing CS224N
Machine Learning CS229
Linear Systems and Optimization
The Fourier Transform and its Applications EE261
Introduction to Linear Dynamical Systems EE263
Convex Optimization I EE364A
Convex Optimization II EE364B
All you need is desire to learn.
Joe December 8, 2008 at 7:58 a.m.
Good job Miki... taking more certs is always a good thing. Throwing the name of Stanford or MIT around doesn't hurt either.
Thanks Miki! December 8, 2008 at 3:31 p.m.
Nicely done, alternatives are a great thing!
Certs December 8, 2008 at 11:15 p.m.
Miki, Joe and everyone else,
What would you think an employer would look more highly upon a certficate or a degree? Let's say I have a DETC degree in engineering or IT would my application look better with certificates from Stanford?
Please any and all opinions are welcomed.
Thanks
Chris
Miki December 9, 2008 at 12:24 a.m.
I think degree is looked as prerequisite for many positions in Engineering and Technology.
For some jobs certificate maybe sufficient.
In IT world more people have only certs.
If you have Harvard certificate you are Harvard trained :-)
I think a person with Grantham University degree can only gain by supplementing his degree with a cert from name recognized traditional ABET accredited program Graduate Certificate.
To me it will demonstrate that a person continues to develop his knowledge.
And a little secret that not to many managers will share.
If you screw up and I hired you some of the questions I will have to answer my superiors is why did you hire a person from such and such school, is this reputable school and I will answer the school is fully accredited and he also Harvard trained , cert.
Now lets say UC Berkeley grad screw up - all I have to say well you know he is UC Berkeley grad.
Its allows me to better cover my B...
Also the extra knowledge may make the team more successful, I will look at it as if you bring more to the table.
JoeNavy December 9, 2008 at 12:27 a.m.
I am thinking about enrolling in Grantham but after reading these posts I'm a little concerned. My only observation to all this though is that everyone is complaining about not being able to transfer credits to other schools. What if you plan on sticking with this school? How is the workforce currently treating degrees from Grantham? I am not arguing on behalf of G.U., i was just curious. Also, Can anyone tell me if American Military University is anygood? I am a young sailor and I'm trying to better myself, and want to make a good decision. A little advice would be helpful!!!!
Miki December 9, 2008 at 12:34 a.m.
What do you want to study?
Electronics Engineering, IT, Computing, Business etc.
GU doesn't offer Electronics Engineering or Mechanical Engineering.
They do have Engineering Technology degrees, these are viewed more as Technologist degrees.
JoeNavy December 9, 2008 at 12:37 a.m.
Homeland security or Criminal justice. Still deciding
One Viewpoint December 9, 2008 at 2:12 a.m.
"how is the workforce currently treating degrees from Grantham?"
My supervisor promoted me as soon as I provided a transcript, no questions asked (BSEET).
Miki December 9, 2008 at 2:49 a.m.
Some one told me once that the prove is in the pudding.
Joe December 9, 2008 at 5:25 a.m.
@Certs
Obviously, the degree plays a bigger role than certs. If you can add the relavent certs from Stanford, Berkely or wherever that show you can do their work will help. The certs I have from a couple of people that took the UC Berkely Extension program are good and solid. The discrimination of online certs even from these schools are still present, but it does get the name on the CV. If you can find certs from a big named school that are relavent to you, it can do nothing but help your career. Just the name recognition for a certification program can work wonders for you. The two folks who went online to UC Berkeley Extension both got promotions to level 3 techs. One of them is enrolled at UND online. I intend to offer her an engineering position at the completion of her program. No Stevo, I am not trying to get in her pants.
Joe December 9, 2008 at 5:55 a.m.
Hey JoeNavy! Great name and service, I share them both.:)
Grantham doesn't offer Homeland Security degrees. As far as Criminal Justice, you will find some state agencies won't accept anything less than a regionally accredited degree, municiple and county agencies vary but most will take it. The FBI will now take it.
If you want Homeland Security I suggest you check out Henley-Putnam or AMU. Putnam doesn't have as many military professionals as AMU, but they have an interesting degree choice in the field. AMU gets alot of respect in government circles, not so much on the commercial side. If you want a cheap Criminal Justice degree I suggest you check out Columbia Southern. You just can't beat those prices for an accredited degree.
miki December 9, 2008 at 10:14 a.m.
Florida Institute of Technology has a very good program.
Kaplan Univ has a combined program of both subjects.
Mi December 9, 2008 at 9:37 p.m.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-valUBOcg8
2008 Grantham University Commencement Ceremony
KMBCTV
part I December 10, 2008 at 1:14 a.m.
Hi JoeNavy,
As a Grantham graduate I’ll answer as many questions you might have about the school.
1). ... not being able to transfer credits?
First, Grantham’s credits will transfer; I transferred mine to North central University PhD program. I’m saying that I am very knowledgeable when it comes to credit transfer since I have had my share of experiences trying to transfer my own credits (At work they’d say that now makes me the subject matter expert…he!he!he!). Take my advice and previous experiences as you want, but in my past, I've attended several regional schools (I’m military too and have moved around too many times in my 15 year career) and each school has the right to accept whatever amount of transfer credits (yes, that includes both regional and national credits). Next, in my opinion, it’s not fair to the transfer student so the whole regional to regional transfer is bogus; I strongly suggest that if you start a degree plan…stick with it. Grantham gave me the flexibility, knowledge, and ability to complete a degree anywhere in the world and anytime for me. Can you imagine that if you tried to transfer 90 credits that the transfer school would accept them all? “Truth be told”; they will not except for one and that school for me was Grantham University. Joenavy, my recommendation is and please don’t take my word on it do your homework between Grantham and let’s say a regionally accredited school in CA. Next, call Clemson University in SC and tell them you’re a Graduate of both schools looking to transfer. Ask them if they’ll accept all the credits from the regionally accredited college. Then ask them if the will accept all of them from Grantham? It depends on who you talk to but you might get a “No” answer for both degree plans. I’m willing to guess that Clemson will not accept transfer credits from both schools because they have to make some money too.
Part II December 10, 2008 at 1:15 a.m.
What if you plan on sticking with this school? If you plan on sticking it out and making it through then there is nothing to worry about.
How is the workforce currently treating degrees from Grantham? I can’t answer that yet, but I know that DoD, Army, Navy, AF, Marines, FBI, CIA, etc all accept degrees that a re either regionally or nationally accredited…DoD don’t discriminate based on your accredited degree they care more about that you have “an” accredited degree.
I believe that DoD has made the most cost effective choice sending me to school as well as having the opportunity to attend Grantham. Perhaps, like you, I have more than enough experience but to move up the ladder I needed that little piece of paper and I’ve now got that.
I’m not going to get into a heated debate on here since I do respect everyone’s opinions including Joe’s. Hi Joe! All I ask is that you respect mine, the sacrifice I’ve made attending Grantham as well as our beloved country, and as one service member to another that is my advice to you. As I tell my kids…try it out first before you tell me you hate eating your vegetables. How do you know it’s bad if you don’t try it first? I recommend taking one or two classes to see if you like it. Yes, I’m talking about Grantham, but I encourage you to do the same with any school you decide to attend. As Joe said, your TA is valuable so don’t waste it. Lastly, this is my answer to your question so “Do whatever you wish with my advice and best of luck to you sailor.”
Regards,
William
Joe December 10, 2008 at 5:30 a.m.
As far as transfer, the DETC did their own report that said they were able to transfer almost 70% of their credits to RA schools. You might want to take it with a grain of salt as most probably aren't applying to schools like Clemson, but there is some wiggle room if you do decide to transfer. Like the gentleman above said, schools can discriminate against any transfer credits and will as they want you to take more classes with them. CHEA has a transfer alliance school list where the RA schools will take most of the credits between DETC schools but it doesn't have any real schools with name recognition on it. If you do plan on transfering I suggest you do it early because you just don't know what they will take.
The best advice is to shop around, find something with either a name recognition that is worthy of the price, or find something that is accredited and cheap enough to be covered by your TA/Top-up. You don't want to be digging into your GI Bill if you plan on going to grad school later. Grantham does provide a decent tuition but the stories here suggest they will reek havoc with your money. Be wary of reviews posted on the same day or within a day of each other as they are probably the same person. This goes for positive and negative reviews.
Proof? December 10, 2008 at 2:19 p.m.
"Grantham does provide a decent tuition but the stories here suggest they will reek havoc with your money"
Proof, please? I never had 1 problem coordinating between the VA and Grantham through 6 full time semesters. Also, I started before tuition was $250/credit hour. Once they changed their tuition rates, I was allowed to grandfather in the old rate until I finished.
Perhaps, Joe, you are confusing this blog with DeVry?
Joe December 10, 2008 at 8:50 p.m.
Am I confused? This board and rip-off report has complaints about Grantham all over it.
???? December 11, 2008 at 2:06 a.m.
Joe,
99.99% of those complaints of from disgruntled employees and students that dropped out trying to reek havoc by discrediting Grantham's image. Who are you going to believe those people or the students, like myself, attending Grantham now?
Also, for the record, I too never had any problems with Grantham nor did they take advantage of me. I assure you if I ever felt that way I would have taken my money elsewhere,
Mi December 11, 2008 at 3:09 a.m.
The following is positive to.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=c-valUBOcg8
2008 Grantham University Commencement Ceremony
KMBCTV
Joe December 11, 2008 at 4:35 a.m.
Mi... you already posted that video a couple days ago. That is called SPAM.
If people are complaining about Grantham, then they most likely have a legitament reason. If Grantham doesn't want a bunch of drop outs then they shouldn't have open enrollment, an unsupportive staff, open-book untimed tests, and absent adjuncts.
Mi December 11, 2008 at 7:58 a.m.
I hear you Joe.
Its just that we get conflicting information.
Some are happy others complaining.
It apears do that the the noise generated by complainers is high.
Is the complainer just 2 or 3 persons? What is the % of the complainers? Do they have personal agenda?
On the other hand are defenders workers of GU pretending to be students?
A mix of real students and graduates.
I have no answers to the questions I just posted.
I do hear the same BS and horror stories about other entities as well. Including people who become drug addicts and alcoholists in the better known party universities.
The fornication going on there is reminding me of Sodom and Gomorrah.
Joe December 11, 2008 at 10:53 a.m.
Are they pretending... I don't see why. I don't doubt that they have an agenda and that would be to let people know what happened to them. The complaints seem to be pretty consitent on the lack of academic and administrative support. Katrina might have had something to do with a slew of the complaints but moving an online university is not exactly a hard logistical task. The testing policy is something that is hot wired into the system. Many believe they are being graded by secretaries.
I do not hear a wide range of drug addicts and alchoholics complaining about traditional universities. I went to a strict military academy and the complaints regarding it are about rules being too strict. The party school in that locale (CofC) doesn't seem to have any of the partiers complaining about it. Fornification is part of youth college experience. Many meet their future spouses in such a way. I married one of those soriority girls from the afore mentioned party school.
MMMMMMMM December 11, 2008 at 10:44 p.m.
Is the complainer just 2 or 3 persons? Yes, chiefly SSgt Guy.
What is the % of the complainers? 99.9%, mostly are like one person said, "disgruntled employees and students that dropped-out of the program."
Do they have personal agenda? Yes
On the other hand are defenders workers of GU pretending to be students. I am a defender and I do not work for Grantham. I'm a current student, but when any student gives an honest answer about Grantham then the antagonists say we're spinsters.
Joe, I do not understand when you talk about open enrollment; its not. According to the college catalog you must take placement test (e.g. SAT/ACT, math and english, TOFEL, etc). "An unsupportive staff", I disagree with that; I've had great rapport with the faculty at Grantham. Also, "open-book untimed tests"; the final exams are the only required open book tests you can take. In fact, I wish they would get rid of the open book "finals" since it's harder to pass the taking any test that is open book versus closed book. Finally, "absent adjuncts"; i'm not sure about this since I've never had any instructors absent without having a substitute step in to help. I've always had great customer service and a rapport with Grantham.
Joe December 12, 2008 at 1:10 a.m.
I highly doubt if it is chiefly 'SSgt Guy' or just 2-3 people. No company is going to have 99.9% satisfaction on any level... none. That line of reasoning is absurd. People have taken the time to search out review sites to air their greviences because they are mad. What doesn't make sense is people who are satisified would bother to search reviews to post commments to defend their purchase. If I am satisified with something I don't try to defend my purchase. If I feel I am ripped-off I get my online megaphone and blast all over the internet.
Grantham is indeed open enrollment. US citizens do not have to take a TOFEL. If you took a TOFEL and you were born and raised in the good ole US of A, you are just stupid.
They even advertise...
" Simple Application Process
Grantham’s application process is designed with busy working adults in mind. It is a straightforward process that does not require an essay submission or an application fee, allowing you to enroll and start your classes in less than one week. At Grantham, there are no barriers to your enrollment; there are no SAT, ACT, GRE, GMAT or standardized test requirements."
www.mentornet.net/Partners/campuses/Camp...
If you think Americans have to take a TOFEL you clearly read it wrong.
How do we know you don't work for Grantham? For all we know you could be one of their admissions people pumping up the school. I am not saying you are as I am sure there are some students who are satisified with limited services. I don't complain about something if I am not expecting much to begin with. What I don't do is come to boards to defend a purchase. I have never made a review of The Citadel to say it is a good school, I have never bothered to make a review of State Farm, Mercedes, Panasonic, Sears, Intel, or any other major purchases I have made that I am satisfied with. If I get ripped-off, you will see one.
@Joe December 12, 2008 at 1:38 a.m.
You better call and kill this.... a Sr. Electrical Engineer spot with Raytheon, and no mention of an ABET BSEE.
ht tp://jobview.monster.com/GetJob.aspx?JobID=77740001&JobTitle=Sr+Electrical+Engineer+I+-+RF+Test&q=MIL-STD-461&cy=US&vw=b&AVSDM=2008-11-26+07%3a26%3a00&pg=1&seq=3;
[kill the space between ht tp]
Right.... BUT December 12, 2008 at 1:40 a.m.
"People have taken the time to search out review sites to air their greviences because they are mad. "
And how many search out review sites when they are happy/satisfied? FEW.
It is funny how frustration and anger always seems to bring out the absolute best in people, eh?
@Joe December 12, 2008 at 2:30 a.m.
Joe,
your wrong, it's not open enrollment. Please read the admissions requirements straight from Grantham and not from your attached website. Here is a better link to show you and everyone else its not open enrollment...check it out, www.grantham.edu/admissions/admission_re...
Also, I wasn't saying TOFEL was from USA students I just mentioned that as added examples...sorry to have confused you. In fact, although I can't prove to you I'm not an admission rep or work for Grantham...you'll have to trust me when I say that I am only a student.
Also, mentornet is a great site for engineerin students to seek a mentor. I used it and its free to Grantham students.
Joe December 12, 2008 at 2:36 a.m.
Why would I need to do anything? It is for a maintenance section. If it was on a design team I might have to say something for a position only requiring an associates degree. Maintenance engineers at Raytheon aren't on the same pay scale as their entire sections are technician services. I believe I already mentioned this.
Citadel December 12, 2008 at 2:40 a.m.
I have heard of the Citadel, but is it known as "CITADEL MILITARY COLLEGE OF SOUTH CAROLINA" in the rankings?
@Joe December 12, 2008 at 2:44 a.m.
It appears to be an EMC design job in their RF lab. Did you even read the posting?
How did you conclude it was in a "maintenance section" when MIL-STD-461/464 dictate design constraints for new products, and ultimately certification for use by the military?
@Joe also December 12, 2008 at 2:52 a.m.
Joe,
Why don't you read the poster's entire post first. He said that 99% of the negative poster's here are disgruntled (like yourself). Also, he does not mention anything about students from the USA taking the TOFEL.
You know what doesn't make sense to me is people like you that have no affilation and would bother to search reviews to post commments to defend a school they claim they've never attended. That's weird!
You said, "If I am satisified with something I don't try to defend my purchase. If I feel I am ripped-off I get my online megaphone and blast all over the internet."
Be honest, your a Grantham drop out aren't you. Why else would you be here on this site posting bad things about Grantham. Yes, I heard about this site and as a Grantham student I feel its my right to post my honeest review on this site. It's supposed to be bias, but poster's like you have ruined that. You shouldn't even have a right to post.
Joe December 12, 2008 at 5:44 a.m.
In the rankings, it is known as The Citadel.
colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/college/items/3423
Joe December 12, 2008 at 6:04 a.m.
Who says you need to take the SAT/ACT, math, English, or any other test? Grantham has a convienent way of avoiding all the above by letting you skip it if you can get credit for an English and Math class. Well Grantham offers work experience credit so there goes that requirement. The article is indeed correct as you need not take any SAT/ACT/GRE/GMAT or any other test. If you apply, they will get you in no matter what.
dang December 12, 2008 at 6:50 a.m.
@ to Grantham Fan Club members
The school is a for profit ripoff/diploma mill.People go to schools like Grantham because they cant get admitted into a real university. You Grantham fans are upset because nobody respects you or your school? How many people do you think have ever been denied admittance into this school? None. All you neeed is 50 dollars for the application fee and you are in.
Joe December 12, 2008 at 7:25 a.m.
The job is for a life-cycle support program of RMS. That much is easily discerned by the ID # on MYRAY. We don't just build the missiles, we service them too. In laymans terms, that is maintenance.
"How did you conclude it was in a "maintenance section" when MIL-STD-461/464 dictate design constraints for new products, and ultimately certification for use by the military?"
You have to test EM interference and EMC on the circuits to make sure they are compatible with commercial off the shelf computers. Since this program must meet A acceptability with numerous launch platforms, it is necessary for them to get this test data for OTS hardware. We rely on OTS far more than we used to. It is part of DoD's cost saving measures. This is not a design job but a life-cycle program dealing with compatibility of existing hardware. Techonologists do very well at these jobs.
Joe December 12, 2008 at 7:57 a.m.
"You know what doesn't make sense to me is people like you that have no affilation and would bother to search reviews to post commments to defend a school they claim they've never attended. That's weird!"
I don't believe I have defended Grantham. That would be WEIRD!
"Be honest, your a Grantham drop out aren't you."
If I was, I wouldn't know that 'your' is spelled you're as apparenlty you don't.
Miki December 12, 2008 at 10:06 a.m.
people come on,
There are thousands of universities out there.
This is a free country so one can make his homework and research and figure out the best university for his situation.
One drives KIA he is not boasting that this is a Mercedes.
You have the tier and rankings of schools.
Places like Stanford laugh at places like U o Phoenix.
I heard many say exams are easy at Grantham , but what you call exams are actually home work assignments.
They have proctored exams from what I was told.
The final test is how well Grantham graduates do after they earn their degrees.
Wile not Mercedes it is still useful university.
There is site called BA in 4 weeks. One can get fast BS ABET accredited from EC in New York. Just take couple of DANTES, Specialized GRE etc, then take some DL classes and in 6 months you have RA ABET BSEET degree
OK December 12, 2008 at 3:58 p.m.
"You have to test EM interference and EMC on the circuits to make sure they are compatible with commercial off the shelf computers. Since this program must meet A acceptability with numerous launch platforms, it is necessary for them to get this test data for OTS hardware. We rely on OTS far more than we used to. It is part of DoD's cost saving measures. This is not a design job but a life-cycle program dealing with compatibility of existing hardware. Techonologists do very well at these jobs."
Ok, I don't know if this is the manager in you speaking or what, but you are off of the reservation here.
MIL-STD-461/464 applies to box-level (an IFF transceiver as an example), and system level (a C-130 as an example) interface testing. Most of the tests required by these standards are intra-system (basically checking that features of said missile do not interfere with other features) and EME (E^3). Computers are not tested specifically, but can be part of the bigger picture if they are included in the system itself.
If a missile (this is a good example, so I will go with it) does not pass HERF, HERO, and HERP testing, as well as radiated susceptibility/emissions and conducted susceptibility/emissions testing, you cannot get an airworthiness cert from the FAA (you bird/missile don't fly).
The information you have spewed contains no more detail than a google on EMC would have provided; a design engineer/team would know these requirements by heart (like me, be it MIL, FCC, CISPR, ANSI, or IEC standards, depending on your market) because it is impossible to go to formal production without checking these boxes.
Given the above, I am beginning to question (I have suspected it for some time now) if you are who you say you are. You are either a really bad engineer gracefully promoted out of a position that you could do damage, or an outright fraud.
Cheap undergrad credits December 12, 2008 at 4:29 p.m.
Check it out!
www.degreeinfo.com/showthread.php?t=2950...
Lots of options available, and extremely affordable.
And another good one! December 12, 2008 at 4:34 p.m.
www.degreeinfo.com/showthread.php?t=2951...
DETC published yesterday it's top 5 military-friendly schools:
American Military University
American Sentinel University
Columbia Southern University
Grantham University
Western Governors University
Another Job link December 12, 2008 at 4:43 p.m.
aol.careerbuilder.com/JobSeeker/Jobs/JobDetails.aspx?Job_DID=J3G1K0764QFQ68TV5P1&cbRecursionCnt=1&cbsid=0daacd4d864644fc94ab4c28931b2920-282397199-wg-6
This is a more detailed description for an EMC Engineer, but lies along the same lines as the Raytheon job posting.
Notice neither list "technologist", but Engineer.
Joe December 12, 2008 at 9:45 p.m.
You know everything about it yet leave out the launcher. Sorry no go. You are applying the standards to a greenfield build when you should be applying certification testing to a maintenance program. There are no boxes to check for production as they are already produced. This is just a case of you comparing apples and oranges.
@Joe December 12, 2008 at 11:35 p.m.
The launcher would be treated as a separate system, with it's own emission/susceptibility requirements (if we are talking about track and shoot, and not just a simple rail).
Basically, said launcher can not exceed XXXX volts/meter at XXX meters. Then missile must not show a malfunction at YYYY volts/meter, at YYY meters. The larger the margin between XXXX and YYYY the better. The bottom line is that each system (launcher and missile) must meet individual requirements according to the 464. On the bench, each component of launcher/missile must meet 461 requirements. The 464 is complementary to 461, but assumes proper grounding, bonding, shielding, and filtering designs are used on the final assemblies.
I was using the missile example above just to provide background to the readers that have no idea of what I am talking about.
The real trick to EMI/EMC is designing test setups that will allow these tolerances to be captured with any real certainty (near-field calculations and shielding effectiveness measurements can be quite a chore!). This is why you need an EMC engineer in the lab, and this is why I make as much as I do. :)
@Joe December 12, 2008 at 11:49 p.m.
Just for clarity's sake, XXX and YYY meters are usually set less than 10m. Often, monitoring for susceptibility is normally performed with an antenna set at 1m from the EUT, due to spreading loss.
Entire Rankings (Military Friendly) December 13, 2008 at 2:08 a.m.
ht tp://d1586.u21.iamtechassist.com/files/Top%20Military-Friendly%20Colleges%20&%20Universities%202008.pdf
[Kill the space in ht tp]
FYI
Grantham AD December 13, 2008 at 4:12 a.m.
<<For nearly 60 years, Grantham University has provided ONLINE educational opportunities to servicemembers and their families.>>
I guess someone needs to tell this publication how long the internet has been around. hahaha
Ever wonder? December 13, 2008 at 6:34 a.m.
The digital age has brought about so many advances; to the point we have actually come to expect certain standards.
From what I understand, Grantham has been around since 1951. It is amazing, when you think about it, how far all of these schools have come. From pamphlets and paper grading to videos (VHS & Beta-Max) to VCD's, and now streaming video with webcam support. Sometimes, I feel so lucky to be in this generation.
If only they could fix stupid....
Oh well. You just can't win them all.
DOM December 13, 2008 at 9:55 p.m.
@ Ever wonder?
Grantham is still a for profit ripoff business and not a real university. The digital age does not change the fact that this business/school is a scam and nobody respects them.
SOC does December 14, 2008 at 2:50 a.m.
ht tp://d1586.u21.iamtechassist.com/files/Top%20Military-Friendly%20Colleges%20&%20Universities%202008.pdf
[Kill the space in ht tp]
Top 20 military-friendly schools. Make sure you read that part a few times.
@DOM December 14, 2008 at 2:43 p.m.
I'll help you all since you're having trouble reading this paper. LMFAO! It takes a Grantham graduate to teach those “blockheads”, you know who you are, how reading comprehension works.
Here is the excerpt.
KMI Media Group and Military Advanced Education are pleased to present the 2008 Top Military-Friendly Colleges and Universities Honorees. These schools were selected by an independent panel of judges from the fields of both education and the military. Their selections are based on each institution’s favorable policies toward our men and women in uniform.
We invited over 2000 colleges and universities to participate in this year’s honors. This year’s response exceeded our expectations and is indicative of the attention being paid to our men and women in uniform by America’s institutions of higher learning. Due to the extensive number of returned submissions, the decision was made to double the number of schools that will be honored in 2008 from 30 to 60.
As a further tribute to those schools whose military-friendly policies set the gold standard for this honor, the judges have singled out Military Advanced Education’s 2008 Top 20 Schools for further distinction. We experienced several ties for this honor and, consequently, you will find 22 schools listed in the Top 20 Schools group.
We would like it to be known that all 60 schools selected for the 2008 Honor Roll scored very high or they would not have been selected. In fact, the difference between the Top 20 Schools and the other schools selected is equivalent to the numerical difference between an A+ and an A-, to use an educational analogy. In other words, all 60 schools scored very high or they would not have been selected.
All of this year’s honorees have been listed alphabetically.
If GU was so bad of school and with so many complaints explain why they received this prestigious award.
DOM December 14, 2008 at 6:14 p.m.
@ Granthad grad poster above
Is Reading Comprehension open book testing at Grantham also? If so, I will scrap my Bachelors degree from my Regionally accredited Division I university and go for a degree from Grantham, which is a scam and a total Joke of a school.
WolfPack rules!
@DOM December 14, 2008 at 9:40 p.m.
I didn't your NC State Regionally accredited Division I university listed.
NC State sucks!
Wolfpack December 14, 2008 at 10:42 p.m.
Lets see....
That makes you:
Ranked 359: LOYOLA UNIVERSITY NEW ORLEANS - 67.90% Accepted
Ranked 446: UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE - 71.80% Accepted
Thats pretty cool, but not worth getting on a soap-box over. Congrats on getting accepted to, and finishing at a ranked school.
I got into UCLA, ranked 19th, IUPUI ranked 475, and ultimately attended HPU ranked 654.
Rankings are cool and all, but really don't mean much unless you finish in the top 50.
Good luck to you,
Grantham Graduate
Complete Rankings December 14, 2008 at 10:44 p.m.
I wrote a program to format the rankings from the above list, Here it is:
School Name Applications Accepted Acceptance Rate
1. HARVARD UNIVERSITY 19690 2054 10.40%
2. YALE UNIVERSITY 17735 2014 11.40%
3. PRINCETON UNIVERSITY 13695 1733 12.70%
4. STANFORD UNIVERSITY 19172 2486 13.00%
5. COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK 17258 2275 13.20%
6. CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY-SAN LUIS OBISPO 21794 3465 15.90%
7. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY 10466 1665 15.90%
8. BROWN UNIVERSITY 15285 2505 16.40%
9. UNIVERSITY OF PUERTO RICO-BAYAMON 6096 1104 18.10%
10. DARTMOUTH COLLEGE 11734 2173 18.50%
11. WILLIAMS COLLEGE 5705 1093 19.20%
12. AMHERST COLLEGE 5489 1136 20.70%
13. UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA 18282 3878 21.20%
14. DUKE UNIVERSITY 17749 3804 21.40%
15. GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY 14828 3243 21.90%
16. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS 19822 4400 22.20%
17. RICE UNIVERSITY 8106 1802 22.20%
18. MIDDLEBURY COLLEGE 5702 1286 22.60%
19. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-LOS ANGELES 44981 10577 23.50%
20. UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-BERKELEY 37001 8833 23.90%
21. BOWDOIN COLLEGE 4853 1186 24.40%
22. MISSISSIPPI VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY 4183 1039 24.80%
23. DAVIDSON COLLEGE 4154 1108 26.70%
24. UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 29792 8037 27.00%
25. PEPPERDINE UNIVERSITY 6447 1756 27.20%
And here is my source code December 14, 2008 at 10:50 p.m.
#include <iostream> //cin. cout, <<, >>
#include <cassert> //assert()
#include <string> //string processing
#include <fstream> //ifstream, ofstream
using namespace std;
//What I want to do:
//1. Read in rankings file
//2. Parse rankings file, removing the extra '/n' with every line, and kill the commas
//3. Write a new rankings file without the extra '/n', commas, but leave the space intact in the University name.
void main()
{
int lineCount = 1;
int fileLineCount =2;
int linePosition;
string line, newLine, tempLine;
string inputFileName, outputFileName;
inputFileName = "g:\\Rankings 2006.txt";
outputFileName = "g:\\Rankings 2006 (sorted, numbered).xls";
ifstream inStream;
ofstream oStream;
inStream.open(inputFileName.data());
assert(inStream.is_open() == true);
oStream.open(outputFileName.data());
assert(oStream.is_open() == true);
oStream << "School Name " << '\t' << "Applications" << '\t' << "Accepted" << '\t' << "Acceptance Rate" << endl;
while (inStream.eof() != 1)
{
getline(inStream, line);
if (fileLineCount%2 == 0)
{
//replace spaces with tabs, starting at end of string. Ignore commas.
linePosition = line.size();
string newLine;
while (isalpha(line[linePosition]) == false)
{
if ((line[linePosition] != ' ') && (line[linePosition] != ','))
newLine += line[linePosition];
else if (line[linePosition] == ' ')
newLine += '\t';
--linePosition;
}
//get the rest of the school
while (linePosition != 0)
{
newLine += line[linePosition];
--linePosition;
}
newLine += line[linePosition];
linePosition = newLine.size() - 1;
string tempLine;
while (linePosition > 1)
{
tempLine += newLine[linePosition];
--linePosition;
}
oStream << lineCount << ". " << tempLine << endl;
++lineCount;
}
++fileLineCount;
}
inStream.close();
oStream.close();
};
This program took me about 30 minutes to write in Visual Studio 2005, and I learned every bit of it in CS265, Programming in C++ taught at Grantham. I finished this class 2 years ago, with an A.
If you copy and paste the rankings into Excel, you will see that the delimiters are there.
Oops! December 14, 2008 at 10:55 p.m.
The tabs were lost in translation to the blog.
How to run my program:
Copy/Paste the info from www.usatoday.com/news/education/2006-11-...... above.
Paste my code into borland, Visual Studio, watcom, etc and change the in/out file names to something of your choosing.
The above code compiles cleanly in VS 2005.
Enjoy!
DOM December 14, 2008 at 11:17 p.m.
@ source code provider
Stop kidding your self. Of course you got an A in the class because your exams were open book. As for the NC State hater above, Its too bad that NC State does not just take anyone or maybe you would have a chance to get in. What are the required SAT scores to get into Grantham. Oh I know, just give them a 50.00 check and the SAT requirement will be waived! What a joke. Why don't you check to see what the acceptance rates are for NC State. I know what Grantham's are though. 100% acceptance for every reject who could not get accepted into a real university! Now, I have to go study because you know that we don't do the open book thing over here and mom and dad are spending big bucks for me be over here on campus. So catch you later.
LOL December 14, 2008 at 11:31 p.m.
"Of course you got an A in the class because your exams were open book."
If only it was that easy; the labs required all contraints (the programs weren't in the book) to be met, the code to be compiled cleanly, and had to be well-documented.
I spent all night working on just 1 of the some-odd 50 programs required throughout the course. 500 lines of code, I hated that one.
Also, again, your soap-box on NC state is misguided.
Ranked 446: UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE - 71.80% Accepted
71.8% accepted isn't that competitive, especially for "mom and dad" to be spending "big bucks."
@wolfpack December 15, 2008 at 12:41 a.m.
let's see your code then...everyone knows tha writing code is like writing a book. Don't tell me NC State doesn't hav open book quizes and tests too, I know for a fact that some classes do.
Ranked 446: UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE - 71.80% Accepted
71.8% accepted isn't that competitive, especially for "mom and dad" to be spending "big bucks."
DOM December 15, 2008 at 4:32 a.m.
@ poster above aka Wolfpack hater
What does the University of North Carolina at Charlotte have to do with NC State University? That is a different university. You Grantham grads sure are funny. UNC Charlotte vs North Carolina State University that is lame
Seriously Grantham Grad go to a real school.
DOM December 15, 2008 at 5:07 a.m.
@ LOL
Here is some real time data for you at the link below.
ht tp://colleges.usnews.rankingsandreviews.com/college/items/2972
Also, the newspaper add is nothing to laugh at considering that Grantham University/Business doesn't have doo doo for athletics. So when are you going to accept that your school is a scam = cyberspace fantasy. I will search to see if Grantham is ranked anywhere besides being ranked as a ripoff on everywebsite they show up on.
Good day now Lad
Which is it? December 15, 2008 at 5:16 a.m.
Name the campus, then. There are so many NC State schools.
Also, I did go to a real school. Grantham is as "real" as it gets when it comes to distance education.
I am glad you can go to a State school. I would trade places with you in a heartbeat. Knowing then, what I know now, I would reconsider my 5 years in the USMC and stick to school. You are very fortunate to be in the position you are in, you shouldn't abuse it by poking fun at people in different life situations.
After my 5 years in the Marines, I picked up a wife, 2 kids, and a career. I had to work full time (single income family) AND go to school full time. Hell, I have 3 (yes, 3) mortgages.
You have to understand, Grantham was the only shot I had, and it paid off. Yes, I know it has 100% acceptance, but I (and most military and working adults) are willing to waive the prestige of a well-known, ranked school, in lieu of just getting the job done.
I sincerely hope you appreciate the fortunate position you are in, and you had better get through your classes. If you flunk out, even with all that instructor interaction, you are going to be in for a dose of reality that few can tolerate.
Good luck,
Grantham Graduate
Miki December 15, 2008 at 4:49 p.m.
Wile I love college sports I do know who funds it to.
The cost of that beautiful football field is payed by the students tuition.
Some DL school not have this luxury but it also is not charging you as much. Going back to watch that college football game now.
See ya
the admission difference DOM December 15, 2008 at 6:52 p.m.
You really stepped into this time. To be admitted into Grantham as a freshman (we're now comparing apples to apples)
Grantham admission (freshman)
Prospective student has taken the ACT or SAT assessments in the past five (5) years and achieved a minimum score as described in Table 1.2:
Table 1.2
Test
Verbal Score
Math Score
Writing Score
Reading
ACT
? 19
? 18
SAT (pre-2006)
? 460
? 460
SAT (2006 or later)
? 460
? 460
? 460
NC State Admission
NC State does not have a minimum SAT or ACT score requirement for freshman applicants. Scores are considered, but we put more emphasis in the admission decision on the high school record including courses taken, grade point average, and class rank. We accept either SAT or ACT Plus Writing scores -- if both have been taken, we use whichever is the better score. If a student provides a number of scores, we use the highest score on the Verbal, Math and Writing score even if they are from different test dates.
Again, this proves Grantham (DETC) admission is stringent versus NC State (RA)...who is this case "Will take anyone joe blow off the street".
Sorry, DOM ...you lose!!!!
Game Over!
Not a minimum December 15, 2008 at 10:06 p.m.
source: ht tp://www.grantham.edu/admissions/admission_requirements.php
"Placement Tests and Remedial Courses
To promote academic success, all undergraduate students new to Grantham University are required to complete placement tests to measure English and mathematics skills prior to enrollment unless an exemption applies (see below). Because academic success depends on developing sound English and mathematical skills early in the degree program, the placement tests are an important part of Grantham's effort to recognize and fulfill the individual needs of its incoming students.
Students will be exempt from English and/or mathematics placement tests if they meet one of the following two (2) criteria:
Prospective student has taken the ACT or SAT assessments in the past five (5) years and achieved a minimum score as described in Table 1.2: "
This is a condition to waive the placement testing, not a hard requirement for admission.
Please do not spread bum scoop.
Grantham Graduate
@not December 16, 2008 at 12:17 a.m.
You didn't read the entire admission process did you?
You're quoting the transfer admission and not new freshmans.
Please read the entire admission
Miki December 16, 2008 at 12:30 a.m.
I'm an immigrant and see all the freedom of choice one have.
Earned degrees from DETC accredited NA universities and colleges are fully recognized and have high utility.
RA degrees are still the gold standard but DETC is closing the gap and as I mentioned DETC began accrediting doctoral programs etc.
People compete for jobs and trying to smear their competition.
If its not accreditation then its the traditional versus DL.
Or top tier versus low ranking school etc.
Accreditation sets standards, these are minimum standards.
It the world of professional and specialized training additional accreditation is required.
Yeh right December 16, 2008 at 1:11 a.m.
@ the admission difference
"Again, this proves Grantham (DETC) admission is stringent versus NC State (RA)...who is this case "Will take anyone joe blow off the street"."
LOL LOL LOL LOL LOL! Your post is the funniest thing that I have heard in the year of 2008. Do you honestly think that it is harder to get into Grantham vs getting in to a school like North Carolina State University or any other Division I university. Grantham is a scam and and a straight up for profit joke.They take anyone who is willing to pay the application fee and enroll for some bogus credits that won't be respected. I think that it has been proven here how other universities feel about Grantham and their useless credits and degrees. As for DOM, you need to stop picking on these Grantham grads and employees because they get real defensive when people shed light on how the school is not respected and is totally bogus.
@yeah right December 16, 2008 at 1:19 a.m.
Ok,
Why are you telling lies?
I live right up the road to NC State. It's not a tough school to be admitted into (now Duke, ok! I now beleive you), but NC State (that's not true)...the previous poster is correct. You don't need an ACT/SAT for freshman admittance.
Awwww crap! December 16, 2008 at 2:43 a.m.
"High School Student applicants
A high school student who wishes to enroll at Grantham University may apply for admission as a non-degree seeking student and may enroll in no more than four (4) credit hours (undergraduate coursework) per enrollment period. Exceptions may be granted by the Provost for students wishing to enroll in more than four (4) credit hours. A high school applicant must submit a copy of his/her official high school transcript with a minimum 3.0 GPA to be considered for admission. The prospective student must also have demonstrated one of the following:
ACT with a minimum average selection index of 18
SAT with a minimum average selection index of 440 Math and 440 English
PSAT with a minimum average selection index of 147
Demonstration of successful completion (grade “C” or higher) of college coursework in which college credit was earned
The student must present a recommendation and permission from the high school Guidance Counselor
Students must attain high school diploma or equivalent before being allowed to enroll into a degree program."
Boy, it sucks to be loud and wrong.
Many apologies,
Grantham Grad
? December 16, 2008 at 3:55 p.m.
ht tp://www.petersons.com/ugchannel/code/searches/srchRslt.asp?quickSearch=Grantham%20University&SortColumn=CLIENT_CHECK,ISORT&searchtype=namesearch&page=1&sponsor=1
What's your point?
? December 16, 2008 at 3:57 p.m.
ht tp://www.petersons.com/ugchannel/code/searches/srchRslt.asp?quickSearch=NC%20State&SortColumn=CLIENT_CHECK,ISORT&searchtype=namesearch&page=1&sponsor=1
,,,, December 16, 2008 at 4:31 p.m.
"What's his point?"
I'll tell you...he doesn't, never have one. As usual he is make assumptions w/o hard facts to back up his argument.
These arguments he makes are not supportede/respected and he is totally bogus.
kol December 16, 2008 at 9:44 p.m.
Linda S. Sherrill Grantham University Graduate
WSMR, New Mexico
. . . degree provided confidence
and a “second wind”
While working at an Army Police Department, Linda Sherrill enrolled in
Grantham University’s Criminal Justice program to fulfill her lifelong goal
of earning a Bachelor’s degree. At the time Linda was working 12-hour
night shifts, and she chose Grantham because its distance learning format
provided the flexibility she needed.
In April 2007, Linda earned a Bachelor of Science in Criminal Justice
with a 3.68 GPA and immediately received a new position, promotion and
pay increase. Because Linda completed her degree later in life, it gave
her the confidence and skills she needed to achieve her career goals,
along with a “second wind” for working and learning.
Linda has worked as a 911 Emergency Services and a Certified 911
Emergency Medical Dispatcher for years at various police agencies from
Michigan to New Mexico and has contributed to the safety of both the
911 callers and the emergency services personnel who respond to each
call. While working at White Sands Missile Range in New Mexico, Linda
assisted in training other dispatchers to use the Computer Aided Dispatch
(CAD) software.
“I have had diverse jobs throughout my life, and my degree from
Grantham University combined all of my skills and experience from
the workplace, giving them additional credibility.”
whatever December 17, 2008 at 2:06 a.m.
@ I live right up the road to NC State your stop fooling yourself. I'm sorry to inform you that universities in the UNC System do not have open enrollment and for freshman students SAT or ACT scores are required. So what is your point. Anyway, Division I universities don't take bogus credits from Grantham in the first place because the school is a total joke.
I pulled this straight from NC State's website and it is for freshman admissions.
Once you've decided NC State University is the right place for you, it's time apply. Here's how to get started:
Note all important deadlines.
Complete an online application through WolfPAW, your personal admissions website.
Review your application to make sure it's complete. It should include:
Complete admission application
Non-refundable application fee ($70 for both domestic and international undergraduate applications, payable through your WolfPAW account).
Current high school transcript, including grades 9-11, senior year courses in progress, overall grade point average and class rank. We may request first semester senior year grades before making a decision. The transcript must come directly from the high school or be enclosed in a sealed envelope with your application.
Personal Statement (recommended)
Official SAT or ACT Plus Writing scores, which must be sent directly from the testing agencies (SAT code #5496, ACT code #3164). We will not accept scores reported on school transcripts.
Teacher or counselor recommendations are not required and we do not have forms for this purpose. However, we will be happy to consider any documents you wish to send in support of your application. Always make sure to provide your name and date of birth with any correspondence sent to our office:
@ whatever December 17, 2008 at 5 p.m.
you just again proved my point and made yourself look silly by not reading "the fine print".
NC State "IS" open enrollement because they DO NOT have a minimum score requirement. That means they will take any joe blow off the street too. Now, they do have average SAT/ACT scores for the most recently enrolled freshman class, but again there is NO minimum score requirement for enrollment.
stop posting lies...here is the proof.
ht tp://ncstateundergradadmissions.custhelp.com/cgi-bin/ncstateundergradadmissions.cfg/php/enduser/std_adp.php?p_faqid=542&p_created=1095433380&p_sid=XE5iLBlj&p_accessibility=0&p_redirect=&p_lva=&p_sp=cF9zcmNoPSZwX3NvcnRfYnk9JnBfZ3JpZHNvcnQ9JnBfcm93X2NudD0zODEsMzgxJnBfcHJvZHM9JnBfY2F0cz0mcF9wdj0mcF9jdj0mcF9zZWFyY2hfdHlwZT1hbnN3ZXJzLnNlYXJjaF9ubCZwX3BhZ2U9MQ**&p_li=&p_topview=1
... December 17, 2008 at 5:15 p.m.
That's such a waste of money that NC State makes students complete an SAT/ACT. What's the point if you don't have minimum requirements to weed out applicants.
NC State doesn't say whether or not they look at the "average" but let's say an average score out of 10 people is measure. Those score ranges can drastically vary between 350 to 600 SAT scores if they had a minimum requirement score of 500 on the SAT. That is still considered open enrollment to all freshman only because it has "NO" minimum admission score, I see that Grantham does.
just my two cents.
another Grantham student
Truth be told December 17, 2008 at 6:57 p.m.
What difference does it make what SAT or ACT score is required? The point is NC State = Divsion I value and Grantham = for profit ripoff = tird paper. No matter how you look at it, Grantham is a joke and will take anyone where as Division I universities such as NC State simply have a more competitive admissions. Grantham is a joke. If it were such a great school they would be ranked up there with other good universities, but the bottom line is they are not. Grantham fan boys usually get upset and do whatever they can to make people give their school respect but the sad fact is Grantham is a business and not a university. If Grantham were such a good business/school, why is it that no matter where you search on the web all you see are people complaining about the organization. Do you think that all of those complaints are done by one person? Highly doubtful. Grantham is just like the other for profits- a scam. At least some of the other for profits that are ripping people off are Regionally Accredited. The good thing is that REAL respectable/traditional universities with a legitimate admissions process are starting to offer online degrees that have value and respect. This should eliminate some of the people getting screwed with worthless credits and bogus degrees such as what Grantham offers. Grantham can post all the SAT or ACT requirements they want, but you know as well as I do that not that many kids are getting out of high school and going to Grantham. Grantham entertains a large military crowd, but the average kid getting out of high school and going to college are looking at going to traditional universties such as NC State, FSU, Pepperdine, Penn State, you know--the kind of schools that have rejected Grantham's credits which has been shown in emails listed in earlier post and has been proven here over and over again.
Fountain December 17, 2008 at 7:08 p.m.
Well, aren't we just a fountain of negativity.
I am convinced the poster above is doing this just for LULZ. Ignored.
LULZ December 17, 2008 at 7:11 p.m.
ht tp://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/lulz
agreed December 17, 2008 at 7:25 p.m.
"Truth be told" your post is the funniest thing that I've heard in my lifetime. Do you honestly think a school like North Carolina State University or any other you mentioned are not out to make a profit?
Non-profit schools...they don't exist!!!
BTW...Grantham's credits which has been shown in emails listed in earlier posts and has been proven here over and over again that they DO TRANSFER.
Grantham Grad December 19, 2008 at 3:34 a.m.
Read "anonymous" in the comments section. Sound familiar?
ht tp://confuzioncityscomments.blogspot.com/2005/09/grantham-university-moves-to-kansas.html
"I understand how you feel. I worked there as well and was treated the same. The news is, they are never coming back and if you did not come up when they asked the first time, you would never be welcomed back. Several people have turned in their resignation and left to return to Slidell. Do they care? No. They have their staff up there now. That school is a joke and I'm glad to be rid of it. I'm making it my personal mission to let military personnel know about their credits not transfering and what a joke their "open book tests" are. Yeah, I wonder why no other school will take their credits when you have open book final exams and every test in the semester is open book as well. Check out this link as well: ht tp://chronicle.com/jobs/forums/read.php?"
3 years and still going. He wasn't kidding.
So, what will it be now? Another fabricated big-whig from a university that military know? (i.e. "Joe" the fake engineer from Raytheon).
Or a snotty kid from Texas A&M? How about NC? (Notice how the mannerisms are so similar between those strings of posts). How many personalities are you willing to create in this foolish crusade?
To the Grantham students and fellow graduates: If this urks you, leaflet in the same manner he has. He did nothing more than drop a google bomb:
www.degreeinfo.com
www.ripoffreport.com
ht tp://chronicle.com/forums/index.php/topic,25036.45.html
ht tp://www.distance-education.org/ReviewsList/Grantham-University-10
nstud December 20, 2008 at 2:57 a.m.
Has Grantham ever been to the final four or a bowl game or even won their conference championship? What type of research is this university involved with? I would like to know before I apply.
@nstud December 20, 2008 at 10:14 p.m.
Are you looking for athletics programs or a PhD program? If so, then Grantham is not for you.
If your looking for a great online, accredited school then GU might be for you. What do you want to major in?
I can tell you about the programs and the school if your interested.
A current GU student
LOLZ December 21, 2008 at 7:11 a.m.
Who would you need a degree to become a dispatcher? Is that the best Grantham can do?
Miki December 21, 2008 at 8:22 a.m.
nstud
Grantham is not for you.
Go and fund the football field, team and the basketball team as well. Why not entire sports and athletics department.
Make sure your tuition can afford a good coaches for the teams, it will look good your your resume. :/)
No parties, no sorority, no dorms. What kind of place is this?
You can't even get drunk and get l---d?
Now serious.
I do respect persons wish to study at a provider with respected research history, some place that produced scholars and scientists.
There are plenty of choices, the entry is comparative but its there for you so go for it and good luck.
Earning a degree from a name recognised B&M university requires a lot of commitment and hard study.
It is an achievement and it caries its rewards.
For others who are serving our country or simply can't attend such a place for many reasons.
There are DL providers some NA others RA that can allow flexible way to completing a college / university degree.
As long as the university or college has recognized accreditation the degree earned will have utility and will definitely help to get a better job or promotion etc.
I learned early in my life when I was in the military the value of Distance Learning and when completed my service had degree and experience that helped me land awesome job with leading high tech company.
AT that time it was delivered by what we call the snail mail, I will get my lessons via correspondence study.
For the supervised exams I had to go to approved admin office and at times a near by college or library if there was one.
Make your homework and select school that is best for your situation.
nstud December 21, 2008 at 3:18 p.m.
I did a little more research on your school and found that their are a lot of complaints. I found out that your school does not even have any sports programs or even a real campus. How can it be called a university if the school has no campus,no student residence halls/dorms, and no athletic teams. Sounds like a ripoff. I think I will move on as someone suggested. I think Grantham is a ripoff like that one art school that advertises on TV where you have to draw the parrot to get in.
Sports December 21, 2008 at 5:05 p.m.
What a waste!
ht tp://www.chicagotribune.com/sports/college/chi-jock-tutoringnov28,0,5918190.story
Miki December 22, 2008 at 5:24 a.m.
nstud
You are still in the 20th century.
Nor every university has to have sports.
GU also has no medical or law degree programs.
Education providers come in many configurations.
As I mentioned before GU is not for you.
DL no longer requires B&M campus, virtual campus will do.
Yet they are legitimate university like it or not.
I think you sound like a person who should attend a traditional public university.
There are many who will appreciate what GU can offer.
You are not one of them.
Hi there January 2, 2009 at 2:38 a.m.
@ nstud
Listen to Miki, he says "There are many who will appreciate what GU can offer.
You are not one of them." He is totally right. Those who choose Grantham appreciate getting ripped off with a bogus degree and bull sh*t credits that won't be accepted by any legitimate university. The school is a scam and just as you stated nstud, they are not a real university. Save your money and your time and go to a school where you will get an education that is valued and respected. Find yourself a good regionally accredited university and enroll there and forget Grantham. Thanks Miki for for telling this person Grantham is not for him. You just saved one more person from gettting scammed by the Grantham corporation/fake university.
Miki January 2, 2009 at 4 p.m.
Oh look who is back :-)
I also say that GU is legitimate and fully accredited university.
Graduates of GU go to be successful professionals with good utility for their degree.
If GU degree is good for all Law Enforcement agencies, FBI jobs I think its good for many graduates as well.
Hi there January 2, 2009 at 7:56 p.m.
@ Miki
Your post is proof that Grantham employees carefully monitor this blog with great effort. Notice how you always come on here just after someone post the truth about Grantham being a bogus university. You Grantham employees sure do work hard. By the way, my dad is an Intelligence Analyst/Operations Specialist with the FBI/Department of Justice and has been for quite some years. He is a graduate of the University of Maryland at College Park. I am going to ask him just how many Grantham grads work in his division or just how popular a Grantham degree is with the "Bureau" as he calls it.
y3k January 5, 2009 at 1:26 a.m.
@ @LULZ aka Grantham employee
I thought that Grantham employees would have the day off on the day after New Years. I guess not. So whats crackin over in Kansas City?
WTF? January 5, 2009 at 5:22 p.m.
My post was deleted? You let this nutjob post over, and over again with outright libel, and you censor ME?
So much for unbiased......
Me January 5, 2009 at 8:49 p.m.
"I also say that GU is legitimate and fully accredited university."
sorta true. It is DETC accredited, which real, but definitely much less useful than regional accreditation, which can be had in a DL environment, much more cheaply than Grantham.
Me January 5, 2009 at 8:50 p.m.
Oh, and as an employer, we require regionally accredited degrees.
Miki January 6, 2009 at 12:58 a.m.
I don't believe that employers hire only RA degrees.
maybe 6 years ego.
Employers - majority don't discriminate on base of accreditation, they do discriminate on base of name recognition of universities.
Employers , especially smart employers know that education is important but there are many other factors that play in hiring employees.
Experience almost always is more important then college degree.
Now there are jobs that require specialized Professional accreditation , in such case RA or NA is not sufficient.
Miki January 6, 2009 at 1:02 a.m.
The only connection I have to GU is that I'm graduate of DETC accredited university.
I never attended GU.
The university I attended is very similar to GU.
I think our proctored exams are supervised more strictly do.
some facts January 7, 2009 at 3:51 a.m.
I attended Grantham and I will tell you seriously the school is a joke. The exams are a joke and open book. They are also poorly proctored. I transferred to a regionally accredited university and not one Gantham credit was taken. The school is a total ripoff. This school is simply not valued like real regional universities are.Grantham goers think they are ahead of others by learning the Grantham way, which is as easy as ninth grade, but if they were to go to a real university they would see that they are way behind students going to real universities getting a quality education. Try taking a calculus test at a real university with the book closed and see the difference. I bet you won't get an easy A like you would at Grantham. I will suggest to anyone considering college to pick a traditional university that is regionally accredited. There are plenty of them that offer online education that will allow you to get a degree that will be respected. Don't be scammed by Grantham. The school is a total joke and I dont care what you Grantham bandwagoners say. Open enrollment and national accreditaion are not respected in the education community and in the workforce. Its as simple as that!
Blah Blah Blah January 7, 2009 at 3:54 p.m.
Blah blah blah Grantham is a joke blah blah blah blah DETC sucks blah blah blah.
-Blah
again... January 7, 2009 at 7:07 p.m.
Here we go again...
Another GU dropout that trash talks the school because they couldn't pass the courses exams (too hard for you huh). GU is a real and legit (respected)university and the credits are transferrable.
Also, great post above about being a vet that worked and just quit Grantham. You got to love this site...it's so full of people that will say just about anything to discredit this school. What is your name so we can verify that you even worked there? I bet you never have.
I agree with blah! blah!
some facts January 8, 2009 at 12:09 a.m.
Like I said, Grantham bandwagoners can say and plead all they wan't. Penn State won't take any of their credits and neither will any other legitimate regionally accredited university. Name one legitimate not for profit university that will bite any of Granthams credits. I will personally email them to see what they say. Also, how can someone fail when the test are 100% open book. The answers are right there in front of you. An easy A is certainly guaranteed. Ninth grade is harder than Grantham so please cut the BS. You can preach on all you want but the school is lame and nobody respects them. Let me know what legitimate non profit university will take my Grantham credits. None because they don't take credits from schools that have national accreditation. "(too hard for huh)", you are kidding right. Grantham takes anyone and anyone can pass because it is too easy. Open book testing, yeh right. Anyway, the school is flat out lame and a joke. People leave Grantham because they are starting to find out that the school is not respected in the workforce and the credits are junk and won't go anywhere with a legitimate university. The proof is very overwhelming. Grantham "hard". Please! How about this, Grantham < easy + junk credits = bogus school^2= ripoff * 10
Blah Blah Blah January 8, 2009 at 1:11 a.m.
Blah blah blah Grantham is a joke blah blah blah blah DETC sucks blah blah blah.
-Blah
Me January 8, 2009 at 5:22 p.m.
" I don't believe that employers hire only RA degrees."
We do, we are the 3rd largest employer in our state. It's not a high standard by any means. In our state, there are hundreds of RA schools, and maybe 5 DETC-accredited ones.
"Employers - majority don't discriminate on base of accreditation,"
Exactly my point. Some may accept a lower level accreditation, but some will require it, making Grantham a sub-optimal, more expensive choice.
I do know that for almost all professional licensing, you will need an RA degree. Accounting, Nursing etc.
Engineering is an exception, since you can certify with a high school degree.
Calling out regionals! January 8, 2009 at 8:03 p.m.
"For the reasons I have just outlined, I hope to see significant changes in accreditation. First of all,
it is my hope that the regional accreditors will take their cue from accreditors like ACCET and other
national accrediting organizations – which have long been focused on measures that get at the real issue
of educational quality. What is needed broadly is something you have done for a long while – namely
attention to mission fulfillment while focusing on quality assurance."
"In a world where nearly 60 percent of college students can be expected to attend more than one
institution of higher learning, the institutional practice of privileging certain kinds of federally-recognized
accreditors over others cannot continue. Simply publishing one’s credit transfer policies is not enough. If
accreditation wants to survive, it must look at how sending and receiving institutions manage the transfer
function to ensure an easier and less costly progression by students."
Brilliant!
Reference: ht tps://www.goacta.org/publications/downloads/NealACCET10-24-08.pdf
Miki January 9, 2009 at 7:04 a.m.
In some states accreditation discrimination is legal offense.
Some RA like SACS are very traditional and don't accredit 100 DL universities.
NCA another RA accrediting body is very liberal when it comes to accrediting
DL universities such as NCU.SO RA also vary.
DETC has its purpose it is recognized by CHEA just like ABET and it is also listed with Secretary of Education.
RA is longer and more established form of accreditation.
Many oversea countries have National Accreditation system.
Number of my friends with DETC accredited degree are Chartered Engineers in UK or MBCS CITP etc.
I'm Fellow of Institute of Leadership and Management.
My DETC degree NEVER had issues.
It was evaluated by NARIC UK as Equivalent to UK Royal Chartered Degree.
And there is a bridge between NA and RA degree such as WGU.
I seen people with NA DETC degrees earn RA Masters degree from Western Governors University.
Unlike some persons who fear universities like WGU, this school gets very good reviews and they are both accredited by NA DETC and 4 RA accrediting agencies.
Any one who hold DETC accredited degree can be proud of their achievement and know that there is competition out there and some who will play dirty.
If there companies that don't hire NA degreed employees then they are guilty of discrimination and should be challenged in court of law.
Not mentioning that they are missing on good employees.
MIKI January 9, 2009 at 7:19 a.m.
For record I'm an Immigrant.
I'm working on improving my English.
I'm not in/from India but will visit that beautiful country some day.
I measure my success by ability to provide for my family and raising my children to be good citizens of USA.
I was WO in military - Sgt-Mgr and thanks God have successful career in my civilian world.
You will find me almost always on the side of the underdog.
WIle many State universities are RA I don't think they are as good or better then DETC accredited universities.
Universities such as UC or NYU or Stamford, Yale etc are a different story.
Cal State degrees are inferior to UC system.
So once and for all understand that accreditation RA or NA is setting MINIMUM standard that school has to meet.
I stress the word MINIMUM.
There some bottom RA schools that don't have any respect as well.
I sight of others.
I don't judge by the school but what you know and bring to the team at work.
Wrong January 9, 2009 at 2:19 p.m.
Hi Miki, I am sorry, but you are factually incorrect in many spots here.
"In some states accreditation discrimination is legal offense."
No, it is not. Please point to something that even hints at such a silly thing.
"Some RA like SACS are very traditional and don't accredit 100 DL universities."
SACS accredits many DL universities, again you'll have to point to something useful instead of just saying so.
Even the DETC, on its own website admits that acceptance is less than RA degrees. They claim 80-85%, but again, why take a school that is accepted less than 100%, when there are so many other options out there.
2009 OEDb Rankings January 9, 2009 at 3:16 p.m.
OEDb published the 2009 rankings. Notice, neither Grantham nor Columbia Southern is on this list.
ht tp://oedb.org/rankings
To be safe, when picking a future college, I would stick to this list.
I suspect the reason for excluding GU and CSU is the criterion:
"The college must be listed in College Navigator. The College Navigator was commissioned by the US Department of Education to help prospective students compare higher education opportunities. We decided to exclude colleges not listed in College Navigator for two reasons: firstly, it would be impossible to rank them accurately without the trusted third-party metrics that College Navigator provides; secondly, we felt that any college not already in College Navigator was not notable and/or important enough to be included in our rankings."
Reference: ht tp://oedb.org/rankings/methodology
I already graduated from GU, so I have made my bed. I was thinking of chasing a Master's via GU, but after seeing this list, I think I will look to WGU or the like.
I can't believe UMUC, Penn Foster, and American Military/Public didn't make this list; Thoughts? Opinions?
MIKI January 9, 2009 at 5:31 p.m.
There is a turf war.
Not making some list is not an indicator.
SACS accredits only B&M Traditional Universities, these universities offer DL. SACS is not accrediting fully 100% DL universities that are not B&M.
Please point me to University that is 100% DL that is SACS accredited.
AIU is RA and 100% DL they are not accredited by SACS.
SACS-
The Commission on Colleges of the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools is the recognized regional accrediting body in the eleven U.S. Southern states (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia) and in Latin America for those institutions of higher education that award associate, baccalaureate, master's or doctoral degrees. The Commission on Colleges is the representative body of the College Delegate Assembly and is charged with carrying out the accreditation process.
GEEEZ January 9, 2009 at 11:07 p.m.
Miki, AIU is accredited by SACS. You dont know what you are talking about. Go to chea.org.
Miki January 10, 2009 at 9:26 a.m.
I'm the real Miki.
Who ever posted the AIU post is trying to discredit me.
Why would I state something that is so easy to verify :-).
Don't fall for this deception.
I do think RA + PA is the gold standard.
I hold 2 degrees one is from My country's Institute of Technology and one in USA from DETC accredited University.
Real Miki
... January 11, 2009 at 12:35 a.m.
I would like anyone to show me some proof that RA is the gold standard. The majority of posts made on here are opinionated and no-one can prove that RA is the better standard.
Problem Miki January 11, 2009 at 1:29 a.m.
Congratulations for making it here. The problem is you have a DETC degree yet can't write in complete sentences. This speaks poorly to DETC degrees, inlcuding Grantham.
In what country is a WO a Sgt Mjr? You certainly weren't in the US armed forces.
Miki January 11, 2009 at 6:51 a.m.
B&M name recognized university with RA+PA is the best combination.
PA stands for Professional Accreditation such as ABET, AMA, APA etc. This is not an opinion but a fact.
Now name recognition is a factor, some RA + PA universities ranked very low.
DETC, NA accredited universities have their own place in US education arena.
I agree with notion that recognized accreditation is a mark of school achieving minimum required standard to be awarded the accreditation.
When I post on the internet sites I don't always pay attention to the way I write.
At work or business I take extra time to check and edit my emails, reports and presentations. My professionalism is judged not only by performance as an manager engineer but also as communicator.
NA degrees are valuable credentials, people get good jobs with DETC degrees as well.
As long as degree has recognized accreditation there is good utility to such credential.
... January 11, 2009 at 3:15 p.m.
Hi Miki,
I'm not sure I agree 100% with this statement "B&M name recognized university with RA+PA is the best combination."
This is opinion based. now, based on my experience and opinion, I do not agree that RA + PA is the best combination. Instead I think either NA + PA or RA + PA is the best combo. Why? There is no concrete proof to validate the claim that RA is the gold standard and NA is silver.
Many PA discriminate saying it will only accredit RA schools because the folks sitting on the PA boards doesn't understand NA accreditation or biased for RA schools and are so reluctant because of prejudice, ignorance or anti-competitiveness towards NA.
In addition, pay no attention to the poster...he/she is "no" English professor themselves. You have made excellent points so far...I'm impressed.
Also, do you see PA (such as Abet) finally ever accrediting NA colleges? If I was on the board and had my vote it would be "yes".
Miki January 12, 2009 at 6:25 a.m.
I'm not an educator or a professional in the education field.
Wile recent studies are inconclusive there is a survey that was performed in 2001 by Dr. John Bear who published Bears guides and consulted FBI in their sting operation against diploma mills. The Survey at the time showed that 20% of RA accredited universities accepted DETC credit all the time and additional 20% some of the time.
Since then the percentage increased to something like 70% and some claim even higher.
Remember that RA schools will often not accept credits from other RA schools also. It's not always a case of regional vs. national accreditation.
When in comes to employers then it varies.
Some employers never verify degrees. Yes they simply hire people based on recommendation of hiring manager.
How well one did at the interviews, references and experience usually are the determining factors.
Some employers do have a need for name recognized university graduates. For example is a private Law firm.
They sell representation and at times atornies credentials are selling point. This is also correct for counseling practice, simply credentials in such cases are selling points and they attract customers.
I always see people preferring an MD with Harvard training etc.
Potential employees. Especially if they handle critical contracts such as DoD etc. Their contractual commitment to have experts in some fields and and proposals based on RFP provide extra weight when you can state that you employ people with highest qualifications etc.
Specific requirement for Professionally Accredited Credentialed workers are state law, situation and business driven.
TBC
Yep January 12, 2009 at 3:38 p.m.
Miki,
Your view pretty much sums it up, which many have done since this blog was created. Although your message is on point, you definately need to master the language.
The majority of the filth posted here has a very specific agenda; bringing down Grantham. Although, to a point, a I agree with the motive presented by some (Katrina), the utter lack of consideration for students having graduated is absolutely reckless.
Should the former employees succeed in bringing down their supposedy "evil" former employer, what of the students? Do you think they will get a refund? Of course not. There appears to be no consideration for collateral (casualties, if you will) damage to the educational careers to student who have been sucked into this mess.
Also, the founder/editor of this blog seems to have an agenda as well. I have posted a few times now, only to have been censored. Not only do I not trust this site, but I have learned to ignore most, if not all, anonymous blogs just on sheer principle.
A good site, for prospective students, is www.degreeinfo.com. No anonymous trolling, strict guidelines, and a plethera of seasoned distance education students and graduates eager to help.
I wish all of you the best of luck!
Agreed January 19, 2009 at 3:49 p.m.
Great recommendation, go to www.degreeinfo.com
The consensus there is that you can do much better for the same money and get a Regionally accredited degree.
Don't do it January 21, 2009 at 1:46 a.m.
Don't go to that Nazi board. All they do is pat themselves on the back for their degrees and make fun of the new people.
Here are a couple. January 26, 2009 at 8:43 p.m.
"Please point me to University that is 100% DL that is SACS accredited"
There is no search feature by DL only, but by name, I can identify these two, I am sure there are many more.
Keiser University
American Intercontinental (AIU)
Exactly January 26, 2009 at 8:46 p.m.
"The Survey at the time showed that 20% of RA accredited universities accepted DETC credit all the time and additional 20% some of the time. Since then the percentage increased to something like 70% and some claim even higher."
All are less than 100%, therefore it is a suboptimal choice. There is no quality or other distinguishing feature of Grantham that can overcome this shortcoming compared to its competition.
Why pay $10 for a 6-pack of beer when you can get a twelve-pack next door for the same price?
Lance January 28, 2009 at 2:01 a.m.
Keiser University and AIU are not 100% DL. Try again.
Miki January 29, 2009 at 1:46 a.m.
RA to RA transfer of enrollment are also not 100%.
Its at 80%. Many will ask you to take additional classes and some will not accept old credits .
How old? Some will not accept credits that are 2 or more years old.
Each persons situation is different. The flexibility that is offered by schools such as GU is rally appreciated by its graduates.
If DETC accredited degrees are good for Civil jobs or FBI then its not that bad isn't it?
Some graduates are very experienced persons who need a degree to get the job others fresh out of High school these need to learn more and may find more traditional setting.
Others can start working and earn degree as they earn living.
Spraying Flame-Away January 29, 2009 at 8:41 p.m.
Please end the flame war and only post topics that people researching Grantham University will care about.
RA Snobs January 30, 2009 at 12:32 a.m.
Indeed, while regional accreditors oversee the largest number of four-year institutions around the
country, educational standards have been declining. Meanwhile, there is ample evidence that these selfsame
regionals have used their power as federal gatekeepers to apply intrusive prescriptive standards and
have enforced ideological tests and other criteria unrelated to educational quality. Under the authority
they wield as agents of the federal government, the major regionals routinely insert themselves into the
internal affairs of their member schools. They attempt to undermine the power and authority of duly
elected and appointed trustees who, in the eyes of the law, hold the ultimate responsibility for the
wellbeing of their schools. And quite frequently they serve as a barrier to new entrants in the market by
focusing on inputs rather than results.
The bottom line? The accreditation regime – at least as it concerns the regionals – fools the
American people, pretending that the process implies quality when it often does not
RA no way January 30, 2009 at 12:35 a.m.
So Where Do We Go From Here?
For the reasons I have just outlined, I hope to see significant changes in accreditation. First of all,
it is my hope that the regional accreditors will take their cue from accreditors like ACCET and other
national accrediting organizations – which have long been focused on measures that get at the real issue
of educational quality. What is needed broadly is something you have done for a long while – namely
attention to mission fulfillment while focusing on quality assurance.
The Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools requests data annually on
program completion and job placement. Similar reporting and performance standards requirements have
been adopted by the Accrediting Commission of Career Schools and Colleges of Technology and you.
ACCET notably requires programs to survey employer satisfaction and job placement rates. This is
something for all accreditors to consider.
Secondly, the Secretary of Education can and should take action in order to push the regionals
toward these positive changes. Namely, with a stroke of her pen, the Secretary could abolish the
geographical monopolies currently granted to each regional and allow competition across the country.
Why should a college in the south have to work with SACS? Why not with Middle State, or another
accreditor of its choosing – that is, with whatever other accreditor it thinks best suits its mission?
... January 30, 2009 at 1:42 a.m.
To RA,
BINGO!!!
I could not have said that any better.
RA is not the "gold standard", but those colleges that are RA want to fool due to anti-competitive practice by higher education (namely RA colleges).
Personally, the Department of Education, and the Department of Justice should look into this unfair practices and as you mentioned remove the geographical areas and perhaps consolidate it.
RA the God of accreditation :-) January 30, 2009 at 11 a.m.
As David Justice, an administrator at DePaul University, has explained: “Th e truth of the matter
is that regional accrediting associations aren’t very good about sanctioning an institution
for poor quality.”32 As the accreditors see it, removing an institution’s accredited status is undesirable
since it leaves students ineligible for federal student aid and requires a mass exodus to
other institutions.33
Input January 31, 2009 at 12:37 a.m.
You can blab on all you want about regional accreditation and national accreditation but the bottom line is that even if Grantham had regional accreditation they would still be a for profit joke. Sorry, but there are just too many real reputable traditional universities that offer distance education that are ranked highly and have years of excellence to back up their reputation. People want degrees with value and respect these days and Grantham does not offer any of the two. Community colleges are respected more than Grantham. Please stop blabber mouthing about Grantham being so great because if they were you would not be here trying to defend them. Stop spin doctering please! By the way, regional is the golden standard and that is why all of the traditonal schools have it. Grantham is not even a real university. They have no type of campus environment such as athletics, dorms, etc. Just go to a real university that offers online education.
Miki January 31, 2009 at 12:50 a.m.
Input.
GU is a university and it offers recognized degrees.
I respect and value the RA universities especially the universities with research history and academic excellence.
What you fail to understand is that there are Traditional amd non traditional education providers.
The public has the choice we are not a dictatorship so you have the right to state what you think as also the people who support non traditional education.
When Traditional education opposed DL study its the nontraditional universities and colleges who made it availability to the public to a point in time were Traditional Universities had to join due to the market high demand and technology advancement.
They can co exist and people cam make their mind.
Not all basketball teams are in MBA right?
I repeat if GU degrees are good for employment by uncle Sam, FBI, CIA and other government agencies it has value to the degree holder.
To me any state university graduates are the same as GU graduates I don't see any difference.
If anything people with nontraditional degrees such as GU prove they can archive their goals wile working FT and defanding our country.
More then that they are more motivated to prove at the work place that their degree is as good or better and I love motivated workers.
Spin Detector January 31, 2009 at 6:52 a.m.
Whatever Miki,
Please show me were Grantham is ranked among traditional universities. Thought so! They do not even rank with the lowest tier universities. Stop spin doctoring!
Blah January 31, 2009 at 9:36 p.m.
75% of RA state universities are also a joke.
Miki January 31, 2009 at 9:41 p.m.
Spin Detector
Didn't you read my post?
Grantham is nontraditional university.
Why would you try to compare.
If you want to attend traditional university you have my blessing. There many good traditional universities out there.
Grantham has valid, recognized DL non traditional degree programs.
How is Angel February 15, 2009 at 3:30 a.m.
So how are you current students enjoying "Angel?"
Miki February 16, 2009 at 1:10 a.m.
DETC accredited universities and RA universities colaborate.
The regionally-accredited University of North Alabama awards its MBA to people who do their work through DETC-accredited Columbia Southern University.
The website (ht..://tinyurl.com/b6yq35) says," The College of Business is also accredited by ACBSP, a nationally recognized accrediting agency that only accredits 15 percent of U.S. business schools."
Miki February 16, 2009 at 1:17 a.m.
ht..://www.colsouth.edu/una/admissions/admissions.asp
Joe February 16, 2009 at 8:36 a.m.
I think you are in the wrong blog Miki. CSU is >>>>> that way.
Bgggg February 16, 2009 at 6:22 p.m.
Grantham is a for profit joke. There are too many traditional universities that offer online education so don't fall for the Grantham scam. Earn a college degree that will be respected instead of one that only brings skeptism upon your resume. Trust me, employers do look at the reputation and quality of the institution you graduate from.
Cool February 17, 2009 at 11:52 p.m.
@ Blah
Now Hiring Grantham Spin Doctors! Free Tuition Included!
Quack February 18, 2009 at 3:37 p.m.
Quack Quack Quack Grantham Employee Quack Quack Quack Grantham Spin Doctor Quack Quack Quack.
Quack!!!!
Miki February 20, 2009 at 4:04 p.m.
This Wednesday, the House Education Committee produced the bill to reauthorize the Higher Education Act (H.R. 609) to the full House of Representatives for final passage. The bill federalizes transfer of credit, imposes price controls and excessive cost reporting.
GU graduates will be able to transfer credit to any RA school.
Old news February 20, 2009 at 4:13 p.m.
Senate Reauthorization Bill passed in July 2007 (S. 1642) and H. R. 609, the Reauthorization Bill passed by the House of Representatives in the last Congress.
College Access and Opportunity Act of 2007,” to reauthorize the Higher Education Act introduced in the House of Representatives on October 4, 2007. Includes comparisons to Senate Reauthorization Bill passed in July 2007 (S. 1642) and H. R. 609, the Reauthorization Bill passed by the House of Representatives in the last Congress.
Accreditation and the Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008
The Higher Education Opportunity Act of 2008 was signed into law on August 14, 2008.
This long-awaited bill, five years in the making, retains the familiar authority structure for government oversight of accreditation that has been in place for a number of years. Federal scrutiny and approval of accrediting organizations (“recognition”) will continue through the U.S. Department of Education (USDE) based on ten standards in the law and the regulations that USDE develops to carry out the recognition review process. The federal committee that was codified in 1992 will continue to advise the Secretary of
HR 609 excerpt February 21, 2009 at 5:03 p.m.
According to Congress, universities are prohibited from this type of discrimination and it's a direct violation against American Council on Education (ACE) policies (HR 609).
According to HR 609, "The bill would codify the “CHEA Transfer Principle” – that institutions are not to refuse to
consider transfer requests based solely on the accredited status of an institution as long as the accreditor is recognized by the U.S. Secretary of Education. [495]"
If you feel you have been discriminated against due to your degree being recognized by DETC (btw..it is a valid accreditor and also respected on the Hill) then I recommend that you file a complaint against that college.
ACEs contact info:
American Council on Education
One Dupont Circle NW
Washington, DC 20036-1193
(202) 939-9300
Jay Smith February 22, 2009 at 10:01 p.m.
Grantham, is a good solid school to earn a degree if you are active duty military, bottom line.
Paul Jones February 22, 2009 at 10:08 p.m.
Grantham has earned a A+ rating with the BBB, if there were any real issues with the school, why not file a complaint with the BBB, there are a lot of people that are using this sight to post derrogatory info against the school because they refused to do proper research prior to enrolling, I agree granthum is no better or no worse than any other online school. As far as i am concerned they are a solid school to earn an online degree.
Paul
My 2 cents February 24, 2009 at 4:59 p.m.
"Grantham has earned a A+ rating with the BBB,"
Could this be more academically meaningless? There is a great tattoo parlor that has an A+ rating there also.
Bottom line: For the same money (and usually a lot less), you can get a regionally accredited degree in the same subject via distance learning and not have to worry about the licensing and acceptance issues.
One Example, Please February 25, 2009 at 12:06 a.m.
Please provide 1 example of cheaper and Regionally Accredited for the following degrees offered by Grantham:
BS Electronics Engineering Technology
BS Computer Science
Cost: 125 Credits, $31,250.
Also, I need the programs to be 100% online, in an asychronous delivery format.
Thank you,
Prospective Student
Cheaper, and better accreditation March 2, 2009 at 3:18 a.m.
Fort Hays State
www.fhsu.edu
BS Computer Science / Information Networking
124 Credits - $19,964
Regionally accredited, no worries about DETC accreditation.
FHSU March 2, 2009 at 4:36 p.m.
Thank you,
The link: ht tp://www.fhsu.edu/virtualcollege/degrees/bachelors/index.htm
doesn't show a computer science program; the closest thing I can find is "Bachelor of Science in Information Networking & Telecommunications (Computer Networking and Telecommunications)"
I need more programming and computer architechture than this curriculum will provide. I cannot find a link for the delivery format.
Any others?
to: Jay Smith March 2, 2009 at 10:10 p.m.
That's a false statement (six posts up)! Jay, you may want to take a look at this school if you're active duty military: www.amu.apus.edu/index.htm. Please feel free to scan the web (particularly popular online education discussion boards like www.degreeinfo.com/ and www.community.elearners.com/blogs/defaul... and you'll be hard pressed to find a negative comment about this respected, fully online, regionally accredited school.
infoman March 8, 2009 at 5:20 p.m.
Go to a regionally accredited school and leave the Grantham riff raff in the dust. You will better off having a degree that will be respected and valued from a respected traditional university that offers online degrees. Why bother with the Grantham headache?
See Above March 9, 2009 at 3:03 a.m.
refer "One Example, Please" above.
Can you not read?
LOL at latest review March 9, 2009 at 3:35 p.m.
"Grantham has earned a A+ rating with the BBB, if there were any real issues with the school, why not file a complaint with the BBB,"
The tattoo parlor in our city also has a great rating with BBB, how is that academically meaningfull in the slightest way?
Not getting off that easy March 9, 2009 at 4:36 p.m.
Please provide 1 example of cheaper and Regionally Accredited for the following degrees offered by Grantham:
BS Electronics Engineering Technology
BS Computer Science
Cost: 125 Credits, $31,250.
Also, I need the programs to be 100% online, in an asychronous delivery format.
Thank you,
Prospective Student
Many out there. March 10, 2009 at 5:09 p.m.
Fort Hays State
www.fhsu.edu
BS Computer Science / Information Networking
124 Credits - $19,964
Regionally accredited, no worries about DETC accreditation.
www.fhsu.edu/sfs/tf/FY09_TuitionFees.pdf...
5 minutes of research and you can do better than Grantham.
Already disqualified that one, try again March 10, 2009 at 7:07 p.m.
That program does not meet the requirements listed. 5 Minutes of research you say, when you have spent far longer shaming the school and it's alumni. 1 full week since I posted the challenge, and no one has answered.
"Thank you,
The link: ht tp://www.fhsu.edu/virtualcollege/degrees/bachelors/index.htm
doesn't show a computer science program; the closest thing I can find is "Bachelor of Science in Information Networking & Telecommunications (Computer Networking and Telecommunications)"
I need more programming and computer architechture than this curriculum will provide. I cannot find a link for the delivery format.
Any others?"
FHSU is no gem; non-competitive (peterson's words, not mine), and not CAC of ABET accredited, either.
I have done the research, and there are NO others. Some are disqualified for team play (lame, I want asynchronous), and others for overspecialization (FHSU). The closest I could find was DeVry, but only the MSEE is entirely online.
LOL at Buyer's Remorse March 10, 2009 at 11:54 p.m.
Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
I suppose if you make as narrow of a criteria as possible, and discount all the options that are cheaper and better than Grantham, you'll end up with the conclusion you want.
For the other 99.999999999999% of you, go get a regionally accredited degree that will have greater utility and less cost than a Grantham school.
Grantham March 11, 2009 at 12:40 a.m.
Good Point: Petersons calls Grantham: "Entrance Difficulty Noncompetitive" also, and a lower level accreditation on top of it, and also more expensive. :-(
It doesn't even make the US News College Guide. :-(
Libel, yet no programs March 11, 2009 at 2:09 a.m.
Please provide 1 example of cheaper and Regionally Accredited for the following degrees offered by Grantham:
BS Electronics Engineering Technology
BS Computer Science
Cost: 125 Credits, $31,250.
Also, I need the programs to be 100% online, in an asynchronous delivery format. FHSU BS TN has been offered, but doesn't meet spec for low-level programming, nor computer architecture.
Thank you,
Prospective Student
Another one better than Grantham March 11, 2009 at 5:10 a.m.
Thanks for the Fort Hayes link, it looks good. Another good one for a BS in computer science is Athens State University in Alabama.
Same degree, regionally accredited, and $111 per semester hour or about $14,000 if you are in state or in a state with reciprocity.
If you are out of state, it still comes in cheaper than Grantham. No DETC worries either!
This one looks perfect for you March 11, 2009 at 2:32 p.m.
The third good option - is the BS in Electronics Engineering from Excelsior College. Online, same price on the surface, and exactly what you are looking for - regionally accredited.
The Bachelor of Science, Electronic Engineering degree program is also accredited by TAC-ABET!!!
If you have experience in the field or can pick up the entry level stuff quickly, you can also test out of several classes and save thousands!
Good luck!
See, was that so hard? March 11, 2009 at 3:37 p.m.
Thank you for the suggestions, I will look into them.
I believe this is the way to go about navigating the online education argument; provide specific examples of BETTER and CHEAPER programs, vs. the usual "grantham sucks" and "scam" comments.
Thank you!
Options March 11, 2009 at 3:40 p.m.
"I believe this is the way to go about navigating the online education argument; provide specific examples of BETTER and CHEAPER programs, vs. the usual "grantham sucks" and "scam" comments."
Amen! There are alot of choices out there, Grantham may or may not work for you. Assess your goals, check with the people who will be making the decisions on your degree, and perform due diligence.
I don't have a link, but Troy University (Troy State) has several technology programst that come in around $200 per credit.
Buyer's Remorse March 11, 2009 at 4:38 p.m.
Also,
I am not coming at this from a "Buyer's Remorse" motivational angle; I finished my BSEET at the old GU rate of $2617/semester, which totaled out at $15,702 for 6 semesters (86 credits). At the time, before GU raised tuition, this was the best deal I had ever heard of. I didn't know (completely, utterly ignorant) of the NA vs. RA debate, but I didn't let me stop from finishing. In the end, it didn't matter; I got into a ranked, RA, and ABET school chasing a MS Electrical Engineering. Everyone told me this couldn't be done (even their website asked for a BSEE with EAC-ABET), and I am so glad I didn't listen to them!
With that said.....
If there are better programs coming online that are RA and ABET, go for those!!!!! Capitalism will dictate who emerges the victor in this educational money-grab, and may the best universities win. If you run across a good program that is cheap and has all of the tickets punched, spread the word!
Buyer's Remorse (Again) March 11, 2009 at 4:42 p.m.
And since I know someone is goint to ask, the accepting University is private. One thing I learned first-hand, private universities can let in anyone they please.
James J. March 11, 2009 at 6:50 p.m.
"I got into a ranked, RA, and ABET school chasing a MS Electrical Engineering"
Where? This is a huge win for Grantham, and I'd personally love to get into such a school also with my GU degree.
------ March 11, 2009 at 7:07 p.m.
Sorry James, but I will not post that info here. There is a troll on here that likes to forge e-mails.
Go to the GU student forum, you will find the answer there.
James J. March 12, 2009 at 1:22 p.m.
Ok, well if anybody ever hears of a ranked RA/ABET school that would take my GU Degree, I would love to know.
Sasha March 13, 2009 at 12:23 a.m.
I graduated from GU with BSEET.
Was rejected by local state university. They didn't accept NA credits.
Registered via IET as Incorporated Engineer with ECUK Council.
Applied to City and Guilds London Institute and received Graduateship in Engineering from City and Guilds ( Fast Track).
City and Guilds is an examining body for Engineering credentials for Engineering Council UK,
Had my Graduateship evaluated by NACES member credential evaluation agency WES. Graduatdhip of City and Guilds is equivalent to US BS Engineering Degree from RA university.
Got accepted to MSEE ABET accredited program in my state university.
As IEng ECUK MIET I'm recognized as registered Engineer and
I'm a licensed member of National Society of Professional Engineers USA.
As an Engineer working in EU and USA I'm very happy with GU degree and what it did for me.
James J. March 13, 2009 at 5:47 p.m.
"Got accepted to MSEE ABET accredited program in my state university."
Which one?
Email March 13, 2009 at 10:37 p.m.
@ Anonymous
"There is a troll on here that likes to forge e-mails."
Yeh right! You will not post the name of the school because you know the truth will come out when the email is sent with a guaranteed returned rejection. Drum roll please!
Sasha March 14, 2009 at 5:19 a.m.
Last thing I need is some j--ks harassing administration of the university.
I'm doing OK not the brightest in my class but bot as bad as some grad .
My employer provides tuition reimbursement as long as I earn B or higher grade.
My GU degree was also paid bt the employer.
Students Only March 14, 2009 at 5:47 p.m.
The information is available on the Grantham Student Forum; I have made it available to GU Alumni and current students only, so trolls are blocked. I see no reason to post the name of my new University here.
Also, you do have a minor point. If YOU were to e-mail them playing just on the Grantham name, I am sure they would reject you, it is a very selective school (peterson's words, not mine). I am sure they would reject you outright, as you say you have a business degree, and I was accepted into the MSEE program.
They took my case into consideration because of my work history and grades, as well as letters of recommendation and career awards. I am sure without those I would have wound up on the pile with everone else. Apparently, I am worthy of exception, and that is the right of a private school.
J. James March 14, 2009 at 10:35 p.m.
Can someone please post the name of the school for me, thanks.
So.... March 15, 2009 at 2:20 p.m.
"They took my case into consideration because of my work history and grades, as well as letters of recommendation and career awards."
So 99% of Grantham grads wouldn't get in due to their degree, that makes sense.
Not Quite March 15, 2009 at 5:13 p.m.
No, 74% of ALL applicants, regardless of the origin of their degree, would not get accepted (US News Stats, not mine).
Lio March 16, 2009 at 6:14 a.m.
No, 74% of ALL applicants, regardless of the origin of their degree, would not get accepted (US News Stats, not mine).
RA included?
@Lio March 16, 2009 at 2:10 p.m.
RA, NA, and International applicants.
My school March 16, 2009 at 7:02 p.m.
I love Grantham
True Dat March 17, 2009 at 3:33 a.m.
I think everyone is loyal to the school they attended, but recommending it when facts say otherwise should be avoided.
Bah March 17, 2009 at 3:45 p.m.
"recommending it when facts say otherwise should be avoided."
As if the fabrications presented here could be taken as fact; your suggestion implies a smear campaign should be taken at face value.
Look to the accreditors, BBB, student forums, and NON-ANONYMOUS boards, not this filth.
HeHe March 17, 2009 at 6:02 p.m.
"Look to the accreditors," - DETC is real, but not as useful. We've covered that.
"BBB" - Academically meaningless. If this is the 2nd best thing about this college, I would be very worried.
"student forums" - Everyone loves the college they went to.
"NON-ANONYMOUS boards" - Feel free to point to one.
Help March 22, 2009 at 7:52 p.m.
Looking for MSEE program that will accept my Grantham degree.
Login March 22, 2009 at 9:37 p.m.
Login to the student formus. There are many options given by other alumni.
Help March 24, 2009 at 6:21 p.m.
Looking for MSEE program that will accept my Grantham degree.
I'm alumni and been out for a 6 years. Appreciate any advice. Needs to be Regionally Accredited.
Miki March 25, 2009 at 10:23 p.m.
A graduate with DETC degree in EE from California National University ( DETC accredited) had no problems what so ever to be accepted to the DL MSC Engineerigng degree from Bath.
The DL instruction is in British English.
bath.ac.uk/elec-eng/eps/dl/index.html88888
Miki March 25, 2009 at 10:28 p.m.
I my opinion GU graduates will be welcomed there.
The university has accreditation equal to ABET - registered with Engineering Council UK Institution.
Satisfies Chartered Engineer Education requirements and fully recognized in USA under Washington accord.
Miki March 25, 2009 at 10:30 p.m.
Taught Degrees: MSc Full-time and by Distance Learning
The Department offers the following four one-year full-time MSc degree programmes. One of these is also offered as a distance-learning programme. Our teaching recognises the interdisciplinary nature of modern engineering and the MSc in Mechatronics is a joint degree programme with the Department of Mechanical Engineering. All of our full-time courses follow a unique pattern that takes the students from traditionally taught subject specific units, through business and group oriented modular work to the point where they can undertake a detailed technical project under individual supervision.
Digital Communications
Electrical Power Systems MSc (Full-Time Taught)
Electrical Power Systems MSc (Distance Learning)
Wireless Systems
Mechatronics
Riki March 25, 2009 at 10:49 p.m.
There are many UK and other English speaking well respected universities that will accept GU graduates in their MSEE programs.
I'm sure there are US Universities as well Canadian.
Do some homework and yes, connect with graduates.
There is no justification to the smear campaign and personal agenda of some.
Airman March 26, 2009 at 3:27 p.m.
To those that have problems with Grantham's Accreditation, that’s you're problem. I've been in the Air force for 14 years
and have accumulated several credit hours, from RA schools (Minot State, Mount Olive, and University South Carolina-Columbia) and Grantham was the only online university that excepted all. I would also like to point out that all of the armed services recognize GU as an accredited school, so much so that I'm receiving tuition assistance from the Air Force. This means that I still have my GI Bill benefits, so basically I'm earning a degree with no cost to me (other than time). For me this is great because I just want a diploma hanging on my wall, I already have a career and upon retirement my wife and I will have enough money saved to start our own B&B. So for me it's worth it, to other's out there maybe not, but believe me RA/NA doesn't matter! My experience, in the end all schools are about the all mighty dollar, not their reputations.
Miki March 27, 2009 at 5:26 a.m.
Airman
You are correct about many things.
The only thing I disagree is about schools.
There are research universities that are less vocational .
These centers of excellence and the faculty are among leading researchers in the fields of medicine, cancer research and have long and respected history of research and academic excellence.
School name recognition counts in the real world.
I don't subscribe to notion that the only indicator for school quality is accreditation.
Accreditation is a statement that the school meet minimum requirements.
If you want good professors you have to pay.
GU has a very important role in non traditional education.
I salute to all of who are in armed forces serving our country.
I'm an Airmen too March 29, 2009 at 5:02 p.m.
I agree with both of you.
In Addition to Miki, GU has really good professors that are faculty among leading researchers in the fields of medicine, cancer research and moonlight with other big name universities.
In the past, my GU instructors have taught at the big name schools (e.g. Cornell University, MIT, Univ of CA,Univ of NM, LSU, Texas A&M, Univ of NY, Devry, etc). Most of them have Phds or master's degrees as well as experience on the job and in field research. So for anyone to disagree that these instructors are not elite then look at your own traditional school which is where the have come from.
As an Airmen with 13 years in so far, I like GUs flexibility and the fact they don't spoon feed me like traditional schools do other students. I have not experienced the troubles that many have been posting on here; in fact ... I'm shocked to hear such nonsense. I've always been treated fairly by GU and I feel my degree being earned is the same as everyone pursuing a similar BS/MS degree.
Lastly, Miki thank you for the salute and your welcome!
I'm honored that GU takes great care of us military students and I'm proud to be attending this school.
Jack April 2, 2009 at 6:31 p.m.
"GU has really good professors that are faculty among leading researchers in the fields of medicine, cancer research and moonlight with other big name universities."
ROFLMAO!!
"GU instructors have taught at the big name schools... Devry."
You think Devry = a big name school? ROFLMAO!
Most of GU faculty are a group of adjuncts with fulltime jobs that have little time for you. To call them 'elite' is a joke to say the least.
Miki April 3, 2009 at 8:52 p.m.
The faculty is listed on GU web site.
I didn't see any "stars", I do see mixed faculty some PhD or D.Sc and many instructors hold Masters degree.
I think most faculty are RA university graduates and some are mixed foreign and US graduates.
Some are careered professionals, others are educators.
The advantage is that people who produce class materials are not only theoretics but actually successful employees with careers in the field they instruct.
I know how important is the input from the field, what is actually happening and the need of the industry.
The faculty seems to be in line with what is needed for the type of the non traditional education provider as GU.
No brain surgeons
OK April 4, 2009 at 5:08 p.m.
@ Miki
"I think most faculty are RA university graduates and some are mixed foreign and US graduates."
Stop kidding yourself and others. Most of Granthams falculty graduated from Grantham. You can preach on about Grantham Inc all you want but the bottom line is there are too many big name regionally accredited universities that offer distance education for someone to be bothered with Grantham.
Miki April 5, 2009 at 2 p.m.
Brian Robison
Global Faculty Member, Brian Robison, holds a Master of Science in Criminal Justice Administration and a Bachelor of Science in Criminal Justice from Ferris State University.
Bruce Bayley, Ph.D.
Global Faculty Member, Bruce Bayley, PhD received his Doctor of Philosophy in Family and Human Development, with emphases in crime/delinquency and the criminal justice systems, from Utah State University. He also holds a Master of Science in Family Ecology, with emphases in juvenile justice and juvenile corrections, from the University of Utah.
Cheryl Hayek
Global Faculty Member, Cheryl Hayek, earned her Master of Education from William Paterson University in Educational Leadership in Administration.
Christina Consuelo Kahr
Global Faculty Member , Christina Consuelo Kahr received her Master of Arts in History (summa cum laude) and is a PhD candidate at the State University of New York at Stony Brook. Recipient of the Andrew Mellon Foundation Dissertation Research Fellowship,
Clifton D. James
Global Faculty Member, Clifton D. James earned his Master of Business Administration from Webster University and holds a certification in Total Quality Management. Presently, he is a Configuration Management Engineer overseeing baseline acceptance testing for U.S. Special Operations Command in Tampa, FL. Prior to his current position, he was the Chief Aviation Resource Manager at MacDill Air Force Base, FL
I can continue with the rest of the faculty all have RA degrees.
I stand behing my post.
I didn't see so far any GU faculty member with GU degree.
Maybe there is one, I didn't check all the faculty.
But who ever responded to my post is simply wrong and has agenda to smear GU.
Alberto April 5, 2009 at 2:04 p.m.
"Stop kidding yourself and others. Most of Granthams falculty graduated from Grantham. You can preach on about Grantham Inc all you want but the bottom line is there are too many big name regionally accredited universities that offer distance education for someone to be bothered with Grantham."
Yes to many frightened instructors who need to smear GU in order to keep their job in the to many big name RA Universities.
BTW you are posed as a liar, according to the GU faculty listed on the web site, they all have Regionally Accredited degrees.
Miki April 5, 2009 at 2:07 p.m.
Walt Copley, Ph.D.
Global Faculty Member,Walt Copley, PhD received his Master of Arts from the University of Oklahoma in Public Administration with a focus on Police Operations. He received his Doctor of Philosophy at Colorado State University which concentrated on Education Administration with emphasis on Criminal Justice Education. He spent 22 years in the U.S. Air Force
Miki April 5, 2009 at 2:10 p.m.
John Halstead Ph.D.
Global Faculty Member, John M. Halstead, PhD received his Doctorate in Business Administration with a concentration in Finance from the University of Connecticut. He has taught at several universities including the University of Connecticut.
Kimberly Carter-Cram, Ph.D.
Global Faculty Member, Dr. Kimberly (Kim) Carter-Cram, received her Ph.D. in French Language and Literatures from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA). She has taught languages, composition and world literatures at all levels at various universities including UCLA, Idaho State University, Boise State University,
Miki April 5, 2009 at 2:12 p.m.
Gary Minor, J.D.
Global Faculty Member, Gary Minor, JD completed his Master of Business Administration in Information Systems at City University in the state of Washington. After completing his MBA, he attended Seattle University School of Law and obtained his Juris Doctor. He also obtained his police executive certification, a requirement to be a chief executive of a law enforcement agency in Washington
@ok April 5, 2009 at 2:58 p.m.
@ok...stop kidding yourself and lying to others.
The faculty are graduates from other top RA schools. In fact, many still teach at both, working for the government, or other respected industry within their field.
you're full it and a liar...stop posting nonsense.
Loco April 5, 2009 at 5:01 p.m.
hey, not a bad faculty.
I'm positively surprised. No rocket scientists but deasent faculty.
I see a professor who works for Intel.
Yap all hold RA degrees.
A recent graduate explains... April 5, 2009 at 5:27 p.m.
All,
I am a former student of GU. Dr. Nancy Miller is the Dean of our EE program. Also, she still teaches one or two classes at GU and holds both an RA/Abet accredited degree.
She is great both knowledgeable and fair (She works for the Air Force like me...everyone knows the Air Force high standards/reputation). I agree w/ the poster above that GU doesn't spoon feed you like many RA schools. I like that and I've "earned" my grades (good and bad).
I'd say the faculty is more than decent; they have a highly knowledgeable staff of professionals. If you want rocket scientists for instructors then the only place you'll find that these schools (E.g. Harvard, Standford, or MIT). Nope! I'm happy with the staff they've chosen (i.e. RA/Abet graduates and highly respected professional within their career fields)
Dr Miller's Bio...
Electronics Engineering Technology Program Director, Nancy Miller, PhD received her Doctor of Philosophy in Electrical Engineering with a specialty in control systems from the University of New Mexico. She also holds a Master of Business Administration in Finance and a Master of Science in Applied Physics from Texas Tech University. Dr. Miller brings with her a mixture of management, education, and high tech research and development experience. As a civilian employee of the Air Force, she led a research program investigating telescope alignment and control including a novel neural network technique. This was followed by a position as the project manager for the development of the adaptive optics and control systems for a 3.67m telescope in Hawaii in which she developed a new design methodology for adaptive optics systems specification. She served as the Chair of the Engineering Department for Sedaya College in Malaysia, and developed the curriculum for several engineering programs with UK, Canadian, and Australian partners, as well as developed a laboratory program with an emphasis on design projects. Prior to coming to Grantham, Dr. Miller was on staff at the Hebrew University, developing and teaching laboratory courses in digital control systems and digital signal processing. Dr. Miller has taught part-time at Texas Tech and New Mexico Tech, published and presented papers in the area of telescope control systems, and received several teaching and scholastic awards, including the J. Fred Bucy Scholarship.
two thumbs up! April 5, 2009 at 5:36 p.m.
Miki wrote..
"who ever responded to my post is simply wrong and has agenda to smear GU."
BINGO!! Other GU students and I agree 100% with you.
The person(s) that have been smearing GUs reputation are either disgruntled employees or drop outs.
Another great EE instructor April 5, 2009 at 5:49 p.m.
Sangeeta Theru
Received her Master of Science in Biomedical Engineering from Texas A&M University in College Station, Texas. She has five years experience teaching Electronics, Mathematics, and Physics courses.
What is unique about this degree is that the biomedical engineering curriculum leads to an "EXCELLENT" fundamental engineering degree and excellent training in quantitative thinking. Students can then pursue many diverse careers.
After graduation, about one-third of students enter graduate schools in various engineering or basic science disciplines and one-third are accepted by medical or dental schools. (The rate of acceptance is significantly higher than the national average of all different undergraduate engineering programs.) The rest go to law schools, business schools, industries, or consulting firms.
The Airmen who posted above is correct when he or she said that GU "has really good professors and its faculty among are leading researchers in the fields of medicine, cancer research"...that's what a Biomedical Engineer does for a living.
Joe April 14, 2009 at 4:02 p.m.
Is there some reason you are cherry picking the cream of the Grantham faculty crop? Why don't you post the link to the FULL faculty list. Wait.. I know why. You don't want us to laugh.
WTF? April 15, 2009 at 1:16 a.m.
ht tp://www.grantham.edu/about/faculty.php
Looks like they are thinning out the global faculty. Good riddance!
Huh? April 17, 2009 at 3:42 a.m.
"Another great EE instructor April 5, 2009 at 5:49 p.m."
So why in the world would they work for $15 (pre-tax) an hour for Grantham? That is the going rate for adjunct instructors at Grantham.
So what April 17, 2009 at 4:31 a.m.
For the same money, you can get a regionally accredited degree, so why both with Grantham?
Help April 17, 2009 at 3:41 p.m.
Looking for MSEE program that will accept my Grantham degree.
I'm alumni and been out for a 6 years. Appreciate any advice. Needs to be Regionally Accredited
Are You Joking? April 18, 2009 at 1:16 a.m.
This is to "Huh?" who posted on April 17, 2009 @ 3:42 a.m.
Are you joking when you say that Grantham pays only $15/hr to its adjunct instructors? How in the world do they get ANYONE to teach for that rate? How do you know that they actually pay so little?
Joe April 18, 2009 at 3:56 p.m.
They don't even post the full Global Faculty so how do you know they are thinning it out? Most of their full-time faculty don't even have a Ph.D.
I was just checking this Dr. Kristina Nelson and it turns out she has a Ph.D. from Warnborough University. This is a known British Isles diploma mill.
The rest of these doctors pretty much hold a bunch of online terminal degrees or are in the process of attaining an online doctorate. This is some crappy faculty to say the least.
UUU April 18, 2009 at 5:39 p.m.
Grantham has National Accreditation and no ABET which means no value.Find yourself a Regionally accredited school that will be respected and enroll with them. Why pay for a bogus degree with National Accreditation. If engineering is what you want to study and you can't find it online from a Regional university then just bite the bullet and go on campus part-time until you finish. I know several people who went that route and now have engineering degrees from Regional schools that have ABET. Grantham takes anybody and their credits don't transfer so why bother. Challenge yourself and apply to a real university that offers engineering.
Bottom of the page April 18, 2009 at 6:22 p.m.
"They don't even post the full Global Faculty so how do you know they are thinning it out? Most of their full-time faculty don't even have a Ph.D."
The global faculty are at the bottom of the page, and the list is about 1/3 of what it used to be. Does anyone know if Mr. Cruz still teaches at Grantham? He was my favorite of the bunch.
Also, their faculty has 7 Ph.D's... of 19 full-time faculty total, I would say that is pretty good for a completely online school. Also, their Ph.D's hail from:
University of Wisconsin
University of Kansas
University of New Mexico
St. Louis University
California Coast University/Western State University <--Online
Northcentral University <-- Online
Argosy University <-- Online
University of Missouri
So 3 of the 7 are from online schools. This is all public information, so why post such gross generalizations and outright false information?
Also: "Grantham has National Accreditation and no ABET which means no value"
Is subject to the experience and aptitude of the individual. I got into a RA MSEE program with my Grantham BSEET, so it was of greater value than the more expensive state B&M BSEE. As more BSEE programs emerge that are completely online, I am sure this particular model will not hold up.
And here we find ourselves, yet again, full circle; trolls vs. cheerleaders. How boring.
Joe April 18, 2009 at 9:36 p.m.
Online doctorates include...
Northcentral ABD
University of South Africa/ Aristotelian University
California Coast
Northcentral.. also has a diploma mill doctorate (Warnborough)
Argosy
Walden ABD
Only traditional schools on there are
U of Wisconsin
U of Nebraska
U of New Mexico
U of Missouri @ St. Louis
When those two finish their online doctorates 7:4 online degrees for FULL TIME faculty. There is an academic dean without a doctorate. AMAZING!
The Global Faculty hasn't been thinned out as previously suggested. It clearly states at the bottom...
*(This is not a complete list. It includes a sampling of the degrees and experience our Global Faculty members possess.)*
Which means they are trying to make it look better by cherry picking.
... April 18, 2009 at 9:40 p.m.
Meant 6:4...
Come on! April 18, 2009 at 9:48 p.m.
"Which means they are trying to make it look better by cherry picking."
If that were the case, they would have included Mr. Cruz. Also, your tone implies something sinister at work, yet Grantham has continued it's operations since this blog was founded. I would like to believe that if it were as blatently fradulent as you claim, action news 10 would have covered it.
I would like to see how a regional online school Governance/Acedemic Dean/Faculty looks like. The transparency of the grantham faculty list makes me think they know that they will be scrutinized, and they want the potential students to know exactly what faculty are available.
Can you, or anyone for that matter, provide a legit online school that offers it's faculty name and backgrounds? It is easy to throw daggers (and I am sure this is why it has been brought ip) when there are no standards to which the faculty should be measured.
Joe April 18, 2009 at 11:58 p.m.
Sure I can... CCU
www.calcoast.edu/docs/ccu_catalog_2007.p...
Just look at all those impressive degrees and full bios.
again April 19, 2009 at 3:01 a.m.
There is nothing wrong with online education. The fact of the matter is that there are just too many reputable traditional schools that offer online education for someone to be bothered with a bogus school like Grantham.
@Joe April 19, 2009 at 3:57 p.m.
It is funny you should cite CCU as a reference. They are nationaly accredited (DETC), and were thought to be a degree mill (called out as such by the GAO in 2004) until they received DETC accreditation.
I do however, see your point about the faculty Ph.D's. Perhaps the need for such impressive staff by CCU is a byproduct of their loss in reputation, and the University's subsequent reaction. Or maybe they really are a degree mill. Who knows.
Diploma Mill April 19, 2009 at 4:18 p.m.
A good read for perspective:
ht tp://www.degreeinfo.com/showthread.php?t=30741
Low Pay April 20, 2009 at 4:44 a.m.
"This is to "Huh?" who posted on April 17, 2009 @ 3:42 a.m.
Are you joking when you say that Grantham pays only $15/hr to its adjunct instructors? How in the world do they get ANYONE to teach for that rate?"
I don't know how they do it.
Miki April 23, 2009 at 9:30 p.m.
In this economy people will tank you for that job.
Spelling Miki; Spelling April 24, 2009 at 9:15 p.m.
I made that in 1980. So Miki, "tank" you but no "tank" you!
(Miki: It is spelled "thank").
@Joe April 24, 2009 at 11:29 p.m.
"The rest of these doctors pretty much hold a bunch of online terminal degrees or are in the process of attaining an online doctorate. This is some crappy faculty to say the least."
Have you checked out the EE faculty from the Citadel. They obtained their PhDs from online schools too.
Joe April 26, 2009 at 8:59 a.m.
Full CVs...
ece.citadel.edu/faculty
... April 26, 2009 at 9 a.m.
Not a single online degree in there.
RE: Grantham April 26, 2009 at 5:40 p.m.
Comment by "Grantham" March 11, 2009
"Good Point: Petersons calls Grantham: "Entrance Difficulty Noncompetitive" also, and a lower level accreditation on top of it, and also more expensive. :-(
It doesn't even make the US News College Guide. :-("
Thought you might like to know that Barron's Profiles of American Colleges 2009 (28th edition) with nearly 1,700 entries does not even list Grantham University either. If Peterson's describes them as "noncompetitive" and U.S. News (and World Report) College Guide and Barron's don't even list the school, what does that tell you?
@Joe April 26, 2009 at 10:30 p.m.
Your link shows us really nothing about the choice those instructors made either to attend traditional or online. Honestly, how do we know they didn't go to school online too.
How about proving that Citadel's instructors did not attend graduate school online? All of those schools mentioned (except the naval academy) provides online instruction.
I'm also, asking you to prove that all of Grantham's staff has earned their degrees from an online institution. Actually, to make it fair let's marrow it down to Grantham's EE department. I like to compare apples to apples because I'm sure Citadel instructors have online graduate degrees too.
@regrantham April 26, 2009 at 10:47 p.m.
"Thought you might like to know that Barron's Profiles of American Colleges 2009 (28th edition) with nearly 1,700 entries does not even list Grantham University either. If Peterson's describes them as "noncompetitive" and U.S. News (and World Report) College Guide and Barron's don't even list the school, what does that tell you?"
It tells me you're "green" and willing to believe everything you read from a news magazine. During the 1990s, three educational institutions in the United States were involved in a movement to boycott the U.S.News & World Report college rankings survey. The first was Reed College which stopped submitting the survey in 1995. The survey was also criticized by Alma College, Stanford University, and St. John's College[10] during the late 1990s. many schools do not participate in the survey which doesn't represent accurate statistical numbers.
In fact, Barron's too is only a guidebook and again doesn't represent accurate statical data. How many of you know they also sell cook books and rate recipes? in order to know what I'm talking about ask your grandma if her chicken casserole got a survey? I think not...statistics are as only good as the data we put into it...garbage in = garbage out. Honestly, what the editors want put into their magazines to make money. It's all about marketing tactics.
Yep April 27, 2009 at 3:26 a.m.
"garbage in = garbage out."
yep, perfect description for Grantham and it's minimum wage instructors. One student more than pays for the instructor salary for a course.
Joe April 27, 2009 at 5:20 a.m.
@responder
Look at the CV link I already posted. Not a single faculty member has an online degree from B.S. to Ph.D.
ece.citadel.edu/faculty
That is how we know. You also ask me to prove something that we have already reviewed. Grantham's faculty doesn't even compare to CCUs.
RE: @regrantham April 27, 2009 at 6:09 p.m.
Regarding the comment made on April 26 10:47pm
You are wrong. The fact that all three publications either do not list the "university" or list it as noncompetitive is significant. These publications have been doing this for decades. How long have you been evaluating universities for a living? What expertise do you bring to the discussion? What educational background do you have? I have been in the field of education for over thirty years and I am a graduate of UCLA (a top 25 university).The fact that you choose to ignore this or minimize this tells me quite a bit about you. In fact, you are the one that is "green".
garbage in = garbage out April 27, 2009 at 11:20 p.m.
garbage in = garbage out TRADEMARKED...not to be used outside of Rick Bobby Inc...
Joe,
I looked at the CV link and it doesn't say the instructors attended school via traditional means...my point being how do you know they didn't get their degree online. As I've said, those schools do offer online learning formats.
BTW...I'm not a student or employee.
Almost Over April 28, 2009 at 12:32 a.m.
"These publications have been doing this for decades"
As have the Universities that fight for their attention.
Freedom of information is the future, get used to it. Hopefully the era of job-sucurity through hoarding information will go quietly.
Funny, how education parallels religion; I have found much distaste in the clergy being the sole conduit for god. No surprise the same view can be applied to education.
RE: Almost Over! April 28, 2009 at 3:43 a.m.
Funny how you didn't answer one of the questions I put to you.
Don't feed the troll April 28, 2009 at 4:48 a.m.
Of course not. Feed elsewhere.
Dear Junior College Dropout April 28, 2009 at 4:33 p.m.
Dear Junior College Dropout (aka Almost Over!)
Get yourself a decent education. You will be a much happier person.
Joe May 3, 2009 at 7:58 a.m.
@garbage
I know because all the degrees were started before 2000 except for the newbie who went to Clemson and Clemson doesn't have those degrees online. I don't see what your point is except to show you know nothing about academia. Online degrees are not the route to go if you want to be a traditional college professor.
Miki May 3, 2009 at 8:13 a.m.
Miki April 23, 2009 at 9:30 p.m.
In this economy people will tank you for that job.
Spelling Miki; Spelling April 24, 2009 at 9:15 p.m.
I made that in 1980. So Miki, "tank" you but no "tank" you!
(Miki: It is spelled "thank").
There are many people who only a fiew years ego made fortune and now will THANK :-) for any job.
Is this a telecommuting job? So one can be home with the kids and family.
Is the instructor free to have another job as well?
I seen some people with USC and NYU degrees down on their luck and willing to drive shuttles, work in security and other jobs.
I know they would grab a job like this with both their hands.
Some of us are fortunate to have good paying jobs.
Not all the people out of work that are struggling have substandard degrees or work history. Many used to be in high demand when the economy was in better shape.
Dear Miki May 3, 2009 at 4:43 p.m.
"There are many people who only a fiew years ego made fortune and now will THANK :-) for any job."
First Point:
I assume that English is not your first language. I am not being critical. I appreciate the struggles of individuals that are learning a second or third language. I had four foreign languages in school myself so I do understand. "fiew" is spelled 'few' and "ego" is spelled 'ago'.
Second Point:
Miki, it is really easy to make statements such as you knowing individuals with degrees from high profile universities that are driving shuttles and working in security jobs. Unfortunately, without any real facts such as what their degrees are in, when they graduated, what sector of the economy they were working in etc., it just seems like a statement without any basis in fact.
Third Point:
Government statistics have shown year after year a very strong correlation between a good education (i.e. Bachelor's, Master's or PhD) and job stability and income level. If you do indeed know of such individuals that have degrees from high profile universities, they will also be the first hired into good paying positions when the economy turns around. After all, who are you going to put into such positions? You certainly wouldn't hire a high school or college dropout for such a position, would you?
Take care Miki! :-)
Missing the Point! May 3, 2009 at 9:04 p.m.
I think you're missing the point. The fact is, instructors at all these universities have to have at least a master's degree if not a PhD. That translates into at least 6-10 years of university study. That time investment, along with all that hard work needs to be compensated for. The economy goes through cycles. That will continue. It doesn't change the fact that Grantham is UNDERCUTTING PROPER COMPENSATION if they are paying instructors $15 an hour. That is more than ridiculous! Here is an example; public school districts in Los Angeles are paying their instructors/teachers on average $40-$45 an hour. Not even 1/2 of the teachers hold a Master's. Do you understand now? That is the point. It has nothing to do with being thankful for having a job. It has to do with a school trying to vastly undercut the average pay within the educational system.
Evidence? May 3, 2009 at 11:41 p.m.
@Missing the Point!
And I trust you have evidence to even prove that Grantham offers $15/hour as an ajunct instructor?
This is anecdotal nonsense, again spawned by the hater on this board. Proof, please.
Proof = Verifiable identity (i.e. instructor name) and affiliation with Grantham (i.e. listed in the faculty, at the very least). Otherwise, this is yet another waste of time.
read the posts! May 4, 2009 at 1:37 a.m.
Two items:
1. I said that they are under compensating if they are paying $15 an hour.
2. This is based on a post by a former adjunct instructor, hence the use of the word "if".
Miki May 5, 2009 at 6:51 a.m.
Education is only one important part of professional.
Professional = Education + Training + Experience.
So as far as hiring I will evaluate all 3 factors, then I will interview candidate etc.
I conduct technical interviews and hire candidates that know how to do the work, team players etc.
From a conversation with an on line instructor who gets paid by number of courses he teaches and number of students etc. It apears that the pay is above $30 an hour but after he made calculations taking in to the account all the hours he works it in reality came to $12 an hour.
@ Miki May 8, 2009 at 11:20 p.m.
Please provide a bit more detail. You wrote "From a conversation with an online instructor who gets paid etc.....". Please tell us which university this instructor works for.
Instructor discussion of Grantham May 12, 2009 at 4:43 a.m.
groups.yahoo.com/group/onlineadjuncts/message/3856
Cheryl, I worked for Grantham for about four months. You do not teach, you grade papers for $15 per hour. They are not regionally accredited and I certanly would not add it to my resume when looking for additional online schools. But, if you need to make some money they can keep you busy.
Good luck,
Jim Morgan
@Evidence? May 12, 2009 at 2:35 p.m.
It looks like another instructor (former) chimes in......there's more evidence for you! The truth hurts; doesn't it?
Thank you Jim Morgen for clearing that up.
Tim May 13, 2009 at 12:29 a.m.
I started to read through these comments and then realized how many there were. To the people saying "This is a joke, open book tests, bla bla bla, don't learn" I say, that's your fault. I am a current student, and have suffered through trying (and failing) to understand calculus. I still passed the class because I handed in homework with made-up answers and got 99s on them. Overall I am dissatisfied with Grantham, they just switched to the Angel system, which is just the content management system. It's all up to you, how much you decide you want to learn, how much you study, and how much you put into it. This can be said of Ivy league colleges, or street corner peddlers. I've started watching lectures on www.youtube.com/edu from UC Berkley, Stanford, and even MIT. I learn because I'm putting in the effort, not because it's being forcefed me on a blackboard.
*steps down and picks up soap box*
Instructor Name? May 13, 2009 at 6:22 p.m.
"I still passed the class because I handed in homework with made-up answers and got 99s on them. "
Ok, name him and shame him. If there is an instructor at Grantham that is allowing this, please reveal his identity here. I will personally take this on via news and/or DETC to get it resolved.
I don't work for Grantham, but I sure as hell have a telephone and E-mail.
Don May 19, 2009 at 7:44 a.m.
NARIC Reference Number: 1957XXXXXX Mr D XXXXXXX
Dear Mr XXXXXXX,
Thank you for recent enquiry.
Further to this, I am now able to confirm the following:
Country of Qualification: United States of America
Title of Award: Bachelor of Science in Electronics Engineering Technology
Awarding Institution: Grantham University
Year of Completion: 2008
Assessment: Is considered comparable to British taught Bachelor(Honours) degree standard
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Recomendation for further Study / Employment in the UK
For information on employment and registration in the field of Engineering, Technology in the UK, you can contact the Engineering Council UK
246 High Holborn
London, WC1V 7EX
Tel: +44(0)20 3206 0500
Fax:+44(0)20 3206 0501
Yours sincerely
UK NARIC
Miki May 19, 2009 at 7:47 a.m.
Tim,
Did you try the itunes university they also have great lectures from all the top and other universities.
Well May 22, 2009 at 8:55 p.m.
"I still passed the class because I handed in homework with made-up answers and got 99s on them. "
Well for an instructor rate of $15 per hour (pre tax), that's about what I would expect.
Miki May 27, 2009 at 3:31 p.m.
"I still passed the class because I handed in homework with made-up answers and got 99s on them.
Well for an instructor rate of $15 per hour (pre tax), that's about what I would expect."
I'm positive that this is an exception and not the norm.
There was a big scandal in RA state university were finals sold by faculty.
There are some bad employees in almost any work place.
Well May 27, 2009 at 6 p.m.
I suppose there could be some good, honest hardworking PhD's in the part time faculty willing to work for that.
@ Miki June 11, 2009 at 9:38 p.m.
"There was a big scandal in RA state university were finals sold by faculty.
There are some bad employees in almost any work place."
Miki;
Can you name the university?
I also posted this on May 8th:
Please provide a bit more detail. You wrote "From a conversation with an online instructor who gets paid etc.....". Please tell us which university this instructor works for.
I really wish you would provide detail in your posts. They are so vague and they sound like a "he said, she said" Middle School conversation. I don't mean to be overly critical; I just would like you to give some sources for your posts so we know what you are referring to. Thank you!
Miki June 12, 2009 at 2:36 a.m.
For the fourth time in a little over a year, the National Collegiate Athletic Association's Division I Committee on Infractions has punished a big-time sports program for academic wrongdoing. And in punishing the University of New Mexico for engaging in academic fraud on Wednesday, the NCAA panel linked the shenanigans back to a single source, much to the dismay of the institution singled out.
Miki June 12, 2009 at 2:39 a.m.
2007
-- March 23: Brenda Monk, a former Learning Specialist within Florida State's University Athletic Academic Support Services (AASS) department, directs one athlete to take an online quiz on behalf of another athlete. Monk provides the first athlete with the answers to the quiz.
Miki June 12, 2009 at 2:43 a.m.
The University of Minnesota escaped the harshest sanctions possible for widespread academic fraud.
Gangelhoff had admitted writing more than 400 papers for at least 18 players over a five-year period.
Miki June 12, 2009 at 2:53 a.m.
At elite Brown University, two-thirds of all letter grades given are now A's.
These changes in grading have had a profound influence on college life and learning. When students walk into a classroom knowing that they can go through the motions and get a B+ or better, that's what they tend to do, give minimal effort.
asked Dean Nancy Malkiel at Princeton why so few schools seem to be following Princeton's lead.
"Because it's hard work," she answered. "Because you have to persuade the faculty that it's important to do the work."
Making a switch will take hard work, but the effort is worthwhile. The alternative is a student body that barely studies and drinks out of boredom. That's not acceptable.
A recent survey of more than 30,000 first-year students revealed that nearly half spent more hours drinking than study. Another survey found that a third of students expected B's just for attending class, and 40 percent said they deserved a B for completing the assigned reading.
Last year, the Delaware-based Intercollegiate Studies Institute (ISI) published results of their national survey titled "Our Fading Heritage: Americans Fail a Basic Test on Their History and Institutions."
The survey questions were not rocket science.
Only 21 percent of survey respondents knew that the phrase "government of the people, by the people, for the people" comes from President Abraham Lincoln's Gettysburg Address. Almost 40 percent incorrectly believe the Constitution gives the president the power to declare war. Only 27 percent knew that the Bill of Rights expressly prohibits establishing an official religion for the United States.
Miki June 12, 2009 at 3:03 a.m.
Felony Fraud Charges Lodged in California Grades-for-Cash Scam
BERKELEY, Calif. (AP) —
Nearly three dozen students and former students at a Northern California community college face felony charges in an alleged grades-for-cash scam.
Nearly three dozen students and former students at a Northern California community college face felony charges in an alleged grades-for-cash scam, prosecutors said.
Contra Costa County District Attorney Robert Kochly announced that his office has filed 65 counts of computer fraud and conspiracy charges following an investigation into allegations that some employees at Diablo Valley College were paid to change or add grades in the computer system.
Miki June 12, 2009 at 3:06 a.m.
As to instructor, I respect his privacy.
He may come here and reveal more.
Thanks Miki! June 12, 2009 at 2:33 p.m.
The posts are so much better when they are accompanied by real sources. Thank you for posting!
Ummm June 15, 2009 at 5:18 p.m.
Thanks for all the completely unrelated stories about other universities.
Do you have anything that relates to Grantham "university"?
Miki June 15, 2009 at 11:58 p.m.
When readers trash GU faculty I stated that there are bad faculty on other campuses in other RA universities as well. Stories show something and the info was requested by another poster/reader on this channel.
Miki June 16, 2009 at 6:32 a.m.
BTW I'm not saying that GU has bad faculty.
I agree June 17, 2009 at 4:44 a.m.
I agree that Grantham has the best faculty you can possibly find for $15 an hour (before tax)
Miki June 18, 2009 at 12:07 p.m.
My post about $15 an hour was not about Grantham faculty member.
Rather well known heavily advertised RA university.
Since then he also commented that he feels like he is in grade school and not university.
?? June 18, 2009 at 4:39 p.m.
"My post about $15 an hour was not about Grantham faculty member"
Huh? Missing the point here. Are you saying that is the going rate for all PhD college faculty, not just Grantham?
Even Worse Yet..... June 19, 2009 at 10:28 p.m.
University of Phoenix pays $950 to teach a 5 week class. They expect 20 hours per week from their instructors. That would make 100 hours for $950. How does $9.50 an hour sound?
Miki June 20, 2009 at 3:01 p.m.
Axia College of University of Phoenix pay $1,235 per 9 week class. They said the average adjunct gets 3 classes per semester with 4 being the max. actual UoP classes (not Axia) have a much different format of 5 week class.
Miki June 20, 2009 at 3:05 p.m.
Axia College of University of Phoenix pay $1,235 per 9 week class.
Now do the math if you put 10 hours a week for 9 weeks you get
1,235/90 = 13.72 an hour.
Many put 15 hours a week per class.
@ Miki June 22, 2009 at 6:41 p.m.
The e-mail I received from UoP stated that they expect 20 hours per week from their instructors. If they have a 5 week course at 20 hours per week based on the salary they pay (see above) that is a mere $9.50 per hour.
Miki June 23, 2009 at 1:38 a.m.
They expect a lot from the instructors.
First you have to pass interviews then special training.
You teach and they observe you etc.
Some failed the training.
WHat happens if one gets 3 to 4 classes to teach?
How they calculate the hours, the same?
Math June 24, 2009 at 4:52 a.m.
So if I worked 40 hours a week for Grantham as a PHD / Professor, that would be 2080 x $15 = 31,200 per year. Then I pay both sides of fica, and I'm hauling down as much as a convenience store clerk. Awesome!
I am inspired to enroll now, given the extremely high cost of tuition, the desperate faculty they must be able to attract, and their substandard accreditation.
Thanks for the irrelevant and unsubstantiated posts about unrelated universities tho!
Math June 26, 2009 at 7:13 p.m.
Math
You agenda to put down the faculty at GU is very obvious.
Or maybe you are that smart :-)
@ Math June 27, 2009 at 2:46 a.m.
"So if I worked 40 hours a week for Grantham as a PHD / Professor, that would be 2080 x $15 = 31,200 per year. Then I pay both sides of fica, and I'm hauling down as much as a convenience store clerk. Awesome!"
I have to agree with "math's" assessment. It is simply absurd that institutions like Grantham ($15/hr.) and University of Phoenix ($9.50/hr.) can get away with undercutting the pay for a professor/instructor. It is a joke! I have examined the pay scales at several universities, colleges and school district's only to find these two above named school's at the bottom of my list. When I say the bottom, I mean it is not even close. The next lowest I could find was approximately $27/hr. Top dollar was approximately $60/hr (4 times what Grantham pays). These are facts; hard numbers that really expose how underpaid the instructors are at the above named schools. There is no making excuses or talking around the subject. If one is happy making that amount ($9.50-$15/hr.) for 6-10 years of a university education, good for you! Miki; you have had plenty to say about this subject so let me ask you, is this an appropriate hourly wage for a professor/instructor in your opinion?
Miki June 27, 2009 at 3:14 p.m.
Both of you don't know or can't prove that Granthams Professors earn $15 an hour.
I totally agree that Phoenix pay for Adjunct is very low.
FT Tenor Professors get paid significantly higher.
The difference is that part timers at UoP do this as a side job and mostly grade papers and answer questions.
The FT Professors develop classes and curriculum, conduct lectures that are video recorded and provide many more and above just grading papers.
40 a week FT Professor at GU earns as I'm told earns around $1400 to $1800.
@Miki June 27, 2009 at 4:36 p.m.
Wait a minute! We have had two professors/instructors come forward to confirm this fact. Now you can deny it all day if you wish! How can you claim to know what UoP professors do? I know two of them and they are expected to do more than just grade papers and answer questions! You don't know what you are talking about! You also didn't answer my question! Someone with 6-10 years of university education should be paid much more than $9.50-$15/hr. If you don't agree with that then I would say you lack respect for the educated and a university education. You have said at least twice in this forum that you are an immigrant. Is that how people feel about education and the value of an education where you are from? I would like to know what your educational background is. You seem to want to speak like an expert on education. Are you an educator? Do you have a Master's in Education? How many years of teaching experience do you have? Also, please answer my original question.
Miki June 27, 2009 at 7:05 p.m.
You confuse between part time instructors, FT Instructors,
Adjunct Professors and Tenor Professors.
There is hierarchy that you ignore.
Some have increased responsibilities then others.
And the pay rate is also different.
Miki June 30, 2009 at 7:02 p.m.
You can't survive on adjunct teaching, unless you have another source of income, and it is often an academic dead end.
A more advanced position of FT Instructor or Professor is a different story.
@ Miki July 1, 2009 at 6:14 p.m.
You didn't answer a single question that I asked. I am not the one that is confused. I believe it is you. Regardless of one's status as an adjunct professor or not, they must have obtained at least a Masters. That translates into a minimum of 6 years of university study. The pay rate of $9.50-$15 is a disgrace for an individual with that amount of education. A retail worker (not management) averages over $10/hr. in Los Angeles (for example).This is the opinion of someone who has spent over thirty years in education. Now I ask you again; are you an educator? How many years of teaching experience do you have? Do you have at least a master's in education? If not,which I am sure is the case, you shouldn’t be acting like an expert in the field when in fact you have no first hand knowledge or experience in it.
Miki July 7, 2009 at 2:04 a.m.
Shooting the messenger will not work here.
My credentials have noting to do with what we are talking about.
What??? July 7, 2009 at 6 p.m.
I don't know what you mean Miki but you still haven't answered one single question posed to you concerning your educational background as well as your expertise in the field of education. We are ALL waiting....
LOW PAY = LOW QUALITY??? July 8, 2009 at 6:42 p.m.
Does the extremely low instructor pay equal a lower quality of instruction???
What do you think?
wikki July 10, 2009 at 4:01 a.m.
@ Miki
Why do you talk like Buck Wheat? Also, how long have you been on Grantham's payroll?
@ wikki July 10, 2009 at 7:26 p.m.
This is "What???". I have had my disagreements with Miki as well but you (wikki) cross the line. Making fun of an individual that is new to the country is not right. She is learning English and has stated that numerous times on this site. This is a sensitive issue for me since both my wife and mother were immigrants (actually, we all were at one time or another; right?).
Miki July 11, 2009 at 3:33 p.m.
In my opinion Distance Education is for people with ability to read and learn on their own for most of the part.
DL non traditional providers have completely different expectations from their instructors.
High pay is not always high quality. In DL it's important
that the supplementing materials with the text book designed for a self learner.
Yes - if you are interested in DVD or streaming video recorded or live lectures - more expensive option such as some classes I'm taking from Boston Univ, then yes
you have the same professors that one gets to see on the campus.
WHen I earned my DETC accredited degree \, it was mostly based on reading the text book, live chat with the instructor.
Miki July 11, 2009 at 6:10 p.m.
Assignments, papers, exams are designed to make the student read, practice and really understand the material.
The mature adult student in the university has all the tools to succeed. I compared some of my classes at DETC accredited University (not GU) to MIT on line and to other lectures available on ITunes Univ - from top leading universities. In some cases they match 1 to 1, some are a little older and require updating.
At least 2 classes in my view are better written then the top university ones.
They seemed more relevant to what my company would expect from an employee to know.
Which one Miki? July 13, 2009 at 6:15 p.m.
Which DETC accreditied university did you attend Miki?
Miki July 16, 2009 at 3:14 a.m.
I would like not to bring the name of the university in to this discussion.
Simply there are a lot of negative posts here and I don't want the name of the university connected to this tread.
Which one Miki? July 16, 2009 at 5:36 p.m.
Please post it then at that university's thread on this site (i.e. Ashworth's thread etc.)
Juneau July 19, 2009 at 8:03 p.m.
so wait a sec! its not worth it to go to GU for my Associates in Bus Admin?
Miki July 20, 2009 at 8:18 a.m.
Juneau,
It depends on what are your expectations.
What is your budget?
Are you planning in the future to earn a Bachelors degree such as BBA?
Do you plan to attend RA university for the Bachelors degree
with possibility to go all the way to MBA or maybe even DBA?
Do your homework.
I'm very happy with my DETC accredited degree, so far it serves me well.
As to Business degrees some people prefer a business school with AACSB accreditation, the hallmark of excellence in business education.
AACSB accreditation represents the highest standard of achievement for business schools worldwide.
Schools like GU offer a lot of flexibility for working adults and military.
The degree is DETC accredited.
So it will be accepted by most DETC accredited universities and by some RA universities.
Value July 20, 2009 at 3:06 p.m.
I agree with Miki's perspective; My BSEET has served me well, and I knew the limitations going into it. The convenience sold me, not prestige.
On the flip-side, I have seen focus on ABET degrees, and so far the only ABET degrees are RA; I am sure this will be a limiting factor should I try to move on to other opportunities in engineering.
My only advice I can offer is to consider your own situation and intentions. If you plan to move into Engineering, you will encounter challenges without an ABET hallmark. If you work in a company that just needs you to get a degree to move up, Grantham will serve this purpose.
If you plan to chase a Master's degree, most universities will not accept a BSEET for progression into a MSEE without taking considerable preparatory work. I believe this is justified, as the BSEET does not touch on calculus-based physics, probability theory, statistics, fluid dynamics, thermal dynamics, or electromagnetics that will be required for depth to be successful in any MSEE program.
Enjoy the advice; it is worth what you paid for it.
Miki July 20, 2009 at 7:09 p.m.
In my sate for example if you want to become a licensed Professional Engineer you need an ABET accredited degree to be able to take EIT/FE and later PE exam.
If you hold non ABET accredited Engineering or Engineering Technology degree and have 3 years of engineering experience you can apply for the EIT/FE and PE exams.
There is a flight institute in the sate of California that is not RA accredited but their Masters degree in Flight Engineering are ABET accredited.
There is a possibility that ABET will accredit some EET programs at DETC accredited schools as well.
Miki July 20, 2009 at 8:56 p.m.
The National Test Pilot School (NTPS)is CA state approved school.
It has no National or Regional accreditation so it is unaccredited.
Yet - The Masters of Science in Flight Test Engineering program is accredited by ABET.
ABET accreditation is expansive, many schools may have to pass such cost to the students.
Yep July 22, 2009 at 5 a.m.
"LOW PAY = LOW QUALITY??? July 8, 2009 at 6:42 p.m.
Does the extremely low instructor pay equal a lower quality of instruction???
What do you think?"
I think so. If you were a competent PhD with a good business background and education, why would you be forced to work for $15 (pretax) per hour? Incompetence or desperation or the fact that you don't actually put any time into it are the only explanations I can come up with.
Miki July 22, 2009 at 5:17 a.m.
That maybe the case for UoP.
1. I don't know what GU is paying their instructors.
2. Not all instructors get the same pay.
I think the pay rate depends on duties, education and responsibilities.
@ yep July 23, 2009 at 11:35 p.m.
I'm not sure I agree with your comment ""LOW PAY = LOW QUALITY". I'm in the military and I receive lower pay compared to many civilians doing the exact same job as myself. I don't feel our military members are low quality; I think it's based on that person and their characteristics. Someone from a top ten school could be considered low quality, especially since they're attitude sucks. Grantham is a military-friendly school and the military loves them so that's an A+ in my book. I agree 100% with what Mikki is saying and from the negative posters well...either prove your case or shut the hell up.
@Miki July 26, 2009 at 12:02 a.m.
I am afraid you are incorrect again! We have established that Grantham pays adjunct professors $15/hour. We have had at least two adjuncts confirm this FACT. Grantham hires mostly adjuncts. Therefore, $15 per hour is what most of the instructors there make. Now, I would have to agree with the individual that feels that it is ridiculously low pay. I will say it again; studing hard for 6-10 years at a university to make $15 per hour is absurd. You may not agree with that Miki; but you didn't put in the 6-10 years of studying at a university so it is easy for you to argue against this point. Please don't waste our time trying to explain to us the various levels of professor positions. We already know this, some of us from actual experience. We don't need you to tell us anything about that.
Hostile Tone July 26, 2009 at 9:10 p.m.
My my my..... aren't we pleasant.
@@yep July 27, 2009 at 4:18 a.m.
You do understand what a question mark is, don't you? I wrote:
Low Pay = Low Quality???
It was meant as a question to be discussed. That is what this forum is all about. So you shut the hell up!
Former instructor July 27, 2009 at 1:59 p.m.
"Low Pay = Low Quality???"
Just like in any industry, the most desirable jobs fill up first with the most desirable candidates, then the less qualified gravitate to bottom.
Or to use the sports analogy. The best college basketball players end up at North Carolina, UConn, etc. Eventually someone also plays for Northwest Kansas Community College.
@ Former Instructor July 28, 2009 at 2:15 a.m.
"Just like in any industry, the most desirable jobs fill up first with the most desirable candidates, then the less qualified gravitate to bottom."
Well said!
Miki July 30, 2009 at 2:26 a.m.
In General (not GU specific)
A simple truth is that the same individuals who make extra money as adjunct instructors are also usually making better living in their FT careers.
So many of them work extra hours for betterment of their families.
Do they all have to be FT Professors - to grade papers?
AS I stated some grade papers others develop and write classes.
Low Pay = Low Quality??? July 31, 2009 at 6:07 p.m.
Does the extremely low instructor pay equal a lower quality of instruction???
What do you think?
Mikki August 3, 2009 at 6:30 a.m.
What quality?
Of self learning materials or motivation of the student to learn?
Are we talking about streaming video lectures or a textbook with assignments.
Are the lower paid technicians all do bad job or low quality job? because they get paid 10 to 20 USD an hour in comparison to lets say Engineers who get paid 20 to 50 USD or more an hour?
@ Miki August 3, 2009 at 7:07 p.m.
Are you saying then that adjunct professors do no teaching at all at Grantham?
Low Pay = Low Quality??? August 3, 2009 at 7:08 p.m.
Does the extremely low instructor pay equal a lower quality of instruction???
What do you think?
Paper Graders August 3, 2009 at 7:18 p.m.
There are no teachers, save the FT's that write/revise course guides. Most of the time, the course guides didn't match the book, or there would be test questions on material that simply wasn't covered in the book or in the guide. For the most part, the adjuncts are paper graders, if they are required to do even that. This online format returns grades instantly, so it would only be the essay/paper/show-your-work assignements that would be graded.
My .02
Is it true???? August 4, 2009 at 12:39 a.m.
This question is for "paper grader": at least 4 grantham adjuncts have posted and verified a $15/hour pay rate. Is that what they are paying you as well?
Thank you for the information.
Mikki August 4, 2009 at 5:57 p.m.
As I understand it the on line format is only for type of signalments that are choice type you just select the answer from possible 4 to 8 answers.
For classes such as Technical Writing etc you actually submit
different type of work.
In my University I took Technical writing 1 and technical writing 2, no free choice questions on the assignments or exams.
ALso all the labs etc.
The DL can be divided in to different types of students, some who need the lectures and some who can study by their own reading the text book and doing assignments that designed to test your understanding of the material learned.
I love lectures on iTunes, or CD's , I can rewind go back and have it repeated number of times.
But interestingly when I took my classes at DETC accredited university I didn't need the lecture.
I still has access to instructor for any questions or difficulties encountered during the reading or assignments.
In USA we have freedom to chose, some prefer traditional university, more power to them.
Other like non traditional, DL, correspondence type school.
Technology allows us to have more and more simulation programs that can allow us do the labs at home.
For example, when I was taking classes at the same time I worked at Rockwell, I had access to our labs that had the latest and greatest technology.
Un like some yang kid who may not have this type of lab handy and may benefit from advanced facilities at traditional or break and mortar school.
Military persons who operate such advanced technologies in the service , have access and experience with advanced test equipment.
It all comes to making an educated decision on what will work for you, what you are willing to pay for it etc.
Mikki August 5, 2009 at 8:13 a.m.
Om Multiple choice questions the grading can be done by computer program and the grade returned to you shortly after the assignment or exam.
Dale August 5, 2009 at 6:31 p.m.
NEW YORK (AP) - A New York City woman who says she can't find a job is suing the college where she earned a bachelor's degree.
Trina Thompson filed a lawsuit last week against Monroe College in Bronx Supreme Court. The 27-year-old is seeking the $70,000 she spent on tuition.
Thompson says she's been unable to find gainful employment since she received her information technology degree in April.
She says the Bronx school's Office of Career Advancement hasn't provided her with the leads and career advice it promises.
Monroe College spokesman Gary Axelbank says Thompson's lawsuit is completely without merit.
The college insists it helps its graduates find jobs.
Low Pay = Low Quality??? August 6, 2009 at 6:24 p.m.
Does the extremely low instructor pay equal a lower quality of instruction???
What do you think?
Miki August 8, 2009 at 12:04 a.m.
Quality of instruction depends on the quality of instructor and motivation and ability of the students.
The answer to your question is YES and NO.
Depends if the instructor has to actually instruct or only grade papers. Job description of Instructor in Correspondence, DL school is not the same as instructor in traditional school.
Depends how match the school is charging for the educational services it provides. How mach of instructor pay will be transfered to the student?
I think if the pay is high chances are that the instructor don't have to work on another job and can dedicate his energy to be efficient and effective at the job.
I want to comment as a manager and Engineer I see people with varying levels of pay, it comes down to the individual
employee, money is a good motivator but not the only motivator.
No body FORCES the Instructor to work for low pay, he accepts the job so he needs to provide his best at the job or be replaced by another person who will perform.
Now I don't want to be hypocritical, I had lower paying jobs were I didn't care and I had lower paying jobs and I cared a lot. It all depends on the task at hand and the calling.
You can argue both ways there are pros and cons.
Manager???Engineer??? August 9, 2009 at 2:09 a.m.
"I want to comment as a manager and Engineer"
Really??? Where did you go to school???
Miki August 10, 2009 at 6:21 p.m.
I graduated my country Institute of Technology and I also earned DETC accredited degree in USA.
A Sr member IEEE, a Fellow of Institute of Leadership and management City and Guilds UK.
I hold GCGI and MCGI from City and Guilds Institute of London.
I started my DL experience long time ego when I was in the military service by earning a Diploma in ELectronics Engineering from ICS in UK.
At this time taking some Project Management classes at Boston University. I'm planning to get PMP certification.
Miki August 12, 2009 at 6:56 p.m.
Average professorial salary in the Ivy League: over $170,000. On the other hand, average Instructorial pay at Florida State: under $30,000.
let me clarify August 15, 2009 at 10:16 p.m.
Ok,
Here is a list of Grantham University faculty for the engineering/computer science program.
* James Carmichael, MS, PE, Electronic Project Management
* Lisa Harris, MS, Electrical and Power Systems
* Dexter Malley, PhD, Digital Systems
* Nancy Miller, PhD, MBA, Control Systems
* John Rusnak, PhD, Microprocessor Engineering
* Jayson Sayers, MS, Electronics
* Sangeeta Theru, MS, Instrumentation, Biomedical Systems
* Alireza Torabian, PhD, MBA, Systems Design Engineering
Someone please explain to me why a registered professional engineer and several highly educated PhDs, all from highly respected regionally accredited schools, would work for peanuts? Bottom line is Grantham university is an excellent online university and has the very good faculty with great credentials on its staff.
All naysayers please quit smearing this college's good name and get a real life. Thank you!
clear it up August 16, 2009 at 4:55 p.m.
@ Clarify,
I will tell why they work for Grantham. The degrees that they hold are in very competitive feilds that only take the best and they just happen to be the bottom of the barrel in their degree category, so they could only get jobs teaching at Grantham. Look at the degrees those people hold. Don't you think that if they could, they would be teaching somewhere more prestigious than Grantham. They simply could not compete with smarter graduates of the ones who hold the same degree. That is why they teach at Grantham. Grantham sucks so just get over it.
Jumper31 August 20, 2009 at 8:12 p.m.
Bottom line is that it is not for everyone. If you are in the military and getting education to be competitive with your peers for promotion, it is great. GU caters to mthe military and works with you and your unique work schedule that the military has. If you are looking for something more, and have time on your hands, go for it.
patriotic american August 20, 2009 at 11:33 p.m.
@ Clear,
I'm sorry this fish don't bite. The bottom line is they have very good credentials and you do not know exactly why they work for Grantham. Have you ever thought that perhaps its because of military and they want to give back or honor the men and women that wear the uniform. I'm sorry but your rebuttal is plain dumb.
Miki August 21, 2009 at 7:58 a.m.
I agree that the instructors at GU do hold very good education.
I think that its not the degree that makes the professional but the professional is who makes the degree.
A productive and successful GU employee is he best ambassador GU has ( any school for that meter)
I'm a manager and is I see a pattern that is common to a group of successful employees then I rely more and more on such pattern. (and also less in negative situations.
As a manager who has DETC accredited degree and number of very I stress very good employees with DETC accredited degrees I don't discriminate but do have preference to a sustain type of employees.
The VP ultimately makes the hiring decision but it is based on my and my team leads recommendation.
Did I mention we ask the candidate to take an exam in addition to formal interviews.
Miki August 21, 2009 at 8 a.m.
I meant GU graduate not employee.
TT August 21, 2009 at 2:12 p.m.
@ patriotic american
I highly doubt that those instructors care about the uniform because if they did then they would teach at the more prestigious military academies with those type of credentials. Who cares, Grantham is still a for profit rip off that does not rank with the best colleges.They can't even compete with the lowest tier traditional colleges. So face it, Grantham Inc. sucks.
But August 23, 2009 at 5:11 a.m.
"I agree that the instructors at GU do hold very good education."
If that is true, why are they teaching for $15 an hour???????? If they are so qualified, why aren't they teaching for a better instiution or for more money or for at least a regionally accredited university?
Miki August 27, 2009 at 7:14 a.m.
But
The more name recognized your university the better jobs and more prestige schools will talk to you.
This is not an indicator of how good the instructor is.
As prestige schools market them selves by the name recognition of the instructors degrees.
Some State Universities may not rank the best in country but they may have a leading department in the country.
For example Cal State Long Beach - their Criminal Justice program is well respected among best in the country.
Some one with Masters Degree from that program maybe great instructor but his degree is not from top university.
His chances to teach in top university are lower then lets say a person whit the same qualification from MIT or Columbia.
There are many more examples.
Including professionals who bring good value to the school as they work in leading companies etc.
Don't underestimate what professionals bring to the table.
Miki August 27, 2009 at 7:23 a.m.
Cal State Long Beach - Forensic lab as among the best in US.
ESO September 1, 2009 at 9:55 p.m.
I hear Grantham Univesity Offers Nationally Accredited Degrees but won't let know one teach at their schools with a Nationally Accredited Degree...is that wrong and unethical?
BAD JUJU September 1, 2009 at 9:58 p.m.
Don't wast your time at Grantham. Most of the employees there don't have degrees which tell you something. To work in a college acceptance you have to have a degree. Grantham is telemarketers trying to sell you junk.
Ex-Grantham Employee September 1, 2009 at 10 p.m.
They don't even tell the employees the truth what others think they will tell a student the truth. They work on enrollments more people they sign to a program you pay goes up....I don't think other colleges/unv. work like that..they work on the higher your education is the higher your pay is.....don't be fooled by their programs......attend a regionally accredited college......
Serving the Miltiary Since 1950's September 1, 2009 at 10:02 p.m.
Grantham states they been serving the Miltary Since the 1950's....IF THAT IS SO TRUE WHY ARE YOU NOT REGIONALLY ACCREDITED? THAT IS 50 PLUS YEARS LATER......IT DON'T TAKE THAT LONG. THEY ARE A SCHOOL OF PROFIT!
WHY WORK FOR GRANTHAM WITH A GOOD DEGREE September 1, 2009 at 10:08 p.m.
Because Grantham don't hire people with a Nationally Acc. Degree. So if you got or get a Nationally Acc. degree from them or any other college you will not work for them. (Thats is back-wards right?). So they hire people with Regionally Acc. Degrees to work from them and it don't matter on their back ground. I got my A.S. in Criminal Justice from a Community College my instructor was s retired Police Officer.....GRANTHAM'S CRIMINAL JUSTICE INSTRUCTOR NEVER PUT PLASTIC HANDCUFFS ON HER OR HIS'S KIDS.
MILITARY POLICE, Texas September 1, 2009 at 10:23 p.m.
I have 10 plus years in Military Law Enforcment and it is equal to Civilian Law Enforcement in Training. I took two classes with Grantham and found their instructor never been in law enforcement. Also they didn't take any of my miltiary law enforcement training in for their college courses. I went to the Joint Law Enforcement Academy 10 weeks, Corrections Academy 9 weeks and K-9 handler 20 weeks all with hands on training from Professional Governement Law Enforcement Officials. I ended up dropping Grantham after my first two course, then enrolled into ITT and they took in my miltary law enforcement. It seems Grantham just wants to make money only.
This if Funny September 1, 2009 at 10:41 p.m.
Gantham seems like a joke. That is why you should listen to your ESO. My ESO at Portsmouth VA. don't approve no T.A. for Grantham. and there is a BIG SIGN THAT SAYS SO!
jay September 2, 2009 at 3:03 a.m.
Grantham is one of the top schools in the country!!!!!
This Funny September 3, 2009 at 8:58 p.m.
Top schools are not nationally accredidated like Grantham. State Colleges and Unv. will not accept any credits from Grantham. My community college laughed at my transcript from Grantham. Glad I was only their for 3 classes.
Grantham Top Schools...NOT! September 3, 2009 at 9:05 p.m.
I have a B.S. degree from Grantham...(WAST OF TIME) but I didn't know. I applied for admissions to Fl. State Unv. for my M.B.A. and admissions stated Grantham's B.S. degree was not accredidated and I could not apply for Grad school at any State College in all Of America....NOW THAT SUCKS......DON'T GO TO GRANTHAM....IT IS A DIPLOMA MILL!
Cookie Cutting School! September 3, 2009 at 9:19 p.m.
GRANTHAM SUCKS! IT IS GROUP OF SALES PEOPLE WORKING OUT OF A ABANDONED APARTMENT COMPLEX WITH WI-FI AND CELL PHONES. THAT IS WHAT THEIR CREDITS ARE WORTH. (DIPLOMA MILL).
jay September 4, 2009 at 3:54 a.m.
I transferred my grantham credits to HARVARD, I just finished my PHD, thanks grantham for making my dreams come true.
Doctor Jay
Board certified
Heart Surgeon
Miki September 4, 2009 at 7:38 a.m.
So mach hate and all from one person.
All this is very childish.
Its clear that some one failed their Grantham University classes and is looking to smear the schools name.
wowowo September 5, 2009 at 9:18 p.m.
@ jay
Grantham is a ripoff man.They have been scamming students for years with their National accreditation. Have you seen all the post where the emails were sent to legit universities and rejections were being handed out like candy on a Halloween night. Stop posting nonsense jay before an email gets sent to Harvard and a certified rejection is sent back and posted on this site.
john john September 7, 2009 at 5:01 a.m.
Grantham is a great school, I went there on a 4 yr track and field scholarship, i was the top track runner at the school, I was so good i was asked to join the olympic team but i refused because i wanted to focus more on my masters degree, Thanks GU for making my dreams come true. John John
Miki September 7, 2009 at 5:32 a.m.
I am alway amazed when people they get economy car as a form of transportation and then get upset that this is not Ferrari.
Some people here display complete ignorance of what non traditional education and Dl colleges are all about.
As I stated before no one is stopping them from attending other options.
This is a free country and I didn't see GU forcing people to join them.
Degree is only one of the major 3 parts of professional.
Education+ Training + Experience = Professional.
Education can be formal and informal, traditional or non traditional.
One can learn on the job another in the class, one can read a book another needs a lecture.
Freedom of academics provides us many choices.
Miki September 7, 2009 at 5:54 a.m.
Any one who has RA or NA degree and can't get in to Grad school in US shouldn't think twice but apply to overseas Grad School such in UK etc.
There are leading UK universities that will not discriminate.
My good friend David which his Ohio State University degree and Leonid with Aspen BBA DETC accredited degree had major problems to get accepted in to grad school of their choice.
David earned MBA from Heriot Watt University - Edinburg completely by DL. (ranked 30 in UK)
Leonid went to University of Alberta with his Aspen University degree.
Both are now doing their doctorates in leading top universities in USA.
Grantham has no sports programs September 8, 2009 at 10:10 p.m.
"John John" Grantham has no sports programs...their are not a legit college...so why do you tell tails about a track program you did there? They are a school for profit..."ALL SCHOOLS FOR PROFIT" DON'T HAVE SPORTS, MUSIC, ART, ACTING PROGRAMS...DUDE! IT IS A ONLINE SCHOOL...GOOGLE THEM AND LOOK AT THEIR BUILDING IT IS ON TOP OF A ANOTHER BRICK BUILDING. Save the tall tails for someone who don't know about college.
Also I am amazed at Harvard taking in Grantham's credits....I THINK NOT!
U.S. Army Education Service Officer September 8, 2009 at 10:39 p.m.
I am an Education Service Officer for the United States Army. I retired in 1988, Master Sgt. with Doctorate in Education from the Unv. Of North Carolina. If you are already employed with a great company and would like to move up, I see nothing wrong with a Nationally Accredited degree. Now if you are searching for Higher Education after your 2 or 4 year degree I don’t recommend a Nationally Accredited Degrees because of its restrictions. If you are searching for a Credential or a State License (RN, Teacher, CPA, Drug Abuse Counselor or any of the other Higher Value Credentials, I DON’T RECOMMEND NATIONALLY ACCREDITIED DEGREES. Certified credentials and state license’s boards don’t recommend nationally accredited degrees and will not accept their degrees. If you are seeking a position with the United States Government, please read the OPM education requirement. The Office of Personnel Management will not accept Nationally Accredited Degrees for certain positions within the Government. Like I said, “I am an ESO for the United States Army and I was required to hold a Regionally Accredited Masters degree just for an interview with the OPM office for the ESO position. If you are seeking to be a College Professor, again you need to have a Regionally Accredited Degree in your field and usually 5-10 years of work experience to back it up. Take a look at Grantham Employment Requirements, you must have a Regionally Accredited Degree to even teach for them, they will not even let you teach a online course for them with their own nationally accredited degrees (That should light your bulb up in your head). They reason why Grantham pay so low is because school’s of PROFIT ONLY WANT TO GAIN MONEY FOR THEIR COMPANY, most of Grantham’s instructors have great degrees but no real life experience to back it up. I taught at UNC as a full time faculty with their Criminal Justice Program and I made close to 200k a year, but I had 20 years of Military Law Enforcement, 10 years State Criminal Justice Dept. for North Carolina to include in my Resume. I don’t think Grantham’s Criminal Justice Instructors are even near that to teach at a real ground criminal justice program/academies. The bottom line hear is the best interest for the student and Nationally Accredited Degrees are a PROFIT SCHOOL. The only business they are in is to gain or receive your money, but they will provide you a degree that is not highly accepted. You need to make the decision. The United States Army counsels every Military Student on Nationally and Regionally Accreditations.
(NEASC) September 8, 2009 at 10:55 p.m.
"Dr. Jay" I don't think for one minute you are a Heart Surgen, with a partial Grantham Online Degree! I am also for sure Harvard didn't accept any of Grantham's Credits. Comminity Colleges won't even touch them. Here is some History about HARVARD:
Harvard University is accredited by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges (NEASC).
Founded in 1885, the New England Association of Schools & Colleges, Inc. (NEASC), is the nation’s oldest regional accrediting association whose mission is the establishment and maintenance of high standards for all levels of education, from pre-K to the doctoral level.
Nationally Accredited Degree "NOT GOOD" September 8, 2009 at 11:07 p.m.
I am an Navy Officer, as of 2000. I recieved my Degree from San Diego State Unv. I applied for the Navy's Medical Officer Program and was accepted in 2004, I was sent to Washington State to complete my 2-yr medical program prior to being stated as a Medical RN Nurse the U.S. Navy. What is so disappointing to me, is I have a yound lady in my department at Camp Pendelton, CA., with a Grantham Degree and she can not be appointed in the U.S. Navy's Medical Corps. because no RN College Program will accept GU's 4-yr degree. Please if you are looking for a License or Certification in the Medical field don't go with a Nationally Acc. School. Also I believe most Pilot Officer Prgrams will not accept GU's degree into their program. Please take caution when tracking your degree for your future!
Miki September 9, 2009 at 5:07 a.m.
Its fair NA degree is not always a best choice.
Yes it is restrictive as well.
For licensing it is almost always required Specialty Accredited degree so only RA may not work.
Majority of colleges that offer nursing programs are accredited by the appropriate specialty accreditor.
In CA state for example even unaccredited degrees but state approved degrees can take license exams.
CA state you can become a CA attorney with sate approved unaccredited degree.
All these do have limitations.
Here is one more tip.
99% of persons who hold NA degree can get in to final year of degree in UK university and earn second bachelors degree that is equivalent to RA.
There are ways.
Also there is an Alliance of RA universities that accepting NA credits.
Miki September 9, 2009 at 6:37 a.m.
U.S. Army Education Service Officer
“I am an ESO for the United States Army and I was required to hold a Regionally Accredited Masters degree just for an interview with the OPM office for the ESO position."
In my post I mentioned that one needs to do his homework to see if GU degree will serve their needs.
Will Heriot Watt University Masters Degree be accepted for an interview with the OPM office for the ESO position?
There are many positions in Government that will accept such degree from UK.
The reason I mentioned it is because HWU accepts graduates with DETC degree in their Masters degree programs.
Some are 100% DL.
Me I have two degrees in different fields.
One in from Institute of Technology of my country of origin the other is from DETC accredited university.
UC Berkeley September 9, 2009 at 6:45 a.m.
GU graduates are welcome
UC Berkeley Post-Baccalaureate Certificate in Information Systems and Management
Certificate Application Procedure
Interested students must register for the certificate program before they begin their third course in the program.
To register, please (1) complete and submit the Program Registration Form or (2) print out and complete the form at www.unex.berkeley.edu/cert/certproginfo..... Mail or fax it as it indicates, and include the nonrefundable registration fee.
Since this is a post-baccalaureate certificate, students must submit the following prior to enrolling in the program:
Official transcript proof of a baccalaureate degree from an accredited institution
Hard copy of the degree received
Please note that the application form will be denied or put on hold until the above documents are received by the academic department.
Send transcript(s) and copy of degree to:
Technology and Engineering Programs
UC Berkeley
1995 University Avenue, Suite 110
Berkeley, CA 94704-7000
Miki September 9, 2009 at 5:18 p.m.
if one needs a track trailer then they don't buy an economy car.
If you want to be a MD then you get the appropriate education provider who will get you in to medical school.
My older son is in Law school, it is RA, ABA accredited.
My cousin is a successful Network / Security Engineer with NA BSCIS Networking DETC accredited degree and IT certifications from Cisco CCIE and as a part of his BSCIS degree he earned A+, Network +, Security + certs as well.
Army ESO September 9, 2009 at 9:18 p.m.
The OPM office screens and evals all degrees out side the United States to see if it is equal to a required degree to full fill a position with them. If Heriot Watt University has a M.A. in Education and the OPM screens it has equal to a RA degree in the U.S. then I would say his that degree is good. In my 20 years of Government work I seen maybe 10, but they were from Big Names Colleges overseas and these people had Doctor Degrees with classes on ground not distance education and they had a long work history to support their education.
I hope that answers your question Miki.
Miki September 10, 2009 at 11:07 p.m.
Army ESO I don't know about HWU's education programs but their Edinburg business school of HWU is ranked among top 5 in UK.
Economist ranks this among top international MBA's one year it was listed #2 after Harvard.
They have good name and will accept in to MBA GU graduates.
STEVE September 11, 2009 at 2:28 a.m.
Are there any colleges/univesities in the US that will accept a bachelors degree from Grantham, that can be used
towards a masters degree.
steve
Miki September 11, 2009 at 7:52 a.m.
Schools that are members of the Higher Education Transfer Alliance don't use accreditation type as a criterion for determination of acceptance of transfer credits. There are many regionally accredited schools listed.
Also Strayer University accepts NA credit to transfer.
Previous Education
Students who have attended institutions that are not regionally accredited may be able to transfer credit upon evaluation of their transcripts.
Graduate Admission Requirements
To qualify for admission for an advanced degree program at Strayer University, we require the following credentials:
Completed application form.
Proof of completion of a Baccalaureate degree from an [b]accredited[/b] college or university. Any undergraduate major will be considered, but if it varies widely from a proposed graduate major, you may need to take certain undergraduate foundation courses.
Official copies of transcripts from all other colleges or universities attended.
Satisfactory performance in at least one of the following areas:
A minimum cumulative score of 450 on the Graduate Management Admission Test (GMAT).
A minimum cumulative score of 1,000 on the Graduate Record Examination (GRE).
A 2.75 undergraduate grade point average on a 4.0 scale during the junior and senior years of the Baccalaureate degree (i.e. the second half of the credits required for the degree, normally the last 60 semester hours or 90 quarter hours).
Evidence of graduate potential. Special consideration may be given to applicants who show graduate potential and have a minimum of three years of professional or business experience. A personal interview with a Campus Dean is required.
--------------------------------
Dear Abner,
Thank you for your inquiry to Excelsior College.
You are generally correct in your understanding of the process. I would just add that the coursework must be degree level and there are some limitations when it comes to NLN and ABET degrees.
As well, the nationally accredited institutions must be approved by the US Department of Education and hold either professional or national accreditation, as verified by CHEA.
I hope this information is helpful to you. If you need further assistance, please contact us again or call our toll free number at 1-888-647-2388 ext. 2-7.
Sincerely,
Emily Glasser
Admissions Counselor
Miki September 11, 2009 at 8:03 a.m.
University of Pheonix
Walden University
Jones International University
Everett Community College
Mount Ida College
Cheyney University
Western Governors University
Bellevue University Nebraska
Winona State University
Sterling College
Northcentral University(Arizona)- Used to accept NA now seems like some programs require only RA.
University of Wisconsin Platteville
Upper Iowa University
Strayer University
Argosy University
American Military University
Ellis University
Griggs University
American Public University
Excelsior College
South University
Kaplan University
Colorado Technical University
Widener University
Western International University
Tiffin University
Ashford University
A.T. Still University of Health Sciences
**University of Maryland (did not check)
Liberty University
Peru State College
Baker College
I am about to graduate with my B.S. from the United States Sports Academy which is SACS (regionally accredited). They took my NA credits with no problem at all.
Lina PA, PA
WGU September 11, 2009 at 8:06 a.m.
WGU - Western Governors University is both RA and NA accredited.
They accept NA degrees for entry in to Masters degree
Graduate school programs.
NA ACC -VS- RA ACC September 17, 2009 at 10:04 p.m.
Always check with the Unv. you plan on attending to see if they would take in a N.A. degree or credits. About 99% of legit community colleges and universities will not take


navy student September 19, 2006 at 3:01 p.m.
Dissapointing to say the least. No other school will touch my Grantham credits. I attended Grantham for two semesters. Now I am transfering because I am tired of trying to contact the school and my instructors for help and not getting return phone calls or e-mails. Their customer service is severly lacking. Now, I am stuck with two semesters worth or worthless credits that no one will touch.